WEBVTT - Steven Rattner on the UAW Strike and the Challenges of Bidenomics

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Our new spinoff show Lots More. We'll be back next Friday,

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but for now, enjoy this bonus episode with Steve Radner.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Blots podcast.

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Whysenthal.

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Joe, it is the first week of the United Auto Workers' strike.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel confident predicting that by the time this episode

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 2>comes out, it'll probably still be ongoing.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Right so we are recording this September twentieth. I think

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to this Friday, September twenty second. Even in

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the off chance that they get a deal between now

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and then, there is a lot going on with autos

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>right now, there's a lot going out with labor that

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>even if they're by some miracle there's a deal in

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the next forty eight hours, it's worth having a deeper

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>understanding of what's going on right now.

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, and we've obviously recorded an episode on this previously.

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>We spoke to one of theaw leader's Dan Vicente, talked

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 2>about some of the concerns. But I think this whole

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 2>saga is interesting from a sort of thematic perspective because

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 2>it gets it all these big picture conversations that we've

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>been having, you know, questions over the division of labor

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>in the US economy, over productivity, over the future of

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 2>the US car industry, and how it's responding to environmental

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>pressures and concerns industrial policy. Even it sort of wraps

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 2>all of these things up in one complicated package.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Let's put it that way.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you nailed it. I mean, there's the question of

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>labor costs and the tight labor markets and whether this

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity for labor to get a greater share

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>of the pie.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>So to speak.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>There is the transition which was already happening, is already underway,

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and that poses very unique opportunities and threats to the

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>legacy industry. And then this idea of like, well, we're

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in an era of sort of industrial policy, and part

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of this is by design the Bidenomics and so forth,

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and so you know how all of these things play together.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It really, as you said, it comes together in this

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>one story in a unique way in.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>The strike, right, So we obviously need to talk more

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 2>about it. I am very happy to say that we

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 2>do indeed have the perfect guest. We're going to be

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 2>speaking with Stephen Ratner, a very prominent American financier, as

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>they say, and someone who was very much involved, in

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>fact spearheaded the big auto bailout, the auto task. Cars

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 2>are the cars are, That's exactly it under the Obama

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>administration in circa two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Someone who can talk very authoritatively over some of the

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>concerns from the car makers and the broader sort of

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 2>financial state of those companies. So Stephen is currently the

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>chairman and chief executive officer of Willett Advisors, that's the

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>investment arm for the personal and philanthropic assets of Michael Bloomberg,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 2>who is, of course the majority owner of Bloomberg LP. Steve,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the show.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much for having me.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 2>We're excited to have you here. I wanted to start

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>out with something that the UAW representative that I mentioned

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>in the intro told us, and it's the idea that

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:20.239
<v Speaker 2>the unions accepted a lot of concessions in the aftermath

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of two thousand and nine in order to get their

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>respective employers, the car companies back up and running.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>And was there an expectation that at some point those

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 2>concessions would reverse.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 5>No question that the unions made concessions as part of

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 5>what we like to call not the bailout, but the

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 5>rescue of the auto companies. It was important, it was

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 5>an important part of committing what ultimately became eighty two

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars of tax payer money to this industry that

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 5>they be shared sacrifice, that all the different constituents around

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 5>the industry, whether it be labor, whether it be shareholders,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 5>whether it be suppliers, whether it be management, all participated

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 5>in making shared sacrifice. So yes, that definitely was the case.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 5>But as I'm sure we'll get into, as you asked

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 5>me some more questions, the concessions that the automaker the

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 5>auto workers made back in two thousand and nine were

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 5>relatively small compared to what they're asking for today, And

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 5>what they're asking for today would not just restore whatever

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 5>it is, whatever they gave up back in two thousand

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 5>and nine, but add a bunch of other stuff on

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 5>top of that.

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>What did they give up in two thousand and nine.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>The main thing that came up in our previous conversation

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.679
<v Speaker 1>on the strike was just this idea of tiered labor,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a teering system. Certain employees sort of grandfathered into one

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>pay scale and then an acceptance that new employees would

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not be on that scale. But what did you give

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>your comparison of your characterization of what the UAW gave

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>up or was willing to concede to in two thousand

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>and nine versus what we know about what the UAW

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is asking for now.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 5>Some of the things that were given up in two

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 5>thousand and nine were actually given up just before the

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 5>auto rescue because of the problems that the industry had.

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 5>So I'm going to lump all that together into what

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 5>really happened around those couple of years, both right before

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 5>and right after as part of the auto rescue. It's

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 5>important to say that no full time Tier one as

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 5>we called them, member of the UAW took any reduction

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 5>in their cash compensation. That was a part of the understanding.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 5>There were concessions around things like the Tier two workers,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 5>who are workers who get newly hired workers who started

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 5>out at roughly half of the cash compensation of the

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 5>established workers. I don't want to get into a huge

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 5>fight with the UAW, but it's important to note that

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 5>the way the concession, the types of concessions that the

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 5>UAW was willing to make mostly affected these newer workers

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 5>rather than the established workers. It was a case of

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 5>the UAW and effect. Think of it as there was

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 5>a big pot of money and how does it get allocated?

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 5>And the uaw's attitude is that the existing workers should

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 5>be protected and the new workers should in effect take

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the pain. But there were other changes

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 5>made around healthcare, especially for retirees, around the so called

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 5>jobs bank, in which workers were getting paid even if

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 5>they were laid off during a downturn, they could get

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 5>ninety percent of their wages for actually working. And so

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 5>it was a very complicated package of a lot of stuff,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 5>but we did think that in total it reduced the

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 5>automaker's labor costs by a meaningful amount.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>What was it like negotiating with the unions back then?

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 5>It was very different than today, and I think it

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 5>was different for a couple of reasons. First, there was

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 5>a crisis, and as Ram Emmanuel, President Obama's chief of STEFF,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 5>liked to say, never let a good crisis go to waste,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 5>and so the UIW got it. They understood that without

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 5>this shared sacrifice, these companies would go bankrupt and perhaps

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 5>even disappear and lose all of those jobs, and so

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 5>they got the message in that. Secondly, they had a president,

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 5>Ron Gettelfinger, who I dealt with extensively, who was a

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 5>very reasonable guy. He had an agenda, he had members

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 5>he wanted to take care of. We respected that, he

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 5>respected us. The discussions are always very cordial. Nobody, at

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 5>least in the meetings I was in, ever started yelling

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 5>and screaming or pounding the table or any of that

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 5>kind of stuff. And in contrast, today, for a variety

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 5>of reasons, the UAW has a leader, Sean Fame, who

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 5>is much more of a firebrand, who's put these rather

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 5>large demands on the table, who's actually conducted a lot

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 5>of these negotiations publicly, which is not the way it

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 5>worked certainly when I was involved with it, or the

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 5>way I think it's worked most times in the past.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 5>And that reflects a couple of things I think. I

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 5>don't know Sean Fayne, but I think it reflects a

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 5>couple of things. One that, in fact, as I'm sure

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 5>we'll get into, the auto workers haven't really done that

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 5>well in the last fifteen years, and so they do

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 5>have legitimate concerns, grievances, whatever you want to call it

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 5>around that. Secondly, the UAW, as i'm sure you know,

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 5>has been through a variety of corruption scandals in the

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 5>last few years, had a whole succession of presidents. These

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 5>are not ron Gettholfinger kinds of guys. And I think

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 5>the membership is just angry and frustrated and disappointed in

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 5>their union. And I think Sean Fain has been able

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 5>to capitalize that. He's really more of a firebrand than

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 5>he is a dispassionate negotiator.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the tiering system, one argument that the union

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>makes that tiering is bad for the It's just bad

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for the union. It creates divisions. The union is supposed

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of one family or one team. And

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then if you say, as you put tier one tier

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>two workers, that inherently weakens the union in your view,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it sort of plausible or reasonable that it goes

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>back to a single tier people doing this getting the

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>same pace goal for the same job. And then what

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>else you said in the beginning that the demands are

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>above and beyond what that sacrifice was like roughly fourteen

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So talk to you about what you perceive

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>as being further beyond that.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, let's take that in pieces, and you can remind

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 5>me of a couple of the questions that I'm not

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 5>going to remember, but because I'm focused on your first question. Yeah,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 5>there's no doubt that it is odd, I think unfair

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 5>in many respects, a bad dynamic to have two people

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 5>working on the same assembly line performing essentially similar functions.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 5>Maybe one is putting on windshield wipers and one is

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 5>putting on door handles, and one is getting paid literally,

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 5>at least back then, was getting paid literally half as

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 5>much in cash and a much reduced benefits package relative

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 5>to the guy or a woman who was standing next

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 5>to him doing essentially the same job. That's a bad dynamic.

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 5>But it occurred in part for the reason I said

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 5>that the union was unwilling to have the existing members

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 5>make a significant and more significant sacrifice. Sacrifice I actually

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 5>reduced their cash compensation. And so again you think of

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 5>it as a pot of money and has to get allocated,

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 5>and a disproportionate amount of it got allocated the existing

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 5>workers at the expense of these knew what we used

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 5>to call here too now they call them temp workers

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 5>who had just started at the company were getting paid

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 5>a lot less, all.

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, I'm going to take up the second portion of

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Joe's question then, And you've pointed out in an op

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>ed that you think there's no way the automakers will

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 2>be able to meet some of the asks or all

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 2>of the asks, rather that the UAW is making. Can

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 2>you explain that a little bit more. What's the thinking

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>behind that statement.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 5>The auto companies are making very very good profits at

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 5>the moment. There's no nobody can argue about that. But

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 5>this is a tough business. The profit margins are relatively thin,

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 5>the capital expenditures required are large. The transition to EVS

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 5>is going to be very expensive and painful for these companies.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 5>And so when you boil it all together, if you

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 5>look at General Motors, for example, it's stock price. When

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 5>it's stock price from when it went public, I think

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 5>about twelve years ago it was twenty eleven, has not budged.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 5>The overall stock market is up two hundred and seventy

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 5>five percent, and so Wall Street investors are basically saying,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 5>we don't think these companies are actually doing that great,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 5>and therefore they have limits as to what they can

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 5>do and still have the resources and the profits they

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 5>need to keep investors happy and do this transition. And

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 5>so when you talk about things like getting paid for

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 5>forty hours but working thirty two hours, when you talk

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 5>about things like restoring the jobs bank where you get

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 5>paid even if you're laid off. When you talk about

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 5>going back to a defined benefit pension plan from defined contribution,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 5>which would be wonderful, but very few companies even have

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 5>those anymore.

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 4>From new workers, those.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Are demands that the company simply can't meet. I think

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 5>what this will hopefully come down to is a big

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 5>ask on cash compensation. The union wants thirty five thirty

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 5>six percent. The companies have offered twenty percent. This would

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 5>be over four years and some other one time payments

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 5>something like somewhere in there. There's a deal to be done,

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 5>but all the rest of this stuff is mostly going

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 5>to have to go away to have an outcome that

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 5>I think is appropriate for these car companies.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 4>We're obviously going.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>To talk more about the negotiations, but I want to

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>actually just pause the union component of the conversation for

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a second setting. Aside the UAW contract, This would be

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a major period of upheaval for the industry regardless, because

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the transition that we're talking about and the incredible investment

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to take to compete with Tesla, to

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>compete potentially on a global scale with Chinese ev makers,

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you name it. Give us your review of just how challenging,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>setting aside the labor component, how challenging for the business

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>models of the Big three, which make most of their

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>profits from selling cars with internal combustion engines, How challenging

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is this ev trans.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be significantly challenging. And we should talk

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 5>about the labor piece of it, because that's very relevant.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 5>But let me, as you ask, let me talk about

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 5>some of the other elements of it. Look, you have

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 5>a whole bunch of new entrants coming into this industry

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 5>starting from scratch. I'm reading at the moment Walter Isaacson's

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 5>new biography of Elon Musk and Tesla. He started with

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 5>a blank piece of paper when he did Tesla, and

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 5>he was able to design a manufacturing system, a set

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 5>of supply arrangements, not without a lot of commotion and

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 5>difficulty and so forth, and with no unions, by the way,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 5>and build Tesla in effect from the ground up. The

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 5>legacy companies have a way of doing things that's existed

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 5>for now one hundred and twenty years plus or minus,

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 5>and so they have to completely rethink a lot of

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 5>how they operate a lot of their processes, and they

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 5>have to compete against not just Tesla, but Rivian and

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 5>Lucid and the Chinese companies you mentioned are not yet

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 5>here because of the high tariffs that we have on

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 5>auto imports, but sooner or later they probably will be here.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 5>And so what has been a tough business is getting

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 5>even tougher. And it's important for these companies to have

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 5>a cost structure that they can live with.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 2>You touched on it in that answer just then. But Tesla,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of course is famously non unionized, and then of course

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 2>there is the threat of the Chinese EV manufacturers and

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 2>cheap labor over there. Could it not go the other

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>way though? Could you not have a situation where instead

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>of competing with non unionized EV companies that maybe some

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 2>of those start to get unionized, Like maybe these actions

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 2>start to filter through to companies like Tesla.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 5>I think it's pretty unlikely. I think that it's not

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 5>just Tesla, but when you look at the auto companies

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 5>that have been operating in the South for a long time,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 5>which were Toyota, Hana, the German companies and so forth.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 5>They are also not unionized, and I believe I'm right,

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 5>although my memory is a little hazy and sad saying that,

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 5>I think there have been efforts to try to unionize

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 5>them that have failed because the workers understood. Look, I

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 5>think we should step back and talk about the general

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 5>issue of manufacturing in the United States, not just autos.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 5>But this was a real wake up call for me.

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I had spent my whole career working in essentially with

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 5>service industry companies, mostly media and telecoms, and then suddenly

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm plunged into manufacturing. And what I saw was really

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 5>scary to me, which was that we basically have a

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 5>high cost structure in this country. Appropriately, we want our

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing workers to earn a good living. But an increasingly

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 5>globalizing world and we can talk about whether the world

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 5>is now going to deglobalize, but at least has been globalizing.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 5>It was getting harder and harder for us to compete.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 5>And that's why, in large part, we lost so many

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing jobs over these last fifteen or twenty years. And

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 5>so you had, from the union's point of view, you

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 5>had jobs moving from the Midwest to the South, from

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 5>union jobs to non union jobs. But you also had

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 5>a lot of jobs moving to Mexico from these same companies,

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 5>including the Detroit companies. The Detroit Three have twenty facilities

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 5>in Mexico of one sort or another. And when you

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 5>look at the wage structure in Mexico, you're literally talking

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 5>about GM actually has a unionized plant there which has

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 5>low wages. But if you talk about the non unionized

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 5>plants there, you're talking about wages of nine to thirteen

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 5>or fourteen dollars a day, not an hour a day.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 5>And if you talk to auto executives who operate there,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 5>they will tell you that they get very good productivity

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 5>out of their Mexican workers. Some will say they get

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 5>better productivity. And the consequence of that is that the

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 5>number of auto workers in Mexico has crossed the line

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 5>and has now higher the number of auto workers in

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 5>the US. Our number of auto workers did recover after

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 5>the two thousand and nine exercise, but Mexico simply grew

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 5>faster and has outgrown US and is now a larger

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 5>source of employment at these very very low ways. And

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 5>so this isn't changing. And again you have the Chinese

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 5>as we talked about coming and potentially other low wage countries,

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 5>and so it really worries me about the future of manufacturing.

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 5>The yin and the yang of this whole situation with

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the UAW in a sense is that it's a tension

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 5>between jobs and pay. The more you pay, the fewer

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 5>jobs you ultimately have, because inevitably these jobs will migrate

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 5>out of the union facilities and into non union facilities.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's pushing back, but intuitively or

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of big picture I get that, Okay, if

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you can get high productivity or commensurate productivity out of

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a plant in Mexico and labor costs are a lot

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>cheaper than over time, are going to have this migration.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>But labor costs still, like my understanding, I've seen this

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>stat a few times, like they're not a huge part.

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>They're like I've seen a stat here it says five

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of auto industry costs, so it's like it's significant,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the majority of the cost or even

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>anywhere close to the major.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Costs of a car.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So intuitively, someone I look at five percent, who's like, okay, well, like,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what would be the big problem if it moved to

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>seven percent or six percent, I guess I'm just skeptical

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or I have this intuitive skepticism that the labor component,

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's a bit more radically changes the economics for

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>these companies.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's think about it this way.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I think I don't have this figure in my head,

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 5>but let's just say, and I think it's probably directionally

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 5>about right that the profit margins all going well, and

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 5>there are plenty of times when they're not going well.

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 5>The profit margins for these kinds, for these big companies,

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 5>there's maybe ten percent or something like that. And so

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 5>if your labor costs go from five to seven, as

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 5>you said, that means your profit margins go from ten

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 5>to eight, and you've wiped out twenty percent of your profits.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 5>And that's a lot to a company. I mean companies

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 5>like these that are high cost companies with lots of

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 5>moving parts, no pun intended. They watch, or they're supposed

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 5>to watch every penny, every cost item, and work unbelievably

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 5>hard to keep costs down to make some reasonable profit.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 5>These are not companies with forty percent profit margins where

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 5>maybe it doesn't matter, And so it is important to

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 5>these companies to have labor costs be competitive with other

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 5>companies that are basically doing the same thing with labor

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 5>costs and can behalf of what they are for the

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 5>Detroit three.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, on a similar note, the UAW strikes are happening

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 2>against this backdrop of historically low unemployment post pandemic, and

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I imagine that has empowered a lot of the workers

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>to feel like this is the moment when they can

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>ask for all these different things. But the other broad

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 2>trend that's happening is the sort of post pandemic tendency

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>towards reshoring or building more resilient supply chains, or call

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 2>it whatever you want. And of course the backdrop of

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Bidenomics as well, where Biden has basically said he wants

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 2>to build more industrial and manufacturing capacity within the US.

