WEBVTT - Week 14 NFL Best Bets with Jessica Gridiron | Free Picks, Predictions & MORE! (Ep. 259)

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, I'm Matthew Friedman matt fd Oracle. Welcome to

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Betting FROs Podcast, brought to you by bet MGM,

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>where you can get a risk free bet about two

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars when you use the highly original promo code

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>betting Pros with your first deposit. Right here with me

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>to talk NFL Week fourteen best Bets is Jessica grid

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Iron of The Action Network. Jessica, we're we're like in

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the home stretch of the season. Next week we have

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>three games on Saturday, and when we start to get

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Saturday games, that's officially when my brain sees the end

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of the season insight, Like, how has the season gone

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for you so far?

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 2>The I know it's it's exciting and said at the

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 2>same time, I agree with you, but so far the

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>season has gone pretty well.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I've had definitely had some.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Good weeks and then I've had some soso you know

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 2>weeks as well, But overall, I'm happy with the season

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 2>so far, and it's been fun and exciting overall.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, last week one of the best NFL weeks I've

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ever had. So I'm just waiting, like I know, regression

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to strike, like the Empire. Just I know,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>some some point I'm gonna have a really bad week,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just hoping it's not this week. But all right, this

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>morning I published on Betting Pros my projected spreads for

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>every games and per usual established betting positions earlier in

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the week. Still some games that I like, though, and

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Jessica has some bets that she likes as well, so

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to we're gonna cover those. I'm gonna start

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Bills hosting the Jets minus nine and a

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites. And by the way, God do the

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>plug here, we're giving away a free signed Isaiah McKenzie

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills many helmets from Pristine Auction. If you want

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win it, subscribe to the Betting Pros

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel right now and comment below on the video.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>We will announce a winner in a future episode, So

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>turn on those notifications, all right. I think my rationale

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for this bet of Bills nine minus nine and a half,

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty straightforward. You know. I think they're just

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>significantly better. That's that's the thesis there. But you know,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think anything less than ten is not enough. When

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the Jets hosted the Bills in Week nine, the Bills

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>were minus ten and a half, and yeah, they did

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>use that game, and the Jets are better with Mike

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>White a quarterback versus Zach Wilson. But the Bills are

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>now at home at high Mark Stadium. I think they

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>have a significant home field advantage, and they're only nine

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites, and that doesn't add up,

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>especially when you take into account that the Bills are

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>playing with three extra days of rest and the Jets

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are on a three to four away streak, so you

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>know they they are living on the road at this point.

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And the difference between these two teams, like it is,

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it is significant. In the massive Peabody Power rankings, the

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Bills are seven point nine to one points better than

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>an average team on a neutral field, the Jets minus

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>two point h nine points. So there's, you know, like

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I would just say, in general, like a nine or

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>ten point difference between these two teams. And then you

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>add on home field advantage and the extra rest that

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bills have, and I think that pushes this pretty

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>cleanly over nine and a half for me. And I

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>know that we've seen back to back three hundred yard

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>passing games out of Mike White. He's un quitem b

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>lean upgrade on Zach Wilson, but I think it's too

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>early for us to assume that he's actually like a

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote good quarterback, like he probably isn't. Just last

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>year in Week nine, he had an abysmal game against

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. Had a fifty four point six percent completion rate,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>one point six of justice yards per attempt. Like that

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>is like sub Blake Bortles, like Bortals, that's like Nathan

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Peterman esque for interceptions he threw in that game. He's

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly better than the typical third string quarterback, but

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like that's what he is. He's a third string quarterback,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's yet to prove himself to be a starter

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>caliber player. So I think anything less than ten offers

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>value on the Bills. I don't know if you have

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>any opinion on this game? Do you do? You have

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a position or any thoughts?

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, as you know, as you can tell, I'm

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a Dolphins fan, you know if you look kind me

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>so overall, I dis like both of these teams a ton,

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll just put that out there, but I always tend

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to lean towards the dogs, and I agree with you.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Bills are one of the top three

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>teams in the league, but I can't take favorites in

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the divisional game. I also, you know the Deat's defense,

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 2>it's significantly improved this year, and I think they can

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>get a couple stops on defense and an offense. As

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, Mike White is almost one of the games

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 2>outright last week. You know, he won the game outright

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 2>last week against the Vikings. So if he can limit

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 2>his turnovers and improve his third down conversion rate, he

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>could be a serviceable quarterback.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.119
<v Speaker 3>In my opinion, they almost won the game.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you're skeptical of my position here. Yep, Yeah,

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. It feels dirty, like I hate. It's so

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>weird because like it feels dirty, like the want to

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>be sharp in my brain feels dirty taking a big favorite,

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the like definite square in my brain feels

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>dirty when I take a big underdog. So there's always

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this battle that I have within myself about what to

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>do when I'm betting here. But yeah, I mean, I

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>have this projected at let me see where do I

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>have this projected? I have this projected at eleven point

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, So I am well on the other side

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of ten here, but maybe I'm wrong. You mentioned that

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you are a Dolphins fan, but you are going against

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>your Dolphins this week. You like the Chargers hosting the Dolphins,

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and right now this number is, you know, kind of

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>vacillating between three three and a half in the market.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>What do you see in this game that is putting

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you on the Chargers.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I like the Chargers plus three and a

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>half because everyone is going to expect a major bounce

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 2>back from the Dolphins this week, but I'm expecting a

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 2>two week road hiatus to affect the Dolphins' ability to

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 2>get into a routine. That being said, you're going to

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>give me a three and a half line where I'll

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>gladly take the home dogs to stay within a field goal.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 2>And you know, everyone knows about Miami's offense, so nothing

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 2>needs to be said about that.

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 3>But it's their defense. It's middle of the.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Road, and Justin Herbert should be able to pick apart

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the field. Similarly how rookie nine Ers

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>quarterback Brock Purty did last week. You have a quarterback

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 2>in Herbert who has more experience and of course a

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>bigger arm. To make the Dolphins defense pay. One big

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 2>factor that has overlooked on this Miami team is a

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>special teams unit, where they are the worst in the NFL.

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:16.679
<v Speaker 1>You have.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>The eighth worst kickoff.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Return success tenth worst punt return success in the NFL,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 2>and then you add in the fact that kicker Jason

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Sanders comes in as the seventh worst in the league

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>as field goals and extra points. I mean, I think

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins will be leaving points on the board and

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>they'll lose the field position battle all game, which will

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 2>keep the Chargers closer than people expect. Also, the Dolphins

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>have the sixth worth net average in the league per

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>punt at thirty nine point eight. So I really wouldn't

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.799
<v Speaker 2>rely much on this on special teams in a normal

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 2>scenario while handicapping, but with the Dolphins team that will

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>be out of their normal routine, I'm expecting this to

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 2>come into play.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting, Okay, So I will say if I

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>had to bet on this game, I would be on

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, and my numbers do show value on the Chargers.

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>One thing that gives me a little bit of pause,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So I guess two things. One is that Miami they

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are cross country, you know, traveling east to west, but

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they did stay out on the West coast because they

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>played the forty nine Ers, and so I think the

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>normal road disadvantage that we would expect to see from

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a traveling team maybe we don't see that quite as

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>much with the Dolphins. But the bigger thing is the

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>injury situation for the Chargers with right tackle Trey Pipkins,

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>center Corey Lensley, and wide receiver Mike Williams. If I

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>knew those three guys were going to play well, of course,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>if the market knew those three guys were playing this

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>number one, it'd be three and a half, right, But like,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>those are really important positions for the team, you know,

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like Mike Williams as the bigger body, downfilled option in

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that offense. Lind's as you know, the anchor within that

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. I think he's one of the better centers

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in the league and really important to what they're doing

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>on offense. And then right tackle Trey Pipkins, who it's

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>not so much that he's great, but he's way better

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>than Storm Norton, and so it's just you kind of

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>put it all together, and if those three guys are there.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I really do like the Chargers, and I would be

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in them on the money line, Like because my

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>number is showing value, this number is three, I haven't

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>projected at one point twenty five. Uh, And that's like

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of assuming that those three guys are likelier than

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not to be out. But I just gotta say, I

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of know there's like snowballing catastrophe potential if those

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>three guys are out. So I'm with you in that,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Like this is the side I would bet, but I

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just I haven't been able to do it yet. I

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just kind of want to see a little more on

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the injury reports. It's some sort of sense about whether

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>those guys might be in or out. Do you have

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on the injury situation for the charge?

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I was also just gonna mention too,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 2>like I agree with you, you know, with the Dolphins stay

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 2>in California, but we are fond of of routines and

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 2>they won't have their usual routine and I just don't

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 2>think iowa sorry, I do think that Herbert will be

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 2>running for.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 3>His life, but I still feel like he's going to

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>find some open looks.

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I have a minus one point seven for the Finns also,

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>so according to my projections.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we're pretty close. We're pretty close there.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I and I also think having offensive line

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 2>worries for the Chargers is legitimate. But we'll have to

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 2>make plays like we like we've seen him do.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. All right, So a game that you and I

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are both on and this this one is really disgusting

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and is like testing my my fortitude and willingness to

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>bet on games and also just to watch an NFL game.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But the Broncos hosting the Chiefs. This number is nine

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>in and a half And by the way, you know

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half across the market, but nine and

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a half at bet MGM. Weare reminder you can use

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the risk free bet of a thousand dollars when you

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>use a highly original probo co betting pros with your

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>first deposit. Okay, uh, the the Broncos at nine and

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a half. This this really is an interesting situation because

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Russell Wilson has been horrible, you know, I mean,

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't describe the the difference, like the

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>delta between what we would have expected when the year

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>started and all the enthusiasm and if you look at

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>any of the the look ahead markets for the off

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>season and where these lines were projected months in advance.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are, they are so off it's just incredible.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I have to I still look at

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this game and I think, like, where is the on

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>field edge for the Chiefs? Like betting on the Broncos

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>is disgusting, there's no denying it, But like, I'm backing

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a big divisional doll at home where the elevation provides

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a true edge for the Broncos. And I like that

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>general scenario. And you know, as cringey as Russell Wilson

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>has been this season on and off the field with

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.719
<v Speaker 1>those ridiculous commercials, he's still four and two against the

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>spread as an underdog, historically very good against the spread

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>for his career as an underdog. And the Chiefs, I

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just don't see them having an on field edge, Like really,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously they're the better team. But I'm probably higher on

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs than most people are, and I still have

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>them as the number one team in my power ratings.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be too high on them each week,

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but I still see value on the Broncos here, And

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like that's saying something so on offense the Chiefs, right,

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>great team number one and drop back EPA number two

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and drop back success rate number two and past dvoa.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The thing is they're going against one of the best

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>secondaries in the league, right, the Broncos number three in

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>drop back EPA, number one in drop back success rate.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Like this is not like an easy passing matchup for

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the offense for the Chiefs, and the Chiefs aren't really

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all that good running the ball. The Broncos about average

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and run defense actually number eleven in rush success rate,

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, so like it's not as if the offense

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Chiefs, which drives the team, has a really

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>great matchup in front of them. And then the Broncos defense, Yeah,

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not likely to shut down the Chiefs offense, but

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like slow down Patrick Mahomes, and you know, with a

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>spread of nine and a half in a total of

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>just forty four points, slowing down Mahomes might be enough

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to get the cover and the Broncos offense obviously massive

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>disadvantage relative to the offense of the Chiefs, but not

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a massive disadvantage relative to the Chiefs defense. Drop back

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>EPA of twenty four for the offense for the Broncos

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty five for the Chiefs defense. Like, these two teams

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>are kind of even in terms of like the offensive

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>versus defensive matchups that we see. So I think the

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Broncos they're gonna be challenging the running game, but they're

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not good there. But what does that matter? Like the

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>running game doesn't matter when you're a double digit dog,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be throwing the ball anyway. And the

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs have a blow average pass defense. So I doubt

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that the Broncos win. But the Chiefs throughout the years

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have displayed a propensity for winning outright but not covering

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the large spreads, and I think we see that happen here.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think anything more than seven is too much

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Broncos at home. And I'll just close out

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this dietribe here. Russell wilson career stats might not matter

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>because like there's there's a case to be made, real

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>case to be made. He is no longer Russell Wilson,

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but Russell Wilson five to zero against the spread as

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>an underdog of more than seven points for his career.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes eleven sixteen and one against the spread as

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a favorite of more than seven points. So it's it's

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those like, I'm not gonna be watching this

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>game at all. I'm not gonna be looking at it

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on my phone tracking it because looking at it will

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>probably give me a heart attack. But I'm going to

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be betting it and then just at the end of Sunday,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be looking to see what happened here.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you have opinions? We're on the same side of this.

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We're i mean, tell me why it is that you

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are sick oh enough to be betting on this game.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, I agree with you.

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Probably the only time I'll be watching this game is

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 2>if it pops up on the you know, red zone.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>But here we are with the divisional dog again, divisional

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>dog again. But I'll keep this short and sweet because

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>you really went into a lot of detail already, you know,

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>But like you said, it's a divisional game.

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 3>It's strength versus strength.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Here you highlighted extremely you know how well the Chiefs

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>offense is and how it's arguably one of the best

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>in the league's right now, but they are going against

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>one of the best defenses in the league. And just

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>like we were talking about, it's a divisional matchup. So

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I expect this game to be stay within a touchdown

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>considering just how well these two teams know each other,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and that really might just be the biggest factor at

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 3>And like you said, you know, maybe there's a day Russ.

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Russ took some cooking.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Classes and he's ready to cook this, you know, this

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 2>weekend and we'll see.

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Broncos, let's ride baby.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>No, that guy is eating raw food. He's not cooking anything.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I've just projected at Broncos plus seven point twenty five.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do you have it?

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, you know, I have it actually at eight, so

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of right there.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, all right. So a game that you are,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>another divisional game that you're looking at here, divisional dog

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that you like the Browns And this opened at four

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half I think in the look ahead market

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>last week it was three and a half. Opened on

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night at four and a half, was bet up

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>all the way to six and then now has moved

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>back to five and a half. So there has been

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>some money coming in on the Browns recently, the Browns

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>on the road at the Bengals. You like the Browns here,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>divisional dog five and a half. Talk to me about

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>what you like with this team?

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, sell the Bengals by the Browns. Reason

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>behind that is this is game number two of Deshaun

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Watson in the offense, and I expect significant improvement from

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 2>last week's game. This is, like you mentioned, it's a

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 2>divisional matchup with two heated rivals, and with Deshaun Watson suspended,

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 2>this Brown's offense has still managed to be top ten

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>in DBOA and EPA. Actually, and we know by now

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>that they love to run the ball. It's one of

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the highest it's one of the highest rates in the

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>league right now. And do you know what the Bengals

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>defense is bad at stopping the run? They are actually

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>ranked twenty six and defensive rush EPA. And while Deshaun

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>is still getting acclimated to this offense, I expect the

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Browns to employ a heavy dose of Nick Chubb and

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Kareem Hunt and then look at them defensively. You have

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the Browns numbers are not that great this season, and

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I expect these numbers to change over time as the

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 2>offense continues to improve.

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Give them more rest in between drives.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 2>So like I mentioned I'm selling on the Bengals at

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 2>what I consider to be the high point season for them,

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 2>and because they are coming off of a four game

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>win streak, they went from a five hundred record to

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>now a top three team in the AFC. Whereas the Browns,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 2>they're rolling into this game with a five and seven

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 2>record and would love nothing more than to just unseat

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>their rivals. So I expect this game overall to be

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>high scoring, as my projections actually have this being twenty

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>seven to twenty four Bengals victory.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So really you have this as a three point game, Okay,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm closer to the number that we have here.

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I have it at five. But it's there's just so

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>much unknown with Deshaun Watson acclimating to the offense, and

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>there's no way he is as bad as he was

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>last week that was like easy, sort of like, Okay,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>he's going to have some rust type of situation. I

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>would expect him to be significantly better here. So I

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a lot of volatility, a lot of

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty built into the projection that I have here. So yeah,

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if if I were betting this

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for Cleveland, I might just take the money line, you know,

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>because it's if we see, like the really good version

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>of Deshaun Watson Cleveland, Cleveland could win, you know, like

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that's well within the range of outcomes here.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at the end of the day, who would

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.479
<v Speaker 2>you rather have well known Brissette or a rusty DeShawn

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's how I feel. Yeah, I mean I

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 2>like the money line look too. But for me, whoever

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 2>wins this game, I really I really see it.

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 3>But just waning by three?

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>All right? So one game here, final game here for

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>us to talk about. And we are on opposite sides

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of this game, and I gotta say, you're probably right,

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like I will just I will. I will own my

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>l Here Seahawks three and a half is the current

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>number in the market they are hosting the Panthers. I

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>feel embarrassed to say this. I bet this in the

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>look ahead market at six and a half because I

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>thought there was a much better chance that this number

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>would get to seven then would get to three. And

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>evidently I was. I was very wrong. I mean very

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong there by the way I logged it in the

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>betting pros app here here comes the plug, the Betting

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>pros app where you can sync up with sports books,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>get free betting advice and picks, and track different experts

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>in your own bets. And you can set alerts so

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we monitor all the major sports books. When one of

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>them moves a line that hits a threshold you've set,

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you get an alert that tells you where to make

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the bet, at the book that offers the most value.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Download the app today in the Apple or Google Play,

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>whor Okay, so you know, I was the more on

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>who bet Seahawks at minus six and a half and

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it has massively moved against me and is now three

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half in the market. But I you know,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I like Seattle. Here this is just I mean, I'm

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the donkey. But Gino Smith nine to six

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>against the spread at home with the Seahawks, you know,

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and Pete Carroll fifty seven to forty one and three

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.959
<v Speaker 1>against the spread at home with the Seahawks. I'll just say, like,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I feel like this market like when

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the market speaks, I've learned that I need to pay

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>attention to it. But I'm literally betting that the market

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is wrong in this spot Seahawks at home have if

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>not the best home field advantage in the league. I'd

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>say top three pretty cleanly, maybe top five if you

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be conservative with it. The Panthers are coming

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>off of the buy, which helps to kind of counterbalance

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're on the road. But I'm skeptical

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>that the buy actually means all that much against the

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>spread to a non playoff contender this late in the season,

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and when you factor in home field advantage for the

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks rest advantage for the Panthers, this line is saying

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Seahawks are about one to two points better

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>than the Panthers, and I just think that's wrong. Like,

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>without adjusting for short term injuries, I have the Seahawks

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>power rated is five points better than the Panthers. And

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm being optimistically aggressive with the Seahawks pessimistically dismissive

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Panthers, who are on their third quarterback. And

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that third quarterback is Sam Donald. And this is like

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a great sort of like crossroads meeting of like Sam

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Darnald and and Geno Smith as like two guys discarded

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Jets, and like one of them is actually

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like kind of like become the guy that the Jets

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>would have hoped he could be, and one of them

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>totally hasn't. And you know, Donald as the guy who's

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>who's coming into this just his second start on the season, Like,

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's still going to be getting used to

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that offense. But you know, the massive Peabody power rankings

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they have, the Seahawks is four point five six points

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>better than the Panthers. So I feel like my line

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of five isn't all that out of step with another

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>set of power rankings I really have respect for. So

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't believe that I'm out of line

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with reality. I think the market is out of line.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 1>But you're you're in line with the line that we

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>see here. You like the Panthers at plus four plus

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>three and a half? What do you see in the Panthers?

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I'll just start off by saying, you

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 3>make a good argument. I'll give you that.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if this was Seattle minus three or less,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I could totally buy into the Hawks. But at minus

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>three and a half and higher, I'd have to lean

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>opposite of them in this game.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who really wants to bet on the Panthers? Really?

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they looked horrible all season long, but like

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 2>you said, the market is speaking volumes in my opinion,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know this is why I am again leaning

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Carolina at plus four. Like you had mentioned, they are

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 2>coming off a bye, so they've had two weeks to

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 2>prepare and this season, NFL teams following the bye week

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>are actually fifteen and nine straight up, So it's not

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 2>a long shot that the Panthers could win this game outright.

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'll take the points, and travel is not

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 2>an issue in this game. Again, well rested from their bye,

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and they are going up against one of the top

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 2>defenses in the league. I mean, sorry, they went up

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 2>against one of the top defenses in the league, the

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Denver Broncos, and Sam Darnold was actually pretty efficient. He

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 2>didn't turn the ball over and he they ran the

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>ball a ton, and Panthers are a better team offensively

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>when they run the ball a lot, and I expect

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>them to do the same to keep the ball out

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of Gino Smith's hands. So that's why I'm going to

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 2>take the points on this one and I'll take Carolina.

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>The one thing, and your point to the running game

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Panthers is well taken and Dante Foreman has

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>been really good. I think as the you know, kind

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of mid season replacement for Christian McCaffrey after the trade,

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the injury report situation with him, Like, I think he's

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna play. He didn't practice yesterday, he did practice

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>today on a limited basis, so he's probably going to play,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but he is dealing with a foot injury, and so

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if he if he's not quite his full self, like

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I start to have a little less faith in the

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>offense for the Panthers. But do you have any thoughts

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>on on his injury situation?

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think you pretty much highlighted everything

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that you know, Uh, it's unfortunate that he was limited

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 2>with practice, but I still at the end of the day,

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna play.

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So yeah, yeah, he probably does. All right, So

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we're we're on opposite sides there. I mean, I feel

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>like you're you're you're on the sharper side here. I

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just have to imagine given how strongly the market moved

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>against the Seahawks here, and you know, I actually kind

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of want to ask like a bigger picture question here

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks because I think something kind of goes into

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>this line of maybe the book makers, the odds makers

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>think that a certain perspective exists of the Seahawks, and

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>then the market moves against them. But how are you

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>viewing the Seahawks here? You know, because now that we've

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>had the brock pretty injury in San Francisco, the Seahawks

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have chance of winning this division if they can string

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>together some wins here like they are, they're within striking distance.

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>But it seems as if the market really doesn't think

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Seahawks are really even an average team. What

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what is your overall assessment of the Seahawks?

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I was even just looking at just

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe my top five NFC teams that I like, and

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, I Seahawks are kind of they're they're up there,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>They're getting up there. I mean, you know, looks good,

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 2>just like you've been talking about. I mean, that's every

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're all seeing it, how well he's playing

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>this season. But I just don't know how legitimate they

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 2>get deep in the playoffs. And even with San Francisco's situation,

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 2>I kind of still like him. You know, Shanahan doesn't

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>care about his quarterbacks.

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 3>We know this.

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 2>His system is based on running the ball yards after

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the catch and defense. Uh, pretty should be able to

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 2>manage this offense. So as much as that might be

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 2>a big issue with the Niners, I'm I'm kind of

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 2>leaning more towards liking the Niners still more than liking

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks at at this.

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Time right now.

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, as good as Gino Smith has been

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 2>playing and showing him you know, and you know, of

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 2>showing just how well he's playing actually the season and

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 2>he's you know, at the end of the day, I'm

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 2>still with the Niners.

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, wins championships.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I certainly still have the Niners ahead of the Seahawks

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>in my my power ratings, you know, still still the

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>better team. Okay, So Jessica, thanks for joining us. Tell

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the people where to follow you on social and where

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to find the work that you're doing and any pieces

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>any content that you have coming out.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, I mean you can find me.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 2>The biggest way to find me is on Twitter, so

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 2>grid Aaron and Wine and there that's where you'll be

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 2>able to see where I post things. For Action Network

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 2>is the majority of where all my work will be

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>found as well, but I post a lot of plays

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 2>on there. You can always message me through there and

0:26:57.960 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>as well as catch any articles or anything like that

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll writing.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, the grid Iron and wine do you also?

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you do like wine content? Are you a connoisseur

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of vino?

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm a connoisseur of all forms of alcohol, but.

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you know is one of my favorite. But yes,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean I don't.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't have like a whole any type of show

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 2>or anything like that specifically on wine. But I always

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 2>talk about wine, and I've spent some time in Napa,

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'm always down to drink some wine.

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good to know. It's a good handle. It's a

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>great Twitter handle.

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's better. It's better than Matt F. The Oracle

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Man if I could go back in time anyway. All right, Jessica,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining the show. She is Jessica Gridiron. I'm

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Friedman at Matt F the Orcle. Check out Betting

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Pros and Fantasy Pros for all of my work best bets,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>player props, Fantasy favorites, player projections and rankings, and more.

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate interview on your

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast app that is going to do it for

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the Week fourteen Best Bets edition of the Betting Pros Pod.

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tuning in, good Luck and See you Now,

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Episode h