WEBVTT - College Scandal Trial and VIP Admissions List

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brussel from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I just want you to walk me through the whole

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>thing again and how it works. We helped the wealthiest

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>families in the US get their kids into school. So

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I've done seven hundred sixty one what I would call

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>side door. The front door means getting in on your own.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>So I've created this kind of side door, and because

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>my families want to guarantee and it works every time.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>The Varsity blues sting exploded into public view in with

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>dozens of parents across the country arrested for paying hundreds

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of dollars to get their kids into elite universities.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>There was a Netflix documentary, Books Countless Stories, and even

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a Saturday Night Live skit. The vast majority of the

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>parents pleaded guilty, but a handful decided to fight the

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>charges in court, and now, nearly two and a half

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>years later, the first trial of two parents is starting

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in Austin. Here to tell us about what's ahead is

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Legal report of Patricia Hurtado, who has been covering

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the case since the beginning. So pat tell us about

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the two fathers who are going to be tried. Forty

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>parents were indicted by the U S Attorney in Massachusetts.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Thirty three pled guilty. Six of them are fighting the

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>charges and one got a partner from President Trump just

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>before he left office. Two dads are fighting the charges

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in this first trial. It's John Wilson, the private equity

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>investor who is a former Staples and Gap executive, and

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the Maal app del Az, a former executive for Win

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Resort and he operated in Acal and Hong Kong left

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time. I understand Rick Singer, the mastermind of

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this day, had two different schemes. One was to boost

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the college entrance test scores of kids whose parents paid money,

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and he would get a test with to take the

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>test for the kids. The second scheme is called the

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>side door. The back door would be if your parents

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>donated stepanmillion dollar and you get into the college of

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>your choice because you've given them a new athletic building.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Or are you Jim. This side door is you don't

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>have to donate as much money. You could give the

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand dollars to Rick Singer as a charitable

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>donation and he would help with friends and connections at

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all these universities and get the applicant students and as

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a purported athletic recruit, so it's like a jock for

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a designated sport. Wilson is accused of paying Singer a

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>total of one point two million dollars for his three kids.

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>A Della dizz is accused of paying Singer three hundred

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars and more to a USC athletic coach for

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>his daughter's admission, and they don't deny they made the payments.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>John Wilson is accused of trying to get his three

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>kids into colleges, the first with a son who he

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>allegedly paid Singer two hundred thousand dollars to get a

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>kid in as a water polo player. The dad says,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>but my kid really was the water polo players. There

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>was no faking involved. I gave a few hundred thousand

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars to Singer. He told me he was going to

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>give it to USC, and as a matter of fact,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand ended up at USC, and I gotta

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you know for my donation. Meanwhile, Singer pocket at

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the next hundred downs. And then he's accused of allegedly

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>paying a million dollars to singer five hundred thousand dollars

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a pop for the two twin daughters to get one

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>into Stanford as a purported athlete and one into Harvard

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>as a purported athlete. The dad Wilson says that his

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>two daughters tstoo dutifully and had excellent, if not near perfect,

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>college board scores, so they could have gotten into the

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>college of their choice. Then the dad Gamal at la

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Zi's he's accused of trying to get his daughter into

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>USC as a reported basketball recruit. He says he didn't

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>need to pay abroad because she was good enough athletes.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Is USC on trial here in a sense? Well, it's

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>USC and the process, and USC was one of the

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>schools that everybody wanted to get into. It was like

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a hot popular school for these West Coast parents. So

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>some of these parents went after USC and its admissions processes,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and it just p the documents and eventually they got

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what they call a smoking gun, which is an eight

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>page spreadsheet of names of students who they knew at USC.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It was called the v I P List, and it

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was submitted for admissions over a period of years. And

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's several dozen students. It's like an eight

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>page Xcel spreadsheet, and it explained their connection whether they

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>were good for quote unquote fifteen millions to the men's

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>golf team, for three millions to the USC Sporting Center.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>It's just stunning to see this all written down in

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this list. There was a magistrate at one point and

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>she was questioning what this c I P list was

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and USC said, oh, there's nothing wrong. These are people

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we just consider v I P. And the judge was saying, well,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>why do you even have this list. So some of

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>these parents say this is an accepted way. Many schools

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>operate that if you just kick in enough cash, you know,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>for a reasonable donation, you can get your kid into

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the college of their choice if you know the right people.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So they're arguing their children were just part of this

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>group of people that are on the v I P

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>list and there was nothing wrong with what they were

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>doing and it's not criminal. So it seems like a

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>two pronged defense. The first is we did nothing wrong,

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and the second is the mastermind Rick Singer misled us right,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's a big question. I was actually really shocked

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>when I covered the final pre trial conference for the

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>judge on August eating, and the government slipped in on

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a footnote and a filing the night before said we

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we're calling Rick Singer the mastermind. I

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was kind of looking forward to hearing what his story was,

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>because the parents are saying he double talk to us,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>he lied to us what we want to question him

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and thrilled him on class examination. And there's also some notes.

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Singer took notes on his iPhone just as he was

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>beginning to cooperate with the government, with the SBI and

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I r S agents in the fall of and he

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>says the FBI agents told him to quote unquote telesps

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to the parents to get them to implicate themselves and

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>why he was recording their calls. So the parents are

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>arguing Singer is a wire and basically fabricated all these

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>things that he said to us on the telephone. So

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he told us one story before he cooperated, that everything

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was on the up and up and was totally a

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>pure and riable and honest way of getting your kid

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>into college. But the minute he started cooperating and he

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>realized his neck was on the line, that's when he

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>started line and telling the different version, and we never

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>agree to what he was saying on the wire tap.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So because Singer may not testify the parents, probably you

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot bring in those I phone notes because that witness

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>will not be on the stand. So it's a big question.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I've thought the lawyers about whether or not the parents

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>can make hay of those iPhone notes would prove or

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>help their arguments. The Singer was basically concocting stories the

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>minutes the FBI was listening. I can see how not

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>calling Singer will help the prosecution keep those notes out,

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But how do you not call the alleged mastermind of

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the scheme? Won't the jersey that as a hole in

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the case and ask why are they not calling Singer?

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>They must be hiding something. And some people who ask me, well,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>why don't the parents call Singer? But rules of evidence

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and probably agree with me. If you call someone, you

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can't impeach your own witness unless the court declares them

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a hostile witness. And it's like a whole procedure you

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have to go through. And the parents lawyers have never

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>spoken to Singer ever, so they don't really know what

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>his story is. It's not like the prosecutors who crept

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody for days or weeks, having twenty six sessions and

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>knowing they asked a question, they exactly know what the

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>answer is. This would be like flying blind and asking

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a question that might be a trap door for the

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>parents because then Singer could turn on the defense lawyer

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and say, will your clients to criminal or whatever. So

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the parents may not necessarily want to call Singer, but

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they could make argument that there's a missing witness. You know,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to have the jury note that Singer is

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>missing and maybe make him out to be the fall

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>guy or the real villain of this whole scheme to

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Rebut those wire taps, some of those recordings are very

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the parents are talking about, oh can I

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.599
<v Speaker 1>get a two for one? Oh? How much is it

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>going to cost me? And it sounds like the parents

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are scheming. A jury could considerue that that's evidence of

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a father entering into an elicited ringment with Singer. So

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution could introduce the tapes because the FBI recorded them,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But normally wouldn't you have the person who recorded them

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on the stand to explain them, right, and you think

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of doubt. Sometimes there's mob cases where they have a

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wire tap, and they don't have a person that says

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the wire taps. They just have the FBI agent saying, yeah,

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we put a wire in the Ravenied Social Club and

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that's how we got John Dotty Cockey. They already made

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a request to the court to authenticate and the usage

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>of the case the consensual recordings that Singer made without Singer.

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you know if either of the fathers are going

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to take the stand. Of course they don't have to.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>That remains to be seen. I guess how the case

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>plays out for the government side of it. One of

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the things that's really interesting is a couple of parents

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to testify for the government, a couple from

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>California named Bruce and Dzana Isaacson, and they were the

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>first to play guilty of all the parents. They immediately

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>did a deal and now they're going to testify what

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>they were thinking, to give the jury some perspective of

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>what parents may have been thinking, of what these two

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>fathers may have been thinking. They're also going to call

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>some coaching staff that played guil See and other co

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>conspirators with Singer in his business to give insight. This

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was a gam that Singer was milking money. I mean

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the government when they announced this case said Singer had

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for years and had made twenty five millions.

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>We've added up the bound of bribes in this case.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I think we got to maybe ten million or eight millions.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about this case several times, and initially I

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>thought the prosecution has a slam dunk case, but it

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like the defense might knock some holes in the

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>prosecution's case. What you can do get a plea deal

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is different from how it will play before a jury.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean some people have said, oh, this is going

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to be so impalatable to the general public ensured that

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going to immediately convict and the judge. I'm in

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>more than two hundred people to courts in Boston to

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have people fill out a questionnaire. And it's the thirteen

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>page questionnaire that asked, how much do you know about

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>this case? Have you ever had a child applied to college?

0:10:57.520 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you remember worked in the college system, you have

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>work at fundraised? Do you have anything against cooperators? So

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.359
<v Speaker 1>they're going to try to weed out those with opinions

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that might be swayed one way or another, and to

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>read out those people and try to get a fair

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and impartial jury. Thanks Pat, That's Bloomberg Legal reporter Patricia Hurtado.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Another group of charismatic fish are the darters. Darters are

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a small, wonderfully colored bottom dwelling fish that looks more

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>suited to live in a coral reef for tropical aquarium

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 1>than the cold, fast flowing streams of the Smokies. The

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>snail darter is a tiny Tennessee fish that made big

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>waves in legal waters. That is, the three inch fish

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>became famous when the case to save it went all

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the way to the Supreme Court, and the court's first

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>decision on the landmark Endangered Species Act in articulated an

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>expansive interpretation of the law in favor of protections for

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the little fish. Now, after nearly fifty years, the snail

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>darter has been taken off the endangered species list, joining

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>me as a lawyer who took that case to the

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. Zig Platter, professor at Boston College Law School,

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the snail darter. The snail darter was

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>a tiny perch that was found in the last thirty

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>miles of big flowing, clean river in Tennessee because sixty

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>seven other damns basically eliminated wherever else it lived, and

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Value Authority decided they wanted to build their

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>last damn to impound this river and the darter, it

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>turns out, was you know, a perfect illustration two humans

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>canary in the coal mine, that this was the last

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>place left for humans who having credible trout fishing and

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>boy Scouts and girl Scouts could do the float trips there,

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and the history of the Cherokee Indians. The little fish

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 1>was in effect a barometer for a lot of really

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>strong public values right at the edge of the Smoky

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Mountains National Park, and so the farmers fought to protect

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>their farms by protecting the fish. Um there were three

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>family farms that were condemned by the government agency, most

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of them for resale, not most of them not for

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the little lake. So it's a complicated story because you

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>got to explain the agency was not building this for hydropower,

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't building it for flood control. It was it

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>had to justify it by inventing a pretend city that

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they said would be built on the land that they

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>had condemned. It never was, and also if this would

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be a recreational lake, it's not a Ydro lake in

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of his justifications that everything is connected to everything else.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's a complicated story. How did the farmers take

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>up this battle? Well, the farmers really were quite sophisticated,

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for you know, Appalachian farmers, who most of them had

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not gone to college. They got a lawyer to bring

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>an environmental impact statement case first of all, and the

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>government agency, we don't have to do an impact statement

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because we're an emergency agency or something. Uh. They went

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to court and they got an injunction. So for sixteen months,

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Valley Authority had to prepare an environmental impact statement.

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>But once you do that, it's a procedure. They've they've

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>done the procedure, they can go ahead and flood the valley.

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Um even though the farmers said, the valley, the agriculture,

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the tourism, the history is worth much more than than

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the last most marginal dam. But once they lost, they

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>had about given up. And then suddenly this little fish

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was discovered, and the guy who discovered it was in

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a river. He bent over, and the shallow, beautiful,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>clear river he picked up this fish in his fingers.

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Then he walked over to the bank and he said

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to the farmer, this is an endangered fish and this

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>might save your farms. And so they basically carried the case.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>My students and I did the law of it, and

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we had a local attorney on the trial as well.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But the farmers, they went to Washington. They testified, this

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was grassroots democracy, an incredible story. And then you know,

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we won in the Supreme Court. Tell me how it

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>got to the Supreme Court. Well, at trial, the judge

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee, of course, decided in favor of the Tennessee

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Valley Authority, but he said, this dam is going to

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>jeopardize the survival of the fish and it's going to

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>destroy its natural habitat, but I'm not going to stop it.

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And then in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal said,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, but those are both separate violations of the

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Endangered Species Act. So they stopped the project, and the

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>agency took it to the Supreme Court of the United States,

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Supreme Court said, well, Congress said, you cannot

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>destroy an endangered species or destroy its habitat if you're

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a federal agency. Meanwhile, Of course, there was a firestorm

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>going because this is the only law that most citizens

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>could bring a suit for that would question the rationality

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of a project. Normally, all they have to do is

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>do the paperwork. That's what an environmental impact statement was.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So eventually, after the Supreme Court there was a cabinet

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>level economic study about what was worth more the river

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>development that the farmers wanted, or the dam develop but

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that the agency wanted. I mean, this was the God Committee,

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is an extraordinary tribunal that most people don't know about. Unanimously,

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they said the dam was never worth building in the

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>first place, and it isn't worth completing because the river

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>with agriculture, with the historical stuff, with tourism, with an

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>industrial park. The farmers really made an amazingly good argument,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and so it was vetoed. And then in Congress, the

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>industries that were worried about the Endangered Species Act and

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the government agencies that build dams were able to change

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the law. The river died and the fish was wiped

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>out in its major natural habitat. It was really heartbreaking

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>politics because every member of Congress got a message from

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Interior and this high level committee saying

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this dam will destroy more than it will ever create.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But America didn't know that because the firestorm of political

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric was all, you know, stupid little fish, gigantic hydro

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>electric dam. The dam is a tiny little dam and

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not a hydro dam. And the cynical environmentalists who

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the fish, well, you know, we care

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about all living things, and in this case, this living

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>thing was connected to economic values, and so it was

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>heartbreaking to lose the Little Tennessee River. People were coming

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>from hundreds of miles away to fish this place before

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it died. Who relocated the fish? Well, once a species

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is endangered, if Congress has said you cannot save it

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in its natural habitat as they said here, then the

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Department of Interior put together a recovery team and they said, well,

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>what can we do to keep the species from dying out?

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>And working with tv A, and t v A said okay,

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>where can we transplant it? The Department of Interior worked

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>out plan and so they put it in several rivers

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that weren't ideal. And so that's part of this story

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>that you know, some people say, oh, well, when you

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>have an endangered meansy to transplant it somewhere else. It

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>took forty years. It took forty years. But the transplant

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>now seems to be successful. But to fallback transplantation is

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's second best. No, it's not even second best,

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>it's third best. First best is to keep a species,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to conserve it in its natural habitat second is to

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>put it into a place where it can live without

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>any more human investment, human actions. But the third best,

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess is what they did because these rivers in

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the summertime got hot, didn't have enough oxygen. So t

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>v A now has to pump oxygen into the transplant

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>rivers to keep the fish alive. And they're pulsing their

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dams to wash the mud away so that the fish

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>can have spawning beds, egg and children in the clean

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>gravel below some of these dams. So the fish are surviving,

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but they depend on a government agency maintaining oxygen pumping

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>into the water and a special flushing water pressure process

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and the dams. And that's not ideal. You you want

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a transplant that doesn't require human support forever. That's what

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got. The government said it's no longer in danger

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of extinction. Is that true or not true? That's right.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>The scientist said, if the t v A keeps putting

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>liquid oxygen into the water and keeps flushing the dams

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in a way it hadn't done before so as to

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>clean alternative rivers where the fish could survive, then the

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>fish can survive. It's no longer endangered. And that's science,

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and I believe it's true. It's just we have to

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>be sure that those measures to conserve the species go

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on how long? Forever? Forever? So wouldn't it have been

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>better than to leave it on the endangered species list?

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Why did you file a petition to delist it? That's

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>a really tough question, and there complicated answers and scientific terms.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It was no longer endangered because the agencies were pumping

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>oxygen and blowing the water clean. So, but this more

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to it. The prior federal administration was attacking the Endangered

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Species Act. It was cutting regulations this way and that

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that the protected species. And we started hearing that there

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>was a specific plan to delist the snail darter in

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a way that would not protect it, and so it's

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of preemptive. We don't like transplantation. But um,

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>by filing the petition ourselves, we sort of get special standing.

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Two make sure that those measures continue, that the delisting

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>regulation will require those actions to go on forever. And

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there's ever a double cross, if the

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>agency stopped protecting the fish, we will be able under

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the delisting regulation immediately to file for emergency relisting. And

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's unfortunate that we have to talk about it

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>in those terms, but I'm thinking that in the circumstances

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be delisted by the prior administration.

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We filed in July, there was still a year and

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a half of the prior administration or more, and the

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>safest thing to do was to try to be part

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of the process to make sure that maintenance of the

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>protections could could be assured. What did environmentalists learned from

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole saga of the snail darter? Well, it's it's

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. In spite of the tremendous criticism that was

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>poured against the snail darter, I mean it really was.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>We were called fringe lunatics and Russia Limball called us

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>homo socialists. I mean, protecting a stupid little fish against

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>a gigantic hydro electric dam. Of course that wasn't the case.

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>But this is the point. Even when it was thought

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to be an extreme as the courts enforced the law.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And that is a precedent that makes people pay attention

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to the law even if they don't like it, if

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they know that even in that case, the courts enforced it.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So so there is that a really good precedent came

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>from it. And the species, you know, the Endangered Species

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Act is recovered a fair number of species over the years.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>The Act works. The Clean Water Act works because the

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>water and the rivers where they put the fish is

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>cleaner than it was um back forty years ago. So

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>so it's one of those things where you make the

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>best decision you can in the circumstances when the really

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>best solution for everyone, for the farmers, for fisherman, for

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cherokee Indians that had their sacred sites in this

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>river area, and for the fish. You when you lose

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it there, you do the best you can somewhere else. Um.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But the president in the law is a good strong one.

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what the precedent is and whether you think

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this Supreme Court would recognize that precedent today. Well, I mean,

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's of course a complicated question. The present Supreme Court says,

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the members who have been put there recently say that

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they generally follow precedent. They don't overturn prior Supreme Court decisions.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll see with Roe versus Way, that will be

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of course a question. And but this was such a

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>declaratory decision by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Warren Burger, saying that the Endangered Species Act represents institutionalized caution.

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>You don't destroy a species when if there's any possible alternative,

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and of course in most of these cases there are alternatives.

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>The president is that the courts will enforce the protection

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the species and of its habitat um. And that's

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>really something. It's it's cited all the time for the

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>importance of not having a court overturn a law, and um,

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been used to protect many other species. But it's

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>also been used in other settings too, where where there's

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a question of whether the Water Pollution Act is going

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to be Well, you cite t V a versus Hill,

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Stale Darter case, and courts say, oh, yeah, that's

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that extreme case where the courts just enforced the law.

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what the law hust be. And if

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Congress is going to change it, and you know, Congress

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>is always a question. It's it's but, but you know,

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the Congress doesn't easily change the law. Uh, it holds

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>things together and over time, very often endangered species are

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sensitive little indicators of human importance, of human economics as

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>well as ecology. The the plan that the farmers did

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>for the river had a tourism route from the Interstates,

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>going up through the valley, through these historic areas, through

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the farmland into the Smoky's Park it which gets eleven

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>million people a year. It would have been an incredible

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>money maker for the local region instead of just one

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>more damn the dam which is already getting polluted with algae.

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being the Bloomberg Law Show. That's Zig Platter,

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Boston College Law School. And that's it

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can always at the latest legal news on our Bloomberg

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and at www dot Bloomberg dot com. Slash podcast Last Law.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Rosso and you're listening to Bloomberg,