WEBVTT - The Unintended Consequences of Trump’s Tariff Strategy

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Your sense is right that this is the path we're

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>heading where these tariffs will stay. And in fact, the

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 2>milted treatment's criticism of government intervention, which is that once

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>you start, it's hard to sunset anything.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 3>and this is trump Anomics, the podcast that looks at

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the global economy and what on earth is going to

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 3>happen next. And this week we're zoning in again on trade.

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've all been through another round of tariff

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>deadlines in the last few days. There's a bunch of

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>countries around the world feeling could have been worse, Others

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>facing a severe case of tariff sticker shock, for example,

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>who have the misfortune of running a thirty eight billion

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 3>dollar trade surplus with the US. The Swiss president's actually

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>in the air to Washington as we record this on Tuesday,

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 3>the fifth of August, and she's hoping to negotiate down

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the shocking thirty nine percent tariff rate that is otherwise

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>going to kick in on August seventh. So all these

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 3>months of so called trade talks between the US and

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 3>its trading partners have been messy and not always about trade.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>For the negotiators charged with striking a deal with the US,

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>you have to think pride and points at principle were

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>often the first to go. But what do all these

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>deals and understandings actually add up to, and how is

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>the global economy going to be affected? What difference has

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>it made to the impact on ordinary US consumers that

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>more than a trillion dollars worth of US imports have

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>been exempted from tariffs, sometimes very openly, often for reasons

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that are not entirely transparent. Those are a lot of

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>weighty questions, and I have one of my favorite double

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>acts to answer them, sitting in Washington, DC today, Sean Donnan,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 3>senior correspondent on the US and Global economy for Bloomberg Sewan,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>fantastic to have you back.

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's great to be here.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>And again Anna Wong, chief US economist at Bloomberg Economics,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>who's worked at the FED and served in the Trump

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 3>White House between twenty nineteen and twenty twenty, once comment

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>at the Council of Economic Advisors. Hi, Anna, happy to

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 3>be here.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Of Stefan.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Sean.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Of course, China is a bit of an exception to this,

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and we'll get on to it. We have not seen

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>a formal deal there, and the deadline may well be

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>pushed head again. But stepping back from that big exception,

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 3>if this was said to be a bit of a

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>shakedown by the US, I mean, it seems to have

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 3>been quite successful, right. I mean, by and large, the

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>US hasn't really chickened out, as the claim was often made,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 3>but the rest to the world it's sort of carved in.

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 3>That's the impression, Is that right?

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I think so far, I think that's right, Although I

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>think what we have to keep in mind is that

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we really haven't seen any final text to any of

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>these agreements. There's still a lot of big issues to

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be worked out. All of these things could fall apart

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 1>at a moment's noticed or in a single social media

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>post from President Trump. But essentially what we've seen is

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>President Trump take another step and cementing in these new

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>higher tariffs. I think one of the things that's fascinating

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is how he's changed the way we talk about these things.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Coming into this week, people have talked about, Oh, the

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>EU has managed to negotiate a fifteen percent tariff, and

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 4>that's down from a thirty percent tarifwill actually the tariff

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>is going up from ten percent to fifteen percent on

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 4>imports from the European.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Union, and of course it was much much lower than

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that as recently as January of this year. So look,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is putting a tarffwall around the United States.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a tariff wall that added some layers. It's also

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>got a few doors through it and the exemptions that

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. But the project is successful, at least if

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you're judging it on the political side. And I think

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>this is where we move into a different phase, and

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the economics of this project, and that's where we're

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>just now starting to get the first data that raises

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>some questions over whether or not Trump is going to

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to bring in this golden age that he

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>has promised to the American people and deliver the reindustrialization

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of America, a new era of American I guess exceptionalism,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>although of a different kind.

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 3>I would say, we're definitely going to get into the

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>impact on the US in a minute. I guess we'd

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 3>have to say. I mean, if Donald Trump is one

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>free trade definitely lost so it just remind us when

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you're thinking about when you say we've put the wall

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 3>around the US, just updatus on where tariffs are now

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>relative to for Donald Trump took office, because as you

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>point out, there's been a sort of expectations of management

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 3>along the way. We had those announcements in the Rose

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Garden on April second, which kind of puts some very

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 3>high numbers, and now the numbers look a bit smaller,

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>but they're still a lot higher than they were a

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 3>year ago.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, or a lot higher than they were six seven

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>months ago. We came into this year with the average

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>applied ter freight in the United States sitting are out

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between two and three percent. It is now sitting

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around fifteen percent, and it's threatening to go higher. Still.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We still are waiting for sectoral tariffs to be announced

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber and all the things that are

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>made of lumber that include semiconductors, and so there's a

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more tariffs to come potentially. To put that in

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>historical context, these are the highest tariff in almost one

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. Nothing like this has happened since nineteen thirty

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and the smooth Holli terror at the time.

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Our economists have working in the sort of trade modeling

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 3>which strakes from everything and just says, other things being equal,

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>that there's a global impact of this kind of tariff

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>shock of maybe two trillion dollars by the end of

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty seven. Output that would have happened, trade that

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 3>would have happened, that's not going to happen. But Anna,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 3>I know in the short run you see some powerful

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 3>offsetting factors or maybe one in particular that's helping to

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 3>offset that shock at at least for the short term,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 3>and it has really made a difference to the way

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 3>we perceive the impact.

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So Stephanie, I would call that the dog that

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>did not bark in this whole forecast that US tariff

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 2>trade war would plunge the world into slower growth is

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the dollar. So in all these economic models, internally, what

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the model forecast also is that the dollar would appreciate

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>in response to tish And that's because when there's higher

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 2>to import volume is supposed to decrease. As import volume decreased,

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 2>than the demand of US firms for foreign currency falls,

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>and therefore the relative demand supply of dollar would be

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>shifting in favor of appreciation the dollars since there's relatively

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 2>less outflows. Instead, the dollar has depreciated by about ten

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>percent year to date, and for one of the biggest

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 2>targets of this trade wars China, right, and China's remen

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 2>be actually stayed pretty constant vis are the US, which

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>means that China's currency has actually depreciated against the rest

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.119
<v Speaker 2>of the world by double digit in the past six months.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>For example, it has depreciated against the Europe by ten percent,

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And so what we're seeing therefore, China's growth is better

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 2>than expected because whether be it transhipments or trade diversion,

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>it is able to export to other countries more. The

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>dollar depreciation also loosened global financial conditions. So what we're

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>seeing is in any ems, you're seeing a lot more

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>capital inflows. This whole Cell America thing led to a

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of capital outflows in search of new homes and

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 2>many lended in emerging markets. And on my trip to

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong earlier, what I saw and what I heard

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>is that the first half of this year had been

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>really good for Hong Kong as an international financial center

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 2>because of all these deals that are coming from China

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 2>to the Hong Kong stock market. It's just like the

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 2>dollar depreciation has really loosen global financial conditions. So all

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of that has basically currently delayed the adjustment that all

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>these models would be expecting to happen as a result

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of trade war.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 3>That is interesting. So there was a feeling that the

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 3>dollar was going to go up, that's what the model said.

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 3>And when the dollar's high, it's sucking in investment to

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the US from the rest of the world, and that's

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of tightening for the rest of the world because

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the dollars actually fallen because people are moving money out

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 3>of the US, or at least not putting it in

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 3>as much. It's sending liquidity out into the world, and

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>that's making financial conditions easier for everyone else. They don't

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 3>have to have interest rates as high to track money

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>if you're an emerging market economy, and it's definitely making

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>things a bit easier for the central banks in that economy.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 3>But you also you had something crucial about China in

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 3>that discussion, because you were pointing out that because of

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the way the Chinese currency is fixed to the dollar.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, bizarrely, you've had the America become more competitive

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>and China's just become more competitive along with it. And

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 3>I know you spent that time in the Council of

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Economic Advisors and the Trump's first administration. Did Donald Trump

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>have an understanding that as the dollar goes down, it's

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>actually also helping the Chinese.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, President Trump loves a week dollar.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>We were examining his tweets back then, and aside from

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 2>constantly tweeting about power, the next thing that he really

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>loves talking about is week dollar. And I think from

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the perspective of the Trump administration, a week dollar is

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 2>part of the state craft, which is too onshore manufacturing.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>To ensure there's a manufacturing based in the US, you

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 2>have to have a week dollar. I do think that

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>the administration actually favors a week dollar.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 3>But they presumably don't favor a more competitive China. So

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 3>what's going to be the policy there?

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that is an unintended consequence. So somebody like Brad

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 2>Setzer from Council for Foreign Relations have really looked into

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 2>the intervention practice of China, and he has noted that

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 2>China has been interviewing through state banks, and so China

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 2>is actually responding to this trade war in a lot

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of very smart ways, and its found a way to

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 2>keep exporting. And that is something that I don't think

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the calculus of the administration was able to cover. If

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 2>they were able to make other country not retaliate, as

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned earlier, are the other countries ky, but they

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 2>were not able to stop China from keeping their currency

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 2>from appreciating.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 3>Yes, if you want chapter reverse on that. My old

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>friend Brad's analysis is always he understands the ins and

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 3>out of China's balance of payments better than I think

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 3>anybody on the planet, certainly better than anyone in this core.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, Sean, you had a couple of big

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 3>pieces in the last week or so that we're talking

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 3>through different elements of this, and that's the sort of macro.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's a micro to this, which is individual

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 3>companies scrambling to deal with the tariff rates that very

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 3>much do affect them or stand to affect them. And

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 3>you had picked on the tomato exporters in Mexico as

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 3>one example, and how they're just trying to grapple with

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 3>what's happening.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>There's the world of the models, and then there's the

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>real world, which is a lot messier and that is

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.599
<v Speaker 1>full of unintended consequences. We're talking about the impact of

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, and the traditional view is that yes, a

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>week or dollar dollar is good for American manufacturers. Well,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of all imports into the United States are

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>inputs that go into products that are manufactured in the

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>United States. When you have a weeker dollar, they become

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>more expensive and US manufacturing actually becomes less competitive on

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that front. And that's the messiness and reality of global

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. And you see that around Mexican tomatoes, which

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>also can be Arizona and tomatoes as well. So there's

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a company called Nature Sweet. It is the essentially the

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest greenhouse tomato grower in North America. It does a

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of it's growing in Mexico. It also has a

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>big facility. It's about thirty football fields of green couses

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona in which it's grown. Think you're growing lots

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of tomatoes. These are what they call snacking tomatoes, the

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of cherry tomatoes and great tomatoes, the multicolored things

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that you put in your salad at home. What they

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>are caught between is the tariffs and their future plans

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to grow their production in the United States, all of

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>which are being affected by tariffs and the policy. So,

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>first of all, President Trump has restored a seventeen percent

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>tariff on tomatoes from Mexico, So that is literally a

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a week in additional costs to Nature Suite

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on its imports from Mexico. But at the same time,

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you have all of these other tariffs that are affecting

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>all of these other inputs that they use at their

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>facility in Arizona. They had a plan to start expanding

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that facility from thirty football fields to seventy two football

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>fields of greenhouses, a big multimillion dollar investment there, but

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>now they're looking at that investment and they're putting it

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on hold. Why because most greenhouse technology comes from the

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Netherlands or Israel, so you're importing things to build those

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>new greenhouses. Also, all the inputs, and I did not

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>know this, all the things that you need to grow

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes in greenhouses are in fact imported. So they don't

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>grow these tomatoes and soil. They grow them in coconut husks.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Where do those coconut husks come from. They come from

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka, Guess what, they've got a tariff on them.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Where do they get their fertilizer from, Well, it comes

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>from Chile. Nowadays, guess what, it's got a tariff on it.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Where do the seeds come from. The seeds come from

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Israel. Guess what, they've got tariffs on them.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And so all of a sudden, the economics both importing

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the finished product in these tomatoes has changed, but also

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the economics of investing in the United States and increasing

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>production in the United States have changed materially. And as

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Nature Street told me, that's just the

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>world that we live in. And by the way, his

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>main competitors at this time of year are in Canada.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>You know what, they don't have any tariffs on their inputs,

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to be more competitive even if you

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have a tear on Canadian tomatoes coming into the United States,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at least until the Canadian winter sets in and they

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have more trouble growing tomatoes. And I think we're seeing

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that replicated in all sorts of different ways. It's Japanese

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>auto parts makers, it's Chinese manufacturers, it's French wine producers.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>There are all of these effects around the world. A

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of them just unintended consequences, and that's we're really

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>starting to see happen in the real economy, and that's

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>going to start filtering through into the data.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating. I mean, I guess we should thank Donald

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump at the very least for having kind of lifted

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 3>the hood or forced us to kind of look under

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 3>the hood of the global economy. I know you spent

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 3>your life under the hood of the global economy, sure,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 3>but just to get a sense of how complicated and

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>intertwined all of these supply chains are. And in case

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 3>anyone's wondering, I am half American, so I can say

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 3>tomato and tomato. But Anna, we know that there's been

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>this sort of micro complexities for individual companies, but at

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the same level, there's been this sort of broader sort

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>of tailwind that people have had from a week a dollar,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 3>which has made people feel slightly better than they might

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 3>otherwise have done. But let's just quickly turn the lens

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 3>on the US. I mean, we discussed recently, I think

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>with Orang cass about why tariffs might not have the

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of significant effect on inflation that some people had

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 3>talked about, but they're clearly is an effect on the

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>US economy, and it seems like we may have seen

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>some of that in the controversial revisions to the job

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>data last week. So just talk us through where you

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 3>think we are in terms of the impact on the US.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Last Friday, we had July payroll data and it came

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>with a shockingly massive downward revisions to June and May's

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>jobs data. So now the three months moving average of

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 2>job growth from May to July is only thirty five

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>k as opposed to just before last Friday, everybody thought

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>three month job growth was really at one hundred and

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand. So that's like an order of actitude of

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>five lower. So the last Friday's jobs report really flipped

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the narrative of is the US labor mark holding up

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 2>Donald trup to flip as well. Yes, And when you

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>look at the details of these downward revisions, they came

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 2>from sectors which one would have thought would indeed be

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 2>affected by this policy shock. So two months ago we

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 2>had written a piece about how Liberation Day and all

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>these other policies is going to generate a blood bath

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 2>in the nonfarm payroll for May and June. We thought

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 2>that three sectors affected would be leisure in hospitality, which

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>is affected by the reduced TOURUS coming to the US,

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>part of the Cell America narrative, construction sector from the

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 2>high ten year yields since the Liberation Day, and of

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 2>course logistics sector as trade flows comes down. For the

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>last couple of months it seemed like those three sectors

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>were holding up. The last Friday's revisions show that in

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>fact they did not. These three sectors were not holding up.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>And then additionally, I think the way to think about

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>these revisions is that they bring questions. But whether it

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>is those revisions could be revised up again in the

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>next month possible also, But right now these are the

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 2>earliest science that in fact the trade war is causing

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>a crack in the labor market, and I would characterize

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>them as early and tentatives because there are other issues

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 2>related to how BLS is, whether they're accurately measuring the payrolls,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's entirely possible that next month will see and

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 2>upward revisions to those data.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Recondiss of who has come in to run the Bureau

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 3>of Labor Statistics Molly Smith, who's been on this show,

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>but others have written quite a lot about the funding

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 3>issues at the BLS, and also the issue that many

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 3>other statistical agencies have had with surveys and getting people

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 3>to respond promptly or at all in a world certainly

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>post COVID. We're covering a lot of ground here, but

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 3>I did want to get to potentially one of the

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>reasons another reason why it's hard to read the impact

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 3>on the US economy of tariffs, and that's the large

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 3>chunk of imports that's been exempted one way or another. Sure,

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 3>you've done a fascinating analysis that we brought out last

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 3>week that adds up the numbers and finds over a

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollars worth of imports one way or another has

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 3>been exempted by Donald Trump from any kind of tariffs

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 3>so far.

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Though.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 3>We may have even news on one of the sectors

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 3>in the next few days. But just talk us through

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>just the sort of headlines of your investigation.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, I mean, one of the real differences in

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at least the language around the tariffs this time versus

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>during Trump's first term is that there has not been

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>way for companies in the United States to kind of

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>plead their case for tariff relief. What's called an exclusions process.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Right in the first term, when it came to the

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>tariffs that were applied on steel and aluminum and goods

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>from China, companies could go to the government and say, look,

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't get this anywhere else. This isn't made in

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the United States. All you're doing is hurting my business.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I can't find these things outside of China and win

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>an exclusion at least temporarily from the tariffs. And it

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>was a very transparent process. We could see the applications

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and the decisions on the website. You can still, if

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you're interested to this day, go to the USTR website

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>and dig up these exclusions. There were more than fifty

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand applications, by the way, for tariff relief just from

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the China tariffs in the first term. This time around,

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has said no, we're not going to have

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>any exclusions. Well, in fact, on Liberation Day April second,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>when you put out an executive order ordering up these

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>new tariffs on on goods from all over all over

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the world, there was a thirty seven page annex to

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the executive order that had more than a thousand tariff

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>codes that were in fact exempted from those tariffs. The

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>administration will tell you, well, those will eventually be subject

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to other tariffs, to sectoral tariffs, but at least temporarily

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you have this exclusion. That's quite a lucrative exclusion for

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies. They then followed up on April eleventh,

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they added in a lot of consumer technology products. That's

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>when smartphones, for example, became exempted from the tariffs. So

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple's iPhone production in China faces a lower tariff than

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of other products that are that are coming from China.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>That may change in the future depending on how you

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>apply semiconductor the tariffs that President Trump is promising, but

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a major exclusion on a major consumer product, and

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the type of thing that actually the President stayed

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>away from tariffing in the first administration because they wanted

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the impact on consumers. When you add all

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of this up, this whole universe of excluded products, you

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>get to like something close to one point two trillion dollars,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>about seven one hundred and fifty billion dollars of that

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is these Liberation Day tariff exclusions. And then there's also

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>all these products in North America that are subject to

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the US Mexico Canada Agreement which used to be known

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>as NAFTA, and President Trump, after initially imposing tariffs on

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Canada and Mexico, said well, actually, what we're going to

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>do is we're not going to apply that to products

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that fits the bill on this US and Mexico Canada agreement.

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's like four hundred billion dollars in trade there

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>that's excluded. Add it all up, and it's a third

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of all imports into the United States that are now

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>excluded from tariffs. And that obviously has a meaningful impact

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>on consumer prices and the effect on consumer prices on

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the overall economic effect. And we're going to get more

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of this to come.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>But Sean, I think a lot of people would say, Okay,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 3>there's a whole segment of the market which have been exempted,

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 3>and that may be unfair, you know, if you're making

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 3>in China and you're facing a big tariff if you're

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 3>making a certain kind of good, but not if you're

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 3>making an iPhone. But at least it applies to all

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 3>companies in a given sector. Do you have a sense

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 3>when you're looking at some of the sort of smaller exemptions,

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 3>are there cases where it seems to be company by

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 3>company or where they're sort of implicitly companied by company

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 3>because of the way the exemption has been designed. Do

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 3>most of these still take the form of a whole

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 3>market segment rather than just a single business person getting

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 3>a break.

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes and no, right, I mean it depends what you make.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>As a consumer technology product, for example, it depends what

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you make. And this is where tariff codes get incredibly specific,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and by choosing one tariff code over another, you can

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>really have an impact on different companies. The great example

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in technology is game consoles. Game consoles have not been

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>excluded from tariffs, so your Microsoft or Nintendo, your product

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>becomes significantly more more expensive to import. And that's kind

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of key product.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 3>And most people when you hear consumer electronics, you would

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>probably think that those were included in that life exactly exactly.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And then you get into kind of smaller accessories and

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it gets more complicated. Yes, there are smartphones or excluded,

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>laptops are excluded and so, but then it gets incredibly

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 1>finicky into you know, inputs like nylon, certain polymers, things

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>like rubber. There's you know, one type of graphite that

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is excluded and one type that isn't excluded. I mean,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>imports of cocaine that are done legally are right now

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>under the state of terraffs excluded from new terraffs. While obviously,

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is the case of American Textile imports of

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the pillow shells. The American Textile makes bed pillows and

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>other betting products, but the shells that they import from

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>China and India and Pakistan are subject to severe tarf

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, no turffs on co can. Asbestos, by

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the way, is also excluded, and you have terts. And

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what you've created is a very murky system. Now, and

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>this is what economs will tell you. The terriffs do

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is that they create distortions in the market, but they

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>also create this kind of favor system, and they create

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>perceived unfairness as consumers of steel get whacked while producers

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of steel get protected, right and and so you know,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>American Textile is an interesting company and that they've taken there.

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They've managed to get all the way into the White House,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and they've had meetings at the White House and all

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>along the way they say they've been told they're a

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>victim of unintended consequences. This isn't what was what intended?

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what was intended. It's so interesting.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Every topic is a is a is a rabbit hole. Anna,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 3>But I am going to slightly put you on the

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 3>spot because there's a CNBC interview that Donald Trump has

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 3>been doing, and I know my colleagues have been avidly

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 3>watching for news, and one of the things that has

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>come out of it is Donald Trump saying that US

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>tariffs on semiconductor and pharmaceutical imports will be announced within

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 3>the next week or so quote, and he says, we'll

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 3>be putting this is I thought was interesting, Anna, will

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 3>be putting an initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 3>one year, one and a half years, max, it's going

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 3>to go to one hundred and fifty percent, and then

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 3>it's going to go to two hundred and fifty percent

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country. He said

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 3>that as say, Tuesday morning, in an interview. I mean,

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 3>what's striking to me, Anna, is that one of the

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>criticisms of his policy up till now has been this

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 3>that if you wanted to actually move production, it seemed

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 3>like you should have a delayed timetable for tariffs, because

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 3>how are you going to build all these factories in

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 3>a month or three months in order to avoid those tariffs?

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Very early days obviously, but is there a sign that

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of taken on that argument with this approach

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 3>to pharmaceuticals if this is what we end up seeing.

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with pharmaceutical if that's what we end up seeing,

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it's seems like he does. And we have looked into

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the quantity of stockpiling for pharmaceuticals, and we estimate that

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>US firms have stockpiled enough for at least a year

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 2>as of now for pharmaceuticals. So even without that, the

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical industry has a year, and now with that they

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 2>have bought themselves ten years.

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah.

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 3>There's also some suggestion he's talking about semiconductors and chips,

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 3>but which is a separate category. I think that's right,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 3>he says, But as Shorten reminds me, the categories can

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 3>get much much smaller than that.

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>There's also a key question, which is how these things

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>are applied. Right, So one of the big exclusions that

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen creep in to the deal with the European Union,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, is an exclusion on tariffs for generic drugs. Now, again,

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>when we see these pharmaceutical sectoral tariffs, will they apply

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to generic drugs as well? People in the generic drug

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>industry say, the economics of producing those which are incredibly

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>low margin products in the United States, it's you'd rather

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just swallow the tariffs. They're not just there. So we're

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking for those exclusions on the semiconductor side.

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 1>All of these sectoral tariffs, they've applied to what they

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>call derivative products as well. Right, so things that include semiconductors,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>including that Apple smartphone, which has not been subject to

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the Liberation Day tariffs, but maybe subject to the semiconductor

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>The question becomes, how do you compute it. Is it

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a tariff of twenty five percent on the entire value

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of the smartphone or is it a twenty five percent

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>tariff on the value of the chips inside the smartphone.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a very different proposition, and you can guess which

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one Apple was pushing for.

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I've had conversations here in the UK with people who

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 3>was struggling when the aluminium tariffs came in with the

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of a similar issue of how a soft drink

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 3>can is it on the value of the can overall

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 3>when it's sold, or is it on the value just

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of the aluminium or aluminum inside the can. And these

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 3>are things that all those companies are having to grapple with,

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 3>and I was really struck. I mean this is by

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 3>way of a sort of last word. There was a

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 3>relatively senior diplomat came in to just talk off the

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 3>record in Bloomberg the last couple of days from a

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty major country, and he just said, once it's actually

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 3>been imposed, the US has never taken away a tariff

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>in the last fifty years. Once you actually put them

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>in and you start making money or people start making

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 3>decisions on it, the US has never removed them. Now,

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I suspect that may not be technically true, but it

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of feels broad directionally true. And once we have

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 3>seen all these tariffs we built that wall that we

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 3>started off for the program talking about of a fifteen

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 3>percent or so average tariff freight compared to the extremely

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 3>low one that a year ago. Do you think these

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 3>will get removed by future administrations, these tariffs or are

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 3>we just moving into a world where every US administration

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:03.959
<v Speaker 3>relies on tariffs.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, definitely, I think that your sense is right that

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 2>this is the path we're heading where these tariffs will stay.

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think that it's not just tariffs, generally taxes,

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, the Milton Treatments criticism of government intervention,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>which is that once you start, it's hard to sunset anything.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think that we are going to eventually see

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>these tariff legislated. I think America has decided to use

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 2>tariffs as a means to dig ourselves out of our

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 2>fiscal hold. These tariff revenues right now are averaging about

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty billion per month, so that's looking like over three

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion per year, and that is exactly what you

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 2>need to pay for the one that beautiful bill.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, that seems a poignant place to end. Donald Trump

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 3>not taking lessons from Milton Freeman and a wonk. Sean Donnan,

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here, Thank you.

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening to Trumponomics from Bloomberg. It was

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 3>hosted by me Stephanie Flanders. I was joined by Anna

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Wong and Short Donner. Trumpnomics is produced by Moses and

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Dam and Samma Sadi, with help from Amy Keene and

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 3>special thanks to Rachel Lewis. Kriskey. Sound design is by

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Blake Maples and Sage Bowman is head of Bloomberg podcast.