WEBVTT - Best Picture Breakdown  (Part 1)

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey, that folks. In this episode, we watched them. So

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to welcome to part one of our

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>best picture previews if you will here on Amy and TJ. Rhodes.

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Every single year we all end up in the same position, now,

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is it. It can't just be us Where you get

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>around to Oscar stile, you ask that question, have you

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>seen any of the Oscar movies?

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 2>And usually I say I saw one of them. I

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 2>mean that's usually at best case, I've seen two. It's

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel like a universal experience to see the list

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>come down and say what what picture?

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just us, is it?

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So you got ten movies this year, so we watched them, folks,

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So you don't have to the Oscars coming up just

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>days away now. But if you were to sit down today,

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>right now and start watching all ten Oscar movies, it

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>would take you one four hundred and eighty nine minutes

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hours and nine minutes.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>So a full day of not sleeping.

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the longest collective runtime of Oscar movies in history.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>These were long, long movies, not a single one under

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>two hours.

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>They were long, and most of them, if not all,

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>of them dealt with extremely heavy topics.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Was there a happy movie in here?

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Wicked?

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, even at the end, I was kind of pissed.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a cliffhanger, so you can watch part two.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>All of them now. And that's the full disclosure. We

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't see a single one of these movies in the theater.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 2>We did not. We only saw them at home streaming.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, second full disclosure here. We didn't have a desire

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to see any of the ten nominated movies except for one,

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was you.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to see Wicked in theaters. And it's funny

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>because my daughters and my friends all saw it without me,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and I knew that I was not gonna drag you

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 2>into the theater to see that one. I mean maybe

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>if I had it really begged and said please, pretty please.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I knew my only chance was Sabine and.

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>She saw it with me.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 2>So I was then left to see it finally with

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 2>you under a work assignment. Okay, so I was very happy.

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I but I would have gone to that movie

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 1>with you. But I'm making the point there that out

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of all ten of these movies, there's not a single

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one that I would have registered say, hey, go to

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the theater and watch. Yes, we're big horror movie fans.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty much exclusively all we watched in the theater.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>But that's weird to feel that none of these ten

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>movies appealed to me enough that I wanted to go

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to a theater.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I actually, because you just said that, I need to

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>make an exception. I actually would have seen two in

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the theaters. I would have seen Wicked, and I absolutely

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>would have seen The Substance and wanted to and was

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>begging you to see it in the theaters with me.

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember that? And I kept saying I want

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>to see the Substance to the point where it became

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 2>a joke, and you were teasing me like, oh, let

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>me guess you want to see the Substance.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you glad we didn't see it in the theater? I?

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, you would have been even more angry.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we this mony that might have caused a relationship

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>altering incident. Was it even the two of us?

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 2>But we'll get I could never have anticipated it. But

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 2>it turns out, yes, that actually could have been tripped, and.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just us. I should tell you now,

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>these movies a lot of people didn't see them. And

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I say that because a lot of wide mainstream audiences

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>did not. The collective group made two point seven billion

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars at the box office. That sounds good, sounds great,

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but that is almost two billion dollars less than last

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>year's movies.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Wow, and probably almost all from Wicked.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot Wicked and Done drove a lot of this. Now.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Of course, last year we did have Oppenheimer and Barbie

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>going head to head. That was a big deal Barbarenheimer.

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But still this was a drop. A lot of folks

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>just didn't see these movies. So, folks, that's why we

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>are here now, so you don't have to sit for

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hours and twenty nine minutes and watch all

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>these movies. So we're gonna split it up. In this

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>episode we're gonna do five, and the next episode will

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>do five. But the five we're doing today for you,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>A Nora the Brutalist, a Complete Unknown, Nickel Boys, and

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Milia Perez are the five movies we'll get into. And

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're getting a little help. It's just not me, Me

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and Robes here. We have a little diversity of voices

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the room, wrote Emma Sidney and Andy are

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>three producers. They went through this exercise with us and

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>watched all of these movies. First up is Anara, which

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>has some momentum. Right now, Robes take it away.

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It's been nominated for six Oscars Best Picture, Best Director,

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 2>Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, Best Original Screenplay, and Best

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Editing and Starring Mikey Madison, Mark Edelstein. Directed by Sean Baker.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>The synopsis of the movie is this. It's a young

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>sex worker. She marries the son of a Russian oligarch

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>on a whim it happened at that famous chapel in Vegas. Hilarity,

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 2>heart and havoc all in sue when her new husband's

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 2>parents God I loved the mom in this hear about

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the marriage and rush to the United States on their

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>private plane from Russia to force them to annul the marriage.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Box office gross thirty seven point six million dollars. And

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you can stream it as we did on video and

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>demand to get to pay for it. But if you

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>wait till March seventeenth, you can watch it on Hulu

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>if you subscribe to that and it comes in. Actually

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 2>is not even close to being one of the longest

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 2>two hours and nineteen minutes, and it really did great

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 2>with Rotten Tomatoes. I'm a big fan of looking at

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the score ninety three percent. It's already won a lot

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 2>of awards, the Top Prize at the can Film Festival,

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 2>the Palm d'ore, Best Picture at the Critics' Choice Awards,

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 2>and Spirit Awards, Top Prize at WGAPGA DGA. So this

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 2>is a film. It's one of the front runners for

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Best Picture.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'll start over there with you, Andy

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and go through all three of you. All. First impression

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of Honora was I thought it was good, am I

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>first impression bored? Wow, loved it, Rokes, I.

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Thought it was incredible and riveting.

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Shockingly good. I wasn't prepared for this one. So who

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>over there? Okay, we got Emma. We'll start with you.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You actually said bored. Now, what wasn't about this movie

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that didn't do it for you?

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't entirely interested in the plot. It kind of

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 4>was slow to me, and so I stopped halfway through.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Wow, you don't like sexy dances nudity, and.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We should mention that that this was a lot of

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>nudity in this movie. I mean, look, it's just you start,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>sit down and watch an Oscar movie. I didn't know

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>enough about what it was about, but it's about a

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sex worker, so shocking. There was nudity and sex in it,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but there is a lot of it. Andy You, your

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>response to it was how good luke warm?

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was like I really wanted to love

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the movie, like I've like. I went into it saying, like,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.119
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, it's going to be so good. Everyone

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 3>was talking about Mikey Madison and how great her performance was,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and I went in I think maybe expecting too much

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 3>out of it. I watched The Florida Project other movie,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 3>and it's kind of the same thing he does, like

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 3>very realistic takes on it, so you can't expect I

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 3>don't know, crazyness from these types of movies that he makes.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think I went in expecting too much

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and then was bummed out.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>See but we didn't know anything about it, Robes you

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and I. But we were in a theater and we

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>saw a preview of Anora, like wow, that looks awesome,

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>but we still never went to see it. But it

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>looked incredible to me at the time.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, even the trailers that I saw I was intrigued,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and then we actually got recommendations from two of my

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 2>friends saying, including my daughter, saying, you will love this movie.

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And just like Sidney loved it. Now, why why is

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>your buddy sitting next to you, Emma there? How is

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it possible that YouTube? Yeah? What would you tell her?

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>How did she not like this movie? That's shocking to me?

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 5>I well, very different from Andy. I had no I

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 5>never saw the trailer. I didn't know anything going into it.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 5>I was like not on my phone the entire time.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I loved it.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 5>I was so invested in the story. I was so

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 5>invested in Anora, Like I just loved her so much

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 5>and I wanted her to come out on top. And

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 5>I thought Mikey Madison was like beyond incredible, like that performance,

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 5>the accent, everything, like she was so real to me

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 5>and I just I thought she was beyond.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting you say the accent, because that was the

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>one part for me growing up in this area. I

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 3>was like, she keeps slipping out of it. Where is

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>she from? And I'm like, this is California. I know

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 3>it's California, Like this is California pretending to be New Yorker.

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 3>It's not like organ there my cousin Vinnie girl.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Marissa Tomey when.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 3>She's in that. My cousin Vinnie never slips because she's

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 3>from Brooklyn. This one, there were a couple of words

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 3>where she like talking.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that was funny. I mean, you know, I'm a transplant,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>but I've been here for more than twenty years, and

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I was fooled into thinking that her accent was spot on.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>But I will say I I was so invested because

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought the storytelling was so great and the acting

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>was so phenomenal that I actually felt like I wasn't

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 2>even watching a movie. It was almost as if I

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>was watching a documentary. And I was blown away at

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>the whull time mobility that Mikey Madison showed just physically

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to do what she did. I mean, I imagine.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>There's exotic dancing on the level of you have to

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>have an athleticism that No, that's impressive, so impressive.

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And I also was, as you pointed out, Sydney rooting

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>for her. And I thought, especially the ending, and we

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>don't want to give it away, but it had so

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 2>much heart, ye so much heart in life.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not just hyperbole because it's recent. There has

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>never been that few seconds of a movie that tore

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>my heart out but also made me love the movie.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>There there is as that scene in this There is

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a scene in this movie that I was not expecting

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and you get it and you understand and it fucking

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it crushes you in that moment and it's just beautifully done.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's that. Mikey Madison, she is my hands down.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into it later, but she I am rooting

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for that young lady.

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am too, and I just thought she she

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 2>did such an incredib job and for anyone I think

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 2>there was Obviously there was a lot of messages, but

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 2>we're also quick to judge and to put people in

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 2>boxes and to assume we know what they're thinking or

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>what their motivations are. And that movie just blows your

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 2>mind with expanding it. All Right, So what we're gonna

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>do at the end of each movie that we discussed,

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 2>We're going to ask you if you would recommend this

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>movie to your friends and why So, I guess we'll

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 2>start with you, Emma.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, for context for why I didn't particularly like it,

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 4>it's because I was looking for a romance movie something

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 4>that was light, and I saw romance in.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>The description, what this is hilarious? And so I clicked

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 2>it while I was doing laundry, and then I.

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Realized I was in an intense sex worker movie and

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 4>I was not ready for it. You wanted a light

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 4>rom com, so I was totally unprepared and I couldn't

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 4>snap out of I was just disappointed that that.

0:10:59.920 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Was the movie i'd bought. Okay, expectation make all the difference,

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 2>So that makes a lot of sense. So now that

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 2>you know what the movie is and you watched it,

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 2>would you recommend this to your friends and why.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 4>I would recommend it. But I would want to watch

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 4>it with them because I want to do over, so

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 4>that's why i'd recommend it.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel the same way. Like I wrote this

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 3>down while I was watching it. I think it's like

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>for me, one of the higher watchability ones, Like I

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 3>look forward to seeing it on TV and like just

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 3>mindlessly watching because there are so many funny parts to

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the movie and I did love the ending so much,

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 3>so I think it has a really big rewatchability scale.

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>It's just for me personally, Like I said, maybe going

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>in with less expectations this next time, I would just

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 3>be like, great, loved it ten out of ten.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that's really interesting because I think there's

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 5>only two movies on this list that I think I

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 5>could ever like watch again, which would be Anra and Wicked,

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 5>And I would one hundred percent recommend it to my friends.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 5>I already have, like, I just love that movie.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I would absolutely and I would say stick with this

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>movie and stick with honor through the end, and you

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>will fall in love with this girl.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree. I have already recommended it and I

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>will as well because I just also if you just

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>love incredible writing and phenomenal acting, this is a movie for.

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>You, all right. Next up on our list, we got

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the Brutalists. Woo oh my goodnesss all right. This one

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is nominated for ten Oscars All The Big Ones Best Picture,

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Best direct Or, Best Actor, starring Adrian Brodie, Felicity Jones,

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Guy Pierce, directed by Brady Corbett. This is about a

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Jewish architect who flees post war Europe to come find

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the American dream not going great, but then a mysterious

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and wealthy client changes everything. Now, this one may thirty

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>one point six million dollars at the Box Office. If

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to watch it, it is available to rent

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or buy video and demand right now. The runtime three

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>hours and thirty five minutes that includes a fifteen minute

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in a mission. It's rotten Tomato score ninety four has

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>won some major awards, including Best Director, Actor and Drama

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Golden Globes, also Best Director Best Actor at

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the BAFTA's Robes. I'll start with you on this one.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>First impression of the Brutalists brutal Sydney.

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Tough watch Emma, too long, complicated.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Heavy as hell would be my first impression. It's I

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>don't you have to start here with Adrian Brody. He

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is just phenomenal start to finish. Every single scene you

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>can't take your eyes off of him. But this one look,

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that runtime has to turn some people off.

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, we would never have sat down and watched it.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>We haven't watched Oppenheimer because it's too long. I mean,

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>let's just be honest.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Stop.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just need to admit it. This was

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>a labor of duty to get through this. And it's

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 2>not to take away from the art and the acting

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 2>and the cinematography. I mean it was all beautiful and

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>something you would expect of a Best Picture nominee. However,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>it just went on for so long, and the themes

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>were very heavy. I think I started to make a

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>list of these themes, and we're talking about Obviously it's

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 2>set just after or actually towards the end of the Holocaust.

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Then you have heroin or opium addiction. I'm not really

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>sure what it was that he was injecting in himself.

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 2>There was possible overdose. There was prostitution, there was like

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>sex addiction.

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>There was disease.

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 2>There was osteoporosis that was debilitating that I didn't even

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>know that could happen with that disease. There was rape.

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>It was heavy, it was.

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think a friend of ours recommended it and

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>she said, you know, it kind of just flies by.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I get what she was saying. I didn't find necessarily,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and for you all down there as well. I didn't

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>find even though it was three hoursan and third of

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>five as long. I didn't find it to have any

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>unnecessary scenes. I didn't find that there was too much

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that so that went too long. Everything still seemed to

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>contribute to the story in some way. That's me Andy.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You had some I.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Think personally it would have been better served as like

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 3>an HBO mini series because the first half I was in,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 3>like I was so in and invested, and the second

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>half crammed so much in that I just kind of

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 3>felt lost watching it, Like where is all of this

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 3>coming from? Like the wife really added such an element

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to it. Yes, coming to the country, and then they

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 3>go to Italy and You're just like, so much is

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 3>happening where? I feel like if I got a six

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 3>hour HBO mini series, I could have really appreciated it

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot more.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it felt like parts were cut towards the end,

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 3>and I would have liked to have seen weird, like

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>a longer cut to get some more backstory.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow, where were you give me the redeeming part of

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Sydney of the movie? What did you like about it?

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's talking about this, but just the cinematography and like

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 5>just the visual aspect of it, Like that was something

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 5>I have never seen before ever, and it was just

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 5>it was like so crazy to see. And I also

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 5>saw online that they shot it in thirty four days,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 5>which I'm like, that is like unbelievable to me. And

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 5>like the budget was like super low. It was like

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 5>under ten million or ten million, which is like so

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 5>crazy for me to think about. But yeah, the way

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 5>that it was shot, I know it was like some

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 5>special camera or something, but like was so beautiful to

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 5>me to see.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Emma, you haven't waited yet.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm I'm the most intrigued by the use of AI

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 4>during this film because I think with my generation, we've

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 4>AI was introduced in school to us because there was

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 4>no way around it. And I think with older generations

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 4>people are still adjusting to the way that it's impacting

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 4>people's jobs in acting because it's being used. But I

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 4>think that it's out there and it and it's meant

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 4>to be used, and so I'm for the use of

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 4>AI enhancing a production and enhancing a film, especially to

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 4>make something more realistic. If an actor can't correctly have

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 4>the Hungarian.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Accent, I am I and I see it. I like,

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how any I don't know how anything

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 1>will be able to replicate what Adrian Brodie makes me

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>feel when I watch him on film, Like I can't

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>take my eyes off him. This was this movie was

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>It's so there. I don't know, is there any joy

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>in this movie? Is Are there any there's a taut story.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a true love story, but it's it's very flawed

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and he was a flawed character, but they loved each

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 2>other and that did resonate throughout the film.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>And we don't want to harp on the fact that

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's as long as it is, like that's a negative thing.

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This is it probably should win the Oscar. It is

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful movie. It is it just it's movie making

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>on this type, this scale is stunning to watch it.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we watched it. It took us seventeen hours

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifty minutes to watch a three hour and thirty

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>five minute move. It did because at one point we

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>needed a break, like, oo.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's get them cleanse our palate with married at first Sight.

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And then we got back to and then we

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fell asleep on it. We woke up a mound and

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we had to do a podcast, and then we had

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it going.

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>It winded a couple of times too, did We ended

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>up turning on the closed captioning, which we don't often do.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 2>But sometimes when you're having to focus on a movie

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>that's that complex, sometimes it's helpful to not have to

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>rewind an already long movie by just putting up the

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 2>closed captioning and knowing what they said. I also want

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 2>to give a nod to Felicity Jones. I thought she

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 2>was phenomenal and Guy Pearce was just incredible. I mean

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone in that cast nailed their performance and you did

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 2>feel like again, I was watching a documary and that always,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>to me is like the best way to say the

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 2>acting was so good. I forgot I was watching something

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>that someone had to memorize lines.

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>For This and Doom two are probably the two movies.

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Just looking at them, I'm in awe of movie making.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty incredible. So with that Robes, if you had to,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>would you recommend The Brutalists to a friend? And why? Hmmm?

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 2>I would decide between my friends are among my friends

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 2>who to recommend it to not to because you do

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>have to have a love of cinema. I really think

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to have an appreciation for movie making to

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 2>enjoy this movie, because I think if you're looking for

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 2>just a quick fix of entertainment, which so many of

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 2>us are, this is not the movie for you. But

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>if you actually enjoy the art of filmmaking and cinema,

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 2>then I would recommend it to you because it is

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 2>something beautiful to witness, and I am glad I watched it.

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 2>But I know most of my friends I would probably say,

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 2>you might want to skip that one.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Sydney recommend it, and why.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 5>I couldn't recommend it just because I couldn't get through

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 5>it myself. So I just don't think that where did

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 5>you stop?

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 2>It was like an hour in.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 5>I think, oh, so, yeah, we're not once to talk

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 5>on this one.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, then what was your answer to you? What would

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you say?

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I believe that any movie that is up for

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 4>so many wards, like The Brutalist is, I would absolutely

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 4>recommend because I think it's worth a watch, and I'm

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 4>kind of on the same tract of how beautiful it

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 4>is that I think it would be best picture.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 3>I would recommend it to certain people for sure. I

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 3>also thought it was a real movie up until the intermission,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and I looked over at the person I was watching

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.239
<v Speaker 3>it with and I was like, I keep looking at

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Doyle's Town, like where is this place? And they were like, Babe,

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 3>there is no Doyles Town.

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>This is not a.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Real sculpture being built. This is not a real story.

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, Okay, I thought it was saying,

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 3>are we.

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure this wasn't a real architect? It seemed it did

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 2>seem like a biopic.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I was looking for this mega audit turium chapel whatever

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 3>they were building thing in Doylestown and then was shocked

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 3>when none of that was real.

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 2>How about you? Would you recommend it?

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I would man so many asterisks next to it right

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>when you do? So? This was an amazing movie. It

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>just is. It's and I'm such a wit. Daniel day

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Lewis those, Denzel Washington, there, Anthony Hopkins. There are some

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>guys that just like Mount Rushmore type Oscar guys. I mean,

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Brody in this performance is everything. He is just everything.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So yes, that's how I would recommend it. You watch

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy do his thing, and it's a very cool movie.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, we are going to move on now to

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 2>a complete unknown. This is nominated for eight Oscars Best Picture,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Best Director, Best Actor, Best Supporting Actor, Best Supporting Actress,

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Sound Costume Design, Adapted Screenplay, starring Oh the heart Throb

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that He Is, Timothy Chalomey, El Fanning, Edward Norton, and

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Monica Barbarro. Directed by James Mangold, This is a film

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 2>that follows the early nineteen sixties rise of a young

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Bob Dylan who arrives in New York as a while,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 2>as the title will suggest, a complete unknown. This one

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 2>did really well at the box office one hundred and

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>five million. It arrives on video on demand this week

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 2>the week of the Oscars. Yes, and the runtime two

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>hours and twenty minutes. Rotten Tomatoes score eighty one percent.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot of nominations in all of the major categories,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 2>but there have been no major wins. However, Timothy Challomey

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 2>won Best Actor at the SAG Awards, and that was

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 2>considered an upset because a lot of folks are just

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 2>anticipating that Adrian Brody was just going to do a

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>clean sweep. But challo May was able to get that SAG.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a mystery now about Sunday because the SAG Awards

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>is the one though those are the actors themselves are

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>voting on this, and they make up a big portion

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the OSCAR voting. Wow, it's Timothy Chalomte might pull

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>off an upset first impression of a complete unknown. We

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have to direct that to one person in particular. I

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think only one of the five of us have seen, right,

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>That would be me, Emma. That's our thing, dear Emma,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And we should say the reason we haven't seen it's

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>still in theater. They haven't released it yet video on demand,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>or it's being released. I think as we recorded this,

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>yeah it is so we just haven't been able to

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>get out to a theater and see it. But we

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>still wanted to speak on it. Emma, you can speak

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on it. First impression was what amazing. Wow.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 4>I saw the movie in December in theaters, which I

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 4>think adds so much value being away from distractions, dark

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 4>right in your face. But I also went into it

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 4>not knowing anything about Bob Dylan. I never really followed

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 4>his music. I've just listened to it. And the movie

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 4>painted him in a good light. And when I talked

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 4>to my parents after the movie and my grandparents, they

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 4>they thought it painted him in a better light than

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 4>he actually was when he was younger.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 4>So it made me like him even more I did,

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 4>But other people were kind of annoyed by the way

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 4>that it made him seem like a better person than

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 4>he was.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>See. I don't know enough of the backstore his history,

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just interesting to hear how people in her

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>own family receive this guy differently, and that was your

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>first introduction to him.

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, oh wow. And it's interesting, Emma, because you are

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty three. So my daughters are twenty two and eighteen,

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and they raced to the movie theaters to see this

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>as well in December and came back just with a

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 2>glowing review of how much they loved the movie. But

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:41.959
<v Speaker 2>I wondered how much of it is that I'm not

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>taking away from the movie or its value or its reception.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 2>But I can just speak for my daughters. They're huge

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 2>Timothy Shalomey fans.

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Huge, and the fact that he pre recorded his songs

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 4>but then also sang all of his songs live in

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 4>so which the director chose to keep some of the

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 4>live performances in, as well as Monica's who played Joan Baez.

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 4>Blown away by his ability to sing like Bob Dylan

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 4>and by Monica to sing with fake teeth that resembled

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Joan Biez's teeth.

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 2>That's incredible. This is one that I actually when it

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>is available, I do want to watch it. I think

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>enough has been said I would. I was actually upset

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 2>that I didn't get to see this one in time.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 2>For this podcast because I it has also been on

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Hey when this is available, I want to see it?

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 2>You all? Will you watch it? Andy? Will you watch it?

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm so excited to watch it.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree with you. I really want to see it.

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's funny.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 3>I actually had no interest in seeing it, and then

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I heard everybody saying it was such a great movie

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 3>that I'm like, I'm invested.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's what I know. It's a horror movie, is

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the usually the answer here? But why we didn't want

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to go to the theater?

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:25:55.200 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna move on to Nickel Boys, Now nominated for

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>two Oscars Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay, starring Ethan Harresey,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Williams, and angeenue Ellis Taylor. Directed by Ramel Ross.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Based on a Pulitzer Prize winning novel, the story follows

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>two young African American men who are sent to an

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>abusive reform school during the Jim Crow era. This made

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>at the box office two point six million dollars. You're

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>hearing this right that this was a tiny and independent film. Here.

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>It is available now video on demand. It's still in

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>very few theaters this week, but you can find it

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>runtime two hours, twenty minutes ritten Tomato score ninety percent.

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It has gotten a slew of Best Picture nominations, but

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it has not pulled off any upsets and won the

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>top prize. Everybody here saw Nicol Boyce correct Sidney, what

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>was your first impression?

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 2>Not for me? YEA, I didn't see it.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay, nice, Yeah, you were busy watching Bob Dylan.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd say, incredible, incredible ropes.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to agree with Sydney. It just wasn't for me.

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 2>I loved the story, but the execution of it was

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 2>difficult for me to watch visually, and.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 1>My first impression was just uncomfortable watching. So we talked

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>about the ropes you hit on here. So we talked

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>about this is Jim crow Era, and this is about

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>an abusive reform school. But it's shot in a first

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>person way that is creative and clever and cool, or

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's distracting and annoying on the other side.

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I like the concept of it, the idea that you

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>were actually watching a movie as if you are living

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>in that actor's body, so your vision, your lenses are

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>their eyes. And I like the concept of that. But

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 2>what ended up happening is I felt a little like

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I needed to take some dramamine. It was.

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>It moved aunt.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, as you do when you're moving around.

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>The camera isn't still. It isn't even like a smooth

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it's jerky, and it goes on and on back and

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 2>forth between two young men, and it was confusing sometimes

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 2>whose eyes I was looking through? Yeah, yeah, it was

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>just for me. It was a little jarring from a

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 2>just spatial awareness perspective, but also I was confused in

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the storytelling sometimes.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, what did y'all any, Sidney, what did y'all

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think about that first person thing they were doing?

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 5>I liked that they did something different, but it just

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 5>did not work for me, and I couldn't. I just

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 5>couldn't get into it, Like I just I couldn't. And

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 5>it's so interesting that you said incredible, because I feel

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 5>like that's the perspective that I've heard from people who

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.239
<v Speaker 5>have seen it. It's either love love love, or like

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 5>me and Amy are saying, like could not get into

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't for them.

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think at first I was It's like, oh,

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know it was going to be like this,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and the first person point of view kind of was

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 3>like a little jarring of fish, like I'm gonna watch

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>the whole thing through their eyes. But I think it's

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 3>such a vital part of the storytelling and so important

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 3>on how the story is told to make you feel

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 3>uncomfortable or just like you're in the scene with them.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 3>So I personally came around to it entirely, and I

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 3>think it made it brilliant, and I am so shocked

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 3>that it's not winning more.

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. Brilliant might be a good way. It is brilliant,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but still uncomfortable. I am one who wants to go

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to a movie and be nothing but entertained. Scare me,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>make me laugh, or fly around, do some action stuff, right,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>That's me. And so this was and you know the

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>scene towards a certain part where you have a young

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>African American male being chased down in Jim Crow era

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>by a white man with a gun, and it's you're

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>doing that in first person. Now that hits kind of differently,

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe with me having literally been chased by white men

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in my life. I think that's the point of it

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is to make people uncomfortable and for you and you

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and you, you all are sitting to be put in

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a position of being a black man running from a

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>white man who shooting at you. And I think that's

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>all really beautiful, But it is a it's it's it's

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a tough watch at times, and it's supposed to be.

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But the storytelling this again, this is this is movie

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>making at its absolute best.

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>No, it is, and I get it. Like if the

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 2>goal was and it seems as though it was for

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 2>you to be in someone else's shoes, to be in

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 2>someone else's body and to feel not just discomfort, but

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 2>fear and just yeah, the ultimate fear, right, it was compelling.

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>It was just in an effort to do that. It's

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 2>just it's just hard for me to watch. I'm not

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 2>even saying like from a from a from a subject matter,

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 2>obviously that's a given, but even just from a visual

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 2>point of view, I just had a hard time seeing

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 2>it through that lens.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But great storytelling and Andy, Andy, how would you then

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>recommend this to a friend?

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I would absolutely recommend this to people. I think it's

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 3>an important watch. I highly highly recommend it. And it

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 3>is actually based off true events. They kind of made

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 3>their own with the Nickel Academy, but it's based off

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the Dogier Academy, which was in tallahassee there. Yeah, and honestly,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 3>it's I am so shocked this is not winning more.

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And thank you for saying that word. That's I think

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a good way to put it. This is an

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>important watch. That's a good way to put it.

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I agree. I would recommend it. And just because

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 5>visually it was not for me, like I think that

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 5>everyone should give it a watch on their own and see,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 5>and like Andy said, it was an important watch.

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I would recommend it as well. But I would just

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 2>let folks know this is not your typical movie. Just

0:31:56.280 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 2>be prepared to, you know, really witness something in a

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 2>very creative way. And I think if I were prepared

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 2>more for that, I might have been it might have

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I might have had a better reception to it.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And mine would be Yes, certainly, given the heads up

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about how uncomfortable you could get. But this is one

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of the more creative movies and storytelling that I've seen.

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So agree, I would recommend it for that reason.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, And we say that now, yoh boy, let's

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 2>move on to Amelia Perez right, thirteen Oscars. I mean,

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 2>this is the most nominated film of the bunch Best Picture,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Best Director, Best Actress, Best Actress in a Supporting Role,

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Best Original Song, two for that, Best Original Score, International

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Feature Film, Makeup and Hairstyling, Sound, Adapted Screenplay, Film editing

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>and Cinematography. WHOA starring Zoe Saldana, Carlo Sophia Gascon, Selena Gomez,

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and Edgar Ramirez. This was directed by Jacques audiard I.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Hope I said that name correctly. This is you know

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 2>when you tell folks, hey, it's not in English, and

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a musical, and it's about a drug lord who

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 2>is transitioning to a woman so he can live authentically.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>He hires a run of a mill lawyer, this is

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Zoe zel Dania to help him fake his own death,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>remove himself from his family, and start this new life

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 2>where he is living authentically. Fifteen point four million box

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 2>office gross. You can watch it on Netflix exclusively. The

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 2>runtime is two hours and ten minutes. Rotten Tomatoes score

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 2>seventy two percent, and so far it's won four Golden Globes,

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 2>including Best Actress and Best Foreign Language Film at the BAFTAZ.

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 2>So why don't we go around and give us your

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>first impressions, TJ.

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>My first impression was what is happening?

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Bizarre?

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, no, bizarre in your face, unexpectedly enjoyable.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Ah, you know what, that's really good it. I was

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna say, WTF, but I liked it. If that makes

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sense. It's one of those movies. Let's

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 2>just say, I've never seen anything like it in my life,

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 2>and I wouldn't have been able to even come up

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 2>with a plot like that. Look it. I think one

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>of my biggest issues was that it seemed ridiculous. It

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>seemed unlikely, it seemed almost impossible, And so that was

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>my biggest hurdle was could this actually? Would this actually?

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 2>How could this happen? And then when, for instance, there

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 2>were a couple of scenes when they broke into song,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 2>it was just it almost was.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Comical for me, but there was I think it's okay

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to your okay, it's a comedy, but it's not supposed

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. It's an action movie, but it's not supposed

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to be. It's a romance, but it's not supposed to be.

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing and it's not supposed to be. All these

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>thing you can't make sense And and you said bizarre,

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I knew I had an idea of what I know

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>what it was about. It was all this stuff. But

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>still when you start singing in the market at the

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I was thrown Yeah.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 3>And also like I would use singing loosely because when

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 3>you were talking like this and call it saying, I

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 3>didn't necessarily see it that way.

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Again, I thought he Israel was especially that was awesome.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I actually that's when I started laughing.

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Again, it was bizarre. And I've seen people say, like,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 3>that's why they're giving it awards because it really is

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 3>pushing the limits of filmmaking. But then when you watch

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 3>something like a Nickel Boys, I maybe appreciate that a

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 3>little more. But I can still find value in what

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this movie did. I don't want to like completely say

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 3>it's like not a watch.

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>What was unexpected was your word, I think you said

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>in your face in your faith. Okay, so does that

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>mean you enjoyed it?

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:55.879
<v Speaker 2>I did enjoy it.

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 4>I was confused again because I didn't know that they

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 4>would do a crime musical, and so when Zoe Saldana

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 4>immediately breaks out and singing, I was like, what did

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 4>I just put on?

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Again by accident?

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 4>And so and then I had to turn the subtitles

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 4>on because it was in Spanish, so then there was

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 4>so many elements, like they jammed so much into this movie,

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 4>which like, it's awesome, I love it, but it might

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 4>have been a little bit too much for me.

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I'm finding that Emma was struggling with

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the synopsis of the.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Movie this is about you know a drug lord.

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, Sidney, when did you start to or did you

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning.

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 5>Enjoy it or so all my friends were like, you're

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 5>not gonna like this movie. We all turned it off

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 5>halfway through, like you're not gonna like it. You're not

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 5>gonna like it. So I went in with like a

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 5>not so good attitude and I loved it. I was like,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 5>so go into it. I was completely I'm like, I

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 5>was completely shocked by how much I liked it. But

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the musical aspect was necessary at all,

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 5>Like it did not bring anything to the movie to me.

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 5>I like actually liked the story. I was into the story.

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 5>I didn't think, yeah, I don't know. But when I

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 5>was like, after I watched all the movies, I like

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 5>to go on TikTok and like see what other people

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 5>are saying about it. And one thing that I thought

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 5>was interesting about this one was that a lot of

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.959
<v Speaker 5>people were saying that it was a very like stereotypical

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 5>way to view Mexico and with like the cartel and

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 5>everything like that, and that they should have they like

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 5>also shot the entire thing in France, which was like

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 5>another interesting thing that people brought up.

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>There were non there were no Mexican actors, a French director.

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people took issue with some of that.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 2>That was just an interesting Yeah, there was a lot

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of controversy surrounding this movie from coming in from multiple places,

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 2>directed at multiple people. But so I think, yes, I was.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I had very low expectations. Now I will make this disclay.

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I love me a musical movie, and I love Broadway,

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and so I don't mind when people break into song

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know. I've enjoyed lots of movies and

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 2>forms of entertainment where people break into song that is

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 2>jarring to some people. I think it's entertaining. And when

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 2>this happened and it still took me by surprise a

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 2>couple of times. I enjoyed it because it made me

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.959
<v Speaker 2>lean in more. I was watching more intently because I thought,

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 2>what are what's happening right now.

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of conversational song though right yes,

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and this point it wasn't like there were some things

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that barely qualified as singing.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 2>It was like, I was like, wait, are they singing

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>right now? Because they're kind of going into a weird cadence.

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 3>She was whispering during that one song. I'm like, this

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 3>is a whisper song.

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 2>I heart talking song. Yes, yes, some people could sing

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 2>better than others. And it was a little distracting, and

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 2>yet I leaned in more when that happened, and I

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 2>would watch it again too. I would watch it again.

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 2>That's how much I surprisingly liked it.

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>It was once again beautiful. I mean, you can't And look,

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the reason I am glad I watched this movie.

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>There is a scene with Zoe Saladonia in that ballroom

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that she does a song and dance routine that is

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>worth the watch. She fricking kills this scene. I love

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that scene, like all of Oscar season. That might be

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>my favorite bit of a movie.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 2>I believe you said when not even Nazi, but when

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 2>at first arted you said, how did these rehearsals go?

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 2>You would imagine how much work went into that production.

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 1>That scene was incredible, but the movie on its own,

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it was just bizarre to me for the most part.

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think we talked about the story and what

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>are we trying to say. I know what it's based

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on and all that, but it's it's like a message

0:39:54.640 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 1>out there that felt at times disjointed forced. We're talking

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about I mean, can you get any more macho than

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a Mexican cartel lord who now decides to have to

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>transition to a woman that that idea and then become

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a famous woman who now is battling cartels again, It's

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's storytelling.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:18.399
<v Speaker 2>That was That was where I got a little I mean,

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing is contrived and like I said, unrealistic.

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 2>But when you are hiding, you fake your own death.

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>You know that if anyone knows you were your former self,

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.919
<v Speaker 2>that you would likely meet a very very unfortunate fate.

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 2>That you would then put yourself as a woman out

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 2>in front of all of these cameras, impressed to then

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 2>battle cartels or at least to help them find those

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.840
<v Speaker 2>who they've killed. That seemed even more unrealistic.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And he's looking at us like that was Yae's problem

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>with the.

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Movie In her family, and she calls herself the aunt

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 3>like no, no, let's go back.

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 2>And Selena Gomez's character her wife didn't put two and

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 2>two together.

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh look, okay.

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I was still entertained, the entire entertaining.

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So, Emma, I'll start with you. Would you recommend this

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to her friend? And why?

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I not particularly?

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 4>No, I think there's other movies I would see again

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 4>and recommend.

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I will say, like you, Amy, I couldn't keep my

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 3>eyes off of it, and so in a weird way, yes,

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 3>you would recommend it.

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I would recommend it.

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I would too. I would recommend it. I think it's

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 2>worth a watch.

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I would recommend it this way. You gotta see this

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>shit like that almost how you would recommend like you

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna believe this, And I would tell you if

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to watch it, at least fast forward.

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>There's always sounds on youa scene in that ballroom where

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>she just absolutely crushes it. This is good. We're only

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>halfway through, all right. The next time around, we're going

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>to have Conclave doom too. I'm still here the substance

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and wicked. That's a good.

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait. And this is gonna be fun So again,

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 2>we watched these movies so you don't have to. And

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I will say this is gonna be a really fun

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Oscars show for us all here in this room, because

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 2>when you do watch these movies, you are invested. And

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 2>we're also in the next episode going to give you

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 2>our predictions for Best Picture, Best Actress, Best Actor? Are

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>we going to do the supporting roles too?

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 1>The four acting categories and Best Picture?

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll let you know where we stand and

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 2>you all feel free to check any of these out

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and see what you think your movie review would be

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:36.720
<v Speaker 2>and how it compares to ours.

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.879
<v Speaker 1>So for Andy, Emma, Sydney and Rhodes, I'm te Jenny

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Will for yeas