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Does that not potentially put a lid on the threat

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 2>of moving a lot of car production to places like

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>China or Mexico.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, let me try to unpack that.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 5>You're going to again have to remind me of a

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 5>couple of good questions that you asked that I won't remember. Look,

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 5>the first point that you alluded to, I just would

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 5>like to mention for the benefit of the listeners, which

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 5>is and maybe it's obvious, but as you said, what's

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 5>happening right now is we have a historically low unemployment

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 5>rate three point eight percent and about one and a

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 5>half jobs for everybody who's actually looking for a job,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 5>and so that has led workers in many, many industries

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 5>to feel empowered to ask for more. And so obviously

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 5>you have the screenwriters and the actors on strike, you

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 5>have hotel workers in LA on strike. At the moment,

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 5>you've had very large contracts to the ups drivers, to

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 5>the American Airlines pilots and so forth. But those are

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 5>all service industries and if you pay those people more,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 5>sure it cuts into profits a little bit. It may

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 5>add to inflation a little bit because the companies raise

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 5>their prices, but fundamentally, those jobs don't leave. They can't

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 5>leave if you have to have if you're an LA

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 5>hotel worker, that's the only place you're going to work.

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 5>And again, manufacturing, manufacturing is different. So let's talk about

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 5>deglobalization and industrial policy and bynomics because they are somewhat different.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 5>Obviously related. I think the wake up call during the

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 5>pandemic and the context of what's going on with China

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 5>to many American companies and government officials is that we

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 5>globalized to a great extent to cut costs for Americans.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 5>And it's important to recognize that part of why we

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 5>had so little inflation until the pandemic was because we

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 5>were importing manufactured goods from China from other places, not cars,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 5>that were much cheaper than anything we could make here,

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 5>and so prices for things like clothes were very barely

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 5>moved I think during this period because they were able

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 5>to source it more cheaply. Now, companies and again the

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 5>government are saying, well, the supply lines are too stretched

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 5>and this is how you get in trouble, and so

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 5>there will be and it's not an organized effort, it's

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 5>not a government policy that, it's not a government edict.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 5>But companies are reassessing their supply lines and saying, Okay,

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, maybe we shouldn't rely on China. But then

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 5>they have to get it from somewhere else. And by definition,

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 5>if they were getting it from China because it was

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 5>the cheapest they could get, it's going to cost more

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 5>to get it from somewhere else, and that does add

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 5>at some point into inflation and costs for everyday Americans.

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 5>And so this is not going to be a top

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 5>down decision from Washington. This is going to be decision

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 5>made company by company to try to balance secure supply

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 5>lines with being able to keep prices to consumers at

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 5>reasonable levels. And I think when the dust settles, it

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 5>will not be as big of a It will not

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 5>be as big as people think it might be for

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 5>the because of the cost problem that companies are going

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 5>to find the costs are higher and are going to

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 5>maybe pull back from some of this deglobalization that you

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 5>see talking about. So now if you're ready, we can

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 5>talk about bionomics and industrial policy. Yeah.

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, wait, can I ask one more question just on

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the car industry. I mean, you were the cars and

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 2>before you were the cars are you were in private

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 2>equity and an investment banker. So you've dealt with all

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 2>these different types of businesses over the years. What did

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 2>you learn about the car industry specifically? Is there something

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 2>that makes that business model special in your mind?

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 5>It's an iconic American industry. It's an industry that every

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 5>country takes some national pride in having their own company.

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 5>In effect, if you look at Europe, there's been some

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 5>mergers recently to try to rationalize it. But every country

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 5>in Europe felt like it had to have its own

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 5>car company, even though it really didn't make sense for

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 5>every country in Europe to have its own car company.

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 5>And so if I were to stand up and say,

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 5>you know, we don't really need a car industry in

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 5>this country, I'd be probably drawn and quartered or burned

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 5>at the stake or something like that. There's a lot

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 5>of emotion and feeling around it. The car industry is

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 5>three percent of our GDP that it may not sound

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 5>like a lot, but that is a lot. And I

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 5>think there's a strong feeling that we need to have

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 5>a robust car industry here. And I get that. As

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 5>I said I when I got into the auto rescue job,

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 5>I did see a couple of things. One was the

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 5>unbelievable pressure I'm manufacturing that I just described and how

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 5>tough this was. And secondly, I saw these iconic companies

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 5>that were really so much a fabric of America that

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 5>we really felt like we.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Had to save.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 5>That it was the right thing to do with tax paramney,

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 5>which by the way, we got virtual all of it back.

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Out of curiosity. Other other factors that pressure domestic auto

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing or maybe manufacturing in general in the US versus

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>other countries, not related to labor costs. I don't know

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>whether there are environmental regulations, et cetera, other other reasons

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>why manufacturing in the US is tough.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question, and the answer is yes, we

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 5>obviously do focus on this labor problem. But for example,

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 5>permitting in the US and the environmental regulations and all

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 5>that surrounds it is really really tough. Let me give

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 5>you an example that has nothing with the car industry,

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 5>but we recently looked at at copper invests in a

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 5>copper mine in Arizona.

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Fine.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 5>It's what I learned, though, is that much and I

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 5>don't know the percentage of the copper ore that we

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 5>mine here gets sent to China to be smelted and

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 5>then it comes back here, all adding to cost. And

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 5>of course the Chinese don't exactly observe a lot of

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 5>environmental protections when they do that kind of stuff over there.

