WEBVTT - Cleaning Up: Closer Chaos Breakdown (Ep. 987)

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Reynolds here for mint Mobile. I don't know if

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>wireless for fifteen dollars a month plan that I've been enjoying.

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and have one of your assistants assistants switch you to

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Midmobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do. At

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>midmobile dot com.

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Slash switch upfront paymental forty five dollars for three month

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>plan equivalent to fifteen dollars per month required intro rate

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>first three months only, then full price plan options available,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>taxes and fees, extra fefal terms at mintmobile dot com.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>What's Up, Friends, and welcome in too, Fantasy Pros MLB.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 3>This is Cleaning Up the Cleaning Up Podcast Joe Rico,

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 3>Chris Welsh. We are live on the Fantasy Pros Discord,

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 3>hanging out with the best community in the world. The

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>leading off guys come over there and the Fantasy Pros

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 3>MLB article.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 4>People.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Everybody comes together on the Fantasy Pros Discord can hang out.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>They've built their own community of people with different rooms

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 3>and we have got live podcasts.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 4>That we do.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 3>It's your opportunity to be a part of it. You

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 3>can ask your questions. Some people can be on if

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>they raise their hand. We'd love to have you guys,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 3>so come on down. You can check us out fantasypros

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>dot com, slash chat to join. We got a premium

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 3>and I would let everybody know changing some times. I

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>think we're going to be moving to five pm Eastern

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 3>on Mondays, so put a little marker into that that

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 3>we're going to be doing that, and I know, I

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>think it's the schedule for next week. Might have to

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 3>ask talk to everybody about that for that, but five

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 3>pm Eastern on Mondays is when we are going to

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>be live on the discord switching up some time. So

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>hopefully you can join us and be a part of

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 3>the show and talk to the great and powerful Joe

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Rico somebody.

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 4>I felt more great and powerful when Christopher Sanchez was

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 4>still at full strength yesterday. But I'm doing well, man.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk through some of this stuff. We can use

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 4>this as kind of like a therapy session for some

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 4>of our players today because I like to been a

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 4>big Justin Martinez guy, and that doesn't look great today either.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've got a couple of topics we're going to

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 3>hit just on the here. We want to talk about closers,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>and we want to talk about injuries, and unfortunately injuries

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of move around to everybody. Let's start with the

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 3>closer situation, though we'll be waiting see if we get

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 3>any of our guys. We got a couple questions in

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 3>the queue. We'll hit a few things, so drop him

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 3>in for anybody hanging. But closers are getting kind of weird.

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 3>The very first one, I want to get your take

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>on this. Joey's backtracking a little bit. Joey piece of Pia,

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>but he was kind of having an implication, the implication

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>of Emmanuel class A and kind of being like, I

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 3>don't know, and then he backtracks a little bit, except

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 3>he was doing it because of because of Cad Smith

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 3>getting back to back staves. But they had said they

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>wanted to give class a couple of days off. There's

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 3>some like arm fatigue that's going on. Doesn't seem like

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 3>anything serious, but there's a lot of closer situations that

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>are kind of fluid right now. So the question to

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 3>you to start with is is should we be worried

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 3>at all about class A? There is a shoulder thing

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>that I think is a worry. I don't think kid

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Smith is a worry or the early results, but the

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 3>early results maybe being because of the shoulders the problem.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 3>So what's your worry level of Emmanuel class.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Ah, it's kind of high. I mean, even going back

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 4>to the playoffs last year, he didn't look good. If

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 4>you look below the surface, there's nothing that's like jumping

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 4>off the page that you necessarily The strikeout rate being

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 4>down is the only thing that I can really point to,

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 4>but like he's still not allowing a ton of hard contact.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 4>The walk rate is only five point seven percent. If

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 4>you look at his sierra it's three seventy three. A

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of the era estimators are pretty good, but the

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 4>velocity dip is kind of drastic. Last year he was

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 4>averaging almost one hundred and ninety nine point eight on

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 4>his fastball. This year's at ninety eight point two. Everything

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 4>is kind of down. Every pitch is down at least

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 4>a tick or so in velocity, and he hasn't been

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 4>good going back to the playoffs last year. So I

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 4>am a little bit worried. If you have kid Smith

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>out there on the waiver wire and you're a class

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 4>A owner. I would be adding him up like asap

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 4>if you can.

