WEBVTT - Long Covid Impacts Millions Worldwide

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. We're gonna talk a bit

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about more, a little more about COVID uh Switzerland joining Spain,

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK and suggesting that the virus pandemic may be

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>shifting to an endemic phase. You've got the White House

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>moving to prevent future shortages of COVID night Team tests

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>ensuring they continue to be produced in large number, crety,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>A lot going on. Australia's cases are surging. It's just

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a reminder it's a global pandemic and until we all

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>get through it, we're all gonna have to deal with it. Yeah,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it really speaks to the fact that vaccine or I say,

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID fatigue is absolutely a factor. Here a people saying, well,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're done with this, We're gonna just live

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>our lives as normal, and in some case numbers show

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that maybe you can't do that just yet. Speaking of

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID fatigue, some of those who get COVID, it's sticking

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>around for a long time, those long haulers. Let's get

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to that and more. But Dr Batty Raman, Principal investigator

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>of the Radcliffe Department of Medicine at the University of Oxford.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>She joins us on the phone from Oxford, England. Dr Ramen,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you here with us. How are you

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and what are you seeing when it comes to the

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>progression of COVID in the UK. Thanks Carol. I'd like

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to take this opportunity to say, UM, you know, really

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate this invitation. UM. COVID is still very high. The

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>number of cases are still very high in the UK. UM.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>An increasing concern for many is the long term effects

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. As you might no long covid is um.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>The is a syndrome that some people may experience beyond

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the acute space it's a serious global health concern and

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>UM has already affected one point three million people here

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in the UK that constitutes more than two percent of

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>our population. And it is estimated that more than fifty

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>million worldwide will be affected by long COVID and that

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>many will will will continue to be diagnosed with ongoing

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>symptoms and complications from COVID. Is the normal simplicancy. We

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>are statistic and I'm not sure if your team shared

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it with our producer, but is it correct that nearly

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>one quarter of virus survivors will have some kind of

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>long term effect? Yes, that's that's true. So roughly about

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>can have sometimes some type of long term effect. Touch

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about one what that looks like

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and how you actually go about addressing it. Yes, so

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this is what people are commonly referring to long COVID

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>or prosecutically of COVID or past UM. Long COVID is

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>defined by consistent systemctings beyond three months of infection. The

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>most common manifestation is fatigue, but people to report a

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>range of symptoms including headaches, body pain, gas or intestinal symptoms,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>brain fog. So there are multitude of symptoms that people experience.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>We know that it it really affects someone's ability to

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>return to work. That more than fifty percent of people

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.519
<v Speaker 1>with long covids have either not been able to return

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to work or have returned to modified duties. It has

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>huge implications for the economy. What can we do about it?

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're still looking for answers. Um there

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>has been some evidence that the mitochondria of the muscle,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which is basically the powerhouse of all the cells, might

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>be contributing to the symptom of fatigue. The certainly is

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the pre clinical studies showing that the virus might hijack

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the mitochondria and affect the seal's ability to fight the

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>infections and promote inflammatory pathways. So we're particularly interested in

0:03:55.120 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>testing a treatment or a therapy that Accelor Therapeutic have developed.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>It's called the EX five, a mixture of five amino

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>acids um which has been shown to have a beneficial

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>effect to the mitochondria and also result in meaningful reduction

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in other markets of inflammation, a little fat and even

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>incident resistance. So we talk about long COVID, just how

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>long is long? Are we talking about weeks, months, years, even? Yeah?

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So some of the patients we've seen, UM, who've who've

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>volunteered for our study have had long COVID since we'll

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>have had ongoing symptoms since March so UM, you know,

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>so sorry twenty So this is we're talking about really

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>protracted symptoms for some people. But the definition that the

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>UK has introduced by nice refers to symptoms beyond three

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>months of infection. What's the what's the timeline in terms

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of this treatment that you talk about, um, that might

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>help with these COVID long haulers? Uh? Is this something

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that will see maybe put into use later on this year?

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Just got about thirty seconds left here, Yeah, so we

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>hope to have some results by mid twenty two. The

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>study has already started recruitment as well underway. There's been

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a huge number of participants interested and the first patient

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has been dosed with the treatment. So UM, so we've

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>got some Uh. It looks really promising just in terms

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of reaching our target and finishing the study UM quite

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>early on, UM, and we hope that there's some positive

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for patients worldwide. We'll look forward to hearing more on

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that as you guys go through the testing process. Dr

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Betty Rama and Principal Investigator for the Radcliffe Department of

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Medicine at the University of Oxford, on the phone from Oxford.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Another story I just want to mention having to do

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with COVID from the Associated Press u S Army for

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the first time offering a maximum enlistment bonus of fifty

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>dollars to highly skilled recruit who joined for six years.

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>The AP learning this as the service struggles to bring

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in soldiers into critical jobs amid the continuing pandemics with

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>A two creating or dealing with a work shortage. This

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, this week's Bloomberg

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, it's all about the year ahead. The cover story.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>The issue is about the biggest dangers to the economy,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the global economy this year in folks, surprise, surprise, it's

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>really not about COVID for more. Let's bring in our

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>senior executive editor for Economics at Bloomberg, Head of Bloomberg Economics,

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Flander. She is with us on the phone in London,

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>along with Bloomberg Business Week editor Joell Webber on the

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>access line and Brooklyn. You know, Joel, the t I

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a issue. I love it. It It always looks into you know,

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going to go on maybe and what are these

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>stories that are to dominate this year? But so much

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of what happens this year depends on kind of global

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>bankers getting it right. And I'm talking about you know,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about central bankers getting it right. Yeah, and

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about a well timed story right just on the

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>heels of of yesterday. UM. And you know, we try

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and gaze into a crystal ball as as much as

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we can in this issue. UM. We always feel like

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>whenever we're talking about the year ahead, people are just

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>like I want to always know what's going on with

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy. And I think that is especially true now

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>living through what we've all lived through, the unpresented nature

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of of not only COVID but also the responses to COVID.

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And now we find ourselves somewhere hopefully maybe on the

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>back end, and we get to deal with, um, you know,

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the aftermath of all of this. UM. But you know,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>like you said in the top there, UM, COVID perhaps

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the central theme that we have to rustle

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>with now. And we we've seen what response can can

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>look like and how we can manage um. So so

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie over to you, what what job is it that

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the central bankers have to rustle with now? They have

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to work out whether the glabal economy is kind of

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>especially the US economy if you're the FED, is permanently

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>changed as a result of COVID, that they should really

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>take seriously the idea that people don't want to go

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>back to their jobs, you know, having trouble filling jobs,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're really going to have inflation kind of endemic

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in the economy rather than just being this transitory thing,

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or whether actually we are all going to be going

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>back to normal, the economy is going to be more

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>or less like it was in a year or so.

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's time and they just need to kind of sit

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>tight and you know, tweak a few levers and raise

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a few interest rates, but fundamentally they don't have to

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>grapple with something different. And the risk is that at

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year it turns out that they

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>just called that raw that for example, inflation really is

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a big issue. Financial markets are losing confidence in the

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>central banks kind of understanding in the situation and we

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>face a big problem, Stephanie. These aren't exactly synchronized, synchronized moves.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>We're we're talking about central banking, and you have the PBC,

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, continuing to ease, the ECB essentially passing the FED.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Even emerging market it's hiking as quickly as they can,

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>or at least that's what the market is telling us

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do. How much of that kind of

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>dislocation across the world is a problem for the global

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>economy because that's this is a new moment there. Yeah,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so, And I think that was interesting. One

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things I was sort of thinking about as

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I wrote the piece is you have, on the one hand,

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>a kind of familiar dynamic of, you know, if the

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve raises interest rates were emerging market economies that

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>could face the biggest problems as a result of that.

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>They kind of get the long end of that story.

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But actually there's a whole other thing going on, which

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is China's already slowed down a bit, and for the

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>first time ever really certainly in living memory, that the

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>People's Bank of China is going to do something different

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>from the FED. They've always had to slavishly follow the

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Fed because they had their exchange rate tied to the dollar.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>They've kind of won their own declaration of independence from

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>developing their economy and changing their policies, and they now

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have the freedom to cut interest rates just as the

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve is raising them. So that is an interesting

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>moment the global economy viewers, and kind of staying as

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>always a few steps behind, still waiting even for that

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>much inflation, let alone problem needing to raise rates. Okay,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, Stephane, the fact that Chinese going one way,

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the US going another, but even just the fact that

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>we have I did a bit of cross talk there,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so forgive me. But the fact that we have everyone

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>not working in locked stop for a change that is

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>radically different, right, And and so what what does that

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>start to look like if you're if your power, for instance,

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to control what you can control, but

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>then there's all these other forces that could perhaps work

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>against you. How much of that the calculus starts to

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>have the factor in that stuff? Well, it certainly effects

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the certainly way thanks the way the financial markets think, right,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>because you've got the urosone more or less on hold.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, interesting, there is a certain amount of

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>pressure pulling down the cost of money, pulling down long

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>term interest rates, bond yield, even as you've got the

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve maybe four maybe five, maybe six rate rises

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, we don't know, um, So that is a

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>different dynamic that we're not all darting to the same

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tune as the US. But I think it is still

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally the case. The most important story is going to

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 1>be what happens to inflation in the US, what happens

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to inflation expectations to people trust that the Fed knows

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing, And as a consequence of that, of course,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens in financial markets. What's this tricky Stephanie? Right?

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>And in the question on on your pieces, which way

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to normal? Do we really know what normal? Is it

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>a new normal on the other side of the pandemic?

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that part of the problem. Yeah, And that's what

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I found kind of curious, and it made me think

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about it writing this piece, and I was so glad

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>that the editor asking me to do it just before.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's pout knowing your audience, Stephanie, well done. I

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the forecast and I sort of thought, it's

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>funny because I've also written them, but had we've had

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>economic research around the VID having boosted productivity in some areas,

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, businesses that had to bring in automation much

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>faster than expected, everyone working from home and therefore being

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>modiginously enabled in their work. You know that this was

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>actually going to make us more productive weirdly and almost

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 1>produced like a COVID dividend. So there was that whole discussion,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, other ways in which people felt there

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was a fundamental change, maybe in supply chains, you know,

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because of what's happened in China and what happened during COVID,

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>and when you look at the forecast, and maybe economists

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are just not very original or imagine people, but they're

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>all kind of expecting despite all of what we consider

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to be really important changes in the micro economy, they

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>somehow think the macro economy is going to carry on

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>more or less the same after this year. And that

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>does seem like a bit of a disconnect, like who's

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>going to turn out to be right? Is it? How

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are we really transformed as a result of COVID, or

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is this just you know a lot of this much

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>less permanent than we think. Alright, we're gonna leave it

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 1>on that note. It's an incredible story. Joel's right, it's

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so timely considering hearing from j Power all and all

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>these uh fed central bankers are fed bankers, I should

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>say this week. I mean, this is really front and center.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So an incredible story and a great read and so relevant. Stephanie,

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Stephanie Flander, Senior Executive editor, head of Bloomberg

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Economics at Bloomberg News, on the phone from London, and

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>our thanks to Joel Webber as well, Editor Bloomberg Business

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Week on the access line from Brooklyn. I love this issue.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the year ahead. It's looking at what's ahead in

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy, what's ahead in politics, what's ahead in terms

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>of how we consume. It's going to be all on

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>our weekend show. But it's really a really smart issue,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and it'll be on newstands tomorrow. Some of the stories

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>already on the Bloomberg and also Bloomberg dot Com. We're

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out this week. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Interesting story that popped up on our raidar.

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It also happens to be in Bloomberg Business Weeks You're

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>Ahead issue, which is out on newsstands tomorrow on the

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and also at Bloomberg dot com and cretty. It's

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>about how there is still no Amazon for housing, but

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some fintech companies they're working on it. It's it's

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in the works. But I mean, remember we've had a

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>rough couple of months when it comes to Zillo and

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the other up piers. And for that, for

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>more information on that sector, we've got to bring in

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the experts here, and that of course is Patrick Clark.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>He covers real estate for bloomber Keys on the phone

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>from right here in New York City. Patrick, thank you

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I loved your story because there's a

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>line that stuck out to me. Uh whereas that it

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>made sense to order pants online, but many consumers still

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>prefer brick and mortar grocery stores where they can squeeze

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the avocado and I at the steak. I guess houses

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are no different. Tell us more about it. Yeah, I

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>mean every house is different, just like every piece of fruit.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess, um, it's been the it's been the great

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>challenge for companies, particularly tech companies. But I guess all

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that are looking for waste to to sort of

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>carve out a either a small or large niche in

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the US housing market. Um, at the end of the day,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they're really not a house is really not a commodity

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>good even even a sort of mass produced house that

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>looks like all the houses next to it, Like every

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>house has a different view and every house will you know,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>age in different ways, and and um it's um not

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>only did for the most part like literally to do

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>homebuyers want to actually go squeeze the house, but they

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they it's just very hard to take the human element

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>out of out of buying and selling one. So wait,

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>are you saying that there isn't a Carbonna approach to

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>buying a house and we can't go to a chaosk

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and say yeah, like that split level. It's you know,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really I love that you said Carvana because it's

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's how a lot of the companies, a lot of

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the prop teps as they call themselves prop tech companies, UM,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them use the Carbonna model as an analogy,

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>which is which is to say, that you know, UM,

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we started with pants or books and and and you know,

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>slowly but surely have have worked our way up the

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>value chain in terms of the types of um, the

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>types of goods that you know, we're willing to that

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>we feel competent buying online and you know, and we

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have gotten to cars in a way, right and and

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you know the bet is that houses are next. It's

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just that I think, UM, I think that you know,

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at at at each new level of value and it's

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not just value when it comes to a home, UM,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's value and complication and there's an emotional component.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It just gets more complicated. Well, what's interesting is, and

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we've talked throughout the pandemic to UM real estate agents, realtors,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>heads of home companies where they talked about transactions during

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the deep throws of the pandemic back in where they

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>did everything online, everything was a digital transaction. So it

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can be done. I guess right, More and more parts

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of the transaction can be done digitally. And I think

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that the pandemic was you know, I think it accelerated

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>acceptance both by consumers, regulators, UM that UM, you know, lenders,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what have you like that that that more things can

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be done virtually remotely. Um. And so so I think

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic spit this up, no question. Um. But um,

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing too, you know, it's one thing to

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>speed it up, but it hasn't solved the problem. Creaty.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get I want to get rid

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>of that that that meeting that you have to have

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with everybody's lawyers and secure lawyers on one side, the

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>sellers on another, or the part like I just want

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of that part of it. I have

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>never bought a house, so I cannot relate, although I

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>will admit I live in New York City and I

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>look forward to the days where I can have a

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>white picket fence. That being said, speaking of rental properties,

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what it actually kind of comes to mind

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about the pandemic, because a lot of

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>people were actually shopping for apartment these virtual walkthroughs, and

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>then I wonder how many people actually showed up at

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the apartment was like, this is a lot smaller than

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it looked on FaceTime. I'm curious, Patrick, what's next for this?

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there a solution or is there any

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>money making prospect when it comes to shopping for houses virtually. Yeah,

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two there's two main ways to think

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. One is, you know, you'll continue to have

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that improve and and sort of digitize and bring

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>online components of the transaction. And some of these are

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that we don't really think about. It's like

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the people in the room at the closing date

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>who you know, you barely understand who they are, but

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but this guy is you know, this guy has run

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the title on the home to make sure that the

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 1>seller you really owns it for example, right, and and

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's pieces of it that that I think can

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be very successfully um you know, brought into the century

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>here and there are also there's also a move to

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>put more and more of these services together. So you

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>have you know, you have brokerages that are real estate

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>brokerages that are hiring that that are buying or building

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>mortgage lenders internally, you have um, you know, traditional mortgage

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>lenders who who are sparing in to offer different types

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of bridge finance that that would allow a buyer to

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>compete like a cash buyer. You have you have this

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>idea that you can bring all of these things together

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and again going back to the this idea

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the closing meeting um basically to

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>simplify and do more of the transaction online with one company,

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so the consumers only dealing with sort of one interface

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that I think there's some promise to that. One of

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the challenges is it's a lot of technology, it's a

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of process you have to deliver to

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the customer. And so the question is one can you

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>build it? And too can you actually make money doing it?

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing that you know, hopefully we'll we'll

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>see some progress on. I look forward to the huberization

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of home buyer. Hey, Pat, thanks so much. Patrick Clark

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>real Estate Report at Bloomberg News on the phone from

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Check them out at Twitter at Pat

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>underscore Clark. I'm road, yeah, I'll bet you Let me drive. No, no, no, honey, please,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding gravels. Let's I want to drive.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question. Good drive. This is the drive

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to the globe well up down on bloom Bird Radio.

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, tick took everybody nine, about ten minutes left

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in today's trading session. We've seen some volatili this week,

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>but certainly a lot more optimism bouncing around though today,

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and we are a little bit lower on those major

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>equity averages. So let's get to it. Let's get to

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the clothes. Aaron Kennon is back with us,

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>co founder, chief executive officer at Clear Harbor Asset Management

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>approximately a billion a little bit more than a billion

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management, on the phone once again from Stanford, Connecticut. Hey, Aaron,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you with Creedy and me. Happy you year.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing great? Thanks for having me back. Carroll,

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Happy new year to do both of you. Well, So

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>how do you make sense of what we've seen so far?