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 5>And meanwhile, there's a smelter in Idaho I'm told that

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 5>is built sitting there not operating because it can't get

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 5>permitted because of environmental concerns and so and of course,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 5>copper is a key ingredient in EVS and all the

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 5>energy transition things we're talking about. And so there is

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 5>a tension in this country between various goals, and we

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 5>have a goal of obviously making this energy transition. If

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 5>we want to make an energy transition, we're going to

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 5>have to radically change the permitting process. It would be

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:53.959
<v Speaker 5>great if you want at some point we can talk

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 5>about semiconductors, which is another manufacturing business where there are

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 5>a lot of issues to be thought about.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, all right, I'll take the bait. Let's talk about semiconductors.

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 2>And I mean this leads nicely into bidenomics as well.

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 5>So look, so what happened with semiconductors, and I've actually

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 5>spent a fair amount of time on semiconductors recently because

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a fascinating subject, is that we of

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 5>course invented semiconductors basically after Sputnik. We basically had our

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 5>Sputnik moment. We said we've got to become a technology leader.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 5>The Defense Department got heavily involved DARPA, and the Internet

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 5>was one outcome of that our leadership, and semiconductors, with

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 5>Intel in particular being our national champion, but many many

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 5>other companies, QUALCOMAMD whatever also being products of that. But

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 5>what then happened was that we also encouraged and we

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 5>were not the main reason this happened, but you then

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 5>had a semiconductor industry grow up in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan,

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 5>and Singapore. We encouraged it because we felt that if

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 5>those countries were strong economically, it would help resist China

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 5>better in its own economic expansion. Those countries pursued a

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 5>very vigorous industrial policy, which relates to your question, to

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 5>develop those industries there. And so where do we sit now?

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 5>We sit now we're ninety two percent of the world's

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 5>high end semiconductors, the most important ones that power your

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 5>phones and lots of other things that you use are

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 5>made in Taiwan, which obviously has a series of issues

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 5>surrounding it. And now suddenly we want to bring that

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 5>back here. But what we're finding is, and what we're

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 5>going to find, is that that is not easy. We

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 5>don't have the ecosystem of engineers, suppliers and so on

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 5>that has grown up around the semiconductor industries elsewhere. We

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 5>have this permitting problem, we have a high cost structure TSMC.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan Semiconductor, which is the leading company in making this stuff,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 5>has a facility up on the Oregon Washington border they've

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 5>had for a number of years. They say their costs

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 5>are fifty percent higher than they are back in Taiwan,

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 5>and so yeah, they're building a fab as these factories

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 5>are called in Phoenix. But it's going to cost a

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 5>lot and it's going to make barely a dent in

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 5>our semiconductor situation. So we can talk about our industrial

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 5>policy towards semiconductors. We have. The Congress has approved fifty

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 5>two billion dollars for mostly for tax and grants to

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 5>build these things. Another I think twelve billion of it

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 5>for research and development. But then they've gone out with

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 5>an RFP for companies to apply with all kinds of

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 5>other conditions and things around it, like that companies have

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 5>to provide childcare for their employees. One thing, one of

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 5>the most important things that I learned in the auto

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 5>rescue and that we were lucky to have, was we

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 5>were told by the White House, you focus on fixing

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 5>the companies, We'll worry about all the other issues that

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 5>are out there, whether it's environment, labor, whatever, You can't

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 5>have multiple objectives in a policy that's that important and

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 5>be successful. In my opinion, you have to have one

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 5>objective and be willing to make certain sacrifices around it

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 5>to be successful.

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Setting aside whether these sort of other aspects like childcare

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to hobble our efforts to build domestic semiconductor manufacturing.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could make the argument right that the

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>US semiconductor industry is doing really well. In Vidia is

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a one trillion dollar company. That's twice TSMC is only

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a four hundred and fifty eight billion dollar company, so

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in video is bigger than TSMC. Do you agree with

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the even premise that we need to have more domestic

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:28.959
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor manufacturing.

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 4>And video doesn't make anything? No, I know, they make nothing.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But they but they make a ton of money.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah that point, but.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I know, But like, but do we need

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, so the whole look, the whole thing

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of arose. This got this semiconductor supply chains got

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>on everyone's radar in twenty twenty when the low end

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>lagging edge nodes that went into cars, there was a

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>shortage of them. But then you know that eased and

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect pandemics to happen except maybe once every

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. Like, what, how much manufacturing do we need

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to do here?

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 5>A lot or some or look, I don't know. I'm

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 5>rather skeptical as possible, but in imperfect world you'd want

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 5>a lot more. Nvidia does not make anything. It doesn't

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 5>matter what their profits are. They could design chips every

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 5>day from now till the end of civilization, but if

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 5>they don't have somebody to make them, it doesn't matter.

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 5>So in the chip world, you can separate I, at

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 5>least in my own mind, separated into kind of three

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 5>groups of chips. You have memory chips, which are basically

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 5>a commodity. We make a lot of them. That's not

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 5>going to be an issue. You have, as you said,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 5>low end processing chips. We make some of those. There

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 5>are made in plenty of places in the world. We

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 5>can be competitive there. But none of that matters if

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 5>you don't have high end ships, because you need those. Again,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 5>it's not just your phones, it's Defence Department's missiles. It's

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 5>all kinds of stuff that cannot function without them, and

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 5>we don't make any of them here. We literally don't

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 5>make any of them.

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, if we agree that we do need to semiconductors

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>in the US, and that maybe there is a role

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 2>for industrial policy or government money to play in that process.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I know you've been somewhat critical of the federal deficit

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>in recent years. How do you square those two objectives,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, not wanting to explode the public debt but

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>also wanting to foster certain domestic industry.

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Look, first, let me say a couple things.

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 5>First of all, I am on the more skeptical end

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 5>of the value of industrial policy. I think when the

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 5>government gets into the business of picking winners, there are

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 5>many many ways in which it can mess up. I

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 5>will freely concede that what the Asian countries, the for

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 5>Asian countries I mentioned did in semiconductors, which is heavily

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 5>through industrial policy, worked and so there are plenty of

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 5>examples it works. Lots of people like me would say, Okay,

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 5>if you give me full control of this and I

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 5>don't have to deal with all this other stuff and

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 5>politics and whatever, I can make this work. There's a

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 5>certain amount of hubris in saying that, but that's what

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of us would say. That's not how it's

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 5>going to work. It's going to work as a whole

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 5>different kind of process, and that I think brings a

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 5>lot of risks in terms of the costs. We're not

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 5>talking about that much money. I mean, we have a

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 5>federal budget deficit of two trillion dollars. We're talking about

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 5>fifty two billion over a number of years. It is

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 5>important if we believe we can execute it well. And

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 5>as I said, I have my questions about that. It

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 5>is just as important as many many other things the

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 5>government does. And we just would need to find fifty

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 5>two billion dollars somewhere else to pay for this because

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 5>it is. It should be a priority if we can

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 5>execute it well.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Let me bring it back to autos for a second.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>You laid out the logic of why we should have

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>some more manufacturing of semiconductors here. Does that logic to

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you also apply to the battery realm?

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 4>I thought you were asking about autos in general.

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, we could go into audit, but like

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to be a specific concern, and I think

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that when they passed the Inflation Reduction Act, a big

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>part of it was probably one of Joe Mansion. A

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>critical vote was like he does not want to be

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in the same position that the US has found itself

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in with respect to solar with respect to potentially semiconductors,

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and find us in that same vulnerable position with respect

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to batteries.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 5>I would like to see us make more batteries here,

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 5>because there are a lot of batteries made in China.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't worry quite as much about that as I do.

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 5>It's about semiconductors because they're also batteries made in South

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Korea and lots of other places that are friendly to us.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 5>And we're Look, we are living in a global world

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 5>and we're not going to get away from that. We're

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 5>not going to get away from that. We have spent

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 5>too many years globalizing. There's a company called ASML that

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 5>you may have heard about, which makes the equipment that

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 5>makes semiconductors. Their high end EUV what's called an EUV

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 5>machine has something like six hundred and fifty thousand parts

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 5>in it. It's one of the most complicated pieces of machinery,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 5>if not the most complicated made. Those parts come from

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 5>all over the world. The intellectual property is owned by

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 5>countries all over the world, including by US. Some of

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 5>those parts are actually made in California, and so we're

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 5>not going to get away from that. The world's not

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 5>going to get away from that. We have to accept

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 5>that we're always going to be at some risk of

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 5>supply line problems if the world becomes a less forgiving place.

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 5>So I would like to see us make some batteries here.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 5>I think it is a much easier challenge than making

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 5>semiconductors here. So I think it's possible and likely that

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 5>we will make some. Tesla makes its batteries here, of course,

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.959
<v Speaker 5>But again we shouldn't get overly optimistic about how many

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 5>we're going to make and what the costs are going

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 5>to be.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask you to put your banker slash

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 2>private equity hat on again. As a director of capital,

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 2>how do you encourage more money to flow into some

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of these strategically and or environmentally important industries such as semiconductors,

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 2>such as potentially batteries, things like that, where to date,

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.479
<v Speaker 2>maybe there hasn't been as much money as certain people

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 2>would have liked.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 5>In some industries where the prospects for return don't seem

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 5>fulsome enough for us to invest there may if they're

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 5>important enough, then the government needs to step in so

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 5>let's talk about how the government can do this in

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 5>a way that is most cost effective. If you think

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 5>about it very broadly, the government can provide subsidies. They

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 5>can provide tax incentives. The problem with subsidies is then

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 5>you have the government in effect picking winners, and that

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 5>scares me. The advantage of tax incentives is you're basically

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 5>letting the market decide which projects are going to go forward,

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 5>with the tax and centives providing and added boost. We

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 5>have seen in my investment role, we have seen projects

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 5>that came by a couple of years ago that we

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 5>could not get pencil out to make returns meet our thresholds,

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 5>and so we didn't invest. We literally had one of

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 5>those same projects come back after the IRA was passed

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 5>and suddenly there's i think a thirty percent or some

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 5>large tax credit associated with it, and the project suddenly

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 5>made economic sense and we invested in it.

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 4>What area are we talking about. This was in the

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 4>solar area. In the solar area.

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And so that's how the market can work better,

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 5>and it is working better. In fact, it's working so

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 5>well that it seems clear that the original estimate for

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 5>the cost of the IRA, which I think was around

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 5>five hundred billion. Goldman Sax thinks it's going to be

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 5>one point three trillion. Other people are somewhere in between.

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 5>And that may sound like a bad thing, and it is,

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.879
<v Speaker 5>obviously from the standpoint of the budget deficit, but it's

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 5>a good thing in the sense that these incentives have

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 5>taken so many projects that were not economic and made

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 5>them economic. And so you've had this enormous take up

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 5>and we will have a lot of progress made in

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 5>this country on energy transition projects because of it.

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to cars more broadly, because something it

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>comes up a lot in our conversations. It's not just

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about do you have the cash, It's not just about

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>do you have the workers. It's like are you good

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>at it? Are the learning by doing? And when you

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about you know, you even mentioned the car industry

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in the US has been working on it's sort of

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>existing model for over a century. The chip makers in

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>places like Taiwan and Korea, like they've just gotten really

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>good at what they do and they know how to

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do these repeatable processes. When it comes to evs and

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the legacy automakers. Sitting aside the labor cross again for

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a second, like, how much of a challenge is it

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be for them to basically get good at

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>producing electric cars at scale.

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be a challenge. But I think there's

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 5>an and yang to this. I think on the positive side,

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 5>they have one hundred years of history in a very

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 5>complicated industry and everything from design, engineering, supply lines, manufacturing, distribution, marketing,

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 5>and so on, and so that's an advantage that they have.

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 5>The disadvantage is their legacy companies, and they really need

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 5>to reinvent themselves in a way to compete. I was

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 5>a skeptic about the ability of companies like Tesla to

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 5>come into a market that was so established and compete effectively,

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 5>and I was wrong about that.

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 4>Obviously it can be done.

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 5>And you now also have a whole bunch of other

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 5>startups coming along, and at the moment, the Detroit Three

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 5>as we call them, are losing a lot of money

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 5>on their evs and just really beginning to roll them

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 5>out in force, and it's going to be a tough

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 5>competitive experience for them, and that's why things like labor

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 5>costs become important.

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Just going back to the UAW strikes, what's your base

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 2>case for how this all works out, and what is

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the trigger I suppose for the two sides to come

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 2>to a resolution.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, first, in relation to your opening comments to your listeners,

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 5>I think this podcast will be relevant for a long

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 5>time from every Unfortunately, unfortunately, certainly, the attitude at the

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 5>companies is that this is not going to get settled

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 5>quickly because the gap between the two sides is so vast,

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 5>and I think the companies, as I said, and you

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 5>may or may not agree, there's no possibility that companies

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 5>can possibly accept paying people forty hours and working thirty

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 5>two or anything like that. It's just it's not in

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 5>the realm of reality. And so I think at the

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 5>end of the day, what I hope will happen, and

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 5>what would be the right thing to happen, is for

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 5>the union to drop a lot of these ancillary demands.

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 5>And there are also, by the way, demands and requests

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 5>around the issue of workplace flexibility. One of the things

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 5>that we did in two thousand and nine was to

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 5>basically strip away a lot of the work roles that

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 5>we felt were impeding efficiency. General motors, I believe from

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 5>my recollection, had something like three hundred job classifications for

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 5>its workers. If you were a plumber, you couldn't touch

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 5>a piece of electric, piece of equipment or whatever. And

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 5>we reduce those to six and that is still more

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 5>or less where things stand. But there are other kinds

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 5>of flexibility that the companies need to manage, especially in

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 5>relation to the ev transition. So what I would like

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 5>to see happen is a robust pay increase, and I

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 5>think the companies have offered a reasonable one, but there's

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 5>more to go, I'm sure, and the gap there, as

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.280
<v Speaker 5>I said, I think is bridgeable. And for the union

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 5>to give up most of these I'm going to call

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 5>them crazy demands and hopefully also address any kinds of

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 5>workplace flexibility issues that the companies feel they need to

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 5>be competitive.

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Does it have to get worse though, before it gets better, Well, it.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Will get worse because what's happened is, as you know,

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 5>first of all, is the way they structured the strike

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 5>is unprecedented. They close three plants, one for each of

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 5>the companies, and they did that in part because they

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 5>didn't want their strike fund to get depleted too quickly.

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 5>They couldn't afford to strike all three companies. They didn't

0:40:57.520 --> 0:40:59.399
<v Speaker 5>want to do what historically has been done with strike

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 5>one company. But what's going to happen now is that

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 5>gradually other facilities are going to close because there's no

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 5>place to send the parts because there's nobody to assemble

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the cars and trucks at these three facilities that have

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 5>been shut down. And then those facilities will shut down

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 5>and those workers will be laid off. Under the rules,

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 5>the companies can't simply shut those facilities and lay off

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 5>the workers unless they have a legitimate business reason to

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 5>do that, i e. They're oversupplied with whatever that particular facility,

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.800
<v Speaker 5>what facility does. So yeah, this could easily ripple through

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 5>the entire set of facilities around the Big three in

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Detroit three they could shut down. You could have one

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 5>hundred and thirty thousand workers on strike or not on strike,

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 5>but laid off and on strike. There will be significant

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:47.800
<v Speaker 5>effects on parts suppliers. By the way, let's not forget

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 5>that these companies don't make a lot of their parts.

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Most of their parts they've outsourced those years ago. So

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 5>those and this was something we encountered in two thousand

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 5>and nine as well, And so those companies are going

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 5>to suffer financial pressures and they will be concentrated in

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.879
<v Speaker 5>the Upper Midwest, and none of this is a good thing.

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>You broke the UAW demands between what you see is

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like sort of very reasonable and deserved pay increases and

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>then this so called crazy demand. Where does ending the

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.720
<v Speaker 1>tiered system fall into that? Do you consider that crazy

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 1>or is that something that can be solved?

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, again, that's a money issue, really, and so it's

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 5>a question of how you want to allocate the money.

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 5>If you give the existing permanent workers more than whatever,

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 5>then there's less to deal with what they're called the

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 5>temp workers now, and so it's really a question as

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 5>much for the union as for the companies as to

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 5>how they want to allocate it. The temporary worker thing

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 5>has been significantly improved since two thousand and nine in

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 5>terms of the amount of time a new worker is

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 5>a temporary worker before they become a permanent worker, and

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 5>I think that will continue to shrink under this new contract.

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 5>I think the company's prepared to give something on that front.

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 5>But again, as I said, it's as much for the

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 5>UAW is this for the companies as to where their

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 5>priorities lie.

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you one thing about EV's is I

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think they're less labor intensive and they have fewer parts total,

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's less assemblies. So even under again saying there

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was no contract issues, I believe the perception is that

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the transition would require less labor. Is that the case, Like,

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what is the stress that's going to become on the

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>labor force in your view, regardless of this contract from

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>But this is.

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Something the UAW is worrying about, and it's analogous in

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 5>a way to what the screenwriters are worrying about. They're

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:38.720
<v Speaker 5>worrying that AI is going to put them out of work.

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 5>The UAW is worrying that the evs are going to

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 5>put them out of work. And this is again where

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 5>there's a very interesting tension in America today between the

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 5>people who care passionately about labor and the people who

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 5>care passionately about the energy transition. Many of them are

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 5>the same people, and I certainly would even consider myself

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 5>one of them. But you have to decide what your

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 5>priorities are, and if we want to be competitive in

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 5>evs and not end up like semiconductors where they're all

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 5>made somewhere else, then we have to accept that there

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 5>are going to be some costs to that. I don't

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 5>mean financial costs. I mean costs in terms of jobs, because,

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 5>as you correctly said, evs require a good bit less

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 5>labor and we just have to accept that, and trying

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 5>to protect old jobs is never a winning strategy for

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 5>any country or any company.

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask one more question. This is what

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>we call a giveaway question. Well, you're a former journalist.

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 2>You know your time as cars are.

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>What was your.

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Favorite or most memorable moment from that period?

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 5>My most memorable moment, there's a competition for that. For

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 5>that award, I had many many It was a fascinating experience.

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 5>It was the best thing I ever did with my life.

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 5>I felt like I actually made a contribution and we

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 5>were able to achieve it. I would say, interestingly, and

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 5>this this is a little different than what we've made.

0:44:55.440 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 5>My most memorable moment was when we got inside of

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 5>General Motors. I had been taught and brought up in

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 5>my investment banking world to think that General Motors was

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 5>a really iconic company, well managed for the most part,

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 5>especially in finance. They were renowned for their finance department.

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 5>When we got inside General Motors, I could not believe

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.720
<v Speaker 5>how badly that company was run. They didn't even really

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 5>have a model, a financial model that we could use

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 5>to project the results for five years. They had some

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 5>cut and paste thing, but they didn't even have really

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 5>a model that could be manipulated and where you could

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 5>change assumptions and things like that. The culture of the

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 5>company was terrible. It was a get along, go along

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:42.399
<v Speaker 5>kind of culture. Nobody would challenge anybody. The CEO had

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 5>an elevator that took him from his private executive or

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 5>the private executive car parking area, straight to I think

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 5>it was the forty ninth or fiftieth floor and the

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 5>Renaissance tower to his office without stopping any of the floor,

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 5>so he didn't have to mingle with any of the

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 5>ordinary people. The executive offices were behind a locked door.

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 5>You had to have a certain kind of paths to

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 5>get through that door. It was unbelievable, unbelievable to me

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 5>to see an kind of company run like that, and

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 5>it was clear from the from day one that a

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 5>big part of what we needed to do there was

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 5>to change management. This was this is not labor. It

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 5>was not labour's fault that these companies got in trouble.

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 5>They have some responsibility, but management had an off lot

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:23.240
<v Speaker 5>of responsibility.

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, Steven Rattner, thank you so much for coming

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 2>on all thoughts and reminiscing with us and sharing your

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on the current situation. Appreciate it.

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 4>It was fun. Thanks so much for having me.

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. That was really great.

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was fantastic. Thank you, so Joe. I thought

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 3>that was a.

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Very nuanced discussion of a topic that clearly people have

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 2>a lot of feelings about. I did think one thing

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 2>that jumped out to me was just how important that

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 2>echomic backdrop is for these types of things. So Steve

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 2>was talking about how in two thousand and nine you

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 2>were able to get concessions out of the union because

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the economy was not doing very well. Obviously, fast forward

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:14.720
<v Speaker 2>to today and it feels like the balance of power

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 2>has shifted potentially more in favor of workers, and so

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 2>you can see why the UAW thinks this is the

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 2>moment to strike.

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I mean absolutely, the macro backdrop couldn't be more

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>different from the time when Stephen was the cars. It's

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy that last point. I'm yeah, about the elevator going

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>straight up to the top of the Renaissance Tower in Detroit.

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he was talking about how a lot of companies,

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 2>especially car companies, don't have defined pensions anymore. I wonder

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 2>if they still have executive dining rooms and bathrooms and

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 2>things like that.

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 1>They get a I would guess so, though I guess

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we could confirm hopefully. I wonder if they still have

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that elevator. But you know, like there's a lot here,

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and so, you know, obviously, the labor component, like in

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>my mind, like when I think about will the big

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>three companies thrive in the age of electric vehicles, I

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm skeptical that the cost of labor, whether it's

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 1>five percent or seven percent, is going to be the

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:15.720
<v Speaker 1>defining question of it. It still seems like the big

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>question mark in my mind is can they make cars

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>productively that people want to right and can they maintain

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their businesses which are still, like, you know, heavily driven

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>by profits from internal combustion engine cars priced over a

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 1>long time. Can the pencil out in the end where

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the profits from evs against all kinds of competition that

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.359
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have in the previous era, does it work?

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Are they competitive in this space? And I think it's

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>still kind of TVD Yeah.

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing and Steve kind of touched on

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 2>this is just the uniqueness of the car industry on

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the whole. So, you know, we associate a lot of

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 2>car makers with American industry, and I think there's also

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 2>a tendency for Americans to want to buy American cars

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 2>often there's the sort of brand recognition of and so

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I kind of wonder, to your point on the labor costs,

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 2>if maybe people are willing to give up a little

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 2>bit of price in order to you know, support and

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 2>buy American and all of that type of stuff.

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Tracy, did you hear where that copper

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>mind he was looking to invest in?

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Is I knew? I knew you would notice that. Arizona.

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, another another Arizona angle for when we do our

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Arizona I didn't realize. I just look at on Wikipedia.

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 2>They all somehow comes back to Arizona.

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 2>We have to go to Arizona, visit an alfalfa farm,

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:35.400
<v Speaker 2>visit like a water treatment plant, car a copper mine,

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 2>a car factory.

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>No, there's more. There's a Howard Hughes Master Limited, a

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>master Plan community semiconductor fab and we have to take

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a self driving car around on the entire tour.

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, shall we leave it there? Right now?

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's leave it there.

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this has been another episode of the Odd Blots podcast.

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Follow our guests Steven Rattner. He's at Steve Rattner. Follow

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 1>our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol Bennett

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at dashbod. And thank you to our producer Moses Ondam.

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Follow all of the Bloomberg podcasts under the handle at podcasts,

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and for more odd Loots content, go to Bloomberg dot

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 1>com slash odd Lots, where we post transcripts, a blog,

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and a newsletter. And check out the discord. We have

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a transportation room, we have a climate room. Gonna be

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>lots to talk about this one discord dot gg slash

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>odd Lots. Talk about this and all the other episodes

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with fellow listeners.

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about labor movements, then please leave us

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 2>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening.