Speaker 1: All right, news round up in information ob load hour.
Speaker 1: Here's our toll free telephone number at eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine foot one, Shawn, if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. If you are not following the
Speaker 1: news today, it turns out mister Higher Honor James Colly
Speaker 1: himself turned himself into a federal authorities at an Alexandria,
Speaker 1: Virginia courthouse today. The grand jury indictment revealed on Tuesday
Speaker 1: charges call me with threatening to kill President Trump. That's
Speaker 1: the eighty six forty seven shell thing. I have no
Speaker 1: idea what it meant, none at all, whatsoever. Now James
Speaker 1: call me, maintaining his innocence after the second indictment, here's
Speaker 1: what he had to say.
Speaker 2: Well, they're back, this time about a picture of seashells
Speaker 2: on a North Carolina beach a year ago. And this
Speaker 2: won't be the end of it. But nothing has changed
Speaker 2: with me. I'm still innocent, I'm still not afraid, and
Speaker 2: I still believe in the independent federal judiciary. So let's go.
Speaker 2: But it's really important that all of us remember this
Speaker 2: is not who we are as a country, This is
Speaker 2: not how the Department of Justice is supposed to be,
Speaker 2: and the good news is we get closer every day
Speaker 2: to restoring those values. Keep the faith.
Speaker 1: Anyway, so, now indicted presidential death threat suspect James Colemy
Speaker 1: decided not to wait till his squad cards showed up
Speaker 1: at his house this morning and haul him down to
Speaker 1: police headquarters.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 1: I spent a couple of hours with John Solomon and
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett on my podcast, Hanging Out with Me Sean Hannity.
Speaker 1: You can watch it wherever you get your video podcast,
Speaker 1: and it's on YouTube and Spotify and Apple. You know,
Speaker 1: I would urge you all to watch it because it
Speaker 1: really is the culmination of years of work that we
Speaker 1: all did together. We did it collaboratively, We worked very
Speaker 1: hard at it, and we were able to get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of it. The left wing legacy media mob
Speaker 1: was wrong. We have been vindicated time and time again.
Speaker 1: I look at this at the as the lower hanging
Speaker 1: fruit when it comes to Camy, mister higher honor, and
Speaker 1: I think, especially with my interview with Dan Bongino and
Speaker 1: what they have found, I think that this Grand Conspiracy
Speaker 1: investigation is going to be the mother load that may
Speaker 1: implicate a lot more people. Bongino told me that he
Speaker 1: really felt that there were people in the FBI the
Speaker 1: purposely preserved evidence, knowing and hoping that one day when
Speaker 1: he and Cash Pttel got in the FBI, that they
Speaker 1: would find it. They did find it, and that's where
Speaker 1: you know. Dan famously said he didn't think a Republican
Speaker 1: survive under these circumstances. But I think that that is
Speaker 1: the case that I'm paying the most attention to. However,
Speaker 1: this is significant anyway. Joining us now, John Solomon. He
Speaker 1: is the founder, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter justinews
Speaker 1: dot com, Greg Jarrett, Fox News, legal analyst, and of
Speaker 1: course number one New York Times bestselling author. John, let's
Speaker 1: start with you. I think you agree with me. This
Speaker 1: is the lower hanging fruit. I think, yeah, I think
Speaker 1: the big investigation is into the Grand Conspiracy.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you're exactly right. This is sort of a side issue,
Speaker 4: but one that takes on more significance when you remember
Speaker 4: what just happens Saturday night. People are getting motivated by
Speaker 4: these social media posts. They are getting motivated by the
Speaker 4: hateful rhetoric. And so if an FBI director or a
Speaker 4: former FBI director wants to suggest it's a good idea
Speaker 4: to eighty six forty seven, get rid of forty seven,
Speaker 4: and that might motivate someone. You're going to charge him
Speaker 4: just like you charge anyone else. If a guy in
Speaker 4: Las Vegas said, Hey, I'm going to kill the lawmaker tomorrow,
Speaker 4: they're going to go arrest him too. So that's what
Speaker 4: went on here. This is a minor case compared to
Speaker 4: what's playing out in Port Pierce, Florida. They are systemically
Speaker 4: looking at an effort to get Donald Trump violate his
Speaker 4: civil liberties over a ten year period, using four or
Speaker 4: five code name investigations, and along the way, not only
Speaker 4: violating President Trump's simil liberties and those around them, but
Speaker 4: very likely members of Congress whose phone records were taken,
Speaker 4: lawyers whose law firm records were taken. Us keep in
Speaker 4: mind that they use secret measures to suck up entire
Speaker 4: law firm files as they were looking at certain lawyers
Speaker 4: in these cases. That is going to be such a big,
Speaker 4: inconsequential place, far more consequential than what went on in
Speaker 4: North Carolina yesterday.
Speaker 1: And John, if you can explain how arctic frost is
Speaker 1: only the tip of the iceberg, that there are multiple
Speaker 1: investigations with multiple names, that they also now have discovered,
Speaker 1: and we will learn a lot more in the days,
Speaker 1: weeks and months ahead about these examples.
Speaker 4: Yeah, Basically, there's a Washprin's repeat cycle of weaponizing law enforcement,
Speaker 4: and each time a Democrat has a problem, they then
Speaker 4: hang a fake scandal on a Republican and the youth
Speaker 4: of powers of the intelligence in law enforcement commute to
Speaker 4: try to give the illusion that this is a serious matter.
Speaker 4: Hillary Clinton has the Russia collusion problem after the Peter
Speaker 4: Schweizer book, they make the Crossfire Hurricane investigation against Trump.
Speaker 4: We know that had no merit. Then Joe Biden has
Speaker 4: a Ukraine corruption problem with his son Hunter, and they
Speaker 4: hang Ukraine impeachment around him. A little bit while after that,
Speaker 4: they find Joe Biden's classified documents right after he got
Speaker 4: named president. They want to neutralize that. They create the
Speaker 4: investigation against President Trump that leads to the raid on
Speaker 4: mar A Lago, for which, now that we know, the
Speaker 4: FBI believe there was no probable cause to do that.
Speaker 4: And then as it's becoming clear in twenty three that
Speaker 4: Joe Biden has a mental acuity problem that he's fading away,
Speaker 4: they need to put Donald Trump back on the defensive
Speaker 4: because he's doing well on the polls. They use Arctic Cross,
Speaker 4: which basically goes all the way back to twenty twenty
Speaker 4: and says we're going to look at that period after
Speaker 4: the election and charge Donald Trump with something that John
Speaker 4: Kennedy and Sam Tilden did and never got charged, which
Speaker 4: is submit alternate electors to a Senate as a former protest.
Speaker 4: Twice in American history that wasn't a crime, but when
Speaker 4: it came to Donald Trump, they tried to turn it
Speaker 4: into a crime. Four consecutive Washerton's repeat cycles all along,
Speaker 4: capturing hundreds of people into a dragnet who were clearly innocent.
Speaker 1: Let's get your take, Greg Jarrett. Let's start with eighty
Speaker 1: six forty seven. According to Komy, he had no idea
Speaker 1: what that meant. He had no idea. It just happened
Speaker 1: to stumble upon it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, he said, gosh, it never occurred to me that
Speaker 5: some folks associate those numbers with violence. I mean, that
Speaker 5: kind of fakery is a pattern with James Cummy. He
Speaker 5: feigns ignorance, he plays the dummy to try to weasel
Speaker 5: out of wrongdoing, and he's proven to be a master
Speaker 5: of deceit, lying about leaks to the media line of
Speaker 5: the Pies Accords, secretly weaponizing the FBI and the Russia hoax,
Speaker 5: while denying it all with a straight were. Under testimony
Speaker 5: before Congress, he claims, acute, am Nigi, I don't remember anything.
Speaker 5: It's all a phony act.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 5: Komy loves to portray himself as Saint James, but there's
Speaker 5: nothing virtuous about Komy. I will say this. I've been
Speaker 5: mildly amused at all the legal commentators who've been quick
Speaker 5: to condemn the Komy indictment as frivolous or absurd. They're
Speaker 5: overlooking several important points, and if I may, I'll just
Speaker 5: run through them quickly. This case, first of all, is
Speaker 5: in the Eastern district of North Carolina, predominantly conservative, and
Speaker 5: in a politically charge case like this, that helps the prosecution,
Speaker 5: it doesn't help Komy. Second of all, the federal grand
Speaker 5: jury was persuaded that Komy wilfully intended to threaten the
Speaker 5: life of the president, while the trial jury from the
Speaker 5: exact same district may agree, even though of course there's
Speaker 5: a higher burden of proof. Third, it's important to realize
Speaker 5: that the second count against Komy does not require a
Speaker 5: willful threat instead recklessly disregarding the risk of violence is sufficient.
Speaker 5: As a lower standard, it's easier to prove for the all.
Speaker 5: You know, other people in that same eastern district in
Speaker 5: North Carolina have been successfully prosecuted on the exact same charge,
Speaker 5: which will undermine Comy's claim that g I'm a victim
Speaker 5: of selective, vindictive prosecution. And finally, I point out, you know,
Speaker 5: Comy is surely going to argue I have a free
Speaker 5: speech right, that's my defense. Well, the Supreme Court has
Speaker 5: made it abundantly clear that the First Amendment is not
Speaker 5: a shield for threats against the president the Seminole case
Speaker 5: Watts versus the United States in nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 4: So you know, I.
Speaker 5: Also suspect that prosecutors have marshalled together a lot more
Speaker 5: incriminating evidence than we now know. The attorney acting Attorney
Speaker 5: General said yesterday, we have witnesses, we have documents that
Speaker 5: will help prove the government's case. Well, it's quite quite
Speaker 5: possible Dy've uncovered evidence that Comy's doobious story is a
Speaker 5: brazen lie. Will wait and see.
Speaker 1: You know, this is the low hanging fruit John Solomon
Speaker 1: that I often talk about. But there is being built
Speaker 1: as confirmed by the Attorney General still Pam Bondi, confirmed
Speaker 1: by Todd Blenz, confirmed by the FBI Director Cash Bettel,
Speaker 1: new evidence put forward by Tulca Gabbert at D and
Speaker 1: I that in fact, a grand conspiracy investigation is not
Speaker 1: only going ongoing, but it is being built out. How
Speaker 1: do you imagine that that will play out?
Speaker 4: I think the first likely charges if a grand jury
Speaker 4: decides to do something, we'll be to charge John Brennan
Speaker 4: in the next few weeks, once the Senate transmits its evidence,
Speaker 4: so that you begin to and grand jury begins to
Speaker 4: understand there was a cover up as far late as
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three. People were lying in twenty twenty three,
Speaker 4: trying to cover up what began in twenty sixteen. That is,
Speaker 4: I think the starter gun firing for a larger conspiracy case.
Speaker 4: All right, there's a lie. That lie is trying to
Speaker 4: cover up the fact that the intelligence community committed created
Speaker 4: a fake intelligence document to justify the fact that the
Speaker 4: FBI previously tried to investigate Donald Trump wrongly for Russian collusions.
Speaker 4: So that sort of becomes a what we call the
Speaker 4: pattern case. And then from that pattern case, you're going
Speaker 4: to start to look for people like FBI agents or
Speaker 4: CIA analysts who did things that exceeded the role of
Speaker 4: their job, that exceeded the evidence, exceeded their training, and say,
Speaker 4: these guys were part of it too, different part of
Speaker 4: the conspiracy. And at some point you're going to flip someone,
Speaker 4: because when you look at all the great conspiracies that
Speaker 4: have been brought against the mob or against drug CARTELSI
Speaker 4: you usually flip an insider Sammy the Bold in the
Speaker 4: case of the famous Gambino trials. Whoever flips first, whoever
Speaker 4: becomes that key critical witness he can help or she
Speaker 4: He or she can help tie it up in a
Speaker 4: very big way. And I think that, well, who might.
Speaker 1: That person be? Is it going to be like an
Speaker 1: Andrew Weisman? Who's it going to be?
Speaker 4: It's a great question, right, we don't know yet. You know,
Speaker 4: who's going to take a deal, who's funding their law fers.
Speaker 4: You know, maybe the Left will pay a lot of
Speaker 4: people's legal bills and try to keep people from cooperating.
Speaker 4: So we'll see. But you know, someone like an Andrew
Speaker 4: McKay would be a really interesting thing. Now I'm not
Speaker 4: saying that Andrew k committed to crime yet. I don't
Speaker 4: know the evidence against him, but he's a guy that
Speaker 4: can testify upward on a James Comey and Chris Ray
Speaker 4: and on Barack Obama because he had contacts with him,
Speaker 4: And he can testify downward to the agents who didn't
Speaker 4: think to Pete Struck's in the least of pages and
Speaker 4: other So you're looking for someone that is like a
Speaker 4: man in the middle or a woman in the middle,
Speaker 4: that has visibility up and down. That sort of conspiracy
Speaker 4: witness becomes really key to a good prosecution.
Speaker 1: Greg Jared, I'll give you an opportunity explain how you
Speaker 1: think this will play out in terms of the broader case,
Speaker 1: the larger case, the more significant case of an eleven
Speaker 1: year grand conspiracy to destroy Donald Trump.
Speaker 5: Well, I think John has summarized it as he always
Speaker 5: does with his reporting quite well. You post an important
Speaker 5: question who might flip and implicate others, for example, like
Speaker 5: John Brennan, who I think John's right is clearly the
Speaker 5: next person of you indicted. There were people high up
Speaker 5: in the CIA and in fact in other intelligence agencies
Speaker 5: that Warren Brennett. You can't use this dossier by Christopher
Speaker 5: Steele paid for by Hillary Clinton. There was a total
Speaker 5: smear and a complete lie. It's phony. You can't use
Speaker 5: it to try to implicate Trump and altering the intelligence
Speaker 5: community assessment upon the orders of President of Barack Obomb.
Speaker 5: You can't do it. Brennan did it anyway. He essentially
Speaker 5: had one person compose it. And I would think that
Speaker 5: that person who was the writer who penned this thing
Speaker 5: would be somebody if I were a prosecutor, I'd be
Speaker 5: looking at to flip along with some others who were
Speaker 5: in on it against John Brennan. And once you get
Speaker 5: people to begin to flip to save their own butts,
Speaker 5: you know, then a snowball effect invariably happens. And so
Speaker 5: you know, look, you've got a grand jury investigation going on,
Speaker 5: and it's very intensive. Dan I Fort Pierce, Florida. You've
Speaker 5: got some new blood there that took over recently that
Speaker 5: are motivated to make sure that justice is done. So
Speaker 5: we're going to see some action over the course of
Speaker 5: the next few weeks.
Speaker 1: By the way, if you want a longer discussion on
Speaker 1: this very topic, both John Solomon and Greg Jarrett came
Speaker 1: on my podcast, and you know, we go over this
Speaker 1: in great specificity in detail for nearly two hours NonStop
Speaker 1: conversation about it, and you will learn a lot, I
Speaker 1: promise you. John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, thank you both. Appreciate
Speaker 1: both of you. Let's get to our busy phones. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred ninety four one, Shawn our number, Janet in Utah.
Speaker 1: Next on the Sean Hannity Show, Hi.
Speaker 6: Hey, hey, can you hear me?
Speaker 1: I can hear you? Can you hear me? The worst
Speaker 1: words in the English language?
Speaker 6: Go ahead, Yes, I can.
Speaker 7: Hey.
Speaker 6: So it's in honor to speak with you. But what
Speaker 6: I wanted to comment on is a gentleman saying wondering
Speaker 6: why this last shooter wasn't dead and you wanted to
Speaker 6: have him alive so that you could get information from him.
Speaker 6: And I'm just kind of the opinion that there's this
Speaker 6: flashooter and there's so many more people that have drink
Speaker 6: drank the kool aid, and they aren't thinking for themselves anymore.
Speaker 6: And I feel like there just needs to be a
Speaker 6: consequence and tell there's consequences for people doing this, like
Speaker 6: call me not knowing what the shells represented, That's that's
Speaker 6: just ridiculous. And I want to know when the consequences
Speaker 6: are going to happen.
Speaker 1: Well, they may never happen to the extent that they should,
Speaker 1: and I'm not going to I'm not going to give
Speaker 1: you false hope. Too many of these people. Oh, they're
Speaker 1: going to be in jail for the rest of their life.
Speaker 1: They will never see another day free. And you know,
Speaker 1: look at John Hinckley who shot Reagan. He's free as
Speaker 1: a bird. So it frustrates me. In terms of dead
Speaker 1: or alive, I'm perfectly fine if the guy ends up dead. However,
Speaker 1: if you have the person alive, you do have an
Speaker 1: opportunity to discover if there might be other people that
Speaker 1: were aiding a betting, supporting and that were part of
Speaker 1: a grander conspiracy. And in that sense, I would like
Speaker 1: to know the answer to that so you can get
Speaker 1: information you otherwise would not be able to get from
Speaker 1: a dead person. But with that said, if the guy
Speaker 1: ended up dead, I would not be sitting on this
Speaker 1: program today, you know, shedding a tear. I promise you, right.
Speaker 6: But I think we can pretty much guarantee that there's
Speaker 6: unfortunately many more like him every and there where.
Speaker 1: Well, I think there's plenty of them, and I think
Speaker 1: we're doing a very poor job in terms of creating
Speaker 1: a safe perimeter for the president, his cabinet and and
Speaker 1: high ranking government officials. And we're doing a poor job.
Speaker 1: We're not sweeping, we're not securing, we're not holding areas.
Speaker 1: In this case, the entire hotel should have been swept.
Speaker 1: It was not. It was like it was not swept.
Speaker 1: The area around Trump International, just like Butler was not
Speaker 1: swept the way it should have been swept. And at
Speaker 1: this point, how many more examples do we need before
Speaker 1: we make the changes that are necessary?
Speaker 8: Hi? Zero zero, Yeah.
Speaker 1: I appreciate the call, Janet, thank you. Let us say
Speaker 1: hi to doctor George in my free state of Florida.
Speaker 1: Doctor George, how are you? What kind of doctor are you?
Speaker 8: For longevity medicine? But in any case, mister Sean Hannity,
Speaker 8: my wife and I hold you in such high esteem
Speaker 8: because you very few bona fide professional journalists who's not
Speaker 8: going to lose their professional journalism card because you've never
Speaker 8: attended at one of those White House dinners through the years,
Speaker 8: and any journalists who did participate in those events ought
Speaker 8: to lose their professional journalism card.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you a question, doctor, if you know
Speaker 1: you have to go to an event, and there are
Speaker 1: events all of us have to go to that we
Speaker 1: really don't want to go to. It's not at the
Speaker 1: top of our list of things we would choose to
Speaker 1: do on a day off. Why would I want to
Speaker 1: go in a room full of people most of whom
Speaker 1: I don't particularly like that don't like me. What is
Speaker 1: the point. I don't see any point to that.
Speaker 8: Well, the point is that professional journalists ought to not
Speaker 8: casually cavort with the people whom they have to ask
Speaker 8: probing questions off. And this is the problem we saw
Speaker 8: when the Democrats were in power, when they get together
Speaker 8: at that White House dinner and they joke around about
Speaker 8: serious issues that affect our country. Journalists should not be
Speaker 8: doing that if they want to maintain their ethics and
Speaker 8: still be highly respected bona fide professional journalists. And the
Speaker 8: very fact that you had the spine and the determination
Speaker 8: knowing that that would challenge the ethics of any professional journalists.
Speaker 8: We just admire you for your fortitude, for your patriotism,
Speaker 8: and we just think the world of you. Thank you
Speaker 8: for fighting the good fight. By the way, you have
Speaker 8: the best screeners all calling shows.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. George Thank you, doctor George. Thanks But look,
Speaker 1: if people want to go, if that's fun for them,
Speaker 1: then I guess we just have very different definitions of
Speaker 1: what's fun. I think I would rather hang out at
Speaker 1: a barbecue joint or a restaurant with friends and family.
Speaker 1: And I think there's better use of my time than
Speaker 1: hanging out with these DC you know, arrogant elitists that
Speaker 1: hate the president. And you know they call it nerd
Speaker 1: prom for a reason. Marty in North Carolina. Next on
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Show, Marty, how are you, Sean?
Speaker 7: Thank you for taking my call. I saw you recently
Speaker 7: by the way in Florida, and you were looking dapper,
Speaker 7: and you were looking healthy. And I've been following you
Speaker 7: all the way since you used to sit in for
Speaker 7: Rush last century.
Speaker 1: Wow, thank you.
Speaker 3: I'm listen.
Speaker 1: Where did you see me in Florida? If I may
Speaker 1: be so bold to.
Speaker 7: Ask, Well, it was a it was a rule site gathering,
Speaker 7: and you found the only liberals in the room. Remember
Speaker 7: he was on the camera crew.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm actually I've got liberal you know, I
Speaker 1: have liberal detectors that are working twenty four to seven,
Speaker 1: don't stop. I can usually spot them a mile away.
Speaker 8: It was fun.
Speaker 7: It was so fun and you were funny, So that
Speaker 7: was that was great to be with you.
Speaker 1: Well, it was nice to meet you. And you should
Speaker 1: move to my free state of Florida. Although I do
Speaker 1: like North Carolina. I love the mountains of North Carolina.
Speaker 1: I think it's great there.
Speaker 7: Actually, I'm from the mountains, and I might move to
Speaker 7: the Free State of Florida if we can't get a
Speaker 7: democratic if we can't get rid of this democratic governor
Speaker 7: that we've got. But listen, the reason I called you
Speaker 7: is because I got a question for you. You know,
Speaker 7: ma'am selling real estate last century and the average prot
Speaker 7: the average age of the first time home buyer when
Speaker 7: I first started selling real estate was twenty seven, twenty
Speaker 7: eight years old. The average age for somebody to buy
Speaker 7: their first time home now is forty forty one.
Speaker 4: What happened?
Speaker 1: Look, a lot of things happen. Government has you know,
Speaker 1: adopted waste, fraud, abuse, corruption, et cetera. You have governments
Speaker 1: on the state level, federal level, they have been taking
Speaker 1: more and more people's harder money. Donald Trump now seeking
Speaker 1: to reverse that. I think, you know, as soon as
Speaker 1: we get the Iran situation over I think you'll see
Speaker 1: a dramatic move with the economy. I think interest rates
Speaker 1: will come down. I think manufacturing will go up dramatically
Speaker 1: because we have committed investments trillions of dollars worth. I
Speaker 1: think high paying career jobs will come online once interest
Speaker 1: rates go down. People that have been reluctant to sell
Speaker 1: a home that they want to sell because they don't
Speaker 1: want to give up the two three four percent thirty
Speaker 1: year fixed strate mortgage, I think that'll get fixed. And
Speaker 1: I think you'll see, you know, sale of pre existing homes,
Speaker 1: a new home construction start the skyrocket. That's my hope. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I absolutely hope that that will happen sooner than later.
Speaker 1: I think I'll never forget when I bought my first
Speaker 1: home and it was in Rosweld, Georgia, and I was
Speaker 1: in my early thirties. Uh, and I paid I think
Speaker 1: I don't know what did I pay for that home?
Speaker 1: One hundred and twelve thousand dollars. Was the happiest guy
Speaker 1: on earth. I felt like I'd made it, I know.
Speaker 7: But you know when this first started happening is when
Speaker 7: Pelosi started selling young people on you can have some
Speaker 7: kind of universal income, and you can go out there
Speaker 7: and be an artist, and it's the lack of commitment.
Speaker 7: We've got to sell home ownership. That's been the backbone
Speaker 7: of the American family's economy for years, and I don't
Speaker 7: want to see that change so anything.
Speaker 1: I know. I know more people that are waiting for
Speaker 1: interest rates to go down so that they can move
Speaker 1: up to the next level of home that they want
Speaker 1: to get into. But they're not willing to sacrifice a
Speaker 1: low thirty year fixed rate mortgage to get there. So
Speaker 1: that's an important part of the equation, and I think
Speaker 1: it will happen sooner than later. Let's get this Iranian
Speaker 1: conflict behind us, and I think things will change quickly.
Speaker 7: I do tell Slump to do anything that promotes tax
Speaker 7: deductions on American home ownership and for the American family
Speaker 7: we've got.
Speaker 1: The average American is getting over thirty five hundred dollars
Speaker 1: in terms of their tax refund more than they were
Speaker 1: getting under Joe Biden. That is a significant increase. People's
Speaker 1: take home pay has gone up significantly again because of
Speaker 1: the one big, beautiful bill and the largest tax cut
Speaker 1: in history. So people are beginning to feel the benefit
Speaker 1: of Trump's economic policies. However, I mean stopping Iran from
Speaker 1: ever acquiring a nuclear weapon to kind of get in
Speaker 1: the way of all of this and for a short
Speaker 1: period of time until this is resolved. Unfortunately, it'll slow
Speaker 1: down progress, but then it'll pick up right after three.
Speaker 7: But I feel the ground shaking. The Golden Age is coming,
Speaker 7: and it always begins with America real estate.
Speaker 1: One hundred percent. And I urge every American if you can.
Speaker 1: Once you get to the point you can afford your
Speaker 1: own home, I urge you to get it. Most people
Speaker 1: it is the biggest investment they have in their life.
Speaker 1: And look, the value of property is not going to
Speaker 1: go down in the end. Property values keep going up.
Speaker 1: Look for property that is unique, Look for property that
Speaker 1: is special. Look for property that you can improve. Don't
Speaker 1: buy the nicest house on the street. Buy the one
Speaker 1: that needs a little elbow grease, and you can invest
Speaker 1: in yourself in your spare time, improve the property and
Speaker 1: you'll make more money. Appreciate it. Marty, God bless you.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine four one Sean, if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. Jeff and Oregon, Jeff,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called hi?
Speaker 3: Sean, Yeah, thanks for taking my call. I'm a long
Speaker 3: time a listener since Comb's Day, and also I'm a
Speaker 3: retired MD. My point only is a quick one. I
Speaker 3: find it extraordinary that Cole Thomas was able to travel
Speaker 3: across the country on a train. Trains have rules regulations.
Speaker 3: You can't carry guns, you have to check them in,
Speaker 3: and I think I ride trains all the time, and
Speaker 3: I actually have a license, but I won't carry because
Speaker 3: I'm afraid of getting caught and getting a selony. He
Speaker 3: could have been caught if they had security at trains
Speaker 3: like they have at planes. And the days now are
Speaker 3: not safe for trains. God awful things can happen without security.
Speaker 1: Listen. I think, probably, deep down in my heart, I
Speaker 1: think you're one hundred percent right. I think the same
Speaker 1: protocols we have in place for anybody to get on
Speaker 1: an airplane should be institutionalized for trains and buses. I
Speaker 1: think it would make travel more safe and secure. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's a bad idea, but I hate the
Speaker 1: idea of being further inconvenienced. I hate it they.
Speaker 3: Had been blown up on a train also, or having
Speaker 3: some If I had.
Speaker 1: A dollar for every time I was wanted in my life,
Speaker 1: I'd be a very very wealthy man. And whatever you do,
Speaker 1: don't ever travel with Sweet Baby James, and don't ever
Speaker 1: travel with Linda because they're wearing signs on their forehead.
Speaker 1: It's tattooed in saying wand me, you know, give me
Speaker 1: extra security, you know, sweeps and to get some impatient
Speaker 1: when they pull her out of the line, he gets
Speaker 1: very impatient. Sweet Baby James is a lot nicer about it.
Speaker 3: I've had drunks that the police have pulled out who
Speaker 3: are threatening, but that's the that's the worst I've ever had.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's just not fun. But you know, unfortunately, I
Speaker 1: guess you know, it's the twenty fifth anniversary year of
Speaker 1: nine to eleven. I guess you know, we can't go
Speaker 1: back to where we were, and you can thank radical
Speaker 1: Islamis for changing our way of life and now you know,
Speaker 1: we don't even think about it anymore. And it's just
Speaker 1: it's just unfortunate, it really is. I wish it wasn't
Speaker 1: that way, but in this day and age, we have
Speaker 1: to put safety first.