WEBVTT - EU Competition Chief Margrethe Vestager Talks Big Tech Crackdown

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Google both lost big legal battles with the

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>European Union. For Apple, it was over an EU ordered

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Irish tax bill of over fourteen billion dollars. Google, on

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, lost its challenge to and over two

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar fine for abusing its market power in the

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>search business. Both cases were among the biggest competition cases

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the EU's history. Following the rule in Bloomberg's Max

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey spoke with EU Competition chief Margaret Vestayer.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Two huge victories. What does this mean for you personally?

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 2>What does this mean for European citizens?

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's a very important step towards tax

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 3>justice that Apple now actually have to pay the thirteen

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 3>billion euros to the Irish States. I think that shows

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 3>European citizens at actually, once in a while, tax justice

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>can take place. And it's important to me as well.

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm very very happy with this win.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I can totally imagine and I guess you know, we

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>never start thinking about what's next as well. You do

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>have a fourth case against Google and the ad tech business.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm right that previously you've suggested a resolution

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>to this could be a breakup. I mean, do you

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 2>see that as the resolution that's going.

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 4>To need to happen. Is that the only way forward

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 4>on that case.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, of course it may be that we are not,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, using all our imagination, but the thing is

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>that there is an inherent conflict of interest because Google

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>earns the marketplace, it earns the seller, it earns the

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>buyer who uses this marketplace. So it's difficult for us

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 3>to see any other solution. Of course, reopen is but

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 3>the case is very very advanced. So yeah, let's see

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>what decision we can reach.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>And then, I mean, looking back over the past ten years,

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>You've been in this role as the head of the

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 2>competition for for ten years. In that time, you've had

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>huge cases, You've had, you know, huge pieces of regulation

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that have you know, caused times pushback, particularly from big

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>tech companies, from former president on the Trump. How have

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 2>you dealt with these kind of sometimes fractious relationships you

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>know yourself personally.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've tried not to make it personal because I

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 3>think it comes with the job. You need to be

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 3>able to do a job. Also when people do not

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 3>agree with you, also when people are aggressive towards you,

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise it's not possible. And of course also my

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 3>responsibility to push because the world is changing. So you know,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 3>we look at a lot more now at innovation. In

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>our cases, we lose innovation, can innovation be enabled? So

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>it has been a process of renewal and I think

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 3>that is really really important. Also when people disagree with

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 3>you that you try to push on and.

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 2>The world is changing, I think is very interesting to

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>bring up because of course we have had this report

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>from Mario Drugi, We've had previously the report from Enrico Letta,

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 2>and there is talk, you know, even harder push from

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>others around loosening state age rules or you know, allowing

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>more mergers to kind of boost European companies or create

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.279
<v Speaker 2>European champions.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>What do you think of that? Do you see risks

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 4>in that approach?

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think from what I have read so far

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>in the Dwagi report, actually he calls for ending temporary

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 3>state ed rules. He's asking for a prudent state aid approach,

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 3>but for more European approach, which is what we have

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 3>in what we call important Projects of common European interests.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 3>We have ten of those projects, a total of private

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and public investment more than one hundred billion euros. So

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that is a very important push because we

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 3>have faced the acute crisises of the pandemic, war, energy crisis,

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 3>but the slow crisis of you know, the eroding of

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 3>our competitiveness is something that needs to be phased head on.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>So I really hope that the Drug Report, the Letter

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Report will make us focus making the single market work,

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 3>have more people use their talent, have capital made available

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 3>for businesses who want us to scale. So I think

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 3>it's a very important time of the European Union to

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 3>be able to solve also the slowly emerging crisis of

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>eroading of competitiveness. Now, when we have showed that the

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 3>acute crisises, they can actually be solved.

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>And I guess does that also call for any kind

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>of paradigm shift in competition policy or do you see

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 2>this you know, continuing under your success as you have

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>led the competition policy of the Commission.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have renewed quite a number of things, so

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>we have a much more thorough look at innovation. We

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>have made it clear how do we look at markets,

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 3>because of course more markets become global. How can we

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 3>assess that we have prepared the grounds to look at

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 3>the regulation that governs how we look at abuse of

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 3>dominant position. So there are quite a number of things

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>that has been renewed, and we have sort of paved

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 3>the way for I think a bitter administration, more better

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>access to file so there would be plenty of work

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>for my successor to.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 4>Do, I don't doubt.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 2>And then I guess just a final reflection on these

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 2>judgments today. I mean, you mentioned the press conference that

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>you were brought to tears I think by the judgments.

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, do you feel is this a kind of

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>vindication coming at the end of your term?

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 4>You know of your work over the past ten years.

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you need to of course own your victories,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 3>but you also own your defeats, and we have had both,

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>and hopefully that shows that we're willing to push the

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 3>envelopes also sometimes to take a risk in order to

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 3>try to make sure that the market serves the consumer

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 3>and that we are not just small meet for the machine.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>And I hope that is what people take down from

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 3>today's judgment, both that we won the Google case and

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 3>it's final, and we won the Apple case and it's final.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>That's Margaret Vesteer, Executive Vice President of the European Commission

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for a Europe Fit for the Digital Age and Commission

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>for Competition. For more conversations like this one, subscribe to

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Talks podcast. I'm Charlie Pellett, and this is

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg