WEBVTT - Fed Minutes and Could We go Lower?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to the latest episode from the

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>midweek edition of the Coin bureau podcast. Every week, I

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>pick out two of my favorite videos from coin bureaus

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel to present to you in podcast form. The

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>audio you're about to hear is from those videos I've

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>chosen this week, and I hope you enjoy listening. You'll

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>no doubt be pleased to hear that ft X doesn't

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>feature prominently in either of the sections you'll hear today.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>It still hangs like a black cloud over the crypto industry,

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but there are other things we need to focus on,

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>such as what Jerome Powell and his crew at the

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve are thinking about the economy and why the

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto market could still go lower from here. It's been

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks since the folks that the Fed last

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>hiked interest rates, and many have been speculating or praying

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that they may ease off on raising them any further.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>As always, investors have been hanging on every scrap of

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>information to emerge from Fed HQ, and we've got a

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>whole dollarp of it recently, when the minutes of the

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>last FED meeting were published a couple of weeks ago,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so In the first part of today's video, you'll hear

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>our analysis of those minutes and what they could signal

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>for the US and other economies in the coming months.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>There's still lots to be concerned about. Speaking of things

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to be concerned about, the crypto bear market we're in

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>could still get more well bearish before things start to

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>look up. There are a number of macro and crypto

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>specific factors that could yet push prices lower, and they're

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the topic for the second part of today's episode from

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>yet more f t X Contagion. I knew we'd touch

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on it at some point too. Bitcoin miners struggling to

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock market and beyond. Crypto has a minefield to

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>walk through before things can get better, and some of

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>those minds contain a lot of explosives. Have a listen

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and watch your step. Thanks for listening to today's episode,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and there'll be more coming your way soon. And if

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you want even more content from coin Bureau, be sure

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to our YouTube channel and visit us on

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>social media too. Last week, the Federal Reserve published the Minutes,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that is summary of its most recent meeting. The minutes

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>revealed that most Fed officials want to slow the pace

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of interest rate hikes going forward. The news caused markets

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to rally on the possibility that the FED will pivot.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that slowing the pace of rate hikes

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is not the same thing as lowering rates themselves, and

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the headlines don't tell the full story. That's why today

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take a closer look at the Fed's

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>most recent minutes, summarize what they say in simple terms,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and tell you exactly what it could mean for the

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>markets in the coming months. Okay, let's start with a

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of background. As most of you will know, the

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>What most of you may not know is that the

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>FED itself consists of twelve regional banks that are scattered

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>across the United States, each of which has its own president.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>As most of you will know, the FED is governed

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>by seven governors, which include FED Chairman Jerome Powell. What

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>some of you may not also know is that the

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>central banks monetary policy is decided by the Federal Open

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Markets Committee, or f o m C. The f o

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>m C consists of the feds seven governors, the president

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Fed, and four of the other

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>presidents of the fed's other regional banks. The regional FED

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>presidents who sit on the f o m C change

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>every year, save of course, for the President of the

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>New York Fed, who has a permanent seat. In theory,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>each member of the f o m C casts a

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>vote supporting or opposing the committee's decision on whether or

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>not to raise or lower interest rates, and the final

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>vote determines the rate hike. In practice, however, the FED

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Chairman in this case, Jerome, apparently has the final say.

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>In addition to Jerome, the f o m C currently

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>consists of the following personnel. Fed Governor's Lele Brainard, Michael Barr,

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Bowman, Lisa Cook, Philip Jefferson, and Christopher Waller, New

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>York FED President John Williams, Boston Fed President Susan Collins, St.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Louis Fed President James Bullard, Kansas City President Esther George

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and Cleveland FED President Loretta J. Mester. I'll quickly note

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that Michael Barr actually wrote the law that created the

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>position of Vice chair for supervision, which he now holds.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael seems to be intent on using the laws he

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>wrote in the aftermath of two thousand and eight to

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>crack down on crypto. More about that using the link

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in the description. Now, all twelve f O m C

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>officials were present at the FEDS last meeting. This is

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>in addition to around fifty other academics and economists who

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>work for the FED, including members of the fed's other

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>regional banks. The f O m c's last meeting took

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>place on the first and second of November. To clarify,

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.679
<v Speaker 1>the minutes of these meetings are not released until around

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>three weeks after the meeting in question takes place. This

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>is presumably to give the markets guidance about interest rates

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>between FED meetings, which occur around every six weeks. Obviously,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what investors look for in the FEDS minutes is evidence

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the central bank's plans regarding interest rates. Every single

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>word is scrutinized to see if the f O m

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>C is being hawkish i e. Planning on raising interest

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>rates or dovish i e. Planning on lowering them. As

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>almost all of you will know, raising interest rates tends

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>to cause markets to crash, whereas lowering them tends to

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>cause markets to rally. Because markets are forward looking, assets

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to react immediately to the FEDS minutes even though

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the rate hike or rate cut hasn't actually happened yet.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So with that background under your belt, let's see what

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the f o m C had to say. The first

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the fed's meeting was a quote ethics discussion,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>wherein FED Chairman Jerome Powell reminded everyone present to be

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>on their best behavior. In other words, no sharing of

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>insider information, no insider trading, and make sure to report

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>all your investments. Nudge nudge, wink wink. With that bit

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of business done, the second part of the meeting was

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about rate hikes. F O m C officials discussed how

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they're planning to raise interest rates higher than they had

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>planned in September, something that Jerome had told the public

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in the fed's subsequent press conference. We actually summarized Jerome's

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>press conference too, that will also be in the description now.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>One thing that Jerome didn't tell the public during his

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>press conference was that most f o MC officials see

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a fifty basis point hike as being appropriate at the

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>fed's next meeting. For context, the FED has been aggressively

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>raising rates at seventy five basis points a pop for

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the last few months. This basically confirms what Jerome denied,

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>which is that the FED is planning on slowing the

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>pace of rate hikes. As I mentioned in the introduction,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this caused markets to rally across the board, except for

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>crypto because it was busy getting wrecked by the ft

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>X Alameda situation. The f o m C also mentioned

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the blow up in UK government bonds in September and

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>cautioned that the early warning signs of a similar event

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are starting to emerge in the US, namely low liquidity.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The f o m C also touched on how other

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>currencies are collapsing against the US dollar, but didn't have

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>much to say on the matter. What's interesting is that

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the f o m C reveals that the Federal Reserve

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and other central banks are actively losing money due to

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates. Fortunately for the central banks, they don't

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>technically need to be profitable, even though the FED is

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>technically a private company. The more you know, now. The

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>third part of the Fed's meeting was about the economy.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>The f O m C officials discussed the surprisingly positive

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>GDP print for Q three in the United States, the

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>continually tight labor market, and the increase in the Personal

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Consumption Expenditures Index or PCE, the feds favorite inflation gauge.

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Oddly enough, the FED went on to discuss how labor

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>market conditions are looking for different minority groups, and seem

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to blame most of the economic issues we're facing on

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the war in Ukraine, China's zero COVID policy, and tighter

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions as a result of higher interest rates. The

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>f O m C also touched on the rising inflation

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in other countries, caused primarily by disruptions to energy supplies.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They noted that foreign central banks have raised interest rates

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to try and fight this inflation, but have slowed their

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>rate hikes as they realize there's only so much demand

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>they can destroy. The fourth part of the fed's meeting

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>was about financial conditions. There's a lot to cover here,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>so i'll just give you the highlights. First, the f

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>O m C seemingly took issue with the recovery in

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the stock market that started in mid October. This would

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>make sense as it's essentially the markets challenging the Fed. Second,

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>investors have been selling off foreign assets and deploying that

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>dry powder into US s sts, mainly US government debt.

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>This makes sense given that US government debt is provided

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>increasingly higher interest rates and is also considered to be

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the safest asset in the eyes of institutional investors. This

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon of money flowing into the United States is actually

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>part of the so called dollar milkshake theory proposed by

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>an increasingly popular macro analyst named Brent Johnson. The t

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>l d R is that most of the world's money

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>will flow into the US as foreign countries and currencies collapse.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 1>You'd think that this would be incredibly bullish for the U.

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>S Dollar and US assets, and it will be for

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>a while. The thing is that the dollar milkshake theory

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ends with the US dollar and US assets collapsing. To

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>note that this process will take many years and possibly

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>decades to play out, assuming Brent's theory is true. Now.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>The third thing that caught my eye in the f

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>O m c S Financial overview was the rapidly rising

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>interest rates on credit card debt in the United States.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>This is concerning because credit card debt in the United

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>States recently hit an all time high of over nine

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars I reckon one trillion is just weeks away.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>This relates to the fourth takeaway, and that's that the

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>housing market continues to slide on the back of rising

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and that banks are becoming less eager to

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>lend to consumers. This is essentially true of auto loans

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and credit card related loans, which is understandable given the

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 1>statistics I just mentioned regarding financial stability. Stress tests conducted

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in conjunction with the largest US banks suggest that they

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>would be resilient in the event of a severe economic downturn. However,

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the f o m C couldn't say the same for

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and other entities in the financial sector due

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to their high levels of leverage. This ties into the

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>fifth part of the fed's meeting, which was about its

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>economic outlook. If I understand correctly, the f o m

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>C is projecting that output of the U S economy

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>will be quote below potential until five and that unemployment

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>will simultaneously stay above four until that time. This might

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have something to do with the fact that the f

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>o m C raised its inflation projections for the coming quarters. Logically,

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this means that the FED will have to continue raising

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, or at least keep them higher for longer

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to fight this inflation, resulting in the aforementioned economic conditions.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>For what it's worth, the f O m C expects

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation to come back down to two percent as measured

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>by the core PC in This is expected given that

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>what the f O m C is effectively forecasting is

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a long recession that will last at least two years,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and recessions tend to reduce inflation. As a cherry on top,

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the fo MC cautioned that their baseline projections are quote

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>skewed to the down side. Put simply, they know that

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>their economic projections are likely to get worse, not better,

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>as more economic data comes in. This makes sense given

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that an energy crisis could happen over the winter. More

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>about that in the description. Anyways, The sixth part of

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's meeting was again about current economic conditions. The

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>f O m C again blames Russia's invasion of Ukraine

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as being a primary driver of inflation. I'll just remind

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.599
<v Speaker 1>you that central banks printed trillions upon trillions of dollars

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>in response to the pandemic in early Most of the

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation related to Russia's invasion of Ukraine also has to

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>do with sanctions that don't seem to be working. But

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>let's not go there. Funnily enough, the f O m

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>C says that another decline in real GDP would be

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>helpful in bringing inflation back down. As a fun fact,

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank for America seems to have predicted the sudden g

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>d P spike in Q three this year. The rest

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of its projection says that real g d P will

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>again go negative starting next year. Take note. The f

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>O m C also discussed the status of household balance sheets.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Believe it or not, but the still record levels of

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>savings in the U S economy thanks to all the

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic stimulus. The catch is that most of these savings

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are concentrated with wealthier individuals and institutions. There's a surprise.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>On the lower end, individuals and institutions are starting to

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>report financial stress. I reckon the record levels of credit

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>card debt say it all. Even so. Jerome mentioned at

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the fed's most recent press conference that the higher overall

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>savings should cushion the U. S economy from a severe recession.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Makes you wonder whether it was all planned. More about

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that in the description. Now, after discussing the collective effects

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the rising interest rates of central banks are having on

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the global economy, the f o m C focused on

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the supposedly tight labor market in the United States. I

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>say supposedly because there's lots of debate about how accurate

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment statistics are. Case and point tech companies have

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>literally laid off over one hundred thousand people over the

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>last few months and are planning to lay off hundreds

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of thousands more going forward. This might just be a

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>case of media bias, but it really looks like people

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are starting to lose their jobs across the board. This

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is implied by the f O m C in the Minutes,

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>as they note the supply of labor coming in line

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with the demand for labor. They also note that most

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of the demand for labor is coming from low skilled,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>low paying jobs that recently fired six figure salaried software

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>developers probably won't be doing any time and soon. What

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sucks is that the people working these low skilled, low

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>paying jobs are being squeezed the most by inflation. The

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>element that's been hitting most people the hardest is the

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>cost of accommodation i e. Rents. What really sucks is

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the f O m C projects rents will be one

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the last inflation dominoes to fall now when it

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to inflation expectations, the f O m C observed

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that long term inflation expectations remain quote well anchored, as

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Jerome loves to say. However, they cautioned that if long

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>term inflation expectations start to rise again, then it could

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>make their fight against inflation that much fiercer. What's fascinating

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the f O m C seems to have

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten into a small argument over how long it takes

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Fed's rate hikes to affect the economy. The

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>section of the minutes breaking down this exchange is one

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of the lengthiest by far, which is why I suspect

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of back and forth there. For

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>those who don't know, Jerome seems to believe that the

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>FEDS rate hikes have a near immediate impact on the economy.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>His reasoning is that the economy has become so financialized

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't take more than a few months for

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the effects of rate hikes to be felt. By contrast,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the academics on the f O m C argue that

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it takes much longer for rate hikes to impact the economy.

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>This is because history suggests that it takes up to

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months for the effects of rate hikes to be felt.

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Jerome seems to have pushed back by pointing out that

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this historical data is shaky at best. The f O

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>m C quote generally noted that their economic projections are

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>uncertain and they believe that inflation is more likely to

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>increase than decrease in the short to medium term. Some

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>members once again repeated that this is all Russia and

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>China's fault. Good thing, Jerome knows what's up. In terms

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>of U S. Treasuries, the f O m C one

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>again acknowledged that markets for US government debt are lacking liquidity,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>but remain quote orderly. If you're wondering why liquidity is important,

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>that's because high liquidity means that you can sell a

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>large amount of an asset without moving its price. Now

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't help but notice that some members of the

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>f O m C quote noted the risks posed by

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>non bank financial institutions amid the rapid global tightening of

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy and the potential for hidden leverage in these

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>institutions to amplify shocks. I see you, Michael Barr. The

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>f O m C went on to agree on raising

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>interest rates by another seventy five basis points and patted

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>themselves on the back for raising rates so aggressively. They

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>agreed that the labor market is tight, at least on paper,

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and that means they can continue raising interest rates while

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>claiming the economy is fine. After repeating the mantra that

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is committed to bringing inflation back down to

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>its two pc target, the f O m C reiterated

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that they want to slow the pace of rate hikes.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>This is because they want to see how much the

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>already high interest rates will affect the economy and don't

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>want to risk breaking something. Now. The last part of

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's meeting was about the f O m c

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>s monetary policy decisions. This part of the minute mostly

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>repeats everything from the previous sections. I couldn't help but

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>notice that the wording is almost identical to what Jerome

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>said during his press conferences. Copy paste is a powerful tool. Indeed,

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in all seriousness, the f O m C agreed that

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>it must make it clear to the public that it

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>will continue to monitor incoming data when it comes to

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>future rate hikes. It seems that this is not being

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>underscored enough because what's currently being priced in by investors

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the FED will pause and then pivot in

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>any case, The f O m C also agreed to

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>continue selling assets the central Bank's balance sheet. If you

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>watched our video about Jerome Pal's testa means to politicians,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll know he tacitly admitted that this balance sheet run

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>off will eventually lead to higher interest rates. Also something

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody is noticing. Surprisingly, all members of the f O

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>m C voted in favor of the seventy five basis

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>point great hike and the other ongoing actions being taken

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>by the FED, such as the balance sheet run off.

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>This is surprising because it suggests that even the more

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>dovish members of the f O m C realize that

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation will stick around for a while. This brings me

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to the big question, and that's what all this means

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>for the markets in the coming months. In short, it

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>could really go either way. From where I'm standing, the

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Fed has made it clear that it will adjust interest

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>rates in response to inflation and employment statistics. In case

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you haven't noticed, things aren't looking too good on the

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation front. Large amounts of stimulus, supply chain issues caused

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>by pandemic restrictions and yes, the war in Ukraine and China,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>zero COVID policies all look like they're going to keep

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation high. The most inflationary factor, however, seems to be

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the reassuring of supply chains. The disruptions to supply chains

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>caused by all the above has pushed many countries to

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>start bringing manufacturing back within their borders, especially the manufacturing

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of microchips. If you watched our recent video about Goldman

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Saxes analysis of the fed's two percent target, you'll know

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that we will be entering a prolonged period

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>of higher inflation as a result. This begs the question

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of whether the FED would accept a three or four

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>percent inflation rate, and the answer currently isn't clear. On

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the employment side, things are looking kind of sketchy. I am,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>by no means an expert in employment statistics, but I've

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>been hearing in many macro podcasts that these stats are

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>calculated in questionable ways. The same is true of inflation statistics,

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 1>but we all knew that already. This begs the question

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of just how much the books can be cooked to

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>convince the American public that the job market is doing

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>just fine, or rather how hard. The f o MC

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>can squint at the numbers until they see what they want.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I reckon it'll be hard to keep up the illusion

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>when the average person's own lying eyes start to notice

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that everyone around them is losing their job. I'm sure

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact checkers will come in with full force on

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that one, But so long as free speech on Twitter exists,

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the truth will find its way out. Thanks Ellen. In

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>some then, it's going to be a very uncertain few

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>months for both the FED and therefore the markets. Assuming

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the FED follows through on slowing the pace of rate

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>hikes and pausing sometime early next year, we could finally

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>see some recovery rallies in stocks, cryptocurrencies, and other assets.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>That said, I have a bad feeling that we're going

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to see a bearish catalyst that takes all assets much

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>lower than they currently are, a catalyst that will shake

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>retail investors to the corps and cause institutional investors to

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>run screaming into the arms of the FED. Let's hope

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong about that one. Earlier this year, we made

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>two very important videos about crypto. One was about when

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the crypto bear market could end, and the other was

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>about how low cryptocurrencies could go during the bear market.

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Over the last few months, we've been keeping a close

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>eye on the indicators we identified in those two videos. Now,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the good news is that they seem to be accurate.

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The bad news is that the bottom isn't in yet. Today,

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to explain why the crypto bear market will

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>likely continue, when it's likely to end, and estimate how

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>low cryptocurrencies could go before it's over. This is a

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>video you don't want to miss. I want to start

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>by saying that nobody knows the future, not even me.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Everything in this video is based on the best information

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>my research team and I could find. Note that this

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is information that could change at a moment's notice. It

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>should also go without saying that nothing in this video

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is financial advice. That said, the first reason why the

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto bear market is likely to continue is because retail

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>investors haven't capitulated yet. In other words, lots of regular

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 1>crypto investors are still holding on to their coins and

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>tokens despite some massive losses. This is also true for

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>stocks and other assets with retail exposure. Now, that second

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>point is significant because the prices of tech stocks and

0:24:54.920 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies are highly correlated. This correlation has been as apparent

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>in recent weeks as crypto specific factors such as the

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>ft X Alameda situation have caused a slight decoupling. I'll

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>come back to that in a moment now. There was

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>some retail capitulation in mid October when inflation in the

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>United States came in hotter than expected. This crash the

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>stock market and caused a small flash crash in crypto. However,

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>some sources suggest that most retail investors were still buying

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>those dips. Not only that, but the stock market has

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>been rallying since its recent October lows. This seems to

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be because the minutes of the Federal Reserves most recent

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>meetings suggest that the central Bank will start slowing the

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>pace of rate hikes in mid December. It's also believed

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>that stocks will see a Santa Claus rally at the

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>same time. It's possible that the stock market will crash

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in December when pension funds are forced to sell assets

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and regular people sell assets to finance their holiday shopping.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>It's also possible that the Fed will raise rates higher

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>than investors are currently pricing in. This would also crash

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. Given the brutal macro backdrop of energy shortages, inflation,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rising interest rates, pandemic restrictions, and the war in Ukraine,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of a dump seems higher than that of

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a pump. The technicals for stock indices like the SMP

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>also suggests that stocks will soon resume their long term

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>down trends. Regardless, the stock market will continue it's longer

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>term down trend at some point. While the reversal could

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>happen as soon as December, it's possible that it won't

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>come until early next year when consumers realized they took

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>on a bit too much debt during the holiday season

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and start selling. When the stock market correction inevitably comes,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it will likely take the crypto market lower as well.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>The technicals for the now stacks suggest it could fall

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>by around twenty from its current price in the next correction.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>This would bring the NASTAC back down to its pre

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>pandemic levels, which would make sense. As I mentioned a

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>few moments ago, the prices of tech stocks and cryptocurrencies

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>tend to move in parallel. The only difference is that

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies are more volatile. I have a high beta with

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the market. In practical terms, a twenty to drop in

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the NASTAC would translate to a forty to fift drop

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>in large cap cryptos, and much more for those with

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>smaller market caps. The second reason why the crypto bear

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>market is likely to continue relates to the first, and

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's all the speculation and leverage that we continue to

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 1>see in the crypto market. As some of you will know,

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>an easy way to measure speculation in the crypto market

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is to look at bitcoin dominance. For those unfamiliar, bitcoin

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>dominance is a measure of how much of the total

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>crypto market cap is just BTC. Because BTC is seen

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>as the safest cryptocurrency, Bitcoin dominance tends to rise when

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire crypto market is falling, and bitcoin dominance tends

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to fall when the entire crypto market is rising. As

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you can see, bitcoin dominance has been stuck at around

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for more than a year, and though it did rise

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to almost fifty percent in June after terror collapsed, it

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>has since fallen back down to around What this means

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is that money has resumed moving into all coins, and

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that means there's still lots of speculation. The caveat is

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's possible that E has also become a safe

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>haven in the eyes of crypto holders. This means that

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>part of Bitcoin's dominance is essentially being shared with ethereum. Unfortunately,

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the dominance for both has been on the decline, and

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this arguably proves that lots of speculation is indeed present.

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>If you need more proof, consider that meme coins like

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>doge coin were pumping as recently as last week. There

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have also been a few headlines about small and medium

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>cable coins that have more than doubled in price over

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the course of just a couple of days. That is

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>pure speculation or price manipulation. Until we stop seeing dog

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>coin pump by double digits every time Elon Musk teases

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter's upcoming features, then it's safe to assume that the

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto bear market bottom isn't in yet. Now, speculation is

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mostly the retail side of the equation. Leverage is where

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the institutions come in. Some of you may recall that

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.239
<v Speaker 1>there was a record level of eath liquidations at the

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>end of October when leverage traders got wrecked to the

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>tune of half a billion dollars over two days. The

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>collapse of ft X and Alameda also led to around

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollar of liquidations for BTC and E in

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the days that followed. Funnily enough, recent research by coin

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>shares suggests that institutional investors have been shorten the crypto

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>market at record levels. This logically means that they will

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>get liquidated at record levels if the crypto market somehow

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>rallies in December, which is possible given what I mentioned earlier.

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's important to remember that leverage doesn't just mean trading either.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Many institutions in cryptocurrency have given each other massive loans

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. Some of these loans

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>involved cryptocurrencies which have since fallen significantly. The elephant in

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the room in this regard is f t X and

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Alameda Research, whose ft T back loans eventually led to

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>their bankruptcies. If the headlines didn't make it clear enough,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the contagion of leverage between these and other crypto companies continues,

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like Genesis Global will be the next

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>two collapse. More about that in the description anyways. The

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>third reason why the cryptobar market is likely to continue

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is because Bitcoin's hash rate hasn't crashed yet. For context,

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoined hash rate has historically fallen by between forty and

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty around the time that BTC hit its bottom, and

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of course BTC leads the rest of the crypto market.

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin's hash rate collapsing around btc's bottom makes sense on

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the cause and effect relationship. If BTCS

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>price falls, then it becomes unprofitable to mine BTC. This

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>forces the least profitable bitcoin miners to shut up shop,

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>which causes Bitcoin's hash rate to fall. As some of

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you may have heard, lots of bitcoin mining companies are

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to struggle, particularly the publicly traded ones. To give

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>two examples, in late September, Compute North filed for bankruptcy,

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and in late October Core Scientific warned it was on

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the brink of doing the same. This is because the

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>average cost of mining a BTC is currently around eighteen

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>k and the BTC price is below that at the

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>time of shooting. This means that most bitcoin miners are

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>losing lots of money and have likely been selling lots

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of their existing BTC to stay afloat. This is evidenced

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>by glass nodes Minor net position change indicator, which suggests

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin miners have been aggressively selling BTC since it's price

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>dropped below twenty k. It's possible that this selling has

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>suppressed BTCS price, but it's probable that most of this

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>BTC is being sold over the counter or OTC. If

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you watched our video about bitcoin miners selling BTC, you'll

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>know that the lowest price BTC can go before the

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin blockchain is at risk is eight k. The thing

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is that this was back in August, when Bitcoin's difficulty

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was twenty lower, and it therefore required much less energy

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to mine one BTC. What this means is that the

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>lowest price BTC could go before Bitcoin itself is in

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble is now just under ten k. However, this assumes

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Bitcoin difficulty will stay the same or increase.

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>This is unlikely, as Bitcoin's hash rate has finally started

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to decline. As miners go bust, difficulty will decline. Accordingly,

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this brings me to the other side of the cause

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and effect relationship of Bitcoin's hash rate and BTCS price.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>As I just explained, a decline in BTCS price can

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>cause a decline in Bitcoin's hash rate. However, a decline

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in Bitcoin's hash rate can also cause a decline in

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>BTCS price. China's crackdown on crypto mining. Last May is

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a great example. Bitcoin's hash rate fell first as miners

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>were forced offline and BTCS price followed. This is because

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the news of a crypto mining ban in China was

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>very bearish, especially since other countries started raising concerns about

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin's energy use. You can find out why those concerns

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are unfounded using the link in the description. I digress

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>now believe it or not, but Bitcoin could be about

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>to see the same cause and effect relationship play out.

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>That's because winter is coming and countries are trying to

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>conserve energy. The European Union recently warned that it would

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>put a pause on crypto mining in the event of

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>an energy shortage. In Canada, the province of Quebec is

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to get approval from the federal government to end

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>its contracts with crypto minors, citing energy use concerns. The

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>U S state of New York recently passed a two

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>year crypto mining ban for environmental reasons, and we could

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>see similar degrees from other states. I suspect that a

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>crash in BTCS price, combined with crypto mining bands in

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>certain countries, will be enough to bring bitcoin's hash rate

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>down by the forty to it has fallen in previous

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>cryptobear markets. Again, chances are that BTCS price will bottom

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>around the time this happens, along with other cryptos. The

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth reason why the cryptobear market is likely to continue

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is the upcoming global energy crisis that's already being felt

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>acutely in many countries. The one that comes to mind

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the most for me is Ukraine, with eighty percent of

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the country reportedly being without power due to Russian attacks.

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Although Ukraine will likely be able to repair most of

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>its energy infrastructure, it probably won't be enough to prevent

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>another wave of refugees from fleeing to neighboring European countries.

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>In case you missed the memo, other European countries aren't

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>doing so well on the energy side either. As such,

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the influx of refugees alone could lead to blackouts in

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>some countries. This is because many European countries have said

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they can avoid blackouts if citizens can't serve enough energy.

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Something tells me they didn't factor in the demand coming

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>from millions of new refugees. European politicians also don't seem

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to be factoring in the practical effects their proposed price

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>cap on natural gas will have. Setting a price cap

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>means that the demand for gas won't come down to

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>match supply. This means that gas shortages are almost guaranteed,

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>and history as shown this to be the case. If

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't bad enough, the United States and its allies

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>will be imposing a price cap on Russian oil starting

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>on the fifth of December. Naturally, the U s Department

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Treasury has threatened to sanction any country that

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>violates this price cap. Meanwhile, the Russian government recently announced

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that it will stop exporting oil to any country that

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>goes along with the price cap. This means that the

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>countries that comply with the price cap could soon be

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>short on oil, and this comes at a time when

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>OPEC has cut global oil production already on the demand

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation. Meanwhile, we have the United States,

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>which will soon be looking to refill its Strategic Petroleum Reserve,

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>which has been emptied by the current administration in a

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>bid to keep inflation low. Many investors are also expecting

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>China's economy to open up again sometime early next year.

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The recent protest against the CCPs pandemic policies suggest China's

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>reopening could happen much sooner than initially expected. If it does,

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it will create a massive surge in manufacturing related energy demand.

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>These and other factors will cause energy prices around the

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 1>world to skyrocket over the winter. This will do direct

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 1>damage to the economy in the form of higher prices,

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and it will do indirect damage to the economy in

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the form of higher interest rates from central banks trying

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to fight inflation. Obviously, it's difficult to see how the

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto market could go in any other direction, but down

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in these kinds of conditions. Never mind the crypto mining bands,

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>there will be millions of people selling everything they can

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep the lights on in their homes and businesses.

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>That includes cryptocurrencies. The fifth reason why the crypto bear

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>market is likely to continue ties into the fourth, and

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the uncertainty around how high interest rates will go

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and how high they will stay. This ultimately depends on

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 1>how high inflation goes and how high it will stay,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.280
<v Speaker 1>something will only know in a few months time. This

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is probably why investors currently expect the Fed to stop

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates sometime early next year. To be clear,

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stopping rate hikes isn't the same as bringing interest rates

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>back down. Rate cuts aren't expected to occur until later

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>next year at the earliest, and could come as late

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as early to four. Then again, rate cuts could come

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>much sooner if something in the economy starts to break

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>because of high interest rates. This is basically why there

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is a correlation between the FED dropping interest rates and

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of a stock market cycle. Something broke, so

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the FED dropped interest rates in response. More often than not,

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing that would break was the stock market. This

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>is why investors have become so conditioned to buy the dip.

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>They expect the FED to step in to save the

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>stock market every time it crashes to record lows, because

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what the FED has been doing for years.

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>This time it's different, however, and I know it's a

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>cliche to say that, but it really is. Inflation is

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the highest it's been in almost half a century. Central

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>banks must bring this inflation down at all costs, or

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.800
<v Speaker 1>else it will do even more damage to the economy

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and could even lead to hyper inflation of some fear currencies. However,

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't mean the FED won't blink when something breaks.

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just that the threshold for what needs to break

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is much higher than the stock market dropping by double digits.

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>As it so happens, some Fed officials are starting to

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 1>get concerned that something big will break if they keep

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hiking rates. This is why the Federal Open Markets Committee

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or f o m C, agreed it would be appropriate

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to start slowing the pace of rate hikes. If you

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>watched our video summarizing the minutes of the feds aforementioned meeting,

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll know the Central Bank may stop raising rates as

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>soon as January. Now, this is all well and good,

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'll reiterate that pausing is not the same as pivoting.

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Depending on the inflation situation, we could see lots of

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>capital flow to traditionally safe haven assets like government bonds

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and precious metals. It's possible that cryptocurrencies like BTC will

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be a part of this basket, but the fact of

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the matter is that investors see bitcoin and other large

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>cap cryptocurrencies as being akin to tech stocks. These kinds

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of assets will continue to struggle in a high interest

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>rate environment, which again could last until the final reason

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>why the crypto bear market is likely to continue has

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to do with technical analysis. If you're subscribed to my

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 1>weekly newsletter, or have been keeping up to date with

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>our weekly crypto reviews, you'll know that I've been watching

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a massive bare flag form on Bitcoin's monthly chart for

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>months now. This massive bare flag seemed to have finally

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>broken last month. I had initially expected it to break

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>back in July, but BTC managed to hold on for

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>three more months before breaking down. This begs the question

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of just how low this bare flag will go, and

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the answer really depends on how you measure it. If

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you measure from the initial bare flag from three months ago,

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>then BTC is headed for the ten k range, and

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, this is the last stop. However, if

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you measure from the more recent breakdown, then it's possible

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that we've already seen the bear market bottom at around

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>fifteen K. What's interesting is that we saw the same

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>double bare flag pattern on btc's monthly chart during the

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>previous crypto bear market in back then. The second breakdown

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>initially looked like the bear market bottom, but in the

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>months that followed, BTC hit the target of the initial

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>break down to four K. As the saying goes, history

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme. Considering all the factors

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned in this video and others. It's quite possible

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that we will see something similar happen again. After all,

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no shortage of bullish crypto catalysts coming in early

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to mid twenty three that could cause a recovery. More

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>about that in the description. Now, before I go, I

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>want to bring your attention to one last indicator, and

0:43:07.160 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the balance of BTC on cryptocurrency exchanges. As you

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>may have heard, the balance of BTC on exchanges is

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the lowest it's been in almost five years. This means

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that btc s price is going to be very volatile

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in the coming months, and that means that the kind

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of technical analysis we just did maybe way off the target.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:32.439
<v Speaker 1>For instance, BTC could temporarily for much lower than ten

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>k due to a lack of liquidity and liquidations by

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>any leverage traders who are left. This means that you

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>need to be extremely careful if you're planning on trading

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies in the coming months. I will be dollar cost

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>averaging into promising crypto projects, and you can find out

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>which ones are be accumulating by signing up to my

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>weekly newsletter. The link for that will be in the description. Anyways,

0:43:57.600 --> 0:43:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching guys, and I will

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Thank you so much for listening

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to the coin Bureau podcast. If you'd like to learn

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>more about cryptocurrency, you can visit our YouTube channel at

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube dot com forward slash coin Bureau. You can also

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.320
<v Speaker 1>go to coin bureau dot com for loads more information

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>about all things crypto. You can follow me on Twitter

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at at coin bureau or one word, and I'm also

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 1>active on TikTok and Instagram too,