WEBVTT - The Returns: A Conversation with Jill Lepore

0:00:16.115 --> 0:00:23.035
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. I feel like we got to start with the

0:00:23.675 --> 0:00:26.995
<v Speaker 1>Archive intro. Do you want to do it?

0:00:27.075 --> 0:00:32.955
<v Speaker 2>What do you imagine? Imagine a place in our world

0:00:33.275 --> 0:00:37.635
<v Speaker 2>where the known things go a quarridor of time bookshelves

0:00:38.235 --> 0:00:44.795
<v Speaker 2>lined with old ballots, political campaign posters, and television ads.

0:00:45.595 --> 0:00:50.115
<v Speaker 2>Step over a threshold to the Electoral College as if

0:00:50.115 --> 0:00:55.435
<v Speaker 2>it were an actual place, a university of knowledge about

0:00:55.475 --> 0:00:57.955
<v Speaker 2>the past of American politics, at.

0:00:57.795 --> 0:01:04.635
<v Speaker 1>Place many people hate. Not actually surprisingly, application numbers are

0:01:04.675 --> 0:01:09.995
<v Speaker 1>dropping this year. It's a very staid old college.

0:01:10.915 --> 0:01:14.835
<v Speaker 2>It used to be held in such high esteem electoral call. Yeah,

0:01:14.875 --> 0:01:17.275
<v Speaker 2>and now it's ratings have fallen.

0:01:17.515 --> 0:01:21.915
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, we're here to talk about the twenty twenty

0:01:21.915 --> 0:01:24.355
<v Speaker 1>four election in the context of history, but also in

0:01:24.395 --> 0:01:26.955
<v Speaker 1>the context of these three Last Archive episodes we've brought

0:01:26.995 --> 0:01:30.915
<v Speaker 1>back from the archives. But I thought maybe to start,

0:01:31.115 --> 0:01:33.995
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about how the Last Archive was kind

0:01:34.035 --> 0:01:36.795
<v Speaker 1>of born out of an election. It kind of came

0:01:36.875 --> 0:01:40.835
<v Speaker 1>from the twenty sixteen election and the panic over fake news,

0:01:40.915 --> 0:01:45.315
<v Speaker 1>alternative facts, the kind of Trump era epistemological crisis. And

0:01:46.075 --> 0:01:50.435
<v Speaker 1>I guess now that we're eight years past that moment,

0:01:51.435 --> 0:01:53.675
<v Speaker 1>those concerns you had when you started the show, like

0:01:53.675 --> 0:01:55.835
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about them now? Like, how do

0:01:55.875 --> 0:01:57.595
<v Speaker 1>they fit into this election cycle?

0:01:58.275 --> 0:02:01.555
<v Speaker 2>H Yeah, So when we came up with the idea

0:02:01.635 --> 0:02:05.315
<v Speaker 2>you and I for the last archive, it drew a

0:02:05.355 --> 0:02:07.755
<v Speaker 2>lot from a course that I'd been teaching at the

0:02:07.755 --> 0:02:10.955
<v Speaker 2>Harvard Law School on the history of evidence that looked

0:02:10.955 --> 0:02:18.235
<v Speaker 2>at changing ideas and standards of proof in history, the law, science,

0:02:18.235 --> 0:02:21.075
<v Speaker 2>and journalism since the Middle Ages, of the kind of

0:02:21.115 --> 0:02:24.115
<v Speaker 2>invention of trial by jury and the what historians call

0:02:24.155 --> 0:02:28.875
<v Speaker 2>the cult of the fact, And that course maybe itself

0:02:28.995 --> 0:02:32.355
<v Speaker 2>kind of came out of the the sort of two

0:02:32.435 --> 0:02:38.835
<v Speaker 2>thousand and five Stephen Colbert coining of truthiness and the

0:02:38.995 --> 0:02:41.395
<v Speaker 2>kind of panic in the first decade of the twenty

0:02:41.435 --> 0:02:48.555
<v Speaker 2>first century and the aftermath of the non existent weapons

0:02:48.595 --> 0:02:53.235
<v Speaker 2>of mass destruction, and the idea that was pursued that

0:02:53.315 --> 0:02:58.635
<v Speaker 2>somehow truth had died if the Second Push administration was

0:02:58.915 --> 0:03:03.275
<v Speaker 2>willing to present to the American people essentially fabricated evidence

0:03:03.475 --> 0:03:06.955
<v Speaker 2>to call for a war. But like any historian watching that,

0:03:07.435 --> 0:03:10.595
<v Speaker 2>did you not read the Pentagon papers? What part of

0:03:10.635 --> 0:03:14.755
<v Speaker 2>how the Vietnam War was also a war that depended

0:03:14.795 --> 0:03:20.395
<v Speaker 2>on wholesale misrepresentation of conditions in the other on other

0:03:20.435 --> 0:03:23.435
<v Speaker 2>parts of the world to the American people. So the

0:03:23.515 --> 0:03:27.915
<v Speaker 2>class was an attempt to kind of historicize a panic,

0:03:28.515 --> 0:03:30.435
<v Speaker 2>and then the podcast was.

0:03:30.435 --> 0:03:33.875
<v Speaker 3>Like, wait, the panic is even greater, and it's not.

0:03:33.795 --> 0:03:35.915
<v Speaker 2>Like it's a misplaced panic, right, Like there are all

0:03:35.955 --> 0:03:40.475
<v Speaker 2>kinds of reasons to think about the kind of crisis

0:03:40.515 --> 0:03:43.835
<v Speaker 2>of truth. The last archive was kind of an attempt

0:03:43.955 --> 0:03:46.755
<v Speaker 2>to say, well, here's a way to calm down. Not

0:03:46.835 --> 0:03:49.515
<v Speaker 2>that it's comforting, but like, let's try to historicize this

0:03:49.675 --> 0:03:51.835
<v Speaker 2>and have fun thinking about the history of some of

0:03:51.875 --> 0:03:53.995
<v Speaker 2>these ideas over the course of a century, at least,

0:03:54.035 --> 0:03:57.395
<v Speaker 2>not looking back five centuries or six centuries, but just

0:03:57.435 --> 0:04:00.995
<v Speaker 2>looking in the last one hundred years of American life.

0:04:01.395 --> 0:04:04.035
<v Speaker 2>What has been the kind of trajectory of our shared

0:04:04.075 --> 0:04:10.355
<v Speaker 2>ideas about evidence and proof and truth. And I remember,

0:04:10.395 --> 0:04:12.915
<v Speaker 2>like our big commitment was we didn't want to go

0:04:12.955 --> 0:04:15.315
<v Speaker 2>after the usual suspects, Like we didn't want to have

0:04:15.915 --> 0:04:20.715
<v Speaker 2>a podcast that attempted to prosecute Mark Zuckerberg or Trump

0:04:20.915 --> 0:04:27.115
<v Speaker 2>ultimately prosecute. Yeah, I'd much rather prosecute Mark zucker work. Yeah,

0:04:27.155 --> 0:04:30.195
<v Speaker 2>what was the third big postmodernism?

0:04:30.435 --> 0:04:31.195
<v Speaker 1>I've also got to.

0:04:31.155 --> 0:04:33.355
<v Speaker 2>Mention y yeah, yeah, yeah, So we didn't do the

0:04:33.395 --> 0:04:35.675
<v Speaker 2>best job steering clear of our easy.

0:04:35.675 --> 0:04:38.595
<v Speaker 1>Villains, but still, I mean, they are kind of mentioned

0:04:38.595 --> 0:04:40.195
<v Speaker 1>on the side, but I do think it amounts to

0:04:40.235 --> 0:04:42.275
<v Speaker 1>a more textra portrait of the thing.

0:04:42.955 --> 0:04:44.355
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hope so. Well.

0:04:44.435 --> 0:04:46.275
<v Speaker 1>One thing I was thinking about when I was listening

0:04:46.315 --> 0:04:50.555
<v Speaker 1>back to Project X, it's like all about polling and forecasting,

0:04:50.995 --> 0:04:53.235
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like if the Trump era is kind

0:04:53.235 --> 0:04:56.515
<v Speaker 1>of like the mainstreaming of the panic about truthiness and

0:04:56.555 --> 0:05:00.875
<v Speaker 1>the epistemological crisis. One of the first experiences of that

0:05:01.035 --> 0:05:03.155
<v Speaker 1>for people, I think, was like, how could the polls

0:05:03.195 --> 0:05:06.195
<v Speaker 1>be so wrong? That was like the same moment as Brexit.

0:05:06.515 --> 0:05:09.115
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, we miscalled Brexit. You really miscalled the

0:05:09.115 --> 0:05:11.875
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen election and the like. There was you know,

0:05:11.915 --> 0:05:14.355
<v Speaker 1>that Princeton professor who was so certain that it would

0:05:14.355 --> 0:05:16.035
<v Speaker 1>be a Clinton victory that he was like, I'll eat

0:05:16.075 --> 0:05:18.155
<v Speaker 1>an insect on television and then you'll eat a cricket

0:05:18.195 --> 0:05:21.435
<v Speaker 1>on CNM. It was like that everybody was eating crickets.

0:05:21.515 --> 0:05:25.035
<v Speaker 1>Basically post twenty sixteen, a panic I now feel has

0:05:25.035 --> 0:05:27.595
<v Speaker 1>sort of vanished, Like you still hear this kind of

0:05:27.595 --> 0:05:30.315
<v Speaker 1>like oh well, like maybe Trump vhoters just don't answer polls.

0:05:30.435 --> 0:05:32.115
<v Speaker 1>But when we don't really know. We might be still

0:05:32.155 --> 0:05:36.715
<v Speaker 1>under representing his support. But Project X feels like a

0:05:36.795 --> 0:05:39.635
<v Speaker 1>kind of early history of some of that. We can

0:05:39.675 --> 0:05:42.155
<v Speaker 1>predict the future with these new machines. We don't even

0:05:42.155 --> 0:05:45.035
<v Speaker 1>really need to run the election anymore. And I was

0:05:45.075 --> 0:05:49.035
<v Speaker 1>wondering if you could contextualize our poll crisis if it

0:05:49.115 --> 0:05:52.195
<v Speaker 1>still exists in that historical context, like what is the

0:05:52.235 --> 0:05:53.795
<v Speaker 1>promise of polling originally?

0:05:53.955 --> 0:05:58.635
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I remember that in the twenty fifteen primary season.

0:05:59.115 --> 0:06:01.875
<v Speaker 2>For the twenty sixteen election, I did a lot of

0:06:01.915 --> 0:06:04.155
<v Speaker 2>reporting for The New Yorker, which I don't, you know,

0:06:04.515 --> 0:06:08.635
<v Speaker 2>often just do researched pieces from archives. And I had said,

0:06:08.635 --> 0:06:09.755
<v Speaker 2>you know, I really want to kind of go out

0:06:09.835 --> 0:06:13.035
<v Speaker 2>and repreests. So I went to, you know, rallies in

0:06:13.075 --> 0:06:15.435
<v Speaker 2>New Hampshire during the New Hampshire primary, and I ended

0:06:15.515 --> 0:06:17.915
<v Speaker 2>up going to both conventions. And one of the things

0:06:17.955 --> 0:06:19.595
<v Speaker 2>I did is I went to one of the debates

0:06:20.235 --> 0:06:23.995
<v Speaker 2>and I remember there going into I think it was

0:06:24.035 --> 0:06:26.995
<v Speaker 2>like a CNN media tent or something. I mean it's

0:06:27.035 --> 0:06:29.435
<v Speaker 2>like a jed. Those places like a circus, like with

0:06:29.475 --> 0:06:33.755
<v Speaker 2>all the kind of outbuildings that are popped up, and

0:06:33.835 --> 0:06:36.395
<v Speaker 2>they were doing kind of live polling through the whole

0:06:36.395 --> 0:06:39.835
<v Speaker 2>debate sort of moment by moment, and it was like, wait,

0:06:39.875 --> 0:06:42.635
<v Speaker 2>this is everything that is wrong with our political culture

0:06:42.635 --> 0:06:46.635
<v Speaker 2>and life. Like it was a like a Piranha like

0:06:46.875 --> 0:06:50.075
<v Speaker 2>frenzy on the America. That's what you think? What do

0:06:50.115 --> 0:06:50.315
<v Speaker 2>you think?

0:06:52.435 --> 0:06:53.835
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm gonna eat your own head.

0:06:54.115 --> 0:06:56.315
<v Speaker 2>Like it was just it was it was just so

0:06:56.715 --> 0:07:00.155
<v Speaker 2>mannic and crazy and fruitless, and was.

0:07:00.315 --> 0:07:03.155
<v Speaker 1>Just people with like dials like well yeah, I don't

0:07:03.195 --> 0:07:03.475
<v Speaker 1>know like.

0:07:03.435 --> 0:07:05.395
<v Speaker 2>What methods they were using. Was like a kind of

0:07:05.555 --> 0:07:09.635
<v Speaker 2>like instapule web calling thing, and like it just defied

0:07:09.635 --> 0:07:13.635
<v Speaker 2>it possible scientific method around public opinion surveying, which is

0:07:13.635 --> 0:07:16.875
<v Speaker 2>a legitimate social science that has, you know, real standards

0:07:16.875 --> 0:07:21.515
<v Speaker 2>of evidence. And it was completely unhinged. And I wrote

0:07:21.515 --> 0:07:24.835
<v Speaker 2>a piece that year called Politics and the New Machine

0:07:24.875 --> 0:07:28.515
<v Speaker 2>that was about how data science is replacing polling because

0:07:28.595 --> 0:07:31.355
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't just call landlines. People don't have landlines. The

0:07:31.395 --> 0:07:35.035
<v Speaker 2>people own landlines don't represent most of the population. You know,

0:07:35.075 --> 0:07:38.475
<v Speaker 2>they tend to be really older, moral whiter. Like it's

0:07:38.515 --> 0:07:40.435
<v Speaker 2>just not you can't get a good sample of the

0:07:40.475 --> 0:07:42.715
<v Speaker 2>electric if you ever get a hold of like a

0:07:42.755 --> 0:07:45.955
<v Speaker 2>young Hispanic man on a landline. You have to wait

0:07:45.995 --> 0:07:49.475
<v Speaker 2>that person's opinion like seven thousand times because that person

0:07:49.515 --> 0:07:54.435
<v Speaker 2>has to represent like all young male Hispanics, whereas you know,

0:07:54.475 --> 0:07:57.795
<v Speaker 2>you talk to an old white woman, it's just her,

0:07:57.915 --> 0:08:00.115
<v Speaker 2>like she just represents one person. So it's just a

0:08:00.155 --> 0:08:04.435
<v Speaker 2>real field of distortion. So I wrote a piece about

0:08:04.475 --> 0:08:09.115
<v Speaker 2>that because I just was really surprised at the incongruity

0:08:09.115 --> 0:08:12.395
<v Speaker 2>of it all that the worst polling got, like the

0:08:12.475 --> 0:08:15.915
<v Speaker 2>less reliable polling seemed to be getting, the more our

0:08:15.955 --> 0:08:19.035
<v Speaker 2>political arrangements were dependent on it. So that was the

0:08:19.115 --> 0:08:23.395
<v Speaker 2>year that for the first time when Fox News they

0:08:23.395 --> 0:08:27.835
<v Speaker 2>hosted the first of the GOP primary debates, where they

0:08:27.955 --> 0:08:31.075
<v Speaker 2>used polling an average of I think four polls to

0:08:31.155 --> 0:08:34.315
<v Speaker 2>decide who would stand where, and they had try to

0:08:35.075 --> 0:08:37.555
<v Speaker 2>stand in the middle. And it was really early on,

0:08:37.715 --> 0:08:40.435
<v Speaker 2>and there had been very little coverage of anything, but

0:08:40.475 --> 0:08:42.555
<v Speaker 2>Trump's name was better known. He's a guy who had

0:08:42.595 --> 0:08:46.715
<v Speaker 2>add like a television show for years, and a lot

0:08:46.715 --> 0:08:49.555
<v Speaker 2>of the most reputable polling agencies I think you know,

0:08:49.675 --> 0:08:53.475
<v Speaker 2>Gallop and Pew and NBC, Wall Street Journal refused to participate.

0:08:53.515 --> 0:08:57.915
<v Speaker 2>They're like, you can't use our national polls that are

0:08:57.995 --> 0:09:01.475
<v Speaker 2>like two hundred and ninety days before the election to

0:09:01.595 --> 0:09:04.075
<v Speaker 2>determine who gets the most because where you stand on

0:09:04.075 --> 0:09:06.315
<v Speaker 2>the stage determines how many questions you get and how

0:09:06.395 --> 0:09:08.355
<v Speaker 2>much camera coverage you get. So you're just propping up

0:09:08.395 --> 0:09:10.995
<v Speaker 2>a candidate. You know, you're just deciding what would get

0:09:11.075 --> 0:09:15.435
<v Speaker 2>you the best audience. It's like one poll driving another poll. Right.

0:09:15.475 --> 0:09:17.275
<v Speaker 2>That's around when I was working on this piece, and

0:09:17.315 --> 0:09:19.835
<v Speaker 2>you know, the reputable polling people are like, yeah, this

0:09:19.915 --> 0:09:23.555
<v Speaker 2>is unconscionable, like, and then the polling organizations that did

0:09:23.635 --> 0:09:26.275
<v Speaker 2>participate in that had the least reliable polls, right, Like

0:09:26.315 --> 0:09:30.915
<v Speaker 2>there were the you know, least principled ones. But so

0:09:31.395 --> 0:09:33.115
<v Speaker 2>I know, it's like a trendy thing to talk about

0:09:33.115 --> 0:09:35.315
<v Speaker 2>the Overton window, but you do really kind of see

0:09:35.715 --> 0:09:38.355
<v Speaker 2>even with the history of polling, right, polling's not gotten

0:09:38.395 --> 0:09:42.355
<v Speaker 2>better since then, and it's only made our politics messier

0:09:43.035 --> 0:09:48.795
<v Speaker 2>and lousier. So I don't know, I mean to go

0:09:48.795 --> 0:09:50.555
<v Speaker 2>back to your question of historicizing it. One of the

0:09:50.635 --> 0:09:53.795
<v Speaker 2>things that's different about say, in nineteen forty eight, when

0:09:53.835 --> 0:09:57.715
<v Speaker 2>famously Gallop predicted that Dewey would win and then the

0:09:57.795 --> 0:10:00.555
<v Speaker 2>Chicago Tribune Prince Dewey beats Truman and then you see

0:10:00.555 --> 0:10:02.315
<v Speaker 2>that this is a photograph of Truman holding up the

0:10:02.355 --> 0:10:07.635
<v Speaker 2>paper with this giant you know, grin polling really righted

0:10:07.715 --> 0:10:10.755
<v Speaker 2>itself from that. There was a big invest mitigation. The

0:10:11.075 --> 0:10:14.755
<v Speaker 2>I think his social sciences counsel did an investigation. Gallup

0:10:14.795 --> 0:10:18.875
<v Speaker 2>investigated itself. You know, there was a kind of reckoning

0:10:18.915 --> 0:10:23.555
<v Speaker 2>with that because there were still in place institutional guardrails

0:10:23.875 --> 0:10:29.035
<v Speaker 2>against like a real failure. But even that, even that,

0:10:29.155 --> 0:10:31.395
<v Speaker 2>like if you look at the history of that, Gallup

0:10:31.435 --> 0:10:34.475
<v Speaker 2>had said, So Gallup, George Gallup, who's not an academic,

0:10:34.515 --> 0:10:36.995
<v Speaker 2>but he opens this organization called the American Public Opinion

0:10:36.995 --> 0:10:39.635
<v Speaker 2>Research Institute in Princeton, New Jersey, so that it can

0:10:40.035 --> 0:10:42.275
<v Speaker 2>so that people will think it's part of Princeton University.

0:10:42.315 --> 0:10:46.115
<v Speaker 2>So his address is Princeton. It's very canny. I mean,

0:10:46.115 --> 0:10:51.875
<v Speaker 2>he has guys a piece. Yeah, it is a town,

0:10:52.595 --> 0:10:54.515
<v Speaker 2>so listen not you know, he had a PhD. Like

0:10:54.555 --> 0:10:57.275
<v Speaker 2>the guy was a real quantitative social scientist. But he's

0:10:57.395 --> 0:11:00.275
<v Speaker 2>trying to sort of cloak his endeavor in the venew

0:11:00.315 --> 0:11:04.195
<v Speaker 2>year of academic legitimacy when really he's a syndicated newspaper column.

0:11:04.195 --> 0:11:06.475
<v Speaker 2>It's like that's what he's kind of churning out, but

0:11:07.275 --> 0:11:09.795
<v Speaker 2>in order to get newspapers to pick up his column

0:11:10.155 --> 0:11:11.995
<v Speaker 2>because the people like, who cares what you say? Like

0:11:12.035 --> 0:11:13.795
<v Speaker 2>with the American people believe about that, Like we have

0:11:13.835 --> 0:11:15.395
<v Speaker 2>reporters to go out on the street and they talk

0:11:15.435 --> 0:11:17.995
<v Speaker 2>to people in pubs and they go to pta meetings.

0:11:17.995 --> 0:11:20.075
<v Speaker 2>We have like man on the street stories all the time.

0:11:20.075 --> 0:11:22.955
<v Speaker 2>We know it are the people in our town, in

0:11:22.995 --> 0:11:25.395
<v Speaker 2>our city, whatever our newspaper is. We know what they're

0:11:25.715 --> 0:11:28.035
<v Speaker 2>reporting on, what they believe. We have reporters to do

0:11:28.155 --> 0:11:30.075
<v Speaker 2>that work. Why would we take your calum or like

0:11:30.515 --> 0:11:33.075
<v Speaker 2>you had, you know, you called people on telephone. How

0:11:33.075 --> 0:11:36.075
<v Speaker 2>many people have phones? It's nuts. So he did this

0:11:36.155 --> 0:11:38.195
<v Speaker 2>big gimmicky thing, which is he said that, you know what,

0:11:38.715 --> 0:11:42.235
<v Speaker 2>our opinion research is so good that we can ask

0:11:42.275 --> 0:11:43.835
<v Speaker 2>people who they're going to vote for and we will

0:11:43.835 --> 0:11:47.835
<v Speaker 2>successfully predict the next president. And that's when they started

0:11:47.835 --> 0:11:49.835
<v Speaker 2>doing it. And he said all the time, like this

0:11:49.835 --> 0:11:52.555
<v Speaker 2>would be a really dangerous thing to do if we

0:11:52.555 --> 0:11:57.755
<v Speaker 2>were doing this in order to guide candidates or you know,

0:11:57.875 --> 0:12:01.475
<v Speaker 2>drive funding of candidates. So this is just to demonstrate

0:12:01.555 --> 0:12:06.395
<v Speaker 2>that our public opinion research is sound. But then it

0:12:06.435 --> 0:12:08.955
<v Speaker 2>was such a big hit. People love that horse race

0:12:08.995 --> 0:12:12.115
<v Speaker 2>stuff that it kind of took on its own life.

0:12:12.155 --> 0:12:14.675
<v Speaker 2>So it kind of then came to a crescendo of

0:12:14.715 --> 0:12:18.195
<v Speaker 2>a crisis in nineteen forty eight, when like his whole

0:12:18.635 --> 0:12:22.195
<v Speaker 2>business model had then become like no, no, no, no, My

0:12:22.355 --> 0:12:24.875
<v Speaker 2>election predictions that were were making money, like that's how

0:12:24.875 --> 0:12:28.355
<v Speaker 2>we're gaining subscribers from my syndicated column. But then so

0:12:28.395 --> 0:12:31.395
<v Speaker 2>you kind of see a kind of writing of that ship.

0:12:32.235 --> 0:12:36.355
<v Speaker 2>But then this guy Lindsay Rodgers writes this book right

0:12:36.395 --> 0:12:38.955
<v Speaker 2>after that, or it comes out, you know, right after that,

0:12:39.155 --> 0:12:40.915
<v Speaker 2>and he was like, I don't care whether the polling

0:12:40.955 --> 0:12:43.715
<v Speaker 2>is accurate, interaccurate. It's bad for democracy. It's not how

0:12:43.715 --> 0:12:47.155
<v Speaker 2>our democracy is supposed to work. And I it was

0:12:47.195 --> 0:12:50.555
<v Speaker 2>surprising to me to discover how every critique that this

0:12:50.595 --> 0:12:53.835
<v Speaker 2>political theorist Lindsay Rodgers offered in this book called The

0:12:53.835 --> 0:12:58.555
<v Speaker 2>Pollsters in nineteen forty eight really still applies. And it's

0:12:58.635 --> 0:13:03.995
<v Speaker 2>just it's a business model that's extremely successful, and there's

0:13:04.075 --> 0:13:06.595
<v Speaker 2>not really a way you can say. And every generation

0:13:06.795 --> 0:13:09.635
<v Speaker 2>has its you know grouch like me who comes along

0:13:09.635 --> 0:13:11.635
<v Speaker 2>and says, wait, this stuff's actually really bad for our

0:13:11.675 --> 0:13:17.755
<v Speaker 2>political culture. But it's like, well, white sugar is really bad,

0:13:17.755 --> 0:13:20.355
<v Speaker 2>but all the food in the supermarket is laced with it.

0:13:20.395 --> 0:13:23.035
<v Speaker 2>Like it's not going to be like saying that sugar's

0:13:23.075 --> 0:13:24.715
<v Speaker 2>not so great for you. It's not going to stop it.

0:13:24.955 --> 0:13:27.715
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny because there was did you listen to

0:13:27.715 --> 0:13:30.715
<v Speaker 1>the Nate Cone interview recently where he talks about finding

0:13:30.715 --> 0:13:33.075
<v Speaker 1>a historical precedent for the twenty twenty four election, and

0:13:33.115 --> 0:13:35.715
<v Speaker 1>the one he finds is nineteen forty eight because Truman

0:13:35.835 --> 0:13:39.275
<v Speaker 1>suffered from high inflation, high prices and had actually successfully

0:13:39.275 --> 0:13:41.315
<v Speaker 1>managed them and the lead up to the election. But

0:13:41.355 --> 0:13:43.635
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's like not mentioned in his account is

0:13:43.635 --> 0:13:47.435
<v Speaker 1>that after nineteen forty eight there's a huge crisis. It's funny,

0:13:47.475 --> 0:13:49.435
<v Speaker 1>and then that ties into the Project XT thing where

0:13:49.475 --> 0:13:52.115
<v Speaker 1>it's like the reason they don't share the UNIVAC prediction

0:13:52.635 --> 0:13:55.475
<v Speaker 1>is because they're like, poles were so oft in forty eight,

0:13:55.515 --> 0:13:57.795
<v Speaker 1>we can't come out with this landslide prediction early in

0:13:57.795 --> 0:14:00.955
<v Speaker 1>the evening because it's just who knows. But I guess,

0:14:00.995 --> 0:14:04.075
<v Speaker 1>like from the episode perspective, I mean, you talk about

0:14:04.075 --> 0:14:07.795
<v Speaker 1>responsible polling, people who understand what the limitations of polling

0:14:07.835 --> 0:14:11.835
<v Speaker 1>actually are, what the appropriate use of it is. It

0:14:11.875 --> 0:14:16.595
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's a media demand or like a voter demand.

0:14:16.675 --> 0:14:18.475
<v Speaker 1>People want to know how things are going to turn out,

0:14:18.555 --> 0:14:20.235
<v Speaker 1>or even like a Wall Street demand, people want to

0:14:20.275 --> 0:14:22.675
<v Speaker 1>be able to project forward. Like there's already all this

0:14:22.715 --> 0:14:24.915
<v Speaker 1>attention given to predicting the next election because it's going

0:14:24.955 --> 0:14:26.795
<v Speaker 1>to bear on how the markets do. It has a

0:14:26.795 --> 0:14:29.795
<v Speaker 1>lot to do with futures in an economic sense and

0:14:29.875 --> 0:14:33.755
<v Speaker 1>also in a kind of like entertainment sense. But in

0:14:34.635 --> 0:14:37.595
<v Speaker 1>the Project X version of this has all of those things.

0:14:37.635 --> 0:14:40.235
<v Speaker 1>It's got the sort of like we're making a show

0:14:40.475 --> 0:14:43.675
<v Speaker 1>out of projections, but it also has the behind the

0:14:43.715 --> 0:14:47.115
<v Speaker 1>scenes blurring of the line between how the campaign is

0:14:47.155 --> 0:14:50.595
<v Speaker 1>being run, which is Rosser Reeves making the ad spots

0:14:50.675 --> 0:14:53.635
<v Speaker 1>based on the gallop polling about what are people most

0:14:53.675 --> 0:14:56.075
<v Speaker 1>concerned with, you know, like Miami gets after me about

0:14:56.115 --> 0:14:59.355
<v Speaker 1>high prices. The Dwight Eisenhower thing. Is that the moment

0:14:59.355 --> 0:15:02.275
<v Speaker 1>that those things really come together, or is it like

0:15:02.395 --> 0:15:04.875
<v Speaker 1>the thirties campaigns inc moment.

0:15:04.715 --> 0:15:08.635
<v Speaker 2>Or well, I think the nineteen fifty two story remains

0:15:08.715 --> 0:15:13.075
<v Speaker 2>deeply resonant because it's kind of the superbolification of election night. So,

0:15:13.515 --> 0:15:15.675
<v Speaker 2>you know, when we talk to Archanoi and his work.

0:15:15.795 --> 0:15:18.595
<v Speaker 2>You know, he kind of relays these tremendously interesting stories

0:15:18.635 --> 0:15:23.035
<v Speaker 2>about early technologies of reporting results, like yeah, we'll have

0:15:23.075 --> 0:15:25.435
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times building the you know, the the

0:15:25.515 --> 0:15:27.475
<v Speaker 2>will light up red if it's going this way and

0:15:27.515 --> 0:15:30.395
<v Speaker 2>green if it's going that way. They have this like yeah,

0:15:30.475 --> 0:15:33.515
<v Speaker 2>like we'll blink, you know, we'll blink fast if the

0:15:33.635 --> 0:15:38.195
<v Speaker 2>Democrats are ahead, and like just crazy, like it's lighthouses

0:15:38.235 --> 0:15:40.515
<v Speaker 2>and it's no one really knows and they're kind of

0:15:40.515 --> 0:15:42.195
<v Speaker 2>out in the street. Only in the city. Maybe you

0:15:42.235 --> 0:15:45.235
<v Speaker 2>would get like any kind of updates. But in nineteen

0:15:45.275 --> 0:15:49.155
<v Speaker 2>fifty two they do all this elaborate setting up of cables, right,

0:15:49.195 --> 0:15:51.795
<v Speaker 2>Like they have the studio and that's got all these

0:15:51.795 --> 0:15:54.515
<v Speaker 2>reports going on, and they have this map, and you know,

0:15:54.595 --> 0:15:56.915
<v Speaker 2>Kronkite's gonna go to the map, and then they have

0:15:56.995 --> 0:15:59.315
<v Speaker 2>the guy with the UNIVAC, the fake UNIVAC, and then

0:15:59.315 --> 0:16:02.955
<v Speaker 2>there's also the real UNIVAC, and they have people are

0:16:02.955 --> 0:16:05.555
<v Speaker 2>calling in with precinct results and they're trying to do tabulation,

0:16:05.675 --> 0:16:09.075
<v Speaker 2>and they have punch cards and and it's a whole

0:16:10.155 --> 0:16:13.355
<v Speaker 2>sort of fun circus to watch, and the clock is

0:16:13.355 --> 0:16:15.195
<v Speaker 2>in the background and we'll have new results at the

0:16:15.195 --> 0:16:18.475
<v Speaker 2>top of the hour, and they're trying desperately to make

0:16:18.515 --> 0:16:21.355
<v Speaker 2>people watch television instead of listen to the radio. And

0:16:21.395 --> 0:16:23.835
<v Speaker 2>there's very little to report. They're just not going to

0:16:23.915 --> 0:16:25.755
<v Speaker 2>have the results into the morning, but they're trying to

0:16:25.835 --> 0:16:28.675
<v Speaker 2>you know what we call must watch television, right, and

0:16:28.715 --> 0:16:31.155
<v Speaker 2>they're really pretty successful. People are like, well, this is fun.

0:16:31.195 --> 0:16:32.595
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if what else are you gonna do? It's

0:16:32.595 --> 0:16:35.355
<v Speaker 2>like a Tuesday night in the vent it's very cold

0:16:35.355 --> 0:16:38.195
<v Speaker 2>outside much of the country, Like it's you know, it's

0:16:38.235 --> 0:16:40.755
<v Speaker 2>a civic lesson for your kids. It is pretty interesting,

0:16:40.755 --> 0:16:43.355
<v Speaker 2>Like what are all these machines the TV's and brand new?

0:16:43.715 --> 0:16:46.235
<v Speaker 2>It's exciting that you even have one. And oh, it's

0:16:46.275 --> 0:16:48.195
<v Speaker 2>like it's like you're in the war room at the

0:16:48.195 --> 0:16:50.555
<v Speaker 2>White House, Like it's like you're part of a campaign.

0:16:50.715 --> 0:16:54.795
<v Speaker 2>You're wrapped into the drama of it all and there's

0:16:55.075 --> 0:16:59.475
<v Speaker 2>really nothing else quite like it. And it's really successful

0:16:59.475 --> 0:17:03.915
<v Speaker 2>for them, their Project X. And then there's a kind

0:17:03.955 --> 0:17:08.075
<v Speaker 2>of a level raising, like you have to up your

0:17:08.075 --> 0:17:09.675
<v Speaker 2>game every four years. You have to come up with

0:17:09.675 --> 0:17:10.915
<v Speaker 2>a more exciting election.

0:17:11.195 --> 0:17:13.595
<v Speaker 1>We have to invent both flits there, yeah, coman.

0:17:13.515 --> 0:17:16.515
<v Speaker 2>So like you know, and if then I write about

0:17:16.515 --> 0:17:20.035
<v Speaker 2>when the cinematics company is hired to go do election

0:17:20.635 --> 0:17:25.915
<v Speaker 2>prediction uh in nineteen sixty by CBS, and it's just mayhem.

0:17:26.115 --> 0:17:28.835
<v Speaker 2>No one knows how to program the mainframes. There's all

0:17:28.835 --> 0:17:30.995
<v Speaker 2>these women trying to type in you know, who are

0:17:31.035 --> 0:17:33.195
<v Speaker 2>the computers trying to type in the results that are

0:17:33.195 --> 0:17:35.635
<v Speaker 2>coming in by phone, and people are falling down tripping

0:17:35.675 --> 0:17:38.275
<v Speaker 2>over the cables and it's a comedy of hers. But yeah,

0:17:38.275 --> 0:17:43.395
<v Speaker 2>it's still great television. And it also obscures, you know,

0:17:43.515 --> 0:17:46.155
<v Speaker 2>the reality of like knocking on doors and driving people

0:17:46.195 --> 0:17:48.635
<v Speaker 2>to the polls and what election day is really about.

0:17:49.195 --> 0:17:52.435
<v Speaker 2>That's why I'm making the case that that's nineteen fifty

0:17:52.435 --> 0:17:55.195
<v Speaker 2>two Project X is more resonant than ever before. Is

0:17:55.235 --> 0:17:58.075
<v Speaker 2>because what happened in twenty twenty two, twenty twenty. In

0:17:58.075 --> 0:18:02.955
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, remember it was the pandemic. Most people did

0:18:02.995 --> 0:18:04.355
<v Speaker 2>not want to go to the polls and wait in

0:18:04.355 --> 0:18:08.115
<v Speaker 2>those lines or go indoors. And you know, the best

0:18:08.195 --> 0:18:11.675
<v Speaker 2>news organizations said every once in a while, like Orson

0:18:11.715 --> 0:18:13.475
<v Speaker 2>Welles saying in nineteen thirty eight at War of the

0:18:13.475 --> 0:18:17.035
<v Speaker 2>World's weally this is not real, you know, and they

0:18:17.035 --> 0:18:19.275
<v Speaker 2>would say, like we won't really know the results tonight

0:18:19.435 --> 0:18:21.995
<v Speaker 2>because mail in ballots and absentee ballots are not going

0:18:22.035 --> 0:18:23.955
<v Speaker 2>to be counted over to the next few days. And

0:18:24.435 --> 0:18:27.755
<v Speaker 2>right now really looks like, you know, Republicans are winning

0:18:27.795 --> 0:18:30.395
<v Speaker 2>all over the country and Trump's going to win enough

0:18:30.435 --> 0:18:34.395
<v Speaker 2>electoral votes. But this is a red mirage. It's you know,

0:18:34.475 --> 0:18:37.075
<v Speaker 2>most people expect this to change in the coming days

0:18:37.155 --> 0:18:40.675
<v Speaker 2>or even weeks as the late coming votes are counted.

0:18:41.435 --> 0:18:44.475
<v Speaker 2>But you know, they said that, look maybe once every

0:18:44.475 --> 0:18:48.035
<v Speaker 2>two hours. And meanwhile, except for the like thirty seconds

0:18:48.075 --> 0:18:51.875
<v Speaker 2>every two hours that they're pointing out that their results

0:18:51.915 --> 0:18:55.915
<v Speaker 2>are completely useless and meaningless, like really truly meaningless, the

0:18:55.955 --> 0:18:59.675
<v Speaker 2>most meaningless Election night results probably ever in American history.

0:19:01.075 --> 0:19:04.355
<v Speaker 2>They're selling the whole thing to keep their audience is

0:19:04.395 --> 0:19:06.435
<v Speaker 2>if they have to watch second by second because the

0:19:06.435 --> 0:19:08.275
<v Speaker 2>election is about to be called, and then they start

0:19:08.275 --> 0:19:11.795
<v Speaker 2>calling it. And so, I mean, this is where like

0:19:12.235 --> 0:19:14.395
<v Speaker 2>one can exert a lot of sympathy for Americans to

0:19:14.395 --> 0:19:17.315
<v Speaker 2>believe the election was stolen because they watched that coverage

0:19:17.875 --> 0:19:20.995
<v Speaker 2>and look, we watched, you know, we watched though John

0:19:21.075 --> 0:19:23.395
<v Speaker 2>King he had the panels and the thing flipped and

0:19:23.435 --> 0:19:25.475
<v Speaker 2>then the color turned and then we looked like this

0:19:25.555 --> 0:19:28.035
<v Speaker 2>state was going this way in Arizona, in Michigan, Pennsylvania.

0:19:28.915 --> 0:19:31.755
<v Speaker 2>And then you know, I went to bed and then

0:19:31.755 --> 0:19:34.355
<v Speaker 2>they're like no, we no, no, no no, And then they've

0:19:34.355 --> 0:19:37.595
<v Speaker 2>called it for Biden, No that was stolen. Like I'm like,

0:19:38.275 --> 0:19:41.915
<v Speaker 2>I know, it's just an incredible amount of perfidy in

0:19:42.035 --> 0:19:44.035
<v Speaker 2>terms of the planning up to the election, that Trump

0:19:44.115 --> 0:19:46.675
<v Speaker 2>knew he was going to lose, that his supporters expected,

0:19:46.835 --> 0:19:49.275
<v Speaker 2>you know, his inside like team knew he was going

0:19:49.315 --> 0:19:51.795
<v Speaker 2>to lose, and they came up with these cockamamie plans

0:19:52.675 --> 0:19:57.755
<v Speaker 2>to pursue a contest of the results they knew in advance. Like,

0:19:58.395 --> 0:20:01.475
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean to diminish the nefariousness of their planning,

0:20:01.595 --> 0:20:05.635
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of well people being willing to believe it,

0:20:05.675 --> 0:20:07.555
<v Speaker 2>when he said the election was stolen.

0:20:07.635 --> 0:20:09.635
<v Speaker 3>No one is ever held.

0:20:09.955 --> 0:20:12.795
<v Speaker 2>I'm not talking about the pollsters, but the television producers

0:20:12.835 --> 0:20:16.675
<v Speaker 2>accountable for what happened that night, you know, why not

0:20:16.755 --> 0:20:18.795
<v Speaker 2>say and you don't even hear this now. And there's

0:20:18.795 --> 0:20:20.635
<v Speaker 2>a ton of mail and we would expect a lot

0:20:20.675 --> 0:20:23.915
<v Speaker 2>of mail in voting in November. We would also, I

0:20:23.915 --> 0:20:26.275
<v Speaker 2>think expect really low turnouts in a lot of places

0:20:26.275 --> 0:20:28.235
<v Speaker 2>that I have and I couldn't really would be really

0:20:28.275 --> 0:20:33.115
<v Speaker 2>hard to account for with your polling results. And we

0:20:33.155 --> 0:20:35.195
<v Speaker 2>are not going to hear an election night people saying

0:20:35.195 --> 0:20:38.955
<v Speaker 2>we've decided tonight that we are gonna re examine the

0:20:38.995 --> 0:20:41.795
<v Speaker 2>results of the twenty twenty election and investigate our own

0:20:41.835 --> 0:20:45.155
<v Speaker 2>coverage as a public service to the American voter, and

0:20:45.275 --> 0:20:48.355
<v Speaker 2>explain one the ways in which we as a news

0:20:48.435 --> 0:20:51.635
<v Speaker 2>organization contributed to the chaos and American political life over

0:20:51.635 --> 0:20:53.795
<v Speaker 2>the last four years. We'll be getting back to you

0:20:53.835 --> 0:20:57.875
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow night. We'll have full coverage of amended election results,

0:20:58.115 --> 0:21:00.715
<v Speaker 2>but for tonight, we're going to set that aside and

0:21:00.755 --> 0:21:04.635
<v Speaker 2>we're going to do what we think is right. Maybe

0:21:04.635 --> 0:21:07.515
<v Speaker 2>that would be bad television. I think that'd be awesome television.

0:21:08.035 --> 0:21:13.995
<v Speaker 2>But I think that reckoning and accountability is genuinely required.

0:21:14.275 --> 0:21:17.995
<v Speaker 2>Like I just can't even picture like Jake Tapper or whoever, like,

0:21:18.035 --> 0:21:19.955
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, these are the best people, right,

0:21:20.075 --> 0:21:23.115
<v Speaker 2>like saying we really screwed up, like we are in

0:21:23.155 --> 0:21:27.395
<v Speaker 2>big part responsible. It's just much easier to do something different.

0:21:27.715 --> 0:21:30.035
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, they're working within the framework that's established

0:21:30.035 --> 0:21:32.315
<v Speaker 1>in fifty two, which is received and can't be changed,

0:21:32.355 --> 0:21:34.755
<v Speaker 1>so they're not going to question it. I totally buy

0:21:34.995 --> 0:21:39.435
<v Speaker 1>that the election night coverage contributed to this, but it

0:21:39.435 --> 0:21:42.915
<v Speaker 1>does seem to me like over the last decade, you

0:21:42.955 --> 0:21:46.915
<v Speaker 1>have so many crazy lies that are just convenient lies

0:21:46.915 --> 0:21:49.275
<v Speaker 1>that people just like take up and believe just because.

0:21:49.915 --> 0:21:52.035
<v Speaker 2>No I mean, in the campaign, you know, the false

0:21:52.035 --> 0:21:55.475
<v Speaker 2>selectors that like this. I thought about this a lot

0:21:55.475 --> 0:21:57.435
<v Speaker 2>when I was asked to write a review of the

0:21:57.515 --> 0:22:00.715
<v Speaker 2>January sixth report from the House Select Committee.

0:22:00.755 --> 0:22:02.035
<v Speaker 1>You're like, could have been more fun?

0:22:02.195 --> 0:22:05.155
<v Speaker 2>Could? Yeah? Like it was like a I don't know,

0:22:05.155 --> 0:22:07.715
<v Speaker 2>fifteen hundred perce long, you know, I read every word

0:22:07.715 --> 0:22:09.195
<v Speaker 2>of it and that I wrote this piece, but I

0:22:09.315 --> 0:22:13.155
<v Speaker 2>was and it's in many ways, you know, an excellent report,

0:22:13.275 --> 0:22:16.035
<v Speaker 2>and it served basically as the bill of indictment for

0:22:16.075 --> 0:22:21.795
<v Speaker 2>the federal prosecution of Trump and other conspirators, and so

0:22:22.115 --> 0:22:24.675
<v Speaker 2>really meaningful kind of bill of indictment against Trump. But

0:22:24.675 --> 0:22:27.355
<v Speaker 2>it is laser focused on Trump, and it is a

0:22:27.395 --> 0:22:33.475
<v Speaker 2>list of really indictable allegations about Trump. And you know,

0:22:33.555 --> 0:22:36.235
<v Speaker 2>that was a decision that the committee made, you know,

0:22:36.315 --> 0:22:40.195
<v Speaker 2>I think partly to accommodate, largely to accommodate Liz Cheney,

0:22:40.235 --> 0:22:45.715
<v Speaker 2>who did not want to be indicting other Republicans aside

0:22:45.715 --> 0:22:49.275
<v Speaker 2>from Trump, and who did not want to lose sight

0:22:49.475 --> 0:22:54.595
<v Speaker 2>of Trump as the leader of the conspiracy. But among

0:22:54.675 --> 0:22:57.035
<v Speaker 2>the things that that committee had done in its hearings,

0:22:57.195 --> 0:23:01.635
<v Speaker 2>which I think are barely in the public eye at all,

0:23:02.115 --> 0:23:06.035
<v Speaker 2>was investigating the role of the media, and there was

0:23:06.075 --> 0:23:08.595
<v Speaker 2>another investigation into social media. And none of that stuff

0:23:08.635 --> 0:23:12.155
<v Speaker 2>is in the report. And so you read that report

0:23:12.275 --> 0:23:16.275
<v Speaker 2>and you're just like, wow, single handedly Trump and you

0:23:16.275 --> 0:23:22.195
<v Speaker 2>know the occasional like Giuliani, Sidney Powell, other lunatic you know,

0:23:22.235 --> 0:23:26.275
<v Speaker 2>you see their villainy, their outright criminality. Could there have

0:23:26.275 --> 0:23:29.835
<v Speaker 2>been like three paragraphs about you know, networking cable television

0:23:29.835 --> 0:23:35.755
<v Speaker 2>on election night and how it made it harder to

0:23:36.235 --> 0:23:38.075
<v Speaker 2>undo that, like because you kind of you do kind

0:23:38.115 --> 0:23:42.595
<v Speaker 2>of puzzle over all. Right, there were sixty one different

0:23:42.635 --> 0:23:45.995
<v Speaker 2>court cases and Trump lost sixty of them, and the

0:23:45.995 --> 0:23:48.915
<v Speaker 2>one that he won had no consequences in terms of

0:23:48.915 --> 0:23:51.915
<v Speaker 2>a recount. Like, there's so many ways in which there's

0:23:51.955 --> 0:23:55.675
<v Speaker 2>just such abundant evidence that strikes down, you know, the

0:23:55.715 --> 0:24:01.875
<v Speaker 2>criminal misrepresentations and lies of Trump and his lackeys. Remember,

0:24:01.915 --> 0:24:04.515
<v Speaker 2>like people remembers of the Republican parties still have not

0:24:04.635 --> 0:24:07.515
<v Speaker 2>essentially conceded the election to Biden and were, you know,

0:24:07.755 --> 0:24:11.755
<v Speaker 2>very close to the next election. So and you're like,

0:24:12.075 --> 0:24:15.355
<v Speaker 2>why they clearly don't want to disappoint their followers. They

0:24:15.395 --> 0:24:18.555
<v Speaker 2>think their constituents believe this, so they need to defy

0:24:18.595 --> 0:24:21.715
<v Speaker 2>their constituents. But why would their constituents keep believing this

0:24:21.755 --> 0:24:25.355
<v Speaker 2>has been disproven in every possible forum where we arbitrate truth,

0:24:26.395 --> 0:24:32.995
<v Speaker 2>and like, it's among the places where we might consider

0:24:33.795 --> 0:24:38.075
<v Speaker 2>asking for some accountability would be news organizations.

0:24:37.635 --> 0:24:39.795
<v Speaker 1>Especially because in twenty sixteen, that is what happened with

0:24:39.875 --> 0:24:41.795
<v Speaker 1>social media. There was like an attempt at that kind

0:24:41.835 --> 0:24:43.635
<v Speaker 1>of reckoning, and you don't really see any of that

0:24:43.675 --> 0:24:47.915
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty. It is interesting to think about Project

0:24:48.075 --> 0:24:51.275
<v Speaker 1>X as like a comparison for the twenty twenty election.

0:24:51.635 --> 0:24:54.595
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about framing it as they are like

0:24:54.595 --> 0:24:58.955
<v Speaker 1>two separate epistemological crises. Twenty sixteen election, we no longer

0:24:58.955 --> 0:25:01.555
<v Speaker 1>can predict the future because we just don't understand what's

0:25:01.555 --> 0:25:06.635
<v Speaker 1>happening anymore, and then twenty twenty we lose faith in elections.

0:25:08.275 --> 0:25:10.795
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's compelling the idea that they are

0:25:11.555 --> 0:25:14.875
<v Speaker 1>linked in this way. I do wonder, though, to what

0:25:14.955 --> 0:25:18.155
<v Speaker 1>extent do you think voters earnestly believe the election was stolen?

0:25:18.675 --> 0:25:20.675
<v Speaker 1>And do you think it's going to have an impact

0:25:20.755 --> 0:25:25.275
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four beyond how Trump campaigns.

0:25:25.475 --> 0:25:28.115
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess I'm not a you know,

0:25:28.235 --> 0:25:31.555
<v Speaker 2>inside Beltway DC reporter. I would love to talk to

0:25:31.595 --> 0:25:33.235
<v Speaker 2>someone who does that kind of work, you know, like

0:25:33.275 --> 0:25:35.795
<v Speaker 2>a Susan Glasser from the New York or Dan Baltz

0:25:35.795 --> 0:25:40.315
<v Speaker 2>from the Washington Post and say, are people preparing for

0:25:40.515 --> 0:25:44.635
<v Speaker 2>the election denihalism? Like what is in place? Not only

0:25:44.835 --> 0:25:48.955
<v Speaker 2>preparing for you know, assuring election integrity. I feel like,

0:25:49.595 --> 0:25:52.115
<v Speaker 2>you know, the states and down to the municipal and

0:25:52.155 --> 0:25:54.355
<v Speaker 2>town level actually do a ton of that stuff in place,

0:25:54.395 --> 0:25:57.635
<v Speaker 2>Like that's why the twenty twenty election actually went so

0:25:57.795 --> 0:26:01.635
<v Speaker 2>well as in terms of the election, the country is

0:26:01.675 --> 0:26:06.715
<v Speaker 2>really reliable reporting of results and you know, any audits

0:26:06.755 --> 0:26:12.835
<v Speaker 2>were revealed just really tremendously impressive accuracy with the counting.

0:26:13.515 --> 0:26:20.475
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not worried about the election results, but everybody

0:26:20.515 --> 0:26:24.115
<v Speaker 2>should be worried about the election denialism that is likely coming.

0:26:24.155 --> 0:26:27.075
<v Speaker 2>And I still think honestly, when we talk about we're

0:26:27.075 --> 0:26:30.635
<v Speaker 2>talking about polling that you know, if we had a

0:26:30.715 --> 0:26:33.675
<v Speaker 2>national popular vote, polling would be more reliable than any

0:26:34.515 --> 0:26:36.595
<v Speaker 2>When people do those national polls, they just don't talk

0:26:36.635 --> 0:26:38.635
<v Speaker 2>about the electoral college. So there's like so many ways

0:26:38.635 --> 0:26:43.755
<v Speaker 2>in which we are not positioned to know who is

0:26:43.795 --> 0:26:47.355
<v Speaker 2>going to win an election. And this is likely to

0:26:47.355 --> 0:26:49.235
<v Speaker 2>be an extremely close election. I don't think that we

0:26:49.275 --> 0:26:53.115
<v Speaker 2>can expect anything other than extremely close elections at the

0:26:53.195 --> 0:27:00.075
<v Speaker 2>presidential national level anytime soon. And surely the Trump campaign

0:27:00.115 --> 0:27:03.435
<v Speaker 2>is thinking of all kinds of ways to undermine the

0:27:03.475 --> 0:27:07.795
<v Speaker 2>outcome of the election. If Trump loses, which she's pretty

0:27:07.875 --> 0:27:10.955
<v Speaker 2>likely to do, He's pretty likely to have been convicted

0:27:10.995 --> 0:27:13.755
<v Speaker 2>of a felony by then, which is at least expected

0:27:13.795 --> 0:27:18.395
<v Speaker 2>to cut some dent in his support among independents at least.

0:27:18.635 --> 0:27:21.275
<v Speaker 2>So I'm sure they have a really elaborate plan in

0:27:21.355 --> 0:27:26.875
<v Speaker 2>place for exactly what to do. And Eve, I don't know.

0:27:27.555 --> 0:27:28.715
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really worrying.

0:27:29.675 --> 0:27:33.435
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember so one of the episodes that we've

0:27:33.755 --> 0:27:36.995
<v Speaker 1>rerun is Hush Rush, which is the Rush Limbaugh al

0:27:37.035 --> 0:27:41.715
<v Speaker 1>Franken episode, And I was remembering when I listened back

0:27:41.715 --> 0:27:44.555
<v Speaker 1>to it that one of the things we read for that,

0:27:44.675 --> 0:27:47.835
<v Speaker 1>but then didn't include in the episode. Was that David

0:27:47.875 --> 0:27:53.915
<v Speaker 1>Posen the Columbia Law Scholars that awesome article Transparency's ideological Drift,

0:27:55.755 --> 0:27:58.515
<v Speaker 1>and one of the claims in that essay that I

0:27:58.555 --> 0:28:00.835
<v Speaker 1>had never seen before, and it really stuck with me.

0:28:00.955 --> 0:28:03.395
<v Speaker 1>So we think of transparency laws like the progressive era

0:28:03.475 --> 0:28:06.675
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties and seventies, as these like super liberal

0:28:06.795 --> 0:28:10.235
<v Speaker 1>progressive reforms, but then actually they have these right wing

0:28:10.275 --> 0:28:12.675
<v Speaker 1>functions when you like Foia, the EPA to death or whatever.

0:28:12.995 --> 0:28:16.275
<v Speaker 1>But another way that they contribute to dysfunction and government

0:28:16.915 --> 0:28:21.035
<v Speaker 1>is when you have everything broadcast on c SPAN. Everything

0:28:21.075 --> 0:28:25.035
<v Speaker 1>is accessible to lobbyists and private interests especially, but like

0:28:25.075 --> 0:28:28.515
<v Speaker 1>really just everybody. You have to keep acting as if

0:28:28.635 --> 0:28:30.915
<v Speaker 1>the things you do as campaign strategies or the things

0:28:30.955 --> 0:28:34.755
<v Speaker 1>you think your constituents want from you are like exactly

0:28:34.795 --> 0:28:37.075
<v Speaker 1>how you believe and behave, and you refuse to make

0:28:37.115 --> 0:28:41.115
<v Speaker 1>any kind of compromises. And that I think it speaks

0:28:41.155 --> 0:28:43.795
<v Speaker 1>to that idea of we might have plenty of Congress

0:28:43.795 --> 0:28:46.315
<v Speaker 1>people who don't for a second and believe that the

0:28:46.355 --> 0:28:48.595
<v Speaker 1>election was stolen, but they have to act as if

0:28:48.675 --> 0:28:50.715
<v Speaker 1>because this is one of the consequences of the like

0:28:50.995 --> 0:28:53.715
<v Speaker 1>everything's a culture war because you can see everything behind

0:28:53.715 --> 0:28:58.075
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. Do you think a way of answering the

0:28:58.155 --> 0:29:01.235
<v Speaker 1>kind of crisis in the media is to take some

0:29:01.275 --> 0:29:05.155
<v Speaker 1>of the work of governing offline or would that just

0:29:05.195 --> 0:29:06.955
<v Speaker 1>create a whole other raft of problems.

0:29:07.435 --> 0:29:09.435
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think there is a lot offline, but

0:29:09.515 --> 0:29:13.915
<v Speaker 2>we are kind of offered the illusion that we can

0:29:13.955 --> 0:29:16.195
<v Speaker 2>see at all. So you hear all the time, if

0:29:16.195 --> 0:29:19.035
<v Speaker 2>you know anybody involved in politics or you know members

0:29:19.035 --> 0:29:21.915
<v Speaker 2>of Congress that like, oh, yeah, these guys who still

0:29:21.915 --> 0:29:25.915
<v Speaker 2>say that publicly that Trump won the election, privately they'll

0:29:25.995 --> 0:29:28.315
<v Speaker 2>laugh and laugh and laugh at him and like, obviously

0:29:28.955 --> 0:29:32.795
<v Speaker 2>he totally lost. The guys a complete fraud, and they

0:29:32.875 --> 0:29:42.035
<v Speaker 2>want you to kind of forgive them privately, to allow

0:29:42.115 --> 0:29:45.675
<v Speaker 2>them to kind of make amends by being honest with you.

0:29:45.675 --> 0:29:47.595
<v Speaker 2>You know, that they can kind of feel like they're

0:29:47.635 --> 0:29:52.395
<v Speaker 2>acting in good faith because really, you know, it's like

0:29:52.395 --> 0:29:57.035
<v Speaker 2>a kind of weird penance for like I hear, I've

0:29:57.035 --> 0:30:00.595
<v Speaker 2>heard this multiple times, like to kind of confess and

0:30:00.915 --> 0:30:04.755
<v Speaker 2>try to like almost like erase your public persona by

0:30:04.955 --> 0:30:09.155
<v Speaker 2>insisting yes, like to kind of have a camaraderie around

0:30:09.195 --> 0:30:15.955
<v Speaker 2>that privately, and it's it's incredibly contemptible, right, Like I

0:30:17.915 --> 0:30:20.915
<v Speaker 2>you can think of more sinister ways to act as

0:30:20.915 --> 0:30:24.955
<v Speaker 2>a politician, like to vote for a war that you know,

0:30:24.995 --> 0:30:27.635
<v Speaker 2>for you know, new caster vote in Congress to declare

0:30:27.635 --> 0:30:29.395
<v Speaker 2>a war when you don't believe in it, or to

0:30:29.395 --> 0:30:31.635
<v Speaker 2>withhold funding for something that is a crucial kind of

0:30:31.715 --> 0:30:35.515
<v Speaker 2>humanitarian aid in order to gain some you know, really

0:30:37.915 --> 0:30:40.875
<v Speaker 2>self serving pork for your state, or like things that

0:30:40.995 --> 0:30:43.355
<v Speaker 2>kind of compromises that people make surely all the time

0:30:43.515 --> 0:30:49.475
<v Speaker 2>that largely involve money. And yeah, you can think of

0:30:49.515 --> 0:30:53.195
<v Speaker 2>worse things, but it's a pretty short list.

0:30:53.675 --> 0:30:56.955
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's just like you have this performance personality or

0:30:56.955 --> 0:30:58.835
<v Speaker 1>there's this like unreality to the way you behave and

0:30:58.875 --> 0:31:00.715
<v Speaker 1>everybody accepts it. But then it's like the only way

0:31:00.755 --> 0:31:03.355
<v Speaker 1>you're behaving in public, so it becomes real. Which is

0:31:03.395 --> 0:31:06.635
<v Speaker 1>this like reality TV phenomenon which is very trumpy.

