WEBVTT - What's Wright - LeBron James returns, Lakers struggles, JuJu Watkins injury + Dan Hurley erupts

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Drive with the great Episode three thirteen.

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Programming note demonse for I think the first time in

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the history of the pod out sick today. I talked

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to him this morning. He was gonna fight through and

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>come in. I said, take your day. So wish the

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>best to Demons, but a hell of an iron man

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 1>streak for him of not missing any time, and so

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he's out today, So it will be just me, which

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know should definitely, as always promised, lead to a

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>quicker show because he's the one that always does the

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>over talking and explaining and non sequiturs and different various

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.319
<v Speaker 1>rants you where you interrupt yourself. I've told him he's

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>got to stop talking so much, so we'll get right

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to it. Here is what missed the cut in today's show,

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and the first thing that missed the cut didn't miss

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the cut is all at all? Uh. Bronnie James thirty nine, seven,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>four and four for the South Bay Lakers last night

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>against Sam Cruz. He was a plus nineteen in his

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight minutes. It was far and away his best

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>game at the professional level. And this is where I

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>will as I have remind everyone that twenty months ago

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>July twenty fifth or twenty fourth of twenty twenty three,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this kid suffered cardiac arrest. It totally derailed his collegiate season,

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is evidenced by the fact that he has

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>now had ten professional games, one at the NBA level

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and nine at the G League level that are better

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>than anything he ever did in college. And so when

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>people pointed out, like, oh my god, look at his

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>college statline and that's a player that you're drafting, it,

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there had to be some math done on. Yes, his

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>collegiate numbers were that of a player that typically would

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>not be drafted, even late in the second round. But

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>if you throw the season away and say those numbers

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>were due to the fact that he never got his

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>legs or his wind underneath them because of the months

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he had to stay away from the court because they

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>thought he might not be able to play basketball ever

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>again due to a congenital heart defect, then maybe, just

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe you saw some traits that could be a successful player.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>And Kevin O'Connor, who knows a hell of a lot

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>more about the draft and about college basketball than I do,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>tweeted to me this morning that if they did a

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>redraft today he thought Bronni would be a first round pick,

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and that if Bronnie can keep up this shooting, then

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he's a legitimate NBA player. And again, I am not

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to make too much of the G League, which

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is something we never talked about previously. However, because Brownie

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is a star and because he has been the subject

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of scrutiny, we have to be fair in that the

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>expectation was that in the G League, with grown men,

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of guys who were former first round

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>picks trying to make a career for themselves, with a

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys who had a lot more experience than him,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of guys who were much more highly

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>drafted than him, that he was going to it certainly

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in his first year in the G League. Really have

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>his work cutout for him now, and more than his

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>work cutout for him, potentially really struggle. And instead he

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>now after not playing well in Summer League and not

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>playing well in the G League's kind of preseason I

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>don't tip off tournament or whatever they call it, in

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the G League regular season, he is now averaging twenty

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>two five and five on forty six thirty eight eighty

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>splits that is a great value for your fifty fifth

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>overall pick and shout out and credit to Brownie. And

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so we're not gonna spend more time on that. But

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that was in what missed the Cup, But he didn't

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>actually miss the cut. We did a nice few minutes

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on it. Also, SVP my guy after Maryland finally gets

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on the right side of a buzzer beater, tweets you

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>know he's a Dieyard Terrapin fan, and he tweets out

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>never a doubt, as a wise man, says shut out,

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott Van Pelt, Ernie Johnson, Kevin Wilds the only three

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>people in sports media with one hundred percent approval ratings.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And very nice of Scott to include. You know, obviously

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>my trademark tattooed came up with first person ever use

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it phrase never a doubt. Very nice of him to

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>use that in celebrating an all time Marilynd moment. More

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on the tournament in a second, and I guess that

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is one way to put it. I did invite myself

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Kelsey's pod. The Kelsey's tweeted, should we have

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>an NFL salary cap expert on the show? And I

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>just responded, I got you. I mean, you know that

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>way it could be said, because obviously I'm a salary

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>cap expert, but also we could talk other things and

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>it would be interesting because you know, Eagles fans tend

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>not to like me that much, but Jason, I would

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine does I don't know, but if we could get

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a What's Right with Nick Wright New Heights crossover, that

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>would have to be good for the burgeoning What's Right brand, which,

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, YouTube's like rate, subscribe review on all

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>platforms YouTube just crossed one hundred and ninety thousand, so

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you guys for that. We're the slow climb

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>towards two hundred thousand continues. But also we'd really like

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys to subscribe on either iTunes or Spotify wherever

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys get your podcasts. All right, so we have

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to lead this morning with just a huge bummer, which

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is a young woman who I truly and I said

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this last year. I think, well, and I'm not going

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to use past tense, but I had said this in

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the past, and I still believe it has a chance

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the greatest women's basketball player ever. I truly

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that. I believe that I when everyone was talking about,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and I obviously was a huge part of the talk

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>as well about the phenomenon that is Caitlin Clark. I

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>think you guys heard me say a couple times on

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the show that I thought Juju Watkins at USC might

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>end up being even better better than Caitlin and even

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>better than everybody her size, her athleticism, her basketball IQ.

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It is elite of the elite, and a player that

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>can do everything, a player that recently put up a

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>stat line that had not been put up in men's

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or women's professional or college basketball this century. When I

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>think she had thirty eight points, eleven rebounds, five assists,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>eight blocks, and again a forty minute college game, she

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>tore acl last night, and it's just devastating for a

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of reasons. It puts it. I would imagine on

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the board that she doesn't play college basketball again. Now

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I would think she does. I would think that the

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>playing is for her to miss all of next season

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and then come back for what would be her senior year.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess red shirt junior year and continue to play.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And with nil and the WNBA salary structure, I would

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have to imagine Juju can potentially make far more money

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>at USC than she would at the beginning of her

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>WNBA career, unless something drastically changes with the rookie salary

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>scale there. But this is just an ultimate bummer because

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>getting we got in the final four last year Page

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>versus Caitlin, and we were basically assured that we were

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>going to get Page versus Juju in the Elite eight,

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was I talked about how I didn't love

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that they put USC in Yukon in the same region

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>because that felt like it should be a final four

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>inter national championship potential matchup, and it ends up that

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be, and USC should still get they

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>should be able to win next round without Juju, but

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>not past that. They absolutely can't beat Yukon without Juju.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And you just feel sick for this young lady who

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>is has the real potential to be a true superstar,

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a true crossovers not just great player. She's obviously going

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to be well, she already is a great player, and

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>she and a torn acl you know, is not career

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>altering the way it once was. But she needs a

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>great NCAA tournament run just to catapult her celebrity the

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>way Caitlin had and the way honestly Angel Reese, who

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>no disrespect to Angel Reese, but Angel Reese is not

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>nearly the caliber of player of Caitlin, or of Juju,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>or of Page for that matter, and they have all

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>had these great tournament runs. Juju, this was going to

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>be that this year, and if not this year, next year,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and now out for I would imagine all of next season,

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>which is just such an absolute bummer. And here is

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing about acls the way I have seen them

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade. Acls are different in that they

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>used to truly be career altering and these days they

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are not. Meaning people typically come back one hundred percent

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to their pre ACL tear ability, strength, speed, quickness, all

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of that, but they are not quick injuries. It usually

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is a minimum of the calendar year that you are out,

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and usually a little more than that until you look

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>like your old self. So a huge bummer. Not really,

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this is put this in the huge story not a

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>great topic category, and I mean that's kind of what

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it is. There's not much to say. It's massive news,

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>but it just sucks. There's no real take to have.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And so Juju Watkins out and I have to you know,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Yukon's now, I'm gonna look it up on DraftKings. I

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>just can't. Maybe you guys can put in the dock

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. I mean, I know they're the favorite, but

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I just wonder what they are now? Is Yukon women

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>to win that region? To win the region, I have

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to imagine they are minus huge money. I'm not able

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to pull it up right now. If you guys can

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>throw it in the dock whenever you can find it,

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just put what they are to win the championship and

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what they are to win the region, because I do

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not see who possibly could stop them. Certainly now listen

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>UCLA South Carolina. Those are legitimate championship level teams. But

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I Yukon's in the final four and they're now plus

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one sixty to win the whole thing. We can't find

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>them to win the region. But it's not gonna be

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean they it's not gonna be much of a question.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw. I got the I had the privilege of

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>watching the Yukon women in person from court side seats

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Fox. The game was on Fox beginning of

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the year, and I left that game saying I don't

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>know how anyone's beating them. Now, Ucla and South Carolina

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a juggernaut, and USC had shown, oh no,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>they're of that caliber, and Yukon lost a few times.

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like you can put probably in pen A,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Yukon Ucla final four on your left side of the bracket,

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, thoughts with Juju, it absolutely sucks, just

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely sucks that she's done for the year and potentially

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 1>done for next year. One note, and I'm sure this

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>will happen because Page is such an awesome athlete and

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>awesome person. From all accounts, Page dealt with an ACL

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and missed a year, and so I would imagine if

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>she has not already, Paige is going to reach out

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to Juju and try to help her through it. But

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>really really sucks for basketball fans, for USC fans, for Juju,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>all right to the men's side of the tournament. So

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different things I want to hit

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>here before we get to the Lakers losing streak, the

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Rogers stuff. We'll get all of that later. But our

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>college basketball coverage on this show burns hot, bright and fast.

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Like the rest of the country. We have somewhat of

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a tepid interest in it. I shouldn't say everyone's like this,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but at least for me, a tepid interest in it

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout its regular season and then are living and dying

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with the tournament and the storylines come March. So I

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>am not going to act like I am Mark Titus

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or Big Cat or John Fanta or John Rothstein. The

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are, you know, who know all of these

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>teams in and out. I do not. However, I do

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>watch the tournament non stop for you know, twelve consecutive hours,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>four consecutive days, and you feel like that, plus a

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>passive interest throughout the year, you have a good feel

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on things. And the people who had been watching all

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>year who said Duke's way better than everybody, they appear

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to obviously be correct. Now you might be like, Nick,

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't you pick Tennessee to win it all? I did

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>because upsets happened, and that's a fun one and I

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>think Tennessee is really really good. But right now there

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are seven guys left in the tournament. Seven left in

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the entire tournament that are consensus first round picks, meaning

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>guys that are high enough picks that they are included

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in every mock draft, you find out there these seven

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>guys are in all of them, Duke's got three. The

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>rest of the tournament has four. Now, again, there's three

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>or four other guys in the tournament that might end

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up being first round picks, maybe even four or five others.

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's seven players right now in the NCAA tournament

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that are what you would consider minus huge money to

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be first round picks, and Duke has three. There are

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>five guys that are currently projected lottery picks left in

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the tournament, and Duke has three. Now, that doesn't guarantee

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you anything, but it does give you an idea of

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what a talent edge this team currently has and why

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be absolutely, at least to me, shocking if

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they do not make the final four. Now, in the

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>final four coming out of the region, beneath them on

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your bracket will either be Houston, Kentucky, or Tennessee, and

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>any of those three teams could beat them. And you

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>guys know, I'm picking Tennessee. I like the odds on it,

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think they have a I really part of that,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>if I'm being totally honest, probably has to be that

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>a disproportionate amount of the college basketball regular season and

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>conference tournaments. Games that I watched involved Tennessee because we

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>have a close friend that's a big Tennise Tennessee volunteer fan,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>so we watch some games with her, and so I

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>thought this team had high upside. But I so, you know,

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>bake that in to my analysis of this. But Duke

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 1>is obviously the most talented team in the country and

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Cooper flag is as advertised. Now, I do find the

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Cooper flag hype is the wrong word, but because hype

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>almost sounds like unwarranted. But I I am curious, like

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a take the temperature of what are fair Cooper flag

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>expectations when it comes to how he stacks up amongst

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>number one picks. So if we just go the last decade, right,

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that So the number one picks the last

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>decade are Karl, Anthony Towns, Ben Simmons, Markel Foltz, DeAndre Ayton, Zion,

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Edwards, Cade, Paolo Wimby, reesa Chet. If you were

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to rank them based on NBA, you can't really rank

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>based on NBA career because there's you know, Carl's played

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a decade, Wimby's played a year. But I think you

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>would probably slot them. Like if you did a draft

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of number one picks, Wimby would go one again the

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>last decade, Aunt would go to Towns three, Kaid four,

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and then Zion Polo five six. When I watched Cooper Flag,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I put him right ahead of Powlow and right behind Zion.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>When Zion when it comes to like potential coming out

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of school. Now again, if you were re redrafting based

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on hype or expectation, it would have been Wimby one,

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Zion two, Karl Anthony Towns three, But we've now seen

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Zion didn't quite live up to it. When I hear

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the draft experts talk, they they go further

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>back and they say, basically number one picks the last

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two twenty years, basically number one picks post Lebron, that

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they have Cooper. They that it's Wimby one, Anthony Davis two,

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and they would have Cooper Flag three. I had a

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>ky ahead of everyone I just mentioned, plus Kyrie and

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Dwight and Blake d Rose, all those guys that strikes

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>me as ambitious. Now again, as I've said now for

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the sixth time on this show, I am not a

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>college basketball expert. The way some are, but I it

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>felt to me like the absolute Anthony Davis was such

0:20:53.400 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a overwhelming, obvious numbernumber one pick, franchise changer, the likes

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of which, again Lebron's in his own category, we hadn't

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>seen in you know, the four or five years prior

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to him or after him. Wimby took that up to

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>another level because of just the absolute kind of freak

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>nature of what his upside potential could be or would be.

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>And so set those two guys aside. I don't I

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think Flag is a better prospect than Zion was now. Zion,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it turned out, had his own things. He had to

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>deal with, injury issues, some weight issues, so maybe some

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>personal kind of off the court stuff that has derailed

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>him a bit. I was wrong about how good Ant

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and Caid would be. I thought Ant was a good

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but not gonna be a superstar. And Ant is a superstar,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I am very interested to see how Flag

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>looks over these next He's gonna play at least two

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>more games, and the odds are he's gonna play four

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>more games. How he looks, and if he has a

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>dominant tournament moment the way Zion did the way Anthony

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Davis did, the way a lot of these guys who

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>were number now Anthony Edwards obviously didn't. The guy didn't

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>make the tournament, but a lot of the number one

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>picks who went to college Paolo had won, a lot

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>of those number one picks who went to college had

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>those kind of signature tournament moments. Cooper hasn't needed one yet.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Andy's coming off the injury, but I I'm very excited

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to see him in the final four against Houston, Tennessee

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>or Kentucky and what that looks like. Now. The other

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 1>story of this tournament so far has been that, you know,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>no Cinderella, Nils, you know, nil is the death of

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>college basketball. Let's all please pump the brakes just a bit,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just a tiny bit, if we could. Okay, on first

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of all, one year is not a trend. This is

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>one year where we've had no mid majors in the

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sweet sixteen. Second of all, would we are we saying

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we would feel drastically different if the queen kid from

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Maryland hadn't made his buzzer beater and all of a

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>sudden there were there was a there was a Cinderella

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or a mid major in the Sweet sixteen that would

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>make us feel like, oh okay, everything's fine. No, probably

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>not right, And so I don't really subscribe to the

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that because it happened this year, this is what

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>every tournament's going to look like from here on out,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>especially because it literally almost didn't happen this year in

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that Maryland needed the first buzzer beater of the tournament

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to keep a mid major out of the Sweet sixteen. Now,

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a fool, and I do understand that the

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>transfer portal and guys who are really good at smaller

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>schools than transferring two bigger schools, and one of the

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>things mid majors had going for them was guys sticking

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>around together for three or even four seasons and growing together.

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>That gave them a chance against the more talented teams.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You are going to see less of that. But what

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that could lead to, and maybe I'll be

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>proven wrong, is more of the true deep cinderellas, guys

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that are from single bid conferences. You're fourteen or fifteen

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>seeds who are not going to get poached because of

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>nil stuff coming in and having real Cinderella runs. But

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>even if we have less Cinderella stories in the NCAA Tournament.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The upside is having a bracket as it stands now

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>where the games are as follows two versus six, four

0:25:55.720 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>versus one, four versus one, three versus ten, but the

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ten is Arkansas coached by John Calipari. Two versus six,

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>two versus three, one versus five, and one verses four.

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>What that creates, what it should create is an unbelievable

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>weekend of college basketball. On Friday, the spreads are three

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half, four and a half, seven and a half,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. On Thursday, the spreads are five

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half, five and a half, six and a half,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half. And we should have eight games

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>where six are super competitive. And I'm good with that

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because people don't you like the story of the Cinderella.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But the actual games, especially once we get Sweet sixteen

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and certainly to the Elite eight, are usually not always.

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes Butler makes back to back national finals, the games

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>are usually not as good as one would have hoped

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for because that team is just so outmatched. I don't

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>look at any team this weekend as insanely outmatched. I mean,

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest underdog is an excellent Arizona team, and that's

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>because they're playing Duke on Sunday. I'm sorry. On Friday,

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest underdog is a Michigan team that absolutely can

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>beat Auburn. And so I I think it was a

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>little too fatalistic saying that college basketball is just in terrible,

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>terrible shape because we're not having Cinderellas when A it's

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>one year and b it is probably going to lead

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to a more compelling Elite eight in Sweet sixteen than

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we've had in recent history. And my last NCAA tournament

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>take before we get to the lakers losing streak in

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the Western Commends playoff race some other things is you

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>can't ever get everything in life. And this is about

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan Hurley and the Connecticut Huskies. So Dan Hurley is

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a great coach. I don't think there is a single

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>person in the sports world that thinks anything other than that.

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Danny Hurley also is intentionally I think provocative and kind

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of wants to play the villain role a bit or

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he thinks it either helps him or or helps his team,

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, that's fine. What I don't love and

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I gave credit to Mark Titus for this yesterday on

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the TV show, and I will do it again because

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he put it absolutely perfectly, which is he

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>compared Dan Hurley to the wrestler that takes the stage

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at a show in Wichita and then makes fun of Wichita.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, you're a bunch of rednecks, or and

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>makes fun of the local teams and does all this

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff in order to catch heat and get booze, except

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that wrestler then does not act wounded or like he

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is being unfairly maligned when he catches heat or gets boot.

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>It's what he's going for. And so having Danny Hurley

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>walk off the court their first time they lose an

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>NCAA tournament game in more than two years and blame

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the refs and then say to the local media after

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>his press conference, thanks to you guys for being fair.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>The national media skip Bayless wannabes were not is to

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>me trying to have it both ways to a degree.

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>You cannot try to play the villain and then get

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>upset when you get treated like a villain. And I

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>also would like to know who are the national media

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>folks that were unf What was said that was unfair?

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Was it that the way you acted in Maui or

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was it Maui. I don't even know if it was Maui,

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the court, Bahamas, whatever, it was the preseason tournament where

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you were a game into the year absolutely losing your

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.959
<v Speaker 1>mind with the officials, and then your final game of

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the year blamed the officials when Baylor's trying to take

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the court was criticizing that unfair? Was it the people?

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know who these people would be. The

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>people in the national media who do talk college basketball

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>all season said, ah, this Yukon team is not as

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>good as their ranking early in the year, or this

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Yukon team is not a real contender. Those people who

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>were proven one hundred percent correct. Was that unfair? What

0:31:55.760 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was unfair about it? And I said this on the show,

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Wilde seemed to not only disagree, but to think

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I was crazy for saying it. But when you then

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>hear that the Yukon sports information director confronts a local

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>journalist who got the video of Danny Hurley yelling, I

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>hope they don't f you like the f dos Baylor.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope they don't f you like the fd us.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>The Yukon sports information director going to that journalist and saying,

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if you don't take that down all quote ruin your life.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think that that is because of some of

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the culture that is set by the head coach. I

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely think that, and I think that is not great.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And so we can hold multiple thoughts in our head

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at once. He is a great coach, they are an

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable program, and he also runs so hot and is

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so brash in their success and does not seem to

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>handle the little bit of on the court adversity that

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they've had this latest bit that well at all. That

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that typically is a cocktail of a lack of likability,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and he might not care at all how well liked

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he is. But Yukon fans acting like people are unfair

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to their coach, or him acting like the media is

0:33:52.360 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>unfair to him, I think is a little much. And

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>so listen, unbelievable run by Yukon the last two year

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>or the previous two years. And man, they sure help

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>with a scare into Florida. But they did not lose

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that game because the officials. They lost that game because

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>from the seven minute mark to thirty seconds left in

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the game, they made one basket they could have won.

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>They stopped hitting shots, and that's not only officials. When

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to college basketball in March Mania, one thing

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is for sure. Nothing's for sure. Upsets, buzzer beater, Cinderella

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is advancing, top seeds going home early. It all could happen,

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as it happened in this tournament. Not a lot of

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Cinderella's advancing and not a lot of top seeds going

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>home early, which should make the next few rounds great.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But we did get an unbelievable buzzer beater in one

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the last games of the round of thirty two

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for Maryland. It all could happen. Bet the unexpected, every upset,

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>every day with DraftKings sports books with live betting, exclusive content, promos,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and parlays. DraftKings is the ultimate college basketball destination for March.

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Ready to make your first bet, check out the matchups.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Pick a team to win. It's that simple. You guys

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>know I've been writing with Tennessee, so I'm gonna give

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you a couple more Tennessee picks. Tennessee laying four and

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a half versus Kentucky on Friday is something I'm is

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>something I like. And Tennessee at plus twoin fifteen to

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>win their region the Midwest. That is something that I

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like as well. Lines and odds are subject to change

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>first time. Here's something special just for you. New DraftKings

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>customers bet five dollars, get two hundred dollars in bonus bets.

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Instantly bet the unexpected with DraftKings Sportsbooks. Download the DraftKings

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Sportsbook app. Use code right that's co right for new

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>customers to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets. Code

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>wrighd to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets when

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings. The Crown

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>is yours. Gambling problem call one eight hundred gambler in

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>New York call eight seven seven eight hope in why,

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>or text hope in Why, which is four six seven

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>three six nine. In Connecticut. Help is available for problem

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>gambling Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>seven seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of Boothill Casino and resort in Kansas twenty

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>one plus age in eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance.

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>For additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG, dot

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>co slash b ball. All right, so now to the NBA.

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>The Lakers lost again, and it was when you were

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>looking at this schedule for the Lakers you probably had

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>penciled in even before you knew Lebron was coming back,

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but certainly once you heard Lebron was coming back. Wins

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Bulls, the suddenly red hot Bulls, by the way,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>who won again last night, and the Magic, whose offense

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is just impossibly bad. The Bulls instead scored one forty

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>six and the Magic scored one eighteen. And so what

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I am concerned about, what I'm not concerned about, what

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not concerned about is this, It always takes guys.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things we in the media

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>do a very poor job, even though we see it

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>time and time again. But one of the things we

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do a very poor job of recognizing or accounting for

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is when athletes tell us, man, there is nothing to

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>prepare you to play professional basketball. Like playing professional basketball,

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we should believe them. And by that I mean every

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>single one of these great players when they are coming

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>from an extended layoff, take two or three games to

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>look like themselves. Luca his first few games with the

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Lakers after the being out for a while with injury

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>before and then during the trade, was so rusty. There

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was a brief oh, maybe Nico was onto something renaissance,

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and then of course it went away. Luca got to

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>being Luca again, sticking with the Lakers. Austin reeves, he's

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not a great player, but a good player. His first

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>few games back from his injury, he didn't look anything

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like himself. Then he immediately ripped off the best basketball,

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the best stretch of his career. So Lebron not playing

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>quite up to Lebron's standards last couple games is not

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>something to panic about. And here's the other piece of it.

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into this more in a bit. The entire

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Western Conference, except for Oklahoma City, is on a losing streak.

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Spots one through nine or two through nine in the

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>standings have lost. The Rocket against streak is too much,

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>but had lost their most recent games. The Rockets lost

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>their last game, The Nuggets lost their last game. The

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Lakers lost three in a row, the Grizzlies lost three

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in a row. The Warriors, Clippers, Timberwolves all lost their

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>last game, and the Kings lost three in a row.

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Of those teams, obviously, Houston had one nine in row.

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>They were playing great. Golden State had won eight of nine.

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 1>They were playing great, and the Clippers had one eight

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>of nine. They were playing great. And the timberlves had

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>won seven of nine. They were playing really well. But

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the teams the Lakers are really jocking for in positioning

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Denver and the Grizzlies. They've lost six out of ten.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>The Grizzlies have lost five out of ten, which is

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>why the Lakers losing seven out of ten has not

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>killed them, And so it has opened up the window

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>potentially for one of those teams, Denver, the Lakers or

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies to drop to the six if the Warriors

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>keep winning. But that the Warriors, you know, Steph dealing

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>with his injury, and the Warriors just took a loss,

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>so they you know that they cooled off a bit.

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how they look and Jimmy's return to Miami.

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But so standings, Wises hasn't killed So those things I'm

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:09.400
<v Speaker 1>not worried about. Here is what is a legitimate concern

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and what has to be said, And I think JJ

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>has alluded to it, and he's correct. This Lakers team

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>is not good enough defensively to hold anyone under one

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>point fifteen if they are not locked in, dialed and

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>connected on that end of the court. In the last

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>few games, they have not been there, and so I

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>do not think it is the sky is falling for

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers. I do think that I said yesterday on

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the show that over their next five they should expect

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to go four and one. The next five were Orlando, Indiana, Chicago,

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Memphis home Houston. That was the five. Well, they just

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>lost the first one, and so four and oh with

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>one back to back at Indiana at Chicago might be

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a tall ask, but it's what the expectation should be.

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>At Indiana after back to back bad losses, you must

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>win that game at Chicago after even though Chicago again,

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what is Chicago won. I'm looking at it right now.

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Eight of ten I think that is. Yeah, they've won

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>eight of their last ten. In one of those losses

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>was a heartbreaker to the Rockets at Chicago. After you

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>just let Chicago and Kobe White embarrass you, you must

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>bounce back and win at Memphis. With Memphis, we'll see

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>if they're still dealing with all those injuries, a game

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'll be at. Actually, that's a game that you

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>absolutely gotta find a way to win. And then home

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for Houston in a game that, if you have any

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 1>chance of catching Houston in the standings, you must win.

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>That'll be the kind of pivot game. But these next

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>two games for the Lakers at Indiana and at Chicago

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there and Indiana's good. I'm not trying to downplay Indiana,

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and Indiana is hot right now. I think they've won

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>five in a row. Those are games you absolutely, unequivocally

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>must win. And I'm really interested to see how the

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Lakers are able to guard Halliburton because obviously Kobe White

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>had that monster game against them. It's forty six or

0:43:53.320 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>something and Orlando scoring one eighteen when Orlando cannot score,

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and Franz and Paolo combining for sixty two. It's problematic.

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So not panicking. Those are a couple bad losses. One

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons you don't panic is, again, if we

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about the Western Conference playoff situation, and I alluded

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to it, a lot of these teams are in again,

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Houston is not, and the Warriors are not. But Nuggets, Lakers, Grizzlies,

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some because of injuries and some just because of like

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a march malaise, just don't seem to have it all together.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, the Thunder just keep handling their business.

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>They win basically nine out of every ten games they

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>play for almost any sample of the season, that's really

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like eight and a half out of every ten games

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they play. They're on another ho hum six game winning

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>streak with a point differential for the season of thirteen.

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>That team is excellent. I know, breaking news the Thunder

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>or excellent, but that team is really something, and it

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>might you might be like, well, then, Nick, why aren't

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you picking them to win the championship. I'm very interested

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to see how they can deal with Luca and Lebron

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in a playoff series, But if the Lakers defense doesn't

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>tighten up, they're not gonna get the opportunity to go

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>against them in a playoff series. This episode of What's

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Right is brought to you by Daya Pizza featuring dairy

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>free cheese made with their new Daya oat cream blend.

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Dairy free cheese come a long way and Daya's leading

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the charge. Their pizza's off for the Melton stretch of

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>traditional cheese without any dairy. Each day of Pizza starts

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>with a perfectly crisp crust, layered with savory, satisfying toppings,

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and finished with cheese that melts and stretches beautifully. The

0:45:56.680 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>DAYA oat cream blend delivers a creamy cheese texture that's

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>indistinguishable from dairy based options. Every pizza is crafted to

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be dairy free, making it a great choice for anyone

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:14.919
<v Speaker 1>seeking more inclusive meal options without compromising on taste. Data

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 1>takes the concept of dairy free to a new level,

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>eliminating faux MoU that is not the fear of cows,

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that is the fear of missing dairy. These pizzas delivered

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>delicious taste and texture, making them perfect for any occasion,

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.759
<v Speaker 1>from casual dinners to game day spreads. Enjoy a faux

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:38.240
<v Speaker 1>moo free pizza night with DAYA. Visit dayafoods dot com

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 1>for more information, or find DAYA Pizza at retailers like

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods, Kroger, and Walmart coming soon to select publics

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and sprouts. Follow DAYA on Instagram and TikTok for more

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 1>updates and recipes. All right, before we get to the

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>f one minute after an awesome race weekend. Here is

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Aaron Rodgers. Florio floated the idea because evidently I

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this, but McAfee is hosting a live show

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh April eighth or ninth, and Florio floated the

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that Rogers is holding off on signing with the

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Steelers so he can announce it at McAfee's live show,

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>which would be so perfectly on brand and also just

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>so perfectly outrageous that I almost think it's gonna happen.

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 1>No one has explained to me, because no one can explain.

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 2>To me.

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Anything positive as far as the Steelers' chances of breaking

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>forget winning a championship, blake breaking their nearly decade long

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>drought of not winning a playoff game. No one has

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.399
<v Speaker 1>explained to me how Rogers wait like this helps them,

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and the reason is because they can't. All it does

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is either feed rogers ego, help Rogers assert power within

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>the organization, or give, if he really really drags this out,

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>give Rogers the excuse to not be a part of

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>an offseason program. Those are the only benefits that come

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>from this, and none of that is good for Pittsburgh.

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Which is why I I and there is no there

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is no quo like Rogers clearly wants to play, and

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers are clearly his only real option. So there's

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>no reason for this to be going on except for

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the Steelers don't have the right now

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>institutional courage to tell Rogers, hey man, we need to

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 1>know by Friday if every other free agent in the

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>league has been able to make their decision. You obviously

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>want to play. The Vikings aren't interested that the Giants

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>have finally, you know, begrudgingly turned to the page at

0:49:09.840 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>least a bit. You want to come here anyway, Let's

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>just get this done. But I I don't. I don't

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna do that, and I think Rogers is

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to drag this out, and I think

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 1>we're all, myself included, kind of playing into it all.

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:49:31.040 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to listener questions, a reminder like rate,

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and review, and also a reminder that it is

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>now racing season, so time now live from Miami or

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 1>plausibly live from Miami. The F one Minute was Sierra Fiddel.

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to F one Minute. I'm cr Furdell and

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm be covering the biggest news following the Chinese GP

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and Shanghai. Now, Oscar Piastri started from pole position for

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the first time in Formula One history. George Russell was

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in P two and Lando Norris in P three. Now,

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 2>on lap one we had some dicey action between the

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Ferrari boys. The clerk picked up some front wing damage

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and then around lap four Fernando Alonso dnf again, but

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 2>not because he crashed into the wall, just because of

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 2>break failure. But I feel kind of bad for him

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 2>because he has yet to follow through an entire race,

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 2>but in Japan were ruining for him. A major talking

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 2>point of this GP was tire preservation, though a vast

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 2>majority of the teams tried their best to maintain tire life,

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 2>leading up to most of them only making one pit

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 2>stop over fifty six laps, so it wasn't the most

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 2>thrilling strategy race, but a strategy race nonetheless. In the

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 2>end it was another McLaren won two, with Piastre taking

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the dubs, securing his third victory in his Formula One career.

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Lando Norris finished at P two and then George Russell

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 2>in P three. Now the biggest news from this GP

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 2>came after it already ended, and that is that Lewis Hamilton,

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Charles Leclerk and p Air Ghastly were all disqualified from

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese GP for failing post race technical checks. Now,

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 2>it was a fairly accomplished weekend for Ferrari. They had

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 2>their first ever sprint win thanks to Lowis Hamilton, but

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 2>they also had their first ever double disqualification in the

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 2>same weekend. It's it's honestly crazy work. Thus, Leclerk and

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Hamilton have officially earned their place in this week's drsaka

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Disastrous Race Shenanigans, and that's the second time in a

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:32.879
<v Speaker 2>row for them. But Leclerk and Ghastly were both disqualified

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 2>for their car being underweight, so basically, lighter car equals

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 2>performers advantage. Hamilton, on the other hand, was disqualified because

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the thickness of his plank assembly was below the minimum requirement,

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 2>So lower the cars equals performance advantage. So as you see,

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 2>once the FIA finds a performance advantage, that means disqualification.

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 2>So since they all lost their finishing positions, Olkon Antonelle

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:01.839
<v Speaker 2>albon Embarment, each moved to places and picked up some

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:05.720
<v Speaker 2>more points on the way. Ghastly disqualification from Pete eleven

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:09.919
<v Speaker 2>also meant that nixt guy Signs and Stroll snuck up

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 2>into the top ten to grab some unexpected points for

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 2>them as well.

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:14.399
<v Speaker 1>So that's all I have.

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:18.280
<v Speaker 2>For the Chinese GP. I'll see you next time for Japan.

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Great job as always, man, I I guess I'm a dope.

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I need to ask Sierra about this off the air,

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>can ye not? Just do? I'm sure they do do

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a pre race inspection. This showing my own ignorance here.

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Why would a car pass the pre race inspection and

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not the post race And if they're not doing a

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:42.919
<v Speaker 1>pre race inspection, why are they not if you're gonna

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>end up being disqualified? I don't know. I have to

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:47.399
<v Speaker 1>learn more about this. I'm gonna ask Sierra, all right,

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>some quick listener questions. Noah says, do you see Dan

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Hurley as the rich Man's nick? Sirianni? Uh that listen.

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's on the board. Yeah, I mean I

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good uh, a good potential comp and

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Syriana's champion now too. Uh. But Syrian doesn't seem to

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 1>think the media treats him unfairly. Oh, the our producers say,

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're changing parts and pit stops. That's maybe that's it.

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the cars are good pre race than during the race.

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:20.040
<v Speaker 1>There are some shenanigans. Taylor asks, why is achilles or

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 1>an acl sometimes considered a two year injuries consistently, but

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a literal heart attack isn't taking the same understanding. That's

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>about Bronni. I I think it's because we look at

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't like physical injuries. Is like binary, like

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is he okay? Is he allowed to play again? Okay?

0:53:41.040 --> 0:53:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Then he should be the same, when in reality it's

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the time off that I think really hurts these guys

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>at times. Sixness says, what would it take for you

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to get into hockey? How much skew would you need

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to see in the Vegas books for betting to be

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a thing for you during the NHL season? I for

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this of my marriage. I don't think I can pick

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 1>up another sport that I'm into right now. Maybe at

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>some point in life, but I just know so little

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about hockey. Can't sitydn't have a team. I've never been

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>into it, So I nothing against the sport. I just

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I it's very very it'd be very, very tough for

0:54:21.120 --> 0:54:22.919
<v Speaker 1>me to tell my wife now by the way, also

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>watching hockey, especially because I've kind of refallen in love

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>with baseball thanks to Bobby Witt Junior and the Royals

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>being legit again. Uh all right, Alex, is there a

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>single anything the Rockets can to do? Our lasting games

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>make you believe that they can win a single round? Yeah,

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to win a single round? For sure? There is stuff

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they can do. So because the Rockets have a tough schedule,

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 1>tough ish schedule, I should say, down the stretch, so

0:54:50.160 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Utah is their next two, but then it's

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix who's on a fourty winning streak, Lakers, Utah again,

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City, Golden State, Clippers, Lakers. The Rockets play well

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:06.319
<v Speaker 1>during that stretch and hold their positioning. I certainly could

0:55:06.400 --> 0:55:09.279
<v Speaker 1>see them winning around. My fear for them is they're

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:12.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna drop from the two to like the four, and

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:16.799
<v Speaker 1>unless they are playing an injured Memphis team, I don't

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:18.520
<v Speaker 1>think they could. Again, I think the Rockets have had

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable season as is. They're gonna win around fifty games,

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But for me to believe in them to win around

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.759
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, they have to show me more, and

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Scott says, what would it take for Tom en on

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the hot seat? They haven't been a true contender since

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they lost to Jacksonville in twenty seventeen. Listen, he's just

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 1>got a contract sension. I think the Steelers have had

0:55:39.520 --> 0:55:43.239
<v Speaker 1>three coaches in fifty years. I actually think what could

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:45.719
<v Speaker 1>be best for the Steelers and for Tomlin would be

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a fresh start for both of them. But it doesn't.

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>He's obviously an excellent coach. I just don't know that

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you can. I think he if he could have gotten

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a job like the one Jim Harball got, where the

0:55:57.680 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is taken care of and you build the rest

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of it up, that might be the best. And he

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:05.560
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't been able to figure out the offensive side

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:07.919
<v Speaker 1>of the ball post Big Ben, or even with Big

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Ben near the end. All right, demands feel better. Thanks

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to our great friends at Blue Doc and DraftKings and

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Day and the Volume and everyone. I will see you

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 1>guys on Thursday. What's right