WEBVTT -  Michael Saylor: The Blueprint for A New Financial System

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>There are no losers here except the twentieth century antiquated

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>oligopoly that is selling inferior credit instruments. But that's technology.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>The human race has got to move forward. The skeptics

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and the cynics, they choose to be strategically ignorant.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 2>Twenty seven years ago you didn't have trading apps on

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>your phone, and now it's even more accessible, but yet

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the market is still held back.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The investment cycle is one thousand times faster than technology,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>real estate, anything else you've ever seen before in your life.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>We're literally selling fifty million an hour or one hundred

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>million an hour and buying one hundred million dollars a

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin the same hour.

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Is there an appetite for over collateralized debt that pays

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>ten percent?

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Just go walk down the street and ask one hundred people,

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>would you like a stable investment that yielded ten percent

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>tax deferred? If you think the bitcoin is okay, I

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>can jack your retirement income from thirty thousand to one

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty thousand. So what we're really talking about

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>is creating an annuity or a pension, And so what's

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the offers like? Happily ever after, it's social security. That's

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the product for how many people a.

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Billion we need to go build the world that we want.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>The real interesting question for all of us in the

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>industry is.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Michael. First of all, thank you for taking the time

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>to sit down with me here in DC.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, happy to be here.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I've gotten to spend a little bit time with you,

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 2>but I've never sat down one on one, so I've

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 2>been excited for this. There's one question I've always wanted

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>to ask you because I love history, and I know

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 2>you majored in science of history of science, but you

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 2>also have the MIT engineering degrees in astronautics, system dynamics,

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 2>and history of science. It seems like this unique blend

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and I'm just curious how that the history so you

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>sort of get the history as well as like aeronautics,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>helps you maybe understand bitcoin better and maybe sort of

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 2>see where the future of bitcoin goes.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think when you read I've read a lot

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of history of late in its original form, you see

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>historians observing things. They're making observations that are noting its suboptimal,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>like observing ten thousand tragedies.

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Then occasionally you'll see philosophers who are complaining about it.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So philosophers synthesize and they complain about about what they

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>don't like, or they lament that it isn't better the

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Austrian economies. The philosophers. The engineers build machines that work airplanes, ships, railroads, right,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, electric motors. The scientists they divine the relationships.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>The math that you know explains the universe, and the

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>physicists you know, and the mathematicians take that you know

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to the extreme right. I had a background on all

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>those things. I think it was useful to have studied physics.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It's useful to have studied math. It's useful to have

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>studied all of the sciences and the engineering disciplines, which

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>get deep in thermodynamics and mechanics. And I think it's

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>also useful to have studied history and philosophy and the

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>history of science. It's particularly interesting subject because it goes

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>back and looks at the histories, but it's extrudes it

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>through or filters through a scientific lens, like the classic

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>non scientific historian says this happened, and this happened, and

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that was sulb optimal, right, and the history of science

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>historians says that happened because of this. That happened because

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of this, Yeah, guns, germs and steel. Right that the

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Europeans didn't just show up to the New World and

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>then they conquered it. They showed up to the New World,

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>brought a German every but he died. They didn't have

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to conquer it. I think ninety ninety five percent of

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the natives died, you know, And that's that's actually, you know,

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a biological explanation for what happened. If you don't understand

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the science of immunology, or you don't understand germs,

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't explain it. And then you know, if you

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think about the impact of steel, what's to take to

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>create steel and explosives and gunpowder? You know. And so

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the history of science is all about how technology dynamics

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>channeled the course of human history. And I think the

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>reason it's important to bitcoin is is you can't really

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>understand bitcoin if you're not an engineer. If you don't

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>understand engineering systems, engineering control systems, servo mechanisms, the system stability,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got to understand all those concepts. Intuitive if you

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>don't understand thermodynamics. You know, the people that are pure

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>computer scientists who are weak on physics and engineering and systems.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Oftentimes they create Reube Goldbherd devices in code that a

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>hardcore engineer wouldn't build, right, And so you can't just

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>be a coder. And of course if you're a pure

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>engineer and you reduce the world, or I built a

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>ship or I built I built a gun, but you

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>don't consider the implication of the ships and the guns

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>on the course of economic and political history, right, then

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't really understand bitcoin either, because you have to

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>understand the history of money and the history of economics

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>and mercantel networks and yeah, yeah, the idea, the idea

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>credit networks are local, like a German prints can have

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a credit network, a British prints can have a credit network.

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>But gold or silver networks tend to be transnational. Right

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that the French, the Germans, the Brits, the Persians and

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese could all agree to trade on a silver

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>network or a gold network, but not on a Chinese

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>paper money network. And so when you start to understand

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the impact of technology has metallic money on economic networks,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the impact of a ship with guns on it,

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, on that economic network, or the impact of

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>not having immunity to all the germs the Europeans brought,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>or the impact of not having steel and being stuck

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Stone Age. All of those things have an

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>impact on the way the world evolved, and I think

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is it's crossing every one of those fields right now, right.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So being able to synthesize that information and understand

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 2>the cause and effect, and then looking at the changes today,

0:06:55.480 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>as you said, sort of a multinational asset, strong, a steel, fast, etc.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Then you can start to it seems like you can

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 2>start to see maybe the future that that creates better

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 2>than most people.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just I think if you've got a broad

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>synthetic educational background, if you've studied a bunch of different subjects,

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of experience, you appreciate bitcoin more. If

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a very narrow background, if you understand economics

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>or i you've studied economics but never studied engineering, you'd

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>be missing half the equation. And if you're an engineer

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't understand economics and never been in business, or

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>never traded internationally or never traveled yet, or didn't know

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>anything about history, yeah, you would also understand only a

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the equation. So I just think you need

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to know a lot of different subjects in order to

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>fully appreciate the impact and the significance of the invention

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is then in your professional career building technology companies,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and so you kind of predicted a lot of those

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>technology companies that have grown some of your books that

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you wrote in the past. But then also navigating those

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>tech companies through the capital markets then sort of gives

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>you a new perspective to see the deficiencies in the

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>current capital markets that we have today and then help

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>you kind of think about fixing those with jumping into

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of like this refinery model, trying to see solve

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>some of the deficiencies in those capital markets the way

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 2>companies are crue capital.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think what can be said of the capital

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>markets is ninety nine point nine percent of the companies

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>were locked out of them, right, So the first question

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you got to ask is how come this forty million

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>businesses in the United States, But there's only like four

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand publicly.

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Traded companies, right, so don't have access to the capitol.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So it doesn't sound like a like if I

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>said only four thousand companies have telephone and internet access

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and the other forty million businesses don't.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 2>What would you say, Yeah, that'd be a problem.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know what if I said four thousand companies

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have bank accounts and the other forty million don't. Right,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So you just start with the observation that the capital

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>markets can't be all that effective if ninety nine point

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the companies can't access them. And you know,

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, the other observation is if you look at

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are in the public market, if you

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the thousands of publicly traded companies, it's like

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty that control all the attention. And so you know,

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>most public companies are zombie companies. They're uninteresting, no one

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>cares about them, They carry a huge burden of regulatory compliance,

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and they don't get the attention they deserve. So one

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>could characterize the capital markets as being unwieldy, ineffective, right,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's you know, and what is that they're twentieth

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>century instruments that never really evolved in the twenty first century.

0:09:58.240 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>You got to ask the question, why does it take

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>three years to raise money if you have a small business,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you do it in three days?

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Why is it? Uh? You know, why does Why is

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it impossible to take custody of your own stock shares?

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Why is it impossible to trade shares on Saturday afternoon?

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is it impossible to transfer things globally? You know?

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is it? Why is it that you can actually

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>take a million dollars of cash and get paid interest

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>on it, but you can't take a million dollars worth

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of stock shares and get paid for that? Yeah? Why?

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Why?

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>You know? So there are all these things that just

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are very inefficient that we just take for granted, but

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't work very well.

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Right. A lot of that is technology being inefficient, and

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 2>here we're at this in DC, at this bitcoin policy event,

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of that might also be regulatory, right,

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of that regulations maybe prevent some of that.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, generally, often oftentimes whenever you have a highly regulated industry,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>progression stops. Right the banking If you look at the

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>credit markets, they seem to be stuck and stuck in

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a mode that was probably probably modern thirty years ago,

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Like they're thirty forty years old and they haven't advanced.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the equity markets, it's the same way.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, now, my company came public in nineteen ninety eight,

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we traded on NASDAK from nine thirty in the morning

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>till four in the afternoon. The year is twenty twenty five.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We trade on NASDAK from nine to thirty in the

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>morning till four in the afternoon. Right, what's the difference

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>between the way my stock trades today and the way

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it traded twenty seven years ago?

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Nothing? Nothing?

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Right? Could you imagine any other industry where there was

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>no material change for twenty seven years.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Every day we see headlines about inflation and dead and

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 2>diminishing control over our own money. That's why I always

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>come back to bitcoin, because it's built for generations, it's

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>built for legacy. But protecting your bitcoin legacy the right

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>way is not always simple. It demands discipline, focus, and

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the right partner. Now, that's why I personally use unchained Signature.

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a premium private client service for serious bitcoin holders

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 2>who want expert guidance, resilient custody, and an enduring partnership.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 2>Now Signature, you're paired with your own dedicated account manager,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>someone who understands your goals helps you every step of

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the way. You're going to get white glove onboarding, same

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 2>day emergency support, personalized education or reduce trading fees, and

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 2>priority access to exclusive events and features. Unchained Collaborative custody

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 2>model is designed to provide the same security as the

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>world's biggest bitcoin custodians, but for those who prefer to

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>hold their own keys. Now. I've been using and recommending

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Unchained for years. I even got my parents to set

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>up with them. So if you want to get set up,

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 2>check out Unchained signature at unchained dot com, slash mark

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Moss and as a loyal listener, I got a discount

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>for you. Just use code Moss ten at checkout to

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 2>get ten percent off your first year. Because your bitcoin

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>isn't just for life, it's for generations. And one of

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the differences, I mean, twenty seven years ago you didn't

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 2>have trading apps on your phone and now it's even

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>more accessible. But yet the market is still held back,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 2>even though retail could access it easier.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because you know, the traditional finance industry is highly

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>regulated and it has settled into a comfort zone, and

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know the forces of progression are in the crypto industry.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Most of the forces of the traditional finance industry are

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>forces of regression like that that the knee jerk reaction

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>is why shouldn't we do this? Why is this a

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>bad idea? If you listen to all the guenslor speeches

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>for the last four years, it's always why this is

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea, right right, Like why can't why can't

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I issue a token, you know, for my small business

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend? Well, we got to protect the investors, right, Okay,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's why we're going to disenfranchise forty million companies

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for being able to raise money, because the people that

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>might want to invest in them might not be qualified

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to make that investment. So it's kind of like, well,

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>why don't we give cars to people below the age

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of sixty? Got to protect the pedestrians or protect the work.

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like if you if you took that rule and

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you applied it to phones, or cars, or websites or

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>flying in an airplane, we would have no automobive industry.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>We'd have no aircraft industry, we'd have no telephones, we

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>have nothing, because we wouldn't do anything until we're sure

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that no one would be harmed by the doing of

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the thing. We wouldn't even have fire, you know, we

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>w'udn't want someone to get burned. We wouldn't have electricity.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>People might get shocked, right, got to protect you know,

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>got to protect the people that might get hurt by

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the new idea. So that's pretty much should be the existing

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>status quo in traditional finance, and it has been for

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty years.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and with the advancements of technology, I'll get I

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 2>want to get more into the politics side. And you

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>talked earlier on your keynote about maybe the last twelve

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>months of this big political wins that shifted, but kind

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>of sticking with some of the ways that technology is changing.

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 2>On your keynote, you said you spent I think about

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty years trying to come up with a billion dollar idea,

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 2>which you did and then couldn't come up with the

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>next one and now half a dozen billion dollar billion

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>dollar ideas in the last year or two. And that's

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of in New York at the unconference, you talked

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 2>about this refinery model and standard oil sort of taking

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 2>this raw asset like bitcoin and creating products off of it.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 2>And so you're creating now products off of it. That's

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the model to do is what would be the kerosene

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 2>of this industry.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Kerosene represents most highly refined crude oil. It's like it's

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>pure liquid energy. Right if JEF you put it in rockets, like,

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't refine oil more than kerosene. So it's an

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>important metaphor. It's the cleanest, highest grade distilled liquid energy,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like pure grain alcohol. Right, that's what you're talking about

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>there from a bunch of potatoes, stock of potatoes and

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>outcomes pure grain alcohol. The equivalent of kerosene in the

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin industry is a treasury preferred credit instrument like stretch.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So on one side you have digital capital bitcoin and

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is a long duration, volatile, high energy, high performance

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>source of capital. Long duration. Think of it in terms

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of like two hundred and forty months, like twenty years.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>You should if you want to get the optimal performance,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you can hold it for twenty years. It's a ten

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to twenty year type in man high volatility. Right now,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it's about forty five ball implied ball. It's been fifty,

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been sixty, it's been seventy ball and high performance,

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, appreciating fifty percent a year. So that's the

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>raw commodity. What happens if I if I strip away

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the volatility, strip away the risk, strip away or compress

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the duration, translate it to a given currency, and extract

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the yield. That's what a treasury credit instrument or treasury

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>preferred is. So that's what stretches. The idea is you

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>build something that's got one month, like I'm going to

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>give you ten percent dividend yield for one month. Like

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the duration is one, the yield is ten percent, the

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>currency base is US dollars. The spread. It's like, if

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the risk free rate is four hundred basis points and

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a six six hundred basis point credit spread, I've

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>extracted a six hundred basis point spread for the next

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>month in US dollars. Maybe I five x overcollateralize it.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I ten x if I, you know, raw bitcoin

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>is like one to one. It's like if I have

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a dollar bitcoin. I have a dollar a bitcoin and

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin trades down fifty percent, I've lost half my money.

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But if I ten x overcollateralize something I have ten

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>dollars a bitcoin, I have one dollar of stretch. A

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin trades down fifty percent, I still get a dollar

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>stretch a bitcoin trades down ninety percent, I still have

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a dollar of stretch. The statistical odds of bitcoin trading

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>down ninety percent or like points something. Right, It's a

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>small percentage. So by over collateralizing, you strip away the

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>risk by structuring it to adjust. If you put a

0:18:56.119 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>set of adjustments or representations below below one hundred, you

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>start to strip away the ball Telly on the downside.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>If like with Stretch, what we did is we put

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in a call option at one oh one, and then

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we told the market we're going to sell it actively

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>at one hundred or better. And then we also told

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the market we're not going to sell it below ninety nine,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and if it's below ninety nine, we're going to raise

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the dividend. Okay, So you're kind of collaring this instrument.

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And then the last point is we created a preferred

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>instrument where we pay it monthly in cash and then

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we adjust the dividend every month. So it turns out

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if you scan in the history of preferred stock or

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the history of the credit markets, no company has ever

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>issued a perred preferred stock where the management has discretion

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to adjust the dividend every single month. Like there are

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>some preferred. That are floaters where they set the credit

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>spread at three hundred and fifty bases points over SOFA,

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and they will float with SOFA with the risk free rate.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot that are fixed where you

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sit it at seven percent, and the principle will trade

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>up and down if sofur falls or arises. But the

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>idea that the credit spread is completely variable is a

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>new idea. But by the way, not a new idea

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in a world of credit, because who does this, well,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Nation States do it.

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 2>The Fed.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Literally, that's what a central bank does, right, That's what

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>every central bank does. They set the interest rate on

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>their currency. Ye what we did was just copied you know,

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional bankers, and we set the interest rate on our currency,

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>which is stretch. So that is the kerosene of of

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin you know, Treasury company, or of the digital

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>assets industry. Because it's the it represents the greatest degree

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of financial engineering, just like kerosene represents the greatest degree

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of petroleum engineering. Right, I've done the most refining. I've

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>distilled the highest quality product. You could imagine, for example,

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you could you could extract the same product and yen.

