Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. If you're like me
Speaker 1: and suffer from insomnia, you know what, that's not fun.
Speaker 1: You know I tried everything I couldn't get a good
Speaker 1: night's sleep. And this is neither drug nor alcohol induced.
Speaker 1: That's right. It is my pillow. Mike Lindell invented it
Speaker 1: and he fitted me for my first my pillow, and
Speaker 1: it's changed my life. I fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer,
Speaker 1: and the good news you can too, Lea. Go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com promo code Sean and take advantage
Speaker 1: of one of Mike Glendell's best offers, his special four pack.
Speaker 1: You get fifty percent off to my Pillow Premium Pillows
Speaker 1: to go Anywhere Pillows. My Pillows made in the USA,
Speaker 1: has a sixty day unconditional money back guaranteed no risk
Speaker 1: to you, and attend you warranty. You don't want to
Speaker 1: spend more sleepless nights on a pillow tossing interney that's
Speaker 1: not working for you. Just go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com right now, use the promo code Sean and you
Speaker 1: get Mike Glendell's special four pack. You get to my
Speaker 1: Pillow Premium Pillows to go Anywhere pillows fifty percent off,
Speaker 1: and you'll start getting the kind of peaceful and RESTful
Speaker 1: and comfortable and deep, peeling and recruitative sleep you've been
Speaker 1: craving and deserve my pillow dot Com promo coach on.
Speaker 1: All right, what a breaking newsday this is on all fronts.
Speaker 1: We've got it all covered for you. Amazing numbers on
Speaker 1: the economy literally is an overdrive, and records of being set.
Speaker 1: Will go over all of those with you. We've got
Speaker 1: two big breaking Deep States spygate stories to pass on
Speaker 1: to you, one from Sarah Carter one from John Solomon,
Speaker 1: will go over all the details. Even Lindsay Graham now
Speaker 1: is pressing the ever so conflicted Rod Rosenstein to recuse
Speaker 1: himself from this whole you know, Russia Gate bologny that
Speaker 1: we have. So we'll get to that and much more.
Speaker 1: But it's back on the June twelve Singapore summit with
Speaker 1: the President and Kim Jiang Un is on. The President
Speaker 1: literally just got out of the White House maybe fifteen
Speaker 1: minutes ago. Remember this is the first time in eighteen
Speaker 1: years a North Korean high ranking official has been in
Speaker 1: the United States and they've been meeting in New York
Speaker 1: with Mike Pompeo, the Secretary of State, now meeting in
Speaker 1: the White House with President Trump. President Trump went to
Speaker 1: the cameras. Here's some of what he had to say.
Speaker 1: We'll play a little of this and then I'll give
Speaker 1: you the details. This question will be UH. Meeting on
Speaker 1: June twelfth and Singapore went very well. It's really it
Speaker 1: gets to know you kind of a situation. UH. Mike
Speaker 1: has spent two days. UH who it is. We've gotten
Speaker 1: to know their people very well, and we will you
Speaker 1: people are gonna have to travel because you'll be in
Speaker 1: Singapore June twelfth. UH. And I think it'll be a process.
Speaker 1: It's not I never said it goes in one meeting.
Speaker 1: I think it's going to be a process. But the
Speaker 1: relationships are building and that's a very positive Mr. Per
Speaker 1: what's your sense of what the North Koreans are willing
Speaker 1: to do on the issue of the nuclearization? Are they well,
Speaker 1: I wanted I think they want to do that. I
Speaker 1: don't I know they want to do that. They want
Speaker 1: other things along the line. They want to develop as
Speaker 1: a country. That's going to happen. I have no doubt.
Speaker 1: Japan is involved, as you know, and South Korea is
Speaker 1: very much involved. We're involved in terms of getting everything
Speaker 1: everybody wants the United States, so we're going to help
Speaker 1: in the process very much. Without us, it wouldn't happen.
Speaker 1: But I think that you see a lot of very
Speaker 1: positive things, including with China. I think you see a
Speaker 1: lot of very positive things happening with President she who
Speaker 1: is helped me quite a bit with this. So we'll
Speaker 1: see where it leaves. But we're gonna be June twelfth,
Speaker 1: will be in Singapore. It will be a beginning. I
Speaker 1: don't say, and I've never said it happens in one meeting.
Speaker 1: You're talking about years of hostility, years of problems. He
Speaker 1: is a really hatred between so many different nations. But
Speaker 1: I think you're gonna have a very positive result in
Speaker 1: the end, not from one meeting. Didn't give you that. Ever,
Speaker 1: you want to appear that they appear to question your
Speaker 1: question their sincerity in your letter to Kim John last week.
Speaker 1: Have they gone far enough now? Well, my my letter
Speaker 1: was a response to their letter. The media forgot that,
Speaker 1: you know, the media said, oh, you had a meeting,
Speaker 1: then you cancel. I didn't cancel the MEETIA and canceled
Speaker 1: in response to a very tough statement. Uh. And I
Speaker 1: think we're over that, totally over that, and now we're
Speaker 1: going to deal and we're going to really start a process.
Speaker 1: We're meeting with the chairman on June twelve, and I
Speaker 1: think it's probably going to be a very successful ultimately
Speaker 1: a successful process. We'll see if you remember what I say.
Speaker 1: We will see what we will see. But I think
Speaker 1: it's going to be a process that we deserve to have.
Speaker 1: I mean, we really deserved. They want it. We think
Speaker 1: it's important, and I think we would be making a
Speaker 1: big mistake if we didn't have it. I think we're
Speaker 1: going to have a relationship and it will start on
Speaker 1: June twelve. Can you get done in one meeting? What
Speaker 1: can you get done on one? This was a meeting,
Speaker 1: come forget. This was a meeting where a letter was
Speaker 1: given to me by Kim Jong Pun. And that letter
Speaker 1: was very nice letter. Oh would you like to see
Speaker 1: what was in that letter? Tell you like how much?
Speaker 1: How much? How much? Give it the labor? It was
Speaker 1: a very interesting letter and at some point I maybe
Speaker 1: it may be appropriate and maybe I'll be able to
Speaker 1: give it to you, maybe you'll be able to see it,
Speaker 1: and maybe fairly soon. But really this was a letter
Speaker 1: presentation that ended up being at to our conversation. Why
Speaker 1: didn't end up point because we found we found the
Speaker 1: whole subject matter very interesting, and because I really think
Speaker 1: they want to do something, and if it's possible, so
Speaker 1: do we put it. I think all we're gonna do
Speaker 1: is be there on June twelve, and we're going to
Speaker 1: see what happens. Mike has been dealing very well to
Speaker 1: have a very good relationship with Mike Puffe or Secretary
Speaker 1: of State UH. It was actually very interesting because this
Speaker 1: was literally going to be the delivery of a letter
Speaker 1: and it ended up being a two hour conversation with UH,
Speaker 1: with the second most powerful men in North Korea. We
Speaker 1: old folks. We talked about almost everything. We talked about
Speaker 1: a lot, and we talked about sanctions. Did they ain't
Speaker 1: read it? With d A. I don't want to say
Speaker 1: that we talked about a lot of things. We really did.
Speaker 1: But the big the big deal will be on June twelve.
Speaker 1: And again it's a process. It doesn't go We're not
Speaker 1: going to sign it We're not going to go in
Speaker 1: and sign something on June twelve, and we never were.
Speaker 1: We're going to start a process. And I told them today,
Speaker 1: take your time. You can go fast, we can go slowly.
Speaker 1: But I think they'd like to see something happen. And
Speaker 1: if we can work that out, that would be good.
Speaker 1: But if the process will begin on June twelve in Singapore,
Speaker 1: do you believe it is committed to be new? Yeah?
Speaker 1: I do think so. He'd like to see it happened.
Speaker 1: He just wants to be careful. He wants to be Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, he's not gonna run and do things. But
Speaker 1: I told him to be honest with you. Look, we
Speaker 1: have sanctions on their very powerful sanctions. We would not
Speaker 1: take sanctions off unless they do that. But the sanctions
Speaker 1: are very powerful. You've seen how powerful in other ways.
Speaker 1: You're going to see how powerful sanctions are when it
Speaker 1: comes to Iran. You see what that's doing to Iran.
Speaker 1: So we have sanctions on and uh, at a certain point,
Speaker 1: I'll tell what I look forward to the day when
Speaker 1: I can take the sanctions off of North Korea. And
Speaker 1: about human rights today and you effected I did not
Speaker 1: talk about human rights, you bet to talk about n
Speaker 1: fall could speak, Yeah, could be. I think we probably
Speaker 1: will and maybe a great detail. We did not talk
Speaker 1: about human rights, Yeah we did. We talked about Yes,
Speaker 1: they asked about sanctions. Excuse me, pressure over the kid's
Speaker 1: going to remain what it is now. I don't even
Speaker 1: want to use the term maximum sure anymore because I
Speaker 1: don't want to use that term because we're getting along.
Speaker 1: You see, the relationship we're getting along says that a
Speaker 1: question of maximum pressure staying essentially the way it is
Speaker 1: at some point hopefully a deal for the good of
Speaker 1: millions of people, a deal will be work. When you're
Speaker 1: describe the state of relations now between the United States here,
Speaker 1: because it gets a little repetitive as it was literally
Speaker 1: happening just before we're coming on the air here. Um.
Speaker 1: You know, for all of the destroyed Trump media, this
Speaker 1: was a breakup letter, um, and all of their predictions
Speaker 1: that when the President was calling Kim Jong on little
Speaker 1: rocket Man, when it was firing rockets over Japan and
Speaker 1: threatening Guam and the entire region in the Korean Peninsula,
Speaker 1: and and even threatening to you know, nuke the United States,
Speaker 1: the continental United States and Hawaii on Highler and all
Speaker 1: that had happened. Well, what did the President do? He
Speaker 1: puts ancients in place. The President put you know, neighbor
Speaker 1: navy striker forces right off the coast of North Korea.
Speaker 1: It was a strong show of our military strength. And
Speaker 1: even though he was openly mocking Kim Jong un uh, interestingly,
Speaker 1: look at where we are now. There's no more missiles
Speaker 1: being fired over Japan. Guama is not in jeopardy, the
Speaker 1: region is not in jeopardy. Japan is not in jeopardy now.
Speaker 1: They have literally shut down one of their nuclear test sites.
Speaker 1: We know that they are willing to talk about d
Speaker 1: nuclearization because, as you just heard the President say, what
Speaker 1: was supposed to be a hand delivered letter ended up
Speaker 1: being a two plus our meeting. You can see that
Speaker 1: it went very well as the President and the Secretary
Speaker 1: of State Mike POMPEII walked the delegation, the second highest
Speaker 1: ranking individual and North Korea right to his car and
Speaker 1: stayed there the pleasant trees where obvious was on display.
Speaker 1: They were clearly getting along. And we have three hostages
Speaker 1: that have been now brought back safely to our country,
Speaker 1: fellow Americans, And so what are we giving up in
Speaker 1: the process. Nothing? And you know, it's it's so funny that,
Speaker 1: for whatever reason, there's still those on the left in
Speaker 1: this country that they think if you, if you don't
Speaker 1: get on your hands and knees and kiss the ring
Speaker 1: or the ass of a dictator, that somehow you're gonna
Speaker 1: cause a war. And in spite of every historical, modern day,
Speaker 1: historical lesson that is out there, there's still a belief
Speaker 1: that that somehow we can bribe our way into making
Speaker 1: dictatorships and and despots and and Malah's and Iran like
Speaker 1: us if we just give them money. I mean, the
Speaker 1: President Trump did not fly into North Korea, you know,
Speaker 1: plain low, it's cargo planes full of cash and other currencies.
Speaker 1: He put sanctions in place, he showed military force, he
Speaker 1: mocked little rocket Man. Everybody predicted the opposite would happen,
Speaker 1: and here we are, and as the President just said,
Speaker 1: the possibility that millions of people in the world will
Speaker 1: have a better life, and that clearly Kim Jong un
Speaker 1: got the message. Now, there's no guarantee that this is
Speaker 1: gonna work out ultimately, in the end, I would say
Speaker 1: the odds are a lot higher today than they were
Speaker 1: than they've ever been. You know, Bill Clinton is a
Speaker 1: good deal for the American people. When Bill Clinton, in fact,
Speaker 1: you know, tried to bribe Kim Jong UN's father, Tim
Speaker 1: Jong O with with what energy subsidies billions of dollars. No,
Speaker 1: that didn't work out well. Because they have a nuclear program.
Speaker 1: They started the ballistic missile program. They were testing their
Speaker 1: ballistic missiles. They were saber rattling around the entire world.
Speaker 1: You know, a little unknown fact. And and part of
Speaker 1: this equation that never gets brought up is that, you know,
Speaker 1: if you go back and look at the relationship that
Speaker 1: the President has built with the president of China, China
Speaker 1: is playing a big role behind the scenes here in China.
Speaker 1: You know, now the president everyone's worried about trade wars,
Speaker 1: trade wars and and terrorists, and the President slapping tariffs
Speaker 1: on Europe and in Canada and Mexico. I'm telling you
Speaker 1: how this is all gonna end. It's gonna end with
Speaker 1: a better trade deal for the United States. And the
Speaker 1: President is a constant negotiator. I think one of the
Speaker 1: other best things he just said there is that this
Speaker 1: is not gonna We're not signing an agreement or a deal.
Speaker 1: On June the twelfth, and Singapore. He reminded everybody this
Speaker 1: is going to now be a process and even said
Speaker 1: that he sent word back that it could be as
Speaker 1: fast or as slow as as you want this to be.
Speaker 1: Where ready to roll. Obviously, Japan, South Korea and China
Speaker 1: are gonna be playing a role in all of this.
Speaker 1: And you know the fact that we've gotten as much
Speaker 1: as we have gotten, the fact that the president was
Speaker 1: willing to walk away from the deal member the day
Speaker 1: after he said no June twelfth summit immediately north the way, Well, sorry,
Speaker 1: we didn't mean that. It is the It is the
Speaker 1: very definition of peace through strength or trust and verify.
Speaker 1: It is the Reagan doctrine, and it always works or
Speaker 1: for Churchill, work for Reagan, It's gonna work for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And don't think that the Iranians and all of this
Speaker 1: are not paying very very close attention because they know
Speaker 1: that these sanctions now have been slapped on them, and
Speaker 1: they know that their younger population is more savvy than
Speaker 1: than probably ever before, and they would like their chance
Speaker 1: at freedom. With only a kite, a husky and wet hempstring,
Speaker 1: Benjamin Franklin captured ening in a bottle over two d
Speaker 1: and sixty years later, with a little resourcefulness, ingenuity, and grit,
Speaker 1: we're not only capturing energy from the sun and wind,
Speaker 1: we're starring it, ensuring Americans have the energy they need
Speaker 1: whenever they need it. Learn more about the nation's leader
Speaker 1: and energy storage at next Era energy dot Com. All Right,
Speaker 1: as we roll along, Happy Friday, Sean Hannity Show. We're
Speaker 1: gonna spend an hour today with Greg Jarrett and Sarah Carter.
Speaker 1: Why because there's a tremendous breaking news. I'll get into
Speaker 1: this at the bottom of the next hour. Look, the
Speaker 1: President announces the June twelve summit is on. There is
Speaker 1: every indications. Look, the President's already one into a huge concessions.
Speaker 1: American hostages are back, missiles aren't being fired. One nuclear
Speaker 1: launch site has been, you know, literally shut down, and
Speaker 1: they're inviting the Western world to see it. North Korea.
Speaker 1: And so we're making a tremendous progress. Haven't given up nothing,
Speaker 1: the president. All right, you they got a little cute
Speaker 1: with their language. The President says, I'm out. No, please wait.
Speaker 1: And now, after a week of meetings in New York,
Speaker 1: second highest ranking official powerful man in North Korea meeting
Speaker 1: with Mike Pompeo now with the President for two hours today.
Speaker 1: It's huge, it's and it's good for the world. You
Speaker 1: know what that means for Democrats. That's bad news for
Speaker 1: Democrats because the president does well on foreign policy. They
Speaker 1: predicted he'd start World War three. They were freaked out
Speaker 1: that he called Kim Jong on little rocket man. They
Speaker 1: couldn't handle it because he wasn't kissing his ass and
Speaker 1: kissing his ring and and sending over cargo planes full
Speaker 1: of cash, which is their predictable way of dealing with dictators.
Speaker 1: And now we've got a shot at peace in the
Speaker 1: Korean peninsula. It's an amazing development. Now, on top of that,
Speaker 1: we had amazing news today on the economy. Let's see
Speaker 1: job creation beat expectations. Oh, when the president's water. I
Speaker 1: can't wait for the job numbers today. He may have
Speaker 1: broken the law. He may he can't. It broke protocol.
Speaker 1: He didn't give out what the numbers we said, I
Speaker 1: can't wait for them. You're gonna give any indication he knew.
Speaker 1: And that's how uptight Frank oh Man that the left
Speaker 1: is for them for Donald Trump to succeed. I'll give
Speaker 1: you these economic numbers when we get back. That means
Speaker 1: political death for them, because after eight years of Obama,
Speaker 1: he's fixing the economy and he's showing that his tough
Speaker 1: stance on foreign policy leads to greater peace. By the way,
Speaker 1: the President now announcing the June twelfth summit. Back off,
Speaker 1: We've got other stuff on the deep state. We're gonna
Speaker 1: break as well today. Busy newsday. Stay with us right
Speaker 1: as we kick off our Friday. Glad you're with us.
Speaker 1: Such a busy, breaking newsday. We've got the President meeting
Speaker 1: with the second most powerful man in North Korea today
Speaker 1: and a hand delivered message from Little Rocketman Kim Jong
Speaker 1: in the June twelve Singapore summit is on. No other
Speaker 1: news we have on the deep state we'll get to
Speaker 1: in a second. And we have the i G Report
Speaker 1: that we expect now is coming out next week. So
Speaker 1: much happening, so much now, what is interesting beyond the
Speaker 1: i G report. Just to give you one little preview
Speaker 1: of coming attractions. Remember the i G Inspector General Michael
Speaker 1: Hararts doesn't have the power to you know, convene a
Speaker 1: grand jury, but there will be criminal referrals. Remember he
Speaker 1: released the report on Andrew McCabe and Andrew McCabe lying,
Speaker 1: and that also then became a criminal referral. Well, I
Speaker 1: would suspect, and I do suspect, and I do believe,
Speaker 1: and I'm kind of pretty confident that that's going to
Speaker 1: happen as a result of his report, which comes out
Speaker 1: next week. I want to go back to some other news.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is huge on North Korea. It's massive news,
Speaker 1: and just because everybody has been so wrong. But on
Speaker 1: top of that, you just you gotta look at these
Speaker 1: numbers and they are staggering. You know, if you think
Speaker 1: back in the election, what was I talking about every
Speaker 1: single solitary day? And if you've been with me that long,
Speaker 1: you know you probably can recite them. You know, under
Speaker 1: Barack Obama eight years as our president, we added thirty
Speaker 1: million more Americans to the food stamp rolls. Eight million
Speaker 1: more Americans ended up in poverty, the lowest labor participation
Speaker 1: rate since the nineteen seventies, the lowest home ownership rate
Speaker 1: since the nineteen went in fifty one years, let's put
Speaker 1: it that way. We know that it was the worst
Speaker 1: recovery since the forties. We know that Obama, who said
Speaker 1: nine trillion dollars in That is irresponsible and I'm patriotic.
Speaker 1: Away Bush has done it over the last eight years
Speaker 1: is to take out a credit card from the Bank
Speaker 1: of China in the name of our children, driving up
Speaker 1: our national debt so that we now have over nine
Speaker 1: trillion dollars responsible, irresponsible, unpatriotic, unpatriotic. Well, that was him,
Speaker 1: because he took on more debt than every other president
Speaker 1: before him combined. That's the legacy of Barack Obama. Now
Speaker 1: I any time in our history. It's just it's so
Speaker 1: counterintuitive to what the left believes. Like the left believes,
Speaker 1: unless you're kissing the ass of a dictator and kissing
Speaker 1: their ring and giving them money, bribing them, than they're
Speaker 1: never gonna like you. If we're only a little nicer
Speaker 1: to them, they'll be nicer to us. That philosophy fails
Speaker 1: every single time. You know, we've played comparisons of Neville
Speaker 1: Chamberlain and and Winston Churchill. Now we won't play it. Now.
Speaker 1: We played comparisons of Jimmy Carter versus Ronald Reagan and
Speaker 1: piece through strength and Clinton and Obama versus now Donald
Speaker 1: Trump and Ronald Reagan. This this is so, it is
Speaker 1: so crystal clear it's the same. On the economy, Larry
Speaker 1: Cuddler probably wrote the defining book about how the Kennedy
Speaker 1: tax cuts. Yeah, John F. Kennedy Democrat cut taxes. Talked
Speaker 1: about the stifling you know, bureaucracy and and and high
Speaker 1: regulations and over regulation and taxation and the impact that
Speaker 1: has the negative impact on on business formation and opportunity
Speaker 1: for people in this country. You know, you had this president.
Speaker 1: You know, he's negotiating with every car company individually, and
Speaker 1: he's negotiating with every even air conditioned companies, and he's
Speaker 1: pressuring them, don't go to Mexico. And we're gonna make
Speaker 1: the economic environment better, and we're gonna end needless regulation,
Speaker 1: and then we're gonna and burden some you know regulation ship.
Speaker 1: And then we're gonna end high taxation, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: incentivize you to build your factories here. And we have
Speaker 1: all these people that have been out of work, in poverty,
Speaker 1: on food stamps, that are dying for opportunities rather than
Speaker 1: you taking the jobs to Mexico or some other place.
Speaker 1: And it works. And on the President saying all right,
Speaker 1: for all you companies that multinationals out there that have
Speaker 1: been parking your money in safe havens, tax safe havens,
Speaker 1: Will you bring your money back at a low rate. Well,
Speaker 1: that means they're not gonna put it in a bank somewhere,
Speaker 1: they're gonna invest it. Well, Greg Corporation, Oh, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: Shell corporations. According to everybody that reports on any LLC,
Speaker 1: which is ridiculous. Well, those companies hire people. Those company
Speaker 1: build buildings and manufacturing centers and factories, and the forgotten
Speaker 1: men and women which the election was all about. They
Speaker 1: now have their shot at the American dream. Don't they
Speaker 1: deserve their shot? If they want to send their kids
Speaker 1: to a better school, they have the ability, the financial
Speaker 1: ability to do so. You know, most people there wants.
Speaker 1: Their desires, their needs are pretty simple. I think we're
Speaker 1: all the same in this regard. We want a nice
Speaker 1: house in a safe neighborhood, um, you know, with good schools.
Speaker 1: And if we don't have good schools, we want the
Speaker 1: opportunity to send our kids to a good school, maybe
Speaker 1: a private school, you know. We we want to be
Speaker 1: able to take a vacation at least once when your
Speaker 1: kids are young. You you want to take that dumb,
Speaker 1: horrible vacation to Disney. But you know, you gotta do
Speaker 1: it because every kid wants to go to Disney, and
Speaker 1: you want to be able to go out to dinner
Speaker 1: and not say I can't afford a cheeseburger. You know,
Speaker 1: maybe just once a week, once a month, once every
Speaker 1: two months. You don't want to say I can't afford it.
Speaker 1: And we we ought to be able to deliver that
Speaker 1: and more for people. This is the United States of America,
Speaker 1: that's supposed to be the land of milk and honey.
Speaker 1: An opportunity. Well, it's now happening because as it worked
Speaker 1: for Kennedy and as it worked for Reagan, it's now
Speaker 1: working now. Job creation for the month of May we
Speaker 1: added two twenty three thousand new jobs. Unemployment rate fell
Speaker 1: to three point eight percent. We have not seen a
Speaker 1: rate this low since nineteen sixty nine. That's the year
Speaker 1: the New York Mets won the World Series. I can
Speaker 1: tell you the whole line up if you're interested. Jerry
Speaker 1: Grody was the catcher. They're the best pitching staff. Jerry Kuzman,
Speaker 1: Tom Siever, Race the Deckie, Tim McGraw or Tug McGraw.
Speaker 1: Tim McGraw's father was in the Bullpen and cream pool
Speaker 1: Wing Garrett, but Harrelson, I mean Cleon Jones and uh
Speaker 1: uh Tommy A. G And I just Ron Swoboda. Now
Speaker 1: that's how far my mind goes back. African American unemployment
Speaker 1: decreased now from six point six percent, which is already
Speaker 1: a record low, to only five point nine percent. It
Speaker 1: is the first time African American unemployment has ever been
Speaker 1: recorded under six percent in our history. Thank God? How
Speaker 1: great is that? These are amazing numbers. This is this
Speaker 1: is you know, for all the talk by the left,
Speaker 1: how many times have I said this over the years.
Speaker 1: Liberals in this country they claim a monopoly of compassion
Speaker 1: for the poor, for minorities, for women, et cetera. Every
Speaker 1: four years, every two years, that race card is pulled out.
Speaker 1: I've played it enough, you know, Al Gore Republicans, you
Speaker 1: know it goes before a predominantly black audience changes his voice,
Speaker 1: cadence tone. Republicans don't want to count you in the census,
Speaker 1: just lying, you know, James Bird add in two thousand
Speaker 1: and I could trace the history of it. I've done it.
Speaker 1: If you like, Republicans, crosses are going to burn. Add
Speaker 1: by the Democratic Party of Missouri. Look at this. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's a Republican president that is now creating record low
Speaker 1: after record low as it relates to unemployment for African Americans,
Speaker 1: the first time African American unemployment has ever been recorded
Speaker 1: under six percent. Consumer confidence continues to climb a seventeen
Speaker 1: year high. Sixty seven percent of Americans now believe it
Speaker 1: is a good time to find a job. They're right.
Speaker 1: Since Donald Trump was elected and all these swamp creatures
Speaker 1: and sewer creatures thought, you, the American people, we were
Speaker 1: stupid in picking Donald Trump, and we shocked the world
Speaker 1: because here's a guy. He doesn't play by these idiotic,
Speaker 1: ridiculous politically calculating you know, one party resembles another party rules.
Speaker 1: And he's rolled up his sleeves and he goes from
Speaker 1: issue to issue to issue to issue to issue, to
Speaker 1: promise to mus to promise, and he checks him off
Speaker 1: his list, including the largest tax cuts in history. Tried
Speaker 1: like hell to get rid of Obamacare repealing or a
Speaker 1: place you can blame Republicans and the Republican Party for that,
Speaker 1: but even still got rid of the individual mandate. That's
Speaker 1: partly there. We expect a new plan again introduced presidents
Speaker 1: fighting like hell to build the border wall. We are
Speaker 1: now on a path we're producing more energy, more barrels
Speaker 1: of oil than we've ever produced in our history. We
Speaker 1: now have literally the opportunity with all the opening of
Speaker 1: the Dakota pipeline, all these other pipelines, we now have
Speaker 1: an opening to drill in an moir the forty eight
Speaker 1: states off the coast of the Atlantic Coast, Pacific Coast,
Speaker 1: Gulf Coast. Well, it also means high paying career jobs
Speaker 1: for Americans. And if we add fracking to that and
Speaker 1: the President saving the coal industry, well, we're doing amazingly
Speaker 1: well for so many people that are are either in
Speaker 1: the industry or want to be in the industry. Remember
Speaker 1: when we partnered drill here, drill now pay less, and
Speaker 1: we partnered on this program with some of the energy
Speaker 1: companies in North Dakota. And what do we do? We
Speaker 1: people were able to transform their lives. Why do you
Speaker 1: think OPEC, you know, conspired I think to artificially drive
Speaker 1: down prices because they know we have more natural gas,
Speaker 1: more energy resources than they do. And when the new
Speaker 1: Saudi Prince, the Crown Prince was doing is you know, okay,
Speaker 1: we're gonna be different tour in America. I went on
Speaker 1: sixty minutes, etcetera. You notice that he's saying, Yeah, we're
Speaker 1: trying to transfer quickly out of an energy only economy
Speaker 1: because we see it's coming to an end. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is an incredible story. I mean, unemployment now has
Speaker 1: at three that even Trump haters, you know, at cnnner
Speaker 1: swooning and at the New York Times, they can't believe
Speaker 1: it's all happened. And I'm not I'm not making any
Speaker 1: of this up. They literally have to acknowledge that which
Speaker 1: they have been saying has been wrong. New York Times
Speaker 1: literally admitting the economy is so good it defies description. Quote.
Speaker 1: We ran out of words to describe how good the
Speaker 1: job numbers are. The economy is in a sweet spot
Speaker 1: with steady growth, broad improvement in the labor market. The
Speaker 1: senior New York Times economic economics correspondent, Uh, they did
Speaker 1: not want to write that they've been They have been
Speaker 1: part of the overall corrupt, destroy Trump media to bring
Speaker 1: him down. CNN as a headline up, unemployment rate matches
Speaker 1: the lowest point in a half century. Oh, I mean,
Speaker 1: why don't they just put in Trump was right, Guys
Speaker 1: like Hannity were right, and all you never trumpers, all
Speaker 1: you haters in the media, We're ang. You didn't think
Speaker 1: he could win. We did. He didn't think that he
Speaker 1: would deliver on his promises. He's delivering. You know, it's
Speaker 1: funny not only you know, look at the African American
Speaker 1: unemployment rate. I mean it's now at a record low.
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, I would think that maybe people
Speaker 1: that maybe it convinced themselves that conservatives, you know, they
Speaker 1: believe the slye that is told, this false narrative that
Speaker 1: is told every four years. Maybe they don't look at
Speaker 1: it and say, you know, this is good for the country.
Speaker 1: Maybe the Democrats have lied to us only these years.
Speaker 1: How many times have Democrats gone to the black community
Speaker 1: and election years and you never see him again until
Speaker 1: the next election, and they got nothing done. You know,
Speaker 1: President has brought African American unemployment from seven point eight
Speaker 1: to five point nine percent, first time ever under six percent.
Speaker 1: Unemployment benefits fell more than expected as well. That's more
Speaker 1: good news. Look at the jobs created beyond expect patients.
Speaker 1: You know, it's um this month's unemployment numbers being called incredible. Great.
Speaker 1: We ran out of words the New York Times to
Speaker 1: describe how good the jobs numbers are. The economy was
Speaker 1: an overdrive in May. CNBC says it's on fire and
Speaker 1: you know it just what what? He can't even lie
Speaker 1: and say it's bad anymore. Consumers confidence seventeen year high,
Speaker 1: historically strong levels of consumer competence, and the increase in
Speaker 1: consumer spending is also now setting you know, new new
Speaker 1: bars of success. You know, forty percent of small business
Speaker 1: feel good about their local economies. That's tying the highest
Speaker 1: level in the history of that index met Life US
Speaker 1: Chamber of Commerce Small Business Index and another record high
Speaker 1: in May, driven by confidence in local economies of small
Speaker 1: business owners expect higher revenues one year from now, and
Speaker 1: owners remain optimistic. And I can go on, I can
Speaker 1: go on. You know, it's an amazing thing and we
Speaker 1: ought to be very happy about it. But it's bad
Speaker 1: news for the Democrats. All of this is bad news
Speaker 1: because as the economies is successful, you know, if the
Speaker 1: if everything now continues to to move, oil input, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: oil output now jump to a record high. It's amazing,
Speaker 1: all right, We're gonna get to that now. Um. We
Speaker 1: have two massive stories. One from Sarah Carter, one from
Speaker 1: John Solomon and analysis with Great jar We're gonna do
Speaker 1: an hour on this because there's so much news will
Speaker 1: break that coming up, or full coverage of what happened
Speaker 1: the June twelve Sumone is on the Great Economic News tonight.
Speaker 1: Will also be talking about Wow, how the deep state
Speaker 1: is now being exposed in the House of Cards is
Speaker 1: falling in and so much more. Wow, what a newsday. Incredible.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is history in the making. The June
Speaker 1: twelveth summit is on President very clear though they're not
Speaker 1: going to sign an agreement in Singapore on June the twelve,
Speaker 1: and it probably will take a number of meetings to
Speaker 1: get there. But yes, the nuclearization is the top priority.
Speaker 1: And apparently in the North Koreans wanted massive economic growth.
Speaker 1: And we have two big, huge, breaking news stories on
Speaker 1: the deep state that is now crumbling in the House
Speaker 1: of Cards falling Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett. Next, there's another narrative,
Speaker 1: which is what I'm interested in, has been reported in
Speaker 1: the Guardian and and in the Observer here uh in
Speaker 1: the United States that in fact the the your interest
Speaker 1: in this and that be the real roots of this
Speaker 1: counter intelligence operation. Our investigation beget earlier than that with
Speaker 1: signal intelligence that was brought to the United States by
Speaker 1: some of our allies, particularly Great Britain, but others in
Speaker 1: Western Europe. Can you can you tell me which one
Speaker 1: of those narratives is right? Well, I continuously shake my
Speaker 1: head at how much fabrication is going on. People make
Speaker 1: things up out of whole cloth. The one report you're
Speaker 1: referring to, UH says that Robert Hannigan, the head of
Speaker 1: g h Q, which is Great Britain's n S A equivalent,
Speaker 1: came over and delivered information to me that involved the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign. No such visit or meeting took place. I
Speaker 1: didn't put eyes on the Steel Dozier until December of sixteen,
Speaker 1: after the election. But yet people claim that I was
Speaker 1: the one that was sharing it around town and briefing it.
Speaker 1: That is not true. And so I think what it
Speaker 1: shows that Mr Trump, with his continued emphasis on lying
Speaker 1: and fabrication and untruths, falsehoods, it just feeds this and
Speaker 1: it encourages others to do it. And this is what
Speaker 1: I think is really so corrosive on our country in
Speaker 1: our government today. Well, my response to you was related
Speaker 1: to that one specific story. Um CIA during the course
Speaker 1: of sixteen worked very closely with our domestic partners, and
Speaker 1: if there were opportunities to work with the foreign partners
Speaker 1: to try to understand what Russia was doing, not what
Speaker 1: US persons, US officials were doing, but what the Russians
Speaker 1: were doing to try to undermine US. And I shared
Speaker 1: information with Jim Comey and with the White House as
Speaker 1: well as with the folks on the Hill to make
Speaker 1: sure that there was a complete awareness of the things
Speaker 1: that we knew in terms of what Russia was doing.
Speaker 1: So but again, I keep reading stories that are fiction,
Speaker 1: and that's what they should be titled. No, I think
Speaker 1: the Mr Trump has demonstrated a paranoia and insecurity as
Speaker 1: well as a real concern about the investigation that is underway. Certainly,
Speaker 1: his tweets do not seem like they're coming from a
Speaker 1: person of innocence and confidence. I don't believe that are
Speaker 1: speaking out feeds that narrative among those who understands that
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice and the FBI and the CIA
Speaker 1: are the institutions that the American people rely on to
Speaker 1: protect our freedoms and our liberties. Mr Trump is going
Speaker 1: to promote his narrative, he certainly is going to continue
Speaker 1: to try to discredit the FBI and the CIA and others.
Speaker 1: But I think, make no mistake about it, the American
Speaker 1: justice system, I think is going to prevail UH in
Speaker 1: this endeavor to get to the bottom of who might
Speaker 1: have been collaborating and working with foreign actors to try
Speaker 1: to undermine the integrity of the election. There was concern
Speaker 1: on the part of the president himself because of the
Speaker 1: allegations of rigging which the kennidate Trump was then espousing, UH,
Speaker 1: that anything that the president did would be viewed as
Speaker 1: political and he would be putting his hand on the
Speaker 1: scale in favor one candidate to the disfavor of the other.
Speaker 1: So I think Ben's exactly right, and my book course
Speaker 1: with his account, he says, but not for Mitch McConnell,
Speaker 1: iss that a majority leader, perhaps there would have been
Speaker 1: more said. Did Mitch McConnell stand in the way well,
Speaker 1: the Republicans in general, did we encounter reluctance on their
Speaker 1: part to enter into a very aggressive statement about the
Speaker 1: Russington Alright hour to Sean Hannity Show here on a
Speaker 1: Friday eight nine one, Shawn toll Free number you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. All right, So
Speaker 1: that's John Brennan. I didn't put eyes on the Steel
Speaker 1: dossier until December of twenty sixteen. Okay, then who did
Speaker 1: because a lot of people did put eyes on it,
Speaker 1: because it was used as the bulk of information for
Speaker 1: a FISA warrant. I don't believe a word that comes
Speaker 1: out of Brennan's mouth. Brennan has been caught lying, as
Speaker 1: Clapper has been caught lying. And then Brennan saying in sixteen,
Speaker 1: the CIA working with parign and domestic partners to study
Speaker 1: Russian undermining of elections, not Americans sharing infot with quote.
Speaker 1: Why didn't they then, therefore, at that moment in the
Speaker 1: spring of s bring in the Trump campaign and say
Speaker 1: this sky loosely associated with you, we've got an eye
Speaker 1: on because it was they, because they used it, like
Speaker 1: everything else, as an opportunity to undermine Trump, and Brennan
Speaker 1: saying Trump has shown paranoia insecured. You know, this is
Speaker 1: classic spy speak, this is classic diversion. It's one oh
Speaker 1: one read a book many years ago, a synthesis of
Speaker 1: Russian mind control techniques, and Clapper, you know, saying Republicans
Speaker 1: stood in the way of efforts to war in the
Speaker 1: US and then on the view bragging, Oh yeah, if
Speaker 1: you should be happy we had spies in the in
Speaker 1: the campaign, all right, we have that. And of course
Speaker 1: I mentioned in the last hour Sarah Carter's breaking story
Speaker 1: which is out today and she joins US Investigated reporter
Speaker 1: and Greg Jarrett Fox News legal analysts upcoming book, The
Speaker 1: Russian Hoax, The Illicit Scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and
Speaker 1: frame Donald Trump. Sarah, how are you? Let's start with
Speaker 1: your story today. I'll let you sum it up in
Speaker 1: your own words, but um, this is pretty blockbuster as
Speaker 1: everything else you Oh, thank you so much, Sean. I'm
Speaker 1: I'm actually thinking about what you just said about John Brennan,
Speaker 1: and what comes to mind is admit nothing, deny everything,
Speaker 1: and make counter accusations, which is, you know, what he
Speaker 1: was trained to do and uh, and that's what he
Speaker 1: continues to do as an operator. You would just never
Speaker 1: think it would be against uh, the actual legalities of
Speaker 1: the United States and the mouth decent that probably occurred
Speaker 1: and allegedly occurred within his organization, as well as the
Speaker 1: you know, probably the d n I and the FBI.
Speaker 1: So this is why they're fighting so hard tooth and
Speaker 1: nail to get this thing varied and to move on
Speaker 1: or to make people who are investigating to minimize them.
Speaker 1: And we thought that was Clapper statement that but the
Speaker 1: more they talk, the less people aft are to believe them.
Speaker 1: And so what the story that I was focused on
Speaker 1: is putting together this timeline of event and talking to
Speaker 1: people within the intelligence community, former and current, as well
Speaker 1: as people within law enforcement, is to the event of
Speaker 1: spying that occurred. You know, we're so focused on what
Speaker 1: just happened in the United States, which is which is
Speaker 1: extreme and extraordinary in a sense we've never seen this
Speaker 1: in history. But what was happening overseas? I mean, the
Speaker 1: bulk of this information that they say they gathered on
Speaker 1: the Trump advisors, George Cappadopolis carter Page, look at Sam Clovis,
Speaker 1: um other people that they were looking at at the time,
Speaker 1: was all overseas. A lot of this, a lot of
Speaker 1: this occurred in England. A lot of information was being
Speaker 1: shared as early as two thousand, fifteens. So we know
Speaker 1: that you know, m I six or g h Q,
Speaker 1: which is like the United States and s A is
Speaker 1: collecting data and information on people consistently that are overseas
Speaker 1: and that means Americans. I mean, they have the full
Speaker 1: authority to spy on Americans. My question is what were
Speaker 1: they sharing and how were they cooperating with the United
Speaker 1: States on this investigation because it is a counter intelligence investigation,
Speaker 1: and if it is a counterintelligence investigation with with this
Speaker 1: much sensitivity because they were looking at the Trump campaign,
Speaker 1: that means Brennan absolutely knew about it and what was
Speaker 1: going on. So Brennan lying again, We've known lied before. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: I have spoken to people who have sat on principle
Speaker 1: committee hearings with the nfc UM National Security Council. This
Speaker 1: is definitely something that would be in the purvy of
Speaker 1: the CIA because they're dealing with overseas information. If if
Speaker 1: g h Q, if other entities, people in Poland, in
Speaker 1: other parts Hungary are sharing information about particular members of
Speaker 1: the United States political apparatus, if one of the Five Eyes,
Speaker 1: which those are our partners out there, you know, Great
Speaker 1: Barit in Australia, New Zealand, if they're sharing information with us,
Speaker 1: they're sharing it with our intelligence, they are sharing it
Speaker 1: with the people that are running those operations. Who would
Speaker 1: those people be James Clapper Rennan. The questions we have
Speaker 1: to be asking ourselves, and the questions that aren't being
Speaker 1: answered to it is did they ask for this investigation?
Speaker 1: Were they asking for information on particular Russian that they
Speaker 1: already knew would be connected or particular people that they
Speaker 1: already knew would be connected with members of the Trump campaign,
Speaker 1: or for some reason being when you put them, when
Speaker 1: you put all this timeline issued together and and coupled
Speaker 1: with John Solomon's release of this struck page text about
Speaker 1: that this was being run through the White House other
Speaker 1: than Liz, I'll quote it, this is August. Other than Liz,
Speaker 1: the White House, that would be the Obama White House
Speaker 1: is running all of this. And you know we've you
Speaker 1: know that to me is staggering, because you've got FBI,
Speaker 1: You've got people within the highest ranks of the FBI.
Speaker 1: The attorney for Andrew McCabe, Peter Struck that as in
Speaker 1: the forefront of all of this, they're the ones. Let
Speaker 1: me bring Greg Jarrot in that would know, oh absolutely, um.
Speaker 1: And John Brennan has almost no credibility. I laugh every
Speaker 1: time I see him on the air now because as
Speaker 1: he spews his hatred towards Donald Trump. He's he's simply
Speaker 1: exposing his own motivation for being the instigator of the
Speaker 1: Trump Russia collusion hoax. Uh. He senior aide of the
Speaker 1: House Intelligence Committee who deeply examined what Brennan did involving
Speaker 1: the dossier said, and I'll quote John Brennan did more
Speaker 1: than anyone to promulgate the dossier. He politicized and effectively
Speaker 1: weaponized what was false intelligence against Trump. That great any
Speaker 1: other people, you know, the great challenge in a story
Speaker 1: like this that is so multifaceted because there's so many
Speaker 1: different angles, the Clinton crimes, the Clinton exoneration, no investigation,
Speaker 1: and rigged investigation, rigged exoneration. Uh. Then of course you've
Speaker 1: got all of the FBI corruption propping up one candidate
Speaker 1: not another candidate, abuse lying of visa court judges, the
Speaker 1: dossier being used as the bulk of application. So the
Speaker 1: challenge at least from my point of view and our
Speaker 1: point of view as a legal analyst, Gregg as an
Speaker 1: investigative reporter, Sarah me as a talk show host, which
Speaker 1: encompasses pretty much all the above to the extent that
Speaker 1: I'm it's possible, you know, is reminding people of this,
Speaker 1: and and it's you brought it back up to me
Speaker 1: last week or the week before, and I've been saying
Speaker 1: it ever since. We had discussed it many months ago,
Speaker 1: and that the interrogatories in Great Britain, Christopher Steel himself
Speaker 1: said it was raw intelligence, maybecent chance of being true. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, and he was forced to admit the truth
Speaker 1: under penalty of perjury. And his admission was, you know,
Speaker 1: my dossier ain't worth the paper it's written on. It's
Speaker 1: sort of at g it's only raw intelligence. Think about this.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the guy who came up with
Speaker 1: a phony document that was used as the pretext by
Speaker 1: the FBI to investigate a presidential candidate that then morphed
Speaker 1: into an all encompassing you a special Council probe that
Speaker 1: has dogged the president United States. And at its core
Speaker 1: it was a piece of fiction. That that is its core.
Speaker 1: It was disinformation, possibly spewed out by FSB agents working
Speaker 1: for the Russian government in order to so chaos in
Speaker 1: the United States. It's really a frightening time for the country.
Speaker 1: It really is. All right, I'll tell you what. We're
Speaker 1: gonna take a break. We have plenty of time today.
Speaker 1: We are gonna keep Greg and Sarah for the full
Speaker 1: hour because there's so much breaking news on all of this,
Speaker 1: so uh we we promise we'll get it all in
Speaker 1: right as we continue. Sarah Carter out with a breaking
Speaker 1: news column today and John Salomon all will lay all
Speaker 1: of this out on Hannity tonight. But we want a
Speaker 1: great thing about radio. As we have a little bit
Speaker 1: more time here, I want to go through this timeline
Speaker 1: issue and why this timeline is so imperative. Sarah, you
Speaker 1: you go into great detail here about the timeline. Yes, well,
Speaker 1: I start in late two thousand and fifteen, because what
Speaker 1: we know now is that according to sources that I've
Speaker 1: spoken with, as well as is being reported now in England,
Speaker 1: that it appears that the British UH, specifically g h Q,
Speaker 1: which collects that raw intelligence those communications UH, was already
Speaker 1: looking apparently at people connected to the campaign or people
Speaker 1: who would be connected to the campaign. And this is
Speaker 1: really really important because we have to ask for ourselves
Speaker 1: who and how did this all begin when they were
Speaker 1: collecting that intelligence? Was that just on their own? Were
Speaker 1: they being asked by the US to collect this intelligence?
Speaker 1: We also know that not only g h Q, which
Speaker 1: was in England, was collecting intelligence raw intelligence, but that
Speaker 1: other our nations we're collecting that intelligence. And it's not
Speaker 1: just Australia, Canada and New Zealand, which are part of
Speaker 1: the Five Eyes, but it was other groups that were
Speaker 1: collecting the intelligence of The Guardian reported that Estonia was
Speaker 1: one of the countries collecting intelligence, Poland was collecting intelligence,
Speaker 1: and even Germany was collecting intelligence. And then all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, I had one of those light bulb moments
Speaker 1: and I was thinking about this. They're collecting intelligence. And
Speaker 1: we know that there's nothing private anymore, that everything you write,
Speaker 1: that every phone call you make, that everything you do
Speaker 1: can be collected by someone or something. It doesn't have
Speaker 1: to be the United States, that could be somebody overseas.
Speaker 1: But then what happens to that intelligence when it's part
Speaker 1: of an opposition party? So they collect intelligence. And what
Speaker 1: I mean is here the Obama administration, you know very
Speaker 1: much behind everybody's believing Hillary Clinton is gonna win, we
Speaker 1: know what's happening at the time they're trying to shut
Speaker 1: down this Hillary Clinton investigation. All of a sudden, their
Speaker 1: gathering intelligence on the opposition or they have access to
Speaker 1: this intelligence which actually should be very well guarded and protected.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the CIA should in no way,
Speaker 1: no way be involved in any kind of US politics
Speaker 1: or US investigations. They are there, Pervy is outside the
Speaker 1: United States, and that's by law. Stay there. I want
Speaker 1: to I want to get Greg's take on the timeline.
Speaker 1: When we get back, we'll take a break, we'll come back,
Speaker 1: we'll continue on the other side of this half hour.
Speaker 1: May put a few calls up. You know, we have
Speaker 1: Greg and Sarah on a lot, and if you have
Speaker 1: any calls, comments, questions, we'll try and squeeze in a
Speaker 1: couple of calls on this Friday edition Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Right down our toll free number, it's one Seawn if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. Top
Speaker 1: of the next hour, Joe Consco, what do we do
Speaker 1: about all these crazy comments you know by the left?
Speaker 1: Then they all keep their jobs. If you're conservative, you're gone.
Speaker 1: No apologies, no forgiveness, no whoopsie daisies. Uh. It's a
Speaker 1: double standard that we've been pointing out all week. So
Speaker 1: we'll get to the at quick break. Right back, Hannity,
Speaker 1: We have an amazing show tonight at nine on the
Speaker 1: Fox News Channel, Big Breakthrough, obviously with North Korea also
Speaker 1: straight ahead alright to the top of the hour on
Speaker 1: this Friday. Uh, we have North Korea news. We'll get
Speaker 1: to that. We have corrupt media, bias, news double standard
Speaker 1: in the media news of course, the absolute hatred and
Speaker 1: vile comments on the left seem to never have any repercussions.
Speaker 1: We'll get to all of that and uh much more.
Speaker 1: But first, you know, we continue our study of Spygate,
Speaker 1: the deep State, and what is now the single biggest
Speaker 1: corruption abuse of power scandal in American history. There's no
Speaker 1: ambiguity anymore. It's not an issue in question. It's an
Speaker 1: issue of how it's going to be resolved. We're expecting
Speaker 1: the ig report to come out sometime next week. We'll
Speaker 1: get to that in a second. As we were going
Speaker 1: to break we continue with Sarah Carter, investigative reporter, Fox
Speaker 1: News contributor Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal Analysts, and his
Speaker 1: book is out in July. You can go to Hannity
Speaker 1: dot com and get it now and preorder it so
Speaker 1: you're the first to get it. It's called The Russian Hoax,
Speaker 1: The illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and framed Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: which pretty much sums up exactly what this abuse of
Speaker 1: power is all about. And not only do they want
Speaker 1: to frame Donald Trump, they would like to remove them
Speaker 1: from office. Um. Anyway, let's go to the important timeline.
Speaker 1: Both Sarah John and and they're breaking news articles today,
Speaker 1: Greg and we've been putting it together. But now the
Speaker 1: interesting part is these new text messages released put it
Speaker 1: right up into the upper echelon of the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: It's now to me, it's it's a question I've asked before,
Speaker 1: but I think now has the greatest amount of urgency
Speaker 1: and legitimacy, which is, what did they know and when
Speaker 1: did they know it? And I mean Obama, and I
Speaker 1: mean Valerie Jarrett, and I mean uh, Samantha Powers and
Speaker 1: Ben Rhodes and Susan Rice and a lot of others
Speaker 1: and Clapper and Brennan. The sequence of events goes like
Speaker 1: this steal the x M I six British spy and
Speaker 1: by the way, he's not really X because you're never
Speaker 1: x Uh. He's still involved with British intelligence. He comes
Speaker 1: up with this fictitious dossier June twenty contacts immediately the FBI,
Speaker 1: they traveled to London meet with him. Three weeks later,
Speaker 1: they opened officially the Trump Russia investigation. Five days later,
Speaker 1: Peter Struck, counter intelligence chief at the FBI, sends a
Speaker 1: text to his girlfriend. The White House is running this,
Speaker 1: and that means Barack Obama, because he's been briefed all along,
Speaker 1: nearly every day by John Brennan, the CIA chief, who is,
Speaker 1: as I mentioned earlier, the chief instigator of all of this,
Speaker 1: pedaling the fictitious dossier. But I think Sarah is right
Speaker 1: that we will find out in the months to come
Speaker 1: that this actually began before the Sea, that foreign agents,
Speaker 1: British agents, together with the intelligence agencies of the United States,
Speaker 1: we're spine on the Trump campaign, and that they were
Speaker 1: setting him up. They were the ones in their confidential
Speaker 1: informants who were feeding information, false information by the way,
Speaker 1: to people like Papadopolis, Sam Clovis, uh and Carter Page
Speaker 1: and then trying to entrap them with that same false information.
Speaker 1: It's a hideous, obscene plot, but that is likely what
Speaker 1: will be of eventually revealed, you know, and then again
Speaker 1: and that's that's it's sort of almost now becoming overwhelming
Speaker 1: and incontrovertible. Let me look ahead a little bit too
Speaker 1: next week. And I was a little piste off when
Speaker 1: I heard that they might release the IG report as
Speaker 1: late as Friday of next week. Now that is going
Speaker 1: into a weekend, and then that's also rubbing up right
Speaker 1: against the President UH and his trip to Singapore, which
Speaker 1: makes me think that, Okay, they're trying to bury the
Speaker 1: IG report. But now I'm hearing it may come out
Speaker 1: as early as Tuesday of next week. Sarah, Yeah, we're
Speaker 1: hearing two different stories here, we know, and I heard
Speaker 1: just I was contacting people about the IG report because
Speaker 1: it is very important. It's a four d page. Remember
Speaker 1: I had reported several weeks ago that it was a
Speaker 1: very long and thorough report. I mean, that's the most
Speaker 1: detail I was able to get on that i G Report,
Speaker 1: other than what had already been reported out there about
Speaker 1: um Abadeen and or emails. But now we're actually hearing
Speaker 1: that there is a hearing, that the hearing had been
Speaker 1: postponed from the fifth which was next week by the
Speaker 1: Senate Judiciary Committee, to the eleventh. So the hearing has
Speaker 1: now been postponed with the Senate Judiciary with Michael Horowitz,
Speaker 1: the Inspector General to the eleventh So it seems more
Speaker 1: than likely that the i G report will not come
Speaker 1: out until at least the end of next week or
Speaker 1: right before that. Okay, before the end of next week,
Speaker 1: if you had to predict, Because what I'm hearing is
Speaker 1: there's as many as twenty eight FBI agents and other
Speaker 1: people involved, investigators that are willing if if they are
Speaker 1: in facts opinioned by Congress. They can't talk otherwise legally,
Speaker 1: but if Congress brings them in. And apparently Congress has
Speaker 1: now identified many of who these people are, and they're
Speaker 1: chomping at the bit to confirm. Yeah, the fix was in.
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton committed felonies. It was taken out of the
Speaker 1: hands of the of of Special Agents UM boots on
Speaker 1: the ground, if you will, rank and file, if you will,
Speaker 1: UM and field offices around the country, and they took
Speaker 1: it and put it in a special category. And they
Speaker 1: are aghast at the at the at the at the
Speaker 1: at the handling of this by the upper echelon, and
Speaker 1: how we don't have equal justice under the law, and
Speaker 1: how if they did anything remotely close to what Comey Clapper,
Speaker 1: McCabe and and the rest of them may be involved
Speaker 1: in or struck in page at least then they know
Speaker 1: they would be fired, and they want to tell the truth.
Speaker 1: You don't want to tell the truth. You know, from
Speaker 1: my book, I interviewed a half a dozen top former
Speaker 1: officials with the FBI. They all reached the same conclusion, uh,
Speaker 1: that high ranking officials at the bureau put the fix
Speaker 1: in at the behest of the Obama administration. And they
Speaker 1: were aghast and they're still angry to this day as
Speaker 1: the damage that James Comey, Lauretta Lynch, and Barack Obama
Speaker 1: has done to the integrity and reputation of the FBI.
Speaker 1: They're absolutely convinced, all of them that they fixed it
Speaker 1: for Hillary to be exonerated. And they imagine on the
Speaker 1: hills early targeted Trump and the IG report the i G.
Speaker 1: You know, he doesn't have the ability himself to subpoena
Speaker 1: a grand jury. Now we saw in the case of
Speaker 1: Andrew McCabe, the IG report comes out and there's a
Speaker 1: criminal referral. And now apparently earlier this week, Comey is
Speaker 1: throwing McKay down the stairs. And you've got now a
Speaker 1: circular firing squad emerging amongst the deep state actors, which
Speaker 1: is going to be interesting to watch. Um. So the
Speaker 1: problem with the i G is that he has no
Speaker 1: ability to force people who have left the government service,
Speaker 1: um to speak, people like Comy and and McCabe and
Speaker 1: you know Baker and RUBICKI in the whole gang Lisa Page. Um,
Speaker 1: He's got to rely on obtaining documents and public records
Speaker 1: and speaking to others who spoke to them. That's the
Speaker 1: flaw with the Inspector General. Having said that, I am
Speaker 1: optimistic that he has uncovered some of this you know,
Speaker 1: odious scheme and will wait and see when the report
Speaker 1: goes out. And now that that basically now lays out
Speaker 1: a lot in terms of people's expectations other things I'm hearing.
Speaker 1: So let me go back to you, Sarah. Do you
Speaker 1: think it's Tuesday or do you think it's Thursday or Friday.
Speaker 1: I think it's going to be later in the week.
Speaker 1: I I don't think they're going to really sit that soon. Um.
Speaker 1: I think there was a reason. So they're literally are
Speaker 1: going to do a weekend dump of an i G
Speaker 1: report that has gone on nearly eighteen months, and they're
Speaker 1: gonna dump it on the eve of the president's trip
Speaker 1: to perhaps the biggest summit and his presidency with Kim
Speaker 1: Jong Un. That's what they're gonna do, That's what I suspect.
Speaker 1: Now the ICE sounds like they want to bury it well,
Speaker 1: and that's exactly what I think they're hoping. Uh, they
Speaker 1: can't bury this. So this is just too big. So
Speaker 1: regardless of if they release it on Tuesday, regardless of
Speaker 1: they release it on Friday, it's still going to have
Speaker 1: enough steam. It is going to take a little bit
Speaker 1: of the wind out of the sales, you know, but
Speaker 1: it's still going to have enough steam because this is
Speaker 1: a huge report that journalists all across the country are
Speaker 1: waiting to see. They want to know the extent of
Speaker 1: Komey's involvement, particularly and of course McCabe, Peter Struck, James Baker, Rebecky,
Speaker 1: you named them all, Lisa Page, And remember Peter Struck.
Speaker 1: It's still employed by the d I and he was interviewed,
Speaker 1: according to all of the sources that I spoke with,
Speaker 1: by the i G as well as Comey, as well
Speaker 1: as many others. So there is going to be a
Speaker 1: lot of information in that report and a lot of
Speaker 1: questions that we hope will be answered with regard to
Speaker 1: the Hillary Clinton investigation. Unfortunately, though it was moved up. Um,
Speaker 1: and and that's something that now we have to wait for. Okay,
Speaker 1: now let's go what we think we expect in the
Speaker 1: IG report. UM. I expect James Comey is gonna get
Speaker 1: hit hard. I would have suspect that we're going to
Speaker 1: see a lot of Bruce Or and Nelly Or's name
Speaker 1: in there. Struck in Page obviously are going to be
Speaker 1: in there. Are we going to get all of the
Speaker 1: struck page text messages now, many which have not come out.
Speaker 1: I think we don't have possibility that that many of
Speaker 1: them that have been withheld for so long, notwithstanding Congress's demands,
Speaker 1: may actually be revealed. But I think the important ones
Speaker 1: so far we do know about Uh, that that this
Speaker 1: is a guy who was heading up both investigations for
Speaker 1: the FBI and harbored a deep seated hatred for Trump
Speaker 1: and an adoration for Hillary Clintons that by itself smacks
Speaker 1: of insidious corruption. Sarah, Yeah, absolutely, I mean, I agree.
Speaker 1: I don't think all of them struck and page text messages, though,
Speaker 1: will be uh redacted or the unredacted so I think
Speaker 1: that what's going to happen here is there's a number
Speaker 1: of them that are considered classified. I think that Congress
Speaker 1: will and has been able to view them behind closed doors.
Speaker 1: There's still more that they need to view. There's more
Speaker 1: documentation than just these text messages, although they're very very important.
Speaker 1: I think what we're gonna see here and what we're
Speaker 1: seeing right now, just like you said, Sean, is this
Speaker 1: battle being waged between these players. There's a struggle. There's
Speaker 1: a sip ship that is sinking, and these wraths are
Speaker 1: climbing on top of each other and throwing each other
Speaker 1: into the water. So I think we're going to see
Speaker 1: a lot more of that in the upcoming days. And
Speaker 1: I actually believe that once this report comes out, there
Speaker 1: will be criminal referrals like we saw with McCabe. I'm
Speaker 1: not certain of what those will be or who those
Speaker 1: will focus on. I had to guess we're pretty your
Speaker 1: as close to this as anybody who would you say
Speaker 1: should be very worried or concerned about it? I would
Speaker 1: say James Comey should be very worried. Um, I know
Speaker 1: that that can I just say one thing before he
Speaker 1: went out on his book tour and wrote his book
Speaker 1: and his I am great. I am so much superior
Speaker 1: to everybody else. Tour I did warn him, and I
Speaker 1: don't know who. Well, we now know who. His three
Speaker 1: attorneys are, the three people that he leaked the FBI
Speaker 1: information government documents too. How interesting he chose all three
Speaker 1: of them to be his attorney. Then he would then
Speaker 1: have attorney client privilege and apparently I'm the only one
Speaker 1: in America that doesn't have it. Um, just to make
Speaker 1: a point, I mean, go ahead, yeah, you know, UM,
Speaker 1: if I were to make a guess, um, I would think,
Speaker 1: just based on the law and the fact that Comy
Speaker 1: should have a criminal referral leveled against him. Um. And
Speaker 1: I you know, I make a powerful argument for that,
Speaker 1: uh in my book. I mean, Comey is a guy
Speaker 1: who stole government documents he had no right to do.
Speaker 1: He leaked some of those documents to third parties. Uh.
Speaker 1: And according to Chairman Grassley of the Judiciary Committee, at
Speaker 1: least one of those documents was classified. This is exacly
Speaker 1: what Hillary Clinton did. Uh. And and so I would
Speaker 1: expect a criminal referral on that basis alone. Greg Jarrett
Speaker 1: and Sarah Carter with us, all Right, I promised a
Speaker 1: couple of calls here. Let's start with a carry in
Speaker 1: Orlando Carrier on the Sean Hannity Show, Say hi to
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett, and your question, um thought about
Speaker 1: death Sessions? It makes no sense the way he's acting
Speaker 1: or that he instantly refused himself. So I want to
Speaker 1: know what your thought is. Is it possible they have
Speaker 1: something on him, they're blackmailing him, that that's how they've
Speaker 1: tied him up. Anybody want to venture? I guess so
Speaker 1: you're asking, do you think that you're wondering if the
Speaker 1: AG is compromised? Anybody want to weigh in on that?
Speaker 1: My my impression is that he's simply not very smart
Speaker 1: and not very skilled, and he was snookered by career
Speaker 1: officials on the first day that he became Attorney General
Speaker 1: and they convinced him uh to recuse himself by using
Speaker 1: the wrong regulation that calls for recusal in criminal investigations
Speaker 1: and prosecutions. This was neither one. This was a counterintelligence
Speaker 1: pro that that Sessions didn't know. The difference speaks to
Speaker 1: his competency, which is not very high. So that's something
Speaker 1: that I heard. Yeah, that's something that I've been looking
Speaker 1: into as well or even over the past year, and
Speaker 1: I've heard from a number of sources, uh, even in
Speaker 1: the d o J that he accepted advice from somebody
Speaker 1: who basically led him down the wrong road. Uh, and
Speaker 1: that he refused himself. But look, there's no excuse here.
Speaker 1: You're the Attorney General of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: You are the Attorney general. This is the most important
Speaker 1: job in the country by far, I mean, one of
Speaker 1: the most important positions. And he's basically been refused of everything.
Speaker 1: It appears that we don't see a lot of him.
Speaker 1: And and your question is one that everyone is asking.
Speaker 1: Believe me, even here in Washington, even people who know
Speaker 1: the same information that Greg and I know, are asking
Speaker 1: the same thing. I'm gonna let it go here. Thanks
Speaker 1: for and formative our We'll have more. Both will join
Speaker 1: us tonight. Two big breaking news stories, one from Sarah
Speaker 1: one from John Solomon. Great analysis, well, so have David Limbaugh.
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett will join us and much much more. That's
Speaker 1: nine Eastern tonight. When we come back. The media and
Speaker 1: the double standard, which is if you're a conservative, you're fired.
Speaker 1: If you're a liberal. Oh, it's okay. We'll explain that.
Speaker 1: We'll get to your calls much more. One Sean on
Speaker 1: this Friday edition Sean Hannity Show, All Right, News, Round Up,
Speaker 1: Information Overload on a Friday toll free telephone number eight
Speaker 1: one sewn. You want to be a part of this extravaganza. Well,
Speaker 1: what a week we have in terms of okay, double
Speaker 1: standard in the media. I mean we'll just start with ABC.
Speaker 1: I mean they got Keith Oberman, you know, the single
Speaker 1: most vile texting against the president, against the first daughter
Speaker 1: that I've ever seen in my life. He gets hired
Speaker 1: by Bob Iger. Let's see Jimmy Kimmel. Oh, that's right.
Speaker 1: He dressed in black face and we showed you this
Speaker 1: week what he did with Karl Malone and just absolutely disgraceful.
Speaker 1: On top of him walking around with cucumbers in his
Speaker 1: pockets and telling young eighteen year old girls, uh oh,
Speaker 1: just feel around my private parts, tell me what you
Speaker 1: think is in there. And that's only the tip of
Speaker 1: the iceberg. He works every night for ABC, and then
Speaker 1: on top of that and Alec Baldwin, Father of the Year,
Speaker 1: he works for ABC, and of course over a conspiracy
Speaker 1: theory TV MSNBC they're they're doing an entire hour on
Speaker 1: the issue of race. And right there on the panel
Speaker 1: is the Reverend Al Sharpton. Okay, tell me how that
Speaker 1: makes sense. And Roseanne Barr, we know what she said
Speaker 1: was wrong. She rightly, rightly apologized, profusely and repeatedly, and
Speaker 1: she got fired. Okay. I don't call for firings. I
Speaker 1: don't call for boycotts because it's always thrown in conservatives faces.
Speaker 1: And uh, and I don't even know if Roxanne was
Speaker 1: really ever a conservative, And I kind of felt she
Speaker 1: was more libertarian, left middle maybe maybe more nationalist. I
Speaker 1: don't know. Um, But with that said, that all went down,
Speaker 1: and then you have Samantha b Now, just to give
Speaker 1: you a quick history lesson on the vitriol of the left,
Speaker 1: we have a montage we put together, and then Samantha
Speaker 1: Bee's comments and she's working there over a turner broadcasting
Speaker 1: the home of fake news, CNN, and her show continues
Speaker 1: after using the C word against the first daughter. Let's
Speaker 1: play it. It is a weird tension. I think we're
Speaker 1: the dangerous time for the First Amendment and for the
Speaker 1: free press in this country. And at the same time
Speaker 1: we're oddly influential with the guy who wants to kill us,
Speaker 1: and to our detractors that insist that this march will
Speaker 1: never add up to anything, Thank you you, but this
Speaker 1: is the hallmark of revolution. Yes, I'm angry, Yes I
Speaker 1: am outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about
Speaker 1: blowing up the White House. You know, I had a
Speaker 1: dream the other night about that. I was playing golf
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump, and I was standing beside him with
Speaker 1: a club in my hand. I was, you know, considering
Speaker 1: my options when I suddenly woke up. You know, it
Speaker 1: was one of those dreams when you want to just
Speaker 1: get back to sleep so you can finish it. You know,
Speaker 1: that was pretty good. I might have to put Mr
Speaker 1: Burgess on Fox News. I'll put I'll put I'll put
Speaker 1: Mr Burgess up against Sean Hannity. I'll tell him up.
Speaker 1: I need you to go out and talk to your
Speaker 1: friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to
Speaker 1: talk to him, whether they're independent or whether they are Republican.
Speaker 1: I want you to argue with him and get in
Speaker 1: their faces. Press always ask me, I don't I worsh
Speaker 1: I were debating him. No, I wish you were in
Speaker 1: high school. I could take him behind the gym. That's
Speaker 1: what I wish. What we've got to do his fight
Speaker 1: in converse, fight in the courts, fight in the streets,
Speaker 1: fight online, fight at the ballot box. And now there's
Speaker 1: the momentum to be able to do this. This is
Speaker 1: a death panel bill because people will die. This is deadly.
Speaker 1: This is deadly. You can't standing. I am Your president
Speaker 1: is a dishonorable, lying man. Ordinary people who simply saw
Speaker 1: what needed to be done and came together and supported
Speaker 1: those ideals. Who have made the difference. They've marched, They've bled, Yes,
Speaker 1: some of them have died. This is hard. Every good
Speaker 1: thing is we have done this before, we can do
Speaker 1: this again. I don't respect this president. I don't trust
Speaker 1: this president. He's not working in the best stenches of
Speaker 1: the American people. His motives and his actions are contemptible.
Speaker 1: And I will fight every day until he is impeached
Speaker 1: and peach forty five and peach forty five. As far
Speaker 1: as I'm concerned, that TEA Party can go straight to hell.
Speaker 1: In fact, the only thing your mouth is good for
Speaker 1: is being Vladimir Putin's pulster. How long there's going to
Speaker 1: be our saving grace. You know, when he's about the
Speaker 1: new Finland or something, she's gonna walk into the bedroom
Speaker 1: and you know, daddy, daddy, daddy. I mean, he's so
Speaker 1: blatantly stupid. He's a punk, he's a dog, he's a pig,
Speaker 1: he's a con, a bullet artist, mutt who doesn't know
Speaker 1: what he's talking about, doesn't do his homework, doesn't care,
Speaker 1: thinks he's gaming society, doesn't pay his taxes. He's an idiot.
Speaker 1: Colin Powell said it best. He's a national disaster. He's
Speaker 1: an embarrassment to this country. It makes me so angry
Speaker 1: that this country has gotten to this point that this fool,
Speaker 1: this bozo has wound up where he has. He talks
Speaker 1: how he wants to punch people in the face. Well,
Speaker 1: I'd like to punch him in the face, and I
Speaker 1: might just killing isis with the same ice pig that
Speaker 1: a murder Donald Trump, in the same night with which
Speaker 1: enemy are you most proud of? Probably the Republicans. Ivanka Trump,
Speaker 1: who works at the White House, chose to post the
Speaker 1: second most oblivious tweet we've seen this week. You know,
Speaker 1: if Anka, that's a beautiful photo of you and your child,
Speaker 1: but let me just say, one mother to another, do
Speaker 1: something about your dad's immigration practices. Effect listen to I'm
Speaker 1: counting tight and little cut and tell your father to
Speaker 1: stop it. Tell him that was an Obama thing, and
Speaker 1: see how it goes. Okay, we'll be right back alright
Speaker 1: here to weigh in on all these developments. He is
Speaker 1: the media reporter officianado contributor to the Hill. Uh, Joe
Speaker 1: Concha is back with us. How are you, sir? That's
Speaker 1: my new title. I'm longer reporter Commas. I'm the aficionado. Baby, listen,
Speaker 1: whatever makes you happy, I listen. I have. I have
Speaker 1: other words for other media people, and I can put
Speaker 1: you on that list too if you want. And I
Speaker 1: think you know some of those names. That's a list
Speaker 1: I don't think I ever want to be on. That's uh,
Speaker 1: you know. I've actually what nobody knows is I don't
Speaker 1: have Twitter on my phone anymore. They haven't figured it
Speaker 1: out yet. The last Twitter fight I had was with Kimmel,
Speaker 1: but I had to actively put it back on the
Speaker 1: phone and then actively take it off when I was done.
Speaker 1: And you in a better mood now because that you're
Speaker 1: not in that swamp all day because well, the reality
Speaker 1: is I just don't need a fifth job. I mean,
Speaker 1: I feel like I'm working enough now as it is.
Speaker 1: And while in the beginning it was fun and I
Speaker 1: love fighting. I mean obviously I do m m A,
Speaker 1: you know, mixed martial arts training every day, so I'm
Speaker 1: I'm obviously in verbal combat, often with the left, so
Speaker 1: I have no problems with it at all. A lot
Speaker 1: of these people can't take a punch, which makes me laugh.
Speaker 1: They just bubble and fizz like alka Seltzer. But yeah,
Speaker 1: the answer is one less job on my plate. Yes, sir,
Speaker 1: you are the Cobra Kai of Fox News and the radio.
Speaker 1: There's no question. Congratulations. A lot to unpack, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: this was one of the craziest weeks if you're a
Speaker 1: media reporter or columnists, I'm telling you, I mean, I've
Speaker 1: never seen so many stories rapid fire of just people
Speaker 1: shoot themselves in the foot. I mean, like Samantha B.
Speaker 1: Let me start with her. Okay, Samantha B. People want
Speaker 1: to go off on her, and yes they absolutely should
Speaker 1: when you call what she did Ivanka Trump effectless crime
Speaker 1: that words with bunt uh. Look if Laura Ingram or
Speaker 1: Michelle Malkin or Katie Pavlick ever ever said that a
Speaker 1: conservative woman ever said that about any Obama woman or
Speaker 1: any Clinton woman. They get fired. It's not even a
Speaker 1: thought process around there, just like Rosanne did. I think
Speaker 1: so many conservatives. Sean saw this happening and said, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, Roseanne gets fired, but Samantha b is at
Speaker 1: an award ceremony on Thursday night getting an award for
Speaker 1: advancing social dialogue and she doesn't even get suspended nothing. No.
Speaker 1: Her comments Sean, we're in a teleprompter, which means that
Speaker 1: that's the whole Yeah. I mean, that's an amazing part
Speaker 1: of it. I mean I look ambient, took a big
Speaker 1: shot at Roseanne and saying, well, it's not one of
Speaker 1: the known side effects to be you know, bigoted. Um,
Speaker 1: and I get it. I don't know what time did
Speaker 1: she send out her tweet? Do we know what Roseanne? Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was at night. I don't know exactly what time.
Speaker 1: I have to look it up. But this is a
Speaker 1: good point excuses, whether it's amping or not. I don't
Speaker 1: think anybody should make it. Look and do is am
Speaker 1: I right? If you know Bob Buyer's sending out statements,
Speaker 1: this does not reach Disney's standards. Okay, there's Jimmy Kimmel,
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin, Father of the Year. What about the tweeting
Speaker 1: of Keith Olberman. And I want to be clear, I'm
Speaker 1: not I don't want Bob Buyer to fire these people.
Speaker 1: I'm not asking. I'm not telling people not to watch
Speaker 1: these shows. I mean, if you want to watch somebody
Speaker 1: who's really not funny and kind of vile and means
Speaker 1: spirited and nobody really watches her anyway. And I don't
Speaker 1: know a whole lot about Samantha be except that I
Speaker 1: think she's trying to gather some attention for herself and
Speaker 1: doing it in every dumb way possible. Yeah, you're gonna
Speaker 1: go watch the show, Sean. Hannity's not going to stop you, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, you don't want to start calling for
Speaker 1: firings and boycotts and all that, I don't know, silencing people,
Speaker 1: then good. Let the free market decide whether these people
Speaker 1: stay on or not. Ratings do that or right. Uh. Look,
Speaker 1: Oprahman is the best example here, Sean, because Disney owns
Speaker 1: a d C. Right Eiger. Ultimately, it was Roseanne's boss,
Speaker 1: and it was his call to cancel the show. But
Speaker 1: then how could you cancel her? And then in the
Speaker 1: same breath, higher Keith open him for the six times
Speaker 1: when he sends out, I want your audience to be clear,
Speaker 1: this is what he said, just in one tweet, just
Speaker 1: quoting it, and I can't say the words, so I'll
Speaker 1: just you know, paraphrase here, F you at real Donald Trump, Nazi,
Speaker 1: Nazi F Nazi, Nazi F Nazi, Nazi racist Nazi. Biggett
Speaker 1: go f yourself Nazi effing Nazis. Wait a minute, that's it.
Speaker 1: One tweet that's got to be a record. And then
Speaker 1: Bob Ogger says, yep, that guy Disney standards and but
Speaker 1: but Roseanne doesn't. It's probably that one tweet and there
Speaker 1: I have pages of them of him, very similar tweets,
Speaker 1: and probably and probably is one of the reasons the
Speaker 1: guy cannot hold a job. And I think, what is
Speaker 1: this say is fourth or fifth attempt at ESPN was
Speaker 1: a time when he was working with Dan Patrick and
Speaker 1: Sports Center. Look, I'm not gonna deny that the guy
Speaker 1: I think had encyclopediccknowledgist, sports, witty, quick, funny, and and
Speaker 1: had talent. But he's gotten so angry and so bitter
Speaker 1: and and really kind of a little weird too in
Speaker 1: the process that it's he's kind of lost it. But
Speaker 1: Bob Biger just hired him. So Bob Eiger, you know,
Speaker 1: I think he's got a need in need of a
Speaker 1: little self reflection time himself. Here wins and all this,
Speaker 1: believe it or not, President Trump wins in all this
Speaker 1: because when these people are acting so unhinged and say
Speaker 1: all these things, it only benefits him because it's showing
Speaker 1: just how crazy people have become. And the mean, while
Speaker 1: they look at the progress of the nation's making. I mean,
Speaker 1: look at that jobs report today, I mean two or
Speaker 1: twenty three thousand added or down, the three point eight
Speaker 1: percent unemployment and everything that media can concentrate on is
Speaker 1: a President Trump. He tweeted out about the jobs numbers
Speaker 1: before they came out, and they focus on the negative
Speaker 1: again when people in in Middle America and Michigan. Was
Speaker 1: consequent Lavaniel Iers saying, hey, things have never been better.
Speaker 1: The New York Times, of all places, says we are
Speaker 1: running out of great things to say about this economy.
Speaker 1: That's when you know that came right out of the
Speaker 1: New York Times. Mountain, and look at where we are.
Speaker 1: It looks like the June twelve summer's gonna be a goo.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe not. The President said it may not be
Speaker 1: one meeting. You know. We had the North Korean delegation
Speaker 1: departing the White House earlier today. Seemed like I'm very
Speaker 1: extremely friendly terms and the letter delivered to the White
Speaker 1: House and the President directly from Kim Jong un um.
Speaker 1: Who would have think that when the President was calling
Speaker 1: him a little rocket man and and putting fleet of
Speaker 1: the U. S. Navy ships Striker Brigades right off the
Speaker 1: coast of the peninsula, and of course everyone was predicting,
Speaker 1: oh no, this is gonna start a nuclear war. Joe
Speaker 1: Concha the hill. Thank you, my friend. We appreciate it.
Speaker 1: My buddy John Gomez just walked into the studio. Um,
Speaker 1: I'll talk to him in a minute and we'll get
Speaker 1: to your calls at the bottom of this half hour.
Speaker 1: All right, we roll along on this Friday eight dying
Speaker 1: for when Shawn is a number of My buddy John Gomez, Uh,
Speaker 1: I don't know what business you have in the city today,
Speaker 1: walked into the studio. We've been friends from third grade.
Speaker 1: He he said, you wanted to write a book about me.
Speaker 1: I like, really, what about what? What are you talking about?
Speaker 1: Well about you, obviously, but I mean all the things
Speaker 1: we used to do. Why we're friends? You know, why
Speaker 1: you are who you are? That's a good question. Why
Speaker 1: are we friends? How did this last stop? It's question
Speaker 1: number one? Why are we friends? Yeah? I actually I
Speaker 1: think you said that at my wedding. You know, you
Speaker 1: can you get up there to say something, and you said,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't even know why I like you.
Speaker 1: I never said that, that is an absolute. I never said,
Speaker 1: do you have it on video? Have it on video? Folks? Not. Also,
Speaker 1: we'll be in the book. I will say this. When
Speaker 1: we were growing up, I got it in a lot
Speaker 1: more trouble than you did. I don't know what's true. No,
Speaker 1: but the problem is you were sneakier than I was.
Speaker 1: You were better. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, you were so
Speaker 1: much better. Not me, yes, oh no, please not me.
Speaker 1: While the rest of the school was at rehearsals for
Speaker 1: the Christmas Carol concert, Gomez was back at the school
Speaker 1: vacuuming the entire school. You mean the day I got suspended.
Speaker 1: I don't even know how I got that deal. Well,
Speaker 1: there it was. We were in sixth grade. My father
Speaker 1: was never more mad, and my well, now that's true,
Speaker 1: he was mad a lot of times. I don't remember
Speaker 1: you being suspended. I don't know why you weren't allowed
Speaker 1: to go to down to the washing in d C
Speaker 1: eighth grade. Oh no, no, my parents like you the
Speaker 1: only one in the class that I didn't go to
Speaker 1: Boston the year before either. Now I didn't, but because
Speaker 1: my parents said, you're gonna get in trouble. They had
Speaker 1: such they were like you in d C for three
Speaker 1: days with Gomez is a bit and John and Chris
Speaker 1: is a bad prescription. That's that's trouble. Actually, the way
Speaker 1: I kind of saw it was every single time I'd
Speaker 1: come to hang out with you on the weekends, Friday night,
Speaker 1: Saturday night, your mom knew. My mom was a prison
Speaker 1: guard for twenty five years. By the way, go ahead,
Speaker 1: your mom knew that the chances of you coming home
Speaker 1: in the backseat of a patrol car went down tremendously
Speaker 1: if you were hanging out with Gomez. You know this
Speaker 1: is the thing. You You're like Eddie Haskell and leave
Speaker 1: it to be. You're like hello, Mr. And Mrs Hannity,
Speaker 1: it's such an honor to see you again. And they thought,
Speaker 1: why can't he be more like John? And I'm like,
Speaker 1: he's worse than me. Why are you believing this? Anyway,
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to write the book eight hundred nine
Speaker 1: for one, Shawn. When we come back, your calls much
Speaker 1: more Friday, eight nine for one, Sean told free number.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get your calls in a minute. First, I
Speaker 1: want to say hello to Jeffrey. Aaron Hunt and nine
Speaker 1: Line and he have teamed up and they're backing this
Speaker 1: Memorial Day which is just passed, and those who stand
Speaker 1: up for the families that are left behind when a
Speaker 1: soldier pays the ultimate sacrifice. You know, we had a
Speaker 1: great weekend last weekend. Why because so many people put
Speaker 1: their lives on the line and many lost them and
Speaker 1: so many others were wounded, all in the name of
Speaker 1: liberty and freedom. One of a why it's so important
Speaker 1: to fight for our constitution every day. That's why. Anyway,
Speaker 1: they have joined together Jeffrey Earnhardt along with uh, you know,
Speaker 1: he's a stock car racer and he literally you know
Speaker 1: now competes part time in the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series.
Speaker 1: And by the way, my brother in law Tim is
Speaker 1: probably as big as fan. He joins us now, and
Speaker 1: how are you? I'm doing pretty good? How about self?
Speaker 1: I'm good? What's going on? Oh? Just uh, you're gonna,
Speaker 1: We're gonna you let me, gonna let me ride one
Speaker 1: of these cars at three hundred miles an hour, two
Speaker 1: hundred miles an Come on, come on, I'll put you
Speaker 1: in the passenger side and take you around. You want
Speaker 1: to you want to know something. I didn't grow up
Speaker 1: with Nascar. Grew up as a big hockey fan, right
Speaker 1: I was. I grew up in New York, and I
Speaker 1: played a lot of hockey and a lot of baseball.
Speaker 1: Just it's a little different than then. I lived in
Speaker 1: Alabama for a while, I lived in Atlanta for a while,
Speaker 1: and all my friends were NASCAR fans, every one of them.
Speaker 1: And uh remember Eli Gold used to do the announcing
Speaker 1: of all these races. I mean I got I met
Speaker 1: him once, amazing guy, and I used to run the board.
Speaker 1: All of a sudden, I became I just started to
Speaker 1: become a NASCAR fan. And long story short, when I
Speaker 1: finally went to the Daytona five D, I was shocked
Speaker 1: at how amazingly, amazingly fast, you guys go And what
Speaker 1: a real sport this is in the sense that you know,
Speaker 1: it's a little it's obviously different than football, basketball, baseball,
Speaker 1: and you know what, it's a dangerous sport as you know,
Speaker 1: as your family knows. Yeah, it's uh, it's definitely a
Speaker 1: different sport. You know. Still you still all about being
Speaker 1: competitive and stuff, but it's uh a little different. You know,
Speaker 1: you get to go to our ire and um it
Speaker 1: takes uh, it takes a lot of money. But yeah,
Speaker 1: that's why it's good to have uh, good partners that
Speaker 1: you're involved with, you know, make the whole picture go around. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll tell us. You know, you are actually said over
Speaker 1: this past weekend, I don't think I've ever had to
Speaker 1: hold back tears so hard in my life as you
Speaker 1: were participating, you know, in this Memorial Day weekend honoring U.
Speaker 1: S Service members and their families that gave it all. Yeah. No,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, for one, just the opportunity to
Speaker 1: be partnered with such an awesome company like Ninline of
Speaker 1: Parel that uh, you know does so much to give
Speaker 1: back to all different kind of foundations is just a
Speaker 1: great opportunity and then uh you know this past weekend
Speaker 1: at the Charlotte Race, we uh we helped raise money
Speaker 1: for uh foundation called Angels of American's Fallen and uh
Speaker 1: you know they continue to take care of the family
Speaker 1: members who have lost the loved one, uh you know
Speaker 1: in in the military. And um, we had a couple
Speaker 1: of families there that you know that you know, had
Speaker 1: had lost a loved one that you know paid the
Speaker 1: ultimate sacrifice. And um to sit there and see uh
Speaker 1: see how excited the kids or you know at the
Speaker 1: at the event was was pretty incredible. And then um,
Speaker 1: you know when when the family broke down and started
Speaker 1: uh started crying at the beginning of the race when
Speaker 1: they started playing taps, man, it uh that'll kill you. Look,
Speaker 1: my father served to World War Two and at his
Speaker 1: funeral they did it and it just kills you, It
Speaker 1: just breaks you up. Um let me bring in two
Speaker 1: for a second. We had Tyler Merritt and he's also
Speaker 1: on the line from the Nine Line Foundation and uh, well,
Speaker 1: I want to thank you Tyler for all you do
Speaker 1: and uh you know, how did you get Dale Earnhardt's
Speaker 1: grandson to participate obviously such a big name in racing well,
Speaker 1: thanks for having me on, John, I really appreciate it.
Speaker 1: And uh, Honestly, Jeff and I became friends a few
Speaker 1: months back, and I've had the opportunity to make some
Speaker 1: incredible friendships and partnerships in the last couple of years. Uh.
Speaker 1: We just partnered with Black Rifle Coffee, got their first
Speaker 1: franchise location. Aren't they the people in the world. They
Speaker 1: are an advertiser on their show. Isn't that the coffee
Speaker 1: is amazing? That the coolest guys I've ever hung out with. Honestly,
Speaker 1: they're they're they're good friends, and I like partnering with friends.
Speaker 1: It's all business, but it's you got like minded organizations
Speaker 1: that really just like to get after it. I spent
Speaker 1: the majority of my career in special operations, obviously, that's
Speaker 1: the majority of their senior leadership, and they're just give people.
Speaker 1: And when Evan and I talked about, you know, buying
Speaker 1: a car and getting the right driver, we wanted to
Speaker 1: make sure we got the rape one. So one of
Speaker 1: the questions I asked Jeff was, Hey, Jeff, how do
Speaker 1: you feel about taking a knee from the national anthem? Jeff,
Speaker 1: how do you feel about that? Jeff? How do you
Speaker 1: feel about that? By the way, before you before you answer,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna help you out, you know, just be careful. No,
Speaker 1: I don't think you've ever seen me taking knee, or
Speaker 1: anyone at a NASCAR event taking knee. That's uh, not
Speaker 1: gonna see Sean Hannity take one either. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm not even I won't support the New York Jets
Speaker 1: anymore now that the uh the car you know, president
Speaker 1: of the Jets to say, oh, we'll pay the fine,
Speaker 1: I'm like, you know, I'm not accepting that. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's and that's ridiculous. And that's why we decided, you know,
Speaker 1: if we're gonna be endorsing sports, uh, you know, we're
Speaker 1: we're one fascist trying to teacher out a Caperrol companies.
Speaker 1: I'm blessed to have been able to not only you know,
Speaker 1: return from uh words of a dozen deployments, but you know,
Speaker 1: we're we're just growing like crazy, and and to enter
Speaker 1: the NASCAR with Jeff it's an incredible human being and
Speaker 1: a partner with people like Black Rifle, And we decided
Speaker 1: rather than having our logos on the hood, we wanted
Speaker 1: to pay respects and a lot of our friends I
Speaker 1: want that handy logo on the hood. What are you
Speaker 1: talking about? Black Rifle Company, coffee company and Hannity together.
Speaker 1: I think that's an awesome combination. And we'll put nine
Speaker 1: Line too. We'll do it. We'll do like a heart combo. Hey,
Speaker 1: I got I got you covered. You know what? Hey,
Speaker 1: Jeff for your race in fourth of July and Daytona.
Speaker 1: What do you think about putting Hannity's name on the
Speaker 1: side of the car. Will you throw it on there?
Speaker 1: But either way, those cars are covered in these in
Speaker 1: these decals, and I bet people pay millions to put
Speaker 1: it on there, and I'm gonna get a free one
Speaker 1: because you're my friend. Well, I'll tell you what, though,
Speaker 1: I'll be glad to donate to your cause. And uh, listen,
Speaker 1: it's very important. We cannot forget these families. And I
Speaker 1: know the President feels the same way about it. And
Speaker 1: if you, if you guys can give out any way
Speaker 1: that this great audience of mine can help you, please
Speaker 1: tell them, because then we'll put it up on my
Speaker 1: website Hannity dot com. What's the best way to do that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if they go to nine Line Apparel dot com, they'll
Speaker 1: see a bunch of landing pages. They're talking about our
Speaker 1: upcoming race fourth of July. All the money will go
Speaker 1: to the Nine Line Foundation. I get Bernie Carrick Hughes
Speaker 1: on my board, uh, and we're raising money to take
Speaker 1: veterans off the street to support homeless veterans in a
Speaker 1: sustainable project in conjunction with the v A. By the way,
Speaker 1: then everybody needs to know, because I'm worn't and a
Speaker 1: lot of that charities, that PTSD is real. You know,
Speaker 1: these guys multiple deployments, you know, living under the most
Speaker 1: stressful conditions imaginable, and you know year after year it's rough,
Speaker 1: and we gotta help these guys out. Anyway, we'll put
Speaker 1: it up on the website. Thank you, Tyler Merritt, and uh,
Speaker 1: we really appreciate it. Jeffrey Earnhardt, thank you. You have
Speaker 1: a legendary family, and uh, I have nothing but great
Speaker 1: admiration for you and and all you're doing here. We
Speaker 1: really appreciate you taking a time. Alright, guys, thank you.
Speaker 1: All right, that's gonna wrap things up today. Alright, amazing stories. Yes,
Speaker 1: the summit with North Korea back on. This is history
Speaker 1: in the making. We'll have all the details. Historic incredible
Speaker 1: economic numbers. I doubt the destroy Trump media will be
Speaker 1: covering we will. And two massive new breaking news stories,
Speaker 1: one by Sarah Carter, one by John Solomon. That's right,
Speaker 1: the deep state, the White House, they were in control
Speaker 1: from the beginning. All evidence seems to point in that direction.
Speaker 1: We'll explain news information you won't get anywhere else. Set
Speaker 1: your DVR, we'll see it tonight at nine. Have a
Speaker 1: great weekend. We'll be back here on Monday.