Speaker 1: Center has always nice to be with you here in person.
Speaker 1: And if the White House thought the Hunter Biden plea
Speaker 1: Dale was going to get them a get out of
Speaker 1: jail free card, clearly they are wrong. As more whistleblowers
Speaker 1: are coming forward and more damning information that's now making
Speaker 1: it to the podium at the White House, and they're
Speaker 1: having a hard time just walking all this back.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: Well, the White House and the Department of Justice are
Speaker 3: in one mode right now, and that is stonewall. They
Speaker 3: are desperately trying to cover everything up that they are
Speaker 3: simply running away, and it is bad. The evidence is
Speaker 3: mounting and mounting and mounting, and they don't have a
Speaker 3: substantive response. They're not addressing it on the merits. Instead,
Speaker 3: what they're hoping is that their lap dogs in the
Speaker 3: media will continue to hide it for them. It is
Speaker 3: getting so bad even the corrupt corporate media can't ignore
Speaker 3: this anymore. But here, take a look at the Attorney
Speaker 3: General of the United States and what he's saying.
Speaker 2: I certainly understand that some have chosen to attack the
Speaker 2: integrity of the Justice Department as components and its employees
Speaker 2: by claiming that we do not treat like cases alike.
Speaker 2: This constitutes an attack on an institution that is essential
Speaker 2: to American democracy and essential to the safety of the
Speaker 2: American people. Nothing could be further from the truth. You've
Speaker 2: all heard me say many times that we make our
Speaker 2: cases based on the facts and the law. These are
Speaker 2: not just words. These are what we live by. They
Speaker 2: are the foundation of the way we make these decisions.
Speaker 2: The agents of the FBI, as well as the DA,
Speaker 2: the ATF our Deputy US Marshals, every day, often at
Speaker 2: great personal risk, protect the American people and secure its safety.
Speaker 2: Our cases are based on their work. I could not
Speaker 2: be more proud to.
Speaker 1: Work with them. Senat you predicted this. You said they
Speaker 1: were going to indict Hunter Biden, and then they're going
Speaker 1: to say, see, look at how fair we are as
Speaker 1: we go after Donald Trump, and we have no bias
Speaker 1: the agency. That's clearly though not the case.
Speaker 3: Well, let me be clear, as I listen to that
Speaker 3: press conference, it's infuriating Merrick Garland says, you're impugning the
Speaker 3: integrity of the Department of Justice. Now, let me be
Speaker 3: very clear, it's your integrity. It's Merrick Garland's integrity that
Speaker 3: is missing. He is the one who has politicized this process,
Speaker 3: and he is the one who is burning the integrity
Speaker 3: of the Department of Justice to the ground. And by
Speaker 3: the way, the people accusing him are his own damn employees.
Speaker 3: The whistleblowers work for him, and they're coming forward mad saying,
Speaker 3: why is this man turning the Department of Justice into
Speaker 3: a political arm for the DNC that self righteous? If
Speaker 3: you dare question me, you are disloyal. I'd look at that.
Speaker 3: And I see Louis the fourteen, the son king. LETASSEMOI
Speaker 3: I am the state, I am justice. He tells you
Speaker 3: the words he saying are objectively false. We use the
Speaker 3: same standards for everyone, whether your name is Trump or Biden. Well, okay,
Speaker 3: if your name is Biden, you can have classified documents everywhere.
Speaker 3: You can stick him next to your corvette, No big deal,
Speaker 3: We don't care. But if you're Trump, we're setting in
Speaker 3: the stormtroopers. By the way, they do the same thing
Speaker 3: as we discussed at length on Verdict. If you're violating
Speaker 3: the law committing federal crimes outside the homes of Supreme
Speaker 3: Court Justice, we don't like. We don't enforce the law.
Speaker 3: Why because we agree with the violent protesters and we
Speaker 3: don't like the justices, so our politics are on this side.
Speaker 3: On the other hand, if you're a pro life protester,
Speaker 3: my goodness, you are the greatest terrorist threat to humanity
Speaker 3: and we are going to send the storm troopers at
Speaker 3: your house like they did with Markalk at the break
Speaker 3: of dawn, with machine guns drawn. Every word he said
Speaker 3: there is a lie and the self righteousness with which
Speaker 3: he says it. Man, I gotta say it's time. It
Speaker 3: is time the Department of Justice needs to appoint a
Speaker 3: special council to investigate Merrick Garland for obstruction of justice
Speaker 3: and perjury. Wow, there's a reason he's saying, don't ask
Speaker 3: these questions. Let's be clear. It is his integrity and
Speaker 3: I want to walk through it because that is a
Speaker 3: very serious statement. But at this point, the evidence that
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland personally committed multiple felonies is growing greater and greater,
Speaker 3: and the chances that the Merrick Garland Justice Department will
Speaker 3: fairly investigate evidence of his wrongdoing are zero. So let's
Speaker 3: walk through it. On perjury. Let's remember the start of
Speaker 3: the irs whistleblower. It concerned an allegation that Merrick Garland
Speaker 3: himself had committed perjury. So Gary Shapley, the first IRS
Speaker 3: whistleblower who wrote to Congress. I want to read from
Speaker 3: his prepared statement in Congress. Beginning in January twenty twenty,
Speaker 3: I was assigned to work the Hunter Biden investigation as
Speaker 3: a supervisory special agent for IRS criminal investigation US Department
Speaker 3: of Treasury. So this is not some Republican, This is
Speaker 3: not some partisan. This is a career supervisory special agent
Speaker 3: for the IRS criminal investigations. What did he do? He
Speaker 3: supervised line agents investigating Hunter Biden until I continued in
Speaker 3: that role until I was removed from the investigation by
Speaker 3: the US Department of Justice. That's Merrick Garland in May
Speaker 3: of twenty twenty three. So just two months ago, after
Speaker 3: providing protected disclosures concerning prosecutors mishandling of the investigation of
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden, to include conflicts of interest, preferential treatment, deviations
Speaker 3: from normal investigated procedures, and conflicting information provided by Attorney
Speaker 3: General Merrick Garland to Congress. Now understand what he's saying.
Speaker 3: He came forward as a whistleblower to say Merrick Garland
Speaker 3: just committed perjury, lied under oath to the United States
Speaker 3: Congress in response, what did Merrick Garland do had him
Speaker 3: removed from the case immediately retaliated, which is in and
Speaker 3: of itself illegal and part of what the Special Council
Speaker 3: needs to investigate. Now, this whistleblower continues. Most recently, former
Speaker 3: Attorney General Bill Barr provided an interview in which he
Speaker 3: stated that the information provided by a confidential human source
Speaker 3: concerning an alleged illegal bribery scheme by President Joe Biden
Speaker 3: was received through the Pittsburgh US Attorney's Office and was
Speaker 3: determined it was not likely to have been disinformation. This
Speaker 3: is a big deal that they made a determination. Okay,
Speaker 3: this is not likely Russian disinformation or something else. In
Speaker 3: other words, there could easily be some there there. According
Speaker 3: to Attorney General Bar, it was provided to the ongoing
Speaker 3: investigation in Delaware to follow up on and to check out. Now,
Speaker 3: he continues, neither I, nor the line IRS criminal Investigation
Speaker 3: agents operating under my supervision, nor the FBI agents working
Speaker 3: with IRSCI wherever provided the confidential human source information the
Speaker 3: Attorney General Bar recently referenced was sent to Delaware to
Speaker 3: have it checked out. He goes on to say the
Speaker 3: confidential human source information was sealed by prosecutors, by people
Speaker 3: working for Merrick Garland. They said, we don't want the
Speaker 3: FBI agents to see this. We don't want the IRS
Speaker 3: to see this. That on the face of it. By
Speaker 3: the way, we also have a letter from quite recently
Speaker 3: from June nineteenth, twenty twenty three. It's an interview of
Speaker 3: whistleblower X. We don't know who whistleblower X is. That's
Speaker 3: the anonymous pseudonym, but whistleblower X confirms in particular, as
Speaker 3: mister X is testified he was the IRS Criminal Investigation's
Speaker 3: case agent over the subject investigation at the time, in
Speaker 3: other words, investigating Hunter Biden and mister X has stated
Speaker 3: to me that he has never seen this FBI Form
Speaker 3: ten twenty three and that he does not recall ever
Speaker 3: hearing about this information being turned over in any meeting
Speaker 3: with the prosecution team in Delaware. Further, mister X informed
Speaker 3: me that this information could have been relevant to mister
Speaker 3: X's investigation at the time of the subject as it
Speaker 3: related to a claim of five million dollars being paid
Speaker 3: to the subject, which directly ties to email correspondence reviewed
Speaker 3: between Subject and a business partner of Subject set in
Speaker 3: May of twenty fourteen, which is believed to reference the
Speaker 3: five million dollars being paid to subject from Company XXX.
Speaker 1: It's shocking when you put it all together the way
Speaker 1: you're describing it what Merrick Garland has clearly I think
Speaker 1: done or tried to accomplish by covering it up and
Speaker 1: making this go away. And this on top of the
Speaker 1: fact that this week we had other people that were
Speaker 1: also saying, hey, there was this idea that then Delaware
Speaker 1: the prosecutor had the ability to do whatever he needed
Speaker 1: to do and to charge anybody with whatever he needed,
Speaker 1: charge them wherever he needed to. Then there was word
Speaker 1: that came out this week from others saying.
Speaker 3: By the way, that we're not going to do that.
Speaker 3: That's what Merrick Garland les lied about. Right, So Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland told Congress actually in response to a question from yours,
Speaker 3: truly it would be me that he lied to under
Speaker 3: oath walk.
Speaker 1: People down that road the question that you ask, so
Speaker 1: people understand what you were trying to get to at
Speaker 1: that point.
Speaker 3: Well, here, I'll tell you what we'll do better than that,
Speaker 3: We'll play it right now. Let me say, in particular
Speaker 3: on Hunter Biden, I very much hope that an investigation
Speaker 3: of Hunter Biden is focused not just on his own
Speaker 3: personal substance of abuse issues, but on connections to his
Speaker 3: father and potential corruption. That is the matter of public
Speaker 3: concern and why people are concerned. And it was striking
Speaker 3: that the leak that came out from DOJ suggested this
Speaker 3: is just going after some poor, poor person struggling with
Speaker 3: drugs instead of looking at the very real evidence of corruption.
Speaker 3: Will you commit that the investigation will actually examine the
Speaker 3: public corruption aspect and not simply scapegoat Hunter Biden as
Speaker 3: an individual.
Speaker 2: I can't about the investigation other than to say that
Speaker 2: all the matters involving mister hunter Biden are a purview
Speaker 2: of the US Attorney in Delaware. It's not restricted in
Speaker 2: his investigation in any way.
Speaker 1: So you look at that there when you were asking
Speaker 1: that question, based on now we have, you're saying, it's
Speaker 1: pretty fair to say he probably just find out lied
Speaker 1: to you and to Congress under oath.
Speaker 3: Well, that's what the whistleblower has alleged that he did
Speaker 3: lie to me to Congress under oath, and to be
Speaker 3: clear lying, he started that testimony by raising his right hand,
Speaker 3: taking an oath tell the truth. The whole truth and
Speaker 3: nothing but the truth. So help me God if that
Speaker 3: statement you just saw was a lie. That the statement
Speaker 3: that there's no political interference from DJ and the investigation
Speaker 3: of Hunter Biden, that is a criminal offense with serious
Speaker 3: jail time. It's yet another reason why I believe it
Speaker 3: is time for a special counsel, And let's be clear,
Speaker 3: a special counsel with real credibility, not a henchman of
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland who's going to give him a sanitized report,
Speaker 3: but someone who will laugh actually investigate, because at this
Speaker 3: point it is the Attorney General directly who is implicated
Speaker 3: in this and his conduct, his absolute hubris. How dare
Speaker 3: you question me? And let me say something about the
Speaker 3: Delaware US attorneys. So a lot of folks in the
Speaker 3: corporate media keep saying, well to US attorney appointed by Donald.
Speaker 1: Trump over and over again. They always lead with that.
Speaker 3: Now that dramatically overstates the situation. I don't know mister Weiss.
Speaker 3: I don't know anything about him, his background, he was
Speaker 3: a career prosecutor. What I can tell you is how
Speaker 3: US attorneys are picked, which is US attorneys are picked
Speaker 3: essentially by the senators from that state. In other words,
Speaker 3: The Delaware US Attorney was picked by Tom Carper and
Speaker 3: by Chris Coons, both of whom are.
Speaker 1: Democrats, pretty liberal Democrats.
Speaker 3: And by the way, Delaware is also the home to
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, who is the closest to a political king
Speaker 3: in a tiny state of Delaware. Joe Biden is the
Speaker 3: colossus that bestrides tiny little Delaware. You know, my mom
Speaker 3: was born in Delaware, in Wilmington, Delaware. Her mother was
Speaker 3: the second youngest of seventeen kids. Wow, they were Irish Catholic,
Speaker 3: you know, because I liked to joke, they didn't know
Speaker 3: what else to do it. On a Saturday night when
Speaker 3: I was first sworn into the Senate thirteen, Joe Biden
Speaker 3: swore me in. He was the vice president at the time,
Speaker 3: and I introduced my mom to him, and my mom
Speaker 3: told him said, oh, I have hundreds of cousins in Delaware,
Speaker 3: and Biden smiled and said, oh, they probably all voted
Speaker 3: for me. And it was actually it was charming the
Speaker 3: way he did it. It was and my mom laughed and
Speaker 3: she sort of rolled her eyes and said, yeah, they
Speaker 3: probably did. The point is this US Attorney was handpicked
Speaker 3: by two Democrat senators, so every time the reporters say
Speaker 3: a Donald Trump US attorney. The way it works, you
Speaker 3: can't advance it without the senator signing off, and so.
Speaker 1: So okay, to be clear, a lot of people to
Speaker 1: understand this is inner workings. I love doing the show
Speaker 1: for this reason. Any state in America, you've got an
Speaker 1: attorney you're gonna pick. If the two senators say no
Speaker 1: to that, it's dead, it's dead in the water.
Speaker 3: Yep.
Speaker 1: Okay, yep. A lot of people have none none. So
Speaker 1: Trump said, this is probably the best I can get
Speaker 1: out of Delaware from two Democrats.
Speaker 3: So look, there's nothing in his background that indicates that
Speaker 3: the guy is a wild eyed leftist. Sure, but he's
Speaker 3: not remotely a Republican either. He's someone who had been
Speaker 3: a career prosecutor in a state like Delaware. People know him.
Speaker 3: I am certain he's a Democrat. That you know that
Speaker 3: in that process. Look, there are four US attorneys in Texas.
Speaker 3: I can tell you the US attorneys for eleven years.
Speaker 3: John Cornyn and I have been integral in selecting each
Speaker 3: and every one of them and giving those names to
Speaker 3: the White House. And that's true whether it's Republican or Democrat.
Speaker 3: That's true for Trump US attorneys, it's true for Biden
Speaker 3: US attorneys.
Speaker 1: Now, is it a short list you guys give them
Speaker 1: or is it like basically saying, hey, this is who
Speaker 1: we want. Here's a name, we think they're qualified. You
Speaker 1: guys need to let this happen.
Speaker 3: So it varies, and different senators have more leverage than others.
Speaker 3: Typically with Corner and I, we give them one name. Okay,
Speaker 3: we had the house one name and say this is
Speaker 3: who you're going to be. Now, look, they're different names
Speaker 3: under Trump. Corner and I forwarded very different names than
Speaker 3: we do under Biden. Sure, Look under Trump, there were
Speaker 3: some strong conservative US attorneys that Trump was happy to appoint,
Speaker 3: and we had really strong leadership for Texas US attorneys.
Speaker 3: We're not going to point a vocal, strong Republican conservative
Speaker 3: as a US attorney nominee for the Biden White House.
Speaker 1: That's they're not going to give a hard core democrat.
Speaker 3: Those are dead in the water. Like if you're a
Speaker 3: hard partisan Democrat, you're you're not getting it. That's the
Speaker 3: way the process worked. If Corner and I don't sign off,
Speaker 3: that US attorney doesn't go forward. So we have an
Speaker 3: absolute veto on that. The same is true for Tom
Speaker 3: Carper and Chris Coons, which means they both affirmatively signed
Speaker 3: off and said, this is our guy.
Speaker 1: He's watered down enough, he's enough of a Democrat. That's
Speaker 1: on our team. We're good with it.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that to impugne his integrity, but I
Speaker 3: am saying the repeated refrain that he's a Trump guy.
Speaker 3: There's nothing in Donald Trump, and there's nothing in his
Speaker 3: background to think that he has even one iota of fondness, loyalty.
Speaker 3: There's nothing, there's ever a voted by Donald Trump that
Speaker 3: happened to be the president who appointed him. But for
Speaker 3: US attorneys, far more relevant as who are the senators.
Speaker 3: What Garland told the Senate Judiciary Committee, what I asked
Speaker 3: him is he said, I the son King, the Attorney
Speaker 3: General will not interfere with this prosecution. What we're saying
Speaker 3: coming out of the House is a mountain of evidence
Speaker 3: that that's not the case.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you real quick though, first, before we
Speaker 1: get to another question about these whistleblowers about Augusta precious medals,
Speaker 1: if you've seen what's been going on the economy, if
Speaker 1: you've been looking at your IRA your four to one
Speaker 1: k and you've got losses. The majority of people do.
Speaker 1: Especially with what's been going on with the economy. You've
Speaker 1: seen interest rates that have more than doubled on houses,
Speaker 1: and interestates have gone up in general. That has been
Speaker 1: tough for a lot of people in retirement or close
Speaker 1: to retirement. If you want to protect some of your
Speaker 1: hard earned dollars your assets, call Augusta Precious Medals. Now
Speaker 1: they are different because they actually sit down with you
Speaker 1: one on one in a web conference and talk to
Speaker 1: you about your financial situation, what you've saved, your retirement diversification,
Speaker 1: and they want to help you protect your dollars because look,
Speaker 1: if you're in retirement a close retirement, there is no
Speaker 1: time to make up losses. And that's where gold can
Speaker 1: come in to help you protect your dollars. Check them
Speaker 1: out eight seven seven the number four GOLDRA eight seven
Speaker 1: seven the number four Gold IRA. You can also go
Speaker 1: online to Agusta Precious Metals dot com. That's Augusta Precious
Speaker 1: Metals dot com and they will send you your free
Speaker 1: investors guide on gold eight seven seven the number four
Speaker 1: Gold IRA. Get that peace of mind back and make
Speaker 1: sure you have diversification when you're heading into retirement eight
Speaker 1: seven seven, the number four gold Ira Sata. I want
Speaker 1: to ask you one other question about these whistleblowers are
Speaker 1: coming forward. I think it needs to be stated just
Speaker 1: how brave they are. Yes, they're risking their careers. I
Speaker 1: think many of them know that regardless of what the
Speaker 1: whistle blower rules say they're supposed to be under this administration,
Speaker 1: there's a very good chance their careers are completely going
Speaker 1: to be stonewalled, done, put into isolation, taken off the
Speaker 1: cases which in their JOPP which has already happened. They're
Speaker 1: risking at all to come forward to you, guys.
Speaker 3: They are and we've seen and in fact, the House
Speaker 3: has put FBI whistleblowers forward who have had their whole
Speaker 3: careers destroyed. That these guys, Merrick Garland and the Biden
Speaker 3: Justice Department have behaved like vicious partisans. If you cross them,
Speaker 3: they will crush you. They will destroy your career, they
Speaker 3: will destroy your livelihood. They've done it over and over again.
Speaker 3: And I want to walk through some of the specific
Speaker 3: allegations these whistleblowers are put forward because they're incredibly damning.
Speaker 3: Number One, they have alleged the Justice Department not once,
Speaker 3: but twice prevented US Attorney David Weiss from bringing stronger
Speaker 3: charges against Hunter Biden. Now, let's be clear if that
Speaker 3: is correct, Merrick Garland committed perjury twice. Wow, so that's
Speaker 3: what they've alleged. The Justice Department prevented the US Attorney
Speaker 3: from bringing stronger charges twice against Hunter Biden. That is
Speaker 3: directly contrary to what Merrick Garland testified under Oath number two.
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland refused to name a special council in the
Speaker 3: tax investigation. Number three, the IRS recommended charges against Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden that were not approved by Merrick Garland. So it
Speaker 3: wasn't just the US Attorney's office in Delaware saying we
Speaker 3: want to bring stronger charges. It was the IRS saying
Speaker 3: we want to bring stronger charges. And again, Merrick Garland,
Speaker 3: the Department of Justice said no, you can't. Number four.
Speaker 3: Then this is a really damning one. The investigation fore
Speaker 3: warned Hunter Biden of future searches for materials that could
Speaker 3: be used as evidence. So understand this. They're executing search warrants,
Speaker 3: they're looking for evidence of a crime, and yet this
Speaker 3: administration gave a heads up to Hunter. Hey, here's where
Speaker 3: we're going to go search before it happened. By the way,
Speaker 3: that's called obstruction of justice. That's why I believe Merrick
Speaker 3: Garland needs to be investigated for obstruction of justice because
Speaker 3: you don't have the investigators tell the subject to the investigation.
Speaker 3: Here's where we're searching for evidence. Hint, hint. If you
Speaker 3: have any evidence there, make sure to remove it. Number five,
Speaker 3: an assistant Attorney General named Leslie Wolf refused to allow
Speaker 3: the investigators to ask about Joe Biden being quote the
Speaker 3: big guy. This assistant US attorney needs to testify under oath.
Speaker 3: If it is correct that this assistant in the US
Speaker 3: attorney told investigators you are not allowed to ask about
Speaker 3: Joe Biden being the big guy, well, then that is
Speaker 3: directly contrary to what Merrick Garland testified under oath to Congress.
Speaker 3: This same assistant US attorney, according to the whistleblowers, told
Speaker 3: the investigation team, they could not search Joe Biden's guesthouse
Speaker 3: in Delaware, which is where Hunter Biden was living, because
Speaker 3: of quote optics. So at this point they're just looking
Speaker 3: for well, this would look bad politically for the president,
Speaker 3: so never mind we're not really investigating crimes, we're not
Speaker 3: following the law. We're making sure we don't do anything
Speaker 3: that has bad optics for the president. Another individual, Rob Walker,
Speaker 3: who is a Biden family associate, said Joe Biden showed
Speaker 3: up at a meeting with cef C, which is a
Speaker 3: Chinese energy company closely affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party,
Speaker 3: that Biden showed up personally there. They also said that
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden demanded in twenty seventeen to be paid by
Speaker 3: Chinese businessman Henry Zoo while Joe Biden was sitting next
Speaker 3: to him in a room. And hold on to that one,
Speaker 3: and we'll come back to that one in a minute.
Speaker 3: They also revealed that Hunter Biden, on his tax returned
Speaker 3: deducted payments to prostitutes as employees and to sex clubs.
Speaker 3: He claimed claimed those were business deductions. They also revealed
Speaker 3: that the investigation of Hunter Biden began as an offshoot
Speaker 3: into an inquiry into a foreign adult platform. So listen,
Speaker 3: there's lots of sordid stuff here, but what is really
Speaker 3: sorted is corruption by the president of the United States.
Speaker 3: And so I want to go back to the to
Speaker 3: the WhatsApp that was sent and this.
Speaker 1: Is big breaking news this week for people that may
Speaker 1: be miss a verdict. We talked about this. Go back
Speaker 1: and listen, but I want to be able to understand
Speaker 1: this what's app text. We have a copy of it.
Speaker 1: It is Hunter Biden basically shaking down someone demanding it
Speaker 1: and using his father saying he's sitting right.
Speaker 3: Next to me. We're gonna put it up on this
Speaker 3: you can see it on the screen. This is if
Speaker 3: you didn't listen to Friday's pod, you should go back
Speaker 3: and listen to Friday's pod because it is all about
Speaker 3: this smoking gun evidence. This WhatsApp sent by Hunter Biden
Speaker 3: to Henry Zoo says as follows. I'm sitting here with
Speaker 3: my father and we would like to understand why the
Speaker 3: commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that
Speaker 3: I would like to resolve this now before it gets
Speaker 3: out of hand, and now means tonight, and z if
Speaker 3: I get a call or text from anyone involved in
Speaker 3: this other than you, Zang or the chairman, I will
Speaker 3: make certain that between the man sitting next to me,
Speaker 3: in other words, Joe Biden and every person he knows,
Speaker 3: and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you
Speaker 3: will regret not following my direction. I am sitting here
Speaker 3: waiting for the call with my father.
Speaker 1: The King, Ben, the big guy.
Speaker 3: This is as damning evidence of presidential corruption we've ever seen,
Speaker 3: and it's worth remembering what Joe Biden said. Here's what
Speaker 3: Joe Biden told the American people about whether he discussed
Speaker 3: business dealings with his son or was involved in business
Speaker 3: dealings with his son. Oh, I have never discussed with
Speaker 3: my son, or my brother or anyone else ending him
Speaker 3: to do with their businesses.
Speaker 1: Period. That was a lie.
Speaker 3: If this WhatsApp is accurate, if this is a real document,
Speaker 3: and if Hunter Biden was telling the truth, then Joe
Speaker 3: Biden flat out lied, just like Merrick Garland is accused
Speaker 3: of perjury. Joe Biden. That wasn't under oath, So that's
Speaker 3: not a felony. That was just a lie to the
Speaker 3: American people on national television during a presidential campaign. But
Speaker 3: if this WhatsApp is jen when, then Joe Biden lied
Speaker 3: to the American people. And let me go back to
Speaker 3: the whistleblowers because we need to tie these together. The
Speaker 3: investigators wanted to obtain location information to confirm that Joe
Speaker 3: Biden was in the room with Hunter. So Hunter says,
Speaker 3: I'm sitting next to my father. The investigator said, hey,
Speaker 3: we can figure that out. Where was Joe Biden at
Speaker 3: the time. We know when the webs app was sent,
Speaker 3: we know where Hunter was, where was Joe And at
Speaker 3: this point it's not clear that the investigators were allowed
Speaker 3: to do that. It appears that they may have been
Speaker 3: prevented from checking Joe Biden's location data. All of this
Speaker 3: piled together, and by the way, that list comes from
Speaker 3: a very good article that Breitbart put together of thirteen
Speaker 3: ways that this administration stonewalled and blocked investigation based on
Speaker 3: the whistleblowers and the point I make. Look, I don't
Speaker 3: lightly call for a special counsel to investigate the Attorney
Speaker 3: General of the United States for obstruction of justice and
Speaker 3: for perjury.
Speaker 1: Have you ever called for that to happen against an AG?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 3: Yeah, And given this at this point, the evidence is overwhelming.
Speaker 3: And you know Merrick Garland, if he were standing up
Speaker 3: saying these are very serious allegations. We need to come
Speaker 3: clean with the American people. We need to disclose what happened.
Speaker 3: We need each of the individuals who have testified to
Speaker 3: tell the American people.
Speaker 1: What happened.
Speaker 3: We need to clear the air. We need to have
Speaker 3: absolute confidence in the Department of Justice. If he was
Speaker 3: saying that, that'd be a very different story. But he's not.
Speaker 3: He is defiantly saying you can't touch me.
Speaker 1: Yeah it is well, also saying that my employees are amazing.
Speaker 1: Yet it's his own employees that are whistleblowing on his abusive.
Speaker 3: Power because he is so damaging the Department of Justice
Speaker 3: and so damaging the air FBI that his own employees
Speaker 3: are outraged. And look what it is doing to the
Speaker 3: White House. This is a White House press briefing that's
Speaker 3: really astonishing.
Speaker 1: Watch this.
Speaker 4: The House Ways and Means Committee yesterday released documents their
Speaker 4: Authenticity Nowhere Challenge that included a July twenty seventeen WhatsApp
Speaker 4: message sent by Hunter Biden to Henry Jao.
Speaker 3: Here pausters, I guess Communist Party official. So I want
Speaker 3: to point out two things right now. Number one, James
Speaker 3: Rosen is asking a great question. Terrific journalist, one of
Speaker 3: the few journalists still doing journalism today. He points out
Speaker 3: the WhatsApp content, it's authenticity nowhere challenged. Listen to that
Speaker 3: very carefully because you're going to see. John Kirby doesn't
Speaker 3: challenge it either. Nobody has challenged it could be a
Speaker 3: defense to say this is pride, this doesn't exist. That
Speaker 3: if it's fraudulent, that would be a real defense. But
Speaker 3: Rosen said, look, no, one's doubting this thing's real. That
Speaker 3: Hunter said exactly this, by the way, exactly the same
Speaker 3: as the Hunter Biden laptop. At no point did Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden say no, no, no, it's not real. And look at Actually,
Speaker 3: I want to rewind and play from the beginning. This
Speaker 3: is right at the beginning of this clip. I want
Speaker 3: to rewind and play from the beginning. Look at John
Speaker 3: Kirby's face when Rosen brings this up, because Kirby looks
Speaker 3: to the side, like, get me that hell out of here,
Speaker 3: the look of terror.
Speaker 1: And he's looking at the White House pre secretary and
Speaker 1: her staff.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Karine, Jean Pierre.
Speaker 1: I don't want a part of this. You guys, ndle
Speaker 1: this here. It is. It's amazing.
Speaker 4: The House Ways and Means Committee yesterday released documents their
Speaker 4: authenticity nowhere challenged. That included a July twenty seventeen WhatsApp
Speaker 4: message sent by Hunter Biden to Henry Jao, a Chinese
Speaker 4: Communist Party official, which stated in its entirety and I quote,
Speaker 4: I am sitting here with my father, and we would
Speaker 4: I like to understand why the commitment made has not
Speaker 4: been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to
Speaker 4: read resolve this now before it gets out of hand,
Speaker 4: and now means tonight and zee. If I get a
Speaker 4: call or text from anyone involved in this other than
Speaker 4: you Xang or the chairman, I will make certain that
Speaker 4: between the man sitting next to me and every person
Speaker 4: he knows, and my ability to forever hold a grudge,
Speaker 4: that you will regret not following my direction. I am
Speaker 4: sitting here waiting for the call with my father unquote.
Speaker 4: So just a couple of questions about this. First, does
Speaker 4: this not undermine the president's claim during the twenty twenty
Speaker 4: campaign and the reaffirmations of that claim by his two
Speaker 4: pres secretary since then, that he never once discussed his
Speaker 4: son's overseas business dealings with him.
Speaker 5: No, and I'm not going to comment further on this, James, James,
Speaker 5: let me just let me save you some let me say,
Speaker 5: let me say, let me save you some breath. If
Speaker 5: you're gonna ask about this I am not addressed. I
Speaker 5: know you do more than i'd like you to have.
Speaker 5: I am not going to address this issue from this podium.
Speaker 5: I'm just not going to do it.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to do the president.
Speaker 5: Thank you, Thanks guys, have a great weekend in the
Speaker 5: father's house.
Speaker 1: I mean, you can even see the White House Press
Speaker 1: series Luke when she walks like I'm walking into this.
Speaker 1: Now your hand, that's over to me.
Speaker 3: So I gotta say, when Kirby leaves the podium, I'm
Speaker 3: reminded of the great scene in Monty Python run away
Speaker 3: right away. Let me ask one question in response to Kirby,
Speaker 3: which actually the reporters were calling out, Why the hell not?
Speaker 3: He says, I'm not going to answer it. Why not? Yeah,
Speaker 3: because it's hard. Oh, you only answer the easy ones.
Speaker 3: I'm not gonna answer. We have evidence. And by the way,
Speaker 3: this was just put out by the Chairman of the
Speaker 3: Ways and Means Committee of the US House of Representative.
Speaker 3: This is not some random guy on Twitter. Yeah that
Speaker 3: it is the son of the President of the United
Speaker 3: States shaking down a Communist Party official for millions of dollars,
Speaker 3: invoking his father, saying his father's sit right next to
Speaker 3: him and saying, Daddy is gonna punish you if you
Speaker 3: don't give me the money, And the White House's response
Speaker 3: is I'm not gonna answer it. Why because I don't
Speaker 3: want to answer from this podium.
Speaker 1: My question is there another podium they will answer this question.
Speaker 3: It just I don't want to answer. I don't want
Speaker 3: to answer. I mean it, what the hell are you
Speaker 3: talking about? There is serious evidence of corruption from the president.
Speaker 3: You are giving a press briefing at the White House.
Speaker 3: You're not asking about some random thing. And his answer
Speaker 3: is just because I don't want to. And in fact,
Speaker 3: there's one exchange where Rosen says I have a lot more.
Speaker 3: He's like, I know you do a lot more than
Speaker 3: I wish you did.
Speaker 1: Did.
Speaker 3: Yeah, dude, I'm sorry that the administration that you were
Speaker 3: willing to be a part of there's mounting evidence of
Speaker 3: corruption coming out and the administration is stone walling at
Speaker 3: every step. But when you play bag dad Bob and
Speaker 3: say no, I'm not gonna answer, not gonn answer, not
Speaker 3: gonna answer, there's no basis for not answering. They're not
Speaker 3: asking you can I have the nuclear codes that you
Speaker 3: could say, I'm not going to answer the national security reason,
Speaker 3: I'm not going to tell you the nuclear codes.
Speaker 1: Well, it used to be an ongoing investigation with Hunter,
Speaker 1: so we're not going to talk about it. Then it
Speaker 1: was a personal, private, family matter, so we're not going
Speaker 1: to talk about it. There's one part of this that
Speaker 1: you could argue you should absolutely have to answer the question.
Speaker 1: This is a Chinese This has kind of an overlooked
Speaker 1: but it's it's clear.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and he's an admiral, right, Kirby is an admiral
Speaker 3: who spent most of his career speaking on behalf of
Speaker 3: the Department of Defense.
Speaker 1: But go ahead, No, you have a Chinese Communist Party
Speaker 1: official who's being shaken down by Hunter Biden and his
Speaker 1: father is sitting next to him. So the idea that
Speaker 1: this could be private or a personal matter, or doesn't
Speaker 1: involve the government, or doesn't involve the White House all
Speaker 1: should be taken off the table. This is an official
Speaker 1: member of the Chinese Communist Party, an official party official.
Speaker 3: And Hunter is threatening official retribution from the US government. Yes, so, now,
Speaker 3: to be fair at the fair At the time I'm
Speaker 3: of the WhatsApp, Joe Biden had just finished being Vice president,
Speaker 3: so he was not currently an office holder. He was
Speaker 3: simply the immediate past vice president and fixing to be
Speaker 3: in a few years the next president. So he had
Speaker 3: a lot of levers to pull, but he did not
Speaker 3: at that instant have official government powered exercise.
Speaker 1: So then this goes back the question when this deal
Speaker 1: that was done, when this arrangement between this Chinese Communist
Speaker 1: Party official happened, was he then the vice president? Do
Speaker 1: we know that timeline? Because the question that should be
Speaker 1: answered by the White House.
Speaker 3: If the whistleblowers are accurate, then the investigators were not
Speaker 3: allowed to ask because they weren't allowed to investigate the
Speaker 3: big guy. This is all about We've got our scapegoat.
Speaker 3: Our scapegoat is hunter. He's a poor, troubled substance abuse user,
Speaker 3: and blame it all on him, but nothing about the
Speaker 3: big guy. Protect the big guy, Protect Joe Biden at
Speaker 3: all costs. And I got to say, you know what
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland said in that press conference, it actually is accurate.
Speaker 3: The Department of Justice has a long tradition of integrity,
Speaker 3: and integrity is important to the rule of law in America.
Speaker 3: I want the Department of Justice to be above reproach.
Speaker 3: I want the FBI to be above reproaches. Why I'm
Speaker 3: so angry because Merrick Garland knows better. When he lays
Speaker 3: down at night, there is a little still voice in
Speaker 3: the back of his head that he knows he is
Speaker 3: lighting on fire. An institution that has protected the rule
Speaker 3: of law, has protected the Constitution, has protected our rights
Speaker 3: for decades, and he's doing so. I don't know why
Speaker 3: he's doing it.
Speaker 1: Is a direction from the President of United States of America,
Speaker 1: Or is this he just got so far off the
Speaker 1: beaten path of what legally he was supposed to do
Speaker 1: in his job that now he doesn't know how to
Speaker 1: come back, or is it could be a combination of both.
Speaker 3: Look, I genuinely don't know, and I don't want to
Speaker 3: play armchair psychologists, although we're sitting in armchairs. Some have
Speaker 3: speculated that and when he didn't get the Supreme Court
Speaker 3: and when the Senate didn't take it up, that it
Speaker 3: just infuriated it. Maybe that list, Maybe that's it. I
Speaker 3: don't know. To be honest, I don't know the man.
Speaker 3: I have never met Merrick Gardli. I've shaking his hand,
Speaker 3: I think once or twice in a hearing room, But
Speaker 3: I don't know him when he was up for Attorney general,
Speaker 3: he refused to come by the office to meet. It
Speaker 3: was COVID, and so he was he was like, no, no, no,
Speaker 3: because of COVID, I can't ask hard questions. By the way,
Speaker 3: no other attorney general has done that. And the Department
Speaker 3: of Justice nominees did that over and over and over again.
Speaker 3: They used COVID for the bidens, wasn't it if you
Speaker 3: want to hide in the basement, COVID was a fabulous excuse.
Speaker 3: So I'm sitting here. He he behaves as if he
Speaker 3: is utterly unaccountable to anyone. And to be honest, that's
Speaker 3: the same way the White House is behaving, John Kirby.
Speaker 3: They're what possible basis. It's not a basis at a
Speaker 3: press conference to say I'm not going to answer your
Speaker 3: question because the answer would make me look really bad.
Speaker 3: I don't want to because it's bad for the president.
Speaker 3: And so no, thank you, Like that's what he said. Yeah,
Speaker 3: not here are the facts. Not these are serious allegations,
Speaker 3: not the WhatsApps falls, not not anything. It's just I'm
Speaker 3: not going to tell you now that's from this podium,
Speaker 3: from this.
Speaker 1: Podium or the other podium yeah, I'm just I want
Speaker 1: to find the other podium where he would ever answer
Speaker 1: this question. I don't think it'll ever happen. And that's
Speaker 1: where you have to those questions answer. My question for
Speaker 1: you is this what moves and what happens next when
Speaker 1: it comes to Congress dealing with him? If more comes
Speaker 1: out that the line, and before you answer that, I
Speaker 1: want to tell you about our friends at Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: If you are sick and tired of giving your money
Speaker 1: to woke companies and you want to give your money
Speaker 1: to companies that actually align with your values, one great
Speaker 1: way to do it is with your cell phone. Now,
Speaker 1: you may not realize the Big Mobile has been giving
Speaker 1: money for years. We're talking about millions and millions of
Speaker 1: dollars to hardcore leftist organizations and include Planned Parenthood. That's
Speaker 1: where Patriot Mobile comes in. Not only the only conservative
Speaker 1: Christian conservative phone coming in the US, but they give
Speaker 1: you amazing coverage. You can keep your same cell phone number,
Speaker 1: you can keep your same cell phone you have right now,
Speaker 1: or upgrade to a new one. And when you pay
Speaker 1: your bill every month, a percentage of that bill goes
Speaker 1: back to support the causes that you want to stand
Speaker 1: with we're talking about the First and Second Amendment rights.
Speaker 1: We're talking about standing up for unborn children, helping with adoptions,
Speaker 1: and standing with our veterans and our first responders and
Speaker 1: our police. Check out Patriot Mobile. Give your money to
Speaker 1: a company that is aligned with what you believe inven
Speaker 1: eight seven eight Patriots. The number that's eight seven eight Patriot,
Speaker 1: that's age seven to eight Patriot or Patriot mobile dot com,
Speaker 1: slash verdict Patriot mobile dot com slash verdict Center. Moving
Speaker 1: forward with Garland, Clearly the pew that work for him
Speaker 1: have had enough of him. They think he's lied. They're
Speaker 1: coming forward and whistleblowing on him and talking about how
Speaker 1: they're not allowed to do their jobs, which for them,
Speaker 1: I think is absolutely nonpartisan. They just want to do
Speaker 1: their job and do it. The lost says that's why
Speaker 1: they're coming for it. It's not a Republican that says
Speaker 1: I'm a Republican to hear me out. These are people
Speaker 1: that just want to do their job and go where
Speaker 1: the evidence would allow him to go. And he's throwing
Speaker 1: a wall and saying you can't go there, and they
Speaker 1: go this way and they go you can't go there,
Speaker 1: it's amaze that never ends. So if this keeps mounting
Speaker 1: against him, where does this move with Congress next?
Speaker 3: Look, it's going to continue to be the House of
Speaker 3: Representatives that drives this. We've now got multiple committees that
Speaker 3: are investigating. We've got the Ways It Means Committee, We've
Speaker 3: got the Oversight Committee where the Judiciary Committee, they're going
Speaker 3: after and investigating, and they need to keep driving this
Speaker 3: because the Senate doesn't care. I'm going to press the
Speaker 3: Senate Judiciary Committee to do something on it, and that
Speaker 3: will not succeed because Dick Durbin doesn't care. There is
Speaker 3: not a single Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committe who
Speaker 3: gives a flip. They haven't asked a question about it. WhatsApp.
Speaker 3: I promise you you're going to see me in the
Speaker 3: Senate Judiciary Committee with the poster board of this WhatsApp
Speaker 3: behind me, and I'm going to ask the Democrats about it,
Speaker 3: and they're not going to respond. Their response is going
Speaker 3: to be John Kirby's I'm not going to answer that,
Speaker 3: but it's actually going to be better than John Kirby.
Speaker 3: They're simply sin since they're not actually at a podium
Speaker 3: at a press conference. They'll just ignore it. They'll just
Speaker 3: be like, oh look, look squirrel. Yeah, they'll they'll just
Speaker 3: talk about something totally different. They are willing. It doesn't
Speaker 3: matter what evidence there is about Joe Biden, they don't
Speaker 3: want to talk about it. An interesting question is does
Speaker 3: there come a point where the corporate media has to
Speaker 3: out I will tell you, for a long time, Hunter
Speaker 3: Biden laptop, all this stuff the corporate media ignored. I
Speaker 3: will say as I was flying back to Texas, the
Speaker 3: I think it was NBC News was on the TV
Speaker 3: and the airport and they were suddenly covering on the
Speaker 3: six o'clock news whistleblowers with allegations of misconduct at the
Speaker 3: Department of Justice. And it was the first time I
Speaker 3: had seen the corporate media start to cover this. If
Speaker 3: that starts to happen more, that's a big deal. If
Speaker 3: you look at Watergate, if you look at when Richard
Speaker 3: Nixon started to go down, they're different pieces. One of
Speaker 3: the pieces has to be a Democrat flipping with Nick.
Speaker 3: Yet that hadn't happened yet, and we're nowhere close. With Nixon,
Speaker 3: lots of Republicans flipped, which ultimately took him down. But
Speaker 3: the corporate media has to decide to do their job
Speaker 3: and actually cover these facts. Right now, what they do
Speaker 3: almost every waking moment is scream Trump Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump,
Speaker 3: Trump Trump. They don't want to talk about this. This
Speaker 3: is getting so bad. Uh that may change.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you about our friends of her Chalk.
Speaker 1: If you're a guy and you feel like you got
Speaker 1: a little bit older, you feel like fatigue is setting in.
Speaker 1: Maybe you just feel like you don't have that strength
Speaker 1: and vitality that you used to. I want to tell
Speaker 1: you about Chalk. Go to choq dot com and they
Speaker 1: at Chalk can help you boost your testos from up
Speaker 1: to twenty percent and ninety days now. I've been taking
Speaker 1: the Mail Vitality Stack hitting forty. Things are just different now.
Speaker 1: You get that, you get that fatigue that sits in,
Speaker 1: You get that brain fog that sits in. It's frustrating
Speaker 1: and you're like, wait, I don't like this. That's where
Speaker 1: Chalk comes in and can help you. So go to
Speaker 1: choq dot com and check out the Mail Vitality Stack.
Speaker 1: They can help boost your testos from up to twenty
Speaker 1: percent over ninety days plus if you use the promo code.
Speaker 1: Ben you'll get thirty five percent off any chalk subscription
Speaker 1: for life. Just use a promo code ben choq dot com.
Speaker 1: Promo code ben if your guy fight back against the
Speaker 1: War on fatigue and check out chalk choque dot com.
Speaker 1: Don't forget to hit that subscribe auto download button, or
Speaker 1: if you're listening on Apple, the follow button and you
Speaker 1: can get this show three days a week. If you're
Speaker 1: watching this video as well, and you don't listen to
Speaker 1: the podcasts on your phone, just put it. If you
Speaker 1: have an iPhone, put in the word pod in your
Speaker 1: search and you'll see podcasts come up. You can hit
Speaker 1: that follow button on Verdict and you can get every
Speaker 1: episode for free, so make sure you do that right
Speaker 1: a five star review. We'll see you back here in
Speaker 1: just a couple of days.