WEBVTT - Tech News: MrBeast Gets Deepfaked On TikTok

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech are.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the tech news for Thursday October fifth,

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. Not an official tech news thing. But

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling a little bit better. I hope I'm sounding better.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I know my voice has had quite a journey over

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this last week. It's not I'm not at one hundred

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>percent by any means, but you got to keep on,

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>keep it on, all right, Let's get to the tech news.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>First up, let's talk zero day vulnerabilities again. So as

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a reminder, the term zero day refers to a case

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>where software developers are unaware that the product they've made

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and released contains vulnerabilities. And to be clear, it's not

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>just software. It can be other stuff too, but we

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>often talk about in terms of software. So they release something,

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a security vulnerability in it that they're not aware of.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>That means there's a chance for bad actors to discover

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that vulnerability and then create an exploit that leverages that vulnerability.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And since the developers may still remain unaware that there's

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>a problem in the first place. There's no one to

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>prevent that from happening, or even to react in a

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>timely way until someone discovers that something hinky is going on. Now,

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>once developers do become aware of the problem, they can respond,

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but by then the damage may have already been done,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at least to some extent. Now, the reason I mentioned

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this is that Microsoft released patches to two open source libraries.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>In this case, a library determined programming that refers to

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a collection of resources that can be used by various

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>computer programs. So, according to tech Crunch, products that tapped

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>into these two libraries, Microsoft products that had been using

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>these two libraries included the Edge web browser, Microsoft Teams,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and Skype. And just to be clear, Microsoft was not

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the only company affected by this. These are open source libraries,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>so lots of other programs from other companies also tap

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>into these. Google issued its own patches for Chrome, Firefox

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>did the same. Well, I think we're going to be

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about Apple later doing the same sort of thing.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So Microsoft has not commented on whether hackers targeted any

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of their products through these vulnerabilities, nor has the company

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>indicated whether or not they could even determine that in

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the first place. A scammy advertisement that featured a deep

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>faked mister Beast popped up on TikTok and has now

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>become part of a larger conversation around AI and deep

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fake technology and fraudulent advertising. So mister Beast, in case

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, is the YouTube handle of Jimmy Donaldson,

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's mostly known for doing stuff like giving away

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>massive sums of money or opening up a burger chain

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and then later on suing it and being sued by it.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>But the burger chain story, while fascinating, probably belongs to

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>another podcast. Anyway, mister Beast is super duper Internet famous.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I joke about being Internet famous, No, I am unknown.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Mister Beast has more than one hundred and eighty eight

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers on YouTube. That makes him the most popular

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>individual on YouTube by subscriptions. There is technically another channel

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that actually has more subscribers. That is a music label

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in India that has more subscribers than mister Beast. But

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about a single person, mister Beast is

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>like top of the pile. Anyway. In this ad that

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>appeared on TikTok, the AI generated mister Beast claimed that

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>he will sell ten thousand iPhone fifteen pro smartphones for

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the princely sum of two American dollars. Now, these are

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>phones that usually go for like thirteen hundred dollars or

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>more depending upon what version you buy, and since mister

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Beast actually has this long history of stunts that involve

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>giving stuff away to people, you can imagine how this

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>ad might actually fool folks into thinking that it's legit

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they pay two bucks to try and get

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone fifteen pro. TikTok has since removed this ad,

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that it went up in the first

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>place despite the platform's review process is concerning because TikTok

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>says it uses both human review and AI to analyze

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>ads before allowing them to go up on the platform.

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>If that's true, this ad somew i managed to slip

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>through those controls and was on the platform. People were

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting it, Mister Beast himself commented on it. So it's

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>another example of how deep fakes can be harmful. Of course,

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.559
<v Speaker 1>this isn't you know, a surprise. We know deep fakes

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>can be harmful. They've been harmful ever since they were

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>unleashed a few years ago. Other folks who have said

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that they have been deep faked into ads without their

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>consent include America's Dad you know, Tom Hanks, David S.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Pumpkins if You're not familiar, and also an anchor for

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>CBS named Gail King says that that has happened to them.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you happen to see an ad that features

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>me hawking the latest I don't know sports gambling app, well,

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>someone done darn faked me, because I wouldn't do that.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal reports that part of the US

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Federal Trade Commissions lawsuit against Amazon hinges on a quote

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>unquote secret algorithm. Now the algorithm does exist or did exist,

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and its code name was Project NeSSI. The FTC claims

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that quote Amazon uses its extensive surveillance network to block

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>price competition by detecting and deterring discounting, artificially inflating prices

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on and off Amazon, and depriving rivals of the ability

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to gain scale by offering lower prices end quote. So,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>according to the FTC, Amazon manipulated the market so that

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>when merchants tried competitive practices such as cutting product prices,

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm essentially kicked in to counteract that move so

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that the competitor would see fewer sales. So, if you

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are a merchant and you cut prices and your sales

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>don't go up, well there's no reason to keep the

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>prices low. If your sales have remained the same, you

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>might as well sell things for more money, because otherwise

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you're just cutting into your profit margins. So the FTC

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is saying this is what Amazon was doing in order

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep competitors to keep their prices higher. Amazon reportedly

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>stopped using this algorithm in twenty nineteen, but the FTC's

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>point is that the company was stacking the deck for

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>its own benefit, a benefit that amounted to more than

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in revenue according to Wall Street Journal's sources.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>An Amazon representative told Ours Technica that this complaint is

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a mischaracterization of what Project NeSSI was all about. The

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>rep says that Nessi's purpose was to prevent Amazon's price

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>matching practice from making unsustainable changes to product prices. So,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in other words, you know, making sure that Amazon wasn't

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>going to sell something for less than what it cost

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon to make or procure it, or ship it. Amazon

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>says that its policy was to try and match lowest prices,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and that this is not meant to drive prices up,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but rather to be more competitive. They said, it's the

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite of what ft claims. The FTC says Amazon

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>was actually manipulating the system so that the lowest prices

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>would be driven up much higher than they would be

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in a true free market, and that Amazon was again

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>gaming the system. It's all pretty complicated, and it might

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>boil down to the possibility that Amazon was essentially using

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a powerful algorithm to manipulate weaker algorithms that were belonging

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to various competitors, all in an effort to fix pricing

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>levels that would favor Amazon. Apple has released an update

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to iOS seventeen, which means the most current version as

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of this episode is iOS seventeen dot dot three. The

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>update includes security fixes that address some vulnerabilities, including a

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>kernel exploit, as well as attatched to one of those

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>open source libraries we talked about with the Microsoft story,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and the update also addresses a problem that some iPhone

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen users have reported, you know that their smartphone tends

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to run a little hot. Apple says that the reason

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for the hot phones mostly falls to software and also

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to those darn USBC chargers. You see, Apple tried to

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>warn you that switching away from the company's proprietary charging

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>technology would cause problems, and here it is. I should

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>also add that folks have speculated that maybe the processor

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in the iPhone fifteen could be partially at fault. Apple

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>says that's not the case anyway. If you do have

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone, you might want to check to see if

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the version of iOS running on your device is the

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>current one. Meanwhile, Google launched its Pixel eight and Pixel

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>eight Pro smartphones this week, as well as the Pixel

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Watch two. Now smartphones have Google's own Tensor G three

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>chipset to power everything. The Pro model has a fifty

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>megapixel rear camera, a forty eight megapixel telephoto lens with

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>five times zoom, and a forty eight megapixel ultra wide camera.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So Google is continuing to embrace the whole photography aspect

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 1>of smartphones, which you know it's been doing for several

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>generations now. The Pro also has a temperature sensor that

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Google says you could use to measure the temperature of

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like a surface, you know, kind of like those gadgets

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that barbecue enthusiasts use to make sure that their coals

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>are hot enough to I don't know, seer a pig

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. The Google Pixel eight Pro starts at nine

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred ninety nine bucks. That's one hundred dollars increase over

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the previous generation's Pro model. The standard Pixel eight not

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the Pro, but the regular Pixel eight is a little

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>bit smaller than the previous generation, the Pixel seven. It

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>lacks the telephoto lens that the Pro has, but it

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>also comes with the ultra wide camera, and it starts

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at six hundred ninety nine dollars. That's also an increase

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>over the previous generation. The phones also launched with Android fourteen,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and Google has promised seven years of ongoing OS upgrade support,

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>which is best in class as far as OS support

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>goes in the smartphone industry. The watch, meanwhile, the pixel

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Watch two, has a few cosmetic changes compared to the

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>original pixel Watch. It also has some updated sensors, and

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it has a new processor, the snap Dragon W five,

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and that means that the pixel Watch two should be

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>better at conserving battery life more effectively than the original

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>pixel Watch was. There were a few other announcements that

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Google made as well, including one that says Google is

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>going to unleash a new AI enhanced version of the

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Google Assistant on all of us at some point in

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the near future. And I for one welcome our robot overlords. Okay,

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be back

0:11:51.360 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with some more tech news. We're back. So last week,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Meta pushed out an update to Messenger for some users

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a small group that would allow them to create stickers

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>through AI generation, something that would presumably find its way

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>into various Meta platforms. And it didn't take long at

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>all for people to show that this tool as designed

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>has no real safeguards against stuff like intellectual property infringement,

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like infringing upon trademarks and copyright and that kind of stuff,

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>because users created stickers where they prompted the AI to make,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, images of popular characters like Mickey Mouse doing

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff that the Walt Disney Company absolutely would object to,

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like having Mickey Mouse holding a bloody knife. That's not

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>an image that the Walt Disney Company would be likely

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to approve of. Several folks pointed out that it seems

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like the people at Meta a very little, if any

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>thought as to the consequences of rolling out an AI

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>generative sticker tool. Now, on the other hand, you could

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>make the argument that what Meta is doing is essentially

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a limited beta rollout, and that the whole purpose of

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the beta is to find exactly what sorts of issues

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>exist with the features before they push it out to

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the world at large. You know, it's better to find

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>out that your tool is I don't know, violating intellectual

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>property laws with a small group rather than your overall

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>user base, right, I guess there's some logic to that. Now,

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I personally wonder if perhaps some of this could have

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>been handled before it actually reached the beta test stage. Personally,

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I see this as another indication that some companies are

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>really rushing a bit too quickly to incorporate generative AI

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>into products, and then the grand scheme of things are

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>actually making it harder on themselves. But again, that's that's

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>just my personfctive. I don't mean to suggest that that's

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the correct way to look at things, or even that

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm necessarily accurate in my estimation. It's just the way

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be unfolding to me. Assuming an early

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>report from Reuters has been accurate. Meta also held another

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>round of layoffs yesterday. This time the division that was

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>said to have been affected the most was Reality Labs.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Now that's the part of Meta that's working on future projects,

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff like the metaverse. So according to this report,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the specific people who were targeted by these layoffs worked

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on creating custom silicon products for Meta. So these are

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the products that power stuff like mixed reality hardware. So

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>think of it like processors and such, and the mixed

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>reality includes stuff like virtual reality, augmented reality, that kind

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of thing. So this does not mean that Meta has

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>lost confidence in the metaverse concept in general, or even

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>lost confidence with mixed reality in particular. Instead, it may

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>indicate that Meta wasn't seeing positive results as far as

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>developing their own chipsets. They weren't seeing the benefit of

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>doing that versus say, relying upon external providers and purchasing

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>chips from established companies that specialize in that sort of thing.

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think the common wisdom is that Meta just

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>decided that it makes more sense to purchase stuff essentially

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>off the shelf rather than develop it in house for

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this particular product. Okay, time to head over to the

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>platform X formerly known as Twitter. Elon Musk has made

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>another change, one that strikes me as a little odd,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was definitely Musk who demanded this change because

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>he said so himself. Anyway, that change is to remove

0:15:54.880 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>article headlines from posts on X. So let's say that

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you're on X. Wow, that sounds terrible, right, not ecstasy.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>You're on the platform X and you're posting an article

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to your post used to be called a tweet. It's

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to call anything anything these days. So you're posting

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>an article on your X platform. And now that means

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that people who follow you, instead of seeing a headline,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going to see a blurb from the article followed

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>by an image and they can click through to go

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and read the article there. But they're not going to

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>get the headline that actually indicates what the article is about.

