WEBVTT - Rerun: Working with the Large Hadron Collider

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and usually I love all things tech, but today I'm

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>having some issues, been having some technical glitches that I've

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>been trying to fix, and unfortunately it means that the

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>episode I had planned today, which was a follow up

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>an additional space suit episode, is probably gonna have to

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>wait till tomorrow. I'm going to My plan is to

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>have that one published instead of a tech News episode.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to leave you without an episode

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>of the show, so I thought we would play this

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>episode that originally published on January seven, two thousand nineteen.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It's an episode where Daniel Whiteson of Daniel and Jorge

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Explain the Universe, joined the show to talk about his

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>work in experimental particle physics and how his work with

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a large Hadron collider what it was like. And you know,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to talk about technical glitches, the LHC

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is a good topic because that's an entire, you know,

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>particle acceleration facility that had more than its share of

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>technical difficulties, including you know, reportedly birds. But I hope

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this episode and I'll be back to chat

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with you again towards the end. Today we have a

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very special guest on our show, someone who has worked

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on really interesting problems. Is a rare occasion that I

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>get to talk to someone who has experienced in high

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>energy particle physics. So I want to introduce to all

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of you, if you haven't listen to his amazing podcast yet,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Whitson. Dr Daniel Whitson, Welcome to the show. Hi,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.839
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot for having me on. I am so

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>glad to have you here now. Daniel. You are one

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>half of the podcast team of Daniel and Jorge Explained

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Universe, and thank you for taking time away from

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>explaining the universe to grace my humble show with your presence.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I greatly appreciate it. Well, thanks a lot for having

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>me on. You guys talking about really fascinating stuff. So

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a pleasure to be here. It's been a pleasure

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>listening to your show. We'll talk a little bit more

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>about that towards the end of the episode, but just

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>so that my listeners kind of understand where you you're

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>coming from before we get into work with the Large

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider and CERN and particle physics. Tell us a

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>bit about yourself, all right, Well, I'm devastatingly good looking,

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>which is why I have a podcast, and m familiar

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 1>my my. The most important thing to know about me

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in this context, I guess, is that I am a

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>high energy physicist, which means that I'm interested in studying

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe at the smallest scale, and I do so

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>by smashing stuff together at the highest energy. It's like,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want to understand how things work, take

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>them apart, and that's basically what we do, is we

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>try to take the whole universe apart and understand how

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it works. So I'm a professor at the University of

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>California at Irvine that's in Orange County, and I work there,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and I work also at the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>where the actual collider is, and we have a big

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>team of people smashing particles together and trying to figure

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>out what is the smallest bit of matter and how

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>does it all fit together? And where how did everything

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>start and how is it going to end? And we

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>basically try to tackle those really big, sexy questions. Yeah,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I I love the way you describe that, the idea

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of taking apart the very basic particles that make up

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff and and and finding out what makes at work.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's very relatable to all the stories of the various

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>innovators who got their start taking apart the various pieces

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of technology they have, often to the the detriment of

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>their family, and then learning how it works, and then

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>hopefully being able to put it back together again. Except

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at reality here, how the the very fabric

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that makes up existence works. And uh. I also I

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>watched a great presentation that you and Jorge gave in

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which you talked about your book and you talked about

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the gaps and scientific knowledge, and that also made me

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like I am all a smart person, only because

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in the past I have described our understanding of the

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>universe like we're staring through a key hole and we

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>can only see a little bit of the illuminated room

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that's beyond the keyhole, and there's stuff and shadows, So

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>there are things that we don't really see, and there

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>are elements that are out of you and and to us.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that's our understanding of the universe. We only see

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a very narrow band of what really exists out there,

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and our goal is to expand that over time. That's right,

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and the most amazing thing in my perspective is that

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 1>we've only recently discovered that we are looking through the keyhole.

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for a long time we thought we were

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>saying everything. We thought, well, we've seen the way the

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>universe is. Now, we just need to figure out how

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to explain it. We made a lot of progress and

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the last fifty year, in the last twenty or fifty years,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we've discovered that there's a lot of stuff out there

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have any understanding of, dark matter, dark energy,

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>huge chunks of the universe which completely defy our our explanation.

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean it can't be explained. You don't have

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>to go to like weird woo woo crystal energy stuff.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It just means that there's a lot more science left

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to do. And for me, those are wonderful moments in

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the history of science when you you know, you pull

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.799
<v Speaker 1>back a layer of reality and discover, oh my gosh, wow,

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>things are totally different from what we expected, or you know,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>turn is out we were only studying the the tail

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of the elephant, and we need to look at the

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. And and that's exciting, not because the

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>science is humbled and realizing that we don't understand everything,

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a wonderful experience. It's exciting because it means

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.559
<v Speaker 1>there are discoveries left to come, right, means that maybe

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the most dramatic, most insightful realizations about the

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>nature of the universe might still be ahead of us.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I like thinking about how in the future and a

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred years people might look back with great knowledge of

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>how the universe works and wonder what it was like

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to be us when we lived in such ignorance, right

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>when we didn't know so many things about so many

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>basic things about the universe. Um And what you said

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier really resonate with me about trying to figure things

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out by taking them apart. I think that there's an

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>innate curiosity in being human. I mean, that's what makes

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>being human fun, it makes being being alive worth It

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we are driven by this desire to know

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to understand the things around us. So if you're the

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of person who's like, how does a blender work?

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me take it apart? Or you know how does

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>this thing in my car work when we look under

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the hood and poke around, then you're basically a physicist.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You're the kind of person who wants to understand things

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>by taking them apart, by boiling them down to the

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>most essential elements, and using that to explain your car,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and then also your blender and then other things you

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen before. Right, It's about learning generalizable universal truths. Yeah,

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and and I would also argue that the history of

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of humanity has been one in which we have attempted

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to explain the why things are the way they are

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for for all of our history, and the as we

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>eliminate gaps piece by piece, and knowing that we still

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>have enormous gaps left to fill in, we start to

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>really hone in on that over time we're able to

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>replace things where we had the explanation of a uh.

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Well though, that that's the gods battling it out in Olympus,

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's where the thunder comes from. To know now

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we a deeper understanding to the point now where we

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>even are able to get a grasp on the idea

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that as humans, as as we are the way we

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have evolved, we have limitations in our perception. There are

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>things that we are capable of perceiving because we have evolved.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It was advantageous, it made sense in our environment, But

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that's everything there is out there, which

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of leads into discussions that I've heard about, you know,

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the various dimensions that we were capable of perceiving. Some

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>of those obviously we can. We can observe the physical dimensions,

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and then once you start figuring that out, you say, well,

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it may be a leap to you to think there

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are so many more dimensions or potentially more dimensions than

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the ones we can perceive. But we also know that

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we can't see things in the infrared or ultra violet

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>UH wave forms, but with technology, we can convert that

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>into light that we can see. And once you start

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at things is like that level where you say, oh, yeah,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess we have developed tools that let us go

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>beyond our limitations in our perception. Then it kind of

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>opens up your mind into the idea of now I

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of understand how there can be things like dark

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>energy and dark matter that are beyond our current capability

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of detecting it. Because it took thousands of years for

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>us to get to the point where we could, uh

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>could even indirectly observe stuff like beingfrared and the ultraviolet.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of the approach I take with people

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, the idea that it feels like you're taking

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a big leap when you start going into things like

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>particle physics, when you start talking about quantum quantum effects,

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>because everything seems so strange. It doesn't it doesn't work

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the way the classical physics work, and it's it feels

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like you're asking people to take a leap of faith.

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But once you start to build on those blocks, they say, okay,

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, now I'm with you. Now I got it,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And that kind of brings us over to the work

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that we see over at at CERN and the large

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>hey drunk collider. Now, one thing I like to remind

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>people about before before we get there. I think he's

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>touched on a really interesting topic there. You know, Um,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think people have been thinking about mysteries for a

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>long time, right, And for a long time the world

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>was really mysterious. It was obvious that there were mysteries

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you could just go outside, and there were things you

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't understand. What is lightning? Right, Um, and it's sort

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of it was a common feeling that the world was mysterious,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, like there are more things in the heavens

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, right,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's even in literature. But we've sort of lost that.

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people these days, when they

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>walk around, they feel like they mostly understand stuff like, yeah,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we know how weather works. Maybe we can't predict it exactly,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but we understand the mechanism of it and gravity we

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have an understanding of that. And the sense of experiencing

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>mystery on the daily basis is sort of gone because

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>science has made so much progress in explaining the various

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>bits around us. And I want to remind people that

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the bigger questions, the larger questions questions we're asking ourselves,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>like why are we here? How should we live? How

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the history of everything? Those questions are still

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>totally unanswered. And uh, And as you said, I think

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is really insightful about how we don't even know what

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, because there's a lot of things that

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we've only recently discovered we don't we we didn't understand

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>right that there's things happening around us that we're not

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>aware of various kinds of particles moving and even different

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>kinds of light that's invisible to us, as you said,

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's really no limit on how much of that

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there can be, right, I mean, we know certain things,

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we know dark matters invisible. We know neutrinos are invisible.

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>There could be other things out there that are also

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>invisible that we just haven't even yet discovered that they're

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>there through some sort of very slight hints. Right, So

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of discoveries left remaining in the future is enormous,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the kind of thing that gets me all excited. Yeah,

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I I have a feeling, Well, first of all, I

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling I'm gonna need to fly out to

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>California and have have like just maybe a four hour

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>long conversation with you, because I haven't feel like that's

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly what's going to be needed. But is I This

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of stuff I love to talk about

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>just to anyone who will, you know, be patient enough

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to let me chatter at them. Let let me ask

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you a question that you you mentioned about how we

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>used to explain things in terms of gods, and I

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>think that makes a lot of sense because humans are

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>good at like identifying agency and willfulness in places where

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>there aren't any. Right. But there's another element to that,

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>which is the sort of the narrative. Right, These gods

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>don't just have personalities and wheels that had stories the

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons why they were doing what they were doing. And

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I feel like storytelling is a big part of who

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>we are as a species, and it's still even though

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not explaining things in terms of gods, it still

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>drives our science. Like you know, if you asked me, um,

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>what would you do if you knew the final answer

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to particle physics? Like if you could explain the whole

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>universe in terms of one particle? Um, you know that,

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, then we would want to tell a story, right,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>We want to tell a story about what that means

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about the universe and why the universe? Why is the

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>universe this way and not the other way? First we

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out what way is the universe, and

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>then we want to know, like why that way. In

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the end, we're still telling stories to ourselves about how

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the universe came to be and what it means and

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>how we should live our lives. So it's a very

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>human endeavor. Well, certainly, I mean, we we call it matter,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and we know about antimatter, but we chose the optimist

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>route right when we describe, when we describe these things

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that are antithetical to one another, and they they annihilate

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>one another when they come into contact. And for some

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>reason that we don't fully understand, we had slightly more

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>matter than we had antimatter, and therefore we've got stuff.

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we had been pessimists, we would call

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we have the antimatter. Right, So clearly there's

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a narrative issue there that's right. So here, seriously, here's

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the question. Then the question is do you think if

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we met an alien species of physicists, do you think

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they would be asking the same questions or would they

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>be satisfied with our answers? Or do you think the

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of questions we're asking are inherently human in some

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>way that we don't even understand? What an excellent question. Now, obviously,

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 1>from the scientific perspective, I have to tell you that

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I have a very small sample size of intelligent life

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>forms that I can work from. I only have the one. Really,

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you you mean, you're the only intelligent life form you're

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I mean of entire I'm talking about

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>entire species. I guess I'm not not only I mean,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I could get super nihilistic and and and very egotistical

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, I can only experience my own experience,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and therefore I know I'm intelligence. But I'm just granting

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody else that consideration. Um, that's this. This gets into

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>philosophy and then, which I also fascinated by. But I'm

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a pregnantist, so eventually I get very irritated. Um, that's

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>an excellent question, and and honestly, the it's one that

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't given a lot of consideration too, largely because

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I have accepted the fact, or at least accepted the

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>notion that any sufficiently intelligent species that may exist somewhere

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>else would be so very different from what we experience

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that that the word alien only begins to describe how

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we would uh define such a species, and that perhaps

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>their approach to understanding and explaining the universe to themselves

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>would be very different. But it seems like it would

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>follow a similar pattern. But I say that only because

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's what has happened here. I don't have

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else to draw any conclusions from. So, um, it's

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>so hard to imagine outside of your experience, right, It's

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very, very difficult. Even in science, when we discover

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>something new, we're always describing it in terms of the

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>things we know. Like we want to know what is light?

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it a little particle? Is it a little way?

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Because of the things we know, Right, when we find

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>something that's totally new and different, we don't even really

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have the words to describe it. So imagining what it's

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>like to be an alien scientist is I think it's

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>an impossible question. So yeah, and that's that's why I

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>posed it to you. It's why it's I I while

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I find science fiction endlessly entertaining, I love science fiction.