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just, you know what, five eight days in in

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the new year, we're trying to figure out the trend line.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's safe to say that it's going to

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>be vaulatile this year, but but who knows, because I

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>do feel like we've got some clarity to some extent

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Fed in terms of what's to come. How

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>do you see it though, Well, you know, we're we're

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly moving into a very different um economic, monetary, fiscal environment.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going from peak growth which was well above trend

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>last year, uh what five point six odd percent and

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>based on Bloomberg consensus to probably something closer to uh

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>three and a half to possibly as high as four percent.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, peak monetary stimulus and peak fiscal stimulus

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>last year towards you know, much more normalization. Growth certainly

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>coming down. But but also the FED is unwinding their

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>asset purchases and and and raising the funds rate, and

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>so you know, this downdraft, in my opinion is is

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is about you know, less liquidity in the system. It's

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>probably about more volatility. We should expect that in an

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>environment with less liquidity, and that should be an incremental

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>headwind two pe multiples in the equity market. Um. But

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that all all is lost this year.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Earnings we still believe will will prove positive, and we

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly are already seeing in the first several trading sessions

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of the year this sort of sector dispersion like we

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't see last year. And it's not just sort of

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>um growth to value, right, because if you look at

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in the equity market, industrials are really doing

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing year to date. But but energy is up over

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's funny that you say that. I was looking

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>at the S and P five the members and like

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the top the seven out of the top ten names

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>are your energy names, and you're talking about like some

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>incredible gains. I think hess was up. Let me just

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>look at my numbers. I mean each of these names.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>You're talking some really really strong gains. Absolutely, and that's

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly driven by the commodity which is having a very

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>strong start to the ear up almost ten percent. But um,

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>now there's a real question around whether or not the

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>FEDS posture the markets pricing and what four times for

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for rate hikes this year will prove itself out, or

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they're they're going to ultimately need to

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to put their foot on the brakes with that with

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that game plan. Um, you know, I have a hard

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>time believing that this sort of four times this year,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>three times next year, UM plan is going to play

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>out close to that way. I have a hard time, well,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time believing. First of all, I

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>think inflation will ultimately prove to be yes transitory UM,

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>because supply chain bottlenecks or the cause of to a

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>great extent of of this inflation and the headline piece

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of inflation we're seeing in the rising price of things

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>like oil and natural gas. And that's the area I

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>think on the headline, which may remain stubbornly high, but

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at the core um when when we're looking at goods

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and services, it's it's a supply chain bottleneck UH issue

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>that needs to sort itself out and clear clearly, Amikron,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this next variant UH, that is Amicron has has sort

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of a Steymied clarity on on the reopening trade generally

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>both home and abroad, and I think it's really delaying

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this fine of the supply chain, and it's it's keeping

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this inflation question front and center for everyone. Right. So, Aaron,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>how many how many rate hikes are you expecting UH

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>this year? The PO says three, Goman Sack Stapen Morgan

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>say four. Jamie Diamonds says we need more than four.

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Where are you on that spectrum? Well, the short answer is,

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm not an economist. I look at

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the market as as my um is my set of

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of does it matter. Does it matter to you

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it's three, four or five? No, it doesn't matter,

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly helps us informs us. So what's informing

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>me on on on on on the market right now?

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it pertains to that question is where are long

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>term inflation expectations? Where where our long dated treasury yields?

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And what has the curve done over the last several days, months, quarters,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and what how does this inform us? And I think

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>what the market is telling me is growth is slowing

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and is going back towards trend over the next year

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or two. A long term inflation is not a concern.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Short term inflation is a significant concern. And if the

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Fed races rates, they're going to they're going to just

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>aggregate demand, but they're not going to solve the supply

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>chain bottleneck issues. So it's not clear to me that

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this rate rise campaign of four this year, three next

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>year solves the inflation problem. It will only exacerbate the

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.040
<v Speaker 1>demand side problem, could lead us towards a recession. It

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of sounds like you're in the camp of of

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>really what Stephanie Flanders was discussing earlier, Carol in that

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the week, the likelihood of the Fed getting this wrong

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is super super high. What are your thoughts? Well, I

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think there's certainly a risk, but I also think that

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we we've learned through Chairman Pyle that he's pragmatic, he's

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to pivot, he's not all that stubborn. And um,

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we we saw that just a couple of years ago.

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We he was initially we thought as the market did

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that he was raising rates uh and too aggressively. And

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the market finally told him to stop, forced him to stop,

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and he did. And I think the market has a

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 1>way of conveying these messages to not only investors, but

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fed in the loop. They'll do it again. Yeah,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that is the so in that sense, I'm optimistic. Okay,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna leave it there. Hey Aaron, nice to check

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in with you. Aaron Kennon, he's found our chief executive

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>officer at Clear Harbor Asset Management, joining us on the

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>phone from Stanford, Connecticut. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News