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that was what I was going to ask, is

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 3>do you think CAD is like a must in this situation? So,

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think the shoal that's where it's kind of

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>weird here because it's like a what am I doing

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 3>with class say, like, I'm just not doing anything. Like

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, I'm not going to panic.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to freak out. But if you've got

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>the ability, it's probably not the worst thing in the

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 3>world to go pick up Kid Smith because he is

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the replacement if there's something worse with that shoulder. I mean,

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 3>hell man, like, that's gonna be one of the top

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>closer markets out there, especially if they're going to get

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 3>and he has looked really good so far. Okay, so

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 3>caate Smith pick up Arizona Diamondbacks. There's worry you were

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>justin Martinez guy. I've been an AJ puck guy. I

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>think I had a slight lead in that, and then

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Ajpuck hurt, I l MRI and then second and third opinions.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 3>We know exactly what that means. We're not stupid. This

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 3>is not our first rodeo, we know where that's going. Okay,

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Justin Martinez, he's moving up, he's got some fatigue and

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>some army sh use as well that they're kind of

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>tapering back. So here's the thing. A, do you go

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 3>all in on Justin Martinez? B Do you speculate on

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 3>a guy like Shelby Miller who they love? His fastball

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.559
<v Speaker 3>is graded out incredible, he did have like a prior

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 3>to the blown save, he was untouchable, but his little

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 3>blown save they ended up getting the wind, but they

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 3>really like him. Or see, do you look at a

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>guy and speculate on Kevin Ginko right now who is

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 3>inching closer to coming back and he had been thrown

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 3>in the mix by Tory Levello, So which obviously, like

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Justin Martinez is like the main piece here, but like

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 3>in ordering, what is the most aggressive play here? Is

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 3>it going all in on Martinez to kind of buy

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 3>or is it speculating on the other two pieces?

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 4>I think with Martinez, I still don't really know how

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 4>serious it is. They're saying it's shoulder fatigue, but they're

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 4>also saying he's very close to one hundred percent. That's

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 4>what the quote from Lebello said, So, I don't think

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 4>we need to sound all the alarm bells, but especially

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 4>in deeper leagues, if you have a little bit more

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 4>leeway to pick up players, picking up Shelby Miller for

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 4>the time being probably makes a little bit of sense

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 4>if you're looking for like very short term saves. But

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Ginkel is the guy who has some experience in

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 4>the role. They've never really let him run with the role.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Four saves, five saves here and there, but he's put

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 4>up really good numbers over the last several seasons three

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 4>thirty eight, ERA two forty eight, three twenty one, really

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 4>good numbers. Doesn't walk a lot of batters. I think

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 4>that Ginkle, if I was running the team, would probably

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 4>get the job when he comes back, assuming there's something

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 4>more seriously wrong with Martinez. But I think Martinez as

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 4>of now, my concerns aren't off the charts until we

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 4>get a little bit more information.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I guess again the theme of that is

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 3>like do you go and you're like, Hey, I'm gonna

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>buy on Justin Martinez right now because we know Puck

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>is going to be done and there's a little bit

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>of worry with Martinez or is it like, oh, you

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of avoid and you play in that speculation. Mark,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I think an investment on Ginkle right now actually makes

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of sense. I'm a little bit Shelby millerish,

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 3>but I guess it's like even if Shelby gets an

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>opportunity or too, when Ginkle comes back, Like you said,

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>he's like the guy Banshee said, what about Beaks? I don't.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. Lavello is obviously making lots of

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 3>bad decisions. There's just too many guys that are above him.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Beeks is I think Beaks is low

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 3>down the rings. But you know what if all these

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 3>dudes keep getting hurt, you never know, right Beeks.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Being the only lefty is going to work against him

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 4>in that regard because there will be times when Yeah,

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm assume, I'm assuming Puk is just gone

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 4>and he'll be the only lefty, so that kind of

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 4>works against him. I don't think that he's an option

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 4>unless you're in a saves and holds the league.

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Will vest for the Tigers. Head got a couple opportunities

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and look good. What is your comfort level or your

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 3>desire of investment? On Will Vest. If if Ginkle was

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>out there and Vest, which one are you picking up?

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 4>I'd probably go with Ginkle. It's a better team. There's

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 4>gonna be more victories. I feel like, especially if Martinez

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 4>we hear he has to miss a lot of time

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 4>and podcasts miss a lot of time, then Ginkle becomes

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 4>a pretty obvious option. Where in Detroit they could go

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 4>back to Conley next week and it wouldn't really shock me.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 4>I know he blew a save on Sunday, but he

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 4>has also been not too bad this year as a whole,

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, one O four E R eight to this point.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 4>I know that he blew a save, but I don't

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 4>really trust anybody in Detroit. I feel like it's a

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 4>situation where you pick up one guy for one week

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 4>and maybe they go with Conley and maybe they go

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 4>with Vest, and you're kind of just chasing your tail

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 4>on the waiver wire and wasting your fab on this situation.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 4>It's not a team that's gonna win a ton of games,

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 4>So how many saves are you really getting, especially if

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna mess around like this. I just I just

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 4>can't get myself invested in the Detroit Closer situation unless

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a super deep league and you're really desperate, in

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 4>which case I'd probably still go with Conley is there.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any concerns moving over to the Kansas

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 3>City Royals with Carlos Estevez blowing a save? I think

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Erseeg has been a little bit banged up, but he's

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 3>like the dude that it was kind of in the

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 3>wings as the closer before. Do you think people should

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 3>be concerned in speculating off of Carlos Estevez right now?

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 4>So, I don't think we need to sound the alarms

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 4>just yet for Estevez because leading up to that start,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 4>he'd only allowed one run on the season. It was

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 4>a it was a bad start. It was a blown save.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 4>It happens, I now. I was definitely more in the

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Erseg camp preseason, but after really thinking about it and

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 4>the arbitration money that they're gonna have to pay uh

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Erseg in the offseason, they're not gonna want to have

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 4>to go into that meeting with Erseg having twenty five

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 4>saves because they're gonna have to pay him more. STZ

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 4>has been a closed in the last couple of years.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that the talent level is better with Stevez.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 4>I think Erseg is a much better pitcher, but just

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 4>based on Kansas City situation, it's probably gonna be Erseg

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 4>outside of an injury. Now, maybe later in the season,

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 4>Let's say they're making a playoff push and we're getting

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 4>done to the final two months and Stevez doesn't look great,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 4>then they're not gonna worry so much about how many

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 4>saves Erseg is gonna have. And there's a chance that

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 4>are excuse me, how many saves asked them? Or no,

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm getting myself confused. They're not going to care about

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 4>arbitration money for saves. If Ersag is the closer for

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 4>just the last month or two of the season, I

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 4>think there's a chance that could happen, but I think

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Askedebez is still the guy.

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Is there any other closer situations and or guys of

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 3>speculation that have you worried or have picked your interest

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 3>so worried about any other situations, Like you said, you're

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of picking up Cad Smith. Obviously. You know Yankees

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 3>have been Devin Williams been a little bit shaky, and

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 3>I think Fernando Cruz had gotten a save and you

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 3>got Weaver out there. But is there any other speculative

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 3>worry or is there any other guy that you think

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>it's looming of interest?

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the Cincinnati situation is always a little bit interesting.

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Alexis Diaz, I just don't really trust him, and he's

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 4>the one who's still on more rosters if I'm looking

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 4>at just like Yahoo now, Emliopegan blew a save last week,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 4>but for the most part he's been pretty good. That's

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 4>a situation I'm really keeping an eye on because I'm

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 4>not one hundred percent sure about which way they're going

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 4>to go. But I see Pegan I was on thirty

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 4>five percent of rosters. Diaz is on fifty five. I

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 4>think that even the people who are more believers in

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 4>Daz should be a little bit worried right now. I

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 4>don't think he's looked good for a while. And because

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Terry Francona wasn't the one who put him in that

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 4>closure role, I don't think he'll have much loyalty towards

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 4>keeping him there or putting him back there. So that's

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 4>what I'm keeping an eye on. But I think the

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Pagan is going to be the guy to roster there personally,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I know I might be in the minority there, but

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of still on the pagan side.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 3>I think Diaz is going to jump back to it.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I actually if Diaz are available, I want to speculate there.

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 3>But there's also a part of me that this Reds

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 3>team is going to be like highly competitive, that they

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 3>that might be something you have to make a move for.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, they went out and got Taylor Rodgers and

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>they brought in Pegan like they got a bunch of

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 3>help and never worked out, you know what I mean,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Like none of those guys, so you might need to

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 3>keep going. But unfortunately, how many sellers are there out there?

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 3>So I think if Pegan and Diaz are both available,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>those are fun speculative guys. There's a lot of Arizona

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 3>guys closer situations are weird and at the tippy top.

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Obviously a couple of those big names like Emmanuel Classe

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 3>have people worried if you, I guess I didn't ask

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>you this, what would be your rank of your top

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>three speculative pickups? Like is Caid Smith at the tippy

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 3>top of everybody we've talked about?

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Does it ever feel like you're a marketing professional. Just

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 5>speaking into the void. Boy, Well, with LinkedIn ads, if

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 5>you can know you're reaching the right decision makers, you

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 5>can even target buyers by job title, industry company seniority skills. Wait,

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 5>did I say job title yet? Get started today and

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 5>see how you can avoid the void and reach the

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 5>right buyers with LinkedIn ads. We'll even give you a

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 5>one hundred dollars credit on your next campaign. Get started

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 5>at LinkedIn dot com slash results, terms and conditions apply.

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Caid Smith has got to be at the top there.

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 4>If he goes into that, like let's say class they

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 4>say that some injury has to miss a few months

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 4>of time, then Kate Smith becomes like a top five

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 4>or seven closer. The skill set is just unbelievable. Like

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 4>he is truly one of the best pitchers in baseball.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 4>As the best relievers in baseball, I'll put that caveat there,

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 4>but he is just fantastic. If he were the closer,

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 4>then I think he's easily a top ten closer rest

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 4>of the season, assuming that clause like let's say class

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 4>is done, which I don't think is necessarily the case.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 4>But if he were, Kate Smith is a top ten closer.

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm with that one. I think it works. We

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 3>had another closer question as well. Elsba said, should I

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 3>trade Tanner Scott or Kyle Finnegan for Ryan Helsley says,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 3>I got Alvarado and Mason Miller, so we'll kind of

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 3>stop there for a second. So Tanner Scott, that's a

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of a weird one. Should I trade Tanner, Scott

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>or Finnegan for Hellsley? Already having Miller and Alvarado, I

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 3>would feel like the quick answer is.

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Like, yes, probably. Helsley worries me a little bit. I

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 4>don't think he's been that great this season. I know

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 4>he's got a few saves, two twenty five era is

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 4>not too bad. I worry a little bit about the

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 4>injuries that he's racked up over the years, and I

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 4>wonder if his arm is gonna be able to stay

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 4>healthy for the whole season. I think that i'd probably

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 4>trade Scott for him, though. Kyle Finnegan just seems to

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 4>be the guy that nobody was interested in, and he's

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna do what he did last year once again, and

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's not going to be forty saves, but it'll

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 4>be like thirty something saves that were absolutely free. I

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 4>don't really trust Scott as much just because there are

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 4>so many Bible options in Los Angeles. It's a tricky

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 4>one because I don't really have a lot of faith

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 4>in Hellsley either. On there's a part of me that says,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe you could trade some of these closers

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 4>for a non closer, because having Alvarado and Mason Miller

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 4>is probably good enough in most leagues, don't.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 3>You think I do? That's why I was like, if

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess if there was a market the Tanner Scott

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 3>one's really weird because the whole Dodgers that's another one

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 3>of those we didn't really I guess, like focus on

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Vesia is getting opportunities, Kirby Gates is getting opportunities. Like

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 3>they're still very rotational with all of that. So if

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 3>you're just looking to pick up a random save, Kirby

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Yates is not the worst to be looking at right now.

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>But like, what's the value on getting fin again and

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Tanner Scott? But I would be more hard pressed to

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 3>trade them for positional players, like you said, than targeting

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>another closer Alvarado Mason Miller. That's getting it done. But

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>if there is no market for that and someone's offering Hellsley, Like,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, Helsy was a top ten closer coming into

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 3>this year. Things are weird. But you know, if the

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals were to fade, he's probably a guy that ends

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 3>up getting moved and maybe he goes into a closer

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 3>sit Maybe our Reds goes into a closure situation. So

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't really hate I don't hate doing that. I

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>just wish Tanner Scott would turn it around. The Finnegan

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>one stands out to me like I'll trade Fin again

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>for Helsley. That's fine, Totally fine by me. We had

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 3>else had another question that's going to coincide with where

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>we're going to go. But want to remind everybody, as

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned at the top, but with a little bit

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 3>more details. Join our Fantasy Pros Discord community at Fantasypros

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>dot com slash chat. You can chat with other fans,

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>get access to exclusive amas that will wind up on

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the podcast. You could talk with Joe, Rico and I

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 3>moving to Mondays at five pm Eastern. Come and get

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 3>your questions answered. Be on the show at Fantasypros dot

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 3>com slash chat. Plus, we've got a lot of other

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 3>podcast offerings in other sports, and we've had an incredible community,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 3>whether it is the free side, which you can do

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 3>or you want to set up premium premium. Also getting

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 3>access to joining the home run contest, which we have

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 3>got over on Leading Off, and we've got a Sammy

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Sosa autograph jersey that's on the line this year and

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the top ten right now, so and I

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 3>challenged Piezapia today to get on the board at some

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 3>point this season. And just as a little aside, I

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>put it out to the audience if you go on

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the YouTube channel, look for the Leading Off episode on Wednesday,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 3>so the twenty third be a part of that. Go

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 3>into the comments section and pick what the what the

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>odds are, what the ramifications are for Joe to get

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 3>it or not get it. So if he gets on

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the board, what should happen? If he doesn't get on

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the board, what happens. We ask the audience members to

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 3>go on the YouTube and comment there and that also

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 3>gets you eligible for Nico Horner autographed that we're doing.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 3>So it pays pays to do all that stuff, but

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>check it out today. Fantasypros dot Com, slash Chat, join

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 3>the discord. Elsba Rico had also thrown in thoughts on

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Strider and I want to do this because the other

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 3>thing we were going to talk about, and then we'll

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 3>just answer a few of these last questions. We're getting

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 3>out and we got our voy mctunda wants to come up.

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Is we had a couple big injuries. The two biggest

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 3>art Strider, which seems to be okay, just as giant hamstrings,

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 3>it's not on our issue. But then Chris Sanchez, who

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 3>went fifty something inning our pitches, his velo was down.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 3>But as we're recording this today, they had no expectation

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 3>there's any structural damage. They're not even going to perform

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 3>an MRI, but he is going to miss a start.

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 3>So your level of worry between Chris Sanchez and Spencer

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Strider is what for Strider.

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not too bad. They've said it's a Grade one

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>strain and I am very far from a doctor, but

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 4>from what I've understood, it's like a few days to

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe a few weeks at most, So that one's not concerning,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 4>especially because it's not the arm. Right. If it was

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 4>anything to do with his arm, oh boy, that would

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 4>have been serious. Trouble probably for Strider. With Sanchez, why

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 4>are they not just gonna do the MRI? I don't

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 4>understand it? Is it so much of it? Is it

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 4>that taxing on him? Is it that expensive? Like? What's

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 4>the reason to not do it? And why not just

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 4>make sure? Even though like he said yesterday, his quote was,

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I've never felt something like that when I was pitching before.

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 4>Why would you not just do some imaging and just

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 4>make sure you're not missing something? I don't really understand

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 4>that point of view. It feels like it's kind of

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 4>the Phillies being lazy or something, which I don't necessarily

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 4>know if they are or not. But they also just

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 4>signed Jordan Romano and gave him money when there was

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 4>no real reason to when he was coming off a

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 4>bunch of injuries. So my head right now with the

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Phillies is what are they doing surrounding injuries that other

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 4>teams are not? And with Sanchez, I don't know why

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 4>you wouldn't just give him the scan. That part of

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 4>it makes me worried for sure. Maybe I'm reading too

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 4>much into it, but just give him a clean bill

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 4>of health. He says he's feeling okay, But why not

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 4>just make sure well he was checked out.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 3>The doctor looked at looked at it there internally and

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 3>just determined that there's nothing. But yeah, to be on

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 3>the safe side, it'd be nice just to go get

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 3>it checked out. But you know, I think based on it,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 3>they felt that there were no structural issues. He feels

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 3>better today, so I think those are signs why to

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 3>move through. But again, I'm not going to disagree with you, like,

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 3>let's just be sure about it. So tiny little worry

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe on the Crisanchez side. I'm not worried about Strider

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 3>as much. I don't like that he's hitting back the il,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 3>but it's not an arm issue. So I'm breathing a

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit, maybe even buying Strider. But hopefully the injuries

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 3>aren't going to keep taxing themselves up together. I hope not. Hey,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>it's our boy mctund to raise hand. Let's get mctonda

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 3>on what you got brother.

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 6>A question for you there. Somebody dropped Luis Robbers in

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 6>my ten team head to head dynasty league. So right

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 6>now for center fielders, I either have him or Victor

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 6>Scott moving forward. I mean kind of Corby Carrol's had

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 6>centerfield eligibility, so they're kind of floating them there anyway.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's one of those like left field, right field, center.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we don't have three outfielders.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 6>We have actual left, right and center and so, but

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 6>who do you like going forward? Luise Robert or Victor Scott.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question. It's like the question every week

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 3>it was. It's turned into different things. It was Tristan Cassis,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 3>it turned into Luise Robert. It's kind of turning again.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>But Robert continuously keeps coming up in this He's hitting

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 3>only one fifty one bunch of stolen bases, seven couple

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 3>homers to sixty seven OVP. That sucks, but it is

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 3>a profile that is very reminiscent of the player that

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 3>we know. In general, his expected batting average is like

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 3>eighty points higher. It's two thirty four. He's barreling more

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 3>than he has, he's hitting the ball as hard, he's

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 3>actually striking out less than last year. The profile screams,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 3>this is the player that we know, and we know

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 3>there's a trade looming here. I leen Luise Robert. I

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 3>don't even lean, especially because it's keeper. It's Louise Robert.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 3>He will be traded this off this season and it

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 3>will probably be to a much better team. And he,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 3>unfortunately is one of these dudes that like, oh, I

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>only play with the White Sox, and he kind of

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 3>plays down. He's going to play up when he goes

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 3>to a bigger team. He's loud tools. This is pretty easy,

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Robert for me. But it has been pretty bad so far, Arico,

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 3>what say you? Victor Scott or Luis Robert Jr.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 4>It's probably still lou Bob, but it's not quite as

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 4>clear for me with the decision. Like Victor Scott has

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 4>been fantastic. He's sitting two ninety eight steals, he's got

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 4>a homer, and he's doing it from the bottom of

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 4>the order too. If he does find his way to

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 4>the top of the lineup, then who knows what he

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 4>could do. But Victor Scott is almost like Chandler Simpson

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 4>if he could hit for a little bit of power,

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 4>maybe not quite as much speed, but that kind of

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 4>profile is really interesting. We've seen lou Bob, whether it's

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 4>been the injuries or the disappointments and the performance like

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 4>it's been a disappointing career for him. I think things

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 4>will turn around eventually. But it's a long stretch now

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 4>where he's been, he's been pretty bad. If he gets traded,

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 4>I would hope that his attitude and everything would turn

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 4>around and his performance would follow, but I'm not necessarily

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 4>assured of that. Like I would still probably take lou Bab,

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 4>But I think this is really really close.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Personally, I'm surprised it's maybe that that close, But but

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 3>I get it. I understand. I mean, Victor Scott, there's

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's a lot of big improvements this year,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 3>the stolen bases. We just would like to see him

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 3>hitting high on the lineup again. But I guess I'm

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 3>just still a believer. Robert still only twenty seven. I

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 3>know it feels like he's like thirty two. He's only

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven. The most recent trade rumors were with the Dodgers.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 3>I really hope he can turn the career around. There

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 3>is some like just knucklehead stuff because you know, he

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 3>seems to kind of play down and and he's streaky

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 3>as well, and maybe streaky isn't like great for everybody.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Not everybody likes a streaky fantasy player. All Right, we

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 3>got some other questions in here. Let's see what is

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 3>going down. Finner says Yannier is being dropped in a

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 3>bunch of my leagues. Would you drop Austin Wells for

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 3>him in a Points league?

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 4>De Diez, I think I would. I know it's been rough,

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 4>but it's not like Wells has been so great either,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 4>So I think I would default to where we were

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>before the season. I think that Houston's lineup is still

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 4>just as good, if not even better than the Yankees.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 4>It's probably fairly close. Judge does a lot of the

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 4>heavy lifting there in New York, but I think that

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 4>I would still go with Diaz here.

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I would too. It's ironic that both of those are

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 3>just like bad catchers. We had a lot of people

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 3>This is a very popular question over the last two days.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 3>Do I drop Austin Wells for Augustin Ramirez? And you

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 3>know he's going mollistic, stolen base attempts, homers, hard to

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 3>hit balls, and it feels like it's a little bit premature.

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 3>A points league makes a lot of this different. I

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 3>think the like Wells and Ramirez or bigger strikeout threats

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 3>than the Yon ear So I would pick up Yanner

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>in this one.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 4>And you're with me, Yeah, Yeah, Augustin Ramirez, though I'm

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 4>pretty excited, like the potential for the power and the speed,

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 4>if only it wasn't for the bad lineup in ballpark.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 4>But I think I would take him over Wells. Maybe

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 4>that's me being a little bit to reactionary, but is

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 4>that crazy to take him over Wells? Right now?

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 3>Someone asked a question I said, I would probably stick Wells,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 3>But I'm also okay, Like if it's a ten man league,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 3>sure like Burn and churn Man, there's only like a

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 3>couple good catchers anyways. If it's a fifteen team league,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. Like I guess Ramirez is probably secured,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 3>especially with how he's playing, but there's like some swing

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 3>and missing his game too. I'm not gonna kill anybody

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that does that. I guess that would be my big thing.

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 3>You want to do that, that's fine. I probably stick

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Austin Wells at the ballpark. But Wells hasn't He hasn't

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>really been great either. We actually had another Robert thing.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 3>The Big Dance said, do I pick up Luis Robert

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 3>in a ten ten team? Rodo outfield is Butler Castiano's

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Cheerio judge would my gut says maybe to drop one

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.719
<v Speaker 3>of my closers. But I'm only leading in saves by two,

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 3>so you didn't give us who the closers are. Would

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Robert versus Castianas is the only one that's close there,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 3>and Castianis has been really good right now, ten team,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 3>if you're not leading in saves, I don't know. I

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 3>feel like, based on what you said, you're probably gonna

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 3>not pick up Robert in this scenario.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it's pretty close with Castillanos. I think the

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 4>ceiling is higher, especially if if lu Bob goes to

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 4>the Dodgers, then that would change everything. As of today,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it's probably Castellano still though, And in the

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 4>ten team league like that, there's gonna be a lot

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>of options. So even if Castiano's cools off a little bit,

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the fact that lou Bob's already on the waiver wire

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 4>means that there's going to be options for you.

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's why, like I could do that. By the way,

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 3>his closers were Luke, Jackson, McGill, Alvarado, Munos, and Hoffman,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's like, could he cut one of those for Robert?

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, you don't need five closers. That's a little excessive.

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I would, and I would probably drop Luke Jackson of

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 3>all those so probably yeah, okay, so drop Luke Jackson

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 3>to pick up Robert. Then don't worry about your Castiana situation.

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Bing Bang boom, landon Roup is looking good. Would you

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 3>drop Job or Nesky in a ten team head to

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 3>head points league.

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm not as impressed with Joe, but the thing is

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 4>he's got relief, picture, eligibility, and in a points league

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 4>that's really valuable. I don't know that rape has it.

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, you know what rape does have it too.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 4>On looking at Yahoo, I would make the swap personally

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 4>landing route for Jackson Job in that situation.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Wait, you would you would go Roupe over Job?

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I would, Yeah, I would.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I would. Like he's super interesting right now,

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 3>but I'm not sure that everything is locked down. I

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 3>think it's a short leash.

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't.

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I don't think I would make that move

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Like at the Job's I think it was his last

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 3>start was pretty encouraging. Was Nesky with the strikeouts? I'm

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna stick with those two, but I guess I get it.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 3>What was was mctime to try to get rid of me.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 3>This is how do you not have recall announcements for

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 3>your folks that come into sub in on leading off?

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Would love to see Welsh to the vacation list and

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 3>we recall Joey O from cleaning up. You want to

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 3>get rid of me?

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 4>I think he's looking for something on the I think

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 4>you want something on the blurb feed, like the MLB

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 4>account tweeting out like Chris Welsh gone to the disabled list,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Joe Rico, Oh okay, I think that's what he's looking for,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 4>which would be kind of funny for the blurb guys

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 4>to do that, but.

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 3>That actually would be really really funny. I was like mctunda,

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I thought we were boys, like everyone's trying to get

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 3>rid of negativity. But I am actually out on Friday,

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 3>So it will be the Joey and Joe show is

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 3>going down Friday's leading off. It'll be a Rico and

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 3>piece of Pia all Joe's all the time to Joe's

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 3>one show, as I will not be there. My first

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 3>non leading off episode I think of the year probably

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be one of my only ones. Not much

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 3>on the vacation list, but that would be very funny

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>to have that announcement. Would you drop Ben Rice from

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Marcelo Zuna? Is how we will finish this bad boy off?

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 3>What a question?

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 4>And there's got to be somebody else other than Rice, right,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 4>There's got to be somebody. Rice has just been so good.

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.479
<v Speaker 4>I get maybe in a shallow league he'd be your

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 4>only option. There's it's probably Ozuna Ozona is probably the

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 4>right decision, But dropping Ben Rice feels icky right now.

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Gotta drop somebody else, dude. The game is going on

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 3>right now. We got a heavy set of games going

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 3>on as we're doing the show, probably not helping everyone

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 3>coming in. He's one for two with two runs and

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 3>an RBI. He walked, He's hitting two ninety two. He's

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 3>lead off. I mean, I just I can't I guess

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.479
<v Speaker 3>in that scenario, like it's gotta be Ozuna. But like

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 3>you said, you gotta find somebody else Ben Rice is.

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 3>He's borderlining, like you can't even consider cutting him in

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 3>places I wouldn't in team leagues do make it different,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 3>of course, but he's so good. The Yankees leadoff hitter

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 3>who's hitting almost three hundred at the end of April,

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 3>who keeps going, who has an insane hitting profile, I

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 3>just was redoing my redraft or my my ranks for

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 3>rest of season. I do them every single week here

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 3>and Fantasy Pro, so it helps some of the algorithm.

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 3>And you guys can check that out, dude. I mean

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Ben Rice and Sodastrom, those guys are both like in

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the top ten range. I think I put them both

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 3>in my top ten first base and rest of season.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I believe in those guys. I kind of don't have

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 3>a long term belief of like Torkolsen being in that

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 3>same camp, but those two I'm fully in on. I

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 3>just don't know how you make a move for it.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Like the same thing. What if this question was soda

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Strum or Ozuna? Could you cut Sodastrum?

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 4>No, I couldn't do it. I can do it. The ballpark,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 4>the fact that he's so much younger, the fact that

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 4>he looks so good. Ozuna's dh only I love I

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 4>mean Ozuo. I'm not gonna say I love Marcelo Zuna,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 4>but he's a very good fantasy asset. But Tyler Soderstrom

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 4>might be a top fifty player this year, and I

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 4>don't know that we're gonna see quite those heights from

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Ozuna again. We could, but this is this is the

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 4>problem with super shallow leagues. It's very hard to make

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 4>room for everybody. But if it was Sodastrom or Ozuna,

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 4>I would takes oders from there.

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 3>Well look at this els but even updated, So you

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:05.959
<v Speaker 3>dropped Torklsen for Azuna?

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, yeah, I wouldn't. Again, I wouldn't feel great about

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 4>it because Torklesen has been fantastic.

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Tork Ben rice Ozuna. What's the order for you?

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 4>It has to be it has to be Torkosen at

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 4>the bottom. It has to be. But man, Torklsen has

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 4>been great this year. Yeah, he's the number sixteen player overall,

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 4>number sixteen overall so far.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 3>He just heard us though, by the way, he struck

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 3>out literally as we were talking, struck out swinging against

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Hurt. But yes, I would drop Torkosen for Azuna

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 3>very last one. This is actually a good question.

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Would you.

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh Well, it's a good question because like I know

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 3>exactly what I'm doing. But if if it's out there,

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 3>people are wondering, would you drop an injured George Kirby

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 3>to pick up a Caid Smith? And the answer would be.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 4>No, No, I wouldn't go quite that far. No, I

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 4>couldn't do it.

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 3>He's close.

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Base myself into it for a second, but I couldn't

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 4>make it.

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 3>As far as I'm told he had been here at

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 3>the complex, I was told he left complex. So that means,

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's in a state where it's really getting close.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I don't know, if he's in Seattle and he's

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 3>throwing a live session and then he's going to, like,

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, bail out and then maybe do one rehab start.

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 3>He seems like he's very close. So it's good to

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 3>talk about Kirby here because I don't think Kirby should

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 3>go anywhere, and I think that's the most importin thing.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 4>He corrected his message. I think he was talking Kirby Yates,

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 4>not George Kirby here. He added a little, oh yes here.

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, that's a good question I would go. I

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>mean we kind I think we kind of answered that

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 3>we would go Kate Smith over Kirby Yates.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Kirby doesn't even have a saved this year yet.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, as much as we can dream on it,

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 4>he hasn't saved a single game for them this year,

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 4>and Kate Smith already has a couple even with class

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 4>A being around the whole time so far.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 3>So you know, no, sorry, I'm sorry, I cut you off.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Keep going.

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 4>No, No, I'm just gonna say, like, Kate Smith as

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 4>a pitcher is in my opinion, much better than Kirby Yates,

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 4>even if we're just like getting rid of the whole

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 4>save thought, but then you're also adding in that Smith

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 4>is in a much better position to get saves right now.

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it's got to be him.

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about draft time where it was like

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 3>like how crazy people were going with Kirby Gates even

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 3>when Tanner Scott was there, and like Kirby Gates was

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 3>being drafted like really high, and it was like, I

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 3>don't think so, I don't think this is the way

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>to go. And he's you know, he's being put in

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 3>leverage situations but he's not there. But Kid Smith would

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 3>definitely definitely be the answer. Friends. If you guys want more, well,

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 3>we always got it for you. Wednesdays at four pm

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Eastern on our YouTube It's Joey p and Me. That's right.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 3>You can interact with us for live fantasy baseball advice

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube dot com Slash Fantasy Pros m LB Wednesdays

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 3>at four pm Eastern. All the questions and we even

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 3>have an ability for guaranteed answered questions using the super chats.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 3>People can jump in super chat a question they get

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 3>put up there. It's a great rewatch if you guys

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 3>want to go on because there are gajillion questions. So

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 3>even if you miss it live, you guys can go

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 3>back see what we've covered. We're probably going to be

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 3>talking about Caid Smith's of the World and Ben and

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Luis Robert. It'll even be more. But if you can

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 3>make it, put a pin in it. Make sure you're

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 3>subscribed to the YouTube, get notifications, and then when we're

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 3>live you can jump in and hang out with Joey

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 3>p and me.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Very good.

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you guys for hanging out for Joe Rico, who

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 3>is going to be on leading off on Friday. Make

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 3>sure you guys are tuned into that and make sure

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 3>you guys are locked in because I believe next Monday

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>we are moving times on cleaning up to five pm,

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 3>so five pm Eastern Mondays is where we're going to

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 3>be doing. I have a little scheduling thing that's why

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 3>it could maybe even be the following week. But just

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 3>make sure you're locked in. If you're on the discord,

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 3>we'll tell you. Also if you're following us on the socials.

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 3>We try to update everybody on all the shows, So

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Joe Rico Friday Leading Off, I will be there Thursday

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 3>on Leading Off, twelve pm Eastern for mister Joe Rico,

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Welsh. Thank you for hanging out with us, and

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk to you next time right here on Fantasy

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Pros MLB.

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:33:58.760 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>us is by

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, follow

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 5>us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 5>subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Fantasy Pros MLB