1 00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: So the big question is this, how do investors like 2 00:00:07,880 --> 00:00:11,800 Speaker 1: us get access to the ideas, information, and most importantly, 3 00:00:12,039 --> 00:00:14,880 Speaker 1: the right people that give us the tools and information 4 00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 1: we need to make informed and educated decisions to have success. 5 00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 1: That is the question, and this podcast will give us 6 00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:25,520 Speaker 1: the answers. This is Mark Moss, your host. Let's get 7 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:30,240 Speaker 1: this started. Welcome to another episode of the Market Disruptors podcast. 8 00:00:30,520 --> 00:00:34,440 Speaker 1: Today we are joined by Chris kem here from Susteny Capital. 9 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:38,599 Speaker 1: He is an investor in the blockchain space. However, he's 10 00:00:38,680 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 1: much more than that. He's a technologist, a futurist. He's 11 00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 1: an attorney. He's been through the Internet um bubble. He's 12 00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:49,959 Speaker 1: built companies, sold them off at the peak. He's been there, 13 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:51,519 Speaker 1: done that, and he has a unique view in this. 14 00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 1: In this episode, we're gonna dig into his past. We're 15 00:00:54,520 --> 00:00:58,360 Speaker 1: gonna talk about how he built inside the Internet stages. 16 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:00,160 Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about how he exited at the top, 17 00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 1: what he learned from that. We're gonna talk about where 18 00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:06,280 Speaker 1: he sees the current blockchain space today, where he's looking 19 00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:09,000 Speaker 1: to focus on investing, and where he sees it in 20 00:01:09,040 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 1: the near future. It's an amazing conversation, one that I 21 00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:15,440 Speaker 1: really enjoyed, and let's just jump right into it, all right. 22 00:01:15,440 --> 00:01:18,199 Speaker 1: Welcome everybody. I have a special guest today, Chris from 23 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:22,039 Speaker 1: Susthany Capital. He's got a very very interesting UM story 24 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:24,560 Speaker 1: and perspective on the markets. I learned about at a 25 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 1: conference at on Chain nineteen about a week or two ago, 26 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 1: and I really wanted to bring him on and talk 27 00:01:29,240 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 1: more about that. So UM, Chris from Sustany Capital. Welcome, Hey, Mark, 28 00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 1: all right, so UM, as I alluded to, UH, I 29 00:01:37,959 --> 00:01:40,880 Speaker 1: heard you speak at on Chain UM in Newport Beach 30 00:01:40,959 --> 00:01:43,800 Speaker 1: and and I really liked your perspective on the markets. 31 00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: And what I really liked was your story of how 32 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:49,760 Speaker 1: you've been through these technology cycles before. And I thought, 33 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:52,760 Speaker 1: I thought that you had a different perspective that I 34 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:55,160 Speaker 1: aligned with. But I don't hear a lot, and uh, 35 00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:57,120 Speaker 1: I think it's missing, and so I wanted to talk 36 00:01:57,160 --> 00:01:59,200 Speaker 1: to you more about that. So maybe you can just 37 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 1: kind of explain to everybody, UM your background and kind 38 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:04,600 Speaker 1: of how you got here. Sure, I'm sort of a 39 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 1: field technologist. I want to become a computer program in 40 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:10,639 Speaker 1: the eighties and I was doing the day during those 41 00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:14,799 Speaker 1: days when there was basically just basic programming and so forth, 42 00:02:14,840 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: and everything was pretty slow and mostly for me. The 43 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:19,600 Speaker 1: one thing that I remember was very hard on your 44 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:23,560 Speaker 1: eyes because the monitors back then we're just not really great. 45 00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:26,639 Speaker 1: So I would write my bicycle home for my internship 46 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:28,919 Speaker 1: over it seems next of at the time, and I 47 00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 1: would see stars in the middle of the day because 48 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:36,320 Speaker 1: my eyes get really so impacted so badly that I decided, oh, 49 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 1: I should be looking for something else that doesn't impact 50 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:41,639 Speaker 1: my health as bad. So it became a lawyer instead, 51 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:45,760 Speaker 1: which is kind of a unique breed in essence, there's 52 00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:50,760 Speaker 1: not too many lawyers or vice versa computer scientists, um 53 00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:57,440 Speaker 1: that have kind of this cross perspective. Yeah, but definitely, definitely, 54 00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:00,440 Speaker 1: I definitely I did a good blend. I yes, it's 55 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:04,360 Speaker 1: it's usual today maybe yeah, I mean today. And again 56 00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:07,960 Speaker 1: that's kind of me being biased obviously with my particular background, 57 00:03:08,040 --> 00:03:10,640 Speaker 1: but it seems to me that a lot of the 58 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:15,000 Speaker 1: blockchain implementations that can be had a mix of those 59 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:18,080 Speaker 1: two topics and a few others obviously, like mechanics and 60 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,120 Speaker 1: economics and whatnot. But there's a lot of what I 61 00:03:21,160 --> 00:03:25,280 Speaker 1: call legal technology or rec tech involved in that particular space, 62 00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:28,160 Speaker 1: and it's needless to say, outside of coding, and that's 63 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:31,360 Speaker 1: the one topic that comes up all the times, that 64 00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:36,000 Speaker 1: topic of regulation. All buy it often mostly misguided in 65 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:40,480 Speaker 1: my opinion, and again that's me having more international background 66 00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 1: and not necessarily being indoctrinated in any particular paradigm. Well, 67 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,800 Speaker 1: the the international background is very important because this is 68 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:49,960 Speaker 1: a global movement, and a lot of times people get 69 00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:53,080 Speaker 1: stuck in just their view of the local, their local 70 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:56,360 Speaker 1: currency or whatever, and they forget about the global movement. 71 00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 1: But before we get into that, let's talk about your 72 00:03:59,600 --> 00:04:01,800 Speaker 1: involved then in there in the Internet days, which a 73 00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:04,280 Speaker 1: lot of times people draw parallels to, they were both 74 00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:07,160 Speaker 1: new technologies, if you will, so tell us a little 75 00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:09,960 Speaker 1: bit about your experience and the Internet days. Sure, I 76 00:04:10,040 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 1: was still in law school. I joined a little startup 77 00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:17,440 Speaker 1: on another consulting site to help them build what was 78 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:24,600 Speaker 1: then UM an idea for the multi um platform voice applications, 79 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:27,159 Speaker 1: so kind of a unified messaging system of sorts, and 80 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: that was the way ahead of its time. We did 81 00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:32,120 Speaker 1: this a ninety four, so let's to give you an idea. 82 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:34,720 Speaker 1: It's still ahead of its time today. So it's kind 83 00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:38,280 Speaker 1: of the idea of having a unified messaging system that 84 00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:41,479 Speaker 1: would you do. It would let you do crossovers between 85 00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:45,320 Speaker 1: voice and email and voice and text and so force. 86 00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 1: And we're still still not there, um. But because of 87 00:04:50,040 --> 00:04:54,360 Speaker 1: that telecomverlation, I got really interested in then a new 88 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 1: regulation at space. So this was closely before the European 89 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:05,240 Speaker 1: Union opened up tele communications to alternate carriers, meaning before that, specifically, 90 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:07,920 Speaker 1: in Germany, you only had one telephone carrier, which was 91 00:05:07,960 --> 00:05:10,720 Speaker 1: about to Tailor Comment at the time, UM. But they 92 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:13,840 Speaker 1: were about to opening open the markets, and so they 93 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:19,280 Speaker 1: were circulating um suggestions for the regulation of that space. 94 00:05:19,320 --> 00:05:21,559 Speaker 1: And I was one of the very very few nerds 95 00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:24,800 Speaker 1: who would read those and then sort of also understand them. 96 00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:28,040 Speaker 1: And I had my eyes set on one particular part 97 00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:33,680 Speaker 1: of the regulation which would hopefully be used to guide 98 00:05:33,760 --> 00:05:36,159 Speaker 1: the regulation in the space that we were interested in 99 00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:40,200 Speaker 1: of this particular communications tool. And they're at the regulation 100 00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: and the suggestion didn't fit my my idea of how 101 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:48,280 Speaker 1: that should work at all. So, like the stupid mid 102 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:50,240 Speaker 1: twenty year old that I was at the time, I 103 00:05:50,360 --> 00:05:53,040 Speaker 1: just sat down and rewrote the entire thing and send 104 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:57,360 Speaker 1: it into the Federal Communications Commission, and lo and behold, 105 00:05:57,400 --> 00:06:00,960 Speaker 1: they called me back and invited me to work with 106 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:04,840 Speaker 1: them on that particular legislation, and so long story short, 107 00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:08,080 Speaker 1: they ended up using what I wrote that weekend. But 108 00:06:08,440 --> 00:06:12,240 Speaker 1: they're more interesting, he really is. UM. That made me 109 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:14,359 Speaker 1: kind of an expert, one of the very few in 110 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:18,560 Speaker 1: a particular space, because initially internet and telecommunication was into 111 