WEBVTT - Weekend-July 10, 2021

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news As it happened. Bloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Stinevink on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone, Welcome to the weekend

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week. It was a shortened trading

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>week coming off the July four holiday, and yet one

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>where we were still trying to get to the bottom

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of the most recent round of cyber attacks. More on

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that in a moment. Also trying to impact a massive

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending proposal in the US. Former US Transportation Secretary

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Rodney Slater weighs in on how we need to think

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>about it. We're also being pretty thoughtful about the reality

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of what post pandemic work is like, right Tim, Especially

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>if you cannot work from home, it's going to be different.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that though with the Chief people officer over

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>at Waste Management. Plus the bitcoin dilemma, what really is

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the future of cryptocurrency and the blockchain? All that to come,

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but we begin with the latest targets of international cyber

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>criminals and tim We know there are lots of moving

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>parts and questions regarding cyber attacks and Russian involvement and

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Russian government awareness. Lots of questions, yet one thing we

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>know for certain. They're happening more frequently and getting more sophisticated.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Caroline I spoke with Bloomberg News cybersecurity reporter William Turton

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to help break them all down. We reported that hackers

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>that are aligned with the Russian State Russian Intelligence Service

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>reached the Republican National Committee. Now we don't know what

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they did once they were inside or what data they took.

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>We're still working to find out more about that. But

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the really interesting thing is that happened on this backdrop

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of a massive ransomware campaign. So there's there's two things

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>happening here. There's an espionage campaign happening and there's a

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ransomware campaign happening, and they're both originating from Russia. So

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Russian criminals, this criminal hacker group called Reval is conducting

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a ransomware campaign and very wide scale skill that we

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't really seen before where they have automated their attack.

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>They hit one company that makes technology for a lot

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of companies in order to encrypt nearly eight hundred businesses

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>as the estimate right now. So at the same time,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Russian intelligence services use the chaos created by that

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>attack to then go and breach the RNC. So where's

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the Russian government and all of this despite President Biden

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>saying to President Putin, like, knock it off. So, you know,

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Russian state hackers hacking the r NC is just sort

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of your normal espion. Actually, I mean, we do the

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>same thing. That's standard. That's not that surprising. It's certainly

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting and newsworthy. But the combination of the two is

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what's really raising people's eyebrows here because the question for

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time has been to what degree are the

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>criminals and the intelligence hackers in Russia aligned and how

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>much are they collaborating And is it a tacit approval

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Russian state or they're getting more instructions And

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that's just something that we don't know right now, But

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of one of the questions is being raised

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>by these things happening at the same time. When you

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>also say, just to follow is that we the US

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>government and other governments are doing it on other governments too.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Are we somehow doing something on a similar level. Obviously

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the ransom ransomware side being part of it. Well,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>espionage and ransomware are two very different things. Espionage has

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>gone on forever and will go on forever. But it's

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really the backdrop of the espionage happening at the

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>same time of this global ransomware, right because the cybersecurity

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>professionals they're worn out. I mean, ever since Solar wins,

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>there's been one huge hack after another, so people are

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>just really lacking the resources to respond. And and when

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a big systemic ransomware event like this, I mean,

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>people really have their eye off the ball and you're

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to be looking for something like espionage. What

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is the weak link here? Because these security systems, they

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>seem to be this reoccurring theme, right, they're only as

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>strong as the weakest link, and employee clicks a bad link,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>gives some information, enters his or her password, and boom

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>therein what's the weak link here? Well, it's it's hard

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to know. I think the problem is extremely complex, um

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's sort of new threats that are evolving all

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, and it's like the pace of innovation and

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and how we're kind of integrating ourselves even deeper into

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>computers and networks. Isn't really keeping up with security, And

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Internet fundamentally was not built with security

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>in mind. No one really anticipated that these things would

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>ever happen. So, you know, I just don't know. There's

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>so many week wins. But William, they are getting more sophisticated.

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean you think about how they got into the

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>global software supply chain, Like when you start to do this,

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that makes it that you can kind of do one

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.799
<v Speaker 1>thing but potentially impact so much more. Right, So, in December,

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we learned about Russian intelligence hackers doing this with solar winds,

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was amazing. I mean, it was the sort

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of tradecraft that you would expect from some of the

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>best hackers in the world. Right, But now we're seeing

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>criminal groups do this. That's what's really interesting. They're they're

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of upping their tradecraft and they're making it so

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't just hit one company, they hit hundreds or

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>thousands of companies all at once. You know, one thing

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, Tim and I think on air on our

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>daily show, we are constantly talking with cybersecurity firms who

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are saying we're protecting everything, and yet it seems like

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the criminals are the bad guys are the folks who

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are involved in ransomware are always a couple of steps ahead.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it always going to be like that? Well, you

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>have there are I mean, think about it. There are

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>some companies that haven't been hit by ransomware right, and

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>there are companies that are doing things right. I think

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone will agree. Financial institutions, for example, are

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of very far ahead on cybersecurity where their industries

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are not right exactly. And um, you know, it's really

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's there's just so much that we don't hear

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>about because most of these hacks go unreported. Um, you know,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you can have great security tools, you can buy all

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the products, but if you don't have a team that

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>implements them correctly, then it's not gonna work. So what's

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a government to do? What's what's a business to do?

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it sounds like this is something that that

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>has to have the support of private public partner ships

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>right in order to actually prevent it from from happening again.

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And we saw this in the wake of I think

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it was the JBS in colonial pipeline attacks, right where

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>these companies paid these large millions of dollars in big coin,

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and it seems provide some sort of incentive for that

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 1>actors to go out and continue to do this because

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the will is there for these companies to get their

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>systems back online and they'll pay to do it. Yeah,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean the option of your like a colonial pipeline,

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense to pay. And a lot of these

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>companies a cyber insurance, so you know, what's the point

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of paying the premium if you don't invoke your cyber

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>insurance to pay the ransom. That was Bloomberg News cybersecurity

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>reporter William Turton tim Every time we talk with him,

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I just realized there's still so much we don't know,

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and folks get ready for even more of this to

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>go on. Well, like you said, and it's just it

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like the cyber criminals are one step ahead of

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone else right now. Yeah, and it's worrisome. So far,

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the financial industry has been really good, as you mentioned,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, but it just makes me a little nervous,

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>all right, coming up securing our future infrastructure security and needs.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>We check in with a former U S Transportation secretary.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. This

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinevik from Bloomberg Radio. So bipartisan group of

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>House lawmakers have publicly endorsed President Joe Biden's five hundred

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine billion dollar infrastructure deal with a number of

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican and Democratic senators. We're talking about the hard infrastructure

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>part of his deal, and that's giving the compromise fresh

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>momentum at the start of a crucial month for the

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>administration's agenda. The possibility of infrastructure spending has fascinated investors

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for years. Joining us with some thoughts this week former

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>US Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater. He served under President Bill

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Clinton and before that he was administrator of the Federal

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Highway Administration. I feel like we've been talking about an

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spend forever today. Rodney is a partner at the

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>international well known law firm and lobbyist squire Patent Boggs,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>based in Washington, d C. Clearly, President Biden had a

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>much larger bill, and I think ultimately even this measure

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>will be beyond um that amount because I think when

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you consider courage spending levels with new spending levels, it's

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be an excess of one trillion dollars. But

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got significant transportation needs. I think this is a

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>very very important step. And I think, just as is

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the case with all transportation measures, you have to have

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>bills that are continuously reauthorized. Uh. And it's just unfortunate

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that in the last you know, decade or so, we

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just have not been as um uh forth right in

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>spending the kinds of dollars we have to spend to

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>ensure that our system remains in good shape and that

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>we're also investing in things of the future like um

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, high speed trains, maglev trains, those

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things. So I'm excited about the bill traditional

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure primarily, though with some significant investment in broadband uh.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's a very important first step. Well,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Slater, and that's something I wanted to get into about.

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's different types of infrastructure out there. You

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>were Transportation secretary under President Bill Clinton. Before that, your

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>administrator of the Federal Highway Administration. I mean, you have

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>seen our infrastructure for many years the comings and goings.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Are we thinking about infrastructure in a bit of an

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>outmoded way and old model? Should we be thinking about

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>ways to actually cut back on the use of roads

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and highways rather than just building it back. And I'm

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about things like efficient congestion pricing for cars and trucks,

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>or efficient payment and bridge wear pricing for trucks, because

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>trucks really kill our roads and highways, you know, should

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we have them be paying more that that will hopefully

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately bring about better design, if you will. When it

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>comes to trucks, well, uh, you know, first of all,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>let me just I want to step in and supportive

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>state trucks and trains because that's really what keeps our

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>economy moving. We are the most mobile society in the world,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and we moved significant amounts of freight and all the

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of products that we take for granted when we

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>go to a grocery store, when we go to a

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>department store, that sort of thing, and many of those

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>good to move by trucks, many move by trains, and

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>even during the pandemic, Uh, these workers were on the

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>front lines again keeping our economy going. But you're right, transportation,

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I've always said is about more than concrete asphalt to steal.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>We have to look at new means of investing in transportation.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>We have to uh frankly, wean ourselves from a dependence

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on fossil fuels and look at new renewed energy sources.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think um the President has challenged us in that

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>guard even with his campaign theme of building back better,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>not just building back, but building back better and shoring

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>up our infrastructure so as to withstand some of the

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>natural disasters that we're facing, especially on the coast. So

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot of work to do. I think

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got some professionals to get that work done. The

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>American people want it done, and it's key to our

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of happiness. So I think that there is much

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>about the new that has to be done, but also

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we have to maintain the system that we have currently. Well,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that you bring up the coast to and

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder about that. With climate change, we talked

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about Florida a lot here on Bloomberg. It's caught the

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>attention of investors. You know, should we continue to build

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>back and shore up if we're not going to really

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>equally do something about climate change, because it's just a

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>case of rebuilding the castle only to see the shoreline

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>take it down again. Yeah. Well, you know, the President

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>has been very clear about that, and I think he's

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.599
<v Speaker 1>really hit on three words that I believe will ultimately

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>define line uh, the effort that he's proposed and the

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>effort that the Congress will actually pass. He's talked about resilience,

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>He's talked about sustainability, and equity, and all of those

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>issues go to the transportation system of the future being

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>more resilient where it's showed up where it's building back, better,

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>being sustainable, meaning a system that can withstand the challenges

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of freight with then the challenges of natural disasters, those

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things, and then more equitable, ensuring that everyone

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is included, that no one is left behind. And so

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited about what we can anticipate. I think that

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the system really um tested in this fourth

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of July holiday weekend where we've enjoyed m the opportunity

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as Americans to see America come back, if you will,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and and it's sort of get back to a period

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of normalcy, especially hopefully as we've sort of put COVID

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in review mirror. But again that has been the number

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>one objective of the President, freeing us from that, and

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>then dealing with our economic pandemic, our economic challenges, UH,

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and then investing in the future. And I just feel

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>good about where we are. But we've got much more

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to do as the Congress returns from the holiday and

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of nears the August recess and then frankly the

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the fiscal year, UH the end of September.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So a lot to do, but I think we're on

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the right track, to be sure. I think here again,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some good signs. I mean clearly, UH, this

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 1>effort is not only an effort that's being pushed by

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the President, but you've got a bipartisan group of Senators

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>who have responded quite admirably as well. And then more recently,

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the House Problem Solvers cause has stepped forward. That's roughly

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>six members of UH, sixty members of Congress, both Republicans

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats. So I think that's that's a good son.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you in years past, UH, those of

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>us who have had the honor of serving as Secretary

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of Transportation, we've enjoyed significant bipartisan support. I was just

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with Sam Skinner, a secretary during the Bush administration. Bush one,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll sit that way, uh and UM gave us a

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>wonderful piece of legislation that was bipartisan. We came in

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>shortly after that, took advantage of that gift. UH. During reauthorization,

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>added additional resources. And really it's that piece of legislation

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that's governed transportation policy for about thirty years. We now

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have a need to build on that and to go

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, and that's why this current opportunity is so critical.

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That was former U S Transportation Secretary and former administrator

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Highway Administration that Rodney Slater. Still ahead

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Business Week as Congress tries to figure out

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>passage of an infrastructure plan, the world is working on

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how we work in a post panda the world.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We get some thoughts from the chief people Officer at

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Waste Management. This is Bloomberg broadcasting from the financial capital

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the World, Bloomberg eleven Frio in New York to Washington,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty to the country Sirius XM,

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Chado one nine team and around the globe, the Bloomberg

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot com. This is Bloomberg

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Recently, I moderated a Bloomberg panel on how

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we work, how leaders are leading and organizing for the

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>future to make sure companies and their teams have what

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they need. Tim listen, how many times do we have

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this conversation? Yeah? I mean the big question is what

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>does it look like? And nobody really knows the answer.

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a big experiment that's playing out right

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly in real time. All of this, too, is impacting

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>employer relationships with their own employees, with their clients, with

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>their customers, their business strategies, and their tools for tracting

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>new talent. Well. One participant on your panel, tomlaw Oates Forny,

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Senior vice president and Chief People Officer for Waste Management,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>was kind enough to stop by our daily show to

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>continue the conversation and how she sees work life post pandemic.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We recently launched this new program known as Your Tomorrow,

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:21.119
<v Speaker 1>where we're providing debt free educational benefits for our employees

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and beginning in January two, it's going to be a

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>benefit that's not only intelligible for employees, but their dependence

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as well, meeting their spouses and their children. And we

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>think this is a creative and innovative and competitive way

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to one attract people to waste Management, but not only

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>attract them, but we came them, tell them this is

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. Why did you do it? And and

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can anybody access this? And anybody's family access this? So

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>why did we do it? One? Because there are a

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. One, our employees were asking about educational

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>reimbursement benefit in its traditional senses, but it's something that

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our employees were interested in. But when we looked at

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the old model, it was more of a reimbursement, so

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the burden was on the employee to find the school

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and university and they would have to come out of

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>pocket upfront and the company would pay for that. So

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we were looking at options for an educational benefit and

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>we discovered Guild Education, which has been a phenomenal partner

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for us. And with Guild Education, every employee that's the

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>full time employee waste Management is eligible for the benefit

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so long as they've completed ninety days ninety days of

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>free employments, they have to go to a probation area period,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but on the ninety first day. This is yet another

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>benefit that we offer and through Guild, once they apply

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for the benefit, they get an education coach right and

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they will help them determine what opportunities are best aligned

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>with their interest and also their career aspiration that's aligned

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>with us at Waste Management. So once they come on

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they are eligible for the benefit and the next year

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>their family members will be eligible for the benefit. And

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>we looked at this for a couple of different reasons. One,

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we know that we're going to have to repeal really fast,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and we needed an educational partner that could help us

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>up steal and refeal the workforce to be aligned with

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the changes that are happening in the workforce. So we

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>were I would like to say we were proactive and

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we were ahead of COVID, but once COVID hit, it

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>really just exacerbated the need. And this was a really

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a good program that we're offering. We launched it in

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>April of this year. Well, and as you said, I

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>mean we saw this pre pandemic. You know, employers were

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>beginning to fight for workers. You don't want to lose workers.

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It cost the company when that happens, absolutely absolutely on average.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.959
<v Speaker 1>If we look at the our drivers and technicians, if

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you will, those are the ones that are most critical

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to our our survival as a company, if you will,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>And we were seeing that on average it's about twenty

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>three thou dollars or more a year to when we

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>lose a driver. So we can't afford to do that.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And you think about COVID and the demand for drivers

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and technicians have increased exponentially. You have bunnies that big

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>box stores that are you know, um, they have more customers,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and more customers generate more products that they have to

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>deliver and ship from different places, so they have to

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>hire truck drivers and so the demand has gone up,

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but the supply is somewhat dwindling. I'm the mother of

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>two gen zs, and most gen Zs are not thinking

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about a career driving a truck. And so what we're

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is bring them into our organization. We're

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>looking at them not just for a job, for the career.

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And our program has called you or Tomorrow because it

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>talks about how we're planning and supporting you on having

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a career not just for today, before tomorrow. We have

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a way of getting them in. And this

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is something that is addressing a need that a lot

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of people have in terms of education, and we're solving

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that for them. And I think this is going to

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>put us at a competitive advantage. Tamila's you know from

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the panel, we talked for an hour, and I could

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have talked for more hours because several more, because there's

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so much to unpack. We just have about forty seconds

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>left here. Help me with the debate between workers staying

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>at home workers in the office. There feels like a disconnect.

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The financial sector really wants all the workers back in

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the office, but when I talk with the broader corporate America,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it's a bit of mixed. How do

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you think it's going to plan? Again? Just got about

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.239
<v Speaker 1>thirty five seconds, Sorry, so no, I think it's going

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a hybrid. I think it's going to be

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>all the above and not one or the other. I

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>was on a panel with another panelist and what they

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>were saying. I say, I'm gonna talent war, and they

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>said it's not a war any longer. That talent has

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>won the war, which means that they have more say

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how they work, and so to the

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>extent the companies can be flexible and adaptable to meet

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the needs of the workforce, that's what's going to make

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 1>them an attractive employer of choice. So I think it's

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be all the above. Tumla Oh, it's Forny,

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Senior vice president and Chief people Officer for Waste Management.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. From figuring out how

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we work to figuring out cryptocurrencies and the blockchain. Up next,

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bitcoin dilemma with technology futurist ian con We're figuring

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it out, aren't we we? Certainly? I'm I don't, I

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Still clear as mother Rose, but I like that.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>A great piece on the Bloomberg Terminal this week by

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>our Charlie Wells. He says his bitcoin turned twelve years

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>old this January. Kind of hard to believe. It's certainly

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>been acting like it's in middle school. Is that tween? This?

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a tweet Well, earlier this week

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I got a chance to speak with someone deep into

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the crypto and blockchain scene, Carol. It's technology futurist Ian Cohn.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But we started the conversation talking about the promise of blockchain.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>What is the future going to look like? Well, blockchain,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I think is the most confused technology. But really it's

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for me, what blockchain significant signifies is peace of mind.

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>That's how I equate that technol oology to a result,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>piece of mind, because it takes care of trust issues,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it takes care of packing, it takes care of data protection,

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>takes off a lot of things that traditionally we have

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>been unable to do with databases and computer technologies that

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had, And that's what blockchain does in a very

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>complicated way. Yes, it's being defined as a ledger in

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the sky, and it's uh an imputable ledger of records.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But but hey, I I love the simplified definition, which

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is peace of mind technology something that creates trust and

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>enables trust. Give me a more tangible example than that,

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>something that you think has been improved by blockchain technology

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or or will will very soon be improved by the blockchain.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there's many, many different use cases of blockchain.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>I love the ones that UH that are happening in

0:22:55.240 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the food industry. Australian beef exports are about the fake

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Australian beef exports counterfeit. Australian beef exports are about two

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar industry. And UH these foods we don't know

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>what the origin is, but their stamped is Australian beef. UH.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a company, I believe, Beef Chain, that's trying to

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>solve this problem by certifying beef that originates from Australia.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's stamped at the beginning of the process of export,

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can scan the package at the grocery store

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and see the whole journey that this packet

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of beef has taken. There are examples such as Walnut

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is doing something with with produced tracking UH and UH

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>lettuce tracking, and it's got uses when you're tracking the

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>spread of diseases like semonela or any other contamination of food.

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>There's examples from the logistics industry where transportation off certain

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>types of equipment or goods or vaccines as an example,

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>has to be under controlled temperature, under controlled conditions, and

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>in a traditional industry, traditional refrigeration industry. If the power

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>goes out on one of these units, it's kind of

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>hard to figure out what has happened. But with blockchain

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>enables container ships that are temperature controlled, you can verify

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that information really quick and figure out that there's something

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on wrong. The reason why we're able to do this

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is the god because you can't manipulate a blockchain database.

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You're unable to uh insert records in it or or

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>modify it in any way that is not authorized. So

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>once let's use this beef example from Australia that you

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about. So once it's been been and I don't

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>want to say stamped on the blockchain, but how how

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is how is it associated with the blockchain? Like what

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is the physical thing that becomes a part of this

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>beef on the package that that puts it on the blockchain.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So blockchain is essentially a database and every people you need,

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the industry, the farmer are never going to touch blockchain

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as such, but it powers the underlying system on which

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but it needs some sort of bar code, so it's

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>something that associates it with the blockchain, right, correct, correct,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And you can use r if I to your bark code.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's give you an example. So at the beginning of

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the farm, you can have let's say cattle that are

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>at this farm and they're taken to the harvesting site.

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Right there at that site, you have a bar code

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's generated associated with a certain animal that tags zach

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>carcass to its journey as it's as its processed and package.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>That bar code signifies the start of that journey. We

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>were talking all about applications for blockchain that we're what

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I would consider not non financial. You didn't mention cryptocurrency once,

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so I want to dive into that right now. Why

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>why didn't you mention cryptocurrency as one of the top

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>applications for blockchain technology because I think that's where a

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of pole associated with. Absolutely, I think cryptocurrency is

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>one important side of blockchain, but not the most important side.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's my opinion. Uh, And it's because cryptocurrencies

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>are in a very initial development phase right now. Yes,

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin has been out there for the last ten twelve years,

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's waves ahead until the financial systems globally accept

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies if they do as a stable form of payment

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>or or asset class. But that's happening very very slowly.

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>The other applications of blockchain, in fact, are proceeding really

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>much rapidly, and the applications are tremendous, from insurance industry

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to logistics, to food, to retail, education, music rights, intellectual property.

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a limitless number of applications. Crypto is just one

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of them. When do we get to a point where

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>people like me don't ask you questions about applications for

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>blockchain technology? That is, where it's something that is so

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>present in our lives, If ever that we'll all know

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what it does, yep. I think it will be still

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>some time, and it might happen in a way in

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>different ways across the world. It may happen in certain

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>regions or countries that are faster adopting digital money or cryptocurrencies,

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and it might take decades in some other parts of

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>across the world. Uh. And it all depends on adoption.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It all depends on how progressive financial systems and governments

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>in those countries are. We're seeing some some countries adopt

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin as a form of currency. Of Salador just did

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that some time ago, although yes, a very small nation economically,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but but that push has started to happen. Will that

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>happen in the United States or China or once the

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>world's largest economies. It's it's a big, big change, and

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it will happen just in a few days.

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it will happen with bitcoin that will

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>be the cryptocurren see or do you think you know?

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I hear from a lot of experts

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in people in the spaces, they've said, okay, well, you know,

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain technology is like the underlying technology that the

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Internet was in the A well days and and a

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>well though is is like the cryptocurrency of of of

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin. So the technology is there, but that's a

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>very early technology and what you're going to see built

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>on it will significantly surpass what's available right now. I

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think bitcoin is of it has the hype associated with

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it because it was the first cryptocurrency that was out there.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>It is it has a very limited number of cryptocurrencies

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>bitcoins that will ever be generated twenty one million, and

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's got a few of those factors associated with it.

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>In my personal opinion, it still has challenges. It's still

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>has to overcome those challenges, and some newer cryptocurrencies are

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>really far ahead, very faster, uh and and have got

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>much more utility than just bitcoin. But it's it's it's

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the popular ones right because it was the

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>first to market. And right now is also a time

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of hype for cryptocurrencies. And we've seen that, uh you know,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>when when certain people are tweeting about bitcoins, the prices

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>are going up when they're teeing, Yeah, elon Musk for

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically specifically. So it's a very hype driven um era

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>where consumers are taken by what popular figures in the

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tech industry are doing and which is not right, which

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is which is a challenge with bitcoint that it's it's

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>its own fundamentals are better than that and it doesn't

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>deserve to be taken up and down like that. So

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's my opinion on that. And do you own

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>any cryptocurrencies? Oh? I do, and it's a very instantesimally

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>small amount. I have deliberately done that to stay away

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>from any kind of uh, you know question that I

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>might it may arise. I I own next to zero cryptocurrencies.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Are there certain cryptocurrencies though, that you are more bullish

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on than than others? In the short term. I think,

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of course bitcoin see is the most popular one. UM.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I likedra hash graph, uh and I like Ripple a

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But I wouldn't I wouldn't push anybody to

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>buy them or not buy them. Do your due diligence

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>because there are so many factors that are driving these

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>picto currencies. Some are fast, some have a limited quantity,

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some have an underlying technology. Um. And I interviewed somebody

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on my documentary The bitcoint Dilemma. It's Dr Lemon Beard

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>who invented the dea hash graph, and it's a it's

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a cryptocurrency that's much faster than bitcoin, and it's got

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>some really good things happening with it. But please do

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>your due diligence right and don't go with hype. Do

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>your due diligence. Hey, and um, when you think about

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the future uses of of cryptocurrency, I wonder if you

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>do see you know, like a country like China actually

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>going through and building its own digital currency and what

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that means. I think China is doing something very interesting,

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and we know they've gone cracked down signal secondently on

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto quarrency mining, which means they're not entertaining crypto quarrency

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>mining in China right now? What do? What will they do?

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple of things they could be doing. They

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>could either be creating their own crypto currency and starting

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to plan the next few years and decades and how

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that would work. Uh. And also they could be looking

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>at the digitization off the off their own currency that

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you want. That's technology futurists and documentary in ian Con.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a futurist. How do you become one?

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm working on that. I just got

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to think more about the future. I think I'm trying alright.

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>That wraps up the first hour of the weekend edition

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol mess

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Tim Stanivac. Coming up in our next hour.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>The one Trillion Dollar market Cap Club recently got a

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>new member. We take a look at Facebook culture of

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>growth at any cost, and Amazon is currently well over

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a one trillion dollar market camp founder Jeff Bezos got

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the company there. Now, Amazon's new CEO is tasked with

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>cultivating a new company culture. How Andy Jase can improve

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on his predecessor's record with employees plus private jets are

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>all the rage. Any subscription based food delivery service, is

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it evolving with the times? Do you have private jets

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or are using this subscription base? Yeah, so I'm much

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>more into the subscription food delivery service than I am

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>into the private jets. We gotta work on that, we do.

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>We gotta become a better futurist. Exactly. All right, that's

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>all ahead in the next hour Bloomberg Business Week. This

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>reporters and editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine,

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>plus global business, finance and tech news as it happened,

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Sloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovik on Bloomberg Radio. I am Carol Masser, and

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm instead of a plenty ahead in our second hour

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week, including Facebook

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>recently hitting that one at trillion dollars in market cap.

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street got it there, so too, did the companies

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>grow at any cost? Culture. We're going to get that

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Business Week story in just a moment. We're also talking

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>about another company that's well over the one trillion dollar

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>market cap mark that is Amazon, of course, and how

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's new CEO is task with upgrading the company's culture,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>plus a subscription based online meal plan service. We're gonna

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>hear from meal Pal's co founder and CEO on how

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they are doing food delivery differently. First up, let's get

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to the latest mega metric achieved by Facebook, hitting that

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one trillion dollar market capitalization the week before last. Facebook

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>did it quickly compared with the big tech and fan

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>companies that did the same and tim They did it

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with a grow at any cost culture. We got more

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from Sarah Fryer Bloomberg News, big Tech team leader. She's

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>also the author of the fantastic book No Filter, The

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>inside story of Instagram. Check it out. The way that

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg has chosen to run the company to grow at

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>all cost strategy, the fact that he has keen laser

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>focused on incrementally adding users, adding the time they spend

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.719
<v Speaker 1>adding revenue, and has kind of blocked out a lot

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of this, a lot of this criticism and considered it

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a public relations issue. That's really frustrating for

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the public. But if your Facebook, that's exactly what the

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>market wants. You to do, as evidenced by this one

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>trillion market valuation, and so why would Facebook have any

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>incentive to change from here? I really think that this

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>is the lesson of of this week. The trillion dollar

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>valuation came after just dismissed the FTC lawsuit on Facebook's

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>monopoly power. So really this is a celebration of the

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that Facebook can just keep growing and and that

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.919
<v Speaker 1>growth as a priority is what investors want to see.

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sarah, every few years there seems to be

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>some sort of speed bump with Facebook, and I think

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of conversation. Okay, is this the beginning

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of the end of Facebook or some sort of derailing

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of of Facebook's massive says, whether it was that FTC

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit that you just mentioned, maybe the Cambridge analytic and

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>data scandal a few years ago, a few years before that,

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>the rise of snap and Snapchat for example. Um, how

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>does Facebook continue to keep moving forward and growing bigger? Well,

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, most of those scandals, most

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of those revelations about the company have not hit its

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom line. Facebook is still adding users, They're still able

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to expand their audience. The amount of time they spent

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on the platform, they're able to move into new areas.

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Um with the acquisitions of WhatsApp in Instagram, they were

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>able to add young people people outside the US. And

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so this is this is a company that you know,

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be slowed down by a data scandal.

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to be slowed down by regulatory scrutiny

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>unless something comes and hits them where it hurts. And

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that the long legal battle with with FTC

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.919
<v Speaker 1>or with Congress or whatever it may, whatever the case

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:02.479
<v Speaker 1>may be, UM Facebook still doing its daily job while

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>all those things are happening, and investors do not seem

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that concern about the microscope that's been on the company

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years because it doesn't hit the

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bottom line. Sorry, you know this because I've talked with

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you before. I love this line in your story. Zuckerberg

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>runs his company like an emperor, paranoid about obsolescence. So

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>how does that translate in terms of the internal culture.

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>It's gotta be tough, and it's got to be all

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about growth. As much as Facebook says our top priorities

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>your privacy, or use, your safety or all the all

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the statements they've come out with in the past few

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>years trying to british their image. The truth of the

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 1>matter is, if you are a Facebook employee, your bonus,

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>your promotion pinges on getting more people to use your

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>product and getting more people to to click on whatever

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you've created. And if you can do that, if you

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>can add to the to the number of minutes that

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>people spent on Facebook, the number of posts they create,

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the data that goes into that advertising machine, that's what

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they want, that's what they reward. Those are the people

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that ascend the ranks of Facebook. And if you are

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody who who raises your canon, says weight, I have

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>an idea that will help um, you know, avoid Russian

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>election interference or um, maybe we could. We we have

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>some risks in these products. We need to clean up

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>before we ship it. Facebook says, well, let's ship it

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>first and figure that out later. There doesn't seem to

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>be any public uproar over about that yet, and so

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 1>why would we do anything to hinder our gross? Hey, Sarah,

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>where does Lena Cohn come into this? She's a new

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>chair of the FTC, and people who antitrust circles in

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>previous years knew about her because she really changed the

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.959
<v Speaker 1>way a traditional definition of of anti trust. And look,

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>she's been very critical of big tech, Amazon most prominently,

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>and including Facebook as well. Lena con comes at it

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>differently than her predecessors because historically we thought of monopoly

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as big company corners the market and something is able

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to charge predatory prices and drive out other people because

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>they have just this hold on it. That's not how

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>these big tech businesses work. Lena konsmost famous paper was

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon, but the same can be said for Facebook.

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>You start in one market and then you just expand

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and expand into adjacent businesses. Try to grow those businesses

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and try to create a platform on which other businesses

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are created. UM So for Amazon, that's their marketplace, that's

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>aw us. For Facebook, you know, you think about all

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the small businesses that are running their entire livelihoods on

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>virtual stores after being closed during the pandemic. You think

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>about the creators on Instagram that are reliant on Facebook,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the media companies that use Facebook for audience development. There

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of businesses that um that look to

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook as their way to reach their customers. That's Sarah Fryer,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Big Tech Team leader also author of No Filter,

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>The Inside Story of Instagram. I do wonder about what's

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the next chapter for Facebook, especially as it does feel

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like there's picked up momentum when it comes to the

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment. Yeah, there is an I think from a

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 1>consumer perspective, need an investor perspective, it's Instagram that gets

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>all the attention right now. Remember Facebook owes WhatsApp and

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>there's still lots of questions about monetation there and then

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Oculus VR. How is Facebook thinking about dr Yeah, a

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions out there still to come. On Bloomberg

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, the founder and president of Para Villan, which

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>works with the buyers and sellers of business jets. This

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg Radio. People

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't just been getting back on planes, They Tim have

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>also been buy man. For more on what's going on

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to private air travel, we checked in

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>with Janine Yanarelli, founder and president of par Avion, which

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.919
<v Speaker 1>represents international buyers and sellers of pre owned business jets. Wow,

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what a difference not even a year makes, But really

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the activity level ratched it up I would say mid

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter and has not let up. It was absolutely

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented and continues to be so. Specifically what and who's

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>doing what? Well? Private individuals. I would say that the

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:32.959
<v Speaker 1>bulk of the buyers for business and private aircraft today

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>are still individuals, entrepreneurs. Uh. The driver last year was

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>really COVID. That was a motivation for an individual to

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>create what we referred to as a health corridor. How

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>do I get from point A to point the relatively

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>safely and how do I control my environment? Well, that's

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>relatively easily done through private jet travel. That continued into

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, but I would say the drivers became

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different towards the end of the fourth quarter.

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Some of that was change in administration. That's always something

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit rocks the aircraft sales marketplace. But

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>after that it became an appetite for travel. I mean

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the impact comes from the decline and airline service uh, right,

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>cutting of routes, the cancelations that you're now seeing. I

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>think people are thinking they made a wise bit when

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>they bought their own airplane. Will that continue though, as

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the airline industry increasingly ramps up. I mean, we know

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the predicaments. We've heard it from some of

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the carriers. Not enough pilots who need to get back

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.399
<v Speaker 1>into the simulator and get their hours back up. I mean,

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's an adjustment in the supply chain of everything

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>as the economy which was shut down completely and is reopening.

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you anticipate that's going to have an impact on

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>what you will see in terms of activity. Oh. Absolutely.

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is not a problem that is easily solved.

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just because demand is back, the airlines can't

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>go simply flip the switch and put back online all

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the aircraft that they retired or i should say placed

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>into preservation at the height of the pandemic and the

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>number of crew members that they furloughed. This is going

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a multi year requirement for them in order

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to return to pre pandemic levels. You talked about individuals

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and entrepreneurs buying. Is this US international? Give me an

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of the demographics. Break it down as much as

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you can, Bloomberg. We love to know specifics. So the

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>bulk of the activity in the resale marketplace for business

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 1>aircraft has always been North America, even more so today.

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think at this particular moment, North America is accounting

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for about of the global aircraft sales. Part of what

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is um a slow return to the market

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>by those countries that are now opening back up, And

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the first ramp up you'll see is in four higher.

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>By that, I mean those who are chartering aircraft or

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>buying into the fracture will share or club programs. Uh.

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It will take a global reopening before we see a

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>real resurgence and aircraft sales activity outside of the continental

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.919
<v Speaker 1>United States. But for the moment, the appetite is extremely

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>strong here and demand is outstripping supply, and that can

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>also create dislocations for you. Do you anticipate a sales

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 1>slowdown because there isn't there the supply out there? Good observation,

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:28.399
<v Speaker 1>It has become the concern of people in the trade

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>today is that how good can this here be if

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in fact we can't get our hands on airplanes. Well,

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's relative. It's sort of cyclical, even among

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>aircraft brokers. You know, one particular quarter you're extraordinarily busy,

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and then it's quiet, and I think the same will continue. UM.

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Hard to say new aircraft are a challenge to get

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>your hands on. In fact, you're probably looking at several

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>years out before you can take delivery, even if you

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>place an order at this time. So really the focus

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is on the pre owned aircraft marketplace, all right, and

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>pre owned Uh, this isn't like you know the used car,

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you kick the tires, you get a great deal. I mean,

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 1>give us an idea of what's a what's the typical

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 1>pre owned aircraft? What do you get, what's the maker?

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>What does it cost? Well, it depends on what one

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is after. But let's talk about something in the mid

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>size super midsized category, which I happen to be very

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>well versed in at the moment because I'm offering to

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>for sale. So I have an aircraft that is um

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years old and another one that is at twenty

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 1>two years old. They are coast to coast capability. They're

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 1>actually intercontinental capability, but it will require a stop for example,

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're going off the east coast into Europe. Uh.

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:44.439
<v Speaker 1>They are state of the art. They are mid range

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>on their inspection cycles. This is all important considerations because

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>points towards the actual cost of the aircraft. You're talking

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about two planes that you've got for sale, ones I

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>think seventeen years old, ones twenty two years old. Continue

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think our audience wants to know what are

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you selling. These aircraft fall into that midsize category that's

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Falcon fifty x is And you know, even though when

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you hear the words seventeen years and twenty two years,

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's really not that old. Uh, we look or we

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>focus more on what is the overall total time and

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the overall care of the aircraft. And private jets, as

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine, are let's say, baby, a bit more

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.439
<v Speaker 1>than your commercial airliners. They just don't work as hard

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:28.399
<v Speaker 1>as a commercial airline or aircraft does. So consequently, we're

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>not faced with some of the same maintenance issues on

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a very rapid reoccurring basis. It's going to fall between

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:37.760
<v Speaker 1>four and four and a half million, and that certainly

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>represents an appreciation from what those aircraft might have been

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 1>worth fourth quarter of You know, one of the things

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that we've talked a lot about, and you said that

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason maybe people are tapping into the

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>private jet market a little bit more is also the

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>slow recovery uh in the commercial airline space and some

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of us holding back commercial airlines is access to workers.

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>How about in your world, because you can buy a

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>private plane, but if you don't have a great private

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:05.359
<v Speaker 1>pilot who can fly it, or engineers to take care

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of it, Uh, it's not going to do any good

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>very good point. I mean, the supply of qualified personnel

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to impact the aviation in industry across the spectrum.

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say for the moment that while flight departments

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>established flight departments are struggling and thinking about the next generation,

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>they're well established enough at this point in time that

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they can manage the uplifts they currently are responsible for.

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But the future is very, very uncertain. There are entities, uh,

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the fractional shares, the club memberships, they're offering bonuses,

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>signing bonuses. Charter operators are taking on pilots, junior pilots,

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>let's call it, starting out with far fewer accumulated hours

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and they might have five years ago. But all of

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that is in an effort to feed the pipeline, to

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>train them, to indoctrinate them into the industry, and to

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully retain them. Because there is some jumping between the

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>private aviation industry and the airline industry back and forth.

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Some some pilots would prefer a schedule, and when you

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fly the airlines, at least you have a set schedule.

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But private aircraft is more of a as needed basis.

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the whole purpose of having that aircraft

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is for some people simply a luxury, but for others

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it is an absolute business tool. That's Janine Yanarelli, founder

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and president of Para Villon. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Week still to come. What Amazon's new CEO can do

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to change that company is called chair. You're listening to

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg broadcasting from the financial

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>capital of the world, Bloomberg eleven Rio in New York

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one O

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>six one does San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty to the

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>country Sirius XM Chado one ninety and around the globe

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week. Well, any Jasse started his new

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>job this week, his chief executive officer at Amazon, replacing

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>billionaire Jeff Bezos as the head of the e commerce giant. Well,

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Carol for more on what we can expect from Jasse

0:48:18.120 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and really how he can improve company culture, especially among

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>those hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers. I spoke with

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Heather Younger, founder of Employee Fanatics. This is a firm

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that focuses on how to improve the employee experience. Well,

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think no matter what, he needs to be really

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 1>clear up what type of leader he's going to be,

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and and how he might be different from Bezos

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, and even though he's been there, you know,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 1>setting his mark, deciding what kind of leader he wants

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to be and how he's going to show up for

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>all of those hundreds of thousands of people who are

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:51.359
<v Speaker 1>looking to him for leadership. That's that's one thing I think. Secondly, um,

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going to need to take some real clear steps

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to listen to those people, because I'm not sure anybody

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>has been listening and understanding what their needs are with

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>their complaint might be, and just to be committed to

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:03.719
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing as it relates to them. You

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned listening, and it struck me because I just finished

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>our colleague Bradstone's new book about Amazon, and I was

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>struck with many parts of it. But he shares this

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:16.239
<v Speaker 1>story from a little over a year ago April, when

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States in the midst of this pandemic. Amazon

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is hiring so many new people. These are essential workers.

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:25.600
<v Speaker 1>The service quickly becoming essential to people who are in

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.959
<v Speaker 1>lockdown and need to get groceries and supplies. And Jeff

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Bezos made a surprise visit to one of Amazon's warehouses,

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but it was the first time that he had visited

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those fulfillment centers in years. Yeah, and I

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really big mistake. I'm hoping that Jesse says,

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm going to be the listening leader.

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be going around and I'm gonna do

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a listening tour, go to as many as sinners as

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I can, even if it's virtual or in person, but

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in person probably better, so we can really see how

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>people are living in this in the way in which

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to work every day and trying to trying

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to get their work done. So yeah, I hope that

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>would be his first step as listening to or it

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is just going around, Um, you know the listening is

0:50:03.360 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it's no, It'll go a huge way for those people

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 1>because they hadn't been listening to they have people know

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>when they've been heard, They know when they're cared for

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>by the leaders who they look to for guidance, and

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that would build a level of trust that he needs

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat, particularly with any new initiatives he's

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to get, you know, put through. How does he

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>do this at scale though, because this is something that

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is a unique beast right it has fulfillment centers

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. Is that hundreds of thousands of employees.

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>How does Jesse do this in a way that makes

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it look like he's going on He's going beyond just

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 1>doing it for show. In the end, he doesn't have

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to do it all by himself. He can have the

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 1>whole seas to me, he can have outside consulting firms

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like my employee Fanatics right come in and help with

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the listening sessions. In the end, it's when

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they know that they are being heard and that there's

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 1>an intent to act on at least some of what

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it is they're saying, and they see the results, and

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 1>then you feed them back do actions, telling them what

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 1>it is you're doing for them. They know they've been heard.

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It makes it just makes the huge difference and validates it.

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:00.120
<v Speaker 1>It makes them feel that the warpant that they're doing

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is meaningful and they feel like there's more than just

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the day to day, but that there's it's leading to

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 1>some bigger mission for the world. Okay, so apart from

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the listening tour, what else can Jesse you do, especially

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to working with other executives to help

0:51:13.200 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>build up that team. You know, right off the beat,

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>if he's able to establish with his leadership team that

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that things are going to change, that it is going

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to be about making sure that they're driving a more

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>positive culture and that every one of those people on

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the leisure team has to take responsibility, so he's not

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>in it all by himself. That will be super clear.

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Making sure that maybe he does put someone in charge

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that really is super focused on having the pulse for employees,

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>suggesting really good avenues for cultural improvements um and making

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that they're always keeping those of the front line

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of the customer experience right at the front of all

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 1>their cultural improvement so that they're you know, it's not

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so just coming from top down, but maybe he creates

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>culture teams all throughout the organization. And they report into

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this new person, but making sure that there's someone that

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>has the pull. I think the other thing through all

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of this kind of crazy the time is making sure

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that that he and his team and the in the

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>team in verse can be adaptable, less fearful, and they'll

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be less fearful, more adaptable when they're aware of changes

0:52:10.960 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that are coming down the pikes of being super open

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and communicative about this. What are the takeaways that we

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>can learn from a transition like Bezos and Jassy's that

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that we can all apply to our own corporate lives.

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is this idea of reinvention is a big

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>one for reinventing. You know yourself as a leader, and

0:52:26.960 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>then how do you and then if you're over the

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>organization as a beastly as Amazon, how do you kind

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of reinvent but don't do it in the stylo and

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>don't dispute at the leadership level? How do you? How

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:38.480
<v Speaker 1>are you more inclusive in your decision making? Um, I

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna be the biggest thing for leaders coming forward.

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And and I'm not just talking from you know, the

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>marginalized group side, I'm just talking about generally, how are

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:48.879
<v Speaker 1>we more inclusive in the decision making process, that people

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 1>feel bought into things. And when we're talking about these

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:54.760
<v Speaker 1>people that are not coming back, it's probably because leaders

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't getting a clue. They don't understand what it is

0:52:57.480 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>They're people needed from the beginning. They needed to be

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:02.799
<v Speaker 1>listening and they needed to be more inclusive. Thirty seconds Heather,

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we uh, you know, we know on Wall Street leaders

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of publicly traded companies are judged by returns. How are

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you going to judge Jesse? You know, I hate to

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>say it, but those those news articles of things that

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you see, the coverage that's happening with employees and our

0:53:17.280 --> 0:53:19.720
<v Speaker 1>pastes leaving in their mouth. I think I'm gonna judge

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 1>him by how how that goes down, and if it's

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be if he's gonna be able to turn the

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>tide of the negative culture and bad press that they're getting.

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What is he going to do to set his mark

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to create a more positive culture. That's how the younger

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:35.359
<v Speaker 1>founder of employee Fanatics. You're listening to Bloomberg business Week

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 1>coming up, how meal Pal is putting their own spin

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>on online food delivery. This is Bloomberg. You're listening to

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Yes, there is a buffet

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of food delivery apps and services to what I here? Okay, Well,

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we know that there's tons of options. There's Uber Eats,

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.840
<v Speaker 1>there's grub Hub, there's door Dash, there's there's Postmates. I

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.680
<v Speaker 1>know I'm leaving some out. So when one advertises a

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:12.959
<v Speaker 1>free dinner delivery, we definitely wanted to know more, Okay,

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So this is why we checked in with meal pal

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 1>co founder and CEO Mary big and see, by the way,

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>she's also a co founder of class Pass as well.

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Meal Pal started as a subscription based meal plan restaurant

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 1>service back in where users picked up their food. I

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>used to used it a ton, Carol, before the pandemic.

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>This was the way I got lunch, all right, I

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>love that. Well, the company now also offering to deliver it.

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 1>We got a deep dive into how it all works

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and where it's all going. Meal Pals traditionally has been

0:54:39.280 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a meal pickup service, and we really focused on lunch

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and helping consumers save time and money when you're running

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the office to pick up a lunch UM.

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, pre covid we helped consumers reserve over forty

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:56.279
<v Speaker 1>million meals at restaurants like Sweet Green, Chipotle, Take Jack,

0:54:56.440 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Pick fil A, UM, you know, kind of all of

0:54:58.480 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the actasual restaurants that people know and are really familiar

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>with UM. And just recently we've added on a delivery service.

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We certainly had a lot of interest in that as

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people transition to working from home and really have launched

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a different delivery service and that it's

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 1>really geared at helping consumers save money, but making it

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>really efficient and a good offering for the restaurant's business

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 1>model as well. So tell us how it works. And

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I feel like to some extent it's like just in

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 1>time inventory for the restaurants that they can really plan

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and know exactly how many people are going to buy meals,

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but walk it through. If I am a member, tell

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.879
<v Speaker 1>me what I'm paying and what I'm getting for the service. Yeah,

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:38.320
<v Speaker 1>so as a member, you're getting lunch or as little

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:41.680
<v Speaker 1>or dinner for as little as about six dollars per meal,

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 1>depending on what you book. So with meal Pal, as

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a consumer, you'll always save at least UM You're buying

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:49.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of a package of meals. And when you log

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:52.880
<v Speaker 1>into the website, you'll see that each restaurant on our

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 1>platform is offering just one menu option per day. So

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you might choose the kill pallet at Sea Green or

0:55:58.960 --> 0:56:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the stake buritable at Chipotle. The men who's going to

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:04.800
<v Speaker 1>rotate on a daily basis, so you'll always have hundreds

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of choices of actually thousands of choices on a daily basis.

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But by having it all focused on one meal per restaurant,

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we're giving the restaurant really valuable efficiency and really valuable

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>operational capacity. Um. You know, the restaurant is able to

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of employees make just the meal Pow

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:23.120
<v Speaker 1>meals and they're making a lot of the same meals

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>very quickly as opposed to making a lot of individual orders.

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>And so especially right now as restaurants are facing pretty

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>significant staffing challenges and trying to rehire. Wir one's really

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>getting a value out of Meal Pow because they're able

0:56:35.719 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to make their meals more efficiently. And I'm curious, so

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a member, what do I pay for the

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Are there's different plans? Correct? That's great. We have a

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of different plans, but our most common plan is

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a twelve meal plan and that's about eighty five dollars

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>per months. UM. We also have a sixteen meal plan

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's thirty nine dollars, and actually we have a trial

0:56:58.120 --> 0:57:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's fifteen dollars. Will let you try out three meals

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and get free delivery on those meals as well, so

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you can really see how the service works and and

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure it's a good fit for you. And you

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:08.719
<v Speaker 1>have to order by what time, by a certain time

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. Yes, So for our lunch product, you

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>can actually order in real time now, so we still

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>have a data algorithm we can predict where people will

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>order from and still send orders for the restaurant advance

0:57:18.960 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that you can order all the way really through lunch time,

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and then for dinner you still have to order in advance.

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So for dinner you have to order by four o'clock

0:57:26.000 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the day of. That is really interesting. So talk to

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>me about the number of users, because you've been doing

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this with that you launched this, UM, tell me that's

0:57:34.400 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what for five years that you've been I mean most

0:57:39.840 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of our business you know, pre covid, we were really

0:57:41.920 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>lunch focused and so we did over forty million reservations

0:57:45.200 --> 0:57:48.240
<v Speaker 1>for lunch, we paid restaurants over two hundred and fifty

0:57:48.280 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars and truly incremental revenue is a really valuable revenue,

0:57:52.600 --> 0:57:55.960
<v Speaker 1>really different than a delivery service provider because we're not

0:57:56.160 --> 0:57:58.440
<v Speaker 1>taking a sea on each order that we sent to

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant. We're instead spending the restaurant a bulk order.

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So we can say to seakre and we want to

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>send you a hundred orders for the same item, and

0:58:06.800 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they can price out what that hundred orders would be.

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Anything that passed some of those savings along. Because the

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 1>consumers so really valuable partner to restaurants, I think, um,

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of a core part of our DNA. We

0:58:16.480 --> 0:58:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have to have a product that's beneficial to restaurants and

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's helpful for restaurants and building good businesses, and then

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, we want to make sure we're

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>saving consumers money and helping them have efficient meal. So, Mary,

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated by what you are doing because it feels

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>like you're stripping it down and kind of simplifying the process,

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but and also reducing the cost uh and helping restaurants

0:58:38.280 --> 0:58:41.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as users in the process. Having said that,

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>how many users do you have? What's the kind of

0:58:43.440 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>growth that you're seeing. Yeah, I can't share user numbers,

0:58:47.080 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell you on a daily basis, there

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are tens of thousands of people who are using our

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>products in cities really around the world. So we're available

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty markets from New York to San Francisco, even

0:58:57.800 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>internationally in London, Singapore, UH, Australia, UM. And I think

0:59:03.240 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>really the the name of the game for us is

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all about efficiency, right. We want to give our users

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a really efficient way to get lunch or dinner, whether

0:59:10.720 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to pick it up or whether they want

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:13.959
<v Speaker 1>to have it deliver if we want some saving money

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and saving time and we're saving the restaurants creating efficiency

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 1>for them as well, which is really different than what

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:22.440
<v Speaker 1>others in the space have done in the past. Well,

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:23.920
<v Speaker 1>let me just push you a little bit. I understand

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't share numbers, but how sticky is it? I

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:28.720
<v Speaker 1>mean if someone when someone signs up for a meal

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:30.959
<v Speaker 1>plan or do they have to commit to six months

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a year one month? How does that work? Yes, so

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we do thirty days cycles, so it's a monthly commitment.

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, people don't have to renew after that. The

0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:42.880
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming majority of people do renew after one cycle. So

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:45.920
<v Speaker 1>similar to class pass and many other subscription models, we've

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>found that could be a really good way to build

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a business and and really to have some predictability for

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>our restaurant partners as well. So you're not spending a

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 1>ton of money on marketing to kind of keep people

0:59:55.840 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in or do you like, what's your biggest cost of operation? Yeah,

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean our biggest cost of the costs of the

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>team and our engineers and the people who are building

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the product. Um. You know, we don't spend a ton

1:00:05.240 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of money on marketing. The majority of people who are

1:00:07.280 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>signing up from meal puth. I've heard about it from

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a friend or a coworker. Uman. I think especially when

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>people were in office, this is the type of thing

1:00:14.440 --> 1:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that would catch on in one office and you'd have

1:00:17.120 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, entire floors of people at Sydney Bank or

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan or Credits with all using meal Pal to

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>get lunch together and kind of facilitating that that sort

1:00:25.400 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of social time of their day for them. Um do

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you see. I mean, I'm thinking about the established players

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that have been out there, you know, all of us.

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>If we go to I'm looking at my phone, if

1:00:34.680 --> 1:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I go to my food apps, you know, whether it's

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>grub Hub, whether it's store Dash, whether it's UM. I've

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>got Yelp, I've got open Table, I've got uber Eats.

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you see yourself as a competitor to

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>them or how do you see it differently? Yeah? I

1:00:48.480 --> 1:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>mean our model is really different. Right they's wanted to

1:00:51.080 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>order a burrito bowl from Chipotle right now and have

1:00:53.640 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it delivered to right now, You're gonna be paying upward

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the twenty on most of those apps. Now, the brutal

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bowl might cost only two into twelve dollars, but when

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you kind of layer in all of the feeds, we're

1:01:02.920 --> 1:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be paying quite a bit for that sort of

1:01:05.240 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on demand experience. UM with meal Pal, now with our

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>delivery product or pick up, you're gonna be getting that

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>exact same meal for you know, eight or nine dollars.

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, meal Pal is really well

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>footed to people who are consistently ordering restaurant food, and

1:01:19.520 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of say like, yeah, I do order

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>kick out, or I do want to do delivery six

1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:26.439
<v Speaker 1>times a month, ten times months, whatever it might see

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a much more efficient way

1:01:28.280 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Um, it's interesting to uh. I mean,

1:01:32.280 --> 1:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have any indications that you said that most

1:01:34.200 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>people who sign up for a month, they stay with you,

1:01:36.200 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and they stay with you four months, for the year,

1:01:38.920 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for years. Yeah, We've got people who have been with

1:01:42.000 --> 1:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>us for several several years. H. I mean, you know,

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got people who have literally saved over ten thousand

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars using meal pal at this point. If you look

1:01:51.160 --> 1:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at all of the meals they reserve compared to you know,

1:01:54.000 --> 1:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the cost that would have been if they were buying

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>them at retail. Well, I'm going to tell you in

1:01:57.520 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>my household too, it's just because of the pandemic. They're

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of food ordering going on and the additional fees,

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden you look at it and

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you're right, you order a salad that maybe doesn't cost

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that much, but once you throw on all the fees,

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I just spent thirty bucks for a salad. Uh.

1:02:13.520 --> 1:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And some guilt there. There's a lot of guilt. Um.

1:02:17.720 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>What about your demographics of your users? Is it a

1:02:20.560 --> 1:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>younger crowd, is it across the age spectrum? Or give

1:02:24.960 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what can you share with us about the demos of

1:02:26.800 --> 1:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>who's using your service? Yeah, so pre COVID, it definitely

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>stewed a bit younger. It was people who were sort

1:02:33.000 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of you know, they're twenty two to three five, working

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in offices and looking to save money on lunch and

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>really wanting to get lunch in the restaurant on a

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>daily basis. Um of course, stuff shifted with COVID, so

1:02:44.160 --> 1:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we started to have more families using the product. We

1:02:46.440 --> 1:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>started to expand our product offering to be available in

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>suburbs as well, so kind of outside of that core

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>urban area where we started. Um, you know, I think

1:02:55.000 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we really do focus on areas where there's a good

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of density. Sending us high number of orders to

1:03:01.040 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>our restaurants is really key. You know, if we can

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>send topotely a hundred orders all for the same items,

1:03:06.280 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be really efficient for them to make

1:03:08.120 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>those meals. And who want to make sure any markets

1:03:10.480 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're in or any restaurants that we're partnering with,

1:03:12.920 --> 1:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we can really send them meaningful volume so it's beneficial

1:03:15.600 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to their operation. Mary, how do you pick and choose

1:03:17.680 --> 1:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>partners or do you pick and choose are Are you

1:03:19.560 --> 1:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty open to whoever wants to be on the platform. Yeah,

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So we capture ratings for every meal served on the platform.

1:03:26.160 --> 1:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if we find that a restaurant doesn't

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have ratings that are in line with where we think

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they should be, will be talking about restaurant and kind

1:03:32.320 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of making a determination of whether they should say or not.

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the unique thing though about food is that

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a meal that I give five stars, you might you

1:03:39.080 --> 1:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>might hate and give one star, and vice versa. A

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>key part of our product is our recommendation engine. So

1:03:44.520 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>about fifty per of the reservations we get on a

1:03:47.440 --> 1:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>daily basis people choosing the meal that we've recommended for them.

1:03:50.800 --> 1:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We recommend three meals for a user on a daily

1:03:52.640 --> 1:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>basis based on what they've reserved and what they've rated

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past. So we really start to understand users

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>preferences and do a pretty good job of mat see

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>them up with the best meal for them on a

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>given day. But we work with a lot of the

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>local restaurants as well. You know, hear you guys talk

1:04:06.240 --> 1:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about Pizza earlier. Pizza Loved Emily in New York. They're

1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>an amazing partner they've got I think some of the

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>most creative pieces in New York City. Or kest Day

1:04:14.720 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is another great one, or pass. I mean, we've got

1:04:16.880 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of mom of top restaurants that are you know,

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe one or two locations, and you know, really all

1:04:22.560 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>over the world. We've got over five thousand different restaurant

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>partners in total. That's meal Pal co founder and CEO

1:04:27.920 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Mary Biggins. And that wraps up the weekend edition of

1:04:29.880 --> 1:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks so much for

1:04:32.280 --> 1:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us. I'm Carol Masser and I'm Tim stunt Of

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>That could be sure to tune into our Bloomberg Business

1:04:36.240 --> 1:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Week daily show Monday through Friday. It starts at two

1:04:38.320 --> 1:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can also

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>watch our daily broadcast on YouTube just search Bloomberg Global News.

1:04:44.520 --> 1:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Also check out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast. You can

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>find it at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or wherever you

1:04:49.240 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>get your podcast. Bloomberg Business Week is available on newsstands now,

1:04:52.240 --> 1:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com and on the Bloomberg Terminal. It's

1:04:54.640 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that special double heist issue. You can also see me

1:04:57.080 --> 1:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on a Bloomberg quick Take. It's available at bloomberg dot

1:04:59.200 --> 1:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>com slash que. He also streaming platforms like Roku, Apple TV,

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Samsung TV and more. Have a great weekend. This is Bloomberg.