WEBVTT - Democracy in the Dumpster

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to wok F Daily with

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Meet your Girl Danielle Moody. Pre recording from the Home Bunker. Folks,

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it is wokf's holiday week and it is our farewell

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>week as we close out seven years of conversations, rage, information, celebration,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and trying to deliver keen political analysis over the last

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>seven years. So this week I am bringing you some

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite shows with some of the voices that

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we've brought took f over the years that I am

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>just so grateful for. First up is my conversation with

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>our friend Ellie Mistell, who is the Justice correspondent at

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the Nation, and he returns and in this episode he

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>gives his expert perspective on Trump's indictments that we now

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>have known are no longer they've gone the way of

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the wind. But to remind us these indictments were serious,

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and had America decided to, oh, I don't know, not

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>vote for a convicted felon, not vote for somebody that

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>had been indicted multiple times, not vote for somebody who

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>showed very little care about the American people but a

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention to America's coffers, maybe we wouldn't be

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in the situation that we're in. But I think that

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it is important as we wind our way to the

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>second Trump regime, which is certain to be worse than

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the first one, because now they know where all the

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>keys the kingdom are. The first time around, they were

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>just case in the joint seeing what they could take,

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>and as my friend doctor Christina Grier said, it was

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a smash and grab job. This time around, they can

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>be methodical, they can be slow because guess what, ain't

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>nobody going and check them? So in this best of episode,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Ellie Mistell brings us through the Trump indictments and the

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>mountain of evidence that America will never see. Folks, I

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>am so excited to welcome back to wok F after

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>just too long of a time away, which is our

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>friend Ellie Mistel, who is a justice correspondent for the

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Nation and the author of Allow Me to Retort, A

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Black Guy's Guide to the Constitution and just all around.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the fuck we call Twitter these days?

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it X?

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Is it? You know?

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Trash? It is trash, but you you make it a

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>place still worth going. I will say that, Ellie.

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, don't put that. Don't you put that evil on me.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Let me not put that X on you by that. So, Ellie,

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you know I want to talk to you because I

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.839
<v Speaker 1>just there are times when I wish that I had

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not listened to the old white male professor who told

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>me it wasn't smart enough to go to law school,

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that I actually went. And it is times when

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to understand how much legal trouble a normal

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>person whose name wasn't Trump would be in, uh if

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>they had all of these indictments that have already come

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>out and one big one still that is looming, actually

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>two big ones that are looming if you're also looking

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>at the state of Georgia. But walk us through, because

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's potential, the potential of Donald Trump being indicted for

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a third time while people are listening to this is

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>very high. So please walk us through where we are

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in the insurrection case so as not to get people

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>confused with the other indictments that the former twice impeach

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>president has.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes, any look, a normal person would be in jail

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>like eight times over by this point. A normal person's

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 2>children would probably be in jail at least twice over

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 2>by this point. The normal rules simply don't apply to Trump.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>The White Rules does do. And that's kind of how

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>where we start with. Right, this indictment that's coming from Jacksmith,

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 2>potentially already out from Jacksmith, coming at the time that

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>we're recording. To me, this is the big one. This

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 2>is the one that we should have been working towards.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Since January seventh, twenty twenty one. Now, there has been

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>reporting about how Merrek Carlin has slow walked the investigation

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and basically kind of did everything he could to get

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 2>Trump off the hook. But finally he appointed Jack Smith.

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I've said on other shows Danielle that I think I

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>was wrong about Jack Smith. I thought he would be

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of another Robert Muller type, and he has not

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 2>been run. Now, he is not an actual fucking prosecutor,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and he has been putting the wood to Trump, not

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 2>just in the espionage case, but now finally on the

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 2>January sixth case. We already know that he has interviewed. Basically,

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>he has finally done the work that Garland should have

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 2>been doing and that the January sixth Select Committee in

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Congress already did. Right, He's finally done the interviews with

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the Cassidy Hutchinson's and the Mark Meadows and the Steve

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>batt Bannons. He's gotten all of that information in and

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>he's prepared to charge Trump with a number of ofugh crimes.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Right the biggest ticket would be kind of conspiracy to

0:05:56.080 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 2>deprive right through the color of law. That's basically the

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to intimidate and and potentially assassinate Mike Pence charge,

