WEBVTT - Banks Launch Return of Earnings Season

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanevik. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>news from the world's of business and finance, clus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our journalists and analyst in more than

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one and twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You can also

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern Time

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or stream us live on YouTube and

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. All right, let's talk more bank stocks.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>See that all right? Well as a whole, you know,

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they were lower, now they're higher. So this first hour

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a group in a couple of different ways.

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>First up, Carol, this morning's earnings and updates on the

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>business from JPMorgan Bank of American City group that had

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks moving lower at least initially. Yeah, and after bank stocks,

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep in mind, underperforming the broader market last year,

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>there were many who were saying that this group is

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially primed for a bounce higher, and we ultimately are

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.959
<v Speaker 1>seeing that in this latter half of the trading day.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to bank stocks, KBW Bank Index was

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>up more than nine from December twenty through yesterday, but

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's even more now with a bump up today. So

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it. Uh. Anton Shoots is back with us.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>He's president chief investment officer at Mendon Capital Advisors, joining

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>us via zoom from Florida. Anton, Good to see you,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Happy new year, Happy new year. Always happy to be

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with you. Well, always great to have you here. So

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>quite an interesting day. They came out. Initially those bank

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>names as big bang names were under pressure in the

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>equity trade. They've turned around. Um, as I always like

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to do and start with you broadly, what jumps out

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what we got from results today? Oh,

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we got kind of what was expected right,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of maybe near the end of the net interest margin,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, very weak investment banking, you know, thick. That

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was okay. Um, it was really the conference calls, I

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>think to turn the stocks because I think that the stocks,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, unperformed last year. People were really afraid of

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bad credit right two thousand seven all over again. And

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as I've said on your show many times, this is

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not two thousand seventies are not the dumb bank CEO

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is making really terrible mistakes of bad products, because they

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>really did in two thousand seven, right, they negative amortization

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>mortgages and they were letting a and it moved. I mean,

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>these guys who run these banks today, they've learned a

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of lessons. They understand risk and risk management, credit underwriting,

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and they are not where the bad loans are. Um

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is obviously maybe the end of the

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>interest rate margin expansion, but they've had that expansion right

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to go from zero rates to where they are today.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Earnings estimates went up all year, yet the stocks went down.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we may be in a scenario where earnings estimates

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>may actually go down some but the stocks are so

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>cheap relative to where the rest of the SMP is

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the stocks could actually outperform in value. Has certainly been

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>showing them. Anton It's interesting because even if this year

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is looking good, we still saw all of the lenders

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>put aside more money to cover loans that might go bad.

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 1>How do you read into that? Well, first of all,

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know it's this crazy accounting thing called CECIL, So

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know the banks will have to buy a model

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>for Moodies, and obviously they have their own models as well.

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you have to take in all these factors,

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and those model based factors tell you that credit is

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get worse. They're not seeing it, right, It

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't happened. I mean, on the margin, we've seen

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>credit get worse than the subcrime consumer. The banks really

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't in that space. We're certainly seeing, you know, on

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the credit card side, people are spending more than not

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>paying back as quickly, but they're not defaulting. They all

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have jobs. I mean, I think another big factor is

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody has a job. Everybody wants a job as a job,

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, employers are still scrambling to hire people.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make too of you know? One

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things, and no doubt about it that we

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see the results and what the you know,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>how the banks came in. We were really interested in

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>outlooking what the CEO has had to say, Um, any

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>consensus takeaway for you, you know Jamie Diamond. Of course

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we pass everywhere that he says. But was there any

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>takeaway for you among the big banks CEOs today? Yeah?

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean he didn't use the word hurricane. You know,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank goodness, I think he's regretted that word. We we

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>all have, anybody who owns financials regretted that word. But

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the reality is is, you know, they're all, you know,

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of cautiously optimistic, right. Nobody is negative. No one's going,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>oh my goodness, you know things are going to be

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>tough now. You know, nobody likes the pressure that's out there.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the fat is done, right, your prior guests talked

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>about maybe being done. Maybe they're close to done, and

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we can engine eer a soft landing. And

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>even if there's a mild recession, banks have outperformed during

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>milder sessions. If you look at that that period and

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess I'm giving my age away, but

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I ran money in that two thousand period where the

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com bust happened and financials performed very, very well.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And you may have that value, you know, out performance

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>versus growth. You may have that mild recession where banks

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>do not lose a lot of money, they don't lose

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>money at all because their underwriting has been so good.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the other thing is is, you

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>know we've talked fin techs on your show fin techs

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>don't have deposits, right, the neo banks, they really don't

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>have good deposit, good cost structure. Look at Golden Specs, right,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's is it a bank, Well, you know it's an

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>investment bank and their cost of funds is very expensive.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>They've lost a lot of money, you know, for going

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>into this consumer segment. Banks that have true core deposits,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>checking and savings accounts actually benefit from setting stable funding,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>from being regulated, and they actually can go back and

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>take market share now because the people who don't have

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that funding cannot compete. So go ahead. I was just

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask about the American consumer because that's one area

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that we really like to hear from big banks eos

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>on and oftentimes there's a lot of commentary about it.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 1>How would you characterize what we heard from banks CEO

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is regarding the American consumer their cash position and you know,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>how much money they have to be able to to

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>pay for stuff that is more expensive. Yeah, I mean,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cash position is still better than pre um.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're they're they're they're certainly spending, they're not

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>saving a lot. I think that's you know, the savings

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>rate is where we're starting to see some stress, but

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the cash levels that consumers are still in pretty good shape.

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>You can see it in the credit cards. Like I

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, that that they're not paying them off as

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly right there. They're using their cards and they're borrowing

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're not paying them off as rapidly. That's very

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>different than defaulting. But you know, there's no doubt that

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>at least the consumer has a job, and you know,

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>lack of jobs is what really causes trouble and consumer lending.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we know when we you know, check

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in with you, you always like the regional bank space.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming you still do. That's where you know your

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>fund and investments go. Um. What in particular, what's the

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>outlook for regional bankers at this point? Is it tough

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tough for them in a mild recession? No? No, no,

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it isn't. And I think I've talked before

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about you know, markets that are favorable, right You've seen

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people and businesses moved to places like

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas and Florida, uh in Tennessee. So you know those

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>markets can maintain above national growth metrics first of all,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, second of all, a regional bank, you know,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly a smaller bank can really know its customers. Right,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the underwriting becomes a lot easier than going out and

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>underwriting very large multinational companies. So you know, you actually

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>can can understand that customers do a better job of underwriting.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think what's really important is again going back

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to deposits, and regional banks that are very well funded

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>really can outperform because they can take advantage of these

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>higher rates, right, margins can still rise. You know, I've

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>got companies in the portfolio the trade it. You know,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I have sixt loaned deposit ratios loaner deposit ratios means

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if they can lend out that other difference to a

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>loan or even buying a security at a higher yield,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>their margins continue to improve. So you know, those are

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the types of companies that have become much more valuable

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to those that don't have deposits. What's interesting, go ahead, Well,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so if you look you look at the northeast, the Northeast,

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>generally a lot of the banks in the Northeast um

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have loaned deposit ratios that are closer to so they

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>don't they don't have that room. Hey, Anton just got

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>about forty seconds left here. So if you had one

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>name that you know you feel pretty confident about three,

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what might it be? Um, Well, I'm gonna first bank.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>FBMS is the symbol. It's one of the largest positions

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of my fund. And you know, I think they have

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that optionality that I really like. I think they're very

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>attractive franchise. I think they do have sixty plus percent

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>loan deposit ratio, so in good shape there. Of the

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>bank is in Florida, in Georgia, so good, good growth,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>even though their headquarters in Mississippi. And at the end

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of the day, there's a lot of bigger banks that

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>would love those deposits. Um. But also they've been a

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 1>very smart buyer. They've added a lot of value to

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>that company over the years. All Right, We're gonna leave

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it on that note. He's so great to check in

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with you and really appreciate on what is obviously a

0:08:58.080 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>really big day when it comes to big banks. We

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>know it continues into next week. Anton just shoots, excuse me,

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, President and chief investment officer at

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Mendon Capital Advisers, joining us via zoom from Florida, and

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, once again if I look at some of

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>those names, even something like a Morgan Stanley that reports

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>next week, it's up one and a quarter percent. And

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>then we have gold Man. Let's see what it's doing

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>as we speak. It's up about eight tenths of a percent.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>But really those that reported today quite a rally. We're

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>starting to see. This is Bloomberg. These sees Bloomberg Business

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>The new issue of Bloomberg Business Week, great way to

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>spend the Friday the thirteenth. It's out funded at newsstands,

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>online at Bloomberg dot com, slash business Week and always

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal. And Tim, let's remind everybody it's

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the year ahead issue. Yeah, and in the finance section

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you find this a great story by Max Abel Sandys,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Finance reporter. It's all about the young bankers

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>who got used to smooth sailing and how they now

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are preparing for a storm. Talk about a sea change.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Max joins us right now in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>stud to you. You You say young, but it's kind of

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 1>like anyone under forty. Max Well, I resent the implication

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's because I myself turned thirty eight recently, So

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, my idea of what young is kind

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of changes. You know, I did not know that, but

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you look like thank you. But but it's true though.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we're really saying young is essentially ethan

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is some frustrates. What we're really saying is that if

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>you started in this industry, I mean any time after

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>two or let's call it after two thousand nine, you

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>know you have lived through this era where, you know,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>free money is essentially a fair phrase. Interest rates have

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>been so low by and large since then, and the

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>sailing has been so smooth, although obviously horrible things have

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>happened like but by and large people have lived through

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>an era that is sort of being replaced by something new,

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's what the story is about. I do feel

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's been an error, right. You could kind of

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>throw money to almost anything it felt like, and things

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>went up, and I feel like now the learning begins

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>for a whole generation on straight ye. So I want

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to give a shout out to my co reporter Nick Carrela,

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.359
<v Speaker 1>who was a great, great reporter. He found this guy,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Drew Pettitt, who is an analyst at City Group. I

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say he's in Buffalo, New York. Shout out

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to Buffalo, New York. And Drew basically realized that his

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>life on Wall Street was so you know, essentially so

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even keeled that he decided to give himself homework. I

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>think that was the word he used. He decided to

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>give himself homework and read like basically the bleakest books

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>he could find. We we actually didn't print this, but um,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>I think he I think one of them was black Swan. Um,

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think one of them. I have a list, I'll

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll send it to you, the bleak books, books about

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>bleakness and financial bleakness. And he really wanted to understand,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think at the end of the day,

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>probably this this these are my words and not his,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, but how to make money, you know, when

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the times aren't aren't good and money isn't growing on trees,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's I run it. Because the story

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was inspired Paula Dwyer, and editor who edited a piece

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for Business Week. Paul Paula Dwyer noticed this. A City

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Group executive, um not not one of Drew's bosses. But

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this is like I think one of the top bankers

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in London, she gave the speech at a conference late

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>last year where she said, you know, I laugh to

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>myself when I see these young people who are now

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>making managing director. So I think that called out like

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>your thirty two, your thirty three. These people are becoming

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>managing directors at my bank and they've never lived through

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, any anything, but you know, the an era

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of easy money. And she I think she really implied

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be in for a rude awakening

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>here in here in we also, do you think that

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>those banks are firms to also want to make sure

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that these guys have an understanding of like what happens

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to assets in a very different environment. Yep, it's so true.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes reporting is it's not that it's a hassle,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes reporting stories is so hard you bang your

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.239
<v Speaker 1>head against the wall. And then sometimes, like to the contrary,

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>things fall into places like so nicely. I was in

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 1>what we call in the industry, or at least what

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do as an ed board, an editorial board,

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was sitting and listening to um, you know,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it sounds boring because he's a regulator. Michael suit so interesting,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>so much fun hearing him talking is the I think

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>he is the acting controller of the currency, acting controller currency.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>But the guy was fascinating. And I mean I did

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>not I did not ask this, but I knew, I

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>knew we were working on the story. And without me

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>saying anything, he said, you know, it's funny because bankers

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are saying to me. Bankers are saying to me. Michael said,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are all these young kids, all these

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>young kids working for me, and they don't they don't

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to deal with all all these crazy things.

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there this layer of anxiety permeating right now among

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the bankers that you and your colleagues spoke to, not

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>just because of you know, it's not just burnout that

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you guys reported on over the last couple of years

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, but but also look at the news

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we got earlier this week about Goldman sex upople being

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>laid off. And that's a lot, a lot of peoples,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>with thousands of people. And it's not just a Goldman

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>either too across the industry. I think anxiety is the

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>right word. I think anxiety is the right word because

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, we're hearing bankers talk about that, But

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for another, it's the right word because you know, we

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are not going through um an awful era on Wall Street.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>After all, remember my story with Hannah that came out

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago. These big banks just made a

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in ten years, a trillion dollars. So these

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are by and large wealthy world. That's a lot of

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>money and profit and profit. So you know, I'm not

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>taking out my time of violand um or my violent

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>shape pool to refer to a very old story of mine.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But but we are talking about an entuurgy though. That's

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>where people are beginning to worry about just how drastically

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>things are going to change and just how many jobs

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to be lost if this country and the

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>global economy gets into as much trouble as as a

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people think of mine, No, I think it's

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. It's just like having a generation who's lived

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in a certain environment and and we're maybe going into

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a very very different one, and like how do they adapt?

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>How do they function? Um? But I also do wonder,

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, volatility and bad markets are also an opportunity

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>where you can make still money, right, So it's like

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they've just got to figure all of this stuff out.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really interesting what surprised you most, and you

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and Nick doing this story. Well, without kissing up to you,

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>let me just say that what you just said a

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>second ago is so spot on the idea of that.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And this was something that I think I had a

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of in co eight sense that this was true,

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea that when times are bad in the global

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>economy or the U s economy, it is bad news

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for parts of Wall Street, it is good news for

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>other parts of All Street. And Sally big Well, our

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>our teams just in with us. Yeah, you know, Sally,

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.359
<v Speaker 1>she helped us sort through the thinking. So it's like, okay, mortgages,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be in the mortgage business. If

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going up because people are not you

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>know that the business is gonna is gonna dry up

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and that will have knock on effects. But then on

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the flip side, it's like net interest margin, you know,

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a fancy way of the you know, the

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>difference between what you are and on loans over here

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and what you pay the positors over here. You know,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that is good news. If if if rates are going up,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that's good news. You don't want what rates to be zero,

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you if you're a trader, I bet

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>either a couple of traders listening to this right now

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and chuckling to themselves because volatility is lucrative. You make

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>money from bolatile markets. It's not bad to be a bank.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Well you can, I can make it a lot of

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>different ways, like absolutely, um, yeah, I am curious to

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>see how it all plays out. And I think it's

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting too, you know, Max that the banks still feel

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>confident to make these people put them in leadership positions

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>knowing that they're going to be maybe going into environment

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I think about that, right, these guys are gonna be

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>making investment decisions, trying to make deal. I don't know, Like,

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to see how it plays well. If there

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are any listeners here who are working for a bank

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and their bank is like taking them to this new

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>giving them classes on how to deal with calamity, you know,

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know who you have to call, you gotta you

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>gotta Levy know about that. Did anybody say that, like

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>off the record, we're in calamity classes. Were on the record,

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. Well, I couldn't tell you if I heard it,

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but no, I I did not hear about any calamity classes.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But let me you did mention a violent shaped pool

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>an old article that you wrote it from. We'll tweet

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it out. Ex Bankers upgrade the good Life as violin

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>pools back in. So if you you know, had that

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>deep tease, go check out that story because it's another

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>good one from the team, including Max. But it's some

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>great it's great insight in terms of the Wall Street culture,

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of the financial culture, in terms of what's to come

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially um and what they're facing. Thank you so much.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, have a great weekend. Max tables In he's

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>financial reporter at Bloomberg News, joining us in our interactive

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>broker studio. You are listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on this Friday, Carol Master Tim Stanovic. We are Bloemberg Radio.

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanev on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the largest digital currency

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>by market value, we're talking about bitcoin. Did you see

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what's been going on? Yeah, it's higher, it's true. Is

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.959
<v Speaker 1>it's also on track to have its best week since one.

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's up roughly twelve percent or so from the last

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>time I checked. Other tokens have also gained, with an

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>index of the hundred biggest coins adding more than ten

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and then shares with some crypto related companies up even more,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with Bitcoin minor Marathon Digital adding more than sixty percent

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this week alone. All right, well, it's time for our

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>weekly crypto segment. Very pleased to have with us Ja Jog,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of say Network, joining us via Zoom

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>from San Francisco. J By the way, former lead developer

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood during the game Stop crisis. I've got about

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars in funding that got that over the summer.

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It was led by multi Coin Capital, with participation from

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Coin based Ventures, Delphi Digital, and a few others. Jay,

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>how are you think fantastic? Are you doing today? We're

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>doing well. Thanks, It's good to have you with us. Okay,

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>So for the enough uninitiated, which I will include myself

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>and explain what you do at say Network. Yeah, So

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>my background, as you mentioned, I worked at Robin before this,

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and I was there when the game Soft crisis happened

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. And I'm sure you were falling along

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>with it. It was not handled very well, largely because

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>there was internally a complete lack of transparency around what

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>is happening, right, so that made me much more of

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>a decentralization. Actually, anything that happens on chain is inherently trustless,

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>inherently transparent, which is why we started building say um.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Say is a new leyerl one blockchain, and you can

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>think of it as the plumbing for decentrized exchanges. So

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>basically what we're doing is we're making it as easy

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>as possible for exchanges to deploy and scale by building

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on say so. Our mission is to build the best

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>instructure for exchanges, and if we succeed, then the decent

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>tragic chain experience will be identical to that of the

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>centrized exchange treating experience. Hey so, j so hardware software,

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is your whole idea of build it and

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>then let everybody else play with it. Yeah, so we're

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just making open source software from say Labs and we're

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>letting everyone just up around with the work it do

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want to with it. We ask all of

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>our guests when they come on and talk crypto if

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>they were had any exposure to f t X or

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>three errors. Uh yeah, yeah, talked about that at you. Yeah,

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>so directly. Thankfully we were not effected role. All our

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>money was in the odd in a bank account. Um.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But it was definitely a crazy time, right, like everything

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that happened in Tarot, everything that happened with f t X.

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just been incredible that things like this actually happened

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Um. And it's just been extremely

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>negative for the crypto industry over role. But it really

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>does highlight how decentralization and having things happen on chain

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>are important because, I mean, the biggest issue with FS

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>is it was completely centralized. You needed to trust one

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>entity to do the right thing, and then f t

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>X case, it looks like they just did not. Alright,

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to ask a stupid question, but I'm

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>sure there's a lot of folks out there or maybe

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not a stupid question, but when you talk about

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>first layer one blockchain, I mean, we're all learning to

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>be fair jay as we go. Uh. And we've talked

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>about this with people who are very entrenched in the

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>world that you know, are in the crypto world, that

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it isn't the terminology how it all works. We are

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>learning as we go, So tell us exactly. First layer

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>one blockchain is what how many layers are there? Is

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this just kind of a beginning layer where everybody can

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>build on it. Just go a little bit deeper for us. Yeah,

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So generally speaking, there's two layers. There's the layer one,

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which you can think of is Ethereum, Salana. Basically any

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the big block chains doing that you know out there,

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>they're a layer one blob chain. Then now they're starting

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to be an emergence of layer two box chains. So

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this would be things like arbitram optimism, and these are

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>built on top of an existing layer one and their

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>purposes to help the exchange of skill. So what we're

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>doing is we're building that basically ourselves, and you can

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>think of it as being similar to Ethereum or Salana.

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>So who are your competitors out there? Yeah, So the

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>chains that we're generally compared against our chains like Salana

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and optos, so high performance chains that are meant for

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>people to be um doing different types of activity. A

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is tied to decentralized finance. Can you

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>give us an example of you know five is from

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>now how you envision people using the platform the chain

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>h five years and now we're successful, then all on

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>chain trading activity or be the majority of it will

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>happen on say, And I also think that the future

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that I envision for the way that finances is gonna

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>work is that we're going to have to stop relying

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>on these trusted, centralized intermediaries to be involved in every

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>step of the process. So I think long term there's

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be more for the shift of the macro

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>environmental role to be more decentralized. And I also think

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that UM within crypto specifically, there's very strong network effects

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to exchanges, so say it's going to start having a

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>larger market share of exchange trading volume in the future

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. When you talk about intermediaries, you're talking about

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the existing you know, financial infrastructure exactly. So what why

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would someone choose your level one over somebody else's more secure?

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it faster? What's what's the pitch? Yeah, So the

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing is we're creating customized infrastructure for exchanges. So

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>there's this idea of application infrastructure cycles UM. That idea

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>is basically that initially there's some infrastructure that gets created

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>This leads to new applications, some of which find product

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>market fit, and then you now need more specialized infrastructure

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to support these applications. One example of this would be

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the database industry started off with solutions like Oracal. This

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>led to all of the web one and web to

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>applications we know and love, many of which have found

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>product market fit, and that has now led to solutions

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like data Big Squarehouse, which is customate for AI and

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>m L. I think something identical is going to be

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>happening with box chains. We started started off with ethereum,

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that led to an explosion of decentralized applications. Now exchange

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 1>stable points have found to a degree product market fit,

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and now we think there's going to be more and

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>more specialized infrastructure or these specific text of applications. And

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm building on top of the general purpose

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>chain doesn't really work because it's not specialized, whereas in

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the case of say, we've made a bunch of optimizations

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to make the experience of treading on substantially better. As

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>prices in cryptocurrency as a whole have come down our

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>last year plus the so called crypto winter, we I've

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>also seen the decline of you know, three Hours Capital

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and f t X. Of course, at the same time,

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not hearing from companies the same way that we

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>were in the last couple of years when the prices

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>were going up, that they're exploring crypto, that they're exploring

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain. We're not hearing analysts asked about it on

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>earnings calls in the same way either. Do you think

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this crypto winter and the very public downfall of of

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>f t X has caused permanent damage to the way

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that people think about crypto. I think it's absolutely caused

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>short term damage. I do not think in the slightest

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to be long term negative for

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto overall. If anything, ft X just reinforces that you

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>really need to do things decent life with, so I

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>think long term fts is actually going to be good

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for crypto. UM and overall crypto is extremely sickly Like

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if you look in the past decade, there's always been

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>cycles when things are in the bull market, when everything

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is very high. That's when there's a lot of traditional

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>companies that are exploring UM, launching things really to crypto,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and then afterwards when there's a bull cycle or when

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a bear market, that's when a lot of these

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>companies that haven't launched anything um they might take a

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>step back. But if you just look at the trajectory

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of crypto overall, it's still just up into the right.

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So even though there's these cycles, the overall trend is

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the crypto is just starting to get more and more

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>option moving forward. And I think it's largely for the

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons that I mentioned initially, right, crestlessness, transparency, permissionlessness. These

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>are really really powerful things, and I think society overall,

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>like people, once they get it, they just become very

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>strongly tied to these notions. So I think society overall

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to become much more receptive to crypto moving

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>forward as well. We're talking with j jog, co founder

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of Say Network via zoom from San Francisco. Hey, J,

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned that you guys did a funding round uh

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>five million over the summer UM. I am curious that

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>because of f t X in the fallout in the

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto carnage that we saw in two UM. What has

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>been the funding environment for you and your need you

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>think going forward or do you feel if you need

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to reach out you can do it in this environment,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>or maybe not so in our case. We I mean

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we have a ton of fundways still, Like we raised

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars. This was something we announced nag Is,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>so we're not really facing any negative repercussions from that.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think overall, the market is harder to be raising

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>right now than it was a year ago. UM. A

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of firms that weren't necessarily in it for the tech,

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of venture capital firms that were just

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>there because they thought they could make a group book. UM,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>those terms have been leaving, So I think it is

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little bit harder now to raise

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>than before. But anyone that builds right now, like this

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is the ideal time to be building because there's no

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>noise and a lot of the technology, the technology that

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>gets created right now, it tends to be extremely mission

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>driven rather than um just kind of mercenary folks that

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are trying to make a quick book. So if if

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying to build is mission driven, I think

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you still won't have any problems raising capital right now.

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>What's your exit strategy and timeline? And just got about

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. I personally don't have an exist strategy. I

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm just having a lot of fun working on

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to day right now. So I'm gonna keep granding on

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this for however long I can. How much more do

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you think you're gonna have to raise? I mean, we

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>have more enough money to launch the main net, So

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be just launching the net and seeing how

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>community response to that later this year. Can we just

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly twenty seconds, who you're partnering with or who's who's

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to you and saying we want to work

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>with you? Just quickly? Yeah? So right now, we have

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred projects that are building on top of Stay.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So these are all different types of exchanges that are building.

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So that would be the largest set of partners that

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we're working with right now. All right, Well, stay in

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>touch and let's know how things are going. Jay Job,

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Stay Network, joining us via zoom from

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco on this Friday. I'm rom a journal. Yeah,

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no no, no,

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hol please, I'll ride gravel. I want to drive. Good question.

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe down on blue

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Bird Radio to talk. Everybody's seventeen and a half minutes

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>left in today's trading session. Right down to the wire. Yeah,

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but we're exactly I mean, we are kind of right

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>down to the wire. Seventeen minutes left. We're seeing Hender.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>We just heard the numbers from Doug, but they're worth repeating.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Up closed out percentage point the nastac hire seven tenths

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of one percent. Well, the Dow carroll up by four

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>tenths or one percent, and we see some buy like

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a leg up in the last half hour or so,

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just kind of rolling over a little bit. So let's

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>get to it. Joining us once again, Emily Hills, she's

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>founding partner at Bowersack Capital Partners, eight hundred million in

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>nassets under management, and she joins us once again on

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Lawrence, Kansas. Emily, good to have you

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with us. How's it going. It's going well, good to

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.239
<v Speaker 1>be here. Um, sentiment, Is there a clear direction for

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you when it comes to where the economy is going,

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.959
<v Speaker 1>where the market should go? At this point with regard

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to sentiment, if we're talking about consumer sentiment, we actually

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of an opportic and we uh

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in you know, in consumer attitude and the moderation of

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations. But I think the you know, the general

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>consensus on people on market washers is that you know,

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we're in for a rough And in fact, I was

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>saying just this morning to a client that it's one

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the it's one of the strongest. It's a very

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>strong consensus. It's one of the stronger ones that I've

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen in my career, which always gives one pause,

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it. Also, though, I love when everybody's like it's

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be terrible, because it makes me think, Okay, I'm

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a contrarian. I love it when everybody's

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like saying, it's bed. Is there any of that thinking

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>going on? Because you know, it's interesting. We had some

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>stories the UK maybe you know, missing a recession, um

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the I think Germany the same thing, like all of

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you know, China continues to open up. I

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>know none of this is ever straight, you know, path

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>up or down if you will, but it does feel

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>like there are a lot of metrics coming in, you know,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>raw data if you will, that is saying maybe it

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>might not be as bad. Well, I agree with you

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that there it's it's very interesting. There's some real mixed signs,

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>so that if you look back at you know, what

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was one of the factors that really performed strongly, and

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it was industrial. Right, if we were really going into