0:31:07.515 --> 0:31:10.155
<v Speaker 2>But is it trumpy because I think regress is it's

0:31:10.235 --> 0:31:12.635
<v Speaker 2>the whole version of that. Like the progressives are really

0:31:12.715 --> 0:31:15.635
<v Speaker 2>trumpy too, Like that that's that's the that's the difference

0:31:15.635 --> 0:31:18.555
<v Speaker 2>between twenty sixteen and twenty twenty four. Right, the American

0:31:18.595 --> 0:31:22.515
<v Speaker 2>political style across the board imitates Trump.

0:31:22.595 --> 0:31:25.155
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that is like part of the premise of

0:31:25.195 --> 0:31:27.795
<v Speaker 1>the last archive is that this thing that appears to

0:31:27.835 --> 0:31:30.115
<v Speaker 1>have taken this this thing that like you might think

0:31:30.195 --> 0:31:33.035
<v Speaker 1>Trump has caused, is actually just like he's the man

0:31:33.075 --> 0:31:35.715
<v Speaker 1>for the moment because he fits all of the structures

0:31:35.715 --> 0:31:37.995
<v Speaker 1>we have in place, which are these varying degrees of

0:31:38.035 --> 0:31:41.555
<v Speaker 1>unreality and like right fantasies we have about the That's.

0:31:41.355 --> 0:31:43.435
<v Speaker 2>Why you know, when you look at Rush Limbo and

0:31:43.475 --> 0:31:45.115
<v Speaker 2>then you look at Al Frank and you're like, I

0:31:45.115 --> 0:31:50.275
<v Speaker 2>really wish Frank and were significantly different, And no he's not.

0:31:49.955 --> 0:31:53.275
<v Speaker 2>He's different. You know, he's not nearly as bad. But

0:31:53.315 --> 0:31:57.955
<v Speaker 2>there's you know, a real leaning in that direction of

0:31:58.755 --> 0:32:01.115
<v Speaker 2>you know, let me kick you in the crotch.

0:32:01.235 --> 0:32:03.835
<v Speaker 1>Like the entertainment, like politics is entertainment, which is the

0:32:03.915 --> 0:32:10.155
<v Speaker 1>CBS Election Night thing too. Yeah, well, I guess part

0:32:10.155 --> 0:32:12.835
<v Speaker 1>of the point of this conversation is to find precedence

0:32:12.875 --> 0:32:15.275
<v Speaker 1>for the twenty twenty four election, which is kind of

0:32:15.275 --> 0:32:17.515
<v Speaker 1>funny because I feel like a lot of the narrative

0:32:17.515 --> 0:32:20.755
<v Speaker 1>of the selection is that it's totally unprecedented, you know,

0:32:20.835 --> 0:32:24.835
<v Speaker 1>like Trump having so many criminal cases, Biden's age, like

0:32:24.835 --> 0:32:28.195
<v Speaker 1>two candidates who are historically old, And I guess maybe

0:32:28.275 --> 0:32:30.395
<v Speaker 1>that's a place to start in trying to think about

0:32:30.435 --> 0:32:33.795
<v Speaker 1>how you historicize these things that feel like they come

0:32:33.835 --> 0:32:36.355
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere or like they've never happened before. So

0:32:36.395 --> 0:32:38.875
<v Speaker 1>like maybe to begin with the age questions, And we

0:32:38.915 --> 0:32:40.435
<v Speaker 1>don't need to think about this in terms of like

0:32:40.475 --> 0:32:42.875
<v Speaker 1>should Biden be the nominee for the Democratic Party, but

0:32:43.275 --> 0:32:45.235
<v Speaker 1>more just like how did we get to this place

0:32:45.275 --> 0:32:48.035
<v Speaker 1>where we have two historically old candidates and the bigger

0:32:48.075 --> 0:32:51.115
<v Speaker 1>picture thing behind that the tear intocracy? Where does that

0:32:51.155 --> 0:32:53.195
<v Speaker 1>come from? What does it mean for democracy?

0:32:53.475 --> 0:32:57.235
<v Speaker 2>Right? So, one of the reasons that I wanted to

0:32:57.235 --> 0:32:59.395
<v Speaker 2>do the last archive in the first place is because

0:32:59.435 --> 0:33:05.835
<v Speaker 2>as a historian, the rhetoric of the unprecedented development was

0:33:05.915 --> 0:33:09.115
<v Speaker 2>really driving me crazy. Like by the time we started,

0:33:09.915 --> 0:33:12.675
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess I really noticed that after Bush v.

0:33:12.795 --> 0:33:15.955
<v Speaker 2>Gore in two thousand, which you know was unprecedented, there's

0:33:15.995 --> 0:33:18.435
<v Speaker 2>like on an eighteen seventy six moment you could point to,

0:33:19.235 --> 0:33:26.115
<v Speaker 2>but the it became a very lazy journalistic move for

0:33:26.555 --> 0:33:29.395
<v Speaker 2>journalists writing about pretty much anything in American politics to

0:33:29.435 --> 0:33:35.515
<v Speaker 2>call their rolodex American presidential historians, right, which is like

0:33:35.635 --> 0:33:37.835
<v Speaker 2>five people that like you'd see David Gergan and Michael

0:33:37.835 --> 0:33:41.675
<v Speaker 2>beschlass Endors, Karns Goodwin, pretty much every story commenting on

0:33:41.715 --> 0:33:47.195
<v Speaker 2>whether this whatever it was, was unprecedented, and like it's

0:33:47.235 --> 0:33:51.435
<v Speaker 2>a stupid question, is the thing, And there's no answer

0:33:51.595 --> 0:33:56.315
<v Speaker 2>that can be satisfying because every answer reduces the past

0:33:56.595 --> 0:33:59.555
<v Speaker 2>to you know, like an ice cube training like you

0:33:59.555 --> 0:34:01.155
<v Speaker 2>pop out an ice cube. This one would be good

0:34:01.195 --> 0:34:03.795
<v Speaker 2>with this drink like it just it's like a meaningless thing.

0:34:03.915 --> 0:34:06.555
<v Speaker 2>So you know, when the two thousand and eight financial

0:34:06.595 --> 0:34:09.115
<v Speaker 2>crisis happened, I remember, because then you know I would

0:34:09.155 --> 0:34:12.475
<v Speaker 2>start getting these is this is this financial crisis unprecedented?

0:34:12.515 --> 0:34:14.315
<v Speaker 2>And you know, how does it compare it to nineteen

0:34:14.355 --> 0:34:18.795
<v Speaker 2>thirty one, nineteen thirty two? And what are you talking about?

0:34:18.835 --> 0:34:21.555
<v Speaker 2>It is like nothing, there's nothing in common between two

0:34:21.595 --> 0:34:24.035
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight and nineteen thirty one nineteen thirty two,

0:34:24.195 --> 0:34:27.115
<v Speaker 2>Like we're not eating our shoes. This is a completely

0:34:27.155 --> 0:34:31.475
<v Speaker 2>different set of problems with finance and globalism and like

0:34:32.315 --> 0:34:35.795
<v Speaker 2>and chicanery among financiers.

0:34:35.835 --> 0:34:38.555
<v Speaker 1>Like it's a that's the argument that it is unprecedented,

0:34:38.595 --> 0:34:40.675
<v Speaker 1>that like everything is new because everything is a totally

0:34:40.675 --> 0:34:41.275
<v Speaker 1>different set of.

0:34:41.155 --> 0:34:44.715
<v Speaker 3>Com Yes, well, they're always you could always call upon say, well,

0:34:44.715 --> 0:34:47.755
<v Speaker 3>would actually be really quite interesting to compare two thousand

0:34:47.795 --> 0:34:51.275
<v Speaker 3>and eight to nineteen thirty two, But it's an act

0:34:51.315 --> 0:34:52.755
<v Speaker 3>of extended comparison.

0:34:52.795 --> 0:34:54.475
<v Speaker 2>There are some things that are similar. And one of

0:34:54.555 --> 0:34:56.955
<v Speaker 2>the things that as a historian you're interested in doing

0:34:57.075 --> 0:35:00.195
<v Speaker 2>is measuring the distance between two points and then trying

0:35:00.195 --> 0:35:02.715
<v Speaker 2>to figure out what's the engine that drives you from

0:35:02.715 --> 0:35:04.795
<v Speaker 2>point day to point b. You know, is it is

0:35:04.795 --> 0:35:08.195
<v Speaker 2>it changes in the economy, is it US foreign policy?

0:35:08.955 --> 0:35:11.955
<v Speaker 2>Is it changing to technology? Is it the circulation of

0:35:11.995 --> 0:35:15.755
<v Speaker 2>goods due to new transportation infrastructure? Like, there are a

0:35:15.755 --> 0:35:18.835
<v Speaker 2>lot of interesting questions you could ask, but you can't

0:35:19.115 --> 0:35:21.995
<v Speaker 2>ask those questions and answer them in you know, a

0:35:22.115 --> 0:35:26.075
<v Speaker 2>three minute phone call with a reporter or popping up

0:35:26.075 --> 0:35:29.995
<v Speaker 2>on MSNBC or something like. It's very hard to offer

0:35:30.155 --> 0:35:33.875
<v Speaker 2>up an account of the relationship between the past and

0:35:33.915 --> 0:35:37.595
<v Speaker 2>the present to the media as it is currently configured.

0:35:38.235 --> 0:35:41.755
<v Speaker 2>So the past is really flattened. It's like available for

0:35:42.395 --> 0:35:45.875
<v Speaker 2>the occasional bond mo oh fgr once said, you know,

0:35:46.075 --> 0:35:49.195
<v Speaker 2>this reminds me of something that Kennedy did, like what

0:35:49.875 --> 0:35:53.635
<v Speaker 2>like as the history, especially because everything becomes narrative presidential action.

0:35:54.235 --> 0:35:58.995
<v Speaker 2>So all those accounts fall prey to what historians call presidentialism, right,

0:35:59.035 --> 0:36:02.915
<v Speaker 2>just just inflating the presidency as the sole mover of

0:36:02.955 --> 0:36:06.115
<v Speaker 2>all events in the United States, like, oh, the economy's down,

0:36:06.155 --> 0:36:07.995
<v Speaker 2>Well it's President Biden, Like what the hell did he do?

0:36:08.075 --> 0:36:10.715
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Like it's a weird. But then since

0:36:10.755 --> 0:36:13.835
<v Speaker 2>the go to people among historians are like these kinds

0:36:13.835 --> 0:36:18.555
<v Speaker 2>of celebrity presidential biographers, it's not their fault that they're

0:36:18.595 --> 0:36:20.475
<v Speaker 2>getting the phone calls, and their answer is going to

0:36:20.515 --> 0:36:23.875
<v Speaker 2>involve something that a president said or a president did,

0:36:24.035 --> 0:36:27.555
<v Speaker 2>and so those answers are just really not going to

0:36:27.555 --> 0:36:31.075
<v Speaker 2>be illuminating, and they're going to distort American's perception of

0:36:31.115 --> 0:36:34.475
<v Speaker 2>how change happens. There's nothing that's ever structural, and nothing's

0:36:34.515 --> 0:36:38.435
<v Speaker 2>really driven by economic forces or technological forces. Everything is

0:36:38.475 --> 0:36:41.955
<v Speaker 2>somehow driven from the White House, and it corrupts our

0:36:41.995 --> 0:36:46.675
<v Speaker 2>sense of our own capacity as voters and as citizens

0:36:46.675 --> 0:36:50.475
<v Speaker 2>to act right or as parents or as you know, children,

0:36:50.595 --> 0:36:55.555
<v Speaker 2>or as school principles or whatever. Like somehow everything's nationalized

0:36:55.595 --> 0:37:00.275
<v Speaker 2>and partisanized, so that like is this ever precedented? As

0:37:00.315 --> 0:37:02.795
<v Speaker 2>that go to or even like you know, the swine

0:37:02.795 --> 0:37:09.555
<v Speaker 2>flu panic or you know, the coronavirus, like everything has

0:37:09.595 --> 0:37:13.475
<v Speaker 2>to answered that question. And it sort of drove me

0:37:13.755 --> 0:37:18.475
<v Speaker 2>crazy because I don't know, Like it just seems like

0:37:18.515 --> 0:37:23.035
<v Speaker 2>you would you call up a chemist and say, can

0:37:23.075 --> 0:37:26.355
<v Speaker 2>we turn out, uh, you know, steal into gold? Like

0:37:26.435 --> 0:37:29.595
<v Speaker 2>it just doesn't. It's like that's not how chemistry works,

0:37:29.635 --> 0:37:33.115
<v Speaker 2>Like that's alchemy, Like that just doesn't. It defies the

0:37:33.155 --> 0:37:34.955
<v Speaker 2>method of being a chemist. Why would you ask me

0:37:34.995 --> 0:37:35.555
<v Speaker 2>such a question?

0:37:35.635 --> 0:37:39.075
<v Speaker 1>Because they want like unprecedented is another way of saying newsworthy, yeah,

0:37:39.075 --> 0:37:40.635
<v Speaker 1>which is then like I have a peg. This has

0:37:40.635 --> 0:37:41.355
<v Speaker 1>never happened before.

0:37:41.715 --> 0:37:44.795
<v Speaker 2>This happens before, Like so I get it, and I'm

0:37:44.875 --> 0:37:47.155
<v Speaker 2>like I do there's I mean, like I'm I get

0:37:47.195 --> 0:37:50.115
<v Speaker 2>why a journalist want to do that. But as a story,

0:37:50.115 --> 0:37:51.395
<v Speaker 2>and there is a lot to be learned from the past,

0:37:51.435 --> 0:37:52.795
<v Speaker 2>so you kind of want to say, like wait, but yeah,

0:37:52.795 --> 0:37:54.235
<v Speaker 2>actually there's something and let me tell you about the

0:37:54.275 --> 0:37:56.715
<v Speaker 2>election of eighteen seventy six. It's really different from this,

0:37:56.875 --> 0:38:00.155
<v Speaker 2>but here's how that went. So anytime I was asked

0:38:00.195 --> 0:38:02.435
<v Speaker 2>to do something because a story in like rhinesse or

0:38:02.475 --> 0:38:05.195
<v Speaker 2>whatever about something in the present, and I had to

0:38:05.195 --> 0:38:08.035
<v Speaker 2>be a way that something in the past illuminates it.

0:38:08.115 --> 0:38:10.955
<v Speaker 2>But then to try to tell that story in a

0:38:10.955 --> 0:38:14.955
<v Speaker 2>way that doesn't reduce the past to the prologue to

0:38:14.995 --> 0:38:17.835
<v Speaker 2>the present, like everything is somehow explained by the past,

0:38:18.795 --> 0:38:23.275
<v Speaker 2>and therefore we should either like get really worried or

0:38:23.435 --> 0:38:25.675
<v Speaker 2>not worry at all. Like people want to talk about

0:38:25.675 --> 0:38:27.875
<v Speaker 2>the lack of civility in Congress. Remember that guy who

0:38:27.955 --> 0:38:30.275
<v Speaker 2>screamed out you lie to Obama during the State of

0:38:30.315 --> 0:38:33.035
<v Speaker 2>the Union. And then there was all like everybody would

0:38:33.035 --> 0:38:34.995
<v Speaker 2>call this history and at Yale Joan Freeman who'd written

0:38:35.035 --> 0:38:39.115
<v Speaker 2>about the fisticuffs on the floor of Congress City in

0:38:39.195 --> 0:38:44.595
<v Speaker 2>eighteen fifties and eighteen forties, and it was like, somehow, sure,

0:38:44.715 --> 0:38:48.315
<v Speaker 2>that's important history. We should know that. But does it

0:38:48.995 --> 0:38:54.475
<v Speaker 2>mitigate the cruelty and just vulgarity of members of Congress today?

0:38:54.635 --> 0:38:58.875
<v Speaker 2>Does it make us sleep easier that people were crap

0:38:58.915 --> 0:39:01.155
<v Speaker 2>in the past? I don't know, Like what's the I

0:39:01.155 --> 0:39:03.675
<v Speaker 2>don't get. I don't even understand what that is meant

0:39:03.715 --> 0:39:07.315
<v Speaker 2>to offer, Like as a citizen, I just actually want

0:39:07.315 --> 0:39:09.035
<v Speaker 2>my members of Congress to being better. I get the

0:39:09.035 --> 0:39:11.075
<v Speaker 2>fact that people bashed each other over the head in

0:39:11.155 --> 0:39:13.595
<v Speaker 2>eighteen fifty six doesn't actually make me think it's okay

0:39:13.595 --> 0:39:14.275
<v Speaker 2>to do it today.

0:39:14.355 --> 0:39:16.075
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is interesting to think about this in the

0:39:16.155 --> 0:39:18.635
<v Speaker 1>context of the conversation we're having around polling though in

0:39:18.755 --> 0:39:23.675
<v Speaker 1>sofar as they're I mean, they're both entertainment oriented products

0:39:23.755 --> 0:39:26.675
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of like Newsy in a way, but

0:39:26.715 --> 0:39:29.395
<v Speaker 1>they're also about conveying a sense of security, like if

0:39:29.395 --> 0:39:32.155
<v Speaker 1>something is precedented, if it's happened before, we've seen this before,

0:39:32.435 --> 0:39:34.315
<v Speaker 1>we know everything's gonna be okay in the future, saying

0:39:34.395 --> 0:39:36.315
<v Speaker 1>if you think you can predict what the future is

0:39:36.355 --> 0:39:38.715
<v Speaker 1>going to be. So there is this way in which

0:39:38.715 --> 0:39:41.315
<v Speaker 1>they both serve to manage anxiety about shame.

0:39:41.475 --> 0:39:44.115
<v Speaker 2>But you know what it also did. It diminished the

0:39:44.115 --> 0:39:47.035
<v Speaker 2>threat that was Trump because I don't know if you

0:39:47.035 --> 0:39:49.475
<v Speaker 2>can mervous, but I have really strong people trying to

0:39:49.475 --> 0:39:52.875
<v Speaker 2>come with like he's he's like thirty percent Goldwater, forty

0:39:52.915 --> 0:39:57.115
<v Speaker 2>percent Nixon, and the other thirty percent is George Wallace,

0:39:57.635 --> 0:40:01.355
<v Speaker 2>or you know, he's fifty percent P. T. Barnum and

0:40:01.395 --> 0:40:04.675
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent Charles Lindberg. It'll be like what, like, yes,

0:40:04.755 --> 0:40:12.235
<v Speaker 2>there are frogs and tycoons and showmen and want to

0:40:12.235 --> 0:40:16.115
<v Speaker 2>be dictators in the American past. But wait, this guy's

0:40:16.195 --> 0:40:18.275
<v Speaker 2>looking like he's gonna win. Like, this guy is a

0:40:18.355 --> 0:40:21.515
<v Speaker 2>huge following, And I don't place myself outside of like

0:40:21.555 --> 0:40:25.075
<v Speaker 2>diminishing what that was, or what his presidency might do,

0:40:25.275 --> 0:40:31.715
<v Speaker 2>or his likelihood of getting elected. But it really was

0:40:31.755 --> 0:40:36.435
<v Speaker 2>a disservice to people's ability to understand him, and like,

0:40:36.515 --> 0:40:40.595
<v Speaker 2>as a voter, I would say to me, one of

0:40:40.595 --> 0:40:44.115
<v Speaker 2>the great mistakes of that the twenty fifteen twenty sixteen

0:40:44.195 --> 0:40:47.995
<v Speaker 2>moment was the Democratic Party deciding to defer to Hillary Clinton,

0:40:49.155 --> 0:40:53.235
<v Speaker 2>to drum Bernie Sanders off of all possible stages, and

0:40:53.315 --> 0:40:56.795
<v Speaker 2>to discourage anyone else from running. Elizabeth Warren wanted to run, right,

0:40:57.555 --> 0:41:01.035
<v Speaker 2>I would have so loved to see, Okay, they have

0:41:01.075 --> 0:41:05.915
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people lining up in these Republicans, and

0:41:06.035 --> 0:41:09.995
<v Speaker 2>have the Democrats say to themselves, let's see who's out there,

0:41:10.115 --> 0:41:13.155
<v Speaker 2>Like why Hillary Clinton, who was a terrible candidate and

0:41:14.995 --> 0:41:17.555
<v Speaker 2>a terrible candidate to put off against who became the

0:41:18.035 --> 0:41:20.835
<v Speaker 2>mentual nominee. But like that to your question of like,

0:41:20.955 --> 0:41:25.875
<v Speaker 2>what the how do we get here to twenty twenty

0:41:25.875 --> 0:41:32.275
<v Speaker 2>four with this gerontocracy? The from the Democratic point of view,

0:41:33.275 --> 0:41:39.315
<v Speaker 2>you see that real lack of faith in the people's

0:41:39.315 --> 0:41:42.595
<v Speaker 2>ability to discriminate and choose the best candidate, where the

0:41:42.635 --> 0:41:46.315
<v Speaker 2>party has the party will anoint Hillary Clinton, or the

0:41:46.355 --> 0:41:49.075
<v Speaker 2>party will you say, of course Joe Biden is going

0:41:49.115 --> 0:41:51.675
<v Speaker 2>to run. No one. Everyone has to agree not to

0:41:51.715 --> 0:41:54.795
<v Speaker 2>contest that, not to even publicly challenge it, but certainly

0:41:54.795 --> 0:41:57.115
<v Speaker 2>not to run against him or to give money to

0:41:57.155 --> 0:42:00.635
<v Speaker 2>someone who might run against him. It's completely anti democratic

0:42:00.715 --> 0:42:02.395
<v Speaker 2>with a lower case D. And the fact that the

0:42:02.435 --> 0:42:05.915
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party is allegedly running as the Party of Democracy

0:42:05.955 --> 0:42:08.595
<v Speaker 2>when they can't actually even tolerate a competition for the

0:42:08.715 --> 0:42:13.035
<v Speaker 2>party's nomination for president is appalling. But I think that

0:42:14.795 --> 0:42:18.195
<v Speaker 2>risk aversion is somewhat I think as you're kind of

0:42:18.195 --> 0:42:23.475
<v Speaker 2>suggesting tied to that fetish around unprecedented, like, oh, well,

0:42:23.515 --> 0:42:26.315
<v Speaker 2>because this is the most important election that's ever happened,

0:42:27.715 --> 0:42:30.315
<v Speaker 2>you know, Hillary Clinton must be our candidate. She's you know,

0:42:31.035 --> 0:42:33.555
<v Speaker 2>or whatever like that. Somehow the nature of the rig

0:42:33.795 --> 0:42:36.835
<v Speaker 2>you have to be willing to lose. And yeah, I like,

0:42:36.875 --> 0:42:39.515
<v Speaker 2>if you don't trust the voters or the voters in

0:42:39.555 --> 0:42:44.955
<v Speaker 2>your own party, then you're not doing your job. I

0:42:45.355 --> 0:42:49.395
<v Speaker 2>think the reasons that that what looks like as the

0:42:49.395 --> 0:42:52.115
<v Speaker 2>moment we're talking that Trump and Biden will be the

0:42:52.155 --> 0:42:57.515
<v Speaker 2>major party nominees. I think the reasons for their elevation

0:42:57.635 --> 0:43:00.675
<v Speaker 2>to those positions are different, but I mean, they're both

0:43:00.755 --> 0:43:06.195
<v Speaker 2>representations of many political failures, the chain of political failures,

0:43:06.235 --> 0:43:08.675
<v Speaker 2>but the failures are different.

0:43:08.675 --> 0:43:10.875
<v Speaker 1>Along the way, we're talking last night about the calls

0:43:10.875 --> 0:43:13.275
<v Speaker 1>for an open convention from people who are concerned about

0:43:13.275 --> 0:43:16.915
<v Speaker 1>Biden's age, and it's kind of a lovely fantasy in

0:43:16.955 --> 0:43:19.155
<v Speaker 1>some sense, but one of the big concerns I have

0:43:19.235 --> 0:43:22.275
<v Speaker 1>about that is, like, do you really trust the Democratic

0:43:22.275 --> 0:43:25.555
<v Speaker 1>Party to pick a candidate that meaningfully represents what the

0:43:25.635 --> 0:43:29.555
<v Speaker 1>voting base would want? And it seems like twenty sixteen

0:43:29.635 --> 0:43:31.875
<v Speaker 1>is a good example of why you might be suspicious

0:43:31.875 --> 0:43:33.875
<v Speaker 1>that that's actually going to yield a result that they

0:43:33.875 --> 0:43:34.675
<v Speaker 1>would be happy with.

0:43:35.835 --> 0:43:40.795
<v Speaker 2>But it's not. Unlike there's currently a pretty major effort

0:43:40.955 --> 0:43:45.195
<v Speaker 2>on the part of Republicans of the kind of Greg Abbott,

0:43:45.395 --> 0:43:50.915
<v Speaker 2>Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum armed the party to get enough

0:43:50.915 --> 0:43:54.035
<v Speaker 2>state legislatures to call for a second constitutional convention that

0:43:54.115 --> 0:43:56.595
<v Speaker 2>there would be one, And that's been going on for

0:43:56.595 --> 0:43:58.675
<v Speaker 2>a number of years and they're getting closer year by year,

0:43:58.755 --> 0:44:03.075
<v Speaker 2>and it has been the position of the left since

0:44:03.115 --> 0:44:07.995
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen eighties to oppose such a convention on the

0:44:07.995 --> 0:44:13.795
<v Speaker 2>theory that it would lead to results that liberals and

0:44:13.795 --> 0:44:18.755
<v Speaker 2>progressives would not like. And you can keep doing that,

0:44:18.795 --> 0:44:21.875
<v Speaker 2>but you can't then also call yourself the party of Democracy.

0:44:22.555 --> 0:44:25.275
<v Speaker 2>And if there's going to be a convention, maybe you

0:44:25.315 --> 0:44:28.035
<v Speaker 2>should prepare for it and actually have a plan and

0:44:28.075 --> 0:44:30.595
<v Speaker 2>an agenda and a proposal for what the rules of

0:44:30.635 --> 0:44:32.995
<v Speaker 2>such a convention would be, and have a wish list

0:44:33.075 --> 0:44:38.955
<v Speaker 2>and have a platform. Start thinking about delegates, like maybe

0:44:39.395 --> 0:44:45.195
<v Speaker 2>start initiating smaller convention like meetings that involve not just

0:44:45.235 --> 0:44:50.715
<v Speaker 2>the party elites but actual voters. So a reason that

0:44:50.755 --> 0:44:52.635
<v Speaker 2>you don't have a lot of faith in a democratic

0:44:52.755 --> 0:44:55.715
<v Speaker 2>national convention choosing a candidate that you would be happy

0:44:55.715 --> 0:45:00.075
<v Speaker 2>with is you've probably never been a participant in any

0:45:00.115 --> 0:45:04.555
<v Speaker 2>kind of a convention of any kind. Whereas historically, you know,

0:45:04.635 --> 0:45:09.075
<v Speaker 2>state constitutional conventions were held all the time, constitutional like

0:45:09.835 --> 0:45:13.755
<v Speaker 2>constitution like conventions held in towns and cities for all

0:45:13.835 --> 0:45:16.595
<v Speaker 2>kinds of activities. It was like the main mode other

0:45:16.675 --> 0:45:20.275
<v Speaker 2>than voting, people participated as citizens and sometimes they're called

0:45:20.315 --> 0:45:24.115
<v Speaker 2>citizen assemblies. But that very act of like gathering together

0:45:24.155 --> 0:45:26.075
<v Speaker 2>with a bunch of random people to kind of make

0:45:26.075 --> 0:45:32.115
<v Speaker 2>a decision about something. That's what polling replaced. So we

0:45:32.235 --> 0:45:34.875
<v Speaker 2>now have this like weird now now it's like tech

0:45:34.995 --> 0:45:38.995
<v Speaker 2>driven thing instead of getting together at the town library.

0:45:39.315 --> 0:45:41.115
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're talking here in Vermont, where there's still

0:45:41.115 --> 0:45:42.875
<v Speaker 2>our town meetings, but a lot of the town meetings

0:45:42.915 --> 0:45:44.715
<v Speaker 2>have become zoom meetings. Like that was the kind of

0:45:44.715 --> 0:45:49.435
<v Speaker 2>consequence of COVID and also of diminishing attendance at town meetings.

0:45:49.475 --> 0:45:52.035
<v Speaker 2>But we just don't We're not in the habit of

0:45:52.035 --> 0:45:54.915
<v Speaker 2>sitting in a room and arguing things out, building a coalition,

0:45:55.195 --> 0:45:58.275
<v Speaker 2>arriving at some kind of decision. Excepting that nobody gets

0:45:58.315 --> 0:46:01.675
<v Speaker 2>what they want. That compromises important. And so no one

0:46:01.715 --> 0:46:06.075
<v Speaker 2>trusts the convention as a anymore than they trust elections.

0:46:06.115 --> 0:46:08.475
<v Speaker 2>I think people trust conventions a lot less because they

0:46:08.515 --> 0:46:11.595
<v Speaker 2>just don't even know what that means. Like there has

0:46:11.635 --> 0:46:13.835
<v Speaker 2>not been a state constitutional convention in the United States

0:46:13.875 --> 0:46:17.875
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen eighty six. Was Rhode Island like it was

0:46:17.955 --> 0:46:21.115
<v Speaker 2>voted on in nineteen eighty four as a ballot initiative?

0:46:21.155 --> 0:46:22.715
<v Speaker 1>Why was that a ballid initiative for them?

0:46:22.955 --> 0:46:26.155
<v Speaker 2>So they have a regular they're a number of I

0:46:26.155 --> 0:46:28.875
<v Speaker 2>think it's maybe ten states that it's it's in their

0:46:28.915 --> 0:46:32.595
<v Speaker 2>constitution that the voters will be asked at a regular interval,

0:46:32.595 --> 0:46:34.395
<v Speaker 2>would you like to hold a convention? So I think

0:46:34.475 --> 0:46:37.515
<v Speaker 2>Rhode Islands is every ten years. So there there were

0:46:37.555 --> 0:46:39.275
<v Speaker 2>some of these votes in twenty twenty two. They are

0:46:39.275 --> 0:46:41.475
<v Speaker 2>going to be some in twenty twenty four. Voters keep

0:46:41.515 --> 0:46:45.275
<v Speaker 2>saying no because they just don't trust conventions anymore because

0:46:45.275 --> 0:46:46.875
<v Speaker 2>no one even even really knows what that means. Well,

0:46:46.875 --> 0:46:48.715
<v Speaker 2>how do you picked delegates and how that happened? But

0:46:48.875 --> 0:46:52.435
<v Speaker 2>like a convention. I would love to attend a convention,

0:46:52.555 --> 0:46:55.115
<v Speaker 2>like like actually in a meaningful way to participate in one.

0:46:55.755 --> 0:46:59.835
<v Speaker 2>But it's one of the biggest holes in our system

0:46:59.875 --> 0:47:03.195
<v Speaker 2>of representative government because it's a major historically, it's like

0:47:03.275 --> 0:47:08.835
<v Speaker 2>a major way that Americans involved themselves in political decision making.

0:47:09.195 --> 0:47:11.275
<v Speaker 2>You know, no one's going to run for the legislature

0:47:11.875 --> 0:47:15.715
<v Speaker 2>and first pulling and now like social media posting is

0:47:15.715 --> 0:47:19.875
<v Speaker 2>somehow like you civic conusity. Yeah, and so I get

0:47:19.915 --> 0:47:22.075
<v Speaker 2>that not trusting, like or if you were a Republican

0:47:22.115 --> 0:47:23.195
<v Speaker 2>and they said, you know, we're going to have an

0:47:23.235 --> 0:47:26.755
<v Speaker 2>open convention because Trump's in jail now or whatever. People

0:47:26.795 --> 0:47:30.155
<v Speaker 2>would really freak out. It's not on either party, like

0:47:30.195 --> 0:47:32.755
<v Speaker 2>it's across the board. People don't trust the idea of

0:47:32.995 --> 0:47:34.315
<v Speaker 2>letting the people decide about.

0:47:34.155 --> 0:47:36.955
<v Speaker 1>Something there was I mean this, this connects to the

0:47:36.955 --> 0:47:39.635
<v Speaker 1>pos and thing also because there's that Okay, sure you

0:47:39.675 --> 0:47:43.355
<v Speaker 1>can put everything about everything Congress does is now on television,

0:47:43.515 --> 0:47:46.875
<v Speaker 1>but like, who's actually watching. It's lobbyists, it's private interest groups,

0:47:46.915 --> 0:47:48.995
<v Speaker 1>the people who actually have the time, which most of

0:47:49.075 --> 0:47:52.915
<v Speaker 1>us don't. And it reminds me of two moments in

0:47:52.955 --> 0:47:57.595
<v Speaker 1>the episodes that we just reran in Hush Rush. There's

0:47:57.635 --> 0:48:00.115
<v Speaker 1>the Rush Limbok quote, something that effective. If you listen

0:48:00.155 --> 0:48:03.275
<v Speaker 1>to me, you never have to read another newspaper, never

0:48:03.355 --> 0:48:05.835
<v Speaker 1>have to read another magazine. I do it for you,

0:48:06.195 --> 0:48:07.595
<v Speaker 1>and best of all, I tell you what to think

0:48:07.635 --> 0:48:11.515
<v Speaker 1>about these very complicated issues. And there's the Eisenhower ad

0:48:11.555 --> 0:48:14.195
<v Speaker 1>from the fifty sixth election that we love so much

0:48:14.355 --> 0:48:17.315
<v Speaker 1>that we almost made the avatar of the last archive,

0:48:17.395 --> 0:48:19.715
<v Speaker 1>that little cartoon guy who's surrounded by all his voices.

0:48:21.195 --> 0:48:25.955
<v Speaker 1>High prices, low prices, unemployment like full employment. Why stop?

0:48:26.275 --> 0:48:28.435
<v Speaker 1>I read the papers and the magazines, like you know,

0:48:28.515 --> 0:48:31.995
<v Speaker 1>but who's right what's right? How can I tell like

0:48:32.035 --> 0:48:36.235
<v Speaker 1>that that kind of increasing complexity, the like daily burden

0:48:36.275 --> 0:48:40.595
<v Speaker 1>of democracy is heavier every day because it's a more

0:48:40.635 --> 0:48:42.475
<v Speaker 1>and more complicated world.

0:48:42.995 --> 0:48:45.555
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, no, it's just a more and more

0:48:45.675 --> 0:48:49.395
<v Speaker 2>nationalized political conversation. So I think if you were just

0:48:50.355 --> 0:48:52.955
<v Speaker 2>do you participate, like in your neighborhood in a neighborhood

0:48:52.955 --> 0:48:57.555
<v Speaker 2>council or in your borrow in New York in borough meetings,

0:48:57.595 --> 0:48:59.795
<v Speaker 2>Like if you were doing those things, it wouldn't actually

0:48:59.795 --> 0:49:01.835
<v Speaker 2>be that hard to keep up with what you needed

0:49:01.835 --> 0:49:04.435
<v Speaker 2>to know, like, well, there's a new budget line about

0:49:04.435 --> 0:49:05.675
<v Speaker 2>our public library and this.

0:49:05.795 --> 0:49:06.955
<v Speaker 1>Mole, you know, like.

0:49:09.115 --> 0:49:14.635
<v Speaker 2>We've most of us completely abandoned our responsibility to the

0:49:14.675 --> 0:49:17.995
<v Speaker 2>civic institutions that are part of our local lives.

0:49:18.115 --> 0:49:19.995
<v Speaker 1>No, well, I mean we do do that, and it

0:49:20.075 --> 0:49:23.395
<v Speaker 1>is like we want to reroute traffic on this street. Maybe, yes,

0:49:23.475 --> 0:49:27.075
<v Speaker 1>that is still simple in a way that it was before.

0:49:27.195 --> 0:49:30.315
<v Speaker 1>Although I do think I mean, especially with neighborhood determinations

0:49:30.355 --> 0:49:33.475
<v Speaker 1>and building and things like that. There's environmental reviews, like

0:49:33.555 --> 0:49:38.115
<v Speaker 1>my dad is on the conservation committee. I think it's

0:49:38.115 --> 0:49:42.275
<v Speaker 1>called for the suburb where my parents live, and those

0:49:42.275 --> 0:49:44.675
<v Speaker 1>are like they have to do these really intensive reviews,

0:49:44.835 --> 0:49:46.795
<v Speaker 1>so like, in some way, I actually do think those

0:49:46.795 --> 0:49:48.995
<v Speaker 1>things are more complicated now than they were before. But

0:49:49.195 --> 0:49:52.515
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm talking more about the you know, our

0:49:52.715 --> 0:49:57.955
<v Speaker 1>season two, episode five and six moon Landing argument of like,

0:49:58.035 --> 0:50:02.275
<v Speaker 1>there's just stuff now that you could not possibly understand

0:50:02.315 --> 0:50:07.155
<v Speaker 1>on your own, both geopolitically and technologically. The scale of

0:50:07.235 --> 0:50:09.555
<v Speaker 1>the problems we face, or at least the scale the

0:50:10.115 --> 0:50:12.475
<v Speaker 1>we can now comprehend that perhaps we could not before,

0:50:13.115 --> 0:50:14.755
<v Speaker 1>does feel master And if.

0:50:14.595 --> 0:50:17.955
<v Speaker 2>You really believe that, then then why does everybody get

0:50:17.955 --> 0:50:18.435
<v Speaker 2>to vote?

0:50:18.475 --> 0:50:21.515
<v Speaker 1>Because I do still believe in people's capacity to understand

0:50:21.515 --> 0:50:23.715
<v Speaker 1>these things. I'm just saying I think it takes more work,

0:50:24.395 --> 0:50:26.915
<v Speaker 1>and I think one of the problems is you get

0:50:26.915 --> 0:50:30.355
<v Speaker 1>all these shortcuts from doing the work, and some of

0:50:30.395 --> 0:50:34.035
<v Speaker 1>them can be trusted and others of them can. But

0:50:34.115 --> 0:50:37.675
<v Speaker 1>maybe there ultimately is no real substitution for like taking

0:50:37.675 --> 0:50:40.835
<v Speaker 1>the time to think hard about these issues, and we've

0:50:40.875 --> 0:50:43.235
<v Speaker 1>all just gotten comfortable with substitutions that we shouldn't be

0:50:43.235 --> 0:50:43.915
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with.

0:50:44.515 --> 0:50:47.715
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think that the sense though, of helplessness

0:50:47.995 --> 0:50:49.875
<v Speaker 2>around do I even know enough to figure out how

0:50:49.915 --> 0:50:50.275
<v Speaker 2>to vote?

0:50:50.315 --> 0:50:50.515
<v Speaker 1>Here?

0:50:50.595 --> 0:50:54.395
<v Speaker 2>In this you know from the Senate seat in my

0:50:54.555 --> 0:51:01.955
<v Speaker 2>state is exacerbated by just a tremendous deterioration of support

0:51:01.995 --> 0:51:05.675
<v Speaker 2>for local news organizations, which means that the kind of

0:51:05.755 --> 0:51:08.995
<v Speaker 2>daily reporting about what's going on in your town, your neighborhood,

0:51:09.035 --> 0:51:12.715
<v Speaker 2>your state, at your state house is really hard to find,

0:51:12.715 --> 0:51:16.515
<v Speaker 2>and it's really hard it's hard to figure out who's

0:51:16.515 --> 0:51:18.395
<v Speaker 2>going to pay for that. So, you know, in the

0:51:18.395 --> 0:51:21.595
<v Speaker 2>absence of that local news coverage, people turn to the

0:51:21.675 --> 0:51:23.675
<v Speaker 2>drama of the national news coverage, and they get kind

0:51:23.675 --> 0:51:26.915
<v Speaker 2>of radicalized by their news sources. And you know, we

0:51:26.955 --> 0:51:28.955
<v Speaker 2>can think of all kinds of problems that fall from that,

0:51:29.035 --> 0:51:30.755
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think until we solve the problem of

0:51:30.795 --> 0:51:33.555
<v Speaker 2>local news we can solve those larger problems.

0:51:33.835 --> 0:51:38.115
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, something that's interesting about twenty twenty four is it's

0:51:38.115 --> 0:51:41.035
<v Speaker 1>the biggest selection year in history. You know, roughly four

0:51:41.035 --> 0:51:42.835
<v Speaker 1>billion people are going to go to the polls this year.

0:51:43.155 --> 0:51:46.715
<v Speaker 1>That's like about half the global population who are going

0:51:46.755 --> 0:51:51.435
<v Speaker 1>to participate in self determination. That's an incredible thing. But

0:51:51.475 --> 0:51:54.395
<v Speaker 1>then there's this sad undercurrent to that, which is that

0:51:54.435 --> 0:51:56.875
<v Speaker 1>in so many of these elections there's this you know,

0:51:56.995 --> 0:51:59.395
<v Speaker 1>cliched thing that's kind of true that democracy is on

0:51:59.435 --> 0:52:04.275
<v Speaker 1>the ballot, And I guess it brings me to this

0:52:04.875 --> 0:52:08.315
<v Speaker 1>question about twenty sixteen, in the panic around democratic norms,

0:52:08.955 --> 0:52:11.835
<v Speaker 1>how do you actually promote a democratic cast of mind?

0:52:11.915 --> 0:52:15.435
<v Speaker 1>Which we've talked about in the radio episodes too. What

0:52:15.675 --> 0:52:20.035
<v Speaker 1>is your answer to that? How do we inculcate in

0:52:20.235 --> 0:52:24.475
<v Speaker 1>voters the spirit of democracy, the tolerance for the complexity,

0:52:24.555 --> 0:52:25.635
<v Speaker 1>and the daily work of it.

0:52:25.795 --> 0:52:27.515
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of really smart people have thought

0:52:27.515 --> 0:52:31.595
<v Speaker 2>about that like that. The new Zublett and Levitsky book

0:52:31.635 --> 0:52:33.595
<v Speaker 2>on the Tyranny of the Minority really kind of spells

0:52:33.635 --> 0:52:36.875
<v Speaker 2>out what the stakes are, but there have been some

0:52:36.915 --> 0:52:40.955
<v Speaker 2>great efforts made at thinking through what the solutions are too.

0:52:41.195 --> 0:52:43.515
<v Speaker 2>So one of my favorites is the report that the

0:52:43.555 --> 0:52:47.435
<v Speaker 2>American Academy Arts and Sciences put out several years ago

0:52:48.675 --> 0:52:52.195
<v Speaker 2>after like a multi year study involving, you know, hundreds

0:52:52.195 --> 0:52:54.595
<v Speaker 2>of people all over the country. Was led by Daniel Allen,

0:52:54.755 --> 0:52:59.635
<v Speaker 2>political theorist at Harvard, and among their recommendations were these

0:52:59.715 --> 0:53:02.515
<v Speaker 2>kind of small steps, like the kind of obvious thing

0:53:02.635 --> 0:53:05.075
<v Speaker 2>like election Day should be a national holiday, it should

0:53:05.115 --> 0:53:07.475
<v Speaker 2>be held on Veterans Day. It would honor veterans to

0:53:07.515 --> 0:53:11.355
<v Speaker 2>do so. Then you sort of kind of instead of

0:53:11.395 --> 0:53:14.155
<v Speaker 2>election night being a television and social media spectacle, you

0:53:14.155 --> 0:53:15.915
<v Speaker 2>could have the day itself as a kind of July

0:53:16.035 --> 0:53:18.755
<v Speaker 2>fourth celebration of the act of voting and the great

0:53:18.755 --> 0:53:21.275
<v Speaker 2>privilege that that is, and people wouldn't have to go

0:53:21.315 --> 0:53:23.515
<v Speaker 2>to work, and you know, the sort of federal holiday

0:53:23.555 --> 0:53:26.715
<v Speaker 2>piece of it. And so it was for instance, really

0:53:26.755 --> 0:53:29.395
<v Speaker 2>discouraging to me personally when Biden's big move was to

0:53:29.395 --> 0:53:33.675
<v Speaker 2>make Juneteenth a federal holiday. It was like, okay, you

0:53:33.675 --> 0:53:37.155
<v Speaker 2>could have met you Like there was another that was like,

0:53:37.435 --> 0:53:39.915
<v Speaker 2>this is this is a kind of real bipartisan project,

0:53:39.995 --> 0:53:43.035
<v Speaker 2>Like there's not. It's like just there's really not a

0:53:43.075 --> 0:53:45.835
<v Speaker 2>ton of objection to that. And the only objection is

0:53:45.875 --> 0:53:48.395
<v Speaker 2>it would make it possible for more people to vote.

0:53:48.395 --> 0:53:50.675
<v Speaker 2>So it's hard to state that as an objection publicly.

0:53:52.275 --> 0:53:54.835
<v Speaker 2>You know, there should be a year or two of

0:53:55.435 --> 0:53:58.395
<v Speaker 2>mandatory national service that could be civil or military, that

0:53:58.475 --> 0:54:01.315
<v Speaker 2>would bring together people, you you know, serve with people

0:54:01.355 --> 0:54:03.795
<v Speaker 2>from all over the country and it would sort of

0:54:03.835 --> 0:54:07.715
<v Speaker 2>mix Americans up more. Like things like that that just

0:54:07.795 --> 0:54:13.595
<v Speaker 2>seem they seem kind of you know, for giving student debt,

0:54:13.715 --> 0:54:16.475
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna was always going to be challenging to enforce,

0:54:16.635 --> 0:54:22.595
<v Speaker 2>to implement, to get through to defend budgetary grounds. But

0:54:22.755 --> 0:54:28.915
<v Speaker 2>the National Service, which would have also provided funds for

0:54:28.955 --> 0:54:31.515
<v Speaker 2>students to go to college, right like, in recompense of that,

0:54:31.555 --> 0:54:35.115
<v Speaker 2>there're you know, there's just like a much better idea

0:54:35.355 --> 0:54:42.115
<v Speaker 2>and it actually achieves in terms of support for college

0:54:42.195 --> 0:54:44.835
<v Speaker 2>education for people that can't afford. It is a much

0:54:44.875 --> 0:54:48.555
<v Speaker 2>better solution because it meets all these other civic goals,

0:54:48.595 --> 0:54:51.755
<v Speaker 2>whereas the forgiving student debt is like become a really

0:54:51.755 --> 0:54:57.155
<v Speaker 2>bad pub you know, partisan hot potato. Like. So it's

0:54:57.195 --> 0:55:01.275
<v Speaker 2>frustrating to see these really good ideas not having been

0:55:01.395 --> 0:55:04.635
<v Speaker 2>quite taken up yet. But that doesn't mean there aren't

0:55:04.635 --> 0:55:07.755
<v Speaker 2>really good ideas out there. So in terms of how

0:55:07.755 --> 0:55:09.755
<v Speaker 2>to implement those things or why they haven't been implement

0:55:09.875 --> 0:55:12.755
<v Speaker 2>men did because they're you know, they've been supported by

0:55:12.795 --> 0:55:16.635
<v Speaker 2>so many different people. I sidedly think you have to

0:55:16.635 --> 0:55:19.275
<v Speaker 2>look at who's making money off of not implementing that stuff.

0:55:24.555 --> 0:55:30.515
<v Speaker 2>If I think about twenty twenty four as the product

0:55:30.515 --> 0:55:36.475
<v Speaker 2>of a series of political failures, and you have made

0:55:36.475 --> 0:55:39.195
<v Speaker 2>the case for media accountability for some of those failures,

0:55:40.035 --> 0:55:44.355
<v Speaker 2>I really just think historically, so much of the blame

0:55:44.435 --> 0:55:46.035
<v Speaker 2>is going to be placed on the Republicans and the

0:55:46.035 --> 0:55:49.035
<v Speaker 2>Senate who voted against convicting Trump of impeachment and the

0:55:49.035 --> 0:55:52.355
<v Speaker 2>second of impeachment after the January sixth insurrection. That was

0:55:52.395 --> 0:55:56.835
<v Speaker 2>just a complete abdication of their constitutional duty as members

0:55:56.875 --> 0:56:00.435
<v Speaker 2>of the Senate. It was a completely clear cut case.

0:56:00.795 --> 0:56:06.235
<v Speaker 2>And among the arguments that you now see, For one thing,

0:56:06.275 --> 0:56:10.035
<v Speaker 2>you know, Mitch McConnell famously said, oh, you know, he's

0:56:10.115 --> 0:56:12.875
<v Speaker 2>subject to criminal indictment and prosecution, and that's the way

0:56:12.875 --> 0:56:19.955
<v Speaker 2>this should happen. He's immune from criminal proscription. But for another,

0:56:20.395 --> 0:56:22.155
<v Speaker 2>you know, when you read memoirs of people like Mitt

0:56:22.195 --> 0:56:25.355
<v Speaker 2>Romney or Liz Cheney, you learned that a lot of

0:56:25.355 --> 0:56:28.195
<v Speaker 2>those members of the Senate who voted against conviction did

0:56:28.195 --> 0:56:31.515
<v Speaker 2>so because they had been subject to threats of violence

0:56:31.555 --> 0:56:37.035
<v Speaker 2>against their wives and young children. And as terrifying as

0:56:37.075 --> 0:56:39.995
<v Speaker 2>that isn't as terrible as that is, as itself, as

0:56:40.035 --> 0:56:43.675
<v Speaker 2>you know, the symptom of the pathology of our politics.

0:56:44.755 --> 0:56:47.715
<v Speaker 2>You are a member of the Senate and your obligation

0:56:47.915 --> 0:56:50.355
<v Speaker 2>is to cast the correct vote. And it is like

0:56:50.435 --> 0:56:52.435
<v Speaker 2>a trial by jury. It is a trial by jury,

0:56:52.475 --> 0:56:56.555
<v Speaker 2>is it? It is our constitutional trial by jury? And

0:56:56.595 --> 0:57:00.875
<v Speaker 2>you can't choose to vote not to convict out of

0:57:00.955 --> 0:57:05.475
<v Speaker 2>fear and and and and stand by that. And I mean,

0:57:05.515 --> 0:57:10.115
<v Speaker 2>I just think when we think about all the things,

0:57:10.195 --> 0:57:12.555
<v Speaker 2>all the kinds of compromises to what is true and

0:57:12.595 --> 0:57:15.515
<v Speaker 2>what is not true, how do people know what is true?

0:57:15.875 --> 0:57:18.075
<v Speaker 2>How are we to know who to believe? At the

0:57:18.195 --> 0:57:22.635
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, those guys, the guys who voted

0:57:23.515 --> 0:57:26.675
<v Speaker 2>not to convict Trump in the Senate, I think they're

0:57:26.755 --> 0:57:30.955
<v Speaker 2>the heaviest burden for you know, the New York catastrophe

0:57:30.955 --> 0:57:33.635
<v Speaker 2>that is our current political culture.

0:57:34.355 --> 0:57:40.035
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to wrap up, We've talked about a lot of

0:57:40.115 --> 0:57:45.275
<v Speaker 1>sort of bad habits of American democracy, and I think

0:57:45.315 --> 0:57:48.875
<v Speaker 1>one of them is this idea that the election is

0:57:48.915 --> 0:57:51.555
<v Speaker 1>all that matters. And it's hard to escape that idea

0:57:51.755 --> 0:57:54.315
<v Speaker 1>in an election year. And obviously it is an extremely

0:57:54.355 --> 0:57:57.115
<v Speaker 1>important thing, but it's not the only thing. If you

0:57:57.155 --> 0:57:59.395
<v Speaker 1>were to come up with three rules for keeping your

0:57:59.435 --> 0:58:02.315
<v Speaker 1>head during an election year, what would they be.

0:58:03.315 --> 0:58:05.835
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that the rules that I live by

0:58:05.995 --> 0:58:10.555
<v Speaker 2>are just like completely unpalatable. Most people never ever go

0:58:10.675 --> 0:58:13.395
<v Speaker 2>on social media, just refuse to participate, and it is

0:58:13.475 --> 0:58:15.755
<v Speaker 2>bad for the human condition. I've just never heard a

0:58:15.755 --> 0:58:20.555
<v Speaker 2>really powerful defense of social media as being good for

0:58:20.635 --> 0:58:26.995
<v Speaker 2>you psychologically, emotionally, politically, culturally. So that's me though I

0:58:26.995 --> 0:58:29.435
<v Speaker 2>can't like, that's not a prescription. People don't live that way,

0:58:29.515 --> 0:58:33.395
<v Speaker 2>Like that's just my own quirkiness. But I think, come

0:58:33.475 --> 0:58:37.435
<v Speaker 2>up with some decision for yourself about what amount of

0:58:37.475 --> 0:58:40.555
<v Speaker 2>that or what exposure to that, or what participation in

0:58:40.595 --> 0:58:45.755
<v Speaker 2>that seems to you defensible and where does it cross

0:58:45.755 --> 0:58:47.635
<v Speaker 2>the line. This is good. I feel good about this.

0:58:47.635 --> 0:58:50.715
<v Speaker 2>This is how I learn about new music, this is

0:58:50.755 --> 0:58:53.835
<v Speaker 2>how I stay in touch with these people. Whatever it is.

0:58:53.875 --> 0:58:57.275
<v Speaker 2>That's good. But I think to think really carefully about

0:58:58.595 --> 0:59:01.755
<v Speaker 2>where to draw the line yourself between what's good for

0:59:01.835 --> 0:59:04.235
<v Speaker 2>you politically and not just good for you, good for

0:59:04.275 --> 0:59:07.555
<v Speaker 2>your community, for the polity to which you belong, good

0:59:07.555 --> 0:59:11.475
<v Speaker 2>for our political culture. More more people make more responsible

0:59:11.475 --> 0:59:13.795
<v Speaker 2>decisions about that, things would things would better. I mean,

0:59:14.595 --> 0:59:17.275
<v Speaker 2>you know, going to the neighborhood council meetings, getting involved

0:59:17.275 --> 0:59:22.555
<v Speaker 2>in the local convening of whatever kind of convening it is.

0:59:24.875 --> 0:59:29.555
<v Speaker 2>You know, the suggestion like join a knitting group, like honestly,

0:59:29.675 --> 0:59:31.755
<v Speaker 2>like figure out a way to meet with other people

0:59:32.035 --> 0:59:34.195
<v Speaker 2>in each other's houses and talk about what you're going

0:59:34.235 --> 0:59:35.955
<v Speaker 2>to do next, Like are we going to knit a sweater?

0:59:36.155 --> 0:59:38.515
<v Speaker 2>We gonna We're gonna work on a hat next time.

0:59:38.435 --> 0:59:40.875
<v Speaker 1>Like just a massive campaign.

0:59:41.435 --> 0:59:43.795
<v Speaker 2>I just disagree with people about something with very low

0:59:43.835 --> 0:59:48.515
<v Speaker 2>stakes and accept that how compromises work, and like just

0:59:48.635 --> 0:59:52.235
<v Speaker 2>kind of exercise those muscles around, like being with a

0:59:52.235 --> 0:59:54.675
<v Speaker 2>group of people that are not your own family and

0:59:54.755 --> 0:59:58.755
<v Speaker 2>not your workmates and which you make some decisions like

0:59:58.875 --> 1:00:01.915
<v Speaker 2>don't really matter. You know, we're a book club or whatever,

1:00:02.035 --> 1:00:04.355
<v Speaker 2>like get together, you know, talk about the podcast. I

1:00:04.395 --> 1:00:05.955
<v Speaker 2>don't know, it doesn't really matter what you do, as

1:00:05.955 --> 1:00:07.875
<v Speaker 2>so long as you like meet with other people like

1:00:07.955 --> 1:00:11.635
<v Speaker 2>in person and make decisions that involve compromises. Like that's

1:00:11.755 --> 1:00:14.595
<v Speaker 2>just a good place to be in terms of figuring

1:00:14.635 --> 1:00:16.835
<v Speaker 2>out like what do you actually believe in? In terms

1:00:16.835 --> 1:00:19.395
<v Speaker 2>of like if people get together and decide things together

1:00:19.515 --> 1:00:22.075
<v Speaker 2>and consent to them as a group, was that a

1:00:22.075 --> 1:00:25.555
<v Speaker 2>good outcome? I think the reason people are so vulnerable

1:00:25.555 --> 1:00:29.675
<v Speaker 2>to authoritarianism is they have very little experience of civic

1:00:29.675 --> 1:00:33.675
<v Speaker 2>participation any longer. Or you know, it's the declining church membership, right,

1:00:33.755 --> 1:00:35.835
<v Speaker 2>Like if you were going to your church board meetings

1:00:35.875 --> 1:00:38.555
<v Speaker 2>all the time, and many people do, but many people don't.

1:00:38.795 --> 1:00:41.395
<v Speaker 2>You'd have a model for like, yeah, actually, when we

1:00:41.435 --> 1:00:42.915
<v Speaker 2>get together with a bunch of other people and we

1:00:42.995 --> 1:00:44.395
<v Speaker 2>argue it out, like we usually come up with a

1:00:44.435 --> 1:00:46.875
<v Speaker 2>good app Like you have to find some way to

1:00:46.875 --> 1:00:48.035
<v Speaker 2>have to be a part of your life. Yeah.

1:00:48.035 --> 1:00:49.315
<v Speaker 1>It goes to the like at the end of the

1:00:49.315 --> 1:00:52.035
<v Speaker 1>Epiphany episode when you're talking to Steve Shapin and he

1:00:52.115 --> 1:00:56.115
<v Speaker 1>reads that passage from the Social History of Truth. Yeah,

1:00:56.315 --> 1:00:58.915
<v Speaker 1>where a knowledge is a collective good. This kind of

1:01:00.035 --> 1:01:03.075
<v Speaker 1>like bears on our social relationships. It bears on trusting people,

1:01:03.155 --> 1:01:05.835
<v Speaker 1>and to trust somebody you have to know them, not

1:01:05.875 --> 1:01:07.235
<v Speaker 1>just in the way you might know someone at a

1:01:07.275 --> 1:01:08.155
<v Speaker 1>distance online.

1:01:08.275 --> 1:01:11.195
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, yeah, so you know there has to be

1:01:11.235 --> 1:01:13.395
<v Speaker 2>a way. Is it not that hard to put that

1:01:13.555 --> 1:01:15.315
<v Speaker 2>back into your life if you had it once, or

1:01:15.355 --> 1:01:18.315
<v Speaker 2>to find it if you don't have it yet. Third role,

1:01:18.875 --> 1:01:21.995
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh, my third role is it's like actually expose

1:01:22.115 --> 1:01:26.755
<v Speaker 2>yourself to ideas that you think you really disagree with

1:01:29.235 --> 1:01:33.795
<v Speaker 2>and try to understand why they are persuasive to other people.

1:01:34.795 --> 1:01:39.595
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, that's not a it's not a bold

1:01:39.675 --> 1:01:42.155
<v Speaker 2>or new idea, but it's still that's I think that's

1:01:42.235 --> 1:01:43.315
<v Speaker 2>much harder for people to do.

1:01:43.835 --> 1:01:46.075
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well this was awesome.

1:01:46.315 --> 1:01:48.355
<v Speaker 2>Happy twenty twenty four, man, Yeah.

1:01:48.195 --> 1:01:51.195
<v Speaker 1>Happy twenty twenty four. Maybe live to see twenty twenty five.