WEBVTT - Trudeau Gets Trucked

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Falling up on the Supreme Courts. A number of Republicans,

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>as you know, and as you've been asked about, to

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have spoken out about the president's pledge to pick a

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>black woman for the hot sport. How do you respond,

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>specifically to Ted Cruz who overnight solve it offensive and

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>defensive the black woman they really make that WoT. Well,

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>here's what I would say. First, Just over a year ago,

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the previous president also promised to select a woman for

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. Not only were there no complaints about

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>choosing a nominee from a specific demographic from the same corners,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>but there was widespread praise of now Justice Barrett on

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>those grounds, with Republican lawmakers widely highlighting that they thought

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this was positive for women in America. So take Senator

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Cruz himself. He had no objection to Donald Trump promising

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>he'd nominated a woman in twenty twenty. Repeat, no objection

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. In fact, he praised her on these grounds

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>during praised her on these grounds. The nominee during her

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>confirmation hearing, Senator Cruz said quote, I think you're an

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>amaze using role model for little girls. What advice would

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.919
<v Speaker 1>you give little girls? When President Reagan Honors campaign pledge

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to place the first woman on the court. He said

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it symbolized the unique American opportunity. There is no outcry

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>around that. The President's view is that after two hundred

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and thirty years of their Supreme Court being in existence,

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that not a single black woman has served

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Supreme Court is a failure in the process,

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not a failure or a lack of qualified Black women

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to serve as Supreme Court justices. This episode, A Verdict

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>with Ted Cruz is brought to you by Thompson's Cigar.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to sell you. The gentleman on this

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>show like cigars. Well so does my husband most times. Actually,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what we do after the show. We go smoke

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>cigars and tell ourselves what a great show it was.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>That's why you've got to check out Thompson's Cigar. Whether

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you're working from home or just kicking back after a

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>week of being essential, there's no better way to relax

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>than with a premium cigar. They've got the best prices

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on the best brands in the business, from Macanudo to

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Monte Cristo. Looking to try a new, rare, top rated blend,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>but don't want to splurge on box as well, check

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>out Thompson Cigars Tour, a smattering of five different blends

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>delivered to your doorstep each month. Now. Michael and my

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>husband have been fans of Thompson even before they became

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>a partner. In fact, I think Thompson Cigar sponsors to

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Moles Show as well. No one has more selection

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>than Thompson. Their customer service is the best. So sit

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>back and take a break from all the craziness with

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a cigar from Thompson Cigar Company. This guy, these guys

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rarely do offers, but right now Thompson is offering our

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>listeners fifteen percent off orders over seventy five dollars or

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent off orders over ninety nine dollars. To take

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>advantage of these incredible savings, simply go to Thompson Cigar

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com and use the promo code cactus when you're

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>ready to check out. That's website is Thompson Thompson Cigar

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>dot com and use promo code cactus. Thompson Cigar dot

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Com promo code cactus. This episode of Verdict with Ted

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Cruiz is also sponsored by American Hartford Gold I'm sure

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the only one who's noticed everything is getting expensive.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>We are in the biggest economic crisis since two thousand

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and eight, with the government that's printing trillions and trillions

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. Consumer prices are the highest we've seen in

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. Inflation is certainly here to stay, and if

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the government continues it's out of control printing and spending,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the dollar could continue its free fall and lose its

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>coveted role as the world reserve currency. So how do

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you protect your money, your retirement, your savings. Well, American

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Heartford Gold can show you how to head your heart

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>earned savings against inflation by helping you diversify a portion

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of your portfolio into physical gold and silver. They'll even

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>help move your existing IRA or four O one K

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>out of the volatile stock market into a precious metals IRA,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and they make it easy. They are the highest rated

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>firm in the country, with an A plus rating from

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the Better Business Bureau and therefore thousands of satisfied clients.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you call them right now, they will give

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you up to fifteen hundred dollars of free silver on

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>your first qualifying order. So don't wait. Call them now

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>call eight five five, seven, six, eight one eight eight three.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>That's eight five five seven, six eight one eight eight three,

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or text cactus to six five five three two. Again

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that's eight five five seven, six eight one eight eight three.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Or text cactus to six five five three two. This

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>episode of Verdict is also brought to you by stamps

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. If you've got a small business, and I

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of you do, you know that there's

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing more valuable than your time, so stop wasting it

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>on trips to the post office. Stamps dot com makes

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it easy to mail and ship right from your own computer.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You can save time and money with stamps dot com

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>send letters and packages for less with discounted rates from USPS,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>UPS and more. Stamps dot Com brings the services of

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the Postal Service and UPS shipping right to your computer.

