WEBVTT - Surveillance: Pricing Power With Hyman

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene, along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jailely, we bring you

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. He is extraordinary man.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>He would say that Edward Himan invented market economics with

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>honor and grace to Alan Greenspan as well. Evercors I

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>s I chairman, and we're thrilled that Adeiman could brief

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>us here into August, into Q three and into Q

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>four of this tumultuous two thousand twenty one. And I

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>want to cut to the chase. You've seen this out

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of your engineering at M. I t an ear of

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>pricing power, It can't happen. Another ear of pricing power,

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it can't happen. And this time around you say there

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is pricing power, and corporations can to adapt to the

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>new inflation. How do they do it? So when we

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>UH survey retailers in particular, they tell us that pricing

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>power is the most Ever. We also UH survey manufacturing

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>companies that they say the same thing and so cost

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>her up. But independent of that, liber cost her up also.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>But in an independent of that, uh, companies are able

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to pass it along. Uh because I guess because the

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>economy is good, people are getting pay increases. Uh. But

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it also is important because it allows earnings to go up.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And earnings are in a second quarter that were explosive,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but I guess more important they'll be a strongly the

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>third quarter as well. What do you see for Q four,

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean the idea year of inventing market economics into

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.919
<v Speaker 1>market analysis. Many would say, you did that chart paragraph, chart, paragraph?

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>What are the chart say now about the fourth quarter?

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of economic growth, we have it slowing

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>down to about six from roughly ten percent in the

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>second and third quarters. Uh. And but because I'm really

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on the stock market, uh, I think earnings will

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>increase again. We have earnings in the second quarter to

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty which is probably twenty dollars ahead of the constensus,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe thirty and maybe two forty in the

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>third and fourth quarters. And that was the pe you know,

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>something like nineteen times with Bonnils, you know, below two percent,

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and the dead ballance sheet increasing ADDI, uh, every single month.

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned high prices, you alluded to what you thought,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to get you to emphasize it's

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more higher prices in the foundation

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for higher prices that virtuous cycle that seems to be

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>taking place at the moment. Is that a virtuous cycle

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you think overwhelms the Federal Reserve? Or is this the

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>right kind of price growth? Um? Well, I think inflation

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be more than expected. Uh. You know,

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we do a lot of work on rents and they

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>are surging, and that's of the core CP. I Uh,

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the core PC, and so real is gonna be running

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>around six. You can do the math on what that does. Uh.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And then wages have been going up, and like we

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>discussed a second ago, priceting power is going up. So

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation is likely to to run ahead of expectations. But

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll settle out around and say twenty three,

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so it won't get out of hand, but it's gonna

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>be higher than that it has been in the past.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>And how does that shape your view some what the

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve is going to do in that kind of environment.

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Three cleep below where we are right now, but that

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>high rate to change if you think that's gonna stick.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted how to shape your views of money

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to you policy. Well, you know, I hate to stay

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the obvious with a thrill of discovery. But you know

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna they're gonna move, and they're already indicated they're

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna move. Uh. So they'll start the taper. It'll tak

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>you about a year uh to you know, get down

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to zero, and then they'll start to raise rates. Uh.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And neither of those are tightening, they're just you know,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>less generative. And then if they keep raising rates, which

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>will be down the road but a bit, they'll finally

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>get a tightening position. So I feel I think the

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>faith right now is probably behind what I see. But

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're they're moving, and so they'll keep moving.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And uh, whether they start to taper in December or January, uh,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>which is for the discuss and at the moment, doesn't

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>make a big difference. I think in the big picture,

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>do you see a taper tantrum or has that already happened? Uh?

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>You know they Bernanke gave us a good way to

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.559
<v Speaker 1>avoid it, you know. Uh, he's told you what can happen.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>And so they've been very careful and uh trying to

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>avoid a taper tantrum, and I think they've been largely successful.

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Um now everybody is on the same page that they'll

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, discuss it, uh inn upcoming meetings, the

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Lee story in the journal today and uh and then

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>probably by January they'll start to uh cut the balance

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>sheet expansion by ten billions will be then you get

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to zero in twelve months. The hallmark of what you

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>invented is your granularity. Folks, we used to weigh with

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>bated breath. Ed would sleep in and we'd be lucky

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>if we got the report by ten am, and there'll

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>be this big, ugly black marker on it where Hyman

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>would say, shut up and listen to this. This is C. J. Lawrence.

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And then onto I s I and now ever core

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I s I. How does your granularity, your study of

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>American business respond to business people that say they can't

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>find workers? Do you just say to yourself, Ed, raise

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a damn wage? I mean, how do you respond to that? Well?

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Pretty pretty pretty much. We'll see if there's uh an

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>increasing wages, increasing workers when the enhanced benefits roll off

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in September. Uh. But you know, I agree with the

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>way you implied. Uh, and that's what I see is

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>t happening. Companies will simply raise pain and for what

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, uh, you know, at an hour wage, Uh,

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if you do two or three dollars, you could get

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>a significant change and a number of people applying. You know,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be enough. And so I think that

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see, you know, pretty big popping wages. Uh.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Could be transitory as well, but you'll see a pretty

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>big popping wagers. And but it's also moving up to

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>change he set work. Black Rock is giving an eight

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>percent across the board pay increase and uh, you know

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>for bankers or up to a hundred thousands an hour, Yessuh.

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And so you know it's not just workers and im

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is it Jerome Powell continuing his services to the Federal

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Reserve system in America? We'll find out it's not. It's

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>not a it's not a done deal in my opinion. Uh.

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sure you know Bideness considering the options and

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>considering whether or not he needs to work on it,

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you have having a broader uh footprint. I mean, Joe,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see. I don't think it makes a difference

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if he's replaced. Um first that replaces it will probably be,

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little bit more beveraged than he is.

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's he's done. If anything, he's too delish.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think John, what we've got to

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>come to the conclusion is Chairman Himan would look awfully

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>good at the eucles. Oh, there we go. I don't

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>think it wants to respond to the don't don't listen

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to that guy. I'm not going to go there and

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>don't worry beyond this though for you, for the chairman

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for the f O m C looking down to Washington

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, I think it's so difficult for a

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people just getting the direction right. Earlier this

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>year was somewhat straightforward. You knew that Washington d C

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>would be a tail wind for your GDP forecasts. Everyone

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was revising GDP revisions higher. It was a positive growth shark.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you look down to d C now and characterize

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>things for us just on the fiscal side, the range

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>a outcomes and how white they offer you is you

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>try and generate a decent outlook with some confidence. So first, uh,

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>let's not leave the monetary apart behind because it's still

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a huge tail wind, and monetary policy leads

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>by one and two years. But on the fiscal side, uh,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, my team in Washington, uh comes to about

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollars when the dust all settles. Uh. And

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not the three or a half traying that they're

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>looking for, but it's not one trier either, and so

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll get uh, you know, more stimulus. Now

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's over say a decade, so it's a couple of

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion a year. I say a couple hundred billions

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>changed that till they'll win the world's changed. There was

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a time when a couple of hundred billions was something big.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.599
<v Speaker 1>And now and I think under a trillion, you're a

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>fiscal hulk. Chairman, ed Hyman. It's gonna catch up. If

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a call and it's going to see you. Thank you

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so much that you want to guess right now, our

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>great honor, to get some clarity on where we are

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in this pandemic. We do this with Peter Hotez, who

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>has become nationally known many media appearances, speaking in English

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and also as a pinata for the anti vaccination Crow

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>were thrilled that Dr Hotels could join us. Yes, from

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Baylor College of Medicine, but far more you need to know.

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>He is co director of Parasites Without Borders with an

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>incredible focus on the children of this world. He's Texas

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Children's Hospital and dowed share in tropical pediatrics. Peter Hotez,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you deal seven in children. What is the risk to

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>our children of the delta variant? Tom? I think what's

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>happening is it's not that this virus is selectively targeting children.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think what's happening is this is so highly transmissible.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's twice as transmissible as the previous lineage, earliest lineages

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that we had. So pretty much anyone who has not

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>been vaccinated or previously infected and recoverty is getting swept

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up in this along with kids, and particularly in areas

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>where they haven't vaccinated. Well, you know, people forget that

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting vaccinated only to keep yourself out of

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the hospital your loved ones, but also if enough people

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated in the community, then it slows or halts transmission,

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>so the kids who are not eligible to get vaccinated

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are protected. And that's what's happening in the Northeast, but

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately it's not happening down here in the South, where

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the vaccination rates are just so abysmal. Peter, how sick

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>do children get? Is that part of it? The unvaccinated

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>would say, it's one big So what is it? So what? Yeah?

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And so what you know of the misinformation to the

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>disinformation out there is, you know, they quote death rates

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and they only point to older Americans or those with

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>provound underlying disabilities. That that are those who get not

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>even disabilities, but co morbid conditions who lose their life.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is we have a lot of young adults, adolescents,

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and even kids who are one getting sit very sick,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>requiring hospitalization. Now we're starting to see UH intensive care

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>pediatric intensive care units for adolescens and some of the

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>younger kids start to fill up. And and we don't

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>know the full extent of long COVID this this more

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>long term UH condition where which includes neurologic injury, and

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how long lasting that is. So it's

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all hands on deck to try to keep the kids

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>from getting infected. Should schools be fully reopened? Look, I

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>think it really depends on where the transmission is. And

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you know, whether I think it, whether

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be fully opened or not, doesn't

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>really matter. That ship has sailed and pretty much and

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much in person classes for a lot of the country.

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the key is trying to get the adults

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and adolescents fully vaccinated. But you know, like if you

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>look in Louisiana, Mississippi, fifteen six of the adolescents are

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated who are eligible, maybe thirty of the young adults.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous. So that and you have a lot of

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the red state governors refusing any mask mandates,

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and you have the delta variant. You know, I say, well,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what could possibly go wrong? Right? I mean,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's we're I think we're asking for trouble the

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>way we're managing this. We've got to jack up vaccination

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>rates in the South that we're going to do well

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the school year. So let's talk about the mask mandates.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I go home to the home state of California, and

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's l a county that is mandating masks indoors and

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>outdoors for vaccinated, fully vaccinated individuals. Should that be a requirement? Yeah,

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly for indoors as deltics elerates, and and

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason and certainly for unvaccinated individuals who are at

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>high risk, but even the vaccinated ones and and it

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>takes a little bit of time to explain, but we

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think what's happening based on some preliminary studies out of

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>China and Guangdom province that this virus is multiplying at

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>much higher rates in the nose and mouth a thousand

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>times more, so you're shedding a lot more virus. So

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>even if you're vaccinated and you get asymptomatic infection, in

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the past, with previous lineages, the vaccine was really good

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.239
<v Speaker 1>at not only stopping symptomatic illness, but even asymptomatic transmission.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>What's less clear now is with this delta variant. Certainly

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the first parameters holding that it keeps you from getting

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>seriously ill or even uh symptomatic illness at very high rates,

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so that's great, But people who are vaccinated may still

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be shedding a fair bit of virus if they gave

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>us asymptomatic infection. And that's the reason for for remasking.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're vaccinated. The CDC has not come out

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with that recommendation. But that's where possibly things good ahead. Peter.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Six months ago you had the courage to publish an

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>article linking Soviet theory with American anti science. You said

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>anti science kills. Elaborate on that. Now was six months

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>more knowledge of this pandemic. Well, we just have to

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers, tom right. I mean, there's the

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>reason why six hundred thousand or more Americans have lost

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>our lives from COVID nineteen is partly due to the

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>stars to coronavirus, but in my opinion and equal measure

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was due to defiance, defiance olver masks and social distancing,

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>not defiance over vaccines. And it's all a consequence of

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a massive what I call disinformation empire um, which you know,

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>we heard a little bit about it last week and

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this week from the White House around Facebook. But you know,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I point out that's that's it's you know, this is

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so much more than Facebook. This is you know, this

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>anti science aggression coming out of US members of Congress,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the sum of the conservative cable news networks.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing it now. It's been well reported another Russian

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>government is trying to destabilize our democracy through what's called

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>weaponized health communication using anti science as a wedge issue.

