WEBVTT - Winter Gas Outlook: Cautious Optimism as LNG Steps Up

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the BNF podcast. Last year was tumultuous for the global

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>gas market. Russia's invasion of Ukraine led to disruption and

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>volatile prices as European nations rushed to find new sources

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to replace established Russian supplies. This in turn resulted in

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>prices on the Dutch TTF benchmark hitting a record high

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of nearly three hundred euros per megawatt hour in August

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty two. Prices have since returned to some

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of normality, albeit still elevated against historical averages. But

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>as we once again approach winter, just how full are

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>European gas stores and what is the global picture for

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>gas supply and demand? While on today's episode, I speak

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with bn EF's head of European Gas, Irina Sarada, and

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>also the head of Global leg as well as apat

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Gas for BNF Abhishek Rohatki. Today we discuss how full

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>gas inventories in Europe are and which countries are meeting

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the demand and what's happening on the Asian continent where

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>we typically find the growth markets. We also go through

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the potential impact of the weather on gas markets during

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>an El Nino year, and how climate change poses a

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>real challenge to forecasting. Lastly, we touch on how some

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>European countries are actually looking to store their gas in Ukraine,

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>as well as what new projects will be coming online

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>to increase global gas supply in twenty twenty four. If

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to learn more, BNIF subscribers are going to

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to access bnef's Global Winter Gas Outlook, which

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this show is based on, and they can find it

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on BNF dot com or at BNF go on the

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal, or on BNF's mobile app. As always, if

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you like this podcast, if you subscribe, you'll receive an

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>update when future episodes are published. And if you give

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>us a review or a rating on Apple Podcasts or Spotify,

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going to make us more discoverable by others. Now,

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>let's jump into the conversation with Arena and Abashek about

0:01:52.280 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Winter Gas Outlook. Arena, thank you for joining us today.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Ana and Abhishek, thank you for joining as well.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Dana.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So we are here to talk about well the next

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>half year of what's going on in the global gas markets,

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to talk about LNG. But this actually

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is a show very much based on reports that we

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>put out twice a year, which are really important pieces

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of research. We put a lot of effort into these.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We are here today to talk about what's happening with

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the global gas markets. Last year, it made headlines all

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>over the world, and in particular from where I'm recording

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, it was one of the things that everyday

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>people were talking about because of how much it impacted

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>our energy prices at home. Of course, those in the

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>gas space are looking at this every single year, every

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>single moment, every single day, and we put out two

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>reports a year, half yearly, one which is our Summer

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Gas Outlook, and one that is our Winter Gas Outlook.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain to the lay person who's potentially listening

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>right now why we do these reports at half yearly

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>intervals and really who they're designed to target and who's

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>actually listening closely to what we're saying about the upcoming

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>half year in the gas market.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Thanks, Dana's that's a really good question. So usually we

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 3>put two outlooks just before the beginning of each season,

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>so our winter season in gas world starts in the

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 3>beginning of October and last till the end of March,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 3>and our summer season starts in April and goes all

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>the way till the end of September. So that's why

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 3>we are producing our outlook just before those season to

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 3>give market players a bit of a perspective and share

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 3>our view of what's going to happen for the upcoming

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>whole gas year. So we are producing for two seasons ahead.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about where we were

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this time last year, what was the background, and essentially

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>why was LNG and the existing gas pipelines so much

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>at the front of everyone's thoughts in the twenty twenty

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>two twenty twenty three winter.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 3>So last year, as Europe was heading into the winter season,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>it lost around the third of it supply that was

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>previously coming from Russia, and as you can imagine, it's

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>been quite a shock for the market to balance, and

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 3>there's a response to that. Europe turned to LNG, so

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>that's liquefied natural gas, the one that comes on ships

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 3>or on vessels, and Europe turned in particular to the

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Global flexible or spot LNG, so the one that is

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 3>not tied up into contracts, and the challenge with that

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>is that Europe has to go on a global market

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 3>and compete with other players in order to win that

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 3>share of LLERG. So that's triggered the push into gas

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 3>prices going to the record level high that we've seen

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 3>last year, and that's been a challenge for the market

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 3>players to see how it's going to unfold and how

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 3>to balance the market. So traders and other market players

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 3>were facing a lot of uncertainty on the market as

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 3>we were heading into the winter. Is it going to

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 3>be a cold winter or is it going to be

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>a warm winter? Do we have enough gas in storages

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>to survive that winter? So those were a big question

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 3>marks for the market players to handle on the demand side,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and then on the supply side, they were worried about

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 3>how much of that spot lergy Europe can bring into

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the region. And back then, our guest team was forecasting

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 3>that Europe will survive the winter and will end the

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 3>winter with a reasonable amount of gas in storage and

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>indeed we'll have enough gas to go through the restocking

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>season during the summer period, And to be frank with you,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 3>that was not an easy statement to make back then

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 3>when everyone was worried about the crisis and Europe not

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>surviving without the blackouts. But the reality is that Europe

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 3>ended winter season with storages being well about seasonal normal,

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 3>and now we are in the end of the summer

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>season and Europe is closed to reach one hundred percent

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 3>full of storage levels. So indeed, our guest team was

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 3>right and we predicted that it's going to happen and

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Europe will go through the winter without facing the blackouts

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>and will have enough gas to go through the summer season.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>What were the reasons last year, in addition to war

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>taking place Ukraine, what were the reasons that Europeans storage

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of gas were solow headed into that period.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So even the year leading to the twenty twenty

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 3>two when we see this crisis unfolding, Russia stopped sending

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the regular amount of gas into Europe and that's why

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the storage level has been even lower compared to the

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 3>seasonal normals. So everything was leading up to it.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So with the reduction in supply to Europe, the gas

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>had to go somewhere else, and there were buyers in

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world. Abashak, perhaps you could talk

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about where other parts of the world

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>were essentially grabbing up some of this gas supply that

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't coming to Europe.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 2>Yes, certainly. So we did see some of the Russian

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 2>cargoes that were previously coming to Europe, they were being

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 2>sent to the other markets around the world. So we

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 2>did see some of the cargoes going to China, going

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 2>to India. And one of the main reasons that cargoes

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 2>were coming to these markets is because a few of

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 2>these cargoes were available at a discounted price. So buyers

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 2>were quite willing to take the Russian energy at the

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>time when the global energy market is quite tight to

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>their shows.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And when you say at a discounted price, what are

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we talking about.

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of the prices, we usually do not

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>have very good data, but based on the reports that

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>we caught from the various media outlets and our own

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>interaction with the market, some of the cargoes that were

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>coming out from Russia, they were selling at least a

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>ten percent discoune to the market price.

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you indicated earlier that there was one third

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>less supply coming to parts of Europe, which now has

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>found places elsewhere in the world at a discount. It

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't all of the Eastern European gas that got shut down,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a third. So that therefore and firs that

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>there are existing pipelines that have continued to flow. Can

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit about where we currently stand

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what is available and what is not

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>available and really where is Europe's gas coming from? Right now?

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>You're right that Europe is got in gas not only

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>from Russia, but there are others, for example, pipeline sources

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 3>that are sending gas into Europe. For example, Norway, after

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 3>LNG supply, is the second larger source of supply in

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the European mix, and that's been very helpful. Europe has

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 3>been maximizing it production and sending quite a lot of

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 3>gas last year in particular, that was around if I

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>remember correctly, around ninety five bcm of gas in the

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>previous gas here, so that is a big share to cover.

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 3>And then apart from Norway, we have some r the

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>pipelines for example coming from North Africa that's supply in Europe.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>And then there is also a pipeline coming from Azerbaijan

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 3>via Top pipeline. So those supply sources are covering some

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>share of the supply mix, but they are not as

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 3>significant as for example, ler G which is the number

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>one source in Norway, which is the number two source

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>of supply, So Norway and ALLERGI they are covering in

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 3>total roughly I would say, seventy percent of the total

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 3>supply mix, which is quite a big share.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's the supply sign. But then how about the

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>demand dynamics. There was a lot of conversation around last

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>year reducing the demand, and let's stay on Europe at

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Europe responded by having different targets to reduce

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>their demand in a number of different measures across the content,

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>some differing from country to country. Do we see demand

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>staying suppressed this year or things going to bounce back

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and essentially, do those same targets continue to exist or

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you mentioned at the beginning, if we're

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>close to one hundred percent in storage as essentially that

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>concern over the demand side really reduced.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>That's that's a very good question. So last year, indeed,

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 3>demand destruction or guest demand savings helped a lot to

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 3>balance the market. And what we expect in our seasonal

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 3>outlook that we just published on the eleventh of September.

