WEBVTT - Hong Kong’s ‘Mainlandization’ Remaking World City

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.119
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence, the podcast

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>that pulls back the curtain non global business so you

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can invest better across the Pacific realm. I'm Tom mccorbett

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 2>And I'm John Lee. Hong Kong's so called brain drain

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>is turning back into a brain gain as thousands of

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 2>knowledge workers return to the city after fleeing COVID.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But who's coming back and from where could have a

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>big impact on the city's economy, its culture, and its future.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong's changing workforce is driven largely by twenty and

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty somethings flocking over the border from mainland China, and

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>the reasons why they choose Hong Kong might surprise you.

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>What's driving the change and how might Hong Kong's job

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>market look in twenty thirty and beyond. For this, let's

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>bring in three experts. Mark Tibbett's managing director at Page Group.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>In Hong Kong, Francis Senior analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And Peter Lau, Associate analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. Gentlemen, welcome,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Here Mark, what strikes you most about the job market's

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 2>most notable changes.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 3>I think there was a pretty seismic movement of people

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>through the last few years. A lot of people left

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong for various reasons, and as you guys just

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>rightly pointed out, there's a flow of talent coming back

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>into the city and the demographic has certainly changed. I

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 3>think the most notable shift for me, certainly as an

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>expatche in Hong Kong, was a large volume of pretty seasoned,

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 3>pretty senior overseas workers, business leaders, experts, et cetera moved

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 3>out during the COVID period, and many of those moved

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 3>out permanently.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And so that's at the stage for some big changes

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or at least a reset, if you will, for Hong

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Kong's job market. Was it just the obvious factors, was

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it COVID or were there other contributing factors.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the overall sort of economic political environment faced

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>some changes through that same period, So I certainly think

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that there was a proportion of movement driven by that,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>certainly amongst the more local community. But I do think

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 3>the expatriot community were really pushed out by COVID policies,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 3>not a huge amount more maybe some economic draw but

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 3>largely COVID policies from an international standpoint and mark some of.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 2>These workers are coming back to Hong Kong. Are they

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 2>the expats or are they more sort of like Mainlanders

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>coming to Hong Kong for the first time.

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, there's definitely an influx of people from mainland China.

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>The top talent visa schemes have appealed to people in

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 3>mainland China in large numbers, and we're certainly seeing that

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 3>from the other side of the border professionals that we

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>see in China who are applying for the various schemes.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 3>So there absolutely is that, but there is also a

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 3>flow back of talent from other markets within the Asia

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Pacific region, and also we're starting to see more now

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>from further Afield Mark Tibberts.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>In every great human migration, there is a component of

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>running from something and then running to something. The writer

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul Through likes to say that travel is equal parts

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>flight and pursuit. How do you see that dynamic as

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it applies to what's happening with mainland China and Hong

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Kong right now.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I think primarily they're running to Hong Kong for the

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 3>advanced economy, the opportunities the education, maybe the healthcare system,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 3>access to international markets. I think largely following the carrot,

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>so to speak.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Mark, There's been a lot of discussion of how Hong

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Kong is becoming much more integrated with China. Some have

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>caught it the mainlandization of Hong Kong. When you recruit

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>people for Hong Kong, is Mandarin as a language becoming

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>much more important.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 3>As a language is certainly more important in Hong Kong

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>now than it ever was. I think that's actually been

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>a process that was happening long before COVID. Certainly within

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>the education system, we saw Mandarin becoming a much more

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>dominant language. Obviously, it stands to reason that if more

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 3>people are coming into Hong Kong from mainland China, then

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Mandarin is going to be spoken and heard a lot more.

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I think we'd all agree that you do at the

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 3>moment in Hong Kong, for sure.

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Francis Chan, senior analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. You recently published

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a piece of research that was quite widely read on

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal about this very subject. Talk a little

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>bit about what your key findings were and the conclusions

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that you drew from.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 4>That well, I think the first findings from our research

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 4>is minenntization. As we discussed earlier, and more and more

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 4>Mainlan talents are coming to Hong Kong for different reasons,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 4>hopefully for poor factors of the city, and that's very

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 4>evident in the governments saratistics the visa information. Ninety four

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 4>ninety five percent of the latest top Past Talent program

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 4>released in December twenty twenty two applied by the mainland

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 4>talents and twenty two thousand of them have been approved

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 4>in terms of applications. And if we look for other

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 4>channels of visa application to Hong Kong, they are also

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 4>predominantly occupied by talents from mainland China, and about only

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 4>eight thousand of other talents have been getting visas from

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong. But that will really spread across different Western

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>countries or sofeast Asian countries. I would say seventy to

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 4>eighty percent of the visa application we'll be coming from

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>the North.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And Francis Chan, let's talk a little bit about the

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>demographics of those people from the north, from mainland China

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>coming into Hong Kong. Who are they, what's the age range,

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>their background, who is it in mainland China broadly speaking

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that has found attraction to Hong Kong.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, they could be a wing from the age of

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty to forty, mostly so.

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Mostly younger adults, early career professionals.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Or or mid age professionals. And if you take a

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 4>look of the professions of these applicants coming to Hong Kong,

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 4>you find that finance is one of the biggest industry

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 4>attracting talents from the North, followed by maybe academic education industry.

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 4>They may be coming to Hong Kong as professors or

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 4>do R and D in Hong Kong working in different

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 4>educational institutions. And two other segments which is not as prominent,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 4>but they are also significant. It will be commerce and

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 4>trade and information technology. Of course, if you talk about

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 4>the biggest pool of talents, it will be for finance

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 4>and academics.

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed Mark Tibbetts from Page Group sitting here quietly

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as you were talking. Francis nodding his head, Marco head

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and way in, Yeah.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 3>I think absolutely right. The largest group of migrants we're

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 3>seeing is that ex executive workforce that maybe the junior

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>aspirational executive people with young families and big financial commitments,

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and again I do think that speaks to the economic

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 3>pull of the city. I largely agree with the intelligence

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>that France has just mentioned.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Mark and Francis. You know, Hong Kong invariably always gets

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>compared to Singapore if both cities vie for being Asia's

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 2>financial capital. What's happening with this race like Mark? From

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>your point of view, is Singapore gaining the upper hand

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 2>or you think it's still too early?

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just personally think that Hong Kong and Singapore

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 3>are two different places and have two different roles in

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 3>the sort of economic food chain of the region. I

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 3>just don't think that Singapore can supplant Hong Kong in

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>its location, in its strategic importance for Greater China, and

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong needs to really focus on that as its

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of primary role, primary objective as a conduit for

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>money for goods, trade for people, talent, etc. Into China

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>and out of China. And if we focus on our

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>strengths in Hong Kong, then I personally think Hong Kong

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>stands alone for all of its sort of assets and

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>attributes in that regard. I think Singapore's equally in a

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 3>really strategic location for a lot more economies, and largely speaking,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that's going to drive Singapore's longer term success.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>In Francis Chan, some cynics have written off Hong Kong already,

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>but are they too quick to have written its epitheph

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of speak dog tailing off of Marx comments.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 4>I think for Hong Kong's future or Hong Kore's prospects,

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 4>it relies most heavily on China's prospects from this point onwards,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 4>both as a financial center or a business hob in

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 4>the Asia specific area. If you talk about its status

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 4>as the financial hop solely focusing on copy financing functions,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong as of now is the far ahead of Singapore,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 4>not because we are doing better, but we are the

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 4>offshore financial hop of mainland China or the PLC Frans's like.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Sitting in Hong Kong, you do get this warp sense

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 2>that you know, finance is the center of the universe,

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>but there's actually other industries that are actually more important

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>than finance. Technology. For a start, when I got to Singapore,

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 2>I noticed that a lot of the technology companies I'm

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>talking Apple, Google, Alphabet are located in Singapore. Is it

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>arguable that maybe technology and you know, other M and

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 2>cis find Singapore more attractive, Well, I.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Think your spot on. In fact, Singapore has a more

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 4>diversified economy in terms of GDP contribution. Manufacturing including technology

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 4>in fact, is the leading GDB contributor in twenty twenty two,

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 4>followed by wholesale trade including commodities trading than finance and

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 4>insurance in Singapore. That's government statistics talk about. Hong Kong,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Finance and insurance is the top GDB contributor with twenty

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 4>tuber self GDP contribution yea, followed by public sectors also

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty one percent, i e. Government spending. Then you have

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 4>maybe a property or important export as a support to

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the manufacturing centers in Southern China market.

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 2>You want to weigh in on that.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty consistent with my own personal view. And actually

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 3>if you look at our business at Page Group, a

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 3>similar proportion actually more comes from financial services in the

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 3>region of thirty percent banking and insurance. It's just such

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 3>a dominant space for us here. And I think again

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 3>it's a strength that Hong Kong has that won't easily

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>just drift off over. Of course, in a couple of years, yep.

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark during your career in this part of the world

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, you spent last of time in mainland China.

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You've watched Shenzen grow from a small town into a

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>major tech hub. Do you see that tech component making

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>its way any more into Hong Kong or do you

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>think sheng Jen is going to remain the epicenter of

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>China tech.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a really interesting point. I was actually there

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 3>for a large chunk of that change, having really started

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>moving our Southern China business into Shanzhen in two thousand

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 3>and nine and operating there right up until COVID kicked off.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I saw a lot of those changes and the evolution

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 3>of that technology industry and in the Shenjan economy. And

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I certainly think that the policy and if you look

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>at the sort of the central government policy with regards

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 3>to the Gredabay era in Hong Kong's role within that,

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 3>it does seem to suggest that Hong Kong's got a

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 3>bigger role to play. But you know, Shanzen is vast

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>and Hong Kong's got limitations in terms of land and

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 3>workforce as it is, so to get businesses of the

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 3>scale that you've got in Shenzen, like the Huawei and ztees,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the Djis and ten cents and so on, who have

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 3>so many thousands of people working for them. I don't

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>think it's a competition. I think it's a collaboration that's

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 3>probably going to see Hong Kong's role grow.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Francis Chan, you just heard Mark Tibbett mention the Greater

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Bay Area. You have also written about the Greater Bay

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Area a considerable length. Talk a little bit about what

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>lies ahead in China's vision for the Greater Bay Area

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, Juhai, Macau, Guangzhou, and what that's going to

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>look like five or ten years from now, any thoughts.

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 4>First of all, Beijing is taking a Greater Bay Area

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 4>as the locomotive for its economy, and this agenda has

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 4>been set for about ten years. And this area you

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 4>will expect a population of eighty six million with eleven

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 4>cities as being had by the four major cities, the

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 4>two offshore cities Hong Kong, Macau, together with Quanto Province capital,

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:52.599
<v Speaker 4>Kuangshu and the Special Administrative Region of Sinten. So this

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 4>could be a powerhouse comparing to the Tokyo Bay Area,

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco's Bay Area, and finally in the New York'speto Poland Area.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 4>And we're expecting this to contribute to more than one

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 4>tenth of China's GDP. At the same time, it contains

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of fast growing industries including technology as you

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 4>said earlier, commerce and finance in Hong Kong, entertainment in Macau,

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 4>conferencing in Hong Kong Macau, and with some backup manufacturing

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 4>facilities in other smaller with the Bay area cities. So

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 4>we are very autimistic on the future of this area.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned eighty six million people, that's a quarter

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of the US population in this quarter of Guangdong Province

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>or what borders Guangdong Province. If you're talking about Hong

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Kong in terms of GDP or per capital GDP, is

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it not the wealthiest province in China already?

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you talk about the mainland Chinese cities, we

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 4>still have Faijing, Shanghai. Talk about the provincial level, Arejiang

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 4>and Jiangsu. Those are all very rich regional localities with

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 4>very high income capital. But obviously Kwangdong is among those

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:03.479
<v Speaker 4>high income provinces. Or administrative regions. Hong Kong Macau themselves

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 4>are considered as offshore special administrative regions, and obviously they

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 4>have a higher income than China's average as a whole.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 4>So if you put Hong Kong Macau together with the

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 4>rest of the mainland cities in the Great Bay Area, yes,

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 4>we will see it as the highest income group within

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the mainland China.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 2>And francis which companies benefit from the growth of the

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Greater Bay Area.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, we want to go for the

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 4>robust finance sectors, and we identify two groups of financial

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 4>firms to gain most from the flows or the communicative

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 4>wealth in the region. Foreign banks with great presence in

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 4>the region, including hspecs, then the CHILDED and some of

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 4>the Hong Kong domicile banks like Bank of East Asia,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 4>those could be gained a lot from those cross border flows.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Of course, we have the biggest banks in the country ICBC,

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Bank of China and China Construction Bank. They are presence

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 4>both in the mainland cities in the Greater Bay Area

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 4>and also in Hong Kong Macau and they will also

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 4>gain a lot from these flows. As Hongkong Macau get

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 4>more integrated into the Greater Bay Area.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Francis Chan Mark tibbets what do you see as far

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>as the breakdown of nationalities where the expands come from.

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you see mainland China being the primary source of

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>expans to Hong Kong or do you see any of

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the non China nations of generating an inflow in the future.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that inflow from mainland China will absolutely be

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the dominant inflow of talent in the next couple of

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>years and beyond that, primarily because Mandarin as a language

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 3>is going to be so important in the business ecosystem

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 3>of Hong Kong. I definitely think that Hong Kong will

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 3>have plenty of international elements to its market, but the

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>talent coming in from let's say Europe or the US

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>or South America, I think these will be at the

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 3>more senior end, perhaps with the exception of the education need.

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 3>I think somebody spoke earlier about academic I've certainly heard

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 3>recently that there has been a lot of influx of

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 3>teachers from further afield.

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you see Mandarin as being the primary quote language

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of business in China and Hong Kong much as English

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as the language of business and much of the rest

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of the world.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 3>So increasingly so. I think anybody that is in Hong

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Kong in a customer facing role is largely required to

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 3>be able to speak Mandarin and Cantonese. Absolutely. I think

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the exceptions lie more perhaps where it's a leadership role

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 3>or more strategical, or maybe in more international markets where

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 3>trade with China is concerned, that Mandarin's absolutely a prerequisite.

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 2>And mark outside of the language requirement. What are the

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>skills do employees want these days? Has anything changed over

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the last few years.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Technology has become so intertwined with every aspect of business,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 3>and every organization these days in some way is also

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 3>a technology company aside from the core of what they do.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 3>So I think technical ability the ability to use various

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 3>new technologies, whether that be even as simple as social media,

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.239
<v Speaker 3>from a relationship management standpoint, right through to actually being

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 3>able to write code and so on. I think technological

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 3>language and userability as well as spoken language is probably

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the next biggest thing.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark During your early days in Hong Kong and mainland China,

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>could you have imagined the events of the past few

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>years that have shaped the way the job market is today.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Was it foreseeable. How did that strike you.

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I've been in and around Hong Kong pretty much all

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 3>my life, I think pre nineteen ninety seven, it was

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of hard to know much really, certainly as a

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 3>young student as I was then, about what the future

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 3>might look like. But having been back here for fifteen

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 3>years and working on both sides of the border, a

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 3>good decade spent helping to build our business in mainland China,

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I would say yes, economically speaking, commercially speaking, I think

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the direction of travel has been more local than global,

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 3>and more China centric than international in terms of the

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 3>way I seen in Hong Kong developing and needing to

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 3>be part of the bigger China strategy.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. By the way,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>if you like what you hear, and we hope you do,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>please rate us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google podcasts, or

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>wherever you may be listening to us. Of course, more

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>stars are better. Your feedback matters, and we love hearing

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. And speaking of young people, we wanted

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to get the perspective of somebody in that age bracket.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Peter Lao, Associate analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. You were born

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>in mainland China, you grew up in shin Jen, You

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>came to Hong Kong during your high school years, you

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>spent college here. You gave up your hooku, your mainland

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>residency to come to Hong Kong as a permanent resident.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are big decisions for somebody, especially early in life.

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Talk about how that came about.

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it's not necessarily my decision. It's probably

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 5>my parents' decision. Fair enough, there's a rationale behind. I

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 5>think they definitely look at Hong Kong's access to the

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 5>international education or even markets. Right. For example, if you're

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 5>your kid in China, you're going to go through a

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 5>lot of exams gau Kau and you're probably only going

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.239
<v Speaker 5>to land one of the top schools in China. But

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 5>whereas you should do go through the Hong Kong education system.

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 5>You can actually choose China, you can choose local universities

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 5>in Hong Kong, you can go to UK, Australia US.

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 2>So it opened up options for really, that's.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 5>One I'm saying. So I think that's also a great

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 5>pitch to a lot of the talents coming to Hong

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Kong because they can see that, oh I can plan

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 5>for my kids, I can also plan for my job

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 5>and stuff like that. So I think that's what makes

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Hong Kong an interesting place to them.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Are so many twenty somethings, thirty somethings, even forty somethings.

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Are they running front something or are they running to something?

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>When they make that decision?

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think these Mainian talents they're runn into Hong Kong.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 5>I believe that first of all, they thought about their

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 5>etche across a lot of the markets London, New York,

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Hong Kong and Singapore. Hong Kong and singapare only places

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 5>that these Melian talents can actually leverage their language skills

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 5>right right, fair enough Mandarin? Right, you got to know

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 5>the language in order to do due diligence or you know,

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 5>do acrid research whatever in Hong Kong. And Hong Kong

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 5>has that soil to unleash their potentials because we have

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 5>so many businesses with China, and I think that's where

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 5>they think, right, they see, oh, this is a place

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 5>that I can actually build up a career. I can

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 5>leverage my skills, and the tex is very favorable and

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 5>the work environment here is also great compared to China.

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 5>We know about this kind of an evolution thing in

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 5>China and in Chinese cons right.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 2>And Peter, do you see a lot of people in

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 2>your situation staying in Hong Kong or do they use

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong as a stepping stone to maybe go to

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 2>New York, London, Singapore.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 5>That's a very good question.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>It depends.

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 5>I think for finance, for banking, Hong Kong essentially gives

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 5>them a great platform. I don't think a lot of

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 5>them will love to, you know, jump around, because here

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 5>you can get a lot of business done, right you go,

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 5>China can get up deals done. But for technology, I

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 5>would say that's a different situation because as we talked about,

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 5>Hong Kong doesn't have that many tech companies headquartered here,

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 5>and I would say the evolution of technology here is

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 5>a bit slow compared to other markets or other countries.

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 5>So I think still for tech talent, they're gonna hesitate

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 5>and they probably gonna think about where they go, and.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Mostly Silicon Valley or sea or or maybe even bacticians in.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 5>Vacticians in exactly yeah, because those areas have the group

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 5>at the circle, have the soil I would say, so,

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, meeting greets with people and to develop products together.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 2>Mark, you're a senior executive at the Page group, you

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>must get this question all the time. When university grad

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>speed to you, they must say, like, what should I

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 2>do to get ahead? What advice to give them?

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I think anybody looking for a job, the first piece

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 3>of advice that I would give is to network without shame. Okay,

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:33.959
<v Speaker 3>being an ex pat when you move somewhere new that

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 3>the key is to accept every invitation and go meet

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 3>as many people as possible, and then you'll find your channel,

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 3>you find your lane. And I think this is a

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 3>big risk posting covid is that people are a little

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 3>bit averse to meeting people.

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>They're want Zoom meetings.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you know that they want to be able

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 3>to sort of swite right to do everything in their life.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 3>It's a it's a convenience thing, right, But looking for

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 3>a job as a human thing. And you know you

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 3>can apply online, but in reality you're going to get

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 3>a job by meeting people and impressing.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, so be a hardcore networker.

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely in person.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Though Zoom has not up ended the entire career management process,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>how's it.

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. I think though, that it's proving

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>more complicated than I thought it would to unwind some

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 3>of these habits. But I think zoom AD's convenience, if anything,

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>it's definitely good for recruitment. It allows people to look

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 3>for jobs a little bit more aggressively. It allows them

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 3>to have initial interviews without disrupting their current existing work life.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 3>But most people prefer to make big decisions like that

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 3>having looked someone in the eyes and established trust and rapport.

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Our guests, I've been Mark Tibbitt's managing director with Page

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Group in Hong Kong. Francis Chan and Peter Lau, both

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg Intelligence, are fascinating exchange about jobs, the future,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and Hong Kong's evolving niche. Gentlemen, it's been a pleasure

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and your insights have given all of us a lot

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to think about.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thank you, Thanks having.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Corbett in Hong Kong.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>And I'm John Lee. This podcast was edited by Clara

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Chen and you've been listening to the Asia Centric podcast