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And that seems really weird, right, because I mean, I

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know a lot of articles bury the lead, so

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the blurb at the top might not actually indicate what

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the article itself is really about. You might not actually

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>have a good feeling as to what is this article

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>all about. And of course there are also those terrible

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>articles that will spend five hundred words just rambling about

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the obvious in an effort to drive more AD impressions,

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and you have to just keep scrolling and scrolling and

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>scrolling for like a full minute before you get to

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the actual point of the article. I hate those anyway.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Musk says that this is going to quote greatly improve

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the esthetics end quote. Now maybe I don't think so.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand what aesthetics are being improved by this,

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to guess, I'd say what Musk

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is actually hoping for is a way to discourage people

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>from posting articles on X in the first place, because

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>clicking on an article takes your eyeballs away from X,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and Musk really needs your eyes to stay on X itself.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So maybe what he's hoping is that people will just

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of stop posting links and instead they'll summarize an article,

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>or they'll give their own opinion on a topic, and

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll write longer posts, and this will prompt more engagement

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. That way, because a lot of reports

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>have said that excessing massive drops in AD revenue ever

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>since Musk took over. That being said, Linda Yakarina, the

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>actual CEO of X, has claimed that ninety percent of

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>x's top advertisers have returned to the platform to place

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ads there, but all the analysis I've seen has suggested

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that between like fifty to sixty five percent of revenue

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is down every month because of various issues that advertisers

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>have with the platform. So if I were a betting fellow,

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, but if I were, I would place a

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>wager that this is all really part of a move

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to try and reverse the bad fortune of x Reuter's

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>reports that BlackBerry is splitting into two companies. I was

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>actually surprised to learn that BlackBerry is still a thing.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been keeping up with that company for ages.

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But one of the two companies will be focusing on

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>BlackBerry's Internet of Things business that's primarily in car connected systems,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and the other one will center around cybersecurity. Now, once

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>upon a time, BlackBerry was synonymous with smartphones. This was

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>actually in the era before smartphones had touch screens and

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff, before the iPhone. Now, back when

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>smartphones had physical keys that you would use to type

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>on and only business executives typically owned one. Now, according

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>to the Globe and Mail, the driving force behind this

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>decision is to provide more shareholder value and to drum

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>up interest in the investor community because BlackBerry has been

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of stagnating recently. Whether this will actually work and

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>achieve those goals remains to be seen, but the spinoff

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to happen at the beginning of the next

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>fiscal year for BlackBerry, and for BlackBerry that means it

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>starts on March first. One story that I've somehow missed

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last month has to do with a company,

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.959
<v Speaker 1>and I use the term loosely called AOG technics all right, So,

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>several major airlines, which include American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines,

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and now Delta Airlines, have found out that some of

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the in ees on some of their aircraft contained parts

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>that had fraudulent certification attached to them. So when it

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to the aerospace industry, everything is supposed to be

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>carefully tested and documented and certified. You've got agencies like

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>here in the US we have the FAA that oversees

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this sort of stuff, and it's all for the protection

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the public as well as for the companies right

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that everything is as buttoned up as

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it can be to be as safe as possible. Now,

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of airlines have aircraft that use a jet

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>engine that was made by CFM International, and there's nothing

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the engines, like, the engines are fine. But

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes time to service or to repair an engine,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>it's not uncommon for these airlines to rely upon a

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>third party repair company, and those third party repair companies

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>will use various brokers in the industry to acquire spare parts,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which then they use to replace stuff that's either ending

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the nearing the end of its service life, or showing

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>signs of wear and tear, whatever it may be. So

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>AOG Technics was a part of this supply chain. It

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was one of these brokers and its job was to

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>source and certify parts which it would then sell to

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>these various repair companies. It was claiming that these were

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>certified parts, and as it turns out, that certification was fake.

