WEBVTT - AMD Suffers Worst Rout Since 2018 on Disappointing Forecast 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I want to start John with the AMD. That stock.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 3>That story really got my attentions down sixteen and a

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 3>half percent today. I mean, this was one of the

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Darling tech stocks, the chip names that we're really writing

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the AI wave here, and it's at its worst day

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 3>since twenty seventeen. Stocks up seventy percent over the trailing

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 3>twelve months, but taking a.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Big hit today.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>So let's figure out what's going on in that part

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>of the world. Kun John Sabanni joins US senior analyst

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>covering the semiconductor companies Bloomberg Intelligency's based on our Los

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Angeles OFFICEO John, is this an Norman reaction for AMD?

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Is there something fundamentally problematic there?

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 4>There was nothing fundamentally wrong in this report.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 5>There were a lot of good things to take away,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 5>but it comes down to you know, when you become

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 5>an ar Darling, you set up really, really high expectations,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 5>and when you take out the China revenue, which was

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 5>not included in the guidance and the expectations, the beat

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 5>came out pretty modest, which I guess people didn't like,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 5>and then was not at power against the really high

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 5>expectations that you have now every quarter from these companies.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 6>Like they used to ask in the old Westerns, you know,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 6>is there room enough for the two of us in

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 6>this town?

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 5>Is there room enough for them? And in Nvidia there

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 5>is right now. I mean, look, all the tide is

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 5>lifting all boats. There is so much demand for accelator

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 5>chips that there's room for AMD as a GPU provider.

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 5>There's even room for other folks like Broadcommon Marvell as

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 5>an AC provider.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 4>So there's a plenty of demand right now. You know.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I used to work for a portfolio manager and you know,

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>one of our native I was recommending AMD and it

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>had a day like today. He would just pop ahead

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>and said, do we like management? Do we still like management?

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>And if the answer was yes, oftentimes you'd go out

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and buy more on days like today?

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Do we like management?

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 4>At least?

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 3>As Sue, I think is just when I just see

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>your interviews, it seems super on top of it.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, like I said, fundamentally, nothing changed from yesterday.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 5>Right Their CPU story continues to become stronger. Nobody's paying

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 5>attention to do it right now because all the focuses

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 5>on GPU and competing with Nvidia, But people are forgetting

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 5>inherently I when you look at two years back, this

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 5>was really a CPU company. Their GPU storyline remains intact.

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 5>We didn't expect any fireworks coming into this earnings. We

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.839
<v Speaker 5>don't expect it until really four Q twenty twenty six,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 5>so the market is aware of this. We really have

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 5>to wait until the four Q twenty twenty six. This

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 5>is when they will be really put to tests if

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 5>they can really execute their first server level.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Solution or not.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 5>So there's nothing changed overnight yesterday that we saw should

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 5>really concern us.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 6>How important is China in all this? I thought the

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 6>expert restrictions were lifted. I mean, what's what's taking some on?

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, so the expert restrictions are different for each chip.

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 5>So the MI three to eight which they were able

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 5>to ship, had already licenses approved prior, so that's a

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 5>different chip. The newer chips that now is in the

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 5>news when it comes to in media, is that aged

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 5>two hundreds and equivalent, it will be the MI three

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 5>twenty five licenses for those have not.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Been granted yet.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Even though the White House has said that yes, these

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 5>companies can start shipping these products, yet the formal licenses

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 5>have not been granted.

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Cou John some M and A in your space today,

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Texas Instruments has reach an agreement to buy Silicon Laboratories

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 3>for about seven point five billion dollars. Here what's going

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 3>on here with TI.

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so just to give some context, this is sort

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 5>of this size of the deal they have not done

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 5>in the past. The last time they did a deal

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 5>like this was buying National for about seven billion dollars

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 5>in twenty eleven. So this is not their typical nature,

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 5>so a bit of a surprise. Strategically, it fits well

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 5>their industrial segment, which is their largest segment, and that's

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 5>where they want to be focused as a missing piece

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to wireless connectivity in IoT, so Silicon

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Lab gives them that portfolio. Financially, however, it's a lot

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 5>more important. They have retreated that this has not changed

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 5>their pre cash foot trajectory. This has not changed their

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 5>dividend path and this does not increase. The most important

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 5>thing is the capex, so all those things we really like,

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 5>if they're able to execute to that yet the cost energies,

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 5>then this will be a really good deal for them. Also,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 5>remember TI has been on a spending spree for the

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 5>last three to five years building up a lot of capacity,

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 5>so this will help bring more loading to their internal factories,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 5>bring more manufacturing internal to own TI, and help with utilization.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 6>You know, one of the things we saw in the

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 6>cell off today and yesterday was this capex spending when

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 6>it's all going to be paying off investors getting a

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 6>little impatient with everything. Is it all paying off immediately

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 6>or in the near future for all these firms?

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, so there's two preci of CAPEC spending, right, The

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 5>one I think you're referring to is.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 6>The high AI for everybody.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, it's it's the jury is not out yet, right,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 5>We still need to see monetization. The capex spending is

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 5>not done yet, so we still need to see a

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 5>lot more proof points of monetization from all of this

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 5>AI hyperscale infrastructure spending that's been going on.

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 7>Let's bring in Sam Fazzelli. Bring back Sam Fazzelli. Really,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 7>he's our Bloomberg Intelligence drug boss. That's the jacket he

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 7>wore yesterday. Actually he's the director of research for Global

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 7>Industries and our senior pharmaceuticals analyst. But Sam here a

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 7>drug boss.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 2>Let's face it.

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 7>Let's talk a little bit about Eli Lilly and its

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 7>upbeat guidance in contrast to Novo Nordisk. Why is there

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 7>such a stark difference between what Lily is seeing and

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 7>what Novo Nordisk is seeing?

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Right, So, Scarlett, I've always maintained, based on data and

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 4>based on factual comparisons of the drugs that they have,

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 4>that Eli Lily's drug does better the weight loss over

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 4>a serious past a period of time. Then we go

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 4>they didn't head to a trial, so that I think

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.559
<v Speaker 4>is helping them. They are both in the same camp

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 4>in terms of price pressure as Novo, as Lily has said,

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 4>they have several areas where there's price pressure on them. Right. Nevertheless,

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 4>they seem to be at this forecasting a meaningful volume

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 4>gain in twenty twenty six, which you would want to

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 4>see if you've got a price drop. That's the whole idea,

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 4>and we've talked about this right from the beginning of

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 4>this obesity run. That is, if prices come down, volume

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 4>should go up. Nobo seems to be not doing that.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>And there's two ways to explain that. One is Loah's

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 4>thinking and is worried about losing market share so not

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.559
<v Speaker 4>gaining as much volume. Two is that Novah's being over

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 4>pessimistic to deliver. I have a tough time choosing between

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 4>those two. Those two decisions tells you whether you buy

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 4>the stock or not.

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Right Sam, you know, Lily Novo, they're kind of in

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 3>strong positions in this weight loss area. Here talk to

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>us about the competitive threat from some of these telehealth

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>companies selling cheaper copycat versions.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Where where is that right now?

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? But that shouldn't be It should be nowhere in

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 4>the right now because that's illegal. Right at the end

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 4>of the day, this is a patented product and there

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 4>should be no compounding going on. I then buying the

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 4>active ingredient and mashing it up and put it in

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 4>a capsule or whatever and their injector and doing it themselves.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 4>That should be not allowed, although there's clearly some of

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 4>that's still going on, and I don't know where the

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 4>FDA's teeth is on this because they were allowed to

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 4>do it well. There was a volume, a shortage of supply,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 4>but there's no more shortage of supply, So what is

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 4>still happening that is not I think what people are

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 4>particularly worried about, or exercising people's mind, is what will

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 4>happen in the longer run between the oral drugs that

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 4>then soon in Q two Lily is going to bring

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 4>versus the well launched nice start to the launch of

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 4>the we go vi oral pill. And then the next

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 4>question is what about other people who are coming with

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 4>other GLP ones and slightly different here once monthly from

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 4>fivez era et cetera, et cetera. And I think that

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 4>we will see how those guys are going to be

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 4>able to compete. It's going to be tough. Is a

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 4>machine that's run by both Lily particularly and Novo two.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you're talking about this weight loss pedal that Lily

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 7>wants to launch. It could happen or the approval, I

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 7>should say, could happen as early as April. Lily did

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 7>just get approval from the FDA SAM to sell zet

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 7>bound in a multi dose pen. Why is this format important?

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 7>Is it because it's more lucrative? Does it make it

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 7>more accessible?

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 7>What does that multi dose pen allow Lily to do?

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Here? Well, let's although I know we don't talk about

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 4>sustainable stuff anymore, this is more sustainable rather throwing out

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 4>the pen every time, right, So that's that's nice. And

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 4>number two is therefore that should mean depending on how

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 4>complicated it is to have a multi dose pen, the

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 4>origin is a bit better because you're not throwing out

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 4>the pen every time and they don't have to keep

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 4>making a pen. So all of these are our elements.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 4>And you know, it's not rocket science that they've done it.

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 4>It's just that you have to also be careful. This

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 4>is an active drug. You need to make sure that

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 4>it's well stored, so it's not sitting in the sunshine

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 4>or frozen outside. That's the sort of thing you have

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 4>to think about when you have a molted those device.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 4>But I think this would be helpful to both people

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 4>users and the karma companies.

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Sam.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 3>We all know that President Trump has made cutting drug

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>costs a key priority, and a lot of drugmakers have

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 3>cut deals with this administration. Has it resulted in profits

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 3>reductions out there for a lot of these companies are

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 3>annalys taking their numbers down.

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you go with Noble ICs announcement today that

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 4>specifically calls this out price pressure, then yes, the only

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 4>thing is that they need that price pressure to exist. Really,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 4>so how come they're not covering? So I think the

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Novo story is more than just the price pressure. It's

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 4>also that they're potentially, as we talked about earlier, losing

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 4>volume going forward, or that they're being over pessimistic. There's

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 4>a couple of other companies like today no artists mentioned

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 4>MFN pricing for some of theirs that will be it,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's as think it hits as Novo's

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 4>talking about. If you look at the share price too

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 4>for twenty twenty six, it sounds like they're going to

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 4>pretty much manage it. But they have pulled it out

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 4>until these companies that don't pulled it out at all

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 4>stay with us.

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's talk about some technology earnings. Here, we

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>get super Micro delivers I guess better than expected sales

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 3>forecast in the quarter we had HP. They maintained their guidance.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Here their CEO left. I don't know what's going on there.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk to Wujinho. He doesn't know what's going on.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 3>There, Senior technology anels from Bloomerg Intelligence. Hey, well, let's

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 3>talk about Hewlett Packer here HP. I guess they kept

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 3>their guidance. But the CEO departure was Is that unexpected?

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, hey Paul, Yeah, that was highly unexpected. You know, Enrique,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 8>the CEO was a lifer, started there as an intern,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 8>and jumping over to PayPal was a surprise to us.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 8>And he's leaving me at a precarious time because he

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 8>was tasked to navigate the PC business when dram prices

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 8>are spiking, which and then quite frankly, I did find

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 8>it positive that they did maintain their guidance for the year.

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, let's talk a little bit more about those DRAM

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 7>prices spiking, because this is something that people really zer

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 7>it in on when it came to Apple's results as well.

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 7>How big a cost is these rising prices of memory

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 7>chips for a PC company like HP.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so if we think about the total build up

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 8>of materials d RAM as well as the storage that

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 8>goes in there, it's roughly it went from about ten

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 8>to fifteen percent of the cost, and now it's spiking

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 8>up to about twenty to thirty percent of the cost. Right,

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 8>So what's going to happen. They're not going to give

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 8>it away a gross margin, that's for sure, because we're

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 8>talking about very thin margins for the PC business, and

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 8>we've already we're already hearing about PC pricing going up

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 8>around twenty to thirty percent going into the later twenty

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 8>twenty six. So, Scarl, if we think about it as

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 8>a very elastic, elastic demand for PCs, it is going

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 8>to hit possibly on the demand side, and then keep PCs.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 8>People keep keeping PCs longer.

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>How about the print supply business. Just as a consumer.

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 3>That's where I feel like I pay a lot of

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 3>money when I get the print supply stuff for the

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>HP PRI inter talk to us about that business, yeah.

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 8>You know, I will tell you though. I think what's

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 8>being overlooked by investors here is that the print supply

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 8>business is going to be the cushion, you know, the

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.599
<v Speaker 8>inks that you and I pay for. That that's a

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 8>nineteen percent EBIT margin business.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>So more than that, trust.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 8>Me in my wallet's all I light as well. I'm

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 8>glad my kids are out of school so they don't

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 8>print as much, but it is going to provide a cushion.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 8>Even though it is the hardware isn't secular decline, there

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 8>are making some move either by subscription UH to UH

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 8>to supply to provide some of that downside risk and earnings.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 7>What is the long term trend line for that print

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 7>supply business, because I mean, every office is trying to

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 7>go digital and not have printers available to everyone, and

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 7>I know there are some parts of government that can't

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 7>do without actual physical printouts of documents. But I would

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 7>imagine that this shift to you know, everything being virtual

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 7>and digital means that this overall is in a long

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 7>term structural decline.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 8>Easy answer or the simple answer minus two percent on

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 8>a year one year basis, on a long term basis, right,

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 8>there's always that. Yeah, well there's always that one guy

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 8>who's going to print the ten case and ten qures

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 8>right and in color.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 7>So you know we're a dying Breed's that's the thing, right,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the young people aren't going to do that.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't do that.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 7>Really, you don't pretend anything. Oh that's true, got.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>It on my phone.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 8>I think the kids are the kids are going back

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 8>to the old school ways of old elder folk of

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 8>printing more and having more photo keepsake. So, uh, you know,

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it's We're talking about a structural decline

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 8>of ten percent on a year on year basis, but

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 8>there's enough print from a documentation, uh standpoint that is

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 8>going to hold the business.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 3>How about super Micro? Here, I see the stock of

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>fourteen percent here today. Talk to us about their earnings.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 8>I will tell you. Look, I've talked about this, you

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 8>know at nausea about super Micro. The AI server business

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 8>is a double edged sword.

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 8>Where they won out in the last quarter print was

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 8>that the AI servers demand came out a lot better

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 8>than expected, roughly one point five billion beat in in sales,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 8>and that's primarily because the Blackwell ramp up is or

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 8>to wrap up now, I will tell you I think

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 8>one customer really helped them out. Sixty two percent of

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 8>their sales was from I think from Xai. But look,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 8>the offset has always been the margin side, four point

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 8>five percent in operating margin, and I think their guidance

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 8>implies is going to be roughly around the same my

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 8>next quarter.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up here for.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>This you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's stay with some earnings news here rights back in

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the middle of a busy, busy week for earnings young brands.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>I think restaurants fourth quarter just at EPs misses estimates here,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, hit or missing the restaurant business is kind

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 3>of what we've been seeing more recently.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Jody Lori joints us here. She is a Bloomberg Intelligence

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>credit analyst.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 3>She covers all things kind of the consumer things, cruise lines,

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 3>theme parks, casinos, parts of the restaurant industry.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So anywhere you.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>See the consumer spending money, that's where you'll find her.

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So let's check in with Jodi Jody. Let's start with

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>young brands there. What are they saying about their business

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 3>and the consumer.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 9>So it's very clear that they're focused on Taco Bell

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 9>as well as the international component of KFC because those

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 9>are what is driving revenue at the moment. They're also

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 9>looking into strategic alternatives for pizza, which they announced last quarter,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 9>and they got a little bit more clarity around that

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 9>in terms of closing some stores, really sort of reassessing

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 9>the pizza hut business because it's not necessarily where they're

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 9>seeing growth. I think what was most interesting for me

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 9>is they highlighted the strength of the high income consumer

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 9>as well as the young consumer and the family consumer,

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 9>particularly as it went to Taco Bell. And I mean,

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 9>for me personally, I like to consider myself young, but

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 9>I do fit the family category and I fit the

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, higher income category, I would say, and that

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 9>definitely checks out. You know, I think there is an

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 9>appeal to a company like that particularly as you're looking

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 9>at alternatives.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, during the snowstorm when I was kind of socked

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 3>in here, I found the Taco bell on Third Avenue.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, Lexington Avenue. Very good finded. Did not did

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 3>not know it was there. So I'm in good shape there.

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 3>From the credit perspective, Jody, to credit investors, like when

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 3>they look at these restaurant companies that they want to see,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess a diversification of brands, you know, through the

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 3>income level.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>How do they how did they look at it?

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 9>So you do want to see some diversification. You want

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 9>to see some geographic diversication. Something that young It benefits

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 9>from is because they have the franchise model so heavily

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 9>in their business, it's almost all of their their restaurants.

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 9>It helps them from a cash flow and from margin perspective,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 9>particularly as compared to companies that have more owned brands

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 9>such as Darden. Right, Darden is going into franchise, but

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 9>they're primarily owned brands, and so it's a little bit

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 9>different structure and it does help Young Now. I think

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 9>what's so interesting interesting about youm is if you look

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 9>back ten years ago, they were investment grade rated. Then

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 9>they spun off on China, and then they decided to

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 9>give themselves hefty dividends and share buybacks and stayed high yield.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 9>Since management is very clear that they're happy with the

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 9>four times debt leverage, they're keeping within that range and

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 9>I don't really see them moving beyond that. But if

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 9>they wanted to be investment grade, I think they could.

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 9>They just don't care too because they'd rather spend their

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 9>money on shareholders and on KPEX.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Drea, I thought of you earlier this week when

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 3>we saw the news that Josh Tomorrow has been appointed

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 3>chief executive officer of the Walt Disney Company, and of

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 3>course he runs the experiences businesses for Disney.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the theme parks, the cruise.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Ships kind of the businesses.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 2>That you tend to follow here.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 3>But boy, they seem to be all in on theme parks,

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>on cruise ships, that scene. I kind of took it

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>as a vote conference for that part of the industry.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you know, we're seeing in our data that

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 9>experience spending is still very very strong. I've joked many

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 9>times with Steve Flynn, who covers Disney from a credit perspective,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 9>that really it should be under my coverage because they're

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 9>much more of an experienced company, and I think this

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 9>lands right. But all that aside, you know, Steve's fantastic analyst,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 9>and you all should read and stuff. But all that aside,

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 9>I would say that that what's so interesting, and something

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 9>that I've said many times when people talk to me

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 9>about the cruise lines, for example, they say, Okay, you know,

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 9>I see that occupancy levels are you know, one O

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 9>eight or one o nine? What does that mean? One

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 9>hundred and nine percent, right, And that means that the

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 9>average room occupies two people per room, and if you

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 9>have more than that, then that is obviously above one

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 9>hundred percent. That's how you get that weird one O

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 9>nine one o eight number. But when you look at Disney,

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 9>obviously they don't give that detail. And I've made comments

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 9>to the effect that I do I am curious what

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 9>their occupancy level is because if you've ever been on

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 9>a Disney cruise, I don't think there's any room that

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 9>is fewer than three people in it. I'd be very

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 9>shocked to see so their occupancy rates are so much higher.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 9>It makes sense why they're expanding their ship presence in

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 9>the water. You know, increasing the number of ships in

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 9>the water. It also makes sense why they're expanding in

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 9>terms of travel beyond the US, because I think that

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 9>with the trend we're seeing is that international travel demand

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 9>is there, and it also helps to sort of diversify

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 9>them away from any sort of pressures in Florida or California,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 9>where we've seen quite a lot of weird patterns that

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 9>SeaWorld has commented on. Six Flig has commented on so

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 9>that that geographic diversification could be helpful.

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I booked my first cruise ever for next I

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 3>guess October Viking cruise, going river cruise.

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 7>That's the one cuds right, that's so I'll no kids.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 9>In big print on the shampoo is.

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday ten

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal