WEBVTT - Businessweek Talks- Sinovation Ventures CEO Kai-Fu Lee

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. Kai Fu Lee

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>has spent nearly forty years at the forefront of artificial intelligence.

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>He's the chairman, CEO, and co founder of sign Ovation Ventures.

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>It's a venture capital firm with about two point five

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets. It focuses on AI, healthcare, and

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>other high tech and has made more than three hundred investments.

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the first Chinese VC firms to have

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>a presence in the US, and he's also the co

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Artificial Intelligence Council at the World Economic Forum.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>He's the former president of Google China and before that

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>was an executive at Microsoft and at Apple. His newest

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>book is AI Ten Visions for Our Future, and unlike

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>his last book, it's a work of fiction. He and

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>his co author, the sci fi novelist chen Cho Fan

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>right ten stories. They're all set twenty years from now,

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in ten forty one now. These stories illustrate a world

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that's layered with artificial intel agents. They cover themes like

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>AI displacing workers, deep fakes, and how a I will

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.279
<v Speaker 1>reimagine education of course, also imagines what could go wrong.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Kai fu Ley joins us now from Beijing. Kai ful,

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>great to chat with you. Thanks so much for taking

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. Why are these stories? Why is sci fi?

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Why is it the best way to communicate what you

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>envision AI doing to society in twenty years. Hi great

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>to have to be a here. AI is such an

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>important technology, perhaps the most important in the history of mankind,

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and yet it's sometimes viewed as rocket science, very hard

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand. So I wanted to see if there's a

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>way to make it accessible to people and that it's

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>actually not only understandable, but also fun to read. That's

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>why I uh found a science fiction writer to work

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with me. He writes the stories, I write the analysis,

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and then we make sure that the stories are realistic

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>within the twenty year time frame, so that the stories

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you read will be roughly what life will be like

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty years from now. Each story has an introduction, it

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>also has an analysis after the fact. What were you

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to do here? I wanted to explain the how

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the technology works and what it's good for, why it's

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>why it's good at what it's good at, and also

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>why it is almost always a double ex short. What

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>makes it incredibly powerful also creates some downside. For example,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>AI is great to help Facebook and Amazon make a

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of money by showing us things that we will

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>watch and buying, But then are those things good for

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>us because that's not being considered in the AI run

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>by Facebook and Amazon. So there is a flip side

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to this, and the story is really not just tell

0:02:55.639 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the technologies but also bringing up issues that they anology

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>causes and also suggests possible solutions. Do you think the

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that deploy AI today that are working on solving

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>these issues, do you think they're taking into account the

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>pitfalls the perils that you associate with AI. I think

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they are trying. But because it's a new technology, so uh,

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 1>they're the tools to combat the problems aren't there yet,

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and the engineers building the products weren't aware of the problems.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>None of the problems were intentionally created, you know, issues

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>with respect to personal data and explainability and what happens

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>when AI makes a mistake and accountability uh, and also bias.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So these were not intentional by the companies or the

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>engineers who build it. But now that we know these

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>are real problems, we need to put the training regulations

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>UH and investigating new technologies to come back techno oology problems.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the incentives, though, are aligned for companies

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that do work on this type of technology to create

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>solutions or are they mainly concerned with us getting to

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy more, to engage more, to to read more,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to spend more time on the platform without being concerned

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>about the consequences or while you really hit the problem

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on the head that it is exactly because the incentives

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are not aligned. So I think the only way to

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>fix it is to realign the incentives. And in the

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>short term, the internet companies could have an incentive realignment

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>if there were either regulations or certain parties that may

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>do an AI audit, or maybe there would be a

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>watchdog functions that are estimating percentage of fake news and

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>things like that that forces them before their brand and

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>reputation to consider that because if they lose their brand

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and have a some kind of a media disaster, they

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>will lose customers. So that would is one way to

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>externally force an approximation to an alignment, but there are

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>also other ways. Why can't we not encourage building of

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>applications and products that help us in the long term.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So if there were a product that could make me

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>more intelligent, more knowledgeable, more wealthy, m more happier, then

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be a product I would want to buy

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>more than I would want the Facebook news speed, um

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>or YouTube. So I think there are ways to align

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>user interests. I think people just um the company's just

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>felt like they got such a good AI tool. It

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>can make money directly, so use it for that singular purpose,

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>um and forget really that companies should be focused on

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>user needs first, and users want more than um just

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>watching some videos and and reading some blogs. There are

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>long term goals that we have, and when we have

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>such a powerful AI tool that can optimize our long

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>term goals, it would be such a unfortunate, um events

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if nobody tried to build something that that's for our

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>long term interests. So let's stick with Facebook because it's

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the companies that you mentioned. So who should

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>regulate Facebook? Should it be the U S Government or

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>should there be some sort of international body that takes

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>these difficult questions into account to come up with some

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>regulatory framework. After all, for all intents and purposes, Facebook

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is a global company, right right. I'm not an expert

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>in regulation, and I think regulation, in my opinion, is

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>just usually the last resort because, especially given the tools

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that the US has generally to use, such as breaking

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>a company up, that's just too brittle. So I think

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be ways to push the company into

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>an alignment with the goals that we the users have,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned a few of them. Uh. You know,

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>when I work for Google, there were third parties that

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>measured the relevance quality of Google Search Engine, and Google

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>paid a lot of attention to that. So if there

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>could be similar third party watchdog measures of level of

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>fake news, number of deep faith, and uh, how much

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>spam uh, and then it's measured externally, that would put

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a pressure on the engineering team to figure out at

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>least to spend part of their time to make the

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>content higher quality, uh, instead of just getting us to

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>click more and more. So, okay, I feel let's take

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a step back and just think about how we interact

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>with AI ine just just take us through, because I

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>think that there are a lot of people who don't

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think about it. Each and every day that we

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>are interacting with this technology, we are aariensing this technology

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>so so what does it look like for in our

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>daily lives globally. Sure, I'll give a couple of examples.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So one example is that um Ai language capabilities to

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>converse with us will grow significantly in many cases indistrestinguishable

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>from human human communication. And that means Ai will become

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a companion. UH. And that companion can learn our interests,

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can try to help us improve ourselves. That would be

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>an educational companion or to figure out how how we

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>might be healthier. That it might be a more of

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a doctor or psychiatrist companion, or it could just be

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a friend, a power for for a young kid. And

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they take and take shapes in UH, both in the

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the phone and the computer of course, but but

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>also v R and a R will be really realistic

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>by then that if we put on something like glasses,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we will see figures and avatars superimposed on the glasses

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and and then there there there is as though they

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>were in the actual environment. So it would be um

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>really virtual reality that's indistinguishable from the real reality. UH.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>In transportation, autonomous vehicles should just about work by then

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.199
<v Speaker 1>get all the kings worked out. Of course, throughout the

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>way we will see incrementally robot buses and shuttles and

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>trucks and so on. But truly, the steering feel wheel

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>free car that we can either share right or buy

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>will be just about fifteen to twenty years from now. UM.

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That would dramatically change our habits because we will have

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>um something like ten hours a week freed up that

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>when we're in the car we can educate and entertain, communicate,

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>no longer have to drive or look at the road um.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>And also cars can be on demand available um. And

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they will be smart, they will talk to each other,

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>they will avoid accidents, they will miss each other by

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>one's enemy there in a very calculated way. They will

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>drive more safely, probably eventually reducing fatalities. So it will

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be more efficient, lower costs, save us time, more comfortable

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>um and and also safer uh. And finally, in healthcare,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a I will be able to with a very high

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>likelihood predict the next pandemic because it could be watching

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data all over the world. And AI

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 1>will be used to alongside with scientists invent new drugs,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and that the cost of new drugs probably could be

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as little as ten of new drugs inventions today and

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>what that means is today's pharmaceuticals can only go after

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>blockbuster drugs for common diseases. But in the future, when

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the cost is slashed because AI is proposing treatments that

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are highly accurate working with scientists reducing the cost, that

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>means rare diseases for which is not economical for pharmaceuticals

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to book go after will become possible. And and also

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>AI will be keeping us healthy by taking all of

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>our m R I and gene sequencing and blood to

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>regularly monitor our health and give us hints on how

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to be healthier and live longer, and both of which

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>will happen in twenty years. You you paint a picture

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think is really optimistic when it comes to

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>this type of technology. But I'm wondering what your biggest

0:11:54.480 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>fears are regarding AI. Yeah, AI, like any technology, is neutral,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's good or bad because of the people who

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>program it have good or bad intentions. And the examples

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that gave earlier are all constructive, but there are definitely

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>cases where AI can can do terrible things. AI can

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>be used by UM companies to change the way we think.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>We already saw that to influence the way we think,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's extremely dangerous. AI can be used in uh.

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>The most disastrous situation is autonomous weapons. Imagine a thousand

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar drone combined with recognition of individuals with a bullet

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>connected to it, and that becomes an assassination tool, and

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's deployed in the tens of thousands, it becomes a

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>tool for genocide. So that essentially makes terrorist groups that

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>have a few million dollars they can almost um uh

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>do what countries do to create havoc can damage without

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>risking any terrorist lives. So that's something that's um I think,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>extremely dangerous. And and also unlike nuclear weapons, which uh

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>offers a unique property that is mutually destructive, so people

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>don't launch it before fear of retaliation, but autonomous weapons

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>are not totally destructive and not easily detectable, So that's

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>another serious problem. And and lastly, we already saw the facts,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's really just the beginning. AI will be able

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to fake many things. It will be able to make

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>videos that look really real when it's off fabricated UM.

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It will be able to talk like someone quote quote

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>room evidence. UH may maybe maybe at the point where

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>people can't tell if it's fake or real anymore, not

0:13:55.720 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to mention rumors on the and false rumors on the Internet.

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And also AI will be able to fake emotion, so

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you know the scenario we saw in the movie Her.

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, while AI doesn't have any feelings, it can

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fake feelings to a point that could be used to

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>do bad things as well. So I think that interest

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>cases are just as significant. But my optimism is based

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that all technologies that have been incredibly powerful,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, electricity, automobile, internet, PC, UM, they have caused

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>problems from time to time, but ultimately they end up

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot more good than evil because hopefully we

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>are learning from experience and have some wisdom to um

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to self managed so that we figure out ways to

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>counter the bad guys and encourage the good guys. Well,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>how do we do that? It ends up being all

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>constructed because I can't help, but think that those do

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we counter Yeah, yeah, because they can't help, But think

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that those problems are of a different magnitude than problems

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>created by other types of modernization. It really makes me

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>think of the sci fi series Black Mirror and the

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>way that that show really lays out so so many

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of the dystopian futures that you could think about when

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this type of technology, how do we

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>prevent that type of future from overtaking us. Yeah, I'm

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Black Mirror. It's partly inspired the book,

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think in the Black Mirror, though, it's usually

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>uh a technology is used in the wrong way by

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>some some part bad person and then it leads to

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>usually a disastrous ending. In in my book, I try

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to create scenarios where many of the bad endings were

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>saved by the by the good guys, and that might

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>be saved with some clever technology that combats the bad technology,

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>or with some smart tools prevents the back technology from propagating,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>or maybe there's some new regulations like the AI audit.

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So what I wanted to propose in the book is

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that yes, AI and like any other great technology, will

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>create a lot of problems, but many of the problems

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>can be greatly reduced if we let technologies work on

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>solutions that address the problems created by technologies themselves. I

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta ask about your interpretation of of what's been happening

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in China and your interpretation specifically of President She's cracked

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>down on technology I'm wondering how you interpret Beijing's measures

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>against d D, Shu Shing or Jack Moll for example. Oh,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>these are not really technology firms per se. And we

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>invest in technology, invest in robots and AI and healthcare

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, new cures and new drugs. Those are

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>actually heavily encouraged. UM. What those companies are d D

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and Ali Baba and Tensent and others are really I

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think the issue is that they have a lot of

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>power and a lot of days done, and that gives

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>them even more power, and that power needed to be checked.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So not at all, you know, consistent with what US

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and EU are doing to rein in Google, Facebook, UM

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon. Given what's happened in China over the last year,

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to reigning in these tech firms, has

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it changed the way that you're thinking about investing in

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Chinese companies? Does it make you think differently about how

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to deploy your money. Well, actually, we've always been investors

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in deep tech, so now it's just a better time

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>than ever to keep doing what we have been doing.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>UM deep tech hasn't been as favored. They haven't seen

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>as much growth five or ten years ago compared to

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Internet giants. But I think going forward, deep tech

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>um is going to generate the best returns, probably globally,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly in China. You told Bloomberg a few years ago

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>back in of your money was invested in in Chinese companies.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that consistent roughly yes, still the case, even more

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>given COVID. How so what do you mean, Well, we're

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>unable to travel, so we can't really see a lot

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of companies outside China, and you think you need to

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>see companies in order to know whether or not to

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>invest in them. That would help to build trust, to

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>see the people, to understand them. So I think generally

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer is yes, we have made one investment in

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the French company without seeing them, but that detainitely the exception,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not the rule. So that brings me to the next

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>question is how do you think the pandemic will will

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>affect China, the tech industry and in China's place in

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. The pandemic has really in China pushed further

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the adoption of automation and robotics. Initially it may have

0:18:55.119 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>been for reducing social contact UH by having robots in

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>UH factories and restaurants and even homes, I get my

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>um takeoff delivered by by robot nowadays, So I think

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the robotic revolution is probably the big big step forward

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that will be helpful to push China's technologies ahead. Um.

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, UM, the other big thing that's

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>happened globally is the work from home and and that

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>has really streamlined work for a lot of companies and

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>also enabled the use of uh ai and cloud technologies.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's why where I think US has really done

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>by far the best job, partly because the US has

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>always had stronger enterprise technologies, but also partly because Americans

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>were um working from home longer than the Chinese. So

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I think each country has got some benefit um um

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out of COVID, even though it's terrible disaster for for

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole world, I feel things have changed just quite

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit since you picked your computer science as your

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>college major years ago. It was of course before you

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>went to get your PhD from Carnegie Mellon. So if

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you could go back in time, what advice would you

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>give your eighteen year old self, what advice would you

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>give to college students today? Um, I would say back

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>then I going or today, following your heart, do what

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you really love to do. Is It's the same advice

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I give to myself back then and also to a

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>young person today, perhaps even more important today because um,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a young person is not just competing with other young people,

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but also AI is taking away routine jobs. So it

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>pushes us to do things that a I cannot do,

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>whether it's creativity or compassion, and it forces us to

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>be the best we can be. And the best we

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>can be is doing things that we're good at and

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the things we love. CAIFOOLEI thank you so much for

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>taking the time and joining us in Bloomberg business. We

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it.