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So I want to create a yen instrument that's ten

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand yen that pays you know, a monthly yen cash

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>yield or a cash dividend. I changed that every month,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and now I've created the equivalent of kerosene for the

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Japanese market. And of course, what does everybody want? Everybody

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of just wants. I've got some money I need

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to park for the next ninety days. If I put

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>it in the bank, If I put it in the

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bank in Japan, I got fifty basis points or less.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I put it in the bank in Switzerland, I get

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>minus fifty basis points. If I put in the bank

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, I get two hundred basis points or less.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>If I put it in the bank in the US,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I got four hundred basis points or less. And so

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what I'd like to do is put it in some

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of structure where I'm going to get my money

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>back in nine months or six months or whatever. The

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>principal is not going to move around, but I'm going

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to get ten percent. Everybody wants a bank account of

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>base ten percent out of four percent, two percent or

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>zero percent. And and so I think I think the

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>most interesting product that you can create, the most interesting

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>digital credit product is a treasury preferred credit instrument for

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:31.239
<v Speaker 1>corporate treasurers or for retirees. Right, just you know, and

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>how big is that, Marcus, Like thirty trillion dollars in

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the US. Yeah, of just short term treasury money. So

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty trillion in the US that's getting paid, so fur.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And the opportunity with digital credit is you create a company,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you hold bitcoin, that's digital capital. You start to issue

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>credit instruments on top of the capital, and you can

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>decide how much risk do you want to strip away?

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it a BTC rating of two, which is two

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>times over collateralized, or is it ten? Right, Two is

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>less risk stripped away. Ten is more risk strip strip away.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The amount of risk you want strip away, the amount

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of volatility. The smaller the instrument compared to the overall

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>collateral pool, the less the volatility. And then there are

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of terms and conditions that you can put

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in the instrument that would constrain the volatility. So you

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>decide how much volatility and risks you want to strip away,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>decide how much yield do you want to give it.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You decide whether you want it to be in pounds

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>or Canadian or euros or yen or whatever you know,

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and then you distill out, you extrude the yield and

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the pure you know, boost over the risk free rate,

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and you offer that to the marketplace.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I saw you ask it both in New York

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 2>conference then today at the keynotes. Just let me see

0:23:58.080 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 2>a raise of hands, like how many people have a

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 2>bankcount that like ten percent? And of course everybody wants that,

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 2>so we can see the demand for that is.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Nobody in the world's getting paid five.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>We created a product STRD stride. It's the junior long

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>duration credit instrument right now. It pays about twelve point

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>six percent twelve point six percent and so the average

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>part by twelve point six percent as a return of capital.

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's tax deferred and if you put your money

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the bank, you're going to get four percent pre tax,

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent after tax. Right, So it pays anywhere from

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>three to four times as much cash flow. Yeah, so

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>that those are really interesting products that we're creating in

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the market.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just in the US, we have seven trillion

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 2>in money market accounts just trying to earn a third

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of that yield that you're paying out there. And so

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.479
<v Speaker 2>then you have four different products, and so not everybody

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 2>wants cares. Some people might want other products. Yeah, you've

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>got strike, stripe, stride, and now stretch, and so each

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 2>one of those sits in a different location that gives

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>them a little bit of a different variation of the kerosene.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pure kerosene like the I would think, I would say,

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the other ones are kind of like gasoline or diesel,

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>or plastic or you know there naphthos. There's a lot

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of other petrochemicals. You know, the entire petroleum ministry is

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because out of a barrel of oil doesn't just

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>come gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Also, you get acrylics,

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you get fibers, you get polyester, you get lycra, you know,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you get PBC. You get the stuff that we make

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>doors with it, we make walls with it, we make

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>pipes with it, We wear it, we look through it,

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we burn it. Think about how profound it is. Like

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just around this room, if you glanced at the room,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>you probably find there's probably one hundred or hundreds of

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>petrochemical products in this room.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that have been created.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So the possibilities are endless. But if you come back

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to just what we've done. Right, we're just one company

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and we're just we're showing what's possible. Strike was the

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>first and it is a convertible preferred. So Strike shows

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>how you can you can extract any amount of yield, delta, duration, risk,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>or volatility. So we Strike. We basically gave it about

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty five delta, that is like thirty five percent of

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the upside of the equity. So you get you know,

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you get an equity component, then you get like a

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's like eight and a half percent yielding,

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like it pays eight percent at part. So we gave

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it a divid end at eight percent. We gave it

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>an equity component for some upside, and then we made

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it cumulative and so gave it some seniority privileges. And

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that's for people that kind of just they don't want

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>to buy bitcoin and be on the roller coaster. They

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>want to get I call it a bitcoin fellowship. It's like,

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like you buy it, you're waiting for

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the upside and you're getting paid to you know, a

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>living stipend right while you're waiting, you know, for the

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>principle to appreciate. So that's one instrument.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Because it will convert into mstr A thousands.

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Because it's got a conversion right. Right, So if you believe,

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to hold something for thirty years, well

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get thirty years worth of dividends. And

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of thirty years, you're you're holding, say

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred dollars stock, you're holding if you have

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about one of these, you've got a forty dollars worth

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of of equity when you buy one hundred dollars instruments.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's for people that want some upside with downside

0:27:55.480 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>protection with guaranteed cash flow, right, which a lot of

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>investors want, right, I mean a lot of investors they

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.239
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted max upside, max volatility, you would buy

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin, right. But can I go thirty years without

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>any cash flow? Can I go ten years without cash flow?

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 2>And can I stomach the volatility?

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? And there are a lot of people that just

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want the volatility right for any number of reasons.

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So that Strike, it turns out that Strike is the

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>most volatile of the four preferred instruments because it's got

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that equity component in it, and it's got longer duration,

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and so that means it's got more volatile to interest

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>rate forward curve and has got more volatility to bitcoin

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>price and more volatile to MSTR price. The second thing

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we did with Strife STRF, and that was long duration

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>senior credit. So it pays ten percent dividend in par

0:28:54.960 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>forever and that means that it doesn't adjust. It's like

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like a you know, it's not a bond because

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a dividend. It's better than a bond because in

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you want cash flow, because the dividends get

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>better tax treatment, and it becomes if it becomes a

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>return of capital, which is what it is right now,

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's completely tax deferred. So that's that's for someone who's

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a long term credit investor, and it happens to be

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>senior in the capital structure, so it so it gets

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>paid off before everything else, and it has penalty provisions

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if we ever skip a dividend, right and so extremely

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>risk adverse institutional investors that want the credit but they

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be ahead of everybody else in the stack,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they would buy that. Well, that's trading above par right now,

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so it pays like nine percent effective yield, okay, because

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it's senior. We followed that with the identical instrument. We

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>basically weeded ten percent at par, but instead of cumulative,

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we made it noncumulative, and we may instead of senior,

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>made it junior, and instead of the penalty provisions, we

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>took them.

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Out so get a little more yield.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And so what it does is it makes it theoretically riskier,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you know to the person studying the contract, but it

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>means the trades lower, so that trades like in the eighties,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>so that that yields twelve and a half or twelve

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>point six percent. So the issue is why would somebody

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>want to buy the one without all the investor protections

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in the security And the answer is because you get

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>paid three hundred and sixty bases points. So do you

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>want do you want twelve points five or twelve point

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>six percent for the junior instrument or do you want

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>nine percent to be senior? Well, if bitcoin, you know,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>go sideways or up, and if the company doesn't fail,

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>then it's going to cost you three point six percent

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a year for the rest of your life to not

0:30:56.120 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>trust us, right you see, So now you've actually got

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there an actual credit spread. If you're wondering what is

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the equity premium between being senior and then having having

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>none of the representations where you've actually got the market

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>tell it's like three point six or three point seven

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>percent or something. It varies every single day. If you

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>don't trust bitcoin, if you think bitcoin's gone to zero,

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want to buy any of this, right, And

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so then it comes down to how much do you

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>trust the company? And if you know, people buy dividend

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>bearing equities all the time, like every single equity, if

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you buy Verizon equity, if you buy a telephone AT

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and T equity, they pay dividends, but they're not required to.

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>They could suspend them without prejudice and without penalty at

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>any time. So could Apple. Do you trust the company? Correct?

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>You know that if they suspended, their stock's going to

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 2>take a hit, But otherwise you're completely trusted in your view.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Is like, well, they probably won't because the stock will

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>take a hit. And so the issue is with Stride,

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>will we pay the dividend? Well, of course we will,

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but what happens if we don't. Well, if we don't,

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Stride will trade way down. But then we won't. But

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, well, why would the company care.

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>We want to sell it, right, Like, if we actually

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>default on that obligation, then the instrument isn't the capital

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>raising vehicle for us. And the big idea is, unlike

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>most companies that issue credit apologetically in order to deal

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>with the crisis, we issued credit strategically, enthusiastically, with the

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>intent that the credit is the product. See when Boeing

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>issues preferred stock, the product is the airplane. They sold

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the preferred stock because they ran out of money to

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>build airplanes. We issue the preferred The product is the

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>preferred We didn't never run out of money. We issued that.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, why did you sell a billion dollars of

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Stride so I could sell ten billion dollars more of Stride?

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Why did you sell a billion dollars of Strife so

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I could sell ten billion dollars more of Right, So

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a very different business model in that regard.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>We created the Stride so we could create the credit

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>spread because we literally wanted to have an investment grade

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>type instrument, a senior one, and we wanted to have

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a junior one because there's one class of investors that

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>want the junk credit, like they want twelve percent yield, right,

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like, it's very simple, do you trust the company?

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you want twelve and a half percent? You know,

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>do you have trust the company and you prefer to

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>take the nine percent? Well, iron it. There's markets for both,

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and they are not the same investor. Yeah, there are

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>days when everybody wants to buy Strife and they don't

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>want Stride, and there are other days when they want

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to buy Stride, and so so that was part of

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>building out the risk curve. And then the last thing

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we did stretch was a very different idea. Instead of

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>paying an eight or ten percent perpetual dividend forever, we

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>just said, hey, let's actually reduce this to one month duration, right,

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and so we're only promising to pay this dividend for

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a month. The other one is a promise for one

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. And so theoretically the mcaulay duration, the theoretical

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>duration on the other instruments ends up being between like,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight and twenty years or eight and fifteen years.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's very long range. Take of a lever that's one

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty months to two hundred and forty months long,

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you have a little change in interest rates,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's a very big lever to the good of bad.

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But with Stretch, the idea is a one month duration.

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, inherently that's going to be less volatile. And

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, I'm not going to get capital appreciation

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>if Soufur dives by foreignerd basis points, I'm not going

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to double my money. Well, exaly, exactly, it's the treasury instrument.

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>You're not buying it to double your money. If you

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>want it to double your money if Sofur dives, you

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>would buy strife. Right, that's the instrument for the credit

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>investor that wants to actually ride it up when interst

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>rates fall, or wants to do the opposite when interustrates rise.

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a different instrument. It turns out the most people, right,

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>corporate treasurers, retirees, retail most people, they're not really interested

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in being long duration credit investors. Like ask the average person,

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do you have a bank account? Yes? Do you have

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year treasury bond?

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the difference is like fifty to one. Stretch came last,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But ironically, stretches the best piece of financial engineering, and

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the most universally applicable product because what you're

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>doing is just giving people pure currency cash flow, pure

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>pure currency yield without the volatility, the risk, the duration,

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>or the delta. It's like, you know, some people want delta,

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 1>like I want the thirty I want thirty or forty

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of the upside of the common stock. Other people don't.

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Other people like I want nothing to do with the

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>common stock. I just want you to pay me ten

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>percent on my money until I ask for my money back, right,

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what they want. It's a very different, uh financial

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 1>instrument for a different investor.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned how when Boeing issues debt it's because they

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 2>need the money. And when you do it, when Mike,

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 2>when Strategy does it, you're issuing the debt because that's

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the product. And we think about like, if I'm buying

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the debt of Boeing, then I'm trusting that their investment

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 2>into their airline will have enough cash flow maybe to

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 2>pay me in the future, versus I'm paying you, but

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you're buying the asset, so I'm not depending on future

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 2>cash flows because I know you have the asset and

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the debt is over collateralized. Yeah, governments will never stop

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 2>printing money, so inflation it's not going away. Now. If

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 2>your money's not earning at least ten percent a year,

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 2>you're losing purchasing power. Now, that's why I talk about big.

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 2>It's the number one way to beat inflation and secure

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 2>your future. And the question I get asked almost every

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 2>day is where do you buy your bitcoin? Now? For years,

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I've personally use River dot Com and I only take

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 2>on sponsors that I use and I trust, and I

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 2>trust them because River's bitcoin only. They have one hundred

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 2>percent reserve, and they keep your bitcoin safe in cold

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 2>storage with no middlemen, and you can actually talk to

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 2>a real person, a US based support, dedicated manager. Now,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 2>try getting that peace of mind from coinbase. Of course

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 2>you can't. Now the perks. If you set up auto buys,

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 2>you can pay zero fees plus instead of you're bank

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 2>paying you, you know, zero point four percent on cash.

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 2>River pays you three point seventy five percent on cash

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 2>paid in bitcoin. So if you're ready to build your

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin position with confidence, go to River dot com, slash

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Mark Moss and get up to one hundred dollars in

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin when you sign up. Because freedom starts when you

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 2>own your money, and your money starts with bitcoin.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you look at the credit markets. You've got

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>corporate credit that's basically a credit issued against future cash

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>flows of a company. You've got investment great corporate credit

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>from Apple or Microsoft, and you've got distressed corporate credit

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from quasi bankrupt companies. You've got junk from companies that

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>can barely cover that cash, right, And so that's corporate credit.

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got mortgage back credit. It's when you're basically issuing

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>credit back by mortgage payments of homeowners.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we saw that play on two thousand and eight.

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know it's like the good news bad

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>news is if it yields a lot, they probably can't

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>afford to pay it. And if it yields a little,

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting much yield. Right, So either they're not

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going to default but it doesn't pay you much, or

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it pays you a lot and they're probably going to default.

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's the Great Financial Crisis. And we learn that. Well,

0:38:55.160 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then you've got municipal credit. You know, a little bit safe,

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>but it pays nothing, right, it's like almost no two

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to three very little yield in municipal credit back by

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>cities and projects like you know, you've got bank credit.

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>That is when you deposit a million dollars in the

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>bank account you bought bank credit. You know, they're selling

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you bank credit and they're paying you the sofa rate

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>or the risk free rate, et cetera. So that's there's that,

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 1>but you know it's pretty uncompelling in most countries. I

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>mean the best is the US, In Switzerland and in Japan,

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like nothing, right, it doesn't pay anything.

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got sovereign credit fiat credit. You know,

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the government of the United States or the government of

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the UK issues it's sovereign debt and it's and that's

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>backed by the cash flows of the country in theory,

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the taxing ability of the country, or just the ability

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the country to print its own currency. And when the

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>country has a collapsing currency Turkey, those interest rates have

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to be very high. But the country's currency is collapsing.

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And the issue is are you going to want what

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna be able to buy with the currency

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>or the issue you're gonna get paid? So really, the

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>big bran, when's the last time in one hundred years

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a new form of credit. Every one of those

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>credit instruments, they've all been around for a while. You

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>could argue that mortgage credit evolved into a higher form

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>with Freddie, Freddie Mac and Fannie May. Right when what

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>happened the government started underwriting the credit risk of mortgages.

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 1>That drove down the rates, that created systemic risk, right,

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so that changed a little bit. But the idea that

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a company's going to borrow money, or someone's going to

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>mortgage their property, or a government's going to borrow money,

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:50.879
<v Speaker 1>or a seat's going to borrow money, none of those

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are new ideas, right that you can trace them all

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>back for hundreds of not thousands of years. So the

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that you know, what was a quasi stable idea

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>issue credit on gold on a monetary asset, well that

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw that in the seventeenth century, the

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century, the nineteenth century, even the twentieth century. You

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>could argue, you know, British sovereign debt, French sovereign debt,

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they were all gold back credit instruments, and they were

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:22.399
<v Speaker 1>all backed by various amounts of gold, but it was

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>almost never one to one. It was always like under collateralized,

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and eventually it would probably got down to five percent collateralized.

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy one, and that's the end of the

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>gold back credit era, right right. And so now you

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have digital credit, you have digital gold, you have bitcoin.

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is digital gold digital capital. The killer use case

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of digital gold is issued digital credit instruments. And the aha,

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the aha moment is any company, any publicly traded company,

0:41:55.760 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can create a digital credit instrument with any degree of yield, duration, delta,

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or risk, and to a certain degree with a man

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with any amount of volatility that they want. Right, if

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you want extremely low volatility, you can't create a lot

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of it. Like if you have one hundred billion dollars

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a capital, can you create one hundred billion dollars of credit?

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 1>That's low volatility enough. But you know, the real interesting

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 1>question for all of us in the industry is can

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I create ten billion dollars of low volatility credit with

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>one hundred billion in capital? Or do do I need

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred x? Can I only create a I'm sure

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I can create one billion dollars of very very low

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>volatile at one hundred times over collateralization. You certainly get

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 1>done with ten x over collateralization. I think you'll probably

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:56.479
<v Speaker 1>also get it done at what level five x, three

0:42:56.719 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>x too? It at what level can you not? And

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of course that's a function of the bitcoin volatility too,

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>because the less volatile Bitcoin gets, the easier it is

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to create these low volatility credit instruments.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Would it also depend on the credit worthiness, the trustworthiness

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:16.439
<v Speaker 2>of the company issuing it.

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's a function of the issuer, their reputation,

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:27.879
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheet, what senior and junior the instrument. It's

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a function of the type of credit instrument. Is it

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 1>a bond, is it a preferred stock? The container it's in,

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the security design, the rails it's running on. Is it

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>trading on the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ, the

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Frankfurt Exchange, the Toronto Stock Exchange, how much liquidity. It's

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a function of the regulators because in a more flexible

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment, the issuer has more tools to strip the volatility,

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and more inflexible traditional primitive regulatory environment, the issuer doesn't

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>have the tools. They can't legally take the action, and

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:18.760
<v Speaker 1>even the technology rails. For example, you know, on the NASDA,

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't tissue a preferred stock denominated in euros on

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAK on the Nasdaq can't do it. You know,

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So what if I wanted to pay a weekly dividend,

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in theory it would be less volatile. But technically, with

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the existing US banking system, it's not practical to snapshot

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the holders of record every week because there's like a

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>three day delay, you know, So it's very problematic to

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>pay a daily dividend or a weekly dividend. Even monthly

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is about the quickest anybody's done. You know. There are

0:44:54.280 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 1>some exchanges where they they're more inflexible on your about

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, do ATMs and issue securities at the market.

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are other there are other places in

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland they never issued. There's no support for preferred stocks

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in the market, okay, just the entire countries.

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, you know, in the UK they're hardly used as

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 2>well preference share well.

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>So there's an issue of whether they're used or whether

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to do it too. And then and then

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of course it's there's a question of can the exchange

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to trade on support it? And the second

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>question is can will the regulator allow you to issue it?

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And the third question is will the investors in the

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>country buy it? And the fourth question is will the

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>bankers that control those networks sell it?

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And so you really have many, many layers of support

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that you need, and I think over time many of

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the better ideas will spread. But it's just like this

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>right of electricity or gasoline or crude oil or whatever.

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like they didn't all spread in the first year,

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>right right, take take Robinhood. Robinhood is is the way

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>people buy a lot of securities today. They hold they

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>support common stocks, but they don't support preferreds. You can't

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>buy stretched, strike, strife stride on robin Hood. Why you

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>can't buy any preferred on robin Hood. Why because no

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>one ever created one anybody wanted to buy. Because the market,

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>because most there's a market for garbage, like there's a

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>market for twentieth century traditional defective crippled credit instruments in

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the preferred market. Okay, they all pay six percent, they're undercollateralized,

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>their opaque, their heterogeneous credit right, and they're issued by

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>any of five thousand regional banks you've never heard of,

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>or buy five thousand reach you've never heard of. And

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they train cheap. They're all liquid. The bit ass breads

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are wide, they have QSIP numbers, there are no ATMs

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on them. No one's ever heard of them. Your private

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>wealth that you know, think about this, one hundred thousand

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>private wealth advisors. They're you know, pulling out their Bloomberg

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're finding the ninety seventh issue of some big

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>bank preferred and they're putting it in your retirement portfolio.

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes due or it gets called, they're

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>rolling into something else and they manage your money and

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>they charge you an x percent fee. And the person

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>that actually owns that thing doesn't know what they own.

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>They've got xxy QSIP fourteen nine two two three and

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:41.320
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't even read the screen. And by the way,

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 1>there is no quote on the screen. You have to

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 1>buy a Bloomberg and pay twenty five thousand a year

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the quote. So yeah, there's that market. But uh,

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>but the modern retail market, the digital market is like

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty million people you know, want to be able to

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>trade on Saturday afternoon. And so that's that is not

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a criticism by the way of Robinhood. That's an observation

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that you invent a new thing, the existing distribution infrastructure

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.800
<v Speaker 1>never seen the new thing. There was no demand, so

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't build out the rails to move the new thing.

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's been an inertia in the system. At the

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>point that those things become screaming home runs and twenty

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>seven million people ask for them, then you know, somebody

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 1>upgrades the rails and then they start to distribute them.

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what's going on in the world right now.

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that you use Robin in an example because

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 2>they're one of the newer digitally tech forward into crypto,

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 2>so they're sort of at the forefront of that, and

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:46.800
<v Speaker 2>yet they're still behind the girt.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And their defense. What I've just described didn't exist in

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>January of this year, sure, right, Like we're literally about

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to be October, and in January, none of these digital

0:48:57.000 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 1>credit instruments existed. So even if you move back lightning

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>fast is within a year or two years, right, Most

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>big banks they take three to five years to study something.

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>There are literally credit investors and fixed income investors their

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of you as well, and money manager's got to have

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a three to five year track record before we'll consider

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:19.240
<v Speaker 1>an allocation to them. Yeah, right, So I'm not again

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>not being critical. That's just the natural inertia of the world.

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And we are moving very very fast in our industry

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, and the world's going to take a while

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to catch up.

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when we were in London, I was meeting with

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 2>some of the bankers there. We were talking to the

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Rothschilds and they're like, you know, we have this century

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 2>long timetable and we don't move really quickly, and preference

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 2>shares aren't really something that's used a lot in the UK.

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 2>And I said, forget the preference shares for a minute.

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Is there an appetite for overclladalized debt that pays ten percent?

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>And they're like, well, of course right, So of course

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the appetite is there. You just have to get a

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 2>packaged up vitally in front of the right people.

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, like we could have sold our stuff as

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 1>a ten year bond, a twenty year bond, or a

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty year bond, or you could do a five year bond.

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>The reason that we didn't do it is because you

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>can sell prefer in the US, and if it's a

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>perpetual instrument, you can attach at the market shelf registration

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to it. And if your goal was not to sell

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars or half a billion of bonds, but

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>rather to sell a billion dollars a quarter forever, if

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to sell billions of dollars a year forever,

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>then you need to do with the perpetual instrument. And

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of course a five year bonds no good because in

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>three years the bond's almost about to be called so.

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 2>And you'd have to liquidate the bitcoin and give it back,

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 2>which goes against the entire purpose of accumulating the bitcoin.

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason that we don't use that kind of debt

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is because eventually there's a refinancing event, and you know,

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't liquidate the bitcoin. We want to refinance the bond,

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>so we'd issue a new bond. But the point is,

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 1>who wants to be beholden to the bond market? Do

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to issue Do I want to raise a

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:01.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars account up the every four years for the

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>next hundred years, because that's twenty five deals and each

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>one of them is two percent fee, and so I'm

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>going to pay fifty You're going to pay five hundred

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in underwriting fees. Or do I just want

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to issue the billion dollars once for the next hundred

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 1>years and was not paid the next fifty percent in fees?

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course the problem is not just the fees.

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the risk because if you get to

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a refinance point and there's a financial crisis or bank crisis,

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in the window to refinance bonds closes and now you

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 1>have to actually sell some of the underlying assets. So

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you know what, speaking of the raw Child's, if you

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>read the history of the raw Childs, they were very

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:53.720
<v Speaker 1>famous for selling consoles which were British government sovereign debt

0:51:54.440 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>issued you know, from like seventeen sixty on, you know,

0:52:00.719 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred years, and they paid three to five percent.

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:06.440
<v Speaker 1>They were perpetual that never came to par value one

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred pounds. So if you think about what that is,

0:52:11.680 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that's actually just what stride is or strife. It's you know,

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>what we did is just copied British sovereign debt from

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>two hundred years ago. And it's a very humbling to

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>notice that the world went backwards. In my opinion, one

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:33.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars pounds one hundred dollars par value in pounds

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that pays five percent forever. A perpetual instrument is a

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>better way for the government of the UK to raise capital.

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a better instrument for an investor to hold. It

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>would adjust the par value, adjust up above par or

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the principle adjust the above part or below part, depending upon

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the risk of the nation and the prevailing you know,

0:52:55.280 --> 0:53:00.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment. You never have to refinance it. What

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 1>happened between then and now, we forgot We swapped that

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 1>for issuing five year notes, three year notes, one year notes,

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 1>three month notes, and in the preferred market we issue

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 1>retail preferreds baby preferred to the part value twenty five

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:22.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars or institutional part value one thousand dollars. I mean,

0:53:22.480 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is it not obvious to a schoolboy that one hundred

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is a better part value than twenty five? Yeah, on

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>one thousand, And isn't it obvious that having a perpetual

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:36.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that never comes due is a lot more elegant

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>way to raise capital than having nineteen different You literally,

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:44.759
<v Speaker 1>if you look at US government debt, right, you have

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff coming due in March, in September, in April. Like

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you've converted a simple idea into twenty five or fifty

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>different tranches of individual securities that have to be continually

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>joggled and traded. Yeah, you made it an accounting nightmare.

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You've made it a tax nightmare. You've made it a

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>trading nightmare. What about that is better than the way

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that the British did it during the Napoleonic Wars.

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, sometimes we have to relearn those lessons.

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of relearning those lessons, you've been moving fast than

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:23.719
<v Speaker 2>you've been pioneering this whole industry obviously, and so sort

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 2>of micro strategy which used the convertible debt now strategy

0:54:28.239 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 2>which is maybe the two point zero version, using the

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:33.359
<v Speaker 2>ATM and prefs, You've rolled out four prefs you called

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 2>stretch like the iPhone moment it had this huge splash

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 2>you were over subscribed I think two point six billion

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 2>in the IPO something like that. Now, looking backwards, is

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 2>stretched the perfect instrument? Or really do we need all

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 2>those different instruments for all the different people? And more specifically,

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 2>my question is if you were starting over, would you

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:56.040
<v Speaker 2>skip ahead to like a stretch and maybe strike? Being

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 2>convertible isn't the best instrument anymore? Real estate or bitcoin

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 2>which every one's better. Well, it's not about choosing one,

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 2>it's about using both together. Because today sixty percent of

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 2>American homeowners net worth is trapped in their home and

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 2>there's no way to put it to work. In bitcoin.

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Until now, Horizons help you unlock a portion of your

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 2>home equity to buy bitcoin. And it's not alone. There's

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:21.919
<v Speaker 2>no new monthly payments and you stay in your home

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 2>just as usual, but you leverage your equity to get

0:55:24.960 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin exposure. Now what makes Horizon stand out, Well, there's

0:55:29.239 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 2>no term limits. You keep one hundred percent of the

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:34.840
<v Speaker 2>upside of the bitcoin, and the bitcoin is yours to

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 2>custody however you want, with no risk of forced liquidation.

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 2>So if you've got equity but you don't want to

0:55:41.320 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 2>refinance or take on new debt, but you would like

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:48.120
<v Speaker 2>some bitcoin exposure, Horizon could be the perfect option. So

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 2>check out Joinhorizon dot com to learn more and get

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:53.960
<v Speaker 2>an extra five hundred dollars in bitcoin. If you use

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 2>my code moss MSS and you get funded again, that's

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:00.720
<v Speaker 2>join Horizon dot com code moss to get an extra

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 2>five hundred dollars in bitcoin.

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we have provided the entire market with a roadmap.

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 1>With all those instruments, they can see how you can

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>see how they all trade. You can see the the

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:16.120
<v Speaker 1>way the volatility profiles come off them, like, for example,

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the senior credit instrument STRISS is traded to a ten bowl.

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Stretch traded about a ten ball. The junior instrument is

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 1>more like a twenty bowl. Strike is more like a

0:56:29.480 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven ball, the equity is more like a fifty

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 1>bowl or something. So you can actually see that. You

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>can see the demand in each one of them. You

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>can see the liquidity profile. They all do serve different

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>investor bases, so I don't regret having any of them

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 1>out there. We will let the market decide what their

0:56:50.080 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>appetite is. For each of the four. I would say,

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of plan, what we know is

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we won't focus on convertible bonds or eight bonds, junk bonds,

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:06.360
<v Speaker 1>unsecured bonds. We won't do that. We will gradually equitize

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 1>our convertible bonds as they come do and then, uh,

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if I were giving advice to a new digital asset company,

0:57:14.840 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a new bitcoin treasury company, if you will, I would say,

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to raise as much capital as you can,

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You want to buy as much bitcoin as you can.

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't really want to have senior debt. You don't

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 1>want to have debt that has a lean on the bitcoin.

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, you in the ideal world, you might do

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a convertible bond, but you don't. But it's not clear

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to me that you should. If someone wanted to buy

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a convertible bond from you while you're private, if they

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 1>showed up with two hundred million cash and said, i'll

0:57:50.440 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 1>give you two hundred million dollars in you and I

0:57:52.600 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want the equity, but I want to bond with

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:57.840
<v Speaker 1>conversion right and a thirty five percent premium, I might

0:57:57.880 --> 0:58:04.520
<v Speaker 1>take that money. That's not really reasonable. Having said that,

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:10.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're already trading in the aftermarket, the reason to

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 1>do a convertible bond is you want to raise a

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of capital in a hurry. But the way you're

0:58:14.680 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>going to raise the capital is the person that buys

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the bond is going to sell that much of your

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>equity in four hours. So if you sell a two

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:27.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars bond, you're probably gonna create one hundred

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million dollars of selling pressure on the equity

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:33.439
<v Speaker 1>that day. And then the question you'd have to ask

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself is whyannt you to sell the equity yourself? Right?

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of five people that have the

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:42.400
<v Speaker 1>convertible bond, they don't have an ATM, so if you don't,

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're crippled because you don't have an ATM, the

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 1>convertible bond is the de facto. You know, try party ATM,

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but you pay a price. Right, you might as well

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just dump two hundred million dollars of your own stock

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on the market, not owe anybody. The stock will take it.

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Going to do it anyway, the stock will take a hit.

0:59:02.120 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you do the convert the stock will take

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a hit, but you'll still owe the money. You see,

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that you could potentially skip that stage,

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, if you take if you take

0:59:16.120 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the perfect structure. Here, here's here's an ideal structure. You

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 1>raise a billion dollars, you buy bitcoin, and then you

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 1>go to the market and you sell two hundred million

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of treasury preferred credit instruments treasury preferred stock

0:59:31.080 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like stretch like if you just wanted as simple as possible.

0:59:36.120 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>The equity is high ball, high performance, high risk, and

0:59:42.760 --> 0:59:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the credit is lowball.

0:59:45.720 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 2>So you have tools and the preferred.

0:59:49.280 --> 0:59:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, And the leverage for the equity comes from

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the preferred and the collateral right, And you know, for

0:59:57.880 --> 1:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the preferred comes from the equity sale and from the

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin capital and then sell the equity to pay the

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>divenot on the preferred.

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that might be the best kind of combination

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>to come out with.

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You could very well build one hundred million dollar company

1:00:13.160 --> 1:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>from scratch with one credit instrument. Just yeah. So if

1:00:19.200 --> 1:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you were to say, you know, what would I do? Yeah,

1:00:21.720 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I would distill kerosene, Like, is that a big enough market? Yeah,

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it's thirty trillion dollars in the US, it's seven trillion

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars in Japan. Must be fifteen trillion dollars. Right, Basically,

1:00:37.640 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself what is the sum of bank deposits, money

1:00:40.600 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>market accounts, treasury preferred repo, short duration treasury credit instruments,

1:00:47.200 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you're given capital market. I would just uh,

1:00:51.560 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what is the word? Like, skip all the intermediary steps

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and go direct to the answer.

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:00:56.560 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion is uh kerosene is the answer, or

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in this case, treasury credit. A bitcoin treasury company is

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in the unique position to create treasury credit, digital credit,

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>digital treasury credit. And people are gonna they're going to

1:01:17.480 --> 1:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>endlessly torture you and say, well, why should the equity

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>trade at a premium? And the answer is because an operating

1:01:24.160 --> 1:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>company can create digital credit, an ETF cannot, and like,

1:01:29.640 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>well why would I all? I like, well, I whant

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I just buy the bitcoin? It's like, well, I'm not

1:01:33.680 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>selling to the big to people that want bitcoin. I'm

1:01:35.880 --> 1:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>selling to people that want ten percent bank accounts. Do

1:01:39.360 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you do you have a bank account the year is

1:01:40.840 --> 1:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent?

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>No? What I want want?

1:01:43.520 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, well once just buy bitcoin instead. But but

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and that basically tears apart in the argument of the

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>short sellers, Like the reason that people aren't going to

1:01:53.200 --> 1:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>buy bitcoin is they don't want bitcoin. What they want

1:01:56.880 --> 1:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is a bank account that's high yield. And in Switzerland

1:02:01.040 --> 1:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they want ten percent, not zero percent. In Japan they

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>want eight percent, not five you know nothing. In Europe

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They want more than nothing. Right, So the

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>beauty of just focusing upon that mark is it's such

1:02:16.360 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a simple story. It's like, I have a company, we

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>own bitcoin, it's digital capital. We use it to back

1:02:23.080 --> 1:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>digital credit. We're selling a creditement or what does it do? Oh,

1:02:26.200 --> 1:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it pays you five percent more than your bank account.

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you want it? Of course I want it? Right,

1:02:32.440 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So what's the objection? The only objection is it is

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the principal value stable, How volatile is the principle? How

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>risky is it if it's If it's under collateralized and volatile,

1:02:45.400 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to sell that much of it. If

1:02:48.200 --> 1:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's over collateralized and stable and theory, you're going to

1:02:52.840 --> 1:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>sell quite a lot, right, And just that simple. The

1:02:56.760 --> 1:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>largest IPO of the year this year, And you know,

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as states is stretch is our IPO. You're asking why

1:03:05.240 --> 1:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's the simplest, most obvious thing. I'm going to

1:03:07.920 --> 1:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>give you ten percent?

1:03:09.440 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the biggest tam ten percent.

1:03:12.600 --> 1:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, strip away the risk and the volatility. Yeah,

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>And like, I don't know what will happen in the future,

1:03:17.760 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'll just park my money there until I figure

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>out where what gives me better than ten percent. That's

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea. And it's a very simple idea and you

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>can test it. Just go walk down the street and

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>ask one hundred people. Would you like a stable investment

1:03:33.280 --> 1:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that yielded ten percent, you know, tax deferred? Yeah, and like,

1:03:39.440 --> 1:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of course I would. And it's a question that do

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I trust you? Do I trust bitcoin? So you reduce

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the entire thing down to is bitcoin? Am I trusting Bitcoin?

1:03:49.960 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Is the basis? You know, and do I trust the company?

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of like, Hey, I have this penthouse apartment,

1:03:57.520 --> 1:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in an island city and it's beautiful and

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it's free. Do you want it? And the question is, well,

1:04:05.560 --> 1:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is the only going to sink underneath the ocean? Do

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to live there? That's bitcoin? Is the granite solid?

1:04:11.040 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:04:11.640 --> 1:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And then oh yeah, who built the building? And then

1:04:14.280 --> 1:04:15.439
<v Speaker 1>do the elevators work?

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>And do I trust them?

1:04:16.720 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Do I trust?

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>You know?

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Do I trust the neighborhood? So if I get comfortable

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>with the company and get trump comfortable with the locale,

1:04:24.440 --> 1:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>but of course I want it, it's better than my

1:04:26.520 --> 1:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>current situation. So it's a very straightforward, constructive thing to

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>focus on.

1:04:33.040 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 2>The trust piece was the one I was thinking about

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>if maybe the stretch one takes more trust, and so

1:04:38.240 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a strike or strife might be a little bit less trust.

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>So maybe as a new company, easier to roll out

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>because they're a little bit more senior in the stack,

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>build some track record and then roll out the stretch.

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. So, to tell you the truth, I've

1:04:50.400 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>thought about it a lot. I mean to be honest,

1:04:53.960 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we did strike because it was the first thing we

1:04:57.040 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>thought to do, and it felt like a perpetual convertible bond,

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and we were bootstrapping it with existing convertible debt investors

1:05:08.120 --> 1:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>and existing equity investors, you know, and we didn't really

1:05:11.920 --> 1:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have a big base of retail or fixed income investors.

1:05:14.520 --> 1:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>That's where we did it. It was a gateway product, yeah,

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's got a role. But and then we did

1:05:19.720 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Strife because it was the next obvious thing we thought

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of we needed a perpetual instrument, and we didn't. It

1:05:26.680 --> 1:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't occurt us we could do anything variable. So we

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>did the perpetual ten percent because that's what we could sell.

1:05:32.760 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And then after we did it, we did Stride because

1:05:34.960 --> 1:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we thought, well, if we strip away the cumulative rights,

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>then this instrument potentially gives us unlimited leverage risk free,

1:05:45.480 --> 1:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like we could in theory sell one hundred billion dollars

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of it with no credit risk. So, you know, why not.

1:05:54.240 --> 1:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And because we'd already sold Strife, and Strife and Strike

1:05:58.120 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>were already successful, they already traded above par, it wasn't

1:06:02.520 --> 1:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a hard thing to sell the identical instrument at a

1:06:05.800 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent discount through the thing that people already owned.

1:06:08.880 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>You see. Yeah, we did stretch because we ran into

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other headaches trying to trying to globalize

1:06:16.520 --> 1:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the first three. It's just the lawyers are slow, the

1:06:19.280 --> 1:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>regulators are slow. I thought, what can I do in

1:06:21.840 --> 1:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the US market, which is not going to cannibalize those

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, I'm on the fart of the yield curve.

1:06:28.520 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the short end end of the yeld curve, right,

1:06:31.600 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the short end of the duration curve. So we kind

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of stumbled on it accidentally, and then as we iterated

1:06:38.480 --> 1:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>through it, we realized that it really was, you know,

1:06:42.760 --> 1:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a better product, and that's what people really wanted. So

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that were buying the other instruments,

1:06:48.960 --> 1:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they were buying the high yield, but they were getting

1:06:51.080 --> 1:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the duration not because they wanted it. They wanted like,

1:06:54.800 --> 1:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>do you want the twelve percent with the risk that

1:06:57.520 --> 1:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the principal will move up and down? You just want

1:06:59.360 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent?

1:07:00.360 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:07:00.880 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I just want the twelve percent, right to say. So,

1:07:03.640 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they were buying it, but.

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:07.080
<v Speaker 2>They were stomach in the volatility because they wanted the yield.

1:07:07.440 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, you took the delta, you took the vall

1:07:10.320 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>because you wanted the yield. So with stretch, we stripped away,

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the delta stripped away, they'll the vall kept the yield. Yeah,

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that it's a simpler product. It's

1:07:23.960 --> 1:07:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, it's a bank account. If you put

1:07:27.440 --> 1:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in ninety nine dollars and ninety nine cents, you'll get

1:07:30.040 --> 1:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>back down to the last penny. With a money market,

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you expect to get back down to like

1:07:36.040 --> 1:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>one significant digit past the decimal point of something very close.

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>May not be the last penny, but it's you know,

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>plus or minus, you know, a small rounding error with

1:07:47.200 --> 1:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a product that's a preferred stock, that's trading. You know,

1:07:50.160 --> 1:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not looking to get to the sixth significant digit

1:07:53.040 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>or the third decimal point, but you want to be

1:07:57.760 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>plus or minus you know, ten, twenty, thirty, fifty basis points. Yeah,

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be varying by one or two percent.

1:08:04.760 --> 1:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You want to be varying by fractions of a percent.

1:08:08.360 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And what you offer in return is, okay, I'll give

1:08:11.200 --> 1:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you five percent more yield, and that is just slightly more.

1:08:18.520 --> 1:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>It's it's more flexible than a money market. And you

1:08:21.760 --> 1:08:23.519
<v Speaker 1>got to go into that. It's not a money market.

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You got to go into it with your eyes open

1:08:25.280 --> 1:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that money markets are trying not to break the buck,

1:08:29.240 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, at all. But on the other hand, you're

1:08:33.920 --> 1:08:35.479
<v Speaker 1>targeting something to pay double.

1:08:36.120 --> 1:08:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the yield is going to make up for that volatil.

1:08:39.000 --> 1:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're giving you a competitive money market to

1:08:41.880 --> 1:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>pace double that will get of his attention. That's a

1:08:46.880 --> 1:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>simple discussion. Also, I mean, the truth of the matter

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>is it's easier to judge whether it's successful or not.

1:08:53.240 --> 1:08:58.519
<v Speaker 1>For example, you know, stretches March from ninety up to

1:08:58.680 --> 1:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven and some chain now and you know the

1:09:02.160 --> 1:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>target is one hundred, and when it gets to one hundred,

1:09:05.880 --> 1:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it were to jerk up to one

1:09:08.200 --> 1:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>oh five or down to ninety five, you know it's

1:09:10.760 --> 1:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not working. But if you look at strike or you

1:09:14.040 --> 1:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>look at strife, those things could trade if the interest

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>rates fall one hundred basis points, strife could trade up

1:09:21.080 --> 1:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>ten or twenty percent. And that's not because it's failing, right,

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. And if you know, when Jerome Palell gives

1:09:29.120 --> 1:09:31.479
<v Speaker 1>a speech and says, you know, I don't I don't

1:09:31.479 --> 1:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>really think we're going to lower instrates as fast. You know,

1:09:33.880 --> 1:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So strife trades down three four five dollars ten it

1:09:39.760 --> 1:09:42.719
<v Speaker 1>could trade quite a bit because of what Jerome Powell said.

1:09:43.040 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not a failure of our instrument, you see, but

1:09:46.240 --> 1:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you understand how much more complicated it is to explain

1:09:49.040 --> 1:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that strife reacted rationally to the forward yield curve expectations, right,

1:09:56.520 --> 1:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>whereas with Stretch, I don't have to With Stretch, everybody

1:10:00.960 --> 1:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>knows the mission. It's like we're pegging it to be

1:10:02.760 --> 1:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>between ninety nine and one o one, Like we're targeting

1:10:05.320 --> 1:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>for ninety nine to one oh one. And the way

1:10:07.840 --> 1:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you'll know that it's in the range is what it's

1:10:09.880 --> 1:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>between ninety nine and one oh one, right, And when

1:10:12.439 --> 1:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you canted, like my goal for strife is I want

1:10:16.800 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to see a trade to one fifty or two hundred, Right,

1:10:20.479 --> 1:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine a world where strife is way over collateralize.

1:10:24.000 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>The risk cre rate in the US is two percent.

1:10:26.800 --> 1:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>We have a three hundred basis point credit spread. Strife

1:10:29.680 --> 1:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>trades with an effective yield to five percent, which means

1:10:31.800 --> 1:10:35.759
<v Speaker 1>it should trade it two hundred. You see, that's success

1:10:35.760 --> 1:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for that, but you understand how much more complicated that is,

1:10:39.640 --> 1:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>because what if it gets a two hundred, Well, we're

1:10:42.200 --> 1:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be paying an effective yield to five percent.

1:10:44.400 --> 1:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll be selling at a two hundred. But now what

1:10:45.960 --> 1:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>happens if you buy it at two hundred and interest

1:10:48.640 --> 1:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>rates get jacked two percent of the trades down to

1:10:50.560 --> 1:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>one sixty. Did it work Yeah? Exactly as designed? Is

1:10:55.360 --> 1:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>some is a retiree going to be irate? Yeah? Like, waitmen,

1:10:59.840 --> 1:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I got five percent more, three percent more, but it

1:11:02.760 --> 1:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>traded down twenty percent or something, and that's not what

1:11:05.920 --> 1:11:09.919
<v Speaker 1>I signed up for. So you understand that looks scary.

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Those long duration, high delta, high high duration, high delta

1:11:14.320 --> 1:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>instruments look scary. They're very exciting for people that are

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>professional investors. But we're we talked about the iPhone moment.

1:11:21.280 --> 1:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's iPhone is kind of maybe not even

1:11:24.600 --> 1:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the perfect metaphor. I mean, the perfect metaphor is a

1:11:29.400 --> 1:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>comfortable retirement. It's like you pick up the phone and

1:11:32.720 --> 1:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>call your dad and you say, hey, Dad, you know

1:11:35.000 --> 1:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you have some capital and your four to one k.

1:11:37.240 --> 1:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>You put it in a stretch. It was paying you

1:11:39.920 --> 1:11:42.599
<v Speaker 1>thirty two thousand a year. You put in a stretches

1:11:42.640 --> 1:11:44.519
<v Speaker 1>going to pay you one hundred and twenty five thousand

1:11:44.600 --> 1:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a year. What's the risk? Okay, there's no risk. I

1:11:49.000 --> 1:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>mean there's risk, you know of a security. But the

1:11:51.320 --> 1:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>point is, you know, it looks like it's eight x

1:11:53.800 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>over collateralized or five x over collateralized, which is more

1:11:56.880 --> 1:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>than investment grade companies offer you. Right, So it's great

1:12:00.720 --> 1:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>comparable risk if you believe in bitcoin. If you hate bitcoin, dad,

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:06.679
<v Speaker 1>don't take it. But if you think the bitcoin is okay,

1:12:06.720 --> 1:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I can jack your retirement income from thirty thousand to

1:12:09.360 --> 1:12:12.479
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty thousand. If you do this, well,

1:12:12.479 --> 1:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what do I have to do?

1:12:13.880 --> 1:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Nothing is buy it in your equity a brokerids account.

1:12:17.360 --> 1:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, like a lot of eighty year olds don't

1:12:20.080 --> 1:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>use an iPhone, A lot of senior citizens have a

1:12:23.200 --> 1:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>hard time using technology. No one has a hard time

1:12:27.360 --> 1:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>collecting a pension. So what we're really talking about is

1:12:32.320 --> 1:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>creating a living stipend or creating an annuity or a pension.

1:12:37.360 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And so what's the offers like happily ever after to

1:12:40.880 --> 1:12:45.639
<v Speaker 1>It's social security. That's the products for how many people?

1:12:45.800 --> 1:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Like a billion? Like everybody? Right, it's it's basically social

1:12:49.880 --> 1:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>security and living happily ever after for a billion people.

1:12:53.200 --> 1:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>What do I got to do? All you got to

1:12:55.400 --> 1:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>do is just A, understand bitcoin, trust it, and then

1:12:58.439 --> 1:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>b you've got to trust the company or the security

1:13:02.439 --> 1:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>that you're buying. But once you get over those two,

1:13:05.560 --> 1:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>those two barriers, what do you get. It's like how

1:13:08.280 --> 1:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>many people would like their salary to go from thirty

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand to one hundred thousand dollars a year?

1:13:12.200 --> 1:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Everyone?

1:13:14.479 --> 1:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So you understand why I would say that's the simplest

1:13:17.040 --> 1:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>product to sell. Yeah, because it's like the other ones

1:13:20.120 --> 1:13:23.519
<v Speaker 1>lead you down a path of explaining conversion rights in

1:13:23.600 --> 1:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>delta and duration, interest rate risk, and it's just you know,

1:13:27.280 --> 1:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and the like and what happens if the central bankers

1:13:30.760 --> 1:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>say this and do that and you make get this boost,

1:13:32.960 --> 1:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but you might not get that, and it's a lot

1:13:35.880 --> 1:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>more complicated. And if you create something which is simple,

1:13:39.000 --> 1:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that means you'll sell ten to one hundred times and

1:13:40.800 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>much of it, right, But if it's a hundred times

1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>as much you sold, it's gonna be a hundred times

1:13:45.800 --> 1:13:48.479
<v Speaker 1>of liquid. If it's liquid, it means you get in

1:13:48.520 --> 1:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and you get out, right. So what we're trying to

1:13:50.080 --> 1:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>do is and that means there's less volatility. So at

1:13:52.600 --> 1:13:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, the simple universal product that

1:13:56.520 --> 1:13:59.479
<v Speaker 1>everybody needs that's the most liquid with the highest day

1:13:59.520 --> 1:14:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you whim you see. My criticism of the preferred stock

1:14:03.760 --> 1:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>market and the corporate bond market is is they were

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>never trying to create good credit. It was always crippled credit.

1:14:13.720 --> 1:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's like, why doesn't a big bank have one hundred

1:14:17.200 --> 1:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of a single preferred instrument with a

1:14:20.720 --> 1:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>four letter ticker that trades five billion a day with

1:14:23.200 --> 1:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit ass spread of a penny. Because because they

1:14:27.800 --> 1:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>never really wanted to create a good credit instrument, they

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they created, you know, ninety seven tranches of rolling debt issuances.

1:14:38.760 --> 1:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's an it's a traditional market and insider game

1:14:42.920 --> 1:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they play with themselves. There is a set of traditional investors,

1:14:47.040 --> 1:14:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and a set of traditional bankers, and a set of

1:14:49.479 --> 1:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>traditional issuers, and a set of a traditional mode and

1:14:54.400 --> 1:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>they're all basically they're going through this hyper inefficient process. Yes,

1:15:01.680 --> 1:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>whereas when we created these instruments like stretch, you know,

1:15:05.120 --> 1:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>ask me what I want. I want to sell fifty

1:15:07.160 --> 1:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of it? I want I want fifty billion

1:15:10.160 --> 1:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with two billion three but I want it to be

1:15:11.880 --> 1:15:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the largest, you know, outstanding preferred stock issued in the

1:15:16.720 --> 1:15:21.599
<v Speaker 1>history of the world. And already these four credit instruments,

1:15:21.600 --> 1:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they're already the most liquid preferred stocks of the century. Yeah,

1:15:25.280 --> 1:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's in the first few months of their life.

1:15:28.439 --> 1:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Imagine what happens three to five years from now after

1:15:31.400 --> 1:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we've actually sold via the ATM every single month for

1:15:37.120 --> 1:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the next thirty six months.

1:15:38.479 --> 1:15:41.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The difference is, as you said, for like Boeing,

1:15:42.160 --> 1:15:44.640
<v Speaker 2>they're taking debt to build their product, and so a

1:15:44.680 --> 1:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>bank or Boeing, they're not trying to make the credit.

1:15:47.360 --> 1:15:49.519
<v Speaker 2>It's not the product, it's not attractive. Whereas you want

1:15:49.520 --> 1:15:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to sell the credit as the products. You're trying to

1:15:51.200 --> 1:15:53.360
<v Speaker 2>make it to reach the biggest addressable market. And if

1:15:53.400 --> 1:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>you look at in the developed world, we have two

1:15:55.720 --> 1:15:58.720
<v Speaker 2>to fifty million retirees, right and they all want the

1:15:58.800 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 2>yield with no volatilities. The tam that told just what

1:16:01.200 --> 1:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>market is massive. As you've explained, the profit margin for

1:16:04.760 --> 1:16:06.840
<v Speaker 2>you to create that product is also big. It's simple.

1:16:07.000 --> 1:16:07.840
<v Speaker 2>The market's big.

1:16:08.840 --> 1:16:14.559
<v Speaker 1>You see what breaks people's brains though, because they think

1:16:16.000 --> 1:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of credit issuance as a mean to the end, and

1:16:19.000 --> 1:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the end is tax arbitrage. At Apple, it's it's it's uh,

1:16:25.720 --> 1:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, leveraging him. Microsoft stock Right, if you look

1:16:30.120 --> 1:16:32.599
<v Speaker 1>at all the big well run companies in the world,

1:16:32.880 --> 1:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they're solving a tax issue, a shareholder related they're trying

1:16:36.400 --> 1:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to improve the quality of their equity or their EPs performance,

1:16:40.200 --> 1:16:43.519
<v Speaker 1>or they're or they're building airplanes, or they're building buildings,

1:16:43.600 --> 1:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>or they're developing skyscrapers. Right, it's it's a means to

1:16:47.040 --> 1:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the end. Or it's like the bank is, they're not

1:16:51.160 --> 1:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bragging about issuing the world's greatest preferred stock. They did

1:16:54.800 --> 1:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it because they have to for like tier one capital,

1:16:57.960 --> 1:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>mezzanine capital allocations so that they can make commercial loans

1:17:02.880 --> 1:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so that they can do something else. Right, So what

1:17:08.040 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>we stumbled upon in the bitcoin treasury business is we

1:17:10.640 --> 1:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>just realized that if you were the first well run

1:17:15.200 --> 1:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>company that actually thought of credit as the product, then

1:17:22.240 --> 1:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the killer application of bitcoin and the killer application of

1:17:26.840 --> 1:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>capital is to issue credit. And the killer application of

1:17:30.160 --> 1:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is to issue digital credit. And now, if you

1:17:34.320 --> 1:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the at these things that were languishing, any

1:17:37.280 --> 1:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>public company in the US can issue a preferred stock.

1:17:39.520 --> 1:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Most just choose not to. When's the last time you

1:17:42.120 --> 1:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>bought a preferred stock from Microsoft? Microsoft, in theory could

1:17:46.000 --> 1:17:48.559
<v Speaker 1>give you a ten percent yielding preferred stock. But could

1:17:48.560 --> 1:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you imagine discussing that or pitching it to the CFO.

1:17:51.880 --> 1:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>They're like, are you out of your mind? Why would

1:17:54.040 --> 1:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we do that? Right? And so most companies in the

1:17:59.840 --> 1:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>un less they could have, but it was never really

1:18:03.640 --> 1:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was never strategic to them. The ATM

1:18:08.960 --> 1:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was developed I think by Michael Milken many many years ago,

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the at the market shelf registration. But you know, if

1:18:15.880 --> 1:18:18.839
<v Speaker 1>you were to go to Microsoft or Apple or Google

1:18:19.000 --> 1:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or Amazon or Meta and say, hey, what do you

1:18:21.600 --> 1:18:24.519
<v Speaker 1>guys think about selling your own equity, They're like, are

1:18:24.520 --> 1:18:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you out of your mind? We buy our equity the money. Yeah,

1:18:27.800 --> 1:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we have no use of the money. We don't have

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the use of capital. Okay, well you could issue credit

1:18:32.680 --> 1:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>instruments at the market. Well, we don't want to issue

1:18:35.800 --> 1:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>credit instruments. And so what we did is we took

1:18:41.120 --> 1:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>existing ATM, applied it to a preferred stock, paired it

1:18:46.439 --> 1:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with a radical different view toward treasury capital. We inverted

1:18:53.680 --> 1:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the company, inverted the balance sheet, inverted the business model. Right,

1:18:59.200 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we're selling that's literally what we do. We credit is

1:19:03.400 --> 1:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the product we created, We engineer the product, right, then

1:19:09.400 --> 1:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>we issue the product. We use the proceeds to build

1:19:14.600 --> 1:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the capital structure, which then thereby boosts the performance of

1:19:19.000 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the equity. Right, the elegance of it, it really is

1:19:23.520 --> 1:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a symmetric thing of beauty. We're selling US dollar yield

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>us D yield to create BTC yield. That's the swap. Right.

1:19:36.200 --> 1:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>The equity investors value the company based on BTC yield,

1:19:40.520 --> 1:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the appretion of bitpoint per share. Credit investors value the

1:19:45.080 --> 1:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>credit the credit security based upon us D yield. And

1:19:51.280 --> 1:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>so just swapping a FIAT yield, a y in a euro,

1:19:55.439 --> 1:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a US dollar yield for a BTC yield with the

1:20:00.240 --> 1:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin as the collateral on the middle is the business,

1:20:05.800 --> 1:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, And and the skeptics and the cynics they

1:20:10.120 --> 1:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>choose to be strategically ignorant. And it's like like a hater,

1:20:14.680 --> 1:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to understand the business because I might

1:20:17.880 --> 1:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have to agree with you. So if I've already decided

1:20:20.320 --> 1:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I hate you, I don't want you to explain why

1:20:23.760 --> 1:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing is going to save the world or

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>help anybody, or help the shareholders. I just don't want

1:20:29.040 --> 1:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to know. I'm going to choose to stick my head

1:20:31.920 --> 1:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>in the sand and be ignorant. But if you're more

1:20:36.680 --> 1:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>open minded about the entire thing, and you just embrace

1:20:41.320 --> 1:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea that this is a new kind of company,

1:20:45.840 --> 1:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a new It's not a bank because it doesn't it's

1:20:48.880 --> 1:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not regulated, doesn't take consumer and commercial deposits. It's not

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of bank. It is a financial kind of company, right,

1:20:58.000 --> 1:21:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's a new form of company. They're a bank,

1:21:00.200 --> 1:21:04.599
<v Speaker 1>they're insurance companies, you know, et cetera. So, a treasury

1:21:04.680 --> 1:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>company is a company that issues securities in order to

1:21:10.080 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>acquire capital. Now a commodity really you're issuing securities to

1:21:16.160 --> 1:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>buy a commodity. And if you pick a commodity that

1:21:19.120 --> 1:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>happen to be scarce, you create a very powerful feedback loop. Right,

1:21:25.360 --> 1:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>work through your mind. If I if I do this

1:21:27.479 --> 1:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on bitcoin going at fifty percent a year, I can

1:21:29.680 --> 1:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>easily pay ten percent capture the forty percent spread. That

1:21:34.360 --> 1:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is an amplifier.

1:21:35.640 --> 1:21:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:21:36.600 --> 1:21:40.599
<v Speaker 1>If I issued the credit to buy soybeans, Yeah, without

1:21:40.640 --> 1:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the keg gar or natural gas or crude oil or

1:21:45.000 --> 1:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>some other you know commodity that returned three five percent

1:21:50.280 --> 1:21:53.519
<v Speaker 1>anything less than the cost of the credit, then I've

1:21:53.760 --> 1:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>run the feedback loop. In the opposite direction. I'm destroying

1:21:56.320 --> 1:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>capital as fast as I can. The business is not

1:22:00.080 --> 1:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>really much more complicated than that. It's just no one's

1:22:03.840 --> 1:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>ever seen it before, which is why people just have

1:22:05.920 --> 1:22:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a hard time getting their head around it.

1:22:08.720 --> 1:22:11.639
<v Speaker 2>And if they don't believe in bitcoin. Now you've talked

1:22:11.640 --> 1:22:14.200
<v Speaker 2>about the different preferreds and how even just one could work,

1:22:14.240 --> 1:22:16.720
<v Speaker 2>and it gives you leverage. And in the in the

1:22:16.880 --> 1:22:19.599
<v Speaker 2>last quarterly report, which are brilliant by the way you're

1:22:19.640 --> 1:22:22.439
<v Speaker 2>changing industry with that. It's great. You showed several slides

1:22:22.520 --> 1:22:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of this Bitcoin factor, which is like this amplification of bitcoin,

1:22:26.439 --> 1:22:28.799
<v Speaker 2>and so by doing the preferge, you're adding the leverage

1:22:28.960 --> 1:22:30.880
<v Speaker 2>which then over time you use a ten year window,

1:22:31.120 --> 1:22:32.960
<v Speaker 2>you can give you a bitcoin factor of two point

1:22:32.960 --> 1:22:37.479
<v Speaker 2>eight to five six whatever. Does that number sort of

1:22:37.520 --> 1:22:40.759
<v Speaker 2>relate into this m NAB number over a long period

1:22:40.760 --> 1:22:43.200
<v Speaker 2>of time and sort of justify or show why that

1:22:43.360 --> 1:22:45.639
<v Speaker 2>m NAB number should be greater than two or three

1:22:45.760 --> 1:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>or four.

1:22:47.120 --> 1:22:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So if you think about think about the value

1:22:50.560 --> 1:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of the equity over and above net asset value. If

1:22:55.800 --> 1:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the company did nothing, if it just bought bitcoin and

1:22:58.840 --> 1:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>held bitcoin forever, it starts to look like an ETF.

1:23:04.240 --> 1:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Probably a trades around NAB The way that a company

1:23:09.439 --> 1:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>generates a premium to NAB is primarily through credit amplification.

1:23:14.760 --> 1:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So if a company can generate, say thirty percent leverage,

1:23:20.439 --> 1:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>then it's going to create an amplifier because you can

1:23:24.800 --> 1:23:28.959
<v Speaker 1>see systemically, I issue a billion dollars of a preferred

1:23:28.960 --> 1:23:33.479
<v Speaker 1>stock paying ten percent, I buy a billion of bitcoin. Right,

1:23:33.479 --> 1:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>if I own a billion dollars a bitcoin already and

1:23:37.080 --> 1:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I was able to do that trade, I'd have two

1:23:38.960 --> 1:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars a bitcoin, no additional common stock outstanding, you know,

1:23:43.520 --> 1:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so you end up with fifty percent leverage on that.

1:23:47.520 --> 1:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>So you start to generate amplification. Now we have models

1:23:53.720 --> 1:23:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to calculate how accretive that is, how does that contribute

1:23:56.560 --> 1:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin per share? And it turns out that it's

1:24:00.280 --> 1:24:03.599
<v Speaker 1>more accreative. But this won't come as a surprise. It's

1:24:03.640 --> 1:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more accreative if the cost of capital falls. For example,

1:24:08.040 --> 1:24:10.599
<v Speaker 1>raising the ten billion at five percent instead of ten

1:24:10.640 --> 1:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>percent is more accreative, right raising it at one percent.

1:24:16.520 --> 1:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Imagine borrowing a billion dollars at one percent and buying

1:24:19.720 --> 1:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin that returns fifty five percent. You're capturing fifty four

1:24:24.040 --> 1:24:27.479
<v Speaker 1>percent spread, right, So the spread that you're capturing as

1:24:27.520 --> 1:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the function of you're cost to capital. So the lower

1:24:30.240 --> 1:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the cost of capital, the more the amplication. The higher

1:24:34.240 --> 1:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the leverage, the more the amplification, the faster. If you

1:24:39.120 --> 1:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>did all that the bitcoin went up zero percent a year,

1:24:43.680 --> 1:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not terribly You don't get a lot of good amplification. Right.

1:24:46.720 --> 1:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>So it bitcoin goes out fifty percent a year, right,

1:24:51.080 --> 1:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that's more amplification. So the rate of growth of bitcoin,

1:24:54.920 --> 1:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the ar bitcoin plus the leverage, plus the cost of capital,

1:24:58.160 --> 1:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>all those are primary factors that drive the amplification. That

1:25:02.160 --> 1:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is a rule of thumb. You know, we kind of

1:25:04.120 --> 1:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>calculated that. You know, assuming bitcoin appreciates thirty percent a

1:25:07.960 --> 1:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>year and we get thirty percent leverage, then we should

1:25:10.240 --> 1:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to get a three x BTC factor, or

1:25:13.479 --> 1:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we can accumulate three times more bitcoin per share over

1:25:16.840 --> 1:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a ten year timeframe. So you could imagine an m

1:25:21.040 --> 1:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>non floor of three, right, makes sense? Or you know,

1:25:25.960 --> 1:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>how what do you do in percentage? Or you do

1:25:27.760 --> 1:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that a factor and you know, for when you're evaluating

1:25:31.600 --> 1:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a company, the question is how high can they take

1:25:34.720 --> 1:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the leverage? How much is it going to cost them?

1:25:37.160 --> 1:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>There as second order effects like credit risk. Right, So

1:25:40.320 --> 1:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm describing perpetual instrument never comes to there is no

1:25:43.520 --> 1:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>credit risk there. But if you were, if you were

1:25:45.960 --> 1:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>achieving that leverage with a six month loan, yeah right,

1:25:51.520 --> 1:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you can go on an exchange and you can actually

1:25:54.120 --> 1:25:56.599
<v Speaker 1>crank up the leverage to three or four or five.

1:25:57.560 --> 1:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But the duration is instant, right, you get forced liquidated overnight.

1:26:02.640 --> 1:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>When we're managing the business, we're constructing credit amplification in

1:26:07.080 --> 1:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the most intelligent way. And of course, in my opinion,

1:26:10.680 --> 1:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the least risky, most intelligent way to create credit amplification

1:26:14.880 --> 1:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is through publicly issue preferred stocks that are perpetual. Right,

1:26:18.920 --> 1:26:21.519
<v Speaker 1>for the obvious reason, you never refinance them. The principle

1:26:21.560 --> 1:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come due, and so the risk on the principle

1:26:24.920 --> 1:26:28.599
<v Speaker 1>is the minimus. And then the dividends you know, are

1:26:28.800 --> 1:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are subject to the approval of the board of directors,

1:26:31.400 --> 1:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and the company can suspend the dividend or delay it

1:26:34.160 --> 1:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for a time under financial duress, and so the coupon

1:26:39.520 --> 1:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>risk is dominimous as well as the principal risk. The

1:26:43.680 --> 1:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>opposite extreme is a one year senior loan pledge the

1:26:49.080 --> 1:26:52.599
<v Speaker 1>coladal of bitcoin, pay off the principle in one year

1:26:53.120 --> 1:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and pay interest every month as a coupon, missed the

1:26:55.920 --> 1:26:58.759
<v Speaker 1>interest in a month, you're in default, missed the principal

1:26:59.040 --> 1:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>delay it you're in default, missed the principle, you're in default,

1:27:02.560 --> 1:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and the claudal gets ripped away and the entire company collapses. Right,

1:27:07.040 --> 1:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So intelligent leverage unintelligent risky leverage. Right, you want to

1:27:13.240 --> 1:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>go for one not the other.

1:27:14.880 --> 1:27:17.360
<v Speaker 2>So you think it sets in that example. And as

1:27:17.360 --> 1:27:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you said, there's three different factors in there, but that's

1:27:19.120 --> 1:27:21.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of that. In that example, that set an m

1:27:21.400 --> 1:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>NAB number about a three times. When you look at

1:27:24.040 --> 1:27:27.920
<v Speaker 2>other hat asset heavy companies banking, insurance, oil, they kind

1:27:27.920 --> 1:27:30.479
<v Speaker 2>of trade in that one to two times. But do

1:27:30.560 --> 1:27:32.599
<v Speaker 2>you think, because this is not oil as an asset,

1:27:32.640 --> 1:27:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that's got this fifty times or call it a thirty

1:27:35.080 --> 1:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>times kagar over this long period of time.

1:27:39.160 --> 1:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I would stop there and I would say m NAB

1:27:41.760 --> 1:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is just price to book value. Okay, Well, run banks

1:27:46.200 --> 1:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>traded a price to balk north of two, but what

1:27:50.360 --> 1:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is Microsoft's price to book value? It's like twenty ten.

1:27:55.360 --> 1:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of companies traded a price to book five, six, seven, eight, ten, right,

1:28:01.120 --> 1:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Like they have very productive capital, right, they have huge

1:28:03.960 --> 1:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>leverage on it. Right, So an m NAB of three

1:28:08.960 --> 1:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is just a price to book of three, So you know,

1:28:12.200 --> 1:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>how do you get there? There? It's it's simple to

1:28:14.920 --> 1:28:17.479
<v Speaker 1>figure out how you get there. For example, if you

1:28:17.600 --> 1:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have ten billion dollars a bitcoin and you sell ten

1:28:25.080 --> 1:28:29.559
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of Stride s TRD, you would have

1:28:29.600 --> 1:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a leverage factor of fifty percent no credit risk. Yeah, right, right,

1:28:38.160 --> 1:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so you'd sell another five dolling of Stride right if

1:28:41.760 --> 1:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you can sell it? Right? This all comes down to

1:28:44.840 --> 1:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>not should you? Can you?

1:28:47.240 --> 1:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Can you? Right?

1:28:48.320 --> 1:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Not should you? And if you do, you will get there?

1:28:51.439 --> 1:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Right if in that particular case, it all comes down

1:28:54.240 --> 1:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to what kind of credit can you issue and under

1:28:58.840 --> 1:29:00.599
<v Speaker 1>what terms and how rapidly?

1:29:01.120 --> 1:29:03.439
<v Speaker 2>So at fifty percent leverage with no credit risk, I mean,

1:29:03.479 --> 1:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>then there's the five times right.

1:29:05.840 --> 1:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you could get to it and have a five,

1:29:07.479 --> 1:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>or you could be priced a book at five. But

1:29:10.080 --> 1:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ask you off the question, how do banks get to

1:29:12.040 --> 1:29:14.799
<v Speaker 1>a price to book more than one? Leverage?

1:29:15.160 --> 1:29:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:29:16.439 --> 1:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Why do preferred stocks exist at all? So banks can

1:29:19.439 --> 1:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>generate leverage on the common yeah? Right? And so everything

1:29:23.400 --> 1:29:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm describing is it's not we didn't invent that, Yeah,

1:29:27.000 --> 1:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there's five thousand banks in the country right now. There

1:29:29.280 --> 1:29:32.639
<v Speaker 1>are twenty five thousand banks one hundred years ago, thousands

1:29:32.720 --> 1:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of banks, and you know, all sorts of

1:29:35.240 --> 1:29:41.719
<v Speaker 1>finance companies. They generate intelligent leverage using various various tiers

1:29:41.720 --> 1:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of equity, capital, mezzanine equity, preferred equity, senior, preferred, junior, preferred,

1:29:48.479 --> 1:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of debt, and then they got common equity.

1:29:52.320 --> 1:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And the question is, so why, I mean, why does

1:29:54.880 --> 1:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>your favorite bank have to issue anything at all? They're

1:29:57.439 --> 1:29:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the bank. And the answer is because they're actually creating

1:29:59.680 --> 1:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a luck. What are you on the They're generating leverage

1:30:02.280 --> 1:30:05.479
<v Speaker 1>on the common that's all. I mean, JP Morgan, all

1:30:05.520 --> 1:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>these they could basically pay off all their debt if

1:30:09.080 --> 1:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. But the point is they're they're trying to

1:30:13.000 --> 1:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>create leverage on the common to give the common stock value.

1:30:17.680 --> 1:30:23.599
<v Speaker 1>So the only difference is they're not really strategic about

1:30:23.640 --> 1:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>their They're not trying to make their credit instruments the

1:30:26.040 --> 1:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>best in the world and brag about it, make them

1:30:27.920 --> 1:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>homo genius and transparent.

1:30:30.439 --> 1:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>We are, right right, Yeah, they're trying to set the

1:30:33.760 --> 1:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>terms for them. You're trying to set the terms for

1:30:35.880 --> 1:30:38.719
<v Speaker 2>the customer. So it's like a different difference. Yeah, different

1:30:38.720 --> 1:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>there part of there you talk about the common I

1:30:42.200 --> 1:30:44.479
<v Speaker 2>remember in Prague you talked about you give a vivid

1:30:44.479 --> 1:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>example how how MSTR trades as volatilated bitcoin and everybody

1:30:50.439 --> 1:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>wants it to trade volatileated bitcoin. And you gave this

1:30:52.880 --> 1:30:54.559
<v Speaker 2>example that if God came and spoke to you tonight

1:30:54.560 --> 1:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and told you the market was going to crash tomorrow,

1:30:56.080 --> 1:30:58.120
<v Speaker 2>and you woke up and headed your position in the

1:30:58.120 --> 1:31:00.519
<v Speaker 2>market crash, but Microsoft didn't go down, be great, And

1:31:00.560 --> 1:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>you said, no, that wouldn't because the market expects us

1:31:02.880 --> 1:31:06.200
<v Speaker 2>to move with bitcoin. And I think you were trying

1:31:06.240 --> 1:31:08.599
<v Speaker 2>to explain to us during that during that is that

1:31:09.240 --> 1:31:11.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of when the company is lean and sort of

1:31:11.840 --> 1:31:15.000
<v Speaker 2>strips down, it can trade volatility to bitcoin. And so

1:31:15.040 --> 1:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious your take on sort of then having like

1:31:18.000 --> 1:31:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that pure play company versus a company that's like a

1:31:22.439 --> 1:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>big underlying business that has a bitcoin treasury, and how

1:31:28.000 --> 1:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>that then maybe maybe potentially takes that common away from

1:31:31.360 --> 1:31:33.639
<v Speaker 2>really being used like in the ATM, sort of almost

1:31:33.640 --> 1:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>neutralizes that part of the tool.

1:31:34.960 --> 1:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you can have an operating company h that

1:31:38.720 --> 1:31:42.759
<v Speaker 1>has cash flows that uses bitcoin as a treasury asset,

1:31:44.080 --> 1:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's a retailer, if it's a utley company, a

1:31:47.920 --> 1:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>power company and water company, of you know, fill in

1:31:51.200 --> 1:31:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the blank software company. The world's every one of the

1:31:54.760 --> 1:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>mag seven companies. The world's full of companies that have

1:31:57.760 --> 1:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>good businesses to generate cash flows, but they have a

1:32:01.280 --> 1:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>defective treasury strategy. All of those companies have a treasury

1:32:06.720 --> 1:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>which is not schinerating shareholder value. Right, if you take

1:32:11.960 --> 1:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars and you buy money markets with it,

1:32:14.960 --> 1:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the yeld two percent are three percent after tax, and

1:32:20.360 --> 1:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>if the S and P is generating fourteen percent, then

1:32:24.200 --> 1:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you've underperformed the cost to capital by eleven percent. Therefore,

1:32:28.520 --> 1:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>your treasury is a cost center, not a profit center

1:32:32.200 --> 1:32:35.799
<v Speaker 1>for the shareholders. And so what happens is it shribles

1:32:35.880 --> 1:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>up the company, basically decapitalizes the balance sheet, and they

1:32:40.280 --> 1:32:43.479
<v Speaker 1>give all the money away. And that it just describes

1:32:43.479 --> 1:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in a nutshell, every well run company in the United States,

1:32:46.400 --> 1:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>right except Berkshire, Hathway, everyonewhere else, like all the MAGS seven.

1:32:53.400 --> 1:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>What they do is they defund the treasury. So if

1:32:56.760 --> 1:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you're one of those companies, you could just place money

1:33:00.840 --> 1:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>markets with well, you could replace it with bitcoin instead,

1:33:06.240 --> 1:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin is fifty percent, or let's say a reasonable

1:33:09.920 --> 1:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty year forecast is thirty percent. If you're a believer,

1:33:14.240 --> 1:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of you're an investor, ten percent of your

1:33:18.080 --> 1:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a skeptic. Right, But whether it's ten or twenty or

1:33:21.880 --> 1:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent, they're all better than two percent or three percent,

1:33:25.280 --> 1:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the status quo. Right, So if you're in

1:33:31.120 --> 1:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the twenty or thirty percent camp, it outperforms the hurdle rate,

1:33:36.080 --> 1:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>which is the S and P index. And so at

1:33:37.920 --> 1:33:40.639
<v Speaker 1>that point, the treasury in the balance sheet becomes profit center,

1:33:40.720 --> 1:33:43.519
<v Speaker 1>which means that you would stop paying dividends, you would

1:33:43.520 --> 1:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>stop doing buybacks, you would roll it into bitcoin, and

1:33:47.840 --> 1:33:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the company's market cap would grow faster and the stock

1:33:51.479 --> 1:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>would grow faster. Right, So that's whay to create sheeriolder value.

1:33:56.160 --> 1:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You won't be better than us, you won't be better

1:33:58.960 --> 1:34:02.759
<v Speaker 1>than a pure play try company, but you'll be better

1:34:02.880 --> 1:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>than your peers. Right, Like, if if you're a native

1:34:07.320 --> 1:34:09.840
<v Speaker 1>business or your organic business is growing ten percent, you

1:34:09.840 --> 1:34:14.439
<v Speaker 1>will go thirteen. Right. If every other retailer is losing money,

1:34:14.479 --> 1:34:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you'll make money. Right. What we've done is created a

1:34:21.479 --> 1:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>pure treasury company. So risk, our risk free rate, our

1:34:25.960 --> 1:34:28.599
<v Speaker 1>HERD rate is thirty percent. That's what I expect at

1:34:28.600 --> 1:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin over the next twenty years, twenty nine percent

1:34:32.120 --> 1:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of let's call it thirty percent round up. So my

1:34:36.520 --> 1:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>benchmark rate is thirty percent. If I put leverage on it,

1:34:39.360 --> 1:34:43.599
<v Speaker 1>I should be we'll grow fifty or forty. I don't

1:34:43.640 --> 1:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>think there's any any non financial company. There's no there's

1:34:48.120 --> 1:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>no physical company that's going to actually appreciate at that

1:34:50.880 --> 1:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>rate because you can't do it with real estate or

1:34:53.400 --> 1:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>oil or natural gas. The investment cycles are too slow,

1:34:58.240 --> 1:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the develop cycles are too slow, the risks

1:35:02.080 --> 1:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are too ineff of ball, et cetera. So I would say,

1:35:07.640 --> 1:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>across thousands of companies, every company ought to recapitalize their

1:35:12.400 --> 1:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet on bitcoin because that will cause them to

1:35:15.000 --> 1:35:18.760
<v Speaker 1>grow fifty percent faster than their peers or than they

1:35:18.760 --> 1:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise. They'll just be better and the compounds. Yeah,

1:35:23.120 --> 1:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so a billion dollar company will be worth ten billion

1:35:25.200 --> 1:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars instead of two billion dollars in a decade. Okay,

1:35:30.160 --> 1:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>if they were a pure play, they might go from

1:35:32.439 --> 1:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars to one hundred billion. They won't do that,

1:35:36.840 --> 1:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's not their bogie, And the truth is they

1:35:39.760 --> 1:35:42.720
<v Speaker 1>probably can't get political consensus to change their retail or

1:35:42.760 --> 1:35:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to sell the retail business and become a pure financial company.

1:35:46.439 --> 1:35:49.439
<v Speaker 1>That's probably not going to happen. So I just think

1:35:50.479 --> 1:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not a bad idea, but your expectations ought to

1:35:54.600 --> 1:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be adjusted based upon the enterprise value mix, right Yeah.

1:36:00.479 --> 1:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Like if Microsoft bought one hundred million dollars a bitcoin tomorrow,

1:36:04.840 --> 1:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight percent of the enterprise value would still be

1:36:08.000 --> 1:36:11.240
<v Speaker 1>index to the software business, right yeah. If they bought

1:36:11.240 --> 1:36:14.519
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars a bitcoin tomorrow, they still be seventy

1:36:14.560 --> 1:36:18.519
<v Speaker 1>five percent indexed to the software business. So you can't

1:36:18.600 --> 1:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>get to one hundred percent digital exposure unless you actually

1:36:24.920 --> 1:36:26.639
<v Speaker 1>start with a clean balance sheet.

1:36:26.400 --> 1:36:28.479
<v Speaker 2>And starting with a clean balancee So it seems like

1:36:28.520 --> 1:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>for the new crop of companies that are starting up

1:36:31.200 --> 1:36:33.640
<v Speaker 2>in micro strategy, when you raise the convertible debt, then

1:36:33.680 --> 1:36:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you had the debt to cover. So then there was

1:36:35.200 --> 1:36:36.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of questions in the industry about how you

1:36:37.120 --> 1:36:39.360
<v Speaker 2>cover the debt with the underlining business model. But in

1:36:39.479 --> 1:36:42.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of the strategy two point zero version skipt that

1:36:42.280 --> 1:36:44.120
<v Speaker 2>if you could just go raise a billion dollars of

1:36:44.120 --> 1:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin and start issuing preferred SR doing.

1:36:46.040 --> 1:36:48.559
<v Speaker 1>It again, I'd raise a billion dollars, I'd take the

1:36:48.640 --> 1:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>thing public, and then I'd sell one hundred million, two

1:36:52.160 --> 1:36:54.519
<v Speaker 1>hundred million, three hundred million worth of preferred stock as

1:36:54.560 --> 1:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>soon as possible yep. And then I'd rock back and

1:36:57.360 --> 1:37:00.280
<v Speaker 1>forth between levering delevering the thing, and I would grow

1:37:00.320 --> 1:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it with the minimum most elegant set of credit instruments. Well,

1:37:06.160 --> 1:37:08.559
<v Speaker 1>if you look at expansions for US right now, stretch

1:37:08.600 --> 1:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>seems like the killer product in the US. Maybe we

1:37:11.840 --> 1:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing in yen or euros or Canadian

1:37:15.439 --> 1:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>or pounds, right, But otherwise there's nothing else that's all

1:37:18.479 --> 1:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that exciting, right, I mean, and even those things are

1:37:22.640 --> 1:37:25.559
<v Speaker 1>much less exciting than just growing the business in the

1:37:25.680 --> 1:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>US by a factor of one hundred.

1:37:27.200 --> 1:37:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So speaking of that, then in New York you

1:37:30.280 --> 1:37:32.519
<v Speaker 2>had talked about the potential to have a thousand of

1:37:32.560 --> 1:37:36.479
<v Speaker 2>these companies. Yeah, when you think about if it's just

1:37:36.520 --> 1:37:39.160
<v Speaker 2>as simple as just selling that one product, can there

1:37:39.160 --> 1:37:41.640
<v Speaker 2>be a thousand companies selling that one product? Or is

1:37:41.640 --> 1:37:43.439
<v Speaker 2>it that there's going to be a thousand companies each

1:37:43.479 --> 1:37:47.000
<v Speaker 2>doing their own variations. Some are like more like insurance companies.

1:37:47.320 --> 1:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Some of the more like banks is we have ten

1:37:48.880 --> 1:37:50.960
<v Speaker 2>major banks, there's a lot of products. There's thousands of

1:37:51.000 --> 1:37:52.960
<v Speaker 2>regional banks. There's like ten major banks.

1:37:53.479 --> 1:37:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think there's huge amount of How many

1:37:58.439 --> 1:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies are there in the world, a lot. How

1:38:01.880 --> 1:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>many life insurance companies are there in the world that's

1:38:04.160 --> 1:38:07.519
<v Speaker 1>sell essentially the same exact product, right, like more than

1:38:07.560 --> 1:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a dozen.

1:38:08.360 --> 1:38:09.759
<v Speaker 2>And they're completely different than banks.

1:38:10.600 --> 1:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. How many car insurance companies? Right? How many dn

1:38:14.160 --> 1:38:16.240
<v Speaker 1>O insurance? How many reinsurance companies?

1:38:16.920 --> 1:38:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Like?

1:38:17.080 --> 1:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So off the top of my head. Products the obvious

1:38:20.040 --> 1:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ones yourself, treasury credit in every country in the world, Brazil, Argentina. Look,

1:38:28.160 --> 1:38:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you won't be better than a US company, but you

1:38:30.760 --> 1:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>will be better than every Argentine company, right the Brazil

1:38:35.240 --> 1:38:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Brazilian treasury company. It won't be as good

1:38:38.320 --> 1:38:41.800
<v Speaker 1>as the US one, but it will be better than

1:38:41.840 --> 1:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>every country in Brazil. And by the way, in that

1:38:45.160 --> 1:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>way it may become better because if you're this, if

1:38:48.040 --> 1:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you're the most compelling, fastest growing company in Brazil, then

1:38:52.120 --> 1:38:54.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't you going to slurp up all the equity capital

1:38:54.800 --> 1:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and all the credit capital in the entire country?

1:38:57.439 --> 1:38:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:38:59.080 --> 1:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Which is, which is interesting. So you can do this.

1:39:05.760 --> 1:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>There's place to create a treasury company in Switzerland, the

1:39:11.120 --> 1:39:13.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixth country is it twenty six or twenty seven

1:39:13.800 --> 1:39:17.559
<v Speaker 1>countries in the Eurozone, they're all different. There's a German one,

1:39:17.600 --> 1:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a French one, a Swedish one, in Norwegian one. You

1:39:21.080 --> 1:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>can do you know, Netherlands, Belgium, UK, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Italy, right,

1:39:30.400 --> 1:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then Japan, Korea, China, China, Kingdom of

1:39:37.760 --> 1:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia, India, Australia, Canada, Mexico. Okay, So there you

1:39:47.680 --> 1:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>could just be the first provider of digital credit, right,

1:39:51.479 --> 1:39:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you sell kerosene, you sell stretch, but then

1:39:53.880 --> 1:39:57.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe you also sell long duration credit or convertible credit

1:39:57.520 --> 1:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But then let's I've I've broken it down geographically,

1:40:01.880 --> 1:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but then let's come back to the US and break

1:40:04.120 --> 1:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it down by industry sector. Right, you could be the

1:40:07.840 --> 1:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one that specializes in insurance or feeding the insurance company.

1:40:12.400 --> 1:40:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Or you could create a credit product that's like a

1:40:15.280 --> 1:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>reinsurance product. Right, you could you could create various credit

1:40:19.960 --> 1:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>products that are tailored to the life insurance, the annuities

1:40:25.760 --> 1:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, every other type of insurance, you know,

1:40:28.439 --> 1:40:33.519
<v Speaker 1>flood casualty, property insurance businesses. There are a lot of

1:40:33.600 --> 1:40:36.519
<v Speaker 1>buyers in the market, fixed income buyers. They just will

1:40:36.560 --> 1:40:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not buy prefers no matter what. They'll want to buy bonds. Okay,

1:40:41.320 --> 1:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to sell them because it doesn't

1:40:44.160 --> 1:40:46.599
<v Speaker 1>make sense for me. But if you were saying, Mike,

1:40:46.640 --> 1:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I got ten billion dollars, I want to compete with you,

1:40:49.000 --> 1:40:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and I want to grow just fast or what it

1:40:51.280 --> 1:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>should I pick up, I'm like, man, I'm not going

1:40:54.160 --> 1:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to do ten year bonds. Why don't you just do

1:40:56.400 --> 1:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>what I did, but raise ten billion dollars and issue

1:40:59.000 --> 1:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars a bar. It'll do one for four

1:41:02.479 --> 1:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>A offerings. Not compete with me. By the way, the

1:41:05.040 --> 1:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>market loves them. Yeah, start to do basically over the

1:41:09.080 --> 1:41:12.559
<v Speaker 1>counter institutional bond offerings. And the debate is do you

1:41:12.600 --> 1:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>sell five year instruments. I'm gonna sell five year secured

1:41:16.200 --> 1:41:19.599
<v Speaker 1>bonds and I'm gonna roll them every quarter, or I'm

1:41:19.600 --> 1:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, you know, you could go and do the

1:41:22.120 --> 1:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>convertible bond market if you want, or you could do unsecured,

1:41:24.960 --> 1:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>or you could do secure. I'm like, Mike, I found

1:41:27.360 --> 1:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>like the biggest insurance company in the US. They don't

1:41:29.760 --> 1:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>want to prefer, they don't want the converts, but they

1:41:32.320 --> 1:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>would take senior debt as long as it's they've got

1:41:35.080 --> 1:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a claim on the capitol for up to twenty percent

1:41:38.160 --> 1:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of the capital structure or whatever. Yeah, and they have

1:41:42.400 --> 1:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred billion dollars they'll give me. Do you want it?

1:41:45.840 --> 1:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I don't want it right now. It confuses

1:41:49.439 --> 1:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>my story, confuses my investors. It puts credit risk senior

1:41:54.160 --> 1:41:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to all my other instruments, and that kind of is

1:41:56.520 --> 1:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not good for my capital structure. But should you take it? Absolutely?

1:42:00.960 --> 1:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>You could probably take one hundred billion dollars. There's probably

1:42:03.920 --> 1:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a one hundred billion dollars senior debt thing, one hundred

1:42:07.000 --> 1:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of junk unsecure. There's one hundred billion dollars

1:42:10.080 --> 1:42:12.240
<v Speaker 1>or fifty billion to take out of the convert market.

1:42:12.720 --> 1:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You could probably write all sorts of custom instruments for

1:42:15.680 --> 1:42:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the annuity industry, the insurance industry, and guess what, none

1:42:19.240 --> 1:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of that's going to be interesting to the Japanese insurance companies.

1:42:23.160 --> 1:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>They're going to want different. So when you say what

1:42:26.000 --> 1:42:29.720
<v Speaker 1>are all the products, I think the products are if

1:42:29.720 --> 1:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there's three hundred trillion dollars of credit instruments. I think

1:42:34.040 --> 1:42:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the products are every possible currency every by the way,

1:42:38.439 --> 1:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we can say euro, but you know, French bonds and

1:42:42.320 --> 1:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>euros aren't the same as German bonds and euros, right,

1:42:47.040 --> 1:42:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's like every type of currency, every jurisdiction, every

1:42:52.800 --> 1:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>type of credits, every flavor of credit. You know, we

1:42:57.160 --> 1:42:59.439
<v Speaker 1>issued a lot of things that you know. And then

1:42:59.479 --> 1:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>every districtribution channel do you go public on that exchange?

1:43:02.960 --> 1:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you do direct institutional sales? It's not clear to me.

1:43:08.280 --> 1:43:10.519
<v Speaker 1>For example, we couldn't do something where we just like

1:43:10.600 --> 1:43:13.479
<v Speaker 1>roll ten year bonds and you know, it's like, how

1:43:13.479 --> 1:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>do you handle the credit risk? Well, just every year

1:43:15.400 --> 1:43:17.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll refinance ten percent of them, will never have more

1:43:17.640 --> 1:43:21.439
<v Speaker 1>than ten percent, or maybe I'll just refinancing them every quarter.

1:43:21.520 --> 1:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll never have more than two percent two and a

1:43:25.120 --> 1:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>half percent. So there there are other credit products that

1:43:30.360 --> 1:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>can be created. There are other buyers, they're investors, right,

1:43:36.240 --> 1:43:39.519
<v Speaker 1>But then again there's also corporations that would bypass, so

1:43:40.479 --> 1:43:43.559
<v Speaker 1>like the pension funds and the insurance companies would get

1:43:43.600 --> 1:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you could go direct to them and open up a pipe,

1:43:46.960 --> 1:43:49.479
<v Speaker 1>and then there are all the bond traders and the

1:43:49.479 --> 1:43:52.599
<v Speaker 1>pimcos and the vanguards and the fidelities of the world,

1:43:52.680 --> 1:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and indirectly the pension funds and the endowments are behind them,

1:43:57.920 --> 1:44:01.479
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, so you know, you might be able to

1:44:01.479 --> 1:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>create the perfect product for an endowment. It's like, well,

1:44:05.360 --> 1:44:07.599
<v Speaker 1>we like bitcoin, but we don't want we can't stomach

1:44:07.640 --> 1:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the volatility. Can you just give me a ten percent guarantee?

1:44:13.080 --> 1:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And then and then there's issue of liquidity, like, well,

1:44:16.160 --> 1:44:18.519
<v Speaker 1>we would give you ten billion dollars, but we need

1:44:18.520 --> 1:44:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the right to redeem five hundred million in any given

1:44:20.880 --> 1:44:24.519
<v Speaker 1>quarter direct from you. Like I wouldn't do that deal

1:44:25.240 --> 1:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like for my company because it's complicating for me. But

1:44:30.240 --> 1:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you might do that deal if the choice was have

1:44:33.000 --> 1:44:35.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollar company and agree to create five

1:44:35.360 --> 1:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in cash on hand or not, right right, yeah,

1:44:39.880 --> 1:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And but we haven't explored that. But but there's a

1:44:42.920 --> 1:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of there's a lot of you could create a

1:44:45.000 --> 1:44:48.559
<v Speaker 1>quasi money market instrument where you are actually you know,

1:44:48.760 --> 1:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Alix kept five percent of all the capital available for

1:44:52.760 --> 1:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ready redemption on a daily basis, and then you you

1:44:55.640 --> 1:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>know how funds they'll create gated redemption windows, Like you're

1:45:01.280 --> 1:45:03.439
<v Speaker 1>invested with me for seven years, but once a quarter

1:45:03.560 --> 1:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a one day when you can give me

1:45:05.200 --> 1:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>redemt you can call, you could put you could put

1:45:08.040 --> 1:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>call options and put rights or redemption rights into a

1:45:11.040 --> 1:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>preferred stock. I haven't you could. It's a different product,

1:45:19.120 --> 1:45:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you No, some people like polyester, some people like lycra Yeah,

1:45:23.800 --> 1:45:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, nylon. Yeah, right there, there's a lot of

1:45:27.840 --> 1:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>things you can do with carbon, hydrogen and oxygen.

1:45:32.400 --> 1:45:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and not everyone's going to want to do all

1:45:33.920 --> 1:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>those things. In the US, we have almost five thousand

1:45:37.160 --> 1:45:40.479
<v Speaker 2>ETFs that are each just a little flavor of something, right,

1:45:40.920 --> 1:45:42.479
<v Speaker 2>thousands of bonds and a lot of.

1:45:42.520 --> 1:45:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Us question of what can you market? More like, what

1:45:44.760 --> 1:45:47.240
<v Speaker 1>can you sell? And what I think there is there'll

1:45:47.280 --> 1:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be a Cambrian explosion in digital credit issuers and there's

1:45:52.120 --> 1:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>all you know, You're like, well, isn't that a lot

1:45:53.960 --> 1:45:56.479
<v Speaker 1>of stuff? Well have you ever studied the mortgage backed

1:45:56.479 --> 1:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>security industry? You know, I mean thinks people created. Yeah,

1:46:01.840 --> 1:46:06.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's hundreds of thousands of credit instruments, maybe

1:46:06.560 --> 1:46:10.840
<v Speaker 1>millions of credit instruments, and you know, start to go

1:46:10.960 --> 1:46:14.240
<v Speaker 1>online and figure out every possible twist and turn of

1:46:14.280 --> 1:46:18.840
<v Speaker 1>every credit instrument. The average person can't even name the

1:46:18.880 --> 1:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>top five categories or top ten categories. So there's an

1:46:24.240 --> 1:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>industry there. The beauty is, the beauty is, there's a

1:46:30.120 --> 1:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a methodology or a distribution channel to figure out

1:46:33.000 --> 1:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>whether your idea is a good one. Like you create

1:46:36.600 --> 1:46:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a security and you go and you offer it, and

1:46:39.840 --> 1:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a two day road show or a one day

1:46:42.080 --> 1:46:44.599
<v Speaker 1>road show, and the investors are either going to buy

1:46:44.640 --> 1:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty million dollars of it in one

1:46:46.960 --> 1:46:48.479
<v Speaker 1>day or they're going to tell you we don't want

1:46:48.479 --> 1:46:52.240
<v Speaker 1>any of it. It's very So you can create billion

1:46:52.280 --> 1:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar product lines in a conversation with the investors in

1:46:58.040 --> 1:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a one forty four a offering. How many consumer products

1:47:04.080 --> 1:47:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that are a billion dollars can you create in two

1:47:06.320 --> 1:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>days where you know for certainty it's going to work. Yeah,

1:47:10.560 --> 1:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the capital markets are primed for

1:47:15.880 --> 1:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>innovative digital credit issues to go and create a dozen different, interesting,

1:47:20.920 --> 1:47:24.720
<v Speaker 1>compelling things. You might not come up with the thing

1:47:24.760 --> 1:47:27.559
<v Speaker 1>they want, but you won't spend more than a few

1:47:27.640 --> 1:47:33.639
<v Speaker 1>days finding out. And you know, in the real estate business,

1:47:33.680 --> 1:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>people create a billion dollar building and no one's to

1:47:36.040 --> 1:47:38.240
<v Speaker 1>lease it and it takes five years and they lose

1:47:38.280 --> 1:47:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars. Yeah, that's never going to happen with

1:47:42.520 --> 1:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the digital credit instrument.

1:47:44.760 --> 1:47:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can essentially sell it before you build it.

1:47:48.479 --> 1:47:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Like we're literally building it in real time, right mark,

1:47:52.120 --> 1:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Like we're open for business every day with four credit ATMs.

1:47:56.479 --> 1:47:58.479
<v Speaker 1>If someone hit the bid and wanted to buy five

1:47:58.560 --> 1:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in a minute, we build a building

1:48:04.360 --> 1:48:07.639
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. Yeah, in sixty seconds, trade is done,

1:48:08.520 --> 1:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>cash changes hands, we create the collateral, we bought the

1:48:13.080 --> 1:48:20.479
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin underlying that day. Sometimes we're literally selling fifty million

1:48:20.520 --> 1:48:22.759
<v Speaker 1>an hour or one hundred million an hour and buying

1:48:22.760 --> 1:48:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollars a bitcoin the same hour. Like

1:48:27.439 --> 1:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we could do a billion dollars of capital raising in

1:48:31.400 --> 1:48:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a day, and we might have twenty million of exposure

1:48:34.800 --> 1:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at four pm, and by five or six pm, we're

1:48:39.160 --> 1:48:44.559
<v Speaker 1>fully done. The investment cycle is one thousand times faster

1:48:45.960 --> 1:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>than technology, real estate, oil and gas, anything else you've

1:48:51.720 --> 1:48:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before in your life. And maybe the more

1:48:54.320 --> 1:48:58.240
<v Speaker 1>profound idea is think about all these other credit instruments.

1:48:58.520 --> 1:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's backing corporate credit, what's backing mortgage credit,

1:49:03.040 --> 1:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what's backing bank credit, what's backing all the you know

1:49:06.160 --> 1:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>all these things. If you saw a billion dollars of

1:49:09.000 --> 1:49:11.759
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed securities, who's going to build a billion dollars

1:49:11.760 --> 1:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>worth of real estate that someone wants to rent? And

1:49:13.920 --> 1:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>how long will that take? So this is a profound

1:49:18.760 --> 1:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>new idea and and that's why those digital credit issuers

1:49:24.600 --> 1:49:25.599
<v Speaker 1>can grow so fast.

1:49:26.439 --> 1:49:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Man, you've explained it so well. I'm gonna I'm going

1:49:28.680 --> 1:49:31.599
<v Speaker 2>to wrap it up with this last question here since

1:49:31.640 --> 1:49:35.080
<v Speaker 2>we're here in Washington, DC and the nation's capital at

1:49:35.120 --> 1:49:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the at the keynote you justcabed earlier. I love the

1:49:38.080 --> 1:49:39.680
<v Speaker 2>way that you closed it down. It was like this

1:49:39.720 --> 1:49:42.960
<v Speaker 2>empowering message of sort of telling people like this amazing

1:49:42.960 --> 1:49:45.280
<v Speaker 2>opportunity that we have right now. The winds have shifted,

1:49:45.360 --> 1:49:47.000
<v Speaker 2>like now is the time for those that want to

1:49:47.040 --> 1:49:49.640
<v Speaker 2>embrace digital intelligence and digital capital. That's kind of how

1:49:49.640 --> 1:49:53.280
<v Speaker 2>you said it in New York. You had said, I

1:49:53.320 --> 1:49:55.280
<v Speaker 2>want to push back on the fix the money, fixed

1:49:55.320 --> 1:49:58.559
<v Speaker 2>the world narrative, and because it was like, in order

1:49:58.560 --> 1:50:01.479
<v Speaker 2>to succeed, we have to fix the equity and fix

1:50:01.560 --> 1:50:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the funds and fix the mak. So we need to

1:50:03.320 --> 1:50:04.920
<v Speaker 2>go build the world that we want, And so I'm

1:50:04.920 --> 1:50:08.200
<v Speaker 2>just curious, while we're here in DC, think about bitcoin policy,

1:50:08.760 --> 1:50:12.240
<v Speaker 2>how do you think we should be sort of fixing

1:50:12.280 --> 1:50:16.040
<v Speaker 2>that in this political environment more of like a constitutionalist

1:50:16.080 --> 1:50:17.760
<v Speaker 2>we're sort of trying to get them to sort of

1:50:17.800 --> 1:50:20.760
<v Speaker 2>pass laws that sort of protect us, or we are

1:50:20.760 --> 1:50:23.559
<v Speaker 2>we pushing for regulations that give us clarity and direction.

1:50:24.360 --> 1:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the good news is bitcoin has already

1:50:26.960 --> 1:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>got the best regulatory treatment of any digital asset in

1:50:29.800 --> 1:50:35.519
<v Speaker 1>the world and has rights. It's globally recognized as a

1:50:35.560 --> 1:50:40.599
<v Speaker 1>digital commodity and property, even in China. In China where

1:50:40.600 --> 1:50:43.920
<v Speaker 1>crypto trading is illegal, where crypto mining is illegal, bitcoin

1:50:43.960 --> 1:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>mining is illegal, bitcoin holding is not illegal, and bitcoin

1:50:49.000 --> 1:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is represented is recognized by the courts as digital property,

1:50:52.200 --> 1:50:55.639
<v Speaker 1>as property you can own it. So we're already starting

1:50:55.680 --> 1:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>with a good place. If your business model is digital credit,

1:51:00.520 --> 1:51:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we've already got pretty well developed credit laws. The US

1:51:05.400 --> 1:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>has the most advanced rules. So if you're a US

1:51:08.160 --> 1:51:11.120
<v Speaker 1>company you could get There are a thousand ideas I

1:51:11.240 --> 1:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just gave you who knows how many different ones. There's

1:51:14.320 --> 1:51:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a thousand things you could do starting with bitcoin in

1:51:17.000 --> 1:51:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a public created company. Right now, you don't need any

1:51:20.680 --> 1:51:23.320
<v Speaker 1>regulatory changes, You don't need any new laws. You can

1:51:23.360 --> 1:51:26.799
<v Speaker 1>go at it if you're a bitcoin treasury company outside

1:51:26.840 --> 1:51:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the you and it's look that the Swiss are a

1:51:28.560 --> 1:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>bit behind on some things. The Europeans are slightly behind.

1:51:32.400 --> 1:51:36.280
<v Speaker 1>They're slower on ATMs, the Swiss are slower on preferred stocks.

1:51:36.280 --> 1:51:38.559
<v Speaker 1>The Japanese are a bit slower on this and that.

1:51:38.920 --> 1:51:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So you have to go and lobby those regulators and

1:51:41.360 --> 1:51:47.519
<v Speaker 1>those politicians to upgrade and update their exchanges, their rigs.

1:51:48.439 --> 1:51:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the tax code is prejudicial, you know, like in Japan,

1:51:52.520 --> 1:51:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the taxes on bitcoin we're much higher than the taxes

1:51:55.320 --> 1:52:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on equity. So any company has a responsibility for advocacy

1:52:01.680 --> 1:52:05.439
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of its investors, you know, and on behalf

1:52:05.439 --> 1:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of its constituents. We think about what's good for the

1:52:08.920 --> 1:52:11.760
<v Speaker 1>credit buyers, and we think about what's good for the

1:52:11.760 --> 1:52:14.559
<v Speaker 1>equity holders. Right, we think about what's good for the

1:52:14.600 --> 1:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>world and what's good for the United States, and we

1:52:18.160 --> 1:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>only advocate for things that are good for everybody. Right.

1:52:22.240 --> 1:52:27.880
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, there are no losers here except the

1:52:27.960 --> 1:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century antiquated oligopoly that is selling inferior credit instruments.

1:52:35.439 --> 1:52:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's like you just invented the car, and there

1:52:38.880 --> 1:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of horse and buggy manufacturers that are

1:52:41.400 --> 1:52:43.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be out of a job, and if you

1:52:43.439 --> 1:52:47.280
<v Speaker 1>feel sorry for them, no one's getting cars. And we've

1:52:47.320 --> 1:52:52.760
<v Speaker 1>got the atomic powered, flying faster than light hover car.

1:52:52.960 --> 1:52:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, there's a lot of people selling antiquated, crappy

1:52:56.479 --> 1:52:59.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicles and no one's going to want to buy them anymore.

1:53:00.760 --> 1:53:03.679
<v Speaker 1>But that's technology. The human race has got to move forward.

1:53:03.760 --> 1:53:09.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you're offering digital credit, digital capital, digital equity,

1:53:09.520 --> 1:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a better thing, and ultimately you're feeding the four

1:53:13.920 --> 1:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred million companies. Look every for every company that can't

1:53:19.439 --> 1:53:22.800
<v Speaker 1>sell a crappy credit instrument, their treasurer can buy our

1:53:22.840 --> 1:53:26.360
<v Speaker 1>credit instrument and get triple or quadruple and maybe that'll

1:53:26.360 --> 1:53:30.200
<v Speaker 1>save the company. Right. So, yeah, there's technology that's putting

1:53:30.240 --> 1:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you out of business all the time, and then there's

1:53:32.680 --> 1:53:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a new technology that will make you a fortune and

1:53:35.360 --> 1:53:40.519
<v Speaker 1>put you in business. If you're a critical, skeptical cur mudgeon,

1:53:41.439 --> 1:53:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you just focus on the negativity, and you're just a

1:53:43.760 --> 1:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>negative on everything. I hate that, I hate that that's bad,

1:53:46.439 --> 1:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I hate that. I don't want to change. And if

1:53:48.960 --> 1:53:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you're constructive and shareful. If you're an optimist, you're like, well,

1:53:53.080 --> 1:53:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I won't be you know, my a trac take collection

1:53:55.600 --> 1:53:58.559
<v Speaker 1>isn't that valuable anymore. But I do have unlimited free

1:53:58.560 --> 1:54:02.920
<v Speaker 1>streaming music. Yeah, you know, And I guess you know.

1:54:03.200 --> 1:54:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I lost a little money invested in whatever record stores,

1:54:08.400 --> 1:54:12.479
<v Speaker 1>but I also bought some applestock and made a fortune. Right,

1:54:12.560 --> 1:54:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And I would say, all these corporate operators, their job is,

1:54:18.360 --> 1:54:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, look at the you know, anticipate the future,

1:54:22.720 --> 1:54:26.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the past, move forward. Do it in the

1:54:26.720 --> 1:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>most graceful, sibyl, responsible, you know, elegant fashion. You can. Right,

1:54:34.600 --> 1:54:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the world isn't the way it was one hundred years ago.

1:54:36.960 --> 1:54:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It won't be this way a hundred years from now.

1:54:40.680 --> 1:54:44.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the human condition. If there were, if there wasn't

1:54:44.400 --> 1:54:46.800
<v Speaker 1>work to do to move us from the past of

1:54:46.880 --> 1:54:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the future, you wouldn't have a job. There'd be no

1:54:49.320 --> 1:54:51.240
<v Speaker 1>reason to get up in the morning. There'd be nothing

1:54:51.240 --> 1:54:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to get excited about. Right, you're irrelevant. And I got

1:54:56.760 --> 1:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to tell you. You don't want to wake up one

1:54:59.640 --> 1:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>day and think I'm irrelevant. Nobody needs me, no one

1:55:03.960 --> 1:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>will care. And the way we did it for the

1:55:07.520 --> 1:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>past one hundred years is probably just the way we

1:55:09.800 --> 1:55:10.720
<v Speaker 1>should do it forever.

1:55:11.680 --> 1:55:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not a way to succeed. We want to grow.

1:55:14.280 --> 1:55:17.280
<v Speaker 2>We want to challenge ourselves and learn. All right, Well,

1:55:17.560 --> 1:55:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I think we covered everything. Thanks so much, And I

1:55:20.560 --> 1:55:22.040
<v Speaker 2>want to say I kind of said it in New York,

1:55:22.080 --> 1:55:25.040
<v Speaker 2>but I just want to say thank you for all

1:55:25.080 --> 1:55:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the education that you put in the space. I mean,

1:55:26.760 --> 1:55:29.720
<v Speaker 2>you're tiresly going on everybody's show speaking around. I know

1:55:29.760 --> 1:55:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you're in DC speaking so and the education piece is massive,

1:55:32.880 --> 1:55:34.360
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for that. I mean it's made a

1:55:34.360 --> 1:55:37.240
<v Speaker 2>big difference, but also blazing the trail for what's what

1:55:37.280 --> 1:55:39.480
<v Speaker 2>we can do with these credit instruments and these treasury companies,

1:55:39.560 --> 1:55:42.080
<v Speaker 2>not just so other companies like ourselves can fall in

1:55:42.080 --> 1:55:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the footsteps, but all these pensioners that need it right,

1:55:45.680 --> 1:55:48.760
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm sort of taking bitcoin to the biggest

1:55:48.760 --> 1:55:50.960
<v Speaker 2>group of people that need it the most but probably

1:55:51.000 --> 1:55:52.960
<v Speaker 2>won't use it, and now they can have it. So

1:55:53.280 --> 1:55:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to say thank you anything that you want

1:55:55.080 --> 1:55:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to call out attention to for you to shut it down.

1:55:57.240 --> 1:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks for hosting me, and I'm happy to be

1:55:59.560 --> 1:56:00.480
<v Speaker 1>on the journe I need with you.

1:56:00.640 --> 1:56:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, thank you