WEBVTT - What is quantum biology?

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Kelly, how do biologists feel about quantum mechanics.

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't feel comfortable speaking for all biologists, but

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.119
<v Speaker 2>i'd say for myself, I'm mostly uncertain.

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you uncertain about whether quantum mechanics makes sense?

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, when I was working on my PhD, I did

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>some work on neurotransmitters and steroid hormones, and all of

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>that was so complicated and often didn't go as predicted.

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 2>It's hard for me to believe that when you go

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>another step down to the quantum mechanics level, that we

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>could make any sense of it.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So are you attempted to just like brush all the

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>quantum details into the rug?

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'd be okay with letting physicists worry about the

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>particles doing their quantum thing, and you'd all worry about

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the pests and the parasites.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That feels like a fair division of labor, unless unless, what,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>unless it's actually all entangled and you can never escape

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics. Excuse my evil cackle.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 2>It was a good evil cackle.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh good.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Hi.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor at

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>UC Irvine, and I've been practicing my evil quantum wizard Cackle.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Kelly Wiener Smith, an adjunct assistant professor at

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Rice University. And I've been trying to avoid thinking about

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>quantum mechanics and animal behavior.

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But is that even possible?

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess the answer is definitively no. It's collapsed to

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>know as of this.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Conversation, especially if you're a guest host on a physics

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>pot cast. Kelly, that's not a great way to avoid

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I've made bad choices.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, welcome all of you to the podcast Daniel and

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio in which

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we marinate in the mysteries of quantum mechanics. We get

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>down and dirty into the mud of the quantum realm.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>We try to understand how this incredible experience that we live,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>all the ice cream and the goats and the blueberries

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and the blue skies, can somehow be made of these tiny,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>frothing quantum particles that behave according to fundamentally different rules

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>than the ones we experience.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 2>And we don't even understand the biology rules, but let's

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 2>try the physics ones.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>The whole point of reductionism is to say, well, everything

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is big and complicated up here. Let's dig down deep.

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's pull the universe apart and try to understand it

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>at its tiniest little bits. Maybe down there things will

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be simple, will be clear, will be crisp. And from

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that understanding, from that firm foundation, maybe we could build

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>up a comprehension of everything else that flows from that,

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>including goats and ice cream and parasites.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm not sure I believe.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>It, but we'll find out. It's a big goal. It's

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a stretch of goal, let's say, of science. You know,

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>along the way we hope to learn a few things.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's sort of the fantasy, right that we could

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>understand the universe in terms of its smallest little bits.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I do think we'll get there. It's going to be

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit hard to connect across these levels, but

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 2>it's a worthy goal.

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Often in science we do a division of labor. We say, look,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>economists can worry about things at a certain level, and

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>palaeontologists worry about things at another level, and quantum physicists

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>worry about things at a different level. And often these

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>levels are distinct. Like when you do fluid mechanics, you

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>don't really have to understand all the forces between the

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>little particles, and when you do economics, you don't have

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand the chemical reactions inside everybody's fingers. You can

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like abstract that away, and you can do science at

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so many different levels in our universe. It's sort of

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>an amazing fact, and it's like the reason why we

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>have anything but quantum mechanics and particle physics.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And so today you're going to try to convince me

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>that we can understand animal behavior better by connecting with

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>our quantum people. Is that right?

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Today we're going to ask if that's really fair. We're

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>going to ask if there are cracks in that division

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of labor, if quantum mechanics is bleeding through Somehow are

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>there clues in the way we behave and animals behave

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and in the biological world that reveal the fundamental quantum

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>nature of the universe or is it deeply locked behind

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>these philosophical walls and completely abstracted away.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 2>It would be so nice if you could go into

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 2>your own little cove and you didn't have to look out.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 2>But I'm guessing the answer is going to be you

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>see more clearly when you see from a variety of

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>angles m Well.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question what

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>is quantum biology? This does sound like the name of

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a weird startup, doesn't it.

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it does. I hadn't thought of it that way,

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, i'd work there. I'd apply for a job

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 2>at quantum Biology.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Depends on which quanta they use to pay you, I suppose.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Y Oh, no, that's true. And then how good their

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 2>late station is?

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Is that you decide a job to take?

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I guess I'm not employed by anyone

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>right now, but that would help. That would help. And

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 2>if they'll do my laundry, that would be great.

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Aren't you self employed?

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I guess that counts, So.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.119
<v Speaker 1>You should ask yourself for a late station.

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I make a pretty mean latte. I take good care

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 2>of myself.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>There you go, and you do your own laundry, right,

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So the boss is really providing over there on the

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>science farm.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Mmm, you make a good point. Yeah, we do do

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 2>our own laundry around here, but we're the bosses, all right.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Point made.

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>But we're not here to talk about laundry and coffee today.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>We're here to dig into biological processes and to ask

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>whether there is a quantum nature to it, whether the

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum description of the universe, the quantum nature of reality

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>reveals itself somehow in biology if you can find place

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in biology where quantum mechanics is necessary to make things

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>work or to understand them.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And our usual place to go to to get our

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>conversations started is the clever listeners of DJEU. Should we

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>check in with them first?

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, let's do that. Thanks very much everybody who volunteers

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to answer these weird questions that you get asked without

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>any chance to prepare. We love hearing your voice and

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts, and we love if you've participated. We are

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. That's right, you've been listening for years

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>without participating. But you know you want to please write

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to me two questions at Danielandjorge dot com. So before

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you hear these answers, think about it for yourself for

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a minute. What is quantum biology? Here's what people had

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to say.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 4>Quantum biology is a study of microscopic life and how

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 4>such live influences and influenced by quantum effects. For example,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm pretty sure microtubules and specific cells are believed to

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 4>exhibit potential quantum behavior.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's definitely a super cool sounding term. Maybe it's

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>applying the nondeterministic nature of quantum mechanics to biology. I'm

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>thinking about like hydrothermal vents and quantum randomness helping to

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>generate early DNA and early life.

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 5>So quantum biology, I guess, would be looking to see

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 5>within the human body or other animals to see if

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 5>there's some weird quantum effects going on, or if our

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 5>body somehow uses quantum mechanics in a way. So perhaps

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 5>our senses or organs or our brain does something really weird,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 5>like where it communicates information really fast in an impossible way,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 5>and so we're thinking that maybe there's some quantum phenomenon

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 5>going on.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 6>If we're not talking about ant man in the quantum realm,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.679
<v Speaker 6>then I think I've heard something about this with bees

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 6>and their ability to see on ultraviolet, something quantum effects

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 6>with flowers and vision.

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 7>I do know what biology is. I kind of know

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 7>what quantum is. Maybe quantum biology helps explain quantum phenomena

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:23.559
<v Speaker 7>that happens in biology, maybe something like bioluminescence, or maybe

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 7>something with like how energy is transferred a photosynthesis. So

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 7>maybe there's some quantum phenomena that can help explain biological processes.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>What is quantum biology? I don't know.

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 8>I would guess quantum biology is the study of the

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 8>crossover of quantum physics and biology. I kind of recall

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 8>hearing a couple of years ago that we discovered that

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 8>birds are able to tap into some quantum process and

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 8>use that for navigation, and so I would guess maybe

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 8>it's something similar along those lines of different types of

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 8>biological creatures and how they are able to utilize quantum physics.

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 2>So those were some really great answers, and for me,

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>they sparked some old memories, Like I feel like I

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>had heard something about quantum processes and bird navigation, which

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, tie together my interest in animal behavior with

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 2>quantum stuff. And it made me wonder, does something like

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>cancer like caused by mutations from UV radiation is that?

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Does that count as quantum biology? So what are we

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 2>What is the scope that we're talking about here? In particular?

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're doing. You're gonna say quantum mechanics

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>kills people, right, You're going to try to make us

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>look bad.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>What is it? It's my turn to be the one

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 2>who who delivers the bad news. I think your evil

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 2>laugh is better, but I'll work on it.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a good Quantum Wizard cackle. I liked it, thanks,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's exactly what we're going to try to

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>do today is trying to understand where quantum mechanics affects biology.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's really what quantum biology is is the understand

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the impact of quantum mechanics, the rules of quantum mechanics,

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and how they filter up to the big stuff, the

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>sloshy stuff, the goopy stuff that we love in biology.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So I'll be interested in seeing if understanding quantum mechanics

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>mostly helps us understand when things go wrong, or if

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 2>it also helps us understand like helpful things like navigation.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it just does it kill you when it messes up?

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 2>Or can it be helpful?

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd be fascinating If you need it's like quantum

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>mechanics in order to enjoy sex or something like that, that

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>would be cool. That'd be a good selling point for

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics.

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I would definitely care then. Yeah, I'd buy that book.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>All right. So let's start off by reminding ourselves what

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the rules of the quantum realm are. What are we

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about here? Because we understand that physics tells us

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>about how things move and fall and inertia and motion

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and gravity and all that stuff. But that's the kind

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of stuff we already find intuitive. We know that dolphins

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>know the rules of fluid mechanics, and that birds understand

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>how to fly, and of course they have to follow

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the laws of physics. But that's classical physics. That's the

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>physics that we grew up with, the physics that we

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>have an intuition for. The physics that defines why a

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>ball flies through the air into your glove, or why

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a car crashes or doesn't crash. What we need to

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>understand today are the rules of the quantum realm, which

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>seem fundamentally different the physics basically of the tiny particles

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of the big stuff.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>So does that rule out cancer caused by solar radiation?

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>No, it does not, absolutely. Okay, as long as we

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>can find a quantum link, then we can blame quantum

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>mechanics for all of cancer. Don't worry, we'll get there.

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's great, Okay, great, I look forward to it.

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's do a quick review on what is the nature

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of the quantum realm? What are we talking about here?

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>What are the rules of quantum mechanics that could influence

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>biology in a weird, sort of unusual, non classical way.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And point number one is that quantum mechanics has an uncertainty.

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is often described as like Eisenberg uncertainty principle,

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>there's fuzziness to the universe. But it's much more than that.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It's much deeper than just like we don't know where

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that electron is. Philosophically, it requires a complete revision of

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>your understanding of what location means, like in the sort

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bill Clinton sense, like what is means when we

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>say where the electron is?

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the raunchier shows we've done in

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>a while.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, yeah, I'm trying to keep it sexy

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in this case. What I mean is that's more than

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't know where the electron is. It that the

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>electron doesn't have a location at every point. Like when

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you think about a baseball flying through your backyard, it's

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very natural to think that it has a location at

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>every point in time. And like freshman students of physics

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>learned to write the trajectory as a function X of t,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>which tells you where it is at every point in time.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Because we assume that objects exist somewhere at every point

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and that they have a smooth path. They don't like

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>disappear from here and just appear over there. It's like

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a very basic assumption of the way the world works.

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's not true for electrons. Electrons have locations at

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>moments like snapshots. It's here at this time, it's there

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at that time, But they don't have paths. They don't

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>have to go from here to there. Even if they

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>can be here and then later be there, you don't

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have to connect them. In fact, you can't connect them

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with a smooth path.

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess as an animal behaviorist, I was hoping that

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>that uncertainty sort of provides an at like if you

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 2>average it, you get an answer that tells you everything

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you need to know, so you can ignore it. But

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll see if that's true.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly. That seems to happen when you have lots

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of electrons. When you're averaging over many, many particles, then

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>things seem to come together and behave differently. Like you

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>have an individual electron, it doesn't have a path. But

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have ten to twenty nine particles and exists

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in a baseball that does have a path. And so

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the weird thing about quantum mechanics is that when you

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>zoom out, when you aggregate it over many many particles,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>different rules emerge. And that's the mystery of the universe

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about earlier, like, we don't really know

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>why stuff does emerge. Why when you zoom out the

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>rules seem to be different. Why can you write simple

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>mathematical stories about the motion of a baseball without really

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding what it's made out of and what the rules

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>are for what it's made out of. It's this incredible

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>magic trick we do that allows us to do science

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>at so many different levels without understanding the internals. Agreed,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>But we definitely learned that electrons don't have this property.

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't have a path or trajectory. They have multiple possibilities,

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and they can maintain those possibilities simultaneously. Like if an

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>electron interacts with something, it might go left or might

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>go right, for example, when it hits a magnetic field,

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and the universe allows it to have those possibilities simultaneously,

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, maybe you went left, maybe you went right.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't know both of them are possible. You sometimes

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>hear this set is like, oh, the electron is in

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>two places at once. That makes it sound like, oh,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it's got path, it's just got more than one of them.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is that doesn't have a path two

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>probabilities of being in those places, which it can maintain

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously without actually being in either one.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So I am assuming we'll get to the electron transport chain.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling amazed that stuff like this works when you

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>can't depend on your partner the electron, to do their part.

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's amazing to me that anybody relies on electrons

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to do anything. They don't seem very cooperative. The second

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>crucial element you have to understand about quantum mechanics to

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>think about its impact on biology is that randomness. Like,

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>if an electron can interact with a magnetic field, it

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>has a probability to do one thing and a probability

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to do something else. That's very quantum mechanical. But then

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we make a measurement. We say, well, I want

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to know is the electron over here or is it

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>over there? So we interact with it with like an

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>eyeball or something big and classical. It forces the universe

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a choice, is the electron over here or

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is it over there? And we want one of those

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>snapshots to collapse those probabilities. Something incredible happens in that moment,

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>something which we never otherwise experience true actual randomness. We

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think we experience randomness in the universe a lot, like

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>when you roll a die, or you flip a coin,

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>or they pull lottery numbers. But that's not actual randomness.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>That's just chaos. That's just something which is complicated and

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to predict. But if you repeated it the same way,

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same way, twice, you would get the same answer.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Chaos is when things are very sensitive to exactly how

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you've done them. Randomness means if you do things exactly

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the same way twice, you get different outcomes.

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>So I'm finding myself realizing that I'm not one hundred

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>percent clear on the difference between randomness and uncertainty. Does

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the randomness generate uncertainty?

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, It works sort of both ways. The randomness

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>generates an uncertainty, but the uncertainty allows for randomness. The

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty says, oh, there's several possible outcomes for the electron,

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the universe comes and it picks one. How

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>does that happen If the electron has a fifty percent

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>chance of being left and fifty percent chance of being right,

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>somehow the universe decides, Oh, this electron's left or this

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>electron's right. We don't know what the mechanism is for that.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't have any way to do that ourselves. Like

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>if you came into being said Daniel, build me a

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>device which will generate random outcomes left or right ones

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>or zeros, I couldn't do it unless I connected myself

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>somehow to a truly random quantum process, Like I couldn't

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>build a random number generator on a computer. You probably

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>have one on your computer, but it's not actually a

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>random number generator. You run it twice the same way,

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it will generate exactly the same series twice. The only

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>way we have to generate randomness in the universe is

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to connect to quantum mechanical processes. Cosmic rays and electrons

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and anything tiny and quantum can actually be random.

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And so we do have random generators using quantum processes.

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>And can you give an example of like a process

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 2>that requires that actual kind of randomness as opposed to

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, the random number generators I can get on Google.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Most things don't need real quantum randomness. Most things are

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:15.239
<v Speaker 1>fine with what we call pseudo orandom number generators that

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>approximate randomness. And so for most applications, like you're running

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a simulation or something, you can do just fine with

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>pseudo random number generators. You can create real random number

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>generators if, for example, you have like a camera quointed

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>at a cosmic ray detector. Cosmic rays are quantum particles

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and they are truly random, and if you use that

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as like a seed, then you can generate actual random numbers.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are very are few things that really need

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>true randomness.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>That's good because I use the Google random number generator

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fine, exactly, it's fine.

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, so we got uncertainty and randomness. Is

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 2>there anything else we need to know about quantum mechanics

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 2>before we move on?

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, the word quantum means something important. Quantum means like

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a unit, a discrete chunk, and that tells us something

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>about how the world works. Quantum mechanics gives us a

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>picture of the universe that's not smooth and infinitely divisible,

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but built out of discrete packets. And that's a little weird.

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not something we're used to. Like. If you imagine

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>talking to your friend or cackling loudly, right, you can

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>cackle loudly or you can cackle quietly, and you can

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>make that cackle quieter and quieter, and it feels like

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you could keep making that quieter forever, like keep making

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it half as loud and half as loud and half

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>as loud, and you could just keep going forever. Right,

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>there's no minimum loudness.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, sounds like it would get annoying pretty quick.

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like that song, right, a little bit quieter now,

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit softer now, but.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't go on forever, and that's what you enjoy it.

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. If it went on forever, it would be annoying.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But you can't do that with things like a light beam.

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>A light beam seems like it's continuous. It seems like

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you could dial it up to really bright or really dim,

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and that you could keep making it dimmer and dimmer

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and dimmer forever. But the truth is you can't because

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that light beam is made of quantum objects, individual packets

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of light photons, and so there is a minimum brightness

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you dial your laser down, so it's emitting one photon

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>at a time. That's the minimum brightness. You can't go

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to half a photon, or a quarter of a photon,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>or an eighth of a photon.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 2>So a photon is something we don't expect that will

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 2>ever break down in more detail ever.

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good question. Is a photon fundamental or

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is it made of other stuff? As far as we know,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a ripple and a quantum field that is itself fundamental.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>It can't be broken into smaller bits. But even if

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it could, it wouldn't be a photon anymore.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Still, photons are the discrete unit of light. You can't

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>break them any smaller.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>So electrons are made up of smaller parts, but when

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you take those parts out, it's not an electron anymore.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So electrons are also fundamental parts, is that right?

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't know if electrons are made of smaller

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>bits or not. Protons certainly are electrons. We don't know.

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We suspect probably they are. We don't know what's inside them,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, if you took them apart, it wouldn't be

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>an electron anymore. The same way like if you take

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a car part. It's not a car anymore.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>It's just a bunch of parts, got it all right?

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So the incredible thing is that these are the rules

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the quantum realm. They describe how tiny particles interact,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and how they move through the universe, or how they

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>don't move through the universe because they don't go at all,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>how they exist and froth and fluctuate. And we think

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that the whole universe is made of these pieces. These

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are like the fundamental legos of the universe. They follow

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>these rules. But when you put enough of these legos together,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>something weird happens. Right, different rules seem to emerge. You

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of these particles together, as we were

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>saying earlier, then you can start to use classical physics

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to describe it. Baseballs don't have any real randomness. Sound

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>waves can be made softer and softer and softer. And

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>so we have the rules of the quantum realm, and

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>then we have the rules of sort of our realm,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and we don't really know how these are connected.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 2>So I am yet again feeling the impulse to say,

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't this mean that we could just I've reached out

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the quantum stuff and we don't need to go there.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Most of the time we can, and that's why it

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>took us so long to figure out quantum mechanics, because

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in our world it's not obvious. We can mostly ignore

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the quantum nature of our world, or we would have

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>seen it much earlier. Right. It took into like the

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>discovery of radioactivity, which triggered a whole revolution in the

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>way we think about the world, and the atom and

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>discovery of all those particles one hundred years ago, and

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the photoelectric effect for us to see cracks in the

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>classical world. So it's very, very subtle, and most of

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the time we can ignore it, and you biologists can

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>pretend quantum mechanics is not even a thing. Yes, But

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the question of today's episode, is are there cracks

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>like that in biology where the world reveals its true nature?

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a sense for when we started asking

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 2>questions like this, When did we start understanding quantum mechanics

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and when is the earliest instance where people tried to

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>like meld it with biology.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics and its foundational ideas. Day two about like

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundred. It was Albert Einstein who came up with

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea that light came in these little packets. We

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have a whole episode about how the photon was discovered

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>from the photoelectric effect. Basically, you shine bright lights on

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>metal and it will boil off electrons. And how many

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>electrons you get and the energy that they have tells

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>you a lot about how energy is transferred from the

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>light beam to the metal. And it reveals actually that

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the light is made of these little packets because electrons

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>can only absorb one packet at a time, and how

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that filters into biology is a fascinating question. I think

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>only in the last few decades have people been able

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to make these connections between quantum mechanics and biology. Though

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been a lot of woo, you know,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like, hm, we don't understand the brain

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>where is free will wait? Maybe quantum mechanics fills in

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that gap. So I think in terms of solid science,

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll dig into a bunch of examples, but I think

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just a few decades old.

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, that's truly. You know, on your nspgrades you're

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>supposed to say you're interdisciplinary, but usually the answer is like, well,

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I do two different kinds of neurochemistry. But this seems

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 2>to really fit the bill. So all right, that's been

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot to absorb, my friends, Let's take a commercial

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>break and then we'll get some examples. All right, so

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 2>we are now caught up on quantum mechanics. Surely we

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>know everything there is to know about quantum.

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Mechanics now, it only takes like fifteen minutes, right, and

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>then boom, you're a quantum mechanic.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeap, easy pasy. But biology is the hard stuff. So

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>so now let's dig into biology. Can we start with

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 2>some examples where quantum mechanics helps us understand biology better?

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Absolutely, let's dig in because in the end, we're

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>all made of these quantum objects, and surely at some

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>points their quantum nature must be important. Right. So one

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites is exactly the idea you mentioned earlier,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>which is electron transport chain. Maybe you should give us

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a little summary about what an electron transport chain is.

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I have purposefully not thought about the electron transport chain

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 2>since I was a freshman undergrad, and I've never had

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 2>to teach an intro biology class, so I've never had

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to go over it again. So how about you tell

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 2>us about the electron transport chain.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, I have recently had to review this because my

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>daughter is a freshman in high school and she's taken biology,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and she prefers to ask me these questions rather than

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>my wife, who was a PhD in biochemistry, because when

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>she asks my wife, she gets what my daughter calls

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>a college lecture about it. And when she asks me,

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very short answer because I don't understand it

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>very well. So here goes. Electron transport chains are part

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>of basically how we transfer energy. You eat food, it

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>goes into your stomach. How does that energy get converted

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.239
<v Speaker 1>into a useful form for your body to take advantage of. Well,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole series of reactions there. This oxid, there's reduction.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>All those things are part of converting your nutrients into

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>basically sugars that other parts of your body can use.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And how do these chemical reactions happen? Like, why do

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they happen? They happen because they're energetically favorable. Stuff bumps

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>into other stuff and it finds that it can click

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>together and then doing so release some energy. In this case,

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the energy that's released are electrons moving around. Basically electrons

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are sliding down energy gradients. It's like you're building a

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>snowy hill for the electron and it just wants to

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>coaston down to the bottom. So these electron transport chains

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are molecules passing electrons from one to the other in

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>order to release some energy and release it into some

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>storage unit, some atp or some other kind of sugar

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that the body can later use.

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>Your slitting example sounds so fun. I'm imagining all the

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 2>electrons in my cells right now going and I feel

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 2>so much better about the energy I'm using.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And so mostly this is fairly straightform, and the sledding

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>example works because things just slide downhill. But sometimes there's

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a barrier, like sometimes the electron is trapped in a

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>little valley and it would love to get over a

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hill down to the next deeper valley where it has

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>lower energy, but it can't get over the hump. Right,

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>It's like trapped in a valley. And so if the

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>electron was purely a classical object like a kid on

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a sled, and they weren't going fast enough to go

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>over that hill, then they'd be trapped there forever. Right,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have the speed to go over that hill.

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You just can't go over that hill because classical objects

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have to go places. If you're here and then you're there,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you have to go from here to there. There has

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to be like a continuous chain of locations between here

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and there for you to exist in. And if you

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have the energy to get to some of those locations, boom,

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you're trapped. Right. That's why people can get stuck in

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a valley if you don't have like speed to get

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>over the hill.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'm having trouble connecting that example to like the biology.

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 2>So are you essentially saying that like it had to

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>be quantum particle that did this because biology absolutely required

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>quantum tunneling to be able to make all of this work,

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>because there are hills going down the electron transport chain

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>that we couldn't get over otherwise.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's exactly right. The electron transport chain is not

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>just a smooth hill. There are some barriers there, and

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in order for the electrons to get from the top

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom, they have to get over those barriers.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But they don't have enough energy to get over those barriers.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But they can do their quantum magic, right. Quantum particles

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to go over barriers. Quantum particles can be

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>on one side of a barrier, and then later they

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>can be on the other side of a barrier without

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ever going through the barrier. If you have a probability

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of being here and a probability of being there, you

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>can be here now and be there later without going

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>from here to there. So this is the process we

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>call quantum tunneling. If an electron didn't have this capability,

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>if it was a classical object, then it couldn't get

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>over these barriers. And again we're using the barriers and

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the sledding example as a way to visualize like the

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>chemical reactions the energy ingredients that are involved in this

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>electron transport chain. Getting the energy from the nutrients into

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>your sugar as a whole series of chemical reactions that

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>involve like sliding down these energy gredients. But there are

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>bumps in this energy ingredients, and the electrons have to

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>quantum tunnel through those bumps, through those barriers, or the

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>whole thing wouldn't work.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Okay, And so there's a bunch of randomness and

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 2>there's a bunch of uncertainty. Is it surprising that the

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>electron transport chain works as well as it does, like

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>that they don't quantum tunnel their way out of the

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 2>transport chain or something.

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a really cool question. The concept that there's

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty and randomness makes it seem like it's out of control,

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's unpredictable, right, But remember that quantum mechanics does

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>make very firm predictions. It's just that it predicts the probabilities.

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't predict the exact outcome because there's real randomness,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's very firm on what the possible outcomes are.

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't say like, oh, the electron can just

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>do anything at once. It's not like there's no rules

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>at all and anything goes. This isn't like a rave, right,

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>There are still rules, and the quantum mechanics tells us

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the electron can be here or it can be there.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It can't just like go willy nilly and join some

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>other party. And so it still determines what happens. And

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>if you average over many electrons, you can very very

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.719
<v Speaker 1>accurately predict what's going to happen. And since there are

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lots of molecules and lots of electrons involved, then even

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>if you can't predict an individual electron, you can still

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>rely on the processes happening at a reliable level.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of amazing that that system evolved.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It is sort of amazing. And it relies on the

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>quantum nature of the electron. Like, you could not build

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this system out of tiny little balls of stuff that

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>move the way baseball do. So the quantum nature of

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the electrone is crucial to the electron transport chain, which

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is really fundamentally like our entire power chain. Based on

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>my understanding of ninth grade BIOLGCE.

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, so here's the thing. Biologists have to take physics classes,

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and it really seems to me like they should start

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 2>the lectures for you know, physics for biology majors by saying, look,

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the electron transport chain couldn't happen without wantum mechanics. Yeah,

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and then we'd pay attention.

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, intro science could be taught in a more

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>compelling and fascinating way without turning off masses of people.

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 2>What really, unless it's the classes taught by my friends,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 2>who I'm sure are all doing it the best possible way, I.

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Do think it's really fascinating. A lot of this stuff

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is often brushed over because also there's just so much

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn, Like when you're learning about the electron transport chain,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there's so many details. Their biology is so complicated already,

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, so many interactions, so many pieces. It's amazing

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to me that it ever works. You know, it's like

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge Rube Goldberg machine designed by a crazy person.

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Goldberg machines are already kind of wild, but yes,

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 2>one that's made by a crazy person would be even

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 2>more wild. So okay, so are most of the examples

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 2>things like intro biology or like molecular biology stuff. I

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 2>guess we haven't gotten to my pet topic yet.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get there. We're going to get to

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>neurons and brains.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, all right, so what's next?

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 7>Then?

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>On the top of energy transport are photons, Right like plants,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, they don't eat peanut butter sandwiches and need

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to digest them the same way we do. They have

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a different process. So interacting with light opens lots of

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>questions about the quantum nature of light, like how does

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>photosynthesis all work? How do we absorb that energy? And

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>then even for humans, light is something we rely on

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to build our picture of the world. Does it matter

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's made of individual photons? Could we see individual photons?

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's a really fascinating question, like whether we're

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>able to interact with a quantum object, the experience a

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>quantum object, like a single photon hitting your eyeball. Did

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you even see that?

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 7>Ooh?

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 2>And you know plants sometimes turn in the direction of light.

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Could they turn in the direction of a single photon?

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Right, really fascinating. I think about this a lot

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>when I'm looking up at the night sky and you're

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at some really dim star, some star you're just

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>barely able to make out, and imagine being really close

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to that star. It's an enormous furnace. It's pumping out,

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>like huge numbers of photons out into the universe. If

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you're very close to it, then your eyeball is going

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to get roasted. You're inundated with photons. As you get

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>further and further away, those photons spread out more and more,

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and now you're like between photons, and so the number

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of photons hitting your eyeball is dropping. And now if

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you're millions or billions of light years away, you're so

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>far away that most of the photons are not going

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to hit your eyeball, but one of them might. So

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, a really interesting question is, like, how many

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>photons do you need to see from a star to

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>see that it's there? What's the minimum number you need?

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Do we know?

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>We actually have done this study. It's really fascinating. People

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have been wondering, like can the human eyeball see an

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>individual photon? If you fire a single photon at the eyeball,

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>will somebody experience a flash in the dark? Or do

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you need like five or ten or five million photons?

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So people have been trying to do this experiment for decades.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard because number one, you need to be

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>able to generate single photons, which is not something that's

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>easy to do experimentally. And number two, you need to

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>know that a photon was generated. Like if somebody's sitting

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>there with the clicker and they're going to press a

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>button when they see a photon, you need to be

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>able to correlate that with like an actual photon hitting

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>their eye. But photons are tricky, right, Like you can't

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>see a photon from the side. You can only see

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a photon, but it hits your eyeball, So like a

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>little glowing packet. Right, So this is something that was

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>really tricky to do. They're only really just able to

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>investigate conclusively a few years ago.

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>What was the piece of technology that opened up that question,

0:34:55.600 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>like better lasers or something. It's always better lasers, Probably

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 2>not better lasers this time, so.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 1>It was fancy optics, right. So essentially, what you do

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is you take a light source and you crank it

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>down until it's shooting out just a few photons at once.

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>But again, you got to know when the photons are

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>being shot out, so you can ask like, are you

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing real photons? Are you just randomly clicking the button?

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>In order to know when a photon arrives. What they

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>do is they use this cranzy piece of optics that

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>splits a photon. So you take a photon and it

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>hits a special crystal call a down converter, and what

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it does is it splits each photon into two photons

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that have half as much energy, and so one you

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>can use to tell, oh, the photon was here, and

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the other one you can send to your subject's eyeball.

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So does that mean they're only detecting half a photon?

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 6>All?

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Awesome? Question. They're still detecting one photon, it's just lower energy.

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to send people like a green photon,

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>then you need to produce photons that have twice as

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>much energy as a green photon, and then split it

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>into two green photons, send one to the eyeball and

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the other one to your recording device that tells you

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>when the photon was made. Because anything that's emitting individual photons,

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 1>those are quantum objects that they're going to be random.

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 1>You can't control when they're made. We have to record

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>when you made one.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 2>And then you have to hope that your observer doesn't

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 2>blink at.

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The right exactly. So in twenty sixteen, they did these

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>experiments with humans in dark basements shooting green photons at

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>their eyeballs, and those folks got it right. They were

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>able to like press the button at the right time

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to indicate that they saw individual photons hitting their eyeballs,

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>which to me is kind of amazing.

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess one photon is all you need to activate

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a rot or a cone.

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, those rods and cones have these proteins in them

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>which are very very sensitive, and they change configurations when

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they absorb a single photon.

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Are we unique? It's so nice to think we're unique.

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Or are we the only ones who can view just

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 2>one photon?

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Definitely not. We've seen this actually in frogs earlier, and

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to do in frogs because you can just

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>like take their eyes and put like voltage clamps on

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the optic nerve behind the eyeball and you don't have

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to worry so much about them. You can't do that

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff for humans, so it's more complicated. But

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 1>frogs can definitely see single photons, and I suspect lots

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of animals have more powerful eyes than we do. Eagles

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>probably can definitely see single photons.

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 2>But would they need to see in an environment that dark?

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 2>They're not usually hunting that dark.

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>That's true. Maybe owls, then maybe owls can see there photons. Yeah,

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And so that's interacting with a quantum object, right, And

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that opens the door to a really interesting philosophical question

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about experiencing a quantum object.

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 2>You've just told me that we can experience a quantum

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 2>object by seeing one photon hit or eye. So what

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>do you have in mind that's different.

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if we can experience its quantum nature like.

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Something that's really interesting about a photon is that it

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>can have this superposition of two possibilities. Say, for example,

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you produce this photon in a way that's not clear

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>whether it's going to go into your left eye or

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>your right eye. It is a fifty percent chance of

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>going in either one. According to quantum mechanics, it can

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>maintain both those possibilities, right, as long as it doesn't

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>interact with a classical object that collapses its wave function,

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it can maintain both possibilities. So imagine now you're doing

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the same experiment, but you're not sure which eyeball it's

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going to hit. If you're interacting with a quantum object,

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is it possible to like experience both branches of the

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>wave function, to see it simultaneously in both eyes. What

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 1>would that be like subjectively to experience something with its uncertainty?

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Or does our eyeball just like collapse the wave function

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and we experience it and left or the right. If

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you're interacting with a quantum object, it opens the door

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to this possibility of like experiencing its quantum nature.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 2>So my brain is trying to catch up. My guess

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 2>would be that it collapses when it hits the eye. Yeah,

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 2>but what's the answer do we know?

0:38:58.040 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>We don't know. This is not an experiment we've been

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>able to do, right. It's much more complicated than the

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>initial experiment because now you have to prepare a photon

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and have it be in this quantum superposition using like

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>some half silver mirror whatever. And you know, the classical

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>theory quantum mechanics agrees with you. It says, look, the

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>eyeball is a big classical object. It's going to collapse

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 1>away function. You're going to see it in one eye

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>or the other eye. But there are alternative theories of

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics that say, you know, the collapse happens sort

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of spontaneously depending on the size of the object you're

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>interacting with, so like differently sized parts of the eye

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>might have different rates of inducing the collapse. I don't know.

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of bonkers, but it's a really fun edge

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of quantum biology for me, trying to get things to

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>experience their quantum nature. I wonder if our brains are

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>even prepared for that.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Mine's not. I mean, it seems to me that what

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 2>it interacts with the rods or the cones, that that

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 2>should collapse it. But I don't know.

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know because rods and cones are just made

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of quantum objects. Right at the edge of the rods

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and cones are quantum some particles bound into molecules. Why

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>should that collapse? The wave function? That never made any

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. And orthodox quantum mechanics says you put

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>enough quantum objects together becomes a classical object. What does

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>that really mean? How many quantum objects do you need

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to put together before it becomes classical? None of those

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>questions have answers.

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Wow, okay, well, my brain needs a little brain break,

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 2>So how about we take a commercial break and then

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll move on to magneto reception. Another example. All right,

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>my brain is back to full capacity. I'm ready to rock, Daniel,

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 2>let's give me another example. We're gonna be talking about

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>magneto reception, and I feel like this is probably when

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.760
<v Speaker 2>we start talking about birds and migration. Maybe, yes, yes, exactly,

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's do it.

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I love thinking about in terms

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of quantum mechanics and biology is what it's like to

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>experience the world differently, like if we had different senses.

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We build this picture of the world from our vision

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and our taste and our touch and our smell. But

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>there are other animals out there that experience the world differently.

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They have like different senses that we just don't even experience.

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And trying to imagine, like what is it like to

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have another sense. It's like trying to imagine what it's

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like to hear if you're deaf, or what it's like

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to see something if you're blind. It feels like it's

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be impossible to capture. And there are animals

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out there that have senses that we don't have. For example,

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we know now that birds, when they migrate across the world,

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the way they find their way is by

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sensing the Earth's magnetic field. Like this is something they

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>can experience internally. They don't like little machines on their

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>wrists with an arrow that they can look at with

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>their eyeballs. They can innately sense the magnetic field of

0:41:59.320 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the earth.

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, most of the time biology makes me feel

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 2>just incredible joy, But this stuff really bums me out because,

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 2>like I was reading Edyong's I think it's called this

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Immense World, and it's all about animal umweltz and like

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the different ways they sense the world, and you know,

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 2>like there are colors we don't see, there are flowers

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 2>that are even more beautiful than we can appreciate, and

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the insects can see but we can't. And the idea

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 2>that you know, there's magnetic fields that I could see

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>but I'm missing it. It's amazing, but also I'm bummed

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 2>out that I don't get to appreciate these extra colors

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:38.359
<v Speaker 2>and these magnetic fields. And anyway, okay, let's keep moving on.

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I read that book as well, and I

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>loved it for all the science of the ways that

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the animals sense the world, But I wish that he

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>had dug deeper into that question, like what is it

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like to experience a magnetic field? What is it like

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to see the world if you're a sea scallop or

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a spider with two different kinds of eyes, or to

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>think about the world if you're an octopus with different

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of brains partially distributed across your body. Maybe that's

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more philosophical than he wanted to get. But I wish

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:05.720
<v Speaker 1>he hadug deeper into that question.

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I think there's maybe no way for us to know

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:10.800
<v Speaker 2>yeah it without getting too philosophical.

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>What is it like to be about Nobody knows.

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because he was saying, like, you know, are

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 2>there apps that you could make so you could see

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 2>the flowers but you could detect like, Okay, there's a

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>pattern here that we can't see. But if there's a

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>color we can't see, no app could bring that color

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 2>to life in a way that our eyes could pick

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>up on.

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right, because the color is an experience in

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>your brain. It's generated in your mind. Right, The photons

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are not red or green, or blue or purple, they're

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>just different energies in your brain creates that experience. Anyway,

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>back to birds and their bird brains. Birds in their

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs have these weird proteins, and the proteins have electrons

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>in them that have opposite quantum spin. Quantum spin is

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a property eve an electron. It's sort of similar to

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>spin mathematically and even physically. It's similar because it's a

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of angular momentum, but it's also very very weird.

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not like electrons are physically literally spinning little balls.

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's some other weird kind of spin that we call

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum spin. But you can think of it like electrons

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>can either be spin up or spin down, and these

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 1>protons have these pairs of electrons, and sometimes these electrons

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>like to flip, like they're up and they're down, they're

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>up and they're down. And the rate at which they flip,

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and how often they're aligned with each other or not aligned,

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like are they pointing the same direction or are they

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>pointing opposite direction depends on how strong the magnetic field is.

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.879
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a stronger magnetic field, the rate

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at which these electrons flip their spin changes. So if

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you're like watching these electrons, you can sense and you

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.359
<v Speaker 1>can measure the strength of the magnetic field around you

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.800
<v Speaker 1>by looking at how fast the electrons spin is flipping.

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Is this specifically happening in their eyes or m hmm.

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a special kind of protein in their eye which

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>is triggered by light weirdly to have this property. It's

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like energized by light to get into this state where

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>they can then sense the magnetic field. But then it

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sends that information along a different neural pathway, so we

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>don't really know, like what is it like to be

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a bird. They're definitely getting this information, we don't know

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 1>if they're literally seeing magnetic fields like when they look

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>out on the world, is this part of their visual

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>experience or if it's an overlay on top of their

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>mental image the way like smell is or sound is

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for you. It doesn't augment your vision. It's like another

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dimension of experience. But we know they can definitely sense

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>these magnetic fields directly, and it relies on the quantum

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>properties of these electrons and the way they respond to

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fields.

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, it's so fun to think about what that

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 2>might be like to be responding to magnetic fields.

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>What is it like to see this in the universe? Right?

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Like I want to pick up every random bird and

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just interview it, Like, what's it like to be you?

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Man?

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure you're gonna get the answers you're looking for.

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Are I think a lot of people have spent their

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 2>career studying that question, and they're still working on it.

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>There are still working on it. But this sense which

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>evolution is just like stumbled into this mechanism again, relies

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on the quantum nature of the electron. Without this quantum

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>flipping probabilities and reaction to magnetic fields, it wouldn't be possible.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought I had heard that turtles maybe also respond

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to magnetic fields. Is that right? Do turtles have the

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 2>same system?

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>They might? Turtles are pretty awesome, that's true. I know

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that fish have another sense that they can sense electric fields,

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>though I'm not sure if there's a quantum nature to it.

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>But fish have this like other sense that we don't

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>even have. You know, they can tell if there's electric fields.

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Basically they could like see radio waves.

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, So you have now convinced me that

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 2>this is important because we got to animal behavior and

0:46:50.840 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 2>it mattered, even if it depresses me because I don't

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 2>understand it. Okay, So what about I had mentioned at

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the beginning mutations and how quantum stuff can mess up

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 2>our biology. Let's talk a bit more about that. How

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 2>important is that?

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Exactly. We've been talking about the joy of experiencing

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the world in new ways. Let's bring it down and

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about the cancer but also sex. Right, right, we'll

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about cancer insects at the same time.

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's a little dark, but let's go for it.

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 1>So the universe is raining down particles on us all

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the time. The space out there beyond our atmosphere is

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not actually empty. It's filled with tiny high energy particles.

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We call them cosmic rays. They're just like little protons

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or electrons, or sometimes like iron nuclei flying through space.

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You can think of them like tiny little quantum meteors

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of death. They totally are, and sometimes they smash into

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>our atmosphere and they cause a little shower the way

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like if a rock hits the atmosphere at high speed,

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>it's going to burn up and create a fireball, right,

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing happens if a proton hits the atmosphere. It

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>creates a shower of other particles. Some of those particles

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>are muons, and the muons will make it all the

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:03.800
<v Speaker 1>way down to the ground and pass through your body.

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So right now as you sit there, you're being inundated

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with muons from cosmic rays. These are little particles passing

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>through your body. There's one per square centimeter per minute,

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's not a huge rate. It's not like neutrinos,

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>which are everywhere. But these particles are passing through your

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>body and sometimes they interact with your DNA, that crucial

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of your biology, damaging or flipping something to change

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the encodings and the instructions for life itself.

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, I knew that I could depend on you

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 2>to get to a point where I would say I

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 2>can't let my kid listen to this episode either, because

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 2>because then they'll be afraid of just sitting and reading books.

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 2>That will be that will be a moment of existential dreads.

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:48.239
<v Speaker 2>So there we are.

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't escape this. You can go underground in your bunker,

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and you cannot escape muons. Muons can pass all the

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>way through the earth. We just did a really fun

0:48:55.640 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>episode about using muons to like see inside the Egyptian pyramids. Actually,

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 1>but muons both cause death and joy. Like muons can

0:49:04.920 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 1>give you cancer because they can change your DNA and

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they can make a cell go crazy and start replicating

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>out of control. Boom, that's your cancer. The same way

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that like ultraviolet photons when you sit on the beach

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>without sunblock can give you skin cancer. Muons can pass

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>into your body and they can give you cancer. But

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>they can also sometimes make your kids super smart or

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 1>super wonderful. If they hit some DNA in your reproductive system,

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the bits that you're going to pass on to your kids,

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>then they can change the DNA that you're going to

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>pass on. So if you're like not very fast, they

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 1>could like flip a bit and change the encoding, and

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>your kids can be super duper fast, or super duper smart,

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or just super different. And this actually turns out to

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be a crucial element of evolution.

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, my son is weirdly physically active for our family,

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:52.879
<v Speaker 2>and he's super duper fit.

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>M thank you, Muons, Yeah, exactly, Muons, add true quantum

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:03.799
<v Speaker 1>randomness to evolution. Evolution relies on exploring the space of possibilities. Right.

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You need diversity, You need lots of different examples, some

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of which will survive and some of which will not.

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 1>But you only get the ones that survive if you

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>create them. And so this element of randomness helps evolution

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.759
<v Speaker 1>create a big diversity of creators, some of which you're

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it and some of which are not. Really

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>helps us explore the space of possibilities. And there's real

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>quantum randomness there, and I think it's crucial to the

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 1>reason we're even here.

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Wait a minute, when we talked about the reproductive system,

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 2>was that the entire connection to sex? Does it get better?

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's it? Sorry?

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh what a let down.

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I'm not going to give you the secrets to

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a quantum orgasm or anything like that.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:40.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was waiting for.

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a billion dollar idea. I'm not just giving it

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:45.880
<v Speaker 1>away on the podcast. Okay, that's from my startup.

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, well, and your startup's going to be called

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 2>quantum biology through something something, all right, got it?

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think maybe the most intimate connection between quantum

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>mechanics and biology isn't our experience, isn't our decisions. Isn't

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the choices we make about how to live our life.

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Am I going to work out this morning? Or am

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I going to have a donut? Am I going to

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:10.960
<v Speaker 1>take the bus today or drive my car? We seem

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to have this experience of free will, we seem to

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to make these decisions, and decision making in

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 1>their brain is very complicated, if not. Something we understand

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the brain is this whole set of neurons linked together

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>in a very complicated, very non linear way. And what

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't know is if the brain is deterministic but chaotic,

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 1>like difficult to describe, difficult to predict because it's so complicated.

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:38.319
<v Speaker 1>The way, for example, if you take a brick out

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of a building and it collapses, that collapses, very complicated

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:45.919
<v Speaker 1>to describe, or like hurricanes are difficult to predict even

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>though they're actually determined by everything that comes before them.

0:51:49.239 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Are the brains like that chaotic, difficult to describe but

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>actually deterministic? Or is there real randomness in there is

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the quantum nature somehow of the bits that make are

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 1>neurons generating randomness which leads to like an avalanche, which

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 1>affects our decisions.

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Generally surprised by how often physics bleeds into philosophy and

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 2>philosophy bleeds into physics. All right, So I like thinking

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:18.520
<v Speaker 2>about free will and how like pests and parasites impact

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:21.280
<v Speaker 2>our free will by like tinkering with our indocrine system.

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:25.400
<v Speaker 2>So you have my attention. Tell me more about how

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 2>quantum effects made me decide that this morning was a

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 2>smoothie morning and not a big old morning.

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, the short answer is we don't know, but we

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>can speculate about it. And there's people on both sides

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of this argument. Some people think, no, it's impossible that

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>all averages out. The quantum nature of the neuron is irrelevant.

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter. You could have built neurons out of

0:52:44.200 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>classical objects and they would work the same way. For example,

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Roger Penrose famous physicist and Daniel Dennett, famous philosopher of

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the mind. They say, quote, most biologists think the quantum

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>effects all just cancel out in the brain. There's no

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:59.800
<v Speaker 1>reason to think they're harnessed in any way. And the

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>argument there is like, neurons aren't big, right, you know,

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>even though they're built out of quantum objects. There's lots

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and lots of quantum objects, thousands and millions of these objects,

0:53:09.480 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>all acting together, and so even if one of them

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>has a little quantum fluctuation here or there, it is

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get averaged out. It's not like an individual

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>electron moving down the electron transport chain, or a single

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:22.319
<v Speaker 1>muon fluctuating to be here or there to hit you

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of somebody else. These are big things that are

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:27.360
<v Speaker 1>made of lots of pieces, and so it all just

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:31.080
<v Speaker 1>averages out. That's the sort of conventional wisdom on how

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:31.879
<v Speaker 1>neurons work.

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 2>But there's always someone willing to argue the opposite.

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:38.839
<v Speaker 1>And we don't know. We don't understand neurons well enough

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to say that it's impossible for quantum effects to influence

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 1>their outcome. Like neurons are built on avalanches. You have

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one which triggers another, which triggers another. It's possible that

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a tiny, little avalanche can create a big one. Right.

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Scott Aronson, one of my favorite writers on like quantum

0:53:56.280 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>computing and philosophy, really a general smart guy, polymath. He said,

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>brains seem balanced on a knife edge between order and chaos.

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Are they as orderly as a pendulum? Are they chaotic

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as the weather? We just don't know. And so it's

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>possible that neuronal networks are sort of balanced right between

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>order and chaos. That like, they are sensitive to little

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:21.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum fluctuations, but just barely.

0:54:21.360 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 2>He was at our house the other day, and I

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 2>could have talked to him about this.

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:25.320
<v Speaker 1>You met Scott Aronson.

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's a friend of ours.

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, he is so smart. I love his blog.

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Every time I'm skeptical about some quantum computing claim, I'm like,

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 1>what does Scott have to say? Oh, yeah, it's devastating.

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 2>He yeah, no, he's super smart. But I didn't know

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:40.839
<v Speaker 2>that we could be talking about the nature of free will.

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for fodder for the next time he's over.

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, these really are two sort of connected questions, but

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>also very different. Like, on one hand, we're asking is

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>there true randomness in the brain, and if there is randomness,

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it means that the brain is not deterministic, which means that,

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like your predictions of whether you're going to get a

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 1>smoothier donut are not determined. And what's unclear is that

0:55:02.040 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>whether that actually leaves any opening for free will. Like,

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:07.879
<v Speaker 1>if I tell you, okay, Kelly, you're not just an automaton.

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You're not just a mechanical robot that makes decisions based

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on what's happened to you and decisions you made previously.

0:55:14.360 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>You're a random robot. You make random decisions. Is that

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>any better? Does that leave you room for free will?

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:22.399
<v Speaker 1>It feels to me like, yeah, there's a gap there,

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't explain like the subjective experience and how

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you're somehow controlling the outcome of physical processes even if

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they're random. So I think like randomness and determinism is

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 1>separate from the question of free will.

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I need a beer, So does the randomness. I

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 2>feel like you could sort of predict my behaviors based

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:44.440
<v Speaker 2>on what I've done in the past, which makes me

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 2>feel like randomness isn't dictating things, but is it? Just

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 2>like randomness is tweaking the path I take a little

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 2>bit as I go, and over time it results in

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:54.480
<v Speaker 2>big changes.

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah, exactly, because sometimes you are on a knife sedge,

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like why do you decide to take the bus or

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know those moments of indecision, How do you actually

0:56:03.320 --> 0:56:05.480
<v Speaker 1>decide whether to go this way or that way, or

0:56:05.680 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this or to do that? And so it

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>could be very subtly influencing you, not in a way

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that you experience or understand.

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Could we study this?

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so people are working to try to understand this

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>by looking at individual neurons, Like let's study the neurons

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and see how predictable are they, how sensitive are they

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to quantum fluctuations? And then let's study networks of neurons,

0:56:27.239 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 1>like how predictable are their responses if you give them

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the same inputs, are you going to always get the

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 1>same outputs? Because it might be that this kind of

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 1>thing emerges only when you have the combination of quantum

0:56:36.920 --> 0:56:40.720
<v Speaker 1>randomness and a chaotic system, Like you need a tiny

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:43.319
<v Speaker 1>little random thing, and then you need a system which

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is sensitive to a tiny little difference, you know, like

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a butterfly effect, like if you blow a leaf this way,

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 1>versus that way, could you set off a hurricane or

0:56:51.520 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 1>prevent a hurricane. You need a system that's sensitive to

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a little fluctuation, and then you need those fluctuations at

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the right point. So people are doing these experiments, but

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty hard.

0:57:01.560 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I can only imagine, like even if you

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:07.120
<v Speaker 2>were just trying to study a simple organism like C. Elegans,

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 2>which has you know, only a few handful of neurons,

0:57:09.560 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and we know how they're connected, we know how they develop,

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.720
<v Speaker 2>and I can imagine like one corner of the Petri

0:57:14.840 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 2>dish is a little colder than the others, and that

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 2>makes it hard to measure quantum effects exactly hard.

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>That is the challenge. How do you exactly reproduce two

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:27.160
<v Speaker 1>circumstances so that you know you're getting different outcomes with

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the same inputs. There's a whole field of quantum mechanics,

0:57:30.920 --> 0:57:33.960
<v Speaker 1>bomy and mechanics. It says it's impossible, and that when

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 1>we think we're getting different outcomes on quantum experiments, actually

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's because the initial conditions were slightly different. And so

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a really big challenge.

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you have given me loads of material for my

0:57:46.640 --> 0:57:50.919
<v Speaker 2>next few rounds of insomnia to think about. Uh, thank

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 2>you for that, and I think that's enough for my

0:57:53.360 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 2>brain today.

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the takeaway is that we don't really know

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>if our quantum nature changes the experience of life and

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>while you're having smoothies and while you're having donuts, but

0:58:03.840 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we do know that we wouldn't be here without quantum mechanics,

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>without randomness affecting your DNA and the DNA of your ancestors,

0:58:11.200 --> 0:58:15.520
<v Speaker 1>without electrons, quantum tunneling through those barriers, all these things

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that rely on quantum mechanics, we wouldn't be here. So

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in the end, we are all quantum wizards.

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I like ending on a high note. We're all

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 2>quantum wizards.

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>That's good exactly. We all have a license to cackle

0:58:28.440 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>our way through lives. All right, Thanks very much everybody

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on its quantum journey, and thanks very

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 1>much Kelly for indulging in this quantum adventure.

0:58:40.160 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me. It was a lot of

0:58:41.520 --> 0:58:42.200
<v Speaker 2>fun as always.

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>All Right. I hope everybody fluctuates into having a very

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:52.480
<v Speaker 1>good week and tune in next time for more science

0:58:52.480 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and curiosity. Come find us on social media, where we

0:58:55.320 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 1>answer questions and post videos We're on Twitter, Discord, Instant

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and now TikTok. Thanks for listening and remember that Daniel

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:59:07.080 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.