Speaker 1: All right, glad you're with us. Yeah, it's a historic day.
Speaker 1: It's a low, it's a new low. It's it is
Speaker 1: the modern extreme radical socialist Democratic Party. Why would you
Speaker 1: be surprised or expect anything different. You know what everybody's
Speaker 1: gonna have to get used to as a new normal
Speaker 1: in this country. What is the new normal? The new
Speaker 1: normal is that there is a significant group of people,
Speaker 1: many of them very powerful, that have nothing but contempt.
Speaker 1: We get, we get little glimpses of how they really
Speaker 1: feel about we, the people, at different times. You know,
Speaker 1: it's you know, I can smell the Walmart Trump voters
Speaker 1: from here. That's very revealing, isn't It's? Well, I happen
Speaker 1: to like Donald Trump and proudly voted for him, and
Speaker 1: I happen to like shopping at Walmart. Why do I
Speaker 1: like Walmart and Costco and Kmar? Well, they might Kmar
Speaker 1: shutdown or Target or any of these other stores. Because
Speaker 1: you get the same items and you save money. You
Speaker 1: do it. They have everything. It's the coolest place. Love it,
Speaker 1: no problem. I bought furniture at these places. I bought everything,
Speaker 1: sporting goods, you name it, they got it. Or when
Speaker 1: you hear you know, Trump voters are irredeemable deplorables. There's
Speaker 1: a contempt here, an elitism behind that that is breathtaking.
Speaker 1: There is an elitism behind Obama's comments. You know, the
Speaker 1: bitter people that cling to their god, gun's Second Amendment rights,
Speaker 1: their their Bibles and their religion. Well, most Americans ain't
Speaker 1: hanging out at the church of g d America. Most
Speaker 1: Americans don't have pictures with the racist, virulent anti Semite
Speaker 1: Lewis Ferricon. I know you hit it for nine years,
Speaker 1: former President Obama. I guess tip of the hat tea,
Speaker 1: you hit that one. You know, most Americans don't hang
Speaker 1: out in a church where people say America's chickens coming
Speaker 1: home to roost, not God bless America, Gene America. That
Speaker 1: was Obama's church. It's revealing, though, So I want to
Speaker 1: tell you that it's with all that we now know
Speaker 1: culminating in this this whatever you want to call this
Speaker 1: process today, because it's not justice. There's no due process.
Speaker 1: You've got to understand here, everything that every consideration that
Speaker 1: was given Richard Nixon by Democrats back in the time,
Speaker 1: every consideration that was given Bill Clinton by Nuke gingrich
Speaker 1: at the time is not given to Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: I'm not kidding when I say this is a secret,
Speaker 1: secret Soviet st I'll who attempt here. I am being clear.
Speaker 1: And it's all predicated on a transcript. You know, well,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, you have somebody that interprets it like, oh,
Speaker 1: it's bad, bad, bad. We don't need their interpretation. We
Speaker 1: don't need anybody's interpretation. Why, because we have the transcript.
Speaker 1: The transcript is clear the President is asking Ukraine for
Speaker 1: Ukraine's like the tip of the spear here. It's especially
Speaker 1: as it relates to the whole Russia hoax, an election interference.
Speaker 1: Democrats tell us they care about that. They don't care
Speaker 1: about that. It's like they don't care about due process.
Speaker 1: But it's not the process even it's the substance of
Speaker 1: what it is here. They never got over fundamentally that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump kicked their ass. He won, he beat And
Speaker 1: I'll tell you that there are many Republicans that never
Speaker 1: recovered that we're running against them. He's changed them, he's
Speaker 1: altered them, he's traumatized them. Everybody that I've ever seeing
Speaker 1: that loses the presidency, I'm starting with Gore. They didn't
Speaker 1: go to Hillary Clinton. Even John McCain was never the same.
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney's never been the same. My view, it just
Speaker 1: because they all think they're gonna win, and they don't
Speaker 1: win something that they can't. It's very hard, I guess
Speaker 1: for the ego to accept that. Here. You know, we've
Speaker 1: been watching, you know, this whole process that is being
Speaker 1: run by a compromise, corrupt coward. It won't come on
Speaker 1: this show and a congenital liar by the name of
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff been lying for years. Is about impeachment and
Speaker 1: Trump and Russia and collusion, and Trump and Russia and collusion.
Speaker 1: And we'll play the montage later, but I want to
Speaker 1: just stay focused here for a few seconds. Here. There's
Speaker 1: no goal here to find the truth, because if they
Speaker 1: had a goal of finding the truth, they wouldn't be
Speaker 1: doing all of this behind closed doors. Because it's been
Speaker 1: a disaster behind closed doors as they've been shut down
Speaker 1: by one witness after another. You know, every time, you know,
Speaker 1: another Ukraine witness pulled the rugout from under them. You know,
Speaker 1: we have the top national security official who was present
Speaker 1: on the phone call with Trumps. At Zelenski told investigators
Speaker 1: today that he does not believe anything illegal was discussed,
Speaker 1: and that's the ninety five percent of people. The five
Speaker 1: percent that are compromised, that's a different story here. They
Speaker 1: have political agendas, and it's obvious because we have the
Speaker 1: transcript presidents trying to get to the election interference that
Speaker 1: we know Ukrainian court determined. We know that political confirmed
Speaker 1: January eleven, twenty seventeen, in a long article that they
Speaker 1: were working on behalf of Hillary Clinton to influence the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen elections, and they were successful at it. Hence
Speaker 1: Paul Manafort and the research that they were providing, and
Speaker 1: we also know that there was apparent contact too. Ev
Speaker 1: A Nuness made this point, Ukraine is all over the
Speaker 1: steel Dosier, Ukraine. Yes, Ukraine, Nelly Or was getting information
Speaker 1: from Ukrainians. Ukraine admits that they were involved in our
Speaker 1: election interference on behalf of Hillary Clinton, and they you know,
Speaker 1: why do you think they've been doing all of this
Speaker 1: in secret? Why do you if they had fidelity to
Speaker 1: truth and fidelity to justice and fidelity to the process
Speaker 1: and common sense reason and all of that, they would
Speaker 1: they would have implemented this. They don't want any of that.
Speaker 1: And every Democrat that voted for this today, is voting
Speaker 1: for a compromised, corrupt congenital liar to lead this witch hunt.
Speaker 1: Because that's what this is. But you got to get
Speaker 1: used to it, because this is the new normal for them.
Speaker 1: You know, the impeachment proceedings that ensured Bill Clinton, Richard
Speaker 1: Nixon were not stripped of their fundamental rights, the exact
Speaker 1: opposite happened here today in this country. So you got
Speaker 1: the compromise fact witness, corrupt congenital liar, Adam Schiff, and
Speaker 1: as fellow Democrats, they have the power to veto any witness,
Speaker 1: any evidence, any procedure, anything they want. You know, my
Speaker 1: question is, you know I thought Democrats put their hand
Speaker 1: on the Bible and sworn to uphold and protect the Constitution.
Speaker 1: Is that what ye out of mind? Because I will
Speaker 1: tell you those that think were irredeemable deplorables and smelly
Speaker 1: Walmart shoppers and clinging to our God, guns, Bibles and religions,
Speaker 1: I am telling you something has happened here. And what
Speaker 1: has happened is they never got over losing. They thought
Speaker 1: they had Trump. They had an FBI investigation, they had
Speaker 1: a House Intel investigation, Bipartisan Senate investigation, but that Robert
Speaker 1: Muller was going to take him down. They were salivating
Speaker 1: the entire time, and it didn't happen. To get to
Speaker 1: this point, you have to detach yourself from all intellectual thought, reason,
Speaker 1: common sense, any principles, because in their twisted minds, they
Speaker 1: think they're on a mission from God. I kept talking
Speaker 1: about the SuperPatriot, Jim Comey. There are people justifying all
Speaker 1: of this because they think they know better than we,
Speaker 1: the people of the United States that elected Trump at
Speaker 1: the root of all of this. That is what they
Speaker 1: think and what they believe. That's why this is never
Speaker 1: gonna end. It's never gonna end whether Trump is here
Speaker 1: or not here, because it's us ultimately that they really hate.
Speaker 1: It's the people of this country. They think they know better,
Speaker 1: and if it means that they have to abuse power
Speaker 1: to take power back, they're gonna do it. If it
Speaker 1: means that you have to have breath taking hypocrisy to
Speaker 1: be one of these raging, psychotic democrats. The rage in
Speaker 1: psychosis is not going to go away because even when
Speaker 1: Trump is not convicted in the Senate, when he wins reelection, well,
Speaker 1: first of all, leading up to the election, God knows
Speaker 1: what they're capable of at this point, because we already
Speaker 1: know what they were capable of the last time they
Speaker 1: were willing to rig an investigation into Hillary Clinton when
Speaker 1: she clearly violated the Espionage Act. There's no ambiguity. She
Speaker 1: had a private server, top secret classified information on it.
Speaker 1: We'll send Christians sauciated jail for a year for six
Speaker 1: pictures of a submarine on his phone, but Hillary gets
Speaker 1: a pass. They were screaming about obstruction of justice with
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and Russia, but they had Hillary subpoena and
Speaker 1: emails deleted and the computer hard drive acid bleach pit,
Speaker 1: bust up devices. When hammers remove sim cards, that substruction.
Speaker 1: That's a slam dunk obstruction case. You have to forget that.
Speaker 1: You have to just ignore that because they never talk
Speaker 1: about that. You have to accept that Russian interference only
Speaker 1: matters if it was involving Trump, because you're gonna ignore
Speaker 1: if you're a Democrat, You're gonna ignore the dirty bought
Speaker 1: and paid for with funneled money to a law firm,
Speaker 1: to an op research firm, to a foreign national, the
Speaker 1: dirty Russian dossier that she paid for that was disseminated
Speaker 1: information to their hack friends in the media like David
Speaker 1: Korn and Michael Izikov. You have to accept that that
Speaker 1: unverifiable document because when push Come came to shove, its
Speaker 1: own author wouldn't stand by. It was then used to
Speaker 1: deny an American citizen their constitutional rights and liberties and
Speaker 1: shred the Fourth Amendment, that being Card or Page. And
Speaker 1: then you have to say it says verified. They couldn't
Speaker 1: verify that document. When they finally got around to looking
Speaker 1: into the document, they proved ninety plus percent was false
Speaker 1: and the rest of it none of it's been proven
Speaker 1: true ever. And it was a manufactured document that was
Speaker 1: the basis to spy on a presidential candidate, to spy
Speaker 1: on a transition team and a president. Simultaneous spying was
Speaker 1: going on with the outsourcing of spying to friendly allied countries,
Speaker 1: by turning the powerful tools of intelligence on a president
Speaker 1: and on others, abusing that power. It's the biggest abuse
Speaker 1: of power corruption scandal in history. You have to accept
Speaker 1: all of this and never talk about it. If you're
Speaker 1: a Democrat or Struck and Page or a counter intelligence
Speaker 1: investigation against Donald Trump that happened, you have to forget that.
Speaker 1: Everybody was warned not to use the Steel dossier, but
Speaker 1: they used it when to afise a corp premeditated fraud
Speaker 1: on the court, to spy on an opposition party candidate
Speaker 1: because the candidate you work to prevent putting in jail
Speaker 1: wasn't doing well. And then they have behind it a
Speaker 1: counterintelligence investigation as an insurance policy, which is what they've done.
Speaker 1: You have to accept all of that because I'm telling
Speaker 1: you this is not going to work on Ukraine. The
Speaker 1: facts are against them. Tom Brokaw, it's not there. You
Speaker 1: don't have a case. That took a lot for Tom
Speaker 1: Brokaw to say it. If they still don't have what
Speaker 1: you would call the goods on this president in terms
Speaker 1: of breaking the law and being an impeachable they're going
Speaker 1: to start the process, but they don't have the same
Speaker 1: kind of clarity people who are opposed to Richard Nixon had.
Speaker 1: That's why it is a witch hunt. That's why it's
Speaker 1: a fishing expedition. That's why they want the taxes. They
Speaker 1: want this, they want that, they want that because they
Speaker 1: you know, we know we have one congressman that was
Speaker 1: honest and said it. We can't beat him. We better
Speaker 1: impeach them, and I don't know what they're capable of
Speaker 1: because the number of laws and constitutional violations and the
Speaker 1: lack of reason, common sense, intellectual, honesty, intelligence has to
Speaker 1: be thrown out the window. To be this hippocritical in
Speaker 1: your life, because it is a madness that is taken over.
Speaker 1: This is real. They think they are better, smarter, and
Speaker 1: no better than you. We the American people at the
Speaker 1: root of this, and they can't believe we elected Trump,
Speaker 1: and they can't believe they've tried so hard and didn't
Speaker 1: stop them. And I don't know what they're capable of
Speaker 1: beyond this. If we don't get this straightened out, if
Speaker 1: we don't get to the bottom of it, we're not
Speaker 1: going to have a country at the end of this deal.
Speaker 1: So that's serious. The good news is you have the
Speaker 1: power in the end. And I'll explain that all right
Speaker 1: as we roll along Sean Hannity Show, eight hundred ninefold one. Sean,
Speaker 1: you know, I've known Pulse very a long time, and
Speaker 1: this story breaks late yesterday and you'll be on the
Speaker 1: program with us tomorrow on real real politics investigations. That's
Speaker 1: for example, that's like real clear investigations that's real clear
Speaker 1: politics where we get a lot of polling aggregate, polling averages,
Speaker 1: very credible website. Over the years, he's been somebody that's
Speaker 1: been a credible investigated reporter. I've not been able to
Speaker 1: confirm this yet myself, but i will tell you. Look,
Speaker 1: I've been I've been knowing for quite some time now
Speaker 1: who everybody thought was the whistleblower. I know that this
Speaker 1: person's been mentioned in numerous hearings. I know that now
Speaker 1: it seems to all focus in on this one individual
Speaker 1: until I confirm it. I'm not going to mention the
Speaker 1: person's name if you want to read it. It's on
Speaker 1: real clear investigations. It's that's not even point to me,
Speaker 1: except except what we are ready no looks like a huge,
Speaker 1: massive deets state operation. Already think about this. All of
Speaker 1: a sudden, we had heard we're gonna have eight quit
Speaker 1: pro quos, so many qui pro quos in the call.
Speaker 1: They didn't expect Trump was going to release it. That
Speaker 1: was another, you know, compromise, corrupt congenital liar Adam Schiff
Speaker 1: lie another one. So we know that's problematic for them.
Speaker 1: There's so many problems that we do know when you
Speaker 1: add the stuff that Sperry's talking about. If that turns
Speaker 1: out to be true, Wow, I'll explain next alright, twenty
Speaker 1: five till the top of the hour, eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one Sean. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, we're gonna get the White House's reaction.
Speaker 1: Hogan Gidley is at the White House. He works in
Speaker 1: the communications team of the President. And I've known Hogan
Speaker 1: now for some time time. He is the White House
Speaker 1: Principal Deputy Press Secretary. The President well put out. I
Speaker 1: actually saw a tweet today I want to share with everybody.
Speaker 1: This came from the President. I thought it was particularly powerful.
Speaker 1: It was from a I'm sorry, I came from Avanka Trump,
Speaker 1: surrounded by enemies and spies, catching and perverting every word
Speaker 1: that falls from my lips or flows from my pen,
Speaker 1: and inventing them and inventing where facts fail them. Those
Speaker 1: were Thomas Jefferson's reflection on Washington, DC in a letter
Speaker 1: to his daughter Martha. Some things never change, Dad, Avanka Trump. Wow,
Speaker 1: pretty much sums it up. The Press secretary statemen, the
Speaker 1: president has done nothing wrong. Democrats know it. Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: the Democrats unhinged obsession with this illegitimate impeachment proceeding does
Speaker 1: not hurt President Trump. I agree with that too, that
Speaker 1: this is going to be the ultimate revenge of we
Speaker 1: the people, because the people see the injustice, they're gonna
Speaker 1: there's going to be justice. There's going to be everybody's
Speaker 1: opportunity to speak, and that will be in a year
Speaker 1: and three days on election Day twenty twenty, like reducing
Speaker 1: gun violence and so on and so forth, going through
Speaker 1: the president's accomplishments. Hogan, how are you. I'm doing well, Sean,
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me on. I don't think to me,
Speaker 1: this is just what is a never ending We hate Trump,
Speaker 1: we despise Trump. We can't believe Mullet didn't get Trump.
Speaker 1: We can't believe Trump beat Hillary. Continuation because you know,
Speaker 1: we don't need it, even though the whistleblower, if it's
Speaker 1: what Paul Sperry says it is, is really bad. We're
Speaker 1: about to get an IG report, We're about to get
Speaker 1: the Durham Report. We're about to learn a lot about
Speaker 1: abuse of power and corruption as it relates to this president.
Speaker 1: And I guess now we just have a whole other
Speaker 1: chapter that will find out the truth about in about
Speaker 1: a year or two. Oh, there's no question, and you
Speaker 1: hit the nail right on the head. Let's go back
Speaker 1: to Muller for a moment. If we can thirty million dollars,
Speaker 1: twenty five hundred subpoenas, five hundred warranths, five hundred witnesses,
Speaker 1: forty FBI agents, and nineteen angry Democrat attorneys, and a
Speaker 1: partridge in a peatree. No collusion, no corruption, no obstruction,
Speaker 1: then we move on to this phase of their grandiose plan.
Speaker 1: And they lied about corruption, they lied about Cavanaugh, they
Speaker 1: lied about a cover up, they lied about whistleblower Adam
Speaker 1: Schiff himself has lied so many times. I can't, for
Speaker 1: the life of me, understand why anyone in the mainstream
Speaker 1: media gives him credence incredibility. I don't even think he
Speaker 1: has an apartment in town. I think he just sleeps
Speaker 1: in these green rooms and moved from studio to studio,
Speaker 1: from location to location over at the towers of the
Speaker 1: mainstream media locations. Because I just can't understand what these
Speaker 1: people think they are doing. It's nothing for the American people.
Speaker 1: The president has done nothing wrong. Read the transcript. The process.
Speaker 1: Whether you're Democrat, Republican independent, completely unfair. And if you
Speaker 1: get a parking ticket, you get more due process than
Speaker 1: this president is getting for an impeachment proceeding that's completely illegitimate.
Speaker 1: And lastly, the Democrats again nothing. We're not talking about
Speaker 1: USMCA for our farmers and ranchers. We're not talking about
Speaker 1: lowering prescription drug costs, securing our border, modernizing infrastructure. Democrats
Speaker 1: aren't doing a thing that they were elected to do.
Speaker 1: It's not going to change, unfortunately for you. I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: I think this never ends. Even when the president's reelected
Speaker 1: the day after, we got to impeach them again and
Speaker 1: again and again. I mean, that's how sick that they've become.
Speaker 1: But you know, ultimately, look, not giving any due process
Speaker 1: that helps Republicans, that helps the president because that gives
Speaker 1: every senator the Senate now gets to say, remember they
Speaker 1: tried to do this in the Clinton impeachment, except now
Speaker 1: it'll work, and that is just dismiss what this illegitimate, illegal, unconstitutional,
Speaker 1: lack due process witch hunt in the House is doing it.
Speaker 1: I mean, you have a compromise, corrupt, congenital liar running it.
Speaker 1: We need we say much more but all right, Hogan Gidley,
Speaker 1: thank you from the White House. We appreciate you being
Speaker 1: with us. You know, I love a piece out by Tom.
Speaker 1: It's actually on Foxnews dot Com. Tom, Dear del Bacaro.
Speaker 1: Trump impeachment hearings must include Obama Biden's Republicans, do your job.
Speaker 1: It says Democrats are careening toward impeachment of a president,
Speaker 1: dragging the American people along with them, and today's mass
Speaker 1: media age it will consume this nation like few other
Speaker 1: events ever have. I've outlined a broader strategy for the
Speaker 1: GOP in my recent article on Foxnews Opinion. Republicans must
Speaker 1: win the impeachment trial, and they can follow these five steps.
Speaker 1: At this point, the formal House vote deprives the Republicans
Speaker 1: the right to subpoena witnesses without the permission of the
Speaker 1: compromise corrupt fact witness, congenital liar Adam Schiff, a man
Speaker 1: who was lied now for three years to we the
Speaker 1: American people, a stark departure from the procedure afforded the
Speaker 1: minority under Nixon and Clinton. Now, before we talk about them,
Speaker 1: you might ask, well, what is an impeachable offense? The
Speaker 1: Constitution is clear treason, bribery, other high crimes and misdemeters.
Speaker 1: That's the easy part because treason and bribery easily define.
Speaker 1: Other high crimes and misdemeters are not. But anyway, but
Speaker 1: if we're going to have this, he's right in what
Speaker 1: he is actually saying goes through a little bit of
Speaker 1: the history of all of this, and what we have
Speaker 1: is we have a quid pro quel and that would
Speaker 1: be the bidens Joe Biden. Joe Biden, what he did
Speaker 1: with taxpayer dollars was a quid pro quel. I told
Speaker 1: him he's bragging about his quid pro quel. I told him,
Speaker 1: you're not getting the billion dollars. You got six hours,
Speaker 1: fire him, fire the prosecutor. Or you're not getting the billion.
Speaker 1: You'll get the billion if you fire him. Quid pro quo.
Speaker 1: We've got Hunter Biden making millions. He's on GMA admitting
Speaker 1: Kevin experience none zero with Ukraine, not an energy Now
Speaker 1: why would Ukraine give that person millions of dollars? Why?
Speaker 1: No experience, no background, no expertise whatsoever. Zero. Same with China.
Speaker 1: Now we've got real things to investigate here. Then we
Speaker 1: got if we're really going to get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of this. And this is why pay close attention to
Speaker 1: Durham's probe, because the origins of the Russia witch hunt
Speaker 1: now matter because it also includes Ukraine at a very
Speaker 1: high level. This is what political was telling us in
Speaker 1: January of twenty seventeen. This is what a Ukrainian court
Speaker 1: decided and set happened Ukrainian election interference. And it's tied
Speaker 1: directly as Devin Nunez has rightly pointed out, and we'll
Speaker 1: play it later in the program, and Ukraine is all
Speaker 1: over the Steel dossier. Nelly, you're working confusion GPS. Her
Speaker 1: husband the fourth highest ranking official at the Justice Department.
Speaker 1: We got to get to the bottom of that. You
Speaker 1: cannot have a counterintelligence investigation without a sitting president involved.
Speaker 1: That would be Obama at the Obama and the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: So what I'm telling you here is, and I want
Speaker 1: to get into this thing about Paul Sperry. I can't
Speaker 1: confirm this myself, so I'm not going to name the
Speaker 1: person he's identified, but I can tell you this is
Speaker 1: the person that has been named in hearings, whose name
Speaker 1: has been all bannered about in Washington, and Sperry is
Speaker 1: right everybody in every newsroom knows about this, but I
Speaker 1: can't independently confirm it. I can only confirm that, in fact, yes,
Speaker 1: that's the person everyone's been talking about. So if what
Speaker 1: he is putting in this report is true turns out
Speaker 1: to be true, we have maybe as big of abusive
Speaker 1: power our corruption scandal again, with many of the same
Speaker 1: players now one way or the other. We're now understanding
Speaker 1: here that the Democrats, why is there this big rush
Speaker 1: to impeach the president, Why the need for secret, closed
Speaker 1: door Soviet Union style impeachment coup hearings? Why because they
Speaker 1: don't because they've been getting bloodied and blistered behind closed doors,
Speaker 1: according to all my sources. We'll have some more on
Speaker 1: that in a second, but we now need to find
Speaker 1: out who was the non whistle blower here say whistle blower.
Speaker 1: We need to know what contact took place. We know
Speaker 1: contact took place with the compromised, corrupt, coward, congenital liar
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff, because we know there was contact with his office.
Speaker 1: We need to know did they recommend a lawyer, did
Speaker 1: they tell the person to get a lawyer, did they
Speaker 1: recommend that the person go to the IG? The IG
Speaker 1: pointed out that this friend, this guy was friends with
Speaker 1: Joe Biden at a lot of it was apparently a
Speaker 1: Biden supporter. We know this person worked for the CIA.
Speaker 1: Did they abuse their power at the CIA? What is
Speaker 1: their connection to John Brennan? We know Brennan is a
Speaker 1: you know, he's one of these psychotic, raging Trump paters.
Speaker 1: We need to know if the person was working on
Speaker 1: a political agenda, because the whole thing stinks to high heaven.
Speaker 1: We need to know also, was intelligence that we entrust
Speaker 1: the people abused again against this president or high ranking
Speaker 1: Obama officials involved yet again in an effort to overturn
Speaker 1: an election. Now, if we get those answers, we may
Speaker 1: not like him in the sense that we're gonna be
Speaker 1: asking questions when the IG report comes in, and when
Speaker 1: the Durham report comes in, the conscience of the nation
Speaker 1: is about to be shocked. Those of you that listen
Speaker 1: to this program and watch us on Hannity, you will
Speaker 1: be saying, yeah, really it all happen and how did they?
Speaker 1: How did he know this? Because we've done a lot
Speaker 1: of digging. Our reporting has not been wrong, none of it.
Speaker 1: We've been very careful, very very careful and in a
Speaker 1: town that loves to leak. You know, we know this
Speaker 1: guy was mentioned on the House floor. We know all
Speaker 1: of these things. We know the news, every news division
Speaker 1: in the country knows about it. None of them are
Speaker 1: doing anything about it. And what was Susan Rice's involvement,
Speaker 1: What was the whistleblowers relationship with Shifts and Shifts office?
Speaker 1: When and where did they meet? How often did they meet?
Speaker 1: What was said? What did they talk about? Lawyers? What
Speaker 1: did they talk about the IG? Remember, the IG was
Speaker 1: very clear. Yeah, there's a political taint to this person
Speaker 1: big time. And we already know all of this has
Speaker 1: to be all of this has to be gotten to
Speaker 1: the bottom of you know, you have one guy, one
Speaker 1: of two Democrats. You know, I told you about this
Speaker 1: guy from New Jersey. Vandue, you know, kind of make
Speaker 1: a really good point here. It's the point he's going
Speaker 1: to be impeached, that'll go to the Senate. I believe
Speaker 1: in the Senate he will be vindicated. And he goes
Speaker 1: on to say, yeah, then we're going to be running
Speaker 1: against the same guy who's vindicated, you dopes. That's what
Speaker 1: he's pretty much saying to his own party. We had
Speaker 1: another witness today, Zero Heads, the national security official who
Speaker 1: was present on the phone call between Trumbuns and Lensky.
Speaker 1: I want to be clear, I was not concerned that
Speaker 1: anything illegal was discussed, and we've read the transcript. It
Speaker 1: was nothing illegal, and the president knew all these people
Speaker 1: were listening. By the way, fake news CNN there actually
Speaker 1: have their Paul Callen writing today, maybe this will be
Speaker 1: a double impeachment and to get rid of Mike Pence
Speaker 1: and Nancy Pelosi will be speaker. And Pelosi was slapped
Speaker 1: with the ethics complaint herself. A coalition of conservative groups
Speaker 1: Jenny Beth Martin, Tea Party, patriots. You got a bunch
Speaker 1: of forty separate conservative groups. Good for them, Glad they're
Speaker 1: getting involved in all of this because there is a
Speaker 1: lot of corruption. But what we have here is something
Speaker 1: that you've got to understand is not going to stop
Speaker 1: even when the president is exonerated here and I'm assuming
Speaker 1: that Senate Republicans are going to do their job. Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell has agreed to do an interview with me tonight
Speaker 1: on Hannity. That's a good sign. And comments that he
Speaker 1: made that many people weren't paying attention to earlier in
Speaker 1: the week. Were very clear that without due process, whatever
Speaker 1: the House is doing corruptly over there is dead on
Speaker 1: a rival in the United States Senate, as it should be.
Speaker 1: But I'll let him speak for himself tonight. But whatever,
Speaker 1: and by the way, I got to give a big
Speaker 1: shout out to the nation's largest police union, Fraternal Order
Speaker 1: of Police. Congress is violating one of the most basic
Speaker 1: rights afforded to American citizens amid their attempt to impeach
Speaker 1: the president, President Patrick Gios, president of the police union,
Speaker 1: the largest in the country. Due process does not protect
Speaker 1: the guilty. It is the means by which we guarantee
Speaker 1: the most fundamental aspect of our nation's justice system, innocent
Speaker 1: until proven guilty. Sadly, members of Congress are undermining that
Speaker 1: trust in due process by ignoring its fair and universal application.
Speaker 1: Just as local law enforcement officers are often convicted in
Speaker 1: the media after being denounced by local elected officials without
Speaker 1: collecting the facts, these members are violating due process to
Speaker 1: score political points. You can't have justice without due process,
Speaker 1: not even that. We're further down the line than that,
Speaker 1: because we all you can read what is the transcript
Speaker 1: and I'll want you to read the transcript. They want
Speaker 1: you to get their sick interpretation, twisted interpretation of the transcript.
Speaker 1: I'm going to tell you what's likely going to happen
Speaker 1: here they're going to do. They're not going to afford
Speaker 1: the president to due process. They're going to allow the
Speaker 1: compromise fact witness, corrupt coward, congenital liar, shift to do
Speaker 1: his thing. They'll impeach him. They sent it, will dismiss it.
Speaker 1: You need two thirds of the Senate, sixty seven, it lose.
Speaker 1: I think what nineteen Republicans, It's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: And then we're gonna get our chance to vote in
Speaker 1: a year and three days. Here's my thing. Even then
Speaker 1: when we re elect him, they won't stop because it's
Speaker 1: not Trump is a manifestation of us, a movement that
Speaker 1: has existed to clean and drain out corruption in the swamp.
Speaker 1: You want to know how corrupt they are, just look
Speaker 1: at Biden, Hunter and Joe quid pro quo Joe, look
Speaker 1: at Hunter, millions and millions, no experience the American people.
Speaker 1: Do you think any of you listening to my voice
Speaker 1: would ever get millions for knowing nothing? The answers, no,
Speaker 1: they were buying influence, and you know how corrupt the
Speaker 1: swamp is. They don't care about that. They didn't care
Speaker 1: about a rigged investigation into Hillary. They didn't care about
Speaker 1: real Russian interference with Hillary and her dirty Russian dossier.
Speaker 1: They didn't care about the premeditative fraud on a court.
Speaker 1: They don't care about Ukrainian influence in the elections. They're
Speaker 1: phony hypocrites and that have suspended all decency, common sense,
Speaker 1: intellectual honesty, intelligence reason to get where they are today.
Speaker 1: They are driven by psychotic rage that's not ever ending.
Speaker 1: The only answer we have is to defeat them one
Speaker 1: year in three days from now. People forget the Ukraine
Speaker 1: is all over the still dossier. We know that Nellie
Speaker 1: Or testified that she was getting information from Ukrainians. So
Speaker 1: why on earth is there a problem for the president's
Speaker 1: lawyer to go to Ukraine to get information of figure
Speaker 1: out where did this dirt come from? Where did it
Speaker 1: originate from? So for the president to be upset with Ukraine,
Speaker 1: upset about the corruption because he knows, don't forget. The
Speaker 1: Ukrainian ambassador here in the United States in August of
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen wrote a nasty hit piece on President Trump,
Speaker 1: well then Candidate Trump before the election. There's plenty of
Speaker 1: reasons why the President would be over in Ukraine, having
Speaker 1: his lawyers in Ukraine to try to get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of the Russia probe. And look, these nitwits on
Speaker 1: the Democratic side, and I call them that, not me.
Speaker 1: It's not trying to do name calling here, but it's
Speaker 1: like they're they're living in a dream world. They don't
Speaker 1: know that the dirt that they paid for, They paid
Speaker 1: Fusion GPS to send a British spy to Ukraine to
Speaker 1: dig up this dirt, and all of a sudden they
Speaker 1: pretend like like that just doesn't exist. Yeah, you know, Sorry,
Speaker 1: We're going to hold them accountable, and we're going to
Speaker 1: ask the questions every time about the Democrats ties to Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity show that was Congressman Devin Newness
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine for one. Shaun is our number.
Speaker 1: This now is the one of the more fascinating aspects
Speaker 1: of all of this, because again we're waiting the Inspector
Speaker 1: General report on Faiza abuse. Remember Democrats, they didn't care
Speaker 1: about Hillari's rigged and compromised investigation or obvious obstruction of justice.
Speaker 1: They only cared about Trump Russia collusion. They never cared
Speaker 1: about a dirty Russian dossier full of lies, bought and
Speaker 1: paid for. They didn't care that people were warned about
Speaker 1: its ability to be verified, but they used it anyway
Speaker 1: to take away the constitutional liberties of one individual carter
Speaker 1: page and spy on a president or presidential candidate, then
Speaker 1: transition team, then presidency. We know from a Ukrainian court
Speaker 1: decision that in Ukraine was involved in election interference in
Speaker 1: a big way in the twenty sixteen election. Hence the
Speaker 1: president talking to President z lyns geek, can you get
Speaker 1: to the bottom of it? Democrats said they cared about
Speaker 1: this for three long years. But again the duplicity, the
Speaker 1: double standard. They only care about something if they can
Speaker 1: bludge and Trump with it. They don't care about the
Speaker 1: truth or the real danger of foreign election interference. Now,
Speaker 1: that was Devin Nunez rightly pointing out Ukraine is all
Speaker 1: over the Steel dossier and nell Lyor was getting information
Speaker 1: from Ukrainians. Again, I point to the January eleven, twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen political piece that goes in chapter verse in detail
Speaker 1: exactly what Ukraine was involved in. We have a Washington
Speaker 1: Examiner piece out real investigations, this report by Paul Sperry.
Speaker 1: We have not independently confirmed, as I've been saying, the
Speaker 1: things we do know are scary enough. We have now
Speaker 1: a plot, and I believe we are in the beginning
Speaker 1: stages of exposing yet another, frankly, a coup attempt among
Speaker 1: deep state operatives, those that think they know better than
Speaker 1: we the American people. I've been calling what they did
Speaker 1: the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal in history. There's
Speaker 1: a new book out. It says the Plot against the President,
Speaker 1: the true story about how Congressman Devin Newness uncovered the
Speaker 1: biggest political scandal in US history. I cannot put this
Speaker 1: book down. It is written by investigative journalist Lee Smith.
Speaker 1: He had unprecedented access to Congressman Devin Newness, head of
Speaker 1: the House Intel Committee, in terms of exposing what has
Speaker 1: gone on here. Welcome to the program, Lee, Thank you
Speaker 1: for being with us. I urge everybody to get this book.
Speaker 1: Will link it to Hannity, dot comts and bookstores everywhere.
Speaker 1: But I really just want you. I'm going to turn
Speaker 1: this show over to you to tell this story because
Speaker 1: I don't want to interrupt and ask questions, because you
Speaker 1: know it better than I do, and I thought I
Speaker 1: knew it pretty well well. Sean's first of all, I
Speaker 1: have to thank you for the remarkably generous introduction and
Speaker 1: for letting them the show to begin with. And of course, no,
Speaker 1: you've been. You've been on this story from the beginning.
Speaker 1: I mean you've been. You've been putting out essential information,
Speaker 1: explaining to people, explaining to people what happened, what was
Speaker 1: going on. You've spoken at length with Congressman Nunez, and
Speaker 1: I am very happy about the amount of attention the
Speaker 1: book has gotten. We're you know, we're at the top
Speaker 1: of Amazon Amazon bestseller's list. But the reason for that
Speaker 1: is because people, as you understood early on, the American
Speaker 1: public are dying to know what happened here, how these people,
Speaker 1: how these operatives undermined our government, how they turned on
Speaker 1: candidate Trump, then the President elect, and then the president himself.
Speaker 1: So of course there's a lot of interest and a
Speaker 1: lot of hunger to know what happened and to praise
Speaker 1: and to praise and honor the people who did the
Speaker 1: right things right. We all know who the bad guys are,
Speaker 1: we know their names, We've been hearing about them for
Speaker 1: three years. They won't give us any peace. John Brennan
Speaker 1: can't stop tweeting, James Comey can't stop opening his mouth
Speaker 1: and making some comment or another. But the story of
Speaker 1: the good guys, that's really important to be known. So
Speaker 1: there are people like, of course Congressman as other people.
Speaker 1: One of us the estigators I was a gentleman named
Speaker 1: Cash Patsal, Congressman Inez is Concations director, as a man
Speaker 1: named Jack Langer. There were other people working on the
Speaker 1: investigation as well, which they called objective MEDUSA. They couldn't
Speaker 1: speak to me on the record, But that's one of
Speaker 1: the most important things about the book, praising people, praising
Speaker 1: people who stood up and did the right thing at
Speaker 1: a very difficult moment, a somewhat dark moment in our
Speaker 1: Republic walk through, because I was reminded reading your book
Speaker 1: things that we did report that I had forgotten. What
Speaker 1: we're really looking at here in my mind is there
Speaker 1: was a first a plan to prevent Donald Trump from
Speaker 1: getting elected. That would include not charging Hillary Clinton with
Speaker 1: obvious crimes, that would include the dirty dossier, that would
Speaker 1: include the FISA applications based on unverified bought and paid
Speaker 1: for Russian lines of Hillary that would then include the
Speaker 1: outsourcing of intelligence gathering to allied countries to spy another way,
Speaker 1: on the president, his transition team, and a candidate. Explain
Speaker 1: that part of all of this. I think one of
Speaker 1: the most important things that we all know now that
Speaker 1: the SBI and dj did some extremely bad things. They
Speaker 1: abused a whole bunch of different classified programs. They abused
Speaker 1: classified intelligence, classified counterintelligence investigations, confidentially human sources, and a
Speaker 1: secret court that grants FISA warrants. One of the most
Speaker 1: important things, though, that about the story that we can't
Speaker 1: put aside, is that the FBI spied on Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: on the Trump campaign. But we need to remember the
Speaker 1: primary beneficiary was not the FBI, not the CIA, The
Speaker 1: primary beneficiary was Hillary Clinton. It was Hillary Clinton, the
Speaker 1: Clinton campaign that used the FBI and resources intended to
Speaker 1: keep Americans safe from terrorism and from hostile foreign powers,
Speaker 1: abused these programs to use it for her own political gain.
Speaker 1: I think that's a central part of the story that
Speaker 1: we can't put aside. What they did was with this
Speaker 1: spy warrant. It was an electronic breakin into the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: What makes this the biggest political scandal of all time
Speaker 1: is that when we speak of Watergate, none of them
Speaker 1: were active government officials. The people behind the break in.
Speaker 1: What we're looking at here is these were active current
Speaker 1: FBI agents, the small team across fire Hurricane group, as
Speaker 1: I refer to them in the book. They were used
Speaker 1: by the Clinton campaign to spy on Donald Trump. This
Speaker 1: has never happened before, because you're right, the powerful tools
Speaker 1: of intelligence were unleashed in favor of a presidential Kennedy.
Speaker 1: But they also had the insurance policy. Explain the insurance
Speaker 1: policy aspect of this and how this was and for example,
Speaker 1: that you can't have, as Andy McCarthy says, a counter
Speaker 1: intelligence investigation without the approval of a president. That president
Speaker 1: at the time would be Obama. There are different places.
Speaker 1: I'll come to the insurance policy in one second, if
Speaker 1: you don't mind. There are different places that I identify
Speaker 1: in the book where you can see where you can
Speaker 1: see the former president finger prints. For instance, in chapter eight,
Speaker 1: which is called Obama's Dossier, but that refers to is
Speaker 1: the Intelligence Community assessment that he directed John Brennan to
Speaker 1: write in December twenty sixteen. Now, the point of this
Speaker 1: intelligence community assessment was again was to delegitimize the newly
Speaker 1: elected president Donald Trump. It interfered with a peaceful transition
Speaker 1: of power. It through the United States into chaos. This
Speaker 1: is what the forty fourth president of the United States
Speaker 1: did intentionally by ordering this intelligence community assessment through it
Speaker 1: into chaos. And the purpose of it, as Congressman Nunez says,
Speaker 1: and as I have him saying in the book, it
Speaker 1: was a political document intended to have a political effect,
Speaker 1: and the effect was to de legitimize Trump. And this
Speaker 1: is one reason why we are where we were where
Speaker 1: we are now. Had had this document not not been assembled,
Speaker 1: I mean we you know, there would still be problems
Speaker 1: obviously with the pre election operation against Trump, but this
Speaker 1: is really the engine of the post election on information
Speaker 1: against now the elected president of the United States. Let
Speaker 1: me ask you this because it's the question I get
Speaker 1: asked most often, and that is do you believe between
Speaker 1: the Inspector General report on FIS abuse? The only conclusion
Speaker 1: we know that there are multiple warnings that this material
Speaker 1: was unverifiable or wasn't verified. It says on the top
Speaker 1: of a FIES application verified and true. But we know
Speaker 1: it's unverifiable because Steele himself wouldn't stand by his own
Speaker 1: work if it was even him, which is another question.
Speaker 1: But it was his dossier and that they used it
Speaker 1: anyway in FISA applications. Is there any other conclusion than
Speaker 1: this is premeditated fraud on a FIZ accord. No. I
Speaker 1: think you're entirely right. I mean, in my I mean
Speaker 1: my assessment, the evidence that I've assembled in the book.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know that we have this. There's this
Speaker 1: debate when the dossier, when Steel's reports actually got to
Speaker 1: the FBI, whether they arrived in July, whether they arrived
Speaker 1: in the middle of September, as other people have said
Speaker 1: in defense of the cross by Hurricane group. No, I
Speaker 1: mean there's a document that I found is what I've
Speaker 1: called the May twentieth, twenty sixteen proto dossier, written a
Speaker 1: month before Steel's first report, and then you see the transition.
Speaker 1: It goes from the May twentieth document investigates Trump's ties
Speaker 1: to organized crime. The June twentieth Steel report looks at
Speaker 1: his alleged ties to a foreign power. They were laying
Speaker 1: the groundwork for a counter intelligence investigation. The document was
Speaker 1: written to allow them or written rather to serve as
Speaker 1: evidence to obtain a spy warrant. It looks to me
Speaker 1: much more like one at the FBI or DJ or
Speaker 1: someone who knew what they were doing, knew how to
Speaker 1: direct that Dotsier. Absolutely they knew it was a fraudulent
Speaker 1: document because they had any Well, that means that there's
Speaker 1: only as I've been saying, the evidence is overwhelming. Stay
Speaker 1: right there. This book is phenomenal. So much I'm absorbing
Speaker 1: at all because there's so much the detail that I
Speaker 1: I've known, but I've reported on at times but have forgotten.
Speaker 1: Lee Smith is with us. This is an incredible book.
Speaker 1: The Plot against the President, The true story of how
Speaker 1: Congressman Devin Newness uncovered the biggest political scandal in US history.
Speaker 1: It is and it's getting bigger by the day. Ukraine
Speaker 1: is a part of the chapter. It's now it is
Speaker 1: part two of it, if you can believe it all right,
Speaker 1: So with us we have investigative journalist Lee Smith. This
Speaker 1: book is phenomenal. The Plot against the President, The true
Speaker 1: story of how Congressman Devin Newness uncovered the biggest political
Speaker 1: scandal in US history. Amazon dot Com, Hannity dot Com, bookstores, everywhere. Um,
Speaker 1: how does this end? In the minute we have with
Speaker 1: you left? What do you believe? Do you believe a name?
Speaker 1: Names who will be held accountable. There's a chapter in
Speaker 1: the book at the end, one of the final chapters,
Speaker 1: where I talk about different people going through the evidence
Speaker 1: and different documents, the different things that people did wrong
Speaker 1: and may have broken the lawn. The names will not
Speaker 1: be unfamiliar to you, Sean. I mean it is people
Speaker 1: like John Brennan. It's people like James Clapper, Seeple, like
Speaker 1: Andrew McKay, Peter Struck, Lisa Page, Bruce and Nellie or
Speaker 1: I'm very optimistic. One of the things a Congressman has
Speaker 1: been saying, Conressman has has been saying since we first
Speaker 1: started speaking about this, about the book and about the
Speaker 1: case generally, is that we need two things. First is
Speaker 1: the accounting, and the book is partially an accounting, or
Speaker 1: it's a partial accounting and what happened and the work
Speaker 1: that Devin Nunez and the Objective Medica team did to
Speaker 1: uncover these abuses and crimes. The other part is the accountability.
Speaker 1: Congressman has talked about that, and the accountability is making
Speaker 1: the people who wrote the law, and who made American
Speaker 1: is vulnerable, who endangered American national security? That these people
Speaker 1: have to pay for what they did. That's the accountability.
Speaker 1: I am confident that Attorney General bar and US Attorney
Speaker 1: US Attorney John Durham have taken their charge seriously. All right,
Speaker 1: we appreciate it. The book is a great read. It
Speaker 1: is the story every American needs to know in detail,
Speaker 1: the true story how Congressman Devin nun has uncovered the
Speaker 1: biggest political scandal in US history, the plot against the president.
Speaker 1: Amazon dot Com, Hannity dot com, bookstores everywhere lead great work.
Speaker 1: Thank you, We'll have you on TV. Will follow this closely,
Speaker 1: and we're waiting for the results. Let's see if people
Speaker 1: do their job and protect freedom and liberty the constitution.
Speaker 1: When we come back, Kim Strassel, Tom Finton and the
Speaker 1: latest on this Ukrainian madness straight ahead. We have not
Speaker 1: spoken directly with the whistle blower. We would like to,
Speaker 1: but I'm sure the whistle blower has concerns that he
Speaker 1: has not been advised as the law requires, by the
Speaker 1: Inspector General or the Director of National Intelligence just as
Speaker 1: to how he is to communicate with Congress. There is already,
Speaker 1: in my view, ample evidence in the public domain on
Speaker 1: the issue of collusion. If you're willing to see it,
Speaker 1: if you want to blind yourself, then you can look
Speaker 1: the other way. I could certainly say with confidence that
Speaker 1: there is significant evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia.
Speaker 1: I've been very clear over the last year a year
Speaker 1: and a half that there is ample evidence of collusion
Speaker 1: in plain sight. Now bear in mind that meeting a
Speaker 1: Trump Tower, which takes place after the campaign is alerted
Speaker 1: that the Russians have these emails. John Junior is told, Hey,
Speaker 1: at the highest levels, ultrasensitive, we have information incriminated about
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton as part of the Russian government effort to
Speaker 1: help Donald Trump. That looks a lot like collusion to me. Well, certainly,
Speaker 1: if the Trump campaign went to a meeting with the
Speaker 1: Russians seeking to enlist or receive the help of the
Speaker 1: Russian government in getting damaging which is what the trail
Speaker 1: of evidence and emails suggests the case, Yes, that would
Speaker 1: be a potential form of collusion. You have an offer
Speaker 1: of illegal help, you of the acceptance of that offer,
Speaker 1: you have an overt act in furtherance of a conspiracy.
Speaker 1: That is I think by any rational Americans expectation the
Speaker 1: personification of collusion, that being the corrupt, the compromise coward,
Speaker 1: congenital liar, the leader of this impedi. But we take
Speaker 1: no joy the course he takes joy in this. This
Speaker 1: has been the culmination of three years of just never
Speaker 1: ending lives by this guy. And as I said at
Speaker 1: the beginning of the program today, this is never gonna
Speaker 1: end in this sense. There's only this psychotic rage is
Speaker 1: not gonna go away. Didn't go away after an FBI investigation.
Speaker 1: Trump Fresher collusion, didn't go away after the House Intelligence
Speaker 1: Committee investigation, the bipartisan Senate Committee investigation, didn't go away
Speaker 1: after the Muller report. No evidence of collusion. Nope, they're
Speaker 1: just not this time. They're just not gonna They're not
Speaker 1: gonna put it to risk and put it in the
Speaker 1: hands of a special counsel that they had put all
Speaker 1: their hopes and dreams in for all this long period
Speaker 1: of time. It has been never ending lies. It will remain,
Speaker 1: you know, never ending lies. And there's only one solution.
Speaker 1: It's a political one. They will impeach him, the Senate
Speaker 1: won't convict him, and the American people you get to
Speaker 1: reelect him. But I'll even tell you after that, they're
Speaker 1: not going to stop. They can't stop. It's it's sort
Speaker 1: of like a drug addict. They need this rage, their
Speaker 1: drug of rages and hating Trump. They need it. They
Speaker 1: get up, they crave it. If they don't have it,
Speaker 1: they break out, start sweating and going through detox. It is,
Speaker 1: it is who they are. It now defines them and
Speaker 1: their minds. They have just made a conclusion. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has to go, has to go, has to go, has
Speaker 1: to go, but they can't beat him at the ballot box. Now,
Speaker 1: with all of this going on about Ukraine, and we
Speaker 1: have a transcript that not only exonerates the president completely,
Speaker 1: it shows the president was faithfully executing his job, his
Speaker 1: constitutional oath, and that was executing the law's land. Again,
Speaker 1: you have to only care about collusion with Russia if
Speaker 1: it's Donald Trump, because you'll ignore the dirty bought and
Speaker 1: paid for Russian dossier that was used to bludgeon candidate
Speaker 1: Trump and spy on Candidate Trump and transition Team Trump
Speaker 1: and President Trump. You have to get that part. You
Speaker 1: have to accept that real obstruction took place when subpoena
Speaker 1: emails were deleted and then we have the bleach bit
Speaker 1: and the hammers and the missing sim cards. You have
Speaker 1: to accept that's okay, But you can't accept that there
Speaker 1: was no obstruction with Trump. You have to accept that
Speaker 1: it's okay to take a dirty, unverified dossier present it
Speaker 1: to the FISA court as verified. And you have to
Speaker 1: accept that it's okay to spy on a presidential candidate,
Speaker 1: transition team and president. And you have to accept the
Speaker 1: weaponization of the powerful tools of intelligence, leaking of transcripts
Speaker 1: and conversations with world leaders and prime ministers and presidents,
Speaker 1: and also spying on a president I illegally because you
Speaker 1: outsource or subcontract out spying against the Americans to allied
Speaker 1: countries so you can circumvent American laws. You have to
Speaker 1: accept that too. Now we're getting to the bottom of
Speaker 1: that part of it. And I think now with Paul
Speaker 1: Sperry's article, and when we get to the bottom of
Speaker 1: if all of this is true, we now have another
Speaker 1: round of deep deep state attempted coup attempt here an
Speaker 1: organized collusion, if you will, to bring America to this precipice,
Speaker 1: this ridiculous impeachment witch hunt. Anyway, Kimberly Strasse, old Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal columnist author new book is out by the Way,
Speaker 1: Resistance at All Cost, How Trump Haters Are Breaking America. Also,
Speaker 1: Tom Fitton is the president of Judicial Watch. They released
Speaker 1: eight pages of State Department documents revealing that well one
Speaker 1: month after the election. In twenty sixteen, twenty eight days
Speaker 1: before the inauguration of Donald Trump, a State Department special
Speaker 1: coordinator for Libya, Jonath Weiner, had a ten minute phone
Speaker 1: call with the police chief at the Russian Embassy in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. Jose how State Department officials continue to use
Speaker 1: unsecure BlackBerry devices to transmit classified material for more than
Speaker 1: a year after Hillary Clinton's use of an unsecure server
Speaker 1: and system had been revealed. They also have other documents
Speaker 1: we'll get into in a second. Welcome both of you. Kim.
Speaker 1: I'm really honing in on a theme in your book,
Speaker 1: which is they're willing to break America, and I think
Speaker 1: they think God has inspired them to do it. They
Speaker 1: think they're doing God's will here. This is a holy
Speaker 1: mission for them. It seems there's nothing that's going to
Speaker 1: stop them. They'll just move on to another impeachment and
Speaker 1: another impeachment. Well, look how far we have come Sean
Speaker 1: just earlier this year, only a few months ago. Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi's standard for whether or not impeachment was something that
Speaker 1: you should do was whether or not it had bipartisan support.
Speaker 1: Look at the vote we had today in which the
Speaker 1: only bipartisanship were two Democrats who crossed the aisle to
Speaker 1: vote with Republicans against the resolution, and both of them
Speaker 1: pointed out that the country is just too divided to
Speaker 1: handle this and what this exposes. That's one of the
Speaker 1: issues in my book, is what we're seeing here is
Speaker 1: a partisan exercise of the impeachment tool, and it's a
Speaker 1: misuse of that tool, and it's something we've never had
Speaker 1: in this country before, and it's setting a terrible precedent
Speaker 1: that could come back to haunt us in the future.
Speaker 1: And you know, Democrats seem not to care about that,
Speaker 1: because all they care about is bringing down this presidency.
Speaker 1: You know, Tom Fitton, you've been discovering a lot through
Speaker 1: judicial watching your Freedom of information out request. Tell us
Speaker 1: what you found. Well, it's the New Bachelor documents that
Speaker 1: involves Jonathan Weiner, who was a State Department official in
Speaker 1: a John Kerry supposedly in charge of the Libya issue.
Speaker 1: Who had literally helped Christopher Steele right parts the dossier
Speaker 1: work with Has that been confirmed that he helped do that?
Speaker 1: He wrote it off ed talking about it. Okay, he
Speaker 1: confessed about it into two Washington Post. He said he
Speaker 1: compiled some information and shared it with Steele for the
Speaker 1: Justice Department. Okay, So we get these new documents asking
Speaker 1: about these very issues, and he's talking to the Russia
Speaker 1: political chief. You're in the embassy at just before Christmas
Speaker 1: in December sixteen. Now that's the same period of time
Speaker 1: that the State Department was desperately shoveling information on Russia,
Speaker 1: the supposed Russia gates smear to the Congress, the both
Speaker 1: and the House because they were obviously desperate to destroy
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. In fact, there's another email we had previously
Speaker 1: obtained Sean that shows they said that we made the
Speaker 1: deadline and what was the deadline Inauguration day. So we
Speaker 1: have this guy who was close to Christopher Steele, who's
Speaker 1: a buddy of his, he worked with him for years,
Speaker 1: was pushing him in on other issues around the State Department.
Speaker 1: Steele may as well have had a desk at the
Speaker 1: State Department. And then he's talking to Russia, the top
Speaker 1: Russia official political official here in DC. And who's he
Speaker 1: talking to about that, of course Victoria Newland, who was
Speaker 1: orchestrating this Russia smear campaign as well against the incoming president.
Speaker 1: You know, it gets to the point, Kimberly, when you
Speaker 1: put all of this together. Now, we're getting the IG
Speaker 1: report on FISA abuse that will come before Thanksgiving that
Speaker 1: I've been assured, So we're really days away from getting
Speaker 1: our hands on that, which is gonna reveal I think
Speaker 1: very clearly premeditated fraud on AFIZA Court with the bulk
Speaker 1: of information coming from an unverified, dirty Russian dossier that
Speaker 1: Hillary paid for. I thought we cared about Russian interference
Speaker 1: or outside interference in our elections. Then we're going to
Speaker 1: get the Durham report. And you know what you can
Speaker 1: see in Paul Sperry's article is well, it seems to
Speaker 1: be that if that article turns out to be fact,
Speaker 1: and we'll have him on this program tomorrow, that would
Speaker 1: mean the same people, the same players, the same scheme,
Speaker 1: the same strategy, the same deep state, and yet another
Speaker 1: coup attempt. Because there's no other way to describe this anymore.
Speaker 1: They want President Trump gone, and by whatever means necessary,
Speaker 1: if if they have to weaponize the powerful tools of
Speaker 1: intelligence to get this president out of office. They're They're
Speaker 1: on a mission from God. This is now for them.
Speaker 1: They're the superpatriots. They know better than we smell a
Speaker 1: walmart irredeemable, deplorable shoppers, and the bitter people that claim
Speaker 1: to God and guns and our Bibles and religion. Well,
Speaker 1: this is why it's so important that the Durham investigation
Speaker 1: in particular, because it gets to what Tom is just
Speaker 1: talking about and what you are talking about. Look, I'm
Speaker 1: looking forward to this IG report too, but I keep
Speaker 1: reminding people that Michael Horowitz is going to be somewhat
Speaker 1: limited in the scope of what he can tackle in
Speaker 1: that you know, he doesn't have subpoena power. He's supposed
Speaker 1: to focus on this spys a court abuse, etc. What
Speaker 1: we need is John Durham, who has the ability to
Speaker 1: reach to all of these different areas of the government
Speaker 1: that you're talking about, the State Department, political actors within
Speaker 1: the Obama administration, the intelligence community, but also outside actors
Speaker 1: like Fusion, GPS, like Steel, and the media's involvement. The
Speaker 1: entire scope of things. We're not going to really understand
Speaker 1: everything that has happened unless and until he actually puts
Speaker 1: out the findings. And that's why it's also good to
Speaker 1: see that members of the Senate are now writing letters
Speaker 1: to ag Barr trying to get him to go on
Speaker 1: the record and commit to saying that, regardless of whether
Speaker 1: or not Durham files charges against anyone, that the American
Speaker 1: people get to see the product of his investigation. Well.
Speaker 1: I agree with all of it, but let's just start
Speaker 1: with one thing here. Premeditated fraud we know was committed
Speaker 1: on the files accord. All right, Well, we'll get to
Speaker 1: that in a second, but I just this is not
Speaker 1: going to end, but ultimately the power will return to
Speaker 1: we the people. That's the amazing part of this process.
Speaker 1: They're not going to be able to stop Donald Trump
Speaker 1: voters on election day, and I expect that there is
Speaker 1: going to be political There will be political payback here
Speaker 1: because the American people, they're smarter than this sort of
Speaker 1: insular and bubble that the Medium mob been the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party lives in, and they know they know an injustice
Speaker 1: when they see it. And that's why so many of
Speaker 1: you feel this anger because you see what is going
Speaker 1: on you see how corrupt they are. You know, they'll
Speaker 1: ignore Hilary's dossier. They'll ignore Hunter and Joe Biden, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's quit pro quota, Hunter Biden's millions for nothing. They'll
Speaker 1: just ignore it. No big deal. Um, most people get that.
Speaker 1: It's simple, all right. Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn
Speaker 1: is a number. Right. As we continue, Kim Strassel is
Speaker 1: with us her book Resistance at All Costs. How Trump
Speaker 1: haters are breaking America? Tom Fitton as the president of
Speaker 1: Judicial Watch, who has a new breaking news today that
Speaker 1: they's been outlining. Let me ask, and I'll give you
Speaker 1: a minute each, simple question, how does this play out?
Speaker 1: Let's assume they impeach him. Let's go from there. Kimberly, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: I'm writing about this for tomorrow. But look, mister McConnell.
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell gave a very important speech on the floor
Speaker 1: of the Senate earlier this week. He didn't get a
Speaker 1: lot of attention because ever one is focused on the
Speaker 1: drama in the house, but he went chapter and verse
Speaker 1: and laid out in detail the lack of due process
Speaker 1: in this proceeding, the problem with the secret hearings, the
Speaker 1: problem with the fact that Republicans have not been allowed
Speaker 1: to call witnesses or demand certain answers, the black balling
Speaker 1: of the president's legal counsel. This to me is really
Speaker 1: important because he was increasingly seeing senators under pressure to
Speaker 1: not even take this up in the Senate. I mean,
Speaker 1: if they have to take it up, but you know,
Speaker 1: you could have a motion to dismiss upfront. This was
Speaker 1: something that happened back in nineteen ninety eight during Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton's trial. Bob Bird put up a motion to dismiss.
Speaker 1: He was defeated along party lines. But the precedent is there,
Speaker 1: and I think you see growing pressure on Republicans in
Speaker 1: the Senate to do that up front and say, look,
Speaker 1: this process has been so tainted from the beginning, that
Speaker 1: our duty is to the Constitution and to send a
Speaker 1: message to the House that you don't get to behave
Speaker 1: this way. Well said, I would hope they do that.
Speaker 1: Let's see, time will tell Tom. Yeah, the Senate needs
Speaker 1: to build a firewall to protect the Constitution from this coup.
Speaker 1: And initially, when I started raising issues about this six
Speaker 1: weeks ago, when this alves started beginning, the Senate said, well,
Speaker 1: the rules can't be changed, and you're hearing a different
Speaker 1: message from the Senate leadership, which means the voters, as
Speaker 1: you point out Sean are taking control of the process
Speaker 1: and letting their senators know about what's going on here.
Speaker 1: They're getting feedback from the grassroots they don't want this
Speaker 1: to proceed, this coup attack on the president. And you know,
Speaker 1: I think what's going to happen though, is there's going
Speaker 1: to be criminal prosecutions or serious criminal implications what Durham
Speaker 1: is doing. And that's what the concern here is. Now
Speaker 1: a criminal investigation has the right to subpoena, he has
Speaker 1: the right to convene grand juries. That was not done
Speaker 1: by accident. There's no doubt I have let you both go. Well,
Speaker 1: that's going to be the most significant development. And we
Speaker 1: have confirmation and the media doesn't want to talk about this,
Speaker 1: that there's evidence of criminal activity in the targeting of
Speaker 1: President Trump and Canada Trump. It will be revealed, hopefully.
Speaker 1: There are few good people that will do their job
Speaker 1: and expose all of this lawlessness that has gone on.
Speaker 1: Both of you are part of the team that has
Speaker 1: exposed it. Tom Fitton, Kim Strassell. Thank you both. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one Sean, you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, all right, when we come
Speaker 1: back News round Up, Information Overload, Congressman's Lee zeld In,
Speaker 1: one of the most outspoken people in Congress against this
Speaker 1: Ukrainian lie and witch hunt. He'll weigh in on that.
Speaker 1: We'll get your calls in eight hundred nine four one
Speaker 1: Seawn as we continue, stay right here for our final
Speaker 1: News round Up and Information Overload. So, no rights for
Speaker 1: the minority unless the chair so designates. In fact, in
Speaker 1: this resolution, it allows the chair to veto even the
Speaker 1: ability for the president to have legal counsel in the room.
Speaker 1: If the Chair chooses at his whim, they can literally
Speaker 1: kick out the president's legal counsel. This is unprecedented. It's
Speaker 1: not only unprecedented, this is Soviet style rules. Maybe in
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union you do things like this where only
Speaker 1: you make the rules, where you reject the ability for
Speaker 1: the person you're accusing to even be in the room
Speaker 1: to question what's going on, for anybody else to call
Speaker 1: witnesses when only one person has the right to call witnesses.
Speaker 1: And as we saw just the other day, the Chairman
Speaker 1: was literally directing the witness to not answer certain questions
Speaker 1: by the Republicans. What kind of fairness is that. Maybe
Speaker 1: you think it's fairness if you can run rough shot
Speaker 1: over somebody because you've got the votes. But that's not
Speaker 1: how impeachment was supposed to go, Madam Speaker, When you
Speaker 1: look through this resolution and you see how one sided,
Speaker 1: how Soviet style this is running, this is the United
Speaker 1: States of America. Don't run a sham process. A tainted
Speaker 1: process like this resolution ensures it ought to be rejected.
Speaker 1: And I'm bipartisan rejection of this resolution. And i yiel
Speaker 1: back to balance of my time. Now you all are
Speaker 1: being used. Some of you are happy about it, some
Speaker 1: of you are not. But many of you are reporting
Speaker 1: zero percent of the story. There was one story that
Speaker 1: came out yesterday in Politico that was filled with falsehoods.
Speaker 1: Just somebody lied to you. I watched CNN last night
Speaker 1: and I saw a host one allegation after another say
Speaker 1: stuff that just was not true. Your sources. Those Dems
Speaker 1: in that bunker are trying to create a narrative because
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff aspires to write the world's greatest parody. And
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what right now is. We're here two
Speaker 1: floors below us in the bunker, Adam Shift's bunker in
Speaker 1: the Capitol Basement. Adam Schiff is tearing up his parody.
Speaker 1: He's going to have to rewrite it. Why is that
Speaker 1: while we can't talk about they say the substance of
Speaker 1: the depositions, but I'll tell you. Isn't it kind of
Speaker 1: curious that you don't know what's going on today with
Speaker 1: Tim Morrison in his deposition? Why is it that you
Speaker 1: don't have the information the opening statements he was at
Speaker 1: Alex Vinneman's us on the substance the Ukraine Aid was
Speaker 1: not even known to behold held up by Ukraine. They
Speaker 1: did not say anything to us until just before it
Speaker 1: was released. And then it was released, And as Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan pointed out, guess what Ukraine had to do in
Speaker 1: order to get that hold released. Nothing. Now, Adam Schiff
Speaker 1: needs to release all the transcripts right now on behalf,
Speaker 1: on behalf of our constituents, on behalf of the American public,
Speaker 1: for everyone who's pissed about being misled by Adam Schiff
Speaker 1: and his cohorts hiding in the bunker of the Capitol
Speaker 1: Basement using you to lie to our constituents. Release the
Speaker 1: darned transcripts. Let's have a conversation about substance, because I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what you lost the conversation about process. You're
Speaker 1: losing the conversation about process. Bring it on about substance.
Speaker 1: On the issue of process, On the issue of substance,
Speaker 1: the Republicans win. All they need to do is stand
Speaker 1: up for what is right. You have a corrupt I've
Speaker 1: never seen anything like this, a compromised, a corrupt, congenital
Speaker 1: liar that is running this charade. It's been a charade,
Speaker 1: it remains a charade. It is a witch hunt upon
Speaker 1: a witch hunt. At this point, now they may have
Speaker 1: convinced themselves they're on a mission from God and they're
Speaker 1: doing God's work and they're the real superpatriots. What we
Speaker 1: are watching here is unprecedented in American history that you know,
Speaker 1: we have people's interpretation of a transcript, when we have
Speaker 1: the actual transcript and the actual transcript, the president not
Speaker 1: only does nothing wrong, it exonerates him. He's doing everything right.
Speaker 1: That we were told by Democrats that was important for
Speaker 1: the last three years is looking into foreign election interference
Speaker 1: because Ukraine has a court decision that admits that they
Speaker 1: did it, and they were. They're willing to give us
Speaker 1: the evidence of what they've done. We know a DNC
Speaker 1: operative met with Ukrainian officials in the Ukrainian embassy in DC.
Speaker 1: Read the January eleven, twenty seventeen piece by Politico. It
Speaker 1: couldn't be any more clear than it is that not
Speaker 1: only was their election interference to help Hillary Clinton, it
Speaker 1: went to the highest levels. And that's where the issue
Speaker 1: of Paul Manafort all came from. Now, if you want
Speaker 1: to talk about quid pro quos, let's talk about them,
Speaker 1: because we got a vice president bragging about his quid
Speaker 1: pro quo. Here's the quid, here's the pro Oh, you
Speaker 1: got six hours you either you know, you fired this
Speaker 1: Ukrainian prosecutor or you're not. You're not getting the money.
Speaker 1: You're not getting the billion. Knowledge you're fire him, you
Speaker 1: get the bill billion. You don't fire him, you don't
Speaker 1: get the billion. Oh they fired him, son of a bee.
Speaker 1: They fired him. Now why did they? Why would a
Speaker 1: vice president want Ukrainian prosecutor fired? Oh because they're paying
Speaker 1: his son's millions. Oh well, maybe it's okay, because the
Speaker 1: son of experience in Ukraine no energy, no oil, no gas,
Speaker 1: No Why are they paying the son of the vice president,
Speaker 1: the second highest elected official in America millions of dollars?
Speaker 1: Do you think it has to do with your name?
Speaker 1: Probably that is called buying influence. But we have such
Speaker 1: the superpatriots, the mob that think they're doing God's will,
Speaker 1: trying to get rid of the people's choice Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: That ends all justify the means for them. So it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if you have a compromise, corrupt congenital liar
Speaker 1: leading leading the process who's been lying to us three
Speaker 1: years on Trump Russia collusion. It doesn't matter that we
Speaker 1: have the transcript or still going to hear from other
Speaker 1: people's interpretation of the transcript when we have the transcript.
Speaker 1: The president rightly is looking into and faithfully executing the
Speaker 1: laws corruption outside election interference. And just because the media says, well,
Speaker 1: it's okay what Hunter and Joe did is okay, doesn't
Speaker 1: make it okay. And it's not a conspiracy theory because
Speaker 1: he really got the millions of dollars, and he admits
Speaker 1: he had no experience, and his father did leverage a
Speaker 1: billion dollars, so that's a problem also, So it's going
Speaker 1: to be led by a guy is that it has
Speaker 1: compromised a fact witness in the case. And to be
Speaker 1: what are they doing. They offer no due process, the
Speaker 1: due process that Nu Gingrich and the Republicans afforded Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton in nineteen ninety eight, none of that. Everything is
Speaker 1: at the whim of the compromise corrupt congenital liar. That's
Speaker 1: who's running the show on behalf of all the Democrats
Speaker 1: except two today. There is no due process in this
Speaker 1: and there's no underlying crime. You can read it and
Speaker 1: you can see it. Everything that was you in terms
Speaker 1: of precedent past impeachment proceedings is gone. That being ensured
Speaker 1: for Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, and what we got
Speaker 1: voted on today does the exact opposite, because they compromise
Speaker 1: corrupt congenital liar, and as fellow Democrats, they can veto
Speaker 1: any witness, any evidence, any procedure, do anything they want.
Speaker 1: They can kick the president's lawyers out of the room
Speaker 1: any time they want. Why is it important now to
Speaker 1: hear from the whistle blower because of all of the
Speaker 1: ties that we're now learning about the whistle blower anyway
Speaker 1: eight hundred ninety four one Shawn is our number. We're
Speaker 1: joined by Congressman Lee Zelden is with us, who you
Speaker 1: heard earlier, and he's been amazing in this whole process. Sir,
Speaker 1: how are you. I'm doing great. Sean's great to be
Speaker 1: with you. I am proud you. You actually work in
Speaker 1: Long Island as a Congressman. You're like one of the
Speaker 1: few in all of the state of New York. You're
Speaker 1: a ranking member of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Speaker 1: I've never witnessed anything like this. On the heel of
Speaker 1: three long years of Adam Schiff lies. This is now
Speaker 1: where Democrat, this is now where they have sunk to
Speaker 1: tell us what goes on from here? Special Counsel Adam Shift,
Speaker 1: Judge Adam Schiff, Grand Jury Adam Shift. He has gotten
Speaker 1: into witness coaching. A couple days ago when alex Vinman
Speaker 1: was there, and they imagine this. You have a committee,
Speaker 1: the House Intelligence Committee. The jurisdiction is any intelligence related matters.
Speaker 1: And on Tuesday, with alex Vinman's testimony, he develops a
Speaker 1: new rule that in any way, shape or form, you
Speaker 1: cannot ask any questions to have anything to do with
Speaker 1: the intelligence community. He's a chief strategist for lying and leaking.
Speaker 1: Some of the information they put out is just totally
Speaker 1: not true. Sometimes it's three percent of the story. And
Speaker 1: as you played in that clip earlier, the media, many
Speaker 1: of them are feeding off of it, loving it, putting
Speaker 1: out false information. Others are pissed that they're being misled.
Speaker 1: And this guy is the point man that doesn't even
Speaker 1: mention all the time she's lied to the American public
Speaker 1: about contacts with the whistle blower lied when he gave
Speaker 1: his parody during the opening statement of the Acting Director
Speaker 1: of National Intelligence or March twenty two to twenty seventeen,
Speaker 1: going back to when he was on MSNBC saying he
Speaker 1: had more than circumstantial evidence that President Trump cluded with
Speaker 1: the Russians in order to win election. It's this is
Speaker 1: evidence that he still hasn't produced. I haven't seen Muller
Speaker 1: never found it. And this guy is now the person
Speaker 1: that they're propping up to lead the charge. This is
Speaker 1: Shift's baby, and he wants to write the world's greatest
Speaker 1: parody ever to take down a sitting president in order
Speaker 1: to appease and enrage radical liberal base. And who cares
Speaker 1: damn the torpedoes if it rips the country and a half,
Speaker 1: it's all good because he's a man on a mission.
Speaker 1: He thinks it's think it's patriotic. He thinks that this
Speaker 1: is courageous. I don't think ripping the country and half
Speaker 1: is anything to be proud of. Well, I don't think
Speaker 1: it's to be proud of. All right, So do you
Speaker 1: believe that they now go with whatever impeachment article because
Speaker 1: it throwing a lot of stuff up against the wall,
Speaker 1: hoping any one of them stick. Do you believe they
Speaker 1: go down that road? And what about the thirty one
Speaker 1: Democrats that are in Trump won districts in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and they seem to be going along with it least
Speaker 1: except with the exception of two. Are they going to
Speaker 1: go along with this charade? They better not. And everyone
Speaker 1: right now goes back for a week. That's a district
Speaker 1: work period. Anyone who's out there listening to this show,
Speaker 1: if you live in one of those districts that went
Speaker 1: to President Trump, are you living in another district that
Speaker 1: maybe it didn't go to President Trump, but you have
Speaker 1: a Democratic member of the House who voted yesterday, let
Speaker 1: them hear from you. I believe in Nancy Closi is
Speaker 1: just handing over the gavel. At this point, she is
Speaker 1: giving off. She's sacrificing her majority because she got rolled
Speaker 1: by her conference. I think in order to prevent them
Speaker 1: from having enough votes to impeach the president, it's important
Speaker 1: that right now, over the course of the next week
Speaker 1: and a half, during a district work period, I want
Speaker 1: members to come back begging Nancy Plosi please don't bring
Speaker 1: a vote on impeachment. And that's a power that I
Speaker 1: don't have. It's a power that your listeners have to
Speaker 1: take charge. Now, Smers, articles of impeachment go. This is
Speaker 1: these are moving goalposts. These are they're trying to create
Speaker 1: new shiny objects. The Constitution is clear when it says treason, bribery,
Speaker 1: are other high crimes and misdemeanors. They can't articulate actual crimes.
Speaker 1: So where this hole started with trying to figure out
Speaker 1: what the actual crime or crimes we're going to look
Speaker 1: like in the articles. Now, I think they're going to
Speaker 1: just try to get like way outside the box and
Speaker 1: create an article that is just some gobbly good or
Speaker 1: different information that they know of to connect dots that
Speaker 1: aren't actually connected, to try to claim the president abused
Speaker 1: his power. The problem is this, and this is why,
Speaker 1: this is why item Ship still hasn't released the transcripts,
Speaker 1: is because every single witness who's been there, there's been
Speaker 1: all sorts of other information that hasn't yet been released
Speaker 1: to the public. The public already knows about the Democrats
Speaker 1: spin on everyone's testimony because they leak it, and the
Speaker 1: public knows nothing about the rest of the story because Republicans,
Speaker 1: you know, we're not the you know, the ends justify
Speaker 1: the means approach. You know, if we're told that we're
Speaker 1: not supposed to be providing every all the information side
Speaker 1: of a skiff, we don't just walk out of the
Speaker 1: door and provide all you from my backgrounds is the military.
Speaker 1: I was a military intelligence officer, my top sea clearance.
Speaker 1: There hasn't been a single thing since I've gotten to
Speaker 1: Congress where I was inside of a skiff and they
Speaker 1: said you're not allowed to share this information. Where I
Speaker 1: walked out and leak it directly, indirectly, anonymously. It's not
Speaker 1: just not how I roll. The good news is the
Speaker 1: facts are coming out. I'm glad that we're going to
Speaker 1: have open public hearings, and I hope that every single
Speaker 1: flaw in this narrative gets destroyed publicly, because I've seen
Speaker 1: it all get torn up and destroyed privately. And Shift's
Speaker 1: bunker in the capital basement. All right, lay Zeldon long Island,
Speaker 1: a congressman Republican, keep up the good work. You've been
Speaker 1: out there fighting every day. We really appreciate all you
Speaker 1: Freedom Caucus members are doing. Every Republican held today, the
Speaker 1: Senate needs to watch what the House is doing. They're
Speaker 1: not putting up with something that we know didn't happen.
Speaker 1: This has all been a manufactured lie. The President was
Speaker 1: doing his job getting to the bottom of election interference
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen and corruption. The fact that the medium
Speaker 1: mob and the Democrats ignore what is an obvious pay
Speaker 1: to play scheme and corruption and abusing power of Biden
Speaker 1: by by literally compromising taxpayer dollars is breathtaking. Is this
Speaker 1: is now what you need to do to be a Democrat.
Speaker 1: You have to be a liar and a hypocrite on
Speaker 1: a mass scale to be able to pull this crap
Speaker 1: off that they're trying to pull off. What it said
Speaker 1: by the other side today that this is a dark
Speaker 1: day and a cloud has fallen on this House. It
Speaker 1: has been falling for ten months, and it is showing
Speaker 1: itself today. What we're seeing is this, If the gentleman
Speaker 1: who is a friend of mine from the Rules Committee
Speaker 1: would actually want to talk about are these the same
Speaker 1: rules as Clinton and Nixon, then we would have had
Speaker 1: a much longer period of debate because he knows and
Speaker 1: I know it is not. There are similarities, some better,
Speaker 1: some not, but they are not the same. Let's get
Speaker 1: that out of the way first. The problem I'm having
Speaker 1: here is the resolution before us today. It's not about transparency,
Speaker 1: it's about control. It's not about fairness, it's about winning,
Speaker 1: it's about following the facts. This resolution is about delivering results.
Speaker 1: You know how I know this because the resolution gives
Speaker 1: no proper way for how these abilities are transferring of
Speaker 1: documents from the Intel Committee to Judiciary Committee will happen.
Speaker 1: Doesn't even give a time frame. And I've heard a
Speaker 1: lot of discussion today about maybe we didn't know how
Speaker 1: to properly ask last night in Rules Committee. I'll guarantee
Speaker 1: you might staff and I know how to properly use
Speaker 1: Rule Levin Twoey to ask for information. And we're told
Speaker 1: yesterday by a committee one of the committees that we
Speaker 1: couldn't have access to that because the parliamentarian said we couldn't.
Speaker 1: That's just false. It needs to stop. This House is
Speaker 1: developing and shredding procedures every day, and if members on
Speaker 1: the minority or the majority cannot have the rights that
Speaker 1: they are given, then we're in a sad situation. Tomorrow
Speaker 1: is November first, We're one year away from an election,
Speaker 1: not just for this House, but for the highest office
Speaker 1: of presidency. Why do you not trust the people? Why
Speaker 1: do you not allow the people to have a voice.
Speaker 1: Why in a process that America lends their voice to
Speaker 1: all of us, that you deny us to speak for them?
Speaker 1: Is animosity risen that high? Is Hamilton proven correct? Again?
Speaker 1: There is a moment and time that you should rise
Speaker 1: to the occasion. This is that moment. This is the
Speaker 1: moment that history will write. History will ask you when
Speaker 1: you cast this vote, When you cast a vote to
Speaker 1: justify something that has gone on behind closed doors, I
Speaker 1: want you to ask the historian and answer the question,
Speaker 1: what do you know that happened there? Have you read
Speaker 1: anything that took place that you just justified? What do
Speaker 1: you believe the definition of due process is what do
Speaker 1: you think the first Amendment is? Do you have the
Speaker 1: right to have a voice? Are only the words that
Speaker 1: you agree with? You may get elected in a primary,
Speaker 1: but in a general election you're elected to represent the
Speaker 1: people of America. But here's my biggest concerns. Ranking Member
Speaker 1: of the Judiciary Committee, I have a question. We've been
Speaker 1: here two hundred plus years as a committee, and our
Speaker 1: committee has been neutered. Our committee who handles impeachment. We're
Speaker 1: the reason in that committee, that's our jurisdiction. We have
Speaker 1: been completely sidelined. Our chairman and others have been sidelined,
Speaker 1: so I have been sidelined. It is so bad that
Speaker 1: they had to have the Rules Committee right the presidential
Speaker 1: due process and give it to us. This is not right.
Speaker 1: I do not know what happened to our committee, but
Speaker 1: we still exist. Due process only kicks in at Judiciary
Speaker 1: for the president. It does not kicked in and the
Speaker 1: closed door secret hearings of Adam Schiff, this is a travesty.
Speaker 1: No one should vote for this. This is a sad day.
Speaker 1: The curtain is coming down on this House because the
Speaker 1: majority has no idea about process and procedure. They're simply
Speaker 1: after a president a yell bat. I'll tell you what
Speaker 1: when it gets to the Judiciary Committee. I do have
Speaker 1: one thing for mister Schiff. If he wants to be,
Speaker 1: as said a special counsel, he set himself up, then
Speaker 1: here's my challenge to mister Schiff. You want to be
Speaker 1: Kin's star, be Ken's star. Come to the Judiciary Committee,
Speaker 1: be the first witness, and take every question ask of you,
Speaker 1: starting with your own involvement with the whistle blower. Folks,
Speaker 1: this ain't over. Get ready. The cloud that is dropping
Speaker 1: will be drawing on their heads because process matters, and
Speaker 1: substance will always win out in the end. And this
Speaker 1: president has nothing to worry about on substance. I yell
Speaker 1: about that on process. It is the most unfair. On substance.
Speaker 1: The president not only gets exonerated, he does his job
Speaker 1: as constitutional duty. I am telling you that everybody needs
Speaker 1: to just buckle up here, because as insane as it
Speaker 1: has been, it's only going to get more insane. This
Speaker 1: is not going to end than a conviction. In the
Speaker 1: United States Senate Donald Trump is going to be re elected.
Speaker 1: And in the course of this coming year, as we
Speaker 1: count down elect to election day, well it's literally now
Speaker 1: what a year. In three days that Americans will go
Speaker 1: to the polls and you will have the final say.
Speaker 1: And everything that we believe is at stake in this election.
Speaker 1: If you believe in the constitution, the rule of law,
Speaker 1: if you believe in due process, if you believe in
Speaker 1: equal justice under the law, if you believe in equal
Speaker 1: applications of our laws, then this election matters to you.
Speaker 1: If you believe in freedom and liberty over the tyranny
Speaker 1: of socialism and state run everything, and you know that
Speaker 1: the ninety four trillion dollar Noon Green Deal destroys the
Speaker 1: country and socialism will destroy the country as representative in
Speaker 1: pretty much the same but different manifestations of every Democratic
Speaker 1: presidential candidate, and medicare for all and no private insurance
Speaker 1: and no oil and gas the lifeblood of our economy
Speaker 1: and no combustion engine and everybody else gets everything free
Speaker 1: and will confiscate pretty much everything people make and will
Speaker 1: redistributed to keep our power base forever. That's what they're
Speaker 1: fighting for. They if you believe, if you'll like the
Speaker 1: choices of the right people on the courts, originalists, constitutionalists,
Speaker 1: if you believe in not open borders, but if you
Speaker 1: believe in controlling our nation's borders and immigration. Have legal immigration,
Speaker 1: not illegal immigration. You know, all of these things matter.
Speaker 1: You want to be energy independent, it matters. This is
Speaker 1: going to be the tipping point election in your lifetime.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure what they will pull in the neck
Speaker 1: in light of everything we now know that they've done.
Speaker 1: There's nothing that some of these quote superpatriots that are
Speaker 1: on a mission from God because they think Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is the devil that they're not capable of. I don't
Speaker 1: know what they're capable of at this point. It's scary
Speaker 1: to think that they've brought us to this precipice in
Speaker 1: this country. But it's real. And as I've been saying,
Speaker 1: it's an all hands on deck moment for the country.
Speaker 1: And this is the moment that you need to be counted.
Speaker 1: And I'm just saying, buckle up, it's going to be
Speaker 1: a hell of a year. Let's go to Carline is
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania. Carline, Hi, how are you welcome to the program? Hi? Hi, Sean,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for taking the time to speak
Speaker 1: with me. I just wanted to call and let you
Speaker 1: know how happy I am and thankful that you are
Speaker 1: educating me because I have been a Democrat for as
Speaker 1: long as I can remember, and I'm sorry to say
Speaker 1: that I am ashamed to be a Democrat right now.
Speaker 1: Well welcome. You know, where are the honest Democrats? I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a real question here. Where are the Democrats?
Speaker 1: You know? Because to be a Democrat you have to
Speaker 1: be accepted. It's okay that Lary Clinton got away with
Speaker 1: what she got away with with the Espionage Act and
Speaker 1: the server and the Russian dossier. And you know, you
Speaker 1: don't have to seem to care about the weaponization of
Speaker 1: the powerful tools of intelligence or lying to fight as
Speaker 1: the court judges, to spy on presidential campaigns, transition teams
Speaker 1: and presidents. You know that you spend three long years
Speaker 1: for investigations saying, impeach, impeach, impeach. That's all we've heard
Speaker 1: from the Democrats. As a Democrat, can you name one
Speaker 1: accomplishment since Donald Trump has been elected president? One thing
Speaker 1: this party has done except trying to impeach this guy.
Speaker 1: That's about it. That's all they're trying to do. And
Speaker 1: that is why I will be voting for Trump in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty. And I hope other Democrats like me who
Speaker 1: are honest really realize that we need to vote for him.
Speaker 1: And it's like a bad scary movie. No pun intended
Speaker 1: that it's Halloween today, but in watching a scary movie.
Speaker 1: And I think anybody who votes for impeachment today should
Speaker 1: be indicted for sedition because it's just scary. I'm scared
Speaker 1: what's going to happen to this country of the next year.
Speaker 1: And I will continue to listen to you every day
Speaker 1: and thank you well, you're very welcome, thank you for
Speaker 1: your honesty. I mean, you know, at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, we are all Americans. What happens to this
Speaker 1: country is going to happen to all of us. What
Speaker 1: everybody has to remember here and if we lose due process,
Speaker 1: if we're going to have a slash and burn deep
Speaker 1: state that decides for us because they think they're smarter
Speaker 1: and they're willing to abuse power, and they're willing to
Speaker 1: be this corrupt and lawless. If this is allowed to continue,
Speaker 1: you don't have a country at the end of that process.
Speaker 1: That's that's a scary part. Let's go to Tom and Georgia. Tom,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called sir? Hey Sean, appreciate
Speaker 1: all that you do listen, thank you. You know, for
Speaker 1: every witness that Adam Schiff has in secret, Senator Graham
Speaker 1: should take each of those witness and bring them from
Speaker 1: the judiciary communitee and air the questions in public. That
Speaker 1: would be the solution immediately. And if you had done that,
Speaker 1: perhaps we wouldn't be at this point. I'm not so sure,
Speaker 1: but it is an immediate resolution to get it out
Speaker 1: in the air. Well. I agree. I want that to happen.
Speaker 1: That will happen. What I'm reading from Paul Sperry again,
Speaker 1: if that all turns out to be true, it will
Speaker 1: be devastating what it will confirm. Again, we're waiting now,
Speaker 1: We're any day now we're going to get the report
Speaker 1: on pies abuse. So more importantly, we now have a
Speaker 1: criminal investigation open into the abuse of power, corruption of
Speaker 1: those people that started this crossfire hurricane operation. And I
Speaker 1: would argue that it has to There's got to be
Speaker 1: some involvement. You don't have this type of investigation go
Speaker 1: on without the input of a president of the United States.
Speaker 1: You don't have a counterintelligence investigation without Obama's approval. I
Speaker 1: want to know what he knew and when he knew it.
Speaker 1: I want to know what Brennan Knewan did and when
Speaker 1: he did it. Interesting that if Sperry's right, this guy's
Speaker 1: connected to let's see Biden, Brennan and the deep State. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is how it all got started. And of course
Speaker 1: I keep talking about the compromise, corrupt coward and congenital
Speaker 1: liar Schiff. I mean, this guy's been saying for three
Speaker 1: years and Peach, I've got the evidence, and Peacho got
Speaker 1: the evidence, and Peacho got the evidence. He's in charge
Speaker 1: of the whole thing. And Nancy Pelosi has no power
Speaker 1: because she's given that up to the squad. She's speaker
Speaker 1: in name only. She's just going along with everything they want. Now.
Speaker 1: I believe this all backfires and blows up in their face,
Speaker 1: but the country gets hurt in the meantime, and nobody
Speaker 1: seems to care about that at all. You know, when
Speaker 1: you get to the substance of what matters here, and
Speaker 1: that is the transcript. The President did his job. He
Speaker 1: was getting to the bottom of Ukrainian election interference. That's
Speaker 1: his job, that's what he that's his sworn duty. Anyway,
Speaker 1: good call appreciated, Ohio. John. Next on the Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: what's up? How are you sir? Hey? But yeah, I
Speaker 1: was going. I was just calling to find out who
Speaker 1: paid for Hunter Biden to fly all over the country,
Speaker 1: actually all over the world. Was at the taxpayer dime,
Speaker 1: because I recall Tom Price getting forced to resign out
Speaker 1: of office because he used toxpayer mondor fly all over
Speaker 1: the country. You know, it's a great point. Um. Look,
Speaker 1: I know presidents invite like for examples, as a member
Speaker 1: of the press, the media. If I ever fly on
Speaker 1: Air Force one, and I have not with this president,
Speaker 1: I know you pay. I believe the equivalent of first
Speaker 1: class air fare if you fly on Air Force one.
Speaker 1: This is usually media in the plane or on the
Speaker 1: plane or on another government plane. Even I know that's
Speaker 1: the standard procedure the president, for example. I do know
Speaker 1: that presidents when they have guests, if let's say the
Speaker 1: president invites somebody for dinner, I think the policy is
Speaker 1: they have to for whatever the food is. I remember
Speaker 1: that became an issue in the Obama years, and but
Speaker 1: there are rules in place that so he might have
Speaker 1: paid the equivalent in buying the asia of a first
Speaker 1: class ticket, but ten days later he got the one
Speaker 1: point five billion, then Ukrainian issue, then the Romanian issue,
Speaker 1: and then we'll have new issues today. I love how
Speaker 1: the media just dismisses all of it as saying, oh,
Speaker 1: there's nothing there. It's just a conspiracy theory that the
Speaker 1: Biden's did anything wrong. No reasonable person would believe that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden leveraging, shaking down quid pro quoting if you
Speaker 1: will Ukrainians billion dollars a taxpayer money. You don't get
Speaker 1: it unless you fire this guy. That's a quid pro quo.
Speaker 1: That's what they're accusing Trump off and the millions of
Speaker 1: dollars for a kid that goes on GMA and was
Speaker 1: stupid enough to admit no experience in anything, well, that
Speaker 1: would be buying that would be buying faith, or wouldn't it.
Speaker 1: Every American, I think, would interpret that as well. They
Speaker 1: didn't give him the millions because they liked them. They
Speaker 1: gave him the millions because they wanted to be viewed
Speaker 1: favorably by his father. That's the only reason. And I
Speaker 1: would say the same thing with China, and I'd say
Speaker 1: that's the type of sewage and corruption that DC has
Speaker 1: accepted for years. And the fact that the mob and
Speaker 1: the media just don't know that's a conspiracy theory speaks
Speaker 1: volumes about their complicity in all of this. Great Hannity Times,
Speaker 1: the great One, Mark Levin, Jim Jordan, Jason Chaffitz, Laura Trump,
Speaker 1: Tonight Chad Pilgrim has given us the behind the scenes
Speaker 1: of everything that went down today, Haraldo and dam Bongino News.
Speaker 1: You won't get from the mob and the media, the hysterical,
Speaker 1: lying mob that support the compromise corrupt congenital liar, because
Speaker 1: they're just in the same boat with him. Ninety Eastern Hannity,
Speaker 1: Fox News hope you'll join us seeing tonight back here
Speaker 1: tomorrow