WEBVTT - COP29's last-minute deal is a miracle and a mess

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Zero.

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I am Ukshatarti and I'm Michaelerel. This week COP twenty nine,

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Big Messy Deal.

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Chat.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 2>COP twenty nine is over and we have a deal.

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 2>I was only there for the first week, so I've

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>had a week to recover. But you've come straight to

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the studio directly from the airport.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>How the heck are you exhausted? But we know this

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is how it ends. This is my fourth COP, so

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I was a little bit prepared that we're going to

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>have an all nighter and we're going to be waiting

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>for a bit, and we're going to be chasing for

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, and we don't know how it ends.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>We are going to have to pick the pieces once

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>everything is done. Seems there was at least a big deal,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>but not as much progress as people had hoped.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get into the specifics of what's in

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>that deal and whether it's a good deal. But first

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 2>I think it's worth returning to the question we laid

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>out on the very first day of the conference about

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>whether Iserbaijan was going to be up to the task

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>of leading this summer in the first place. This was

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>my first COP and there was a lot that impressed

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>me about how things were run in Baku. Things went

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>smoothly at the venue. The shuttle buses to and from

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the Baku Olympic Stadium were very punctual. Things seemed organized,

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty reliable. The city seemed ready for this influx of visitors.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>The tourist district of Old City Baku is very charming,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 2>ready for people. Overall, how would you rate Iserbaijan's performance

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 2>this cop, You're.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, the logistics were better than most cops. It is

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>not easy to suddenly have an influx of fifty thousand

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are all waying to the same place and

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are there for official business, and so they have very

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>little time and just need to get on with things.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And Azerbaijan was able to pull that off. But we

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>also found out that because it's an authoritarian government, they

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>could do a lot to make this happen. Baku's traffic

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is pretty infamous, and we didn't really experience much of

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it because they'd shut down schools and universities, asked most

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of their government employees to work from home. They had

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>cleared up street vendors. They'd shut down these so called

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>slave markets where mostly men show up for informal work,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and there were no beggars to be seen, which are

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a regular part of being in Baku.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So you have to note that for the visitors it

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't what Baku usually is. But yes, it did make

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the COP work better.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So that was the experience for people In terms of

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 2>interacting with the city, it was very seamless. But what

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>about actually when it came time to negotiate and get

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 2>things past.

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of complaints about the presidency, Mukhtar Babayev,

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>who had never been much of a presence at COP

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>meetings before and had never taken on a job of

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this level. And of course he had, you know, ten

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>months to prepare, and he got plenty of advice. As

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we've learned, companies like Deloitte were involved in providing advice,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but also past COP presidents and their teams were involved.

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And yet during these sophisticated, delicate negotiations between two hundred parties,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>there is a level of forthrightness. There's a level of

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>preparedness that a presidency needs to come in with and

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that was lacking and it really showed up towards the

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>second week when the deal had to be done, and

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the documents had to come in time, but they were late,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and the ingredients in those documents over things that people

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>would agree or disagree were all over the place. And

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it did seem like on Saturday, which was twenty four

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>hours later than the official deadline of hop that things

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>might just not fall in place and there might be

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.839
<v Speaker 1>no deal, and some of that blame would have been

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>put on the presidency itself.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>All the more difficult because we knew this was the

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>finance cop Matt alone was going to make it hard

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 2>because it's one thing to agree on some ideas on

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the abstract. It's another thing to agree to pay to

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 2>cough up the bill. And there were two big things

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 2>on the table. One of them was the NCQG, the

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 2>new Collective Quantified Goal on climate finance, the big sum

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 2>that rich countries would have to commit to. Let's start

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 2>with that.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Coming in. We had a lot of different

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>analyzes looking at just how much money this is going

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to be, how much can developing countries get from developed countries.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>And when we were on the ground, we got a

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>chance to speak to developed countries and developing countries. So

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>take a listen to one person we spoke to who

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is moment Khlored, Minister of Energy and Oil for Mauritania,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the world's porest countries.

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the main issue for Africa is financing to

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 3>mitigate the impact of the climate change we get to

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 3>hit because of the climate change. If look even at Mauritania,

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 3>we have inundation now, we have a lot of rain, desertification,

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of issues is causing a lot of problem.

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>So I think we need to find a financial model

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>where Africa can be financed to electrify, to improve the

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 3>skills of its workforce, to cope with the migration of

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 3>people from the desert to the cities. So this is

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 3>really what's needed to be looked at right now.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So he was really clear that the financing number was

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>going to make a big difference for him in terms

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 2>of what his country could do to elevate its standard

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>of living and move towards a green future, and.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>That money had to come from develop countries. And we

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>got a chance to interview the Prime Minister of then

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Mark Meta Frederickson. Denmark has been historically a country that

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>has been quite climbed forward, but when it comes to

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions or trillions of dollars. Even they will

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out how exactly they will deliver that.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Some goals and targets are one thing, but delivering is

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 4>the next. Of course, a country like Denmark should deliver.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 4>We are pushing for ambitious target, but we also have

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.679
<v Speaker 4>to discuss who are going to contribute to this because

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 4>it for me, I am totally convinced that a country

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 4>like Denmark should participate and support this, but I think

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 4>some of the new strong economies to participate, for example China,

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 4>but also the Golf States.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 2>So those are the stakes of why this money was

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 2>so important and why even countries who want to support

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.239
<v Speaker 2>these ideas would have some concerns about the final price tag.

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>What was the final price tag?

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Three hundred billion dollars annually. It will be delivered by

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty five and will be ramped up from current

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>levels of one hundred billion dollars annually. Now, if you

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>just took inflation between now and twenty thirty five, that

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>will already cause the two hundred billion dollars to be

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>just worth one hundred billion dollars today. So three hundred

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>billion by that time is in upgrade. But it's not

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that huge a leap, and so there were lots of

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>complaints from developing countries that this sum is too low,

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that how exactly this sum will be counted, and where

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>will this money flow is still not clear and that's

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not good enough. But on the flip side, you had

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>developed countries, many of which, as we've seen in this

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>year of elections, have taken a right word turn, are

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>looking inward rather than outward, who have budgets that are constrained,

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that are not willing to put anymore. So it was

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mine that even a larger sum was

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon and as we saw it really could have

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all fallen apart.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>So there was a deal, but it was hard fought

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of trauma. Again, it was back in

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>London by the time all this was going down, but

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 2>my WhatsApp was exploding with hundreds of messages from the

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Climate team through every twist and turn on the plenary.

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was quite something. This is my fourth cop

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and we typically expect some fireworks to happen at the plenary,

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just like last minute tweeks in Glasgow. We had a

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>phase down versus phase out fight in India and China

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>were against the US and Europe and we expected nothing

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>less here. Given this has been labeled the hardest COPS

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 1>since Paris. What happened is that typically at the end

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of the COP it's a consensus, which means you, as

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the president, say to the parties, we are going to

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>be adopting this. Does anybody have any objections and if not,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>then the president can gabble it down and it's done.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But consensus is not unanimity. The president has powers to

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>overcome objections because Saudi Arabia has blocked voting rules at

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>COP meetings and that gives the president powers to overrule objections.

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And in this case it's not clear, but as soon

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as the finance deal was put forward for adoption and

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>question about objections was asked. Very soon after that, the

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>gavel went down and India immediately started waving their hands

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>calling for a time out. They rushed onto the stage

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>or talked to the president. They came back and afterwards

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they got a chance to speak and they said, we

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are unhappy with this process. This has been a stage

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>managed process.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 4>This has been stage managed and we are extremely, extremely

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 4>disappointed with this incident.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>It was perhaps one of the strongest pushbacks I've heard

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>from a country at a COP meeting. Now, just so

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that we are clear, there's a technical reason why India

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>was opposing the deal. In the current hundred billion dollars,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>there is a contribution from multilateral development banks such as

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>World Bank or IMF that is counted towards climate finance.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Because these institutions put about fifty percent of their lending

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>into climate projects, about fifty percent of their shareholding is

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>rich countries, so that shareholding's contribution is counted towards the

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>climate finance goal. Going into this three hundred billion dollar figure,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Developed countries wanted to count all of the shareholders in

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that goal, which would mean countries like China and India

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that do have shareholding in World Bank and IMF will

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>also have their number counted towards the three hundred billion.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>From an Indian perspective, that would make rich countries less

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>responsible towards the three hundred billion, because India's contributions are

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>being hunted and they did not want that. But the

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>deal has been done and India will have to live

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with it, and we'll see how this fight shakes out

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and whether the trust in the process that is so

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>crucial to keep two hundred countries together remains as we

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>go into Bellham in Brazil.

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that was the NCQG. The other thing that

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 2>we knew to keep an eye on was Article six,

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>which talks about carbon markets, and some serious details needed

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>to be ironed out on that. Where did things land there.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I was in the plenary hall when the Article six

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>got gabled through by the President and there were quite

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cheers. One observer said, probably because they

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are happy they're never going to have to hear about

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Article six again.

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 2>And clearly people throughout the week kept saying, we've been

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about this for nine years, but you were saying

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>it's even more than nine years.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the idea of carbon markets have been

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>around for a long time. In the nineties, we had

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the CUTA Protocol, as we've discussed on the part before

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and then, and Article six were supposed to be an

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>upgrade to that, and yes, it got done, but there

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>are still plenty of issues that remain. There are questions

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>around the integrity of the credits that will be traded.

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>There are questions about these new types of markets that

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>would be operating between two countries. So Switzerland can make

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a deal with Ghana and maybe no third party verifies

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what that deal is. So we'll see how things shake out.

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, people have been talking and talking about Article

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>six for more than a decade. Now these rules have

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>been agreed on. They will have to be modified and

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>tweaked if they're not working, if countries are not trading

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as you want, if the emissions reductions are not real.

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And those who were cheering that we will hear less

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>about Article six, I'm afraid we are going to hear

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about it.

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 2>So we talked about what was in the deal, but

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>what was not in the deal, what was conspicuously missing.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, there was another piece of text that was called

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Global Stock Take, which is basically the exercise that

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 1>happened Dubai looking at what was the progress countries had

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>made between the Paris Agreement in twenty fifteen and Dubai.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And obviously we know that progress wasn't enough, but it

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>was actually a numerical activity to find out just how

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>far behind countries are and then take actions to try

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and improve on those numbers. That's where we got the

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>phrase transitioning away from fossil fuels, and there was supposed

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a document that said we are going to

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>reaffirm what we agreed on at COP twenty eight, and

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we will go further and transition away from fossil fuels

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and put those into the national climate plans that are

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be submitted over the next few months. That document,

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in the end did not get the support of all countries,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and it has now been postponed for discussion at the

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>next COP.

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>It seems like a bit of a step backwards because

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>last COP, as I understand it, one big breakthrough, one

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 2>big headline, was this consensus around the need to transition

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 2>away from fossil fuels right correct.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>What we've seen is that one actor among a few,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>has been really pushing heart names well, Saudi Arabia because

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we reported that in our stories, has been pushing hard

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to erase any mention of fossil fuels in not just

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>COP meetings but many international forums like the G twenty

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and it has had a lot of success because it

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't want people to be talking about transitioning away

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>from fossil fuels, and the science is very clear. If

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you've signed on to the Paras Agreement goals of keeping

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>temperature targets to one point five or two degree celsius.

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You are going to have to reduce your use of

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels. But saying it out loud is clearly irking

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia and they don't want people to be saying it.

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And we are going to see that fight play out

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>again at the next come.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>After the break, we turned to the question of one

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>point five celsius and some other unfinished business left for

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Cop thirty. And if you've been enjoying this episode, please

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>take a moment to rate and review the show on

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or Apple. It helps other listeners find the show.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>There's another thing that I heard a lot of discussion

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 2>of in that first week, and I know carried on

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 2>through the second week, which is the question of one

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 2>point five c That's the level of warming the world

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>has been trying to keep under. That's been sort of

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>the target, the point we don't want to surpass. The

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>feasibility of that figure has been in question for some time.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 2>There's one quote that caught my eye from Panama Special

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Representative for Climate Change one, Carlos Monterrey Gomez, and he

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 2>said we needed to leave Baku with an agreement to

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>keep the multilateral system alive. We kept the system alive,

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 2>But I think one point five is dead after this

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>COP is one point five C a number we should

0:15:58.800 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>still be talking about.

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So this year is likely to be the first year

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>where temperatures are going to be, on average more than

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>one point five degrees celsius relative to pre industrial levels.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Now that is not the parish target. The parish target

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is a long term average of staying above one point

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>five degrees celsius. But scientists are clear that we are

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>likely to surpass that too. Now within the Paris Agreement,

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a chance that you could go about one

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>point five degree celsius and then come back down by

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>drawing down carbon dioxide from the atmosphere technically feasible but

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. So yes, as a target that we should

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not breach, one point five C is likely dead because

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we will breach it. But the long term target of

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>actually bringing it back down to one point five C

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't dead. And that's the thing that we heard again

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and again from island states at COP twenty nine. For them,

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one point five CE they call it a death sentence

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>because sea levels will rise, their homes will be inundated.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>They won't have places to go to. They're going to

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.479
<v Speaker 1>end up without homes, and so they are not willing

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to move away from this target. This is the thing

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they will keep pushing on, and from the rest of

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the world's perspective, it still makes sense to try and

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>avoid every point one degree celsius of warming that you can.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So one point five CREE is likely to remain as

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a rallying cry, and the world will need to try

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to do as much as possible to avoid the worst impacts.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 2>COP kicked off just a couple of days after the

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>US election, as we've talked about in a couple of

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>past episodes, and in the first days we were in Baku,

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>we had a chance to catch up with Indonesia's Special

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Presidential Envoy, Hashim Joyohadi Kusumo, and he had something interesting

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm a bit wary, frankly, because of the change of

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 5>government in the United States. I was in Marrakesh, you know,

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 5>in twenty sixteen. I remember what happened. I mean, I

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 5>detect the same sort of atmosphere for voting. I hope

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 5>we can work things out between the parties, but we

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 5>have to be wary, and I think everybody in this

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 5>conference is weary, I think.

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>And I think he was onto something, because we did

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>see flickers of chaos. At one point Argentina pulled negotiators

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>out of COP twenty nine, and there was a risk

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that Argentina might also quit the Paris Agreement, as Donald

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump has said the US will do so. But towards

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the second week things come down a little bit. Argentina

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>said they are not going to quit the Paris Agreement.

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>We had Russia come out and say that actually, the

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>US shouldn't leave the Paris Agreement, a twist I did

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not see coming. And we did get a deal done.

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And that deal happened despite many veterans of COP like

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>John Kerry in the United States, Shia Genoa in China

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>not being present, to not have those experienced hands guiding

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations toward the end, the fact that we got

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a deal done is a big deal, and it shows

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that the US, as much as it's a big power

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world, it's only twelve percent of global emissions,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the world still cares about haak

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>climate change and they do want to get on with

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the job.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 2>So Trump's election had somewhat of a limited impact but

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 2>I did feel the geopolitics of this conference was very heavy,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty unescapable. Even in the run up to things, when

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 2>we were reaching out to heads of state trying to

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 2>figure out who we might talk to in Baku, we

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>heard from many countries like, oh, sorry, our plans are

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 2>in flux because there's an election on the horizon. We

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 2>heard that from Ireland, we heard that from Japan. This

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>was a big election year around the world, a lot

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of turmoil, and we saw a lot of incumbents doing poorly,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 2>a populist message resonating, a right word shift in a

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of major governments. How did all of that show

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 2>up in your mind in those two weeks in Baku.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Given climate is a decadal challenge, political swings are power

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for the course. We know that right word shifts have

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past and climate action has continued despite it,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>but you're right, this moment feels more strenuous than it

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>has in recent years. We got a chance to speak

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to Sophie Hermann's who is the Climate Minister of the Netherlands,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and it gave us a sense of what a place

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that has seen a right word shift can do on climate.

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Because Sophie now represents a four party coalition. Two of

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>those parties do not want to do anything on climate

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and to want to and they have to come to

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>this grand compromise to try and figure out how they'll

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>meet their legally mandated climate goals, sit within the European Union,

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>which has very ambitious climate targets, and make them all

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>work despite the political shift. Here's what Sophie had to say.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, in this coalition, we agreed that what we stated

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 6>in our law at the twenty thirty target but also

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 6>the twenty fifty targets, it's non negotiable. That's what we

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 6>are going to do and what we have to achieve.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 6>So there's no discussion about it, and now we have

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 6>the discussion of how to achieve it.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 2>So the theme seems to be it's very messy, but

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>on we go, and that messiness wasn't just about politics

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and elections, but also about several wars that continue even

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 2>as these talks played out. It was striking to go

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 2>visit the Russia Pavilion with its life size Motroit cadals,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 2>and then right around the corner was the Ukraine Pavilion,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 2>which also had a very elaborate showing with these biodegradable

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 2>walls covered with seeds. Both countries quite engaged in the process,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 2>even as they are also engaged in a war.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just Russia and Ukraine. We caught up

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>with the climaton way of Israel. Gideon Behar and I

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>asked him, how do you think about climate change when

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.719
<v Speaker 1>there is a war happening? And how do you compare

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the timelines on which these two crises have to be

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to agree with people you are

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at war with.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, the climate crisis is impacting all of

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 7>us and it's a danger for humanity at all. So

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 7>we really have to come to a consensus. And Israel

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 7>is here because Israel is part of the international community.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 7>Israel is a dedicated member trying to make its contribution

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 7>to solve the climate crisis. And we are here, so

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 7>we will be part of a consensus.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And we did get ideal, and we shouldn't take that

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for granted. The multilateral process is a delicate one and

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it is currently being put under a lot of pressure.

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>But that's what makes it interesting to come to a

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>cop where all these countries do show up and jostle

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>over the fate of the planet over the next century.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 2>There was a line in the piece that you filed

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>with reporters John Ainger and Jender Louis and Alfred Song

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of stayed with me on this point, and it

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 2>was this idea that even though there was a deal,

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 2>and here's the line, the process of global climate cooperation

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>will lurch forward from here under the weight of heavier

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>existential questions. This was already a pretty heavy cup. How

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 2>much heavier can I get?

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Look covering climate change day in and day out, there's

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>just no way to escape heavier existential questions. You know,

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>humanity is likely to survive this period, but perhaps in

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a very poor state if it doesn't do much, and

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in a very good state if it does a lot.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>But the heavier questions here are quite real. We've talked

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>about so many of them. The right would turn to politics,

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>wars happening, the creaking of the multilateral system, the rise

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of competition instead of cooperation, the inward turn of countries

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>in a time when global crises that required global responses

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are growing. That's what makes this beat so dynamic, That's

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>what makes the progress so interesting, because the forces against

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it are so strong and to me The question at

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the heart of this equation is whether we can all

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>work together toward progress.

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 2>We've already been looking ahead to COP thirty. In our

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 2>last episode, you spoke to Brazil's Andre Corrier di Lago,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the Secretary for Climate, Energy and the Environment. Brazil's the

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>next host. They are planning to hold the conference in Belem,

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the gateway to the Amazon, a place that, again like Baku,

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessarily used to big influx of visitors. He was

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 2>very cheerful and candid about all of this. He said

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Brazil wasn't going to try to hide its problems. Brazil

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>was committed to leading by example and embracing some of

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 2>those contradictions. Given how things ended in Baku, what can

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 2>we expect in Vilm.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of expectations being put on on

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:04.479
<v Speaker 1>COP thirty in Belem. One is that, given we are

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>behind these new national climate plans that countries have to submit,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.479
<v Speaker 1>have to be much more ambitious. With a deal on

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>finance at Baku, that becomes a little easier because countries

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>will have so called conditional climate plans where they say,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>if this money does come through as was promised, we'll

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>be able to do so much more to cut emissions.

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing about this finance deal is that

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>although three hundred billion dollars were agreed to, the needs

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for foreign investments into developing countries is about one point

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>three trillion dollars per year that was acknowledged in the

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>final deal. And there's going to be a road to

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>BELLM program that is going to work on figuring out

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>how to increase the sum of climate finance from three

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion to one point three trillion. What exactly are

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>these innovative financial instruments that could be used us to

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>make that happen. So Brazil already had a lot to

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>do and now it's got more on its table. But

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems Brazil is really committed on making this BELLM

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>COP a real success and they've already begun that job

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>as part of this troika that was created between COP

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, COP twenty nine and COP thirty and a

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are very excited about what's to come. Actually,

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you, And just to add, all of

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>this work is not work that we do alone. We

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>had a big team from Bloombergreen on the ground in Baku,

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and all of our coverage from those two weeks is

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>free to read. Please do go check out bloomberg dot com, Forward.

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Slash Green everything you need to know about COP twenty

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 2>nine and COP thirty.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Zero and now for the

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>sound of the week. In the one free afternoon I

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>had in Baku, I went to visit mud volcanoes, which

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>leaves methane. But the most memorable thing was the ride

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to the volcanoes, which happened in a nineteen eighty seven

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Russian Lada four by four, a vehicle as old as

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I am and one that felt like went at rocket

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>speed on unpaved roads while I sat behind, holding on

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>for dear life. If you like this episode, please take

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a moment to rate and review the show on Apple

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts and Spotify. Share this episode with a friend or

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>with someone who still believes in a United Nations. You

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>can get in touch at zero pot at Bloomberg dot Net.

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Zero's producer is might Lee Raw, Bloomberg's head a podcast

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is Sage Bowman, and head of Talk is Brendan Nuna.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music is composed by Wondering Special thanks to

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Shawan Wagner, Sharon Chan, Jender, Louis, Alfred San, John Ainger,

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Natasha White, Will Kennedy, Rock Kadocky, and Aaron Rutko. I

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>am actual rati back so