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So whether you're in office sending invoices, a side hustle

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Etsy shop, or a full blown warehouse shipping out orders,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>stamps dot com will make your life easier. All you

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>need is a computer and a standard printer, no special

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>supplies or equipments. Within minutes, you're up and running printing

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>official postage for any letter, any package, anywhere you want

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to send and you'll get exclusive discounts on postage and

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>shipping from usps and ups. Once your mail is ready,

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all you have to do is schedule a pickup or

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>drop it off. No traffic, no lines, there's no risk.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>With our promo code Verdict, you get a special offer

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>that includes a four week trial plus free postage and

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a digital scale. No long term commitments or contracts. Just

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>go to stamps dot com, click on the microphone at

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>the top of the homepage and type in Verdict. That's

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>stamps dot Com promo code Verdict. Never go to the

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>post office again. Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael Knowles and Liz am I correct to assume

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that there is going to be even more content for

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the Verdict Plus subscribers after the show. You are correct

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to assume that. Thank you, Michael, Thank you Senator for

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>having me back on. I'm excited to introduce today the

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Cloak Room on Verdict Plus. This is only for Verdict

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Plus subscribers. You can join us over there Verdict with

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruise dot Com Slash Plus. It's a brand new

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>series with Senator Ted Cruz, co hosted by me, Liz Wheeler. Basically,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pick his brain like I would in

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a strategy session. It's a behind the scenes peak into

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>details of what goes on in DC, just like the

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>actual cloakroom of the Senate. Today, we're going to talk

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>about how to apply a constructed foreign policy to a

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>real life situation like Ukraine. We're going to talk about

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Whoopie Goldberg, and we're going to talk about Tom Brady again.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>You can join us Verdict with Ted Cruise dot com

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>slash plus. In fact, to get a one month free

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>trial on your annual subscription. You can use the promo

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>code Cloakroom. That is promo code Cloakroom at Verdict with

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruise dot Com Slash plus for a one month

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>free trial on your annual subscription. That sounds absolutely magnificently

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is I can't wait to head over there, and I

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>know the new show is going to be a huge success.

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>And then after that, we are of course going to

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>launch a show with the Senator and the Cactus. We

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are going We're going to and then we're gonna have

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a show with me and you and the Cactus without

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the Senator. There is going there is a lot of

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>content for you over there at Verdict Plus. So please

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>head on over subscribe, do not hesitate to join today. Liz,

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>We will see you a little bit later. Senator First,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you're in trouble again. You have, You've gotten us both

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in troubled again. Verdict some weeks ago was I think

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the first podcast in American history to be referenced at

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>during a White House press briefing. Now I think we're

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>also the second podcast in history to be referenced because

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of your comments on this show about the Supreme Court nominee.

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I gotta say, the media and Democrats are

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>really phenomenal. So we saw our last podcast. We talked

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the Supreme Court, and you and I

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.119
<v Speaker 1>talked about how it is offensive that Biden threw down

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that the only criterion he would look look for in

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>nominating a replacement for Justice Briars that it had to

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>be a black woman, and the media lost their mind.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there were stories all over the country with

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>media reporters saying this is terrible. And you know, you

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>look at Jensaki there, she actually engages in the logical

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>sleight of hand, were actually the illogical slight of hand

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the left does often because she says, well, if you

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't support a quota, then you don't like whoever it is.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the characteristic is about the person that they're putting

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a quota in place. So for example, she says, well,

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>when Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, you said she was

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a great role model for little girls. Well, of course

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>she is the fact that that you're saying someone's a

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>woman and a mom and an amazing scholar and an

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>amazing judge. Yes, she is a woman. We are aware

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know. Do I think Clarence is Thomas's

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>life story growing up as a poor kid an African

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>American and Pinpoint Georgia overcoming poverty is an amazing story. Absolutely, yes.

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>But here's the weird thing. Democrats today, the modern left

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in this includes all of the corporate media. They embrace

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>discriminating based on race. They believe in discriminating based on race.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's a difference between nominating someone who's a woman,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or nominating someone who's a black man, or nominating someone

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>who's a black woman, and saying, at the outset in

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this instance, ninety four percent of Americans are categorically ineligible.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what their qualifications are I Joe Biden

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>won't consider them. And you know it's it's interesting, Michael,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if anyone else tried to do this in your business.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're running a business. Let's say Daily Wire

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>puts up an ad we're looking for a copy editor.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Only black women need apply, or only Native American men

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>need to apply, or only white guys need to apply.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It would be obviously illegal, It would be obviously wrong.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And what Biden is doing here, and it's amazing. Look,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he could have done the exact same thing, said we're

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>going to look for qualified jurists, for someone with a

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>great record, and nominated someone who happened to be a

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>black woman, and that would have been perhaps have been

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful thing. But but you know, one of the

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>tells that shows that Biden actually really doesn't care about

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>crossing that threshold. Do you know who is one of

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the very few people on planet Earth to have ever

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>filibustered a black woman nominated to be a federal judge.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I know the answer. But who that would be?

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Biden. So when George W. Bush nominated Janice Rogers Brown,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly qualified jurist, to the DC Circuit, the Federal

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Court of Appeals. What did Joe Biden do he filibuster

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>not once twice. Not only Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer did it.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Dick Durbin did it. The Democrats all stood together and said,

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>not that black woman, because she actually believes in the

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Constitution. We want a left wing activist. And

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's bizarre that that it is become an article of

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>faith among the left, that discriminating based on race, doing

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it explicitly at the beginning, we are only looking at

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>black women. That's that almost takes on like this, this

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>religious significance to them. They believe in it. And I

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>got to say, you know, I'm reminded of something Chief

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Justice Roberts said. He said, it's a sordid business that's

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>diving us up by race and drawing distinctions. Look, when

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we were putting this podcast together, I was looking for

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a host. But I didn't say, give me an Italian yalee.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I said, let's let's find the host. Look at Italian yale.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I would have that would have limited the field somewhat

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and we would have landed on you. Nonetheless, it did.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 1>It's true. You know, I don't think anyone has ever

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>put out a call for an Italian Yale, they usually

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>they say no, thank you need not apply. But that's

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>true because it was color blind and degree blind casting.

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I got to do it. And I think your point

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is really important here, which is Joe Biden could have

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>fulfilled his campaign pledge and just happened to have nominated

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a black woman. But what he did was so crass,

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it was so tactless, and if it were any other industry,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it would be illegal to say I'm taking ninety four

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.599
<v Speaker 1>percent of Americans out of the running here. If you

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>look at public polling, people don't like this. The majority

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of Americans think that Joe Biden should have considered all

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of the nominees, even if he ended up with a

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>black woman in the end. So I think the proof

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of the pudding there is in the tasting. Yet seventy

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>six percent of Americans disagree with what Biden's doing. And

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>let's take for an example, because SAKI in the media,

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>this is their talking point. They're going to is oo,

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Trump did this with Amy Coney Barrett. Well, actually no,

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. So what they're referring to is that Trump

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>at a rally just a few days before he announced

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Amy Coney Barrett's a nomination, said he's gonna he's gonna

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>nominate someone, and she's a woman. Well, yes, he was

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>aware she was a woman, so once he decided who

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.599
<v Speaker 1>he was going to nominate, he acknowledged that she was

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a woman. But if you think about how Trump did this,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump did it in a way There's never been a

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>president who's done it this way. He put out a list,

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a detailed, specific list of potential Supreme Court nominees while

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>he was still a candidate for president. He had twenty

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one names honored initially. Then he supplemented that list. He

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>added ten more names, and in fact, we've talked about

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast how the ten more names he added

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>were a condition of my endorsing Trump. He added Mike

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Lea to that list, and he added Neil Gorsuch to

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that list. That was the second list, and then he

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>put out a third list, where among others, he stuck

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>me on it. So I think the third list got

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>much much weaker. The quality dropped dramatically, precipitously. But look

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump's lists, they were racially diverse. They had men, women,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they had had folks of all sorts. Of different races,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>but they were jurists selected because Trump believed they would

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>be faithful to the Constitution. They had jurispredential outlook that

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>would protect the Bill of Rights. And in this instance,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Amy Coney Barrett was the third nomination Trump had made,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>So when Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh, he had interviewed Amy

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Coney Barrett. He had sat down and interview her, so

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>she didn't get that slot, but he knew he liked her.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I talked to Trump at the time and

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>even after Kavanaugh, He's like, she's going to be the

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>next one. She's really good. As far as I know.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden hasn't interviewed anyone. He doesn't know who any

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of the potential candidates are. He's just said, if you're

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>not fitting my racial category and gender category, you are ineligible.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So Merritt Garland, no matter how good Merritt Garland might

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be in his interview with Joe Biden, he's the wrong

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>skin color. And today we had a hearing in the

0:14:54.000 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee. One of Biden's nominees is an Asian American

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>woman who's been nominated to be a federal judge, and

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>she wrote in law school. She was actually in law

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>school with me, a year behind me. I didn't know

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>her in law school, but she was a year behind

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>me in law school. She wrote this article that is

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>really radical, that is actually blasting Asian Americans who oppose

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>discrimination against Asian Americans. She calls them neo conservative Asian Americans,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:31.119
<v Speaker 1>and she explains that really woke Asian Americans should embrace

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Harvard and Yale and other elite schools discriminating against Asian Americans.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>That that's really a sign of being woke. And my

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>opening question, Michael, to her was is racial discrimination wrong? Now?

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>That ought to be a really simple question to answer.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Is racial discrimination wrong? Absolutely? Hell yes. She refused to

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>answer it. She wouldn't answer it. She said, well, the

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court has said blah blah. I said no, no no,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, I'm asking you is it wrong? And by

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, she wouldn't defend her article. She just said, wow,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I was thinking. I said, I

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't ask you what you were thinking. Do you agree

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with what you said? She wouldn't answered. It's much the

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>same thing the far left supports as a matter of principle,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>discriminating based on race and it's it's weird, it's and

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really Look, it's the same thing that's in critical

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>race theory. Again. They believe race is the defining characteristic

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and if they can discriminate based on race and it

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>suits their politics, they're all for it. So this is

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>playing out as I think a lot of us expected

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it would, which is the left has come out. Joe

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden has come out in favor of explicit racial discrimination,

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and conservatives have objected to that and said racial discrimination

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is a bad thing. And then the Democrats have come

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>back and said, well, you're racists. If you oppose racial discrimination,

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you're racists and you hate black ladies or whatever. Okay,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we all knew that was going to happen. That is

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the playbook. They can't fire you for you're elected by

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the people of Texas, so unfortunately for them, you're in

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>your job for the time being. They can fire other

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>people who have said exactly the same thing. And you

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>saw it happen at Georgetown Law School. Elias Shapiro, he

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is a libertarian lawyer. I believe you're friends with him.

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you know Elias Ilia has been around a

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>long time. He's a very well known lawyer. He came

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>out and made almost the same sort of comment. He said,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this is bad. We shouldn't be choosing people based on

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>race and sex. We should just choose the best available candidate.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>He has been placed on administrative leave. There are struggle

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sessions going on in the law school at Georgetown right now.

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>There is a crying session hosted by the dean of

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the law school. It looks like they're going to fire

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Ilia at this point. What has happened to American law schools.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Let me just start by saying there should never be

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a crying session at any university or any law school.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of a league of their own. There's

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>no crying in baseball, and if you want to be

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, don't be crying. Like, if you disagree with

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>what Elias said, argue against it. Yeah. I know Elio well.

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>He's a very smart lawyer. He's a libertarian, he's been

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>with Cato forever. He's a scholar, he's well respected. I

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how Georgetown screwed up and hired him in

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the first place, because he's not a radical leftist, and

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought they insisted you must be a radical leftist

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to get hired, but they did. And actually it's it's

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>more ridiculous even than you described. So Ilia was arguing

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that that Biden should nominate the most qualified left of

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>center judge, and he advocated someone in particularly advocated Sree

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Strin of Assen. So Sreesan of Assen is the chief

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>judge of the DC Circuit. I know Sree. Srie and

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I clerked together on the Fourth Circuit. He's very smart,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>very talented Supreme Court litigator, was a Supreme Court clerk.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Sree is an Indian American Liberal Democrat judge. And Elio argued, well,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>he'd be a great choice for Biden to nominate. And

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>then Elia had a stupid phrase because he said he

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't go with a lesser nominee, and he used the

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>word lesser. It was a badly phrase tweet, right, And

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened is the left said, well, you're saying all

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>African American women are lesser, and it's like, well, no,

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say that. He said he thought that Tree

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was the most qualified nominee. Therefore every other nominee would

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>be a lesser nominee. But I'm sorry, that's that's logic

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and reason and and and the woke mob. They're ready

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to burn you to the ground that they don't want

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to engage it is. It's it's amazing that that they

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>want to cancel you. And and look, I think Elia

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>may well be fired for it. They put him on

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>unpaid administrative leave. You know, what does it say that

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>our law schools don't believe in in anything resembling free speech,

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That you can get fired for your job by arguing

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>for a liberal Democrat to be nominated to the Supreme Court,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>which is what Ilia did. That the very idea of

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>considering people based on their qualifications is now anathema to

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the left. It is a vicious I mean, cancel culture

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>is alive. And well, if they could cancel me, they would.

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>The only reason they can't is that I'm elected by

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine million Texans. It and so that they and

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you think of the interorum effect. It has not only

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is Ilia potentially losing his job, but every other professor

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's terrified to open their mouth, every other person in

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>their job that the mob will come and say fire them.

