WEBVTT - Media and You: From Records to Film

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and Welcome to Tech Stuff.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and I Heart Radio and I love

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>all things tech, and today I thought I would do

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>something a little different from my normal episode. So rather

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>than tackle a particular technology or tell you about the

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>history of a tech company, or even go into an

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in depth profile of an innovator, I thought instead I

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>would talk about a more broad topic that kind of

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>delves not just into technology, but into business and into culture.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's all about our relationship with media. Specifically, I'm

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be focusing on stuff like audio and video

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>and how our relationship with that sort of media has

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>changed as technology has changed over the years. Those changes

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have been pushed by innovation and also the entertainment industry's

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>reaction to innovation and spoiler alert, sometimes the entertainment industry's

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>reaction was resistance. So I think the story also tells

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>us a lot about ourselves, not just the stuff we enjoy,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but it tells us more about what we value and

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>where we can find that balance between art and commerce,

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>which is a pretty tricky topic. So today we're going

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>to look at how tech has changed the way we

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>access entertainment. And because this is a large topic, it's

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>going to take a few episodes. So we're going to

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>focus on the early days of modern media in this episode.

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna actually first start because you know how

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I am a couple of centuries ago, before the Industrial

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Revolution and the age of electricity. So first, most people

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a whole lot of time to spare for entertainment.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>If you were working class, you spend most of your

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>waking hours doing work, and even those more elevated in

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>social class had limited options for their entertainment. Let's say

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that you were one of those fortunate individuals. You're born

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>into wealth and social status, so you could go to

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>where entertainment was happening, such as a theater or an

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>opera house if you're talking about say seventeenth century or later. Um,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but maybe you go to a tavern, to go into

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of public houses courtyard that's where sometimes various

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>entertainments would be performed. Perhaps you could attend a party

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>thrown by some fancy person who has decided to host

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>entertainers for an evening, or maybe you bring the entertainment

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to you, you host your own fancy party. Perhaps you

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>have a string quartet in your palatial estate. Now obviously

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>that option is limited to a pretty select group of people.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Or you could take it upon yourself to learn some

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>form of entertainment, such as learning to play one or

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>more instruments. But entertainment was ephemeral. It was momentary. You

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it as it was happening, and then it was over.

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>You had no way to experience it again without reinitiating

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the performance itself. And then of course you're going to

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>get a variation on what you've just experienced, since it's

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare that humans can perfectly replicate a performance. So

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>being a professional entertainer was a challenging gig in those

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>days too, because there was there was no way to

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>live off of recordings. You could conceivably publish sheet music

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for your works, but that was challenging too. It was

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an industry that was rife with piracy. Because music and

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>entertainment piracy is not a new thing that has been

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>around since the printing press essentially, So take the famous

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>playwright William Shakespeare. He wrote in the late fifteen hundreds

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and early sixteen hundreds. He never published any of his

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>plays during his own lifetime. Other people sometimes published his plays,

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and there were many versions of his plays that were

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>printed in what we're called quartos. No need to go

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>into why, that's more of a history thing. But these

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>quartos were sometimes based off of partial theatrical scripts. They

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>might be based off old drafts that were pieced together

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>from previous performances, or they might even have been cobbled

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>together from memory, either by working with an actor or

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>someone who had attended a performance and then is essentially

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to recreate it as best they can. So they're

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>frequently referred to by scholars as being unreliable or bad quartos.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until several years after Shakespeare had died that

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>an official version of his plays reached publication, so this

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was not a common thing. In fact, it wouldn't be

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>until really Ben Johnson was demanding his plays get published

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later. So if you were a performer

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>back in the old days, you either sought out a

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>patron who would put the bill for your expenses, or

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you would travel around and get hired to play for

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>an engagement, or maybe you'd be part of an ensemble

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with an established theater and depend upon a share of

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the box office if you were part time owner of

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>that or a part owner of that theatrical company. But

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that was about it. Gutenberg's printing press allowed for the

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>rise of the publishing industry, so if you were a composer,

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you could land a publishing deal and make a little

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of money there, although the publishing houses were making

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>most of the money. And that's pretty much how things

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>went until the late nineteenth century, and that's when tons

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of changes happened. The Industrial Revolution was underway and had

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>actually really mostly happened by the late nineteenth century, and

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>suddenly people had a lot more spare time on their hands.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>They could actually dedicate time to recreation and relaxation and entertainment.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It's also when Thomas Edison and others were changing the

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>world by introducing devices uh that could do lots of

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>different things. You were getting electric light, electricity in general.

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The birth of radio was right around the corner, and

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the birth of the ability to record and playback audio. Now,

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the record industry immediately popped up after

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Edison demonstrated this capability. It took many years to refine

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the technology to a point where recording was of a

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>high enough quality to serve as a commercial product, and

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it also took time to develop a better playback device,

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>something like the gramophones that you could actually hear the

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>recording and a decent volume. The gramophone introduced another innovation

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that helped create the recording industry, which was the flat disc.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So earlier recordings were made on wax cylinders. The cylinders

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 1>had several disadvantages. One was that they weren't easy to

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mass produce, so you were had limited runs when you

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>were making these things in the first place. And early on,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you might make a recording by shouting into the wide

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>end of a speaking trumpet, and that would send vibrations

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>down the trumpet to a diaphragm in the narrow end

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>that had a stylus attached to it, essentially, and the

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>vibration would make the stylus carve out a groove in

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a rotating wax cylinder that was moving vertically against well

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>rotating and moving vertically against the stylus, so from top

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to bottom you would have one long spiral, and the

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>variations of indentation would be the representation of sound but

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this was not a terribly efficient way to make recordings.

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Edison vound ways to improve the system, but it was

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>still hard to make a lot of cylinders at once.

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It just wasn't the right format. On top of that,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>wax cylinders were fairly bulky. You couldn't store a ton

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of them on a shelf, for example, and they weren't

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>very durable. After a couple of dozen playbacks, the quality

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on the recording would degrade to the point where it

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>could be unintelligible. And also they couldn't hold very much

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>recorded audio in the first place. They were limited just

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes. So a guy named Emil Berliner came

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>up with the flat disc. If you listen to my

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>episode about the history of the turntable, I talked about Berliner.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I also will be repeating some of the information from

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that episode, but it's important to establish it to understand

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>our relationship with media. So to make a recording on

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a flat disc originally anyway, he would take a master

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>disc made out of metal and he would code it

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>with lamp black, which is sort of like dipping the

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>disc in ink while recording. There'd be a stylus that

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>would drag against this disk in a spiral from the

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>outside edge to the inside edge of this disc. So

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen a record album, vinyl record album,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how the grooves go from the outside and they

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>work their way in same sort of thing. Now, while

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>it was recording, this stylus would make little lateral oscillations,

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning it would shake side to side a little bit

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>as the sound was impacting the diaphragm attached to the stylus.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>This is an opposition to wax cylinders those relied on

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>vertical oscillations. The essentially think of the stylus as going

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in or out of the wax, so it's digging deeper

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>or it's not digging as deeply as the sound is

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting it. This version, the the disc version was going

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>left right, not up and down, So the stylus would

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially wipe away a little bit of the lamp black.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So at the end of the recording you would have

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this disc that's mostly black, but you would have a

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>spiral of metal showing through the black surface where the

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>stylus had had scraped off the lamp black. Essentially, then

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Berliner would take this disc and dip it into an

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>acid bath, and that would eat away at the exposed metal,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>leaving the lamp blacked metal untouched. You're lifted out of

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that acid bath, you wipe it down, and you have

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially a master recording. Berliner then could use a process

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>called electroplating to create a negative image of this master,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the negative image meaning that the copy of it would

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have the groove turned into a raised ridge on the negative.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So what was a a indented groove on the master

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>is now a raised ridge that would actually be used

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>as a stamp, and you could stamp blank discs with

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this master or this master stamp, and thus transfer the

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>master recording two copies. And that meant that Berliner's approach

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was better suited for mass production. It gave it a

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>big advantage over wax cylinders. A bit later, innovators combined

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Berliner's mass production method with the practice of recording on wax,

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>because recording on wax was easier and created a better

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>quality recording than Berliner's approach with the lampblack uh. This

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>was a method that Alexander Graham Bell and Charles Tainter

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>had developed, and so that was on wax cylinders back

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Now they're transferring it over to wax discs,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and the result was a mass producible recording method that

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>was able to produce good enough sound quality to allow

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for amercial application of the technology. So at the turn

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of the twentieth century, so right around nineteen the companies

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>making the playback devices, namely the Gramophone and Typewriter Company,

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>began to sell home grammophones with the help of recordings

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>of famous musicians and singers. The allure was really strong

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>because not everyone had the means or opportunity to hear

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>someone like Enrico Caruso sing, but with a gramophone and

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a record, you could reproduce him singing in your own home.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Some of those early recordings were so popular that they

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>would have to be re recorded because the master recording

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>would wear out. The master stamp would wear out after

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain number of pressings, so that also led to

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the industry developing a new method in order to create

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple stamps from a single master recording. That way, when

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>one wore out, they would still have another backup master

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>stamp to go with, and they wouldn't have to worry

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>about having to rerecord or the whole thing, because it

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>would just mean that you have two different recordings of

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the same piece, and one might actually be better than

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the other, and maybe that the first recording was better

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>or maybe the second one, but either way they wouldn't

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be exactly the same. Now this time around, you started

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing recording companies emerge. Victor and Colombia were big ones,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and from the turn of the century until about nineteen five,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>all recordings were made by playing or singing or speaking

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>into that wide end of a trumpet, a physical trumpet.

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>This was the mechanical approach to recording. This was before

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the electric microphone was used in recording sessions, and there

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>were engineering challenges that made this pretty tough. If you

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>were really close to the horn, creating what was known

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>as a forward recording, then your performance would sound more

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>vivid and dynamic. You're you're closer to that diaphragm that's

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>actually transferring the vibration through the stylus to the recording media,

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>usually a wax disc. But the nature of those vibrations

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>recorded on the disc meant that the discs you'd produce

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>later would tend to wear out faster. They were deeper cuts.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>They were using a material called shellac at the time,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>which was hard and brittle, and fairly thin um, and

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so those deeper recordings would mean that if you were

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to play this playing it back on a turntable, each

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>time you've laid it back, it was adding more wear

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and tear to the disc, and so those discs wouldn't

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>last as long. The sound quality would be better, but

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't last very long compared to other discs. So

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>if you recorded further away from the horn, you would

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have a more muted sound, but it would also mean

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that those grooves weren't quite so extreme, so the produced

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>discs would actually last longer. So it's something you had

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to balance out. Uh. The technologies limitations also dictated the

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>type of content that could go on them, and thus

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it shaped the development of music itself. Early recordings had

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to be short. Early wax cylinders and discs had a

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>capacity to hold just a couple of minutes of a recording.

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Engineers worked on refining the recording technology and the capacity

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>slowly increased, but it was still hovering it around five

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>minutes per disc or cylinder in the nineteen twenties. Rarely,

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>sound engineers would work with musicians to play a piece

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>faster than the normal arrangement, just so it would fit

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on a side of a recording, so you might hear

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about that. It didn't happen as frequently as some people

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to talk about, but it was something that occasionally

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>happened where maybe you had a piece that would last

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>typically five minutes fifteen seconds, but you're limited to four

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>minutes forty five seconds per side of a recording, so

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>rather than try and split it up, you just speed

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>up the tempo and play it faster than you normally would.

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>That did happen occasionally, but other times they might work

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with a composer or a musician to tweak a recording,

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to to tweak the the arrangement of the music so

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that they could create a transition in such a way

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that there would be a natural pause that would allow

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you to turn a disc over or to put on

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a second or third, or fourth or whatever disc on

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the playback device. So here we have our first really

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting example of how technology truly changed music, and not

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just by increasing its accessibility. The recorded media format dictated

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the form. If you were to compose a piece specifically

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to record it, you know, you're not just putting something

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that already exists to a recording, but you're writing to

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the format, you would have to work within the limitations

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the medium. You couldn't have a piece be too

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>soft in volume because it wouldn't be loud enough to

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>transfer the vibrations to the recording horns stylist, so you

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>couldn't also be meat loaf. You couldn't write a fourteen

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>minute epic ballad because the physical space on the red

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>warding blanks wasn't enough to fit that many grooves onto

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a side. These limitations would carry on even as technology improved,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's largely why most popular songs these days averaging

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at around three minutes in length. It's not because that's

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>about as long as people want to listen to a song.

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's because back in the old days, three minutes was

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about what you had to work with, give or take.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Longer pieces required several discs to make a complete recording,

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't unusual for a single long piece to

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>spend nine or more disks on one piece of music,

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not multiple songs. But you think of some of those

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>classical pieces, like a symphony that can go on for

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a while. You might have nine, ten eleven disks

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>representing one symphony. The industry standard recording in playback speed

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>was for the disk to spend at seventy eight revolutions

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>per minute or seventy eight rpm, and that started at

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 1>around five as the industry standard. This actually wasn't anything

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily to do with sound quality or anything like that.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It was literally a convenience because there was a plentiful

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>number of thirty six hundred rpm motors that you could

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>get your hands on if you wanted to build a

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>U turntable, and then you would use a forty six

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>tooth gear to scale down that revolutions per minute and

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you would end up giving getting so many eight revolutions

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>per minute. So typically you would store all the discs

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 1>from a single recording in a folder with pockets for

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>every disk, and those folders were called albums. Look kind

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of like a photo album. You would have a disc

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>album that represented one full recording of whatever piece it was,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we call them albums. Now, after the

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>First World War, radio began to emerge, and that offered

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>up an alternative to owning a gramophone at home. Instead

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of buying a gramophone and records, you could purchase a

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>radio and listen to stations. Some of the stations would

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>also play recordings. You wouldn't be able to listen to

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what you wanted when you wanted, but you'd also have

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the potential to access a much larger library of recordings, or,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the station, you could be listening to live performances.

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>In fact, a lot of radio stations depended more on

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>live performances than recordings because radio, unlike the recording industry

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at the time, was reliant on electric electric microphones, so

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>those were much better at picking up a dynamic range

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of sounds. They could pick up quiet stuff, they could

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>pick up a loud stuff. They were much more versatile

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for recording sessions. You didn't have to be right up

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on the horn. They're amazing photos of of uh, small

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>orchestras or bands all just crowded around the horn of

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>a recording device in order to play their music into it.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>And you always had to put the quieter instruments up

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>towards the front or else they'd be overpowered by the

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 1>louder instruments. There wasn't as big a concern with that

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with electric microphones. They were much better at picking up

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>those dynamic ranges, so you didn't have to worry about

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>having everybody right up ons that that horn. So radio

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>performances tended to be superior to recorded music on disk,

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and you started to see more people kind of gravitate

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.479
<v Speaker 1>towards the radio than the recorded media. So this was

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>another shift the way that technology was changing our behavior,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and the recording industry started to experiment with using electric

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>microphones as well. They saw the need to respond to

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>this new threat of radio. All right, now, when we

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>come back, i'll talk about how some improvements in recording

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>technology got the industry back in the game and changed

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>how we think about media. But first, let's take a

0:19:55.000 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>quick break. In the nineteen twenties, a pair of engineers

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>from Bell Telephone Laboratories would revolutionize sound recording. They were JP.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Max Field and HC. Harrison, and they had already applied

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>their ingenuity to making telephones a viable technology. They subjected

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the process of sound recording and replication to scientific study

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. In August ninety six, they published

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the results of their work in a paper titled High

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Quality Recording and Reproducing of Music and Speech, which you

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>can find online. If you are so inclined, you could

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>read the whole thing. It's not a very long paper either.

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Max Field and Harrison demonstrated that using electronic means of

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>recording would produce higher quality results than the mechanical acoustic

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>method that had been in use. Microphones for orchestras could

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>be placed a bit further away from the musicians, so

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>again they didn't have to be crowded around the horn,

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and microphones can capture the sound quality of the room

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>where the recording is made, and that generated what the

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>two engineers would refer to as room tone, which is

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>still a thing. In fact, we actually try to remove

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>room tone from our recording so that you get a

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>cleaner sound. But it was thought of as a valuable thing.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>It it gave another quality to music, and so it

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was something that was considered an interesting thing to capture

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Interestingly, in that paper, Maxfield and Harrison

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>argue that for playback devices, particularly for home playback devices,

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a mechanical system might be preferable to one using electricity

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for sound reproduction. So recording sound you want to use

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>an electric microphone, but playing it back they didn't think

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>it was that important. So with the mechanical system, you

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.479
<v Speaker 1>have the stylist that vibrates as it travels through the

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>grooves of a disk, and those vibrations transferred to a diaphragm,

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>which in turn vibrates and changes the air pressure inside

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a horn, and then we hear those fluctuations of air

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>pressure as sound. But that's a direct path. The alternative

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>is to have the stylus transfer those vibrations to a

0:21:55.920 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>device that can transform the physical vibrations into electrical impulses,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>send those impulses to an amplification system to boost the

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>very weak signal that the stylus generates, and use that

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>boosted signal to drive some other element to vibrate, essentially

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a speaker, and to create the sound we'd hear. Now,

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>due to the limitations of technology at the time, that

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't a viable approach for home electronics. It wouldn't

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be till later, when speakers and amplifiers were more available

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that that would become viable. The paper led to a

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>new method of recording called the Western Electric Recording System

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>or West TREKS, and the results were pretty fantastic for

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the time. Suddenly a recorded piece of music or spoken

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>word could stand up to the quality herd over live

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>radio performances. Recording companies like Victor and Columbia quickly adopted

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the new methodology. But these recording companies were not eager

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to stick with the Western Electric system for a couple

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of big reasons. One was that the recording companies weren't

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>allowed to purchase a recording system outright. Western Electric would

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>only lease the systems, so that was an ongoing cost. Secondly,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Western Electric demanded a royalty fee for every record sold

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that had been made through the Western Electric process. And

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you something, folks, nothing drives innovation more

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>than money does. Genius has its place, but money makes

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the world go round, and companies often find great incentive

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to innovate when it could mean keeping more of the

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>cash for the company itself. So the recording companies were

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>all at work trying to create alternatives to the Western

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Electric system to get the same results, but through a

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>different approach. They had to be careful that their own

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>methodologies were distinct from Western Electric in order to avoid

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>infringing upon patents, and so alternate methods began to emerge,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and these in turn created recordings with slightly different qualities

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to them, so you could, in theory, record the exact

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>same performance using two different systems and produced two different

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>master recordings of that same performance, But the way the

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>recorded music would sound when played back would be slightly

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>different from one to the other, not so different that

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you would think you were listening to two separate recording sessions,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>but the tone of the recordings could be different. And

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>so technology again was having an effect on music. Now,

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this also touches on something that will pop up again

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in these episodes, which is the quest for fidelity, and

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>by that I mean the effort to create a playback

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of a recorded moment that strives to replicate the original

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>performance as closely as possible. In an ideal recording system,

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the recorded media would sound exactly the way it sounded

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in the recording studio. So if you were in that

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>room listening to the musicians play a song live, and

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>then you listen to the recorded version, you wouldn't be

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>able to tell the difference. Ideally. Now, there are plenty

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of instances in which those making the recording they don't

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>want a perfect reproduction. There are lots of effects you

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>might want to put on audio before you commit it

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to a master recording, like overdubbing or auto tune or

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>what ever. But that wasn't a big thing in the

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties and nineteen thirties, so we're going to ignore

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that for now. So let's switch gears a bit. We're

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna come back to the music industry before the end

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of this episode. But while the music industry was building

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>its foundation, the same thing was happening in the film industry.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The birth of that industry was also in the nineteenth century,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>as innovators discovered that by presenting a sequence of similar

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>images to the eye and rapid succession, you could simulate

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a moving image. Actually it dates back to before that,

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but they're serious study put to it in the eighteenth

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>century or nineteenth century rather, so that's the basis of

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>film and animation. You aren't really watching motion. You're watching

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of still images, like photographs or drawings that

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>are put in rapid sequence in front of us. So

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>our brains, just like technology, are limited. There is a

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>threshold for the speed at which we can view separate

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>images and see them as being distinct. In the nineteenth century,

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>scientists hypothesized that it was the retina that could only

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>distinguish different ages if there was a long enough delay

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>between them, and so the name for the phenomena was

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the persistence of vision. But in fact this limitation is

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>really in our brains, not our eyes themselves. If you

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>present images faster than the threshold can account for, you

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>get the illusion of movement. Twenty four frames a second

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>is a good example. At twenty four frames per second,

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>our brains cannot distinguish the the individual images and we

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>see that as motion. So, just like with the recording industry,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the early years of film were ones of experimentation. In

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen eighties, George Eastman created a process that would

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>allow a camera to take a series of photographs in

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>quick succession, thus recording movement. A very short clip it's

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>less than two seconds long. Uh it comes from eight

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>shows a record of what this process could produce, and

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it's called the round Hey Garden scene. It was created

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>by Louis la Prince and all it shows is people

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>walking around in a garden. It's a far cry from

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a feature film, but it was a building block for

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>what would follow. In the early eighteen nineties, a French

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>inventor named Leon Bouley created a device called the cinematic graph,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>but Bully was never able to produce a physical prototype

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and so he sold his idea to two brothers, Auguste

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and Louis Lumier. The Lumiers took his idea and they

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>created a new device. They made a lot of changes.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was really more their invention than Boulets

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end, but it used the same name cinematograph. Uh.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It was not just a camera that could capture images,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it was also a projector that could display those captured

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>images against a flat surface. In fact, you could process

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the film too. You could do all three in this

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one device. It's was really revolutionary. So earlier devices could

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>capture images on film, but they weren't projectors. So instead

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 1>you would use this device that was kind of like

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a had a visor I piece. You would actually look

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>into the visor and typically you would turn a crank

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, though some of them had mors and it

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>would play back the frames and you would watch it

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>playback in real time, but limited the audience to just

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>one person at a time. The Lumier brothers created a

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>technology that allowed for group presentations, which in turn set

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the stage for the theatrical film experience, and their contribution

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was significant enough that cinema became a word we would

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>use to describe the art and industry of filmmaking. Their

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>version was a hand cranked device. It actually made it

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>much more portable. You didn't have to have big wires

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>or anything to provide electricity to it. But it also

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>depended upon the camera and projector operator having a steady hand,

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>otherwise motion would be herky jerky. As the recording or

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>playback speed varied, so there were electronic versions or or

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>electric motor versions out there. Edison had already created one,

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but again, it wasn't a projector. Also, I'm skipping over

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a ton of interesting historical facts about projectors in general,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but just know they were a critical component of cinema now.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>The Lumiers held a special screening in eight They charged

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>people one franc to view ten short films. The total

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>running time for all ten films together was about twenty

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>five minutes. So the Lumiers combined several things that would

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>become important parts of cinema moving forward, the capturing of

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>images in short succession, projecting them back on a large surface,

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and charging money to watch the result. They weren't the

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>first to do any of those things individually, but combining

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>them in this way meant that Their screening is frequently

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>used as sort of the birthday for modern cinema, but

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the brothers didn't think this curiosity would stand the test

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of time, with Louis even proclaiming that the practice didn't

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have a future. George Millier, who made films in the

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>late nineteenth and early twentieth century, used the futureless art

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to do more than capture scenes of real life that

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lumiers were just sort of capturing stuff that was

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>happening in front of them. Millier had the idea of

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>using this to create stories. He wanted to build narratives

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with plot. He would edit and cut films. That was

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a practice that was truly innovative and would become another

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>integral component of filmmaking. Edwin s Porter, who had worked

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>for Edison, created a twelve minute narrative film called The

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Great Train Robbery in nineteen o three, and films were

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>starting to get longer and longer, with what is considered

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the first feature length film debuting in nineteen

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>o six that would Charles Tate's film The Ned Kelly Gang,

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>had a running time of seventy minutes. The following decades

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>saw various filmmakers introduced new techniques to push the art form.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, engineers were working to improve camera

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and projector technologies. Gradually, the hand cranked era gave way

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to electric motors and projectors that could record in playback

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>film at a set speed, so you didn't have to

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>worry about herkey jerky motion anymore. One of the big

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>engineering challenges the industry faced was how to put sound

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to film, and there were a couple of different methods,

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but one of those methods was called vitaphone, and vitaphone

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>would rely upon a projector sync nized with a phonograph player,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>upon which a disk with the film's soundtrack would play

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in synchronization with the playback of the film, which ties

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>together cinema with the recording industry. The big difference here

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was that while you could have a phonograph in your

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>home and listen to your own records, there was no

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>way as of yet to enjoy a film in your

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>own home. I've got a lot more to say about media,

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>but let's take another quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Like the recording industry, the film industry gave birth to

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>new production studios. Early movies were usually produced by engineers

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and innovators, so sort of independence who were just trying

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>out this new technology. These geniuses created that technology, but

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they weren't necessarily as a dept at building compelling stories. Meanwhile,

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the storytellers out there weren't necessarily in a position to

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get hold of cameras and actors and sets and crew

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to put a movie to get other and so enterprising

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>individuals began to form studios for that very purpose. The

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>oldest one in the United States is Universal, which was

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>founded in nineteen twelve. Paramount would follow later that year,

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>but it was originally called the Famous Players Film Company.

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Films had to have a place to play as well.

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just enough to make them, you had to

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>have a place to show them. And that's where theaters

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>come in. Now. Some theaters were independent operations, and those

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>independent operations would negotiate with different movie studios for the

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rights to show different films. Such an independent theater could

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at least in theory, show a Paramount film one week

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and a Universal Pictures film the following week. But many

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>theaters were outright owned by the studios themselves, and they

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>would typically only screen films made by the parents studio.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>In addition, studios were buying up film processing companies, which

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>brought the entire process of moviemaking from shooting to processing

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to screening under one company. An so, if you want

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to see a movie back in the early twentieth century,

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you were probably headed to a specific theater owned by

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the studio then made the film you wanted to see.

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was a great situation for the movie studios

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and not so great for just about everyone else. Filmmakers

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and actors would have to sign exclusive contracts to specific studios,

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which might guarantee a number of movies or pictures as

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they call them in the biz, but would prevent those

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>actors and filmmakers from working for any other studio during

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the duration of that contract. It was possible for a

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>studio to sign a popular actor, let's say, to a

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>contract and then not do anything with that actor except

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>prevent them from being in any other studio works. So

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a way of, you know, taking an actor

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 1>off the shelf so that competitor couldn't make use of

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>them if they need be. Studios could also they were

0:33:55.400 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>constantly producing movies. It was just a movie generating bis

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this it was almost like mass production of film, so

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>people were at work all the time that there was

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>very little downtime in those movie studios. Moreover, the studios

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 1>were very powerful even with independent theaters. The studios could

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>throw their weight around. They would negotiate with theater owners

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>using a tactic called block booking and sometimes blind bidding

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. So in block booking, studios would withhold sought

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>after films unless the theater owners agreed to buy copies

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>of other movies from that same studio, and usually they

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 1>were lower quality, mediocre films that no one was really

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>clamoring to see, and independent filmmakers who were not working

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the studio system found this practice to be unfair

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for a few reasons. One was if all the theaters

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in a region are beholden to studios because they've agreed

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to these block booking tactics and it's filled up their theaters,

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>there may not be any play time for them to

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>run into in film. For another, sometimes independent filmmakers would

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>partner with studios for distribution, but then the studio would

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>use that independently produced film to again be part of

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>block booking and say, if you want to screen this movie,

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you also have to take these other twelve crappy films,

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes the block would be such a large block

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of programming that a theater's entire year's worth of programming

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>would be taken up in one deal. And it was

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>seen as a very anti competitive practice. Even early on

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in the silent era, this was seen as a problem. So,

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it created kind of a monopoly. And

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so then the United States, the Department of Justice began

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to push back against the film industry. Way back in

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty one, the Federal Trade Commission or FTC declared

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that the block booking method that the studios were using

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>was anti competitive, and they also began to investigate the

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>industry further. That culminated in nineteen twenty eight with a

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against Paramount Pictures. The case also named nine other studios.

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Paramount was of paramount importance, but they were all kind

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of lumped in together. The case actually took two years

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to complete. In the Department of Justice, one a decision

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that stated the film studios did in fact represent a

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>monopoly and they want a judgment against block booking. But

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>rather than enforce a ban on block booking, nothing was done,

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't that the government changed its mind about

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the practice, but rather, this was also the time when

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression was hitting and films were a type

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>of escapism and they were seen as an important way

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>to preserve morale. So President Roosevelt's administration decided not to

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>break up the studio theater relationship or to enforce a

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>ban on block booking, and things continued as before for

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a time in order for more films to come out.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>The Roosevelt administration was afraid that by going in and

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>regulating the industry during a time of depression, uh it

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>would mean that films would stop coming out, people wouldn't

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have that escapism, and things would get even worse. The

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>time of the studio dominance would finally end in May nine.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>That's when the Supreme Court settled the issue once and

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>for all, declaring block booking to be anti competitive and

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that the movie studios had to sell off their theater chains,

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and that broke up the studio system. Now there were

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>still film studios, but they would only be in the

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>business of making movies, not the entire chain or vertical

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of film from production to screening. This was good news

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for independent filmmakers and for independent theater owners, but they

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>had another technology that was just beginning to emerge that

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>was a big cause of anxiety, which would be television.

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>TV had been around for a bit, but it wouldn't

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>be until the nineteen forties and fifties that started to

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>become a larger concern. Now, jumping back over to the

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>music industry, just to close out this episode, I want

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the development of the forty five and

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the long playing album or LP. So for decades re

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>or than music was limited by capacity problems on a

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>single disc or cylinder, and by this time we're just

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>talking discs. No one was making cylinders anymore. There's just

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>only so much space you can use on a surface

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to carve out a groove. The technology and material that

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>recording studios had to work with meant that the grooves

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>had size limitations too. You couldn't make the grooves too small.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But that changed thanks to Peter Carl Goldmark. Now, if

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>you listen to my episodes about our CIA, you heard

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 1>me mention gold Mark, who worked for our CIA's rival Columbia.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Gold Mark had a team of staff and they began

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to investigate the possibility of developing a long playing record

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>album that would work when play back at thirty three

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and one third revolutions per minute. So remember the industry

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 1>standard at that time was seventy eight revolutions per minute,

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.399
<v Speaker 1>largely because recording and playing records on older materials at

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>slower speeds resulted in lower quality audio. There had been

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times where people had tried to do

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty three a third playback albums. They weren't long playing

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 1>albums because they still had a limited number of grooves

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>on them, but it was never financially viable. It was

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>never economically viable to launch with those technologies. So this

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was a new attempt. So Goldmark wanted to do two things.

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to reduce the revolution speed and increase the

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>number of grooves you could fit on one side of

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>a twelve or ten inch record disc. Doing both of

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>those things would extend the playing time for a record.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>If you had a twelve inch record, you could get

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty minutes of audio per side, and that

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>would remove a lot of the frustrating limitations the recording

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>industry had been dealing with since it had started. So again,

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier efforts had been thwarted by those technical and economic challenges.

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It would take a few years for the economy to

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 1>recover and for World War two to end. That also

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>happened during this time, and then you would get the

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>right environment to launch a new format for recorded media.

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Within that time, gold Mark worked on perfecting his vision.

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>He formed teams focused on specific problems. So one team

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>would work on a turntable design meant to play at

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that thirty three and a third rpm and with a

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>stylist that's capable of fitting in a much smaller groove.

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Another team worked on fine tuning the material they would

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>use to make albums. They had been depending on shellac,

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>but that was not going to work, so then they

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>started practicing with vinyl. They found that vinyl was more durable,

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it produced less noise, and it worked well at that

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty three and a third speed, so they went with that.

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Another team worked on creating the right recording instruments, including

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a cutting head that would make those small grooves in

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the first place. They were called micro grooves, and it

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>would take nearly a decade of work before the technology

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>and the economy were both ready. So the thirty three

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and a third LP record debuted in nineteen forty eight.

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>That was the same year the Supreme Court busted up

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the studio systems, and because you could fit as much

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>music on a single disc as would normally require a

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>dozen or so discs, those single discs were also called albums.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you ever wonder why it's called a record album,

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's because in the old days you had a physical

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>album full of multiple discs that represented a piece of music.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Now you could fit all of that and more on

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 1>one disc. The following year, nineteen forty nine, was when

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>r c A would release the forty five record format.

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.479
<v Speaker 1>While the thirty three and a third album's measured twelve

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>inches across, forty five were seven inches, and they were

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 1>called forty five because they would play back at forty

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 1>five revolutions per minute rather than thirty three and a third.

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>R c A produced them in a variety of colors,

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>originally using color to designate the genre of music that

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the albums belonged to. Actually, I shouldn't call them albums.

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>The records belonged to the forty fives at the time

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>could hold around five to seven minutes of music if

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you were to optimize them. Most popular songs at the

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>time still clocked in and around three sometimes four minutes.

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Forty five's typically would have a single song per side,

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but by the late nineteen eighties the technology had improved

0:41:58.000 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you could fit more than ten

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>min it's to a single side of a forty five,

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and so you have three standards all battling it out

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you had seventy eight, forty five

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and LPs. The seventy eight would eventually bow out. In fact,

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they bowed up first, fading away in the nineteen fifties,

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the forty five and LPs would continue to

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>shape music. Popular music groups would collect songs together to

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>create an album. Albums were something that only a few

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:29.359
<v Speaker 1>artists had been able to produce before that a lot

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of them would produce a single song or two songs maybe,

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and just release one disc so to do the singles,

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but in seventy eight format rather than forty five. But

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>now it was possible to group lots of songs together.

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>They would also release singles on forty five, which in

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>turn could help encourage fans to buy the longer albums

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and discover other songs that weren't in single format, and

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:57.320
<v Speaker 1>later artists would begin to explore other possibilities within the medium,

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 1>including concept albums, and a const album is one where

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all the songs of the album are thematically or totally

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>linked in some important way, so that the songs can

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>be considered not just individually but collectively. Now, you could

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>argue that the concept album debuted before the LP, but

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a novelty at the time because it was

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 1>such an endeavor to produce an album consisting of numerous discs.

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But the Woody Gut three album dust Bowl Ballads, you

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>could say that was the first concept album. They all

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>had to deal with the same sort of subject material,

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and that particular album consisted of six discs, and it

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was sold in two collections of three discs each, so

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you had kind of a part one and a part two.

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So six discs, twelve sides, all dealing with the songs

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>about the same subject matter. That would arguably be the

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>first concept album. But the LP made those sort of

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>projects much easier to produce, and that led to some

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>really interesting experimentation in music and form. It would lead

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to very interesting, weird concept albums and then things like

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>rock operas and other uh extensions of the art. So

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna leave off from this at this point. We're

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna wrap this episode up, uh, And just to remind everyone,

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>this is the time where albums and singles are now

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>available and you can purchase them and play them at home,

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>assuming you had a turntable. At the time, there were

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>films and theaters under a new system that emerged from

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>beneath studio control. Television, which I'll talk about more in

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the next episode, had debuted in the nineteen twenties, but

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>electronic TVs had really only become available in the late

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties, and we're just starting to emerge from a

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>niche industry right around the late forties. In the next episode,

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to look at TV and Hollywood's involvement with television,

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and we'll also touch on radio a little bit, and

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.240
<v Speaker 1>then we'll talk about the rise of the home theater

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>industry and how that shook things up, as well as

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of new forms of media formats, and we'll

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to look at how that shaped the media itself

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and how it shaped the way we consume media and

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:06.359
<v Speaker 1>our our thoughts about media. So this is, like I said,

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a pretty broad topic, but one that I really wanted

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to tackle because I think it's fascinating personally. UM, and

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if you guys have any suggestions for other broad topics

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you would like to hear, maybe two or three episodes

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about why not send me a message the email addresses

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com or pop

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>on over to our website that's tech stuff podcast dot com.

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You'll find links there to our social media presence, as

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>well as the archive of all our past episodes and

0:45:33.960 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a link to our store. Every purchase you make there

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 1>goes to help the showing. Greatly appreciate it, and I'll

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is a

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.