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 3>We expect demand to be still weak, around twelve percent

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 3>below the five year average. And if we are looking

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>into European demand, that is split into US three sectors.

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 3>So the first one is residential and commercial demand, second

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 3>sector will be a guest to power demand, and then

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 3>there is also industrial demand. So I'll start with the

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 3>residential and commercial demand since it's the biggest share of

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>gas demand. Residential and commercial or as we call it

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>in gas world LDZ demand local distribution zone demand will

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 3>be unsurprisingly a key balanced item on the market as

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 3>during the winter time. For example, residential and commercial demand

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 3>accounts for about fifty five percent of the total demand,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 3>so it's quite a big chunk of demand that we

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 3>are talking about. So in our forecast, we expect a

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>slight recovery in the residential and commercial demand, bringing about

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 3>six billion cubic meters of additional gas demand compared to

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the last year. The reason for that that is because

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 3>we are seeing prices lower year and year, but they

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 3>are still historically high, so that recovery is going to

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>be limited and the wholesale lower wholesale prices will be

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>offset by the end of the subsidy schemes in some countries.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Another reason is why demand savings is going to be

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 3>persistent as we head into the next winter is because

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>there is also a share of the demand that has

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 3>been displaced permanently due to for example, electrification of the

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 3>heating demand or energy efficiency measures that customers implement it.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 3>And then there is also we don't we need to

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>remember that there is a permanent shift in the consumer's

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 3>behavior that was encouraged by the media campaign that we've

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 3>seen last year. So those are the factors that are

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 3>limiting the recovery in the residential and commercial demand. Now

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 3>moving on to the industrial demand, we expect the similar

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 3>in a way similar situation that rebound in the industrial

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 3>gas demand is expected to be limited. Like I said,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 3>gas prices a year and year they are lower, however

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 3>they are still historically higher, so that provides little incentive

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 3>for the industry to ramp up gas demand. And then

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 3>looking into the manufacturing demand, it is low and it

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>is weak and a broader economic landscape remains not promising

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 3>so far for the industry to ramp up the production.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Looking into for example, in some country is like Germany,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 3>seeing the mark to decrease in the gas consumption in

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the industrial sector, and that's because the most energy intensive industries,

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 3>they are seeing the reduction in their production output. And

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>then for example, if we're looking into the sectoral split,

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 3>then chemical sector was the one that saw a consistent

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 3>reduction in the output. So those are the factors that

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 3>are supporting the industrial demand to be persistently weak in

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 3>the upcoming winter and most probably summer season as well.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>And finally, gas to power demand, we expect it to

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 3>be higher for the upcoming winter. That is supported by

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the closure of lignite and nuclear plants in Germany. However,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 3>for the summer season, we expect gas for power generation

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 3>to be near record low and that's supported with the

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 3>increased solar generation capacities, so that seasonal difference between winter

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 3>and summer is going to persist for the upcome in winter.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that's the overall picture for the demand. I

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 3>know it's a long answer, but that's an important part

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 3>of the balance well.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>And with liquefied natural gas, this is a truly global marketplace.

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So Abishak, can you comment on other parts of the

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>world and what the demand is looking like there. Is

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it growing, is it staying roughly flat from last year.

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm assuming, and maybe you can correct me on

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this one, but I'm assuming that those prices that were

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>lower last year are perhaps less competitive this year. What's

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>going on with both prices and then therefore demand in

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly so. In terms of the prices as compared

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to the last year, we are seeing lower prices. So

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>for example, we saw price tom back in August September

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>last year, but this year we haven't seen any big

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 2>change in the market or any big thing happening in

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the market that can push the prices up. So prices

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>are lower than last year in general, and what this

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>means is that it is bringing.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Wait, the prices this year are lower than last year,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>even given the last year visited to discount.

