WEBVTT - The Prince Goes to KC, Can Burrow Beat Buffalo, NBA Finals Rematch & Wright-Ins

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first. Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the big game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States Savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one eighteen, What's Right with Nick Wright

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>as we preview the Divisional round of the NFL Playoffs,

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the single best weekend on the entire sports calendar. This

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>weekend will be no different. Four football games, six of

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the eight teams in the league are still standing, plus

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a surprising Giants team and a not so surprising Prince

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 2>from Jacksonville. All of that is on the calendar. We're

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna dive right in. By the way, thank you to

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>everybody who's watching us live on YouTube. As I'm going

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>to continue to mention we are really trying to get

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to one hundred thousand subscribers on YouTube, De Monte gets

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>a cool plaque. We're like sixty five hundred short. So

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>if you're watching right now, you're probably already subscribing. If

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>you're not, please do so and hit the bell so

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>you know when we go live. But additionally, if you know,

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to tweet out or instagram or whatever,

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>promote the link to our YouTube page. We'd greatly appreciate it.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>But let's get right in first. We will discuss what

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 2>we're not discussing on today's show. Oh Demant probably don't

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>even know this. Nick Tennis Corner about to be back

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>with a vengeance. The Australian Open, one of our four majors,

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>is underway as we speak of. Nadal lost in round

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>one while you were sleeping a few nights ago. Now,

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 2>he did get hurt in the match, however, he was

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>already down a set and a break when he got

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 2>When he got hurt, he was being outplayed. Shout out

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to the unranked American that beat him. Djokovic was allowed

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>to actually enter Australia for the first time post COVID

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>after the vaccine controversy. He's winning. He's won Sean Payton

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 2>interviews with Denver and Houston, and a foot archery record

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>has been set in Australia. We're not going to discuss

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 2>any of those things. And by the way, oh there's

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the video. By the way of the foot archery record,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 2>let me watch this. That is pretty impressive. This is

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>why he should describe on YouTube that, oh wow, look

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>at that bullseye. Nailed it. So you can see if

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 2>you're listening, you missed video of a young lady standing

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 2>on her head and hitting a bullseye a La Robin

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 2>Hood from I don't know thirty meters out using only

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>your feet but demon And also check out the chat

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and in the chat, include your questions and Dusty, if

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 2>you're watching, we'll try to get your questions.

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 3>Chat.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Dusty is live in the chat. All right, deman, say

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>what are we starting with?

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Man, tough game for you coming up. Chiefs won game

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 4>from the Super Bowl the Prince to remain undefeated on Saturdays.

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Which one Take your pick. It must be hard for

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 4>you being the number one Kansas City guy, but also

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>being the number one Trevor Lawrence stand in the media.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Is Stan or truth teller? Have I told a lie

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 2>about Trevor Lawrence have been that's fine, but Stan, I

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like is a bridge too far, But go ahead.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 4>The question on everyone's mind is what is the best

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 4>case scenario for Nick right.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>To just continue to be right about this as I've

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>been all year long. Guys, all I did was when

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.119
<v Speaker 2>the Jags were foreign eight, or maybe they had won

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>one game, maybe they were five and eight was I

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and the Titans at that point in time still looked

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>really good. I had the courage to come on television,

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to come on this show and say the Jags were

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>still making the playoffs and that they were not, and

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>that they were not only making the playoffs, they were

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 2>going to win a playoff game and they would not

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.119
<v Speaker 2>lose again until they played Kansas City in the divisional round.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>And I said that when they were like the eleven

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>seed in the AFC, and yet they have not lost

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>since then. They won the playoff game in stirring fashion,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and now they will lose to Kansas City in the

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>divisional round. It is worth noting Trevor's two I'd said

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 2>this on television yesterday, I will reiterate it here today.

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Trevor's two best previous player comps are Andrew Luck and

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Peyton Manning. Andrew Luck, early in his career, I think

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 2>it was year two, had a twenty eight point playoff comeback.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 2>That one was against my Chiefs, and then went to

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 2>New England that at the time dynasty of the AFC

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and got his teeth kicked in. The very next year,

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 2>played New England in the playoffs again and got his

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 2>teeth kicked in. Peyton Manning. Now it took Peyton Manning

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 2>six years to get his first playoff win, but after

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>he did, he then went to New England and got

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 2>his teeth kicked in the very next year he got

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>beat by New England again before finally breaking through the

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>following year. So Trevor Lawrence is already ahead of schedule.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>But now he hits his head on the ceiling of

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the AFC, that is the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 3>So you're picking the Chiefs.

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Of course, I'm picking the Chiefs. The Chiefs are. The

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs are so clearly the best team in the AFC.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I can't say they are so clearly the best team

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL because San Francisco is a legitimate threat

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the ball. But Kansas City had

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the best record, they have the best player, They have

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 2>a top three defensive player in Chris Jones. They have

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the best weapons in the league in Travis Kelce. Quietly,

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 2>that young defense second in the league in sacks for

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the season, not a small sample size this season, and

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>they are healthiest they've been all year. So for all

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>those reasons, I do not think the Jags are ready

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 2>for this level. They were ready for the previous level.

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 2>And so what is my best case scenario. My best

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>case scenario is the Chiefs get up early, run away,

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>and hide and it was a hell of a season

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 2>for Trevor and the Jags.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I just feel like there's a little bit more

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 4>room because you love being right, but it's kind of

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of conflicted what you just said.

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I think you've got a lot more room to be

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 3>right with Lawrence than you do with the Chiefs.

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 4>And I feel like if they were to beat the Chiefs,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 4>you were just that much more right.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>See.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is this, I'm already you right about

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Trevor Lawrence, when in a way no one else was.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I picked the Jags before the year to make the playoffs,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>to go nine to eight, and I never abandoned it

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>right and much to your guys chagrined you guys put

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 2>gambling bands on me on the Jags. But I also,

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 2>all year long was very consistent that the Chiefs have

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 2>been wildly undervalued, and by the way, we continue to

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 2>see it. But we saw this game earlier this year,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and the Jags did a surprise on sidekick to start

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the game. They the Chiefs then turned the ball over

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 2>three times, and the Chiefs still won comfortably. They were

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>up twenty to nothing, they were up twenty seven to seven.

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>In this game. There was no point where it looked

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>like the Chiefs could lose, even though the Jags essentially

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>got four extra possessions. The Jags defense was never able

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 2>to stop Kansas City except when kan City was fumbling

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the football. So I have massive respect for what Doug

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Peterson's done. I obviously think Trevor Lawrence is not the

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>next great quarterback in this league. He's already a great

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in this league. But this is where the run ends.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So a couple questions.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this's a little random, but if me and your

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Slovenian some to play one on one in basketball, who

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 4>are you picking to win?

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 3>What?

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Does that have to do with anything?

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, because it's like the Chiefs Jags to your two teams.

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well I would probably pick a guy who's top

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>two player in the NBA over you, buddy.

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, disrespectful okay, all right, and another one if the

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Prince somehow pulls this off.

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Are the trumpets? Coming back to? First things first?

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 2>So here's the thing. Those those guys, I don't know

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>if I'm supposed to say this or not, but I will.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Those guys who come in now three times. They are

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 2>from Juilliard, which is the world's most prestigious, prestigious performing

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>arts institution for acting, music, all of it. We have

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to book them. The best part about those guys being

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>there is we have had to book them days. We

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 2>booked them the previous week. So that is how that

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>is how convinced I've been at each turn that we

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 2>are booking them a week before these games are played,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and they are coming through for me. So am I

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>booking them today to come back Monday? I am not. Okay,

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I tell you right, You know what I the I'm

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>not gonna burn money, whether it's my money or fs

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>one's money. When we know how this one's ending. So

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 2>the trumpets. Now maybe here's the and here's the other thing.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 2>On this particular game, I've got my co hosts just

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>so boxed in. What are they going? How could they

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 2>possibly like try to have one over on me? No

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>matter the result here, do you think they can come

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 2>in Monday? If the Jags lose?

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 4>Me?

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, hah, Nick, the Chiefs are in their fifth straight

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 2>AFC title game.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And if the Chiefs lose, yeah, I'll be sad, but

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 2>it's because Trevor was even better than I said. So

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a win window.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 3>If they end up winning, all do the emergency trumpet session?

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh you'll come in?

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 2>No, PRIBLEM I appreciate that. All right?

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, we could be in for a game

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 4>to remember on Sunday between Dallas and San Francisco. Rock

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Party and Dak Prescott both silenced the Doubters in the

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 4>wildcard round. Both teams have loaded rosters and have strong defenses.

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Are you worried another statement game from Dak could put

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 4>your Super Bowl prediction into the ground?

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 2>All right? So I have before the year on our

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>gambling show, I gave out fifty to one documented Chiefs

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Niners Super Bowl right now, that bet would you'd get

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it at like seven to one, right, So if that

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>in fact, I think worse, I think like five to

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>one maybe. So it obviously was amazing value. I am

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>not worried about this game. I think the Niners positional versatility,

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>their ability to put out used check Simac Kittle, Ayuk

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and Debo on the field, and you don't know if

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna run. You don't know what they're gonna do.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it is going to be such a more

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>sophisticated offense than the one Tampa was running last week.

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 2>By the way, what did Tampa think of their offense

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>last week? Moments ago? They just fired Byron Leftwich. By

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the way, what a bad beat for Byron Leftwich. The

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>guy was getting head coach interviews. They actually you know what,

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 2>now I think about it. It was reported last year

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 2>that because Byron Leftwich Demons back before you were a

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 2>big football fan, was the Jaguars quarterback. And after they

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>fired Urban Meyer, it was reported last year they wanted

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to hire Byron Leftwich and he turned the job down,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 2>reported because he didn't like to set up with the

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 2>GM there. So he was going to get to coach

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Trevor he turned it down to go with Peterson. It

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 2>works out great. Now he's fired, So that's a sidebar.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 2>But my point is that Bucks were running a caveman

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 2>offense with no running game whatsoever. The Niners have one

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>of the most versatile, devastating running games we've seen in

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 2>modern NFL history, so I think it's gonna keep the

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys pass rush off balance. I also think the Niners

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>defense is drastically better than the Bucks defense, and Dak's

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be able to wheel and deal quite the

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 2>way he was on Monday Night. Also, and this is

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 2>a if I were a Cowboys fan, I'd be really

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>upset about this. The Niners played Saturday afternoon, the Cowboys

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>played Monday night. So that is a two and a

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 2>half day rest advantage going into the divisional round. It's

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 2>a massive difference. Yeah, and so all of that screams Niners. Now.

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to say something else here. I am not

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 2>convinced brock Purty is good. You don't like that take,

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>but here's my very simple justification. I was never convinced

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Garoppolo is good and Brock Purty is playing better

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 2>than Jimmy G. But it is it is not so

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>much worldly better for you to be to convince me

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that this isn't simply the system. Now, Purty is better

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>downfield faster than Jimmy G. I'll give him that. But

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we have seen this offense work with

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy G to the tune of getting to the Super Bowl,

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 2>getting to a conference championship game, and that they were

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 2>able to do that with worse weapons than they currently

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>have because they didn't have Christian McCaffrey, to me, speaks

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to the fact that this is a Kyle Shanahan situation.

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Now Party, is he better than a seventh round pick?

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Should be sure, But am I convinced that Brock Purty

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 2>would be having any success that no matter what system

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>he was an he would be having success.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely rock Party was playing the forty nine ers, he'd

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 4>be screwed.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh I think he would be ruined. Yes, absolutely right,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 2>And so it almost you know, it is almost good

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>for the NFL that the Niners don't have a great

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>quarterback because they have the best defense in the league

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and the best weapons in the league and a good

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>offensive line and a super savvy coach. Like the only

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 2>reason to me there is real intrigue in this season

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>is because, uh, it is because the the Niners have

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>a question at quarterback. But I think Brock party and

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the Niners win. But I don't think it's because of

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Brock Purty all right.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Next, the poll that people the fans with you, seventy

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 4>five percent say or seventy seven percent say no, twenty

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 4>three percent say yes.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Thanks on Will Dallas upset?

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeh, San Francisco?

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, yeah, but next, the Bengals haven't lost since Halloween,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 4>but are getting five points in Buffalo. Meanwhile, the Bills

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 4>will have a huge home field advantage obviously, especially if

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Jamorrow Hamlin ends up coming back into the building. Will

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 4>it be enough to overcome roller coaster Josh Allen's mistakes

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 4>and Cincinnati.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I love Cincinnati getting points. I

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 2>actually also liked them to win out right. I do

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>think there will be massive emotion at the beginning of

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>this game, and I expected Moore Hamlin to be there.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 2>With that said, there couldn't possibly be more emotion than

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>there was in the Bills Patriots game when Naim Hines

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 2>returned to the opening kick for a touchdown. Right, and

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>yet the Bills found themselves trailing in that game, Naim

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Hines returned another kick for a touchdown and the Patrio

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 2>were still right there. So I don't think you're gonna

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 2>be able to purely ride the emotion. And if I

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 2>am Buffalo, if I'm a Buffalo fan, I am incredibly

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>concerned about how my secondary has looked. Now this is

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>in part that is unfortunately and I'm only even comfortable

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 2>saying this because Damar's you know, looks like he's going

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 2>to be totally fine. They missed Damar Hamlin, he was

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>already filling in for Micah Hyde. Then he obviously is

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>lost for the year, and now they have a third

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>string safety in there, and Jordan Poyer, their other Pro

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Bowl safety, is banged up, and they're not getting pressure

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>on the quarterback as much anymore because they don't have

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>von Miller. If if von Miller were healthy, the Bengals

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 2>offensive line injuries no left tackle, no right tackle, no

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 2>right guard, might be enough for von Miller to single

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 2>handedly win him this game, the way he flipped the

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs game at the end earlier this season. But von

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Miller's been out and the defense hasn't been the same

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 2>and Josh Allen can't help himself. Josh Allen could have

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 2>had five turnovers in a game against Miami that all

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>he had to do was take care of the ball

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and they couldn't lose. If Josh Allen simply is cautious

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 2>with the football, they can't lose that game. Instead, he's

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 2>throwing bomb after bomb after bomb. And I saw people

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 2>when I criticized him for that on Monday, say, oh, well,

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>if such and such catches this, and guys, fifty yard

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 2>passes down the field are hard to throw and hard

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 2>to catch. Those balls are dropped more often than nice, easy,

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 2>safe eight to twelve yard passes. Now, obviously they have

