WEBVTT - Quantum Capital Group CEO Talks AI Fueling Energy Demand

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the rise of AI fueling energy demand.

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Golment Sax estimating US data centers will use eight percent

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 2>of total power in a country by twenty thirty, or

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 2>three times the level from twenty twenty two. Will Van

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Low is the CEO of Quantum Capital Group, one of

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the largest private capital providers to the global energy industry,

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and will join us now.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, good morning, good morning.

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>It's good to see you, sir. The incoming president wants

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.319
<v Speaker 2>to unlock energy in America. Drill Baby, drill is something

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>we heard from him repeatedly on the campaign trail. How

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>difficult is that actually going to be?

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, thank you for having me on

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 3>this morning. It's going to be very difficult. In terms

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of oil and gas production. Oil in particular, we have

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 3>really developed most of the resource, the shell resource plays

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>and other than the Permian, they're all either peaking and

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>rolling into decline or they will soon. And I think

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>the Permian maybe we can get another million or two

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 3>million barrels a day out of it. So we produce

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 3>about thirteen and a half million barrels a day right now,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>so maybe gets up to fourteen and a half or

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 3>fifteen and a half, But that would really be the

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 3>physical limitations of the permit.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Given the fact that there seems to be a long

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>runway for anything in terms of infrastructure in the energy space,

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what could changes in the Trump policies next year actually

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>do fundamentally to shift the investing landscape, to shift sort

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the energy landscape from your perspective.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, Well, I think the biggest thing is lifting this

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 3>LNG pause they've got to put on last year. You know,

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>there were tens of billions of dollars of investment that

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 3>were slated to go into the next phase of LNG

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>build out. That's critical for our allies, that's critical for

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 3>America projecting its power throughout the world to be able

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>to export that energy. So I think that's the biggest

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 3>thing that he could do immediately, and he said, you know,

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 3>first day in office that something very likely may do.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>But I think other than that, permitting reform is the

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>biggest thing that we really need. And that's not only

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 3>for oil and gas, but that's also forransmission. I mean,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 3>that's the big is the wind and solar build out continues.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>The biggest bottle Nike is transmission. So I think having

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 3>having regulatory kind of relief in terms of how long

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 3>it takes to get these power lines permitted, permitting midstream

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 3>pipelines so we can get that gas. America has a

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of natural gas. We have a lot more natural

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>gas than we do oil, and so we've got to

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 3>be able to build the critical infrastructure to get that

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>power and that gas around the country.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>What's been fascinating to so many people is that there

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is a dissonance right now to all the discussions around

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence and the energy that's required to power that,

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and then just how long the process is to build

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it out from an infrastructure process, and then the fact

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that policies tend to ping pong and they change change

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>quite considerably. How do you get around that when you're

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>investing to try to cater to what seems like a

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>really big opportunity but has these major pitfalls.

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, look, it's it's AI. A typical AI query,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>generative AI query takes ten times the amount of power

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 3>that are regular Google search takes. Right, and so when

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 3>you look at you mentioned that that power demand will

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 3>literally triple for a data centers over the next kind

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of five to six years, that's a massive amount of power.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, a data center, say a one gigawatt gas

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>turbine that fires a data center could power eight hundred

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>thousand homes. So you think about that a data center

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 3>demand for power is going to grow about fifty about

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 3>fifty gigawatts over the next six years. That's enough power

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 3>we're going to have to install, enough power to power

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 3>forty million homes. That's a lot of power. Well.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, when John sort off the conversation, they're talking about drill, baby, drill,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 4>I can't help but think that President Trump was elected,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 4>and then a few weeks later, Chevron is saying, actually,

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 4>we're going to pull back on the Permian. Do you

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 4>see more US oil producers pulling back on drilling because

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 4>actually the oil right now price point is just not adventageous,

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 4>that's correct.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>So you look at where prices are today, the inventory

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that's left, it's economic at these levels. And that's why

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I say that you've got to be very careful projecting

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>how much production US can actually grow. And so at

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>these prices, no, I don't see anybody drilling more.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Do you think then the Trump administration would be more

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 4>willing to either accept what the buy An administration might

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.679
<v Speaker 4>do on their way out, or do it themselves, which

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 4>is to maybe start to hold back on Russian oil,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 4>saying instead of this price cap, we're actually going to

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 4>sanction oil outright, really hurt putin. At the same time,

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 4>if the prices go up, that actually might be better

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 4>for US drillers.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's difficult. I mean we had there

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 3>has been sanctions in place, arguably not very good ones,

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 3>and so I do think that's clearly it's been rumored

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 3>to be talked about. How effect will be, I don't know,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>but I will say I do think that President Trump

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 3>is very focused on keeping energy prices low for the

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>American consumer, and sanctioning Russian oil would would have just

0:04:58.240 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the opposite effect of that.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 4>The other thing you mentioned, of course, is gas and

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 4>how the US has so much natural gas And do

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 4>you think we're going to see executive orders when it

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 4>comes to these LNG permits. Do you see deals growing,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 4>say for the United States and Europe because they're looking

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 4>for some sort of bipartisan wedge into acquiescing themselves to

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, Europe is still buying a lot of gas from Russia.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 3>It's not talked about very much, but they have to, okay,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 3>And so that's absolutely why we need American LNG to

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 3>be expanded significantly. We have the gas to supply to

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 3>our allies in Europe, and so you know, I think

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be a very critical part of Trump's

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 3>energy policy, and it's something that really needs to happen.

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, given that all these policies are sort

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of question marks right now, how much are you going

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to the share thing, which is tech companies themselves and

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 1>working directly with them in order to build out energy

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because they need it and they need some certainty and

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>you can probably provide that with the pool of capital

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that you have.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So I think a couple of things are going

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 3>to happen. The problem with all the growth an AI

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 3>demand for electricity is it takes still takes four to

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 3>five years to go get a new gas fired power

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>plant built, and so we have to look at the

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 3>existing asset base in the US today. If you look

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 3>at the roughly two hundred gas turbines that are installed

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 3>generating power that are greater than five hundred megawats, those

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.679
<v Speaker 3>run at about a fifty five to fifty six percent

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 3>capacity factor. Okay, so there's a lot of capacity left

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>in existing assets. It's just are the regulators going to

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 3>allow the tech companies to take that excess power because

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that excess power is needed whenever it gets really cold

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>or it gets really hot and demand surges, And that's

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>going to be the real kind of tug and pull

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 3>is we have it. It's going to take a lot

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>longer to build out the new power plants. But what's

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 3>going to how is that going to play out between

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 3>the consumer on one hand and the tech companies on

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 3>the other hand in five to ten years.

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>How different is the backdrop going to look for big

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>energy in the United States at a time where big

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>oil has been sort of self constraint in a number

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of different ways from their investing programs, and you have

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>upstarts like not only yourself, but a whole host of

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>private investors who are trying to really get in alongside

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a big tech Yeah.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think there's a lot of capital that's been formed.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>You've heard about these huge partnerships over the last couple

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>of months that are all kind of around data centers

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 3>and supplying that power for data centers. If you think

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>about it. If you spend a billion dollars on power

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>for a data center, you're going to spend about ten

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars on a data center itself, another twenty billion

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>dollars on chips. So the power component's only about three

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 3>little over three percent of the total cost of a

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 3>data center. So I think there's going to be clearly

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the big tech companies are going to have to partner

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 3>with both private and public companies to get that power.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 3>But the truth is is most of the power is

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>controlled by big utilities, regulated utilities, and so I do

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 3>think you'll see a lot more private companies coming into

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 3>that space to partner with the big tech companies.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Americans doll not want European nay crisis, that's for sure.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering how much pressure that we'll be on and

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 2>provide us to make coal great again. How pragmatic do

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you think politicians leaders in America are going to be

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 2>on that issue.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, if you look at it, the United States,

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>we have retired a lot of our coal plants over

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of decades. Europe's retired even more. Just

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 3>a few months ago, the UK retired their last remaining

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 3>coal plant, which is an extraordinary statistic. I've had over

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty years.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing, and I see the government leaders celebrate it

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 2>all the time, and then my mum calls mad. It

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 2>tells me what an electricity bill was. That's right, what

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a field bill was. And it's astronomical.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>And what you appreciate is in every other part of

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 3>the world, China uses more coal than ever. We use

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 3>more coal today in the world we've ever used before,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 3>despite all the drum beat about how we massively reduced

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the reliance on it we have in the West, the

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world, India, China, you know, it's it's exploding,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 3>and so that's it's not really doesn't matter where it's

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 3>burned one atmosphere, right, And that's the other thing we

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>have to appreciate. So coal use is going to continue

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 3>to go up. I don't think it will necessarily in

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the US. It will in Europe whenever they get really

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>cold or really hot and that's the only fuel they have.

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>But in Asia in particular, you're going to continue to

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 3>see massive use of coal. Why because that's the fuel

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>that they actually have. It's about energy security, and that

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>China uses evs, not because they love the environment, but

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>because they can burn coal to power those evs and

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.119
<v Speaker 3>not have to import gasoline.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Amazing. Well it's going to see you always will. Van Low,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>have quant some capital, Grape and Mason of coled so

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 2>oh the wrong reasons