WEBVTT - This Week In Crypto

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heard podcast,

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. It's Friday, December nine. Well, the Sam Bankman

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>apology tour continued this week, despite a number of high

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>profile lawyers, including one who represented Bernie made Off, saying

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that maybe the former CEO of f t X should

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>really stop talking speaking of lawyers. As the bankruptcy winds

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>its way through the courts, thirty year old Sam Bankman

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>freed has in fact hired a new person to represent him,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark Cohen. Cohen's name, if it sounds familiar, is probably

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's known as one of the lawyers who represented

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>convicted sex offender Lane Maxwell. Today we're also going to

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>discuss whether that big Ethereum moved to proof of steak,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>which happened earlier this year, although it feels a million

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago, really had a meaningful effect on energy consumption.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>A new academic people writing about the merge, asks the question,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what if all those computers are no longer working on

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>proof of work duty for Ethereum have just been reassigned,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're mining other equally energy intensive tokens. Finally, why

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is Senator Elizabeth Warren asking questions about silver Gate? For

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>all this and more, we're joined this week by Bloomberg

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Report to any Massa. To have Sam Bankman Freed come

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in with his kind of reputation for being this real

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>mover and shaker in crypto was exciting to people at

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, and senior editor Dave Liqua, there's worry whether

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>there'll be another wave of sailing or panic selling, but

0:01:53.200 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, the market's actually been fairly flat. So Annie,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you are on the road at the moment. What's going on?

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So I'm in Chicago today. I've been um

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>back and forth here for a couple of conferences and

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>industry events, the goal being to just talk to as

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>many crypto people as I possibly can, as as this

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>industry kind of absorbed absorbs. The shock waves of f

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>t X is massive implosion, and what's a large number

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of shock waves. There have been so a couple of

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>things that have been happening just this week. You know,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>We've had Sam Bankman Freed pop up on three Twitter spaces,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>several other media appearances, just a lot of him explaining

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what he thinks happened, or what he doesn't know happened.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>One thing that's been interesting to watch, at least from

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>my perspective, is there was this big lead up to

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>AM's appearance at the New York Times Steel Book conference,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>where people were shocked that he would talk to the

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>media after all that's transpired. But what's happened since then

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>has been has I think up ended people's expectations. Instead

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>of it being hard to get an interview with him,

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>he'll almost speak to anyone. He's on this on Twitter

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>spaces all the time. Like you mentioned, He's talking to

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>every single outlet, sometimes for hours at a time. And

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's become this parlor game in the crypto industry to

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>guess what on earth he's trying to do? What on earth?

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>The goal is here? And this is despite and I

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have to say this, this is despite the advice of counsel,

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>whether his counsel or other people's counsel, or just like

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>any lawyer in the street. The vibe from the lawyers

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to be Mr Bankman, Freed, please stop talking. Are

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they suggesting this is a good idea for you to

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be speaking? Uh? You know, they're very much not um

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, you know, the classic advice rate don't

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>say anything. Uh, you know, recede into a hole. Uh?

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And is that who I am? I mean one of

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the headlines that our colleagues on the legal team were

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>able to confirm this week is that Sam Bankman Freed

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>has actually hired new counsel who may or may not

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be telling him to stop talking to everyone. Yes. Um,

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>with his apology toward there's been a lot of questions

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>where he's going with his legal strategy, and by hiring

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Gillane Maxwell's lawyer tied to the infamous child sex scandal

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>with Jeffrey Epstein, there's a real question on what he's

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. And Annie, from the perspective of you know,

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>just this very very complicated set of companies. You have

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>multiple lawyers not just representing Bankman Freed himself, but you know,

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>personal counsel for a lot of the folks involved. You

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have multiple different domains and jurisdiction. How are you approaching

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this in terms of your reporting, you know, like and

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what's in terms of the crypto folks that you're talking

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to in Chicago and elsewhere. What are the feeling about

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the reverberations for the industry. I think you're exactly right.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really a sprawling bankruptcy that has impact all over

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the world. I mean FTX operated all over the place

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, in the Bahamas, in the US, but you

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>also have Europe, Japan, Vietnam, um areas all over the world.

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not a typical bankruptcy, right, Like, there are so

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>many entities involved, and as John Ray said, there's really

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>unreliable perhaps financial information that it's all based on. It

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>leaves a lot of questions open about how we're going

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to proceed from here. And I think that a lot

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of the players involved have been lowering up themselves. But

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>then you also have these entities that are going through

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy and there is some confusion right now about how

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly as well it will all play out. Now. When

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the the unusual nous of the bankruptcy

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and the multiple jurisdictions, one of the things that is

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>also kind of unusual is like the contagion effect, right

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that this has had on other entities in crypto, Dave,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>As you've mentioned, you've covered crypto for a long time,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You've covered finance for even longer. People are throwing around

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>words like Enron made off Lehman Brothers. You know, the

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>difference here being that unlike with made Off Sam Bank

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and Freed has not been charged with any kind of

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>crime or wrongdoing, he's not been accused formally of any

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of crime or wrongdoing. Um with Enron, we have

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of hindsight, as we do with Lehman, to say, well,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>here are the things that exactly went wrong, But at

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>least in terms of that feeling of contagion, what are

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the kinds of things that have been happening

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.239
<v Speaker 1>in the past few days and weeks that are giving

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a sense of how the market is reacting to this. Well,

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a real curious time in the market. There's still

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>some unknowns in regards to contagion, so there's there's worry

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>whether there'll be another wave of selling or panic selling.

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, the market has actually been fairly

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>flat um since the the actual bankruptcy of f t X.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>In that time, Bitcoin has maintained its market share, which

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is also disconcerning to some folks because they see it

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:29.679
<v Speaker 1>as a example that there's no real safe haven demand

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Typically in the past, what has happened

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is that as markets fresh like this, the percentage goes up.

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Then the market turns around, the percentage goes down. But

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>everything went down and you just in this time and

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just staying there right that idea of you would

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>almost expect, or at least various analysts have been predicting,

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>especially the bearish ones, that crypto prices across the board

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>would actually be lower than where they are right now,

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's been it's been this like weirdly range bound

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>trading situation instead. Um addie. One of the companies that

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>has been kind of caught in this ft X contagion

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>both directly and indirectly is robin Hood, and you have

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>covered robin Hood very extensively. Could you just share a

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what is the relationship and what's the

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>complexity between this robin Hood shares f t X situation

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. So back when Sam Bankmnfried was doing his

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of buying binge over the spring, he bought this

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>big steak in robin Hood, which is a trading platform

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's really popular among young and kind of inexperienced traders.

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we all recognize it from the game

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Stop meme stock saga of So Sam bought this huge

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>steak in robin Hood and became one of its largest

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>shareholders in May, and at the time people were kind

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of buzzing because robin Hood's share price was like really tanking,

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, to have Sam Bankman Freed come

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in with his kind of reputation for being this real

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>mover and shaker in crypto was exciting to people at

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, and there was a question out there like

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>would he ever want to buy it? Out right? Like

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>what does he want with it? Is he going to

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>broker some order flow deal? Like what does he want

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with this this steak in robin Hood? And you know,

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>fast forward to now we've kind of had a complete

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>one eighty and it's one of the last easily sellable

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>liquid things that any entity related to Sam at all

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>has in in the ft X empire. So now the

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>big question is what will happen to that steak. I mean,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it will be sold almost certainly, but when and how

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and who will get the proceeds from that remains an

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>open question. For example, block Thigh has laid claim to

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the proceeds from that in its own bankruptcy that it's

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>now going through. But again, like It speaks to the

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>unusual nous of this is situation that you have this

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>steak and some uncertainty over where it will actually where

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the proceeds from selling it will actually go. We'll be

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>right back with more of the week's top crypto stories

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>from Annie Massa and Dave Lita. One of the other

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>things that's been, I suppose a little bit surprising about

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the past year is the like the back and forth

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of the regulatory environment that we've been in right where

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at intervals it has looked like there's going to be

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of a lot of momentum in terms of regulation,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and then there was a pause. But what we have

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>seen over the past couple of days is folks like

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Senator Elizabeth Warren, you know, sending letters, which is something

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that she has done to several different crypto companies, but

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>most recently to Silvergate, asking hey, what's going on with

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>your relationship to f t X and Alaman and you

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can you just briefly outline what we're seeing on the

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>bank side as it relates to this crypto complexity. Yeah,

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean to the point about regulation, there's been this

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>dance happening with the SEC and and regulators more broadly about.

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of the broader issue with f

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>t X is that it fell through some cracks, Like

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the SEC has said various things like they want exchanges

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>to come in and register and they don't want crypto

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>et s like that's been a whole um rigamarole for

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>many years. But what really happened is, big picture, f

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>t X and it's all its activities all over the

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>world kind of fell into a regulatory void almost where

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>no one was truly minding all of the farm from

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory perspective. So now the pressure is on for

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>all these regulators all over the world to crack down

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>figure out what went wrong, and um and and perhaps uh,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, takes take some action, uh and not the

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>least of which is political pressure, because now you have

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>all of the attention of politicians, some some politicians who

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>are personally embarrassed because they may have accepted donations from SPF.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>So the banking relationships is going to be a key

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>element of that story to watch. You know, if you

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>were a crypto company in the past several years, you

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't just go in through the front door at JP

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and set up an account. So the banks that

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>did work with crypto companies, including f t X. So

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, like you mentioned, banks like silver Gate.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>There are real big open questions about the contours of

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>those relationships and how much oversight they had, you know,

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>how much they were doing to really enforce uh, the

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>rules there, and I think that will be an area

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that we need to keep an eye on. Dave, Are

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there any big things going into three that we're encountering,

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, reporting that we expect might set the tone

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for what happens next. Yes, and there's a few things

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>look at. Um. One is the world of mining. We've seen,

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>uh that's a been area that's been decimated on three

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>fronts to from higher energy prices earlier in the year

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and now with the lending relationships falling apart. As this

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>downturn lasts on it, it's gonna be a a bankruptcy

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>watch in that sector. To so several of these firms

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>have said we're on the edge and unless this market

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>picks up, they're likely going to be there. So they've

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of exhausted the reserves in the in the upmarket,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it was unusual thing that they were hoarding the bitcoin

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>that they're mining because they wanted to play the appreciation

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>game so that they were both investors and producers at

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the same time. On the way down, they've been selling

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the fun operations and the senses that they've run out

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>of that or they've run through those reserves now and

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>unless the market picks up, it's going to be bankruptcy

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>probably for the case of them, a lot of them,

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and um that's going to have repercussions u as the

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>as it has with the lenders. To stay on the

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>miners for a second, our colleagues on you know what

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we call the Green Team, so who cover like energy

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the environment sustainability wrote up a really interesting documents,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a kind of an academic paper that was questioning whether

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the supposed environmental and energy saving benefits of the merge

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in which you know, the Ethereum blockchain moved from proof

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of work to proof of steak was really all that

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>good for the world. And the central question of that was, well,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have all of these former Ethereum proof of work miners

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have they really switched over to becoming like validators and

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a proof of state context or are they just repurposing

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>their machines elsewhere? And I know you and David pant

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>who is like, are one of our reporters who covers

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>crypto mining A lot have talked about the fact that

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, these machines aren't necessarily easily transferable between causes,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>But do you think this like these kinds of questions

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>around what is this core constituency doing? Is that something

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you see that's going to continue into There is strange

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>dynamic going on right now in this market where they

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>basically just pull these plugs on these computer setups on

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it and if you can repurpose them where you can

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>make money and say the supporting some of the other blockchains,

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>what you don't have the volume that you did with

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin or the or the rewards for that stake on it.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>David would just telling me the other day about a

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>great story about the literally um people who own the

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>miners going to hosting facilities and storming the offices demanding

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that they get their deposits back and being told you

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>can't have your deposits back, but you can go in

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the back in the factory area and take your minors.

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So people are literally coming in with trucks taking a

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>computer equipment away and stockpile on it or wherever that's

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a wild visual, and we've had a lot of wild

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>visuals this week. Um, you know, the the idea of

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody's just like seek unplugging computers and seizing them is

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly one of them. But we also had a story

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>from some of our colleagues in Miami about trash bags

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>full of F t X swag right that there was

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>h there were another set of crypto kind of parties

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and events that were happening in Miami recently. And one

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of the bits of swag that you kind of get

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were a v I P was just you know,

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>an F t X Miami like legacy swag T shirts

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>which people are collecting like if they're you know, Lehman

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Brothers backpacks. Oh, I'm sure they'll be turning up on

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>eBay very soon. In terms of get your nostalgic ear,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it's great analogy in there that the and you do

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have a boom bust and a party like this, there's

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>always the clean up afterword and maybe this time of

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>them beatings, you see, we will have to be stuck

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. Thank you Annie, and thank you Dave. You

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>can find more of their work on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. This is Bloomberg Crypto, a

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>daily podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>shows from I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Send us

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>your comments, questions, or suggestions for the show to Crypto

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>is Vicky very Galina. Our senior producer is Janet Babin.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Our producers are Mohammed Faruk and Sharon Barriro. Our associate

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>producers are Ty Butler and Moses on Them. Desta wonder

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>At is our engineer. Original music by Leo Sidron. I'm Stacy,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Marie Ishmael. Have a great weekend. N A the st

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>ASA