Speaker 1: Hey, this is Buck Sexton and you're listening to the
Speaker 1: Tutor Dixon Podcast, part of the Clay Drivers and Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton podcast Network. Hello and welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast.
Speaker 1: I'm Tutor Dixon, and today it's time to take a
Speaker 1: political temperature. Right now, Trump is still up in the polls,
Speaker 1: but interestingly, he's now demanding Republican loyalty in the form
Speaker 1: of a Joe Biden impeachment. And this may shock you,
Speaker 1: but I believe impeachment could spell political disaster for the
Speaker 1: entire Republican Party, so we'll talk about that. And speaking
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden, the old boy must have gotten some
Speaker 1: negative pulling on denying his own grand baby. I know, crazy, right,
Speaker 1: You can't just say that you only have six when
Speaker 1: you actually have seven. But it turns out that the
Speaker 1: Biden's decided it's time to show little baby Navy a
Speaker 1: little love. Oh wait a minute, not baby Navy, because
Speaker 1: now she's four, she's actually nearly five years old. Maybe
Speaker 1: she'll get her own Christmas talking at the White House
Speaker 1: this year. Her father is a world renowned artist, so
Speaker 1: I'm sure he could craft one up for her in
Speaker 1: no time flat. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Speaker 1: This mere mention of the child is not exactly picking
Speaker 1: bedroom furniture for Pop's house. And last, but not least,
Speaker 1: we have a re emerging Kamala Harris. I say this
Speaker 1: because as Biden's scandals begin to boil, the folks in
Speaker 1: the administration are pretty desperate to retain power. And now
Speaker 1: that they see their fate may lie in the hands
Speaker 1: of a cackling, world word salad spewing world stage failing
Speaker 1: vice president, can they fix that? Sadly, they actually made
Speaker 1: a lot of steps toward recovering one interview this week,
Speaker 1: so I want to get to that as well. But
Speaker 1: you're probably asking why would I say impeachment could hurt? Look,
Speaker 1: I fully understand why Trump wants it. He was impeached
Speaker 1: for suggesting Joe Biden was involved in a corrupt relationship
Speaker 1: with Ukraine. And sure enough, after Devin Archer's testimony and
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden text messages and let's not forget the whole laptop,
Speaker 1: I mean a whole lot of stuff, all signs point
Speaker 1: to ding ding ding corruption. Twenty phone calls with the
Speaker 1: then Vice President Joe Biden with Hunter Biden's business associates.
Speaker 1: Remember these are business associates in adversarial countries, and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is the vice president. So the question is, is
Speaker 1: Joe Biden really that stupid that he just took all
Speaker 1: of these phone calls? And you have to understand something
Speaker 1: about being vice president. It's not like that. It's not
Speaker 1: like you can just answer the phone at any time
Speaker 1: if people don't ask what it is or say yeah,
Speaker 1: maybe not, maybe you shouldn't take that phone call. So
Speaker 1: I don't think he's that dumb. And then you have
Speaker 1: to ask yourself, well, what was Hunter selling with these
Speaker 1: phone calls? Just access to talk about the weather? Doubtful?
Speaker 1: Was he selling political influence? Was he selling policy? That's
Speaker 1: the question. But regardless of all of that, does an
Speaker 1: impeachment help us get the country back on track? Well,
Speaker 1: this is what Trump had to say about that in
Speaker 1: a rally in Eerie, Pennsylvania. Listen, any Republican that doesn't
Speaker 1: act on Democrat fraud should be immediately primary and get
Speaker 1: out out. So he wants this impeachment and if you
Speaker 1: are not acting on this, Trump is calling on you
Speaker 1: to be primaried. So now suddenly this changes the entire
Speaker 1: election to instead of focusing on the issues of what's
Speaker 1: happening to people every day. It's focusing on whether or
Speaker 1: not we can get Joe Biden back through an impeachment.
Speaker 1: And if you are going to be primarying a lot
Speaker 1: of these folks who are in toss up districts who
Speaker 1: are trying to desperately hold on to their congressional seat
Speaker 1: to make sure that we keep the House, then you
Speaker 1: know what a primary means. A primary means that we're
Speaker 1: going to have to go farther and farther right. And
Speaker 1: is that going to win? I say no, and I
Speaker 1: know that horrifies a lot of you. But let's just
Speaker 1: think about this. You make this next election where people
Speaker 1: stand on impeachment rather than these issues that we face
Speaker 1: every day. And the Dems are great at manipulating that
Speaker 1: message in the media. The media is on their side.
Speaker 1: Let the people vote him out and permanently get rid
Speaker 1: of him. That is the best option we have here.
Speaker 1: Get rid of him, fire him. Let's not put all
Speaker 1: of this out on the air for the media to twist.
Speaker 1: You go through an impeachment hearing and you're going to
Speaker 1: have both sides litigating this in the news for the
Speaker 1: entire presidential election. Cycle the news media that is again
Speaker 1: not friendly to Republicans. They're never going to let the
Speaker 1: truth out there. They're going to have all these Dems
Speaker 1: come up on the media constantly and say this poor
Speaker 1: old man, these Republicans are just attacking him over his family.
Speaker 1: And it hit this man that is his son is
Speaker 1: a drug addict, He is a recovering drug addict. Do
Speaker 1: you have no heart for people who have been through this?
Speaker 1: And it will destroy us. The Dems leverage that against
Speaker 1: our congressmen and women, and we are in trouble. And
Speaker 1: then you've got primaries going on where you're pulling Republicans
Speaker 1: further and further right. Republicans have got to start playing
Speaker 1: the same game Democrats are playing. Fight with the truth.
Speaker 1: Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
Speaker 1: the Tutor Dixon podcast. Litigate this in the court of
Speaker 1: public opinion. Take these messages from these hearings, Take these
Speaker 1: text messages, take the Devin Archer words, Take all of
Speaker 1: this and put this in ads and show the people
Speaker 1: exactly what the facts are. Do not let the media
Speaker 1: twist this. Our candidates, our political machine needs to start
Speaker 1: using the evidence, the evidence against Joe Biden in our messaging,
Speaker 1: not in the media. Make sure this man does not
Speaker 1: get the White House back, and then hold him and
Speaker 1: his family accountable for their crimes. The taxpayers didn't need
Speaker 1: to be footing the bill for this impeachment hearing, which
Speaker 1: could quite honestly, very possibly give the White House back
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden because of the endless media coverage. Look
Speaker 1: at and they'll turn this into witch hunt. Unlike the
Speaker 1: Trump hearings. The media will say this is a witch
Speaker 1: hunt against Joe Biden. They will fully support that. It
Speaker 1: is time for the Republican political machine to get the
Speaker 1: message and Joe Biden out and look old Joe, he
Speaker 1: knows he's in trouble. They had it made. They thought
Speaker 1: they had it made. They had the sweetheart deal. It
Speaker 1: was global immunity. Hunter, Biden, his baggage, everything that came
Speaker 1: with Hunter was finally going to fade off into the
Speaker 1: distance for Joe because of this sweetheart plea deal basie.
Speaker 1: One judge got in the way, the global immunity thing.
Speaker 1: It was just too tough of a pill to swallow.
Speaker 1: No one under investigation for other crimes has ever been
Speaker 1: given global immunity. It means Hunter could not be held
Speaker 1: accountable for the past crimes he was being investigated for.
Speaker 1: But when the judge asked, is there any precedent for this?
Speaker 1: Has this type of deal ever been made? The prosecutor
Speaker 1: had to kind of sheepishly acknowledge, actually new this is
Speaker 1: a first of its kind deal, special, whipped up, special
Speaker 1: for the president's son. Well, guess what. The deal getting
Speaker 1: thrown out is truly a pickle for everyone. At least
Speaker 1: a free Hunter Biden would allow the administration to give
Speaker 1: joan out. They could even prop up Kamala. I mean,
Speaker 1: she's their only hope of staying in power if there's
Speaker 1: no Joe. This is the administrative state, the people that
Speaker 1: are working for them. But look the administration, they're not
Speaker 1: the only ones that have an interest in Joe stepping down.
Speaker 1: You have the Newsome and Whitmers and all the other
Speaker 1: bottom feeders waiting to suckle at the sweet teat of
Speaker 1: George Soros and feel the full energy of the Democrat
Speaker 1: machine lifting them to power. But as long as Joe
Speaker 1: has to protect Hunter Biden, man that really screws things up,
Speaker 1: that stands in the way of them getting there. You
Speaker 1: may have heard Karine Jean Pierre asked if Biden would
Speaker 1: pardon Hunter, and what she said is very interesting. Listen
Speaker 1: to what she had to say about whether or not
Speaker 1: Joe would pardon his own son. From a presidential perspective.
Speaker 1: Is there any possibility that the president would end up
Speaker 1: pardoning his son? No, Well, I just said no. I
Speaker 1: just answered no, nope, nope, emphatically nope.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 1: She's not going to say anything else. Why why is
Speaker 1: that a no? He can't because if he pardons his son,
Speaker 1: he admits the corruption. So you see, pardoning him, the
Speaker 1: whole house of cards falls, and doesn't just fall for
Speaker 1: the Bidens, it falls for the Dems. It's something you
Speaker 1: can't recover from. All of a sudden, the guy has
Speaker 1: to admit this is all pretty bad news, and I'm
Speaker 1: going to pardon him and then step down and hand
Speaker 1: it over to someone else. That just doesn't work. They
Speaker 1: won't recover from that. They fear losing that much ground.
Speaker 1: You see, Biden will gladly pardon him if he loses
Speaker 1: in twenty four. He has no choice, but he can't
Speaker 1: do that beforehand, and he could certainly never cut a
Speaker 1: deal with one of the other candidates like hey, I'll
Speaker 1: step down, you run and then pardon my son at
Speaker 1: the end of your term. Because unlike Trump, you see Biden,
Speaker 1: he's actually been in government his whole life, and when
Speaker 1: you're in Washington, you learn one thing there's no loyalty.
Speaker 1: So he would never trust another politician who's going to say,
Speaker 1: don't worry, Joe, I got you. I want to take
Speaker 1: care of Hunter for you. So what happens if that
Speaker 1: can't happen? You see, now you have to enter into
Speaker 1: the cleanup machine, and the cleanup machine says, you know what, Joe,
Speaker 1: it's kind of not so popular for you to not
Speaker 1: really acknowledge Navy. Navy roberts your granddaughter who's almost five.
Speaker 1: So Jill and Joe are like, shoot, what are we
Speaker 1: going to do? This is starting to become a problem.
Speaker 1: Hunter's still in the news. He's not going way. The
Speaker 1: plea deal didn't go away, and therefore there is one
Speaker 1: key problem we must fix, and that is a child
Speaker 1: that we have refused to acknowledge. You see, if the
Speaker 1: plea deal have gone through, Navy would never be acknowledged
Speaker 1: because they were just going to wash their hands of
Speaker 1: Hunter altogether. He was just going to ride off into
Speaker 1: the distance. But see that didn't happen. So now Jill
Speaker 1: and Ja were like, what are we gonna do? They're
Speaker 1: going on vacation for ten days, perfect timing. You're going
Speaker 1: to the beach, no press. I mean, let's face it,
Speaker 1: nobody wants to get close to Joe Biden. We has
Speaker 1: new shirt on, so they're not going to bug him
Speaker 1: on the beach. No better time to be the doting,
Speaker 1: loving grandparents and start to nip that unacknowledged granddaughter's story
Speaker 1: in the bud. But how do you do that? How
Speaker 1: could you possibly make this sound good? Well, if you're
Speaker 1: the Democrats, you have the whole media machine at your fingertips.
Speaker 1: So go to a beloved tabloid called People and dump
Speaker 1: as much of a message of love as you can
Speaker 1: muster for a little Navy that's Hunter's daughter, and do
Speaker 1: it on a Friday afternoon. So here's what they said.
Speaker 1: They had this exclusive in People magazine and it says, quote,
Speaker 1: our son and Navy's mother London, are working together to
Speaker 1: foster a relationship that is in the best interests of
Speaker 1: their daughter, their daughter preserving her privacy as much as
Speaker 1: possible going forward. Yeah, like she's got a lot of
Speaker 1: privacy from that family that literally don't talk to her.
Speaker 1: This is not a political issue. It's a family matter.
Speaker 1: Whow that Actually, I feel like that's what we've been
Speaker 1: saying for so long. This is a family. Why aren't
Speaker 1: you acknowledging this little girl's family? But okay, all right,
Speaker 1: so I'll give it to him.
Speaker 2: Good.
Speaker 1: They're gonna say something, He goes on to say, Jill,
Speaker 1: and I only want what's best for all of our grandchildren,
Speaker 1: including Navy. Again, her name is Navy Roberts. To be clear,
Speaker 1: it's not Navy Biden, because the Biden family actually denied
Speaker 1: the little girl the use of their last name. They
Speaker 1: didn't want her to be a Biden. Now, to be fair,
Speaker 1: the name has been traded on so much at this
Speaker 1: point that I don't actually know that it has much
Speaker 1: value anymore. And I personally think she's much better off
Speaker 1: without them. But politics pushes and pulls, and right now,
Speaker 1: it turns out that claiming all of your grandchildren polls
Speaker 1: really well. And as of Friday night at five pm,
Speaker 1: the Bidens now claim to have seven grandchildren, the newest
Speaker 1: of whom is nearly five years old. And just so
Speaker 1: we know, you don't forget that little nugget. It took
Speaker 1: almost five years for them to talk about her, and
Speaker 1: the President and First Lady they may have said something
Speaker 1: about Navy Roberts, they may have talked about her, but
Speaker 1: the funny thing is they've never met her. President and
Speaker 1: First Lady have never met their nearly five year old
Speaker 1: granddaughter who they now claim as a granddaughter. And for
Speaker 1: that matter, her own father has never met her either.
Speaker 1: What a delightful family. So that whole situation not going swimmingly.
Speaker 1: It's really not a pretty situation. So what do you
Speaker 1: do now? Well, enter the understudy Kamala Harris. Pathetic as
Speaker 1: her term has been, and it's been pretty pathetic, she
Speaker 1: may actually be their saving grace. So where do you
Speaker 1: go if you have to make Kamala Harris look like
Speaker 1: she's the next president of the United States, or even
Speaker 1: for that matter, that she's the current vice president of
Speaker 1: the United States. Well, I mean, why wouldn't you go
Speaker 1: to ABC? You know, their unofficial comms team, the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: They're surely going to cut out all the awkward cackles,
Speaker 1: the trailing word salads, the uncomfortable admissions that she has
Speaker 1: not actually accomplished what she was tasked with by the
Speaker 1: Big Guy. I mean thought is that's what we call
Speaker 1: him the days, right, the big Guy. I feel like
Speaker 1: we can all call him that now. He's like everybody's dad, right,
Speaker 1: we can just all call him the big Guy. So
Speaker 1: they go to ABC. I mean ABC, I say, good choice.
Speaker 1: It's not MSNBC, it's ABC. And aside from one awkward
Speaker 1: laugh during the interview, which you have to really be
Speaker 1: paying attention to notice, it's like a pretty strong comeback
Speaker 1: for Kamala, I mean a shockingly strong comeback for Kamala.
Speaker 1: And that's going to work for her because she's part
Speaker 1: of the left. They don't really need that much. And
Speaker 1: just so you know, if you thought the abortion wars
Speaker 1: were over, or if folks out there were thinking Republicans
Speaker 1: are actually winning on this issue in certain states this interview.
