WEBVTT - ASML, the Obscure Powerhouse at the Cutting Edge of Chip Technology

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Halloway. So Tracy obviously, Yeah,

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we've done a lot of episodes about the semiconductor industry,

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>about chips. There's one specific, I guess I would say,

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>sub component of the story that people are like, Oh,

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys got to do that, you guys got to

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>do that, which we have yet to hit so far.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You say, there's one thing that we have yet to do,

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but I have a feeling like this is the Endless

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Semiconductor series, and as soon as we finished this episode,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discover some other hidden component of the

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>semi conductor supply chain and that's going to lead to

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>another episode. But yes, you're right, um, there is one

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of big elephant, big semiconductor thing in the room,

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is a company called a s m L.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Not to be confused with a s m R, which

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I always seem to do a s mL but hopefully

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for like a certain kind of person, listening to an

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>hour of people talking about chips is a type of

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for them SMR. So maybe killed two birds with one stone,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but yes, s m L, you know, one of the

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>things that we established in thinking about how these sort

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>of the chip ecosystem works. Maybe part of our characterization

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is we twan semiconductor the biggest contract fabrication company in

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>the world. I think we sort of think of as

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like they're the final boss right in chims, Like in

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the end, they're like the central bank of chips. Their

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>capacity kind of almost dictates chip capacity overall. There's some

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>other companies that make chips, including Intel and Global Boundaries,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>but t SMC is the big one. But TSMC has

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to buy equipment from others to you know not no

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>one is completely self sufficient in this industry, and t

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>SMC is a huge client or a huge purchaser of

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>equipment made by this company. It's a Dutch company a SML. Yeah,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>so you mentioned that it's Dutch, And this is the

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>other thing I mean, in addition to not really understanding

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>what this company does or the type of equipment it's

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>actually making for semiconductor manufacturers like t SMC, the other

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>thing I don't really get about it is why is

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it a Dutch company? Because the one thing I know

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about it is it has its origins in the US

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>UM I think in the you know, like nineteen eighties,

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it sort of came out of the collapse of a

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>bunch of US lithography firms or something like that. And

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>yet now it's a Dutch company that has this enormous

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>role in the global supply chain. It's squarely like kind

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of crowning, like it's sort of like a kingmaker for

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor technology or expertise. And I don't know, I just

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have so many questions already. I know we haven't even started. Yeah,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, I have no questions too. We'll get started

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>just a second. But you know, you mentioned the oddity

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of it big Dutch. There's another element here, and I

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, I feel like reluctant to like

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>talking like cliches or stereotypes, but I don't really think. No,

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it is true of like Northern Europe or Europe in

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>general as being like this like cutting edge high tech

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hotbed for anything. When I think about tech, I think

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>about Silicon Valley, maybe more of the consumer and but

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>also like you know, obviously a long history. It means

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley for a reason. And I think about various

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>parts of East Asia, and when I think about the

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>engineering prowess in Europe. Hey, I don't think about tech

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in Europe that much, and when I do think about

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>engineering prowess in Europe, it's typically I'm thinking more on

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>these sort of like bigger industrial engineering, so a company

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like Siemens or companies that are really good at public

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>public works or trains or whatever. And I don't think

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of Europe as being a hotbed of say, semiconductor innovation,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's probably countless like counter examples. I'm just sort

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of thinking, like it doesn't fit into my mental models

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff. So it is interesting that it's Dutch.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Well also, just when you think about the European market,

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like you start thinking about the biggest companies there, and yeah, sure,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff like Semens, LVMH like luxury good makers. But mL

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely massive, and like just looking at the share

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>price chart, it has had a huge, huge run up

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>over the past year or so, I mean basically since

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the global pandemic, much like a lot of other semiconductor stocks,

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but I mean amazing run up, huge market cap, and

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>yet it's sort of like this company that outside of

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor sphere, it doesn't seem to get that much attention. Yeah,

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's A. It's like a it's like a

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>third over three billion dollar market cap. It is. It's

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the biggest companies in the world. Um,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but not many people know about it, far from my

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>household name. Okay, so we have a million questions. So

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we got to get right into this discussion. And we

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have the perfect guest to tell us a out this company.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be speaking with Chris Miller. He's an assistant

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>professor of international history at the Fletcher School at Toughs University,

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and he is the author of a forthcoming book that

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>will be out next year entitled Chip War, The Struggle

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for the World's Most Critical Technology, And he can answer

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>all of our questions about a SML. Chris, thank you

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Thanks for having me. Chris,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what is lithography? You know? I think that this is

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>one of these questions that's like the word gets It's

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>probably come up on like every episode. And I pride

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>myself on never being too embarrassed to like ask a question,

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think I actually was too embarrassed to ask

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this on some of the other episodes. I'm like, hm, phothography,

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what phithography? So if you want to make a semi

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>connected device, you take a slab of silicon, you cover

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it with chemicals called photo resists, which are chemicals that

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>react with light, and then you shoot light raise or

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>now extreme all tra violet light rays at the silicon

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>wafer UH, and the shapes that you shoot at it

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>will form the transistors. So that's that's the simplest version.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Now today, if you buy a new iPhone, the most

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>events process around it will have ten billion transistors. So

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>you've got to shoot extraordinarily narrow wavelengths of light through

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>masks that create these shapes on the silicon wafer, and

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the masks need to be able to project all of

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>these shapes onto the wafer. So making this possible at

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the scale of ten billion transistors per chip is is

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what a SML does. Wait, how many per chip? What

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do you say? Ten billion per chip? That's right, a

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>new Apple processor in your iPhone will have ten billion

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>transistors per chip. Some chips that go into data centers

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>will have more than that. But the scale of transistors

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that we produce at any given year is is more

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>than the scale of all goods produced by all companies

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and all other industries and all of world history. It's

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous number. So could you maybe describe where a

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>SML sits in the sort of ecosystem of the semiconductor industry.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So I gather it doesn't seem to have much competition,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but like who does it actually supply? And also who

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>does it not supply? Like are there people out there

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>who try to do this on their own. In the

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>early days of the chip industry, companies built lithography machines

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in house, so Texas Instruments would have had its own

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Lithography Machine Division IBM. But today the machines are so

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>complex and expensive that there's just a couple of companies

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that make lithography machines in general, and just one company,

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 1>a SML, as able to make a u V lithography machines,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>which are the most advanced type. Anyone who operates a

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>chip fab sility where chips are made has to buy

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>lithography equipment, and so for the most cutting edge chips,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got no choice but to buy from a s mL.

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>This is fasting. So whether we're talking about UNTIL doing

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>its own chips or TSMC or any one else. And

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we've talked with other people who talked to Stacy Raskin

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of Burnstein and about the nanometer wars and all of them.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing cutting edge manufacturing, you are a customer

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of a a s mL. That's right, that's right. For

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the most cutting edge lithography machines, a SML is the

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>only supplier for slightly less cutting edge machinery. Uh Night

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of Japan is also a competitor of s mls.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>They have a duopoly for anything that's not the most

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge. So what is it about the technology that

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>makes it, I guess so proprietary to a s mL, Like,

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>how did they get into a position where they basically

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>control it? And what is it that they've been able

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to do that others haven't. So the the challenge with

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>EUV lithography in particular and lithography in general is that

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got to uh manage a supply chain that is

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary complex. A SML has got around four thousand suppliers,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and many of these suppliers are producing equipment that only

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they can produce. So, just to give you a couple

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of examples them, the mirrors within s MLS lithography machines,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the eu V machines are the flattest structure that humans

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>have ever made, the flattest man made structure in the universe.

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And when you go through the list of materials and

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>components that you need to produce an e V lithography machine,

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>there are multiple parts of the system that are the

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>most this or the most that, and managing that is

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary complex business. If you talk to people at

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>a sm L, they'll say, our biggest engineering challenge is

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>not actually engineering any particular part, engineering the supply chain,

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>making sure that all of our suppliers are producing things

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so that they all fit together, they all work together,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they arrive on time. And it's hard enough to do

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that with basic machinery, but when you're trying to manipulate uh,

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>individual atoms, which is what SML is able to do,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's even more complex. Tracy, I already loved this episode

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>so much. I don't know, like how many things like

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I've learned already in five minutes. And then the fact

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that like it's it's also a supply Like Okay, obviously

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a chip supply chain, but then the idea that

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the most advanced technology within the chip is actually itself

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a supply chain. I'm just like, I'm already obsessed with this,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but where do they So Okay, you mentioned that for

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of like okay, for the very cutting edge, there's

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>just a SML for slightly less cutting edge. Uh, Nikon,

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>did you say, Nikon? That's right, Nikon. In Japan, they're

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>also in the game. Do other players aspire to be

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge or is there some barrier that just basically

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>makes it so that no one else is really trying

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to get be at that level in the which is

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>when investment in EUV began. Nikon made a choice not

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to try to commercialize UV technology. The first physics papers

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>on the V actually came out of a Japanese university,

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>so there's plenty of optics expertise in Japan that a

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>SML was the only company that was willing to bet

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on EUV from the forward and capable of raising the

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>funds and assembling the expertise. So right now, if someone

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to replicate what U vs what a SML has

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>done with UV, it would take them a decade and

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>billions and billions of dollars in investment. And because the

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>suppliers that work with a SML have exclusivity agreements with

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a SML. SML has invested in some of his key suppliers.

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just basically impossible for anyone to break into this

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>without replicating their entire separate supply chain. It would take

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a decade to do. So, maybe this is a good

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>place to start talking about the history of the company

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and where it actually came from. And I think that

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>will help us like understand some of these dynamics how

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>it built up a competitive edge versus it's you know,

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>non existent or very few competitors. But my understanding is

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like sprung up out of US military

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>technology of some sort. Can you start like at the beginning?

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>How like? I guess this goes back to Joe's question,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what is lithography? Why is the U. S Army interested

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>in it? And how did it play into a s

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>ML's creation story. When the transistor was first invented in

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen forties in Bell Labs in New Jersey,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it was predominantly used in military devices for its its

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>first commercialization, and there was a scientist in a US

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Army lab named J. Lathrop in the nineteen fifties who

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was trying to find out how to minim miniature eye

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>transistors produced them smaller and smaller so they could be

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>put in smaller devices. One day, he and his his

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>assistant realized that they could use photo resist chemicals, these

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>chemicals that react with lights to create shapes on on

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the silicon and germanium that they were working with, and

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they turned their microscope that they were using the lab

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>upside down. So normally a microscope lets you see something

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>small and it expands the image for your eye. They

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>did the opposite. They had a shape that was large

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and were able to project that in a smaller version

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>by using an upside down microscope, And with that they

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>filed the first patent or photo lithography and coined the

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>phrase in the nineteen fifties. Over the next couple of decades,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>photo lithography was used both by chipmakers who were making

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>their own machines and house and then eventually a couple

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of specialized photo lithography companies emerged in Connecticut and Massachusetts.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>They were defense contractors primarily, but realized they could use

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>their specialized optics things that they had honed in spy

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>satellites and military equipment like that for the semiconductor industry,

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and so until the mid nineteen eighties, the center of

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the photo lithography industry was in New England, but those

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>companies faced hard times in the nineteen eighties. They were

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>poorly managed, and the nineteen eighties were a time when

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese ship industry in general was rising. A Nikon

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as can and then the two camera companies

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>began investing in photo lithography. For a time in the

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties, they were the dominant companies in the industry,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>which the US was quite worried about. Worried about being

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>too reliant on Japan at a time of commercial and

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>also geopolitical tension, and so US chip makers began turning

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to a s mL, both to diversify their supplier base,

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but also because a SML was able to produce very

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>high quality equipment as well. In the nineteen nineties in

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the mid as well, was the only company willing to

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>take the gamble on EUV, and since that point it's

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>become the dominant firm in the industry. We just have

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>extreme ultra violet. I don't know if we just want

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we've established what UV stands for? Can

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I just ask so, can you explain again? What's the

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>difference between extreme ultra violet and I guess non extreme

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>ultra violet. So over the past couple of decades is

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we've tried to make ever smaller device is in ever

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>smaller features on silicon wafers. We've begun to use different

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and smaller wavelengths of light, and so extreme multi violet

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>has a wavelength of thirteen point five nanometers. Is the

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>smallest wavelength of light that we've been able to use

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in in mass productions. So if you rewind several decades ago,

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we were using larger wavelengths of light that we're uncapable

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of producing the small feature sizes on silicon wafers that

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we demand today. One of the reasons why I think

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the chip episodes, well, why we've done so many chip episodes,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and why they're why they keep resonating. I think there's

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a few things. I mean, one is there's the chip shortage,

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and it should be noted that the shortage is actually

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wore at the is not really at the advanced level.

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of cheap chips, etcetera. But we're starting

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to the chip shortage that relates to automobiles, etcetera. Has

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of brought people a lot of awareness about lack

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of domestic US manufacturing capacity. I think another reason people

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>care about chips is obviously just the general explosion of

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>chip demand. Even where there isn't an acute shortage, there's

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>chips h and everything. And then I think the other

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes it sort of an interesting story right

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>now is that, at least in the US and probably

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere around the world, there is a rethinking about the

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>role of state capacity in and um state investment into

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>certain space. And of course, as we all know, the

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>chip industry and as you just talked about, the chip

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>industry overall really was sort of born out of defense,

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so like sort of the ultimate in UH state investing

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and government spending, and at various times throughout US history

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>at least we seem to go in waves of how

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>much the government wants to get in to protect the

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>chip sector, to invest in the chip sector, to build

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and bolster a homegrown chip sector. You mentioned the sort

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of stress and tension with the Japanese or reliance on

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Japanese companies in the eighties and nineties that seemed to

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>produce a wave of um sort of defensive and use.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps it could be characterized. Talk to us about how

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a SML fits into that in terms of you know,

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about to say, the history of t SMC,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>that was clearly in part it was a very like

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>public sort of private venture. There was the government backed

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it up under the condition that it could raise private

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>foreign money as well. Talk to us about the role

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of like public money in the creation of a SML.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So a sm L emerged first as a division of

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of Phillips, the Dutch electronic company UM and it was

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>spun out in at a time when the Europeanship industry

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>was relatively small as a player on the world stage.

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It was the U S and Japan at the time

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that were the biggest players, and there were a variety

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>of Dutch and European Union programs to support R and

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>D at s mL. But for a SML in particular,

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>actually the most important government support was from the U

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>S government because in in the nineteen nineties, when the

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>investments and EUV were being made, Intel, which at the

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>time was the the industry leader in hip making, decided

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to take a big bet on eu V being the

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>next lithography technology and established a consortium of a number

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of private ship firms and a number of US national labs,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>uh the Lawrence Livermore for example, that would work together

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to produce prototype UV machines. And so the technology that

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>we use today an SML Systems really comes from this

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>work with US national labs. It was largely funded by

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>industry but using the scientists there. And at the time

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>there was some interest in trying to turn the technology

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>over to a US company to producing commercialized on the

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>grounds that it came largely out of US national labs,

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but there was no US lithography firm at the time

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that was seen as a credible candidate to commercialize. If

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the options were NICON or a SML. Given the tensions

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>with Japan, a SML was seen as the least risky option,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and also they had a long track record of producing

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>quality machines. And so we've got this strange situation now

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of the core technology in this machinery

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that's assembled in the Netherlands actually comes out of California.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And indeed SML has actually bought a number of companies

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the past couple of decades in

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>California as well. So there's a lot of US technology

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in a SML Systems partially funded by the US government.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Could you imagine something like that happening today? Like, I

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just think the environment is so different, and the idea

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of like the U S government funding a technology and

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>then deciding like, well, okay, I guess the best company

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to actually make this stuff is over in the Netherlands,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>so we'll just let them do it and give up

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like a key component of a highly competitive supply chain.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>It just seems so so unlikely in the current environment. Yeah,

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an interesting question. On the one hand, you

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>do hear a lot of conversation in Washington, d C.

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>About joint R and D project with Allied countries, and

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in some ways this is a perfect example of this.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think. The other thing is that a SML is

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a Dutch company, But if you look at the components

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of their EUV machines, for example, they're sourcing from all

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>around Europe, around the US and really worldwide. So to

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>describe them as as a Dutch company misses the fact

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that you can't produce an EUV system was for example,

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the light source, which is produced by an S and

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>L subsidiary in San Diego, so that there are a

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Dutch company S, but they're really a global supply chain

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that's focused on on the U S and Europe. So

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting because you mentioned that, Okay, at the

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>time that the technology was sort of they decided a

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>SML would be the most credible entity to commercialize this

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of US funded technology. There was this view that, Okay,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it was better them than a Japanese player, in part

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>because we already had anxiety about our reliance on Japanese

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>chips at the time for other other chips, including DAM.

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>How much are the same dynamics essentially in play when

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>people think about the geopolitics of chips. Obviously one of

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the things that you know, we talked about anxiety about

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>how my we rely on Taiwan. There's perhaps some anxiety

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>about the domestic homegrown chip industry. Although China seems to

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be a several years behind in terms of mainland chip technology.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>How much does it still sort of benefit everyone this

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>idea that this crucial component player is not part of

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>either in US or Asia. That's an interesting question. I

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think certainly if you're a Chinese customer of SML, you're

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>pleased that it's not a U S company, But the

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>reality is that if if the US wanted to use

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>actually poor controls to constrict SML sales to China, that

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be very difficult to do. A SML already doesn't

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>send it's eu V machines to China. In theory, that's

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because of Dutch restrictions. In reality, it's because of US

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the Netherlands to impose these restrictions. And there's

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>discussion um in in Washington and Japan elsewhere about whether

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>there ought to be stricter limits um the type of

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>lithography machines you can sell to China, and legally there's

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing that would really stop the US from posting

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>those restrictions unilaterally. Is the concerning that if those machines

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>were shipped to China, that they would be able to

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>UH that would accelerate China's semiconductor capabilities, or that literally

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>having them in Chinese hands would then maybe allow them

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to be more easily sort of deconstructed and reverse engineered

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and that would be a big knowledge transfer. No, it's

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the former. I think if you just receive an SMaL machine,

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea how to produce it. Okay, Okay,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's that the more advanced cocoric machines you have, the

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>more advanced shipmaker you have, the stronger the Chinese ecosystem is.

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So how big of an impediment is not having access

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to a sml S eu V technology to Beijing's like

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>overall semiconductor development drive, Like, is it such an essential

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>piece of technology that it basically means they're on a

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>completely different footing to something like TSMC. That's right. For now,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no viable of producing the most advanced chips

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>with the smallest features without using UV. There are some

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>some scientists who think there might theoretically be ways to

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>get around it, but for the next decade there's there's

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just no choice but to use a SMLS machinery if

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to produce the smallest chips. So what are

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's talk a little bit more about a

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>s MLS constraints. Everyone this year is becoming aware of, like,

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, constraints, and there's only so much boundary capacity

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world at any given time. The entities that

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to buy cheap chips that go into cars sort

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of got shut out because they canceled their order for

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a while. And now they're scrambling and it might be

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>years before they could catch up again. So we know

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that that's constraints. How strained is a s mls own

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>capacity to grow and where do they face Is it

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>just in the complexity of the supply chain? Is it

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in raw materials? Like what are their constraints? It's mostly

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in the supply chain complexity. So SML last year's shipped

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty one EUV machine sans, so we're talking getting one

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>or two more machines out of the out of their

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>production process is something that's hard to do because each

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of their suppliers is similarly constrained. And the ability to

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>ramp up manufacturing, you know, this isn't high volume manufacturing

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're producing thirty one machines a year, and because

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>their supply chain has so many specialized parts solely for

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 1>their machines, their suppliers are producing thirty one or so

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of the components needed each year, and so there's just

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>no way to ramp How many three hundred billion dollar

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>companies in the world make produce thirty one make thirty

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>one units a year, so we're talking like each one

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>is like half a goon or something. There's thirty one

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of the of EUV machines. They will also sell some

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of the older equipment, but they sold units in total

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>last year, so it's still a tiny number of units.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It's still not very much. How much is it if

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you or I wanted to pull together and by a

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 1>EUV machine? Like what are they? What are they retail for?

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Average average revenue per UV machine last year was around

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred forty million euros. Got it? Okay, So this

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>is something that comes up a lot in our supply

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>chain discussions. But like how does ordering actually work and

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is there preference given to certain customers over others? Like,

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, if one company wants to buy an EUV machine,

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I imagine there there are plenty of other companies that

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>want to do the same thing. For a limited supply

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>How does a SML actually make the decisions about who

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>gets allocated what? Also, how long does it take? Like

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>what's the waiting time to actually get one of these things? Yeah,

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know the details as to how SML

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>decides to allocate the number of potential customers for a

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty million dollar machine. Is is limited? It's a

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>half dozen potential customers in the world, you be realistically

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>looking to buy one. But if you look at the

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>main customers, it's t SMC, which has around half of

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>operating the UV machines in its own fabs, Samsung, Intel,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a handful of others, and there's almost certainly a premium

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that t SMC is paid for getting so many machines valuable.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>If if if a new company came online and wanted to

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>buy machines, they'd face a weight of at least a

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>couple of years because capacity has been purchased and advanced.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Intel has said it's going to be the first customer

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of the next generation EUV machine, which would be online

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>around Presumably it's paid something for the right to get

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the first generation, but we don't know any of the details. Yeah,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Intel, and I want to back up to

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>something we talked about earlier. Why was this never part

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of Intel's own ambitions? Because you know, over the years,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess the degree to which Intel has wanted to

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>be an i P first company or a manufacturing company

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>at Waxes and wind, so at one point it was

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a manufacturing powerhouse, then has sort of scaled. Back then

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it was more of an I P company, and that's

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>sally the anxiety these days now they seem to want

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to get back into being uh manufacturing, and the new

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>CEO has made a point of like, we're not going

0:26:55.400 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>to give up on being a manufacturing powerhouse. Why was

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>lithography or advanced lithography never part of the Intel strategy? Well,

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>when INTIL was founded, it was. It was founded at

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a time where you could already buy lithography equipment on

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the open market, so they always decided they were going

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to produce ships, but by lithography machines from suppliers. Over

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>their fifty years, they've been one of the biggest buyers

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>of lithography equipment in the industry, and the development of

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>e V actually wouldn't have happened without Intel. When Andy

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Grove was still the Intel CEO in the early nine nineties,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he made the first big bet on the development of

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>EV lithography, putting up two or million dollars in nearly

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 1>nines to begin to develop this on the grounds not

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that Intel was ever going to produce lithography equipment, but

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that it would eventually need EUV to produce the most

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>advanced ships. And even as as recently as when a

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>SML needed to raise more capital to to fund its

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>development of UV. It went to Intel, t SMC, and Samsung,

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and Intel was the biggest investor in a SML at

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, putting in a several billion dollars to help

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fund SML's development. So until quite recently, it seemed like

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Intel would be the biggest user of e V lithography machines.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It's only in the past couple of years that Intel decided,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in what looks to be a mistake in hindsight, that

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>EV wouldn't be ready by around now, where t SMC

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe opposite that that EUV would be ready for high

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>value manufacturing. And t SMC was proved right, which is

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>why it's done so well the past couple of years,

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and Intel has proven wrong, which I think most observers

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>can explain some of the manufacturing problems it's had in

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>recent years by not using EUV and trying to use

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>older versions of lithography to produce its most advanced ships.

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Now Intel is changing it's it's it's plans, it's it

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>says it's investing very heavily in UV, but it's gonna

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>take a couple of years for them to learn how

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to actually use the UV and high volume manufacturing. Wait,

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so I have a slightly related question, although maybe it's

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of reversed, I guess, but like, given a SML

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>competitive edge in producing a key technological component for semiconductors,

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>could they ever have just gone into making semiconductors themselves?

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Like if they have a monopoly on this technology, no

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>one can do it as well as them, Like why

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>not just start making the finished product yourself. To make

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a chip, you not only need lithography, which is one

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of the key steps, but there are other steps as well.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You need to be able to deposit films of materials

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>um with with atomic level precision. There's there are different

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>companies Applied Materials, for example, in California that make that

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.959
<v Speaker 1>type of equipment. You need measurement equipment that can measure

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>individual atomic level errors in your final chips to make

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>sure you understand what errors you have. That's a different

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>set of companies that makes that equipment. UM. So there's

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different specialized equipment that you need to

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>make chips. The cost of a new fab that for example,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>t SMC will build more than half of that cost

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is the equipment that goes in it and a SML

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and as ptography machines are a critical part of that,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but that's far from enough to make chips, and SML

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 1>specialty is really solely in lithography UH and not at

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>all in deposition or matching or the other types of

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>equipment that you need to actually make finished chips. This

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point is so fascinating to me, like to

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think about, like, okay, a s mL among the many

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary things. They also lay claim to having the flattest

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>service in the world, and presumably in order to get

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the flattest service of the world, there's some technology, as

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you sort of just mentioned, that has to be able

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to measure flatness and actually measure if the services not

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>flat and it sort of speaks to like you know,

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we think about like in the US these days, and

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>there is UH. There's a bill in d C that's

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>designed to invest in UH, designed to bolster US capacity.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And again that's part of why you keep having these discussions,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because there's this effort on the way. It's kind of bipartisan.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>The bill might pass, it might not pass, but there's

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this sort of bipartisan interest to bolster domestic capacity. But

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what that means sometimes because obviously,

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as you describe, the internationalization and complexity of the chip

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>supply chain is so extreme, and as we've talked about

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with other guests, chips across borders a million times before

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they arrive in your xbox or your iPhone or whatever.

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It is, Like, what does it even mean in your

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>view just to think about like this question of like

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>expanding domestic capacity in an industry that but that just

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is so extremely fragmented and international. Yeah, I think the

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>first thing is you've got to be specific as to

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what type of capacity you wanted to spand expand domestically.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the US could expand production of chips domestically if

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to, but that wouldn't have any effect on

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality that there's no way to buy lithography equipment,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, except from foreign suppliers, either Nicon or a SML.

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think domestic production is a is a great thing

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to support UM, but thesis that we're going to have

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a entirely domestically produced supply chain is a fantasy. The

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>only reason that we're able to produce ships with such

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>small features is because we're able to take advantage of

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>expertise from companies in many different countries around the world,

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's no one in the industry who thinks there's

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>any conceivable future even if you're to spend a trillion

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars over a decade where you'd get a domestically produced

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>supply chain as anywhere near as efficient. Is what we've

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>got now, you know. I think the supply chain risk

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>discussion is often takes place at a thirty foot level,

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>when what you really need to look at is what

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of the specific components you're worried about, Are there specific

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 1>suppliers you're worried about, and how can you mitigate those

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>specific risks? But just talking about domestic versus foreign production

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is not nearly specific enough to have any sort of

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>real meaning. So we kind of mentioned this in the intro.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But again, one of the themes that comes up repeatedly

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>on these episodes is the idea of supply chains all

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the way down. So if there's a bottleneck in one thing,

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a bottleneck um and a component and even

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>smaller component that leads into that one thing. So if

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a bottleneck in lithography equipment that's impacting semiconductors, I

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>guess my question is is there a bottleneck in something

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that goes into the lithography machines or the eu V

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>machines that is preventing a s m L from expanding production.

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>It certainly could be there's not enough public information about

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>SML supply chain to know, and it's very plausible that

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a SML, despite being real experts at management supply chain,

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always uh No. They report having around four thousands suppliers,

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and all of their suppliers who you speak to will

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>say they ask lots of questions about their suppliers suppliers,

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is that there are you know, multiple

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>orders of magnitude more suppliers of their suppliers and so

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>tracing them all down the chain is is basically impossible.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So what a SML tries to do is understand what

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>other biggest risks. They've even gone so far as to

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>purchase some of their suppliers to gain more detailed control

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>over managing those risks. But they simply can't know every

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>ultimate component that goes into all of all their suppliers systems,

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and so that's that's where the supply chain management just

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes extraordinarily difficult. Now what they've been really good at

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I think better than their competitors over the past couple

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of decades is managing that so it hasn't generally caused

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>any sort of serious delays. And one of the things

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>that they're known for with their customers is being able

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to deliver mostly on time when they promise a machine

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and managing this, which is something that no one else

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>has been able to manage. I think. The other thing

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to note is that you know, when you've got this

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>equipment that is is manipulating individual atoms or trying to

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to control the movement of light with extraordinary precision.

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one thing to have a machine that will

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>do this once or twice or sporadically. It's another thing

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to have a machine that will do this day and

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>day out, operating twenty four hours a day. And that's

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the other thing that a SML has done very

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>successfully over the past couple of years. It was clear

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as early as the nine nineties that it was possible

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to make a chip with evy lithography. What's been difficult

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is making millions of ships with the euvy lithography and

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>doing in a cost effective way. And that's what a

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>smlls really stood out is that their machines are rarely broken,

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 1>always functioning um They need less um, less tuning, less

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>cleaning than their competitors. That's what a sml has done

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>quite well. So it's not simply managing the physics, which

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is very hard, but it's also making sure that you've

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 1>got this extraordinary precise physics that's always operating in these

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>act way you expected to operate. Yeah, I'm thinking back

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to one of our discussions with HBS professor. Really, she

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember the math exactly, but if like

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>chip making is like a seven thousand step process, then

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>even you know, ninety nine point nine nine percent execution

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>in each step is insufficient in many cases because by

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the time you're down to the seventh seven thousand, you've

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like basically lost all your chips. I don't remember the

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>exact math, but it is interesting to think about like

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>building up that comp that competent now just in can

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the machine make the chip, but can make it over

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again without without many errors. If

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at a s mls revenue statements, what you'll

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 1>find is they've got a growing share of their revenue

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>coming from services which is servicing the machines that they operate.

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They've got staff in t SMCS, facilities in in Samsung, etcetera,

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>making sure that not only the machines are operating, but

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they're operating exactly according to plan, they're not breaking down.

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that SML is is doing more of

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is managing the software for their machines. And the way

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that lithography works at at the scale that we're talking

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about is that if you want to print a certain pictures,

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>so you want to print an AX, you don't reflect

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the ax on your silicon because the

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>way that light reflects if you print and actually get

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>something different, so you actually learn over time all of

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the unexpected errors and light refraction and errors in the

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>way the chemicals react, and you print the error version

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and then it will give you an act. And so

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>there's extradinally complex software that now tries to understand how

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>all these different effects work. And you can actually look

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 1>at the images that smls producing to produce a straight

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>line and it looks nothing like a straight line. And

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>so that that software as well as something that SML

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>has been focusing on. So one of the things that

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about. You know, it's like the sort of

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the nanometer wars and the obvious. You know, people talking

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>about Moore's law and whether it's t SMC or Intel

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or anyone else, so they're always or a MG. Maybe

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they're always bragging about like making smaller and smaller chips.

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we learned is that

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>actually the chip companies all defined these measures a little

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>bit differently, so to some extent it's made up. But

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>how much are the chip manufacturers themselves as they advertised,

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like Okay, we're gonna be able to make a seven

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>NIM chip or maybe a five NIM chip or whatever.

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>How much are there timelines dependent on a s m

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>l's I guess I would say a smls own learning curve.

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And what are as a sort of monopoly provider, I

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say monopoly, but is the sole provider

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of the most cutting edge technology. What are the forces

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that drive technological gains for a sm L itself. If

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at how a SML has begun to roll

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>out at CV machines in into high volume manufacturing, which

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>has mostly been at t SMC, the learning has happened

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>collectively with a sm L and t SMC, so there's

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 1>been lots of SMA personnel that spend tons of time

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.479
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan and vice versa. So you really wouldn't have

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the rollout of e V over the past couple of

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>years had you not have this collective effort between t

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>s MC and a SML. And that's that puts other

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>companies at a disadvantage because t SMC knows better than

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone how a s MLS machines actually work in practice,

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and and the highlight manufacturing is really crucial to understanding

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>how how these machines work, because you don't really know

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>until you've got them in production. And once you've got

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>them in production, you've got thousands and thousands and thousands

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of iterations every single day where you can understand what

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the errors are, what the idiosyncrasies are of a given machine,

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and begin to correct for them. We talked about technological

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>progress and that that's important, but in some ways the

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>real challenge here is actually manufacturing progress. Understanding what the

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what what the ADO syncrasies are at the manufacturing stage

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and then learning to correct for them. And that's that's

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what t SMC has done extraordinarly well ad and it's

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>been hand in hand with with a SML. So I

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>have a sort of market oriented question. But you know,

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we think of semiconductors as this highly cyclical industry that

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>usually moves in line with whatever is going on with

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>GDP and economic growth, and that hasn't really been the

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>case since the pandemic because we've had, you know, this

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>big boom in demand for electronic goods and it's been

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a struggle to keep up. But I imagine for a

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>company like a s mL, it has also traditionally been

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>considered cyclical and its fortunes are sort of tied to

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with the actual semiconductor manufacturers. But just

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at SML's most recent results, they're forecasting basically like

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a boom in revenue for the next decade, something they

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>expect to last for ten years. Is there anything that

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>could sort of knock that revenue cycle at this point

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in time or is this business like, is there such

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a steep moat around the eu V technology that is

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>just going to be impossible for anything to um to

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hit it. There's there's definitely at mote around SMILS technology,

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and they won't be overtaken into UV in a decade.

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I should say I'm mixing my metaphors and steep and

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>impossible to overcome mote. There's no real competition that a

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>small faces when it comes to UV. That the question

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is what is going to be demand for UV machines,

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's a question ultimately of final demand for the

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>most advanced chips. A SMILS projections are are based on

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the assumption that we've reached a point where there's a

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>secular increase in demand for chips, as we have more

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>demand for data center capacity, um as we have the

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>five G rollout and new devices that are taking advantage

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of five G networks. Their bat is that we're going

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to have more chips per g d P and therefore

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>more demand for a SML. That's a bat that you know,

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear what that's going to play out. What

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 1>is clear is that anyone who's producing advanced ships will

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have no choice but to turn to sm L and

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>so in some ways they're perfectly exposed to the fluctuations

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the semiconductor industry. The more chips that are produced,

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the more machines you need. But the opposite is also true.

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 1>You kind of hinted at this early on. But the

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>idea that at uh seven nnimms in below at cutting edge,

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe EUV in theory isn't the only technology. So it's like, okay,

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 1>if if if EUV is the only technology that can

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>perform the test, then there's no one who can attack

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Are there other theoretical approaches for accomplishing the

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing besides the UV, I feel like you hinted

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>at in the beginning, there are It's really not a

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>question of science but of of manufacturing efficiency. So if

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you if you take the previous generation of lithography machines,

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>which rather than thirteen point five nanometer light, we're working

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>with one. It became it was possible over time to

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 1>produce ever smaller feature sizes on silicon wafers by using

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of tricks. So, for example, you can shoot

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the light through water, and if you think back to

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>high school physics, when light refracts differently through water, that

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 1>same principle lets you shoot lithography machines through water and

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and carve more specific shapes. You can also use multiple

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>steps of lithography to carve specific shapes that are more detailed.

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>The challenges just can you do this efficiently? Um So,

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 1>every step of lithography you need adds to the time

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it takes to produce a way for ads to your costs.

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And so there's no doubt that if you wanted to

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>produce an equivalent of one of Apple's new iPhone ships

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>using older generation lithography, you could do it in a

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lab and do one of them. The question is can

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you do a million of them as skin? And that

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty implausible right now. There's no really credible pathway

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of of how you could do that efficiently today, and

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 1>especially when you project forward five or ten years, we're

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>expecting to be making ever smaller transistors with more complex

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>shapes on them, and it seems really implausible that you'll

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that using anything besides UV. Chris,

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is there anything any other sort of least key things

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think we've missed? And I mean, I'm sure

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a million things, but other key ideas that I

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think we need to get across. I think if you're

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>interested in US China dynamics, obviously it's a big. One

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of the key reasons why t SMC cut off huaweih

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>In was because the US could restrict t SMCS access

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to machinery, of which lithography machinery was a It was

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a key example. So when when the Chinese ship industry

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>looks out and says we're we're gonna get the tools

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that we need, the impact of the US support controls

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on companies like a SML, even foreign companies that nevertheless

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>use US technology in their systems, is a pretty fundamental

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>roadblock that China faces, and that the big concern that

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>SML has right now is that the US is going

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to expand its restrictions on what you can send to

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 1>China in terms of lithography machinery, and China has been

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a big growth market the past couple of years for

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>older generational lithography machines, and so SML does face a

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>risk that the US it expands these restrictions. What inspired

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you to write a book all about a s m

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>L because it is like it's not something that ms

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>up necessarily in daily conversation. UM, so I'm just wondering

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>how it sort of came on your radar and what

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 1>is it that piqued your interest? We like the two

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of you. I spent the past couple of years realizing

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that semiconductors were vastly more important than the average person,

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>including myself realized, and also far cooler. The technology needed

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to make them as extraordinary. The fact that we're able

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate individual atoms in some cases is extraordinary, and

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to do it at the scale of trillions and trillions

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and transistors, I thought was was was really just wild

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what what what was possible? Uh? And

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to me that I took my iPhone for granted,

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I took my computer for granted. I took the cloud,

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:43.919
<v Speaker 1>which is just a bunch of silicon in big data

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>centers in IO. I took all that for granted without

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking through how complex it was too actually make these

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>tools work. And I think for for a long time

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we thought of the Internet is something out there. We

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>thought of data processing is something that happens somewhere else.

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's all actually very physical, all things being carved

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>onto silicon by shooting light at them and depositing uh,

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>layers of atoms and using different chemicals. And the reality

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that our entire digital world is in fact existing on

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>millions and millions of silicon wafers is something I don't

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>think we think enough about and we're just having to

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>come directon with that with the some innunctory shortage right

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>now that you can't just imagine an increase in computing

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 1>power and increase in memory, You've actually got to carve

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it onto silicon in billions and billions of tiny transistors.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting, I mean, your assistant professor at

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the Fletchers School, which I associate with diplomacy and government,

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and that seems like another sort of like fascinating dynamic here,

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>which is like maybe it's it feels again, or maybe

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it goes in cycles, but there's appreciation. And you sort

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of said it for your last point about yours trying

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to like that this particular industry is sort of inseparable

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>from thinking about how governments relate to each other. That's right.

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's crucial for for military systems, for example,

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's crucial for controlling computing power in the future. And

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been a prominent tool of of of geopolitics for

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the past three quarters of a century. And I think

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that more to the four today. But in fact,

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the history of lithography and of

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor is more generally you find that it's constantly been

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 1>something that governments have thought about in in political terms

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as in economic terms, and constantly been an

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>area of dispute between different governments as they tried to

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>vy for a bigger chunk of the semiconductor ecosystem. Chris Miller,

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on. That was the

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the a s m L episode We needed to do it,

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and you are the perfect guest for it, and I

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just learned a lot, So thank you so much for

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>coming out on Oblock Bain's invitation. Thanks Chris, that was

0:47:48.600 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. Obviously, I love that conversation, and you know,

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I sortaty interrupted like seven minutes in because like this

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>idea of like thinking of like a component as in

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>itself a supply chain story. Like the idea that really

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the breakthrough is how do you coordinate four thousand different

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>suppliers of them of highly specific raw materials and machines

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 1>into one thing that forms a cohesive whole. The idea

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that that is what the thing is is pretty fascinating

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to me. Here's the important question, which is, what, like

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>what idea did you get out of that conversation For

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the next Semiconductor episode, so I'm sure there is one.

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 1>What is the next one? Now we we we got

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to the end. Now it would be like really interesting actually, okay,

0:48:48.120 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>so like it all seriousness, like I would like to

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 1>learn more about that process, like the actual like the

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>coordination the heart. It's almost like you think of like

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a conductor of an orchestra. Is sort of like the

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>mental model I use for a company that has to

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:07.439
<v Speaker 1>like have four thousand parts all coming together to form

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty one units or units or whatever. It is like

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about like how do you do that from like

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a management perspective even beyond this sort of tech perspective

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is like a super fascinating thing to explore, especially at

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>its especially right now. I mean this is almost verging

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.279
<v Speaker 1>on state secrets. But we've got to get you know,

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to try to get the a s m

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>L supply chain manager on all thoughts, so you know,

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a s m L hit us up. We're interested in

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>how you're doing it. Um, and we have to keep

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor series going. Yeah, No, that was fascinating, and um,

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Chris was the Chris was the perfect guest for that one. Yeah, definitely,

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>shall we leave it there, Let's leave it there alright.

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.760
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest Chris Miller.

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 1>He has a book coming out next year on the

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:07.360
<v Speaker 1>chip industry. Assistant professor at the Fletcher School, he is

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>at cr Miller One. Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast,

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, and check out all of

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. Thanks

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 1>for listening.