WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Jackson Hole, China, Debate

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Date Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a look at the Federal Reserves Annual meeting in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen Carolin London, where we're looking ahead to the

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>latest house priced data in the UK as the sector

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 2>breaks is for further price falls as interest rates move higher.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look inside the

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 3>black box that is China.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm Killie Lines in Washington, where we have our eyes

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 4>on Milwaukee ahead of the first Republican presidential primary date.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 5>Eleve them free on New York, bloombergon ninety nine to one, Washington,

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 5>d C, Bloomberg one O six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 5>San Francisco, DAV Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nineteen

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 5>and around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot Com and

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 5>via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Day to You, I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>program with what to expect at the Kansas City Fed's

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>annual Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, a three day event

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that officially starts this coming Thursday with a highly anticipated

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>address from FED chair Jerome Powell. Friday morning about ten am,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time, Bloomberg Surveillance co host Lisa Abramowitz, who

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 1>will be in Jackson Hole this week, joins us now

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>with some insight. Lisa, thank you so much for being.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 6>Here, Tom, thank you so much for having me.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, the theme of this year's symposium is structural shifts

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in the global economy, but for most of us, it's

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>all about what Jay Powell will say in those remarks

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and any hints he may offer about what the FED

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is thinking going into the September FOMC meeting now just

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks away. So what do you think we

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>can expect to hear from Chairman Powell? Lisa, Well, I

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think the.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 6>Whole idea of structural shifts raises a question about whether j.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 6>Powell is willing to come out and say inflation is

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 6>structurally going to be high in the years to come,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 6>and whether the rate that the FED sets has to

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 6>also be higher in the years to come, and if

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 6>he says that what that does to sort of underpin

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 6>some of the moves we've seen in the bond market,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 6>in other words, bond selling off, yields going up in

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 6>response to this expectation of higher rates for longer.

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was a year ago at Jackson Hole that

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Jpal warned of the pain that rising interest rates would

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>cause the economy and consumers. Now there's been some pain

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>benchmark lending rates at a twenty year high, but we've

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seen surprisingly strong job growth since then. We've seen a

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>resilient economy, steady consistent growth, consumer spending, housing market a

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>little uneven, but is it better than when he projected

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just a year ago.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 6>So when he was talking about pain, he was talking

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 6>about the unemployment rate coming up. There was a belief

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 6>that there was no way to get inflation lower unless

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 6>you had unemployment tick up. People lose their jobs, and

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 6>this was the pain that they talked about that was

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 6>necessary to avoid further pain down the line in terms

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 6>of higher inflation, sort of taxing the profits, taxing the

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 6>incomes of the average American. We are still at about

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 6>three and a half percent unemployment rate about a year later.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 6>In the employment market, that pain is not apparent. Nobody

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 6>would say that this is a difficult labor market. Quite

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 6>the opposite, and there are indications that while it is

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 6>loosening a touch, it still is relatively easy to get

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 6>a job, and wage increases are still above what they

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 6>had been pre pandemic. So as we look to this speech,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 6>there is a real question about whether Jerome Powell will

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 6>come out and say we were wrong, we didn't need

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 6>the pain, and actually inflation is coming down just fine

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 6>because post pandemic there were normalization effects that had not

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 6>yet taken hold, And whether he's going to come out

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 6>and say, we believe in a soft landing and we

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 6>are going to be patient and hold rates where they

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 6>are for longer to gauge whether or not we are.

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 6>If we're wrong, we can raise rates further, but otherwise,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 6>let's lean into this. That's kind of what we've heard

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 6>from other Fed officials as they've talked, let's lean in

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 6>a little bit to this idea that maybe we're getting,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, this mythical beast that is the soft landing

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 6>or the no landing and inflation coming in. You know,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 6>this will be something that I hope he does address

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 6>because it was a pretty dark speech last year.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the markets took a tumble, right, correct.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 6>It was sending a very clear message. The Fed came

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 6>through on what they were saying. They raised rates at

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 6>the fastest pace in modern economic history. So at what

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 6>point do they have to revamp their idea of what

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 6>restrictive means of how high rates have to go to

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 6>bring inflation back down to two percent? Or are they

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 6>going to say we don't need to get it down

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 6>to two percent so quickly, which is so some of

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 6>them are hinting, And you know, if that's the case,

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 6>we can be patient and we can watch and we

0:04:58.640 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 6>can maybe avoid that.

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, then that year, CPI went from about nine percent

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in July of twenty twenty two to last month's reading

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>of three point two percent. So whatever they're doing seems

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to be working.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 6>Some people would argue that the decline in inflation, which

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 6>just means prices are rising at a slower clip, is

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 6>just simply because year over year comparison numbers are too

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 6>difficult to really achieve that sort of equal nine percent level,

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 6>right that. In other words, inflation rose at a tremendous

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 6>pace mid year last year, very difficult year over year

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 6>to supersede that as such a great clip. Some people

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 6>are saying that that is fading and that you're going

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 6>to see a reacceleration in inflation NEIL data among those

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.799
<v Speaker 6>other people saying that this isn't it even Fed policied

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 6>have taking effect. This is just simply a normalization a

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 6>lot of questions that they, you know, would be interesting

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 6>for them to weigh in on.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, the FED meets again in September, and before then

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get some big data point. We have

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs data, housing data. So what will you be looking for?

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 6>So you're asking, probably I don't want to say the

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 6>wrong person, but I will give you the traditional answer,

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 6>and then I will give you my answer. The traditional

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 6>answer is CPI is really important to see how much

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 6>inflation's coming in, and of course the job's number is

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 6>also really important to get a sense of just how

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 6>much the economy is cooling or how much the labor

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 6>market is showing signs of loosening. I would argue part

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.799
<v Speaker 6>of the problem with this whole concept of data dependency

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 6>is that which data are you looking at and what

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 6>narrative are you trying to paint. Are you looking at

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 6>leading in economic indicators? Are you looking at data over

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 6>a couple of months, how many months? What's enough to

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 6>give you conviction that you've actually killed the inflation beast right?

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 6>And the reason why I ask this is because this

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 6>is supposedly a newly data dependent fed. What do they

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 6>do if inflation gets back down to three percent on

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 6>a rolling three month basis? Do they say victory? Do

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 6>they say we have enough data to have conviction that's

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 6>going down to two percent? Or do they say, wait

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 6>a second, we're also looking at the data that's over

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 6>there with what cars cost and oh yeah, over here

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 6>with how people are feeling in the University of Michigan

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 6>Consumer Sentiment Survey. It is a moving target to get

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 6>a sense of what the economic model is at a

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 6>time of incredible change, and that I think is what

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 6>people are trying to understand. What data are they looking at,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 6>what's their framework for making these assessments at a time

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 6>where that itself is of great debate.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Now some of that data, particularly housing, which we all

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>look at closely. It's tough affordability at a forty year low,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>because interest rates are at a twenty two year high

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and the price is just unbelievable. That's got to impact everything.

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 6>Yes, and it's surprising that, given affordability is so low,

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 6>housing prices having come down more. And this goes to

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 6>the heart of the conundrum for the Federal Reserve. Three

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 6>years ago, if you would have pulled anybody off the

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 6>street and said, hey, the Fed's going to go from

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 6>zero percent to five percent in terms of the overnight rate,

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 6>mortgage rates are going to be north of seven percent.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Where do you think housing prices are going to be?

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 6>Everyone would say, oh, my goodness, they would absolutely tank.

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 6>There's no way they can continue to chug hargher. And

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 6>yet here we are. And part of it is that

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 6>because of the higher rates, people aren't selling and there's

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 6>no supply. I mean, this is one of the most

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 6>counterintuitive economies in the way that it is sort of

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 6>developed that a lot of people have seen, and it

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 6>keeps up ending economist projections. So housing will be interesting.

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 6>The tea leaves that it's sending, though again as much

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 6>mystery as they are anything else, because of the ways

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 6>people adapt to higher rates and finding workarounds.

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>So tell me why we wait to see which J.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Powell We're going to get a Dubvish or hawkish. What's

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it like at Jackson Hole. What's it like being there?

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, truth be told, we're up at four am local

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 6>time or three am local times, so it's usually pretty

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 6>dark and cold, and it's very cold, you know, up

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 6>in the mountains, but it's gorgeous as the sun comes

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 6>up over all of the mountains. And then there are

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 6>those on the fed and the academics who join, who

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 6>go hiking and canoeing and fishing, and they are those

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 6>who stay in the lodge and have discussions. It's really

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 6>neat to have so many thinkers together trying to hash

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 6>things out to understand.

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 7>Where we are.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 6>And it's a retreat in the traditional American kind of sense.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that kind of atmosphere loosens these people

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>up the way we normally see them as so stern,

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so buttoned up. Is it a little different in Wyoming?

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes and no.

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 6>They are stayed because they have a tall task, they

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 6>have a difficult one, and they have a big job

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 6>to do. And I feel that, you know, I feel

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 6>that energy from them.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 6>Sure, people a little bit looser, sure, but it isn't

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 6>party mode. It's not as though people you know, do

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 6>junkets where they're throwing axes and getting hammered. It's like,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, definitely a feeling of gravitas for the moment.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 6>And I think that that's, you know, that's what the

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 6>atmosphere feels like. And to be fair, I mean we

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 6>are fairly isolated, about forty five minutes away from the

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 6>actual town of Jackson Hole, and you're surrounded by little

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 6>cabins or nothing and mountains. So it's not exactly a

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 6>party atmosphere conducive to you know, you know, some kind

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 6>of you know, incredible partying. This is you know, the

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 6>levity that people have going for a hike or you know,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 6>going fishing. It's more of that nature.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Lisa. Bloomberg Surveillance co host Lisa Abramowitz will

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have live special coverage from Jackson Hole of all the

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>key events. Plus we'll bring all the news being made

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines to you as well right here on

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Coming up on Bloomberg day Break Weekend is

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market in the UK in trouble. I'm

0:10:53.200 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top stories

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>New York. Up later in our program, Troubles mount for

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy as the slow down deepens. We'll bring

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you details, but first Britain's real estate market will be

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in focused in the coming days. Home prices under pressure

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>from higher rates, and Bloomberg Economics is forecasting further declines

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>as the effects of the most recent hikes feed slowly

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>into the market. Any hopes of a pause from the

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England have been dashed by recent hotter inflation

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and wage growth data. For more, Let's head to London

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 1>and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe Banker Stephen Carroll Tom like.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 2>The weather, house prices are a topic of national conversation

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 2>in Britain. After more than a decade of steady growth,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 2>prices are starting to come down, falling around five percent

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 2>from their peak last August. Bloomberg reckons they have another

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 2>five percent or so to fall, and we'll get fresh

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>data from the property website right Move in the coming days.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>The Bank of England's fourteen consecutive interest rate hikes are

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 2>still feeding into the market because of the way that

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 2>UK mortgage rates are usually fixed for just two to

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 2>five years. The recent stronger than expected wage growth and

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 2>inflation data means markets now expect BOE rates to peak

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>around six percent, So there's still plenty of pain ahead

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 2>for the housing market. We've been discussing this with Damian Shephard,

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>our residential real estate reporter, and John Steppek, who writes

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Money Distilled newsletter.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, the market expectation though is that rates will peak

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 9>are in about six percent in March. And obviously, I

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 9>mean market expectations have changed an awful lot that she

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 9>hadn't bounced up and down. The more important, I'll say,

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 9>the BOEV is an important fact on mortgages, but it's

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 9>not the kind of most important, and it's not, you know,

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 9>the key. A lot of it depends on how keen

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 9>by are to lend as well. So on the one hand,

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 9>rates have gone up a lot. On the other hand,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 9>banks are quite keen they right loans because they're not

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 9>doing a lot of business to the business they can do.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 9>You know, they want to do it, but you know,

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 9>at the end of the day, the kind of base

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 9>rate is the base rate. So you're talking about interest

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 9>rates have gone from about say two percent in the

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 9>mortgage about you know, eighteen months ago and now you're

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 9>going to be paying what a five and a half percent?

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 9>I think the two year average fix is about five

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 9>point eight at the moment, so it's gone up an

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 9>awful lot and the things I don't think that we've

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 9>seen that feed through all the way to prices yet.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 10>I want to ask your advice from whether you're looking

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 10>at two year ago for five year But we'll leave

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 10>that for maybe the end of the conversation. Let's bringing

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 10>Dimian at this point. Dimian when it comes to volumes,

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 10>because there's been some element resilience in terms of the

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 10>housing market. What's what's happening with with volumes given this

0:13:58.920 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 10>higher rates environment.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 8>Yes, I think you know the doomsday predictions of big

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 8>house price falls. I think it's playing out relatively slowly.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 8>But in transactions, you're seeing them a lot lower than

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 8>they were this time last year. One of John's recent

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 8>newsletters pointed me to the Ricks survey where you see

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 8>the view of estate agents and surveyors and they're pretty

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 8>down beat.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 10>It's pretty brutal.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 8>For real, it's pretty brutal, and that normally points to

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 8>dip in transactions because they're not getting their commission. So

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 8>I think transactions are down. And what's interesting is that's

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 8>even happening at the top end of the market. In

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 8>Prime London, we're down about twenty five percent transaction wise

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 8>in July compared to the same month a year ago.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 8>And when you see that sort of distress happening at

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 8>the top end of the market, it makes you think,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 8>what's happening a bit lower down?

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Economics expect it a peach to traft move of

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>ten percent in house prices. I mean, how far does

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>it look like we're into that and should people be

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>holding on for this help that prices are going to

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>drop much further?

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean, okay, more so far we're doing four

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 9>percent a contination weed from August twenty twenty to. The

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 9>first thing I would say there is look, if you're

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 9>buying a house, forget about trying to time the market,

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 9>because it really is a waste of your energy. There

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 9>are so many other factors that matter for buying a house,

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 9>and it's mostly your personal circumstances. And if you're an

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 9>investor that's a slightly different issue. But you know you

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 9>need somewhere to live, and if you've decided this is

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 9>right for you. The thing you focus on is making

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 9>sure you've got somewhere that a you can afford if

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 9>things go a bit pair shaped with the interest rates,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 9>and be that you are happy to live in for

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 9>a prolonged period of time in case, you know, something

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 9>happens and you end up stuck there.

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 9>So that's that's basically what you should be thinking about,

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 9>rather than worrying about whether prices are going to go

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 9>down by another five percent from here or not. That said,

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, I struggle to see how prices won't fall

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 9>further because you know, obviously there is that massive issue,

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 9>which is the interest rates have gone up so much

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 9>that people can no longer borrow I mean, and then

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 9>and interest rates go up, buyers cannot borrow as much money,

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 9>and therefore they cannot afford the prices that sellers wanted

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 9>a year ago or six months ago. So the sellers

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 9>have to give way or they have to sit in

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 9>their houses, which is, as Damien said, one reason why

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 9>transactions have kind of fallen off at Cliff because you know,

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 9>does a stalemate going on. But the longer that continues,

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 9>the longer that you know, the more I think that

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 9>would have to resolve in favor of the buyers rather

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 9>than the sellers, because you know, if you want to

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 9>move then at some point you're going to have to

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 9>accept that. Well, people just don't have to buy in

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 9>put it anymore.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 10>What is happening diamon on the mortgage market then just

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 10>splash that out for us, we saw a lot of

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 10>big banks pulling deals recently that that grabbed a lot

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 10>of headlines because rates were just going up, markets were

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 10>repricing on higher rates from the boa is. That started

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 10>to settle a little bit. What are you looking at

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 10>in terms of kind of two year, five year I

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 10>mean John touched on this, but but unpacking a little

0:16:59.360 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 10>bit more for us.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So we've seen some headlines in the last couple

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 8>of weeks of lenders sort of slowly putting rates down again.

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 8>And when I say Dan, we're still essentially touching fifteen

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 8>year highs when it comes to the two year and

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 8>five year fixed. Now there's tens of thousands of remortgages

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 8>waiting to happen in September. Now those people have been

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 8>able to secure those new deals for the last six months,

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 8>but it sort of spells a period of pain coming

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 8>up at the end of the year when people are

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 8>coming off those fixed deals which would have been locked

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 8>in at much lower rates, and are now sort of

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 8>looking at mortgage rates of up to almost six percent

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 8>in terms of the average. So there's going to be

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 8>a lot of pain to happen towards the end of

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 8>this year. And despite the fact that lenders are slowly

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 8>cutting rates, we're still so much higher than we saw

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.239
<v Speaker 8>during that era of cheap money. So there's a lot

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 8>of pain to come for these remortgages.

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 2>And the bitter let mortgages are a particular pinch point

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen, and that's come out in some of

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the recent data as well of how many landlords are

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>being forced to sell up because they can't afford the

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 2>increase in interest rates as well. What's the impact on

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the rental markets.

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, renters are at the sharp end of

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 8>the problems in the property market at the moment. There's

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 8>a lot of pressure on landlord finances. A lot of

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 8>them are on interest only mortgages, or the majority are,

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 8>which means that every time there's a BOE hike, they're

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 8>going to feel the pain more than those sort of

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 8>standard mortgage holders who are on fixed deals and the

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 8>only option really is to hike renters monthly bills or

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 8>sell up. We've seen an uptick in landlords selling their

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 8>properties over the last six months, and that's quite probably

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 8>in response to these high mortgage rates and the fact

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 8>that you know, they see those BOE hikes quite intensely

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 8>when they happen. But for renters, you know, they're seeing

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 8>their monthly bills go up a lot. And these are

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 8>the people that want to get on the housing ladder.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm a rent myself and due for a rent hike

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 8>at the end of this month. So when you start

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 8>to consider how much that takes the opportunity of getting

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 8>onto the housing ladder away from you, it's a pretty

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 8>stark reality for those renters. Yeah.

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 10>Indeed, John on by to let is buy to let

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 10>still a good investment?

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 9>No, I mean, if you're thinking this that no, No,

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I imagine what's happening and this is purely conjectured,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 9>but imagine what's happening with these buy to let landlords

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 9>who have been forced to sail up, as the one

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 9>of the problems is that they'll not then sail into

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 9>FoST tame buyers. They had actually twice sealing other cash rich,

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 9>more professional landlords.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 2>That was Bloomberg's John Steppeck, author of the Money Distilled newsletter,

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and Damian Shepard are residential real estate reporter. The one

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 2>sector of the market we didn't get a chance to

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 2>discuss with them was luxury homes. Damien has been reporting

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>about the discounts that sellers are having to offer on

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 2>houses worth millions of pounds as they try to attract buyers.

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 2>So perhaps an opportunity in London's market for those with

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 2>a few million to spare. I'm Stephen Carroll in London.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 2>You can catch us every weekday morning here for Bloomberg

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak Europe, beginning at six am in London and at

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>one am on Wall Street.

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Tom. Thank you, Stephen, and coming up on Bloomberg day

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Break weekend to look at what's happening in China's economy.

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby and this is.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg broadcasting live from the Bloomberg It a active brokers

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 5>studio in New York. Bloomberg e levon free oh to Washington,

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 5>d C, Bloomberg ninety nine one to Boston, Bloomberg one

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 5>O six one to San Francisco Bloomberg nine sixteen to

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 5>the country Sirius XM Channel one nineteen to London DAB

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Digital radio, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 5>in Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York with your global look

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Troubles mount for the Chinese economy as the slowdown deepens

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and a crisis bruise in the shadow banking industry. How

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>will the government navigate through this post COVID trough well

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>For more, let's head to Bloomberg Daybreak Asia's host Brian Curtis.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Tom, we look forward to China's loan prime rates out

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 3>on Monday in the coming week. After cuts in the MLF,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 3>we can expect to see an adjustment there, probably in

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 3>the five year LPR for sure, which is a proxy

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 3>for mortgages. By many accounts, China's housing slump is worse

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 3>than the official data would suggest. New home prices have

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 3>slipped only two point four percent over the past year

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 3>or so, but the feedback that we're getting from estate

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 3>agents and data providers paint a darker picture, and so

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of focus is on what we might see

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 3>in terms of stimulus for the broader economy. Joining us

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 3>now for some discussion about this is Jenny Marsh, Bloomberg's

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 3>team leader for China Economy and Government. Jenny, So, we're

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about some pretty extreme pessimism all of a sudden

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 3>here in the Chinese economy.

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it warranted?

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think the pessimism is warranted. There are

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 7>some sort of big problems facing the Chinese economy, but

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 7>I think it's really important to remember the economy still

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 7>is on track to grow by five percent this year,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 7>and I think you know, there was a State Council

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 7>meeting this week. It was sort of a snap plenary,

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 7>which is sort of surprising and does show some concern,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 7>but you know, Lee Chang's stressed at that meeting. You know,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 7>the economy is in good shape to actually meet its

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 7>growth target this year. So while certainly, you know, growth

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 7>is slowing and the raw problems facing the economy, it's

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 7>not in bad shape.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.719
<v Speaker 3>We've talked a lot about how international investors and perhaps

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 3>even domestic investors are calling for more stimulus, but we

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 3>did see in the South China Morning Post and they're

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 3>running a piece highlighting a speech that Hijin Ping gave

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 3>back way back in September asking for cadres to be patient,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 3>to understand that China just can't simply follow the beaten path,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 3>and he's really pushing for patients because that's what's needed

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 3>for common prosperity to deliver its you know, its fruits.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 3>And with that type of thinking, investors may be waiting

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 3>for a while here.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean absolutely. I mean, you know, I think

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 7>China does have the resources to sort of to simulate

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 7>the economy if it wants to. But you know, she's

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 7>Dremping for years now, has been trying to instill this

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 7>idea of high quality growth, which is sort of shifting

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 7>away from the properties and economic driver, lowering debt and

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 7>boosting high tech industries. So I think, you know, for she,

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 7>I think in a way, he's sort of prepared to

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 7>see the economy run a bit cooler if it means

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 7>that actually it sort of gets into better shape. And

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 7>I think actually people now are sort of accepting that

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 7>five percent growth target was a serious goal rather than

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 7>just some kind of flaw to be exceeded.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 3>We had just in the past few days, some Bloomberg

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>data revealing that some sixty percent of outstanding Chinese offshore

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 3>estate bonds are labeled as distressed. So we need to

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 3>focus a little bit more on the property market here.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes when you get prices only moving down a small amount,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't tell the real story. The big drop off

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 3>in transactions sometimes can tell a bigger story. How deep

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 3>is the crisis in the property market?

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think the thing with the property market

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 7>is the debt sort of facing the developers is the

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 7>big thing now that you know, China has to really

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 7>deal with. There are so many people who have sort

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 7>of put their life savings into homes which developers haven't

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 7>yet built, and now with sort of the debt problem ballooning,

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 7>you know, how these developers are going to sort of

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 7>find the financing to make good on these properties is

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 7>a real risk. And I think that's the thing that

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 7>the government is worried about. And I think, you know,

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 7>there are many ways in which they're prepared to see

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 7>things sort of go a bit cooler, but you know,

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 7>this is something that can sort of spill over into

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 7>social instability. And also then you know how this sort

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 7>of ripple effect through the economy, which is kind of

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 7>what we're seeing this week, you know, with the shadow

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 7>banking crisis now, where these trust funds have sort of

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 7>invested in the property market and this sort of ripples

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 7>over and then impacts some people's wealth. So I think

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 7>it is a big concern.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. One wonder is whether or not we see more

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 3>people out in the streets like we did see in

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the past week in Beijing, whether or not that forces

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 3>the hand of policymakers. It's the type of thing that

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>was rumored back when zero COVID was.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 7>Changed and exactly and I think, you know, for she,

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 7>despite the fact he does come from this elite, sort

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 7>of princely background, he sees himself as sort of a

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 7>champion of the people. And I think this COVID protests

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 7>were so shocking because he realized that the average person

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 7>A was angry and B had been hardest hit by

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 7>his policies, and I think that is worrying for him.

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 7>And you know, the one thing that I think the

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 7>Chinese public is willing to protest about is their wealth.

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 7>You know, if you make Chinese people poorer, they will

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 7>come out into the streets. And I think those protests

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 7>have seen as being somewhat legitimate as well. So is

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 7>the kind of thing the government would respond to for sure.

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 3>So confidence is needed not only for the business sector,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 3>but for the consumer sector. And then we have a

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 3>story like we ran just at the latter part of

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 3>this past week, where officials have asked investment funds to

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 3>avoid being net sellers of equities, in other words, to

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>make sure that they're buying a little more than their selling.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 3>What does that do for confidence when stories like that emanate,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 7>It's not a good look. You know, if the government

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 7>has to intervene in this kind of way, then the

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 7>market's not running as it should be, you know. And

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 7>this is a problem that the government has at the moment.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 7>It sort of has these mixed signals. And the one

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 7>hand they're saying, you know, the growth target is fine

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 7>and sort of the Communist Party's newspaper earlier this week

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 7>had an editorial saying, you know, no growth would be

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 7>a problem. But on the other hand, they don't want

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 7>the confidence to deteriorate in a way that it becomes

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 7>a self fulfilling loop, you know, and then things do

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 7>go into sort of crisis mode. I think there were

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 7>some banks earlier this week that downgraded their economic growth

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 7>forecast to below five percent. And I think if it

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 7>does start to look like the government's going to miss

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 7>the five percent target, that's also something that could really

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 7>motivate the government to take sort of bolder steps.

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 3>And we talked also at times over the past week

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 3>about Chinese officials deciding not to publish the unemployment numbers

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 3>for youth, and as you pointed out in an interview

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 3>that we did on Bloomberg day Break Asia, those numbers

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 3>from sixteen to twenty four maybe a little misleading because

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 3>of the difficulty in sort of tracking young people. But

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 3>it's another example of how policy sometimes will get adjusted

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 3>just to have the appearance of things not being as

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>bad as perhaps they look.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 7>Oh yeah, exactly, I mean, you know exactly. It could

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 7>be that China has legitimate reasons for wanting to change

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 7>just methodology in capturing this data, because you know, should

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 7>it be capturing sixteen year old in youth unemployment data

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 7>if realistically their students you know, still living at home,

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 7>et cetera. But the way they did it, you know,

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 7>pausing that data in a month whereas expected to soar,

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 7>creates a bad impression particularly when it comes as they've

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 7>been restricting growing amounts of data. They used to release

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 7>numbers show the amount of land developers bought and the

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 7>price they paid. That's been missing for much part of

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 7>this year. You know, there's countless examples of this where

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 7>trying to sort of when things get a bit too

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 7>awkward and prickly, they just sort of stop releasing that data.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 7>And you know that creates this sort of feasonter fears

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 7>that China is becoming more of a black box somewhere,

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 7>which is volatile, hard to invest in.

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it does raise questions about the overall data.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I've been here for more than thirty years, and you

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.959
<v Speaker 3>know we always had these questions about data. But for

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the most part we say, well, the data is the data,

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and this is what we live with. But now it's

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 3>very much in focus again. But I think we should

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 3>probably spend a little bit of time on some of

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the positives in the Chinese economy, because, to be fair,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 3>even as you suggested earlier, if we were getting up

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 3>around five percent growth, some things are working. So let's

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 3>take a minute here to look at some parts of

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese economy that do seem to be producing yeah.

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, and also often when we talk about the data,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 7>it's sort of like the data is weakening, the growth

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 7>is slowing. You know, we're not saying that there is

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 7>actually in decline. So you know, obviously CPI did go

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 7>intocline recently, but there are sort of other right spots

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 7>for the economy, so I think it is important to

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 7>sort of to focus on those.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Two interesting perspective. Jenny, thanks so much for joining us.

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Jenny Marsh Bloomberg Team leader for China's Economy and Government.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Curtis along with Doug Chrisner. You can catch

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 3>us every weekday here for Bloomberg day Break Asia, beginning

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 3>at six am in Hong Kong and six pm on

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom, thank you, Brian, and coming up here on Bloomberg

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>day Break weekend to look at we head to the

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>first twenty twenty four Republican primary debate, which happens on Wednesday.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Wednesday marks the first debate of the

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four presidential season, and it's a focus on

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Republican field. For a preview, let's head to our

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety nine to one newsroom in Washington and Bloomberg

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Sound On co host Kaylee.

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Lines tom Next week is going to be a big

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 4>one in the world of politics for many reasons. President

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Biden visiting Maui on Monday, the first Republican primary debate

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 4>on Wednesday, and then a Friday deadline for former President

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Trump and the eighteen other co defendants charged in the

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Georgia twenty twenty election case to voluntarily surrender in Fulton

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 4>count But really it's the debate that's the big one

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 4>we've all been waiting for, so we'll focus on that.

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Washington Senior editor Wendy Benjaminson is here with me

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 4>for more. So, Wendy, the biggest question is going to

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 4>surround former President Trump and will he or won't he

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 4>actually show up.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 11>That's exactly right, and it's killy. It's something that Donald

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 11>Trump has just perfected in his time in political life.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 11>Is no matter what else is going on, this tragic fire,

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 11>his own criminal endeamonds, we are all wondering on pins

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 11>and needles. Is he going to show up for the

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 11>debate or isn't he? And it will? I mean, it's

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 11>important whether or not you like Donald Trump. It's important

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 11>because the whole debate shape is different and for the

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 11>candidates involved, all of their prep will be different. You know,

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 11>candidates really spend a lot of time preparing for the debate.

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 11>They do role playing and all of that. And if

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 11>Trump is there, it's one debate. If Trump is not there,

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 11>it's a totally different debate.

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, and if he's not who then is the punching bag?

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 11>That honor goes to Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 11>who is second in the polls, even though he is

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 11>thirty points below Donald Trump at this point, but he's

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 11>in that number two spot with Vivid Ramaswami and surprisingly

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 11>in some places Tim Scott nipping at his heels.

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, and we learned this past week that those close

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 4>to Rondasantis are actually advising him during the debate to

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 4>defend Trump and go after Ramaswami, who you were just

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 4>talking about, defending the person you are running against, defending

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 4>the front runner. How does that make sense, Wendy Well, I.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 11>Struggle with this I've been struggling with this one too,

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 11>because it just doesn't make any sense in a normal world.

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 11>But what this DeSantis super pack or a firm associated

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 11>with DeSantis, is super pac put online so that it

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 11>could legally communicate with Ron DeSantis debate advice that said, yes,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 11>you should defend Donald Trump, but in kind of a backhanded,

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 11>bless your heart kind of way. What they're saying is, well,

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 11>he's under four indictments. The poor man, he just is

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 11>so distracted he couldn't possibly focus on the country's needs.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 11>He must take time to focus on himself.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 11>Hearts and minds go hearts and prayers go to the

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 11>former president. So I guess that's kind of a left

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 11>handed way of defending him.

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 4>So with Trump as the front runner and all of

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 4>these candidates pretty much linguishing behind him, many of the

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 4>people who are going to be up on that stage

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 4>are still down in the single digits? Are there any

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 4>of them where if they can't, you know, make something

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 4>big happen at this debate, it's kind of game over.

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 11>It could be game over for some of these guys.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 11>There is a guys, I say, Nikki Haley, the former

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 11>governor of South Carolina is still in it, she says,

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 11>to win it. So we will see. But and her

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 11>performance is very important in this debate. But there's another

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 11>debate in September, I believe, toward the end of September,

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 11>and there will be even tougher requirements to get on

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 11>that stage. So unless you have one of those viral

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 11>moments what the Desantus memo called the what was it

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 11>the falling off the cliff ada was the orchestra pit

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 11>moment where a candidate who talks about foreign policy for

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 11>three or four minutes will not be remembered as much

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 11>as the guy who falls into the orchestra pit.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 4>All right, this is going to be a very interesting one.

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Washington Senior Editor Wendy Benjaminson, thank you so much.

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 4>And Tom all eyes are going to be on Milwaukee.

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Kaylee.

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>That was Bloomberg Sound On co host Kaylee Lines, reporting

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>from our Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom in Washington, and

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you can hear sound on weekdays one to three pm

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. And that does it for this edition

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday morning, five

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas,

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and the news you need to start your day. I'm

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global business

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>headlines are coming up right now