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It really is ridiculous. Well, I give the student radicals,

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I give them a little bit of credit, actually a

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>credit at least for their honesty. I don't give them

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>credit for sobbing in front of their dean and demanding

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>people's heads on pikes. No, you can't say heads on pike.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Remember Steve Bannon a podcast said we want heads on pikes,

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and they accused him of calling for murder for remember,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the nutty people are really nutty, So you can't use

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that phrase anymore. You're right, only metaphorical pikes and figurative heads.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But what the student asked was, listen this guy, Elias Shapiro.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a lecturer at Georgetown Law and he's the director

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Center for the Constitution. Seems like an unobjectionable

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of place, but he advocates an originalist position on

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>interpreting the Constitution. And what the student asked was why

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>do we need this, Why do we need this center,

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Why do we need this perspective? Why do we need

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>originalism to be taught at Georgetown Law? And I thought

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it was actually a pretty good question, in that the

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>law school overwhelmingly is leftist. The law school does not

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>teach students generally speak, that originalism is a good or

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>valid interpretive principle. They're trying to churn out leftist, leftist lawyers,

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and so why do they need it? Why does Georgetown,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a left wing law school, need to have these pesky

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>conservatives making all the students cry well, I mean, that's

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the view of a lot of the left. And I'll

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>give you at least one reason. Let's assume you don't

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>care about an intellectual diversity. Let's assume you don't care

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about learning anything other than the orthodoxy and propaganda that

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you're being spoon fed. Presumably at least some of the

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>students at Georgetown Law want to practice law. They would

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>actually like to be practicing lawyers, and presumably that means

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>they'd like to go in a courtroom and argue to

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>judges that the judges should do what is in their

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>client's interest. I can tell you they're a heck of

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of judges and the district courts and the

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 1>courts of appeals in the US Supreme Court that believe,

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I think quite rightly, that the text of the Constitution

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and the text of the Statute is controlling, and that

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that the regional understanding of that text has

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum a major interpretive weight. You can disagree

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>on how much weight, and there are disagreements among judges.

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>But if you got a law school that is graduating

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>lawyers who don't know what originalism is, who don't know

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>how to argue on originalist basis, you're going to graduate

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>crappy lawyers. You're going to graduate lawyers who don't know

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>how to actually litigate in court. And part of the

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>problem is in some of these law schools they're okay

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with this because you've got a bunch of deans and

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>professors and Ivory towers who don't actually engage in the

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>practice of law, and it's just all politics for him instead. Well,

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that is a sort of silver lining. I hope that

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Eliot can keep his job. But if he can, and

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>if the cancel culture mob really claims all these originalist scalps,

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at least the next generation of liberal lawyers will not

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>perform very well in front of conservative judges. And Michael,

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll point out also, so the left's game, they say

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at the outset, we're going to discriminate based on race.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>In this case, we know Joe Biden is going to

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>nominate a black woman. We also know from the pattern

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of Biden's nominees that the odds are overwhelming whoever he

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>nominates will be a radical left wing activist, because most

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of the judicial nominees Biden's made this past year have

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>been radical left wing activist. But we also know the

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>next step in this game, they're going to say anyone

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that opposes the radical left wing activist is a racist

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and sexist who hates black women. That that's their gameplay.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned, you know, when Joe Biden and the

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>other Democrats filibuster Janie Rogers Brown, she was a black woman,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>but of course there they just didn't want a constitutionalist.

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>There's another example. The same time they filibuster Janie Rogers Brown,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden also filibustered a guy named Miguelistrata. Miguelistrata, it's

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a Hispanic, an amazing Supreme Court advocate. Supreme Court Clerk

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush nominated him to the DC Circuit. The

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Democrats had a real tough problem because Miguel was unquestionably

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>qualified and there was nothing in his record that was disqualifying.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And actually one of the Democratic staffers for Ted Kennedy

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote a memo to Ted Kennedy on the Judiciary Committee

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>along with Joe Biden. The Democratic staffer says we must

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>defeat Miguel Estrada, Why because he is Hispanic. I'm quoting there.

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>They say we must defeat him because he is Hispanic.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>And it was widely anticipated if Miguel had been confirmed

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to the DC Circuit that Bush would put him on

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, and he would be the first Hispanic

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>ever on the Supreme Court. And so not only our

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrats willing to discriminate based on race when they're favoring

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>someone who meets their ideology, they are even more eager

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to discriminate on race against someone who disagrees with their ideology.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And there was Joe Biden filibustering an Hispanic inly qualified nominee.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Now is it because I think he hates Hispanics? No,

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>he's a leftist who hates anyone who disagrees with his

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>orthodoxy and is willing to divide based on race. And

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>he believes in his heart, like most Democrats, that discriminating

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>based on race, if they think the cause is righteous

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and just, is a good thing. And I think it

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>is a terrible thing in America to discriminate on race period. Well,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope Eliot Shapiro can make it through. They're trying

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to cancel him. There is an even more prominent person

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>than a libertarian law professor who's got a cancel attempt

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on him right now. That would be not a conservative,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not even really I think a libertarian. That would be

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a left winger, a guy who supported Bernie Sanders, Joe Rogan,

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>who has been up in backed into a corner. Now

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>he's got some of the most powerful voices of the

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies coming after him. We're talking Neil Young, we're

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>talking Joan Mitchell, people who at one time actually were

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhat relevant, and it looks like it looks like he's

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>actually sort of on the ropes. So I gotta say, Michael,

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>just at the outset, who knew you Neil Young was

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>still live? Who knew Joni Mitchell was still a lie?