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I also always I roll my eyes a little bit

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>when I see the Star Trek approach of every alien

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>race is a humanoid with slightly different bumps on their head,

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and they speak the English the same way. Yeah, the

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Universal Translator has no problem picking up what their speech

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>patterns are. So that like, even when you use the

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Universal translator, uh the you know, d O sex Macina

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>coming in and saying, oh, yeah, this is going to

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>translate everything magically. You think you kind of thing a

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sample size, don't you before you really get a grasp

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on it. But I mean, we have a hard enough trouble,

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>hard enough time even on Earth sometimes understanding human cultures

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>from around the globe, you know, understanding how to interact

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with aliens. I think it's going to be hopeless. Like

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>if we ever heard a message from aliens, and you know,

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>even decoding it would be a huge problem if you

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>could even get past that. I have challenges understanding some

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of my relatives, and we all speak the same language

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and arguably come from the same Sure are you sure

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they all come from Earth? I mean that might be

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>an explanation. I got an uncle that's questionable, but pretty

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>much everyone else I got a pretty good handle on. Alright,

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>this is this is great. This is gonna be an

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>eighteen partner. Guys. I'm just gonna sit here and and

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and and monopolize Daniel's time for you want to you

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the large Dan Collider rather than

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>philosophy of alien civilization. I wouldn't say rather, I'll just

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>say that those were what my questions were about. Well,

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you know there's one topic which connects them, um, which

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is the one way we might discover an alien civilization

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is by first detecting their particle physicists. I have not

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>heard this. It might be if somebody's if aliens are

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>building like enormous particle colliders like the size of a

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>solar system, and we might eventually like sweep through the

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially the pollution from that part from that particle accelerator

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and discover them in that way. That would be pretty

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>crazy way defined an alien species, but that would be

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>awesome because they would It would tell us that, hey, look,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>particle physics is not just a human thing, it's a

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>universal thing. Everyone wants to know what the universe has

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>made out of, and everyone's figuring it out by smashing

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>step together. So that would be pretty exciting discovery. It

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is interesting I had not heard about that particular kind

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of an idea. I've heard of, of course, enormous constructs

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>that could especially when you talk about things like the

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Kardashov scale and you're thinking about like the dice and

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>sphere and that kind of stuff. These hypothetical um machines

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that would need to exist in order to to take

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage of, say an entire solar system's energy output, which

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>would be necessary to reach those higher levels of civilization

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've heard about, but I hadn't heard about. I

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>hadn't thought about a particle accelery the size of a

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>solar system. To be perfectly honest, the Large Hadron Collator

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.239
<v Speaker 1>is is a big enough beast for me to try

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and get my mind wrapped around. I mean they're a

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty big and pretty expensive. So yeah, the solar system

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>sizelder is going to take another level of civilization before

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>we can afford that kind of equipment. Yeah, Daniel and

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I will be back with more about the LHC and

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>just a moment, but first let's take a quick break.

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So getting to the Large Hadron Collider, Uh, that would

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know? And CERN as well. A lot of people

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>think of of CERN is just because the Large Hadron

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Collider got so much press a few years ago when

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:32.959
<v Speaker 1>it was when they were preparing to bring it up

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>online and they were starting to stub up the energy levels.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people just associated those two

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as being uh the only real like the CERN is

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>just that's the agency to oversee the Large Hadron Collider.

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I like to remind people that CERN is also the

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>organization where because CERN exists. We have a worldwide web.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean the web started from Tim berners Lee, who

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>was working for CERTAIN at the time. So, uh, I

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>like to remind people that it's beyond that. But let's

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>talk a bit so. So CERTAIN is a European agency

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that is a scientifically oriented agency looking into things like these,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>these high energy reactions. And the large Hadron Collider is

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a particle accelerator. Uh, kind of give us an overview

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of what the LHC is for for someone who has

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>heard the term but they don't really get they don't

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>grock it entirely, alright, sure, Um, the large hadron collider.

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>The basic idea is, let's figure out what's inside matter.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's figure out what's inside matter, and let's do that

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>by smashing particles together. So what you do with the

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>large hadron collider the word large it obviously just means

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it's really big. Hadron is a kind of particle, and

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>proton is the example of it, so you could also

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>call it the large proton collider. Um, And we take protons,

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>which are essentially just the nucleus of hydrogen. So you

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>start with hydrogen gas, which is easy to get. Heat

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it up. So the electrons boil off, and you're left

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>with just the nucleus, which is protons. And what we

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>do is we give those protons a kick. We use

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic waves to push them, and we push them faster

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and faster and faster and faster until they're going about

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. And then we smash them into

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>each other. And the idea is, see what comes out.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>See what kind of weird mysterious quantum mechanical magic happens

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to give you new kinds of matter and new weird

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>particles um. But as you said, the Large Hadron Collider

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a flagship property, flagship experiment, but certain

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is much broader than that. It's a it's a European organization,

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's also international. I mean, I've I've been there

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>many summers, and you sit at a table at the

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>restaurant and there's people speaking all sorts of languages. You know,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this Italian at this table, and Russian at that table,

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and Tie at the other table, and Chinese over here,

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and you meet people from hundreds of countries, well not hundreds,

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but more than a hundred countries. And it's a it's

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a super international place, which is really wonderful and right

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>now it really is the center of the world, world

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Solar System, and you know, maybe the galaxy

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of particle physics. But we do more than

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>just the Large Hadron Collider. We also have experiments studying

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the mysterious particle called the neutrino. Neutrinos are produced by

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Sun and the surface of the Earth is just

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>bombarded with neutrinos, but they're mostly invisible to us. They

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>don't interact with us, but they have a lot of

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>really interesting properties that we don't understand. So CERTAIN does

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of neutrino physics as well. Um they do

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>cosmic ray physics, looking at weird particles from space. They

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>do a big variety of particle physics. And CERTAIN has

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>played a big role in politics as well. I don't

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>know if you're aware, but CERTAIN was founded after World

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>War Two, the idea being let's get all the scientists

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of Europe to work together on projects rather than hiding

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in their own labs and hating each other, and sort

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of like using science as this common human bridge, like

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get connected. Let's not have our own like individual

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>weapons projects. Let's find something we can all work together

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on in a positive way. And I think it's really

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>credited with tying European science together in a way that's

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>made it more effective. And you know, building harmonies between

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>nations is also good, and I know that personally at

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>certain I've eaten a lot of weird food from different

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>countries and that's helped me understand, you know, um, how

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>why the Belgians like horse meat and why the Chinese

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>eat these weird things. And it's a fun cultural experience

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>as well as scientific. Well yeah, and and uh, you know,

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>getting into some of the fun stuff. Well, we'll talk

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about it later. But I love reading about, uh things

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that remind us that scientists are also human. I mean,

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's easy to kind of forget from a layman perspective.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You you hear about science, and you hear about scientists,

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>and it tends to almost be another for people who

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily involved in science, or are not they

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>don't work with scientists, and so they start to think

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of that as their own category of living thing. There's

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a scientist kind of like doctors. There's doctors, they're scientists,

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh, well it's like that time that you meet

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>your middle school science teacher at the grocery store, like

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>buying cereal and you're like, what breakfast? This is not

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>stro strain does not. Scientists have families and ambitions and

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>disappointments and uh and rock rock groups, as it turns out,

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in rock groups and you know, ankle injuries and all

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of things that people have. Absolutely, so

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>what experiment at the LHC did you are you working with? Specifically,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they're different because they're different ones that are associated with

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>different points along the LHC. As I understand it, where

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's different essentially collision points that are looking at very

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>specific of the byproducts of these high energy collisions. That's right.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So we have two beams of protons um, one going

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>one way around the circle, the other going the other way.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And if somebody out there is wondering, well, why is

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>it a circle, the reason is the circle is that

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it takes a while to get protons up to high

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>enough speed. That's what we want to do, is we

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>want to reuse those little boosters. The circle is essentially

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a string of little boosters. Each one gives a little

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.479
<v Speaker 1>kick and gets it going faster and faster, and so

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>if you can spin it around multiple times that you

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>can get it going faster and faster. It's like when

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your kids on the Merry go round or nothing merry

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>go around. What is that thing called the at the

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>playground that spins around? Yeah, I know what you're talking about.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't know the name of that either. The

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>vominator the vominator um uh. And and you put them

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>on there and you spin it, you keep pushing. It

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>goes faster and faster. So that's why it goes in

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a circle. Um. And in order to bend them in

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a circle, we have these really strong magnets. So the

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>way the collider works is it's a kick to make

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>it faster and then a magnet to bend it to

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>go in a circle. And because we want to collide

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the protons, we actually have two of these. We have

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one going one way and other than protons going the

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>other way, and so four places around the ring we

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>cross those beams, right, we try to collide them. And

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and also it's not individual proton. It's not like we

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>put one proton in the in one beam and another

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>proton the other beam and we zoomed around and we

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>smashed one proton. It's really hard to get protons to

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.959
<v Speaker 1>hit each other because they're so small um, and so

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we actually have like a little gas of protons. It's

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a we call it a technical term is a bunch

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of protons, and it's you know, tend to some number

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of protons that we passed through another gas of protons

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>hoping to get some collisions. And so there's four places

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>around the ring that this happens, and each one is

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by a massive set of detectors um to observe

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Think of it like a really big digital camera.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And I work on one of those. And the name

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of the detector is the Atlas detector, which has like

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>which sets the record from maybe the worst scientific acronym

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>ever because it has an acronym inside. I think ATLAS

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>stands for a large toroidal LHC apparatus. It's the most

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>tortured acronym ever. Anyway, Atlas surrounds one of the collision

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>points and we smash the protons together there and that's

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>where the magic happens. And you might be thinking, you know,

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>if you smash protons together, all you can learn about

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is what's inside protons. Right the way, if you take

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>your blender apart. You can learn about what's inside blenders.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>That's true, and we can learn about what's inside blenders,

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but what's inside protons um. But we can also do

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>something else because of the magic of quantum mechanics. What

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>happens when you collide a proton and another proton is

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that the particles inside them interact. So inside a proton

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we have quarks, up quarks and down corks, and those

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>quirks can interact and they can actually annihilate, which means

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>that they convert from mass from little bits of stuff

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>flying through the particle collider into energy. Okay, so the

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>particles are gone, the stuff that made them up is

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>destroyeds turned into energy, and then that energy gets turned

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>back into mass because a little blob of energy is

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>very unstable, doesn't like they hang out very long, and

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so it turns back into mass, and it doesn't have

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to turn back into the same kind of stuff that

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's started from. So you can turn for example, two

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>up corks, you can annihilate them together, turn them into

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>a ball of energy, and then they can turn into

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>muans or electrons or other weird kinds of particles. And

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not required that it's made of the same stuff

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>because the stuff has disappeared, it's been annihilated. So it

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>really is like modern day alchemy. You know, we're turning

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>one kind of stuff into another kind of stuff, and

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that's magical because it means we can create any kind

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that's sort of on the universe's menu. We

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>don't have to know it's there in advance. We just

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pour enough energy into the collisions and eventually all the

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stuff will pop out. So it's it's really

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like an exploration machine. It's like saying, what's out there,

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>what's on Nature's list of particles? What can we make

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if we put enough energy into the collider. And so

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that's how we smash protons together to try to figure

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>out what is the list of particles that the universe

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>has on the list of sort of allowed states. And

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what we're doing to try to get inside

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>into this question of what is the universe made out of.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>That's InCred credibly cool, like I've never heard it described

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that way. So too, the thought of of smashing these

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>protons together at incredibly high energies and then you end

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>up as part of that essentially almost like the proto

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>energy that can convert into various different types of things

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>based on possibly criteria that we don't fully understand. I mean,

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously you go. And those are the laws we're trying

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, you know. We're trying to write down

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>mathematical equations that predict how often you'll see this kind

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of particle, how often you see that kind of particle,

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>And the kinds of particles that we've studied, you know,

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>electrons and mues whatever. We understand how those are made,

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and we can calculate very precisely how often we should

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>see them and uh, and what energies and so that's

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing we study. We we understand in

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty and pretty good detail why some particles are made

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and when and how often. What we're looking for is

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the weird stuff, the stuff we haven't predicted, or the

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff we hadn't anticipated, or you know, the things that

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>people have predicted but we haven't seen yet. And those

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>things tend to be more rare, which is why we

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>smash the particles together so often. We do it every

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five nanoseconds, all day, all year long. And the

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>reason is most of the stuff that happens is boring.

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it before. Occasionally, very rarely, something weird will

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>happen and that'll give us a clue about maybe a

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>new kind of rare particle. So I imagine if you're

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this that frequently with that many protons, knowing not

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that all of them are are colliding, but still a

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>good amount of them are UM and you have these

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>four different points where they're all gathering data that you're

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you're getting getting a few zeros and ones out of there.

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot I'm guessing a lot of information gets

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>generated all the time through these experience. It's a it's

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a tidal wave of data. Every time we have a collision,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we read out the whole detector, which has a hundred

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>million different detector channels. So it's a massive basically digital

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>image of the detector every every every twenty five nanoseconds

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>UM and so that's pretty that's a pretty large volume

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of data UM and we it's so big that we

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>can't even save it all, right, we if we saved

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it all, it would take a huge amount of resources

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and we wouldn't have no time to go through it.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>So what we do, and most of it is not

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>very interesting of what happens is just like two protons

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>come in, they kind of bounce off each other, two

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>protons come out. You know, it's rare that you actually

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have them, like a deep collision that interacts with the

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>particles inside that makes something weird. And so what we

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>do is we have this system we call it the trigger,

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that makes a keep or kill decision on the fly,

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and it says was it interesting enough to save? If so,

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>then shunt it down the down the view the wires

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>towards the disk. If no, throw it away. And so

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to make these keep or kill decisions every

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five nanoseconds. And when it's gone, it's gone. It's

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:54.479
<v Speaker 1>not like it's saved to back up and you can

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>go through it another time. It's just we just toss

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it out. And so that's a really vital system that's actual.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The part that my group works on is this trigger system? Interesting? Yeah,

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I always thought when I was learning more about this,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I wrote an article about how the large hadron collider

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>works as part of my work for How Stuff Works.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And while I was working on it, it struck me

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>just how amazing the actual apparatus is of creating these

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>beams and steering them and creating the collision points. And

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>then it occurred to me that as challenging as it is,

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as much learning and engineering and all the

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>expertise that would be required to make such a thing happen.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>As impressive as that is, it's it's also incredibly impressive

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to think about how do you deal with the information

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that you generate from such a thing. It's so large,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and the ability to differentiate between what is interesting versus

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what has already been known and therefore like this is

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>something that we don't necessarily need to consider because it's

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this is this is like we might as well have

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this etched on the side of a mountain already. We're good,

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>let's just concentrate this other stuff. Um. And as you

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.479
<v Speaker 1>start to look at the challenges that people have with

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>big data in general, which is orders of magnitude smaller

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>than one is being generated at the LHC. But you

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>look at those challenges just like businesses who are saying like,

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know what what data we have at

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this point, and you think, well, that's troubling. Then you realize, well,

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if we're having trouble with that, imagine the challenge of

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sifting through all that information to find these gems, these

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>these indications of something unknown or not fully understood, and

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it boggled my mind. So to me, that is one

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of the the huge achievements was not just the incredible

0:33:56.000 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>technological triumph of building a particle accelerator as large and

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as powerful as the LHC, but then creating the way

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the information that's generated as a result.

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of people don't necessarily appreciate

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that or understand that, because they're just thinking of, uh,

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there's probably conceptualizing. You know, these these particles hitting each

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other really at high speed, and then there's maybe a

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>flash of light or something, and then there's a little

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>squiggly line that goes off into the distance and you think, oh,

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that was a cork right now. It's it's because these

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>are so far outside the normal experience, it's hard to

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>think of. Well, I'll tell you some details about it.

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That's actually the part of it that I'm most interested in. Um.

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>But first, the human side of it is that this

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 1>apparatus is so complex that everybody who participates and it's

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, tens of thousands of scientists all working together.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Certainly not my project by myself. Everybody who participates only

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>does a little bit. You know, the people who specialize

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>in getting the beams to go really high speed, and

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>people who specialize in focusing the beams, and people who

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>specialize in building the detectors that surround the beam, and

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 1>people who specialize in um in the trigger, and people

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>who specialize in analyzing the data. And one of the

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>cool things is that you can specialize. You can say

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I really like climbing around the detector with a wrench

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and I want to spend my days doing that, or

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you can say, oh, I'm really interested in the data

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>reduction problem, and so we sort of get to attract

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>all types and people who are good at different things,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and everybody gets to do the part they want rather

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>than having to do all of it by themselves. Um So,

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really fun. And the part that I'm

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>most interested in is exactly what you were just mentioning,

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is how do you go from this huge pile of

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>data to saying things about the universe right to say

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I've got all these zeros and ones. How do I

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>then say, oh, look we have a Higgs boson. We

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>know it exists or we found dark matter or something

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. And and one of the problems is that

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't create these particles and then like have them

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in a jar. It's not like we're producing a pile

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of higgs bosons and we can point them to them

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>and say, look, these are higgs bosons. You can tell

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you can touch them, or they have some weird property

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or something right the way, like in condensed matter, they

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>can make new kinds of goo and then they can

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>show it to you and then has with strange effects

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>or something. The higgs bosons that we produce only last

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for like ten to the minus twenty something seconds. So

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this this picture I told you where the corks collide,

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they turned into something um some energy. Then they turned

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>into a new particle. That's true, but that new particle

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>might only last for a really really short amount of

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>time because a lot of these particles are very heavy

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and unstable, and they don't like to live very long.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Unlike you know, electrons or protons, which can last for

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>billions or trillions of years, we don't even know. Some

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of these particles are inherently unstable and they turn into

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>other particles. And so what we see in our detector

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is never direct proof of that new particle. Instead, it's

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>always indirect evidence. It's like, um, you came to a

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>UM came to an intersection, and you see, you know,

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>shards in the ground. You see glass over here, and

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you see steal over there, and there's a dead body

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>over here, and you have to figure out what happened.

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 1>It's always like that that we're looking at what out

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the collision and trying to figure out what happened

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. And so a lot of what we

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do is is really complicated statistical inference. We say, given

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the data that we saw, which theory of the universe

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is more likely in the theory with the Higgs boson

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>or without the Higgs boson. So most of the actual

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>work involved is in constructing those two hypotheses and comparing

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>them to the data, saying, how can we analyze the data,

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>how can we um you know, plow through the data

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way so that these two hypotheses give different predictions.

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Like in the case of the search for the Higgs boson,

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we were looking for collisions that had to photons coming out.

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>So two protons come in, two photons come out, right,

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>two little beams of light. And that's because the higgs

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>boson um sometimes turns into two photons, so we're looking

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for two photons. Problem is, there are other things that

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>also turned into two photons, lots of ways to make

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 1>two photons that aren't the Higgs boson. But if you

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>did make the Higgs boson and it turned into two photons,

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>then it would turn into two photons with a certain

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of energy. That amount of energy is connected to

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>how much mass is in the Higgs boson. So we

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>did is we just said, let's look at all the

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>collisions that turned into two photons, and let's just compare,

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and we made sort of a plot where we said,

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on the x axis is the amount of energy and

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the collisions and then why access is the number. So

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're envisioning this, we have one theory that says

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there should be a smooth distribution, and then what the

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>theory with the Higgs boson says, well, there should be

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>a smooth distribution, but then you should you should get

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:33.959
<v Speaker 1>a bump, you should get an enhancement around the mass

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of the higgs. So one theory is there is no

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Higgs boson and you should get a bunch of just

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>random collisions with two photons no special energy levels. And

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the other theory is you have a Higgs boson, which

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>means you get extra production of two photon events and

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they should cluster and they should all have a similar energy.

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:55.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you make this uh this plot, you should

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>get a bump near the mass of the Higgs. And

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>so essentially we have two hypotheses. We say no Higgs

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>boson or Higgs boson, and then we look at the data.

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So we've done the hard work of constructing two possible

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>ideas and figuring out what question to ask the data.

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>That's always the crucial things. What question are you asking

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the data? And we've composed the question in a way

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that we hope the data can answer it. And that's

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>how we discover the Higgs boson is the data followed

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>one curve, the curve with a bump in it, and

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not the smooth curve, the curve that had no Higgs boson.

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the work we do is involved

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in in analyzing that data, and because it's such a

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>big project, we have people specializing in these areas, and

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this is my area specialty is analyzing this data and

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>one of my other interests is in computer science and

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, And in the last five years we've been

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>borrowing really heavily from computer science all these new tools

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they've developed to do really fantastical artificial intelligence to recognize patterns.

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>We found ways to take those tools and apply them

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>to these quests to say, to artificial intelligence tools, can

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>you find patterns in this data? Can you learn to

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>find Higgs bosons in these ones and zeros um and

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>separate them from things that are not Higgs bosons but

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>look like them. So we've had a lot of fun

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing in ideas from other fields. We don't invent a

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff by ourselves. We sort of you know,

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a nail and we sift around for somebody

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 1>nearby who might have a hammer. Mm hmm. Well, that

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>to me is always a fascinating thing as well. It's

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a different level of innovation where you are thinking,

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>rather than let's let's invent a brand new tool to

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>do this thing, you say, well, do we have any

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>tools that perhaps are not currently being used to do

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>this thing, but with some some work, we could repurpose

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>them for this thing. Um exactly. It's usually it's a

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>happy discovery. Yeah. I remember going over to the computer

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>science department it was like two thousand twelve and describing

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this project and saying, look, here's the problem we have.

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a tool that can solve this problem.

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you have? And they said, oh, my gosh,

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we have the perfect tool. Currently we're using it to

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>solve this other problem. And I was like, well, what

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>problem are you solving and they said, oh, we're trying

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to answer the question is there

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a cat in this Internet video? Right? Which is like

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the perfect example of how of a hard but relevant problem,

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not easy to say, here's a video, can

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you tell me if there's a cadet? It's the kind

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing it's easy for a person, but it's really

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>hard for a computer program. Right, how do you define

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a cat? And then it's moving through the videos like

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>different colors of cats, cats, of different behaviors. It's a

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>difficult problem and it's one where there's a lot of

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>data available. So the computer scientists latched onto this problem

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not because it was important or particularly interesting or useful,

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but just because it was hard and they had a

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of data. So when I came to them, with

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>another problem that was hard where we had a lot

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of data but actually had some like scientific value and

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it sounded cool. They were very excited, So they're excited

0:41:57.600 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>to get to use their tool and something that was

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.240
<v Speaker 1>actually real event into society, into physics and to science.

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And we were excited, of course to use their awesome

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>tool which worked really, really well. So it's usually a

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of a peanut butter and chocolate situation when you

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can find this sort of crossovers nice. I like. I

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like the peanut butter chocolate analogy. Daniel and I have

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>more to say about the LHC, but before we get

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to that, we're going to take another quick break. The

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>neat thing up to me about the machine learning process

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that you were talking about with with identifying cats and videos.

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Taking an approach like that where again seemingly if you

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>if you explain that to someone, they sound they say, well,

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like it's trivia hill. It's I mean, it

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>may be a hard computer problem, but what's the purpose.

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>And my argument to them has always been, well, a

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>human can immediately tell if the computer was right or

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong when it or the machine was right or wrong

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to its conclusion and therefore go in

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and tweak the waitings of the various decisions points that

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're using an our official neural network, you change

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the waitings of the the various values so that it

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>can slowly hone in on what is it to be

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a cat and and understand what catness really is, not

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not the character from Hunger Games, but what catness really is.

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And that one, yes, exactly, that's that's exactly what you

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do, right If you're trying to create a

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>tool like this, you want to pick a goal where

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a human can say, yes, the the computer has managed

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>to hit that goal, or no, the computer has not.

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>So that way, once you've perfected the approach and you

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can then start to apply it to things where uh,

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't have as full of an understanding. It's the

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>difference between supervised learning with machine learning and unsupervised learning.

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And and to me, that's a very fascinating area of study.

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about that a lot on tech stuff as well,

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it also gets into other issues that I

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>won't I won't dive into here, things like the the

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>need for transparency for these kind of systems so that

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:08.439
<v Speaker 1>we understand how they get to their conclusions and it's

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.760
<v Speaker 1>not just a black box, etcetera, etcetera. But I digress.

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.400
<v Speaker 1>How does it know what's a cat? Exactly? Exactly? Interpreting

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>these networks is very important. Yeah, if you get to

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a point where you watch a video and you say, oh,

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see a cat in there, but the computer

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>says there's a cat in there, And the computer says, no,

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there absolutely as a cat in there. Just because you

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it doesn't mean it's not there. And then

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you start to get a little worried. You're thinking, are

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we are we heading toward how territory here? Let's uh,

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>let's pump the brakes a little bit and find out

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>how you got them happy to see to the computers

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the job of determining whether is a cat in the video?

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.799
<v Speaker 1>They're better than I am. You say that, but I

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>find cat video so cathartic. Um. So this one thing

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to touch on just briefly, um, and that

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>might be difficult to do. But yeah, we mentioned Higgs

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>boson quite a quite a bit. And how would you

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>describe what the eggs boson is to someone who's interested

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 1>in it but doesn't have that background in in physics. Yeah,

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.879
<v Speaker 1>so the Higgs boson is fascinating a particle, and it's

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a sort of part of the answer to the question

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what is stuff? You know, we want to understand what

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are things made out of? A part of that is

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>understanding like what am I made out of? What is

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the substance of me? And you imagine that if you

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>take yourself apart, you're made out of molecules. Those molecules

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 1>made out of atoms. Those atoms are made out of

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>protons and electrons and neutrons, and the protons are made

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>out of quarks. So at this point we can describe

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>everything that you're made out of in terms of quarks

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and electrons um. But what we still don't know is

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>what are those made out of? Like do they get

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a little scoop of universe stuff? You know, there's some

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of basic matter unit, and we don't understand like

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>how do they have mass? Where does their mass come from?

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's a mystery because in our theory, these particles

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 1>are not little balls. Like when I say a particle,

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you're probably imagining like a little spinning beach ball, right,

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a tiny little dot of actual stuff, but something with

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>extent to its mo with size. Well, in our current theory,

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>these particles don't have any size. Their dots there points

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:20.359
<v Speaker 1>in space, which means where is the stuff to them? Right?

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Where is the mass? Where does the mass come from? Um,

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>there's no room for any mass in a point. Right.

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>If there's mass, there have infinite density, which makes no

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>sense at all. You have like all these tiny black holes.

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So the Higgs boson is in a way is a

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>way to answer that. What it does is it says

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that the mass the particles have doesn't come from a

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>little scoop of universe stuff that they got. Instead, you

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>have to think of it's sort of like a charge.

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Like when I tell you an electron has a negative charge.

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't bother you. But what if I told you

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>electron is a point particle there's no room for it.

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Would you ask where does the negative charge go? Or

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is there room for the negative charge? You just think

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 1>of negative charge is sort of like a lay bowl,

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>something that you can apply to a tiny dot. We

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 1>should think of mass the same way. Mass is not

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a little serving of universe stuff. It's like a charge,

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and a charge is something that tells us how things interact.

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So an electron has a negative charge, which means it

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, um gets repelled from positive stuff, and they

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 1>can interact with photons and things like that. Um particles

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that have mass. Um those particles that have mass, they

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 1>have mass, which is a charge. It tells us how

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it interacts with the Higgs boson. So the Higgs boson

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that gives these that that interacts with

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>these particles and makes them move as if they had mass,

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So they have something the label on them, and the

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>higgs boson interacts with them if you have if you

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of mass, higgs boson interacts with them

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and that's what gives them inertia. It makes

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>makes it hard for them to speed up or hard

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for them to slow down. Right, And so that's what

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the higgs boson does, is it gives mass to these

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>particles or explains how a tiny little particle can have

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>any mass at all. And the fascinating thing is that

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea has been around for decades before we actually

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>found it. Some theorist was looking at the list of

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>particles and the math behind them and saying this doesn't

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>really make sense, like how do these particles, how can

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>these particles have mass. There's no way to give them

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>mass in our theory. Like, we have a really beautiful

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 1>theory that would work perfectly if all the particles in

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe had no mass, But the particles do have mass,

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and when you try to add mass in various ways,

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't work mathematically. It breaks all sorts of

0:48:30.200 --> 0:48:33.040
<v Speaker 1>other rules. So he came up with a way to

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>give math to these particles by having them interact with

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this other new particle we've never seen before. And the

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>thing I love about that is that it's it's purely aesthetic.

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like philosophical. It's like saying, I'm looking at all

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>these puzzle pieces and it seems to be one missing.

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>This whole story, right, This more back to the idea

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of a story. This whole story would make much more

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sense if there was one more character in it. It

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>would just click together, would be symmetric, it would be beautiful,

0:48:56.200 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it would mathematically look pretty. And so he said, well, abe,

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there is one, right, so let's go look for it.

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:03.879
<v Speaker 1>And it was so compelling an idea that we spent

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>decades and billions of dollars looking for it and then

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:10.240
<v Speaker 1>actually found it. Right, what a triumph for theoretical physics.

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>To say, just in my mind, I can think about

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the patterns of the universe and predict what else is

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that we've never seen. To me, that's incredible. Yeah,

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I love that. It's a story where we take a

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 1>look at at an idea that's that's largely fleshed out,

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and then we think, there's this would work so great

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>if only there was this thing. You know what, I'm

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 1>just gonna I'm going to create the mathematics here. I'm

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:41.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna figure out mathematically how this thing could

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>exist if everything else we've assumed is more or less right,

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:50.399
<v Speaker 1>And then wow, that looks really nice. Boy, it would

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be great if that thing exists. We should find out

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.799
<v Speaker 1>if that thing exists, and then and then a lot

0:49:56.840 --> 0:49:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of time and thought is put to it. Not obviously

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm trivial I saying, I'm very much generalizing. But to me,

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just it is beautiful, but it's also there's like

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a level there's a level of beautiful absurdity to it

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>that I find interesting from my perspective, not being a

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>physicist right where to me, it's it's I don't know,

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you sound like you kind of are an amateur physicist.

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think about these ways like a physicist.

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not all about the mathematical training. It's

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what about the front, the way you think, and

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the way you ask questions. So I'm happy to bestow

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you upon you the dubious honor being a deputized amateur physicist. Excellent.

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I cannot I cannot wait to abuse my authority alcoholic

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>looking certificate in the mail pretty soon. Yeah, you'll see

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:41.879
<v Speaker 1>me walking into restaurants saying, give me a good table.

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I am an honorary physicist, and they'll say, yeah, no,

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work for for podcast celebrity either. I can

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you from ten years of experience. Yeah, it's the

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I have the level of fame that is almost but

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not quite completely useless, And honestly I'm okay with that.

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Um well, let me let me shift this a little bit.

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:04.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll kind of uh get toward the end of our

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation here to talk about some more silly fun stuff.

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:10.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I think a lot of people

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>heard about when the LHC was, you know, still powering up.

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a very long process. In fact, it was

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>longer than we had anticipated because there were some problems

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:21.399
<v Speaker 1>that we encountered along the way. I say we as

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>if I had anything to do with it. You're an

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>honor Earth physics. Now you can say we they're excellent,

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's uh, it's so good to join the collective.

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But the there were there were some issues, and it

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>also led to a lot of speculation, much of it

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>completely baseless from people who had little to no understanding

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>of what was happening, but apparently access to wonderful platforms

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 1>from which they could espouse these these baseless claims. But

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we had everything from people saying this is going to

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>create black holes without really one understanding what a black

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:01.720
<v Speaker 1>hole is to understand inning if that were in fact

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to happen. The time frame we're talking about, and the size,

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the the uh of it, and and what energy level

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we'd be talking about less than what a mosquito generates

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>when it flaps its wings, for example, and at a

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at a at a time that's so small that is

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>impossible for us to think of it. We can we

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 1>could look at a measurement, We could look at a

0:52:23.960 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>number with a whole bunch of zeros, you know, a dot,

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of zeros and then a one after it,

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and think, oh, that's how long it is based on

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, point zero zero zero, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, one seconds.

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But you can't by the time you think that, so

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>countless number of those have passed. And so to me,

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that was one of those things that I found funny

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and infuriating at the same time, this sort of misconception about, oh,

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the LHC is a doomsday device that is going to

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>end all life because we're going to create a black

0:52:57.640 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 1>hole that will suck up the entire universe. There's even,

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, there's a website that had a very funny,

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 1>very amateurish gift of a picture supposedly from a security

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:14.800
<v Speaker 1>camera outside the LHC just getting sucked in to a

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 1>single point as if a black hole had been created,

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, wow, that's amazing. That's amazing connection to

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to continue to broadcast while spaghettification is happening.

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>My favorite website is called has the Large hage On

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Collider destroyed the world yet? Dot com? We promise as

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>physicist to always keep up to date, right, so if

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 1>you go to that website and it says yes, then

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, you might wanna, you might want to,

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, might make some plans, But yeah, this is

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a this is a common thing that's raised, and I

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's reasonable for people to wonder, like our physicists

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>going to trigger some sort of universal apocalypse which ends

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>society as we know it. It's a fair question, um,

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's also reasonable for us to lean on physicists

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>expertise and answering the question. In this case, I think

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Cerain has done an excellent job of taking this concern seriously.

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So for those who don't know, there really is a

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 1>theory that we could be creating miniature black holes at

0:54:12.520 --> 0:54:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the large A Run collider. The idea is that gravity

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>might be very very power. Gravity, which is the weakest force,

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 1>might actually be very very powerful if you bring things

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>really close together, like the close the size you know,

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the width of a proton is sort of close together.

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you smash these protons together really high energy,

0:54:30.680 --> 0:54:33.399
<v Speaker 1>they might get close enough where the gravity gets really

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>really strong. I meaning you could create black holes, because

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:39.280
<v Speaker 1>black holes are essentially displaces where gravity gets really strong.

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, those black holes, if they

0:54:43.120 --> 0:54:45.440
<v Speaker 1>last long enough could sit there and sort of swallow matter.

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's lots of reasons not to be

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:49.279
<v Speaker 1>worried about that. First of all, we think if these

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>black holes are created, they wouldn't last very long. They

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>would radiate into nothing using Hawking radiation. And if they

0:54:56.480 --> 0:55:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and and we believe that collisions have been happening for

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:02.799
<v Speaker 1>a long long time, like we've been being hit by

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 1>particles from space for ever basically, and those particles are

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:09.799
<v Speaker 1>traveling much faster than the particles of the large change

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on colider. So if collisions of particles we're going to

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:16.400
<v Speaker 1>cause Earth destroying black holes, it would have happened already.

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a pretty in depth analysis of this

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>um And I think one thing that's funny about is

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the social aspect of it. Like if you

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:27.520
<v Speaker 1>ask a physicist, is it possible for the l AC

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to destroy the universe, to destroy the Earth. The answer

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is technically, yes, it's possible. You don't want to talk

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>about exactly, But there's a difference between, you know, a

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 1>scientific answer and a sort of a public relations answer

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>where it's possible but not to the level where it's

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>really worth talking about. Like it's possible for me to

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>disappear in quantum mechanically appear in Paris. Sure it's not impossible,

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's the real The odds are so remote, and

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:56.839
<v Speaker 1>nobody should factor that into their plans. And that's really

0:55:56.880 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>what people are asking about, Like, is this possible at

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the level where we need to worry about it and

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:03.480
<v Speaker 1>make policy changes or you know, use it to base

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 1>decisions on And the answer is no. Um. But you know,

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we as humans are pretty bad about thinking about dangers

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and making decisions based on that. You know, you'll worry

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about being struck by lightning or being eaten by sharks,

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>but we don't worry too much about handgun safety this

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. So as you on, as we we

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>have our policies upside down, or even you know, the

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of getting in even a minor accident in a car,

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's incredibly likely compared to these other things.

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But these other things because they I think largely because

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:37.279
<v Speaker 1>they and they tap into that same part of our

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:41.560
<v Speaker 1>brains that finds fascination in the unknown. There's there's that

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>related element, the fear of the unknown. The two are

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:48.239
<v Speaker 1>very close. And the less you know about something the

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:52.399
<v Speaker 1>more likely you are to fear it um. And paradoxically,

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:55.080
<v Speaker 1>also the more you know about something, depending on what

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, the more you might start to fear it. Um.

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a really interesting Oh boy, be human.

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Sure is great, um. But in the end, it's all about,

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to answer these questions and exploring the unknown,

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and to me, that's always worth it. The guys who

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 1>jumped in a ship and sailed into the ocean not

0:57:11.200 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 1>knowing what they were gonna find, you know, they were

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>part of that. It's a it's a long legacy of

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 1>exploration and to me that's one of the most exciting

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>things we can do as a species. Daniel, thank you

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining our show. Please can you tell

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about your podcast and why everyone

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>needs to listen to it? Sure? Um. Our podcast is

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>called Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe. I'm one half

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of it. The other half is Jorge Chom, the Internet

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:40.080
<v Speaker 1>famous cartoons behind PhD Comics, and we do a fun

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>chat about philosophy and science and trying to explain things

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about the universe and the idea there is to take

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>big topics and break them up into pieces that are

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 1>actually understandable, not just so you hear a lot of

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:53.200
<v Speaker 1>fancy words and you don't really understand, but so that

0:57:53.200 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you've come away with a pretty good grasp of what

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>these topics are. And we cover things like the Big

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Bang and teleportation and fast and light travel and history

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of the universe and the future of the universe. And

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so check it out. It's a lot of fun. It's

0:58:05.560 --> 0:58:09.600
<v Speaker 1>called Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe. Yeah, it's fantastic, guys.

0:58:09.640 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 1>If you have not listened, you need to check it out.

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I very much enjoyed it's I consider it sort of

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a spiritual cousin to text stuff and and and it

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>makes me. It makes me long for the day when

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I can I can get a co host who I

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 1>can bounce stuff off of and they can bounce stuff

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>off of me. Right now, I'm playing tennis with myself,

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:34.800
<v Speaker 1>so that is always a challenge. Daniel, thank you so

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 1>much for joining the show. We greatly appreciate it. Thanks

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 1>very much for having me on. And hello to all

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:43.480
<v Speaker 1>your listeners. We'll be back with a little bit more

0:58:43.480 --> 0:58:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about the LHC after these messages. I hope you enjoyed

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that episode. From two thousand nineteen and again tomorrow we

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 1>should have the second part the space Suit episode. I

0:59:01.720 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 1>apologize again, I'm so glad we did not call this

0:59:05.720 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 1>show How Tech Works, because, based on my experience of

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to troubleshoot for the last several hours, I clearly

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know as much as I thought I did. To

0:59:16.480 --> 0:59:22.280
<v Speaker 1>be fair, there's some pretty extraordinary circumstances that are interfering,

0:59:22.760 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>but all excuses aside. We will have the part two

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of the space Suits episode tomorrow. I hope you are

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>doing well, and if you have suggestions for topics I

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:35.479
<v Speaker 1>should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach out.

0:59:36.000 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The best way to do that is on Twitter. The

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is text stuff H s W

0:59:41.680 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:01.320
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Three