WEBVTT - Robots Getting Social

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, pay there, and Welcome Beforeward Thinking, the podcast

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>that looks at the future and says people are strange

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're a stranger. I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm La, and

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick, and I've got a story for y'all. Alright,

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>let's gather around the campfire. It's more of an anecodote. Actually,

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not even that anyway, here's what it is. You've

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>built it up so much and now I'm already bound

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for disappointment. No please. So a while back I was

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>writing a video episode for Forward Thinking about whether robots

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to take our jobs? And if you haven't

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>doing that video, yeah you should go watch it. It's

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. It's a great, great episode. It is. It is.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But we have a spoiler for that video. Yeah, there

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is a spoiler. Actually this We say this in the

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>video pretty early on. It's not the end. Yes, they will.

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Robots will take our jobs, will take your job, They'll

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>take our jobs. They'll they'll take all the jobs. But

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in doing the research for the episode, I came across

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of good reasons for thinking that some jobs are

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>much much harder to automate than others. And one simple

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>rubric for separating jobs into robot friendly and robot unfriendly

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is this is the job easily described in an explicit

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>list of instructions that can be executed over and over. So,

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in other words, could it be something like pick up

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>blue box, open blue box, put orange sphere in blue box,

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>close blue box. That's easily explained, and it would be

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>something that you could program as a list of actions

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for a robot that has very simple image recognition software.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It really just needs to know what a blue box

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>looks like and what an orange sphere looks like, and

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>then you're pretty much good. Hard to touch those things

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that they don't shatter whatever, right, and it's it's just

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do the same things over and over again. There

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to be a lot of changing external conditions,

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>or if there are, they might not matter necessarily. Jobs

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like this are pretty easy to automate, and they they

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>if if they have not already gone to machines or

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>computer programs or robots, they probably will soon. So a

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of examples of this might be jobs today, and

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like data entry or data processing or jobs like telemarketing.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people think that these kind of jobs,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're so repetitive and you can make clear lists

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 1>of instructions, can pretty easily be done by machines. Other

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>jobs are very robot unfriendly. They're harder to automate because

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they require things that are harder to predict, Like you

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>can't write a program that does unpredictable things. I mean,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>programs are pretty much by the definition of predicting. And

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about random number generators and how difficult it

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>is to have a truly random number generator. Yeah. Yeah.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>If if you say to a robot, literally any person

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>who exists in the world could walk through that door,

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with that person going to go

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like and just shut down? Yeah? Yeah, yeah, So these

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>jobs are the one The hard to automate jobs are

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the ones that require creativity, strategizing, reacting to unpredictable circumstances

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. And there are some jobs I

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>thought it was interesting that sound like they fit into

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the first category, but they actually fit better into the

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>second well. And there are also some that sound like

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they would fit in the second but seem to fit

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>just fine the first like you mentioned telemarketing. Well, telemarketing

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>involves having conversations with actual people, and you might think, oh,

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>well a robot would have different would there be some unpredictability,

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But often in those cases there's a very specific script

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to follow, whether you're human or robot, and you have

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a very it's essentially kind of a it's a it's

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a very simple decision tree, right, You're trying to get

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the person on the line to say yes or or

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>no in some cases, and if as long as it continues,

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it can keep going down that pathway. And we've even

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>seen some interesting clever uses of natural language recognition to

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>create situations where a person is not entirely sure if

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the if they're actually speaking to a human being or

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a robot telemarketer. Yeah, and that might be some cases

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>where even if it is really a human, they're they're

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like trying to get the human to behave like a robot.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>So these kind of robo calls like that, that's prime

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>territory for automation, especially also if it's low stakes, you know,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>because the people the bosses like aren't terrified about what's

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going to happen if the person being called has a

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>bad experience. You know, it's just that I don't care, right, right,

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But let's take an example of something from our favorite movie,

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Future Part two. Right, So, in the

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>opposite category is stuff that seems like it might be

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>easy to automate, but that actually it would probably be

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard to automate, And like robot servers in a restaurant. Yeah,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so a robot server in a restaurant, what would it

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have to do? It seems like you could basically come

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>up with a simple list of instructions like take drink orders,

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>bring drinks, take the food order, bring the food, check

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the happiness levels at the table, bring the check, uh,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>process payment, and then you're done. But actually being a

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>server in a restaurant requires hundreds of constant little improvisations

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>h plus more athletic nimbleness than any robot today is

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>even close to capable of. I mean, can you can

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>you imagine with how clumsy robots are now, something that

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>could like clean tables and move quickly back and forth

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>between a kitchen and a table without running into people.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Keep in mind also that most robots are very very

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>good at navigating static environments. So in other words, you

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>program in the knowledge of what the environment is, you

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>know how it is, and give the robot some ability

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to sense its environment. It can then navigate around obstacles.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But in a place like a restaurant, you have a

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>constantly shifting environment. You've got people getting up and leaving,

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.679
<v Speaker 1>You've got chairs that are moving. So you have a

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>robot that has to have really good path finding technology

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to maneuver its way through a constantly shifting environment. That's

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>really hard to do. Sure, but there's another factor that

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we haven't considered yet, which is, you know, in defensive servers,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that you guys are not robots. Yeah, there's

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>other stuff that you're doing than just taking the orders

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and bringing the stuff exactly right. And I think this

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>might actually be the biggest problem with the idea of

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a robot server, which is that servers need social intelligence

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>good ones do. Yeah, well, this might be the biggest

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>issue of all here, because a server in a restaurant

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't just a food delivery machine. A good server makes

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>people feel welcome, makes and feel comfortable, uses charm to

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like up sell drinks and specials and appetizers, can explain

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>things about the restaurant and answer questions about the menu,

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>explain things about the food, describe what something tastes like,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and then especially can sort of like calm complaints and

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>help people get what they want, understand what the people want,

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and make them feel happy. Like can you imagine, let's

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>say you're out with your family and you know your

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>great aunt she has a complaint about her chicken peccata.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine a robot server being able to make

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>her feel happy and like make her feel like her

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>complaint had been properly dealt with. I can't imagine anyone

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>making my grain on feel happy. Well well, but especially

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not the same kind of software that like answers your

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>telephone call you call the insurance company, and like that

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is what's trying to like make you fear good.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe it's the chatbot that only answers answers any

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>any message with a question I'm not happy. Why do

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you think you're not happy? The doctor? Yeah. So, in

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the context of robots taking our jobs, I think this

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>also means that, in addition to creativity and improvisation, another

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>type of job that will be safely human for a while,

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>our jobs that have a strong demand for good social intelligence.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So what does social intelligence mean, I mean, we we

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of gave an idea there, but how would we

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>define it? I would say one thing is that it

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>means something along the lines of being able to read

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>social cues, to perceive and understand emotional states, and to

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>intentionally manage and trigger targeted emotions in others. Right, In

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>other words, in order that it has to be able

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to navigate social situations in a way that appears to

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>be natural and does not make things worse, right, doesn't

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>make someone feel awkward or embarrassed or ill at ease

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>for any reason, whether because you are communicating with a

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and obviously artificial construct, which already for many of us,

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is uncomfortable. Right, Yeah, some of us We we in fact,

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>humans are pretty flexible creatures. We can adapt fairly quickly

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if we're willing to, sure, sure, And and some of

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>us I mean, I suspect many people listening to this podcast,

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, probably find it charming that the novelty of

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of interaction, although really like like after a while,

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd be like, I just want not burned chicken cottage,

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And some of us might actually prefer the interaction with

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a robot as opposed to a human being. That's true.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I have days where I'm not sure that

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I can do this list of things that we're talking

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about here that has grouped under social intenation. That's true. Well,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but I mean we all have to practice our social

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligence skills all the time. Oh sure, yeah, no, this

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that we think. It's not something

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>even humans are always perfect at. Right now, there are

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>plenty of times where you might be wrapped up in

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>something that's going on in your life and you don't

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>pick up on social cues that otherwise you would notice

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>right away. Um, there are plenty of times. I mean

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I certainly have been guilty of that because I'm I'm

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>always wrapped up in my own mind. Uh So, you know,

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>when we're when we're aware, and when we are capable

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>of seeing it, then that's one thing. But machines, they

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have that innate ability at all. Right, you have

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to build that into machines. And now there is an

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>entire emerging field of artificial intelligence that is dedicated to

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this problem, to the problem of helping machines understand human

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>emotional states and manage them as best as possible, and

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of all the other things we think of as

0:10:54.880 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>social intelligence, you know, impression management and and navigating complex

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>social scenarios, not being annoying, you know, all these weird

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>things that they don't come naturally to machine. Right. And

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, this is important not just for robots

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that are specifically designed to have social interactions, but robots

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that are just going to be around humans. You know,

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>they're especially consumers, right because you know, people robot industry

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>people are kind of used to having to program a

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>robot by typing code into a thing, you know. But

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but consumers, Yeah, and it kind of and it may

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>be that the robots that you, as a consumer encounter,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it may be that there's no direct interaction, but they

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>still those robots still need to have that social intelligence

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand how to navigate through while being as unobtrusive

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>as possible. It's it's one of the many things that

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to take into consideration as robots take an

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>increasingly more prominent role in our lives, along with the

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>idea that the robots have to be design in such

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a way that they are not likely to cause harm

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to people through their normal operations. I mean, this is why,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>like we've talked about before, with big industrial robots. Typically

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there are huge safety rails all around them, because these

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>are just machines that do the same set of actions

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. And if you let a team

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>full of preschoolers run around and you get a bunch

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of preschoolers welded to a metal wall, it's not good.

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't want that. So this we're we're talking about

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the social equivalent of that same thing. You don't You

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want the social equivalent of welding preschoolers to a wall.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what that looks like, but I kinda

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want. Can someone please make us I'll

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>take you to my next family reunion. You will be

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>able to experience it. No here, I think here's the

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the real world takeaway. We're gonna have robots in our homes. Yeah,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's pretty clear. We aready. Yeah, we

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>already might have some roomba or something like that. More

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and more we're gonna be incorporating robotics and artificial intelligence

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>into our home life. And it actually matters that these

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>things are not causing emotional stress and annoyance, like making

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>our lives more unhappy by not knowing how to behave themselves. Yeah,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a great point. And so there are entire research

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>departments dedicated to this particular aspect of artificial intelligence, And

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>in fact, there's one that's right down the road from it,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>right here at Georgia Tech. They've got a socially Intelligent

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Machines Lab. Yeah. We'll talk about one of the robots

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that they've worked on a little bit later, but I've

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 1>had a chance to visit that particular lab. Yeah, it's

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn cool. Guess. Don't mean to brag, but it's

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty neat. Even as even as a University of Georgia graduate,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I can appreciate this particular Georgia Tech lab. Uh. So

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about what it means for

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>robots to actually possess social intelligence. You touched on this, Joe,

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about the ability to pick up on

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>those social cues. So I would I would say that

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a socially intelligent machine has to be able to observe, analyze,

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>and respond to humans accurately and within the proper context

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the situation. So one example, and I've seen this

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>as particularly examples in Japan, robots that are part of

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a hotel check in phase. You come in and you

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you need to get your room. You would want that

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>experience to be efficient and pleasant and probably not reliant

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on too many assumptions because that could get socially awkward

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>depending upon what the nature of the hotel visit could be. Right, Sure,

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want, for example, you know, yeah, sir, that

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a lovely daughter, this is my wife. That

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>could be awk kind of thing. Yes, that's that's one

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of the team or examples I could get, but yes,

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but in context is really important. So let's say here's

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>another example. I've actually, you know, you we've talked about.

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if we've talked about on this podcast,

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>but there was a design for a flying drone that's

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>meant to encourage joggers to run. It was to keep

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>pace with joggers so that they have they feel like

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>they have a running buddy. So you know, Now, that's

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a simple version of a robot. But imagine that we

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have a more advanced one that actually gives verbal encouragement

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>so that you can continue to run. Now, let's imagine

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that said robot veers off the path and into a

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>memorial service at a cemetery. I think saying you can

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>do it, get on up there, keep on moving at

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a memorial service that, Yeah, that might might not go

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>over so well in the social situation. That is a

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>memorial service. So when we're talking about social intelligence, we're

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about not just responding within the situation the robot

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was intended for, but in broader situations. Sure. And I

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>think also side note, this means that we need to

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>teach all robots in the future about graveyards and funeral practices.

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I think why they're cool. Yeah, now I'm just seeing

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of robots listening to the Smiths, and the

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>robots says, hey, baby, let's go hang out in the graveyard.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling better and better about the lyric I picked

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for the beginning of this episode. Okay, So, in addition

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to understanding context, I think another crucial part of social

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is the ability to incorporate new information right because

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to right, Like, when we interact with people, we don't

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>treat everybody the same way. I mean because they not

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to be treated the same way you treat

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody else. You learn different ways to interact with different

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>people based on what your relationship with them is, and

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>what their preferences are. Some people like very jokey interactions,

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>some people are a little more business like. Yeah, there's

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>entire fields dedicated to this as well. And it's interesting

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because the law of the earning behaviors I've seen have

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>concentrated first on something a little simpler, because when we

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>start getting into social interactions, that's a really complex and

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and chaotic field. So, I mean, if you feel stress

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>in social situations like social anxiety, a lot of the

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>stress you're probably feeling is it has to do with

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the complexity of the social interactions that we have. In

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>your fear that you're not meeting expectations, writing, unsure that

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the choices that you're making are are good choices. Right, yeah, now,

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's a great point. Now, obviously the robots aren't

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be experiencing social anxiety, but they could end

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>up that we know of, but they could certainly encourage

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it in other people if they the robots are not

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>behaving in a way that the people were expecting. If

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they have said something and the robots seems to behave

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in a in a completely counterintuitive way, that could really

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>cause some issue. Oh yeah, well, I was just trying

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to communicate the complexity like, Yeah, us humans who are

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty good at social interaction have enough trouble with it

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes we can get anxiety about it. How So,

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the learning I've seen has been oriented

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to teaching a robot to perform a series of tasks

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>by performing them for the robot. Actually the one that

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's one in Georgia Tech that does this where you

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>could have a robot and it goes into observation mode

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and watches what you do, so you could pick up

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you've got, you know, kind of going

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>back to that example of the sphere in the box.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you've got a sphere on a desk in

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a box in the desk, and you open up the box,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you pick up the sphere, you put the sphere in

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the box, you close the box. The robot will observe

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this and then be able to repeat those steps. And

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>even if if you've designed the robot properly, it might

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to ask questions like does it matter what

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>how I pick up the this thing? Does that matter?

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter how I close the box doesn't? If

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's four flaps, does it matter? Or which flaps are

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>closed first? Is there a sequence? Right, if it were

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a cube that you were putting inside the box instead

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of his sphere, doesn't matter which side of the cube

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>is facing up perfect exactly right. So that's that's a

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>building block, not to make it a weird, stupid pun,

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but that's a building block for the kinds of interactions

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>where a robot starting to get into more complex situations,

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>such as, this person is exhibiting behaviors that indicate that

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they are in a happy mood. So what is the

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>appropriate response for this particular person when they are in

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a happy mood. Maybe it's playing that person's favorite upbeat

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>song because it's going to enhance that happy mood. And

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>then that's what the robot ends up doing. Uh, these

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are you know, it's going to take these these basic

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>steps before you get into something so complex. Is all right,

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got two people, two people the robot has

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to interact with. If we're talking about a home robot,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>it might have profiles for each member of the family,

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, but it knows that person number two is

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>not really into music, so playing songs aren't going to

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have that same emotional effect as for the first person,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So it may have to build an entirely different set

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of interactions, just as we humans would kind of intuitively

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>know from our interactions, like what you know works and

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work with the people in our lives. And you

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>start to realize, Wow, this is this is tough. This

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is a non trivial challenge in artificial intelligence. Absolutely. Let's

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the teams and some of the

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>robots that are that are taking these challenges head on. Sure. Yeah,

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so we've got a collection of different robots. These are

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 1>These are mainly robots designed specifically to have social interactions

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with humans, and lots of we should say that lots

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of computer programs and robots have some elements of this. Yeah. Um,

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean typically you're not going to be interacting with

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a robot that's just designed to be social, because what's

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the point other than a novelty. I mean, typically social

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is a feature of a robot that intended to

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>do something else. Yeah, except for I guess therapy, but yeah,

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Therapy, butts would be a great example. Yeah.

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I started to think that in some of these, some

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of these cases, we're heading toward a future like in

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>future rama, where we have robots built to be hoboes

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or gamblers or whatever, and you think, why would anyone

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>ever build a robot, But we are doing that. Yeah.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>So one robot that I actually watched this adorable video

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier today was this robot called Gibo. Had you heard

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about this one before? I have? I had seen pictures.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I had not seen the video or read about Gibo,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but I had seen photos of Gibo before. Okay, so

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this is nothing super complex. Gibo is just supposed to

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be a social robot that's really designed as a kind

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of around the house helper. So imagine kind of an

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>embodied serie in a way. It can track faces and

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>recognize individual household members, take pictures, record voice reminders, um

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and do a lot of the stuff you might have

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like apps on your smartphone. It can even do things

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like um like sort of like a similar feature as FaceTime,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>where you are in one place, one of your family

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>members is somewhere else they are using their smartphone, and

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>then Gibo just projects their face onto its face. So

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a a direction to look in and it's

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>an actual physical thing. It's not something you're holding in

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>your hand. You're looking down at Gibos quote unquote face,

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>which is really kind of a round screen. Yeah, it's

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this like it's this kind of friendly. I yeah. And

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it has a camera in it so it can it

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>can quote unquote see that allows it to do the tracking.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it doesn't like walk around the house or anything.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of on a stationary base. But you could

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>pick it up and move it around with you a

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>little more than five pounds, I think. And the thing

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about this is nothing about this robot is like crazy

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing, you know. It's not like doing anything all

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that weird. It's sort of a cuddly smartphone or cuddly

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>series kind of thing. It you can talk to it,

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it'll talk back to you. It tries to, uh to

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>be friendly and fit in around the house. Right. So

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to kind of provide a lot of those

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>features that you would find in a smartphone, but in

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a way that is more socially interactive. Sure. Sure that's

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and that's a little bit more relatable because your smartphone.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Although I think that we all have certain attributes that

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we give it, we don't really you know, name them.

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And and no, I'll never name that phone. It did

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>phone phone. Uh so the next one we wanted to

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about is Pepper Okay, So Pepper is According to

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the company that makes it, Aldebron is the first humanoid

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>robot designed to live with humans. And it's a conversational robot,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's supposed to detect and react to emotions, kind

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of like what we're talking about earlier. It can move

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>about in its own and that's about all I can

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>do is have conversations move around autonomously, so you don't

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have to direct it. Um and uh. It watches your

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>facial expressions and your body language for social cues to

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>your emotional state, and it pays attention to your word

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>choice to try and get a handle on what kind

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of mood you might be in. But so I guess

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially builds an index of words that you are more

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>likely to use when you are angry, perhaps of the

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>four letter variety. Huh yeah. But it is meant to

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>have these social interactions and responses so that it has

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>these these appropriate responses for whatever mood you happen to

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be in. You know, I hate to sounds cynical, but

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder to what extent, especially early versions of these

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>kinds of robots are going to be again, like Sirie,

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>not in what they do, but in how people treat them,

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>because I can't remember the figure, Like some significant percentage

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>of what people say to Siri is just profanity, Like

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>they're just they think it's funny, you know, like what

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>will series say if I tell her to do this

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>rude thing? You know? My favorite was serie where can

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I Hide a body? And the response was the nearest

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>quarry is three? Like that is amazing. Yeah, well, you know,

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's that novelty factor before you get really used to

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 1>something and before something works extremely well. I think that

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be treating these robots like like robots, and

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's like playing a text based adventure

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and just like typing in weird things just to see

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>if the programmers thought, yeah, to put inside. And then

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we reach we'll reach the point where we'll get more

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and more movies and this is already the case, but

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll get more and more movies that give us an

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>emotional attachment to robots. So we'll see that more and

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>more in the pop culture, and then gradually the technology

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>will also reach that same level where we will start

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to have emotional attachments to these robots beyond the what

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>you might call superficial ones that we have now, Like

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there are people who if they're if their roomba were

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to get damaged, would feel genuine emotional stress about that,

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>not not just related to I need to replace my room, Bob,

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but more like a member of the family has been

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>hurt kind of thing. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely, And uh, I

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>think that Jarvis from the Iron Man movies is a

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is a really good example of that. And there is

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a robot called Emo Spark that was kind of reminding

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>us in the research of of that sort of Jarvis character. Yeah,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so this isn't really a robot. Yeah, this is more

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>like an artificial intelligence that lives inside a cube. So

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>because the cube is a cube, you could set it

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>on a shelf and but it's a cube, open it

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>up and let the cinambytes out. Cinnabonn have a little

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>home or Simpson moment. Uh. But no, it is like

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Jarvison that it feels almost like it's a disembodied artificial

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that can inhabit a space within your home. So,

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so imagine you've got this cube. The cube is what

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>contains the you know, it's the hardware that contains the

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>software that runs this Emo Spark robot. Uh. The Emo

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Spark robot can sense and interact with its environment through

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>things like Bluetooth and WiFi. It also uses webcams and

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>microphones and a connection to your smartphone. So this is

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>what gives it that that window to the world, and

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>it can recognize people. It can look at facial cues

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>again to determine moods. It actually maps your face against

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty different points and tries to figure out your mood

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>based upon your expression. So, um, yeah, this is kind

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting design. If you want to take a

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the Emo Sparks, it does look like this

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, uh, Cino byte meets tron cube thing,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh yet you know, it's it's one of those

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially have this sort of natural interaction. You know.

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We we are seeing this kind of stuff in the

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>homes already with things like like the Xbox and PlayStation

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>controllers that allow for voice control. So this is kind

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of the next step when where it goes beyond a

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>passive system that's trying to recognize voice commands and then

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>respond to them and have one that can actually have

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>some form of communication back to the person who is

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>issuing the commands. In the first place, so it becomes

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>not just a list of commands and then responses, but

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in actual communication, a conversation that leads to whatever the

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>outcome the person hoped for, you know, was in mind. Yeah, uh,

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to talk for a second going back

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to the stuff that they're working on at Georgia Tech

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.479
<v Speaker 1>in their Socially Intelligent Machines Lab, because they're they're kind

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of working on more the the building blocks of a

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>more practical household robot and how people are going to

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be interacting with that, because part of creating and ease

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of interaction between consumers and robots is going to be

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>making robots that can learn new tasks with a minimal

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>effort on behalf of the owner, right, right, So you

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to sit at a terminal and type lines

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of code so it can open up a can of

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>cat food. Yeah. Yeah, And kind of the first half

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of that was what we were talking about earlier with

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with that unsupervised learning, wherein the robot is watching a

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>human completed task, and you know, so even if it

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any idea what the objects in this task are,

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't know what if it needs to

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>set a table. It doesn't know what cups and plates

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 1>and food are, but it can be taught to know

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what those things look like where to place them in

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a table setting. Um right, that that plates come first,

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>food comes later. Otherwise people are unhappy, right right, Sure,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly that kind of stuff. And when you break it

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>down into those kind of steps, it becomes a relatively

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>easy thing for robot to learn how to do. But

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that's really only half of the equation, because the second

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>half of of how humans naturally learn how to do

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff is being able to ask questions of their teacher

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and so and that that's what they're calling active learning

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in robot circles, and it's it's letting the robot ask

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>questions of the human teacher while it's being presented with

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this new task that it's watching. But that's a trickier

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>question you might expect, like having a robot know how

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask the question to figure out what it needs

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure out. Right, it comes naturally to us, but

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily come naturally to machine. Right, So sure

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to teach a robot when

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's actually permissible to ask a question. And and furthermore,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>how to ask a good question, what does the question mean?

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And then what does the answer mean? Like to to

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>ask a good question, you have to understand what relevant

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>information is to know that you need it right. Yeah,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and and in fact, the examples the robot were specifically

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about is called Simon, the robot um But yeah,

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and I got to see Simon. That Simon was the

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>one I was talking about. Specifically, I got to see Simon.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh didn't get to see Simon really in in full

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>um in full robot mode. But I had a great

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Henrik Christensen, who is the head of robotics

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>over a Georgia Tech and he was telling me all

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about this approach. And it's so interesting the idea that

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the robot can start to build this kind of of database,

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this index of information of the various things in its environment,

0:31:56.440 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the relationships between those things. Uh we which ones are

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>meant to be used in certain ways. It's it's learning

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in a similar way to the way humans learn, but

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it's but it's already got a huge step up and

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's got a basic grammar syntax vocabulary that it

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>can follow. It doesn't have to learn the language. It

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just has to learn, you know, and has to be

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>able to learn how to interact with its environment. And granted,

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>even that is going to be limited based upon what

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the programmers anticipate. Right there may be and in fact,

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there will be situations that are unique to every home

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that a programmer could not anticipate. And in in some cases,

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there will be times where it will be

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to explain to the robot what something is for,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or how it's used, or why it's there. It will

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be tricky and um, you know. The the question then

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is how do you address those those outliers, things that

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>are outside the normal experience. How do you explain into

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the robot how to use your furby? Why are you

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>explaining that to your robot? I mean, other than the

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that that would be adorable. I just okay, I

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>just answered my own question. No, now I'm thinking about it,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and I totally want a robot. The robot in Ferbie

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>are plotting against you. They're having conversations deep into the night.

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>But but so yeah, this this lab at Georgia Tech

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is laying some of this really cool groundwork, um for

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.479
<v Speaker 1>for you know, it sounds like a lot of these

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>other robots are are kind of fun, but aside from

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the interesting fact that they existed there there may be

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>moving towards something like being a therapy bot or being

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>able to interact with the human uh, doing household chores

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. But I mean, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean all the pieces are kind of out there. Yeah,

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think all these are are sort of making steps

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. Though at the same time, as

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>impressive as all this is, we recognize how big the

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>gap is between this and like Rosie from the Jetsons. Yeah, yeah,

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the best socially intelligent robots today are nothing like a human.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And another question is do we want them to be? Yes?

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Like if we so you say yes, yes, I don't know.

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I I think the question might be, um, should socially

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>intelligent robots be like well mannered humans or should they

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>be a different kind of entity? No? No, I I personally, Uh, well,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I would not define what a socially

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>intelligent robot should or should not really be like as

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>much as I joke about it. But well, no, I

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mean I know we're not like setting the rules. I

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm asking is what do people what? What

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>do most people really want. Yeah, yeah, I mean I

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think that I would be creeped out by something trying

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to interact with me as a human or as it

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>thinks or was programmed to think that a human would

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>would interact. You know. I think that it may be

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that we define like a subset of behaviors that we

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>expect from and are comfortable with as far as a

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>robotic entity is concerned. So things that you know, these

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of interactions that I think will be fine.

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>They're very straightforward. Uh, you know, outside of things like

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the robots that are meant for therapy or of of

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one nature or another, those obviously you need to have

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a kind of comforting approach. But for robots

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're having interactions with on a daily basis, Like

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if it's a robot that, for example, Uber has famously

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>invested a lot of money in autonomous cars, you would

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>want that interaction to be pretty smooth and probably pretty quiet.

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>If I know most people who have complained about Uber,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's that. Listen, when I get a when I get

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a newber car, I don't want you talking to me.

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I just want you to take me to the place

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>where I wanted to go, and then I want to

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get out of the car, and then I want to

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 1>be on my married little way. Um, don't remind you

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're a human. See, I don't have that particular interaction.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk if they want to talk, but I don't

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>want to initiate conversation because I figure this is someone

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>who interacts. I can hardly believe that about you, Jonathan.

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>It's once in a while I'm able to be considerate

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>of other human beings. But all right, but but this

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is a point, right that where where in this particular

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>context where Uber would have a Thomas Cars, which are

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>technically robots. I mean, that's essentially a robot. How do

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>how what kind of social intelligence do those robots need

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>in order to be able to uh do their their

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>job and do so in a way that is the

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>most satisfying experience to the customer. Well, I've got an

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 1>analogy for household robots and whether or not we should

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>expect their social intelligence to be like that of humans

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.720
<v Speaker 1>or to be a different kind of thing. How about dogs?

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we love dogs, but you don't. There's the

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>difference between a well behaved dog and an ill manner

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>badly behaved dog. But a well mannered dog doesn't act

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>like a human. It's just a different kind of vinity.

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if well mannered robots we would expect

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to be just a different kind of thing than humans.

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think it will also depend on the

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>form factor, Like, if the robot is a humanoid robot,

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>would we expect it to have more human like traits?

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah? Oh man, a humanoid robot that acted more

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 1>dog like, well not necessarily dog catlike would be pretty awful.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 1>But well, well, but no, no. I I was thinking

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>about that too, and I'm I'm not sure. I'm not

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.959
<v Speaker 1>sure how comfortable I would be giving a robot any

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 1>orders in my house, Like I I don't know, It's

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a very basic thing that I'm not sure if

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I could, in good conscience say, hey, robot, go make

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>me some toast. I've got this really important Facebook articles. Well,

0:37:57.160 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>when you put bread in a toaster, do you ask

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the sister nicely to toast your bread or do you

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just push the button and walk away through that that

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>toaster is just a slave to your demands. I'm just saying, like,

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but I can see what you're saying in terms of

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of the emotional situation, like if it were too human one,

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I certainly wouldn't want a robot to do my bidding

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that was indistinguishable from a human, because I would feel

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like I was ordering a human around, which I mean

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be creepy. Uh. To be more serious though,

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 1>going down this this pathway of of you know, let's

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>let's get a little philosophical, it's also possible that we

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>could have these very socially interactive robots that people would

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable talking to and confiding in in ways that

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they might not with another person. Particularly if there's like

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a problem that's weighing on their mind that they want

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to express, but they don't feel comfortable talking about it

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to anybody in their circle. They're they're support group, they

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>might want to talk to a robot. Which if that happens,

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and I assume it will happen, the next logical thing

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that will happen is people will design robots specifically to

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>get information from folks. Uh sure, sort of like a

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>monitor your children, Barbie, yeah, or or you know uh,

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>or spy upon your employees to find out who's actually

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>leaking corporate secrets to your So you plant a robot

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>employee among them that sits at the lunch table. Know,

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all you have to do is you work at a

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>big company, and and everyone at that company is told, Hey,

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>guess what, we're making this awesome robot that's gonna help

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>people at home, and everyone who works here gets a

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.760
<v Speaker 1>free one. Tell us what you really think about the boss.

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, like free robots, Like if if if

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 1>we were offered a free robot, I'd likely be one

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of the people saying, I will take that free robot.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Can this free robot carry me the way home? Because

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I can carry the robot home,

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and one of us is going to be doing a

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the work, so I wanted to be the

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>robot in this case, you could call an uber. But

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>at anyway, Yeah, get that autonomous car come up and

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>let me my robot buddy, and then I'm outnumbered. I've

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>got two. But yeah, the point being that that, I

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>mean there are actual people who have have brought this up,

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>who have written papers on this subject. The idea that

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>if we get to a point with socially intelligent robots

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>where we feel comfortable enough to confide in them in

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>order to receive comfort. Then there is already the incentive

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to build robots specifically to gather information that might you

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:43.399
<v Speaker 1>might want to remain private. So, in other words, if

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people do this behavior, and if there's a way to

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to profit from that behavior, someone is going to act

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>upon that. That is perfectly logical in the way our

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>world works. It's not the bright, beautiful future that I

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>want where you know, you can have these interactions then

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be be assured that they're between you and you're the

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>robot that you're talking to. Um, well, yeah, yeah, I

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.760
<v Speaker 1>mean eventually you've just got you've just got do android

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>stream of electric sheet of scenario where you've got probably

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a robot interrogating probably another robot. Right. That was this

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>turtle that I came across on my way here. I

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just left it there in the middle of the belt line.

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Well no, first you've turned it over on its back. Yeah.

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>It was odd too, because you would have thought it

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>would have been a tortoise, not a turtle. But it

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.919
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a turtle. That was kind of strange. There's

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>pawns along the belt line, there are there are all right, So, uh,

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>socially intelligent robots is going to continue to be a thing.

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I am curious. Do you guys have any guests like, like,

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I know this is putting you on the spot, but

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>like a prediction of when we will get to a

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>point where a robot will be socially intelligent enough to

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>interact in a a typical social setting. Let's say I

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know a cotillion, oh for years, let's play it.

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, Um, I'm not sure. I think I honestly, Oh,

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>technology is changing so fast these days. Well, I'm tempted

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to say some huge number, like like fifty to a

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. I think my answer would play on the

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>same thing I was just talking about a few minutes ago.

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It would be the difference between something that's very convincingly

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>human versus something that's just very socially pleasant and acceptable

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but not necessarily human. It's its own paradigm, it's its

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.919
<v Speaker 1>own thing. I think the latter is going to happen

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 1>much sooner. In fact, might argue that the latter already

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.959
<v Speaker 1>exists and it's just going to be refined. Yeah, I'm

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>going with fifteen years. That's when we're gonna see robots

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>capable of interacting in social situations as well as your

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>typical human wow, I believe that it could happen. I mean,

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm dubious. It seems like a lot of I mean,

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we're we're coming a long way in terms of natural

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:31.439
<v Speaker 1>language processing and all of that, but it's it's so much.

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Mostly I'm confident that by no one's going to listen

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to this episode in fact check me. So I'll be

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>all right. I feel pretty confident about that. That's a

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>good way to play the game. It's a fairly it's

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a fairly arbitrary number, not prices, right, You're just like,

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>as long as you don't yeah, I think, um, I

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think yeah, I think that. Uh. I think that we

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are making advances in the field of artificial intelligence at

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 1>an incredible rate, and that I think that rate is

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>likely to stay steady. Now, we should point out that

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>these advances aren't on a path like Moore's law, right

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>they are, they are far below the path of Moore's law.

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that advances in various fields are

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>pointing the way to incredible achievements in artificial intelligence. And

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that by having a robot capable of having

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a social interaction that would be more or less indistinguishable

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>from a typical person. It's ambitious, but I think achievable. Uh.

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And if rolls around and it turns out that we

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:45.720
<v Speaker 1>had hit some obstacles we could not have anticipated. Demand

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>money I want. I wanted my socially my socially acceptable robot,

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but I will accept money. It's place that's almost always

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case, actually, Joe, I I like,

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I like our range of of optimism. Yeah. Yeah, And

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know again, I think it's always important you always

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>have to acknowledge the fact that there are challenges. If

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you ignore that there are challenges, you're pretty much guaranteed

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to fail. You need to acknowledge the challenges so that

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you can figure out ways to overcome them on your

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>quest to whatever your goal happens to be, in this case,

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>creating a socially intelligent robot. Joe, you came up with

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea for this podcast. I think it was a

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun. It was. It was entertaining and fun

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to research the various types of robots that are in

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:38.799
<v Speaker 1>this field. So thank you, Thank you guys. Now we

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>all start getting tons of great suggestions from you listeners

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>out there. We want those to keep coming in because

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 1>we really love the fact that you're guiding the conversation.

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You're you're part of the conversation. Keep up the great works.

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Send us your suggestions for future episodes or even comments

0:45:56.520 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on past episodes to FW thinking at how stuff x

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or drop us a line on Google Plus

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>or Twitter or Facebook. At Google Plus and Twitter, we

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are FW thinking at Facebook. Just search FW thinking in

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the search bar. We will pop right up. Leave us

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a message, and we'll talk to you again really soon.

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic in the future of technology,

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>visit forward thinking dot com, brought to you by Toyota.

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's Go Places