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>You know? Graham Natch, Peter Frampton. I mean, we've got

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>every geriatric rocker who was playing when I was in

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>diapers and you were a twinkle in your daddy's eye.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>That's when these guys had their heyday. And I gotta say,

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's funny as hell that a bunch of

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy and eighty year old rock and roll stars from

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>prior eras got more pressed this week than they've had

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>in thirty years. And what they're saying is bizarre. They're saying,

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>we really don't like that that many people are listening

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Rogan. And I think maybe they have a

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>plan here, which is nobody wants to listen to their songs.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>So if they get big tech to ban the things

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're actually listening to, maybe you'll have no more

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>choice but to listen to their songs because they'll be

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the only things left. I mean, it really is Assinine,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Neil Young and Crosbie Stills and Nash went on a

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>free speech tour in two thousand and six that was

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>named of the Tour, and I think people are beginning

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to wake up to this fact that maybe they weren't

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>so much in favor of free speech. Maybe they just

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to smash whatever standards existed of the day and

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to just install their own standards. And now

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rogan is contradicting that. So they are the defenders

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of the entrenched power. But the thing that's crazy to

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>me is, as you say, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, these

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>people have not been relevant in decades and yet they

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>do seem to be potentially getting Joe Rogan not to

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>back down, but to permit a disclaimer on his controversial

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>episodes to get more left wing guests on. I mean,

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it does seem that they really are putting a lot

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of pressure on them. Well, you raise a very good point.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd say two things in response. One, I hope Rogan

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't give in. I mean, look, he's got it's been

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>reported like one hundred million dollar contract with Spotify. One

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars is a lot of leverage. I mean,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has shown a lot of courage, a

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of boldness. But but I have to assume Spotify

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they haven't given in yet, but to the extent I

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>mean Spotify is kind of at the intersection of big

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>tech and Hollywood music. So you've got to assume everyone

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.239
<v Speaker 1>in that world is arguing surrender, surrender, surrender, give in

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to the woke mob. And and I do think it

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>will do real damage to free speech if Rogan knuckles under,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 1>because what people will say is, if they could force

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Rogan to comply, how does anyone else have a chance.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But you bring up the hundred million dollars, Senator, Let's

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>say you're Joe Rogan. And look, Joe Rogan seems like

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a perfectly principled guy. Let's say he weren't. Let's say

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he's totally unscrupulous and he's looking at that big paycheck. Sure,

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be a big blow to the American free

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>speech tradition if he backs down. But what about numero uno?

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>What about Joe Rogan? What what incentive does he have

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not to just give in here? Look, the only incentive

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.959
<v Speaker 1>his integrity that his viewers listen to him because they

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>believe he's speaking from the heart and he's telling the truth.

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And I got to say, you know, anytime you sell

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>out for cash and you're intimidated, when you give into

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the mob, it does lessen your credibility. And I want

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to give him a lot of props. He has shown

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a ton of courage. I also think, you know, he

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it really got his attention when CNN went after him

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for Iver Mecton. He has become a fantastic defender of

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>free speech. I think that's really important. And one thing

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's important I think for Rogan to understand everyone

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>else to understand, is when the mob comes after you,

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not even about the topic you were out. So

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking a minute ago about Biden's Supreme Court nominee.

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I sent a tweet today somewhat tongue in cheek, which

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>was simply Candice Owens for Supreme Court. Yeah. But you know,

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>if Biden said it must be a black woman, you

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and I both know Candice. We like Candice. She is

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>both black and female. According to the left stated criterion,

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>she is an obvious choice. And it's funny like the

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>twitter verse and their media stories written about my tweet,

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>We're like, oh my god, Cruz thinks Candace. As far

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>as I know, I don't think Candice is a lawyer.

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>She isn't a lawyer. I don't know about it. I

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>am assuming if she has the qualifications to be a

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justice, I am unaware of those. But and

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>she's a fantastic podcast host and thinker and provocateur illustrating

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the idiocies of the left. But but what I've enjoyed

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is since that tweet, watching leftist explain no, no, no,

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>not that black woman. You you can oppose people, and

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we oppose her because she's conservative. We can hate on her.

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>We mean only leftist black women. It is. It's all ideology,

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it's all politics. Racist part of the politics. But anyone

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong side they go after. And so Rogan

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>may think, okay, well, if I all right, I've had

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>some some doctors on my show who are skeptical of

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the things they're saying about COVID. Saul have

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>some people on the other side who say, believe whatever

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Saint Fauci says, and maybe the mob will be satiated.

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>The mob will never be satiated. That is the nature

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of the mob. And when when they see they can

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>bow you into submission, they'll come back again and again

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and again. I think that's the fear. You know, Rogan

0:32:55.120 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is speaking two and four a wide variety of Americans.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not rock ribbed right wing Republicans, probably not very

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>many of them at all. I think it's ordinary people,

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe some disaffected liberals, maybe some leftists. For goodness sakes,

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he endorsed Bernie Sanders, so he's got he's got leftists

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in there too, And he's speaking like the kind of

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>guy who is not ideologically rigid. And I think that's

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>part of why he's been able to amass such a

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>huge audience. And I agree, I think so far, He's

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>played this pretty smart. But this is a big fear.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Do not show them your neck, do not give in.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You will never I assume I'm not saying anything that

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Joe doesn't already understand, But you will not win. The

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>moment that you start to appease them, you're dead. You're

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be dead in the water. I guess figuratively

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>again too. I don't want hateful rhetoric in junior high.

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>If you give in to the bullies, they take your

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>lunch money tomorrow too, and the next day and the

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>next day. That principle was true then, and it's true now.

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And you know, Rogan is actually important to

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative sits on the future. But we've talked a lot

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on this show about how when I was a kid

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that the caricature of the GOP was that it was

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>rich uncle pennybag smoking a cigar, shilling for corporations, keeping

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the working man down, and that that is not the

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>case anymore. You're seeing you're seeing it just in exit polling.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing it in the lawn signs and people's yards,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing it in the behavior of Democrats who

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are now very clearly the party of the global elite,

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and Republicans have positioned themselves as the party of the

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>working man. My question is, why is it that Americans,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>who have such a history of loving freedom and fighting back,

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>why is it that we are currently being outdone by

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>America's hat are polite, lovely neighbors to the north, the Canadians,

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>where Canadian truckers by the thousands are showing up to

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the nation's capital and protesting these draconian vaccine mandates. What's

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>going on with the Americans? It is absolutely awesome. God

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>bless the Canadian truckers. And I will say, look, look,

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I love the we were just talking about Joe Rogan.

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I love big bald, angry, working class people who were

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>pissed off and fighting back. That that is that is awesome. Yeah,

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian truckers, those convoys are spectacular. Watching Justin Crudeau

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Trudeau runaway. I had fun tweeting out someone did a

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>mashup of Simpson's videos where there was an old Simpsons

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>episode that had Homer driving a truck and he gets

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.879
<v Speaker 1>in a convoy and then they cut to Trudeau as

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Canada, crawling out the window to run away,

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it actually says something that there were

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of fact checkers today who fact checked that

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Simpson's mashup said, it's actually not factually correct that the

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons predicted the Canadian truckers, because these were two different

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>episodes that someone put together. And I'm just like, all right,

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys are nim wits and idiots, and the Canadian

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>truckers look, they're standing up for freedom. And you know,

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, we listen to people pontificate online very

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>solemnly the truck drivers are heroes in America. We also

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>listened to them to say doctors and nurses and police

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>officers and firefighters, they're heroes for America. All these people

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>are being persecuted right now. Right the totalitarian left wants

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to fire those truck drivers. They want to fire doctors

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and nurses and cops and firefighters and soldiers and sailors

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and Navy seals. Why because they won't knuckle under their

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 1>COVID mandates and vaccine mandates. They won't obey their totalitarian dictates.

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And I got to say, those Canadian truckers are awesome,

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>and they're fighting for American freedom in a way we

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>all should be doing and we could we could take

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a lesson from you. If there is an irony that

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the left, for over a hundred years said, workers of

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the world, you night. And now the workers of the

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>world have united, and their leaders like Justin Trudeau, are

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>running as far as they possibly can. There's a Trudeau

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>shaped hole in the wall where where he once was

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>because he doesn't want to face the crowd. So I

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>will say the Canadian truckers when they drove their convoyant

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and they protested, they did it very politely. And and

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and having having been born in Calgary, I will say

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Canucks, God bless them, are wonderfully polite. But you know,

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in this instance they are warriors for freedom and their

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.720
<v Speaker 1>message is being heard not just throughout Canada, but throughout

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>America across the world hopefully. So this raises an important question.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>We're running a little late, and so we're not going

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to get into a ton of mail bag, but I

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>do want to get into one mail bag question that

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>came up from Eudaemonia. It was this the pseudonym of

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the good old ancient Greek references here in our mail bag,

0:37:52.400 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 1>very educated audience. He asked, what concrete policies are the

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>is the GOP going to put forward to now that

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the GOP is positioning itself as the worker's party. So

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>is it simply that the GOP is saying the doors open,

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're welcome to come in, but we're not going to

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>change anything about the way that we look at economic issues,

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>social issues. We're not we're not actually going to change

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the policy. We just want you to vote for us.

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Or is there going to be some kind of substantive

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>shift in what the goops actually offering. So I think

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen pretty significant shifts, and I think Trump played

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a big part in that. Number One, We're the party

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of jobs. You want a job, you ought to be

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a Republican. We're the party of small businesses. We're the

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>party of the energy. Joe Biden. The Democrats hate energy,

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 1>they hate oil, they hate gas, they hate coal. They're

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>destroying jobs across the country. They're shutting down pipelines, they're

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they're putting people out of work. Where the party of

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>keeping small businesses open? You look at Biden the Democrats.

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>They're happy to shut down a restaurant, a bar, They're

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>happy to shut down anyone who won't comply with their mandates.

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>We're the party of opportunity, but Democrats are shutting down rules.

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>We're keeping schools open. We want to give you a

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 1>school choice. We want to give you opportunity. Immigration is

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>critical to this. Democrats are the party of open borders.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>When you have millions of people coming illegally into this country,

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they're driving down wages, They're hurting working men and women.

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>You want you want to help protect jobs, You stop

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>illegal immigration. And I think every single policy the Democrats embrace.

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Ask yourself what San Francisco and Manhattan billionaires want, that's

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what Democrats support, one hundred percent, straight down the board.

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And ask yourself every policy that Ohio steel workers or

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas truck drivers support. Those are the policies that Republicans

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think ought to be supported, including by the way,

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>protecting free speech and religious liberty in the Second Amendment.

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats want to take away the guns of working men

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and women across this country. It is a radically anti

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>worker agenda. And I will say one of the things

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I think Republicans have gotten better at, but there's still

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>too much of, is corporate chronyism giving into big business.

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Look when it comes to big business, big business has

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gone woke. For too long, Republicans behave that whatever big

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>business wanted they listened to. I think Trump helped break that.

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we have shifted. You know, the giant companies

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>are fine. I don't have anything against them, but they

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>don't need any favors from me. They don't need any

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>favors from government, they don't need any subsidies, they don't

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>need any mandates to benefit them. We ought to be

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the party of the little guy, of the small business,

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>owner of the worker, and Democrats are the party of

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>taking away your job. And I think that's playing out

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in a very very real way now. I do because

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>some of those things the GOP has talked about for

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a long time, but especially when you're talking about the

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>big corporations, that would be a shift. When I was

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.919
<v Speaker 1>a kid, the GOP was the party of helping out

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>every gigantic corporation. They would assist them in shipping jobs

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>overseas and getting sweetheart deals from the government. Corporate welfare,

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of total corporate welfare. And that is a big shift.

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And it does tie into the small businesses too, because

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>if the GOP is going to be the party of

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the big woke, multinational corporations then sort of by definition

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not the party of the small businesses. So that

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>shift is very important, as you say, keeping jobs here,

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats are the party of corporate welfare today, they

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>embrace it openly. Yeah, that's very important. And as you

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>say to this idea that when you have two million

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>illegal aliens pouring across the border, that's going to depress wages.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's not going to depress Mark Zuckerberg's wages or

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I guess Mark Zuckerberg's capital gains. I don't think he

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>makes most of his money from his salary. It's going

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to depress wages for working class Americans. And so that

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a big shift. If the Democrats are going to

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be the party of more and more and more and

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>more immigration, then the Republicans really can offer something different

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>there as well. That was a good answer. That really

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, That makes me hopeful for the future center

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>even as we're all getting canceled, even as we're going

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>to get radical leftist judges all over the courts, there

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be some hope looking ahead to twenty

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. In twenty twenty four, well, we've got to

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. You know. One thing you can do

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to really express your enthusiasm, not merely for the upcoming elections,

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but for this very show, is to go get some merch. Everybody.

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>We've got superb emerged. I don't have my hat on

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>me right now. Hats sometimes make my head look like

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 1>a peanut. But this hat is so good looking that

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to wear it. It is our famous cactus

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>microphone hat. You can get that some really great T shirts,

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.919
<v Speaker 1>some have expressions coined by Lindsey Graham. For goodness sakes,

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what is a podcast. We've got a lot of Verdict

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>merch you can you can get that at Verdict with

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz dot com slash shop, and especially if you

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have a non peanut shaped head, the hats will look

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>really really good on you. Really wonderful stuff over there.

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And then you can stick around and head on over

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Verdict Plus community and check out more content

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>from the Senator and from But as for me, Michael Knowles,

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that's all I've got right now. This is Verdict with

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz is

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.840
<v Speaker 1>being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack,

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations,

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and candidates across the country. In twenty twenty two, Jobs,

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Freedom and Security Pack plans to donate to conservative candidates

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.