WEBVTT - Juul Settles and YouTube Reins Over the Creator Economy

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay and this is Bloomberg Technology coming up in

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the next hour. Jewel ordered to pay almost four hundred

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>forty million dollars to settle a probe over the e

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>cigarette makers marketing to teens, but the company still faces

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of lawsuits plus the rise of the creator economy.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take a deep dive into this booming industry

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and how YouTube in particular reign supreme as platform of choice,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but TikTok is catching up and it's back. The NFL

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>season starts this Thursday, which means more sports betting on

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sites like Draft Kings. Our conversation issue with CEO Jason

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Robbins on what to expect as we kick off this

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>week's sports tech series. Meantime, Jewel Labs, as ed said,

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>agreeing to pay four thirty eight point five million dollars

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to thirty three states. This resolves a two year bipartisan

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>pro into the East Grant Makers manufacturing and sales practices

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the States, claiming that it marketed addictive nicotine products to children.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloom Works Eric Larson joining us now to discuss, So

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Eric tell us how significant this settlement is today. It's

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a very significant settlement. It's certainly the largest that Jewel

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has had to pay to date involving any individual states.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the last year or so, the company

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>had settled a few state lawsuits by Washington State in

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.279
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina and really had all this huge investigation hanging

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>over it in the meantime, So clearly they decided to

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>be done with this particular risk. Although clearly there's a

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of lawsuits still pending out there, but this definitely

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>does away with a lot of the lawsuits that could

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have been filed by these thirty three states and Puerto Rico. So,

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, how much does this resolve these, you know,

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of other lawsuits essentially, how much of Jewels legal

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>troubles go away as a result of this. Well, it

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely significant that these states have settled, but there are

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>still over two thousand, five hundred civil lawsuits like personal

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>injury lawsuits that have been filed by individuals, and also

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>dozens of cases filed by state governments and school districts.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in November, the San Francisco School District we'll

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>go to trial in the first of these cases to

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>go to trial, which could really show the potential for

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>how jury might react to the evidence once it is presented.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, that's another one that potentially we could see

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>a settlement before it hits trial. But there are over

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>suits out there, plus several states that are including New

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>York and California by the way, which normally are you know,

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have the potential for big settlements or damages. They have

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits penning again Stool that are still pending. All right,

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloom Exeric Laws and thank you for that update. Will

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch how those civil suits evolved. Let's take

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a pulse of the VC market and declining market conditions

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>as fears continue about a hawk ish FED, and talk

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about what is the future of venture capital after the

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>growth at all costs mantra of the last couple of years.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to Sheila Patel get her insight

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on this. She's the vice chair and general partner at

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Capital Group. Sheila, thank you so much for joining us. So, Karius,

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just what is your reaction of, you know, to a

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>continuing hawkers fed. Obviously we're getting mixed economic data. Uh,

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, some that looks better than others. But what

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for your world and you're investing investing strategy. Look,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think venture capital has been in an amazing run

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for the last decade, and it was inevitable that we'd

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>come to more difficult time. Uh. That said, looking at

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the environment we're in today, looking at everything you mentioned

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that fed the geopolitical environment, I actually think it's a

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>great time, just as it's been in the past when

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you've gone through vintages or cycles that are difficult in

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>private equity in other segments of the market. To really

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>look at BC today and the technological innovations that are

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>driving uh, future innovation and really future productivity. So to

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>my mind, the pullback is actually necessary and a good

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>thing for shaking out where we need to be in BC.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So where are we in VC? Talk to us about

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>trends are seeing in the private markets? Are valuations still

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>too high? Are there more valuations that are gonna come down? Look,

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I think as you're seeing in the latest rounds UM,

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing founders realizing they need to do larger deals,

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>more capital at reasonable valuations. People need cash runaway. That's

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to be expected. Uh, it's also is able to expect

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll start to see an increasing amount of M and A.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think many of the reports we're seeing, whether

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>from City Group or works UH that are friends are

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>at BCG with whom we have a strategic partnership have

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>done UH suggests that you'll see more M and A,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the software UH space, and particularly in the

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>areas like the back office. So I do think there's

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>room for some valuations to move, but I also think

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there's room for some incredible innovation to come, even in

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>areas that have seen the most difficult you know. I

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>think crypto is a great example of that, where there

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting future ahead after this latest downturn. The

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>question is just how long is this downturn gonna last.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've had guests on the show who are

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>predicting millions of layoffs in tech and that this is

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna last two to three years. Does that drive with

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>your thinking? Look, I think that's entirely possible. I'm probably

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit more optimistic than that, mainly because I see

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>some positive trends UH in what's going on as well.

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>For example, a recent serve very done by City suggested

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that CFOs and c h R o s. So in

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the financial space and the HR space within corporate aren't

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>pulling back on areas like software spending. A lot of

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>what we focus on it be capital or core areas

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>like enterprise, and these are areas where companies can find efficiencies.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>At the same time they're going through more difficult economic circumstances.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So in many cases, for certain segments within technology, recessionary

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>environment or at least even a difficult environment is not

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the worst environment to the business. Meantime, you're investing

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in companies that are, you know, taking on big tech,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>are trying to challenge big tech do things better than

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.679
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies do. We've been following this big piece

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of legislation that's been working its way through Congress to

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.679
<v Speaker 1>rain in big tech, but that's a chance it won't

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>make it before the mid terms. What do you think

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the impact of this legislation could be and what's the

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>impact if it doesn't happen before November ace. Look, I

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>think around the world, the technology industry has proven itself

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to be incredibly adaptable, and this is not the first

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>time or the first region or country to take on

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>issues within big tech. We've actually seen it where I

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>lived for many years UH in Europe, and you've seen

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>UH the tech industry continue to adapt, and I think

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>many within the tech industry are eager to adapt right.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Technology sometimes moves faster than human capacity to handle it.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So to my mind, UM, whether the regulation happens before

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>or after the midterms, some amount of regulation to big

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tech is coming, and I think everyone's accepted that everybody's

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ready for that. The real issue is UM making sure

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's addressing the right things and really solving the

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>right problems that people have concerns with. So what's your

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>advice to your portfolio companies right now? You know, potentially

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>or in a prolonged economic downturn, there's a lot of uncertainty.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I had. You know, we're moving of an era where

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, a lots of money flooding in.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>But now you know, investors want to see real numbers.

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh look, I think I think, UM, it's a real

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>chance to go back to their knitting. And I think

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this is where you really see UH, particularly as we

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>look at portfolio companies, the best in the management side

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>come to the four founders that think about things for

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the long term, founders that have a sense of their

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>use of cash, their burn rates um and really maintaining

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.479
<v Speaker 1>their runaway but also have a sense of the competition

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and realize that they're in a moment right now or

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the competitors are facing more difficult times. They

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>need to be aggressive. They need to think about ways

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to push themselves, their business, their product schoolward as solutions

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in a difficult environment. And I think you see many

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of the best founders and innovators able to put that

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>hat on. Put the hat on that says my idea

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>is the best idea I've put it together, is is

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one my competition is showing the signs of weakness or

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the challenges of the way they've managed their business. And

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>so this is when it's my time to shine. So

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>where are you placing your bets in terms of where

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you think we're gonna be this time next year. I

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>think this time next year hopefully, uh, we look at

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it as a more stable time. I think what we've

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>said repeatedly from our perspective is we invest over many boarders.

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 1>We we don't raise a fun and think let's all

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>get it put to work right away. So I think

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.599
<v Speaker 1>you'll still see us slow and steady investing in a

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>year from now. I think what we've very focused again

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on the areas where we see opportunities, so enterprise UM.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Thinking about the evolution of crypto. My colleagues Matt Levinson

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan Savelle just wrote a great piece UM about

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>where does crypto go from here and where crypto and

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>fintech merge. And to this moment, most of what's gone

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>on in crypto has really been driven in many cases

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>vice speculators. But where do the real world applications come

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in as you think about emerging markets, as you think

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>about removing middleman, which you've already seen blockchain do in

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in a place as unlikely as India, in getting money

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to rural areas and so on. So I think we

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>really still are thinking about where do the ideas of

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>today that may not have been applied well get applied

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in real world situations tomorrow. You know, I'd take climate

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>check is another curiate area for us that we see

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>will be important of the next several years. All right,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Sheila Patel b Capital Group Vice Chair and general partner.

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Sheila for sharing your thoughts with us. Meantime,

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Theoronis founder Elizabeth Holmes claims a key witness in her

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>criminal case visited her after the verdict and express remorse

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>about his testimony. Homes alleges that a former Theories Lab

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>director showed up at her home and said his testimony

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>had been twisted by prosecutors. She's now asking for a

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>new trial after they allegations. This just weeks before Holmes

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is scheduled to be sentenced. Coming up, the creator economy

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is booming. How this new industry is changing the face

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of entertainment and continuing to grow. We'll talk about that next.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg taking a deep dive now on the

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>creator economy, which has experienced a massive boom over the

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>last several years, along with a slew of platforms like Spotify, Instagram,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok and the rule of them all of course YouTube.

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>To give you an idea, every minute at least at

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>least five hours of footage or uploading to YouTube. Let's

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>break this all down with Roberto Blake, a content creator

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>who also has his own coaching program that helps influencers

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>build their online brands, and our very own Mark Bergen,

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>who is out with a new book today called Light

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Comments Subscribe. Inside YouTube's chaotic rise to World Domination. You

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>can buy it now. Mark and Roberto, thank you so

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Mark, I'm gonna start with you.

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you just start by giving us a sense of

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>how big the creator economy is today and just how

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>much it has grown on all of these different platforms

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last several years. Yeah, there are estimates out

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there that it's about a hundred billion, which is from

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>zero to to to sixty within maybe the past fifteen years. Really, uh,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in the past five years. I think that's

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just exploded as all these platforms have got involved. You

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>know that that mind boggling stat about fifty hours uploaded.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The other major stat is that there are now over

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>two million craters in YouTube's partner program, which is actually

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a smaller number than it was before. If if people

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in the audience remember that YouTube actually cut that number

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's but they're on ten. But it's been gradually

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>moving it up, and particularly as they're facing new competition

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>from TikTok. Roberto, you're a graphic designer and a free

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in term before becoming a YouTube content creator. Why don't

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you make this big job change and give us a

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>sense of a day in your life. I mean, that's

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a great question, Emily. For me, a lot of it

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the things that are obvious for people.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Is you want more time freedom, You want to be

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>able to talk about and do things you're very passionate about.

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You want to feel a sense of ownership over the

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>things you're doing. So when you work in uh, you know,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for other people, whether it's as a freelancer or if

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>you work at an ad agency something I used to do, UH,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it's great. It's very gratifying, it's very fulfilling, and it's

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>very legitimate in the eyes of your relatives. But when

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you get to do something of your own and have

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>complete ownership of it, get to build it with your

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>own two hands, you feel directly supported by a community

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>of like minding people. There's nothing like it, nothing in

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the world like it, And so I think that's what

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.599
<v Speaker 1>attracts a lot of people to the creator economy and

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunities like YouTube, podcasting and live streaming. Why are you

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>focus on YouTube in particular and not tick to or Instagram. Well,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been with YouTube almost since the very beginning, and

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is still the most powerful search engine in the

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>world across all ages and all of demographics, and YouTube

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 1>has a sense of permanence with its content. YouTube is

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>also the best monetization opportunity for content creators, as over

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>eight in platform monetization streams, I teach content creators UH

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:29.479
<v Speaker 1>roughly fifteen different ways they can monetize, primarily using YouTube specifically,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but I also do understand and value other platforms have

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a presence in other platforms as well. But I feel

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that even with the rapid rise of TikTok, I feel

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing like the permanence and longevity that YouTube

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>content create content creation has, And if you talk to

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>TikTokers on a regular basis, which I generally do, you'll

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>find that a lot of them have the intention of

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>pivoting and moving to YouTube at some point in their

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>career because they do want a sense of stability and permanence,

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and they also want the potential for evergreen content to

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>benefit them and be monetize able in the future. They

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>know right now with the TikTok Creator Fund, that while

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they're getting something in exchange for their content, they know

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they're disproportionately underpaid for the attention when compared to traditional

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>content on YouTube, as well as in the live streaming

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>community and within YouTube live stream and podcasting, their air

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>higher opportunities in terms of direct compensation when it comes

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to sponsored content and brand deals, and it's not even close.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So so for me, that's probably one of the bigger deals,

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>not even close. Uh is in one way to put

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it mark you know, we've talked so much about the

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>threat of TikTok to YouTube, but to Rebner's point, it

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of disconnected content and it is less permanent.

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>How big a threat is TikTok really in your view

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube and how is it How is YouTube addressing

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the threat internally? Yeah, I think it's a viable threat,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and certainly more so than you know, Instagram, Facebook have

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>tried multiple times to really build out a creator economy

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and thus far I failed. What TikTok and bite dnsiteds

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to do is to demonstrate, you know, Google has a

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>remarkable system, as roberta pointed out book both for Search

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>uh and for Modernization, in the world's biggest digital advertising company,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's had this machinery in place for for years.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok clearly has a lot of political problems, um and

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they haven't really got a proven yet that they can

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>be a threat to YouTube at at large scale. So

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube's response so far is to is shorts. This is

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>their their feature that's sort of short video. They're driving

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pushing a lot of viewers. They're encouraging

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>creators to go there. They're about to flip the switch

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on modernization. You know, it's unclear how productive productive that

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>will be for the company and how they're going to

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sort out modernization. But if there's a lot you know,

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>if history shows is anything that is that YouTube has

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong track record of sort this out, and

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think responding to the to the threat from of

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok in a really significant way. Reward are you're the

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>founder of Awesome Creator Academy, which is a coaching program

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that helps influencers build their brands online. With some fun

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>watching your videos earlier today, what trends are you saying?

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 1>What are you telling creators today advice that that might

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>not be obvious. I think the thing that's not obvious

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to most content creators is their potential, their overall potential

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to their earnings, and the fact that

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>there is a compounding effect from their content over a

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>period of time. So what a lot of creators don't

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>do is they rely so much on platform modetization, whether

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's TikTok and their creator fund or YouTube and their

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>ad Sense partner program and things like that, that they

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>don't explore other monetization opportunities, and they don't think of

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing as what I refer to as content

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>as a service. So that's one thing it's not obvious

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to them is that it's very much almost like software

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>as a service, which most of us are familiar with.

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>We have these wonderful subscription programs everywhere now that we're

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>all paying for well. Content creators have an opportunity to

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>use content as a services leveraged not just with ad revenue,

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>creator funds and sponsored content brand deals, but they can

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>build their own communities around things like their one hundred

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.479
<v Speaker 1>or one thousand truest fans, and they could have monthly

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>membership programs of their own, whether on platform or off platform.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>They need to look at things that give them recurring

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>revenue outside of the platform, and telling more creators to

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>look into opportunities to build their own products, build their

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>own merchandise. YouTube recently partnered which Shopify, and they also

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>expanded their creator monetization program with regard to merch and

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>even physical and digital products. Used to have a ten

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand subscriber their it's it's so fascinating, We're gonna have

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to log onto you tube and watch your videos to

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>find out the rest. But appridging joining us and of

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>course pleased by marks book. Welcome back to one Work

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Technology and I'm win Chang in pal Alto. I want

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to get back to a check on the markets and

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>shares of so called meme stocks on moon Works at

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Ludlow back with an update. Yeah, and one name in particular,

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which is bed Bath and beyond that stock falling for

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a fifth straight day, it's worse run since July. It

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>follows news over the weekend that the company's CFO, Gus

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>star Are Now died on Friday after falling from a

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>skyscraper in Manhattan, the company saying that they have appointed

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>an interim CFO. You see that decline more than eighteen percent.

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Reminded that this is a stock that in the month

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of August surged by zero percent. Caught up in the

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>meme stock frenzy where retail investors discussed this other stocks

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on forums online, such as Reddit. That decline being elt

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in the market. You see other so called meat stocks

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>like game Stop down eight percent. AMC Entertainment also down,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but the activity around this area is really dropped off.

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>If we use cool volumes as a proxy, we've seen

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the fewest CAOL trades in this space, particularly for names

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>like game Stop, since nowhere near the frenzy that we

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>saw in early one. Who is interesting to see some

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>reporting on the Bloomberg terminal while I was away about

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea that when we got to return to school

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>also meaning a return to college, that we might see

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the frenzy in meme stocks pick back up. Because a

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the traders that are doing this are young.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>They're discussing this online in their spare time. That hasn't

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really been the case. We've seen that sort of negative

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sentiment around Meme stocks continue, with bed Bath and Beyond

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>being the exception in the month of August. But tragic

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>news of course relating to that that company, and our

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts of course go to us family such tragic news.

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that update. I want to move on

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to the I p O market, now on pace for

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>one of its worst years in decades after an incredible

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of deal activity of course last year in one,

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving many companies with few options as they waiting for

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the market to calm down, joining us Now Equities and

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>founder and chief strategy officer Phil has Let. So, Phil,

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe last time you were on the show, you

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>said the I p O window is totally sailed shut

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and not opening for a very long time. Do you

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>still believe that? Yeah, Well, it must have been a

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>heck of a party at the Pliat burning Man, because

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been incredibly quiet this morning and today with news.

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we normally see kind of a stampeding of

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>ip O news and big funding rounds on the day

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>after Labor Day. Companies really eager to get out there

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and announce something big, and we've seen barely anything. So, um,

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit surprised that, you know, kind of post

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>summer that there's still been a lot of activity. Um,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that we're kind of starting to see that

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe some deals are getting done, but a little bit

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>more discreetly, maybe with a bit more structure. And so

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, the thesis remains the same

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that actually the ip O window is still pretty quiet,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and yet we're hearing that insta cart, for example, is

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>still considering going public this year. Why would a company

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>do this now when conditions are so unfavorable. Sure, I

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>think there's a subset of the private unicorn companies that

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>have such a large brand and such a large cache

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that really the only way to continue elevating awareness and

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>creating a currency to buy smaller companies is really to

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>go public. Um. Insta Cart, I guess continue to raise

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>money in the private markets, but if they really want

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to have extra prominence, uh, they are going to tap

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the public markets. And they've also kind of created a

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>clean path to do so by kind of already knocking

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>down their valuation publicly having a very senior executive team,

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>including the CEO. UM and so I kind of think

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of it's similar to how maybe a company like Ali

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Baba or Facebook, maybe even a tougher environment, still elected

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to go public. So how long do you think the

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I p O window is going to be frozen? Shot,

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>double locked? As you say, you know, what, what is

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the time frame that company should be planning for? Yeah,

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I keep pushing it out more and more. Um, I

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of think of what's happening now is really what

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>happened during the start of COVID, but it's just being

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>stretched over a longer period of time. If your call

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of April May and June of twenty I p

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>O s, we're pretty much at zero, and what we're

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing is almost just kind of a stretching out of that.

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And what you now see is basically a game of

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>chicken between investors and allocators and I p o s

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and companies that are ready to go public. If you're

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a company that is profitable and good stewards of your capital,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you can wait as long as you need to um.

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But if your company that elected to grow at all

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>costs and burn cash, you're going to have to become

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>markets at some point. What I actually think may evolve

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a bit more is that will see some more m

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and a activity both for strategic investors and also from

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>private equity investors that see some opportunities where deals can

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get done with a bit more structure, a little less

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>public scrutiny. So I think we expect that to pick

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>up quite considerably in absence of an I p O

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>market that's active. I wonder how many more valuation cutdowns

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, though I can imagine that You've got a

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of vcs out there sitting on port oil companies

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that have valuations that are just not right for the times. Absolutely,

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>what I think will start happening is more and more

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>deals that are actually happening kind of behind the scenes,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.719
<v Speaker 1>are deals with structure, and what I mean by that

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is that investors are getting much more preferential terms for

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the money that they're putting into companies. I think we

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just saw recently that Joker is planning to raise money

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at just slight valuation bump up from their last round,

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>but it also basically gives a guaranteed return to the

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>new investors. More and more those deals are happening, and

