WEBVTT - Police Say No Evidence Tara Reid Was Drugged, She Doubles Down

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks. It is Thursday, December fourth, and actress

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Tara Reid was not drugged like she said she was,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>at least according to police. The story has now taken

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a different turn with that. Welcome to this episode of

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Amy and TJ Robes. She's sticking by her story, and

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this was a bizarre story from the beginning, and the

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>very questions we raised and a lot of people raised

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are now kind of seemingly being reinforced by police.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 3>So, Tara Reid, the reason why she even spoke up,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 3>spoke out, and eventually filed a police report was because

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>these videos started circulating of her from a hotel lobby

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 3>right outside of Chicago, near O'Hara Double Tree Hotel. Correct,

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>in the Rosemont area of Illinois. She looked wasted. This

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>was a girl and actress who we know had substance

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 3>abuse problems in the past, and now you're seeing these

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>videos of her unable to even get into a wheelchair

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>to be taken back to her room. Ultimately ended up

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>being carried out in a stretcher on a stretcher.

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That became the story was the story. Do we ever

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>see headlines that Terror Reid was caught on video, this

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>or that was it? Always from the beginning, the headline

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>was that she was drugged. Did we see the videos first?

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And then she came out and explained, I can't remember

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the timing.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, they almost came out simultaneously.

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 3>When I started looking at the stories, she had already

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 3>responded saying she was drugged. Immediately she got on top

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>of it, and she says that she was at the

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>hotel bar. There were some influencers there, some social media

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>influencers and in particular a YouTube influencer who she sat

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>next to while she had one drink of white wine.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 3>She says they went out to go smoke a cigarette

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and when she came back there was a napkin.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>On top of her, which police have confirmed all of this.

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 3>This has been so fascinating to see the detective work

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>that goes on and their pretty quick ability to determine

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 3>what did or did not happen. But her her point

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 3>was they exchanged numbers, and then she said she got

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 3>sent these videos and she felt like it was an

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 3>extortion attempt. But when she saw those videos, she got

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 3>ahead of it very quickly and said, hey, I must

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 3>have been drugged.

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 2>I have no memory of this.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and folks, if you see the video, and you

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>probably have by now, without this backstory and anything we've said,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>if you just saw this and didn't know who she was,

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>you would say this person is wasted. You would say

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>this person drank too much, way, way, way too much.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't stand, was being belligerent, was yelling profanities. Literally, could

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>not sit in a chair and be wheeled. Didn't look good. Obviously,

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we all know one drink of wine, almost doesn't matter

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>who you are, is not going to put you in

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>this condition if you're an adult, could be mixed with

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>some other prescription drug. We've seen that kind of stuff.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But the reaction in her body's reaction was not from

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>one drink. So this is why many speculated she had

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to come up with something. She had to tell the

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>world something and robes she might believe she was drugged

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>because this is up now, she is doubling and tripling

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and quadrupling down on what many believes a lie.

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>That's correct.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 3>So now, even after police have officially come out and said, hey,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 3>we've reviewed the surveillance video from the hotel, it shows

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Tara Reid going to the bar. It shows her getting

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 3>up from the bar. It shows the bartender covering her

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>drink with a napkin, but it never shows anyone putting

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 3>anything in her drink.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>This is easy, This was easy. We said, this was

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the first thing out of our mouths. This will be

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>done in just a moment. There are several camera angles

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at every bar, so they're going to be able to

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>decide this. So now robes If that's the case, nothing

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was put in the drink. What is her next argument

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>for potentially when she was drugged.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, all I can tell you is what Tara Reid

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>said in her statement in reaction to what police have

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>now released.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 2>She says, bottom line, no one ends up in.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 3>The hospital incapacitated for over eight hours after a drink.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>True statement. That is a true statement.

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Then she goes on to say, last thing I remember

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>is having one drink and waking up in the hospital

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 3>the next day without remembering anything. That was the scariest

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>feeling I have ever felt.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that could.

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Only be that all has to be true, She says,

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 3>I felt so helpless. This has been a horrifying experience

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 3>for me that is severely affecting my mental health. I

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 3>cannot sleep over this. It's a very scary feeling, not

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 3>knowing what happened to me. I believe I was drugged.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Something happened to me.

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>All that can be true. Believe every single word that

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>came out of her mouth, absolutely every bit of it.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Something happened to her. Don't know what, don't know what.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Here's what we don't know. We don't know if she

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 3>is on any sort of medication that shouldn't be combined

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>with alcohol. That's possible. We don't know what she did

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 3>in the hours and moments leading up to her walking

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>into that hotel lobby and sitting down at that bar.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 3>We don't know if she drank anything earlier. Yes, if

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>she took any other type of drug earlier, that in

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:37.239
<v Speaker 3>combination with that one glass of white wine could result

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 3>or could be the result of what we saw in

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 3>that video.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But you have come out and accused someone of a

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>criminal act, so that takes us to another level. She

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't just come out and explain, I don't know what

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>happened to me. I don't know what I was on.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>This I was on She could have she had options.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>The first thing she did was point to someone and said,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>someone out there is a criminal who potentially wanted to

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>rape me. She said this, that raised it to another

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>level for police.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 3>And yes, so police now have to take her accusations

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 3>seriously and take the time and resources to investigate this.

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 3>And of course the hotel we talked about this last

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 3>week when we first did the story, would have had

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 3>every incentive to find out if anything untoward happened, and

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 3>certainly want people to know that it did not happen

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 3>in their hotel.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm sure they were.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Happy to hand over all those angles from all those

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 3>surveillance videos to those police. No, not yet, but we

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>do have the official police statement. Is this, while surveill surveillance, sorry,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 3>while video surveillance showed Tara Reid at the hotel bar

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 3>at no time did video show anyone tampering with or

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 3>adding something to her drink. We can confirm that a

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 3>bartender covered her drink when she left the bar, which

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 3>is standard practice for bartenders to do. Completely exonerates the

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>bartender and for all intents and purposes, exonerates the hotel

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 3>for being liable in any way for something happening to

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:11.239
<v Speaker 3>her drink.

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Again, they were waiting what was her answer to you,

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>remember she was very vague. No, she was saying that

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the hospital was vague and telling her what she told

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>her she'd been drug but didn't tell her what she'd

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>been correct.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>So she actually went on TMZ and gave an interview

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 3>to Harvey Levin and said that she was told by

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>hospital officials that she was drugged and when they pressed

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>her further and said, well, what did they tell you

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 3>were drugged with, she kind of started around and said

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 3>she didn't know. They even asked her did they test

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 3>your blood alcohol level, which obviously would be a very

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 3>interesting bit of information given all that we saw in

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 3>that video. She said she didn't know, and that's when

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 3>she went on and added that that.

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>It was vague, that they were being vague with her.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 3>But clearly that doesn't make a lot of sense and

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really add up in a lot of ways.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>You would you said it, and again, if you go

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>through something that frightening. I don't know where she was,

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but you made the point. Obviously, if somebody tells you

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you're drug, you want to know what's in your system.

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>So the first question you're going to ask.

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to stay there? Is it going to

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be long term harm? Am I done? Is it being flushed? Out, Am,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I will watch enough movie. I need to do my insides.

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Am I how long do I have?

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Like you would ask you, does my stomach need to

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>be pumped?

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>All kinds of stuff. Don't know. They were vague. So

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that's information we will not be privy to because that's

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>her medical information. Right, she has the right whether or

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not to tell us that. Do police have any right

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>given that this she filled out a police report? Does

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>she not?

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 2>She filled out a police report.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 3>She actually went so far as to say initially they

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 3>told her she couldn't do it over the phone, she

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 3>would have to come back to Illinois. But then they,

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I think perhaps given the public eye or the spotlight

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 3>that was on them and certainly on that hotel, they said, no, okay,

0:08:58.960 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 3>you can.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 2>You can file one over the phone. Will make an

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 2>exception for you.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 3>So, yes, she made a point to say she filed

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 3>this police report she believed something criminally was done to

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 3>her that ended up with her being in the hospital.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 2>So when we come.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Back, we will tell you what police said about those

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 3>medical records, because yes, there is still a very important, missing,

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 3>key piece of potential evidence in what actually happened to

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Tara Reid and.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back everyone.

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 3>We are talking about the new information that police have

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 3>released that Tara Reid was not drugged at least at

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 3>that hotel bar. They have surveillance video. They have gone

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 3>through it and over, I'm sure all the different angles

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>that that DoubleTree Hotel had pointed directly at their bar

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 3>and they said, nah, she had the dream. The bartender

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 3>put a napkin over the drink when she left the bar,

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 3>and then she came back and no one was seen

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 3>on any of those tapes doing anything to her drink.

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 3>So what does she do now because she is doubling

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 3>down and saying she believes she was drugged. There's no

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 3>way she went ended up in the hospital, remembers nothing

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and woke up eight hours later unless someone did something

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 3>to her drink. So we mentioned she's at the hospital.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Did the hospital do tests, Well, here's what police said.

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 3>They are waiting to get any medical records from Tara's

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 3>hospitals stay and they will confirm if tests were done

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and if they were, if anything was in her system.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>So it sounds like they do have access to that information.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It didn't seem like it was confirmed whether or not

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the right tests were done. That would give the answers

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that I guess the public wants. I guess she wants

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>them too. But what do you do with it? I mean,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you hate something happened to her. We don't know what

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it was, just the suggestion if and you don't want

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to she might not know. It's possible. I always want

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to leave open that possibility. I don't know what somebody

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>else is going through. Even frankly, if this was her

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>own doing, there's still a degree of sympathy or your

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>heart goes out to her for whatever did actually happen

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to her, And if it didn't happen to her the

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>way she said, your heart still goes out to her.

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.599
<v Speaker 1>So I just I don't know what to do with this,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just angry and mad at how could you?

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And you're wasting the resources of the police department and

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, and I get that, but this is

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just a this is one of those robes. I would

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>hate to think somebody's just capable of coming out and

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>starting this whole intentionally right and sending police on a

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>while goose chase and all this. What something happened to

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>her and maybe she doesn't know.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>I agree that there should be a level of sympathy

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 3>for her regardless, because she is clearly struggling, whether something

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 3>happened to her or she is struggling with something within her,

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Certainly our heart goes out to her. And that has

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 3>to be incredibly difficult to have a video like that

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>circulating about you, especially when you are someone who is

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 3>known to have struggled with substance abuse issues. So that

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 3>has got to be incredibly devastating. Although she did point

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the finger or suggest that this YouTube influencer, we won't

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 3>even say his name, just because police have completely exonerated

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 3>him and ruled him out and he's spoken out.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Does she specifically pointing finger. I thought she said it

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of vaguely that was YouTubers down there.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>No, but she actually the guy who she ended up

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 3>smoking that cigarette with. She claims that he then sent

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 3>her the videos that his friends took of her, the

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 3>ones that we've all seen circulated now, and she took

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 3>that as him threatening her and saying, I can make

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>these videos go away, basically if dot dot dot so

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>she was she did directly point the finger at him,

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, and he said that absolutely did not happen.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 2>I was not trying to extort money from her and.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Can be simply and quickly proven with text messages. We'll

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have no problem putting up screen grabs of the text messages.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's the issue.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>All of these allegations she's making or implying or suggesting

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 3>all can easily be proven to be true or not.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 3>And so yes, with this hospital testing, here's what she

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 3>has said. This is also vague. She says she believes

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 3>blood tests were done, and she said she is awaiting

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 3>those results. So I feel like at this point with

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>her saying that, I don't know if police would have

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 3>to get her permission to get access.

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>To those blood test results.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 3>But I also feel like, if you file a police

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 3>report and you claim you were drugged, wouldn't that open

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the door then for police to have access to them,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 3>because either they have to be able to prove it

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 3>or disprove it, or.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Do they still have to get her okay? Could she

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>say nope, I don't want you looking at my medical reports.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Could she say that, I.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Don't know the answer to that.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Once you file a police report and you claim and

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 3>you're cooperating with police, I mean, maybe the only thing

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you could do is say you can't and then police

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 3>would say, she won't give us access and she isn't

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 3>cooperating with us, so now we're going to file, you know,

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>charges against her for filing a false police report, which

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely on the table. I would imagine, given the spotlight,

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the resources, they want to make sure that people are

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 3>de incentivized to do something like this to when you've

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 3>done something wrong, instead of taking responsibility or at least

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 3>doing a little self examination before you start hurling accusations,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely want to make a point to say this is

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 3>not okay behavior.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You know this again. The story though, went from it

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>went from scary to eyebrow raising to head scratching, confusing,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and now sad. It's sad, it's sad. However this ended

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>up going down. But I give the police credit and

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is important, Maybe this is the silver lining

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>robes And I was really impressed with them, their release,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>their statements. They didn't attack her, they didn't go after her,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and they reminded us, all, hey, here's a silver lining

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for you, and I appreciate it that Rosemont right.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Yep, rosemand Police department.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Their statement was after all of this, they said, you

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>know what, it's still a good reminder to never leave

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 3>your drink unattended. So taking this as a lesson to

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 3>everyone out there, Hey, Tara thought this happened to her,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 3>turns out it didn't, at least at this bar at

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 3>this hotel where she says it did. But it could

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>happen to you and be aware, and I do think

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 3>it is. It is a reminder. We all can use

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>those reminders. But bottom line, Rosemont pet said this very

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 3>clearly and very specifically. Right now, we have no evidence

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>of a crime period.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, We'll keep our eye on them. I'm expecting

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>rogues to hear more, maybe from Tara Reid's side. The

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>other option there is they can just go quiet and

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>want this to kind of go away, or does she

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>want to get those medical reports out? See look, I

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>told you see look Rosemand police. You know they definitely

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>would like to get this resolved.

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I you know what, I'm actually just thinking if if

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 3>it's true that she just drank too much in her

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>hotel room mini bar before she came down to the bar,

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 3>or she had some other type of drug you're not

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 3>supposed to mix with alcohol on her system. I mean,

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 3>it will all come out if she pushes this. I

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>know I was drug theory, because then they have to

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 3>look at her blood test results. The question is were

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 3>they even taken?

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>But I can't. It seems impossible to me.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 3>If you're brought to the hospital in that state, they

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 3>have to make sure there's nothing life threatening going on.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 3>They would have to take blood tests, they would have

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 3>to make sure they know what they're dealing.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>With, including a blood alcohol level, so you know how

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to treat that person. Correct this high? Is it this high?

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>We just need to get fluids in this person or

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the something more serious need to happen. It's fascinating and

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just like again it turned into too sad and

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>went from scary to sad. We'll keep an eye. We're

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>expecting to hear more on this story. Maybe it's gonna

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be days, maybe it's gonna be weeks. But as always,

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate you spending some time with us, folks. From

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>my dear Amy Robot, I'm TJ. Holmes. Talk to y'all soon.