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Now this means the reliability of those engine parts is

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>brought into question. It doesn't automatically mean the parts are

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible or that they'll break immediately, but you just don't

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>know because they were never certified. So the company itself,

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>AOG Technics, has a single shareholder, which happens to be

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the company's founder and director a fellow named jose Zamora Yerralla,

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>who has done a really good job of avoiding the

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>press as this story has unfolded. The consequences of this

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>issue is that the airlines affected have been pulling aircraft

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that have these engines out of service until the parts

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>involved can be replaced. So essentially they're having to have

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole repair job done again and the fraudulent part

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>swapped out for one that is truly certified. AOG Technics

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>has essentially kind of gone away in a puff of smoke.

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a heck of a story. It really illustrates how

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>complex supply chains can be, and how you can have

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>unexpected weaknesses in those supply chains, and that you know,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>those weaknesses can include people who are running dishonest businesses.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I will keep an eye on this story as it continues,

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>because I'm very curious to hear how this even happened.

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>AOG Technics, from why I understand, has been around since

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. It's had a kind of questionable history, you know,

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>with its with its own corporate address, bouncing around the UK,

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>never really staying in one place for any length of time,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and not apparently attached to like a actual physical office.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like there's been some fairly questionable proceedings

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>going on for a while, and I'm curious to learn more.

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sure we'll get more information as the story unfolds. Okay,

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take another quick break. When we come back,

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I got a few more stories and a couple of

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>recommendations for y'all, but first let's thank our sponsors. Okay,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So a few years ago, the video game

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>publisher Ubisoft, which is responsible for franchises like Assassin's Creed,

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>had a massive scandal, like a really big, nasty scandal

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with a Nubisoft that involved you know, corporate culture and

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sexual harassment and preferential treatment and all these sorts of

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>allegations that are absolutely terrible. The revelations shook the company significantly,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>with multiple executives being shown the door as a result

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the allegations. But you would you could actually say

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that the problems that were later revealed that Activision Blizzard

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately kind of pulled focus away from Ubisoft. Like it

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was something like a year later where

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Activision Blizzard story started to break and it just started

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to look like it wasn't just a terrible systemic problem

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>with an Ubi Solft, but perhaps a wider problem throughout

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>parts of the video game development industry. Anyway. Now, the

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>new part of the news is that French authorities have

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>arrested five former Ubisoft executives. This is according to Engadget,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and these include executives who left UBI Soft disgrace in

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty after being named in employee accusations as being

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>guilty of, to put it, lightly, unprofessional conduct. The French

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>authorities said they spent more than a full year investigating

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the various claims and that that led to these arrests.

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Like these were serious allegations. A lawyer for the plaintiffs

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>say that the issues indicate a systemic problem with quote

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>unquote sexual violence within the company. I should also add

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that leadership at Ubisoft, after this scandal had become huge

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>news committed to changing corporate culture. I am uncertain how

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>far that transformation has actually gone to date. I would

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>hope that it's been significant and that there really has

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>been massive change within the organization because the stories that

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>were coming out about Ubisoft around twenty twenty were absolutely disgusting.

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So I hope that that actually has been a big change,

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you just didn't see much information about it after the

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>initial scandal made headlines. The United States FCC has told

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dish Network that it has to fork over one

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand bucks as a fine for littering. Yeah,

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>serious stuff. Specifically, this deals with littering space with a

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>defunct satellite. The FCC says that the Dish network had

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a responsibility to move a satellite into a so called

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>graveyard orbit at the end of that satellite's functional life.

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But the FCC says the Dish Network failed to do that,

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and so the old satellite is now just taking up

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>space in an orbit that could pose as a future

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>hazard for some other spacecraft. It's now space junk, and

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's in an orbit that should otherwise be usable. So

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the first time the FCC has actually fined

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a company for contributing to space debris. The agency only

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>recently got the authority to be able to do that,

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>But now that means we got ourselves a precedent, So

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I suspect we will see this used more in the future. Okay,

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I got a couple of article recommendations

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>for y'all, but before that, I have one last little

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>bit of news, and again this is Apple news, but

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a little more light and fluffy, so I thought

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I would leave it to the very end. Apple has

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed the luxury solid gold Apple Watch product to wind

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>down as it were. The company has said it will

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>no longer offer servicing and repairs on the seventeen thousand

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars watch. By the way, this watch has not had

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 1>software support since twenty eighteen, so we're talking the hardware

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>support at this point. So Apple now has designated this

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>luxury watch as being obsolete, which kind of underlines and

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>bolds a massive issue with smart watches compared to a

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional luxury watch. So a traditional luxury watch is expected

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to you know, kind of hold on to its value

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and to operate indefinitely, assuming you treat it well and

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, you occasionally have its service to

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>tune it up in everything. But smart watches lose value

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>when the company that made it no longer offers software

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>or hardware support, or if the company that made it

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>goes out of business because that support goes away, Like

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that is powering and enabling the watch isn't

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily in the watch itself, right, It's provided by a

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>company that pushes that stuff out. So when the company

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>stops doing that and stops offering support and repairs and such,

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it means that you no longer have a really useful product.

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's almost like all those folks who are saying, hey,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>paying seventeen grand for a smart watch is a foolish

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>thing to do had at a point anyway. I guess

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that means now I've just got a really expensive paperweight.

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kidding. I can't afford anything more than a

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>TIMEX digital watch. They did, They actually still make Timex

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>digital watches. I don't even wear a watch. I haven't

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>worn a watch since the pebbles ceased to exist. I'm rambling.

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>We're done here. This is what COVID does to my brain.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I apologize, but I do have a couple of articles

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to recommend. First up is an article in

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Wired that's titled Men Overran, a job fare for women

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in Tech. This article is written by Amanda Hoover, and

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it tells the story of how the Grace Hopper Celebration

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>found itself absolutely overflowing with quote unquote self identifying males

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>at an event meant to help women and non binary

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>tech workers advance their careers or establish their careers. Now,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna leave my own commentary right there, except to

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>add in a the little bit that the event took

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>place in Orlando, Florida, and I expect that we're going

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to see various conventions and conferences, perhaps seek venues in

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>states other than Florida due to various issues within that state.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But we'll leave it there anyway, I recommend that article again.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That one is titled Men Overran a job fare for

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>women in Tech, and you can find it in Wired.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>The second article I want to recommend this week is

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>from NPR's Jennifer Ludden, so you can find this on

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>NPR dot org. The article is titled Los Angeles is

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>using AI to predict who might become homeless and help

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>before they do. Now, I wanted to include this article

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because most of the time, y'all, I cover stories that

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>put AI in a pretty critical or even negative light.

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't necessarily mean AI itself is bad. Right.

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>AI is not necessarily bad on its own, it's how

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we use it. This article outlines how Los Angeles' Department

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of Health Services is leveraging artificial intelligence to get much

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>needed aid to people before they find themselves homeless. So

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a worthy read because it does remind

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>us that artificial intelligence doesn't have to be the boogeyman.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be something that is putting people

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>out of work. It doesn't have to be something that is,

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, compromising your privacy or security. It can be

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>something that ends up being life changing in a good

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>way if we are using it properly and in applications

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that have a positive outcome. So I recommend that article

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, especially if you need like a little bit

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of inspiration in your day to think of, hey, this

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is a really cool way to try and help people.

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's also very realistic, Like if you read that article,

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you will see that they are very clear and forthright

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>about how their approach is moving the needle. But it's

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>not like it's a magic pill that solves all problems.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So I recommend checking it out. Okay, that's it. I

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta stop talking because I keep having to pause this

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>show so that I can cough my head off, and

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be able to go cough my

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>head off without having to start up the show again. Also,

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you could hear it. My dog

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>barked earlier when I was talking. You can tell how

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>tired I am by the fact that I didn't go

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>back and re record and have it without my dog

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>barking in the background. But when I'm coughing this much,

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I just can't afford to do that. All right, I

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>hope all of you out there are doing really well,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, app podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.