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>here at Equities and we're also hearing of those deals

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>happening as well, and so I think those will continue.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, there's a lot of investors that

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want to see some exit and some some

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>realization of the investments they made. It's becoming very hard

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for ventual capital firms to raise their next fund when

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they can't actually return capital to their limited partners, and

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, creating some very tense board meetings, which

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>again is something we've talked about and kind of harped on,

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>but I think that the factor remains true. All right,

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Phil has Let Equities and founder, chief strategy Officer. A

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>great to have you back, Phil. As always coming up,

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>it has been a hundred eighty da since President Biden

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>signed that Executive Order on digital assets. What does the

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the government think about it? Christin Smith the

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Blockchain Association joins us. Next, this is Bloomberg a slew

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of reports or do this week to the White House

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>stemming from President Joe Biden's Executive Order on digital assets,

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>including one on the future of money payment systems and

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the implications of the Central Bank digital currency. Though these

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>reports likely won't be released to the public till mid September,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what we can expect with Kristin Smith,

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Blockchain Association, along with our crypto

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>contributor Shannali Boss. Thank you both ladies for joining us. So, Christen,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you think we're going to find in these reports? Well,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really interesting. I mean, this is the

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>first time that the federal government has looked at crypto

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>regulation from a comprehensive perspective. You know, as you recall,

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>President Biden issued this executive order back in March. He

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>gave various federal agencies, both financial regulators and some non

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>financial regulators, mandates to look at different issues, to look

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>at some of the concerns we have with the space,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but also some of the benefits that the crypto industry

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.479
<v Speaker 1>and sector could provide, and come up with recommendations about

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what types of regulation are needed going forward. So I

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think that we're going to see a fairly balanced analysis.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see some things around competitiveness and inclusion

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that the industry is going to be very excited about. UM.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think we'll see some um concerns around, you know,

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of the lack of regulation of dollar back stable coins,

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>which is something that has been discussed for a long time,

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the need for some spot market regulation. But overall,

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this should provide a pretty substance have roadmap for policymakers

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>should they choose to accept it as they consider legislation

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>this fall and into now. Block Tin Association has had

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a state at the table with policymakers. How have they

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>been processing this crypto winter and all of the drama. Yeah, well, listen,

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you know there's an understanding that crypto is

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>here to stay right like that wasn't always a concern,

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And even in this market downturn, I think policymakers have

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>even more incentive to try to do something in a space,

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if you look at the beginning of the summer.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>We had the collapse of Tera Luna, We had a

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of bankruptcies, we had sort of the three or

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>was Capital. You know, there were a bunch of events

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that had big impacts on consumers, and instead of pushing

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>away from this space, policymaker said, all right, this is

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>a space where we need to make sure that we

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>fill regulatory gaps. We need to better understand what regulations

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>already exists, We need to figure out what are the

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>options going forward. And so you know, Congress has been

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>um pursuing several different bills this year. We saw the

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>one that's still a brand bill earlier the spring. We've

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>seen the Digital Commodity Exchange Act in the House. We

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>have a new bill in the Senate that attempts to

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>regulate this space. So they've been generating their own ideas

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, the executive order process and

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Congress's effort are going to converge quite nicely. To have

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>just an overall more educated policymaking group that is looking

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>at this in a thoughtful, comprehensive way, in a way

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know, moves the ball forward, but not so

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>rushed that we get the policy wrong. And so I

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're really setting the stage up to get a

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>good bipartisan compromise and and fill those regulatory gaps. What

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about the agencies and regulators themselves, Because even though the

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Executive Order was seen as a really big step for

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the industry, a common critique I get when I'm talking

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to market participants is that it really embolds in each

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the agencies separately, that there's a lot of conflict

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>among them on how they define certain issues. To take

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the sec and the securities issue when you come to

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>coin base in particular, So do you see the agency's

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>consolidating power to one agency or another, and how do

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you believe that Congress may enable that or or concept

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with that? Yeah, well, the Executive Order did require cross

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>agency collaboration on different topics. UM. I do think the

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>core issue out there when it comes regulating the crypto markets,

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>like particularly the bitcoin markets. You know that those that

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>are truly commodities, is that today, neither the SEC or

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the CFTC has jurisdiction in this space. Right What we

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>need is Congress to come in and say, all right,

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we have this commodity spot market. Other commodity spot markets,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like the grain market for example, they don't have any

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>regulating federal regulators. So we need to find a new

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>federal regulator to come in and regulate the spot market.

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I think Congress has a choice. What's interesting

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 1>is that the three major proposals that have been at

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>reduced and Congress so far have all pointed to the

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>CFTC as being the appropriate regulator for the crypto industry,

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.959
<v Speaker 1>probably because they already have regulate regulatory powers over crypto

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>futures um and on fraud and manipulation in the underlying markets.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's probably the place that's going

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to end up. It could also go to the SEC

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as well, but Congress seems to think that they want

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to give this authority to the CFTC. And what does

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it mean for the SEC if more of that moves over,

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>because there's so many things that they were looking at,

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>n f t s, other securities issuances for potentially here

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think the SEC ultimately loses some power over

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>these markets as they've already started on the enforcement path. Yeah. Well,

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I would argue they don't have any authority over um,

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of the pure crypto commodity markets, right,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the SEC has has authority over things that

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are securities, and you can use blockchain based systems to

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>issue you know, equity to organized shares of stock um.

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you have something that's truly a security,

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the SEC is obviously going to have a role to

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>play there. I think the problem has been for innovators

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is that there really is a big gray area there.

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to know when they apply. And what we

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>just need is a framework that addresses these concerns. And

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the stakes today are pretty high from a

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 1>regulars very perspective. Right, If you're deemed a security, you're

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>regulated by the SEC. If you're deemed a commodity, a

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>crypto asset commodity, there's no regulator at all. So I

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think by having a regulator, perhaps the CFTC, to regulate

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto commodities, then there's still going to be consumer protection,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>there's still going to be market surveillance, there's still going

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to be uh, disclosures that help give consumers more information

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and investors more information, and so it won't be such

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a high stakes decision if something is a security or commodity.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think that will help pave the way for

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a more constructive dialogue if Congresses indeed give the c

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>FTC jurisdiction. All right, christ And Smith, executive director of

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the Blockchain Association, always appreciate you joining us and taking

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>us inside these rooms a bit alongside our own shi.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>With NFL season kicking off, we are exploring the intersection

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of sports and technology all week long. Today we're starting

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>with sports betting, now legal in thirty one states with Kansas,

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the most recent to join the field. Draftkins

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and rival FanDuel our position to maintain their leadership of

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>daily fantasy sports, a market that has ballooned to four

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars dollars in terms of annual entroyphees Draftkins predicting

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this football season will be the biggest moment yet for

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>sports bettors. Joining us to discuss CEO Jason Robbins himself, Jason,

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>great to have you back with us. Give us a

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>status update on the numbers and just how much you

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>think NFL kickoff, well pick start and already booming industry. Well,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is our holiday season, UM. You know,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to make an analogy, so uh, you know this is

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>when everything, all the numbers go up and it's a

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>fun time a year. A lot of work from the

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 1>team goes into preparing for this. We've launched a lot

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of new features and products of the last six days,

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>including our new Rainmakers football game, which I'm really excited

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about and UM Week one is going to be fantastic.

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm really looking forward to. You're also launching a new

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>blockchain initiative whereby UM betters will be able to collect

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>digital player cards. How old this work and how big

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think blockchain and web three will be for sports? Well, Rainmakers,

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the product referring to UM, is I think

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the most innovative things we've done ever. UM.

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It takes fantasy sports, which you know, the idea is

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you're like a GM and you you know, you have

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>players that that you get UM and it immortalizes that

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>ownership in the form of you know, an n f

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>T on the blockchain, So instead of drafting a player,

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you buy that player's n f T and you can

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>play that in a game. UM. So it's really exciting

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because it mixes things that our customers are really interested in,

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>which is the game and this sort of you know,

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of being able to pick your favorite team or

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:19.720
<v Speaker 1>your team that you think is going to win UM

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with also a strong interest our our customers have shown

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in blockchain and collectibles. So UM, I think it's really

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a new way of looking at fantasy sports. We think

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the future of fantasy sports, and we're really excited

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>by some of the early traction we're seeing. There's sales

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that are going off for a big dollars on the marketplace.

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Vandel seems to have pulled ahead of the

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>industry in terms of market share. What's your play to

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>counter that, Well, you know, it's definitely seasonal. We typically

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>do better in the NFL season where we have a

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>big boost of customers UM, and if you look at

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the eye gaming side, we're ahead of them by a

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So we're just gonna keep trying to have

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the best product UM. You know, for us, we think

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 1>product is the what ultimately will will win the customers

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>over UM, and we think the more people that we

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>we get to show some of the new things that

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we launch this NFL season, Um, the more they'll be

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>excited about keeping their play with DraftKings. So UM, we're

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just gonna kind of keep you know, focusing on product,

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:16.959
<v Speaker 1>focusing on customer experience. UM. We think being the most

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>customer focused and customer centric, which entails having the best

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>product and overall experience, is what will win the day. Obviously,

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger business has has also meant at times some bigger losses.

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Some of your competitors have said they're going to pull

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>back on AD spend this year. How is your spending

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>strategy changing as the market evolves and uh, and also

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know we're heading into a potentially prolonged downturn. Well,

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we've always been very you know, data driven in our

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>decisions around spending. So UM, we look for paybacks that

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that meet our threshold, which in case the customer acquisition

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is typically three year payback or less. Um. Same thing

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>on new states we launch, we typically look for a

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>two to three year path to profitability timeline. So I

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 1>haven't really changed that. I will say though that with

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>some of the competitors pulling back, UM, you know, we're

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>able to achieve great results without having to be quite

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>as aggressive on the advertising promotion front. We're still being

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive. This is an important time of year, so

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we're making sure that we have, you know, a presence

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out there, and we get in front of customers and

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>we get good offers that are interesting to them. But

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I do think the competitive environment is rationalized quite a

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bit year over year. If you compare it to this

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 1>time last year, it's really just a night and day.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>We also got a big election coming up. You've got

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>some proposals on various ballots in California. In particular, UM

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>California could become the largest sports betting market in the

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>world next to the UK. UM you look back to

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>proposal that would allow draft kings to offer sports betting

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in the state in partnership with various Native American tribes.

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>There are various other proposals that are countering this. You know,

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>what is your polling show showing you about the likelihood

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of your proposal passing? And how much are you prepared

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to spend between now and November. We're seeing really good

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>things in the polling. You know, obviously there's a lot

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that's going to occur between now and the election. It's

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>still about two months away, but everything we're seeing in

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the data is great, and we think more importantly, UM,

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 1>policy wise, it makes sense. It's something that Californians want.

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Those that are into sports betting in California, most of

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>them are already doing it anyway in the illegal market,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>which is generating no tax revenue and has no consumer protections.

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And our initiative will generate hundreds of millions of dollars

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a year to help combat homelessness and mental health issues

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>in California. And we also partner with tribes that are

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>getting a cut of it as well. It will help

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>especially a lot of the smaller tribes, um that you

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>know aren't as maybe fortunate as some of the ones

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that the bigger casinos do well and and and really

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>will help with education programs and other things for those tribes.

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So we think it's great for the California sports better,

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>it's great for those that want to see real help

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>on the homelessness and mental health issues, and it's great

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for the tribe. So UM, we're really excited about it.

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:01.879
<v Speaker 1>We think it's great policy for California. Polling numbers look good, UM,

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of time between now and the elections.

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>We just gotta keep getting our message out there and

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it will resonate with voters. One one word answer, Jason,

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>who are you putting your money on for the NFL playoffs? Uh?

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm a Patriots fan, so I gotta say Patriots.

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting my money on them, but I'll be rooting um.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's a lot of great teams this year.

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited about the opening game. I think it's

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be awesome. And you know, it's a really

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>good season, a lot of great play. NFL content has

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>never been better. See DraftKings. Great to have you. Thank you.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We are at Apple tomorrow. You don't want to miss

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>our special show. This is Bloomberg