WEBVTT - L’Oréal and IBM: AI-Powered Beauty

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. This season,

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>non Smart Talks with IBM, Malcolm Glabwell is back, and

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this time he's taking the show on the road. Malcolm

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is stepping outside the studio to explore how IBM clients

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 1>are using artificial intelligence to solve real world challenges and

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>transform the way they do business, from accelerating scientific breakthroughs

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to reimagining education. It's a fresh look at innovation in action,

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>where big ideas meet cutting edge solutions. You'll hear from

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders, creative thinkers, and of course, Malcolm Glabwell himself

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as he guides you through each story. New episodes of

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM drop every month on the iHeartRadio app,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>at IBM dot com slash smart Talks.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>To understand why the cosmetics supergiant Lorel Group is teaming

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>up with IBM, you must first take a closer look

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>at its products. Take lipstick, for example. It's one of

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>those things that seems straightforward, a waxy cylinder that you

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>rub on your lips to turn them a different color. Easy, right,

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Well maybe not. As my colleague Lucy Sullivan found out

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>when I sent her an assignment to Loreel's North America

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Research and Innovation Center.

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm reporting live from the Loreal visitor's parking lot.

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 3>Malcolm told me that he would be sending me to Paris,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>France for this Looreal excursion, but instead I am in Clark,

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 3>New Jersey. Pass a lot of strip malls on the

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 3>way here. But to be fair to Clark, New Jersey

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 3>and Lorel, this is a beautiful compound. It kind of

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>looks like a spa.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Lucy went into the center and was blown away. The

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>facility houses about six hundred scientists and experts across skincare, makeup, fragrance,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>hair care, innovative packaging, and tech. It is one of

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the largest formulation lab spaces in the industry. It's the

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 2>size of six basketball courts. The reason Loreel's facility is

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>so big and has so many people is that everything

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Loriel does to bring a product to market happens here,

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>from molecule discovery and product development to consumer testing. The

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>center even has its own mini factory. My conception of

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>lipstick that it's just a waxy stick was plain wrong.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Lipstick is a high performance product born from years of research,

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 2>consumer insights and precision science. Lipstick isn't simple. It's incredibly complex,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and one of the main reasons it's so complex is

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>just a nature of fashion trends. The kind of lipstick

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>consumers want is constantly changing.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 4>A lot of our consumer insights with Loril is like,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 4>where are consumers going in the future.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 2>This is Nadine Gomez, She's vice president for Loreel's research

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and innovation development.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Team Park Chemist are working out five six years down

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 4>the line. We predicted that consumers wanted more of a

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 4>softer look on their lips as well.

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>So how do you predict something like that.

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 4>We see slow signals from fashion houses and social media

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 4>and things like that. We kind of see that trend

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 4>evolving a little bit, and then we know at five

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 4>six years it's going.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 5>To become big.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Lucy talked with her about the origins of one of

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 2>their products, Mabe Lene matt Inc Liquid lipstick.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Our competitors had two steps. The first step is a

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 4>base coat. It's super opaque. You get the color and

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 4>you get the maddy, but it's very very drying ellips.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 4>You cannot wear that, honestly more than ten minutes. It

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 4>feels like your lips are like aching at one point,

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 4>So we had to develop a top coat, and you'll

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 4>see many of our competitors did the same thing. It's

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 4>like a bomb. You put it on top, it's super comfortable.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 4>But we also noticed that consumers kind of get tired

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 4>of reapplying a bomb. So we're like, what can we

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 4>do to create this two step into one step?

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>So Loriel had a challenge, how do you make a

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 2>comfortable liquid map lipstick that doesn't require consumers to reapply

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a top layer of bomb. Solving this type of problem

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 2>takes a lot of resources and a lot of expertise,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and crucially, it takes time. Remember Nadine said that working

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>on a breakthrough product such as matt inc can take

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>years before it comes out. But can this process be accelerated,

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 2>taken further, be even more sustainable. That's what IBM and

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Laurel are hoping to find out. My name is Malcolm Gladwell.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the latest episode of Smart Talks with IBM,

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>where we offer our listeners a glimpse behind the curtain

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of the world of technology. In our last episode, we

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>talked about how an AI assistant created with IBM Watson

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 2>X helps future teachers practice responsive teaching by simulating classroom

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 2>interactions with students. In this episode, we take you on

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>an even more unexpected journey into the world of cosmetics,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 2>hair care, skincare, fragrance, makeup, and how a custom AI

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>model could help Lorel's researchers shape the future of what

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>we put on our faces every morning. I want to

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>stay on lipstick a moment longer to help illustrate what

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 2>goes into Loriel's product development, and let's focus on matt

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 2>inc lipstick. Loreel wanted to create something that was comfortable

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 2>and could be applied in one step.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 6>So to go from two step to one step, we

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 6>had to look cross functionally and try to figure out

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 6>what can we bring into the product to make it

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 6>more comfortable, And luckily we have many different types of

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 6>products at Lorel.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 2>That's Alex Good, a senior chemist who leads the lip

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>products team in North America. She says the trick to

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 2>making matt incwork was finding an elastomer, a substance they

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>were already using in foundation.

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 6>We have this elastomer that can give you like more

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 6>comfortable and make it feel like there's like something on

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 6>your lips like a cushion.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 2>She handed Lucy two jars. The first jar contained the

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>former version of the product that was used in super

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 2>State twenty four. By the way, this is exactly why

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 2>I sent Lucy to the lab in my place the samples.

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 6>And I actually have something for you to try here,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 6>so you can try this is what was the initial product.

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So this is like it sort of looks like Okay,

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 3>it is clay. It looks like vacline that has like

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>a more of a color. It's kind of a beige,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 3>looks like some skin. Okay. So this was from the

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 3>two steps this would go on after oh okay, right violet.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So it feels like very wet as you can see,

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 6>it's kind of it's gonna absorb into your skin and

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 6>leave and then you're gonna feel the dryness.

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Of the product once it's not okay. So we're gonna move.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 6>From the clay product that you have on your hand

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 6>now to the last summer like you try half.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>One or This jar held the elastomer that Lareel has

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 2>spent years developing in the lab.

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 3>This one is a clear looks like aqua for a

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 3>much player.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 6>And you can pay a physical layer that you're putting.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 7>On your aid.

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's much thicker. It kind of like clumps together. Yeah,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 3>it was more of a cloudy it's less shimmery though

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 3>that's intended.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 6>Yes, So this is a like a powder. This dispersed

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 6>in dimethicone and it creates like a comfort on your lips.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 6>It feels like there's something there for a barrier to

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 6>keep the film form on. And that's like the key

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 6>ingredient that came from Foundation that we transferred into lipstick

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 6>to give us this innovative product ahead of the market. Yeah,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 6>this is what gives it comfort. So the difference between

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 6>super State twenty four and matt Inc is really the comfort.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 6>They both last a long time, but this matt Inc

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 6>you don't have to apply the bomb over over again,

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 6>so you can fly matting once for the day and

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 6>you're good.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>For Alex Good is underselling it here, once for the

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>day and you're good. That's a liquid lipstick revolution. Literally

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>millions of loreal consumers around the world have worn matt ink.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a blockbuster. It's also a marvel of science. The

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>world's first liquid lipstick was developed in the nineteen thirties

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>and it was actually just a stain for your lips,

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>barely counts as lipstick. Then came another wave of liquid lipstick.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 2>When they were able to make it matt that was

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 2>a two step version. It felt heavy on your lips.

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 2>You had to keep reapplying the top coat. It was inconvenient.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Loreel tackled that challenge in the lab with chemists like

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Alex and Nadine leaving the charge their breakthrough matt Inc.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 2>But creating matt Inc took a long time, trial and error,

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the hard work of scientific experimentation. As Nadean told Lucy,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the lipstick team had to put the new product to

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>extensive tests.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 4>We do a very robustability system here. You know, we

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 4>have color odor appearance. We monitor this in extreme conditions.

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 4>We simulate a forty five degrees celsius and that can

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 4>be something like a three year shelf life. I'm saying

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 4>we simulate your real life product. Like if you leave

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 4>your lip gloss in the car in Arizona's one hundred

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 4>and twelve degrees or three days, is it still going

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>to perform? Is it gonna smell? Is it gonna look granted?

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Is it gonna change colors we.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 5>Do all that.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 2>See what I mean. Lipstick is complex. Most people would

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>never consider it a piece of technology, but one lip

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 2>product has millions of data points.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 4>So much science behind. And you can see here how

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 4>many scientists we have. You know, some of them have PhDs,

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 4>some of them have master's degrees to chemistry, biology, psychology.

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Also, when I first heard about this collaboration between LORI

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>L and IBM, I was surprised. I thought, these are

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 2>two very different companies. What do they really have in common?

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 7>Pleasure, you guys, treasure. Yeah.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 2>To find out, I went to the IBM Research Center

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>outside New York City, which I have to say is

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 2>one of the coolest buildings I've ever been in, A

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>semi circular modernist masterpiece with a long curving wall of windows,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>looks like something out of a Stanley Kubrick movie. I

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>was there to talk with two experts from research and

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 2>innovation at LOREL, Metheu Cassier and gabriel Bertoli. Matthew is

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>VP for Digital and Transformation, Gabrielle is a Chief Digital

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Transformation Officer for Formulation. These are the people whose jobs

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>are to oversee big changes within the company, and Methu

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>told me to try on some lipstick.

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 8>I'm gonna make you try this one.

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 7>Okay, this is superstay vinitin final in. Yeah, so that's

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 7>a glosse. Never in my life put on lipsey. I've

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 7>no idea what I'm doing. You don't have to put it.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 8>You can try it virtually.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh this may not be news to people who buy makeup,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>but it was news to me. You can try on

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 2>loreal products virtually. They call it augmented beau.

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 7>Oh my goodness.

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 2>That is the strangest thing I've ever said. I look

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>quite fetching.

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 7>That's amazing. And I can just.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 8>Hit you can choose your color absolutely.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 7>So I'm on a little app.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 2>It's looking at me and it's just showing me exactly

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 2>how I would look with different shades of lipstick. So

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the odd idea of going into a store and trying

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 2>on each one, you cannot do that from home, if

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you're not even at the store.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely, that's all purpose. If you want to manage

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 8>a trend, I would go for something more like pitch.

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 7>You think I'm a peach person.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that looks I have to say, that

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>looks kind of natural. It just is enhanced. It's given

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 2>me a boys share I would not otherwise have. This

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>is why Loreel says it creates beauty products and beauty experiences.

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Loriel is a beauty tech company. Over the last decade,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Loreel has seized the power of AI and more recently,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>generative AI technology has become a driving force alongside science

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and creativity. And while some of this digital technology is

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 2>relatively new, Matthew helped me see that IBM and Lorel

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 2>have always had a lot in common.

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 8>So the original creator of Loyal Legentulier was a chemist

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 8>in nineteen or nine, so one hundred and sixteen years ago,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 8>and he created this new air color type for the

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 8>market in France, and then little by little, it has

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 8>been always a very scientific company. So if you look

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 8>a little bit at key facts, we invented sun filters

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 8>in the nineteen thirties, there was a very very big

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 8>milestone where we also invented not only product, but a

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 8>reconstructed skin. So if you look at nineteen seventeen nine,

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 8>we've been the created this reconstructed skin that helped us

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 8>to go out of animal testing very fast, and by

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 8>the way, before the law even asked it to cosmetic companies,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 8>and then more recently, because it's a history of innovation,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 8>we'll launch on new molecules like one that you can

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 8>find in laroche pose Melabi three, which is really helping

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 8>people to find again some you know, spots they could

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 8>have on their skin. It's all about like big mountation,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 8>how to regulate it.

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Loreel and IBM were both started in the early twentieth century,

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Loreel in nineteen oh nine and IBM in nineteen eleven.

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Both companies have long standing histories of innovation, of using

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 2>trial and error to improve everything they do. The two

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 2>companies have been doing that in parallel for more than

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 2>a century until recently. When does it start? When do

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Lorel and IBM start working together?

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 9>So we started in twenty twenty three, at the end

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 9>of the year. But you know, really the discussion is

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 9>really recent, absolutely, absolutely, it's really recent in reality. You know,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 9>I would say the first really interaction happened at the

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 9>beginning of twenty twenty four.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 2>This is Gabriel Bertoli, who I spoke to alongside Matthew.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 9>What really played a key role here is we wanted

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 9>to bring from a logic perspective to R and D together,

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 9>which Normally, you know companies like us, you just go

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 9>to a provider. You know, it's a customer and a

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 9>supplier and new work they delivered to you. Here, the

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 9>concept was totally different.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Mid two said that the collaboration began with simple conversations.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 8>So if you look at the way IBM entered into

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 8>Loreal Labs, it's started by interviewing people, what would help

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 8>you to do your job? What is your business need?

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 8>So it was, by the way, two months ago, a

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 8>long series of interviews and from all the people around

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 8>the world we have in research in Brazil, in India,

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 8>in China, Japan, US, France of course, So we really

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 8>want to make sure that at the end of the day,

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 8>this new model, this new tool that we will give

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 8>to people is really people c trick in the way

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 8>that it selves their daily need.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>More the point, Lorel has leveraged technology for decades and

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>accumulated amounted of scientific knowledge, everything from consumer aspirations and

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 2>market trends, to the results of all the experiments conducted

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 2>during product development, to which formulations melt in a hot car.

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to get your head around. Loreal isn't just

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a cosmetics company. It's a beauty data powerhouse.

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 9>If we have sixteen thousand terabat of data coming from

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 9>consumer insights, coming from market research, coming from sales, well

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 9>with the new technology, maybe by aligning those two and

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 9>using best in class technology you can solve that problem.

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 2>So you say you have sixteen terabytes of data. Put

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that in perspective. How much data is that?

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 7>Give me?

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 9>This is one hundred year of Looreal data based on

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 9>the last you know, forty years of data in the systems.

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 9>So this is really I mean, we're talking about one

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 9>hundred year of data that only Lorial have. Let's take

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 9>the example of the ellipsis. I mean, you know, if

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 9>ellipsex can be between twenty and thirty year ow material,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 9>each raw material will have I would say ten or

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 9>fifteen way of doing things.

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Gabrielle is talking about how things used to be done.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Researchers at Loreel needed roughly twenty five ingredients for a

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 2>new lipstick formulation, but they have to choose from a

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 2>pool of hundreds, if not thousands, of raw materials, and

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>even after they settle on the ones they want, they

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>have to figure out how much of each ingredient they

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>need and in what form, what molecular weight, what combination.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not just a math problem. It's a problem that

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>requires balancing multiple perspectives safety, performance, quality, compliance standards, sustainability,

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and more. It can take years. But what if you

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 2>could simulate hundreds of cars parked in a sweltering heat.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>What if you could do all those trials and errors

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>virtually over and over and over again. What if instead

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>of mixing materials together by hand, you could ask AI

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 2>to predict what combinations might work best and then try

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 2>those out first.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 9>This is ten on the power of twenty five. This

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 9>is one hundred billion of years for a human to

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 9>do a change in the formula or the possibility they have.

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 9>You can only do this by using technology, power of

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 9>technology and data that you have.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 2>This, Matthew says, is where IBM can come in to

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 2>help take things further. Using artificial intelligence, IBM can help

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Lorio create a custom AI model that helps to crunch

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>those numbers, to be a companion to the researchers, to

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>give them superpowers.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 8>We don't want to replace the intuition of the sentis.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.959
<v Speaker 8>We just want to make sure that this intuition is

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 8>really augmented by some calculation poor that as Gabrielle said,

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 8>then do those ten and the poor of twenty five

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 8>solution and probably try this one, this one, this one,

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 8>it looks like a better solution and Thentimately that's really

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 8>the decision of the chemist to make it happen.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 2>To make a predictive AI model that can give Lorel

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 2>researchers those superpowers, you'd need that mountain of data, years

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 2>worth of laboratory testing and all Loreal's data digitized and

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>AI ready. You'd need to train artificial intelligence on everything

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 2>the company has already done in order for it to

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 2>predict what it could do.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Loriial has one hundred years of course of data, fifty

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 5>years of digitized EGDA.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Mariam Ashuri, Senior director of Product Management for

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 2>IBM Watson X. Loreal has the data and part of

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>IBM's job is to help put that data to work,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>which involves ensuring data quality. Mariam talked about the concept

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 2>of AI ready data.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 5>The sole purpose of this data engineering cuyper is to

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 5>clean the data, and we call them AI ready data

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 5>makes them ready to be consumed by AI. So basically

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 5>looking into biases in the data to fix the distribution,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 5>looking into guard brains that we are putting into place

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 5>in terms of removing personal information.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Variam that explained that a custom model like the one

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 2>IBM is creating with Lorel can be more efficient and

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>targeted than the larger general purpose AI models.

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 5>You've heard about large language models. The reason that they

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 5>call them large language model is they are exposed into

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 5>really large amount of data. So the larger the model,

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 5>the more cake of all the models are, but also

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 5>the larger computed requires that translate stand increase carbon footprint

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 5>and energy consumption that translates stand, increase latency that's your

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 5>response time that translatestand increase costs. So we started seeing

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 5>that interprise started grabbing a much smaller model customize it

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 5>on their proprietary data that's the data their DOMAINO specific data,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 5>or the data about their users to create something differentiated

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 5>that is applicable to a real word use case but

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 5>also delivers the performance that they needed for a fraction

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 5>of the costs. And that's why there's been a lot

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 5>of push around using custom models versus very large general

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 5>purpose models.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So how is a custom model created? Miriam says, you

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 2>start with a base model. Imagine you're buying a car,

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>You could get a minivan or a sedan or a

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>sports car, and then you get to customize it. You

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 2>could add a sunroof, leather seats, or a rearview camera.

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Turns out you could do the same thing with your

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 2>AI model. You pick a base and then you customize it.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 2>You tune it on the data unique to your organization.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 5>We do believe that one model doesn't fit all use cases.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 5>You want to truly have access to any model anywhere,

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 5>and by any model anywhere, I really mean any model anywhere,

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 5>open source, proprietary, low call out your machine wherever the

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 5>model is. You want to host it yourself, because then

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 5>you would be able to take advantage of the best

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 5>of the technology at any point and pick the right

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 5>model for the target use case.

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>So a custom model tuned on Lorel's data would be

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 2>more targeted and efficient than a general purpose model. It

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 2>would understand the researchers world and provide transparency into its workings.

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>That's part of the magic. And what could a custom

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 2>AI foundation model do for a company like Lorel if.

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 10>You accord it was just moder is contain the complexity

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 10>of the formulation.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 7>That's game.

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>La Moline an IBM distinguished engineer and one of the

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>people working on the AI model.

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 10>And to hyperli the formulate or to go not only faster,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 10>but also I would say, be able to include more

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 10>complexity or so in the formulation, more personalization, more certain ability,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 10>better selected ingredient. So it's really a tool to help

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 10>them and to also help them to unniche the creativity.

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>THEOMI saying that with its custom AI model, Lorel could

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 2>improve every step of its product development pipeline, make the

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 2>process faster and more sustainable. But he's also saying that

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>the model could help Lorel create something that's never been

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>done before.

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 7>What could that product be? So I'm mourning you with that.

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 7>All my questions are going to be really dumb.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 11>Okay, now, please, by all means.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Right to find out what people at Lorel are dreaming of.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I spoke with Trisha Iyagari, global general manager at Loriel's

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Abeling brand, and they asked her about her own dreams

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>and how technology and science could help bring those dreams

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 2>into the world. Do you have a secret wish list

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of things you think that this partnership could produce, Like,

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>is there a product out there that's been technically too difficult?

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 2>That you think could be a worthy target.

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 11>There is one that I think could be really amazing.

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 7>What's that?

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 8>So?

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 11>Shine products in general are harder to create, and we're

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 11>unable to create a shiny, long wearing eyeshadow. So basically

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 11>like a shadow that could stay on your eyelids, that

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 11>won't settle into creases, that won't move all over your face,

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 11>that has a glossy effect. It's like the holy grail.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the holy grail. Yeah, yeah, you may have seen

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 2>that look in fashion shows, but that look isn't real,

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 2>not for people like me and Lucy.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 11>Anyway, if you're walking down a runway, you see a

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 11>lot of makeup artists doing techniques where they put some

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 11>eyeshadow on, they layer vasoline over it on like slatter

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 11>vasalina somebody's eyes to create this very like glossy look.

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 11>But you know, within five minutes after they walk down

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 11>the runway, I'm sure it's all over their face or

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 11>being washed off. So the look is kind of more

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 11>of like a fashion look that we've been unable to create,

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 11>and real, real consumers can't wear it because it would

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 11>get it everywhere.

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Trisia had another thing on her wish list too.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 11>The other that we would really like is semi permanent makeup.

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 11>So we've talked a lot about really really comfortable, thin

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 11>film makeup that you could wear all over your face

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 11>and that you can sleep in, and that it will

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 11>last a couple of days basically, so whether it be

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 11>on your face, on your lashes, on your brows. So

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 11>anything that's like more of a semi permanent meaning lasting

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 11>for three days or more, would be amazing.

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you say those two things have been the

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 2>whole How long have they been on the wish list

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 2>of Loreel?

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 11>My gosh. I have been trying to develop this shiny

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 11>eyeshadow since I started. What did I start, like twenty ten,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 11>And I'm sure many people had asked before me, and

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 11>we tried so many iterations of it and nobody's been

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 11>able to achieve it.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 2>It's clear that Loreel's experts like Tricia have a lot

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>of ideas. I once said what I called a magic

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>wand project, where I called up scientists and technologists in

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 2>as many different fields as possible and asked them what

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 2>they could create if they could just wave a magic

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>wand and make it real, And everyone had something they'd

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>want to create everyone. That's not the issue. The issue

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 2>is that there are a million different impediments to make

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the ideas on the wish list reel. Lack of resources,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>lack of time, some crucial bit of know how is lacking.

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 2>There's a gap between what we want and what we

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 2>can actually have, and one of the simplest ways to

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>think of the promise of AI is that it can

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 2>narrow that gap, not close it, of course, but do

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>enough that people with dreams realize there are more things

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 2>within their grasp.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 7>Than they could ever have imagined.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Romano, Amy Gaines, McQuaid,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Lucy Sullivan and Jake Harper. Were edited by Lacy Roberts.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Engineering by Nina Bird Lawrence, mastering by Sarah Brugerer. Music

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>by Gramoscope. Special thanks to Tatiana Lieberman and Cassidy Meyer.

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and Ruby Studio at iHeartMedia. To find more Pushkin podcasts,

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts. I'm Malcolm Gabo. This is a paid

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 2>advertised from IBM. The conversations on this podcast don't necessarily

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 2>represent IBM's positions, strategies, or opinions.