Speaker 1: Listened to it carefully, it should assure you that abortion
Speaker 1: is deadly in more ways than one, and Dems are
Speaker 1: hoping that they can kill off all of their opponents
Speaker 1: again in twenty twenty four on this very issue. You
Speaker 1: have to listen to it. Listen to the Vice president's
Speaker 1: words very carefully when she was first asked about abortion.
Speaker 1: Here it is.
Speaker 2: Well, it's about understanding that a fundamental freedom for the
Speaker 2: women of America has been attacked.
Speaker 1: And when I think about.
Speaker 2: This issue and the fact that the highest court in
Speaker 2: our land just took a constitutional right that had been
Speaker 2: recognized from the women of America.
Speaker 1: She calls it a fundamental freedom attacked, a fundamental freedom.
Speaker 1: These words are chosen very carefully. She calls it a
Speaker 1: constitutional right taken from the women of America by the
Speaker 1: highest court in the land. It wasn't a constitutional right.
Speaker 1: They know that. They don't care. The words are carefully chosen.
Speaker 1: The lies don't matter because it's on the news again.
Speaker 1: It's on It's on ABC. It's not MSNBC. ABC is
Speaker 1: the news right, ABC is safe. What they say on ABC,
Speaker 1: it must be true. So when the Vice President comes
Speaker 1: out and says it is a fundamental freedom, that abortion
Speaker 1: was a constitutional right taken away by the Supreme Court,
Speaker 1: you know where they're going with this. You know that
Speaker 1: these are winning issues that they're taking out, that it's
Speaker 1: a winning message. As much as you might not like it.
Speaker 1: It is. Then you hear they talk about Iowa, where
Speaker 1: Governor Kim Reynolds just signed a six week abortion bill.
Speaker 1: The anchor actually notes seventy percent. She says, seventy percent
Speaker 1: of women in Iowa believe abortion should be legal in
Speaker 1: all cases, if not most. The Vice president, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's almost like perfectly done. She acts this out perfectly,
Speaker 1: and won't you have to watch it to understand what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. You have to think about it from the
Speaker 1: perspective of people in the middle and people on the left.
Speaker 1: She looks ashamed. She announces that Iowa doesn't trust women
Speaker 1: to know what's in their best interest. It's the first
Speaker 1: time in a long time we've seen a truly prepp
Speaker 1: to Kamala Harris. Her posture is perfect, her empathy is there,
Speaker 1: and then she hits you. She hits you right where
Speaker 1: you want to hit, those people right on the edge,
Speaker 1: those center right people that are questioning where they are
Speaker 1: and questioning on abortion. She goes after the faithful heart
Speaker 1: who's torn on the issue of legislating morality, and Harris
Speaker 1: gives women permission to support abortion. She says this quote.
Speaker 1: One does not have to abandon their faith or deeply
Speaker 1: howled beliefs to agree that government should not be telling
Speaker 1: her what to do with her body. Listen, guys, you
Speaker 1: don't have to abandon your faith, doesn't You don't have
Speaker 1: to question your Christianity. Got you just come over, Come on,
Speaker 1: come to this side. It's safe, and you'll be part
Speaker 1: of the team again. Listen, this is a place where
Speaker 1: women get hung up. You see, they think, I'm not
Speaker 1: personally going to have an abortion, and I know my
Speaker 1: faith tells me not to have an abortion. But can
Speaker 1: I really make a decision to support the availability of
Speaker 1: abortion and still be a Christian? And Kamala Harris tells
Speaker 1: you yes. And it's a weird place to be because
Speaker 1: government and church are actually separate. In your life, you
Speaker 1: live in the world, your faith is different. It's exactly
Speaker 1: what these women who are torn want to hear. They
Speaker 1: actually want permission because, as you heard from the previous
Speaker 1: stat if you aren't part of the people who are
Speaker 1: saying I want a choice, then you're in the minority.
Speaker 1: If it's really seventy percent of women who say they
Speaker 1: want unlimited abortion, then these women, they are politically and
Speaker 1: friendly homeless friends are not accepting them. So most women
Speaker 1: have already accepted the term constitutional right. And you know,
Speaker 1: if you don't agree, oftentimes you can't be friends with
Speaker 1: these people. They don't friend somebody with a differing opinion
Speaker 1: on certain things, and abortion is one of them. So
Speaker 1: you're an enemy. But here you go. Kamala Harris is
Speaker 1: cracking the door for you. She's telling these women of
Speaker 1: faith you can come back inside of the Choice club
Speaker 1: and everyone wants choice. Look, even God gives you the
Speaker 1: power of choice. How bad could choice be. This may
Speaker 1: sound nuts to you. You may be out there going,
Speaker 1: oh no, I would never believe that. But it wins.
Speaker 1: They know it wins. They've been testing this stuff. They
Speaker 1: didn't just willy nilly send her to ABC and say,
Speaker 1: sit down and talk about abortion for the first fifteen
Speaker 1: minutes of your interview. They knew that was the winning
Speaker 1: message for Kamala Harris to deliver the woman who is
Speaker 1: the second most powerful woman in the world, the most
Speaker 1: powerful woman in the world, the second most powerful person
Speaker 1: in the world. World. It wins, and it may be
Speaker 1: the best lean to bring Kamala back. Listen, she can
Speaker 1: empathize with this. She prosecuted rape cases and they talk
Speaker 1: about the violence of rape and incest and the vice president.
Speaker 1: She touts her experience as a prosecutor, experience the average
Speaker 1: person doesn't have listen to her talking about it.
Speaker 2: I started my career as a prosecutor and specialized in
Speaker 2: crimes of violence against women and children.
Speaker 1: The idea that in some of.
Speaker 2: These states they would say there's no exception even for
Speaker 2: rape or incest.
Speaker 1: And understand what that means.
Speaker 2: After someone has survived an act of violence to their.
Speaker 1: Body, a violation to their body.
Speaker 2: That these so called leaders would suggest that she does
Speaker 2: not have the right to make a decision about what
Speaker 2: happens to her body next, is immoral, outrageous, any.
Speaker 1: Moral, no word salad bear. She got it right, and
Speaker 1: it works because no one wants someone to be violated
Speaker 1: and then have lifelong consequences of someone else's crime. You
Speaker 1: have to understand that the idea of that life the
Speaker 1: other life. They're able to make you see that the
Speaker 1: other life is more important. But trust me, many Republicans
Speaker 1: they're dug in on life and they're running on life,
Speaker 1: and sadly, that could fundamentally change the country. Because the
Speaker 1: left has the receipts the life message. It doesn't win anymore.
Speaker 1: It didn't win in Michigan, didn't win in Pennsylvania, and
Speaker 1: right now as we speak, it's losing in Ohio because
Speaker 1: they are about to pass an abortion amendment that would
Speaker 1: allow unlimited abortion in the state of Ohio. And it
Speaker 1: looks really good for them, really strong. Like we're talking
Speaker 1: well lower fifty percent numbers here, and Harris is talking
Speaker 1: about it. She talks about the midterms and abortion. Listen
Speaker 1: to what she says about the midterms and abortion.
Speaker 2: We saw in the midterms when this this issue was
Speaker 2: on the ballot in states from Kentucky to California, the
Speaker 2: people said, we stand in support of a woman's decision
Speaker 2: to make decisions about her own body and.
Speaker 1: Not her government.
Speaker 2: So I am concerned about what's been happening, but I
Speaker 2: also have faith in the people of America. For example,
Speaker 2: your point about the people and the women here in
Speaker 2: Iowa just say that they're not going to stand for
Speaker 2: this profound violation of people's freedoms.
Speaker 1: You don't have to like it, but people like choice.
Speaker 1: And the Democrats, like I said, they have the receipts
Speaker 1: they know it wins. She goes on to say that
Speaker 1: they're going to be the party to protect women, and
Speaker 1: in many cases that's enough for women to vote. See,
Speaker 1: there are one issue voters and all of these new
Speaker 1: voters that are popping up, and everybody goes, where are
Speaker 1: these people coming from? They are one issue voters. In
Speaker 1: many cases, they're women voting on this issue. This is
Speaker 1: hard to hear, I get it, but it wins for
Speaker 1: Democrats and it will win for Kamala. This is her moment.
Speaker 1: She is being re built, rebuilt as a vice president,
Speaker 1: potentially rebuilt as a president, right now, right before your eyes.
Speaker 1: Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
Speaker 1: the Tutor Dixon Podcast. I know you may be thinking,
Speaker 1: I don't think this interview was that great for her.
Speaker 1: Kamala is a clown. She's done nothing for the border.
Speaker 1: Wake up, folks, she doesn't have to. It's not what
Speaker 1: you do or don't do on that side of the aisle.
Speaker 1: It's what you say you did or what you say
Speaker 1: about a certain issue. And that's all she has to
Speaker 1: do when she's asked about the border, because they do
Speaker 1: ask her. Of course, remember again, she's on ABC. It's
Speaker 1: very friendly, so they ask her about the border. They
Speaker 1: don't follow up and say, you didn't answer the question.
Speaker 1: But this is what she said about the border. Listen
Speaker 1: to this.
Speaker 2: Let's agree that people should not be the pawns in
Speaker 2: a political game. Human beings should not be treated as
Speaker 2: ponds in a political game.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter that they're literally doing that. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter that they're shipping these people across the country in
Speaker 1: the middle of the night, because they're the federal government.
Speaker 1: It's the people who are doing it that are putting
Speaker 1: them on her doorstep, that are sending them to Martha's vineyard.
Speaker 1: Those folks, they're the ones. They're the ones that are
Speaker 1: using them as political pawns. That's what she's saying. People
Speaker 1: should not be used as ponds in a political game.
Speaker 1: And it's effective. She's telling you, I'm above this. In fact,
Speaker 1: she even invokes former Republicans, who some in the Republican
Speaker 1: Party may say are rhinos today, she says, in fact,
Speaker 1: former Republicans were furthes. Also, she calls out Bush and McCain.
Speaker 1: They wanted immigration reform. She says, you see, Kamala, she's
Speaker 1: for something. She's for reform. What is the reform, We'll
Speaker 1: never know. It doesn't matter. It's not about what the
Speaker 1: reform is, folks, It's about being for something. Because being
Speaker 1: for something is so much more enticing than being against something.
Speaker 1: Watch out because they get the political game, and Republicans
Speaker 1: right now they're still trying to find their lane. They're
Speaker 1: spewing messages to the mainstream media that will run the
Speaker 1: gamut of rage and disgust, but they have a little direction.
Speaker 1: Dems are calculated. No message goes out willy nilly. Even
Speaker 1: word salad does no harm. There was no damaging message
Speaker 1: in there. Even if you listen to how silly and
Speaker 1: stupid Kamala Harris sounds when she has her word solid moments,
Speaker 1: there's nothing in there that you're going to use in
Speaker 1: an ad. There's nothing damning. There's nothing that destroys her
Speaker 1: as a presidential candidate, certainly nothing that destroys her as
Speaker 1: a vice presidential candidate. There's one clear message from their side.
Speaker 1: We'll take care of everyone. We as Democrats will take
Speaker 1: care of everyone. I mean, it's not true, but again
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. It's the only side saying right now
Speaker 1: that they will deliver something for the people, doesn't matter
Speaker 1: what it is, and they will be sending that to
Speaker 1: you in the form of ads that will pop up
Speaker 1: in your little hands on your phone. You know what
Speaker 1: else will pop up in your phone. It will be
Speaker 1: a tax against Republicans because the Republicans they don't have
Speaker 1: the media on their side. And we have Republicans right
Speaker 1: now that are doing everything to get name idea up
Speaker 1: to be that person, to be that person that's going
Speaker 1: to be the candidate. So they're going and they're talking
Speaker 1: to every media person out there. And I got to
Speaker 1: tell you these people, even if you think they're friendlies,
Speaker 1: they're not friendlies. They're putting you in a situation where
Speaker 1: they're like, so, abortion, you want to be on that
Speaker 1: six week ban. I mean, we know that that actually
Speaker 1: doesn't win across the country. We've got governors across the
Speaker 1: country who signed it. But politically, how does that get
Speaker 1: these people across the finish line? Because they're telling you
Speaker 1: right now, the beginning of the interview with Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: was abortion. That's their attack. And the mainstream media and
Speaker 1: the conservative media are still bringing this up. First, either
Speaker 1: they're not for you, or they've figured out that this
Speaker 1: is the game, or they're just stupid enough to follow
Speaker 1: the mainstream media for the Democrats. But attacks against Republicans
Speaker 1: who have said things on camera, they will be perfectly crafted,
Speaker 1: they will be weaponized, and they will be manipulated to
Speaker 1: make Republicans look like monsters. Kamala Harris just came off
Speaker 1: as vice presidential. Well, we've had this law, we have
Speaker 1: people calling out for a long drawn out impeachment, we
Speaker 1: have others retooling their campaigns. Think about that. Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: just came out as vice presidential. People are going to go, wow,
Speaker 1: she's got this. She said nothing, She literally said nothing.
Speaker 1: She said We're four things, and people will go, gosh,
Speaker 1: they're four things. Republicans are out there saying this is
Speaker 1: what we hate, and they're saying we're four things, literally
Speaker 1: just things. There's no substance behind there. But people like that.
Speaker 1: People won't remember Kamala Harris accomplishing nothing. They won't remember
Speaker 1: her word salads because nothing of note was said in
Speaker 1: the word salads. But watch carefully. They are masters, and
Speaker 1: they're shedding their skin to take on their new personas
Speaker 1: for twenty twenty four. While Republicans cantinue to struggle to
Speaker 1: find the right lane, they will come out there strong.
Speaker 1: I promise you the next year of our lives is
Speaker 1: going to be an interesting one. As we watch the
Speaker 1: Democrats continuously tell you we're for you We're for you.
Speaker 1: We're for you. What are Republicans for? It's time for
Speaker 1: us to find out. Now, before I let you go,
Speaker 1: I want you to let me tell you about consumer
Speaker 1: tax advocate. Look, you did the tough thing during COVID.
Speaker 1: You paid your people, and you pulled your business through
Speaker 1: the pandemic. Now I'm doing the tough thing. Could qualify
Speaker 1: you for up to twenty six thousand dollars per employee
Speaker 1: at COVID tax Relief dot Org. Government funds are available
Speaker 1: to reward companies with two or more employees who stayed
Speaker 1: open during COVID. This is not a loan, and you
Speaker 1: don't have to pay it back. This program is complicated,
Speaker 1: but nobody knows more about it than the CPAs and
Speaker 1: tax experts at COVID tax Relief dot Org. You pay
Speaker 1: nothing upfront. They do all the work and share a
Speaker 1: percentage of the cash they get you. Businesses of all types,
Speaker 1: including nonprofits and churches, can qualify even those who took
Speaker 1: PPP loans, even if you had an increase in sales.
Speaker 1: You did the tough thing for your employees during COVID.
Speaker 1: Let COVID tax Relief dot Org help you get up
Speaker 1: to twenty six thousand dollars per employee. Visit COVID tax
Speaker 1: Relief dot org. That's COVID tax Relief dot org. COVID
Speaker 1: tax Relief dot org. Thank you so much for joining
Speaker 1: me for this episode of the Tutordison Podcast. Check out
Speaker 1: the Tutordison podcast dot com. You can subscribe right there,
Speaker 1: or go to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts and join us next time on
Speaker 1: the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blessed ding