Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Freedom at Last, A
Speaker 1: federal judge in Florida has thrown out the Biden Administration's
Speaker 1: mask mandate for planes, trains, and buses, ruling that the
Speaker 1: CDC overstepped its authority. The decision comes a week after
Speaker 1: the administration announced the mask man it would be extended
Speaker 1: for an additional fifteen days, which I guess is now
Speaker 1: a point. We'll have more on this victory for sanity
Speaker 1: in tonight's Paper eighteen Divide. Administration announced that the Transportation
Speaker 1: Security Administration will no longer enforce the federal mandate requiring
Speaker 1: masks in all the US airports and on foreign aircraft,
Speaker 1: effective immediately, Master Option will Ard Aircraft welcome to hold
Speaker 1: a line on Buck Sexton. You heard it right there.
Speaker 1: It's fantastic is and it's amazing people, a lot of
Speaker 1: them on planes finding out that they don't have to
Speaker 1: wear that dumb ass mask anymore, which was mask up
Speaker 1: between bites. So they're wearing it. They're not wearing it.
Speaker 1: They're wearing it. They're not wearing it. There's no science
Speaker 1: behind this. This is just control. This is just catering
Speaker 1: to the over anxious, the nervous wrex out there. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, not a plane without masks on. It's disgusting,
Speaker 1: isn't It's disgraceful. This became so political, all these leftists.
Speaker 1: So I mask up on planes because I'm a good person.
Speaker 1: The whole thing was absurd. Doesn't even work. The one thing,
Speaker 1: if we were having a conversation about how masks really
Speaker 1: do protect you, you're not getting get COVID wear masks.
Speaker 1: Everybody I no war mask, got COVID. It didn't make
Speaker 1: any difference. We all know this. The data proves it.
Speaker 1: And finally, because of one brave judge in Florida, one
Speaker 1: District Court Judge Mizzelle, we no longer have to wear
Speaker 1: these stupid It's Katherine Kimblamizelle. Here you go. Decision from
Speaker 1: US District Judge Katherine Kimblamizelle. Because our system does not
Speaker 1: permit agencies to act unlawfully, even in pursuit of desirable ends,
Speaker 1: the court declares unlawful and vacates the mask mandate. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, she is my favorite person of the month,
Speaker 1: maybe my favorite person of the year, maybe the decade.
Speaker 1: It was so outrageous that the Howard Democrat administration of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was extending this again. You don't wear masks
Speaker 1: anywhere else in your life, really, I mean maybe in
Speaker 1: some medical centers and stuff, but I mean for most
Speaker 1: of your data to love. The only time most of
Speaker 1: America would have to do this whole mask charade was
Speaker 1: when they were on the way to the airport. In
Speaker 1: the airport itself and then getting on the plane, you
Speaker 1: get to find your old mask. Doing all this nonsense,
Speaker 1: and the bidenstration knows that they just look like ridiculous
Speaker 1: clowns in this whole thing. I mean, here's Jensaki telling
Speaker 1: everybody that public health decisions shouldn't be made by the court. Watch.
Speaker 1: As we've said, agencies are reviewing step next steps, including
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. Traditionally following court decision that can
Speaker 1: take a couple of days. We have said from the
Speaker 1: start that our quote or response should be guided by
Speaker 1: the science and data and by experts. And as there's
Speaker 1: a reminder, when we had made this announcement, the CDC
Speaker 1: said it needed fifteen days to assess the impacts of
Speaker 1: an uptick in cases on hospitalizations, deaths, and hospital capacity.
Speaker 1: We feel still feel that is entirely reasonable based on
Speaker 1: the latest science, and public health decisions shouldn't be made
Speaker 1: by the courts, they should be made by public health experts.
Speaker 1: They're actually made by the executive branch, whom the public
Speaker 1: health experts work for. About this White House, because they're
Speaker 1: a bunch of dishonest cowards, loved to pretend that somehow
Speaker 1: there was this alternate branch of government called the CDC
Speaker 1: that was able to write laws on win and everyone
Speaker 1: had to obey and there was no no They see,
Speaker 1: we also have the judiciary brand, and the executive branch
Speaker 1: can't just do whatever wants. That's why we have checks
Speaker 1: and balances in our government. So this is absolutely the
Speaker 1: right move, should have been done a long time ago,
Speaker 1: quite honestly. And notice they don't even try to defend.
Speaker 1: They talk about the science and the experts. Show me
Speaker 1: an expert who says that it is sensible policy to
Speaker 1: have masking only on planes and trains, and I will
Speaker 1: show you a moron political hack. One hundred no, no
Speaker 1: ifans or butts. It is an impossibly stupid position to
Speaker 1: take and everybody knows it. They're angry though about this
Speaker 1: judge because the judge has at some level exposed their stupidity.
Speaker 1: So they're attacking judge Mozelle the Daily Beast, a lib
Speaker 1: trash heap, Trump's worst judge just made travel a maga nightmare.
Speaker 1: What does it do with maga? No rational person wants
Speaker 1: to wear masks on a plane. Has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with maga. But of course they make this about Trump,
Speaker 1: so Trump thing. Put Trump in a headline, and people
Speaker 1: who can't think for themselves, the Daily Beast will read
Speaker 1: it say, oh okay, rolling Stone, Trump appoided judge deemed
Speaker 1: not qualified by Bar Association. A bunch of lives there too,
Speaker 1: voids masked mandate vanity fair. This Trump judge was deemed
Speaker 1: not qualified. Then she asked, acted the mass mandate? Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: it's amazing, isn't it. It's amazing. They love the judges
Speaker 1: who give them what they want, and then they want
Speaker 1: to ignore, an undermine, and destroy the judges who don't
Speaker 1: hand them whatever authoritarian victory they demand. Outrageous, isn't it.
Speaker 1: Here is former White House Senior advisor for COVID response,
Speaker 1: Andy Slavitt. This guy's been wrong about pretty much everything,
Speaker 1: who's apparently also a legal analyst and a crappy one.
Speaker 1: Watch Andy. We saw the judge say that they believed
Speaker 1: that the CDC had exceeded its authority with this ruling.
Speaker 1: What do you make of all of this? Well, that's
Speaker 1: pretty shaky legal ruling from a young and I think
Speaker 1: I would say probably idealistic a former Clarence Thomas clerk.
Speaker 1: But be that it's may be that as it may.
Speaker 1: We're seeing today, if people have to react to I'm
Speaker 1: going to get on a plane in about an hour. Thankfully,
Speaker 1: I'm vaccinated and boosted and have a good quality mask,
Speaker 1: so I should feel Sh'll feel reasonably good. I'll have
Speaker 1: a good have a good quality mask. Yeah, that's really important.
Speaker 1: That's really gonna keep you safe there, buddy, when you
Speaker 1: pull the masks down to drink and eat, and the
Speaker 1: whole thing is so stupid, isn't it. They're really ridiculous.
Speaker 1: I mean, these people and they have power, they have influence,
Speaker 1: and they're idiot. I mean I mean that Governor Ron
Speaker 1: de Santis, who is powerful and has influence and it
Speaker 1: is quite smart, tweeted this out. Great to see a
Speaker 1: federal judge in Florida follow the law and reject the
Speaker 1: Biden transportation mask mandate both. There are a lot of
Speaker 1: employees and passengers deserve to have this misery and absolutely true.
Speaker 1: What was the basis for this? We have to be killed.
Speaker 1: This was all just psychological. This is all anxiety rooted
Speaker 1: and control. This was even if you live in a
Speaker 1: red state, the way that they got you to comply
Speaker 1: with Fauci is and where SPOUCHI, by the way, haven't
Speaker 1: seen him in a little while. This was just last week.
Speaker 1: Airline CEOs were disagreeing with Biden on the mask mandate
Speaker 1: and they know more about this, you'd think than Biden does.
Speaker 1: Right watch We think from the pandemic stage to the
Speaker 1: endemic stage, and we need to learn how to live
Speaker 1: with it without being so restricted. Are you comfortable with
Speaker 1: your passengers dropping masks now? I think our customers are
Speaker 1: comfortable dropping masks. I think our employees are tired of
Speaker 1: wearing masks. Are employees, especially on those onboard those flights,
Speaker 1: are tired of policing masks? You don't say, well, I'm
Speaker 1: more on the lifting of the federal mask mandate with
Speaker 1: New York Post columnist Carol Markowitz. In a moment, let's
Speaker 1: talk about protecting your online date. A lot of companies
Speaker 1: promise you that your privacy is guaranteed, but that's just
Speaker 1: not true. You need a new privacy and cybersecurity application
Speaker 1: tool called Secure. It's spelled sek you are. Security is
Speaker 1: using for prietary encryption and offering secure instant messaging and email.
Speaker 1: But Secure all your communications based on servers and data
Speaker 1: centers hosted in Switzerland without using any of the big
Speaker 1: tech platforms. Privacy is a big issue. Without real security,
Speaker 1: people can read your emails, messages, even your bank information.
Speaker 1: Secure will never mind your data and never ask for
Speaker 1: your phone number. You can send emails to your doctor, banker, lawyer,
Speaker 1: anybody with total confidence you're not being spied on. Secure
Speaker 1: is your solution to stop the constant theft of your
Speaker 1: digital identity. Cost only five dollars or the messenger only
Speaker 1: ten dollars for the messenger an email combination packet. Go
Speaker 1: to secure dot com and take back your privacy today.
Speaker 1: That's sekuar dot com and use promo code buck or
Speaker 1: twenty five percent off. We'll be right back with more.
Speaker 1: Hold the line. There's a battle going on right now
Speaker 1: but maybe the most important fight our country has had
Speaker 1: since the Revolutionary War. Once again, it's about our freedom.
Speaker 1: People like you and me are being canceled, our speech
Speaker 1: increasingly censored by big tech and corporate media. Can't let
Speaker 1: that happen. Kind to fight back. Please stand with us
Speaker 1: and support the first team. He be a part of
Speaker 1: our team, dedicated to preserving the very essence of who
Speaker 1: we are free Americans. Commuters around the nation are breathing
Speaker 1: freely a day after the administration's mass mandate was thrown
Speaker 1: out by a federal court in Florida. Of course, not
Speaker 1: everybody's thrilled by the decision, and the White House is
Speaker 1: failure to fight back. Over at MSNBC anchor Chuck Todd
Speaker 1: complained that the Biden administration looks weak because of the ruling.
Speaker 1: Watch folks, It's one thing for a Trump judge to
Speaker 1: strike down an order from the Biden White House, but
Speaker 1: it's an entirely different thing for the White House to
Speaker 1: let it happen without any legal pushback. And it's not
Speaker 1: the first time recently that's something. He hasn't gone the
Speaker 1: White House's way. They don't fight back, they don't defend
Speaker 1: their rationale, they just give you the emoji shrug. We
Speaker 1: saw it when the Supreme Courts struck down their vaccine
Speaker 1: mandate for large employers. We saw it when West Virginia's
Speaker 1: Joe Matson essentially scrapped the president's entire domestic agenda in Congress.
Speaker 1: We may even be seeing it with the ongoing intraparty
Speaker 1: fight untitled forty two. The Biden administration, with the full
Speaker 1: power and prestige of the presidency, with his hardy's power
Speaker 1: in Congress on the line this November has repeatedly looked
Speaker 1: as if they're easy to roll? Do I mean? Now?
Speaker 1: I discussed New York Pro's columnist Carol Markowitz. Carol, I
Speaker 1: think that Chuck Todd maybe hasn't gotten the memo that
Speaker 1: they're not fighting over this because they'll look stupid because
Speaker 1: the policy is indefensible. Actually, that's the problems, And isn't
Speaker 1: Chuck Todd part of the news arm at MSNBC. Is
Speaker 1: that really the goal here to be giving the White
Speaker 1: House advice from his news seat. I find that all
Speaker 1: really kind of questionable. Yeah, of course the White House
Speaker 1: will looks silly if they pushed back on this. This
Speaker 1: was a national amazing event that happened yesterday. People were
Speaker 1: happy all over the country. Only some kooks on Twitter
Speaker 1: didn't like it. It is extremely popular. I think, you know,
Speaker 1: giving this advice to the Biden administration is not only
Speaker 1: like just you know, inappropriate, but also just wrong. I mean,
Speaker 1: the decision obviously makes me really really happy, and a
Speaker 1: lot of other people, I do think, though. It was
Speaker 1: amazing to see how many I mean self proclaimed and
Speaker 1: they have blue checks, so I guess they're verified at
Speaker 1: some level. Medical doctors who are just hysterical over this.
Speaker 1: I mean, these are people who we can assume are
Speaker 1: going to restaurants, are going to crowded bars, are sitting
Speaker 1: in different office settings with lots of people indoors. Oh,
Speaker 1: but on planes where they actually filter the air below
Speaker 1: the level of microns that a virus actually exists, and
Speaker 1: that's where the mds get all upset. I mean, did
Speaker 1: you see some of the stuff. There were doctors having
Speaker 1: meltdowns over this, Yeah, I did. It's really terrifying actually,
Speaker 1: how many medical professionals don't understand any of the science
Speaker 1: around this at all. You know, my mom kind of
Speaker 1: quirkies and little older. She flew to Florida recently and
Speaker 1: I said to her, which was flying back today, I said, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, you don't have to wear a mask on
Speaker 1: the plane. She's like, I barely wore a mask on
Speaker 1: the way here. I was eating the whole time. And
Speaker 1: she gets that. You know, if you're eating the whole time,
Speaker 1: what's the point of the mask at all. But these
Speaker 1: medical professionals, they got a little taste of fame in
Speaker 1: this crazy upside down world of COVID, and they don't
Speaker 1: want to let it go. And it's really pathetic that
Speaker 1: they're holding onto it and they know it makes no sense.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows it makes no sense. I just want to
Speaker 1: find one person who will make the case that they
Speaker 1: think that this somehow is meaningful in the stopping of COVID.
Speaker 1: After we've had I mean wave after wave, hundreds of
Speaker 1: millions of people have gotten COVID in this country, you
Speaker 1: have the whole rest of society is open. Maybe a
Speaker 1: person spends a lot of people don't even fly, right,
Speaker 1: But maybe a person spends one percent of their month
Speaker 1: actually in an airplane. If they fly, let's say once
Speaker 1: a month somewhere, that's the one place where you're going
Speaker 1: to be protected from COVID. It is so stupid as
Speaker 1: to defy belief. And yet there are people who were
Speaker 1: truly upset about this. Yeah, it's the same concept as
Speaker 1: wearing the mask from the door of the restaurant to
Speaker 1: your seat and then taking it off. It does not
Speaker 1: make sense if you're going to remove it to eat
Speaker 1: and drink, which again happens on flights, and you know
Speaker 1: the fact that you're an inch away from the other passenger.
Speaker 1: The airplanes, you know, the airlines weren't saying like, oh,
Speaker 1: we'll leave space of several roles between guests so that
Speaker 1: they can be safe on the plane. No, of course not.
Speaker 1: We're all sitting crammed into a cerdine box. And these masks,
Speaker 1: these old navy masks that we bought two years ago,
Speaker 1: are really going to protect us. It's a joke. You
Speaker 1: think this might actually be helpful to the White House
Speaker 1: in some way because now the Biden administration can say, hey,
Speaker 1: you know, we didn't even drop the mandate. It was
Speaker 1: a judge universal injunction. What can you do? I mean,
Speaker 1: are the politics of this, maybe in some weird way,
Speaker 1: favorable for them. It's funny because I thought you meant
Speaker 1: that is it going to be favorable for them, like
Speaker 1: with the COVID sane people, And I was like, no,
Speaker 1: it's way too late for that. You were talking about
Speaker 1: the car seeing people. Are they going to be mad
Speaker 1: that the Biden administration didn't fight back. I mean, Chuck
Speaker 1: Todd clearly is mad. I'm sure some people will be,
Speaker 1: but other people really do understand, even as paranoid as
Speaker 1: they might be, that it's time to move on. And
Speaker 1: I have no sympathy for these people, you know, the
Speaker 1: people who are like I had a flight planned, Well,
Speaker 1: now you're going to rent a car and drive wherever
Speaker 1: you were driving, just like you told people with two
Speaker 1: year roulds who had to mask on these flights to
Speaker 1: do for the last two years. So I have really
Speaker 1: no grace for these people at all anymore. And they
Speaker 1: need to get over it. They need to get over
Speaker 1: it fast. I'm also curious about this. There's this group,
Speaker 1: this very noisy group that you see online and people
Speaker 1: speaking on behalf of the group of the immuno compromised,
Speaker 1: specifically in the context of airplanes, as if we're supposed
Speaker 1: to mask up forever because of the immuno compromised and
Speaker 1: I just want to say, if they're so immunocompromise that
Speaker 1: a plane and the possibility of COVID is a danger
Speaker 1: to them, are we to assume that they don't actually
Speaker 1: go out in public anywhere? Ever? Because respiratory virus is
Speaker 1: spread more in the home than anywhere else, but also
Speaker 1: in all kinds of closed closed door venues, places like
Speaker 1: offices and everything else. So why are playing singled out?
Speaker 1: I mean, I think I feel like there's just this
Speaker 1: desperation for a moral high ground from some people, right,
Speaker 1: which is why for me, it's very important to convey
Speaker 1: to people that the masks did not work, so that
Speaker 1: this argument is just null and void. Okay, I care
Speaker 1: about them, you know, compromise people. These masks do zero
Speaker 1: to protect them, and as long as we are caring
Speaker 1: about these people, we need to admit that as a fact.
Speaker 1: I think, you know, I don't. I don't know the
Speaker 1: argument over ninety five masks, but nobody's wearing those. They're
Speaker 1: all wearing little batman masks that they got from some
Speaker 1: random outlet that ordered them from China. And they're barely
Speaker 1: I mean, they're barely like any kind of cloth. It's
Speaker 1: really and even an N ninety five mask is useless
Speaker 1: if you're going to not wear it for thirty or
Speaker 1: forty minutes at a time. Right, So so even that
Speaker 1: argument doesn't even hold. It's crazy, right exactly. So it's
Speaker 1: not about how good your mask is. Most masks do
Speaker 1: absolutely zero, and we need to keep saying that so
Speaker 1: that people who are you know, compromised, don't count on
Speaker 1: other people masking to help them because it doesn't help.
Speaker 1: But I just I wonder, I've never heard so much
Speaker 1: about the immunocompromise before. And I don't know if we're
Speaker 1: talking about people that are elder I mean, I really
Speaker 1: mean this. I don't know what is considered in this
Speaker 1: definition of immunocompromise such that masking them too your point,
Speaker 1: doesn't do anything anyway, But there seems to be this
Speaker 1: belief that they're at you know, they're at unreasonable risk
Speaker 1: from being around people who aren't masked. Which I've never
Speaker 1: heard this any in any other venue, No nowhere else
Speaker 1: have I heard, Oh my gosh, we all have to
Speaker 1: mask up because of the immuno compromised, you know, we can,
Speaker 1: we all have to sit it. So it feels to
Speaker 1: me it feels like this is just people grasping. But
Speaker 1: I want to dig into that one some more. Speaking
Speaker 1: of grasping for some nation, Mayor Eric Adams, your former
Speaker 1: mayor Harold no longer your problem, you Floridian and your
Speaker 1: free state. Here he is telling us, Oh, he's going
Speaker 1: to keep enforcing mask mandates in New York City subways. Watch.
Speaker 1: We are going to continue to encourage New york Is
Speaker 1: to wear a mask on the subway, and we believe
Speaker 1: that we have the optimization to do So what, First
Speaker 1: of all, why is he wearing a mask outside? He
Speaker 1: looks like an idiot? What is going on here? When
Speaker 1: did you last see him in a mask? Which is
Speaker 1: like the biggest joke about this. Do you see him
Speaker 1: all the time at nightclubs partying with celebrities. He's never masked.
Speaker 1: He's never masked. None of these politicians are masked except
Speaker 1: when they're making announcements to tell us that we're going
Speaker 1: to have to stay masked. You know, somebody made a
Speaker 1: joke on Twitter that you're gonna mask to like so
Speaker 1: you don't see the bullets and everything. That there's bigger
Speaker 1: problems on the subway than whether or not you're masked,
Speaker 1: but of course you can't deal with those problems, so
Speaker 1: you deal with this just minor and tyranny. It's really pathetic. Oh, Carol.
Speaker 1: There's the nice, warm feeling that you and I and
Speaker 1: some others can have of being right about this for
Speaker 1: about two years. So yeah, yeah, it's congratulations on that one,
Speaker 1: but the fight continues. Good to see you, Carol, Thanks,
Speaker 1: see you, Bud, Thank you. If you spend any time
Speaker 1: on Twitter, you've probably heard of libs of TikTok. The
Speaker 1: anonymous account has become one of the most popular among conservatives.
Speaker 1: All it does is repost the bizarre and sometimes really
Speaker 1: twisted videos the far leftists upload to the social media
Speaker 1: platform and howners TikTok well today and right. If the
Speaker 1: Washington Post issided, it docks the woman behind the anonymous account,
Speaker 1: revealing her name and even her home address. Coming up
Speaker 1: Washington Enter for the Spectator, Amber eighty stops by to
Speaker 1: give us the details in the latest case of media retribution.
Speaker 1: For a moment, I want to talk to you about
Speaker 1: our newest sponsor. Here on hold the line, the Silencer Shot.
Speaker 1: I'm a big second of Aiment supporters, you know, love
Speaker 1: going out shooting For a lot of gun owners, using
Speaker 1: a suppressor is a must. You're hearing helps your accuracy
Speaker 1: by reducing requoi. Suppressors are one hundred percent legal and
Speaker 1: forty three states states. So if you want to practice safe,
Speaker 1: accurate shooting, the best way to get your suppressor is
Speaker 1: through the Silencershop. They've got a variety of suppressors. They
Speaker 1: started just three hundred and sixty five dollars. They're the
Speaker 1: industry leader for suppressors. They're Texas based company and each
Speaker 1: phone call, email, direct message, or common is answered promptly.
Speaker 1: They treat you like family, great customer service. Get more
Speaker 1: details online at Silencershop dot com or on Instagram at
Speaker 1: Instagram dot com, slash Silencershop shop now, or at the
Speaker 1: Silencershop dot com. You go check it out and see
Speaker 1: for yourself what you want their silencershop dot com for
Speaker 1: all your suppressor needs. We'll be right back with more.
Speaker 1: Hold the line. Unterrified, listen to me. Republicans, listen, you
Speaker 1: are the people in history they want. That's about oncept
Speaker 1: of straightness was basically created make women prisoners to men, because,
Speaker 1: as we see on this app over and over, men
Speaker 1: don't actually like women. Pronouns that I use. Are they
Speaker 1: then she her and clown clunsole. I prefer a mixture
Speaker 1: of those there. Really, it's amazing, amazing content from masks
Speaker 1: shaming to bad teachers. Libs of TikTok has managed to
Speaker 1: reveal leftist lunacy by doing a little more than sharing
Speaker 1: videos of progressives who are insane for the world to see.
Speaker 1: Thanks to Washington Post columnist Taylor Lorenz, the mystery woman
Speaker 1: behind the popular Twitter account has been exposed. Lorenz has
Speaker 1: yet again sparked a furious uproar on the Internet for
Speaker 1: doxing the anonymous creator of Libs of TikTok in her
Speaker 1: latest piece writing Meet the woman behind Libs of TikTok's
Speaker 1: secretly fueling the Right's outrage machine. A popular Twitter account
Speaker 1: has morphed into a social media phenomenon, spreading anti LGBTQ
Speaker 1: plus sentiment and shaping public discourse, and has been working
Speaker 1: as a real estate salesperson Brooklyn, where she created the
Speaker 1: account where she minimized COVID cast down election results and
Speaker 1: promoted a DUBI a story about a child sex trafficking ring.
Speaker 1: Lorenz is being slammed as hypocritical for her hit Pie
Speaker 1: since it was just a few weeks ago where she
Speaker 1: was hysterically crying on MSNBC while recounting harassment she experienced
Speaker 1: because of online behavior and her details being out there. Watched, Hey,
Speaker 1: nice job on that story, you soulless epping. Then also
Speaker 1: you'll see there's these there's many people that are tweeting,
Speaker 1: you know, here's these are Taylor Lorenz's loved ones. I've
Speaker 1: had to remove every single social tie. I had severe
Speaker 1: PTSD from this. I contemplated suicide. It got really bad.
Speaker 1: You feel like any little piece of information that gets
Speaker 1: out on you will be used by the worst people
Speaker 1: on the internet to destroy your life. And it's so
Speaker 1: isolating and terrifying. It's horrifying. I'm so sorry. It's really hard.
Speaker 1: I mean, she's one of the worst people on the internet.
Speaker 1: Just try to destroy somebody this week doesn't care. And
Speaker 1: she works the Washington Post, so she has a lot
Speaker 1: of resources behind her. Let's talk about this. Washington editor
Speaker 1: of The Spectator and senior fellow at the Steamboat Institute,
Speaker 1: Amber eighties with us. Now, Amber, good to have you back.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me, Buck, and there's so much here
Speaker 1: for first, can we just start with Libs of TikTok.
Speaker 1: Why why does Libs of TikTok upset the libs so
Speaker 1: very much? I think this is the story that should
Speaker 1: have been written instead of exposing her identity, Why not
Speaker 1: explore why this account has gotten so popular And the
Speaker 1: reason why is that it does nothing other than reposts
Speaker 1: the liberal content from TikTok. It's really quite incredible that
Speaker 1: it has grown so organically just by sharing what it
Speaker 1: are already publicly available videos for a larger audience. And
Speaker 1: it's because the less doesn't want this stuff exposed. That
Speaker 1: they have such a problem with the libs of TikTok
Speaker 1: account operating because they want these teachers to post this
Speaker 1: insane content about indoctrinating children with critical race theory or
Speaker 1: coming out to their kindergarteners. That they had to shut
Speaker 1: it down because this is all stuff that they want
Speaker 1: to continue to do in secret and in private and
Speaker 1: away from parents crying eyes. And then there's, of course,
Speaker 1: the Taylor Lawrens component of this story. Here she is,
Speaker 1: This is from the Libs of TikTok account, a photo
Speaker 1: of her. This is a Washington Post journalist showing up
Speaker 1: to knock. Of course, she's massed up outside alone, of course,
Speaker 1: knock on the door of the relatives of the anonymous
Speaker 1: creator of the libs of TikTok account and the captain
Speaker 1: here was Hi, Taylor Lorenz, Which of my relatives did
Speaker 1: you enjoy harassing the most at their homes today? I mean,
Speaker 1: it seems to me there are some people that in
Speaker 1: the journalism world we're saying, well, this is what is
Speaker 1: knocking on doors. You're going to talk to people, But
Speaker 1: is it? Though? There's so many objectional things about the
Speaker 1: way that journalistic ethics were followed, or rather not followed
Speaker 1: in regards to this storybook, and showing up at the
Speaker 1: relative home of a private individual is just one of them.
Speaker 1: There was no reason why Taylor needed to even report
Speaker 1: this individual's name when she was going through this story.
Speaker 1: If she wanted to talk about her past political statements,
Speaker 1: she could have done that without linking to her employer's
Speaker 1: website and potentially her home address. That all could have
Speaker 1: retained her anonymity. The reason they named her is because
Speaker 1: they wanted to try to silence her and shame her
Speaker 1: into submission. And then there's the fact that this only
Speaker 1: got exposed before the article went out because Prisina to
Speaker 1: push all The press secretary for Roda Santis shared this
Speaker 1: email where Taylor Lorenz gave her less than an hour
Speaker 1: to comment about her so called relationship with the lives
Speaker 1: of TikTok account, which she has basically publicly retweeted and
Speaker 1: commented on some of the videos, and then she also
Speaker 1: was reaching out to random people on instagrams who happened
Speaker 1: to have the same name as the lives of TikTok
Speaker 1: account owner and was essentially trying to blackmail them into responding,
Speaker 1: saying We're going to link you to an anti gay
Speaker 1: hate account if you don't respond for our reflect for comments. So, really,
Speaker 1: from top to bottom, this is clearly not a piece
Speaker 1: of journalism. This is a piece of activism. This is
Speaker 1: the type of so called journalism that people at Media
Speaker 1: Matters do to try to cancel conservatives. Timla Lorenz, in
Speaker 1: a stroke of real irony, here is somebody who speaks
Speaker 1: out against online harassment of journalists, of course, not of
Speaker 1: people who are just living their lives. That journalists who
Speaker 1: have much bigger platforms and much bigger reach and resources
Speaker 1: behind them and are supposed to have ethics ruin their lives. No,
Speaker 1: A're not that. Here's Taylor Lawrence explaining the problem online harassment.
Speaker 1: Such a it's such a it's such a misnomer. I
Speaker 1: think it's a huge problem because, you know, harassment is
Speaker 1: a it's a tool to silence people, especially women and
Speaker 1: people of color, are people from marginalized identities for speaking out,
Speaker 1: and there's a very intentional like goal behind it. Harassment
Speaker 1: is a tool to kind of discredit and silence journalists,
Speaker 1: and the right wing media plays along with him. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: So she's an expert in harassment, but in the wrong way.
Speaker 1: It's got the funny. An expert in starting the online
Speaker 1: harassment of other people and doesn't like it what it
Speaker 1: happens to her exactly. Taylor Lawrence has made a career
Speaker 1: out of harassing people, whether it's Steph Corey, the pharma
Speaker 1: CEO of A Way, or the daughters of Samuela Geller,
Speaker 1: who were simply running an Instagram account that had nothing
Speaker 1: to do with politics, or Mark Andresen, who she tried
Speaker 1: to accuse of using a blur in a clubhealth room
Speaker 1: that turned out to be totally fabricated and now lives
Speaker 1: of TikTok story. This is how she does journalism. She
Speaker 1: just docses in her ass with people and tries to
Speaker 1: get them out of the public sphere, but doesn't like
Speaker 1: it so much when it's turned around on her. But
Speaker 1: to me, I don't even think these emotions are real.
Speaker 1: I think these are manipulation tactics because she wants to
Speaker 1: try to gil trip people into not criticizing her reporting,
Speaker 1: and really it's just the hypocrisy is sort of the
Speaker 1: point here. She wants to be protected and insulated from
Speaker 1: the consequences of a horrible behavior. Just to give everybody
Speaker 1: a sense of what lives of TikTok the account actually does.
Speaker 1: This is from today a teacher at West Hollow Middle
Speaker 1: School in New York, on a rant about masks. Watch
Speaker 1: this if my school district goes masks optional, since people
Speaker 1: seem to be doing that. Now, I am putting every
Speaker 1: mask I own on my face. If you do not
Speaker 1: have a mask on, do not come near me. I
Speaker 1: hate and nobody better are trying to mask shame me.
Speaker 1: They're walking by and I have my masks on. Do
Speaker 1: not say a damn word to me, because I will
Speaker 1: throw a child at you. I will pick up the
Speaker 1: first child that passes and I will throw them at
Speaker 1: you and you can scream bro all out because you
Speaker 1: want to them. Yeah, there's that. Yeah, it's also ironic,
Speaker 1: isn't it. Bucks The Less used to deride camp the
Speaker 1: people who criticize cancer culture by saying, well, you know
Speaker 1: their consequences to your actions, and if you're posting things publicly,
Speaker 1: then you have to expect people to have backlash for
Speaker 1: what you're saying. But then as soon as this Lesa's
Speaker 1: tutac account is reposting public videos on TikTok from people
Speaker 1: who are in positions of power, whether it's in teaching
Speaker 1: positions or the boards of corporations or what have you,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, it's a problem for us to
Speaker 1: think that these people shouldn't be teaching our kids. Amber
Speaker 1: always going to see you, Thanks so much, all right,
Speaker 1: thank you Bucks. Remember last year when Democrats, including the President,
Speaker 1: accused mounted border patrol agents of whipping Haitian migrants. Well,
Speaker 1: it turns out it was all crap. It was a lie.
Speaker 1: So why hasn't the White House apologized? We'll ask author
Speaker 1: and columist David Marcus. We come back run now, let's
Speaker 1: talk about protecting your most viable asset your home. Look,
Speaker 1: if someone told you that your home could be stolen online,
Speaker 1: you'd say, that's crazy. It's a house. Well, it's your
Speaker 1: home's title, which is actually the legal ownership document to
Speaker 1: your home. And here's what the bad guys do. They
Speaker 1: forge your signature on a quick claim deed. Then they
Speaker 1: are technically treated as the owner of your home and
Speaker 1: can take out loans. Right, it's a fraud, but it's
Speaker 1: an easy fraud to pull off, and you're not covered
Speaker 1: by homeowner's insurance or common identy theft programs. Look, that's
Speaker 1: why you need home title Lock. Home title Lock can
Speaker 1: protect you from this, can shut down this process of
Speaker 1: home title theft before whatever gets going. Reggish your home
Speaker 1: address today. See if you're a victim and don't even
Speaker 1: know it yet, just go to home titlelock dot com.
Speaker 1: That's home titlelock dot com. Back, David Marcus is going
Speaker 1: to drop some knowledge bombs. Stay with us. What we
Speaker 1: takes us back hundreds of years, what we w for
Speaker 1: worse today? What we when did slaver Cowboy with their
Speaker 1: reigns again whipping black people patience into the water where
Speaker 1: they're scrambling and falling down and all they're trying to
Speaker 1: do is escape through violence in their country. That was
Speaker 1: the United States Representative Maxine Waters back in September of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, explaining the quote whipping of Haitian migrants
Speaker 1: at the southern border was worse, she says, her word,
Speaker 1: than what happened happened under slavery. Hers was just one
Speaker 1: of countless hysterical reactions to an incident that we now
Speaker 1: know was fake news, didn't actually happen. Here we are
Speaker 1: a year and a half later, and not a single
Speaker 1: person has appolize to the border patrol agents they slandered
Speaker 1: back then. Not the President of the United States, not
Speaker 1: the Vice president, not the DHS secretary, nobody. It's almost
Speaker 1: as if they never really cared about whether or not
Speaker 1: it was true. They were just happy to score a
Speaker 1: few cheap political points, no matter whom they smeared. Joined
Speaker 1: me now, somebody who's been calling for apology since October
Speaker 1: of last year. Columnists and author of Charade, The Covid
Speaker 1: Lies That Crushed a Nation, David Marcus. Mister Marcus, good
Speaker 1: to see you, sir, and congrats on the book. Thanks Buck.
Speaker 1: So this is pretty straightforward. There were members of border
Speaker 1: patrol who were on horseback. There was a big encampment
Speaker 1: of mostly Haitian immigrants who wanted to illegally cross into
Speaker 1: the United States, not through legal immigration channels. The horseback
Speaker 1: border patrol members were reported on by some media outlets
Speaker 1: as whipping migrants. It did not occur. It was obvious
Speaker 1: it didn't occur, but the entire biden of illustration from
Speaker 1: a top down seemed to throw themselves behind the story.
Speaker 1: Why it was a perfect storm of progressive malfeasance in journalism. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, they saw these images. If I recall, I
Speaker 1: think it was Vice that that was the first to
Speaker 1: really run with them and tweet them out. And I mean,
Speaker 1: you know Vice had its heydays like softcore pornography to
Speaker 1: read on the L train in two thousand. Um, but
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, they ran with it. The next thing,
Speaker 1: you know, there are people over Twitter are talking about it.
Speaker 1: Then you know, as you say, the politicians are, it
Speaker 1: goes all the way to the White House. Honestly, Buck,
Speaker 1: five minutes after I saw that thing, the day that
Speaker 1: it came out, I said that, I said, no way,
Speaker 1: I said, this is crazy. But but it confirmed so
Speaker 1: many priors for progressive journalists that they just they just
Speaker 1: couldn't ignore it. And I think also they're so ignorant
Speaker 1: about what actually happens on the border that they were
Speaker 1: able to believe this. They're so ignorant about, you know,
Speaker 1: jobs where people ride horses. I mean, it was just,
Speaker 1: it really was this perfect storm of all of their
Speaker 1: priors and all of their ignorance smashing into one incredibly
Speaker 1: stupid display of incompetence. Porter Peter Deucy of Fox News
Speaker 1: asked Jensaki when President Biden would be if he would
Speaker 1: be apologizing to the border agents that he falsely accused
Speaker 1: of crimes. And Biden back in the day, just everybody
Speaker 1: can remember, said that there were going to be consequences.
Speaker 1: I mean he spoke not as if there needed to
Speaker 1: just be an investigation. David, I'm sure you remember he said,
Speaker 1: you know, they'll be held accountable. They're going to get
Speaker 1: punished for what they did. And in typical Jensaki fashion,
Speaker 1: here is how she responded to the question about whether
Speaker 1: Biden would apologize for being wrong and lying. Watch the
Speaker 1: mounted border patrol officers president accused of whipping migrants have
Speaker 1: been notified they will not face criminal charges, So when
Speaker 1: is the president and going to apologize to them. There's
Speaker 1: a process and an investigation that's gone through the Department
Speaker 1: of Homeland Security. I don't have any update on that.
Speaker 1: The President said that they were whipping people, which would
Speaker 1: be a criminal offense, and they've been told they're not
Speaker 1: going to be criminally and there was an investigation into that,
Speaker 1: and I'll let the Department of Homeland Security announce any
Speaker 1: conclusion of that investigation. You accuse these officers of brutal
Speaker 1: and inappropriate measures, now that they've been told they will
Speaker 1: not be criminally charged, will you apologize? And Peter, there
Speaker 1: was an investigation into their behavior, so that investigation is
Speaker 1: playing out. Whenever it's going to be announced, the Department
Speaker 1: of Homeland Security will announce it. So I just so
Speaker 1: I understand the progressive playbook here. David slander people before
Speaker 1: the investigation, and then when the investigation shows what really
Speaker 1: was obvious all along, that they didn't actually do anything
Speaker 1: wrong and that the people that said they did lied,
Speaker 1: and then just say, well, there's an investigation, look at
Speaker 1: those findings. Yeah. I mean, it's unreal. It's also political
Speaker 1: incompetence because you want to you want to give Joe
Speaker 1: Biden a five to ten point bounce in the approval
Speaker 1: polls next week, I mean next week, right, send Joe
Speaker 1: Biden to the border, actually to the border. Have him
Speaker 1: apologize in person to these guys. He's good at this
Speaker 1: kind of thing, right, he would be, Hey, man, I
Speaker 1: you know, I saw it. I really overreacted. He'd do
Speaker 1: this well. And then he announces we're not going to
Speaker 1: lift Title forty two because we don't have anything in
Speaker 1: place right now to fix it. If he were just
Speaker 1: to do those things over the next two days, his
Speaker 1: approval rating would raise next week. But they won't do it.
Speaker 1: They can't do it. It's it's absolutely baffling. I mean,
Speaker 1: never has there been a White House in as desperate
Speaker 1: need of a pivot as this White House has been
Speaker 1: for months and months now, and they just won't do it.
Speaker 1: Maybe you were one of the first people calling for
Speaker 1: an apology from the Biden administration for their lives about
Speaker 1: what was going on at the border. In an article
Speaker 1: for Fox News back in October twenty twenty one, you wrote,
Speaker 1: however he chooses to do it, Biden must address the situation.
Speaker 1: Two weeks ago, he promised these border agents had done
Speaker 1: something horrific and would be punished. That isn't true, and
Speaker 1: it isn't true, then the president must lean into the
Speaker 1: truth just as hard as he leaned into a lie.
Speaker 1: I think, David unfortunate. What we see with this administration
Speaker 1: is that they don't as long as it matters helps them.
Speaker 1: I should say in the moment, the truth doesn't matter. No,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter at all. You know, I was down
Speaker 1: in Del Rio just a couple of days after the incident,
Speaker 1: right after the situation had been sort of cleared out,
Speaker 1: and I was talking to not just the residents down there,
Speaker 1: but a lot of the border agents down there. And
Speaker 1: you know, the Democrats present this idea that like these
Speaker 1: border agents are like you know, Nathan Bedford Forest, like
Speaker 1: like racist white guys, you know, trying to like hurt migrants.
Speaker 1: Most of the border agents are Hispanic, but you know
Speaker 1: most of them are are have family who are who
Speaker 1: are immigrants. It's all a lie. It's it's along the
Speaker 1: same lines as the lies we hear about our police departments.
Speaker 1: And yeah, it's deeply disappointing. And Biden could fix it,
Speaker 1: but like I said, he won't. He's just he's just
Speaker 1: he's either checked out or he's not interested. David, switching
Speaker 1: gears for a moment. You've been on the show now
Speaker 1: for two years opposing mandatory masking. I want to get
Speaker 1: your take on the news that the plane mask mandate,
Speaker 1: the travel mask mandate, whatever you want to call it,
Speaker 1: struck down a federal court. What do you think I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm glad. I think clearly this should have happened long ago.
Speaker 1: I'm glad I think that it happened as a result
Speaker 1: of this court order, as opposed to the administration having
Speaker 1: just let it run out. Because now we do have
Speaker 1: some precedent. It looks like the administration is not going
Speaker 1: to fight it. We do have some precedent saying no,
Speaker 1: the CDC can't just, you know, be emperor of the
Speaker 1: United States every time somebody catches a cold. So I
Speaker 1: thought that was good news. Clearly. Clearly, I think most
Speaker 1: Americans are happy about this. Are going to have some
Speaker 1: sad sex you know who, whine about it, but I
Speaker 1: think most of the reaction that I've seen has been
Speaker 1: pretty positive. So you know, it's it's another step forward. David,
Speaker 1: good to see you, Thanks for being here. Thanks Buck
Speaker 1: Billionaire Elon Musk, which is man on the planet, has
Speaker 1: a surprising new ally in his quest to acquire Twitter.
Speaker 1: We'll have that story for you and quickts coming up
Speaker 1: Stay with us. Florida Governor Rhonda Santists announces he has
Speaker 1: Elon Musk's back when it comes to his fight against
Speaker 1: Twitter and Joe Biden continues to blame everybody but himself
Speaker 1: everything else out there for the high price of gas
Speaker 1: and lots of stuff. Those stories and quickts, let's get
Speaker 1: to it. First of all, Rhonda Santists is doing a
Speaker 1: phenomenal job as Governor Florida. I mean, I would criticize
Speaker 1: him if I could find something to criticize him. All.
Speaker 1: It's almost uncomfortable to cover politics as a commentator and
Speaker 1: have somebody who's so on the money so often they
Speaker 1: feel like am I missing something? Because everything this guy
Speaker 1: does I agree with and I'm looking for things to
Speaker 1: not agree with. And I'm telling you, so far phenomenal.
Speaker 1: He's even good on the tech fight. He's good on
Speaker 1: so many things. Governor de Santis has said that after
Speaker 1: Twitter activated, it's poison pale to prevent Elon Must's acquisition.
Speaker 1: Keep in mind, they're telling the richest the board of Twitter,
Speaker 1: who own less than point zero zero one percent of
Speaker 1: Twitter collectively, they want to make sure that Elon must
Speaker 1: the richest man in the world who is a tech
Speaker 1: and entrepreneurial genius, they don't want him to buy Twitter
Speaker 1: note they can run it better, and they're willing to
Speaker 1: cost shareholder's billions of dollars in the process. We all
Speaker 1: know why this is right. It's because the crazy Libs
Speaker 1: want to have their propaganda platform without anybody being able
Speaker 1: to interfere. Well, Governor de Santis had some thoughts on this.
Speaker 1: The State of Florida and our pension system. We have
Speaker 1: shares of Twitter. I didn't buy it. We have people
Speaker 1: that run the fund. But nevertheless, it hasn't exactly been
Speaker 1: great and returns on investment. It's been pretty stagnant for many,
Speaker 1: many years. So but nevertheless, I mean to me, I
Speaker 1: think that that's probably an injury to the fund. So
Speaker 1: we're going to be looking at ways that the State
Speaker 1: of Florida potentially can be holding these Twitter board of
Speaker 1: directors accountable for breaching their produciary duties. So stay tuned
Speaker 1: on that breaching their fiduciary duty. That's what they're doing.
Speaker 1: It's all ideological if it were about making money, if
Speaker 1: it were about what's best for the company, and it
Speaker 1: would say Elon Musk paying way over the current stock
Speaker 1: price gonna make everybody who's who's a shareholder, make them money, man,
Speaker 1: that sounds like a great idea. Nope, not if you
Speaker 1: want to be able to shut down conservatives and throw
Speaker 1: elections for Libs, which is what the people run in
Speaker 1: Twitter and the journals on the left who use it,
Speaker 1: the legacy media entities that use it, that's where they are.
Speaker 1: Brian Stelter also waited on this one, which is hilarious.
Speaker 1: Brian Stelter over at CNN, the guy has a TV show.
Speaker 1: Think about that for a moment. Elon Musk is allowing
Speaker 1: or would rather allow, free speech on Twitter, which would
Speaker 1: be like, well, I'll let Stelter tell you. The tech
Speaker 1: Titan spent a lot of the weekend trolling Twitter right
Speaker 1: on Twitter, in one case, amplifying a suggestion that his
Speaker 1: bit would only be rejected if the system is rigged.
Speaker 1: We've seen that kind of rhetoric before. It's very trumpy, right. No,
Speaker 1: people don't want to play in the gutter. Most people
Speaker 1: don't want to send other kids to play in the gutter.
Speaker 1: Twitters tried to clean it up somewhat, still still got
Speaker 1: there's still a lot of complaints from a lot of
Speaker 1: people about Twitter does that. And I think if you're
Speaker 1: if you're a random user that gets suspended for no
Speaker 1: good reason, you feel that and that's a big deal.
Speaker 1: That's a big problem. But the argument that make Twitter
Speaker 1: more chaotic woul seem to be a losing argument from
Speaker 1: an investiament. No, No, Twitter's already disgusting and if you're
Speaker 1: a conservative, anything's allowed. You know though all kinds of
Speaker 1: horrible things can be said that all of a sudden.
Speaker 1: The death threats don't get cleaned up very quickly. If
Speaker 1: you're a conservative, it's you know how, you're on your own.
Speaker 1: If you're a lib oh big tears, they come in
Speaker 1: and they save you right away from whatever mean things
Speaker 1: people are saying. But more importantly, you can't say that
Speaker 1: men and women are different on Twitter. You can't disagree
Speaker 1: with the idiotic statement that men can get pregnant or
Speaker 1: men can have periods. Not allowed to do that on Twitter.
Speaker 1: That's what we're really talking about. No one's talking about, Oh,
Speaker 1: we need to allow people to be more deep in
Speaker 1: the gutter. It's already in the gutter. But selter go on, clown.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden running out of excuses, but going to keep
Speaker 1: trying them as much as he can. He continues to
Speaker 1: blame the rise in food prices at gas prices on
Speaker 1: Putin's price hike. Here's how that's going. And folks, look,
Speaker 1: the fact is that we are in a situation where
Speaker 1: the war in Ukraine is going to continue to take
Speaker 1: his toll on the world economy. It's gonna take his
Speaker 1: toll on energy, and it's gonna take his toll relative
Speaker 1: to food. So all the rising prices, it's not the
Speaker 1: inflation that started when Joe Biden took office. It's all
Speaker 1: Russia's fault. It's not gonna work, Joe. But you know,
Speaker 1: the least surprising things going on in American politics today
Speaker 1: is the obviousness of the revelation that Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: bad at this job and Kamala wouldn't be any better.
Speaker 1: Anybody was paying attention knew those things were true. That's
Speaker 1: it for tonight's hold the line that No Spin News
Speaker 1: with Bill O'Riley is next Shields High. There's a battle
Speaker 1: going on right now, but maybe the most important to
Speaker 1: fight our country has had since the Revolutionary War. Once again,
Speaker 1: it's about our freedom. People like you and me are
Speaker 1: being canceled, our speech increasingly censored by big tech and
Speaker 1: corporate media. Can't let that happen. Kind to fight back.
Speaker 1: Please stand with us and support the First TEAMV be
Speaker 1: a part of our team, dedicated to preserving the very
Speaker 1: essence of who we are, free Americans.