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 2>a much higher upside, but there is risk to go

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 2>along with that reward risk that they're picked. But also

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 2>you are asking your receiver in a dead sprint, often

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>laying out hitting the turf, to control that ball. So

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 2>I guys, dropping those is not shocking. That is not

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>something that's like, oh, if we do it again, they

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>want to. Of course they could have those drums. The

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>reason those passes are so hard is you need two

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 2>guys to do something great, the throw and the catch.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.479
<v Speaker 2>And so I don't like the way Josh Allen has

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 2>been playing. He has thirty two combined picks and fumbles

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 2>on the year. Joe Burrow and the Bengals, by the way,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>should have lost this weekend, but they didn't, and both

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 2>of these teams obviously could have lost. Neither did. The

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Bengals were going up against the best defense in the league.

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 2>The Bills were going up against the team that had

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 2>limped into the playoffs losing five of six ers on

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the third string quarterback, and a team whose offense had

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 2>just scored nine points against the Jets. That game was

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 2>it ended eleven to six because of a safety at

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the end and the Dolphin move to the football. So

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I like Cincinnati in this spot.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, all right, here's a crazy stat.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 4>Yep, dak is somehow the oldest remaining quarterback in the

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 4>playoffs at twenty nine years old. Mahomes and Allen are

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 4>the only other quarterbacks left in the playoffs on their

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 4>second contracts.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Rogers, Russ Watson, and.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Kyler we Top were the top four highest paid quarterbacks

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 4>this year and they all missed the playoffs. That's not

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 4>gonna stop teams from going all into bit on Lamar,

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Rogers and even Derek Carr. But do these playoffs prove

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 4>it's better to throw darts in the draft than a

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 4>dish out of fact contract for a veteran?

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, no, the playoffs don't prove that. So and by

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the way, this is you said, Dak is the oldest

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>of the remaining quarterbacks. Of all the quarterbacks that made

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the AFC playoffs, Mahomes was the oldest. And let's talk

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>about that when we talk about throwing darts. So you

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 2>have Joe Burrow number one overall pick, Trevor Lawrence number

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>one overall pick, Josh Allen top ten pick, Patrick Mahomes

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 2>top ten pick, Justin Herbert top ten pick. So those

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 2>aren't darts, and whom I and then Tua is the

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>reason Miami was in the playoffs. He was a top

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>ten pick. And then the reason the Ravens were in

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs was Lamar who was an of the first

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>round pick, right, so to me, and why did the

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Ravens lose? In part because their quarterback couldn't get it done? Okay,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>So there's that now. The NFC, Kirk Cousins was a

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>third round pick, Dak was a fourth round pick. Brock

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Purty was a seventh round pick. Daniel Jones was a

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>top ten pick but hasn't worked out. Jalen Hurts was

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 2>a second round pick. Here's what is true. If you

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 2>can get a quarterback no matter where you draft him,

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 2>that is good enough for you to compete immediately when

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 2>he's a rookie, it is the fastest way to trying

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to build a contender. Because quarterbacks make forty million in

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 2>your pay Guys on rookie deals almost nothing, and everybody

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>knows that. It's also why for Cincinnati this is and

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 2>I really like Joe Burrow, but when he said my

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 2>super Bowl window is in my entire career, well yes

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and no, yes it is your entire career. To would agree,

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>But this might be the most talented team he ever

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 2>has because they're gonna have to pay him. They're gonna

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 2>have to pay Jamar Chase. If you pay both of

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>those guys, you can't pay T. Higgins as well. And

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 2>if you do choose to pay T. Higgins as well,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 2>then you're not gonna be able to pay anybody. On defense.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>The fact that Higgins, Chase, and Joe are all on

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 2>their rookie deals is such a huge edge and the

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs by the way, won their Super Bowl when Mahomes

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>on his rookie deal. Now that Mahomes got paid, that's

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason you move on from Tyreek Hill now.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 2>So no, I think that as far as now, the

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>worst thing you can do, to answer your question directly,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is to pay a mid tier quarterback like he's a star.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.239
<v Speaker 2>That is what has hurt Dallas. That is what has

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 2>hurt the Vikings. That is what a lot of people

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 2>felt hurt, the Raiders, hurt the Titans. Paying these guys

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 2>that are just okay, twenty five to thirty five million bucks,

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 2>in Dak's case, forty million bucks. You don't want to

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>do that. So if the question is would I rather

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 2>draft a guy or give Derek Carr forty million a year?

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Probably draft a guy unless I like the Jets might

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>be an exception because they have had so such non

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>existent success in drafting guys. They have the rest of

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the team already built. But yeah, I think that overpaying

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the mid tier quarterback is the quickest possible path to

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 2>being okay but not a true contender. That I fully

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and totally agree with. All Right, keep your questions and

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>comments coming in the chat. Take a very Quick Break,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Comeback WA's Right? Episode one to eighteen Live on YouTube.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 5>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 5>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tania, and

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 2>All Right, welcome back in What's Right with Nick Right?

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Episode one eighteen. Let's get right to it. A little

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 2>bit of hoops before we get back to football. And also,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 2>by the way, put your comments and questions in the chat.

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to those in the next segment. Monte go

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>right ahead, all right.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 4>The Warriors traveled to Boston for the first time since

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the finals tonight.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 4>The Celtics at the top of the East, riding a

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 4>seven game win streak. Those boys, well, Golden State has

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 4>a five hundred and only won five ro games all year. Still,

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 4>both teams are favorites to win their conferences. Yes, the

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Warriors started slow, obviously, but without stacked the East is

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 4>do you have more faith in them to win their

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 4>conference than Boston?

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not. The Warriors are broken. Here we go the now. Listen,

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 2>my pick in the East before the year was Philly.

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Right now, I think the smartest bet it's probably Milwaukee.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 2>But that's just blind faith in Giannis and the blind

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 2>faith Middleton will come back at some point and play,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, look at all like Chris Middleton. There's a

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 2>long time injury Longton. I mean he's played seven games year,

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 2>but didn't look like himself. But I don't think the

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Warriors are good. The Warriors needed someone young to take

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>a lead. Wiseman went in the wrong direction, kaminga state

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 2>where he was at Moody maybe went in the wrong direction.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>And Pool has not improved one percent and every listen.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 2>The Lakers, for instance, had a terrible loss last night,

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 2>another game where there's nothing like I think Lebron had

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty two, nine and eight and it just doesn't matter

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and they lose to the Kings. The Kings who, by

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the way, are good Kings are twenty five and eighteen,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 2>and dearon Fox, a guy you remember from Houston is unbelievable.

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 2>But the Warriors, so the Lakers think about how injury riddled,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 2>how bad, how up and not even up and down,

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>mostly down the Lakers have been. The Warriors are two

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 2>and a half games up on them in the standings.

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 2>The Warriors this year are five and seventeen on the road,

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 2>and Steph is back. And you simply cannot convince me

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>that it is coincidental that the Warriors. All the vibes

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>have been off ever since Draymond hit Jordan Poole right,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, the aside from the plus side

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>for the Warriors is there have been some moments where

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it looked like Clay was getting some of the old

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Clay stuff back. He's up to forty percent from three,

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 2>savaging twenty a game. Those are all positive signs. But

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Poole, who can't defend, who is not a great passer,

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 2>shooting thirty one percent from three is a disaster for them,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 2>And and Draymond just being, you know, an eight seven

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and seven guy. That's one thing. If you've got the

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>league's best defense, because it's like, Okay, Draymond's the biggest

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 2>reason for and the Warriors when they win titles. Last

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 2>year included have been a top three defensive team the

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Warriors this year, where they are in defensive rating, I'm

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 2>going to give it to you real quick. This season

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:19.719
<v Speaker 2>the Golden State Warriors in defensive rating, I think they're fourteenth. No,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong, I overrated them. They're seventeen. So if you

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 2>have a below average defense, what's Draymond doing for you?

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 2>And so I don't look at the Wars. If I'm

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 2>talking about the Western Conference right now, you've got to

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 2>say Memphis, New Orleans, if Zion gets healthy, and Denver

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 2>are all clearly better than the Warriors. I think Dallas

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 2>could be because they would have the best player on

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the court, and I Sacramento I don't trust long term.

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 2>And then the question is are the Lakers actually going

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>to try to win and make a move or they

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>find just squandering this year. I don't know, But the

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Warriors aren't in as much trouble as the Suns are,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 2>who are twenty one and twenty four, But they're in

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 2>real trouble. To me, they are not a finals contender next.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, so we're playing right ends.

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh so it's a game. Do we have props? Got

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 2>you an marker and a whiteboard? I appreciate that.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so our first one we've got mondays seem like

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 4>it could be the end for tom Brady, though we've

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 4>been saying that for a decade. I'm sure the goat

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 4>doesn't want to go out like that. It was a

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 4>really bad game, but I bet he still has a

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Peyton Manning like run left in him. Before joining you

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 4>at Fox Studios, what do you think tom Brady's next stop?

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Right before I answer this, did you remember the Erasers?

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>If you did not, why don't I answer this while

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>you hop up into some paper towers or something or else.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to be able to erase these all right,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, Demande already wrote his answer. He's going to

0:28:54.840 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>go grab the Erasers. So I think that we're gonna

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>power rank the possible Tom Brady destinations as the following.

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the most likely destination is New England. I'm sorry,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 2>is Miami because of the concerns about to his health.

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Because Steven Ross, the owner there, is a big Michigan guy.

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Because they tried to get him previously. I think Miami

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>is the most likely destination. I think the next most

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>likely destination is the Raiders because Josh McDaniels is there

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 2>and they scuttled Derek Carr for a reason. I think

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the next most likely destination is the Pats, and I

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 2>think the I think the only other possible kind of

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 2>sneaky destination possibility is Tennessee because vrabel is there. But

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 2>my answer, I am going to say Tom Brady next

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 2>year is in Miami. Demonsa, you say the Pats, noep,

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>you think it's a little homecoming.

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going back to the Patriots.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Brady just can't help himself, but try to following Lebron's footsteps.

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he goes to Florida, wins a title or two,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 2>then goes back to the team, and then he tries

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to end in California. Also, by the way, we have

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 2>a little additional in case people missed the news earlier.

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay offensive coordinator Byron left, which was fired this morning.

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Apparently when they win, it's all Tom, and when they lose,

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 2>it's all Byron.

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Fuck.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh go ahead, no, go ahead, ask the question.

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, do you think he gets head coach? Look,

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 4>do you think he gets any head head coaching looks

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 4>this offseason?

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that we're not particularly fair to black coaches

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 2>in this league. He wasn't getting a real aside from

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the jack job. He didn't have any great opportunities and

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>head coaching looks when people liked him. Now he just

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 2>got fired. So no. Also, though, Gabe put this in

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>just because he wants to take a shot at Tom Brady.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>So this is where I remind Gabe, Gabe, Today's the

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty one year anniversary of the tuck rule when the

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>whole thing started. Today is the twenty one year anniversary.

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 2>That's been twenty one years of this guy but deviling

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 2>our producer, David.

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 4>But go ahead, another shot at Tom Brady. I just

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 4>noticed how I think people say that NFL teams have

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 4>the tendency to follow the same characteristics as their quarterback.

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 3>And I heard an announcer.

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 4>Saying on the TV that the Tampa Bay offense and

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 4>defense just looked old and sluggish, and I think that

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 4>was like a direct correlation.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, I mean, he did look old. Brady can't move

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 2>anymore except for when he's trying to you know, slide tackle.

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 2>The opposite had been a great public that would have

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 2>been a good public defender. That was a dirty play,

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Next, the Eagles are coming off the buy in our

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 4>favorite to beat the Giants for the third time this year,

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 4>but there's still major questions surrounding Jalen Hurts and his

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 4>shoulder injury.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Reports are he won't be one hundred percent on Sunday.

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 4>To win, the Eagles need Jalen Hurts at So here's

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 4>the thing.

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's going to be one hundred. But

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I also think that there is a path for the

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Eagles to win where they do nothing on offense, because

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.239
<v Speaker 2>I think that I'm not I'm this is not what

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying is my prediction, but I'm saying I think

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 2>there is a path where let's see where they where

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 2>they win based purely on what that defensive line can

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 2>do to Right now, Daniel Jones, who I think right

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.479
<v Speaker 2>now is getting a little too much hype, and so

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I I if Jalen Hurts is one hundred percent, yeah

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 2>they they or even ninety percent that should guarantee a win.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think even fifty percent they theoretically could win

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 2>if the defensive line just gets to Daniel Jones the

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>way I think it will, demands put up eighty three percent.

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.239
<v Speaker 2>I if you guys saw me do this thing, I

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>was trying to see what it looked like. I drew

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the struggle emoji guy, all right, but I don't know

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 2>how many percent he has to be. So that's what

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I tried to draw it, you know.

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 4>The Yeah, So I don't know.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what percent he has to be because

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I think this might be more about what the Eagles

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 2>defense can do to the Giants offense. Next Picasso and

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:17.479
<v Speaker 2>thanks all right.

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.479
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of Eagles Giants, I've rallied the demand stands and

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 4>reorganized them into Danny Dives fans.

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he has what it takes this week.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 4>And I say that honestly speaking after facing Phillis defense.

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones stock will go.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.959
<v Speaker 2>That one's very easy and my drawings even easier. Uh listen,

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that. So you've got Demonse's got an arrow

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 2>pointing up, I've got an arrow pointing down.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Daniel Jones didn't care about that pass rush Man when

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 4>he could run.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. I think this is a game where

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the way you beat Philly is get them vertical. The

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Giants don't have the receiver threats to do that. They

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Eagles are gonna be have a spy on Daniel Jones.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna be a really, really tough game

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 2>for him. If the Eagles are gonna win, they're gonna

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 2>have the force turnovers. The defense is gonna have to

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>be excellent. Saquon's gonna have to be excellent. I don't

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 2>think Daniel Jones has a big game. I think the

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Eagles are gonna press those receivers and take away those

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 2>dinks and dunks that he's lived on all year. So

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the stock goes down next.

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Aaron Rodgers told Pat mccaffee then McAfee, McAfee sorry that.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 3>He still thinks he can win MVP in the right situation.

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 4>Seems like he found some new confidence obviously, maybe some

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 4>old ayahuasca lying around.

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 3>The only way Aaron Rodgers can win MVP is what

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a weird thing? Though?

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 2>What's a weird thing?

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I guess I don't play football, but was

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 4>he chasing an MVP? Well, he's freaking a Super Bowl?

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it's a weird thing. And Gronk kind

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 2>of took a shot at him for that exact point.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I think his point was I won the MVP last year,

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 2>I could win it again. But the only way Aaron

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Rodgers can win MVP is hallucination. Listen, when it goes,

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 2>for guys, it goes. We have seen it. Drew Brees

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 2>went from almost winning an MVP to out of the

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 2>league in two years. Peyton Manning went from fifty five

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns to out of the league in two years. Tom

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Brady led the league in multiple major passing categories a

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 2>year ago. He's going to be out of the league

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 2>in two years. Rogers was not good this year, and

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>because he makes fifty million, it's not like he's gonna

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 2>be able to go to some stacked team. So he's

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 2>done winning MVPs in this league.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Flatley next, All right, you have to feel bad for

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Brett Meyer for missing his first four extra extra point

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 4>attempts Monday night. Then again, he's a pro athlete paid

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 4>to make kicks. Extra points can be that hard, right,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 4>or can't be that hard, right? So if I take

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 4>five extra point kicks, how many would I hit?

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I want you to answer this honestly. I

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 2>want you to answer it honestly, and I'm very curious

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 2>what you're gonna say. Let me see what your number is.

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>You put two, all right, that's fair point.

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not a whole.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not a fifty yard I put one. So here's

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 2>the thing.

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Two.

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So you and I were on the same baitch here.

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Demanse is a good enough natural athlete that I think

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 2>that so an extra point. By the way, it's not

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 2>college to where you're kicking from the nine.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 4>It's like the twenty five, right, well, you're kicking from

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 4>the twenty two two.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, because they sent from the fifteen, it's like

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 2>a thirty two to thirty three yard field goal. I

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:44.239
<v Speaker 2>think Demanse, once he shanked the first one the second one,

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>once you get a feel for it, I think you

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 2>could make one.

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely think you could make one. We we had

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>a family dinner like four months ago down the street

0:36:55.160 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 2>from here, actually, and and I know people don't necessarily

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 2>believe this, and I was not near the athlete Demonse was,

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 2>but I was, I would say I was. How do

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I put it? So? I was terrible with what I

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 2>would call the hand eye coordination element of sports. So

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't hit a baseball. I was a bad tennis player.

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I kind of had a funky jump shot those things.

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 2>But I was very very good at track. I could

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 2>jump really high. In high school, I never in a game,

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 2>but I dunked a basketball. I'm barely over six feet

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:48.439
<v Speaker 2>and I still not the last few months. But ride

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 2>the peloton and finish in the top zero point one

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 2>percent of basically every class. Orlovski and who's the other guy?

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 2>And Orlovsky and Booger McFarland always post their peloton scores,

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and I crushed those guys. Crush them. So I foolishly thought,

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 2>because of my youth, not my current youth, but because

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 2>of my ability to run and jump as a youth,

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and because I'm still good at the peloton, that I

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 2>could compete with Demanse in a race. So we did,

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 2>me versus the three kids in a race down the street,

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 2>and Demanse was wearing flip slides, and I got an

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>unintentional bit of a head start and it was what

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I would call probably a one hundred yard dash made,

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 2>and within four steps Demonse was fifteen meters ahead of me,

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and I mean was running backwards.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 4>At the end, and I mean it's in the legs, man.

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was. First of all, the strides were

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 2>unbelievably long. Second of all, I mean it was just

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 2>nothing I could have done. Nothing I could have done.

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 2>So I do think you could. You're fast, and you're tall,

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 2>and you're strong. So I do think you could kick

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 2>a field goal. I don't think I think it would

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 2>have to be on a practice field by yourself.

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh you don't think I can did a field goal

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 3>in the game.

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a little bit of a different situation.

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Man.

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, fair enough, All right, Well I answer

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 2>your listener questions and viewer questions. Next What's Right? Welcome

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 2>back in What's Right with Nick Right YouTube show podcast.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Please subscribe, rate, review, do all those things. We're trying

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to get to one hundred thousand subscribers. Dusty, if you're watching, man,

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.479
<v Speaker 2>just text me your question. I feel bad. I'm looking

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 2>at the question. Oh wait, we've got one on from him. Okay, good, Okay,

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 2>we got a Dusty question in there. I'll do that

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 2>one first, all right, go ahead and do it first.

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, Dusty said, we need to get demonte watching

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 4>the all twenty two.

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones stinks.

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 2>So the All twenty two is the film Teams and

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Scouts US where instead of the game broadcast, they call

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 2>it all twenty two because you see all twenty two players.

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like the end zone and the sideline view where

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 2>you can see what everyone does on every play, so

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:27.919
<v Speaker 2>you can see you, did he miss an open guy?

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Was this how you can actually break down film?

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So his point is when you watch it from that perspective,

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 2>you realize Daniel Jones is not very good. Listen, Daniel

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Jones average two hundred yards per game this season, fewer

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>than one touchdown pass per game. He had two games

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 2>this year where he had more than two hundred and

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty yards passing, and in both those games he threw interceptions.

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 2>If you the moment you take the handcuffs on him,

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 2>he'll turn the ball over again. Dable's done a great job.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 2>He is not a great quarterback. We were talking earlier

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 2>about the worst thing you can do with a quarterback,

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 2>and I said, over, hey, the mid tier guys, that's

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 2>what's about to happen Daniel Jones, because he's a free agent.

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 2>If the Giants they should probably just franchise tag him,

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 2>but if they sign him, they're gonna regret it.

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Next dare you Dusty? All right?

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Jonathan asked, I Djokovic wins the Calendar Grand Slam, will

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 4>he become the goat of tennis.

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 2>For a lot of people? Yes?

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 2>For me? I listen, I flatly believe that Federer played

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 2>at the highest level anyone has ever played at, and

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I think Nadal has the best resume. So I have

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Djokovic in third. Now. If he goes through the Grand

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Slam this year, will I have to reevaluate? Probably, But

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 2>with Na Doll battling injuries and Federer done, it's I

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 2>don't want to say it, won't be as impressed, still

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 2>be very impressed. Still got to go through Kurios I

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 2>understand all that, and I'm probably being biased here, but

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone's ever played at a higher level

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>than Federer at his best, and I think the Doll's

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 2>resume right now looks pretty unimpeachable. But if Djokovic wins

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the next four, I guess I'll have to adjust.

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 3>That next, Okay.

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Joey Demonte asked would mahomes on the forty nine ers

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 4>be the best team ever, Yes, easily, Yeah, yeah, easy, yeaheah.

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, here's the thing. Mahomes has never had a

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 2>great defense, so he's never even had, statistics speaking, a

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 2>very good defense. I would and the Chiefs are trying

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 2>to fix that. That's why they traded Tyreek and drafted

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>all those young guys. I would love for there to

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 2>be a moment in Mahomes' career where he gets what

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Brady got, which is get to eighteen points and we win,

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, and so that, but I

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 2>just don't think, I mean, on the Niners with those

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 2>he has had weapons similar what the Niners have, but

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 2>he's never had a running game or a defense at

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 2>all like what the Niners have. All right, next, all right, Jake, Yeah,

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Jake Archer. Oh did you did?

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 3>You said the Chiefs had the second most sacks this year? Yeah,

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 3>we're just talking about that.

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they did have the second most sacks, but that

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 2>but their defense does not rank in the top ten

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 2>as far as points per game, yards per game. They

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 2>have been able to get after the quarterback, but they

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 2>have not been any great defense.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 3>The no, of.

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Course, but the so here's the thing. They have actually

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:26.280
<v Speaker 2>had a really good pass rush, but their overall pass

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 2>defense has been well below average. If the quarterback gets

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the ball out, we haven't been able to cover people

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 2>they the and as far as points per game allowed,

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 2>all of that stuff, they've been right below league average.

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 2>It's still it's just what It's just what's been the case,

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Next, uh, Jake Arsher asked, who's your ideal fit to

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 4>pair with Luca no restrictions.

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 2>No restrictions. AD A D is the answer. But because

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 2>of the injury factor with AD, like long term, a

0:43:54.920 --> 0:44:00.120
<v Speaker 2>guy like Evan Mobley would be amazing. Embiid Actually embiids

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 2>my answer, EMBEI, it is my answer. You want a

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 2>great defensive big who can also score but doesn't necessarily

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 2>need the ball a ton and so AD is perfect,

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 2>which is why he was perfect with Lebron, because Luke

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 2>and Lebron are very similar. But AD's injuries at this

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 2>point you just got to say, you've got to bank

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.439
<v Speaker 2>on them happening, all right.

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Last one, Jose ap as, who's the best fit, Joe

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Burrow or yourself?

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Who has the best fits.

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go Joe Burrow because he can pull off

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 2>so many things that I can't because he is just

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 2>naturally I mean, that's harsh, but I mean he's fifteen

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 2>years younger than me, right, He's a true celebrity. He

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>just carries himself like such a cool guy. I can

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:57.479
<v Speaker 2>pull a lot of stuff out off when I'm out

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 2>with your mom because I kind of like coast off

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 2>her coolness. But when I'm just by myself, the only

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 2>reason I can get away with wearing some of the

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>stuff I wear is because I have sent my notoriety.

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't wear dress how I dress. If I was

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 2>just like a mid level lawyer, he'd be like, what

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 2>is wrong with this guy? But no, the answer is

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow. All right, really good show, fun show. Everybody,

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 2>please like, rate, subscribe, review, do all those things. We'll

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 2>talk to you guys tomorrow for the divisional weekend gambling

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 2>show coming off another winning weekend. We'll do all that

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow and what's right around nine thirty in the morning.

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll see you in and also talk to

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 2>you on Monday and on TV later today. What's right