00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:22,599 Speaker 1: very entwined. Right. You probably remember you had to pay 112 00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:25,440 Speaker 1: for a minute for your dial up services and number 113 00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:27,839 Speaker 1: was the case for much longer and back in Europe 114 00:06:27,839 --> 00:06:31,599 Speaker 1: than it was year and so I ended up becoming 115 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 1: general counsel for one of the very early internet service providers, 116 00:06:35,640 --> 00:06:39,839 Speaker 1: and we grew the company very rapidly, mostly by having 117 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:42,800 Speaker 1: a lot of people running around physically installing those dial 118 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:46,520 Speaker 1: upe models and configuring people's dialogue cards to our dial 119 00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:49,200 Speaker 1: in numbers. So we were able to gobble up like 120 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:52,239 Speaker 1: I want to say, three and sixty thousand subscribers women 121 00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:55,559 Speaker 1: like eighteen months and what what what? What time period 122 00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:59,719 Speaker 1: was this? That was between night? So ninety eight if 123 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:01,920 Speaker 1: you're number was the first fifty six kme more thin 124 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:06,720 Speaker 1: funny enough and so over fifty well, but I say 125 00:07:07,880 --> 00:07:10,480 Speaker 1: two thousand and then at the beginning of two thousand, Um, 126 00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:14,160 Speaker 1: I was preparing for an initial public offering and at 127 00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:16,600 Speaker 1: the time we were valued at a billion dollars based 128 00:07:16,600 --> 00:07:19,280 Speaker 1: on r L subscriber valuations, so we were kind of 129 00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:23,160 Speaker 1: the e L of Germany at the time, and um, 130 00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:28,160 Speaker 1: we gotta takeover offer. And yeah, long, long story short, 131 00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:31,119 Speaker 1: I convinced the rest of the management team we should 132 00:07:31,120 --> 00:07:33,520 Speaker 1: take it because I simply couldn't see how we could 133 00:07:33,520 --> 00:07:36,560 Speaker 1: ever make that much money out of our subscriber base. 134 00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:38,880 Speaker 1: So we saw the company at the height of the 135 00:07:38,960 --> 00:07:43,080 Speaker 1: dot com essentially to what's now the largest internet service 136 00:07:43,160 --> 00:07:47,320 Speaker 1: provider in Europe Discolleague, and yeah, we couldn't have time 137 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:49,800 Speaker 1: did better or buy it. At the time when we sold, 138 00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:52,880 Speaker 1: everybody around us told us we were dummies because we 139 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 1: were selling for like thirty five cents on the dollar 140 00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 1: forty six and a half to be precise. But it 141 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:02,560 Speaker 1: worked out really, really well, and more importantly, I retired 142 00:08:02,600 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 1: from the law that day when we sold the company 143 00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:09,960 Speaker 1: and moved to southern California. Basically, you know that's great now, Um, 144 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 1: for those that aren't aware, I'm sure everybody is. And 145 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:14,480 Speaker 1: at you know, in two thousand was the height of 146 00:08:14,520 --> 00:08:16,720 Speaker 1: that dot com bubble, which then we saw a massive 147 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:19,200 Speaker 1: draw down, similar to what we saw in the crypto 148 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:23,240 Speaker 1: space draw down. However, that wasn't the end of the 149 00:08:23,240 --> 00:08:27,480 Speaker 1: Internet technology, and of course it went on in some companies. Amazon, 150 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:30,280 Speaker 1: for example, went to surpass it's all time high and 151 00:08:30,360 --> 00:08:32,360 Speaker 1: hit two thousand from eighty at its peaked down to 152 00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:34,960 Speaker 1: a dollar up or five dollars and up to two thousand, 153 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:37,559 Speaker 1: But not all companies did, so you got out of 154 00:08:37,640 --> 00:08:39,680 Speaker 1: the peak. Um if you would have got out of 155 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:41,760 Speaker 1: Amazon at the peak, maybe that wouldn't have looked so 156 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:45,160 Speaker 1: good in hindsight, but in your case it was yeah, 157 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:49,840 Speaker 1: well for us. But then also another similarity, if you 158 00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 1: want to call it that, if you're looking back, a 159 00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 1: lot of companies beg them that considered themselves Internet companies 160 00:08:56,920 --> 00:09:00,000 Speaker 1: because they had a website wouldn't be considered Internet company. 161 00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:02,600 Speaker 1: Needs to give right. It's a lot of these um 162 00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:05,680 Speaker 1: entities that were formed with that idea we're doing quote 163 00:09:05,720 --> 00:09:08,800 Speaker 1: unquote something on the web never ended up doing anything 164 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,800 Speaker 1: of its you on the web because they didn't necessarily 165 00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:14,680 Speaker 1: need the World Wide Web for what they were doing, 166 00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:19,920 Speaker 1: and or it didn't help with customerquisition costs, specifically because 167 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:22,960 Speaker 1: so few people still were on the World Wide Web, right, 168 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:25,760 Speaker 1: so you have to still convert all of those people. 169 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:27,760 Speaker 1: That was a lot of friction. Like we talked before 170 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:30,319 Speaker 1: the recording, it's like a lot of people are super 171 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:33,200 Speaker 1: reluctant to put in the credit card information, and so 172 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:37,840 Speaker 1: that has obviously a lot of analogies with our current scenario. 173 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 1: There's a lot of entities out there and projects out 174 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:45,120 Speaker 1: there that they think they do anything blockchain related and 175 00:09:45,160 --> 00:09:49,800 Speaker 1: they really don't. And some of them that specifically are 176 00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:52,240 Speaker 1: very prominent in that space really have nothing to do 177 00:09:52,400 --> 00:09:55,480 Speaker 1: with blockchain whatsoever. If you look at some of those 178 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:59,120 Speaker 1: retail things, not that they're necessarily bad, but like a 179 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:02,800 Speaker 1: coin base doesn't use the blockchain for anything obviously, right, 180 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:06,640 Speaker 1: so they don't need the blockchain really for for anything 181 00:10:06,679 --> 00:10:09,320 Speaker 1: that they do in the daily business, and they sell 182 00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 1: pull on quo currencies, but they're really not fostering, uh, 183 00:10:13,880 --> 00:10:17,760 Speaker 1: the innovation in that space in any shape or form, right, 184 00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:20,199 Speaker 1: and Internet Like I think when you look back through 185 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:23,240 Speaker 1: different technology cycles, you'll see the same patterns. And so 186 00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:27,160 Speaker 1: typically in the new technology, you have like existing um 187 00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 1: things that are done try to find a new home 188 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,440 Speaker 1: on the new technology, and then it's not until later 189 00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:35,080 Speaker 1: that there's new things that were never done before. So 190 00:10:35,240 --> 00:10:37,560 Speaker 1: you know, for example, you had a company advertising in 191 00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:39,560 Speaker 1: the Yellow Pages and now they're advertising on the they 192 00:10:39,559 --> 00:10:42,360 Speaker 1: have a web page, right, Um, but today we have 193 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:45,079 Speaker 1: applications like Uber that would have never been possible that 194 00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:50,360 Speaker 1: that technology. Yeah, and it's always important to get the 195 00:10:50,400 --> 00:10:53,319 Speaker 1: vocabulary right there. And that's one thing that it always 196 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:57,000 Speaker 1: takes issue with. Specifically, looking back at the early days 197 00:10:57,040 --> 00:11:01,000 Speaker 1: of the Internet, people still equate Internet and Worldwide Web 198 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:03,960 Speaker 1: as being one thing and that's not the case, right, So, 199 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:07,760 Speaker 1: I mean, the world Web is build based on Internet technologies, 200 00:11:07,800 --> 00:11:12,319 Speaker 1: but it's mostly HTML that lets you experience the World 201 00:11:12,320 --> 00:11:14,560 Speaker 1: Wide Web, and that was the introduction of tim berners, 202 00:11:14,600 --> 00:11:19,400 Speaker 1: leews most of the underlying protocols, and that's more important 203 00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:22,440 Speaker 1: paradigm to understand, mostly for the topic that we are 204 00:11:22,480 --> 00:11:27,080 Speaker 1: looking and now created by wind Surf and other people 205 00:11:27,080 --> 00:11:30,880 Speaker 1: in that space. But unfortunately what didn't happen is that 206 00:11:30,920 --> 00:11:35,280 Speaker 1: we kept working on creating these protocols. So my understanding 207 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:39,440 Speaker 1: moving on to the um, the thematic of blockchain is 208 00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:43,600 Speaker 1: that blockchains are the building block to build new protocols. 209 00:11:44,000 --> 00:11:48,760 Speaker 1: And the bit White people introduced mainly three new concepts 210 00:11:48,760 --> 00:11:52,160 Speaker 1: if you will, and inventions, So the most obvious one 211 00:11:52,200 --> 00:11:55,880 Speaker 1: being this digital bearer instruments so bit common blog case B. 212 00:11:57,040 --> 00:12:02,080 Speaker 1: Then secondarily, if you will, the smart contract systems, and 213 00:12:02,360 --> 00:12:06,600 Speaker 1: every quote unquote cryptocurrency is a smart contract, whereas not 214 00:12:06,679 --> 00:12:10,040 Speaker 1: every smart contract is a cryptocurrency, and that's very hard 215 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:13,600 Speaker 1: for most people to understand that why the constantly intermixing 216 00:12:13,640 --> 00:12:16,880 Speaker 1: those two things. Um. And Then lastly, and that's probably 217 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:20,760 Speaker 1: the most important development that we have not talked about 218 00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:23,120 Speaker 1: a lot as of late anymore, is that of a 219 00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:27,040 Speaker 1: central as autonomous organization, which is the reason really why 220 00:12:27,200 --> 00:12:31,559 Speaker 1: bitcoin is still around, right, because it creates an alignments 221 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:35,240 Speaker 1: of alignment of interest within the system that makes the 222 00:12:35,440 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 1: system super resilient. And that's actually actually necessary prerequisite for 223 00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:45,000 Speaker 1: the digital bearer instrument. Yeah, in order to create quote 224 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:48,520 Speaker 1: unquote immuneability of the transfer of anything that's moving on 225 00:12:48,600 --> 00:12:51,920 Speaker 1: the box chain. Yeah. Those are three, Um, those are 226 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:54,960 Speaker 1: three really good use cases. I think the first two 227 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:59,440 Speaker 1: could almost be like improvement offers. Um, so bare instruments 228 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:02,199 Speaker 1: now we have digit of our instruments, contracts, now we 229 00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:05,240 Speaker 1: have digital smart contracts. But the DOW as you mentioned, 230 00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:08,480 Speaker 1: is a very interesting piece because it takes away the 231 00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 1: human element, which is very easy to be manipulated and corrupted, 232 00:13:12,520 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 1: and puts it into math or code. Right, So is 233 00:13:15,520 --> 00:13:19,040 Speaker 1: that what you're kind of talking about. UM, Well, let's 234 00:13:19,040 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 1: bring this on a higher level, maybe for for a 235 00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:26,800 Speaker 1: second year. So the largest UM problem, if you will, 236 00:13:26,920 --> 00:13:31,480 Speaker 1: that we face right now, as humans are mostly relatable 237 00:13:31,679 --> 00:13:37,880 Speaker 1: to our organizational principles i e. Most obviously UM, the 238 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:43,160 Speaker 1: for profit corporation. If you look at companies that now 239 00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:47,080 Speaker 1: standing on top of the food chain, they standing there. 240 00:13:47,160 --> 00:13:50,880 Speaker 1: Let's use Google as an example, because they implemented their 241 00:13:50,960 --> 00:13:56,439 Speaker 1: particular algorithm most perfectly into this for profit algorithm. Because 242 00:13:56,520 --> 00:13:59,800 Speaker 1: as much as they will tell you well, UM, our 243 00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:03,839 Speaker 1: uh mission statement is to organize the world's information and 244 00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:07,319 Speaker 1: make it more accessible and useful and whatnot, that's obviously 245 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:12,600 Speaker 1: not true because the as with every corporate for profit organization, 246 00:14:12,920 --> 00:14:16,959 Speaker 1: especially the ones that are publicly traded, their model is 247 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 1: basically in law means their main objective is to increase 248 00:14:22,960 --> 00:14:26,360 Speaker 1: shareholder value. If they didn't do this, the management team 249 00:14:26,760 --> 00:14:28,920 Speaker 1: would be held accountable for that. If they all of 250 00:14:28,960 --> 00:14:31,840 Speaker 1: the sudden decided in Google it's case, or we're going 251 00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:35,080 Speaker 1: to yank all the stupid edwards and AdSense stuff out 252 00:14:35,120 --> 00:14:38,240 Speaker 1: of our index, because that that's not very useful to 253 00:14:38,400 --> 00:14:41,320 Speaker 1: find information which to say what they say they do, 254 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:45,920 Speaker 1: I don't think that their shareholders what we um very 255 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:50,480 Speaker 1: happy about the outcome of what profit to bottom line. 256 00:14:50,640 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: So my point here is so this for profit motive 257 00:14:54,960 --> 00:14:59,640 Speaker 1: is actually then UM infiltrating any other algorithm you implement 258 00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:03,080 Speaker 1: after words, But unfortunately, the better you are in implementing 259 00:15:03,160 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 1: your own algorithms or the Google Search algorithm, mainly implementing 260 00:15:08,080 --> 00:15:11,800 Speaker 1: UM searches around what makes up you you and serving 261 00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:17,200 Speaker 1: you the right ads is what drives this particular technology, 262 00:15:17,400 --> 00:15:21,920 Speaker 1: which obviously will never create an optimal result for the user. 263 00:15:22,160 --> 00:15:26,480 Speaker 1: It can't so with a dour though, if you then 264 00:15:26,920 --> 00:15:32,320 Speaker 1: can take something that anybody in the system has the 265 00:15:32,440 --> 00:15:36,080 Speaker 1: most interesting participating from the actual result, not from the 266 00:15:36,160 --> 00:15:39,840 Speaker 1: profit modelf, but for this entity creating the best results 267 00:15:39,880 --> 00:15:43,280 Speaker 1: for anybody involved, then in this case you could strip 268 00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:47,840 Speaker 1: ads out right and it wouldn't matter. And more importantly, 269 00:15:48,520 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 1: anybody right now could set up a doubt and create 270 00:15:52,160 --> 00:15:54,480 Speaker 1: a matter filter, as far as I'm concerned, create a 271 00:15:54,560 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 1: matter search and filter any commercial intent out of Google 272 00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: is all of a sudden had a search engine, actual 273 00:16:01,800 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 1: search engine that would be better in terms of its 274 00:16:04,960 --> 00:16:08,040 Speaker 1: results by several orders of magnitude simply by doing that, 275 00:16:08,680 --> 00:16:13,520 Speaker 1: and simply by essentially removing, um, this for profit modem 276 00:16:13,640 --> 00:16:19,200 Speaker 1: which excuse the incentive system between users, advertisers, and corporate owners. 277 00:16:19,280 --> 00:16:21,640 Speaker 1: And then if you want to go further down, there's 278 00:16:21,680 --> 00:16:27,680 Speaker 1: all so misalignment of interests of managers, shareholders, employees, suppliers, 279 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:31,680 Speaker 1: and so forth. Whereas in the example of any of 280 00:16:31,800 --> 00:16:35,880 Speaker 1: the block chains with the correct and now implementation, everybody 281 00:16:35,960 --> 00:16:40,280 Speaker 1: is basically pulling the same direction because they would hurt themselves. Right. Um, 282 00:16:41,400 --> 00:16:45,560 Speaker 1: there's always this kind of rumor that at one percent 283 00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:50,240 Speaker 1: attack could essentially swipe away Bitcoin or any of the 284 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:54,960 Speaker 1: other block chains. Um. The catch here is that anybody 285 00:16:55,320 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: that would amass this form of either stake in the 286 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:03,720 Speaker 1: system or computing power, but mostly erode his own holdings, right, 287 00:17:03,800 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 1: So it would not. So that's kind of the catch 288 00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:09,520 Speaker 1: they have that prevents this from happening. Um. But by 289 00:17:09,600 --> 00:17:14,200 Speaker 1: skewing incentive system using a four product profit motive that 290 00:17:14,320 --> 00:17:18,280 Speaker 1: doesn't care about align and shareholder interests with user interest, 291 00:17:18,760 --> 00:17:23,160 Speaker 1: you can never achieve an optimal outcome from users. Yeah. Interesting, 292 00:17:23,600 --> 00:17:27,000 Speaker 1: I think that's that's interesting the conversation to have, which 293 00:17:27,119 --> 00:17:29,920 Speaker 1: we won't spend too much time into. But UM, I 294 00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:33,439 Speaker 1: think maybe maybe I'm maybe I'm just a little bit 295 00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:36,040 Speaker 1: too optimistic. But I think maybe when those businesses start out, 296 00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:39,320 Speaker 1: they do have a more pure motive. But as you say, right, 297 00:17:39,400 --> 00:17:41,520 Speaker 1: as they grow, and especially as they get shareholders, they 298 00:17:41,560 --> 00:17:44,120 Speaker 1: have a findiciary duty to those shareholders to increase profits, 299 00:17:45,119 --> 00:17:48,240 Speaker 1: and as that grows, it gets more and more distorted. 300 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:51,160 Speaker 1: Almost so, UM, maybe it starts a little more pure. 301 00:17:51,560 --> 00:17:53,879 Speaker 1: Maybe I'm optimistic, but then I can definitely see what 302 00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:57,320 Speaker 1: you're saying where when everything excuse to profits, it changes 303 00:17:57,480 --> 00:18:00,719 Speaker 1: really the mission or the problem they're trying to solve. Um. 304 00:18:00,880 --> 00:18:02,920 Speaker 1: So it's interesting one of the many ways that I 305 00:18:03,040 --> 00:18:08,320 Speaker 1: think blockchain technology will change the world. Um. I think 306 00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:12,399 Speaker 1: when you look at Internet technology, the technology itself allows 307 00:18:12,480 --> 00:18:14,480 Speaker 1: us to share information. Right, I can upload a file, 308 00:18:14,520 --> 00:18:18,200 Speaker 1: you can download a file. UM. With blockchain technology, it 309 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:20,359 Speaker 1: allows us to share value. I can upload value, you 310 00:18:20,359 --> 00:18:22,960 Speaker 1: can download value. But also it creates other things like 311 00:18:23,080 --> 00:18:26,240 Speaker 1: governance models that we're talking about. UM. Do you see 312 00:18:26,280 --> 00:18:28,880 Speaker 1: it like that? And do you think, um, this will 313 00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:32,720 Speaker 1: really shift the world much more than what we saw 314 00:18:32,800 --> 00:18:37,280 Speaker 1: with the Internet technology. Yeah, absolutely, and that's exactly come 315 00:18:37,359 --> 00:18:40,600 Speaker 1: the right analogy. So the first Internet way if if 316 00:18:40,640 --> 00:18:44,720 Speaker 1: you will change the paradigm for information exchange. And so 317 00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:48,000 Speaker 1: the old publishers that we used to pay for back 318 00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:51,240 Speaker 1: in the days before the Internet, they barely exists anymore, 319 00:18:51,280 --> 00:18:53,720 Speaker 1: and most of them on the way out because the 320 00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:56,720 Speaker 1: business model has been so thoroughly disrupted and there was 321 00:18:56,840 --> 00:18:59,560 Speaker 1: so slow to adopt that they really, for the most 322 00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 1: part on have a reason to exist anymore. Um. And 323 00:19:04,200 --> 00:19:08,480 Speaker 1: there now, yes, blockchains allow you to build the missing 324 00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:11,280 Speaker 1: what I would call value exchange protocol call its all 325 00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:13,800 Speaker 1: buy it. You're still at the very very beginning, and 326 00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 1: I think that's one of the larger problems in that 327 00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:21,080 Speaker 1: space because specifically guys like us who have been watching 328 00:19:21,119 --> 00:19:23,200 Speaker 1: it for the last decade, at this point in time, 329 00:19:23,720 --> 00:19:27,560 Speaker 1: we're getting really impatient to see the next phase set in. 330 00:19:27,840 --> 00:19:30,560 Speaker 1: But just like you couldn't build a YouTube with a 331 00:19:30,640 --> 00:19:33,600 Speaker 1: fifty six came out then and what wasn't very useful 332 00:19:33,720 --> 00:19:40,000 Speaker 1: user experience, UM, you cannot easily build more complex value 333 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:42,399 Speaker 1: transfer protocols. So what I mean by that is the 334 00:19:42,520 --> 00:19:46,480 Speaker 1: easiest value transfer protocols is really what we had in 335 00:19:46,600 --> 00:19:51,040 Speaker 1: the past with descent with distributed ledger technology, because that's 336 00:19:51,400 --> 00:19:54,879 Speaker 1: kind of another myth in that space. Often times people 337 00:19:54,880 --> 00:19:59,040 Speaker 1: are quite d lt so distributed alledger technologies. With blockchain, 338 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:01,879 Speaker 1: it's actually the blo chains are disrupting the lt s. 339 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:04,280 Speaker 1: Meaning if you look at your bank account, that's a 340 00:20:04,320 --> 00:20:07,440 Speaker 1: typical example of a of a distributed ledger, right, so 341 00:20:07,520 --> 00:20:10,359 Speaker 1: you have an entry there that says either the amount 342 00:20:10,440 --> 00:20:12,159 Speaker 1: that you or the bank or the bank as you 343 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:14,720 Speaker 1: and if you send me money then they have to 344 00:20:14,760 --> 00:20:17,679 Speaker 1: align those two ledgers us with mine and for whatever 345 00:20:17,800 --> 00:20:22,480 Speaker 1: reason in between, the money disappears into Nirvana for twenty 346 00:20:22,560 --> 00:20:27,520 Speaker 1: four hours or longer um. So with a digital barre instrument, 347 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:31,440 Speaker 1: it's more less instant, if you will, even if you 348 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:36,040 Speaker 1: your bitcoins typically done within ten minutes. And the big 349 00:20:36,080 --> 00:20:39,880 Speaker 1: difference there though it's settled, right, And there's always these 350 00:20:40,280 --> 00:20:44,480 Speaker 1: really strange comparisons between the Visa network and the big 351 00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:48,080 Speaker 1: coin network, and then people keep saying stupid things like 352 00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:53,400 Speaker 1: that comparison. Yes, it's it's nonsense, right, Visa will never 353 00:20:53,520 --> 00:20:56,920 Speaker 1: be as fast as bitcoin because you'll never be able 354 00:20:57,000 --> 00:21:02,040 Speaker 1: to achieve settlement in ten minutes, it's impossibility. Yeah, and 355 00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,719 Speaker 1: that's really key, right, I mean that's really the value 356 00:21:05,760 --> 00:21:09,280 Speaker 1: of your traditional barer instument. Right. You can take your 357 00:21:09,359 --> 00:21:12,320 Speaker 1: printed dollar notes going to a store, you hand it 358 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:15,639 Speaker 1: over and it's setted. It's done right. In regards to 359 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:18,600 Speaker 1: there's two things. First of all, they say bitcoin or visa. 360 00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:21,160 Speaker 1: You know there's a thousand transaction to second bitcoin seven 361 00:21:21,280 --> 00:21:24,119 Speaker 1: or whatever. Well, first of all, visa is a payment 362 00:21:24,160 --> 00:21:27,400 Speaker 1: application on top of a settlement layer. So the Visa 363 00:21:27,440 --> 00:21:29,200 Speaker 1: network could be a payment layer on top of the 364 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:31,359 Speaker 1: bitcoin layer if it wanted. Second of all, if you're 365 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:36,080 Speaker 1: a merchant, visa doesn't settle, right, it takes days oh 366 00:21:36,240 --> 00:21:39,440 Speaker 1: yeah to get that money at least. Uh yeah. So 367 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:45,520 Speaker 1: maybe I'll remind a little bit so um because the 368 00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:47,800 Speaker 1: one thing that I wanted to get across in my 369 00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:52,800 Speaker 1: target you then, well, as um, there's like this major 370 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:57,119 Speaker 1: focus on on banks and quote unquote currencies and feat 371 00:21:57,200 --> 00:22:01,760 Speaker 1: and whatnot, and ad is a little bit misguided. So 372 00:22:01,840 --> 00:22:04,359 Speaker 1: what I mean by that, A lot of times what 373 00:22:04,520 --> 00:22:08,679 Speaker 1: we see startups do they look at banks and feared 374 00:22:08,760 --> 00:22:14,280 Speaker 1: currencies as um they are the problem. What's really important 375 00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:17,520 Speaker 1: to understand is that they're actually the competition. So what 376 00:22:17,640 --> 00:22:23,200 Speaker 1: I mean by that, so bank and any type of money. 377 00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:28,680 Speaker 1: It's actually addressing one of the fundamental problems in economics, 378 00:22:29,119 --> 00:22:31,920 Speaker 1: were just the double coincidence of one's problem. Right, So 379 00:22:32,080 --> 00:22:36,320 Speaker 1: I need to create an efficient exchange mechanism because you 380 00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:39,240 Speaker 1: have something you want to trade, which is your time, 381 00:22:39,359 --> 00:22:42,720 Speaker 1: but I don't want your time because your skills don't 382 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:47,159 Speaker 1: apply to whatever I want, which is I don't know, 383 00:22:47,400 --> 00:22:51,119 Speaker 1: live somewhere, right. And so in order to facilitate that, 384 00:22:52,080 --> 00:22:56,280 Speaker 1: humans came up with this idea of currencies, however, um, 385 00:22:56,800 --> 00:23:00,040 Speaker 1: and there are specifically people that have been indoctrinate it 386 00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:02,320 Speaker 1: in kind of this old world thinking of what money 387 00:23:02,359 --> 00:23:06,440 Speaker 1: and currencies are. They don't understand the fundamentals anymore, and 388 00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:10,320 Speaker 1: they're going back to kind of this eighteenth century definition 389 00:23:10,400 --> 00:23:13,160 Speaker 1: of money as a medium of exchange and of accounts 390 00:23:13,200 --> 00:23:16,600 Speaker 1: standard of value in the store of value, whereas that 391 00:23:16,760 --> 00:23:20,920 Speaker 1: definition hasn't been useful for decades obviously, right. And I 392 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:23,600 Speaker 1: always make the example of that's kind of trying to 393 00:23:24,240 --> 00:23:28,520 Speaker 1: define a phone by the fact that it's tied to war. Right, 394 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:32,800 Speaker 1: Because the same year that Javon wrote down as a 395 00:23:32,880 --> 00:23:36,639 Speaker 1: definition of money, Um, Alexander Graham Bell got the pattern 396 00:23:36,800 --> 00:23:40,159 Speaker 1: for the phone. Well, we don't look at phones at 397 00:23:40,200 --> 00:23:43,000 Speaker 1: the same way anymore, but for whatever reason, I think, 398 00:23:43,040 --> 00:23:46,440 Speaker 1: mostly because of indoctrination, we're looking at money and currency 399 00:23:46,520 --> 00:23:50,359 Speaker 1: in the same way, and unfortunately there's this conflation between 400 00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 1: those two concepts, which are radically different. Money and currency 401 00:23:53,920 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 1: are radically different things. Money is simply language, and the 402 00:23:58,160 --> 00:24:01,680 Speaker 1: very simple example that you can make for that specifically, 403 00:24:02,240 --> 00:24:05,760 Speaker 1: if you use a digital wallet of cryptocurrencies, whatever you 404 00:24:06,040 --> 00:24:10,360 Speaker 1: have in holdings, if it's bitcoin, ether Um, ex app 405 00:24:10,520 --> 00:24:13,119 Speaker 1: or any of the other old coins, you will always 406 00:24:13,119 --> 00:24:16,520 Speaker 1: see the translation of your language of trade. So in 407 00:24:16,640 --> 00:24:19,040 Speaker 1: our case it's typically going to be used dollar, but 408 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:21,800 Speaker 1: if you in Europe it might be the euro. So 409 00:24:22,040 --> 00:24:24,920 Speaker 1: that part is just language. Money is just language. Currency 410 00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:29,000 Speaker 1: is simply technology that's supposed to solve the cored incidence 411 00:24:29,040 --> 00:24:31,359 Speaker 1: of one's problem. And as far as the medium of 412 00:24:31,640 --> 00:24:35,800 Speaker 1: exchange is concerned, for all feared currencies, for decades already 413 00:24:35,840 --> 00:24:39,119 Speaker 1: has been digital rights. There's a once in a database, 414 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:43,240 Speaker 1: so that part you can check off. As far as 415 00:24:43,280 --> 00:24:47,200 Speaker 1: store values concerned, that's even a fire because no one 416 00:24:47,359 --> 00:24:50,520 Speaker 1: for any lengths of time would hold any feared currency 417 00:24:50,680 --> 00:24:53,359 Speaker 1: in their checking account, at least not in large quantities, right, 418 00:24:53,400 --> 00:24:59,240 Speaker 1: because it's inherently inflationary because of its really uninteresting incentive 419 00:24:59,359 --> 00:25:03,080 Speaker 1: system that would obviously have the issuer create more and 420 00:25:03,160 --> 00:25:04,960 Speaker 1: more of it if you give them the power of 421 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:08,920 Speaker 1: which we do so UM and recently have been using 422 00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:11,840 Speaker 1: the example of hey, if you created a white people 423 00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 1: that would describe a feared currency the US dollar, and 424 00:25:15,960 --> 00:25:19,080 Speaker 1: like how its government system is installed, everybody would call 425 00:25:19,119 --> 00:25:21,359 Speaker 1: it a ship coin, and no one would partake in 426 00:25:21,400 --> 00:25:24,639 Speaker 1: your I C or no one by right, right, and 427 00:25:24,880 --> 00:25:28,840 Speaker 1: so to that extent, once you understand that this is 428 00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:32,919 Speaker 1: UM like a misguided definition that you need to let 429 00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:36,159 Speaker 1: go off, and then more importantly, what is currency actually 430 00:25:36,280 --> 00:25:38,760 Speaker 1: trying to solve, which is a nouble currency of one's problem, 431 00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:42,399 Speaker 1: then you immediately jump to the conclusion we don't need 432 00:25:42,480 --> 00:25:46,359 Speaker 1: more currencies, like we don't need another bitcoin, ether or 433 00:25:46,400 --> 00:25:49,679 Speaker 1: any of the other outcoins. That's not the point, because 434 00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:54,120 Speaker 1: any fear currency is also digital and for the most part, 435 00:25:54,200 --> 00:25:58,560 Speaker 1: if you're doing a transaction, it's also a cryptographically secured 436 00:25:58,760 --> 00:26:01,840 Speaker 1: so there's no difference there. The only difference there is 437 00:26:01,920 --> 00:26:05,200 Speaker 1: in communication for the most part, as in now I 438 00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:07,320 Speaker 1: have to explain to you what a bitcoin is and 439 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:11,720 Speaker 1: why it's more important and whatnot. And we probably reached 440 00:26:11,760 --> 00:26:14,920 Speaker 1: the point already where where most people that wanted to 441 00:26:15,040 --> 00:26:18,639 Speaker 1: own any of those cryptocurrencies owns them, right, and there 442 00:26:18,680 --> 00:26:24,560 Speaker 1: has nothing to do restore or value or utility because 443 00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:27,919 Speaker 1: there's very little utility to be had as far as 444 00:26:28,440 --> 00:26:31,440 Speaker 1: using it in daily business. I mean, it was just 445 00:26:31,640 --> 00:26:35,560 Speaker 1: yesterday that I got it email from UH, an Italian 446 00:26:35,880 --> 00:26:39,480 Speaker 1: restaurant that said, hey, we are now accepting bitcoin, Like 447 00:26:40,040 --> 00:26:45,120 Speaker 1: that's great, but yeah, I'm really not interested in paying 448 00:26:45,160 --> 00:26:47,320 Speaker 1: you with bitcoin. I don't think most people were. You 449 00:26:47,359 --> 00:26:50,360 Speaker 1: pay with an inflationary currency now with a deflationary cuarrency back. 450 00:26:50,640 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean the thing is as an investor 451 00:26:54,520 --> 00:26:57,600 Speaker 1: in anybody who who's dealing with money, we have been 452 00:26:57,760 --> 00:27:01,280 Speaker 1: treating this like that all the time. Right. If if 453 00:27:01,320 --> 00:27:03,480 Speaker 1: you want to store value, you buy a house or 454 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:06,480 Speaker 1: something that's increasing, that's your store of value. You don't 455 00:27:06,520 --> 00:27:08,920 Speaker 1: think of your fear that's a store of value. So 456 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:13,320 Speaker 1: so there's the fear created monster. Right. There hasn't been 457 00:27:13,400 --> 00:27:17,320 Speaker 1: money since ninety one when we severed its relationship to 458 00:27:17,440 --> 00:27:22,040 Speaker 1: a commodity, and since then it's simply that instrument. And 459 00:27:22,520 --> 00:27:25,640 Speaker 1: so part of this is education that this is the case. 460 00:27:25,720 --> 00:27:27,920 Speaker 1: And the next part of this is, so how do 461 00:27:27,920 --> 00:27:32,600 Speaker 1: you solve um not only the fundamental problem, the coincidence 462 00:27:32,640 --> 00:27:34,800 Speaker 1: of one's problem, which you solved on the protocol level, 463 00:27:35,240 --> 00:27:38,760 Speaker 1: and then the secondary problems that come with the fact 464 00:27:38,800 --> 00:27:41,960 Speaker 1: that people still want to use or need to use 465 00:27:42,280 --> 00:27:46,800 Speaker 1: intermittently FIAT currencies. And to me, the solution is right 466 00:27:47,080 --> 00:27:51,600 Speaker 1: in front of everybody, and I keep proselytizing that because 467 00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:54,160 Speaker 1: we want to invest into that, we want to invest 468 00:27:54,240 --> 00:27:57,240 Speaker 1: into what I call money of I P. And in 469 00:27:57,320 --> 00:28:00,560 Speaker 1: a simple example, that could be your digital wallet which 470 00:28:00,680 --> 00:28:04,040 Speaker 1: only holds any type of yet currency for that split 471 00:28:04,160 --> 00:28:07,000 Speaker 1: second when someone's asking for that, and then moves it 472 00:28:07,240 --> 00:28:10,560 Speaker 1: into an actual store of value. And the actual store 473 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:13,000 Speaker 1: of value depends on the eye of the beholder, right, 474 00:28:13,080 --> 00:28:15,440 Speaker 1: So it could be a bond, it could be a 475 00:28:15,560 --> 00:28:18,320 Speaker 1: partial piece of real estate, could be a basket, it 476 00:28:18,400 --> 00:28:22,119 Speaker 1: could be totally algorithmically created. And to that extent, we 477 00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:28,200 Speaker 1: don't need quote unquote stable coins. I mean the stable 478 00:28:28,280 --> 00:28:33,840 Speaker 1: compared to what, right exactly I mean, it's again, it's 479 00:28:33,840 --> 00:28:35,680 Speaker 1: in the eyes of the beholding. At the end of 480 00:28:35,760 --> 00:28:38,520 Speaker 1: the day. Most of these are actually PAGs, right, most 481 00:28:38,560 --> 00:28:41,520 Speaker 1: of them packed to a fiat, which is to say, 482 00:28:41,520 --> 00:28:48,120 Speaker 1: the inflationary. But yeah, yeah, anyhow, so, um, I wanted 483 00:28:48,120 --> 00:28:50,720 Speaker 1: to ask you deleting to that. So that's kind of 484 00:28:50,720 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 1: where you went. So the solution is right in front 485 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:56,440 Speaker 1: of us, which is uh, is uh the moy I've 486 00:28:56,480 --> 00:28:59,320 Speaker 1: heard it called money over I p or really it's 487 00:28:59,320 --> 00:29:03,200 Speaker 1: a transfer value, right, blockchain transferring value, I think. Um. 488 00:29:03,320 --> 00:29:05,840 Speaker 1: Even to add on, I love the conversation that you're having. 489 00:29:05,960 --> 00:29:07,400 Speaker 1: This is I could this is what I talked about 490 00:29:07,400 --> 00:29:09,600 Speaker 1: on my YouTube channel. I could talk about all day, um, 491 00:29:09,680 --> 00:29:13,440 Speaker 1: But really it's this. It's the shift where we used 492 00:29:13,480 --> 00:29:15,719 Speaker 1: to look at it as information is what I got 493 00:29:15,800 --> 00:29:19,560 Speaker 1: in the newspaper, the nightly news, but today information has changed. 494 00:29:19,920 --> 00:29:22,959 Speaker 1: And you mentioned YouTube. Right now everybody's creating news, everyone's 495 00:29:22,960 --> 00:29:25,920 Speaker 1: creating information. But even um, somebody on the beach across 496 00:29:25,960 --> 00:29:27,800 Speaker 1: the world is putting a picture. And then I know 497 00:29:27,880 --> 00:29:29,680 Speaker 1: what the weather is like, I know what the waves 498 00:29:29,680 --> 00:29:32,040 Speaker 1: are like. Right, So I'm getting all this information and 499 00:29:32,160 --> 00:29:36,160 Speaker 1: I look at value Today most people, because of education, 500 00:29:36,520 --> 00:29:40,560 Speaker 1: look at value as like money, but really there's so 501 00:29:40,720 --> 00:29:43,360 Speaker 1: much more to value. And if we go to a 502 00:29:43,440 --> 00:29:48,400 Speaker 1: tokenized economy, everything becomes tokenized and we use blockching technology 503 00:29:48,560 --> 00:29:53,880 Speaker 1: constantly transfer value um and over over I P. Right, 504 00:29:54,000 --> 00:29:56,840 Speaker 1: I guess kind of what you're saying. Yeah, And unfortunately 505 00:29:56,880 --> 00:29:59,120 Speaker 1: a lot of people have been throwing this top money 506 00:29:59,160 --> 00:30:02,800 Speaker 1: over by p around without actually explaining and then probably 507 00:30:02,880 --> 00:30:04,760 Speaker 1: for the most part, not thinking it through what it 508 00:30:04,880 --> 00:30:07,720 Speaker 1: means in terms of what you actually need to build. 509 00:30:07,880 --> 00:30:10,200 Speaker 1: I mean, it comes down to the fact it was 510 00:30:10,280 --> 00:30:13,360 Speaker 1: this initial misguided idea of the fat protocol and kind 511 00:30:13,400 --> 00:30:17,600 Speaker 1: of creating value in in the quote unquote token or coin. 512 00:30:17,840 --> 00:30:21,080 Speaker 1: Obviously there's not value in the token or coin ever, right, 513 00:30:21,160 --> 00:30:23,840 Speaker 1: because it's part of the protocol. It's the pre to 514 00:30:23,920 --> 00:30:27,320 Speaker 1: p element of the protocol, and to that extent um 515 00:30:27,840 --> 00:30:30,640 Speaker 1: there's always a misapplication of that term token for the 516 00:30:30,720 --> 00:30:34,200 Speaker 1: most but there's a very few options where you can 517 00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:37,800 Speaker 1: create an actual token because understanding token and the context 518 00:30:37,880 --> 00:30:40,320 Speaker 1: of blockchain is understanding that this is a pure to 519 00:30:40,400 --> 00:30:43,040 Speaker 1: per instrument. So a blockchain, let's to create two things. 520 00:30:43,520 --> 00:30:46,200 Speaker 1: One thing I call the digital vending machine, so the 521 00:30:46,400 --> 00:30:49,600 Speaker 1: smart contracts or or a bottle of smart contracts. It 522 00:30:49,680 --> 00:30:52,320 Speaker 1: spits out what you need. And the other one is 523 00:30:52,640 --> 00:30:55,200 Speaker 1: the token either can use the too in combination. But 524 00:30:55,360 --> 00:30:59,160 Speaker 1: the thing is if you need both, then the first 525 00:30:59,280 --> 00:31:02,480 Speaker 1: element of the at that the token doesn't actually have 526 00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:06,120 Speaker 1: that digital better function anymore because with that digital bearer function, 527 00:31:06,240 --> 00:31:08,440 Speaker 1: if I can send it to your peer here, you 528 00:31:08,520 --> 00:31:12,360 Speaker 1: should have all the prerequisites that let you either own 529 00:31:12,480 --> 00:31:15,720 Speaker 1: the asset and or have the right. And most of 530 00:31:15,840 --> 00:31:19,400 Speaker 1: the time what we're actually talking about is why it's transfers, 531 00:31:19,480 --> 00:31:22,280 Speaker 1: not as it transfers. And there's a lot of conflation 532 00:31:22,360 --> 00:31:25,800 Speaker 1: of these terms. Like as a law student, that's one 533 00:31:25,840 --> 00:31:28,200 Speaker 1: of the first concepts you learn in civil law in 534 00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:33,160 Speaker 1: Europe to to create these nuances between what is ownership, 535 00:31:33,440 --> 00:31:36,400 Speaker 1: what is possession, what is governance and su course there 536 00:31:36,480 --> 00:31:39,560 Speaker 1: all exist on different levels, and only if and when 537 00:31:39,920 --> 00:31:43,200 Speaker 1: you can combine these in one instrument you can refer 538 00:31:43,320 --> 00:31:46,040 Speaker 1: to as a token, because otherwise you will still need 539 00:31:46,160 --> 00:31:49,960 Speaker 1: this other element. The typical example for that is the 540 00:31:50,360 --> 00:31:54,560 Speaker 1: very vanted security tokens. Security tokens are years of the 541 00:31:54,600 --> 00:31:56,600 Speaker 1: way at best. So what I mean by that is 542 00:31:57,240 --> 00:32:01,680 Speaker 1: I mean with with any given evinance context, you will 543 00:32:01,720 --> 00:32:05,640 Speaker 1: need to look for certainry requisites in your person. Is 544 00:32:05,760 --> 00:32:08,880 Speaker 1: this person able to buy that right and we're simply 545 00:32:09,160 --> 00:32:12,400 Speaker 1: very far away from having these identity protocols on main net. 546 00:32:12,880 --> 00:32:16,720 Speaker 1: But right now, also the value transfer protocols on main 547 00:32:16,760 --> 00:32:21,160 Speaker 1: net are super simple. Right, we really can only deal 548 00:32:21,320 --> 00:32:24,400 Speaker 1: with assets and then to a very small degree with 549 00:32:25,120 --> 00:32:28,400 Speaker 1: with I wanted to say, with fungible, so i e. 550 00:32:28,800 --> 00:32:32,320 Speaker 1: Your your typical talking your typical feats pungible, and to 551 00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:36,000 Speaker 1: a very small degree with with non fungibles, and they're 552 00:32:36,080 --> 00:32:40,680 Speaker 1: mostly just recording the ownership entry and all of those assets. 553 00:32:40,760 --> 00:32:43,560 Speaker 1: Take your typical crypto kitties, they actually don't exist on 554 00:32:43,720 --> 00:32:48,479 Speaker 1: main net, right They they exist on the collapse UM 555 00:32:48,640 --> 00:32:51,960 Speaker 1: system and their servers. Meaning if that entity deplaps and 556 00:32:52,040 --> 00:32:56,520 Speaker 1: maintains the crypto kitty environment, were was to cease operations, 557 00:32:56,640 --> 00:32:59,040 Speaker 1: which it is a startup, and most start ups feel right, 558 00:32:59,520 --> 00:33:03,600 Speaker 1: so they're gonna be wrong. But the thing is, if 559 00:33:03,680 --> 00:33:06,560 Speaker 1: you think this through, what you want to attach your 560 00:33:06,880 --> 00:33:10,880 Speaker 1: security to any of those startups creating the side, I 561 00:33:10,920 --> 00:33:14,000 Speaker 1: would not invest into that, and I wouldn't recommend that 562 00:33:14,080 --> 00:33:18,520 Speaker 1: anybody's creating a quote unquote security this way, right, I 563 00:33:18,640 --> 00:33:21,320 Speaker 1: think I I think there's no doubt that UM the 564 00:33:21,440 --> 00:33:24,440 Speaker 1: way that securities are kind of created and owned and 565 00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:27,840 Speaker 1: traded today could be improved. Um. You know, if I 566 00:33:28,000 --> 00:33:31,000 Speaker 1: buy my share of whatever Tesla on eBay, I don't 567 00:33:31,040 --> 00:33:34,160 Speaker 1: really have custody of that share Ebata. You know, e 568 00:33:34,240 --> 00:33:36,640 Speaker 1: trade doesn't have custody right, and and and it it 569 00:33:36,680 --> 00:33:39,120 Speaker 1: creates all these problems. So it'd be simpler. But that 570 00:33:39,240 --> 00:33:42,959 Speaker 1: to me isn't super exciting. Um. But I as much 571 00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:44,480 Speaker 1: as I love the technology side and I'd love to 572 00:33:44,560 --> 00:33:46,200 Speaker 1: talk to you more about that, I wanted to shift 573 00:33:46,240 --> 00:33:47,680 Speaker 1: gears a little bit because I know we're gonna run 574 00:33:47,720 --> 00:33:51,440 Speaker 1: out of time now. Um. You have this interesting background, 575 00:33:51,520 --> 00:33:54,280 Speaker 1: and you obviously get the technology side and the future 576 00:33:54,520 --> 00:33:58,680 Speaker 1: vision side. Um. But you have a company, saysdy Capital. Um, 577 00:33:58,840 --> 00:34:02,120 Speaker 1: that is your You're an investment firm of some sort, 578 00:34:02,200 --> 00:34:05,240 Speaker 1: and you're actively investing in the technology. And I'm curious 579 00:34:05,320 --> 00:34:08,560 Speaker 1: how somebody with your background in your future vision is 580 00:34:08,719 --> 00:34:11,000 Speaker 1: looking at investing in the space. Maybe you can tell 581 00:34:11,000 --> 00:34:12,799 Speaker 1: me a little bit about that. Yeah, I mean, as 582 00:34:12,840 --> 00:34:15,799 Speaker 1: I mentioned, I'm a technologist at heart, and so we've 583 00:34:15,880 --> 00:34:20,880 Speaker 1: been deeply integrated in the technology development environment here for 584 00:34:21,440 --> 00:34:23,920 Speaker 1: a number of years. We've been running the Theorem meetups 585 00:34:24,680 --> 00:34:27,480 Speaker 1: since day one, Since Abul two thousand fifteen, so far 586 00:34:28,160 --> 00:34:30,920 Speaker 1: more than four years. Now. We typically two monthly events 587 00:34:30,960 --> 00:34:34,560 Speaker 1: and we'll we'll try to theme them to a particular topic. 588 00:34:34,760 --> 00:34:38,839 Speaker 1: Like our last one last week was all around decentralized exchanges, 589 00:34:39,040 --> 00:34:42,800 Speaker 1: so that more equity should be called on because totally exchanges. 590 00:34:42,840 --> 00:34:47,120 Speaker 1: So we're so be excited about UM particular angles in 591 00:34:47,200 --> 00:34:49,200 Speaker 1: that space and the way we work, as I mentioned, 592 00:34:49,400 --> 00:34:52,759 Speaker 1: it's using the scientific method to investing, which means we 593 00:34:52,840 --> 00:34:56,279 Speaker 1: formulate the investment thesis. And in our case right now, 594 00:34:56,320 --> 00:34:59,359 Speaker 1: we're working roughly of three large topics, the first one 595 00:34:59,480 --> 00:35:02,279 Speaker 1: being UM what we talked about money very p and 596 00:35:02,360 --> 00:35:06,600 Speaker 1: within money of IP will look for smart remittance systems, 597 00:35:07,160 --> 00:35:11,600 Speaker 1: point of sales systems, at M solutions, smart wallet systems 598 00:35:11,640 --> 00:35:14,239 Speaker 1: and so far. So there's a lot of utility to 599 00:35:14,400 --> 00:35:18,960 Speaker 1: we had, but it comes down to identifying the solutions 600 00:35:19,080 --> 00:35:23,919 Speaker 1: and UM the actual operators that realized that because nine 601 00:35:23,920 --> 00:35:28,759 Speaker 1: out of ten times or more, UM, we just realized 602 00:35:28,800 --> 00:35:33,440 Speaker 1: that they're still stuck at trying to fix a meta problem, 603 00:35:33,560 --> 00:35:35,919 Speaker 1: not the core problem. But they're trying to fix the bank. 604 00:35:35,960 --> 00:35:38,200 Speaker 1: You don't need to fix the bank, I mean as 605 00:35:38,239 --> 00:35:40,719 Speaker 1: far as the as far as the payment go, I 606 00:35:40,760 --> 00:35:42,880 Speaker 1: mean I see a lot of people trying to solve 607 00:35:43,040 --> 00:35:46,880 Speaker 1: like take take traditional POS systems like point of sales 608 00:35:46,880 --> 00:35:49,759 Speaker 1: systems and trying to help merchants take credit card or 609 00:35:49,840 --> 00:35:52,919 Speaker 1: take take cryptocurrencies for example. I don't I don't really 610 00:35:53,040 --> 00:35:57,120 Speaker 1: understand that. Yeah, it seems like, well, cryptocurrency was designed 611 00:35:57,160 --> 00:35:58,759 Speaker 1: to be peer to peer and it's supposed to cut 612 00:35:58,840 --> 00:36:01,080 Speaker 1: that whole person out. So it's almost like they're trying 613 00:36:01,120 --> 00:36:05,720 Speaker 1: to introduce a technology that actually puts them out of business, right, Yeah, exactly, 614 00:36:05,760 --> 00:36:09,040 Speaker 1: that's exactly right. I mean, it's it's it comes back 615 00:36:09,120 --> 00:36:13,239 Speaker 1: to they're expecting people to adopt the technology rather than 616 00:36:13,320 --> 00:36:16,880 Speaker 1: adopt their technology to people that it's it's the basic 617 00:36:17,800 --> 00:36:21,160 Speaker 1: entrepreneur mistake that they're making there. So you need to 618 00:36:21,360 --> 00:36:25,360 Speaker 1: bury the technology onto the protocol level so that neither 619 00:36:25,480 --> 00:36:29,080 Speaker 1: the merger nor the consumer has to worry about um 620 00:36:30,080 --> 00:36:33,640 Speaker 1: needing to learn a new language of quote unquote cryptocurrency. 621 00:36:33,960 --> 00:36:35,840 Speaker 1: But the only thing they need to know is that 622 00:36:35,960 --> 00:36:40,000 Speaker 1: this particular method doesn't have any fee or better, it's 623 00:36:40,040 --> 00:36:43,239 Speaker 1: actually getting them something right, and that's what you need 624 00:36:43,280 --> 00:36:45,759 Speaker 1: to build in your product. And it's it's not that 625 00:36:45,960 --> 00:36:49,080 Speaker 1: this is easy to do. It just takes more, it 626 00:36:49,239 --> 00:36:52,160 Speaker 1: takes longer, more diligence, and mostly more diligence in the 627 00:36:52,239 --> 00:36:55,759 Speaker 1: original setup and thinking. And then there's the the other 628 00:36:55,880 --> 00:36:58,320 Speaker 1: portion to that, and that's again it's very specific to 629 00:36:58,400 --> 00:37:03,800 Speaker 1: this topic, uh, the topic of regulation, and unfortunately because 630 00:37:03,920 --> 00:37:07,000 Speaker 1: of the misalignment of interest, specifically in the United States 631 00:37:07,040 --> 00:37:11,200 Speaker 1: but also all over the world. Um, the way legal 632 00:37:11,280 --> 00:37:15,239 Speaker 1: systems work. As a lot of these entrepreneurs, they they're 633 00:37:15,320 --> 00:37:19,920 Speaker 1: going to either see the STC worst case scenario or um, 634 00:37:20,760 --> 00:37:24,000 Speaker 1: not as bad but bad, go to the lawyer and 635 00:37:24,120 --> 00:37:26,840 Speaker 1: get legal advice on how to build technology. Well, we 636 00:37:26,920 --> 00:37:31,640 Speaker 1: already know that lawyers in general and regulators in particular 637 00:37:32,080 --> 00:37:35,600 Speaker 1: don't make for good product designers, right, so that's already 638 00:37:35,840 --> 00:37:40,160 Speaker 1: a really bad idea. But then more importantly, um, they 639 00:37:40,239 --> 00:37:43,800 Speaker 1: will never create a useful product because they misunderstand that 640 00:37:43,960 --> 00:37:46,600 Speaker 1: this is an international technology and you should just focus 641 00:37:46,719 --> 00:37:51,480 Speaker 1: on creating that technology. Meaning if you're just providing the protocol, 642 00:37:52,000 --> 00:37:54,319 Speaker 1: if you're not interfacing with the user, and if you're 643 00:37:54,360 --> 00:37:58,719 Speaker 1: actually building a peer to peer protocol, there's no niccense needed, right, 644 00:37:58,840 --> 00:38:02,280 Speaker 1: I can as long as I'm not trading in anything 645 00:38:02,440 --> 00:38:06,839 Speaker 1: elictit you and I can trade anything for anything all 646 00:38:07,040 --> 00:38:12,680 Speaker 1: day long, right, that there's no problem with that, And well, yeah, 647 00:38:13,520 --> 00:38:18,279 Speaker 1: with limitations, but limitations are typically physical in nature. If 648 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:22,040 Speaker 1: we could transfer this to the digital world and exchange 649 00:38:22,160 --> 00:38:25,880 Speaker 1: value that way, that would be preferred. But then, more importantly, 650 00:38:26,520 --> 00:38:30,759 Speaker 1: also these these jurisdictions are obviously different everywhere. I always say, well, 651 00:38:31,400 --> 00:38:33,880 Speaker 1: if you don't want your security to be traded on 652 00:38:34,000 --> 00:38:37,640 Speaker 1: the sabbath, or if it should comply to show real 653 00:38:37,920 --> 00:38:41,560 Speaker 1: and every other regulation you could envision, I probably end 654 00:38:41,640 --> 00:38:47,239 Speaker 1: up not building anything ever, right, And so it's not 655 00:38:47,360 --> 00:38:51,320 Speaker 1: about picking the right regulation. It's about deciding if you 656 00:38:51,400 --> 00:38:54,760 Speaker 1: want to be in the business of acquiring these legacy 657 00:38:54,880 --> 00:38:58,520 Speaker 1: licenses and then eventually wait for for these to kind 658 00:38:58,520 --> 00:39:02,080 Speaker 1: of go away and unify, which will take decades or 659 00:39:03,320 --> 00:39:08,960 Speaker 1: um more progressively, just build technology and and build technology 660 00:39:09,400 --> 00:39:12,040 Speaker 1: in such a fashion that you actually don't need any 661 00:39:12,120 --> 00:39:16,840 Speaker 1: of those. And we have the stereotypical example right in 662 00:39:16,960 --> 00:39:19,759 Speaker 1: found of our nose every day. It's a bit common, right, 663 00:39:20,760 --> 00:39:25,399 Speaker 1: But no, it seems like it's it's not like I'm 664 00:39:25,400 --> 00:39:27,239 Speaker 1: not saying this likely. I mean it's a hard thing 665 00:39:27,320 --> 00:39:30,840 Speaker 1: to do, right, I mean bitcoin, But for all intents 666 00:39:30,880 --> 00:39:33,640 Speaker 1: and purposes, it's it's a miracle that it exists, that 667 00:39:33,760 --> 00:39:36,160 Speaker 1: it works and so far as so many things had 668 00:39:36,200 --> 00:39:40,480 Speaker 1: to come together. But now that we have this example, 669 00:39:41,400 --> 00:39:43,480 Speaker 1: you just need to pay close attention of how these 670 00:39:43,560 --> 00:39:47,000 Speaker 1: examples came together and build it in that such fashion. 671 00:39:47,040 --> 00:39:48,960 Speaker 1: And that doesn't mean that you cannot make money from it, 672 00:39:49,120 --> 00:39:52,920 Speaker 1: by the way, right Redhead makes a lot of money 673 00:39:53,000 --> 00:39:57,759 Speaker 1: by implementing Linux solutions, multi building dollar company, but it 674 00:39:57,960 --> 00:40:00,600 Speaker 1: just requires a different way of thinking and realization what 675 00:40:00,760 --> 00:40:03,120 Speaker 1: the problem is. So how do you how do you 676 00:40:03,160 --> 00:40:05,680 Speaker 1: approach that from an investment standpoint, I mean your firm 677 00:40:05,800 --> 00:40:08,120 Speaker 1: Sesny Capital, like what you're investing thesis or like what 678 00:40:08,200 --> 00:40:12,040 Speaker 1: are the areas that you're focusing on? Yeah, yeah, So 679 00:40:12,280 --> 00:40:15,800 Speaker 1: the first money of IP and like with any thesis, 680 00:40:15,880 --> 00:40:17,640 Speaker 1: will put it out there, we run it against the 681 00:40:17,680 --> 00:40:20,600 Speaker 1: teams that we talked to and get pay review and 682 00:40:20,840 --> 00:40:23,800 Speaker 1: if we find someone who has an intelligent opinion that 683 00:40:23,880 --> 00:40:27,279 Speaker 1: we haven't considered, then we adjust. Are thinking that's I mean, 684 00:40:27,360 --> 00:40:30,880 Speaker 1: that's the best thing you can do. Is also the 685 00:40:30,920 --> 00:40:32,839 Speaker 1: money over I P which is, like you said, kind 686 00:40:32,840 --> 00:40:35,640 Speaker 1: of like the payment sector. That's kind of an area 687 00:40:35,719 --> 00:40:38,399 Speaker 1: that you kind of have your focus on right now. Yeah, 688 00:40:38,520 --> 00:40:40,320 Speaker 1: because at the end of the day, I mean, investing 689 00:40:40,400 --> 00:40:42,279 Speaker 1: is about timing, right, So it's when you get in, 690 00:40:42,400 --> 00:40:45,640 Speaker 1: when you get out, and there's not a lot more 691 00:40:45,760 --> 00:40:47,840 Speaker 1: to be had the next topic that we focus on 692 00:40:48,360 --> 00:40:51,480 Speaker 1: the whole topic of regulation technologies, because as you pointed out, 693 00:40:51,880 --> 00:40:53,839 Speaker 1: there is a lot of value to be had, it's 694 00:40:53,920 --> 00:40:57,000 Speaker 1: just not around the topic of security tokens. It's more 695 00:40:57,040 --> 00:40:59,920 Speaker 1: incremental than that, and has to be more incremental than that. 696 00:41:00,239 --> 00:41:04,200 Speaker 1: So there we made a couple of allocations in different solutions. 697 00:41:05,160 --> 00:41:08,200 Speaker 1: Just one example, we're running thirty five notes for UM 698 00:41:09,120 --> 00:41:12,320 Speaker 1: small fund. They have the ownly decentralized approach to this 699 00:41:13,440 --> 00:41:19,759 Speaker 1: um issuance topic and um we like what Celsius does 700 00:41:19,960 --> 00:41:26,279 Speaker 1: so this loan system. And another another voice over IP guy, Yeah, yeah, 701 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:28,840 Speaker 1: you need to have a talk with Alex about that 702 00:41:29,000 --> 00:41:33,680 Speaker 1: topic because now you mentioned you mentioned before the fallacy. 703 00:41:34,000 --> 00:41:38,279 Speaker 1: You called it the fallacy of the fat fat protocol thesis. Um, 704 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:40,600 Speaker 1: so I guess based off of that statement you you 705 00:41:40,719 --> 00:41:44,600 Speaker 1: stay away from protocols, not at all. We're allocated to 706 00:41:44,840 --> 00:41:49,120 Speaker 1: a lot of the protocols we just um treated appropriately. 707 00:41:49,280 --> 00:41:54,719 Speaker 1: So the all the the protocol allocations and supports, they're 708 00:41:54,760 --> 00:41:57,440 Speaker 1: managed by the data science team. So to that extent, 709 00:41:57,560 --> 00:42:01,120 Speaker 1: you're obviously right now there's nothing you can invest into 710 00:42:01,200 --> 00:42:04,400 Speaker 1: in the cryptocurrency space, right, So in the cryptocurrency and 711 00:42:05,239 --> 00:42:09,000 Speaker 1: exchange in my mind, investing is the long t peround 712 00:42:09,080 --> 00:42:13,160 Speaker 1: means that that's all speculation. You can invest into algorithms, 713 00:42:13,239 --> 00:42:15,759 Speaker 1: and that's what we do. That do those tradings, and 714 00:42:15,800 --> 00:42:17,680 Speaker 1: there's a lot of learnings to be had, so our 715 00:42:17,800 --> 00:42:22,439 Speaker 1: expectations in the future once the systems have all gone 716 00:42:22,480 --> 00:42:25,440 Speaker 1: through the ring. I've been tested a thousand times for 717 00:42:25,640 --> 00:42:28,360 Speaker 1: Sunday and you're you're probably aware of the quote unquote 718 00:42:28,760 --> 00:42:31,680 Speaker 1: Binance hag right, which is really the wrong label for 719 00:42:31,800 --> 00:42:34,600 Speaker 1: what happened there. But let's call it that. In a way, 720 00:42:34,640 --> 00:42:39,320 Speaker 1: it wasn't advertising for that particular exchange, right because because 721 00:42:39,920 --> 00:42:42,520 Speaker 1: just absorbed it and paid everybody out from the fund. 722 00:42:42,560 --> 00:42:44,720 Speaker 1: Don't try that with your f d i C insurance, 723 00:42:44,800 --> 00:42:50,480 Speaker 1: by the way, right, that would just in the f 724 00:42:50,600 --> 00:42:53,600 Speaker 1: d i C case, that would be just one bank glass. Um. 725 00:42:54,800 --> 00:42:58,040 Speaker 1: But yeah, so money over appears one large topic and 726 00:42:58,160 --> 00:43:01,719 Speaker 1: wrack technly in the other topic. But again, incremental, it's 727 00:43:01,800 --> 00:43:03,960 Speaker 1: like we focus on the low hanging fruit that are 728 00:43:03,960 --> 00:43:07,800 Speaker 1: actually time the end feasible right now with um the 729 00:43:07,960 --> 00:43:11,400 Speaker 1: state of the protocol levels that we have, so we'll 730 00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:14,719 Speaker 1: look at like bond issuing systems is probably one of 731 00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:18,960 Speaker 1: the easier products. Like people saying stuff like tokenization of 732 00:43:19,080 --> 00:43:22,960 Speaker 1: real estate, they're just using it unfortunately, as a metaphor, 733 00:43:23,000 --> 00:43:26,280 Speaker 1: and that's always a bad idea. As a technology investor. 734 00:43:26,480 --> 00:43:28,839 Speaker 1: You don't want to use meta for us. You want 735 00:43:28,880 --> 00:43:33,000 Speaker 1: to understand the technology. So unfortunately we use something we 736 00:43:33,200 --> 00:43:35,600 Speaker 1: know to try to describe the technology, but then we 737 00:43:35,680 --> 00:43:38,840 Speaker 1: put it into a box. Right yeah, yeah, as a 738 00:43:38,880 --> 00:43:41,840 Speaker 1: technology investor, you can't afford to do that, right. You 739 00:43:42,000 --> 00:43:46,520 Speaker 1: need to fundamentally, at least fundamentally understand vocabulary, which is 740 00:43:47,239 --> 00:43:50,839 Speaker 1: like we're still forming the vocabulary, right, So don't take 741 00:43:50,920 --> 00:43:53,560 Speaker 1: my particular notion of how to define things as be 742 00:43:53,719 --> 00:43:56,000 Speaker 1: all end all. If someone comes up with something better, 743 00:43:56,000 --> 00:43:59,480 Speaker 1: I'm absolutely willing. I'm wanting to adapt that. Whatever I 744 00:43:59,560 --> 00:44:02,880 Speaker 1: put out, it's always meant in the spirit of peer review. 745 00:44:03,160 --> 00:44:05,560 Speaker 1: I mean, that's the main reason why I talked to 746 00:44:05,640 --> 00:44:08,760 Speaker 1: you or right on forks or anything to get peer review. 747 00:44:08,840 --> 00:44:10,279 Speaker 1: I want to know when I'm wrong, and I want 748 00:44:10,320 --> 00:44:13,719 Speaker 1: to know really really earlier, ideally before I spent too 749 00:44:13,840 --> 00:44:17,040 Speaker 1: much time and money on making further mistakes built on 750 00:44:17,160 --> 00:44:20,480 Speaker 1: wrong definitions. But unfortunately, it seems like a lot of 751 00:44:20,600 --> 00:44:24,760 Speaker 1: people just jumped to just taking on these words, i e. Cryptocurrency. 752 00:44:25,000 --> 00:44:29,840 Speaker 1: The term cryptocurrency is other useless. Right, any currency, hopefully 753 00:44:30,080 --> 00:44:35,200 Speaker 1: in its transfer mechanisms using some form of cryptographic protection. Right. 754 00:44:35,239 --> 00:44:38,080 Speaker 1: I assume that VISA is using that. I'm not sure, 755 00:44:38,160 --> 00:44:40,839 Speaker 1: but I assume they do, and they might not use 756 00:44:41,040 --> 00:44:43,239 Speaker 1: the blockchain variety. But at the end of the day, 757 00:44:43,280 --> 00:44:46,640 Speaker 1: then that's the other topic. Oftentimes, when I find people 758 00:44:46,719 --> 00:44:50,319 Speaker 1: using this term blockchain technology, I think they haven't thought 759 00:44:50,360 --> 00:44:53,160 Speaker 1: about this for long enough, because blockchain technology in that 760 00:44:53,320 --> 00:44:56,000 Speaker 1: never sense is really just a fancy way of encrypting 761 00:44:56,080 --> 00:44:59,279 Speaker 1: things which has been around for twenty years. Right, It's 762 00:44:59,320 --> 00:45:04,000 Speaker 1: really about creating um the incentive mechanisms factor in your 763 00:45:04,080 --> 00:45:07,600 Speaker 1: network that creates the immuntability that lets you allow to 764 00:45:07,719 --> 00:45:10,200 Speaker 1: build digital bearer instruments, which at the end of the 765 00:45:10,280 --> 00:45:13,280 Speaker 1: day will then allow you to build the quote unquote 766 00:45:13,280 --> 00:45:16,799 Speaker 1: digital vending machines with which then I think those are 767 00:45:16,800 --> 00:45:19,120 Speaker 1: all the problems that lead to the regulations because they're 768 00:45:19,120 --> 00:45:22,600 Speaker 1: trying to like put these into these classifications that just 769 00:45:22,680 --> 00:45:26,200 Speaker 1: don't exist. And UM, a lot of these utility tokens, 770 00:45:26,239 --> 00:45:28,400 Speaker 1: if you will, um are meant to be used on 771 00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:33,160 Speaker 1: a system. UM like maybe you would go to david 772 00:45:33,239 --> 00:45:35,480 Speaker 1: Busters and buy tokens to play video games or chuck 773 00:45:35,480 --> 00:45:38,439 Speaker 1: E Cheese, or when I go to the grocery store, 774 00:45:38,440 --> 00:45:40,840 Speaker 1: they give me reward points, um, and they're kind of 775 00:45:40,880 --> 00:45:42,480 Speaker 1: similar to that, and I can use them back in 776 00:45:42,560 --> 00:45:45,319 Speaker 1: the system. However, when I use my Chuck E Cheese 777 00:45:45,360 --> 00:45:47,960 Speaker 1: token or my my grocery store a word points, I don't. 778 00:45:47,960 --> 00:45:52,000 Speaker 1: That's not a taxable event. But now they're calling them assets, 779 00:45:52,040 --> 00:45:53,920 Speaker 1: and now they're taxing me to use them. And then 780 00:45:54,000 --> 00:45:56,239 Speaker 1: it's like, but that's not what they are. That's not 781 00:45:56,360 --> 00:45:59,879 Speaker 1: you know, and so they're uh, and that's what only 782 00:46:00,040 --> 00:46:04,320 Speaker 1: one particular context. And actually frequent fire mars are actually taxable, 783 00:46:05,120 --> 00:46:10,840 Speaker 1: right yeah, same, but like that's different again in other jurisdictions. 784 00:46:10,960 --> 00:46:15,080 Speaker 1: And again that shouldn't play a role. Because I was 785 00:46:15,160 --> 00:46:18,279 Speaker 1: just at the conference. You probably were there when I 786 00:46:18,360 --> 00:46:22,080 Speaker 1: was talking to Hasta from the SEC, and the first 787 00:46:22,200 --> 00:46:24,520 Speaker 1: thing that I told her that I always tell regulator 788 00:46:24,600 --> 00:46:26,800 Speaker 1: or lawyer that I talked to is like, whenever you 789 00:46:26,880 --> 00:46:29,160 Speaker 1: open your mouth, shouldn't you make the disclaimer that you 790 00:46:29,280 --> 00:46:32,440 Speaker 1: don't get ready you like technology, that the only thing 791 00:46:32,520 --> 00:46:34,600 Speaker 1: you get to do is limit the right of your citizens, 792 00:46:34,640 --> 00:46:36,279 Speaker 1: because that's all you get to do, right as a 793 00:46:36,360 --> 00:46:39,280 Speaker 1: regulator of any nation, like you can tell your citizens 794 00:46:39,360 --> 00:46:41,080 Speaker 1: what to do and what not to do, mostly what 795 00:46:41,200 --> 00:46:44,520 Speaker 1: not to do. So if that was actually always phrased 796 00:46:44,560 --> 00:46:47,799 Speaker 1: in mass particular fashion, it wouldn't get much play, right 797 00:46:47,920 --> 00:46:50,560 Speaker 1: because you don't get fast standing up in front of 798 00:46:50,680 --> 00:46:54,680 Speaker 1: your citizens saying hey, I don't want you three hundred 799 00:46:54,719 --> 00:46:58,840 Speaker 1: million people to be able to buy digital tokens and 800 00:46:58,960 --> 00:47:02,200 Speaker 1: potentially get rich stuff from that will potentially lose anything. So, 801 00:47:02,640 --> 00:47:05,600 Speaker 1: speaking speaking of that, there was the California we're both 802 00:47:05,640 --> 00:47:09,440 Speaker 1: in California Sherman who came out and said point blank 803 00:47:09,840 --> 00:47:12,759 Speaker 1: that U. S citizens should be uh, it should be 804 00:47:12,840 --> 00:47:15,960 Speaker 1: illegal for US citizens to buy cryptocurrency. Right. Um, So 805 00:47:16,120 --> 00:47:19,240 Speaker 1: he did get up and say that, yeah, you probably, 806 00:47:19,520 --> 00:47:22,080 Speaker 1: I mean, he probably just wanted to get a reactionize 807 00:47:22,880 --> 00:47:26,680 Speaker 1: no one can be that misguided too. Well, he I 808 00:47:27,080 --> 00:47:29,560 Speaker 1: don't think he was misguided. He actually said so. He 809 00:47:29,640 --> 00:47:32,400 Speaker 1: said the reason why they should be if they it 810 00:47:32,440 --> 00:47:34,680 Speaker 1: should be illegal for them to own it is because 811 00:47:34,719 --> 00:47:37,080 Speaker 1: they believe it takes power from the U. S. Government 812 00:47:37,200 --> 00:47:40,640 Speaker 1: or the the US dollar, the petro dollar, which weakens 813 00:47:40,719 --> 00:47:44,000 Speaker 1: our stance to give sanctions to countries like Iran. And 814 00:47:44,080 --> 00:47:47,360 Speaker 1: he specifically mentioned them. Um so he said he he 815 00:47:47,440 --> 00:47:50,040 Speaker 1: knows exactly what he said. Um, but I think that 816 00:47:50,120 --> 00:47:53,040 Speaker 1: gives fuel to Iran. So they're like, well, heck if this, 817 00:47:53,320 --> 00:47:54,759 Speaker 1: if this takes away the part of the U. S 818 00:47:54,800 --> 00:47:58,560 Speaker 1: to slap sanctions, and we're all for it, right, So yeah, 819 00:47:58,680 --> 00:48:01,759 Speaker 1: I mean you obvious need to take a step back 820 00:48:01,880 --> 00:48:04,759 Speaker 1: and see how this is more likely to play out 821 00:48:04,880 --> 00:48:09,000 Speaker 1: because yeah, and for the time being, nations, the states 822 00:48:09,000 --> 00:48:12,359 Speaker 1: are in a competition, right and we see this play 823 00:48:12,400 --> 00:48:14,920 Speaker 1: out right now in a very specific way, i e. 824 00:48:15,360 --> 00:48:20,239 Speaker 1: Nonsense like what New York did with the bit licensed 825 00:48:20,360 --> 00:48:23,000 Speaker 1: people will just leave New York and exclude New York 826 00:48:23,040 --> 00:48:27,160 Speaker 1: City business for participating and or just decide entirely have 827 00:48:27,320 --> 00:48:30,279 Speaker 1: we don't want to play with US citizens. So if 828 00:48:30,320 --> 00:48:33,000 Speaker 1: you carry this forward, Um, if you have done the 829 00:48:33,080 --> 00:48:35,520 Speaker 1: same things like yeah, we don't trust this internet thing, 830 00:48:35,560 --> 00:48:38,640 Speaker 1: we don't let us people have access to the internet. 831 00:48:38,960 --> 00:48:41,200 Speaker 1: Can you imagine that happening and how we would be 832 00:48:42,440 --> 00:48:45,840 Speaker 1: competitively in the world today, right, and it's no different, 833 00:48:45,920 --> 00:48:48,960 Speaker 1: it's actually worse by several orders of magnitude. What I 834 00:48:49,040 --> 00:48:52,720 Speaker 1: mean by that is, so not only is block BLOKTI 835 00:48:52,800 --> 00:48:56,680 Speaker 1: based solutions going to dirupt a disrupt value transfer, but 836 00:48:57,160 --> 00:49:01,960 Speaker 1: because of the decentralized nature, A will disrupt anything that 837 00:49:02,320 --> 00:49:05,439 Speaker 1: came out of the decentralized Internet. And then we see 838 00:49:05,480 --> 00:49:09,360 Speaker 1: already the beginnings of that right now. But obviously things 839 00:49:09,480 --> 00:49:13,280 Speaker 1: like Google and Facebook and the way they create money 840 00:49:13,440 --> 00:49:16,480 Speaker 1: for their shareholders that shouldn't have been allowed in the 841 00:49:16,600 --> 00:49:19,520 Speaker 1: first place. Right the Internet is the commons, and no 842 00:49:19,640 --> 00:49:22,239 Speaker 1: one should be allowed to filter it and then aggregate 843 00:49:22,440 --> 00:49:27,000 Speaker 1: content for their own purpose, and specifically not in a 844 00:49:27,160 --> 00:49:30,560 Speaker 1: various way by by selling data. And now that's pretty 845 00:49:30,640 --> 00:49:35,200 Speaker 1: much accepted wisdom, I'd say, But um, coming back to 846 00:49:35,280 --> 00:49:39,640 Speaker 1: this topic of competitiveness, we can already see this play 847 00:49:39,760 --> 00:49:42,560 Speaker 1: out right now here and there, with other jurs addictions 848 00:49:42,600 --> 00:49:47,040 Speaker 1: being faster to adopt more appropriate regulations if any or 849 00:49:47,239 --> 00:49:50,919 Speaker 1: simply saying we are hands off, or tell everybody, well, 850 00:49:51,360 --> 00:49:54,200 Speaker 1: but we just treat these as digital commodities, as in 851 00:49:54,280 --> 00:49:56,560 Speaker 1: the case of Canada and so forth. So if I 852 00:49:56,680 --> 00:49:58,960 Speaker 1: asked you, if I asked you to give me your 853 00:49:59,000 --> 00:50:03,360 Speaker 1: outlook for the the world, but the US, where the 854 00:50:03,480 --> 00:50:05,200 Speaker 1: U s fits into the world over the next couple 855 00:50:05,200 --> 00:50:07,759 Speaker 1: of years. It sounds like you're optimistic. You think the 856 00:50:07,840 --> 00:50:09,919 Speaker 1: US is going to get on board and not push 857 00:50:10,000 --> 00:50:13,320 Speaker 1: too much of this stuff overseas. I think that was 858 00:50:13,600 --> 00:50:17,200 Speaker 1: already left behind and that's only going to continue. Um Well, 859 00:50:17,360 --> 00:50:20,280 Speaker 1: a lot of damage I think has already been done. 860 00:50:21,080 --> 00:50:25,200 Speaker 1: Um I think at this stage just can still be undone. 861 00:50:25,600 --> 00:50:28,319 Speaker 1: I don't really like to think in nation state terms. 862 00:50:28,400 --> 00:50:31,279 Speaker 1: I don't think they're used for organizing principle at this 863 00:50:31,560 --> 00:50:34,520 Speaker 1: moment in time for humanity and because we're facing so 864 00:50:34,640 --> 00:50:40,759 Speaker 1: many global problems. But um again, I'm a technologist at heart, 865 00:50:40,920 --> 00:50:45,560 Speaker 1: and so I'm eternally optimistic when it comes to the 866 00:50:46,400 --> 00:50:49,920 Speaker 1: the ability of technology to solve every problem that we're facing. 867 00:50:51,200 --> 00:50:54,040 Speaker 1: And that's kind of my focus. So to that extent, 868 00:50:54,200 --> 00:50:57,680 Speaker 1: I think it will always start, um with efficient data 869 00:50:57,800 --> 00:51:01,600 Speaker 1: distributions or information distribution. I think once we solve that, 870 00:51:02,000 --> 00:51:05,800 Speaker 1: it will kind of dissolve a lot of these misconceptions 871 00:51:05,840 --> 00:51:11,640 Speaker 1: because um, if if you will, all these misconceptions are 872 00:51:11,800 --> 00:51:14,920 Speaker 1: all these ideas that I'm I'm an American, I'm in 873 00:51:15,040 --> 00:51:19,960 Speaker 1: Indian and whatever. Those are all just indoctrinated. Indoctrinations were 874 00:51:20,040 --> 00:51:22,120 Speaker 1: just to say beliefs. If we just let go of that, 875 00:51:22,239 --> 00:51:24,920 Speaker 1: we're all pretty much the same as humans. And so 876 00:51:25,760 --> 00:51:29,840 Speaker 1: if you have the technology to to actually disseminate that information, like, 877 00:51:30,200 --> 00:51:35,480 Speaker 1: the more you travel, typically more accepting of other nations, right, 878 00:51:35,600 --> 00:51:38,959 Speaker 1: that's what you find. And and the more you learn 879 00:51:39,120 --> 00:51:42,720 Speaker 1: and general about how the world works and what's important, 880 00:51:42,719 --> 00:51:46,080 Speaker 1: the more accepting you are, the more collaborative you are. 881 00:51:46,440 --> 00:51:50,799 Speaker 1: And that's the winning formula, right, And that's why at 882 00:51:50,840 --> 00:51:54,800 Speaker 1: the heart of this particular development is open source technology. 883 00:51:54,960 --> 00:51:57,560 Speaker 1: What's open source technology? There's a bunch of people that 884 00:51:57,719 --> 00:52:00,640 Speaker 1: don't know each other, from from all around the world 885 00:52:01,000 --> 00:52:05,360 Speaker 1: that collaborate to one particular purpose. Why are they doing that? 886 00:52:06,640 --> 00:52:10,520 Speaker 1: What's the internsing momtive? Because simply because a they can 887 00:52:11,200 --> 00:52:14,920 Speaker 1: and be it just excites them to see that particular 888 00:52:15,040 --> 00:52:18,400 Speaker 1: thing in the world. And so you can't stop this 889 00:52:18,760 --> 00:52:22,640 Speaker 1: with a nation state. You can stop this regulation, you 890 00:52:22,960 --> 00:52:26,480 Speaker 1: can't stop this with government created money. Right. What they're 891 00:52:26,480 --> 00:52:30,000 Speaker 1: gonna they're gonna try, but it's unstoppable. Yeah, And to me, 892 00:52:30,160 --> 00:52:33,200 Speaker 1: I mean it's unconstitutional to try because at the end 893 00:52:33,280 --> 00:52:36,439 Speaker 1: of the day. I mean, any currency should be free. 894 00:52:36,520 --> 00:52:40,440 Speaker 1: I mean, what's the greater expression of your freedom, freedom 895 00:52:40,480 --> 00:52:44,000 Speaker 1: of expression than allocating your wealth your funds. It's more 896 00:52:44,080 --> 00:52:46,279 Speaker 1: than state. The state is always going to want to 897 00:52:46,360 --> 00:52:48,839 Speaker 1: try to control that trade because they're always gonna want 898 00:52:48,840 --> 00:52:51,919 Speaker 1: their money, right. Yeah. But what shines through there, though, 899 00:52:52,160 --> 00:52:56,880 Speaker 1: is this idea that government's identities there aren't they're functions 900 00:52:56,920 --> 00:52:59,600 Speaker 1: of society. So that's another thing that we need to 901 00:52:59,680 --> 00:53:03,960 Speaker 1: get back to, realizing that governments are to serve societies. 902 00:53:05,120 --> 00:53:10,200 Speaker 1: Now we created all these like quote unquote entities and institutions. 903 00:53:10,360 --> 00:53:13,080 Speaker 1: There aren't institutions, there are functions of societies. If we 904 00:53:13,560 --> 00:53:17,000 Speaker 1: realize that this is the case, then we can replace 905 00:53:17,120 --> 00:53:20,000 Speaker 1: most of them with technology. Because there's a lot of 906 00:53:20,080 --> 00:53:23,239 Speaker 1: these entities that we're that we created, that we that 907 00:53:23,400 --> 00:53:26,040 Speaker 1: we keep alive for no particular reason, right, I mean, 908 00:53:26,080 --> 00:53:29,920 Speaker 1: they shouldn't exist and like nonsense, like the internal revenue, 909 00:53:29,920 --> 00:53:32,879 Speaker 1: so it should not exist. The The idea of how 910 00:53:33,080 --> 00:53:40,240 Speaker 1: we implement our taxation system um by basically penalizing production 911 00:53:41,000 --> 00:53:45,520 Speaker 1: has been has been accepted wisdom since the eighties that 912 00:53:45,719 --> 00:53:49,040 Speaker 1: this is not a really useful system to have because 913 00:53:49,360 --> 00:53:52,480 Speaker 1: it's causing what we call a lot of a lot 914 00:53:52,520 --> 00:53:57,040 Speaker 1: of partial parts of the money law doing things. But well, yeah, 915 00:53:57,160 --> 00:54:01,520 Speaker 1: if you if you tax Apple because they happen to 916 00:54:01,600 --> 00:54:05,239 Speaker 1: be in Crepitine all about, they can create entity in 917 00:54:05,320 --> 00:54:09,839 Speaker 1: island to other ones and then uh slash the text 918 00:54:09,920 --> 00:54:12,120 Speaker 1: boat and half of course they need to do that, right, 919 00:54:12,160 --> 00:54:15,040 Speaker 1: I mean what we would be gross negligent not to 920 00:54:15,200 --> 00:54:19,160 Speaker 1: do that. So what what you're really doing as you're incentivizing, 921 00:54:19,880 --> 00:54:24,480 Speaker 1: um those entities and the most productive people typically of 922 00:54:24,640 --> 00:54:28,840 Speaker 1: societies to look elsewhere. Right, So we have a and 923 00:54:28,960 --> 00:54:31,400 Speaker 1: that's and that's uh. And and that's why blockchain or 924 00:54:31,440 --> 00:54:33,719 Speaker 1: bitcoin and blockchain is so interesting because you have to 925 00:54:33,760 --> 00:54:37,040 Speaker 1: be so multifaceted, and one is on philosophy. And that's 926 00:54:37,040 --> 00:54:40,759 Speaker 1: where a lot of these policymakers and economist miss is 927 00:54:40,800 --> 00:54:44,239 Speaker 1: they don't understand human incentive. They try to organize everything, 928 00:54:44,280 --> 00:54:47,160 Speaker 1: but they missed that big piece of incentive. Um And 929 00:54:47,320 --> 00:54:50,279 Speaker 1: so you've nailed that, um Man. This has been an 930 00:54:50,280 --> 00:54:53,680 Speaker 1: awesome conversation. Uh, these are the parts that I really 931 00:54:53,800 --> 00:54:55,839 Speaker 1: enjoy about this space. So I could just talk about 932 00:54:55,840 --> 00:54:58,160 Speaker 1: it forever, and I know we've gone way longer than 933 00:54:58,480 --> 00:55:00,120 Speaker 1: you had agreed to come on for and every they 934 00:55:00,120 --> 00:55:04,120 Speaker 1: appreciate you taking the time. Um, it's been it's been great. 935 00:55:04,680 --> 00:55:07,919 Speaker 1: UM shared some really good information, some good food for thought. 936 00:55:08,880 --> 00:55:11,080 Speaker 1: But I want to I want to respect your time now, UM, 937 00:55:11,560 --> 00:55:13,560 Speaker 1: because you're so interesting. I'm sure other people want to know. 938 00:55:13,600 --> 00:55:17,239 Speaker 1: Is there are a place they can keep up with you. Well. 939 00:55:17,440 --> 00:55:20,359 Speaker 1: So I've been working on this long time project which 940 00:55:20,400 --> 00:55:23,120 Speaker 1: I called my book project. Although I'm not entirely sure 941 00:55:23,160 --> 00:55:25,319 Speaker 1: whoever result in the book at this point in time, 942 00:55:25,360 --> 00:55:28,480 Speaker 1: because I started this fourteen years ago, but it was 943 00:55:28,600 --> 00:55:31,279 Speaker 1: right after I realized that we never got around to 944 00:55:31,320 --> 00:55:33,239 Speaker 1: actually finish what we set out to do, which is 945 00:55:33,280 --> 00:55:35,680 Speaker 1: to build the worldwide weapon. Instead ended up with the 946 00:55:35,760 --> 00:55:40,000 Speaker 1: commercial web. So I started writing an outline on on 947 00:55:40,400 --> 00:55:42,919 Speaker 1: my block it's just my last name came dot com 948 00:55:43,400 --> 00:55:47,120 Speaker 1: a long time ago, and um, as of a year 949 00:55:47,239 --> 00:55:49,480 Speaker 1: or a year and a half ago, I started writing 950 00:55:50,160 --> 00:55:54,520 Speaker 1: an article also every month every other months on Forbes, 951 00:55:54,600 --> 00:55:57,080 Speaker 1: which was basically an outline of one of the chapters 952 00:55:57,200 --> 00:56:00,480 Speaker 1: in in the book. So at this point in time, 953 00:56:00,600 --> 00:56:05,120 Speaker 1: it's obviously largely slanted to watch the centralized system. It 954 00:56:05,200 --> 00:56:09,720 Speaker 1: started out being about the centralized systems, but knowing obviously 955 00:56:09,800 --> 00:56:14,200 Speaker 1: what I now Now with current developments in the blockchain space, 956 00:56:14,320 --> 00:56:19,440 Speaker 1: it's much more sophisticated in in detail oriented. Worse, the 957 00:56:19,520 --> 00:56:23,160 Speaker 1: initial outline was mostly on principle, so it's like fourteen 958 00:56:23,239 --> 00:56:26,239 Speaker 1: principles of how you need to organize information distribution to 959 00:56:26,320 --> 00:56:28,880 Speaker 1: make it sustainable, which to me is that the core 960 00:56:29,000 --> 00:56:31,759 Speaker 1: of most of the problems that we face today. I mean, 961 00:56:32,080 --> 00:56:34,759 Speaker 1: we will summarize that there's fake news, but it goes 962 00:56:34,880 --> 00:56:38,800 Speaker 1: much deeper into the fact that you can basically google 963 00:56:38,880 --> 00:56:43,520 Speaker 1: anything and find your ever so misguided opinion confirmed. And 964 00:56:43,680 --> 00:56:46,719 Speaker 1: it doesn't matter if the world is flat or um. 965 00:56:46,920 --> 00:56:49,759 Speaker 1: You have whatever name you want to assign to your 966 00:56:50,719 --> 00:56:54,760 Speaker 1: respective and visible friend, right. Uh. And that that's obviously 967 00:56:54,840 --> 00:56:58,520 Speaker 1: true because there's so many people that subscribed to the idea. 968 00:56:58,600 --> 00:57:02,480 Speaker 1: So I kind of adapted the opposite means. If if 969 00:57:02,480 --> 00:57:04,440 Speaker 1: a lot of people think that's the right thing, is 970 00:57:04,440 --> 00:57:08,399 Speaker 1: probably wrong. So I set a lot of people eat 971 00:57:08,440 --> 00:57:12,239 Speaker 1: that McDonald's, that's probably not the right thing to do, right. 972 00:57:12,960 --> 00:57:15,840 Speaker 1: That's one of the highlight examples. But um, yeah, so 973 00:57:16,000 --> 00:57:20,480 Speaker 1: to that extent might be, I always like to get 974 00:57:20,520 --> 00:57:23,680 Speaker 1: feedback on the stuff that I published there on on forps, 975 00:57:23,720 --> 00:57:25,720 Speaker 1: the only thing that I once in a while published 976 00:57:25,720 --> 00:57:27,880 Speaker 1: an article because it's not the right venue on forps, 977 00:57:28,680 --> 00:57:33,200 Speaker 1: publishes on on linked In, but I'm not much otherwise 978 00:57:34,160 --> 00:57:37,240 Speaker 1: present on on social media. I think I tweet maybe 979 00:57:37,320 --> 00:57:41,800 Speaker 1: every three weeks of that and then mostly too like 980 00:57:41,920 --> 00:57:43,440 Speaker 1: a now and say, we have a meet up, but 981 00:57:43,480 --> 00:57:46,520 Speaker 1: does anybody want to talk about the Centristic exchanges or 982 00:57:47,800 --> 00:57:51,720 Speaker 1: game technologies or whatever. Right, well, I'll get some links 983 00:57:51,760 --> 00:57:53,440 Speaker 1: to those in the show notes and as far as 984 00:57:53,480 --> 00:57:55,200 Speaker 1: your meet up, so I'd love to come since we're 985 00:57:55,400 --> 00:57:57,800 Speaker 1: both in the local area, so I definitely want to 986 00:57:57,840 --> 00:58:00,760 Speaker 1: stay more in touch with you on that um. But 987 00:58:01,560 --> 00:58:03,600 Speaker 1: we'll go ahead and wrap it up. Thanks so much 988 00:58:03,640 --> 00:58:06,680 Speaker 1: for joining the Market Disruptors Podcast. Hey, if you like 989 00:58:06,880 --> 00:58:10,440 Speaker 1: this episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast, please help us 990 00:58:10,520 --> 00:58:12,920 Speaker 1: take this to the top of the podcast charts. Just 991 00:58:13,040 --> 00:58:16,080 Speaker 1: please do me a favor and rate review and subscribe. 992 00:58:16,320 --> 00:58:19,040 Speaker 1: Taking fifteen seconds to just leave a quick review goes 993 00:58:19,120 --> 00:58:21,400 Speaker 1: a long way and helping us reach more people and 994 00:58:21,560 --> 00:58:24,680 Speaker 1: disrupt more markets. I really appreciate you listening and I'll 995 00:58:24,680 --> 00:58:27,000 Speaker 1: see you next time on the Market Disruptors Podcast.