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Like that's that's what that is. He's going to be charged,

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>we believe, with obstruction and and and and the fake

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>electors scheme as well. And these are the serious ones,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>not just serious in terms of like legal jeopardy, but

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 2>serious in terms of actually holding the man accountable for

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the coup he tried to pull off against the government,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Like that needs to happen, and it looks like that

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 2>that is finally going to happen. The problem, Danielle, is.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>That because there always is one elle race, it's.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 2>It's never just good news. The problem is that that accountability,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 2>that trial over these charges will most likely happen in

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, and will only be allowed to happen

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 2>if Trump loses again another presidential election, where he will

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>again try to steal it and potentially again try to

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>do another coupe, right, Like this is all because of

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the timeline, because of Merrick Garland's slow walking to get

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>us to this point. We are now in a situation

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 2>where it's just very unlikely that any of these trials

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>are going to happen before the election. And that's not

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and there's almost nothing we can do about that. Like

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the timeline is the timeline, and so Trump will get

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>to run again.

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But but let me ask you, let me ask this.

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I want to say why.

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to say I will say why.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But so you have first in the Document's case, ailing

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Cannon has set the date from May twenty four, twenty

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, right, yep, And so that is several months

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>prior to the election. Why is it that? And then

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump prior to that? I believe that Donald Trump,

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it has the another Egen Carroll case that I believe

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is happening in October. Why wouldn't this case, which is

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be heard in Washington, DC, because it has

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>such a long runway given a Leen Cannon's timeline, and

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>there is no need for security clearance in the way

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Document's case requires security clearance. Why wouldn't that

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>be set for the end of the year or January because.

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Trials take a long time. I mean, it's just like

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>there it is. It is just true that trials, especially

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 2>trials of rich white people, take a long time to

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>process through the system, and the defense lawyers remember, like

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of times, here's here's the thing that listeners

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>have to think about a lot of times when they

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 2>hear about court cases or trials from television, news or

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>even most print media. They're caring about it from the

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>perspective of a prosecutor, right, And the prosecutors are always like,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 2>go now, go now, we can do this now. And

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 2>when they are when the prosecutors are facing criminal defendants

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>who are underfunded, underprivileged black Latino, the system is very

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 2>happy to go as quickly as humanly possible to get

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a black and brown people in jail. But when it

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 2>happens to white people, the defense attorneys have usually legitimate

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 2>reasons and arguments to delay trial. Right. One of the

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>biggest ones is that the defense lawyers need time to

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 2>go over all of the evidence that the government has

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and prepare an adequate defense. Right. So in these cases

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I always argue kind of in favor of the defense,

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>because I realize that more often than not, what I'm

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>doing is arguing on behalf of black and Latino people

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 2>who are being railroaded through the system. Right, So I

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 2>understand and I guess the need for defend's attorneys to

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>have time to prepare their cases. Is Trump getting more

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>time than normal? It depends on what you think normal is. Right.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 2>If you think normal is what we do to black people,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 2>then hell yeah, he's getting way more time. Is he

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 2>getting more time than he should? The brass tacks of

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>it is, if you look at the espionage case, at least,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 2>given when Smith was allowed to make these charges, I

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>think May twenty fourth is about the right day. I

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 2>think that's about the right time. Now. The question is,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think that this is the bigger problem. It's

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 2>unlike May twenty fourth is unlikely to hold up. You know, sorry,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>May twentieth, twenty twenty four is unlikely to hold up

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 2>because as we get closer to May twentieth, twenty twenty four,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Trump's lawyers will again ask for a delay. They will

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 2>say they were overwhelmed, so they'll be there. They're busy

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 2>running a campaign. They'll say whatever they have to say,

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and with Trump Judge Eileen Cannon having already own a

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>willingness to the lay this trial for six months, it's

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I think, but this is.

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>This is why I think that the insurrection case has

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the potential to go before ailing Cannon's case. And my

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling is one because it's going to be held in DC.

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. And this is a question for you,

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>who do we think that that judge is like what

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>circuit is this going through? Is that this is actually

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>about this about national security?

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about somebody who is going to be indicted

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>on charges that I am going to assume one of

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>them may in fact be seditious conspiracy, which we have

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>seen both keeper folks and others get charged with and

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it stick. So I guess, like, am I being in

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>two naive Ellie in thinking that the fate of our

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>democracy and the person who instigated and incided the riot

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Capitol and told people to overturn the government

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>who is running for election, that that would be caused

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for a speedy trial.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you're right. I think it should. I think

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 2>that the differences in the January sixth case versus the

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>espionage case lend itself to a faster timeline than what

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Eileen Canon has set up for the espionage case. As

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 2>you point out, this is happening in DC, that means

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 2>that the judge, we don't know what judge will get right,

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 2>and it will be a random choice from among the

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 2>judges that sit on in the DC circuit. Right, that

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 2>circuit is generally pretty split. Generally, it's not as conservative

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>as the Florida circuit where Canon was pulled from, is

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 2>not as conservative as like the Fifth Circuit if it

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 2>was out in Texas or Louisiana. It's a pretty pretty

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>evenly split circuit, you know. But it's still going to

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>come down to kind of a random dice roll in

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 2>terms of which judge we get right. If you get

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 2>an aggressive judge, you will have an aggressive timeline. And yeah,

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>there's there's a good chance that they will set a

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>date before the next election. But then the defense lawyers

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 2>will appeal that date. And don't forget that these appeals

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 2>about the timing of the of the of the trial

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 2>could go all the way to the Supreme Court, where

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Trump has stacked the Supreme Court with his own hand

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 2>picked judges. Brett Kavanaugh in particular, is very susceptible to

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>arguments that this is happening too close to the election

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>for us to do anything about it, like he's made

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 2>that argument before in cases involving outright racism in electoral jerrymandering. Right,

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>So I am not confident that an aggressive timeline will

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>will work in front of Brett Kavanaugh or the other Conservatives.

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 2>So we'll still have to wait and see, but I

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>think that it is very likely that this trial will somehow,

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 2>some way get delayed until after the election.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>The positive is where are you going for the positive?

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Because you have already put my feelings and my hopes

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and dreams in the dumpster along with our democracy. So

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>what road trip are we go not for the positive side?

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>The positive is this the last time Trump lost an election,

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 2>he should have immediately been thrown into jail for his

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 2>efforts to overturn it. And obviously the system wasn't ready

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>to do that. We picked Merrick Garland instead of like

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>a better person. You know, lots of issues happen. We

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 2>weren't ready. The system wasn't ready to throw his ass

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>in jail after he lost the last election. If he

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>loses the next one, the positive here is that I

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 2>really do believe that if he loses the next election,

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 2>there will be you know, tiny little handcuffs waiting for

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 2>him at the end of that road. Like he needs

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to win the election to stay out of jail. And

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>if he loses, and he should lose because he's a

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 2>terrible person and a terrible candidate and blah blah blah blah,

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>if he loses, there should be handcuffs waiting for him

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>if he loses.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And right now we're at a fifty to fifty fucking

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>toss up that that is going to be the reality,

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>right Like it's fifty to fifty that Donald Trump doesn't

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have the maneuvers still to lie, cheat and steal his

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>way to the White House. Now, I think that the upside,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>if in fact we call it that because it's not

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the floor, the upside is that, I hope, because we

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>have tried the Jurassic Park version where they have touched

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>all of the fences and folks have been you know,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>are there are sixteen fake electors that are being charged

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in you know, in Michigan. You got other people that

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>are being investigated. I think that in my opinion, and

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about this case next the dragnet,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>if you will, is coming out of Georgia, because I

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think that Trump is the only person that Fannie

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Willis is looking at when she's prepared to drop her indictments.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And so again we our democracy held on by a

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>thread and was tested over sixty six times in court

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with Rudy Giuliani, with these fake electors, with the phone calls,

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I think folks are prepared for what they

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>know could be coming their way. That's the only hope here.

