WEBVTT - B.R.I.D.G.E.T. 2.0 Prediction Probability Machine

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The Around the NFL podcast. What's Gregg to give the

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>best man's speech at their wedding? From the Chris Westling

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast studio, It's Around the NFL. I'm Dan Hansis, I

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>got Mark Sessler, I got Colleen Wolf. It's a Tuesday

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>show after all. And Mr best man's speech himself, Greg Rosenthal.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Good on this road again, feel weird energy right now?

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I did give some good best man speeches two? Right?

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this all one? Didn't when you talk down to

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Justin for wanting to go more than a couple of minutes? Yeah, yeah, certainly? Yeah,

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what did you decide it should be two minutes? Or so? Five?

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Five under five A type five is good, can't be ten?

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But then if you do three minutes, then it's like

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>why are you even here? Right? It depends on how Yeah,

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>what does best friendship mean? Like you come up and

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got two and a half minutes of content? Says

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It certainly does. What if the maid of

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>honor goes up and absolutely no, I love, I love.

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I've done this four or five times. But when the

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>maid of honor just absolutely nose dives ahead of you,

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you can do no wrong and you've never seen the dead.

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen a maid of honor kill that actually

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>happened to really not yet kill. I agree with you, yeah,

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>kill the room, absolutely not. They're big, get a little

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>come no one on my weddings. I've been a maid

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of Honor quite a few times. Yes, of course I did.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you'd be great. I've seen one do an

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>incredible job because she went out of bounds with some

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of her commentary. Yeah, and that's that's what you can't

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You gotta be not safe and I think that's yes,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that's so important. Do we have this conversation probably for

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the entire in this month. I don't know if you're

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>new to the show, but we just rehab the exact

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>same conversations like a few times a year, and then

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a new season and the maid of honors out there.

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't let the best man show you up by being

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>edgy and working a little blue. You can do it too,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, don't come killing us on Twitter

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>about anti Maid of Honor commentary. I've seen a quit

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>less and I think it's possible. And I totally trusted Colleen.

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I am living proof. I would never disagree with I

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>hope I lived to see it. Roll the dice. You

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>ask it, we're starting the age out of like wedding

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>seasons unfortunately. Yeah, well, yes, we have coming up that

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm in not me right, Well, you're you're, you're you're cool. Alright, kid, um,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>here we go. I take it you are excited because

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are one step away from another Super Bowl

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and you will be in Philadelphia this week. I'm going

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to Philly. I'm going back home. It's very exciting. I

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>cannot wait. Connie. You are really traveling the NFL world.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing the circuit. Yeah, it's great, it's great. Just

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>got back from Buffalo late last night, and that was

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>so much fun as much, I guess because the obviously

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there were more Bills fans there than Bengals fans, but

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>because totally was terrible. That's why it wasn't a bit

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of a buzz kill a little bit. What was it

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 1>like after the game at the stadium. I heard a

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of Cincinnati fans there. There were a ton of

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Since fans there, so that was that was good, But

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it was somber. It was a little But then, weren't

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you looking for a place to go out on the

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>town in Buffalo after the game. I was trying to

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>find a place in Buffalo to watch the Eagles game

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday night. Um, but instead I just watched it.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>They be in a better mood on Saturday night. Yes, um, alright,

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>so yes, and then there were four four teams left.

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Championship Sunday coming up this weekend. We will have our

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>preview of Championship Sunday on Thursday, so make sure you

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>check that out. And of course the flagship program Sunday

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>night will recap and talk about who's playing in Super

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Bowl fifty seven in Glendale, Arizona. We will be there.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>That's when we get on a plane, Connie and we

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>will be at the super Bowl. So we're kind of

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>mirroring the finish line here, Greggy in a lot of ways. Well,

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we had six weeks of the preseason, you know, of

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>working in the preseason. Since camp started, we had eight

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>teen regular season weeks. We've now had two playoff weeks,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's twenty six weeks total. I'm gonna do this.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I hate when this happens, because it's true. I'm gonna

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>say it. We're now passed halfway through this season. Finally

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>about you know, halfway point on the past weekend, it

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>felt like we basically like wildcard round or the end

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of the regular season is the equivalent of hump day.

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>So we're coming in for a landing, a long landing.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>UM all right, coming up today, UM tech. Tech is

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the future. Tech will always be the future. And that's

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and and science is the path forward for human humans,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>and and it could be the end. Let's face it

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>can go in a lot of different directions. And with

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that said, coming up is a wonderful piece of hardware,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>UM that and software. It's a it's cool right, yep.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The software is run inside the hardware. Beautiful mix of

0:04:54.160 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful mix synergy UM. Bridget returns. It's hit a

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>on around the NFL. Long awaited. It's been a while

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>spenty minute since we've seen Bridget, so Lamar Jackson like

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>contract situation, we've settled it. See, I thought Bridget Condon

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>was coming on the show today. I said, we're gonna

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>do Bridget today, and Connie thought our colleague mis Condon

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was joining us until two minutes ago. So you have

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a whole line of questioning for Bridget. And yeah, she's

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at the collegiate bole right now. So that was a

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>good waste to throw out this note and to open

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 1>like the kimono one step further, like there was um

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we you know we we were like, wait, we did

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Bridget before, Like on the show, we've had Bridget on

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the computer, Like what on what was the segment? We're like,

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we never even know what the segment is. It's like

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I went back to look for Bridget to understand how

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we interact whether which was largely not in my favorite

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I realized. But like, we'll get to that. That's one

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons Bridget how to go into the shop

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>because been on our show, you could not find Bridget

0:05:55.360 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the hardware software UM machine anywhere in the search. So

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a problems and Bridget is an acronym. We're going

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to get to all of it, but before we do that,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>let's hit the news so big, thank you. What was that?

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>That is? Uh? Oh, you don't know? That is the

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>wonderful Who is it? Um? In eight for Brady coming

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>out early next month UM one of the more head

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>scratching films ever to be UH produced by a major

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>studio and released. Who is this film for? That is

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>my question? Brady is part of the production team I

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's for my mom, is it? Yeah? She it's

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>all about it. I mean, I mean I haven't talked

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>at length with her, but she's a fan of these actresses.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Certainly she's a Patriots fan. I think it's made for

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>my mom. That is a fairly narrow audience, though, like

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>your mom had other friends that I think fill that

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>demographic film. My mom and her friends, so Boston or

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts area. Mom's of a certain age. That's a very

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>quite a demostratic, like I would like to know the

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>budget of the film, and then when they did their

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>extended research, are we going to cover you know, sally

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Field salary with the box office of Wilburham, Massachusetts, and

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we should have a watch party for it? Well, I

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>will not be watching for Brady. I have to tell you. Well,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna come over and we're all going to hang out.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a nice team building event. It's also

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>based around a super Bowl that occurred five or six

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>years and I was wondering about that. It's like, why

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 1>did it take so long to bring this to fruition.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.679
<v Speaker 1>It's it is based on apparently on a true story,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it went through the machinations of the story

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>getting out there at some point then, because I was like,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>why did this not about four or five, six, seven, eight?

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Nine years ago? Bowl? There? But but what's the point

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of is now nine years ago? Right? No? I think

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it was actually Patriots I and just that heads up

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Paramount Pictures. There is an issue with football movies and

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and and Hollywood making good ones come to us ask questions.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We can give you a roadmap. I mean that's fair.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But when you can get to dynamic on screen personalities

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>like Brady and Gronk in the same movie, can you

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>play that again the way Gronk says? This is just

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it gets me so big. Thank you man. Alright, let's

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>get to eight for Brady. I guess I'll give it

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a plug coming out February third. Everyway I spoke about

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it for like nine minutes. All right, let's start with

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest story, the biggest health store, I should say. Uh.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>In the NFL had a championship weekend. Uh, Patrick Mahomes,

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with that ankle? We suffered the

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>high ankle sprain on Saturday against the Jaguars. Andy Reid

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>said in his press conference on Monday that the sprain

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't that bad and it's not as bad as the

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>one he suffered a few years back and played through.

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So again, Connie, they're all everything is pointing to, Yes,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes is playing, But the big question of going against

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the mighty Bengals, who are playing at a very sky

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>high level. Will this version of Mahomes be good enough

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>against a great opponent. Well, every time Joe Burrow and

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>these Bengals have played the Chiefs, Patrick Mahomes has been

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and they've lost every single time. So that is a

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>little concerning going into this game. And obviously he can

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes can be a pocket quarterback just as well

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as he can add live different plays. But that's his strength.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And Mahomes he's never been in a position where he's

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>missed an entire week of practice and then played a

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>game in the NFL. So all of this is new

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>territory against a team that is absolutely locked in and

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>loaded on both sides of the ball, and it seems

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like there's nothing that's going to stop them anytime soon.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And we saw his mobility how limited it was after

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that hit. I mean he didn't throw any passes outside

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of the pocket, and that is an area that he

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>led the NFL in last ye or the season, so

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's problematic. He led the NFL though, in in

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns inside the pocket too, so it's like he his

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers went up in that game, which is crazy, like

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>his yards per attempt, Like his second half numbers were

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>actually better per throw. Not that you don't lie though

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't. I kind of forgot that ankle spraining at

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in It was his left ankle, so that's a little different.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're it's not your plant ankle. But he

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>did follow up that ankle sprain, which read is saying

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and he has some self interest in saying that it's

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not worse. He did follow that up with seven touchdowns

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and like eight hundred yards in his next two games.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that maybe, And you know, there is

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>some talk out there that sometimes the the top broad

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>cast booths in the league just get a little bit

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>relentless in their praise of these big quarterbacks and it

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>almost gets in the way of the telecast at times.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Is this all just a long con mark for Mahomes

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to play out of his mind on Sunday and to

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>be turned into its own movie In a few years. Yeah,

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean if I were to pick anyone where that

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>would happen the whole dynamic with the announcing team that

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned in all that business. Um, yes, I mean

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just because it's not because I think like Mahomes, Yeah,

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>he played really well against Jacksonville after the injury, and

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they're very adaptable. I think I trust the Chiefs and

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid and Mahomes to be more adaptable with like

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the pocket stuff. You can also you know, you can

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>roll them out to a side where like the line

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is moving with him if you want to do some

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. It does take elements of their of

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>their offensiveway. But who do you trust more to, like

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with their seven thousand play page book like playbook that

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they put together over the years to come up with

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the counter and to make it work. And so yes,

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I could see if it's gonna be a movie, I

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>mean think we're getting movie Sunday. But like and it is.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It does speak to the great unknowable nous of sports

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, how many more pounds or ounces of

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure needed to be put on that leg before it broke,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like Tony Pollard's day, and they survived. He was able

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to get out of there without it bringing being a

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>broken lower leg. And now he has a chance to

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>win another Super Bowl. That's good because that would have

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 1>been a supreme bummer if the Chiefs survived. But we

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>got Henny. You don't need that Burrow. Are you saying

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that Mahomes has superior bones. I think his bones are

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>rock solid because usually a high ankle spraining, you usually

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>are out. I mean, I don't think. I think there's

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a there's a non zero chance that we get some

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Chad Henny on Sunday, probably not for the first snap,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but you just don't know. Yeah, that's that's for sure.

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in with the Patriots, Greggy, who have made

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>their higher um at offensive coordinator. And it's a familiar name,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien, Old Billy Boy, his offensive He was the

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator in New England from two thousand nine to

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven. Uh, and now he returns um from

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the college game to try to fix an offense that,

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, pretty much created with Matt Patricia leading

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the way. I love it, I don't. I'm surprised. I

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>love anything involving Bill O'Brien. But when you're replacing Matt

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Patricia as offensive coordinator. And you think back to that

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>oh nine to eleven teams, I think I would argue

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>those are some of the most influential offenses of the

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years. They kind of changed the game in

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of hurry up and their two tight ends and

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>they and Bill O'Brien was the guy behind it. And yes,

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been an annoying figure like running the Texans and

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of taking power, and he clearly plays the media well.

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he has some fans at the highest levels

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Patriots organization. Like all that could be annoying

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>at times, but like his offenses were always quite good,

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like Deshaun Watson played his best football with Bill O'Brien

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and all the case Keenum and all the people that

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like he ended up coaching up Like I'm I think

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady loved him. Uh, they were feeling themselves so

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>much during that era, where like remember the week they

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>went and just had Chip Kelly before Chip Kelly became

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>someone that we all knew about with Philly et cetera. Uh,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just come into the Patriots building and kind of teach

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>him his you know, high speed offense, and then he

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>went and ran it. Against the Peyton Manning Broncos and

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like did something no other NFL team had done. No,

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that was I don't think that was

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bill O'Brien year at o C because that was

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>only one yearn and they came in second or third

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and points scored. They were a high powered offense. He's

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not O'Brien the GM. I don't need that business and

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna get that. I mean, to me, it's

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>great for Mac Jones, who also helped teach Bill O'Brien

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what Alabama was doing when he went to Alabama's the

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>relationships already there. I think that's how glowing we are. Right. Well,

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>here's the key. He's Patricia. So if they had hired

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike La I would have been as excited or more,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just like anyone that anybody used to have an offensive

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>coordinator back in New England like that. That seems like

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the right move. Yeah. They completely set up Mac Jones

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to fail last year with what they had in place

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in addition to the offensive line and then no real

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>pass catchers. So now that he's with Bill O'Brien, we

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have to see that growth this year. I mean, it's

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a very it's an extremely safe move. It's going back

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to what you're comfortable with, what you knew. And there

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is a big difference between the offense that O'Brien was

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>running with New England then and now, and it's Tom

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Brady who was in the middle of a peak two

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>point oh at that time. So now he has to

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>do with a lesser quarterback in mac Jones. And you know,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good hire. But you know what

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with mac Jones even last year, like we'll see, when

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Zappy was in there, they did a ton of play

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>action and then if you look at the numbers when

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones was in there, like they went away from it

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>almost didn't even do what Jones did well. And they're

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about incorporating Alabama's offense along with what just making

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it something that Matt Jones have said he could be

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>more thrilled about it. So it's like you change the

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>energy around your quarterback. That is the big first step

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of the guy that was like shoveling the stairs at

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Gillette Stadium as O see, and probably this is probably

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>worth a shot as an upgrade that if they just

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>had their the rookie year Mac Jones offense and last

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>year's Patriots defense. I don't think that team would have

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>won a playoff game, but they would have been like

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the six seed, and they would have been a much

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>better team than General. Does Patricia and Judge stay on staff?

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Probably right? Just does everyone just have a forever safe home?

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're under Bill probably probably don't know. He's definitely

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like like my son, Like he doesn't meet anyone new.

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>He's just like he has his old friends and he's

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>not he's not making any new friends. At this point,

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Tom Brady, Uh, did you just compare yourself

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to Bill Belitick. All I mean is like I have

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the friends I have, I've struggled to make any new ones.

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I wonder why that would be. You know, it's just

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like all of my friends from childhood in college, he

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and all my friends are jerk. Tom Brady has a podcast.

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we've all been We've talked about that. It's

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Sometimes you're a little bit surprised. It's like, Oh,

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady's podcast, shouldn't that be the biggest podcast in

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. It's one of my favorite things about podcasts

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that our podcast is a much bigger podcast than all

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>these big names out there. Tom Brady, I'm sure if

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you asked him about us, he'd say, oh, they're the goat,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, no doubt. Anyway, on the latest edition of

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>The Lad's Go Podcast with Tom Brady, Jim Gray and

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald, fitz Is on that show though, Jim Gray,

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>did you send that? Does Jim Gray have a a

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame? I did send that.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I was walking down the Walk of Fame the other

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like a week or so ago, and stopped in my

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>tracks to realize that, like a little because you could

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you either have like the camera or the television because

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you're a television dude, um or you get the little

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>radio mike and he's got a not surprisingly a radio mike.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But it was like it's it just did surprise me

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's there. I think that um Is typically had

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the TV with the antenna's no, I think it was radio.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's like he's more of a broadcasting type icon

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess. But like in general, does that just come

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>through an agent? I don't really love set like Hollywood, Sessler.

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>That is just dialing into like old school Hollywood. You're

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>doing the walk like it's on my Yeah, I love Yeah,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's on my walks. People do like to demean that

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that they use it sort of as a pr thing.

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to pay about forty dollars for the star

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>yourself for now. It could be yourself paying for or

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it could be like your agency or someone else paying

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>for you. But a lot of times it's just stars,

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, paying for their their own publicity. But you

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>still normally have to be a star. And I'm not

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>done in justice. The payoff didn't go as you thought

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's actually a television set. It wasn't. Yeah, I mean,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>who's getting the radio anymore? But the grace that's It's

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>stunning to me, But good for him. I'm sure that

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>was a nice moment for his family and fans. Um

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>let's listen to Tom Brady when asked by Gray, are

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you playing Tommy Jim? If I knew what I was

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna do, I have already done it. Taking a day

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at a time, let's go. I mean, that's an it's

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>an edgy podcasts assume maybe started He was like, I

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>need to start making some inroads on this thing. Yeah,

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>let's just ramp up a little let's work a little

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>blue like the Bridesmaids to be afraid make people uncomfortable,

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Maids of Honors, we're matrons. Absolutely sleep on the matron

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of honor dropping bombs in a big spot. If that

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that would be a great best friend to have, if

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that were your best friends, it might work. Because I

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like I need more context to that. I was like,

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>didn't build up to that. Usually it seems like he

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>has a very prescripted joke. The hard question of the week.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That was what I can tell you briefly what Grace

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>said after He's like, well, you know, I'm just asking

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the question everyone wanted me to ask. Sorry, you know, so,

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so respect not yet, I don't think.

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that that was him like actually being real

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and being like annoyed one thousand percent by the answer

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the question why did I sign up for this? No

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>halftime of Monday? Like radio hit that they turned into

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a podcast. It's not even a podcast really, It's just

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of radio interviews twice together. Do you have

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a star on the Walk of Fame? I meat it.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's put a go fund me together. Maybe we can

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>get the around the NFL podcast start on that one. Yeah,

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but you want to just want to be I want

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to have some say on where they stick it on

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that street, because you know, there are some some places

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that aren't so wonderful. You don't want to just be

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>slapped down into a part of town that's not great. Alright,

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>discount though, well that might be would be cheaper. We

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>need to wait. Yeah, we're not quite there yet, but

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that'd be part of the fun if we

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>weren't there at all. You know, but you know how

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>they build stadiums in a depressed part of town, like, oh,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna build up the whole area, maybe that could

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>right now. Maybe like they put the Star in a

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>depressed area of Hollywood and that just creates a whole

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>level of commerce for people racing to see. That's very

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>very forward thinking and other news. Uh, and I think

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady is gonna come up a little bit later

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about that. Mark for a little tease please. That's why

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you're the host. Joe Shane. He is the general manager

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Giants. UM Big decisions after the

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Eagles over the weekend, starts with their

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>two most important players on offense, Daniel Jones, s Kwon Barkley.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It does sound like the quarterback is coming back. Here's

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>what Shane had to say. We we'd like Daniel be

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>here again. He said it yesterday. There's there's a business

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>side to it, but um, we feel like Daniel played

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>well this season. He's done everything we asked him to do,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, getting there there's a business side to it.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We we haven't went down that road yet. Um. You know,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we still got to have our meetings with our staff

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>late in the week and we'll devise an off season plan.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>But we we haven't had those meetings yet. But we

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.239
<v Speaker 1>would like to have Daniel Jones back. Hopefully we can

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>get something done with his his representatives and that would

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be the goal to build a team around him where

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he could, you know, lead us to win the Super Bowl.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Confident answer. Hey, if if you don't think your quarterback

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that you have can quote unquote lead your team to

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl, he's not your quarterback. So it's not surprising

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that he would say that. Uh. He also said, Shane

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that they are not close as of right now in

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of se Quon Barkley and the contract numbers. But

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>also we've heard that s Quan doesn't necessarily need to

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>reset the market at running back, and well, I could

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>be posturing Greg where is sae Quon Barkley and the

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>free agency one oh one? He was in the top twenty.

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, he gets dinged a little bit for being

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a running back, him and Josh Jacobs. I think he

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>was around top fifteen. But I think it was interesting

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they sounded much more optimistic about and in certain about

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones, which makes you think if they have a

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>franchise tag available for one or the other, they would

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>probably do it with Jones. And finally, in the news,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately uh from the blodder file, the San Francisco forty Niners,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>their defensive end Charles Omnahue, was arrested on a charge

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of misdemeanor domestic violence following a alleged incident with his

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend on Monday that according to the San Jose, California

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Police Department, um A Many, who posted bail and is

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>no longer in custody, also was served with an emergency

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>protective restraining order. Um The Niners and A statements that

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they were aware of the matter and they are in

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the process of gathering further information. Uh Many, who was

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five former fifth round pick pick greg and obviously

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>made a big play uh in the first round of

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and is a part of their rotation. So

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously the incident is no good. The timing was no good. Yeah,

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he's played fifty snaps over the last two weeks. Be

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>curious how they they handle it. All right, I can't

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine he's going to be playing in this game. All right,

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break and then we will look into

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the future tech. It's very important. Now, all right, we

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>are back and um it is time. Well during the break,

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking into how one would obtain a

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Walk of Fame, and I wanted you guys to

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.959
<v Speaker 1>have what you deserve. According to Wikipedia, anyone including fans,

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>can nominate anyone active in the field of entertainment as

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>long as the nominee or their management approves the nomination,

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>so we would obviously approve it. Nominees must have a

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>minimum of five years experience in the category and a

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>history of quote charitable contributions. Oh, we got that too,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>although we do still Jacksonville. Please but please add us.

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Our show is for free, and we've been giving people

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for all because I don't know. Maybe we'll do that

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville or are Brilliance for free some ad breaks,

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the food bank, the orphanage, whatever we need to do

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for Jacksonville. We were going to do that anyway, but

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it actually kind of links up well with this situation.

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>We would get a radio icon, I think, And do

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we get if we make the charitable donation? Do we

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>get some type of receipt to the Hollywood? Seems fair?

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as any podcast put on the Hall of Favor,

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's a race between us and Old Rogan.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Old Rogan that's what they call him. What were any

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>other qualifications necessary? We got all it says on Wikipedia.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So I will nominate you guys. I think there is.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean I heard what does nominate mean? Does that mean?

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Because then it's probably they're just like they'll get back

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to yees CTC fifty g bro. No. Do think it

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>costs like fifteen dollars to get a star or something

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like that? So where does that money? I looked this

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>up recently. I don't know why. I thought it was

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>like forty or something. Maybe a lot of times agents

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>will pay this for their talent to get work. There

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>is have we been doing it five years give me

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>some dings. Have we been doing this five years? Have

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>we made charitable donations? Would management clear this? Man? Justin counts?

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And finally, do we have agents? We have good agents.

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the NFL would want to pay for

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>this to get the podcast out there more? It's that

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>agents and having agents that are willing to pay for

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that will be an interesting conversation, but it's worth having.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>You could argue that if you want to look at

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what we made the NFL over the course of a

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>decade plus, that this little fee would be dust in

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the wind. Follow the money. I need to know where

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going for all these stars, who who gets what?

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>What bank account does that that's a good point, Like

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the Commission of espcially a city a city a city

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>slush funders. It's essentially been a racket for like some

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>some people who started this and their family members. You're

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>actually asking the question that no one ever did. They

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>planted three trees in Los Angeles in the past fifty

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>five years, and the rest has gone directly into some evil,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>some evil person's malibu. According to the Internet fund, the

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>fee goes to the installation of the star and general

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>upkeep maintenance for the Hollywood Walk of Fame, which if

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone has ever walked down, you know it's in pristine

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>condition on that. Yeah, they gotta work on that. Well,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they got a lot of things to work on in Hollywood.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Connie work in blue. Um, all right, let's get to

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>she's on the case. Let's let me fire it up.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I got a I got, I got our old friend.

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>She's coming back around. And I'll tell you what if

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:06.439
<v Speaker 1>she if she did a maid of honor speech, who doggy?

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>That would be weird to find her a best friend. First,

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 1>let's fire up Bridget. Greetings, I am a bionic reactive

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>intelligence data gathering annunciation transponder also known as Bridget version

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>two point Oh. Hello Bridget, how are you? Does she answer?

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>How about that traffic on the local freeway this morning?

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Well okay, so there's a lot to break down here.

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And that was very good. I've been she's been offline

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and one of the things I wanted

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to do was make Bridget more personable. Um, I wanted

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>her to have more of a person reality. I certainly

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the number one issue with Bridget obviously was how angry

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it made you Mark with some of her criticisms, I

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>would say of certain football takes that you had, as

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I recall, um, and so I did. I did pop

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the hood and I tried to address that as well

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with her guard The first time I encountered her, it

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>caught me off. But what happened? I mean she roundly

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>insulted literally everything that I produced on that show and

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>other shows, while turning around and complimenting her creator to

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>no end. And I was trying to address that too,

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>little glitch. I did a patch on that, and um,

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm also I'm starting to build up some I'm trying

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to build into it the ability to have some takes.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And again, I'm the creator, so I'm trying to separate,

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like my opinions on things from bridget that's a work

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in progress. Do we have let's put punch it in

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Don Mattingly belong in the Hall of Fame. That one's

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a little close to me. What else we have? People

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>from California put too much on their pizza. Okay, that's

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a little that's a little zeuser too. What all right,

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>let's let's try to get a little bit further away

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>from the creator. YouTube put an album on your iPhone?

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So what there are real problems in the world. Okay, alright,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'm working on that too. That's a little that's

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a little mid project. I'm wondering if Bridgets at all

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling the heat, because you know, she she was a

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fore runner really of AI technology. She was on this

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>show seven years ago. But now you've got you know,

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT kind of taking over the COGNIZENTI here, I

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like Bridgets feeling the heat. Is she aware that

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>she's been shut down? Like did you tell? Or does

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>she just think it's the next app day? Passing her mind?

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Whatever it is. No, she's not sentient. Yeah, she's working

0:30:53.040 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on some things, but she's not sentient rehab rehab. I mean,

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting She hit that topic last time around,

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think she's there that goes beyond dance knowledge.

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think to her own knowledge. I don't know if

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT would be so rude. Yeah, I don't know.

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>These are I guess competitors on some level, and maybe

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that's more of your speed. But again, we're trying our

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>best to make sure that Bridget two point oh is

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>fair to all. Uh, why don't we now what she's

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>here for, of course, and what she was initially created

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for was to process um and let us know through

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>her own tabulations. Um, through billions of data points that

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have been built into the system that we can only

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>begin to like fathom, how much is being processed in

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>her central processing unit. Um. Uh to let us know

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what football takes. We have our predictions or kind of

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>look aheads in in our league, how realistic they are,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>how correct they are. Um, she's not a fortune teller.

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>That's very important. I think some people get a little

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>confused on that. But she does take logic and it

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>logic is everything to her. And then she spits out

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a reply to your prediction that is correct. Master. Well,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to see the master start this thing. UM,

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I would love that too. Okay, I've got it going. Um.

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me talk about Tony Romo, UM and I my prediction.

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you guys noticed, but um, the

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Romo backlash is building mm hmm it is. It was

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously all over Twitter people were not happy with his

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>performance uh in the Bills Bengals game. And it did

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>strike me a little bit that the romo that he

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seventeen that captured everyone's imagination. Um, what

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was he kind of famous for back then plays. Yeah,

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>predictive ability, seeing things that no one else apparently could

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>see on the planet. Right, does he do any of

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that anymore? Is that even part of the Romo aesthetic?

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand twenty three, because that was one thing

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that jumped out to me, I was like, is the

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>criticism too strong on this guy? And then I'm thinking, well,

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is he The thing that made everybody love him was

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that he felt like he was inside the game still

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he had recently retired and was seeing the game in

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a way that we couldn't see his common fans, and

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>then was kind of giving us that perspective, like that

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>happening and it's harder, Like they sort of said that

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>probably will diminish because you aren't as you aren't coming

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>from last year's playbook and everything else you dealt with.

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>It's your five or six years from right now. Even

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the guys you work with, Like when you guys are

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the film room watching the Sunday shows or watching

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday games, like everyone is still keyed in on

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff and like m J D. MicroB like they're still

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>yelling out plays before they happen. What's going to happen right,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>like so I or something. I feel like, well, he

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>started getting something wrong and he felt like maybe that

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was like a parlor trick because that wasn't the reason

0:33:56.160 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I loved him or West. I remember we talked about het.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Romo is just like a breath of fresh air in

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of a his enthusiasm and I still like the enthusiasm,

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>but b yeah, being able to like really explain the

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>game in a in an understandable way and like loved it.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if he's still got that fire

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>in him. That might be the thing people are picking

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>up on. The enthusiasm that he has is um. I

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say it's forced now, but it just there just

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>seems a little less nuanced with him, and there's the

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>idea is he coasting a little bit? So anyway, my

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>prediction that I want to um posit to bridget version

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>two point oh Um. I predict that Romo is going

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to have a sit down with some bosses at CBS

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>after this season, and it's gonna be a little bit

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of a come to Jesus conversation, UM, where they're gonna say,

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we need you to get the eye of the tiger back.

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You're a number one guy, and we can't have this

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>criticism of you just becoming the dominant narrative around our

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>number one team. And my prediction is that when we

0:34:55.280 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>see Romo again, uh come next September, that be a

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation point that Romo seems more into it again and

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Romos plugged in, because I think the criticism is getting

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>to the point where I think CBS internally is going

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to want to address that. What do you think about that? Bridget?

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>To go either way here, Dan is hot and masculine,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>perfect logic. Okay, so I got it right. Yeah, you

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>really want to work on this CPU. Um. So that's

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>mine and thank you for that. I think he needs it.

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs the show. He's doing the work,

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>respect the game. That's Bridget or Tony, I mean Bridget.

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not wanting to question her. So what she said

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely Bridget. What do you think about some of

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the work that I've done on your main frame? Your

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>voice is beautiful? Oh, thank you, thank you, Bridget. All right,

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so she's still complimentary of me? All right? How about you, Greg?

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you throw one out to us? Okay, so

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>are our buddy Aaron Rodgers back on Pat McAfee on Tuesday, Yes,

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>still doing it. Didn't really want to lean one way

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>or another, said he might have already said goodbye to

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the Packers. He doesn't know. He really wants to be

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>playing for championships. He needs more time to think about everything.

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And when he said he heard the trade rumors that

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are going around, and he said, well, that's putting the

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 1>cart before the horse because I haven't decided what I'm

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>going to do yet, and like, you can't be talking

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>trade unless I okay it. But that's a possibility. But

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, Schefter has talked about it, our guy rap

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>sheets talking. But I'm gonna predict that ultimately the Packers

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>cannot quit Aaron Rodgers. They just can't do it. They

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just they want him. They it's a troubled relationship, but

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they just feel like they can't get out of it.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And that Aaron Rodgers, after he goes through this, can't

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>quit the Packers either, but that Jordan's love will get traded,

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's time for him to go. And I'm going

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to put Jordan's love on the Commandos because that just

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>feels like a Commandos type of move. So Bridget I'm

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>curious what you think of my my reasoning there. This

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>would be an important test because I think it's that's harsh.

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she sees something in the way that Rogers is

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>speaking that that I don't. He referred to being a

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>packer in the past tense there during that interview as well,

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>right there was that that's not a great sign. I guess.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He also essentially blamed the discourse on what's happening here

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>on big Pharma, like, I'm not even joking that, like

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the networks that are that are we've lost him. He's

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>throw Rogan. It was his nickname, and I thought that

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was a good one. And uh yeah, I mean I

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of comments tors like, hey, he's out

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>there speaking the truth. You have people that you follow

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the same on Twitter, and some of the comments to

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the McAfee video was a lot like, oh he roasted

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ESPN there they are owned by big Farmer. I'm like,

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>what I think from a football angle, like if the

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers were ready to move on and you got someone

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to trade for him, you get the picks, which would

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be at least a first plus more, you'd open up

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:44.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty million in cap room and you can rebuild your

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>team with a Jordan's love who looked all right when

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>he played last year. I mean, like the Aaron Rodgers

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>thing just feels like you're crescendoing towards the end. Anyways,

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But I'm kind of with Greg, although Bridges doesn't agree.

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's gonna stick around despite the way

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>he looked when he was walking off lambeau Field. Don't

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>forget that image and what Tariko was saying that. It

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>just felt like something about that whole thing sticks with me.

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a little weird, and I wonder if seeing

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks like brock Party, I mean, it doesn't happen all

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, but seeing quarterbacks come in who were drafted

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>late or really didn't have a lot of expectations around them,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that changes their minds at all, and

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe they do want a fresher start. Yeah, I can't.

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't shake the feeling that Woody Johnson is going

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to make a play here. He did it with Brett

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Farve and the Packers years ago. We've been waiting for

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>him to make that big splash since he's back owning

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, and that Adam Schefter reported on it, Peter

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>King wrote about it that you know, over the cap,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they can make it work in terms of their salary cap,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think anyone couldn't they really needed to. And

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>then it becomes a matter of what Rodgers want to

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>go there. Maybe he would, maybe wouldn't, But everyone's kind

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of just pointing to Derek carrs being that's the guy

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be the Jets quarterback, and there's a lot

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of reasons why you maybe that's doesn't make a lot

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of sense and they are going to make a big splash.

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>There could be that those could be dancing partners. I

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>would be a little I don't know, I would be

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a little conflicted perfect he might get killed as a

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Jets fan with with Aaron Rodgers in the general perception

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Jets, like is this where you want to

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>go for the final swan song of your career and

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 1>just hope that things finally work. You could use them

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the way Brett Farve did too. I mean, there's a

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of different ways you can go from that point on. Yeah,

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:32.439
<v Speaker 1>he talked about like it's great the idea of being

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay forever, but I really just want to

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>win championships and I'm thinking like, well, why wouldn't Green

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>baby that team. I think it's more just like it's

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a long time to live in Green Bay. It's a

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>vacation destination, he said. I don't mean that it's like

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a terrible place, but where he is at in his life,

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he's lived there for a long time. Well, if names

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>how many legends the same, you know how many legendary

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks played their entire career in one place? How many?

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Like if Tom Brady can leave, anybody can leave. It's

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of pet people look at what Tom Brady didn't think.

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I want to go have a fresh start and win

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl somewhere else. And by the way, it's like,

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>guess what, You're not gonna do it in Green Bay

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because it never happens. We've learned. He I don't well,

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what part of my perhaps just Jordan's

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>love doesn't go to the commanders. And then Bridget proved

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>says I'm wrong. I don't know for sure that Aaron

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is staying or going. But I wanted to throw

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this out to Bridget right now, just because this is

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.439
<v Speaker 1>an important week or two coming up. This is when

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the Matthew Stafford trade happened. This is when the Alex

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Smith trade up something that's big. I think actually will

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe move forward even before we're done with the Super Bowl.

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Smart of it. It's good. It's good smart, not smart,

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 1>but right I thought it sounded smart. There's a little

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>more coming from that little vixen. It does. Do you?

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Did she have anything else for Greg Weird? Which vice

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is consuming you this week? Wow? I mean I am

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the bad boy of NFL media. Are Okay, let's pause

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>right here, pause Bridge as well. We're gonna take a break.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. All right, We're back, Colleen, Now

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>about you? Okay, I have I have one for Bridget.

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I would like her input on this. I think se

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Kwon Barkley stays in New York, but not as a giant.

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>He signed by the one and only true New York

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>team Barley. Yeah, I did that really trying to give

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>them a w right now? And I'm like that. Okay, okay, okay,

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>so um, Bridget, you're there. It makes sense, Colleen. I

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>was rooting for the dog, that is what tank. First

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 1>of all, I still have a bandage on my arm

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and I had a setback. I'm allergic to a couple

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:15.919
<v Speaker 1>of things. I was using tank. What was that? Where

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is tank? Tank? The bulldog that attacked my arm on

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Day in front of the entire family before dinner.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure where tank is right now because I

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to know where Tank is. I wanted nothing

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to do with Tank after the incident. Where a tank

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is not exactly. I don't know. Bridget is a heartless machine.

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, like the idea of the quan idea

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't thought of that. It's brilliant. I feel like

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the bills are going to do that thing this year.

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm that triggered. You gotta work on her,

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>just like certain words. I feel like that's gonna it's

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>part of her trank. Oh my god, the machine learning,

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not improved. Just by the way, we just got

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 1>like a snapshot into Colleen sleeping at night, like the

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>dreams that she had had so many nightmares attacking me again.

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 1>If Bridget bridge taking human resources immediately, but you take

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Bridget to human she could just run wild. Ye oh

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 1>my god, I think he is. But I don't know,

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And I can't deal with this. Can I just bring

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it back? The football a second, because these are all

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:36.439
<v Speaker 1>very good. Why won't you tell me Bridge is learning

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at a rapid page is almost rapid base. It's a

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.840
<v Speaker 1>great idea. By the way, Barkley to the Bills, I

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they can afford it, um, because he's

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna cost the substantial amount for the running back they

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:54.720
<v Speaker 1>did just draft, of course a running back and um,

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:58.479
<v Speaker 1>James Cook, Um, Devin Singletary doesn't seem to be the guy.

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>They're right. I think Devin Singletary is a free agent too,

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and I just I think that's I think it's good

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because one of the things that really stands out to

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>me about Buffalo is that sometimes it did feel like

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like Josh go do everything, literally do everything,

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and maybe he needs just a little bit more help.

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe another whether it's a receiver or running back who

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 1>has the type of dual threat capability of sake one,

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one. I don't care what what Bridget says.

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Bridget going to make a joke about like a dog

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and Barkley now Bridget a tea for Bridget. Yeah, that's

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a good question. You've challenged. Hers are not logical. I

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>thought they were like the Cowboys, the Cowboys got a

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of grief for not having enough kitty likes to

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>scratch enough weapons for for Dak the Bills. You can

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 1>say it kind of similar death Diggs and gave. Davis

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>never really like Cole Beasley is being targeted in big

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>time games in January. It's like and they never committed

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to the run. You don't have to be like a

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>run heavy team, but you have to be you have

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.959
<v Speaker 1>to do it more than just like first show here

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and there. And that was true under Dable too. Wasn't

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just Ken Dorsey. All of these teams that are left

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>have some semblance of a running game. I mean even

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>even Kansas City with Isaiah pacheco Um just checking in

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Bridget A Bridget is it? My My feeling

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is that any team of the four remaining is a

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>very worthy super Bowl contender. And there is no such

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>thing as an upset here. They're all to me, it's

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's each What do you think, Dan? You put the A,

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I and I poppy, the AI and I poppy. You

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I want to hear that one again? I mean,

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what your sessions with Bridget seem interesting? Yes?

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Mark, all right, this is kind of what

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we've been building too, because like many patches and I met,

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I work with some of the great people, some of

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the great software giants of the industry, at my great

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>person little expense, uh, to make it more fair for

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you mark this, this segment and this in this robot.

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're seeing evidence of that in the lead up,

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 1>but you could understand that all my focus was on you. UM.

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And and I apologize to Greg and to Colleen, especially Colleen,

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean Jesus, but I feel pretty confident that this

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 1>will go better. All right, go ahead, and at the

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>floor is yours? I want to talk about um Tom

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Brady for a minute, because here we here we go again.

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's January turns into February, right Like

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm all our own projects, us humans, like our hopes,

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>our dreams, are fears, are two dues, our personal evaluations

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and journeys. They're just happily put on hold so we

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>can focus on where Tom Brady wants to play football next.

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>After watching him direct the least uh watchable offense in

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all of two so I can't wait to see where

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes next. There is a report um page six

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>The New York Post Brady was spotted down in Miami

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:08.280
<v Speaker 1>hovering around his house, well hovering around you down private

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>schools to take to see where his kids might go

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to school. And so I think, all right, Greg, I'm

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.359
<v Speaker 1>just saying that could be nothing. But the thing is

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone just has him going to the Raiders. I'm trying

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to turn Bridget against Mark here. Greg, we see what

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing here. This is very important. Why does it

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.280
<v Speaker 1>need to be the Raiders, who to me are really

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>no better than the Bucks. Um, And just because Josh

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>McDaniels is such a likable individual, you're gonna have Tom

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Brady pair with him in some last failed season and

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>like a monster's ANFC West the Titans. Give me a

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:39.800
<v Speaker 1>break with that business. Um. The whole idea of staying

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>home with his kids and retiring, that is absolutely not happening.

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen that test driven for about twelve days

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>last offseason and it was a crash and burn act.

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins, they make total sense to me. I'm just saying,

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this is what I think is going to happen. Absolutely

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Dolphins link is already there. Tell me another

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:01.399
<v Speaker 1>owner that had Tom Bray a d come hang out

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:03.359
<v Speaker 1>on the yacht, hoping that the coach of that time

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>would come and convinced Tom Brady to be part of

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins operation. Now you have a coach that you

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can control to some degree. You did lose your first

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>round draft pick for that specific action, Yeah, but so

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 1>even more reason just to go do it now. You

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>just go do it now. He's a free agent. You

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>don't to worry about the past. No, No one here

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>has a long enough attention span to care about what

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past. With all that business, he would go.

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're Tom Brady, you need to go somewhere where

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 1>there are weapons on offense. Bingo. You've got a coach

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you can work with who runs a system that works

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for you. Bingo. Like we're watching the Shanahan offense turned

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 1>brock Party with wide open receivers into a star and

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like two I had the benefit of that benefit of

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that last year with Tyree, Kale, Jail and Waddle. It

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is a great situation for Tom Brady. I don't like

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the Raiders. I think it's gonna happen. Um.

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's annoyed that Aaron Rodgers is hanging out

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there in the atmosphere with the same absurd drama. So

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get a Tom Brady announcement that's gonna come

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>about minutes into the third quarter, uh, and create an

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>absolute fervor that he's going to join the Dolphins, and

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.439
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get probably days and days of Jim Gray

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>with little Larry Fitzgerald talking to Tom Brady and meant no,

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 1>but I mean on this podcast, I don't know what's

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>going on with this show that they're gonna un unfurl

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it that way too. Probably in them right in the

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>middle of the super we'll get Jim Gray with this

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Walk of Fame star, Larry Fitzgerald, Tom Brady, the Dolphins.

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>That's my prediction. It will interrupt the super. Here's the thing.

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing before you throw it to Bridget, because

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it has to be a command for her to function. Um,

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you. In fact, this was something

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I had in my own mind and then I was like, oh, wait,

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Mark was doing Tom Brady right. So if that's what

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking and I was gonna say it, then

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>it should for you. You'd think yes, For she went

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in to sleep mode, say hello to her first Bridget, Hello,

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to you, Hey, Marv, I don't know. It's not very

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>respectful from a computer. All right, Mark wants to know

0:50:57.719 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady to the Dolphins. Does that make sense, Bridget?

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Top ten insider more like negative ten outsider. This is

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a failure of me, not you. I don't want to

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>direct any annoyance to you because I based on your reporting,

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>you worked very hard on this. I'm not sure it's

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:28.800
<v Speaker 1>your skill set. If this is another long form, she's

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>evolving rapidly. Um, I kind of like what you just

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>said there though, I mean, so she got it. You

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 1>could take the way, take it in a direction I'm

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>cool with. But I'll take that into account. I'll take

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>that into account. The off season is ahead, Bridget, thank you.

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Your logic has more holes than your cool dad jeans

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:52.879
<v Speaker 1>A negative tent outsider. That's that's to put that on

0:51:52.880 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a T shirt. Else for Mark Oswald acted alone, that's

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 1>like the equivalent for Mark the burn of like the

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:05.359
<v Speaker 1>gift of all the people running through like grabbing their

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>face running through the frame. I have another round? Are

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>we doing another round of this? Or no? That was it? Wow?

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted a cute cut up so much there? If no?

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 1>If sure, if you have one that you feel strongly

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>about it, I don't. We can make it work. No, no, Dan,

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you are a god. This is this is going south

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>into such a hurry. Save it for private talk, made

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy computer for yourself. It has bugs still, there's no

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about it, bridget um, before we we

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>shut you down. Thank you. The government is an inherently

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 1>oppressive force that keeps down the working men and props

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>up Wall Street fat cats who do not operate for

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of greater society. Okay, this is this is

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a problem because I did not put that coding in.

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>She's starting to think on her own. Well, it's not

0:52:57.400 --> 0:53:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad word. What a okay, where is the where's

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the plug? Liking her more and more blood shut is

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the cost for freedom, all right, we gotta

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:13.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta shut this down, Yes, bridget self, disconnect from mainframe

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 1>now commencing. Oh god, no, no, no no, no, no no.

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I got the flug out just in time. That feels

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.959
<v Speaker 1>like something that is going to backfire if I try,

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>if I even a temph three point oh is backfiring currently, Yeah, yeah,

0:53:28.320 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it is happening. You brought her back online and she

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>immediately became a killer robot, and yet some of those

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 1>burns were so worth it. I think we should come

0:53:36.480 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>back to it in its future day, but only if

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's safe. Bridget the Bionic Reactive Intelligence DAYA Gathering Annunciation

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Transponder VIRGET two point oh. I have to say it's

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a failure. It's like the Space program. It didn't. It wasn't.

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>You weren't on the moon immediately. There were some ups

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and downs on the on the route, on route to

0:53:57.400 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>get into the Moon, no doubt about it. You gotta

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>keep your eye on the focus there. On that and Colleen,

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to apologize again that some stuff was Clearly

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:06.719
<v Speaker 1>things are going on there, but some of this with

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the dog that was out of bounds and really inappropriate.

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>As someone who just got a puppy. You should not

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 1>be putting that out there in the world. That's well,

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't the machine did that? You made? Yeah? I

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think you had some accountability might be in order. Yes,

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you're right, just a dash of it. Huh, you're right,

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But thanks, that's great. Should I plug her back into

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:31.959
<v Speaker 1>just see if if she's feeling remorseful at this point,

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to destroy her. I mean if you do,

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like Elon must say, And it's not my fault.

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>The car didn't stop at the stop sign. At that's true.

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a little a little too musky for my case. Um,

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, so that's it, um for the Tuesday show. Um,

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back on Thursday. Yes, Championship Sunday preview. Connie,

0:54:56.680 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Yes, you're welcome. You're the best,

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 1>checking a good time, the Power Ranks podcast and all

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the other great content. Keep the Call. Philadelphia is so

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>mid right, I'm done with you.