WEBVTT - We Just Don't Sleep

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for Bloomberg News,

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heard podcast.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>It's Friday, August twelve. Bloomberg Crypto Senior editor is Dave

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Litka and Anna Arera joined me this week for another

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>edition of what we're calling Friday in the Editor's Room.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>That's when you'll hear from me and a couple of

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>our other crypto editors on the highs and lows of

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>this week. We'll talk about the biggest stories that we're

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>covering and what's driving markets right now. Anna, Dave, thank

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you both for being here. Anna, you are in Italy

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. I am We're fully embracing that distributed

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto lifestyle. We are. I am a crypto nomad sort

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of for for the for the month, a cryptote for

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the month. Um. Stay tuned for more reporting on that

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to our listeners. But Dave, one of the stories that

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we've been really paying attention to, obviously for a long time,

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>but especially this week is coin bases most recent earnings results.

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you just talk through a little bit about what

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that was, why people have been paying attention and like

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>what the market reaction has been, like sure coin base

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for those who do know or do know, it's the

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest US publicly traded exchange and also probably one of

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the biggest and most influential players in crypto right now.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>There's over a hundred million people who are signed out

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for this on it, they are as good as brahmbers

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and that you're gonna see. And everybody knew was a

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>bad quarter on it, but they actually had a more

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>than one billion dollars swing in revenue. So a year ago,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>when everybody was all excited about a crypto, they made

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>over two billion dollars in revenue. This year they were

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>less than a billion on it, which in any industry

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you never see swings like that, right, So it was

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>really indicative of what's going on. And of course with

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>all these calls, people want to know what's going on,

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen next on it, and they did

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>flick that it's crypto winner. We're not gonna make any

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>predictions in terms of when it's over, but we think

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be slow going forward. So as you say,

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars is a fairly dramatic move by any

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>conceivable metric. What contributed to that weakness specifically, were they

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 1>making less money on a particular part of the business. Well,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>they make their money through fees on it, and I

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that's why Wall Street loves them. There's a model

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there on it. But when everybody who got into crypto

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>decides not the trade anymore and sits on their hands

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and then become hobblers as they call um, rather than

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>traders or speculators or the fomo fear tapers out, then

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't generate feast. That was the biggest impact. So

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>their biggest problem is people were like, I'm just gonna

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wait and see and not not making any transactions at all.

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And they need they need that transaction volume to make money,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>transactions to how they make their business. And the big

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>question is with all these exchanges is when does retail

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>come back? What did they say about their n f

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>T business Because they recently launched a platform for non

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>fungible tokens and they were like, we're going to compete

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>with the biggest players and we're going to do it

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>through user experience. Like, how's that been going? It was

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the worst time launches ever in terms

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of a product as the market was collapsing. But they

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>did say in the call, Hey, we're in for the

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>long haul on this. What else would you expect them

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to say on it? They're not gonna punt on what

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think is kind of the future

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of this sector. They're holding the course as that we're

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on their n f T s. They're not pulling back

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>correct and I'm gonna I'm gonna switch to you for

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different element of the market. You know, people

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have been really paying attention to coin base, as you know,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to use one of Dave's words, a baromenta of the biggest,

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>most important, most liquid parts of crypto to really under

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and retail trader sentiment. But then there's like, shall we

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>describe it as a more esoteric part of crypto markets,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that universe of what are called mixers, which you know,

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>services protocols that people use to obscure the origins and

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the destinations of, you know, certain types of crypto transactions.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>What's been going on in mixer land. So there was

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a big week for mixer lands. The US Treasury Department

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>sanctioned a big mixer called Tornado Cash, which, as you said,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is a service lets you hide your transaction, so if

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.119
<v Speaker 1>you tack someone's bitcoin, no one can follow and see

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>where you're sending them. It's been used to London funds,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Tornado cash, have you heard of it. I would put

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this sort of in the category of the most important

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>crypto related sanctions that ever came out of the U. S.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Department. So obviously it's a big deal if a

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto service gets sanctioned and blocked, because the idea of

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>crypto is that it's permissionless and you know, on censorship resistance.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So so it kind of showed if you want to,

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>then you can censor crypto. This is the first step, right,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>because a way that you could go after a crypto

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>services by sort of targeting the providers of the underlying

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>technology and infrastructure, right, which might be companies in the

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 1>US or companies that do have an incentive to follow

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>US rules. So that was the first step. And then

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>this became somewhat interesting was that the way crypto reacted

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to the to this was well, you can't censor everything,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>even providers of technology. So what we'll do is we'll

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>show you that there's only so far as you can go.

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Some anonymous users in Crypto started using Tornado cash to

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>send tokens to known wallet addresses. So some of some

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>celebrities and the idea they're being we're showing you that

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>then these celebrities could have potentially been implicated in the

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sanctuaries or weren't following the US Treasuries advice or ad punishments. Right.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It kind of became this giant question and tension in

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto of you know, is it really censorship resistance or not?

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, do users have a right to privacy don't they?

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So it became so much more than just you know,

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions to one mixer. So it sounds like there's

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of issues all tied up in there at

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>once that I want to unpack with you a little bit.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with the privacy question, because you know,

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in when the Treasury came out and said, hey, you're

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in trouble, We're going to sanction you. As you say,

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the very first thing that people said was like, you

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>can't sanction software, and the Treasure was like, watch us,

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We're totally going to sanction software. But immediately after that

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was this question of how does that work in practice?

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the things that we saw is

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that Tornado cash is a website, email um, their access

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to a platform called get hub, which is what you know,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>developers and people who build software used to share and

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>store their code. They lost access to all of those things.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like the way that you sanction software

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in crypto is by going to companies that are in

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like web two world um, and you kind of undermine

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that decentralization. But the other element of this privacy question is, Okay,

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>if they can go after something that's used Yes, it's

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>used by North Korean hackers, but it's also just used

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>by ordinary people, what does that mean for your ability

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in crypto to actually maintain some degree of anonymity? And

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing from you is it's very confusing right now. Yes,

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And also and also while you might think, well, we

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>do want a society where, you know, some people might

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>want this want of society where people where governments can

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>go after you know, criminals, you know, we could also

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think about the reverse idea, right where you know, maybe

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to send money to Ukraine, or someone in

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Russia wants to send money to Ukraine and they don't

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>want their government to censor that right, there's a legitimate

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>reason why you don't want people to see your transactions.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's especially important if we think about crypto maybe

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>growing beyond just crypto, right, if we think about digital

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>assets and government backset central currencies, if crypto does become

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>more of a form of payment, these questions are important

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>because then we're talking about anti money landering at a

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>much bigger scale, right, not just involving you know, transactions

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that from from hacking of crypto services, right, it becomes everything.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>It becomes like I bought a sandwich for lunch and

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>now the government knows about it, exactly. I appreciate the

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>analogy that you're using there about you know, because people

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>have wanted to send money to Ukraine, and if you

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are a person in Russia, that's definitely not something that

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you necessarily want the Secret Service knocking on your door about.

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But like more prosaically, it's very similar to the conversations

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and technology around like encrypted messaging, and you know, various

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>government officials will say, well, you can use encrypted messaging

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for terrorism. I'm like, yeah, but you could also just

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>use encrypted messaging because you want to talk to your

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>friends and you don't want anybody advertising at you. So

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>these this is I think a good example of like

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>issues that affect many parts of tech and many parts

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of the world really playing out in crypto. But there's

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>something else that you said around, you know, the day

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of people using Tornado cash to send crypto two people

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>with known public accounts and like the legal gray area

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>there can you can you just elaborate on that a

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit more so? The the idea is that if

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the sanctions are to be applied, then you're not supposed

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to receive any funds from tornado cash, right, So if

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>someone sending me, even if I don't want it, sending

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>me funds through Tornado Cash, then potentially am I implicated?

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Am I violating a U S sanction? I mean, just

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>the absurdity of that is you know interesting. Is it's

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>worth contemplating, right because it just shows that there's a

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>level of thinking that goes into how we regulate this

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in the future and how we think about money laundering

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in a sort of Web point three world. That is

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of something that we really need to think about

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>now before it gets to the stage where we haven't

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thought about the rules to govern a world like this,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is possible because of you know, the idea

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of a public wallet, right, So like one of the

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>people who had ether in this case sent to him

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>through Tornado Cash was Brian Armstrong, see you of coin

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>based that we just talked about. And that's possible because

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>his his wallet address, which is like your bank account

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>for crypto, is just like available on the internet. You're like,

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that's Brian Armstrong's wallet address or one of them. Most

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>people in other parts of their lives, like aren't walking

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>around and advertising their bank accounts. So it's very hard

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to imagine a scenario in which you know, a person

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in Iran or Cuba or you know, North Korea could

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>just like send you money or send you something with

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>no ability, with no consent or your ability to even

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>know that that's happening. And there's you know, I think

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>as you say, and like the important thing is there

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these nuances in crypto that will really be

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>forcing regulators to have to think differently and especially lawyers

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>to have to think differently about these things. One thing

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to note is if it is the case,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like if for some reason one of the people who

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>did receive that you know, anonymously sent crypto via Tornado

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>cat were held to be in breach of sanctions. Right,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So take a theoretical example, the Treasury is like, ha ha,

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you person have been interacting with something on the sanctions list.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The consequences for them would be not at all fun

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>because what could happen is that wallet could get frozen,

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So any you know, not just the amount that they received,

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but any of their crypto in that while it could

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>get frozen, they could get kicked off of any exchanges

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>or even you know, non exchanges or like banks that

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they might be a part of. You know, being a

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sanctioned individual, being a person on a sanctions list is

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a pretty stiff and severe penalty. Um, So we will

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely be keeping an eye on if anybody gets pulled

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>into this dragnet unawares. Yeah, it's interesting because it was

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>basically crypto trolling sort of the the U. S. Government,

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but in a way creating some lines to think about

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that go beyond the actual events of what happened. We'll

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be right back with a look at some of the

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto trends were watching this week. You'll keep hearing from

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg editors Dave Lika and Anna Arera Well. Dave I

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to you on that point of

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>who's making money right now. One of those things we

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>saw this week in crypto was kind of like a

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>run up in ether prices. And we've talked on this

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>podcast about, you know, the dynamics of ether and that

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>folks are thinking about what's called the merge, but as

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems to actually be happening now, can you just

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>give us a recap on what we're seeing and why sure?

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all you're here probably the next month is

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be the merge. The merge on it. You

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have the software upgrade where the Ethereum network goes from

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>very energy intensive processed to validate transactions to where they'll

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:07.599
<v Speaker 1>go to something called validators on its and everybody is

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>season on this right now. You mentioned Brian Armstrong. He

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>actually mentioned um a product that they're offering. It's called

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:19.599
<v Speaker 1>staking on coin Base on it, and staking is basically

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>how you make money off this as a as a

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>validator on it, you allow your Ethereum to be used

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in the process to complete the transaction on it. And

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's in this environment it's actually kind of the perfect

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>thing in the sense that it's like passive income on it,

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>especially with a we're in a bad market like this,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so this is almost like clipping coupons in the old

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>days of the bond market on it instead of everybody

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just looking for a huge appreciation in the in the

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>price of a various token on it. So you could

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>be hearing more and more of it, and the risk

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is it happens, it goes smooth, and then it's okay,

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what next, Well, what is next that is to be

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>seen on it? I guess the big question really beyond

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that is to see if more people do gravitate towards ethereum.

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum was kind of introduced as probably the second most

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>prominent crypto after Bitcoin. I'm on it and it was

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>basically labeled as bitcoin two point oh. You can actually

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>do a lot more with it, complete transactions over it

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that include embedded contracts, that type of thing on it.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin has basically been left as really a store value

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of these days and hasn't really worked obviously as a currency.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>But this is being promoted as a utility and whether

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>people will actually start to use it for more things

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is to be seen. When we talk about the utility

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of things like ethereum. The Ethereum the blockchain ether the token.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the use cases that comes up a lot

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is like smart contracts and f ts. You know, it's

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's you know. One one thing we've said here is

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that like if somebody has heard of crypto, they've probably

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of either bitcoin or in a n f T,

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and there are there's a lot of reporting and evidence

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that for some people, like n f T s were

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>their gateway into into crypto. If this merge happens, what's

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>going to happen to n f T holders, Like is

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it clear whether your n f T will continue to

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be accessible if you know, kind of have two different

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sorts of blockchains, or though some of the questions that

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>people are working through, well, it seems to be. We've

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>actually had a lot of news come out recently from

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>people who are basically things like stable coins, which serve

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as kind of the lifeblood of the industry, saying we're

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>going to work with Ethereum on the upgrade on it

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>will continue to do our transactions there, so you should

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be fine. Now there's a minority of people who say,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we like how things are being done, we're going to

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>break off from a theoreum and um. Then it becomes

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a question, and Okay, if if you're on that chain,

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are you going to be able to interact with other folks?

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It just rises a whole raises a whole level of complication, right.

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It's so it's almost like you'll have kind of what

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>happened with Tera and Luna, right this idea, and actually

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>with Ethereum before we there's already an existing chain of

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum called Ethereum Classic. So now we'll have Ethereum Classic,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum Classic too, and then Ethereum. Now there's bitcoin, there's

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin cash, there's Bitcoin Classic, There's been various Bitcoin Gold

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>has been other ones talked about over the years. It's

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit like a divorce and I'm one programmers.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>After the disagreement, um, some succeed and live on, other

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>ones die out. Well, this this is definitely something that

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is driving the markets and we will continue to be

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to so stay tuned for more on that.

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Um Anna, Dave, I know we have to get back

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to work, so we're gonna we're gonna wrap it up.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But thank you both for taking the time today, No problem,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I thank you. You can find all of our work

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal on Bloomberg dot com and on Twitter,

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll find Anna at at anna Arera that's I R

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>R e r A, and Dave is at d Litka

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that's d l i E d t k A. On

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the next episode of Bloomberg Crypto. In late spring of

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>after China banned all bitcoin mining, many Chinese miners headed

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to the sunny state of Texas. With a unique power grid,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>relatively attractive energy prices, and a relaxed approach to regulation,

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas seemed like it was the place to be in

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>things are looking a little bit different. A combination of

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>power outages, extreme temperatures, and declining bitcoin prices are making

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it harder and harder for crypto minors to maintain their profitability.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>To better understand what all of this means, I'll be

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>joined by Bloomberg Reports of David Pan and by Ethan Vera,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>who's the CEO and co founder of Luxer Technology. This

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily podcast from Bloomberg and I

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. For more shows from I heart Radio, visit

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Send us your comments, questions, or suggestions

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>for the show. To Crypto at Bloomberg dot net or

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>find us on Twitter. We're at Crypto. The supervising producer

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky ver Galina. Our senior producer

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is Janet Babin. Our producer is Sharon Burriro. Associate producer

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is Thy Butler. Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>music by Leo Sidrin. I'm Stacy, Marie Ishmael. Have a

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>great weekend.