WEBVTT - Meteoric Metal and Alien Iron, Part 3

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>name is.

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 3>Robert Man and I am Joe McCormick, and we're back

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 3>with part three of our series on human uses of

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 3>iron from space. I think we had a little interlude

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 3>there where. On Tuesday of this week we ran an

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>unrelated interview. But today we're back to finish off the

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>series with Part three. Now, if you haven't heard the

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 3>first two parts yet, you should probably go back check

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 3>those out first, But to do a quick recap. In

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 3>part one, we focused largely on the iron dagger of

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Tuton Common, a blade found wrapped up with the pharaoh

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>tuton Common inside his coffin from before the time of

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 3>large scale smelting of iron in Egypt. And we discussed

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>chemical and mineral analysis showing that this dagger was almost

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 3>certainly made out of iron that came not from Earth,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 3>but from a piece of iron meteorite that fell from space.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 3>And it turns out that a lot of iron artifacts

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>like amulets, beads, tools and trinkets. A lot of these

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 3>iron artifacts from before the various regional iron ages have

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>this in common. They come from meteorites, so ancient peoples

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 3>were taking alien metal that fell from the sky and

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 3>shaping it to their uses. In Part two, we talked

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>about a few more specific artifacts believed to be made

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>from meteorite irons, such as the Shang Dynasty axes from

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 3>ancient China, and a meteorite iron sculpture known as the

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 3>Iron Man or sometimes in the media as the Space Buddha,

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 3>which was at one point alleged to be a Tibetan

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 3>depiction of a divine figure in Buddhism known as vice Ravana,

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>but according to some experts in Buddhist art, was actually

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 3>a twentieth century European design, amounting to a forgery or

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>at least a crude imitation of Tibetan imagery. And then

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I ended up getting in to some of the speculation

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>about who could have actually made this sculpture, which is

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a somewhat wild story if true, big if true. We

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>also talked about the history of knowledge that meteorites come

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>from space. So it took scientists of the European Enlightenment

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 3>until around the beginning of the nineteenth century to really

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 3>agree on this, but there is some evidence that people

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 3>in ancient China. In ancient Egypt and other cultures knew

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that this metal came from above, and some of the

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>indications of this are linguistic, for example, in the fact

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 3>that in the ancient Egyptian language there's a convention to

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>refer to iron as iron of the sky or metal

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>of the sky. And so today we're back to talk

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>about more possible uses of meteorite iron in technology and

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>artifacts from human history. And you know, one thing that's

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.119
<v Speaker 3>interesting this has sort of come up a little so far,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 3>is that meteoric iron still retains a strong power, a

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 3>sense of power, and a mystical appeal, even after the

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>spread of tools and artifacts made from earth based iron.

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 3>So even after iron as an element becomes common and mundane,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>and you know, it's smelted out of iron ore from

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the earth and we use it to make all kinds

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of things, including including steel products, there's still something undeniably

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>appealing and even perhaps mystical about iron from the stars.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right, and that's why in this next section I

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 2>want to get out of the Bronze Age and get

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>into the post Bronze Age Islamic world, where we see

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 2>various mentions of what may be meteoric iron. So a

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of this is going to concern swords, at least

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 2>in the outset here. Swords have of course played a

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>significant role in human history and take on various meanings

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 2>across various cultures that use them, which is pretty much

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>any culture with access to the prerequisite metals. As we've

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>just us on stuff to blow your mind and the

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>artifact the short form episodes we were on Wednesday before,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>we see sword like weapons in cultures that did not

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>have access to the prerequisite metal work, though their functionality

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>is ultimately perhaps more comparable to a club. Thinking here

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>about you know, particular examples of essentially wooden clubs that

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>are that to the untrained eye might look like a sword.

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 2>May even be you may even have bits of stone

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 2>embedded in them, you know, given this the swordlike appearance,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 2>so there is something like, even when you cannot make

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 2>swords because you don't have the prerequisite materials, there is

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 2>something about the form, and it's an extension of the

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>human arm as a weapon that seems to lock up

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in various cultures. At any rate, wherever the sword was known,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 2>the sword increasingly took on various literal symbolic metaphorical meanings,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>And this of course means that swords factor into various

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>religious traditions in a number of ways, like, for instance,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>in Christiananity, Jesus mentions the sword as a metaphor for conflict,

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 2>and I believe the particular passage is widely interpreted to

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>refer to social division rather than armed conflict. But like

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 2>anything in a religious text, people will take it and

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>apply whatever meaning they want to it.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there are a lot of ways you could read

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I come not to bring peace, but a sword.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now you'll find swords, even flaming swords, and Buddhist

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 2>iconography and Hinduism, and the sword of course also factors

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 2>into Islam. And I bring up these other religious examples

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 2>in part because, based on some of the sources I

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>was looking at, it does seem that there is often

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a Western bias in interpreting sword iconography and references in

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Islam as more overtly tied to armed conflict than perhaps

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 2>in other religions. This is not to say that the

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>sword in Islamic traditions isn't, but as with other cultures,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't always refer to harmed conflict or violence.

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Could be literal, could be metaphorical.

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, so. Islamic swords may stand for religious or political authority,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>they may stand for mystical knowledge and more in addition

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 2>to military victory. But moving on to specific swords, there

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>are a number of them of note from Islamic history.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>The prophet Muhammad is held to have possessed nine swords

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>during his life, and the most famous of which is

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the dul Fakari or dul Fakar. I may be pronouncing

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 2>this incorrectly. If so, I apologize, but the name's meaning

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 2>is largely uncertain, but may relate to concepts of splitting,

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 2>and is often depicted as a pronged, split or double

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>bladed sword. You can look up images of various images

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of the sword in iconography, and depending on how it's presented,

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the blade may split near the tip or I've seen

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>examples of the blades splitting close to the hilt. So

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess it kind of runs the gamut from like

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>the highly symbolic to the you know, pievable and practical,

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and again that we're talking about largely about imagery here.

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Actual symbolic swords have been produced, but the sword in

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>question here, the dual Forakar, is I think largely understood

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to be a mystical and or mythological item. The story goes, however,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 2>that the prophet acquires the sword at the Battle of

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Bata in six twenty four, and then ultimately passes the

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 2>sword on to his son in law, Ali, the fourth Caliph,

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 2>now Caliph's by the way, if you're not familiar, these

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>were the Muslim civil and religious rulers who succeeded Muhammad.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>So the sword in question here, the Dulafaikar, is strongly

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>associated with Ali. There are various legends about his military

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 2>exploits with this mystical weapon and its ability to cut

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 2>through his enemies, though it is also a symbol of

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 2>political and spiritual authority. It is in many ways said

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to be the sword of swords, as Islamic blades were

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 2>traditionally inscribed with the phrase there is no sword but

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>dul Fokar, and there is no hero but Ali. Okay,

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>some superlatives, right right, And you can find examples of this.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I was looking around and like various museums inevitably have

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 2>swords of Islamic origin that have that do mention the

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Dulfokar on them. So it's a can you can find

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 2>examples of this, perhaps even in your own museum within

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>your own region. Now, some say that the actual sword

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 2>in question here, among other relics, is currently in the

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>in the possession of the Topekapi Palace museum in Turkey.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 2>But it also seems that in twelve verse Sheism, the

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 2>sword is believed to be in heaven or and or

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 2>in the possession of Muhammad Almadi, the Imam believed to

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>return at the end of time. So again there's this

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 2>idea that again a highly mystical sword that is held

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 2>in tradition to not even be perhaps on this earth anymore. Now,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 2>I say all this to sort of going to get

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>into the idea of Islamic swords, but this is not

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 2>the sword that I wanted to talk about in connection

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to today's episode. Like there's I've seen no discussion that

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 2>this sword or anything any artifact that is connected to

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>this sword containing meteoric iron, And I guess we should

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 2>also clarify that any sword in the possession of beings

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>not on this earth any longer cannot be analyzed. However,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 2>we do see at least some mention of possible meteoric

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 2>iron weapons in Islamic traditions. I'll get to specific example

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>in just a second, but you know, we should remember

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 2>that medieval Arab astronomy was extremely advanced prior to the

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 2>rise of Islam in the seventh century. Pre Islamic Arabs

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 2>depended on empirical observations of constellations, and then with the

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 2>rise of Islam we see the emergence of this tradition

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>of five daily prayers, prayers that need to be directed

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>toward Mecca. And this creates a true incentive based on

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 2>religion for better charting of time and location. Thus there's

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a reason to focus more on the movements of the stars,

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and this ends up helping to foster a more robust

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>cultural understanding of astronomy, drawling upon other traditions in the

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>ancient world and building out new knowledge. Now, on the

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 2>other hand, I was reading a survey of Muslim materials

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>on comets and meteors by David Cook. According to Cook,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 2>comets and meteors during the for a very long time

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>in these traditions were not considered astronomical phenomenon. They were

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 2>held to occur within the atmosphere and therefore they were terrestrial,

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>so they were largely omitted from astronomical works, while mentions

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>would still be found in other forms of literature, especially

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>when they were held as portents or lined up with

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>important deaths or events such as the death of the

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Prophet in six thirty two, as well as events in

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the lives of the Third and fourth Caliphs. Now in

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the past, I think this was when I was writing

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:15.559
<v Speaker 2>for How Stuff Works, and I was writing or applying

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 2>some edits to an article that dealt with iron, and

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 2>I remember reading that blades of possible meteoric iron had

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 2>been associated with seventh century Caliphs, and I look back,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I tried to get into this because I early wanted

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 2>to figure out where's this coming from, what specifically is

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>this referring to? What are the sources? And the initial

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 2>source was a nineteen forty one paper published in the

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Ireland titled the Use of Meteoric Iron by ta Rickard,

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 2>and at one point in the text he discusses the

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>possibility that Zeus's thunderbolts were a quote poetic expression for

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the use of meteoric iron, and that later I'm going

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>to read a quote hear from it In later times,

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 2>we read that Attila, timor Antar and other devastating conquerors

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 2>had swords from heaven. So also the Caliphs, whose swords

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>were made of the same meteoric material as the Cobbastone

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 2>that lies in the Holy Sanctuary at Mecca. Avajo's, an

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Arab philosopher of the twelfth century, states that excellent swords

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 2>were made from a meteor weighing one hundred pounds that

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 2>fell near Cordoba in Spain. Now, if you've listened to

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the show for a while, you know that we did

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 2>in an episode on the Cobbastone the Blackstone of Mecca

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 2>a while back, probably a few years at this point,

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that we did cover there

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>that maybe wasn't as a parent to the author of

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>this paper, is that the origins of the Cobbastone are

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>far from a settled matter.

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't remember. It's been a while, so I

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 3>don't remember exactly what we concluded there, but it seemed

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 3>like there were still plenty of room for uncertainty there,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 3>though there were suggestions of reasons for thinking it may

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 3>have been a stone created by an impact of some sort,

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 3>whether it came from above, or maybe whether it was

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>created of like one of those types of glasses created

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>by impacts.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And I think ultimately it's just all observational

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>because it's a sacred relic. It's not going to be

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>scientifically analyzed, which is the case with many relics around

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>the world. In getting into this whole business about the sword,

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>so that was what I really wanted an answer to,

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 2>and I've got to admit that I was able to

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>find out precious little about Islamic swords alleged to have

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>been forged from meteoric iron. Rickard here was citing British

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 2>geologist Sir Lazarus Fletcher, who lived eighteen fifty four through

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twenty one, but rooting around in available texts by

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>this author, I didn't really find any answers to my

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 2>questions either. I did consult a couple of sources about

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the history of metallurgy in the region. And it is

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 2>key to note that we've already touched on islam arises.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>After the end of the Bronze Age in the Middle East,

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the Islamic world had access to Damascus steel, so any

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 2>meteoric weapons would be largely symbolic and or relics of

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the past, and they clearly had access to what is

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>often held up is the best steel of the day.

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, steel being a product of iron, So it would

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.599
<v Speaker 3>not be a question like we talked about with the

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 3>King tut example, with this being a you know, a

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>product from before the regional iron age, from before people

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 3>before there was large scale smelting of iron in the area.

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 3>There's plenty of smelting of iron and production of iron artifacts.

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>These would just be iron from a different source in

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>a place that was already rich with iron, exactly.

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now, interestingly enough, interestingly enough here, I don't know

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 2>to what extent, or any extent this ends up coloring

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>these older writings by Western writers, if this factors into

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the analysis at all. But there is actually a line

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>in the Quran fifty seven twenty five that refers to

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 2>iron in a way that is sometimes interpreted as having

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>some connection to meteoric iron. I'm going to read the

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>passage here, this is of course in translation. Indeed, we

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 2>sent our messengers with clear proofs, and with them we

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>sent down the scripture and the balance of justice, so

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>that people may administer justice. And we sent down iron

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 2>with its great might benefits for humanity and means for

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Allah to prove who is willing to stand up for

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>him and his messengers without seeing him. Surely Allah is

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>all powerful almighty ah.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>So I imagine some interpretation is hinging there on the phrase

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 3>we sent down iron, with the idea of iron somehow

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 3>coming from above exactly.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I was reading paper talk titled Basic Concepts of

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Physics and the Perspective of the Qur'an by M. M. Karashi.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>This was in a nineteen eighty nine edition of Islamic Studies,

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and the author here writes that quote the implication of

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the words has become fully apparent only through historical investigation

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of the earliest use of meteoric iron. So I could

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 2>be wrong on this end. As always I invite correction

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 2>or clarity, But I believe some commentators argue that these

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>lines in the Qur'an reference and historical understanding of iron

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>meteor rights, you know, perhaps drawing on again, as we've

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>touched on knowledge that already existed in the ancient world

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 2>in different parts and to different degrees, that there was

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 2>a connection between iron and meteorites, between iron and the

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>sky again makes perfect sense, given everything we've discussed, but

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 2>isn't also also isn't necessarily guaranteed. Some also seem to

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>interpret this verse as just stating that iron in the

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>earth was a creation of Allah, and consideration of meteors

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to always serve as part of that conversation.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was sent down just a way of

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 2>saying it came from God, which you know fair enough.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>And say anything was sent down, you could, I guess

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 2>you could say a giraffe was sent down, but that

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean it actually had a re entry into the

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Earth's atmosphere.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, everything in this passage is said to be sent down,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 3>and the other cases of sent down here don't necessarily

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 3>seem to imply a physical descent from space.

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, So again I invite correction or clarity on these points,

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 2>especially from anyone who has kroonic knowledge and so forth.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 2>But I did find it interesting that in this passage

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 2>we see a possible reference to meteoric iron, and then

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>we also have these other, like more perhaps dubious mentions

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>in Western writings about meteoric swords meteoric iron swords that

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 2>were used by the Calbs.

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>All right, well, I wanted to begin this next section

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 3>by looking at how big chunks of meteorc iron arrive

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 3>on Earth. Already, we've mentioned several examples of meteoroids that

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 3>at some point entered Earth's atmosphere and fragmented or shattered

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 3>in the air, separating into a series of smaller meteorite

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 3>fragments which can be found across an impact field. For example,

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 3>in the last episode, we talked about the Chinga meteorite,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>one piece of which was probably used to make the

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 3>so called space Buddha sculpture that we talked about. And

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 3>while the artistic origins of that sculpture are highly suspect,

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the physical origins are not. Really it does seem to

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 3>be agreed upon that this is a piece of iron meteorite.

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 3>So many fragments of the Chinga meteorite have been found

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 3>in the region of Tuva, which is in southern Siberia,

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>since the first recorded discovery by miners in the early

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 3>nineteen hundreds. This scattering of iron meteorite chunks over a

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 3>large area is the result of some original object coming

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 3>apart into pieces somewhere in the atmosphere above roughly ten

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 3>to twenty thousand years ago. Now, there are different ways

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 3>for meteoroids to come apart or lose their structural integrity

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>in the atmosphere. In some cases they land roughly intact,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 3>in some cases they split up into some number of

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 3>smaller pieces from the original, and in some cases they

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 3>basically just explode or vaporize, and on the explosion end

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of the scale, the explosions before the meteoroids reach the ground.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 3>These explosions are referred to as air bursts. In many

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 3>such cases, the entire object, or nearly the entire object,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 3>is burned up or reduced to dust in the process.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 3>In the case of the relatively recent Cheliabinsk meteoroid, which

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:56.479
<v Speaker 3>exploded over Russia in February twenty thirteen, an asteroid that

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 3>was originally like twenty meters or sixty five feet in diameter.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 3>When it entered the Earth's atmosphere, it exploded a few

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 3>tens of kilometers above the ground. For some reason, I've

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 3>seen different estimates about the altitude. Some say twenty three

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 3>kilometers up, others say thirty kilometers up. But wherever it was,

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 3>this explosion released a huge amount of energy, expressed in

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 3>the hundreds of kilotons of TNT, maybe like four hundred

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 3>or five hundred kilotons of T and T. The explosion

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 3>way up there, damaged thousands of buildings on the ground,

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 3>blew out glass, and sent some fifteen hundred people to

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the hospital, though thankfully no deaths were reported.

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>The footage of this, like the dashboard footage that was

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>going around, is quite incredible, so if you haven't seen it,

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 2>definitely seek it out.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely that is worth looking at. It is awe inspiring,

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and this is a particularly big air burst in the

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 3>modern era, not of course the biggest that can happen,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 3>but very big and recent memory, though, I was reading

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 3>if the object had impacted the ground instead of exploding

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 3>high up in the atmosphere, if it had hit the

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 3>ground or exploded lower in the atmosphere the dam the

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 3>damage could have been much much worse. So in a way,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the outcome was rather lucky. But despite the fact that

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 3>the Chelubenzk meteoroid entered the atmosphere as an asteroid the

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>size of a house, I've read estimates that well below

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 3>one percent of its mass reached the ground in the

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.239
<v Speaker 3>form of solid meteorites. Again, this is something where I've

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>seen different numbers on the estimate. I've read like zero

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 3>point one percent of its mass or like zero point

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 3>zero five percent of its mass, some very small percent

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 3>of its mass actually reached the ground in solid chunks,

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 3>and the rest evaporated or was turned to dust as

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 3>the object broke apart and burned up. So this got

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 3>me wondering what actually causes a fast moving meteoroid to

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 3>just blow up or even vaporize like that. A key

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 3>factor is speed. So the original object, which might be

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 3>a chunk of asteroid or comet material at least a

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 3>few meters in diameter or maybe up to tens of meters,

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 3>typically enters Earth's atmosphere at great speed. According to the

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 3>American Meteor Society, meteors tend to enter the atmosphere going

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 3>anywhere between eleven kilometers per second and seventy two kilometers

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 3>per second. And there's actually an interesting fact concerning this

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 3>variability that you might not think about it first. The

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:27.719
<v Speaker 3>speed with which a meteor enters Earth's atmosphere depends not

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 3>only on the speed of the comet or the asteroids

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 3>orbit relative to the Sun, so it has its own

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 3>intrinsic speed as it's orbiting the Sun, but it's also

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 3>affected by the movement of the Earth, which is simultaneously

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 3>orbiting the Sun at about thirty kilometers per second and

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 3>is also though this is less important, rotating at about

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 3>one thy six hundred and seventy kilometers per hour. Of course,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 3>speed is always, you know, it's relative to an observer.

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>So even though we use language like the speed at

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 3>which a meetia enters our atmosphere, that could give the

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 3>false impression that our atmosphere is stationary and the media

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>is moving. In reality, both are moving, and they're moving

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>in their own directions, and so the speed of entry

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 3>is determined by the relative velocity of both objects to

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 3>each other, you know, So it could be kind of

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 3>trying to catch up with the part of the atmosphere

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 3>it hits, or it could be like slamming into more

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 3>kind of a head on kind of collision with the

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 3>part of the atmosphere it hits. And then of course,

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>other things about other things about the way a meteor

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 3>enters the atmosphere will determine, will determine its ultimate fate,

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 3>whether it burns up, what the resistance is, and so

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 3>that would include things like the angle of entry. Anyway,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 3>whatever the speed is at that incredible speed, the air

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 3>directly in front of the meteoroid. Once it enters the

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 3>atmosphere becomes greatly compressed. It's squeezing a lot of atmospheric

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 3>gas in its path into a very small space, very rapidly,

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 3>so you can imagine it kind of like a pneumatic

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 3>piston that is moving so fast it doesn't need a

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 3>cylinder to squeeze the air in front of it. If

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 3>you're traveling at dozens of kilometers per second, you're going

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 3>to squeeze a lot of air into a thin layer

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 3>at your bow before it has the chance to move

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 3>out of the way. And as a result of being

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 3>so violently compressed, this air gets extremely hot, and then

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 3>this layer of hot compressed gas flows around the sides

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 3>of the object as it travels. This fast movement not

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 3>only compresses the gas in front, but it also creates

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 3>a relative vacuum in the space directly behind the meteoroid,

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 3>and these forces put a lot of stress on the object,

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 3>heating it up by thousands of degrees celsius, melting or

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 3>vaporizing parts of it. Causing pieces of it to break off.

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Is just a huge amount of stress on a solid

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 3>chunk of material. These pieces that might be broken off

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>of the object are in turn subjected to extreme forces

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 3>of heat and pressure, and a sudden breakup of the

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 3>main mass of the meteoroid can release just a lot

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 3>of energy quite suddenly and resemble an explosion. Also, in

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>addition to all this, I came across a paper from

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen adding another interesting mechanism, another piece of information

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 3>to the puzzle here. So this paper was by Tabita

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and Malash published in Mediauritics and Planetary Science in the

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Air twenty eighteen and the paper is called Air Penetration

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Enhances Fragmentation of Entering Meteoroids. So this paper is discussing

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 3>an attempt to model the physics of a fragmenting meteoroid

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>with reference to the example of Chellibinsk and the authors

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 3>here argue that their model reveals a previously unrecognized but

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>very important mechanism in how this breakup occurs, and that

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 3>is the penetration of high pressure air inside the body

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of the object through permeability of the material or through

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>tiny cracks and pores in the rock or the metal.

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 3>And as this air percolates into the solid body of

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the meteoroid, it decreases its material strength. That weakens it

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and makes it more likely to want to split apart.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 3>One of the authors, Purdue University professor j Malash, described

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 3>the process in a press release, saying, quote, there's a

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 3>big gradient between the high pressure air in front of

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the meteor and the vacuum of air behind it. If

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 3>the air can move through the passages in the meteorite,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>it can easily get inside and blow off pieces. So

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 3>air bursts are aided by this percolation, which every time

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 3>I say that, I do think of coffee as a

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of kitchen first thinking. But this percolation of superheated

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 3>compressed gas into the body of the meteoroid through these

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 3>tiny holes and gaps in its structure. But not all

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 3>meteoroids are equally vulnerable to this process. Size and density

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 3>help protect a meteoroid from fragmentation and vaporization. Iron meteoroids

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 3>are not completely immune, but since they are denser on

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 3>average than stony meteoroids, they are less likely to result

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 3>in an air burst, and thus it is more likely

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>that large solid chunks reach the Earth's surface intact. And

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 3>so I would like to talk about one such meteorite

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 3>iron meteorite that did reach the surface of the Earth

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 3>in several very large pieces, and that is the Inongenic meteorite,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 3>also known as the Cape York meteorite, three large pieces

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 3>of which are now on display at the American Museum

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of Natural History in New York. There's one that is enormous,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's like sort of car sized, and even

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.479
<v Speaker 3>the other two that are smaller are very big. So

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 3>some thousands of years ago, we don't know exactly when

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a meteoroid weighing possible like two hundred tons about one

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eighty metric tons, but we don't know for sure,

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 3>entered the atmosphere and fragmented into pieces in the Arctic

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 3>over North America. But as several still very large pieces

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 3>of iron meteorite did make it to the ground. They

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 3>landed in what is today northwestern Greenland, probably before it

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 3>was inhabited by people, after people first arrived in the area.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Again we don't know for sure when this was. They

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 3>found these large caches of solid iron and began using

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 3>them to make iron tools through a process called cold forging,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 3>essentially using heavy objects such as stones to hammer pieces

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 3>of the iron meteorite until they broke off, and then

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 3>you would hammer these pieces until they reached the shape

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 3>you wanted, such as a knife blade or a harpoon tip.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 3>And this cold forging process was very energy intensive. It

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 3>took a lot of human labor. These sources of meteorite

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 3>iron became a vital mineral resource for the Inuit peoples

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 3>of the region.

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>It is telling once more, we're talking about a culture

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 2>that would often be interacting with a landscape upon which

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>little bits of meteorites would potentially show up a lot

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 2>easier and be easier to find, you know, in this

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 2>case the snowscape, but in other cases we've been talking

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:29.959
<v Speaker 2>about desert environments.

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Ice is actually a great surface for finding meteorites. This

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 3>came up in that documentary that we watched by the

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Verner Herzog and Clive Oppenheimer documentary where they're looking for

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 3>meteorites on the surface of ice sheets by helicopter in Antarctica,

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 3>and it was a great place to look for them

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise, you know, you not expecting to see rocks

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 3>on the top of these ice sheets.

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 2>That is Fireball Visitors from Darker Worlds from twenty twenty

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, we actually interviewed Herzog and Oppenheimer for the

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 2>show I believe it was an anticipation of this, right,

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 2>or was it about their volcano documentary. I'm blanking because

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 2>I watched them both around the same time. At any rate,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>we talked to Werner Herzog and it.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Was terrifying, though I do want to have a caveat there.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I've seen some pictures I believe, of how these particular

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 3>iron meteorites were as they were originally in the places

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>where the Inuit people's found them, and from what I

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 3>recall seeing, it seemed like they were not just like

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 3>on top of bare ice sheets, but they were positioned

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 3>among a landscape more like nestled in among rocks and earth,

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 3>so I think they still would have really stood out.

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 3>They would have looked weird because they were iron meteorites,

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 3>but not just not so much like the things that

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 3>these scientists were looking for in Antarctica, where it's just

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 3>like a black rock on otherwise unbroken white ice sheet.

0:30:58.720 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Right right.

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, the tools made out of these cold forged chunks

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 3>of iron meteorite were they entered circulation. They were sourced

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 3>from these locations and then eventually traded with the communities

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 3>surrounding the Inuit peoples of northwestern Greenland. Eventually they made

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 3>it even farther. There's some evidence that some iron tools

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>made out of pieces of this meteorite were traded with

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Norse Vikings sometime before in the eleventh century or before.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 3>But by the sixteen and seventeen hundreds, explorers from Europe

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 3>started to make repeated contact with various Inuit peoples, including

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 3>the Inhuit of the far North and the Inuit are

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 3>a group of Inuit people also known sometimes as the

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 3>polar Inuit. They speak a language called Inukton and their

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 3>homeland is in northwestern Greenland. These European and US explorers,

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 3>such as the Scottish naval officer John Ross, recorded that

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 3>in speaking to these people, they were told about some

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of mountain of iron that the Inehuit were using

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to make their iron tools, but for a long time

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 3>they never saw. The explorers never saw these iron sources

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 3>for themselves. This was until the expeditions led by the

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 3>US explorer Robert Peer beginning around eighteen ninety four. Peery

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 3>is mainly known for trying to reach the North Pole.

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 3>There's some dispute about whether Peery ever actually did make

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 3>it to the geographic North Pole. He certainly claimed he

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 3>did in April nineteen oh nine, but it's difficult to

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 3>verify since the ice would have been over water and

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 3>is constantly moving, so the marker he placed in the

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 3>ice can't confirm it. Also, some later analysis of the

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 3>records of the expedition cast doubt on the physical plausibility

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 3>of their journey and also if Piery did make it

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 3>to the geographic North Pole. There's an account from Matthew Henson,

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 3>an African American explorer who lived from eighteen sixty six

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to nineteen fifty five and served on multiple expeditions with Peery,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 3>indicating that he was actually the one who made it

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 3>there first. If they did make it so, a lot

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 3>of questions remain about that, But anyway, after living among

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the Inhuit and learning from them and trading with them,

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 3>PII eventually removed three large chunks of iron meteorite from

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Inhuit lands, the largest of which is known as Anihito

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 3>or the Tent, and this one is more than thirty

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 3>metric tons and it required the construction of a rail

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 3>system just to get it to his ship in order

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to be transported to New York. But there are also

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 3>two other smaller but still quite sizable iron masses known

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 3>as the Woman and the Dog. Later and Pieri's plan

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 3>was to sell these objects in order to finance his

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 3>future expeditions to the Arctic, and they remain on display

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 3>today at the American Museum of Natural History. Now, in

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 3>addition to taking away these meteorites that were so important

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 3>to the Inhuit, not just practically as tools. More on

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 3>that in a minute, there is also an incredibly tragic

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 3>story of how Pierri took away six Inuit people and

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 3>delivered them back to the American Museum as well, under

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 3>the false pretense that they would soon be sent back

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 3>home with many gifts and supplies. But in crowded New

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 3>York they were quickly exposed to unfamiliar pathogens and most

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 3>of them died of respiratory diseases. So in the end

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.439
<v Speaker 3>that story is very sad. I think one man from

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 3>the group was able to return to Greenland, and there

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 3>was a boy among the group named Minic who did

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 3>grow up in the United States for some time, and

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 3>then I believe it sometime later tried to return to

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Greenland and then also at some point came back to

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the United States. But he passed away in the nineteen

0:34:46.960 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 3>eighteen flu pandemic. But regarding the Inhuit beliefs about these

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 3>meteorites that had provided them with iron tools for so

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 3>many hundreds of years, I wanted to mention a really

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 3>interesting episode of another podcast that I came across while

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 3>researching this subject. So this other podcast is called Endless

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Thread and it's put out by Boston's public radio station WBUR.

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I previously wasn't familiar with it, but this one episode

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I listened to is really great. And this podcast generally

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 3>discusses uses of meteorite among the Inuit people. But my

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 3>favorite thing about it is that it includes interview material

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 3>with an Inhuit shaman named Hivshoe, and it's definitely worth

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 3>checking out that episode in full. I think the main

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 3>title before a colon and subtitle is a Meteorite in Greenland,

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 3>but I wanted to mention one interesting and important thing

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that sort of comes up in it. So Hisshue is

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 3>from a place in northwestern Greenland called hira Paluk, where

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the Inhuit people have this long relationship with metiorite fragments

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 3>in and Hipshue says that in their language, these are

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 3>known as the excrement of the stars.

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like an entirely different take on.

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 3>What these are, but it doesn't have the connotations you

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.280
<v Speaker 3>might bring to it, the thinking of it as excrement,

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 3>because these objects are quite sacred. In fact, I've read

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 3>in other contexts that a justification given for Peri's removal

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 3>of the iron meteorites from Inhuit lands is that the

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Inhuit acquired other sources of iron and steel for practical

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 3>uses through trade and so forth. So I guess the

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 3>thinking is like, oh, they can they can get iron

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 3>from other sources now, so they don't really need these

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 3>meteorites anymore now, I think there are even if they were.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Even if these metea rites were only significant for practical

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 3>uses as a source of iron, I think there would

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 3>be reasons for doubting that that way of thinking that justification.

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 3>But in this interview, Hisshue makes clear that these meteorites

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 3>have significance beyond simply being utilitarian sources of metal. Though

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 3>they were that as well, their significance was sacred, and

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 3>he mentions that cutting off a piece of metal from

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 3>the source involves a ritual. There is a ritual to

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 3>that sort of giving the people access to the metal

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 3>from this sacred object, and the tools made from it

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 3>are not simply viewed as tools. He calls them partners

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 3>because in a way, he says, everything in their view

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 3>of the world is life. Everything is infused with life.

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 3>So a tool made from this meteorite is not just

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 3>simply a dead object to get some use out of. It,

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 3>is a partner in your work. So anyway, if you

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 3>want to check out that other podcast episode again, the

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 3>show is called Endless Thread. The title of the episode

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 3>is a meteorite in Greenland. But to continue on this subject,

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I was reading around and I found other accounts of

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Inuit people explaining that they view these meteorites as having

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 3>a sacred power and that in fact, religious significance and

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 3>material utility are not mutually exclusive in their view. So

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 3>just one example I came across was a paper published

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 3>in the journal Meteoritics by marden at All called Contemporary

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 3>Inuit Traditional Beliefs concerning Meteorites. This is from the year

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety two and it records what was said about

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 3>meteorites by Inuit elders in the High Canadian Arctic in

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighty eight, So a few details of what the

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 3>authors here were told. They were told that Inuit people

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.359
<v Speaker 3>have long come across rocks in the landscape that they

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 3>interpret as being not natural, sort of not the same

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.479
<v Speaker 3>as everything else around them, and in some cases these

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 3>are meteorites, and meteorite pieces that are discovered or possessed

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 3>by a person can give people special powers in some cases,

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 3>or have some kind of special link to the fate

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 3>of the person who owns them. They mentioned that these

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 3>iron media have been sources of metal for the fashioning

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 3>of effective tools and weapons. But contrary to what might

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 3>be a common Western assumption, this does not mean that

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 3>they are not viewed as sacred or spiritual objects. Quote.

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>The one evident thing that became clear to the author

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 3>is that the Inuit distinctly believed that these meteorites are

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 3>religious objects of the highest order, and it brings into

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 3>question the current academic practice of sending meteorites south to

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 3>research institutes. Any seeming conflict with the traditional use of

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 3>meteoric iron is more apparent than real. The animals, the hunt,

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 3>the act of survival, all being bound up in the

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 3>mystic patterns of animistic belief. So what I take from

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 3>this is it's sort of pushing back against an assumption

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 3>that many Westerners might have that, oh, if people are

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 3>just using this metal to make tools that they use

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 3>for everyday chores, you know, for hunting and other things

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 3>that must be done to survive, and you know, and

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe if you compensate them by trading with them some

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 3>other objects that are useful for survival, then there's nothing

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 3>wrong with taking this stuff away. And you might not

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 3>feel the same way about an artifact that has religious

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 3>significance but maybe was crafted by humans and kept in

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 3>a sacred special place and has no role in the

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 3>ongoing work of everyday life. But I think they're saying

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 3>that's wrong. Even though this is used to make materials

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 3>that are used in regular work, it still is also sacred.

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>And that kind of raises questions for me about like,

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 3>why would we have the contrary assumption to begin with?

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Why would we naturally assume that if a material is

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 3>broken off of a mother load and hammered into blades

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 3>or harpoon tips or other tools used for everyday survival,

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 3>that material is not sacred or is not a religious object.

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 3>The conclusion doesn't actually follow from that premise. It implies

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 3>there's some other unstated premise that is driving the intuition.

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 3>That premise could be something like things you see every

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 3>day aren't sacred, or things you use to accomplish work

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 3>are not sacred, which, again, like where would such a

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 3>belief come from?

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a lot to unwrapped there, because on one hand,

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you could see this kind of viewpoint being rooted in

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 2>like clear examples of highly ornate objects that were not

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 2>intended for actual functional use, such as some sort of

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 2>a ritualistic weapon that was clearly not intended for use

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 2>on the battlefield, or some sort of ritualistic item that

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 2>essentially has the role of a scepter where it becomes

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 2>a symbol of power, but it is somewhat divorced from

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 2>practical applications that it may have had in its sort

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 2>of artifact based history, like, for instance, the traditional traditional

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 2>scepters in Chinese tradition. I've seen some discussion that they

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 2>they may have in an origin been backscratchers. It's one theory,

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you know. So it's like, Okay, you have a practical

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 2>item that then ultimately becomes a thing that is completely

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 2>divorced from that tradition and so if you're looking for

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 2>those kinds of like clear examples like Okay, well this

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 2>is clearly a sacred item because it doesn't look like

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 2>it could be used every day, so you have that

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 2>going on. But then yeah, I don't know. It is

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 2>weird to think about this idea of thinking that everyday items,

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 2>everyday things cannot be held up as sacred because I think,

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 2>for one thing, you can see various plenty of examples

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 2>from history where things people encountered every day still took

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 2>on sacred meaning. One example that comes to mind is

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:39.479
<v Speaker 2>the horse. Like the horse is you know, during times

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 2>of its domestication to be clear here, you know, it

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 2>takes on sacred connotations, mystical connotations. Like the horse. The

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 2>skull of the horse is often held up in different societies,

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 2>is having some sort of a you know, peculiar meaning

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 2>or area to it. And yet the horse was every day.

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 2>The horse was something that was just part of your

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 2>daily life and you depended upon. And then on the

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 2>other end of things, like there's just our personal experience

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 2>like a beloved tool. We may not really be in

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the mindset of thinking about things in our immediate vicinity

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 2>as being you know, mystical or magical or sacred, because

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe we just don't apply that mindset to our immediate world.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think that the way we consider our

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>tools and consider our knickknacks are completely divorced from that

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 2>thinking either. I mean, just think about, like whatever, if

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you do engage in some sort of a craft or

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>a handiwork, Like, do you have a beloved tool, and

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 2>how much would you have to lean into the idea

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 2>of it being important to get to the level of

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 2>it being sacred.

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Or the source of the material from which it is

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 3>made being sacred.

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, this also comes back to It reminds me

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 2>we were talking earlier about excrement, the idea of meteoric

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 2>iron as being the excrement of the sky or so forth.

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 2>This brings me back just something that came up in

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>our episodes on Dust about how there's sort of like

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a modern understanding of extrement. You know, it's just pure waste, right,

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 2>But for people that were actually engaged in like working

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the land and all like, there would have been more

0:44:16.400 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 2>of an understanding that this is not like a valueless byproduct,

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 2>this is something that then can be used to grow

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 2>something new, you know. It can be used as a fertilizer.

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 2>There are various traditions where, of course it's also used

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 2>and typically you know, I think we're dealing with animal

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 2>excrement in these cases, but it can be used also

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 2>as fuel for fire, So you don't have to like

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 2>lean far in that direction to see this is something

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that can be that new life can be breathed into,

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.439
<v Speaker 2>you know. But again, just coming back to the idea

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of sacred items in everyday life, I mean, yeah, I

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 2>think most of us can easily admit that we very

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 2>easily imbue physical items with meaning. I mean, it becomes

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 2>a problem. So it's they're not necessarily, you know, hoarders

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 2>are not making everything sacred, I guess necessarily. But you know,

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't think it's you know, beyond the

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 2>realm of our understanding that that a tool, especially when

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you depend upon could could you know, take on a

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 2>sacred quality. Now as we begin to close out these episodes,

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess we're closing out these episodes on iron, I

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know, do you think you have another one in you, Joe?

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, there certainly are plenty more examples we could talk about,

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 3>but I feel like maybe we're ready to move on

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 3>for for our purposes, but we could come back to it,

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess, yeah, yeah, there, we'll come up again.

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah. There are a lot of examples out there.

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 2>I would love to hear from listeners about it. I mean,

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 2>for ins as we didn't touch on much in the

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 2>way of modern meteoric weapons that have been produced very

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>much with the understanding that these are meteors, these meteorites

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and and this this is metal from the sky. And

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 2>you see various examples of this.

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 2>The late Terry Pratchett, for example, had a meteoric blade

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 2>forged for himself using I believe bits of meteorite that

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 2>he himself had collected. This was for when he was knighted.

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy.

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:13.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he wanted to make sure you had the right

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 2>sword for.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It, really making it an occasion.

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, make a feast of it. There's all. There

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 2>are also various other blades. I was reading about a

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Japanese blade. This is a Japanese Samurai sword forged by

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 2>modern day swordsmith Yoshindo Yoshiwara. It is called the Tintatsuto

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 2>or the Sword of Heavenly Iron. And this particular sword,

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 2>which you can see is on display. It uses iron

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 2>from the Gibbean meteorite that fell in Namibia during prehistoric times.

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 2>You can look up images of it. Looks pretty cool

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 2>and I also read that fragments of this meteorite were

0:46:54.200 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 2>also traditionally used by the Nama people of Namibia for

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:03.919
<v Speaker 2>many centuries in tools and in weapons. And you'll find

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 2>various meteoric swords in fiction. I don't believe this is

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 2>in like the core of books. This may be in

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the additional matter, but apparently a couple of these blades

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 2>show up in the works of J. R. Tolkien and

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:19.840
<v Speaker 2>also on Avatar the Last Airbender. I'd totally forgotten about this,

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 2>but a meteoric sword does come into play on that

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 2>show as well. Those are just a couple of the

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 2>fictional examples, but I'm sure there are plenty more. So yes,

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:31.959
<v Speaker 2>we would love to hear from you out there. Write

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in with your favorite examples of fictional meteoric weapons, as

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:40.839
<v Speaker 2>well as various examples or potential examples. With that huge

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 2>caveat you know that we get into in the first

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 2>episode regarding actual weapons that may include iron of meteoric origin.

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 3>Please do We're gonna get a lot of the fictional ones.

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a rich vein to exploit here.

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's have it all right, We're gonna go ahead

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and close out the show here. But hey again, we'd

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 2>love to hear from everyone out there, and if you

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 2>would like to help us out, if you want to

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 2>support the show, I tell you, one of the best

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 2>things you can do is make sure that you are

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 2>subscribed to the show. So wherever you get your podcasts,

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 2>be at Apple, various other places, just make sure that

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 2>you've hit subscribe if you have the power to do so.

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Above and beyond that, throw us some ratings, you know,

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 2>give us a nice collection of stars. Maybe say a

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 2>few kind words, and you know, share, share the show,

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 2>share a word of the show with people.

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 3>You know that's right, to invoke a cliche. We depend

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 3>upon the support of listeners like you. But all you

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 3>got to do is listen and share it. So huge

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 3>thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to blow

0:48:52.680 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 3>your mind dot com.

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Stuffed to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.