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, wow, So in general throughout this year we have

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 2>seen lower prices as are in an earlier mentioned that

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 2>we have seen in the beginning of the year, we

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>have seen mild winter. So what the mile winter did

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 2>is that it reduced the heating demand and Europe was

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 2>able to end the winter at a storage level which

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 2>was considered quite healthy, quite higher than even the five

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 2>year average levels. So what that did for the global

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>allergy prices is that eurof did not need to bring

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of flexible cargoes to the various markets,

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's why more lngs available to different markets, and

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 2>that's why the prices this year we have seen are

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>lower than last year.

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Are there parts of Asia that you would consider to

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>be growth markets where demand is increasing given that you've

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just established that prices are even lower this year than

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>last year.

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So we expect demand to recover in South Asian

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>markets and in Southeast Asian markets as well compared to

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the last year. And the main driver is the fact

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 2>that there is going to be an increase in contracted

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 2>allege deliveries and also comparatively higher sport purchases by various

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 2>buyers in India, for example, in bangla and in Thailand

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>because of the lower prices. So last winter, these economies

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 2>suffered a lot as prices were unaffordable and we saw

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>almost zero spot demand from India and Bangladesh in the

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter last year. But this year we are expecting

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 2>to see moderate level of spot buying from these countries

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>because of the lower prices. We also expect India to

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 2>get more contracted deliveries versus last winter when CEFE which

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>stands for Securing Energy for Europe, so that's an x

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>gas from unit which was taken over by German government

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 2>to protect its energy security interest. So SEFE had a

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>contract with India and due to non availability of cargoes,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>safe stopped the cargo deliveries to India last winter. But

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 2>this year it has been able to restart the supply,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 2>so we expect that India is likely to get more

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>contracted deliveries this year and this will result into higher

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 2>LNG imports to India. On the Southeast Asia side, we

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 2>think that Thailand's following production is likely to keep its

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>national oil and Gas company BTIT active in the spot market.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Other smaller markets such as Singapore is also going to

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 2>see new contracts starting which will raise the deliver freeze.

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 2>And we have also assumed higher demand in Indonesia because

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>of the commissioning of a new LERG train there which

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>will supply most of the LNG to the local market.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, the way that we're structured here at PNF, we

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>actually have someone covering each of these time zones, if

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you will, So the Americas are covered by a gas

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>analyst and then we've got our European and then our

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Asia focused gas analysts on the show today. Now, without

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>taking the words entirely out of your colleague, who cannot

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be here's mouth, what were some of the key highlights

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>regarding what happened last year with LNG as it relates

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to the US. And then on from that, how do

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you expect the North American predominantly gas supply to impact

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this year's dynamics in Europe and in Asia.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>So last year what we saw is that a lot

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 2>of the US cargoes that were previously coming to the

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 2>North Asian markets. So when we see North Asia, we

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>mostly refer to Japan, China and South Korea. So a

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of the US ALLERGI that was previously coming to

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>these markets back in twenty twenty one, it was shifted

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 2>towards zero. So there was a change in the global

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 2>allergy trade flows from Asia towards zuro for the flexible

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 2>allergy cargoes. So when we think about the US ALERGI,

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 2>one of the main things to highlight is the fact

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that most of the US LNG is available on FOB basis,

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 2>which is free on board basis, and what that means

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 2>is that those cargoes are not restricted to go to

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 2>a particular destination under some contractual obligations, and this enables

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the portfolio players the suppliers to supply those cargoes based

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 2>on the end user or the end market prices. In

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 2>last year, when Europe was really struggling to get the gas,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 2>prices in Europe were higher than Asia. So what happened

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>is that a lot of the US allgi it ended

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 2>up in Europe. And we have seen this trend continuing

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 2>this year because, as Arena mentioned earlier, LNG is still

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 2>one of the major gas sources to Europe this year

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and is going to be so in the coming years

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 2>as well, So we do expect this will continue this

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 2>year in terms of the overall LNG supply growth. Also,

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 2>we are thinking that US is likely to lead the

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 2>supply growth because we have assumed one of the major

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>projects which was under outage last year is likely to

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 2>be operational this winter because of the incremental volumes coming

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>from that particular project, so that is a freeport project.

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 2>We are expecting US is likely to lead the overall

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 2>global LNGG supply.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>As you look ahead to the next half year, how

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>closely are you watching the weather and essentially there could

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>be extremes on either end. And can you explain how

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go with the extreme of a particularly cold weather

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>for the northern hemisphere over the course of this upcoming winter,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which sees much more of the natural gas that's currently

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>stored being used. What is the potential worst case scenario.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, as we are approach in the winter season,

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 3>we are looking into the weather and daily basis, and

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>that's quite an important risks for everyone to take into

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 3>account during the winter season. So far, what we are

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 3>seeing is that the predictions on the market is that

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a mild start into the winter season,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and we expect temperatures to be about normal throughout the

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 3>October months. And then as we are looking into the

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 3>entire winter again, the forecast is for this winter to

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 3>be milder and wetter compared to the average one. So

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 3>that gives some hope. But then if you're looking into,

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 3>for example, European gas price spreads over time, if we

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 3>are comparing front months with the first quarter of twenty

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, the market is in contango, meaning that contracts

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 3>for later dates are more expensive compared to the spot

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 3>once so that means that the market is pricing in

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 3>those risks, and one of them could be a weather

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 3>related So if we're seeing a particularly cold winter, that

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 3>could displace quite a lot of gas from storages and

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 3>that will challenge Europe in terms of how to go

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 3>through the winter and then for the following summer how

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 3>to restore that storage inventories.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But as of right now, it's looking pretty mild. And

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>then another question, and as somebody who hails from California

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and definitely knew when it was an El Nino year,

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is it too early for us to decide whether or

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>not this is an El Nino year? And if it is,

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>what does El Nino do to well, first of all

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the weather, but more importantly for this show natural Gas,

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 3>For this particular winter we are going to see in

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Europe the impact from El Nino is it Europe is

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be milder and wetter, which is a positive

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 3>sign for Europe, meaning that we will be able to

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 3>keep those storages at a reasonable level of fullness throught

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 3>the winter and throughout the summer.

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>And very simply put, El Nino is a warming of

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the Pacific, which essentially does change the weather all over

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the world, but it certainly impacts certain regions more than others.

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So Abashak living in a part of the world that

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>actually it borders the Pacific Ocean, how does Anino impact

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the gas market in your part of the world.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>So in the North Asia, we have done some analysis

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>using over CAAs demand models, and what we observe is

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 2>that if we look at the historical data, if we

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 2>look at the Alino ears, the gas demand in those

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 2>particular years has been lower than the normal. So what

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>this means for the gas demand for the North Asian

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 2>markets is that if Alino happens this year, it is

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>likely that North Asia will also need less gas for

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the power sector, for the city gas sector, and this

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>may actually help the overall market in terms of prices.

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 2>So it would be a good news for the europe

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>But other thing I wanted to highlight about Alino is

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 2>that besides North Asia, it also impacts other parts of

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the world. So, for example, it can bring dry weather

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 2>in South America and this year we have observed low

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>water levels in the lake that feeds the Panama Canal,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and because of the low water levels, it has been

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>difficult for the ships to cross the Panama Canal. And

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>what this has done is that the ships which are

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>coming from US, let's say they needed to cross the

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 2>Panama Canal to go to let's say Japan or China,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>they are taking a longer route via Swiss Canal or

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 2>another direct route. So that is creating bottleneck in terms

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of the shipping lanes, and this may actually result into

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 2>price volatility. So Alino, we think, is a bag of

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 2>mixed news. It can reduce the customer, but it can

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>also increase the difficulties in bringing the cargoes to issue.

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>And Abishek you highlight that not only are you and

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>your team looking at current weather patterns, but you rely

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot on historical weather patterns. My question really comes

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to climate change and whether or not some of the

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>historical weather information that you rely upon, whether or not

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it differently as we're starting to see

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the changes that are actually part of climate

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>change come to fruition now and how much that really well,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>how difficult that makes your modeling.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>That's a very good question. The short answer is it

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 2>makes the model being extremely difficult because in order to

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>analyze the impact of al Nino, for example, while accounting

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 2>for the global warming, we really need to be very

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>careful about the number of historical years that we are

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>taking into account in our model. So just to give

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>you an example, if we take into account last ten

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 2>years of weather data, Alino appears to be reducing the

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 2>cast demand, or if we take last thirty years of

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 2>father data, al Nino years also have higher gas demand

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 2>in some parts of the world. So what this means

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>is that moving from last thirty years to last ten years,

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>it is possible that global warming may be impacting the

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 2>cast demand in a more significant way as compared to Alnino.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 2>So for us, identifying the impact of Alino versus global

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 2>arming is an extremely challenging task, and hence we have

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>to be really careful about the number of historical years

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 2>we take into account.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>So just pivoting a bit back to well llenng in

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this year specifically and actually onto geopolitics, Assuming that the

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Russian invasion of Ukraine continues this year, what does that

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>mean for gas markets? And should things worsen, which I

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly hope that they will not, what does that mean

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for the global gas market.

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>So so far, Russian flows have been stable via Ukrainian

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 3>route and as we all know that Russian gas transit

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 3>contract with Ukraine is expiring in the end of twenty

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty four, so I'm sure that will be an interesting

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 3>topic for the discussion on the market, despite the fact

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 3>that Russia is not supplying a significant amount of gas

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 3>as it used to do a year or two years ago. However,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>as we are talking about the Ukrainian route, I think

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 3>it's important to bring in the fact that European companies

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.719
<v Speaker 3>started sending gas into Ukrainian storages and so far what

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 3>we have seen is that they started sending it in

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.239
<v Speaker 3>July and then ramping up in August. So far they

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 3>accumulated around two billion cubic meters of gas in Ukrainian

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 3>storages under so called customs ware house regime. So custom

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 3>ware house means that European companies can bring gas into

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine and then store it for up to three years

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 3>without paying any customs or text duties and bring it

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 3>back to Europe. So having that two BCM in Ukrainian

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>storages gives us a bit of a proxy in terms

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 3>of how much European companies are utilizing Ukrainian gas and

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 3>how much of that gas can be used as a buffer,

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>for example, in the upcome in winter. If they decide

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 3>to bring that gas back into Europe. However, it's an

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 3>interesting question to see what's going to happen with that gas.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Is it going to be brought back into Europe or

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 3>it will be sold on the domestic market in Ukraine

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 3>as we've seen previously in the year twenty twenty one,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 3>or is it going to be carried over for later

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>for maybe next winter season.

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So you've established that there is a buffer, and one

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of the lessons that I learned from last year is

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>an incredible amount of flexibility in the global LNG gas trade.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 1>So how flexible would you say the LNG market is

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in filling in any sort of issues that may arise

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>on the supply side.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question. So Europe, as I mentioned before,

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 3>is now dependent on spot llergy market and as we know,

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 3>it's not an unlimited supply, So there is a pool

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 3>of global energy supply that is not tied up into

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 3>a contract and Europe would need to compete with other

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 3>buyers to get or to win that gas. So far,

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 3>in our seasonal outlook, we expect Europe to attract around

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>fifty or fifty two percent of that global spot energy,

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.479
<v Speaker 3>which is quite a big sure, we are talking about

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 3>in million metric tons, that will be around fifty five

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 3>million metric tons, which is quite a significant amount, and

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 3>that is about a quarter of the total supply mix

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 3>in Europe. So, as we can see, Europe is quite

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 3>dependent on that spot energy and obviously to attract that

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 3>gas it has to compete with Asia for example, so

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>we are expecting to see that Europe would need to

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 3>price accordingly to win that gas. So far as we

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 3>are looking into the differentials between Asia and Europe, Asia

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 3>is at premium. However, if we are looking into the

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 3>ship and differential, that premium might be eaten up by

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 3>those transportation costs. However, it would be interesting to see

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 3>how the situation is unfolding and depending on where the

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 3>prices are, who will get that spot allergy and.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>You noted that this is not an infinite supply which

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>then leads me to wonder are there increases on the

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>supply side presently and are there new projects that we

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>should be aware of.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 3>So, like I said, Europe is now energy spot dependent,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 3>so it has to increase its regassification capacity, and looking

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>into the upcoming year, we expect the regasification capacity across

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Europe to increase by around one hundred and ten mcm

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 3>million cubic meters per day, So that's compared to last

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 3>year we had in total four hundred Now it's going

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 3>to be around five hundred thirty million cubic meters per day.

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 3>The most growth is expected to come from Germany, followed

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 3>by Belgium, France and Italy. So Europe needs to increase

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 3>that capacity in order to attract a higher level or

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 3>higher share of that flexible Llerenchy and I'll pass on

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 3>to Abishak to comment on the global energy supply increase.

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of the LNG supply, so besides the

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 2>growth coming from the US, we are expecting startup of

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 2>new facilities across the Atlantic basin and the Pacific basin.

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Some of the projects, for example include Arctic Energy two

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 2>in Russia. We have Altamira fast Lergy in Mexico, tangu

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Train three in Indonesia. Then we also have projects in Mauritiana,

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Senegal and in the Republic of Congo. So all of

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 2>these projects are going to add new supply to the

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>global allergy balances. But I would also like to highlight

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>some of the possible risks to the growth of the supply.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 2>We have seen a number of projects struggling with the

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>feedcare supply. So these are the operational projects in Nigeria

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and Egypt. There could also be some risk from the

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 2>possible hurricanes in the US Gulf Coast where plant operation

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 2>may be impacted from bad weather. Besides this, one of

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the key risks to the global energy balances next year

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 2>may come from continued sanctions or additional sanctions on arctical

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Eergy two. So Optical Eergy two is adding quite a

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of volumes to our balances. So this is the

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 2>project in Russia and this is going to commission its

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>first train by January next year if there are more

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 2>delays in the commissioning of this project, so this is

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be a test for NOATECH whether they can

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>commission a new project and operate a new project. So

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 2>before the Western companies were involved in the project, they

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>used to help Russia in order to operate these projects.

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 2>But because of the sanctions, a lot of its Western

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 2>partners have left the project and so any delays in

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the commissioning of up to two is going to impact

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the global allerge balances in a very significant way next year.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So as someone who has to think about a title

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>for this show, I know you also need to think

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>about titles when you're writing your reports. So European Gas

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Winter Outlook and Global Winter Outlook twenty twenty three to

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four certainly tells everybody what they're reading when

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they're looking in your research, but you give them a

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a second title to kind of let

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody know what. Well, I guess what the headline is.

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So for the European Gas Winter Outlook it says healthy

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but fragile, and for the Global LNG Winter Outlook, it

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>says caution amid supply risk. So it seems like we're

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>cautiously optimistic am by getting the right tone there, because

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I can understand sitting down and not wanting to make

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a headline that essentially says, hey, everybody, it's going to

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>be fine. But reading the subcontext, that does seem to

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 1>be where we're looking at next year. And so what

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>did you mean by these titles? What is healthy but

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>fragile and what is caution amid supply risk?

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 3>I can start with European one, so we called it

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 3>halsibat fragile because European gas balance now is looking housier.

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>European storage is ninety five percent full, which gives hope

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 3>for the week. However, as we've seen with the past

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 3>recent events that European gas market remains sensitive to any

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 3>supply risks. So for example, when there was talks around

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Australian strikes, then the market responded with high prices. Extended

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Norwegian maintenance also a triggered high gas prices. So that

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 3>shows us that despite the fact that gas balance looks healthy,

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 3>we have plenty of storage levels, Europe is still sensitive

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 3>to any risks of the supply disruption. So that's why

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 3>we called it halcy butt fragile.

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And for anybody who's never written a title, I can

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you it's quite difficult to try and figure out

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the entire message you want to send in three to

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>four words. So abashak over to you on the Global

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>LNG Outlook title So caution emits supply risk. What was

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it that you were thinking when you were selecting these

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>four words to really encapsulate your thoughts? Why did you

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>choose them?

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 2>So the recently chose the word caution is because we

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>do see lots of uncertainties in the North Asian markets

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 2>on the land supply side and also on the weather side.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So for example, in the case of China, if China

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>receives lower than expected pipeline imports from Central Asia, then

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 2>it can increase lenty demand from China. Other risk is

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 2>a stronger economic growth scenario for China and likewise for

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Japan and South Korea. Lower than expected nuclear generation may

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>also increase the demand for spodcard. So in summary, we

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 2>do see a lot of uncertainties across the different markets

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>on the supply side and on the weather side, and

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>that's why we did one to say that we are

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 2>cautiously optimistic for.

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>The coming inter arena and Abishek thank you very much

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>for joining today.

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Dana, Thank you Dana.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ne EF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>LP and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>should it be construed as investment advice investment recommendations for

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy, Bloomberg

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>NEF should not be considered as information sufficient upon which

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP, nor

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this recording, and any liability as a result of this

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>recording is expressly disclaimed