WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: The Macintosh Story Part 2

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? It is time for a classic episode. Now.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Last week we had the Macintosh Story Part one, so

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to continue that with the McIntosh Story

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Part two. If you have not heard part one, well

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just check the publication from last Friday. You should be

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>able to pull that and listen to it. But originally

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this episode published way back on June seventh, twenty seventeen.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Hope you enjoy.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>We covered how the mac was born out of strife.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It was not an easy berth. As it turns out,

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of argument going on arguing, i

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>should say, going on behind the scenes. It started off

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as a low priced comput that was the intent that

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to make personal computers more accessible to the

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>average person. And then Steve Jobs effectively took over the

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>project and changed it significantly. Rather than having a cheap machine,

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it became an expensive alternative to the IBM personal computer

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that had just debuted in the early nineteen eighties. So

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the IBM Personal computer came out and actually posed a

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>serious threat to Apple. The Macintosh was supposed to be

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>an answer to that. The Apple two and Apple three

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>lines were distinct, and more about them in a little bit,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But the Macintosh was really supposed to redefine computing and

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to put Apple back on track to being ahead of

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the game, as it were. But what actually happened next, Well,

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we ended right around nineteen eighty five. Last time, nineteen

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>eighty four, nineteen eighty five. The Macintosh computer debuted in

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty four, and Apple was trying to rebound from

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of bit blows. Now. That first one came

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty one. That's when IBM got involved in

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the personal computer market with its own PC. Before long,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>IBM PC sales were outpacing Apple to sales. And the

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>second blow came in nineteen eighty three. That's when Apple

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>launched Lisa. Lisa was a high end computer. It was

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a project that was being pushed primarily by Steve Jobs,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the co founders of Apple. Steve Jobs and

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Wozniak were the two Steves who founded the company.

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But Lisa was not a huge success. It had a

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>graphic user interface or gouey gui uh, and it had

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a mouse, which was very innovative for the time. The

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>only other company that really played with graphic user interfaces

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>and a computer mouse was Xerox, and they had only

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>done it internally. They didn't make this a product that

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>other companies and consumers could go out and purchase. Apple

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>decided to change that. However, r Lisa had a really

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>hefty price tag. It was ten thousand dollars when it

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>went on sale, and it was meant for business applications,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but at that price, very few businesses were willing to

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>take the plunge. Remember those are nineteen eighty three dollars.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>That's significant, even more so than ten thousand dollars is today.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Ten thousand dollars is already a huge amount of money.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>If you adjust for inflation, you're talking around almost twenty

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot.

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So the GUI also ate up a lot of the

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>computer's processing power. So not only did it cost a lot,

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but the operating system alone took up so much of

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the computer's processing power that you couldn't run very many

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>applications on top of it. And that's not a great

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>selling point. Like this is expensive, but at least you

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>can't run much software on it. That doesn't make a

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>really good tagline if you're trying to sell a computer,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>just an fyi in case you ever want to to

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>make and sell computers in the future. Then you also

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>had very few developers who were willing to put forth

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the effort to create programs for a computer that was

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so elite, so expensive that it had a very small market.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>If you are in the business of making software and

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a limited amount of time and money on

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>your hands, you want to dedicate that time and money

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>toward projects that are likely to give you the biggest profit.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you're talking about the types of organizations that

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>are willing to lay down ten grand per computer, that's

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a very small market. So software developers were not eager.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>To jump on the bandwagon there.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So Lisa was effectively a flop. It was kind of

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>doomed from the start. Now, as I mentioned right at

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this episode, Steve Jobs effectively took over

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh project.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, this was after.

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>The then CEO of Apple demanded that Steve Jobs stop

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>interfering with Lisa. Macintosh was a totally different project than

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs once he was pulled off the Lisa project

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and said, you can't bother them anymore, looked around, saw

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh project, which was completely independent, and said, I'm

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>going to make that my pet project. And so he

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>began to involve himself with, or, in the words of

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>some of his contemporaries at the time, interfere with the

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh project. And as a result, McIntosh transformed from a

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>humble machine to an expensive consumer level device with a

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>guy and a mouse. It didn't have a graphic user

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>interface before Steve Jobs got involved. It was initially priced

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at twenty four hundred and ninety five dollars, which is

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>expensive just for a basic computer today before you adjust

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for inflation. If you do adjust for inflation, that's more

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like five thousand, seven hundred bucks. That's a huge amount

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of money.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 2>To ask to pay for a PC.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you wanted a Macintosh in nineteen eighty four

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>when they first launched, you'd be plopping down the equivalent

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of fifty seven hundred dollars in today's money.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>And keep in mind that the.

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Original plan was that this computer was supposed to cost

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars, which would be closer to twelve hundred

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>bucks today, which is still expensive. Obviously, if you wanted

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to pay for a brand new computer, twelve hundred dollars

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is closer to the top end of your basic machines.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, you can trick out a machine to

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>be much more expensive than that if you want top

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of the line processors, graphics cards, cooling systems, all that

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. But if you're just buying off the shelf,

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred dollars is already pretty expensive. It's not the

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>top end, but it's healthy.

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Right Anyway.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>That was the initial goal was a five hundred dollars

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>price point in nineteen eighty four dollars, which would be

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>about twelve hundred dollars today, and it.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Blew that out of the water.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I should point out, however, that this higher price tag

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is not entirely the fault of Steve Jobs. I don't

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>want to give you that impression. It's true that Jobs

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>added a lot of features that necessitated a price hike.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>No matter what, it was going to cost more than

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars because of the changes Steve Jobs made.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But as for that price tag of twenty four hundred

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety five dollars that credit really needs to go to

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the then Apple CEO John Scully. Scully reportedly decided that

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the initial price tag for the mac which was originally

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be fifteen hundred dollars back in nineteen eighty four,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.239
<v Speaker 1>was too low. He actually said, fifteen hundred bucks, that's

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not high enough for us to really see a

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>huge profit off that. So he knocked it up to

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty four ninety five, and that way the Macintosh would

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>see a profit margin of fifty five percent, meaning you'd

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>make fifty five percent over what you paid to create

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the computer. He didn't want to have a slim profit margin. However,

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you increased the price of a machine dramatically,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to decrease the number of sales you make.

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very delicate balance figuring out how much

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to price a product so that you get the maximum

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of profit from your investment. And Scully decided to

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>go pretty hard for that investment with that fifty five

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>percent profit margin. And this also began Apple's long history

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of being a company associated with the idea that its

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>hardware is overpriced. You've probably heard that if you've ever

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>taken any look into Apple products, that you're paying a

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>premium just for the Apple brand name because the products

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are priced more than what they would be priced by

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a competitor for an equivalent machine. That's not always the case,

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but it happened frequently enough in Apple's

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>past that it became associated with the company's identity. People

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>thought of Apple as being an elite company, that you

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>were paying that extra price, and that you could be

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>saving money if you just went with a different computer manufacturer,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>which in some eras was absolutely true, just not in

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>all eras. Back in those earliest days of Macintosh, it

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly was the case that is undeniable now. Initial reviews

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Macintosh actually heaped a lot of praise on

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the computer. Consumer Reports wrote an absolutely glowing review of

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:27.599
<v Speaker 1>the original Macintosh, saying that the interface really transformed computing.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The reviews stated that the interface, including the windows that

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it would use the mouse that you would use to

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>navigate the guy, were more than just gimmicks, which you know,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you could have easily seen them as just being gimmicks.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else was used to using text based interfaces and keyboards,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so this wasn't a guaranteed success right all of the gate.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>But Consumer Reports said, no, they got it right. This

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 1>actually makes sense. They said that it actually transformed computing

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>from a system of Labrinthian rules to something that the

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>average per could easily grasp. A Macintosh wasn't a cryptic

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>machine that required the user to learn dozens of command

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>line terms, like you know, various file trees and ways

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to navigate between different directories. You didn't have to do

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that because it was all graphically presented for you and

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you just click on whatever it was you needed. It

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was a device that a novice could learn to navigate

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>within like half an hour of using it.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>There were some drawbacks, however.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That same Consumer Reports review pointed out that the operating

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>system on the Macintosh took up an enormous amount of

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the computer's processing power. The computer had enough memory to

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>store about eight and a half pages of text after

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you factored in the operating system. That's text, not images

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>or video or audio. All of that stuff would come later.

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Just eight and a half pages of text. That's all

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the memory it could have after you ended up booting

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>up the operating system.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>This was one of the reasons that I was.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>A real snob about Guy interfaces or GUY based computers.

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>I hated the day that my dad decided to install

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Windows on our IBM compatible machine, which was similar in

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>many ways to the Mac operating system. And the reason

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>I was upset about it was because the Windows operating

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>system required so much of our computer's ability to process

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>information that it limited the kind of software we could

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>run on it. If your software required more than what

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the computer could supply, you ran into problems, and I

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>attributed a lot of that to the operating system. I

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>much preferred DOSS, which was so slimmed down by comparison

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that you could run lots of different software on it. Well,

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the same thing was true with the early Mac operating system.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It just hogged up a lot of the initial Macintosh's abilities.

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And to be fair, the original Macintosh only had one

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty eight kilobytes of memory, so it wasn't

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly packing an enormous amount of memory into that package.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a quick break talking about the

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh in order to thank our sponsors.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 2>More and more software.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Developers began to create programs that could only run in

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>GUI environments, which kind of forced the issue to switch

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 1>from the DOSS and other operating systems that involved command

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>lines to shift over to graphic user interfaces because a

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of software ended up only being compatible with graphic

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>user interface systems, and that helped force the issue. I

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>still am bitter about that, even though today I probably

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 2>If you put me in.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>From an Apple two E or an early IBM PC

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that was just running DOSS, I wouldn't remember any of

0:12:55.920 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the commands besides DR, which is directory DOS, I would

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>be lost. But I still am kind of bitter about

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>all this. Now, I also be fair. I'm an elitist

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>computer nerd type. I'm just an elitist computer nerd type

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>who lacks the information to be able to effectively be

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>an elitist, which is the saddest kind of nerd. Apple

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously had really high hopes for that original Macintosh, but

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they had also had really high hopes for Lisa, and

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that didn't pan out back in nineteen eighty one, which

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was back when the Macintosh was still in development. It

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't debut till nineteen eighty four. Keep in mind, in

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty one, Apple had a plan, and their plan

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>was that they would sell two point two million Macintosh

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>computers by nineteen eighty five by the end of nineteen

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty five, but that plan was based upon a launch

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>date that would happen sometime in nineteen eighty two, because remember,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>back then, they were still looking at creating a cheap

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>alternative to the other computers like the Apple two and

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>other competing computers on the market, so they had high

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>hopes that they would be able to sell two point

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>two million units by nineteen eighty five. The computer wasn't

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>even available for purchase until nineteen eighty four, so that

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>set them back, and even if they had launched in

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty two, they would have had to sell around

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand computers every month to hit that two point

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>two million mark within the end of nineteen eighty five.

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>They did have an enormous start. The Macintosh marketing department

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was great for the launch of the computer, and they

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sold quite a bit when they first went on the

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>market because people were really excited about it. But after

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that initial excitement, they weren't able to capitalize on creating

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a momentum and it died off pretty quickly. The marketing

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of failed after that initial launch. The Apple blew

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>too much money early on and didn't have enough to

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>support it throughout its an launch, So after a successful

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of first months, sales dropped precipitously down to like

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>five thousand units a month, way below the number they

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>would need. So by the end of nineteen eighty five

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they had not sold two point two million units as

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>they had originally planned. It was more like two hundred

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand units, a huge shortfall. The Macintosh was

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not quite a flop like Lisa, but it wasn't performing

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>as well in the market as Apple had hoped. Now

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it was impressive, but it was suffering from a similar

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>issue as Lisa. It didn't have a lot of applications

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>available for it, not as many as the competing ibmpcs had.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple's then CEO admitted as much later on John Scully.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>He said, Yeah, we didn't do enough to develop software

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to run this computer. So while the computer was nice

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to look at, the graphic user interface was interesting, there

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't a whole lot to do with it. You

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't have things like spreadsheet programs. There was a severe

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>lack of utility with their computer. Really, they only had

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>two applications They had mac Wright which was a word

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>processing program, and they had mac Paint, which was a

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>simple graphics program, but that was about it.

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>They didn't have the other stuff you would associate with

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 2>other computers.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So while it was user friendly, it didn't have a

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of usability to it, like there just wasn't enough

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to do, so that also hurt Macintosh sales. Now you

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>might also remember from our last episode, Like I said,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Apple at this time was John Scully,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>whom Steve Jobs had lured away from Pepsi. The story

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is that Scully was kind of in line to become

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of the board over at Pepsi, but it

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was on a much longer timeline than Scully wanted, and

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that Steve Jobs was able to convince Scully to come

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>over by saying to him, do you want to spend

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of your life selling sugar water or do

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you want a chance to change the world once again?

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Steve Jobs master salesman.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He could really have a turn of phrase and get

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>you to believe in him even when the odds were

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>stacked against him. Scully himself would say that that phrase

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>really convinced him to come over to Apple, and he

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>said so in a documentary, so you can actually check

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this out. It's a documentary titled Bloomberg Game Changers Steve Jobs,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's part of a series. It was a really

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>effective sales pitch, as it turns out, so Scully and

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Jobs initially worked really well together leading up to the

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh launch. Scully's predecessor was Mike Markula, which in the

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>last episode you might remember was the guy who stepped

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in to remove Steve Jobs from the Lisa project. Markula

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was an early investor in Apple and had transitioned from

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO to board members, so he retired as CEO. He resigned,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>transitioning over to the board. He had told his wife

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that he wasn't going to stay on with Apple for

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>very long, although he stayed on much longer than he

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>initially meant to. He just stayed on in the capacity

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of member of the board as opposed to the CEO,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and then John Scully took over the job as CEO. Now,

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>John Scully would serve as the CEO from about nineteen

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>eighty five to about nineteen ninety three ish. Ninety three

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety four is really when we're looking at that transition. Effectively,

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>ninety three Scully initially got along well with Jobs, but

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>when the Macintosh sales began to drop off, new tensions

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>developed between the CEO and Apple's co founder, and that's

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>not great when you have kind of clashing personalities at

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the top level of your company.

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Now, John Scully also has the dubious.

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Distinction of being on the Worst American CEO's List curated

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>by Conde Nas. He's actually number fourteen on that list

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>back when they published it a few years ago. Now

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>more on why John Scully made that list as this

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>episode progresses. Apple at the time had not completely switched

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>over to the Macintosh line as its primary product, so

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you might think, oh, it went Apple two to Apple

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>three to Macintosh and they discontinued the other computers, but

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. They were actually producing different lines of

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>computers simultaneously, and Apple's structure was designed around this, where

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>each product had its own division, so it wasn't like

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you had one big division of all these different products

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>grouped together. You had an Apple two division, an Apple

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>three division, and a Macintosh division. You also had a

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Lisa division until they discontinued that product. So the Apple

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>two and Apple three computers continued to be manufactured and

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>sold by Apple side by side with Macintosh computers. The

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple three ended up being a failure. It was a flop,

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>very much like Lisa. It just didn't do so well.

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>It was meant to be, again, a business level machine,

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>not a personal computer, and it was priced as such,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and there just wasn't enough there for businesses to jump

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on board with it. There were cheaper IBM computers coming out,

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so that was more attractive from an expense side of things.

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And like Lisa, there weren't a lot of developers creating

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>software for the Apple three, so it didn't make a

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of sense to invest in the Apple three

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>platform if the IBM computer platform cost less and had

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>more development. So companies weren't adopting the Apple three. But

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the Apple two continued to hold its own, so it

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was still a big product even as the Macintosh came online.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 2>The Apple two.

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>C computer debuted in nineteen eighty four. That was the

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>same year that the Macintosh came out, so Apple two

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>C stood for well, a more advanced Apple two computer. Actually,

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the letter system for Apple two computers is really confusing,

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because the Apple two E came out in nineteen eighty three,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the Apple to C came out in nineteen

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>eighty four, so they weren't going in alphabetical order, and

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that is a bit more than a bit confusing. But

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the Apple two C was Apple's first compact model, so

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the C kind of stood for compact. The computer's hardware

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>consisted of a case that had an incorporated keyboard and

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a five and a quarter inch disk drive, and the

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>computer itself, which was separate from a monitor. It was

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>just the computer. You could slide that into a base

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a stand essentially, and on top of the stand you

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>could put your monitor, so the computer would kind of

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>slot in underneath where the monitor was. The monitor would

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>not sit directly on top of the computer case itself.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Apple would continue to make computers in the two C

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>line until nineteen ninety, so the Apple two continued to

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>go on sale to hit store shelves while the Macintosh

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>continued to evolve, so these separate products remained side by

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>side for quite some time. Apple launched an enhanced version

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Apple Too E in nineteen eighty five, so

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the two E continued as well.

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 2>It just got a bit of a beefier.

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Version than the one that had launched a couple of

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>years earlier. It did not have a graphic user interface

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Macintosh, and Apple would continue to make these

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple Too computers available for quite some time. In fact,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that Advanced two E would continue to be on sale

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>until nineteen ninety three, so extending pretty far. Like you

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>would think that by ninety three you would have just

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>graphic user interface based computers, but you still had the

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple two E Enhanced. And maybe one day I'll do

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>an episode dedicated just to those Apple line computers to

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about the process of their evolution compared to Macintosh.

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>But that's not really what this episode's about. I just

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>went into touch base and explained that was going on

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as the development for the mac Now,

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>in January nineteen eighty five, Apple tried to make the

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>best of a bad situation by launching the Macintosh Excel.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Only here's the thing. This was not the next Macintosh computer.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It was actually a rebranding of a different computer, namely

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the Lisa Too. So remember the Lisa was a flop.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Then Apple decided to make a stripped down version of

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the Lisa computer and sell it for a lower price

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>than that ten thousand dollars beast of a computer called Lisa.

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Lisa too did not do well in sales either, so

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>then they rebranded it. They called it Macintosh. Xcel was

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a Macintosh doing all right initially, but they weren't able

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to move the Lisa two computers, so they rebranded it.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>They called it the Excel, but it still didn't do

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>so well, and by April nineteen eighty five they discontinued it.

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>They stopped making the Macintosh Excel.

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>They still had a ton of inventory, but they weren't

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>making more of them.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>They were able to offload some of the Macintosh Excel

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>devices with some big sales deals, so for example, they

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>sold five thousand of the Excel macintoshes to a company

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>called Sun Remarketing back in nineteen eighty seven. But ultimately

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those units never left Apple warehouses.

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>They just sat there.

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>And so in nineteen eighty nine, they decided to take

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a note from the video game crash of nineteen eighty three.

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>You might remember, Atari decided to get rid of a

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of excess inventory by dumping them in landfills out

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in the desert. Apple ended up doing the same thing,

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>only they dumped theirs in a landfill in Utah instead

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of in a different state. So they all of those

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh XL computers ended up in a landfill in Utah.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So somewhere in a Utah landfill, if you dig down,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you would be able to find old Macintosh XL Lisa

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to computers. But don't do that. We'd be a colossally

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>bad idea and you could very easily injure yourself if

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you dug in the wrong landfill. Phil, Plus you'd probably

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>be trespassing. So I'm officially telling you do not go

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>searching for the McIntosh XL because even if you.

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Found one, it wouldn't work. At this point.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>It's been exposed to elements since nineteen eighty nine, so

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't want one.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Don't do it.

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>If I hear about you doing it will be very

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>put out. I've got a lot more to say about

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the history of the Macintosh from nineteen eighty four to

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven, but before I get into the next segment,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break to thank our sponsor. All Right, So,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a few months after the initial Macintosh hit store shelves,

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple released an update called the Mac five twelve, also

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>known as the Fat Mac. This Macintosh had five hundred

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and twelve kilobytes of memory, that's why it was called that,

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so significantly more memory than the initial Macintosh, which remember,

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>only had one hundred and twenty eight kilobytes. That additional

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>memory made it easier to develop programs for the Macintosh

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because the operating system no longer hogged nearly all of

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the system's memory. But that extra memory came at a cost.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>The fat max price tag was three thousand, three hundred

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars in nineteen eighty five. That's equivalent to nearly eight

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars today. Incredibly expensive. Still, the fat mac had

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a big advantage. It could actually do stuff pretty big

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>when you compare it to the original Mac and some

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>software and one additional piece of hardware really helped increase

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the value of the Macintosh line. So on the software

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.959
<v Speaker 1>side you had stuff like Aldice page Maker. It eventually

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>became Adobe page Maker, and it helped usher in a

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>new era of computing. This was the era of desktop publishing.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That was not a thing really before the Macintosh and

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Aldie PageMaker made it a thing. So page Maker, if

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you've never used it, it's sort of a layout program.

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It allows you to lay out an attractive esthetic design

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to stuff like newsletters, flyers.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 2>That kind of thing. A program. If you wanted to

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 2>make a program.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>For a play or some other event, you could use

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:01.479
<v Speaker 1>page Maker to size everything and position properly so that

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you had an attractive layout. And that meant that you

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:08.239
<v Speaker 1>could suddenly do this at home, where if you had

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the right equipment, or with a small business, you could

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>do it there. You didn't have to go to a

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>larger publishing house and contract with them to make your stuff.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This was revolutionary. It was one of the reasons why computers,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>personal computers and small computers that businesses used were so popular.

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It meant that they gave these entities, whether they were

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>individuals or small businesses, greater opportunities.

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So that was very popular.

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But there was also some other software that was helping out.

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty five, Microsoft began to publish software for

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh. So Microsoft and Apple haven't always had a

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>contentious relationship. In fact, Microsoft has often in Apple's past

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>helped the other company out with loans or with investments.

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't always been a I hate you, no, I

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>hate you more kind of relationship. One of the earliest

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>programs Microsoft made available for the Macintosh was Word one

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>point oh, which was the first real competitor to Apple's

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>own Macwright software and eventually overtook Macwright. People began to

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>prefer Word one point oh and its later versions to

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the Macwright word processing program. Another program that came over

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to mac was the Excel one point oh software, the

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet program. In fact, it came to the Macintosh first.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>It was a Macintosh exclusive for a while in the

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>early days. That was just the case because it wouldn't

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>even come to Windows until late nineteen eighty seven. So

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple had a head start on Windows when it came

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to Excel. But there's a whole story that I've talked

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>about in a previous episode about why that is, so

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go into it here. On the

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>hardware side was a device called the Laser Writer. This

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was a printer, a monstrously heavy printer. It weighed seventy

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>seven pounds that's about thirty five kilograms, and it had

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a three hundred dots per inch resolution, pretty standard for

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>printers of the day, and it cost a hefty amount

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand dollars. And let's adjust for inflation because I

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like to do that. That's about sixteen grand in today's dollars,

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen thousand dollars for a printer. But you could network

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple Macintosh computers to this one printer, so that increased

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>its value. You didn't have to buy a printer for

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>every computer. If you had several computer workstations at your office,

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you could network them together to this printer and they

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>could all print from the same printer. That was a

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty big deal, very novel concept when it came to

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this level of computer enterprise. Normally, you'd be paying a

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more money for a networked system that was created

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty much by contract for your company. So it meant

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that Apple could actually compete in that space, and they

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>could also print in different fonts. The earliest laser writer

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>only a few different fonts, but that was still a

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>huge advantage over older printers, remember like daisy wheel printers.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Actually you may not remember daisy will printers. I do

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>because I grew up with them. Those had a physical

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>font on the device itself, so you couldn't really change it,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but the laser writer could reproduce a few different fonts,

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>giving you some options. And later versions of the laser

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>writer and later versions of the operating system and the

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>accompanying software would allow even more fonts, so that made

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>desktop publishing even more attractive. So this combination of software

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and hardware suddenly made the Macintosh a more attractive device

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to go into publishing. And this really

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>begins the relationship Apple has with creators, people who are

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>into graphics, eventually into film and audio. Apple kind of

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>established that relationship with people at this stage, this early stage,

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with the fat Mac.

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 2>It meant that you were catering.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>To people who didn't really feel comfortable with the IBM

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>compatible approach to computing. They found it more intuitive to

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>go to the Mac system and that would remain true

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for decades. In fact, for a long long time, Apple

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>dominated when it came to production, particularly video and audio production.

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Here at how Stuff Works, our video.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Department works almost exclusively on Macintosh computers. So even though

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I would argue PCs have caught up in a large

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>part and software for the PCs have cut up in

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>large part to Apple's dominant place in that market, there's

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>still people who prefer the Apple approach, and to be honest,

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>depending upon what format you're working in, Apple still.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Does it better than PCs do.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>All of that began way back in nineteen eighty five,

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Fat Mac and the launch of the Laser Writer,

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and the launch of these software programs I've been talking about.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 2>On the corporate side.

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen eighty five was when Apple said goodbye to the

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>co founders, but under very different circumstances. Steve Wozniak, who

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>had mostly been away from Apple ever since he had

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>suffered injuries in an airplane crash and had been working

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hard to recover from them. He left on his own

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>accord in February nineteen eighty five, and he went back

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to college. Eventually he went into teaching and then began

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to do other stuff as well. Steve Jobs, however, didn't

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>really have a choice in the matter, not really when

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you get down to it. After numerous teams reported being

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>incredibly frustrated with Steve Jobs' managerial style, the executives of

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the company, primarily CEO John Scully, decided to effectively strip

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs of all of his power. They removed him

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from all the projects. They put him in an office

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in a building that was mostly deserted. Steve Jobs himself

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>referred to it as Siberia and of course Steve Jobs

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is not one known for making melodramatic statements like that,

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>so you know it had to be awful. But the

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>point being the Steve Jobs had really very little to

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>do with the company that he had helped create. He

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>had been pulled away from it and removed more or

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>less from power. Not everyone was upset about that, because

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>so many people had had issues with his management style,

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but it still was a difficult story, right to say,

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we've decided this founder of our company shouldn't be involved

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in any of the company's projects, but was still effectively

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>an employee of the company. He was still drawing a

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>salary at that point. But Jobs decided he didn't want

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to just sit at a desk in an empty building

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and pull a salary from a company. He wanted to

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>see if he could perhaps regain control of Apple, and

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so he went to some of the executives of Apple

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to see if any of them would support him and

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>what would effectively be a coup to go to the

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>board of directors demand that John Scully be removed as

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO and perhaps Steve Jobs would take his place. But

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the executives he went to felt very strongly

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that this was the bad decision. That person was Jean

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Louis Gaess. Now, Jean Louis Gassy was someone who had

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>risen up in the Apple ranks. He was a manager

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in their various product division lines, and he did not

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>like Jobs. Jobs and guess did not get along. So

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Guessay ended up going over to John Scully and tattletaled

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on Steve Jobs. He essentially told John Scully, who was

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>off on a business trip, Hey, you should know this.

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Steve is going around stirring up trouble and he wants

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to try and go to the Board of directors and

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>go over your head and replace you. John Scully rushed

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>back to Apple. He called a meeting of the Board

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of directors. He was furious with Steve Jobs for what

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>he saw as an act of disloyalty and dishonesty, and

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>so they had it out in front of the Board

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of Directors. It was, by all accounts, an ugly confrontation,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately John Scully was asking the Board of directors

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>for essentially a vote of confidence and to say, you

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>know who would they go. Would they side with Jobs

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>or would they side with Scully? And then the board

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sided unanimously with John Scully. Every member of the board,

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>including the people I've already mentioned in this episode, were

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on John Scully's side, and they effectively pushed Steve Jobs

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:27.959
<v Speaker 1>out of his company. Obviously, the story with Steve Jobs

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and Apple doesn't end here in nineteen eighty five. Will

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>actually revisit Steve Jobs later on in this episode, but

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we've also covered this story in other episodes of Tech Stuff.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to hear a really deep discussion

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>about what Steve Jobs did in his years away from Apple,

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of different places you can check out,

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>or a couple different episodes you can check out. There's

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a two parter called How Bill Gates and Steve Jobs Work.

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>They published in two thousand and eight, so they were

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>very early episodes of Tech Stuff Tech Stuff in two

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, so Chris Pollette and I talked about

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, who had a lot of

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not just similarities, but a lot of they worked a

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lot together in those early days of Apple and Microsoft.

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 2>So you can check out that two parter.

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's also a very sad episode titled One More

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Thing and that published in twenty eleven. Shortly after Steve

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Jobs passed away, and in those episodes, I really talk

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>about what Steve Jobs.

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Did in his years away from Apple.

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to cover it here, but we

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>will revisit Steve Jobs because he does factor back into

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple's history a bit later on. If you want to

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>know more, check out those episodes I just mentioned. Now,

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Jobs would end up publishing letters of resignation. He sent

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>letters of resignation to the press after he had effectively

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>been forced out of his own company, so it's more

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like you can't fire me, I quit sort of thing.

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Presumably he did this in order to get the media

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on his side, but it did not have the effect

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that he was hoping for. In fact, Apple stocks rallied

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as a result of Steve Jobs being pushed aside and

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>sending out these resignation letters. Effectively, the market was saying, whew,

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we sure are glad you got rid of that guy.

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Not a great message to receive, not this big blow

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to the ego, I'm sure, but it gave Scully more

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>confidence in his decisions, which would emerge in physical form

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>with the evolution of the Macintosh line. Now, one of

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the CEO's first acts once he had been confirmed as

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>being the head of Apple, was to lead a massive

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 1>reorganization at the company, and a lot of people say

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it was long overdue. So again, up to that point,

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple's org charts were based on products. If you worked

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Apple two line, you were in one division.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>If you worked on the Apple three line, you were

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in another division. If you worked on the Macintosh you

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>were in yet another division, and so on and so forth.

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Each department was separate from all the others.

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And John Scully said, this doesn't make any sense.

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>What we should do is have a big product development

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>department and everyone who works on various products will be

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>inside this structured department with a manager overseeing that product

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or product development overall.

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 2>So everyone would have a single boss.

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>They would report to, who in turn would report to

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>John Scully as CEO. Then you would also have a

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>department just for sales. You would have a department just

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>for marketing, and these departments would work together, but they

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be dependent upon individual products. It would largely be

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>these big divisions within Apple. So essentially he was saying,

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>let's go to your traditional corporate structure. It wasn't like

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he was inventing a new type of leadership. This is

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>something that's common across corporations all over the world.

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 2>So he was just saying, let's.

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Go to that because it makes more sense. It streamlines things,

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>people know who they report to. There's not this compartmentalized

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 1>structure between different products. People can actually communicate with each other.

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>We can make sure that people working on one product

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are not stepping on the toes of people who were

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>working on another product. Everyone can talk to each other,

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and then ended up being viewed as a positive move

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Again, people thought this guy knows what

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he's doing, and they felt confident in Apple's performance because

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of this restructuring, Apple stocks would end up performing really

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>well over the next few years. Meanwhile, Jean Luis Gesay

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that manager I was talking about who tattletaled on, Steve Jobs,

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>became the manager for the product's division.

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Effectively, he took.

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Over the position that Steve Jobs was inhabiting before he

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>was stripped of all of his responsibilities. So Guess became

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the manager for product division and decided to make a

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>major change to the Macintosh line.

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 2>So remember that last.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Mac was the Fat Mac or the Mac five twelve.

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>The next computer in that line was the Mac Plus. Now,

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced this in nineteen eighty six, and it looked

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 1>identical to the Fat Mac. If you were to put

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>two side by side, you probably wouldn't be able to

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>immediately tell them apart unless you could actually read the

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 1>designation on the case. But inside it was actually quite

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>different from the fat Fat Mac. So, for one thing,

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the Fat Mac was not meant to be expandable. Steve

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Jobs hated the idea of users being able to alter

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>the computers that Apple designed. He wanted to have closed systems,

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you bought a computer, that's the computer you

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>got to use.

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:54.799
<v Speaker 2>You didn't get to expand it in.

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Any way unless you were to go to a third party,

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and that would violate your warranty. The Macplus was different,

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was actually expandable. You could upgrade your machine

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to. It was the first Macintosh to

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>feature a small computer system interface, also known as a

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>scuzzy drive SCSI. But people call it scuzzy, not that

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it was scuzzy, it's just how we pronounce it. It's

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>actually a set of parallel interface standards that allow you

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to connect other devices to a computer. So a scanner

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 1>an external hard drive printer's that sort of thing.

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 2>It's just meant to be kind of a.

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Universal plug for certain types of computer peripherals. I talked

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about it in a recent episode about

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>USB's when I was comparing USBs to serial and parallel ports. Anyway,

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the scuzzy would remain a feature in every Mac that

0:43:55.320 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>would follow from that point until nineteen ninety eight. You

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>could also upgrade the memory of the Macplus. The Macplus

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>would come with a whole megabyte of memory. Remember, the

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 1>previous fat Mac had five or twelve kilobytes. Megabyte was

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>another big jump up, but you could expand that to

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>up to four megabytes using a thirty pen memory module

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that was easily pluggable into the Macintosh system. You didn't

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have to do any crazy soldering or anything like that.

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It had an expansion slot you could plug these chips into.

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Previous Apple devices didn't allow you to upgrade your memory,

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>so what you bought was what you got, unless you

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>again went to a third party and had it professionally altered.

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So this was a huge departure from Steve Jobs's philosophy.

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Guessay's approach was almost one hundred eighty degrees different from jobs,

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and would continue to be different from jobs over the

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>next few years. The Macplus also included a keyboard with

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>some features that we now consider to be pretty much

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>standard for keyboards, like arrow keys and a number pad. Obviously,

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>not all keyboards have those, especially for things like laptops.

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You might not have a number pad on all laptops,

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but for your standard PC keyboards, the kinds for desktops,

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much find arrow keys and number pads on

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>most of those these days. But this was novel thinking

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen eighty six, so it was something that

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>differentiated the Mac Plus from other computers on the market.

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And it also ran the third generation of Max operating system,

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:37.720
<v Speaker 1>which was then called System three. This was before Apple

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>started calling the operating system mac os, they just called

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it System and you could use double sided floppy discs

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>with this device, which allowed you to store a wopping

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:53.400
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred kilobytes of data per disc. I remember those days,

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, that was a big thing back then. Having

0:45:56.520 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a double sided disc effectively doubling the amount of information

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you could save on a disc.

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 2>That was a huge space saver.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise you had to have twice as many of those

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>stupid discs, and that was a pain in the butt. Later,

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty six, Apple discontinued the Fat Mac and

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:18.800
<v Speaker 1>replaced it with the five twelve K, which was similar

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Mac Plus. So you had the Macplus, which

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the high end machine, and then they said, well,

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fat Mac doesn't really measure up to the Macplus.

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll make a new version of the Fat Mac called

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Mac five twelve K. It did not have some of

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the elements that the Macplus had. It didn't have the

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>scuzy port, and it didn't have the expandable memory capability.

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>It had those older traditional Apple style memory chips, and

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>as you might imagine, that didn't measure up well with

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the Macplus in the market. So you had consumers or

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>small businesses mainly and larger looking at the Macplus versus

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the Mac five twelve k E and they said, why

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>would I go with the five twelve K E which

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 1>has fewer features than the Macplus. So ultimately the five

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve KE did not sell very well. The Macplus, however,

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:12.479
<v Speaker 1>was a very popular product within the Apple line, in fact,

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so much so that it would become the longest lived

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:20.359
<v Speaker 1>computer in the Macintosh line, meaning it was the one

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that Apple produced the longest amount of time, from nineteen

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty six to nineteen ninety, so four years of producing

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the same computer. That's a long time in computer terms,

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 1>because parts become obsolete so quickly, right processors get faster,

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we can put more memory into these machines, but the

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Macplus would stay on store shelves largely unchanged from nineteen

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:50.279
<v Speaker 1>eighty six to nineteen ninety. Now at this stage, I

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>should mention that I'm not going to cover every single

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 1>variation of the Macintosh in this episode.

0:47:56.760 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I know it sounds like it because.

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I've started with the big one so early on, but

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that would just be ridiculous.

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 2>If I were to do that, it would eventually just.

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Lead to me reading off specs for different computers, and

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that would get incredibly boring incredibly fast. I do want

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to cover some of the big changes that happened throughout

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Apple's history and the history of the Macintosh, but I'm

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to cover every variation of every entry into

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh line. There are lots of them, so many

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that it actually became a problem for Apple.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 2>But I'll go into that in a little bit.

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to try and get a deeper understanding

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of not just the growth of the personal computer market,

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but the evolution of Apple as a company. So that

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>being said, nineteen eighty seven saw some milestones in Apple history.

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, Apple built the one millionth Macintosh in

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven. Now that was a bit behind schedule,

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 1>because you remember, way back in nineteen eighty one, they

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>were hoping to sell two point two million Macintosh computers

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>by the end of nineteen eighty five. It is nineteen

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:04.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven, and they've just built the one millionth Macintosh,

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so they're well behind what they were hoping for back

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty one. However, that being said, this was

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a totally different world nineteen eighty seven. You saw massive

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:17.839
<v Speaker 1>competition in the market. Not only did IBM have its

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>own personal computers out there, but you had all the

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 1>clones of IBM computers, the IBM compatible computers, because IBM

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>licensed that technology to other companies. So there was a

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:31.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of competition in the space. So hitting that one

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>million mark was still impressive, even though it was much

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>later than what they had hoped for, and it was significant.

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So that year Apple introduced new computers in the Macintosh line.

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty seven, they launched the Mac se and

0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the Mac two. As in the Part two son of Mac,

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it was the Roman numeral two as well, kind of

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:58.839
<v Speaker 1>similar to how they did Apple one, Apple two, Apple three.

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We start seeing the Macintosh regularly shortened to just Mac.

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>At this point, very few people started referring to them

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 1>as Macintosh computers.

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 2>They just called a max really.

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 1>After the first Macintosh, that became pretty standard, and the

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Mac two marked another big departure from the original Macintosh

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>design jobs and wanted the mac to be that closed system.

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned, the Mac two had six expansion slots

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that could support all sorts of stuff, including different types

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of video cards, which was a huge departure for Apple,

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>plus different types of network cards, scuzzy drives, that sort

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. It could also display color the video cards.

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:42.560
<v Speaker 1>If you had the right video card in the right monitor,

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you could have a color display, which was a first

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>for Macintosh computers, and it pushed the Macintosh from the

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>monochromatic world to the world of glorious color, with up

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen million different colors that could be displayed, which

0:50:56.200 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>was actually pretty impressive back in the mid eighties. Later on,

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that would be dwarfed by what you could achieve with

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>high end video cards and monitors. In nineteen eighty eight,

0:51:08.960 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple's Macintosh line continued to evolve, but there weren't really

0:51:12.560 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>any major developments like the ones I just mentioned. Instead,

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it was mostly revisions and evolutions of the line, but

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not revolutions on the software side. The operating system grew,

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>with System six coming out toward the end of nineteen

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:30.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, but apart from the first Apple CD ROM

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>drive launching, nothing huge really happened in the macline in

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, and the same is true for eighty nine,

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>with one major exception. That was the year that Apple

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>introduced the mac Portable. So this wasn't really a laptop computer.

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could call it a laptop computer, but

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>really it was more of a portable Macintosh computer. In

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>theory you could call it laptop, but only in theory

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:57.760
<v Speaker 1>because the thing weighed nearly sixteen pounds or about seven

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:01.840
<v Speaker 1>point two six kilograms, which is a pretty weighty machine

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to call a laptop. It was also bulky and was

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>about the size of a standard briefcase. In other words,

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 1>it was a giant compared to the Mac Air that

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you could find today. The Mac Portable had a lead

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>acid battery, which is the same sort of battery you

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 1>can find in your standard gas powered automobile, like a

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>car battery that's also lead acid. That's the type of

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>battery the first Mac Portable had. Now, it did allow

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you to have about ten hours of battery life, so

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that's nice. But it added to that significant weight where

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a rather i should say it made up

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 1>a significant portion of that weight.

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.760
<v Speaker 2>There were two main keyboard layouts you could get.

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>One had a numeric keypad and the other one had

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a track ball which would replace the need for a mouse.

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So track ball sort of like the old centipede arcade machines,

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't know what that is, ask your parents.

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>There were This was another one of the ideas of

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Jean Louis Gassay, so he decided that the portable computer

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting approach. He had already made a decision

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to stick with Apple. He had received an order an

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>offer rather from Commodore. Commodore was making the Amiga line

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of computers and they wanted Guess to come over as

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the new head of Commodore. But he actually turned the

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>company down initially and said that he wanted to stick

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:30.400
<v Speaker 1>with Apple, and so he really pushed for the portable Mac.

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It had pretty impressive specs for the time. Apple said

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:40.279
<v Speaker 1>they spared no expense, they made no accommodation for the

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that was portable. They didn't want to compromise on quality,

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the specs were pretty impressive even for

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:52.720
<v Speaker 1>just a regular desktop machine. However, it meant that the

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>device was incredibly expensive. Again not as surprise with Apple, right.

0:53:57.239 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So its price tag was six thousand, five one hundred

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars for this portable machine in nineteen eighty nine, So

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:08.240
<v Speaker 1>if we look at inflation, that's about thirteen thousand dollars.

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 2>He would have to pay thirteen grand to get this

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:11.719
<v Speaker 2>portable Mac.

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, there was a call for portable machines because more

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and more companies wanted people to be able to take

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a machine into the field. You might work for a

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>company like a utility company, and having a computer that

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>your employee could take with him or her on a

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>service call was incredibly valuable. So there was a need

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for portable machines. People had a desire for them. There

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:40.800
<v Speaker 1>was a market there, But thirteen thousand dollars.

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 2>For a portable mac.

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Was a super steep price, and you might not be

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:48.920
<v Speaker 1>surprised to hear that not very many of them were

0:54:48.960 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>sold as a result. In fact, Apple sales in general

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:55.400
<v Speaker 1>were not doing well that year. It marked the first

0:54:55.440 --> 0:55:00.040
<v Speaker 1>time Apple had an actual drop in sales figures. We

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:04.120
<v Speaker 1>were selling fewer computers than they had in the previous year.

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 1>The following year, Gasse announced his retirement from Apple and

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:12.760
<v Speaker 1>vacated the head of product development, So he only lasted

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer than Steve Jobs himself did. Now,

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety also saw a big shift due to outside competition.

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>That's because in nineteen ninety Microsoft launched Windows three point zero. Now,

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the previous incarnation of Windows had really not made a

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:34.800
<v Speaker 1>huge impact on Macintosh sales. Consumers had not really adapted

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and adopted the Windows platform. But Windows three was a

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 1>different story. Windows three and IBM compatible machines were starting

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to become more popular, and from this point forward, I'm

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:50.760
<v Speaker 1>just going to call those PCs. We'll talk about max

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:54.320
<v Speaker 1>versus PCs. I don't like that because I think personal

0:55:54.360 --> 0:55:57.560
<v Speaker 1>computer is too broad a term to just refer to

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Windows based machines. But just for simplicity's sake, We're going

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to do that for the rest of this episode. So

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:08.200
<v Speaker 1>PCs were really selling well, and Windows three point zero

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>was a dominant operating system, again a graphic user interface

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:17.000
<v Speaker 1>similar to what you would find on the Macintosh. There

0:56:17.000 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 1>were even people arguing that Microsoft was copying no Macintosh,

0:56:21.960 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but the development of Windows was happening at around the

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 1>same time as the development of the Macintosh guy, And

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, both companies really owed a huge debt

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to Xerox because it was Xerox's Park, the R and

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>D arm of Xerox that developed the graphic user interface. Anyway,

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the ibmpcs had a huge advantage over Macintosh in that

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they were less expensive. You could buy an IBMPC for

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of what it cost to buy a Macintosh.

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Then you can get your graphic user interface with Windows

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:55.240
<v Speaker 1>three point zero.

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 2>In fact, within a.

0:56:57.160 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Couple of years, you would have about five copies of

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Windows three point zero for every Macintosh that was being sold.

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:10.399
<v Speaker 1>That's not great if you're Apple. I should also point

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:13.720
<v Speaker 1>out that even at this point, as late as nineteen ninety,

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I still hated Windows because I still hated the idea

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of having to surrender so much of my computer's operating

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 1>system or so much of my computer's processing power to

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the operating system. So I was still being an elitist

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 1>computer snob in those days, although I had to give

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in because more and more games were only Windows compatible,

0:57:33.400 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and if I'm going to be honest, that was my

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:38.960
<v Speaker 1>main concern with PCs back in the day. Wasn't so

0:57:39.080 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>much concerned about the productivity software. But if I couldn't

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>play my Ultima series of games, I got grouchy anyway.

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen ninety remember it was also the year that the

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Macplus finally got discontinued from Apple. They decided to stop

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:56.720
<v Speaker 1>selling it, to stop making it, but it had a

0:57:56.800 --> 0:57:59.680
<v Speaker 1>four year run, so that was really strong. Now I've

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>got or to say about this period in Apple and

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh history, but before I get to that, let's take

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 1>another quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:58:18.000 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Within two years, so.

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, by the time it gets to nineteen ninety two,

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Windows machines were outnumbering McIntosh machines by that factor of

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 1>five to one, and that was super bad news for Apple.

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple stock price suffered dropping twenty percent, so the value

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of the company decreased by one fifth. Because of this

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>issue and other issues going on in Apple, so the

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>company was.

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 2>In a dangerous time in its history.

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It really led to an overall operational loss and it

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was pretty ugly. Stockholders were demanding that something change. So

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:56.600
<v Speaker 1>John Scully was on the way out at this point

0:58:56.720 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 1>because the performance of the company was suffering. He was

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 1>being blamed for a lot of that, and so he

0:59:05.200 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 1>left in nineteen ninety three. But just before he left,

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple was still trying to right the ship.

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>The ship was starting to list. They were trying to

0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 1>get it back on track. I'm mixing metaphors, sue me.

0:59:20.880 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced System seven, so this was the next generation

0:59:24.560 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of its operating system, and it introduced AutoMac support from

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 1>multiple simultaneous applications, so you could run numerous programs at

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the same time. It also introduced its QuickTime software in

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety one, and Apple Max began to run on

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Motorola six eight zero three zero processors. And I'm

0:59:47.200 --> 0:59:49.200
<v Speaker 1>sure there's an easier way of saying that, and I'm

0:59:49.240 --> 0:59:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sure the computer geeks out there in the audience who

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are familiar with these processors, these are the ones that

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Max ran on the sixty eight thousand processors that Motorola

0:59:58.720 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>made since the beginning. I'm sure there's an easier way

1:00:01.800 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of saying them, and I apologize for not knowing that,

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just going to stay them the long way anyway.

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>The Apple introduced the Macintosh Quadra seven hundred and the

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Quadra nine hundred computers in ninety one, which were meant

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to be new product lines within Macintosh, although they didn't

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>last very long. They ran on Motorola six to eight

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>zero four zero processors, which are comparable to the four

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty six processors that Intel was producing at the time.

1:00:30.400 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So you had Microsoft and Windows that were paired up

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>with Intel, and you had Apple pairing up with Motorola,

1:00:37.840 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to make sure that its computers were of a

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>comparable comparable level of quality to the top of the

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>line IBM compatible machines. Apple introduced a new type of

1:00:52.960 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>computer called the PowerBook, which was a line of truly

1:00:56.480 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>portable computers. These were more These were closer to being

1:00:59.560 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>laptop than that portable Mac was. Remember the portable Mac

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:06.439
<v Speaker 1>was really just a portable Mac, but the power Book

1:01:06.480 --> 1:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was meant to be more.

1:01:07.200 --> 1:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Of a laptop.

1:01:08.280 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The first of the power Books, or rather the lowest

1:01:12.280 --> 1:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the whole line. The cheapest was not actually made

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>by Apple. Apple contracted with Sony, and Sony made the

1:01:20.200 --> 1:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>power Book one hundred. This is unusual because most Apple

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>products are manufactured by Apple itself, but that wasn't true

1:01:27.480 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for the power Book one hundred. The battery on the

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>power Book one hundred would last a whole two hours

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>without being plugged in. It didn't sell as well as

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the higher end models because it just didn't

1:01:38.920 --> 1:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have the features. The power Book one forty and the

1:01:41.680 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>one seventy were launched at around the same time, and

1:01:44.760 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they sold better than the power Book one hundred did.

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>The form factor of these ended up kind of defining

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the look of laptops in the future. So if you

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>unfolded the screen, the keyboard sat back toward the screen,

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so typically the way you would open up laptop, and

1:02:00.800 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you know how the keyboard is back in the back section.

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>In the front section there was space for a first

1:02:06.520 --> 1:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of track ball, so again kind of like centipede ask

1:02:09.480 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>your parents, and then later on a trackpad, which is

1:02:12.560 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>what you find standard on most laptops today.

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was the power.

1:02:16.520 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Book that kind of defined that form factor and most

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>laptops following followed along behind it.

1:02:22.920 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>They didn't really change that up because it just made sense,

1:02:27.120 --> 1:02:28.920
<v Speaker 2>but it was the power book that really introduced that.

1:02:31.040 --> 1:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Now beyond this, you also had in nineteen ninety one

1:02:37.200 --> 1:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>an alliance between Apple, IBM, and Motorola. They called it

1:02:42.840 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the AIM Alliance, AIM standing for Apple, IBM, Motorola cute right.

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>The aim of aim yakidishmacaee doo.

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Was building new hardware and software to act as a

1:02:56.480 --> 1:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>platform for the next generation of computers and to and

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>as a direct competitor with Windows and Intel. So they

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make their own version of the partnership that

1:03:09.680 --> 1:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had with Intel and make it a competing standard.

1:03:14.000 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>They called it PREP, which added.

1:03:16.280 --> 1:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>In uppercase P and uppercase are a lowercase E and

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>an uppercase P. It stood for power PC Reference Platform.

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It was intended to serve as that competitor, and the

1:03:26.960 --> 1:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>goal was to create a new operating system that Apple

1:03:29.880 --> 1:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>would be in charge of. So Apple would provide the

1:03:32.760 --> 1:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>operating system and it would run on Risk based processors

1:03:36.760 --> 1:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that's RISC, and those would come from IBM and Motorola.

1:03:41.960 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple's code named operating system was called PINK and why Well,

1:03:47.080 --> 1:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that goes back a little bit earlier in Apple's history.

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So when Apple was planning out future projects several years

1:03:53.960 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>before this happened, they would write down ideas on one

1:03:58.240 --> 1:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of two different colors of note cards. If the ideal

1:04:02.640 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>was considered to be easy to implement, If engineer said, yeah,

1:04:05.680 --> 1:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we can knock that out and it won't cost too

1:04:07.960 --> 1:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>much and it won't take up too much time, those

1:04:10.440 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ideas went on blue note cards, meaning these are going

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to be easy for us to do. If it was

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>considered a challenging idea that was going to require more time,

1:04:19.640 --> 1:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>more effort, and therefore it was going to cost more internally,

1:04:23.200 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they would write it down on a pink note card, saying, yeah,

1:04:27.040 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be harder to do. It might

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>still be worth it, but it's going to be hard.

1:04:32.280 --> 1:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Well.

1:04:32.920 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>The operating system was code named Pink because it was

1:04:36.040 --> 1:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>written down on a pink note card. Creating the next

1:04:39.400 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>generation operating system, one that wasn't rooted in the system

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>versions that had been on Macintosh up to that point

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to take a lot of development time and effort,

1:04:51.360 --> 1:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>so it was code named Pink. Now, sadly, prep never

1:04:56.040 --> 1:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>really meshed you never got a point where you had

1:04:58.600 --> 1:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the hardware and software married to together to make this

1:05:01.600 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>rival to Windows Intel.

1:05:03.920 --> 1:05:06.440
<v Speaker 2>So ultimately the project was a failure.

1:05:06.520 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that did come out of it was

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a new type of processor called the power PC processor,

1:05:12.560 --> 1:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and those would eventually find their way into mac computers.

1:05:17.080 --> 1:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety two, Apple introduced a line of Macintosh

1:05:19.840 --> 1:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>computers called the Performa line, and this was McIntosh's effort

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to actually say, hey, let's make something for the average consumer.

1:05:28.040 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Most Macintosh computers were so expensive and so specialized that

1:05:32.360 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they were just going to a narrow niche market. We're

1:05:35.680 --> 1:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about those creators I mentioned earlier and small businesses,

1:05:39.680 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but that meant they were passing up the opportunity to

1:05:42.360 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>really target personal computer owners. They had mostly targeted those

1:05:46.200 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>through the Apple two line. But now the Apple two

1:05:48.680 --> 1:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>line was dead. It had discontinued, and really it ended

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety three when Apple two E Enhanced stopped

1:05:56.480 --> 1:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>being made, although there were a couple of other variations

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Apple two that lasted a bit longer. But

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to tackle that same market with the Macintosh line,

1:06:05.280 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so they launched the Performa series.

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:07.960
<v Speaker 2>So what was it.

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>The Performance Series was really just rebranded older models of

1:06:12.680 --> 1:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh computers.

1:06:14.320 --> 1:06:15.760
<v Speaker 2>So the Macintosh.

1:06:15.320 --> 1:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Computers that debuted a couple of years earlier but now

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>had slower processors compared to the most up to date models,

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>they got rebranded as Performa models of Macintosh and put

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on the market. However, Apple dumped a whole bunch of

1:06:31.560 --> 1:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>different models at the same time, and that really confused

1:06:35.040 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers in the marketplace. Imagine going to a store and

1:06:38.800 --> 1:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing eight different variations of the same basic computer and

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not really understanding what differentiated one from another. That's kind

1:06:48.040 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of what happened with the Performa series. It just added

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>more confusion in the marketplace, and ultimately consumers just weren't

1:06:55.360 --> 1:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>sure about which computer they should pie, and not a

1:06:58.480 --> 1:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of them got sold. So Apple decided, hey, let's

1:07:02.960 --> 1:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>clear up the confusion, and they produced a half hour

1:07:06.600 --> 1:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>infomercial explaining the different Performa models, and you can find

1:07:12.120 --> 1:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it online. So if you've got half an hour to

1:07:15.280 --> 1:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>kill and you want to see how Apple tried to

1:07:18.400 --> 1:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>explain this Performa series to consumers, search for it online.

1:07:23.040 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>You can find it.

1:07:23.640 --> 1:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It's usually divided up into multiple parts, but you can

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>find the performa series of videos that made up a

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>half hour infomercial. Now, the next person to step in

1:07:34.280 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>as leader of the company, remember Scully had left in

1:07:37.040 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety three, was Michael Spindler. He came from Apple's European

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>operations division and he worked his way up the chain there.

1:07:46.600 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>His term was one of real controversy. It wasn't as

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a smooth transition, and it wasn't without issues.

1:07:55.320 --> 1:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>In fact, there were rumors that he was discussing.

1:07:57.720 --> 1:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>The possibilities of a takeover with other companies like Sun

1:08:01.400 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Microsystems or IBM, and he also oversaw projects at Apple

1:08:05.880 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately failed, like Apple's Newton project. I know I've

1:08:10.560 --> 1:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Newton in previous episodes of Tech Stuff. I think

1:08:14.160 --> 1:08:16.439
<v Speaker 1>we might have even done a full episode about the Newton,

1:08:17.120 --> 1:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of a sad and comical story simultaneously.

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But that was the little handheld device that was meant

1:08:24.000 --> 1:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to be able to recognize handwriting and other and have

1:08:26.880 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>other features as well, that ultimately had its ambitions were

1:08:34.000 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>beyond its own grasp. Let's be kind and call it that.

1:08:37.600 --> 1:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's another story. So the nickname for Michael Spindler

1:08:44.520 --> 1:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>was the Diesel. I don't know what that says about

1:08:48.600 --> 1:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>his character, but I have a feeling that I probably

1:08:51.400 --> 1:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be compatible with someone whose nickname is the Diesel,

1:08:56.560 --> 1:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>unless it was Kevin Nash, because we have a mutual

1:09:02.040 --> 1:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>love of professional wrestling. Now, Spindler would end up being

1:09:06.800 --> 1:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>replaced by the Board of directors a few years later

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety six, and the board of directors chose

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Gil Emilio to step in as CEO. Gill Emilio had

1:09:17.680 --> 1:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>come from National Semiconductor before joining Apple, and Emilio himself

1:09:22.800 --> 1:09:25.479
<v Speaker 1>would also get replaced by the Board of directors in

1:09:25.560 --> 1:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven. But more on that in a little bit.

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the timeline of Macintosh. So we

1:09:32.000 --> 1:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>left off in nineteen ninety four, just took a break

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the shuffle at the CEO level over

1:09:38.360 --> 1:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years, which really tells you that

1:09:40.840 --> 1:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple was in trouble.

1:09:43.200 --> 1:09:45.960
<v Speaker 2>When you see a company changing CEO.

1:09:45.760 --> 1:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So rapidly because the board keeps replacing it, that's not

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a great sign. Doesn't show a lot of confidence at

1:09:52.320 --> 1:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the Board of directors level, and it probably reflects a

1:09:55.080 --> 1:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>lack of confidence at the shareholder level. But the show

1:09:58.439 --> 1:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>had to go on. So what was happening Macintosh. Well,

1:10:02.160 --> 1:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety four, Apple made a big move that

1:10:06.640 --> 1:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>was a defining moment in the Macintosh line. They decided

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:13.519
<v Speaker 1>to move away from those Motorola processors I talked about

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a minute ago, and switched to the power PC processors,

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>which remember were still developed partially by Motorola in partnership

1:10:21.960 --> 1:10:24.519
<v Speaker 1>with IBM. So it's not like they were turning their

1:10:24.560 --> 1:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>back on Motorola. Rather they said, from this point forward,

1:10:28.000 --> 1:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>our architecture is going to depend upon this type of

1:10:30.760 --> 1:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>computer processor instead of this other type of computer processor.

1:10:35.280 --> 1:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>But that meant big changes all down the line of

1:10:38.479 --> 1:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh. Now, they were hoping that the power PC

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>processors would be able to rival Intel's x eighty six chips.

1:10:48.040 --> 1:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are the for eighty six's, the pendums and so on,

1:10:51.800 --> 1:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So that was the hope, and they actually stuck with

1:10:55.040 --> 1:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>power PC processors all the way from nineteen ninety four

1:10:59.040 --> 1:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and six, and then they changed again.

1:11:02.520 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a story for later now.

1:11:05.040 --> 1:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>The first mac to feature a power PC processor was

1:11:08.000 --> 1:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh sixty one hundred, which also ran macOS nine.

1:11:13.400 --> 1:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It was the latest version of Apple's operating system. Although

1:11:15.960 --> 1:11:18.759
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't called macOS nine, it was really System nine.

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It was the first computer to actually run System nine.

1:11:22.680 --> 1:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Oddly enough, Apple also released a second version of this

1:11:28.320 --> 1:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>specific computer with a completely different chip architecture.

1:11:33.439 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 2>So you had the power Pc version.

1:11:35.479 --> 1:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Of the sixty one hundred, but you also had an

1:11:38.000 --> 1:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Intel for eighty six version of the sixty one hundred.

1:11:41.960 --> 1:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>For the first time, Apple decided to try and go

1:11:44.560 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>with an IBM compatible route, So this version of the

1:11:49.200 --> 1:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Mac sixty one hundred had an Intel forty forty six microprocessor.

1:11:53.800 --> 1:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It was DOS compatible. It could run both mac OS

1:11:57.320 --> 1:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>and Windows simultaneously. Later on on Macintosh users would have

1:12:01.479 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to do this by setting up a virtual machine that

1:12:04.200 --> 1:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>would run an instance of Windows over on top of

1:12:07.880 --> 1:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the Mac hardware. This was also a time when Apple

1:12:11.439 --> 1:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>began to stray further away from the concept of making

1:12:13.680 --> 1:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as much in house as it could, and it was

1:12:17.240 --> 1:12:19.479
<v Speaker 1>a big departure from the way Steve Jobs had run

1:12:19.560 --> 1:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>things back when he was still part of the company. Now,

1:12:22.720 --> 1:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the power Pc hardware was incompatible with software that was

1:12:26.040 --> 1:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>written for Macintosh computers running the older Motorola chips. You

1:12:29.920 --> 1:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>often find this if you change processor types. That change

1:12:33.960 --> 1:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in architecture requires software to behave a different way in

1:12:38.000 --> 1:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>order for stuff to get done. So if you were

1:12:41.200 --> 1:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to run an older Macintosh program on a power

1:12:45.360 --> 1:12:49.479
<v Speaker 1>PC Macintosh, you had to have an emulator. This is

1:12:49.520 --> 1:12:54.759
<v Speaker 1>a piece of software that simulates the way other hardware runs.

1:12:54.880 --> 1:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You might remember I did an episode all about video

1:12:58.040 --> 1:13:01.799
<v Speaker 1>game emulators. The same thing is true for operating system

1:13:01.800 --> 1:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>emulators or chip emulators. So you had this software that

1:13:06.600 --> 1:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was replicating the way old Motorola chips ran, but it

1:13:10.800 --> 1:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>would allow the software to run on a power PC

1:13:14.479 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>processor computer. In other words, you just had to have

1:13:18.280 --> 1:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>this other piece of software to kind of act as

1:13:20.439 --> 1:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>an interpreter so that you could get stuff done on

1:13:23.840 --> 1:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>your new machine. Now, the good news was the power

1:13:26.800 --> 1:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>PCs were so powerful, these power macs as they came

1:13:30.360 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to be called, were so powerful that it didn't slow

1:13:34.760 --> 1:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>down the processing of these older mac programs. So the

1:13:38.800 --> 1:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>emulator wasn't so processor heavy that it was impacting the

1:13:44.160 --> 1:13:46.799
<v Speaker 1>way the program ran. It would actually run more smoothly

1:13:47.240 --> 1:13:50.599
<v Speaker 1>on these power PC programs or power pc machines than

1:13:50.600 --> 1:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they would on the older Motorola machines. So that was

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a good story, right. You don't want your emulator to

1:13:56.400 --> 1:13:59.639
<v Speaker 1>slow stuff down, because then people get the implication that

1:13:59.840 --> 1:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the brand new computer they just bought is slower than

1:14:02.760 --> 1:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>their old computer. That's a bad thing. So luckily the

1:14:07.360 --> 1:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>emulator ran really efficiently and it didn't slow things down.

1:14:12.280 --> 1:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety five, that's when things kind of went

1:14:14.439 --> 1:14:17.759
<v Speaker 1>bonkers over at Apple. For the first time ever, Apple

1:14:17.880 --> 1:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>licensed other companies to allow them to bring Macintosh compatible

1:14:23.680 --> 1:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>machines to market, So this was the era of the Macclone.

1:14:28.600 --> 1:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>They allowed other companies to license the hardware and software

1:14:32.320 --> 1:14:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and make their own versions of the Macintosh computer, although

1:14:35.560 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they would be called different things. This, by the way,

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:41.599
<v Speaker 1>ignores the fact that PowerBook one hundred was built by Sony,

1:14:41.640 --> 1:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but that was built by Sony for Apple. In this case,

1:14:45.160 --> 1:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about companies that were building machines for Apple.

1:14:48.720 --> 1:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about companies that would license the technology to

1:14:51.360 --> 1:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>build their own version of the Macintosh and sell it

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to consumers. The first was the Radius System one hundred

1:14:59.640 --> 1:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>from a company called Radius, and it was similar to

1:15:02.520 --> 1:15:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Apple's own PowerMac eighty one hundred. The specs were very close,

1:15:07.080 --> 1:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but the computer itself was housed in a tower style case,

1:15:11.360 --> 1:15:13.679
<v Speaker 1>so very different from Apple's approach where they would try

1:15:13.720 --> 1:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and put the monitor and the computer case all in

1:15:16.880 --> 1:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one unit. That was typical for most of Apple's computers.

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Not all of them, but a lot of them.

1:15:22.360 --> 1:15:23.639
<v Speaker 2>This was totally different.

1:15:23.680 --> 1:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>It was more like your standard IBM compatible where you

1:15:26.400 --> 1:15:30.759
<v Speaker 1>had a tower desktop. So it was a big departure

1:15:30.800 --> 1:15:36.679
<v Speaker 1>from Apple's esthetic. There were other computers that also launched

1:15:36.720 --> 1:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at this time that were clones the Macintosh, because there

1:15:39.120 --> 1:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>were other companies that licensed the technology from Apple, and

1:15:43.240 --> 1:15:46.479
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Apple was hoping to dominate the market again and

1:15:46.520 --> 1:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>make enough money off the licenses to justify their use. Unfortunately,

1:15:51.320 --> 1:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple ended up cutting off its nose to spite its face.

1:15:55.680 --> 1:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>In this case, they licensed the technology manufacturers, but that

1:16:01.400 --> 1:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>gave companies the opportunity to produce cheaper machines running Apple

1:16:06.360 --> 1:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>hardware and software. So you could run Macintosh programs on

1:16:09.720 --> 1:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>these computers because they were clones of the mac not physically,

1:16:13.920 --> 1:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but from a hardware and software standpoint, they were, and

1:16:18.000 --> 1:16:20.519
<v Speaker 1>they were able to sell them for less expensive prices

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>than what Apple was demanding. So Apple ended up undercutting

1:16:24.320 --> 1:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>its own sales because it authorized these other users. These

1:16:27.880 --> 1:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>other manufacturers to make Macintosh compatible computers. So why would

1:16:35.439 --> 1:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you go and buy what appears to be an overpriced

1:16:37.920 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 1>machine from Apple if you can go to one of

1:16:40.439 --> 1:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>its competitors and buy a comparable machine for much less money.

1:16:45.320 --> 1:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>If you are a consumer or a business, it makes

1:16:48.080 --> 1:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>more sense to go the other route, to go the

1:16:50.400 --> 1:16:54.519
<v Speaker 1>cheaper route. As long as you're reasonably sure that the

1:16:54.560 --> 1:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>machine is a good one, that's what you're gonna do.

1:16:57.240 --> 1:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, that's what Apple saw. They saw a

1:16:59.600 --> 1:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of consumers going to these competitors rather than going

1:17:02.920 --> 1:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>to Apple. Now, one benefit was that they had a

1:17:06.479 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 1>lot more people buying into the Apple ecosystem, But because

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple wasn't controlling that hardware, they weren't seeing any money

1:17:15.479 --> 1:17:18.519
<v Speaker 1>off of it, besides that initial licensing fee that they

1:17:18.640 --> 1:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>charged companies in order to produce these clones. So in

1:17:24.080 --> 1:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the long run it ended up hurting Apple. It was

1:17:28.320 --> 1:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hurting their sales, although it did mean that more people

1:17:31.880 --> 1:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>were getting familiar with the Macintosh program and the Macintosh

1:17:35.200 --> 1:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>platform because suddenly they could afford a Macintosh, even though

1:17:40.400 --> 1:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't an official Apple Macintosh.

1:17:44.320 --> 1:17:46.679
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those decisions.

1:17:46.080 --> 1:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>That Apple executives today probably look back on and shake

1:17:50.320 --> 1:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>their heads and mumble about it, because it really affected

1:17:53.920 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>profits over at Apple. By nineteen ninety six, Apple was

1:17:57.479 --> 1:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>looking for the next generation of operating systems because in

1:18:00.360 --> 1:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out. So they said, we need a next

1:18:03.200 --> 1:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>generation operating system. Our system series is starting to show

1:18:06.800 --> 1:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>its age. We need a new operating system. But to

1:18:10.439 --> 1:18:12.799
<v Speaker 1>spend the money in time to develop an in house

1:18:13.280 --> 1:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is not really practical. So they started looking outside the

1:18:15.800 --> 1:18:18.599
<v Speaker 1>company and saying, well, what else is out there that

1:18:18.640 --> 1:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could acquire and then use in future Macintosh computers.

1:18:24.920 --> 1:18:28.599
<v Speaker 1>They looked at two different companies, and here's the funny thing.

1:18:29.280 --> 1:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Each of those companies was founded by a former Apple executive.

1:18:34.880 --> 1:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>The first company was B Incorporated. That's b Inc. And

1:18:40.720 --> 1:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they created the BOS or BOS if you prefer. This

1:18:45.479 --> 1:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>company was founded by Jean Louis Gassa, so remember the

1:18:49.960 --> 1:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>head of product development from a few years ago who

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>stepped down. The other big contender was next Step, the

1:18:57.920 --> 1:19:00.599
<v Speaker 1>next Step operating system, which was from a company called

1:19:00.680 --> 1:19:04.759
<v Speaker 1>next and that company was founded by drum roll please

1:19:06.520 --> 1:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs. So once again you had guess a versus Jobs.

1:19:11.600 --> 1:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>With the two operating systems that could potentially power the

1:19:15.240 --> 1:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>next generation of Macintosh computers. Now ultimately, spoiler alert, Apple

1:19:21.400 --> 1:19:24.799
<v Speaker 1>decided that they would go with Next. They decided against

1:19:24.800 --> 1:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>bios and decided the next step was the operating system

1:19:28.360 --> 1:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. So instead of setting up a licensing deal,

1:19:32.160 --> 1:19:35.599
<v Speaker 1>they did something a little different. They didn't just license

1:19:35.640 --> 1:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the technology from Next. They acquired Next. They spent a

1:19:40.880 --> 1:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of money doing it too. They spent nearly four

1:19:44.720 --> 1:19:48.519
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty million dollars on the purchase, and they

1:19:48.520 --> 1:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>threw in one and a half million shares of Apple

1:19:51.240 --> 1:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>stock as well. Now keep in mind Apple stock at

1:19:54.800 --> 1:19:57.519
<v Speaker 1>this point was suffering, but it was one and a

1:19:57.560 --> 1:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>half million shares. If they could turn things around, and then,

1:20:00.320 --> 1:20:03.839
<v Speaker 1>spoiler alert, they totally did that, million and a half

1:20:04.040 --> 1:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>shares of Apple would be worth way more money. So

1:20:08.479 --> 1:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs came along as part of this part of

1:20:10.680 --> 1:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the deal, They essentially bought Steve Jobs back to Apple

1:20:14.200 --> 1:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>because he was the founder of Next and he was

1:20:16.640 --> 1:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>part of that company, so they acquired the company. Steve

1:20:19.360 --> 1:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Jobs comes on, so he would return to Apple in

1:20:23.200 --> 1:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven after a very long hiatus or as

1:20:26.960 --> 1:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he might refer to it as banishment, and he returned

1:20:31.360 --> 1:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>initially as a consultant, but Apple was reeling. The stock

1:20:34.880 --> 1:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>price had hit.

1:20:35.600 --> 1:20:38.439
<v Speaker 2>A twelve year low, and the board of.

1:20:38.400 --> 1:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Directors had decided eventually that they needed to replace gil Emilio.

1:20:43.479 --> 1:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, there was one person who was really

1:20:46.000 --> 1:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>arguing for this, and that person was a Steve Jobs.

1:20:50.840 --> 1:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>So Steve Jobs goes to the board directors and says, hey,

1:20:53.200 --> 1:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you are in real trouble. The decisions that have been

1:20:56.160 --> 1:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>made over the past few years have been disastrous for

1:20:58.320 --> 1:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>this company and they are leading it to the brink

1:21:00.760 --> 1:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of bankruptcy.

1:21:02.160 --> 1:21:04.200
<v Speaker 2>You got to get rid of gill Emilio. And the

1:21:04.240 --> 1:21:04.519
<v Speaker 2>board of.

1:21:04.520 --> 1:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Directors agreed and they put Steve Jobs in charge as

1:21:07.560 --> 1:21:11.759
<v Speaker 1>interim CEO. But that's that's what and last Steve Jobs

1:21:11.800 --> 1:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>would eventually become the actual CEO, not just an interim CEO,

1:21:16.680 --> 1:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and would end up taking control of the company he

1:21:19.360 --> 1:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>had co founded a.

1:21:21.360 --> 1:21:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Couple of decades earlier.

1:21:23.479 --> 1:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh yeah, it was a total different story for

1:21:26.800 --> 1:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple from that point forward. But that's the tale for

1:21:30.520 --> 1:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>another episode. All right. That concludes this text of classic

1:21:35.040 --> 1:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>episode The Macintosh Story Part two. Next Friday we will

1:21:39.240 --> 1:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>continue with part three.

1:21:40.600 --> 1:21:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Then we'll be all up.

1:21:42.720 --> 1:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>To date as of twenty seventeen, and nothing's happened since then, Right,

1:21:46.360 --> 1:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're good. I'm kidding, of course, but I hope

1:21:49.760 --> 1:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed this classic episode, and I'll talk to you

1:21:52.160 --> 1:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For

1:22:02.880 --> 1:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:22:07.840 --> 1:22:09.839
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.