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And then we have the non governmental organizations in at

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>least a dozen of them identified by the Center for

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Contering Digital Hate. It's amazing we have to have an

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>organization called the Center for Conquering Digital Hate that s

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>m sixty million followers. So this is a well oiled

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>machine or empire. And and I make the point is, look,

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know we make US government puts a lot of

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>effort into putting an infrastructure to come back global terrorism,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to combat nuclear proliferation, to combat um cyber attacks. But

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what, this anti science thing is killing more

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Americans and all those others combined, and we need to

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>recognize that in so far the Biden administration is just

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of skirting around the edges, you know, throwing a

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>few darts at Facebook. This, This won't do it. We'll

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>continue this conversation. Dr Hotez, thank you so much for

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>briefing us this morning with the Baylor College and that

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>School of Tropical Medicine. Peter oh Tis, let's head to

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Tokyo and start the conversation by talking about the Olympics

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and then ton we can move on from there Okay,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>John Making, my management chief global strategist, joins us. Right now, John,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>can you talk to me about the degree of excitement

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the city you're in right now? Well, to be honest,

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the mood is pretty grumpy here because of the lockdown

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and all the trouble that's been affiliated with the Olympics,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the two and throwing from various edicts that have been

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>put out. But essentially a good number of people are

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>quite happy it's happening, and of course the athletes are

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>very happy it's happening. And thank goodness that Japan was

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>able to uh have the Olympics here. I don't think

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>anyone else really could have done it, to be honest,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>at this stage, um, so it will be quite safe

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and secure. All the Olympics activities are happening in a

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>bubble here, and a lot of people will be happy

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>when it's over. To be honest, here, and I think

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you might be one of them. I've got to site

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>tell that John Foud doesn't sound thrilled about what's about

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>type place in his city, and that is the mood here,

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to be honest. Uh, if you're watching on TV, it's fun, um,

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>but there is a sense of of skepticism about the

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Here has been a sort of a burden

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for Japan and it's caused a lot of bad feelings

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>to a nation. John Vale, were symbolism is everything. Is

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the Emperor engaged with the Olympics. Is the Prime Minister

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>engaged with the Olympics. Yes, they are. They will be

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>at the opening ceremonies, although a lot of people have

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>dropped out, to be honest, like former Prime Minister All

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they dropped out, and I think that there's only about

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>close to two hundred people from Japan who will be

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>attending the opening ceremony, so it's very pared down. I

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's about six hundred or seven hundred foreigners who

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>will be at it, so very pared That's amazing, John Farrell,

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm so are your entourage just two people? That's incredible.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>We couldn't go to the Olympics this year. I'm afraid

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>till we couldn't make it. Do you want to talk

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about markets, John's we do that right now. Let's take

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>a bit hard away from something that's clearly upset. This

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is no good security. Tom Equity features up twenty on

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the SMP We're advancing a half of one percent, John,

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it just feels really difficult to push back against this market.

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Even with the bond market doing what it's done this week,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>equities were still doing okay. The drawdown was what two

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>three four percentage points on the SMP. What is the

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>bear case now through this year? Well, I guess you

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>had to look at what Tom was saying earlier. There

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>might be a surprise out of the third It seems

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>like there are some very uh hawkish members who might

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>descend at the next meeting. Um. There's also the question

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about who's going to be chairman going forward, and that's

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>much more important than when the FED starts tapering. And

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of course Powell has the job if he wants to.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But if he wants it, I think, but I think

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that he might say, well, I've I've

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>done enough and retired before things get any harrier. So

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that could cause them uncertainty. But it certainly doesn't seem

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's gonna be earnings, doesn't. I mean, because I'm

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>glad I'm not an analyst in the States. I mean,

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just embarrassing how how how much these companies are

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>overshooting analysts estimates, isn't it? John? The backdrop, of course

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of all of this is a ten year at one

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>nine and it was Nico Lami and PIMCO last hour

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>saying half of it is some of the positioning and

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the technicals, but some of it really is fundamental, is

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.959
<v Speaker 1>slowing down concerns about the delta. What do you think, Well,

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a combination of a lot of things.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of foreign buying too, maybe

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>especially from Japan. The data showed a lot of buying

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>by Japanese banks, and I believe it was in June,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>and so there's certainly a lot of different factors going on.

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And people are really believed the Fed when they say

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that the CPI is going to be coming down. There's

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>a boatload of money out there that needs some place

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to to be, and so they like to They like

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>to be in treasuries. They were almost regardless of the price.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>It seems it's certainly better than European yields in Japanese yields.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Jon Vale, in the Western world, you're one of the

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>great japan watchers. When you hear the word Japanification, the

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Japanification of Europe, the Japanification of the United States, is

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that a genuine concept for you. I go back and

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>forth on that, to be honest a little bit. Uh. Japanification, Um,

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly in terms of the economy is not happening to

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the US economy. I mean, the Japan's economy has been

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:34.959
<v Speaker 1>quite dull for quite some time. The U. S economy

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is bounced back strongly and inflation is back strong. Uh.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, Japan has been suffering from deflation or no inflation,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>as I called for for decades now, and that's not

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>happening in the States. So there's some aspects that certainly

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can happen. Certainly, the debt burden that's going up in

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in the States is a former Japanification. And perhaps some

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of the the the attitudes about how society works is

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>moving a little bit more Japan's way, a little bit

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>more of the polite of version of society is opposed

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to the aggressive side. So there are aspects. Um. Certainly,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Japan has led the way in terms of monterary policy

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and started QUEI started negative rights, all these things. So uh,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly Japan has some examples to uh to show the

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, for better for worse. Sometimes I'm

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>stuck down there, stuck down there for a long time.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>John is gonna catch up. Good luck for the following month,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>John fail then Nick as a management chief global strategist.

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Right now a really important conversation and an appropriate conversation

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for summer long ago and far away. Carl Brunner and

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Alan Meltzer set up summer conferences. I will be direct.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>They invented the economic summer conferences, and the truths of

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that has been the shadow Open Market Committee of which

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Levy has been a member for near forty years.

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>He of Bank of America now at Barrenberg Capital Markets

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is their chief economists. We are thrilled that Dr Levy

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>could join us this morning. Mickey. There has to be

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a fear, a singular fear of the many shadows of

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>our debt and our deficit. Except life seems great. How

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is that? It's it's really quite striking how the public,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the financial media, and financial markets seem to be ignoring

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the dramatic increases in the debt and not really questioning

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>what its consequences are. Particularly Tom, it's not just the

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>piling up of the debt, but but it's also what

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are we deficit spending for? Are we allocating resources in

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a way that's adding to UM, you know, productive capacity

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and UM, you know, I think let's let's be get

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>down to basics. One way or another, we in future

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>generations are going to pay for it. Um. We used

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to think it was all going to generate higher inflation

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and higher interest rates. It hasn't. That doesn't mean it's good.

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Once again, it gets the point, how are you allocating

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>national resources? And um, you know it's going to lead

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to to slower growth in the long run. What would

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>call Bruner and Allen Meltzer say about the two America's

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we've we've been dealt not only off the financial crisis

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and eight, of which you are in

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the cross airs, but also this natural disaster we have.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>What would Brunner and Meltzer say would be a prescription

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>across all of economics to get us out of this mess? Okay,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>One thing they would say is coming out of the

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>current situation, the pandemic. Um. The economic situation is completely

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of coming out of the financial crisis. Um.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>It was the proper role of the government to provide

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>income support during the pandemic, but now you don't need

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 1>any more fiscal stimulus. You've already rebounded back, and you

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>need to um move back to normal, both in monetary

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>policy and fiscal policy. On fiscal policy, they would completely

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>agree with the notion that you need to allocate more

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>resources to infrastructure that is that is really needed, but

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>but not more to stimulating the economy, which is not needed. Mackey,

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>you want us to focus on the dead pole, So

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>let's do that right now. Why is it a mess

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to you? What is messy about it? Well? I I

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>wish our policy leaders were actually um debating the issues

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>in a rational way. All we hear about is the

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>number a trillion dollars for the infrastructure package. Also, the

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure package, please note, is called the American Jobs Act.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It should be called the Infrastructure Act with an emphasis

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure rather than creating jobs. Um. There is little

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>discussion at all about how the resources are going to

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be allocated, who's going to administer the projects, what projects

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>are needed. That is, we should really be thinking strategically

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>about how to upgrade and improve our infrastructure. Also, as

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>you've noted, the Infrastructure initiative, the American Jobs Act is

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>being tied politically to the American Famili's Plan Act which

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>involves a couple of trillion dollars in various income support programs,

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and holding that hostage to more fiscal stimulus is just

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>not constructive. And so we need to disentang the legislation

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and have our policymakers address what is really needed at

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this time. We do not need more fiscal stimulus to

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>create stronger economic growth. Where are That's that's the old battle.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm making your issue that is not the additional

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>dollar of debt. It's what that additional dollar debt of

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>debt is being useful. Is that affect how of your position? Oh?

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a combination. I mean, you know, whenever

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you have the government debt to GDP rising above a

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred um, you should be concerned. You should be also

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be concerned when the Secretary of the Treasury says, oh um,

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the FETE is keeping great to zero, so now is

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the time to spend more. That's not wise strategic thinking.

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm concerned about the rise in the debt per se,

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also very concerned about how what we're deaf

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is spending for and does that quote unquote paved the

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>road for increasing productive capacity in the long run, because

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>it's the continued increase in growth in the future that

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>allows us to UH finance or debt the debt service

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and also raise standards of living. Why isn't all the

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 1>spending leading to inflation? Well, it will, I mean the risks, Uh,

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the risks are inflation is going to go up. So

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>let me put in a nutshell. Inflation has already risen

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>significantly higher than the FED has had earlier predicted it would. Um. Certainly, UM.

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Some portion of the rise in inflation is temporary, as

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>these supplied constraints and and and supply bottlenecks dissipate. However,

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.959
<v Speaker 1>you do see an excel. You have seen an acceleration

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of aggregate demand. Okay, Now the critical issue is after

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>this initial spurt in economic growth fall as the economy reopens.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Following that, if all of the monetary and fiscal stimulus

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and the pipeline, which is unprecedented, if it actually if

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>those policies actually stimulate stronger aggregate demand as they are

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to, then you're gonna end out with excess demand.

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And if those policies fail to work, um, then you're

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the economy go back to where it was.

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And most of the inflation will prove to be temporary.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. The critical point is the risks are for

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation to rise. And there's no question but that the

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation hurts lower income people than most. And and

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed is doing is is it's really accentuating

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>income and wealth inequality, stimulating the economy because of the time.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to get you in trouble with Barenburg in Germany.

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about the new Bundesbank from where you sit

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and after watching Le Guard yesterday and the revolution of

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the e c B, is this a new Bundesbank compared

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to a decade ago? Of course it is. UM, It's

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. You know, the the e c B. You

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>know when it when it was founded, was you know,

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>was you know, the Bundesbank was in the driver's seat

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and UM it held to its old precept of stable

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>money and stable price levels. And and now the e

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>c B is UM it's in an awkward situation, but

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all about UM, you know, financial stability and continuing

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to ease and continuing to have its eye out on

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the weak links in in the European Union. UM that

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>means continuing with its qui and negative rates and so yes,

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and of course under under Leguard they've expanded the scope

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of the objectives of the ECB to include um, you know,

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>climate change, some some credit and distributional issues. So so yes,

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's a different policy making body than

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>than it used to be. Mickey, it's gonna catch up

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just to flight for the heritage of Baronberg. That with

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Lafey and Hulgus Smathing on the other side of

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic, Mickey Laby that of Barenberg. This is the

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene and this is Bloomberg