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>That and you know, a fourth indictment, the fourth and

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>final I don't know, coming out of Georgia.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, if we're looking for hope, that's where

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>we find it. Right like that, people will be more

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>prepared that are there, elections will be more resilient this

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 2>time than they were last time. Of course, you also

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 2>have to worry about the fact that, you know, one

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons why it's so important to prosecute people

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>who attempt coups is that if you don't prosecute them,

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and if you don't hold them accountable, they just try

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 2>it again, and the second time they're better. So as

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>much as we can say that like, okay, our elections,

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 2>our election system should be better prepared to defend itself

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>from Trump. We also have to understand that Trump and

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>his forces will make a better coup attempt round two,

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 2>having potentially learned lessons from round one. We know that

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>they've done a lot to stack the courts, to stack

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the secretaries of states in ways that are amenable to

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 2>various coup attempts, whether the legal ones, the quote unquote

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 2>legal ones of fake electors and whatever. We all, but

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 2>we also know that his more violent forces, you know,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>have also learned some lessons about how to violently overthrow

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the government, and we can we have to at least

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>expect that they will be coming again. You know. We know,

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>for instance, one of the biggest organizing things that Trump

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 2>used to put the coup out there with social media,

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.719
<v Speaker 2>and after you know, being banned, we know that he

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>now has an ally in Elon Musk and social media

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>potentially to organize another coup. So like, yes, there are

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 2>more defenses, but also they're going to be new attacks,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>and so we have to be you know, I am

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 2>still hopeful that he loses, and I'm still hopeful that

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 2>after he loses, he loses all of his attempts to

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>overthrow the election. But I'd be a fool to think

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 2>that they're not going to be It's not going to

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 2>be like, you know, we're watching TV on November whatever

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and CNN says no, the winner is declared for and

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 2>then that's it. Right. We know there's going even after

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 2>he loses at the balance, we know there's going to

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>be another attempt, and we're prepared for that too.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>We shall see. Let's switch gears a little bit just

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to go down to Georgia and then I want to

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>go to the Supreme Court. So down in Georgia, you

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>do have Fannie Willis. You do have another what I

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>deem as another very serious case right that she's been

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>building an unlike the slothlike pace of Merrick Garland, she's

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>actually been going full steam ahead for the last two years.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So give us your thoughts on where Fannie while Willis

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is in terms of her You know, she gave us

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>an announcement several months ago that said we were to

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be on the lookout between July and September. Well we're

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>headed into August now, So what do you think about

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>her case and the timing and then how again this

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>all measures up as we head into the fall a

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>year out from the presidential So I've.

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Always thought Georgia had the strongest case because they have

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 2>the motherfucker on tape trying to overturn the election. Right,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 2>They've got, like everybody's heard the tape where he tries

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 2>to find eleven thousand votes, which has just happens to

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 2>be exactly how many he needs to overturn the election.

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 2>So I've always thought that just kind of evidentiary, that

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 2>is the strongest case against him. But one thing, and

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I do believe that Fannie Willis has been a dedicated,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of hardworking public servant and is trying to do

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 2>things the right way. But we have seen that Fannie

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Willis is also sensitive to political pressure, and so you know,

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 2>we saw her say before the midterms that she wouldn't

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 2>release any news within a kind of zone of secrecy

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 2>around the midterms so as to not unduly influence the

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>midterm elections, which is not a legal position, it's a

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>political position. So, you know, not something that I would

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 2>have done. But okay, so now again what we what

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 2>we worry about with Willis is not whether or not

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>she's going to diligently charge a crime that she can prove,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>but whether or not that trial comes off before the election,

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know, if Fannie Willis is not willing to

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 2>make any an announcement within a zone of secrecy around

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 2>the midterms, you know, is she gonna be willing to

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 2>put this man to trial and let's say July twenty

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, right before the Republican National Convention, or he

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 2>will be crowned the GOP nominee. Again, I don't know that.

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that she'll do that. I don't know

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 2>that I don't know that a judge will let her

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>do a Georgia judge will let her do that. So again,

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 2>the I just am not sure, despite the immense legal

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 2>jeopardy he's under, I'm just not sure that any of

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>these trials, the Willis one, either of the Jack Smith ones,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that any of them come off before

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>November twenty twenty four.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>So essentially we're fucked right, And essentially we've all played

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>into Donald Trump and his lawyer's hands in knowing exactly

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how they were going to use this, how it was

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be spun, the timeline that was going to

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>be created, and the person to blame isn't just Donald

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump and his lawyers, because we always know the tactics

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be made. It is Merrick Garland

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and his desire to not play politics and play the

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>most insane politics at the same time, which is, let

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>me not go after Donald Trump because I don't want

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to look like this is something partisan. Let me waste

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve months of time, and now we're here.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 2>The analogy that Ivan mcgarland is like a basketball referee

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 2>who swallows the whistle and refuses to call a file,

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>and that referee says like, Oh, I'm just trying to

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>be neutral and fair to both sides. I'm not going

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 2>to call file. I was going to let the games

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 2>play out. That's not being fair and neutral. That is

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 2>benefiting the team that fouls. If you don't call the

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 2>rules correctly, you benefit the team that breaks the rules.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's Merrick Garland and his alleged attempt to be

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>non political. He has. All he's done is completely politicize

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the process. And that the reason why I've been screaming

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 2>about Merrick Garland for two years prior to this is

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 2>because at some point his failure becomes unrecoverable, right like

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you can't and This is where I'm talking about the timeline.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Because of his delays, it's now very hard to squeeze

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 2>everything in before the election. I mean, Danielle, riddle me this. Okay,

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's say one of these trials goes off and he

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 2>gets convicted. Is he gonna get sentenced before the election.

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Is he gonna be sent to jail before the election?

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 2>How does that even work? Are we gonna actually send

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>federal marshals to arrest the Republican nominee for president eight

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 2>weeks before the general election? Is that really something that's

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 2>gonna happen in America? Because that's gonna look like something

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 2>that happens in you know, other cut and true Banana

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 2>republic countries. Right. So, because the timeline has been so truncated,

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know how any of this happens before

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>he's allowed to run again. And so even if he's

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 2>tried and convicted, if he wins the presidency, he will

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 2>pardon himself from that conviction commute, I think at that

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>point is what you would call what he would do,

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 2>And so he would never face actual accountability even if

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 2>he was convicted, and he's convicted on the state charges

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 2>where he can't pardon himself. I mean again, are the

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Georgia State troopers gonna go arrest the president of the

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 2>United States? Is that at some point the practicality kind

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>of trumps the theory of the case, right, Yeah, and

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 2>and and so that's my problem, that's my that's my worry.

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Like all of this, all of this looks great on paper,

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 2>right when you actually when it actually comes to time

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 2>to try convict and jail this man before the election,

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's too late. It wouldn't be too

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>late if we were having this trial right now, right.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's again where the failure of Garland where the

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 2>slow pace of all the investigations really take a hole.

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 2>If you think about where we were at the end

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 2>of the January sixth Select Committee process, right where Trump

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 2>could have been charged that day based on that final

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 2>report from the Congressional Select Committee, right, like an aggressive

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 2>prosecutor would have been really ready to charge his ass

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 2>that day. At the end of twenty twenty two, then

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about a trial that happens not in May

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, but May twenty twenty three. Yeah, we're

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.719
<v Speaker 2>talking about a sentencing process that's happening over the summer.

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about the legitimate ability to capture and jail

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 2>this man before Labor Day, a year and a half

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>before the election, and that would have been doable. Now

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I just it's very hard to see

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>it happening.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>God, this was depressing.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Well again, if he loses straight to the pokey right,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 2>if there's no addition like the again, the other way

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to positive to spend this positively is that Trump is

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 2>using his last get out of jail free cards and

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 2>as long as we don't give him four years of

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>another one, right, as long as we don't give him

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 2>another draw for those cards, he's gonna run out eventually

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and we should be able to put his ass in jail.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I mean, here's hoping, right, I have no faith,

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>but you know, here, here's hoping. Before I let you go, Ellie,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna scrap Scotis because you know they've scrapped democracy

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in the country, integrity. But I do want to get

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to someone who I believe that both of us probably

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>grew up listening to, whose music had resonated, and who

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>has clearly had a fucking lobotomy. And that is the

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>one and only ice Cube, who was just recently filming

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>with none other than Tucker Carlson, Please take the floor.

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I would like our friend Torrejo was big, you know,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 2>feature pieces titled from Fuck the Police to Fund the Police,

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 2>the punk bitification of ice Cube.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm texting him right now like that, that.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Is what I want to read, because how this man

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 2>has gone from where he was, where he was one

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>of the what what the what the over educated black

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 2>folks like me like to call one of the urban

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>poets who is you know, talking about police brutality and

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the devastating effects that has on the black community to

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 2>this point where he's kissing their ass is just one

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest devolutions that I can think that I

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 2>have seen in my lifetime. Now I have a theory

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 2>about this, Danielle. I call it the special black Man

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>theory is that there are there are you know, one

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of the and this kind of They're gonna call me

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 2>a critical race theorist after this, but like you know,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 2>one of the issues that I think a lot of

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>black people chafe against is the fact that we're always

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>grouped in with everybody else, right, We're always we're always

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, collectively viewed as if we are a monolithic

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 2>people and we're not right, and some but some special

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>black men like chase at that more than others, right,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 2>And so then their idea is just that whatever most

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>black people are doing, they gotta do something different just

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to prove that they special, they not like the rest

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of us. Right. And so you could argue, and this

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 2>is why I want again a scholar like Terrey to

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of explain it to me. You could argue that

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe he was never really about fuck the police. Maybe

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>he was always just about being special, just just saying

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 2>that special thing that makes him a little bit different

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>than the other black And so now it actually so

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's not incongruous. Maybe it actually perfectly tracks. He

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 2>was fucked the police when the most black people were like, okay,

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 2>we have to have belize what can we do? And

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 2>now that most black people are like, you know what,

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>fuck the police, he's like, oh, actually no, Tucker and

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I tan our balls together, like because he's just like

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 2>that special guy. Like that's my that's my theory. But

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I have not studied, and so I study want somebody

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 2>explain it to me.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You as I mean, but I think that everything that

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you just laid out is right. Maybe we're the ones

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that got it wrong, and he just wanted to be

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a standout, and so at a time in the eighties

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and early nineties he was going to be that standout

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>with Fuck the Police. But maybe we too closely associated

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>his rapping in the way that like Chuck D of

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Public Enemy, actually is that fucking guy right who believes

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what it is that he is rapping about and has

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>always right been that rapper of thought. And so maybe

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it fell on the rest of us that this motherfucker

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>has just been a performer that has played the industry,

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>played his fans, and this is who he is.

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe for ice Cube that was just the song man.

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 2>It was raw, like you you write a song for

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Kesha and she's gonna say it and it's gonna be awesome,

0:30:58.040 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>And maybe that's all it was. For him. It was

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 2>just a song, you know, and and and it wasn't

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's not as you say, He's not Chuck D.

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 2>He's not k R. S One. He's not one of

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 2>these guys who actually live that life or or or

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 2>live that progressiveness. He was just a guy singing a song.

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>He was just a guy singing a song, how fucking sad.

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I want my money back, but I don't know I I.

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I want a deeper dive into what's happening because the

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 2>other thing, Daniels, and you know, we're old enough and

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 2>black enough to have seen this. There is always the

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>like negro gets a bit of money and loses their

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>damn mind, right, Like, they get a bit of money,

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, you know the black people who when

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 2>they meet the I R s for the first time

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 2>as an adult, it's wait a minute, what are these

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 2>tax I? Don't like these? Ronald Reagan told me, and

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>that that's how it happens, right, Like, It's not uncommon

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>for people of any race, color, or creed to get

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more conservative as they get older and

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>get more money and start to try to figure out

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 2>how to keep it. That's not uncommon. This is just

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the kind of extremist, extrema extremophile version of that, you know,

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>normal aging process.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Well, I'll just tell you breaking news.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Tore just said, good idea. I can't wait, So so

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, folks who will have to wait and see

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>got Danielle.

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh my god, I'm gonna be able to

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>read something like I don't want to read more about

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 2>what the hell is going on?

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so well we'll see, we'll see what because I

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have to, I have to tetch them like in the moment,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>so we won't see. Uh, we will see uh where

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that goes. But you know, you could be right for

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a tour Ray, you know, I mean, for for a

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>tour Rade, this would be the interview I'd want to see.

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But for ice Cube maybe that's the title of it.

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It was just the song. We took it too seriously evidently.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>As always, my friend Ellie Vistal, it is a joy

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and a pleasure when you bring the bad news, but

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you bring it with such passion and flair to WOKF.

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I always appreciate you.

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having me.

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>That is it for me today, dear friends on wok F.

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>As always, power to the people and to all the people. Power,

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>get woke and stay woke as fuck.