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a recession, that sector would not have performed as well

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as it did. You know, there's this, there's the there's

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that American consumers are still continuing to spend.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the key questions here is

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that clearly the FED or Ran Powell thinks that wages

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to fall sharply to unstick core

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>services inflation. And you know, not everyone agrees with that,

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and if he's wrong, and if you know, I think

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I think he believes and most of the you know,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the members of the FED agree or believe that, you know,

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have that we've done the easy part

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>on inflation and that now we're getting to the sticky part,

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and that to unstick it, we're going to really have

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to see unemployment pick up. And you know, that's that

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>could be wrong. I mean that the person who came

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>right before me on this show was arguing that they

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>were going to be late and then realizing that that,

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, inflation isn't that sticky. So I'm sorry to

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you that I tend to be I tend to

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>actually agree with the consensus, but I am you know,

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm I asked myself this daily, right because when everyone

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>else when when you've got this kind of group think,

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you do have to step back and question. And I

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>agree with you that there's some positive signs out there. Well,

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five foundered is looking at a

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>second week in a row higher, as we've been saying

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>throughout the program. Today, it's up two point seven so

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>far this week. Emily tested that two under day again. Right,

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But I know thanks to some some notes from our

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>producer Paul, that that do you think that we could

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>start to see even another decline in stocks? The lake

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lower because when we start to hear from companies, these

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>uh investors haven't necessarily priced in profit margin cuts. Yeah,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to remember that, you know, profit

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.239
<v Speaker 1>margins for US companies are at historic high. And I

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>do think we're going to see during the reporting season

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>some disappointing earnings because these higher interest rates, you know,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the Fed bravest interest rates seven times last year, and

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>those are going that those hikes are going to flow

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>through into earnings. And look, I think part of what's

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>happening here is that the FED. There's so much liquidity

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the global economy, and the FED needs to get

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that liquidity under control. And every time there's the slightest

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>optimistic sign or the FED comes out and says something

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that the margaret interprets as debbish, you know, then suddenly

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we've got you know, suddenly we get we have this

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>loosen and which is the opposite of what the FED

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is trying to accomplishing. I've been saying that throughout. Yeah,

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>it's happening again. Now. It's a little bit like a

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>bad relationship where you know, no matter what you say,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the person just isn't hearing it, you know, and you

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>have to say, what part of no don't you understand?

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's very frustrating for the fat and I

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>think we may be seeing another one of those. You know,

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity is pouring back into the you know, the

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>money is pouring back into the market because there are

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a few positive signs. So I don't know, what do

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? I like the I like the

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>analogy and thinking about it like a relationship, especially when

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think about the FEDS as sort of an actual person.

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Um I'm wondering, Emily, how much lower you think the

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>S and P has to go. Well, I think we're

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna I think we're going to retest the lows that

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw on some you know, late September, early after

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a school of thought out there

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that thinks we're going to go lower than that. I mean,

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly Mike Wilson at Morgan Stanley thinks that I am

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>not that bearish, because I agree that there are enough

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>positive sign is out here out there that would you

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of cash equivalents That to me says

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>bear Well, I like cash equivalents like T bills because

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing you know, four points, I got egles. There's

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 1>real yields, right, yeah, there's really yield there. And so

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, for the first time, the bond

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the allocation to bonds in our portfolios, my client portfolios

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>over the past three or four years had dropped quite substantially, right,

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you you know from down to tend to

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>tend ten to fifteen percent or even low or even

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>lower than that. And I think now that bonds are

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's an alternative out there that that Tina

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>era is over. We've been talking a lot about that

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, all of a sudden when you look

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>at the yields that you know, SMP five D yield

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>versus bonds, bonds are certainly competitive with you know, potentially

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>without as much risk. Emily. Thank you. Emily Hill, founding

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>partner at Barrassaw Capital Partners. Eight hundred million in assets

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>under a manager, shutting us on the phone from Lawrence, Kansas.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com. You can also

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern on

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio or stream us live on YouTube and Bloomberg

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com