WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2020: Starter Pitcher Rankings!  

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Tity Tity Yeah.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome by your host five eight nine, by my god,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Rob Say Francis Frantic. Stand all ladies and tell them

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in yours. With that, we will get you inside of

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four and the meadow Lands here in New Jersey.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I am Gregan, joined as always Bama BVFF. Frank Stample,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, Frankie? Okay, what's going on? Man? That was

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an extended version of the intro there for you, Greggy.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope all is going well. I'm excited, man. I'm

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>part of two slow drafts right now. Clearly I have

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Like I've been saying all along, We've got

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen spring training games going on. We're about to

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about starting pitching. What more could you possibly ask for?

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>How did you sleep last night, Grey dude? I slept great.

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I I didn't think I had any weird dreams. I

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not that I remember um, but I I slept pretty well.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I I feel good. I feel refreshed. Last night, Judy

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.279
<v Speaker 1>was talking to me about something. I wasn't listening, why, Frank,

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>because I was making starting pitching rankings. Let's go, let's go, Greggy.

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I love to hear it. Yeah, me see man. You

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>know what I also love to hear. I also love

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear an update from Alex Passano, which comes your

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>way right now. I am Alex Passano with your sports

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Grid news update here on the fantasy the f f

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>let's start in the NFL, Guys, Bears general manager Ryan

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Pace reaffirmed the team's commitment to starting quarterback Mitchell Trabisky.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>In however, Chicago could change its offensive philosophy. Here's a

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>quote from Pace. He said, to be clear, yes, it

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is asked about Bears commitment to Trabisky. We believe in Mitch.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Mitch knows he needs to be better. We need to

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be better around him, and that's our goal. Trabisky was

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the former second overall pick in the two thousand seventeen

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.839
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft. Last year, the Bears went eight and eight

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and failed to reach the playoffs. Sticking in the NFL guys,

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Giants are open for business with the fourth pick

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the fourth pick in this year's draft, while the Giants

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>said they are quote open for business. According to manager

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>David Gettleman. The Giants joined the Detroit Lions, who picked

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>third overall in aprils draft, as willing to at least

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to offers. The Lions and Giants appear to be

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>in the sweet spot for draft plays out as expected.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>At the top quarterback meaty clubs fall in love with

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Alabama's to a Tagle Viola or Organs justin Herbert. We

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>will see what happens as the NFL draft. UH is

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>far away for now, but it will soon be right

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>around the corner. Go to the MLB guys where the

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Braves Freddie Freeman was sidelined by a right elbow irritation.

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Freeman wasn't in the Brave starting lineup Tuesday because of

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>irritation in his right elbow. According to Braves manager Brian Snitker,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>here's a quote. We're trying to nip it in the butt.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>He's been throwing balls and doing things. It's better that

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's in February than the end of March. Snicker said

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>he is not sure how long Freeman will be out. Also,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>really quickly in spring training, the Mets third baseman J. D.

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>David stayed down on the ground for a few minutes

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>after diving for a Cameron Mayben groundball. It was a

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>single in the fifth inning. He's back up, but he

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>left the game. I'm Alex Passano. When this has been

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>your sports grid news update. Now back to the fantasy

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>b ffs. Yeah, so I know we're getting the getting

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the NBA comment from Uh, We'll hear from Drew, and

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna hear from seawn A just a second. But

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>before we do, Luis Savarino go and have Tommy John surgery.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>So smile and think about that as we check in

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with Shaasamlakia Andrew dack Meyer, who had this to say

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about their favorite player. All tonight's end me a slate,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>someone who's under the radar but not real league. That's

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Steven Adams. He's having a great year and he's coming

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>off four straight double doubles yet twenty one and fourteen

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>rebounds in the thunder win against the Spurs last time out.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Steven Adams, you're center tonight. Yeah, there's been a really

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>nice buying opportunity for Steven Adams over the course of the

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the last week, and we think it continues tonight. And

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the reason that there's been a buying opportunities because Steven

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Adams was injured for a while kind of coming into

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the All Star break. He's gotten healthier since then. The

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>minutes of tick back up and now you've got another

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>favorable matchup against the Bulls, the team that ranks towards

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the league in defensive efficiency against opposing centers,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and they've lost a lot of their center depth during

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the course of the season. The absence of Wendell Carter Jr.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Has really hurt their defensive proficiency down there. They've also

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lost Luke Cornette. They're down to playing Daniel Gafford and

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Christiana Felicio. It's a really good matchup for Steven Adams.

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>We think he cleans up tonight. Center position is kind

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of thin, and he really makes sense. He fits a

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of the lineup built with that intier price tag

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they have. It's Steven Adams is the player that you

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>gotta build your lineups around tonight, according to Seawn and Drews,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>make sure you do that. Oh her wherever you play, Fandal,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings, what have you. But we'll talk more about

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the NBA come a little bit later on if not tomorrow.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Does certainly see that on the NBA Fantasy Hour on Twitch.

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But Frankie, today, we're talking about starting pitching, and we're

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna start the show with the news that is breaking,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's the fact that Luis Severino, it has been

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>recommended to him after all the tests in New York

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>from the doctors that he needs Tommy John. So of

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>course you had an injury since October, so you might

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as well wait until March to have Tommy John surgery. Yeah,

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a big blow for the Yankees and fantasy

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>baseball in general. Here, Greg, we lose another starting pitcher

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>who was being drafted as a top twenty starter. We

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>saw last week that you know, he was dealing with

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>something in his forearm, his elbow area. Now Tommy John

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is recommended for him only through twenty innings. Last year,

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been a rough go for Luis Severino the past

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of seasons. Greg, this honestly sucks just for again fantasy,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Yankees. I mean, we just lose another top

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>tier starting pitching for the upcoming season. It'll be interesting

0:06:58.040 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to see what the Yankees do from here on our

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think that they're probably going to make a move.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I see a few people speculating on Twitter that they

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>should go out and signed Colin MQ. I don't know

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how much of a difference that makes. Greg. I have

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>thrown out the possibility of them trading for Ross Tripling.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>The Dodgers have already tried to trade him to the

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Angels, so we'll see what happens. But I

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think the Yankees are probably gonna end up making a

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>move here. This just sucks, man, This this sucks. Greg

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney Murdy says a die contrast, Mr I revealed a

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>partially U c L tear in the elbow. He's head

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of a Tom and John surgery. He'll miss the entire season.

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Testing also revealed pain in the area of the ligament

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. Cashman says, as you expect that

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he would Frank in house competition will fill the spot.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Jay have obviously in the rotation, Jordan Montgomery obviously in

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the rotation, James Paxton shirt. The Yankees are gonna rely

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>quite heavily on Massa Heiro Tanaka, and on Ja and

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on Garrett Cole of course, and that fifth spot you

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>might see David David Garcia earlier than you expect. Jonathan

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Aga, Uh, Michael King, Nick Tropiano, Chad Banish. I mean,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>these are the types of players that the Yankees having house.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>We thought last year they make a move when Savorino

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>went down. We thought last year they needed pitching anyway. Uh,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. Uh Frank one of the I would say

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that they could try to convinces bath to come back.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>He just toreds a c L ski So the Yankees

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>doing great as a list. Yeah, it's you know, whoever

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is part of the Yankees rotation, whoever has been part

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Yankees rotation, it seems like you are susceptible

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to a major injury right now. They lost Paxiston, they

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>lost Savorino. You're right, they can't even talk CC Sabathia

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>into coming out of retirement because he just towards a

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>c L on a skiing trip. So we'll see what

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>happens there. It's very frustrating to from the Yankees perspective.

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It's you mentioned it. They knew about these injuries dating

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>back till last year in the postseason, Paxton with the back,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Severino felt something, you know, dating back to those playoff games,

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and they waited until now. They just thought that, all right,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>an off season, a couple of months off was going

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to help a partially torn u c L If he

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>had an issue back then, why didn't he get X

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>ray is then why didn't he get testing then? Why

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>couldn't they find out what was wrong with him back

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in October November and then maybe we would have had

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>him season now? I mean now he did have some

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>testing done, right, like, he did have some testing done

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>eating what December and February he flew up to New

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>York and he had an m R and everything was clear,

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And somehow now it's not clear. I don't know how

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this works. And can we go back about a week

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ago where we originally had this conversation and the Yankees

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>are ready to treat this like the Mets. He wasn't

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more testing done. Do you remember this. He

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna go through to see the doctor. He was

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just gonna rest, take some at Ville. He's gonna be fine.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>He needs Tommy John. The Yankees are ready to handle

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>us like the Mets. Yeah, I think ultimately they just

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to find out what was the inevitable here,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg is that he needs Tommy John surgery. So I

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's what it comes down to. And you're right,

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe we see you know, Devi Garcia pull pulled up

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to the majors a little bit sooner than expected. But

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 1>he did not perform well in Triple A last year,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think that they should rush him. It's

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna be interesting to see what they do. I don't

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>think that Chad Bettus or Nick Tropiano is the answer

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there either. Mike King last year struggled big time in

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Triple A. We'll see what he can do throughout the

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.719
<v Speaker 1>course of spring training. Jordan Montgomery is an interesting name

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, Greg, because last night they were talking about

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>how he was topping out at ninety four miles per

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>hour seeing increased velocity, and he has performed well in

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the past. Back in now he had a three eight

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a e R, a solid whip, good strikeout stuff, good

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>swinging miss So I'm interested in Jordan Montgomery in the

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>later rounds of drafts as a late round flyer with

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>some upside here, Greg, but I think the I think

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees are gonna wind up either signing some kind

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of veteran another one or training for somebody. Today they

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>got big nicky nanky T. Yeah. I don't think big

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>nikky T is the answer. I don't think Chad Bettis

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is the answer either, but we will see what happens.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you Ross Stripling is the name. That's the

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>name that the Yankees should be going out for. Right now.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this, Frank. I just moved out Jordan

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery number nine my rankings to number seventy six. So

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>get excited, Frank, it's starting pitch here day. Here on

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the VFFS, I've got rankings, their color coding. Look at this,

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the colors. Here on the BFFs. You

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to miss this. Frank and I break down

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the top of the storry pitching market right after this.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for the nation's first and only, free,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour network dedicated to you the betting and

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you with a

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before. Located both in the heart of New

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at the

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Meadowlands Sports Crade. He's live eighteen hours a day here

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to serve you the fanatic. This is sports grade. Get

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>all the grid. We're back here, BFFs. Greg here, Frank

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York City and of course you watching live

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. We appreciate you joining us in of course

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>breaking news today that's only fitting Frank you. We're talking

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about starting pitching as Luis Severino is out for the

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>season following Tommy John's surgery. Uh. Severino was in its

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>hero guys that we were really excited to talk about,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately we won't be talking about him this year.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>He is Donzo. Yeah, and it's a huge blow again

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Yankees. For fantasy owners. He was someone who

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in early drafts, Greg was being drafted as a top

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty starting pitcher and rightfully so, we all remember what

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>he did in eighteen, the talent that he has. But unfortunately,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks like he's going to miss all of the

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>season and you know, potentially even a portion of the

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one season. So whether you have him in a keeper

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>or dynasty league, Uh, it seems like it's gonna be

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a rough go here for Severino over the next couple

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of years, and maybe if you're rebuilding in one of

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>those deeper formats, keeper or dynasty type format, maybe it

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>looked to acquire him on the cheap while you're trying

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild your team. I think that's maybe the only

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>positive that we could take away from Severino here. Greg, Yeah,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no positive. Man. Like I said, Luis Savorino, he'll ride,

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>he'll uh drop, and everybody's writings unless you're kith orgynasty

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>lead is Frank mentioned that's the only spot you'll draft

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>him in Jerman Montgomery, He'll somebody. He's somebody that will

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely arise. He's gonna be a lock forward this rotation. Now,

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>uh super said stuff when it comes to the Yankees.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But when it does come to the Yankees overall, and

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned them, they have my number one picture in

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball this season, and that is Garrett Cole. As

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we begin our starting pitching rankings here on the VFS, Frank,

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he's not new your number one. Your number

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>one is Jacob Degram, but we do have the same

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>top four. Cole, de Gram Verlander and chaser for you

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>is de Gram Cole Verlander, and that's the only difference.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>That's the top tier. Yesterday I was describing how with

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the relief pictures, I don't have that ability, uh to

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out where to break this down. And that's the

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>same old true for starting pitching, because my guys like

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>five food through twenty one are all one gigantics here,

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but the top four to me, they clearly separate themselves.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, for me, it's it's a top three. Greg.

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I have the gram Garrit Cole, and Justin burl Area

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in my top tier, and then I have in tier two,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I have Max Scherzer, Walker Bueller, and Shane Bieber. So

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I haven't broken down a little bit differently in terms

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of tears. And you can see my top twenty rankings

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>here on the BFS right now live on the Sports

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Create TV network. I do have Jacob Degram one spot

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>higher than Garrett Cole, just because he's done it for longer. Greg,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>He's been the most valuable starting pitcher over the past

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>three seasons in Fantasy Baseball. He's won back to bag

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Cy Young Awards for the New York Mets. Over the

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>last three years. He's got a two five three e

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>R a A two nine seven x fib over eleven

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>case per nine A zero point nine seven whip for

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Degram Garrett Cole. I think you can argue he's

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>going to give you more strikeouts, likely going to give

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you a more wins with the Yankees bats backing him

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>up in terms of run support. But again, he's done it.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>He's been super elite for two years, whereas Jacob Degram

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>has done it for three. That's the reason why I

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>have de Gram over Garrett Cole. Uh. And then I

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know where you want to go from here. Do

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to kind of break down our top ten,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>see what we have differently, maybe just you know, choose

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>out a few names here the you want to talk about.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But I have Verlander in that top tier as well.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>With these guys, I think he should be a first

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>round pick. I'm not scared off of Justin Verlander whatsoever.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>There's some people who are ranking Walker Bueller, Max Suers

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him right now. Everything that's going on with

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros, I don't think it affects Justin Verlander

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>one bit. He wasn't even part of the team during

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that whole trash can banging scandal he was for potentially

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>for other stuff that happened in two thousand and eighteen

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand nineteen. But Greg, there is no sign

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever if you deep dive justin Verlander on him falling off.

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, I still trust him. I still

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have him as my third sp off the board. Yeah,

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I have Verlander as my third story of picture off

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the board as well. And Max Chers are four. I

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>think they're in the same tier. Um and you can

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>see my top twenty now on your screens if you're

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>watching on Sports Grid, and mine is a little bit

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>different than French, but it's not all that dissimilar in general.

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But our top four remains the same. I like Garrett Cole.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about Cole versus the Graham here

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and we just mentioned that both guys could of have

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>their categories right in your standard five by five where

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you expect the winds from Coal, you expect the strikeouts

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>from Cole, the women era AA, probably the Gram, and

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of how you're building your team. I don't

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think you would go wrong. I understand the de Gram

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>has done it longer. I just expect a big year

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>from Coal and me. Yiakee, Homer, what do you want

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>from me? But in regards to Justin Verlander, he has

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>shown no signs of slowing down. You're right, and Max

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Scherzer did have some of those injuries that he had

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to battle through last year. But unlike Clayton Kershaw, who

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>also spoke about last week, and unlike Chris Sale who

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken about in the past here too, Sheerzer was

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>able to battle through and pitch through all of his stuff,

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't really uh remain out for a long time. I'm

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>really confident mat Max Sherzer bounces back. I know we

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a surgery and others something done to correct

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>uh what heild him. But I still I still trust Scherzer,

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>who has been the number one starting pitcher for a

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>very long time in Fantasy baseball. And I think Sherser

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>at four to me, still fits the top tier. I

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>know you you said that your top tier, and after

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>three I think Sherser was closer to Verlander then he

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>used to walk blerf the board. Yeah, with Scherzer, I'm

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>just worried about the back and neck injury stuff. Greg.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you mentioned it, and I get it. We're

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>still ranking Kershaw very highly this year, one year after

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he dealt with injuries similar to what Max

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Scherzer is dealing with. And you know, Scherzer pitches deep

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>into the postseason and he even missed a World Series

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>game because he was dealing with, you know whatever. It

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>was a stiff neck at the time, but he's clearly

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>dealing with something in that neck back area. So it's

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>not enough to completely scare me off of Max Scherzer,

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>but it is enough for me to lower him down

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the rankings opposed to where he has been the past

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, where normally he is the SP one

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>off the board or the SP two off the board.

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Walker, Bueler Gregg I will point

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this out. Remember last year in spring training he mentioned

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>he was dealing with like dead arm or something like that,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and everyone started freaking out. He pitched deep into the

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>postseason the year before, into the World Series with the

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers back in eighteen, and then last year going into

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen season, he got off to a slow start

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't really have a normal spring training. His

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>first eleven starts he had an e r a over four. Greg.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But for Walker Bueler's final nineteen starts. Listen to these numbers.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg to eight eight e r A three oh eight

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>x FIP one O two whip over eleven case per

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>nine under two walks per ninety percent groundball rate, uses

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>a fastball, slider, cutter curve. He has four different pitches

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he can rely on, thirty five percent chase rate percent

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>swinging shrike. I mean, Walker Bueller over his final nineteen

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 1>starts pitched like a top five pitcher for Fantasy, and

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that is why he earns his ranking, and that's why

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 1>everyone's excited about him. Greg. The only thing for me

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.479
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Bueller is I think people are

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>almost prematurely pushing it him ahead of guys like Verlander

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and Scherzer. I just still respect what those guys have done,

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're still pitching at an elite level. I think

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>people just want that shiny new toy, and they see

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Walker Bueller as the up and comer and they think

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that he can take that next step. But even if

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he takes that next step, Greg, he's still only as

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>good as Justin Burlander, as Max Serrs. So I don't

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>really understand why people are pushing Walker Bueller ahead of

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>either of those guys. I think you're right. It's a

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>shying toy, and you're excited about Walker Buller. You're excited

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>what's to come. He's so young, he doesn't have the

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>innings on him, he doesn't have the injuries that you

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>worry about with the Max Scherzer. For me, Walkervieller is five.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>As you saw before, as as we've discussed. I like

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Walker Peeler. I love Walker Peeler, even though you wanted

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to trade him on May first last year after the

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>terrible April. For me, uh, it's Walker Bueller at five,

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and I feel very very confident at that number. After that,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we both have Steven Strasburg here at number six.

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Strasburg changed himself around last year. Obviously was able to

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>remain healthy. That was the most important thing for Strasburg.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been hesitant to take him. He's not

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's I don't honestly off your radar. He's not

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>someone that in your draft you're going out of your

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>way to go and get. Why is that? Yeah, I

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>still do worry about the injuries. It just so happens

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that he manages to stay healthy in his career year,

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and they were saying that he changed things up last

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of his routine, and uh, he was

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>doing things differently in order to remain healthy. Uh. He

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. There's no doubt about it. He's always awesome

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in his career. He has a three one seven e

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>r A and a two nine five x FIT. I mean,

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy has been one of the most elite starting

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pitchers since he has entered the league, consistently over ten

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>case per nine Greg, consistently under three walks for nine

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>last year three three two e r A. He was awesome,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about it. The chase rate last year

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven percent, career high hist sween strike create a

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>career high. The skills are only getting better for Strasburg.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you trust that he's going to stay healthy,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>then you should be drafting him in that, you know,

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>second third round range. I just still have some kind

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of pause. There's just been so many injuries for Strosburg

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>over his career, UH that they're kind of lingering in

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the back of my mind, and I almost don't want

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to get sucked into what we saw last year. And

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we said exactly this, Greg, remember when we were doing

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>our sp breakdown last year, we said Strasburg is one

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of these guys who was going in like the fourth,

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>fifth round. Last year, we said it, he's going to

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have an awesome season in a contract the year, he's

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna get pushed up the draft board. Next year he's

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be drafted as a top ten pitcher again, and

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>then he's going to let us down because he's going

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to get hurt. It seems like this always happens. He

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>stays healthy for a year, we draft him early, then

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he gets hurt, he falls down, you know, two or

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>three rounds the next year. This seems to be a

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>pattern when it comes to Strasburg. So I don't know

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>if that's going to hold true. The skills are awesome,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but I still do have some pause when it comes

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to Stephen Strasburg. All right, Yeah, I think that kind

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of pause is fair. But you're right, this one, like

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't really a surprise as long as he stayed

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>healthy last year that he could do this, and he did.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously what we watched on a figure out

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>this year is who's the guy that's really on the

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 1>fourth and fifth round, Uh, that's going to wind up

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly where Steven Strasburg is this year next year. That's

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a question we're gonna try to add answer over the

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>next two days. Let me go more broad, Frank, as

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, as I told you for me literally from

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Walker Bueller and maybe that's not fair, but from Jack

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Flaherty down to Zach Grinky, all those guys are in

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>one tier of me. Is that too large? Should I

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>separate it more? I mean, I think it's personal preference.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.239
<v Speaker 1>It's however you feel. I mean, everyone's gonna do their

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>rankings differently. I currently have uh my third tier as

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>SP seven through SP fifteen, so that starts with Blake

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Snellen ends with Louis Castillo, and those are all players

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know. I wouldn't really mind as my you know,

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>SP one if I waited until the second or third

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>round to wind up with. Actually, in the Great Fantasy

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Invitational, I didn't take my starting picture until the

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>eleventh pick of round three, and I wound up with

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corbin. I don't have a problem with you know,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>getting Patrick Corbin as your SP one, but I I

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>currently break it down with you know pictures seven through

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen as my third tier, and then I have sixteen

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>through one, which starts with Kershaw and ends with Zach

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Grenky up. So for me, it's just I think we

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>actually have the same one top twenty one by the way,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>well that's the exact same top would be, I mean

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>what else would It's true we are where do you

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have st Beaver by the way, because I haven't met

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>six I haven't been eight. Basically, you and I flip

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>flop Shane Beaver and Stephen Shossbrook okay, yeah, and I

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>have Jack Flowerty a little bit lower than you two.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh you're silly on flower Let's talking about him. On

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the other side, Flowery was amazing the second half. I

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>know the first half wasn't what you wanted. That second

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>half was amazing. We will break it down and why

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you should like Jack Flaherty coming back here on the VFS.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for the nation's first and only free,

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour network dedicated to you the betting and

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Crade will provide you with a

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before. Located both in the heart of New

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at the

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>meadow Lands Sports Crade is live eighteen hours a day

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>here to serve you the fanatic. This is sports grade.

0:23:55.600 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>Get off the grid back here with you. B f

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>f's Greg Sam and Frank Stamble hanging out with you

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Meadowlands. It's very loud here today, Frank. There

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of horse racing going on over there.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You saw it coming back from ray at that fantastic

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>job getting that in. It's loud. Do you hear that

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>or now? I hear it a little bit. I hear

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously more so when I'm there doing fantasy sports today,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I hear it a lot of the times.

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>When I first get in there, they start doing the

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>national anthem while I'm on the air. I feel like

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I should stand up and join them in doing shu

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>l anthem. Coming back from the break there, Yeah, I

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>saw that guy. He was freaking out. He's getting in there,

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>getting something, getting on some ponies. Greg, What are you doing, man?

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, what's the play tonight? Well where the

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>horses at? What are you doing? Come on? Man? Uh? Frank,

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I am not betting on horses, but thank you. Oh.

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of which, last night my Devin Booker under twenty

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>six and a half points that I gave out on

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>MSG that hit Grizzlies not awesome. Um, so I guess

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying I did poorly. I don't know. I don't

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>remember what you gave out. Would you give up? Well?

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know I took the Grizzlies that that

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't go well. Um my dalla halla, that meant that

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.479
<v Speaker 1>one also went poorly because I also revolved around the Grizzlies. Uh.

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And then I took the under in the Jazz game.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Did it go under? I I can't confirm or deny

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>that right now I have I have no idea. I

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have no idea. Um, before we hit the break, we

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Jack Flaherty, and I have I think

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of my number seven right seven overall? Yeah, he's my

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>seventh overall picture right in front of Jack Flaherty, right

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>behind Steven Strassburg. You have Flaherty closer to your where

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that's mine you put up Frank so I can see

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that where he has Flriday. So you have Flaherty at

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>number nine just inside you were Taughts and why are

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit lower on Jack Flaherty Despite the

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>awesome second half. Yeah, Greg, I think you're gonna find

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this a consistent theme with starting pitchers. This year. It

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>was guys who had monsters second halves for the most part. So,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>like you, Darvish and Jack Flaherty, I'm both kind of

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of It's like, when things like that happened, do

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we just forget what happens in the first half of

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the season and something doesn't matter. That's that's not true, Greg,

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>It actually has happened. And that's exactly why you should

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>like Caleb Smith Moore because he was awesome in the

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>first half and you only remember things that happened in

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the season. Greg. But look when

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Jack Flaherty, his first seventeen starts last year, Greg,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>he had a four nine oh e r A. I mean,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>how do we just forget about something like that? The

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>shrikeouts were great, but the average was three over three

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>walks for nine. I just worried that what he did

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, is he able? Is he going

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to be able to maintain that level of control? Does

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he have enough? I think he has a really really

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>good slider. I worry about the third pitch when it

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>comes to Jack Flaherty. Uh. And while he did have

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a zero point nine three e r A in the

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>second half, Greg, final sixteen starts, you had three to

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>seven x fits, so that that's fine. If he could

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just like a load of mid three's e r A,

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that would be great. But I'm not discounting what he

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>did in the first half there as well. And again

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we're nitpicking. I still have him inside my top ten.

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I personally prefer Shane Bieber over him because

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I like the strides that Bieber has made. Bieber has,

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, three legit pitches that he can go to

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>me as two breaking pitches that you know are are

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>great pitches. So and and the strikeouts are great for Beaver.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>He's been reliable, he goes deep into games, I know

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it through a few complete games shoutouts last year in

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber. So if you're just asking me between these

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>two who I would rather prefer, I'm gonna go with

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Shane Bieber. I'm a little bit skeptical in the second

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>half for Jack Flaherty last year. Greg, Well, I'm skeptical

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of you, Frank, because Jack Flaherty is going to have

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic full season. Uh for the Cardinals. You though

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we both felt like the Cardinals this year. I'll probably

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>take the under on that wind tone. I'll go back

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to my rankings here, Uh, Blake Snell, Patrick Corbyn. They

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>round out my top ten I've lived there also rounding

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>out your top ten two? Right? Is that correct? So

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>inside my top ten I have I actually have Blake

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Snow at seven, so I have him pretty significantly higher

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>than you safely. And then I have I have Chris

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Sale at ten, and I know that you have him

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen. And Sean Gassimaki was actually asking me about

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this during the break. This is almost like a respect

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>ranking for Chris Sale. You know, Greg, I understand there's

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of injury risk when it comes to him,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of injury risk when it comes

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of these starting pitchers. Like why do

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you have Chris Sale ranked fifteen if you have Steven

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Strassburg rank sixth, Like, that's the question that I would

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>throw back your way because they both have injury concerns

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and you still have Blake Snell inside

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>your top ten. It's I feel like if we have

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Snell and Strasbourg inside of our top ten's, we should

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>probably still have Chris Sale inside the top ten as well.

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I have him rounding out the top ten.

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's no doubt that if he is healthy, if

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he just gives you a hundred and sixty innings, Greg,

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy innings this upcoming season, Chris Sale

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is probably going to be a top five, maybe top

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>three starting pitcher for fantasy purposes. Uh. The underlying numbers

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for Sale we're still great last year, Yes, he had

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in the year he over four is X fit was

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>two point nine three. Swinging shrike great was four percent.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's still a massive, massive mark. Something was

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong with him. We know that for sure. I owned him.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>His velocity was down last year. It seemed like he

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was missing his spots. Has left on base percentage was

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>not good. He couldn't pitch well with with runners on base.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I understand all of those things. The underlying numbers were

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>still really good for Chris Sale. If he can stay healthy,

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to recognize that he has top five maybe

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>even top three upside Greg. So it's really funny because

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we have switched sides in this debate, right, like when

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about Chris sal previously, I told you

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>everything that you're telling me right now about the X fit,

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>about the strike a percentage just seriously, like all of

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks really really good. And he gave you, even

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>though it felt like he was hurt all last year,

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he gave you a hundred and fifty inch. So I

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>understand everything that you're telling me. And yet now he's

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>battling this illness. It feels like something's not totally right

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with the elbow. And you know me, I've been saying

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly illness, it's right, Um, you know me that I'm

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>inevitably waitn't even Christelli get hurt. And it's a Red

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Sox team that like doesn't like really want to be good, right,

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, man, Chris Tale is the one

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that I have had the toughest problem ranking today, Like

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I originally had him at number ten and then I

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know what, I really like Patrick Corbyn.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have Corbyn higher than that. And then we

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>got into the guys you talked about last week, or

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we talked about last week in Syndergarden and Paddock and Nola.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I kind of liked those guys more also, and then

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Clayton Kershaw and I had him ranked

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh screwed up this morning when I sent my rankings

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in and I had him too high. And I'll like,

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute. One of these guys is healthy right

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>now and went to um fix his pitching mechanics in

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the off season, and the other one is battling let's

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>do it together and illness again. So I put Kershaw

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in front of Sell as well. For me, Chris Sale

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is number fifteen in my rankings. Look, it's hard to

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>argue with any of those points. And it's worth mentioning

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that I've already I'm in the middle of my my

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth draft right now. I have two going on right now.

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to completed already over at the NFBC, and

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I have wound up with zero shares of Chris Chris Sales.

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Ust to pull the trigger on that. But here's what

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I will say, right Ultimately, what it comes down to is,

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and I've said this before on the show, I don't

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like the value of the Round two and Round three

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers this year. Greg. I don't mind spending up

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first round on an ace because to me,

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>There are hitters going in the second and third round

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that our first round caliber players, and for whatever reason,

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why they're falling as far as they are.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>J D. Martinez should not be a second round pick.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez should not be a second round pick. I

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>understand struggled in the first half, but Jose Ramirez in

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the second half last year, what are the first half?

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you this is what to do. Jose Ramirez

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in the second half last year was the Josier Mirrors.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 1>He was a couple of years ago in seventeen and eighteen.

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Harper, I think is capable of being a first

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>round player. Javier Baias was a borderline first round player

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>last year. Now you're getting him in the third round.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So I really like the hitters that are going in

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>rounds two and three, And often times I have I've

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>seen myself passing on the starting pictures going there because frankly,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going too high. Jack Flaherty, remember he was one

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of those pictures going in the round four round five

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>range last year. Who's to say that Chris Paddock this

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>year's Jack Flaherty, Right, I think you know the guys

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that you can get in those round four and round five.

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Round four and five can give you similar numbers to

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the guys that we're drafting in rounds two and three.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So I just think that they're being overvalued where they're

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>being drafted, and I really like the hitters that are

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>going in that range. Give me the first round starting

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>pictures and if not, then I'm probably waiting until you know,

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of the third, beginning of the fourth. Guys

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>like Patrick Corbin, Guys like Louise Castillo, Chris Paddock, synder Guard.

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I like that range. I think you're getting good value

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on those starting pictures. Greg. So the reason that I

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have my pictures right the way they are with this

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>massive tier of five twenty one is exactly what you're describing, right.

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The fact is that we like all these guys, and

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what's to say that they got towards the end? Your

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>guy at Charlie Morton, who you have rankingside of your

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen, I haven't ranked the eighteen right there. What's

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to say Charlie Morton can't finish in there? What's to

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>say that Noah synder Guard, who you know, I really

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>like this year, he can't be Steven Strasberg or Jack

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Flaherty from a year ago. Nothing has to say that,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and you're getting all these guys a little bit later on,

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why I think that's here really should be

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>five flute one. I'm like, I'm a real big proponent

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of that, because I think all those guys have the

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>potential to really be first or second round picks next year.

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I like almost all of them. I think I have

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>questions when it comes to Kershaw and Sale. They they

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't really the guys I want um, and maybe I

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>should kind of stop and break the tier up after Rinola,

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.479
<v Speaker 1>who I do like when you get to the Mike

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Clevinger's and Luis Castios and for me that Charlie Morton's, Gelido,

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Darvish and Greggy, and I'm cool with those guys, I

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>really am. So I like how this tear is set

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>up great. Can I just remind everyone, or maybe revealed

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to everybody, why I love Charlie Morton as much as

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I do. I haven't read inside of my top twelve.

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I have him as eleven starting pitcher off the board,

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think the only reason why you're getting him

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>where you are right now in that fourth fifth round

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>range is because of his age. He's thirty six years old.

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>People are scared off of Verlander, and they're scared off

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of Max Scherzer, and they want to push Walker Bueller

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>up the board. And you know Greg wants to push

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Noah center or off the board because his nickname is

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Thor and he throws a hundred miles per hour. But

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>let's look at what Charlie Morton has done. He was

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>even better in than he was ever with the Houston Astros,

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and we had concern over whether or not he can

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to be that good with the Tampa bay Rays

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.479
<v Speaker 1>last year a three oh five e R, a three

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to eight x fit, a one oh eight whip with

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Rays in the a L East with

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the juice ball, going up against the Yankees, the Red Sox,

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>all these teams in the American League, and he was

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that good. Over eleven case per nine, two point six

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>four walks per nine was a three year best for

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Morton, forty eight percent groundball rate. I mean, this

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>guy just checks all the boxes. The only reason why

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want Charlie Morton is because he has missed

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>time in the past. It's a hundred and ninety four

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's last year and because of his age. Outside

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of those things, he's a top twelve starting picture for me. Greg, Yeah,

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, fair enough, Frankie. We'll talk more about this

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Top twenty one uh more on today's program Tomorrow. We'll

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 1>get into the guys later, but coming back, we continue

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>with our top twenty Here the BFFs. Ye are you

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ready for the nation's first and only free, twenty four

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>hour network dedicated to you, the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade will provide you with a real time content,

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>statistics and gaining intelligence unlike anything you've ever seen before.

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Located both in the heart of New York City and

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>inside the FanDuel Sports book at the meadow Lands Sports Crade,

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>He's live eighteen hours a day here to serve you

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the fanatic. This is Sports Grade. Get off the grid.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We are back here on the BFFs. You're in the

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the starting pitching overview. Frank How do you

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>think we're doing this far? I was just thinking to myself,

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not kidding Greg. I'm having a lot of fun.

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I am. I am enjoying doing this right now, going

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>over the top twenty starting pitchers. Look, this is probably

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>what I've devoted the most time too so far in

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of my research, is really like the top thirty,

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>top forty starting pitchers. Obviously, I've still got a lot

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of work to do. We have a lot of work before.

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of time before we get to

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>drafts here, So you know, uh, diving in, excited to

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>do so, and uh, let's go, Greg, come on, let's

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>run out the top twenty. Let's do it. Well, I

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>think its top twenty one. I think we just rephrasing

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>he was the top twenty, because first it's like a

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>clear top twenty one, right like that, zact grenk. It's

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>basically the top twenty zacch grinky, yeah, Zac grinky at

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. But and that's where my um tier ends

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>right there, As I said, like seventy four times thus far.

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So there we go. So there's the top

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. We're not doing a top twenty, we're doing

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a top one. Zach Grikey, has he reported to camp yet?

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he. I think he's showing up this week, Greg,

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think it kind of actually makes

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>sense for Zach Cranky, right, because with everything going on

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Astros, he's dealt with like the anxiety in

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the past, and he has issues like that. So you know,

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I think not having him around the team while reporters

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are asking a bunch of questions about things he had

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with, he wasn't on the team throughout

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. I think it actually makes sense. And

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you remember, annually every single year, Zak Granky gets off

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to a slow start in spring, He's throwing like eighty

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>seven miles per hour and by the time the season

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>starts up, he's throwing ninety and he's his reliable self

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that he is every single year. Greg, I mean Granky,

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I just I guess I'm just gonna own a bunch

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of old players this year, Greg, because these players are

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>under her value because of their age. Right, He's like,

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that's why he was top five started coching in Rhodo

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and head to head points last year and he's been

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>drafted as outside the top twenty. Why is that why?

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I like? I like? I like Zachrangy. He's my number

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of twenty one man. But that's why the VF partnership

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 1>works so well, because I'm infastuated with the young guys,

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're infastulated with the old guys. So we gotta

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 1>just settle in the middle. And that's that's our team. Yeah,

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know I did, uh. I did Diamond Bets

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>recently with Joe Piezappia, and we also came to the

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 1>realization there that I just love old players. He told

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>me to sign up for a dating site that only

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you know has old people on it. You have to

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be like sixty. So I'm really glad you brought this up.

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I read today as I was prepping for the show

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that The Bachelor is going to come out with a

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>senior Bachelor for sixty five and over. Only I'm not joking,

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, So maybe I should check it out considering

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the type of baseball players that I am targeting this

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>upcoming season, Greg, I don't think King could be mad

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>at you. No, I mean, she'd I don't know, I

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know what, I don't know how she

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>would react. She just I don't know. Maybe she would

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>join me in looking at some Let me ask you

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>about a younger guy. Yeah, because we're not out of times,

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure I ask you about a

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>younger guy, and that brings me um to Luise Castio,

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>who for me is number seventeen. He wasn't a guy

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I was on last year. A lot of the industry

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>jumped back in. They talked about a slider, They talked

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>about his second half, and I wanted nothing to do

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>with him. His first half unbelievable last year. I know

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the second half wasn't as good. Where do you stand

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Luise Casti is. I don't know that he's

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>an active target of yours, But isn't he somebody that

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 1>you feel comfortable drafting as your number two picture maybe

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 1>number one? I would be all right with him as

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>my SP two. I would feel better about that than

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>having him as my SP one, because I think there

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are still some concerns when it comes to Casto. I

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>worry about the command. He struggles with walks, but he

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>is able to mitigate that because he does get a

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of strikeouts, so he can wiggle out of these jams.

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:46.479
<v Speaker 1>And he gets a lot of groundballs too, So last

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>year fifty five percent groundball rate. You know, when when

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you average over three walks per nine, you need something

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to help you out. Somebody getting those groundballs that turned

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>into double plays, and being able to wiggle out of

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>those jams with strikeouts is something that Louise Castido could

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>do because you know he gets as many strikeouts as

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>he does. Greg a fifteen point nine percent swinging strike

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>rate that was fourth best among starting pitchers in ten

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>uh three point four zero ear a three point four

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:14.919
<v Speaker 1>eight x tip, right in line with what Luis Castillo did.

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I would feel much better with him as my SP two.

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you do draft two hitters in

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the first two rounds and you wind up with Castillo

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in the third or fourth, maybe as your SP one,

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you can do worse than that. I don't mind it.

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I have them inside my top fifteen. He is my

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>SP fifteen overall. Greg, Yeah, I think I'm okay with

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that as well as your number two. You laid it.

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>You laid it down here. I think it makes sense,

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>which frings me now. It's a Lucas Gledo. He's the

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>guy that I had a hard time ranking as well.

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I had him way lower before I set my rankings

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>in and was like, man, maybe I was just being

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>too harsh, like I was a Gelgo guy last year.

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Um I owned him for that. Entire second half run

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and I regally picked them up because the schedule was

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>really nice, and you looked the peripher roles and they

0:40:56.080 --> 0:41:00.439
<v Speaker 1>were pretty solid as well. And then you you feel

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like and you ask yourself, can he do it again?

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Because in the back of my mind, man, this guy

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>went on draft last year. He was so bad two

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Has he just gotten better? Gilto checks on

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>my number nineteen Pitcher off the board for you, Frank,

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>where do you have geo? And how confident are you

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that Gileto can be like Louis Castio I havent said

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>right by two players here. I have had my SP

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and I've actually lowered him a little. It's really higher.

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I had him even higher than this Greg And the

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>reason why I lowered him is just because he's dealing

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with an injury right now in camp. It's like a

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>chest train that he that he has fine. Yeah, he

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>should be all right. And assuming hold on, knowing what

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I know about you, are you really gonna take Luis

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Gilto over Chris Paddock? There's no way. Yes, I would.

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would have done that today if he

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>came to me. I'm telling you I will confidently take

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Gilto in the third or fourth round. But he's

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>being pushed up draft boards a little bit. I'm I'm

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in a draft right now. He just went with the

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with pick thirty one, so the first pick of the

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>third in a fifteen team draft, so pulled up the

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 1>board a little bit. And look, Greg, he completely revamped

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>himself last year, changed his mechanics. He started throwing harder,

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the velocity was up like two miles per hour, started

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>using his change up more. His fastball changeup combination is

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.919
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ridiculous. And if you worry about the second half,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>where he posted at three seven six e r A,

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>his x fit was three points to eight, So his

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers were actually much better in that second half,

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>almost thirteen case per nine. Think about that, Greg, twelve

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 1>point six case per nine in the second half with

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a one oh six whip and a fifteen percent swinging

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>strike cread I mean Geeledo in terms of his underlying numbers,

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>pitched like a top ten starting pitcher, may maybe even

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 1>top five, like a borderline top five pitcher. That's how

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>good the underlying metrics were for Lucas Gilto, and in

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that second half Greg He made twelve starts, eleven of

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>those he went at least six endings pitched. So starting

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to go deeper into games, starting to mature a little bit. Uh,

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think having as Monti Grandala as his catcher,

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>someone who is one of the best pitch framers in

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the game I am. I'm bullis on Lucas Giulio.

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I like him. I wouldn't mind him again as similar

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to Luis Castillo as probably feel better with him as

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>your SP two, but if you start hit or hit her,

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't mind him as my SP one. Where have

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you settled in with Mike Clevinger? Remember Clev has this

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>surgery towards meniscus, He's gonna be out for a while

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't have a real spring training. You can

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>see him come back to early struggle in the first half,

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe go off in the second half. Where did you

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:28.439
<v Speaker 1>settle it on Clevinger? Because I remember you dropped him

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>way too far and you you watched him where he

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.239
<v Speaker 1>was going in drafts and watched where other people ranked

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>him and he had to move back up. Where did

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you settling with Clev? So I have Clevinger ranked as

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>my SP fourteen right now, so right in between Lucas

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Giulido and with Luis Castillo. And the reason being is

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you finished on the top twenty starting pitcher last year

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>while only pitching a hundred and twenty six innings, Greg, So,

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what do we expect that of him? That

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he misses the first month, He's probably back in early May,

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>mid May, probably misses five or six starts, and of

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>course he'll always have the chance for re injury. But

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if he makes let's say, you know, twenty four twenty

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>five starts this upcoming season, that means he's probably gonna

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>throw around a hundred and fifty innings. Again, he was

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty starting pitcher last year in Roto leagues,

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 1>only throwing a hundred and twenty six. So if he

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 1>gives you a hundred and fifty endings pitched, those are

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, the quality of a top ten starting pitcher,

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of talent. So I've I've picked them

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>back up a little bit. I think I was a

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit too reactionary dropped him outside my top twenty.

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Now I moved him back to back inside my top fifteen.

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>He is someone that you know, if you do play

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in an overall competition like the NFBC. If you want

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a swing on him in like the fourth round.

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>He's someone that once he returns, he's probably going to

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.720
<v Speaker 1>pitch as like a top seven or eight starting pitcher

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in baseball. Yeah, he's been number sixteen pitcher. Here inside

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 1>my top one. Frank, we got about three minutes to go.

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Is there any picture here inside the top twenty one

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that you want to dive a little bit deeper on

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>in the time remaining. Yeah, I'm just going to dive

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>back in on cre Paddock and we and we spoke

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>about him during the a DP and the Money in

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bank that we did recently. But he keeps talking

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about this curveball that he's developed, and I think that

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if it just develops into an adequate an adequate pitch,

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a serviceable third offering four Paddock he already throws per hour.

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>He has one of, if not the best changeups in

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>baseball right now. If that curveball is just solid, then

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think that he could take that next step.

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of projecting his endings last year he

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>was at about a hundred and forty. Let's say, you know,

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they attack on another thirty maybe forty. I would project

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>him for between a hundred and seventy and a hundred

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty innings, a really good ear, a probably sub three five,

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good whip. He doesn't walk. Anybody just got

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 1>nasty stuff. Greg Paddock is someone that I am in on. Uh,

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and I like where he's going right now in the

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>fourth round range. I have him ranked right now at

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>SP seventeen. I would take him just ahead of Aaron

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Nola Noah Synderguard. Uh. You Darvish ends at cranky all right,

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I have my man Noah synder Guard

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>over him. As I said, I have a synder Guard,

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>then Paddock, Uh, then Aaron Nola. Um. And who's the

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>last guy in there, Frankie you yeah, yeah, So then

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I have you way lower. I haven't met number two.

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I haven't down at number twenty. And let's briefly get

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>into the dar Wish in the last minute, year Darbish

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>just sneaks into my top twenty here at number twenty. Um,

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you dar Wish another second half. It was crazy, the walks.

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>We always were back to that game we watched together.

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That was like the epitome of you. Dar Wish. Do

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you think he just is a U dar Wish of

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>old this year. I don't think so. I think we

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>still see a high whip there. Yeah. Look, that's part

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of my concern with him and Jack Flaherty. I mean,

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>he was so good in the second half in terms

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of his walks one point four six walks per nine

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>over his final twenty three starts. Gregg, it wasn't even

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:54.439
<v Speaker 1>just the second half. It was it was a large

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>majority of the season. It was almost two thirds of

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the season where his command was really really good. But

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.879
<v Speaker 1>typically he has struggled with command in his career. Uh.

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And I said this when we spoke about Darvish recently.

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think that everything came together for him over

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:11.640
<v Speaker 1>those final twenty three starts where the cutter was working.

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a phenomenal pitch. He used it more than ever.

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>He uh improved his mechanics as well, He managed to

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy. I just think everything came together, and you

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>need all of that to happen once again for where

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>he's being drafted, you know, as a top twenty starting pitcher.

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I just worry about, you know, an injury popping up,

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe the mechanics are thrown off a little bit again,

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe the walks creep back in. I have some concerns

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to you, Darvish, This season tomorrow is

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really fun because I can't imagine the lists

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are as similar twenty two to forty and beyond. I'll

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>see if you have to use three days starting pitchers.

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>We'll see tomorrow on the program. More starting pitchers are

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Frank stafeld I, a Greman. Farrell comes to Coast is

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>live right here that comes your way next. We hope,

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we hope. Are you ready for the nation's first and

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>only read twenty four hour network dedicated to you the

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>anything you've ever seen before. Located both in the heart

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Metal Lands, sports Crade is live eighteen hours

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a day, here to serve you the fanatic. This is

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade. Get off the grid.