WEBVTT - Is Kamala Harris Better for American Business?

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>This would probably be controversial among my friends in the

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration, but I think that there's a general perception

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that Vice President Harris will be a bit more business friendly.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to voter Nomics, where politics and markets collide.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>This year, voters around the world have the ability to

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>affect markets, countries, and economies like never before, so we've

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>created this series to help you make sense of it all.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Allegra Stratton, I'm Adrian Wooldridge, and I'm Stephanie Flanders.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So look, we are seven minutes out.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:57.319
<v Speaker 3>From the seven minutes.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously fail in the first ten seconds. We are seven

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks out from the US election, and although the outcome

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is no clearer, the end is coming into sites. So

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to unpick what the candidate's financial

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and regulatory policies could mean for American businesses.

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things we're going to get into later,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 3>Adrian and I spoke with one of Wall Street's higher

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 3>profile Democrats and ever Core Chairman emeritus, Ralph sch Losty,

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 3>one of its founders, just to get an idea of

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 3>what the potential ideas could mean for business. You know,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 3>he's sitting in Wall Street, or certainly was sitting in

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street, and has a particular perspective that you might

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>say was a kind of traditional approach to thinking about

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>business and campaigns. You know, how much money are they

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 3>give it putting in what impact of the candidates policies

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 3>going to have? But Adrian and I don't know about you,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>but I've just been struck. You know, Donald Trump progressively

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 3>has so scrambled the way we think about business and

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>politics and brought them closer and closer together. And we've

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 3>seen that particularly in an increasingly close relationship between him

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>and Elon Musk, where Elon Musk is not just giving

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 3>him a huge amount of money, but giving him a

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>platform actively supporting him on Twitter.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, there used to be a sort of hands off

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 4>relationship between the donor on the one hand and the

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 4>candidate on the other. The donor would give some money,

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 4>it would go through a lot of intermediaries and there'd

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 4>be some sort of space between the two. Now you're

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>getting a direct intermingling between business on the one hand

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 4>and the candidates on the other. Trump obviously did this,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 4>and it's most flagrant with his hotel in Washington that

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 4>he encouraged people to go into. But now we're saying

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 4>with Musk, Musk is running this business which is ex Twitter.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 4>That part of the business model seems to be outrage

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 4>people to put Trump on there to encourage sort of

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 4>active engagement with Twitter through saying Trump Trump leaning things.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 4>So it's an extraordinary sort of commingling, I think.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And also there's a kickback because if Trump's selective, Musk

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be given this role looking at So

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>there's and I do try not to be too parochial

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>and bring it back to the UK. But in the

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>UK right now we're having every day on the front page,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>we've got the Prime Minister and his wife being accused

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>for taking clothes and money off of Well, money is

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>not the problem, but clothes and other benefits that they

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't declared off a donor on the one hand. But

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>then in America you've got it on a mega mega,

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>mega scale and it doesn't not mega but a mega scale,

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't seem to there doesn't seem to be

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody saying, hold on a second, it's not allowed.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Well except I mean, there's plenty of people amazed at

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>the kind of conflict of interest that would represent. I mean, remember,

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>it's not just that it's payback for support in the campaign.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>It would be an ongoing and massive conflict of interest

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>for Elon Musk to be reinventing government or thinking about

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>how to reduce government at a time when his own

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>company is receiving billions of dollars in government contracts. So

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the idea that there are no guardrails against that, I

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 3>think is surprise to people in America, where we always

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>taught that, you know, there is this written constitution that

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>provides checks and balances. They're increasingly getting faded.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>If you read the biography of Musk, it's clear that

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen months ago, two years ago, Musk thought Trump

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was a loser.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 3>And maybe that's the direct quote. Well, not very long ago,

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump thought crypto currencies were a scam, and we

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 3>now know that he's going to get his own.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So to talk about that change of heart that

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie just mentioned and how crypto is playing in the

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>US election, we have in the podcast studio right now

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Emily Nicole, who is Bloomberg's crypto reporter. Hi, Emily, Hi,

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>just explain for us what was launched by Donald Trump

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and family this week launched.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Maybe a bit of a generous term, actually more like

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 5>a veiled to a certain extent. So earlier this week,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump went on an X spaces I guess you'd

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 5>call it now, where he spoke for about two hours

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 5>along with other members of the Trump family about the

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 5>project that they intend to launch called World Liberty Financial.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 5>We still don't really know what it is, except for

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 5>the fact that it's going to be in the world

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 5>of decentralized finance, which means that there will be some

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 5>loose form of governance by the people and the community

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 5>that are buying into it rather than by the people

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 5>running it, and that there will be a token attached

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 5>to it for that purpose which people can buy to

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 5>use to vote on proposals on how it's run, but

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 5>also probably speculate with as well.

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So for an expert like yourself, does it look promising

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or does it look a bit odd?

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 3>It looks light on details. I think it's probably not

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the first crypto enterprise that's been a bit light onto.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, but it's probably the most high profile one

0:05:55.160 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 5>that we've had so far. I mean, for a respective

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 5>of president to be launching something like this. It definitely

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 5>is in that gray area of we don't know exactly

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 5>where it sits between business interests, financial interests, how much

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 5>he might stand to profit from it or benefit from it.

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 5>There is a disclaimer on the project that says Trump

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 5>or his family members, none of them will benefit financially

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 5>from it. But you know, that's assuming that the token

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 5>itself isn't going to be something that can appreciate in value.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Obviously it will, so whether or not that actually bears

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 5>out to be the case is something to be.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Seen, Adrian, I mean, before we get onto talking to

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily about the crypto in the election, just sort of

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 1>on the principle of a presidential candidate launching or unveiling,

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to use Emily's phrase, unveiling something like this.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Would we see that in the UK though.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 4>I can't conceivably imagine it. It's not just that there

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 4>that he's unveiling this. This thing is a presidential candidate.

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 4>He's doing it seven weeks before the election on a

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 4>platform provided by one of his biggest backers, Elon m

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 4>It's quite extraordinary, and.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 3>It's also the intermingling with the family. The family are

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 3>ever presently and the business interests continue with the family.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 3>And I noticed even in our story that the white

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 3>paper for well, it sounds like white paper is also

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>a sort of a generous phrase. But the World Liberty

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Financial reviewed by Bloomberg News and that listed Donald Trump

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 3>as chief Crypto Advocate, Eric and Donald Junior each as

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Web three ambassadors, and eighteen year old Baron Trump as

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Chief DEFY Visionary. I guess we should. I mean DeFi

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 3>is a sort of particular bit of the crypto universe

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 3>which is even considered a little bit fringe even by

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 3>some of the crypto people. Is that right Somewhat? Yes?

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you're kind of the yeah, who would

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 5>buy bitcoin or ether because you think it might be

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 5>a bit of an investment, than Defy is certainly fringe

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 5>to you the crypto traders. Though It's kind of the

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 5>bread and butter of how things work, because it's often

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 5>the way that you get to experiment with new tokens,

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 5>new projects and things before they can get vetted properly

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 5>to be on the big exchanges like Finance or coinbase.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 5>For Trump, and in this project, the purpose of it

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 5>being in DeFi is quite important because it means that

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 5>they can have this claim to not really have any

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 5>control or say over how it operates. Defy itself as

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 5>a construct is imagine a project that's basically just a

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 5>whole run of code and smart contracts that kind of

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 5>execute when certain conditions are met, and nobody can intervene

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 5>once they're written. So the idea is that people who

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 5>hold this token that's touched the project can use that

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 5>bit of token that they own to say, Okay, well

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 5>I vote this way, and somebody with more tokens can

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 5>vote another way, and in that way, the Trump family

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 5>themselves can say, well, really, I don't have any say

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 5>about how this goes because all the token holders are

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 5>voting whichever way. That doesn't necessarily mean they don't benefit

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 5>financially from it, though, especially if token does trade in

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 5>open markets, which it should do in time.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there is this a bit of the sort

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 3>of demographic that Trump is really going for, which is

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the sort of countercultural younger skeptical of government. And this

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>is right. Even if they don't make any money on this,

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>it does sort of send that message that I'm all

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>about sort of somewhat, you know, it's getting away from

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the mainstream financial system. Libertarianism, I mean, that's part of

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the messaging.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, all of those things are kind of at the

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 5>heart of crypto, and so a lot of the traders

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 5>who sit within crypto are at least you know, hardcore,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 5>day to day, live and breathe it very much sit

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 5>on that side. But then you have to wonder if

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 5>that they would have been Trump voters anyway to a

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 5>certain extent. And so Trump has made repeated over to

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 5>the crypto industry this year to say that he wants

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 5>to be part of it, he wants to create rules

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 5>for it, he wants to get rid of sec chair

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 5>Gary Guns are on day one because Gary Guns that

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 5>has been launching several enforcement actions against scripto companies over

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 5>the last few years that the industry is seeves as

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 5>overly harsh. But you know, saying all of that was

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 5>probably enough because by comparison, his competitor Kamala Harris hasn't

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 5>really said anything on crypto.

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when it comes to the sort of directly

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 3>benefiting financially from the campaign, we had that you know,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump Media ipo. In April Origin it was valued at

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>nine billion. I think it's now less than half that

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.719
<v Speaker 3>he could still potentially make two billion and people are

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 3>literally trading him and it's been going down pretty steadily,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 3>certainly since Biden got out of the race. If people

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 3>end up trading on this platform, which is very much

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 3>associated with him, if they're speculating on Trump media stocks

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 3>based on whether or not they think he's going to win,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 3>and then they end up losing a lot of money,

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it isn't done that back fire on him

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 3>in the end, or does it not matter because he's lost?

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 5>And it depends how much he can distance himself from it.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean the ability to be able to say, well,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, we don't earn any money from this, I'm

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 5>just an advisor, or I sit on the periphery. I'm

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 5>just promoting it, but my family are really more involved

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 5>these kind of things. There's always a way from to

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 5>distance himself. That said, we did do a story my

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 5>colleagues Zeker Fox and Miashen early this month about the

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 5>people behind the project who are building it. And they've

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 5>previously built projects that have been subject to hacks, They've

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 5>done get rich quick schemes, they've sold colon cleanses online.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's not necessarily the kind of business business

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 5>that you think would be solid footing, so looking ahead

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 5>to what world liberty might look like. I mean, there's

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 5>always a chance, for example, that they don't launch this

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 5>before the election happens, and so he's able to kind

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 5>of say that, well, you know, nothing infringed upon the

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 5>voting process in a certain sense, but once it goes live,

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 5>there's nothing to say. I guess that he couldn't still

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 5>sit on those edges without having all his fingers in.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess this is all part of why it must

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 3>be interesting day to day to be a Bloomberg crypto reporter.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, Sheery, Thank you my top fact.

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 3>I was looking up while we were talking that Trump

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Media's revenue is equivalent and I have to admit this

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 3>is according to Roy, but it is equivalent to two

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Starbucks coffee shops, and strategists say it's three point six

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 3>billion stock market value is detached from its day to

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 3>day business, since it lost just UNDERD nine hundred thousand

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars in its most reported quarter. I love that it's

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>worth several billion dollars and its revenue is the same

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 3>as two star coffee shops. We have our guest this week, Adrian,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.479
<v Speaker 3>and I spoke with one of Wall Street's higher profile Democrats.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 3>A few days ago, Ralph schlostein chairman emeritus at Evercourt,

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 3>which is a global investment banking advisory business, and I

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 3>started by asking him, at this late stage in the campaign,

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 3>was it really going to come down to who had

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the most money?

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the answer to that is how much does

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the relative net worth of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett? Matter?

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Both of them have more money than they need.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 3>They don't have instant access to massive social media.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Platform and I would say both campaigns have more than

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 2>enough money to promote their candidate, and the differential in money,

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 2>which at least at the current moment, seems to favor

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Vice President Harris, is not going to be the determining

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 2>factor in this election.

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Can you give us a general sense of how corporate

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 4>America business America is seeing and splitting over this debate.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Are there any clear lines of difference between different business

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 4>groupings and is it changing? Is that as the election evolves.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>This would probably be controversial among my friends in the

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration, but I think that there's a general perception

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 2>that Vice President Harris will be a bit more business friendly.

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Large technology and corporate business friendly, and I think some

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of that is a function of her background and where

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 2>she comes from. She's represented in the Senate many of

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 2>these large technology companies, obviously Silicon Valley is in California,

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and she's got a long history of interacting with them,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>being supported by them, and having i think some empathy

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 2>to the issues that might be of interest to them.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's not to say that President Biden has been

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>hostile toward business, but he's just he's got less of

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>a background and an empathy toward that, and he's got

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>a very strong background in foreign policy and that's been

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>a big focus of his I think her agenda is

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>very focused on two things. Growth for the overall economy,

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>which I think is really important, as there is something

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>to be said for this long around quote of the

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>rising tide lifting all ships. And then she's also i

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>think very focused on moving a little bit more of

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the benefits of public policy to the middle class. Her

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>housing plan, her childcare plan, her child credit, tax credit,

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 2>capping drug prices, and the fact, you know there's going

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to be a massive discussion next year about what do

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 2>we do with the Trump tax cuts. They all expire

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>at the end of twenty twenty five, and there's a

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>probably the biggest difference between the two candidates, which neither

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>of them talks particularly a lot about, is what their

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>view is of what should happen to that next year.

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Against that, I just want to say that surely we're

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 4>seeing business fleeing from California as a significant rate, and

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 4>middle class people fleeing from California as a significant rate,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 4>because it's hard for middle class people to make ends meet,

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 4>and businesses feel that the burden of regulation is an

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 4>intrusiveness of regulation is very high. If I was looking

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 4>at California, I wouldn't say that that's the sort of

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 4>place I wanted to do business these days.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it has a lot of things going for it too.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>It has an incredibly educated labor force, and it's been,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, until relatively recently, a you know, an engine

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>of demographic growth for the United States. So you know,

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>there certainly are highly publicized, occasionally controversial figures like Elon

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Musk who make very strong statements about the friendliness of

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the California business climate. And I do think as a

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>general matter, the Democratic Party has been a little bit

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 2>excessive in its regulatory exuberance, and that's true at the

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>national level, and it's certainly true in the states that

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>where you have one party rule, one of which I

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 2>live in.

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested. There's been quite a lot of talk. You

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 3>actually just mentioned it. There about three quite unpopular characters

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 3>in large parts of the business community that are currently

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in the administration, Lena Khan and Gary Gainsler, the head

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 3>of the leader Khan being a Federal Trade Commission head,

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 3>and the Security and Exchange Commission head Gary against Leni

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 3>Khan in particular has distinguished herself for a sort of

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 3>pro competitive, quite aggressive approach to at least a starting

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 3>to regulate big tech companies and others. Then more generally,

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I would say, there's a sort of interesting dividing line

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 3>between right and left in large parts of the world now,

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 3>where it's actually the left of the progressive side that

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 3>is talking more. I don't know if they've done a

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 3>lot more, but talking a lot more about competition and

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 3>worried about concentration of corporate power. I Nikan is a

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of symbolic figure for many people and the more

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 3>progressive side of Democrats, because she has been considered to

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 3>be quite radical. Kamala Harras worry about that whether or

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 3>not she gets reappointed, is that going to be a

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 3>key issue.

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>A very high quality news organization, Bloomberg that wrote a

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 2>story about how donors and supporters of Kamala Harris were

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>suggesting that their support or donations should be conditioned upon

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 2>the removal of her, and I wasn't quoted in that story,

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 2>but I was called about it, and I said that

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was highly premature and ridiculous. Other than that,

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>completely true and the reason I do believe that, first

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 2>of all, you had anti trust policy and competition policy.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 2>There hasn't been a single change in law since probably

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>two thousand or earlier. I said in twenty seventeen that

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought one of the most difficult professional jobs in

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.479
<v Speaker 2>America under President Trump was to be an anti trust lawyer,

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 2>because the law didn't really matter. It was whether he

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 2>liked you or not. So he went after the Time

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Warner Att merger because he hated CNN, and of course

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>they got thrown out in court. We had an experience

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 2>where we had a merger held at Evercore held up

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>under Syphius, which was, by the way, a merger of

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 2>two US companies had nothing to do with Syphius.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 3>Syphius is the American law that is used just to

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 3>prevent foreign companies from taking big stakes of US company.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, buying US companies. So this was two American companies

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>and it was held up for a long time, and

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>then one of the companies decided to redomicile one of

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 2>their headquarters back into the United States and lo and

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 2>behold a week later the merger got approved. Nothing to

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>do with law, I think the current group and Lena

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Khan is the tip of the spear there, but the

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Assistant Attorney General for Anti Trust is certainly part of

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 2>that as well Kaplan. They've been definitely more aggressive in

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 2>their interpretation of the law. They've gone to court a

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 2>number of times and lost, they've won a couple And

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 2>so we spend a lot of time at Evercore with

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 2>companies talking about mergers, and this is always a part

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 2>of the discussion. And I would say the prevailing view

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 2>among larger companies today is if we believe the laws

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 2>on our side, we may be challenged, but we'll go

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to court and we'll win. I do think my guess

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>would be that there would be a somewhat moderated view

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 2>of that particular of the FTC and the assistant Attorney

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>General for Andy Trust under Vice President Harris, with her

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 2>legal background and sensitivity to some of the issues that

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 2>business cares about, might care a little bit more about

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 2>how those particular roles are executed.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 3>There are some who say that it potentially more influential

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 3>than you would think. Point of disagreement between Trump and

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Harris as asked you to crypto because it is gaining

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 3>so many Ficinado's, particularly in kind of demographics that Kamala

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Harris is trying to attract. And Trump has changed his

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 3>view on crypto but has now been pretty positive about it.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 3>We think that's partly why Elon Mosque is so supportive

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 3>of him, whereas Gary Goesler stands for a much more

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 3>circumspect and potentially negative approach. Do you think that is

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 3>we are underestimating how much that masses.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 2>I would say it to me, it's a fringe issue,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>not a central issue. I think the change on President

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump's part has been definitely linked in a pretty material

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 2>way to the contributions that have been made. There's an

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 2>interest group out there that has a pack that is

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 2>giving tens of millions of not hundreds of millions of

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 2>dollars in this election cycle to crypto friendly candidates, including

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 2>former President Trump.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>But you're sitting in a mainstream Wall Street maybe you'd

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 3>always say.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 2>That I must say, I'm in the world that things

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 2>are not probably a complete paleoanthic erea troglodite. I have

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 2>said in the past that to me, the valuation of

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin reminded me of the beanie baby create But I

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>think that's turned out to be and not necessarily correct view.

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think it remains to be seen whether there

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 2>are any mainstream uses of these electronic monetary vehicles other

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>than a store of value and speculation.

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 4>I want you to ask about something else, which is

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 4>what might be briefly called woke capital, or the passion

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 4>for micro intervention in the way that businesses run themselves

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 4>THROUGHDI and ESD and the rest of it. Is Vice

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 4>President Harris an advocate of that, and if she is,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 4>is that a problem for business?

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the I'm very passionate about the objectives of

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 2>some of that. I think they're really good business reasons

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>to have a diverse workforce, and I can articulate those

0:23:55.000 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 2>for you if you want. But I do think the

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 2>prescriptive nature of this, which has been broadly thrown into

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the pejorative term woke capitalism, is not necessary? Is overdone?

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 2>I really do And I stepped down as a CEO

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of Evercore about two and a half years ago, and

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the things I've said privately more than once

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 2>is that being the CEO of a public company today

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 2>is just a lot more challenging and less clear as

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to what you're really trying to accomplish. Evercore is a

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>independent investment banking firm. We don't have any balance sheet,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>we have offices, and the idea that we would be

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 2>required to file a lengthy environmental statement about whether our

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 2>buildings are eco friendly or not is in my view,

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 2>complete nonsense. Obviously, if you're a chemical company be focused

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>on that. If you're an energy company, should be focused

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 2>on the environmental aspects of your business. But this has

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 2>gone It has gone way too far. The goals that

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to achieve are laudable. What's gone way overboard

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 2>is the prescriptive exuberance with which they pursue them.

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 3>From the sort of everical perspective, Should anyone be trading

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 3>this election? How does one trade this election?

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how to trade even without an election,

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 2>so with an election it becomes harder. I'm just not

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the only thing that I do think is

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 2>truly market effecting is I do believe that if Trump

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 2>were to pursue the tariff policies that he's discussed in

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the campaign, and it's not clear to me that he

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>would pursue them, but if he were to pursue those,

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 2>which would be very high tariffs across the board and

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 2>much using that as the principal source of new revenue

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 2>for the finance the government, I think that will have

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 2>a very chilling effect on the markets, and because it

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 2>will be widely perceived to be anti trade and inflationary,

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 2>and I think neither of those things are good for

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>equity markets.

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting you say that there is a Wall Street

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 3>view that I would say is quite common, which is

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 3>that longer term, the macroeconomic mix under Donald Trump would

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 3>undoubtedly be less sustainable, more risky band for the US,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 3>band for the world, higher inflation, as you say, reduced

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 3>trade connections, and an enormous deficit. It's going to be

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty large under either administration, but under a completely out

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 3>of control deficit. But I've seen plenty of notes coming

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 3>through my email saying it will be bullish for risk

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 3>assets in the first year or so. Because you would

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 3>have this text, you would have a feeling that business

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 3>was not going to be constrained by regulations, by the

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 3>long arm of the state. All these things that have

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 3>been you even just talked about just now.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting. I remember that in twenty sixteen

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 2>the election. I happened to be in Paris at the time,

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and my phone rang at five in the morning and

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>it was Ed Hyman, who was the founder of ISI

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and now the chairman of Evercore ISI, and the noted

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I think he's won number one in institutional investor research

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.239
<v Speaker 2>for over forty years as economist. And he said he

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 2>was in Tokyo and he was about to speak to

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of institutional investors and at that point it

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 2>was clear that Trump was going to be elected, and

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 2>the S and P was down a thousand points futures

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 2>not the market, and he said, what should I say?

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And I said, if you want to be controversial or provocative,

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>and I said, I really believe this, by the way,

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I think you should say that notwithstanding the fact that

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the S and P is down a thousand points. Futures

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 2>are down a thousand points right now. By the time

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 2>the market closes at four o'clock in New York, the

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 2>market will be up. And he said, why do you

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 2>say that? And I said, Donald Trump is going to

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 2>be for lower corporate taxes, He's going to be for

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 2>a stimulative fiscal policy, he's going to be for infrastructure investment.

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 2>And that's very bullish for the equity markets, and people

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 2>will realize that. And so he got up and said that,

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 2>and it turned out to me, I'm only telling you

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 2>this story because for once I was right, and I

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>do think that the initial effect. Let's take the corporate

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>tax rate, for example, which is a twenty one percent

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 2>right now, leaving a side state and local taxes, which

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>are won't be changing much. If it's a twenty one percent,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>for every dollar a company makes, seventy nine cents of

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>it will go to its shareholders and twenty one cents

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to the US government. If it's at twenty eight percent,

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 2>as Vice President Harris has suggested, and I'm not sure

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 2>it'll ever get that high again, but that's a seven

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 2>percentage point off of seventy nine, which is like a

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>ten percent decline in corporate earnings. Ultimately, that filters through

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 2>to the valuation of stocks. If it's at fifteen percent,

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 2>that's six points on. It's a seven and a half

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>percent increase in what shareholders will get. The math's pretty simple.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that point alone will provide if Trump is elected,

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>will provide a little bit of following wind to the

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 2>stock market.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>But one thing we have in the UK is some

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 3>quite a lot of concern in the City of London

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and elsewhere. That's the moves that the government, that the

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>new labor government might make to increase the amount of

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 3>money coming from the richest and from wealth already encouraging

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 3>people to leave for Italy or leave for America. Quite

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of concern about capital flight. Do you think

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 3>there's any issue around that if Kamala Harris stays in

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 3>just as a sort of attractiveness of the US versus

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 3>other places, as a wealthy person for wealthy people. I

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 3>may not referring to you specifically as a wealthy person,

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 3>but I bet you hang out with a few.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you my personal view on this first. My

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>personal view on this is my parents were both immigrants.

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>My father was a bartender and I've managed to do

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 2>reasonably well in my life. I have an enormous amount

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 2>of gratitude and appreciation both for the United States and

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the opportunities it provides and for New York City. I'm

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>not one of these people who's gonna abandon ship because

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I can save a little money on or a lot

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of money on taxes. I think you have to look

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 2>at for the broader question. It's pretty donning what has

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>happened in the world in terms of the US economy

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and the US markets relative to the Europe's and relative

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to the Japan's. And if you look at in two

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight, the GDP of Europe including the UK,

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and the US were roughly equal. By twenty and sixteen,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the US was about fifty percent higher, and today it's

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 2>almost double. Taxes are about gee, what do you get

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to keep of what you've made? The opportunities to make

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 2>are so great in the US relative to other places

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in the world. Even with Lena Khan sitting in the

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>seat that she sits in and Gary Gensler sitting in

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the seat that he sits in, I think people should

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe people who are sitting on a lot of money

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 2>are going to attract it the places like Monaco and Litgenstein,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 2>in places like that. But the last time I went

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 2>to the opera, I wasn't overwhelmed with the quality of

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the performance.

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Why hasn't that extraordinary economic growth in the US translated

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 4>into more optimistic sentiments. Why is an incumbent struggling to

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 4>be re elected after this incredible economic boom?

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It is shocking. Actually, I think it's a really good question,

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 2>and I think the reason for it is the widespread

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 2>and pernicious effect on people's psyches of inflation. I was

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 2>working in the White House in between nineteen seventy seven

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 2>and nineteen early eighty one under President Carter, when we

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 2>had the greatest inflation in the history of the United States.

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>And I have said a number of times to people

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 2>who worked in the Biden administration that you have to

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 2>recognize that is something that touches every single person in

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the country in a negative way. And when you when

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 2>your wages go up, but you're spending You go into

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the grocery store every week and you're spending twenty percent,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 2>thirty percent, forty percent more for eggs and milk and

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>things that you buy every week. It's or for gasoline.

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>It's in your face, and it's it's really discouraging and

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>off putting. And I think, to me, unemployment's horrible, but

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 2>it touches if unemployment's high, it's six percent or seven percent,

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>it touches a relatively small portion of the economy of

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the voter population and their families and friends and such.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly a big issue, and its effect obviously on

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 2>those people is huge. Is more dramatic than inflation, But

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 2>inflation touches everybody, and it's a in my view, it's

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 2>a cloud over the confidence that people have about the economy.

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So Ralph Rap, you've given us a lot of time.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 3>We're going to let you go. In a second. I

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 3>can't help ask you, if you were in Paris on

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 3>the night of the twenty sixteen, where are you're planning

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 3>to be for this for this election, and maybe cast

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 3>some light on whether what you think.

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be in New York. I'm going to

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 2>be with my two children and a bunch of friends

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 2>that I'm an election party somewhere, and gosh, I have

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 2>no better insight into who's going to win than I

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 2>do into what the markets are going to do. Between

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 2>now and the end of the year, I hope it's

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Vice President Harris. I actually think she's better for the country.

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I think she's younger, she brings us. I think to me,

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the great issues in our country and globally

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 2>is the widening gap of wealth between the one percent

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 2>and then the other ninety nine percent, and particularly the

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent that is the middle class and those who

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 2>have less means than the middle class. And I think

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 2>she's really attentive to that, and I believe that issue, unattended,

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 2>will ultimately corrode support for capitalism and free democratic institutions.

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Ralph last, thank you very much for joining us.

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Votonomics from Bloomberg. This

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>episode was hosted by me alegra Stratton with Stephanie Flanders

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and Adrian Wooldridge. It was produced by Somersadi, production support

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>from Chris Martlu and Isabella Ward. Sound designed by Blake Maples.

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer. Sage Bauman is

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>head of Podcasts and special Thanks to Ralph Schlosstein and

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Emilie Nicole. Please subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen

0:35:54.680 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts