WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 12/5: 3 Up/Down vs. Colts, Current State of the Patriots, Early Draft Deep Dive

0:00:30.658 --> 0:00:34.697
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Unfiltered the world's original podcast. Patriots Unfiltered brings you

0:00:34.698 --> 0:00:38.858
<v Speaker 1>inside Jillette Stadium for rousing conversations on everything New England, Patriots,

0:00:38.857 --> 0:00:42.698
<v Speaker 1>and NFL. Join host Fred Kersh alongside Patriots dot COM's

0:00:42.698 --> 0:00:46.138
<v Speaker 1>Paul Parillo, Mike Desso, Evan Lazar, Tamara Brown, and Alex

0:00:46.178 --> 0:00:48.937
<v Speaker 1>Francisco as they bring you in depth coverage of the team.

0:00:49.018 --> 0:00:51.098
<v Speaker 2>He's a red shirt rookie at that point, so it's

0:00:51.138 --> 0:00:53.978
<v Speaker 2>really that's his rookie season essentially too. So now we're

0:00:54.018 --> 0:00:56.018
<v Speaker 2>really not talking about them, really knowing.

0:00:57.818 --> 0:01:04.738
<v Speaker 1>Search for Patriots Unfiltered anywhere you get your podcasts. This

0:01:04.858 --> 0:01:08.178
<v Speaker 1>is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan Lazar

0:01:08.298 --> 0:01:09.538
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Barth.

0:01:11.098 --> 0:01:13.818
<v Speaker 2>And Lazarre. Hello, everybody nailed it. He joined as always

0:01:13.858 --> 0:01:16.857
<v Speaker 2>by our Bark.

0:01:18.658 --> 0:01:22.097
<v Speaker 1>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex bars Let's flip over

0:01:22.138 --> 0:01:22.618
<v Speaker 1>to the demons.

0:01:22.618 --> 0:01:24.218
<v Speaker 2>Do you have ups and downs? You told me you

0:01:24.258 --> 0:01:24.738
<v Speaker 2>did do that?

0:01:24.777 --> 0:01:26.018
<v Speaker 3>Why you usually do them on Tuesday?

0:01:26.057 --> 0:01:28.938
<v Speaker 2>And I just have I mean I can do one thought. Yeah,

0:01:29.098 --> 0:01:34.058
<v Speaker 2>it's unprepared usual marines like God, one time? Could you

0:01:34.098 --> 0:01:39.178
<v Speaker 2>prepare one time? Are you prepared today? No, you're not prepared.

0:01:39.218 --> 0:01:41.138
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean. Yeah, yeah, it's Thursday, so that

0:01:41.178 --> 0:01:44.417
<v Speaker 2>your your schedule isn't thrown off, so you're prepared today. Yes,

0:01:44.538 --> 0:01:47.217
<v Speaker 2>there you go, all right, Evan Lazar, Alex bar Patriots

0:01:47.298 --> 0:01:49.898
<v Speaker 2>Catch twenty two with you for the next couple of

0:01:49.898 --> 0:01:52.498
<v Speaker 2>hours here on a bye week Thursday. But this is

0:01:52.538 --> 0:01:55.618
<v Speaker 2>a big show for us. This is a big, big show.

0:01:56.258 --> 0:01:59.338
<v Speaker 2>I have actually done some homework. I've actually watched a

0:01:59.418 --> 0:02:02.657
<v Speaker 2>year prepared. I am so prepared to do this show.

0:02:02.978 --> 0:02:05.818
<v Speaker 2>But before we get into the draft talk, I just

0:02:05.858 --> 0:02:07.298
<v Speaker 2>want to put this one thing out there. With the

0:02:07.378 --> 0:02:10.018
<v Speaker 2>draft talk, don't I'm gonna tell you the players that

0:02:10.058 --> 0:02:12.458
<v Speaker 2>I watched, and don't ask me if I watched this

0:02:12.498 --> 0:02:14.618
<v Speaker 2>guy or that I didn't. I didn't. I watched like

0:02:14.697 --> 0:02:16.817
<v Speaker 2>seven guys. And that's the list we're going off of

0:02:16.817 --> 0:02:17.298
<v Speaker 2>for right now.

0:02:17.338 --> 0:02:18.778
<v Speaker 3>Good thing, the drafts only seven players.

0:02:19.058 --> 0:02:22.018
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but don't I know you and you'll sit there

0:02:22.058 --> 0:02:25.178
<v Speaker 2>and you'll say, yeah, but you gotta you gotta watchers too,

0:02:25.218 --> 0:02:28.298
<v Speaker 2>and you gotta watch watch. Yeah, I wasted my time,

0:02:28.377 --> 0:02:30.818
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for that away. Never wait, I could have

0:02:31.377 --> 0:02:33.218
<v Speaker 2>done a little bit more homework on the top of

0:02:33.218 --> 0:02:36.218
<v Speaker 2>the draft, but I didn't I'm watch honestly, the players

0:02:36.218 --> 0:02:37.018
<v Speaker 2>are going to talk about.

0:02:37.498 --> 0:02:39.537
<v Speaker 3>I think you're probably aware enough of burden that you

0:02:39.578 --> 0:02:40.618
<v Speaker 3>didn't need to watch them.

0:02:40.898 --> 0:02:42.058
<v Speaker 2>There's maybe one guy.

0:02:42.097 --> 0:02:43.498
<v Speaker 3>I'll mention that you didn't watch.

0:02:43.978 --> 0:02:45.938
<v Speaker 2>I just know I think there's only one guy, this guy.

0:02:46.018 --> 0:02:47.738
<v Speaker 2>So don't don't ask me if I think there's only

0:02:47.778 --> 0:02:48.097
<v Speaker 2>one guy.

0:02:48.138 --> 0:02:50.537
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling you I will revisit. I think there's only

0:02:50.538 --> 0:02:51.218
<v Speaker 3>gonna be one guy.

0:02:51.458 --> 0:02:53.498
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, So we'll get to that in a

0:02:53.538 --> 0:02:55.618
<v Speaker 2>little bit. I promise we'll get to the draft talk.

0:02:55.657 --> 0:02:58.298
<v Speaker 2>I feel like people come to this show and they

0:02:58.377 --> 0:03:00.178
<v Speaker 2>want to talk draft, and I'm all.

0:02:59.978 --> 0:03:01.978
<v Speaker 3>The YouTube comments are right now are a draft draft draw.

0:03:02.218 --> 0:03:04.537
<v Speaker 2>I've never I have not been prepared yet. I took

0:03:04.578 --> 0:03:07.018
<v Speaker 2>the bye week to prepare for you all, and now

0:03:07.058 --> 0:03:08.858
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I have my takes like for the

0:03:08.858 --> 0:03:12.458
<v Speaker 2>next six months, like I'm good. I'm good until we

0:03:12.538 --> 0:03:16.778
<v Speaker 2>start getting some more information, whether it's college football playoff combine,

0:03:16.898 --> 0:03:17.977
<v Speaker 2>Senior Bowl, whatever.

0:03:18.138 --> 0:03:20.218
<v Speaker 3>I do have a college football playoff take as it

0:03:20.258 --> 0:03:21.738
<v Speaker 3>relates to the draft. I want to get in.

0:03:21.858 --> 0:03:24.258
<v Speaker 2>So yesterday a little behind the curtain too, before we

0:03:24.298 --> 0:03:26.577
<v Speaker 2>get into the current day Patriots, which I do want

0:03:26.578 --> 0:03:28.938
<v Speaker 2>to talk about here for a little bit. So I

0:03:28.978 --> 0:03:31.818
<v Speaker 2>got off a playbook with our friend John Rook, and

0:03:31.858 --> 0:03:35.498
<v Speaker 2>I walked up to No Socks Matt Smith in the office,

0:03:35.578 --> 0:03:38.058
<v Speaker 2>and what did we start talking about. We started talking

0:03:38.098 --> 0:03:41.178
<v Speaker 2>about a trip to Mobile, Alabama for the Senior Bowl.

0:03:41.258 --> 0:03:46.058
<v Speaker 2>So we're we're rolling, We're excited that it's not that well,

0:03:46.098 --> 0:03:48.218
<v Speaker 2>That's why I went up to him because I wanted to,

0:03:48.738 --> 0:03:51.858
<v Speaker 2>you know, start to put out some preliminary feelers of

0:03:51.898 --> 0:03:53.498
<v Speaker 2>what we would like to do, what I would like

0:03:53.578 --> 0:03:55.538
<v Speaker 2>to do, and all that kind of stuff. When it

0:03:55.578 --> 0:03:57.297
<v Speaker 2>comes to the Senior Bowl and it's a little more

0:03:57.578 --> 0:03:58.738
<v Speaker 2>freed around the corner.

0:03:58.578 --> 0:03:59.938
<v Speaker 3>We have a little more freedom this year when it

0:03:59.938 --> 0:04:01.818
<v Speaker 3>comes to the draft. Look, obviously, last year with the

0:04:01.858 --> 0:04:04.578
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks is very important and a ton of people tune

0:04:04.618 --> 0:04:07.658
<v Speaker 3>in and I appreciate that and I appreciate that, but

0:04:08.418 --> 0:04:13.258
<v Speaker 3>last year it almost felt limiting, and that because the

0:04:13.378 --> 0:04:16.217
<v Speaker 3>quarterback is such a big position, we didn't maybe go

0:04:16.298 --> 0:04:19.498
<v Speaker 3>as deep as we do other years or as widespread

0:04:19.538 --> 0:04:22.098
<v Speaker 3>as we do other years. And this year it's almost

0:04:22.097 --> 0:04:25.537
<v Speaker 3>the opposite, where it feels like every position is on

0:04:25.577 --> 0:04:27.498
<v Speaker 3>the table. We have years it was like, okay, we're

0:04:27.538 --> 0:04:30.898
<v Speaker 3>mainly doing wide receivers and tackles this year, wide receiver, tackle, corner.

0:04:31.138 --> 0:04:33.698
<v Speaker 3>Feels like everything's on the table this year. So we

0:04:33.778 --> 0:04:36.058
<v Speaker 3>go from what was a very narrow scope, and I

0:04:36.058 --> 0:04:37.698
<v Speaker 3>think we did a good job with quarterbacks. I was

0:04:37.738 --> 0:04:40.298
<v Speaker 3>actually going back and reading through some of my quarterback

0:04:40.337 --> 0:04:42.138
<v Speaker 3>stuff the last couple of days, just kind of curious

0:04:42.138 --> 0:04:43.698
<v Speaker 3>to revisit. I thought we did a good job with

0:04:43.738 --> 0:04:46.577
<v Speaker 3>the quarterbacks. But I'm looking forward to this year where.

0:04:46.378 --> 0:04:48.658
<v Speaker 2>We get to go. I mean, it's everybody.

0:04:49.097 --> 0:04:51.818
<v Speaker 3>You bring up, any name, and it's pretty much that

0:04:51.898 --> 0:04:54.378
<v Speaker 3>guy is pretty much in play for the Patriots. Any name, Evan,

0:04:54.737 --> 0:04:56.217
<v Speaker 3>any name is in play for the Patriots.

0:04:56.498 --> 0:04:59.978
<v Speaker 2>Look how excited he is. He's giddy. He's giddy over there.

0:05:00.018 --> 0:05:02.258
<v Speaker 2>He can't wait. Hey Patriots fans, if you want to

0:05:02.298 --> 0:05:05.058
<v Speaker 2>see Toyota's best offers, including those not seen on TV,

0:05:05.457 --> 0:05:07.977
<v Speaker 2>go to buy at toyota dot com. It's Toyota's official

0:05:08.018 --> 0:05:11.417
<v Speaker 2>deal official website for deals from the official vehicle of

0:05:11.457 --> 0:05:14.938
<v Speaker 2>the New England Patriots. Toyota. Let's go places, And I

0:05:14.938 --> 0:05:17.338
<v Speaker 2>am definitely gonna have one of these tonight because it's

0:05:17.337 --> 0:05:19.778
<v Speaker 2>officially the bye week for me. Once this show is over,

0:05:20.097 --> 0:05:24.417
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna be excited to crack open and easy

0:05:24.457 --> 0:05:27.097
<v Speaker 2>to drink, easy to enjoy bud like the official beer

0:05:27.138 --> 0:05:30.857
<v Speaker 2>sponsor of the New England Patriots. So I I didn't want

0:05:30.857 --> 0:05:32.578
<v Speaker 2>to start with draft talk. I wanted to end with

0:05:32.658 --> 0:05:34.858
<v Speaker 2>draft talk. So we're gonna put that on the back

0:05:34.898 --> 0:05:36.818
<v Speaker 2>burner for a second because I do want to talk

0:05:36.938 --> 0:05:40.138
<v Speaker 2>some current day Patriots before we get in to the

0:05:40.138 --> 0:05:43.897
<v Speaker 2>offseason talk. And the biggest takeaway that I had from

0:05:43.938 --> 0:05:50.297
<v Speaker 2>this game on Sunday is some sense of frustration for

0:05:50.418 --> 0:05:53.737
<v Speaker 2>me personally. I'm just talking about myself. Yeah, I'm getting

0:05:53.737 --> 0:05:56.058
<v Speaker 2>a little bit frustrated about certain things that are happening

0:05:56.097 --> 0:05:59.097
<v Speaker 2>with this team right now. For the most part this season,

0:06:00.217 --> 0:06:04.138
<v Speaker 2>I've been of the state of mind of Okay, it's

0:06:04.178 --> 0:06:07.057
<v Speaker 2>a rebuilding year. I'm not expecting much in terms of

0:06:07.097 --> 0:06:10.897
<v Speaker 2>wins and losses, that sort of mindset, right, and it

0:06:10.938 --> 0:06:13.457
<v Speaker 2>hasn't really phased me all that much. The record hasn't

0:06:13.457 --> 0:06:15.618
<v Speaker 2>phased me all that much. I picked them to win

0:06:15.698 --> 0:06:18.017
<v Speaker 2>five games. I'm probably gonna be a little bit short there,

0:06:18.018 --> 0:06:20.297
<v Speaker 2>but so we all kind of had them in this

0:06:20.818 --> 0:06:23.418
<v Speaker 2>three to let's call it three to six win range.

0:06:23.418 --> 0:06:26.057
<v Speaker 2>If you really were optimistic at six, so no one

0:06:26.097 --> 0:06:28.818
<v Speaker 2>really expected much more than what's going on. The part

0:06:28.857 --> 0:06:32.017
<v Speaker 2>that has frustrated me, and as a guy, as a

0:06:32.018 --> 0:06:36.498
<v Speaker 2>big Drake May guy, as everybody knows, is it feels

0:06:36.538 --> 0:06:40.778
<v Speaker 2>to me that Drake May at this point is ready

0:06:41.258 --> 0:06:44.657
<v Speaker 2>to win football games in this league, especially against teams

0:06:44.658 --> 0:06:47.337
<v Speaker 2>like the Indianapolis Colts. Right, Like, he played well enough

0:06:47.337 --> 0:06:50.738
<v Speaker 2>in that game on Sunday to beat the Colts here

0:06:50.818 --> 0:06:53.657
<v Speaker 2>at home. It wasn't perfect, and we can get to

0:06:53.698 --> 0:06:55.337
<v Speaker 2>some of the red zone stuff and all that kind

0:06:55.378 --> 0:06:57.578
<v Speaker 2>of stuff that went wrong for the Patriots offense, but

0:06:58.217 --> 0:07:02.258
<v Speaker 2>this was a good offensive performance. Four hundred yards of

0:07:02.378 --> 0:07:05.458
<v Speaker 2>total offense plus four hundred yards two hundred each on

0:07:05.498 --> 0:07:09.298
<v Speaker 2>the ground and through the air. And just as a whole,

0:07:10.018 --> 0:07:14.858
<v Speaker 2>Drake May now ranks fourteenth among thirty two quarterbacks in QBR,

0:07:15.338 --> 0:07:19.578
<v Speaker 2>So he is a above average NFL quarterback already right

0:07:19.618 --> 0:07:22.898
<v Speaker 2>as a rookie, as a rookie with the worst offensive

0:07:22.938 --> 0:07:26.938
<v Speaker 2>line in football and one of the worst receiving groups

0:07:27.098 --> 0:07:31.018
<v Speaker 2>skill position groups in the NFL as well, that's great, Like,

0:07:31.018 --> 0:07:35.538
<v Speaker 2>that's optimistic about Drake. But the question then to me

0:07:36.338 --> 0:07:39.898
<v Speaker 2>that Bear is asking is how is a quarterback that's

0:07:39.898 --> 0:07:43.778
<v Speaker 2>playing above average ball with a let's face it, frankly

0:07:43.818 --> 0:07:46.538
<v Speaker 2>and not good supporting cast. Ye, he's already playing a

0:07:46.538 --> 0:07:49.538
<v Speaker 2>budget above average ball and just I know you hate

0:07:49.538 --> 0:07:52.098
<v Speaker 2>the win probability, but I'm gonna give it to you anyways. Yeah,

0:07:52.378 --> 0:07:53.218
<v Speaker 2>so QBO, No.

0:07:53.378 --> 0:07:55.418
<v Speaker 3>This is a great example of why it doesn't work.

0:07:55.378 --> 0:07:58.978
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, it is. So QBR doubles as a win

0:07:59.058 --> 0:08:01.857
<v Speaker 2>probability in metric, right, it's a way to rank quarterbacks,

0:08:01.857 --> 0:08:04.778
<v Speaker 2>and it's also a way to rank win probability.

0:08:04.338 --> 0:08:07.138
<v Speaker 3>Like if the quarterback plays this way, you'll win this percent.

0:08:07.338 --> 0:08:07.498
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:08:07.578 --> 0:08:11.137
<v Speaker 2>So Drake May's QBR right now is fifty eight point zero,

0:08:11.178 --> 0:08:12.418
<v Speaker 2>fourteenth among thirty.

0:08:12.178 --> 0:08:13.618
<v Speaker 3>Two, So we should be winning fifty eight percent.

0:08:13.698 --> 0:08:15.618
<v Speaker 2>They should be winning fifty eight percent of his games.

0:08:15.618 --> 0:08:18.218
<v Speaker 2>They're one and six in full games that he's played in,

0:08:18.938 --> 0:08:22.098
<v Speaker 2>So there's some of that tiny little bit I would

0:08:22.138 --> 0:08:24.378
<v Speaker 2>say on Drake for the turnovers, right, and they it

0:08:24.458 --> 0:08:27.738
<v Speaker 2>happened again on Sunday, not necessarily his fault, per se.

0:08:27.938 --> 0:08:30.938
<v Speaker 3>I'll say it was the first start, like the first

0:08:30.938 --> 0:08:34.017
<v Speaker 3>full game he's had where PFF did not have him

0:08:34.018 --> 0:08:34.778
<v Speaker 3>with the turnover work.

0:08:34.977 --> 0:08:38.977
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I downgraded him on the throw for the interception personally,

0:08:39.058 --> 0:08:41.977
<v Speaker 2>but it was unlucky that it was intercepted. It shouldn't be.

0:08:42.098 --> 0:08:44.618
<v Speaker 3>It should have been an interception. In fact, the intent

0:08:44.737 --> 0:08:47.178
<v Speaker 3>behind the throw was to me, to me, was to

0:08:47.218 --> 0:08:49.418
<v Speaker 3>protect the ball and to protect Hunter Henry. Yeah, but

0:08:49.538 --> 0:08:51.418
<v Speaker 3>and then you just had kind of a flu Well

0:08:51.458 --> 0:08:52.498
<v Speaker 3>he threw it off the wrong hit.

0:08:52.578 --> 0:08:54.378
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't right, it doesn't the idea we're just

0:08:54.378 --> 0:08:56.218
<v Speaker 2>throwing it low, like you throw it up all low

0:08:56.298 --> 0:08:58.778
<v Speaker 2>to prevent a turnover. Yeah, that's right. That's not why

0:08:58.857 --> 0:09:01.058
<v Speaker 2>they lost this game. That's what I'm getting at. So

0:09:01.898 --> 0:09:03.938
<v Speaker 2>fifty eight point zero means that they should be winning,

0:09:04.458 --> 0:09:06.458
<v Speaker 2>even if we just ballpark it. They should be winning

0:09:06.497 --> 0:09:09.978
<v Speaker 2>half their games. With Drake Mayott quarterback. They're one in

0:09:10.058 --> 0:09:12.298
<v Speaker 2>six in his starts that he finished, you know, not

0:09:12.658 --> 0:09:16.018
<v Speaker 2>taking the Jets game out of this. And the question

0:09:16.098 --> 0:09:18.538
<v Speaker 2>to me that with this team now as we move forward,

0:09:19.418 --> 0:09:24.178
<v Speaker 2>is why, Because the why speaks to the offseason, right, like,

0:09:24.257 --> 0:09:27.698
<v Speaker 2>what are they What are the biggest reasons why they

0:09:27.698 --> 0:09:31.137
<v Speaker 2>are one and six? And one of the big reasons

0:09:31.938 --> 0:09:35.578
<v Speaker 2>and the frustration for me with this is because you know,

0:09:36.298 --> 0:09:39.658
<v Speaker 2>I hate talking about this stuff. It is the one

0:09:39.737 --> 0:09:43.338
<v Speaker 2>thing that I cannot stand talking about, and that is

0:09:43.658 --> 0:09:48.977
<v Speaker 2>in game management, like time management, timeouts. Should he or

0:09:48.977 --> 0:09:52.058
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't he have challenged? Like should he have gone for

0:09:52.137 --> 0:09:54.417
<v Speaker 2>hail Mary or kicked a sixty eight yard field goal?

0:09:54.737 --> 0:09:57.177
<v Speaker 2>You know, this type of stuff drives me up an

0:09:57.338 --> 0:09:58.178
<v Speaker 2>absolute wall.

0:09:58.218 --> 0:10:02.177
<v Speaker 3>But it's almost like it's it's important or something. It's

0:10:02.418 --> 0:10:05.098
<v Speaker 3>you also would have mattered. How about when you have

0:10:05.218 --> 0:10:07.857
<v Speaker 3>three fourth downs on a twenty play drive you get

0:10:07.857 --> 0:10:10.378
<v Speaker 3>a stop that would have we wouldn't have been talking

0:10:10.418 --> 0:10:14.657
<v Speaker 3>about the timeouts al any of that if it didn't matter. Okay, Anyways,

0:10:15.218 --> 0:10:17.777
<v Speaker 3>with that being said, when you lose a coin flip game,

0:10:17.778 --> 0:10:20.098
<v Speaker 3>when you lose a game like one point at with

0:10:20.218 --> 0:10:22.857
<v Speaker 3>twelve seconds left to go in the fourth quarter, those

0:10:22.938 --> 0:10:25.578
<v Speaker 3>types of things that you and on the other show,

0:10:25.578 --> 0:10:27.858
<v Speaker 3>it's Paul that that talks about this all the time,

0:10:28.698 --> 0:10:31.178
<v Speaker 3>and you guys do a great job of talking about it.

0:10:32.338 --> 0:10:35.338
<v Speaker 3>These types of things matter, These types of in game

0:10:35.377 --> 0:10:38.338
<v Speaker 3>coaching decisions matter. I'm glad it took you four years

0:10:38.338 --> 0:10:39.098
<v Speaker 3>to figure that out.

0:10:39.497 --> 0:10:41.297
<v Speaker 2>I don't want them to matter. I don't want to

0:10:41.338 --> 0:10:43.338
<v Speaker 2>talk about it, not even it matters. But it's not

0:10:43.377 --> 0:10:45.098
<v Speaker 2>that I don't want to matter. It's not that I

0:10:45.098 --> 0:10:46.497
<v Speaker 2>don't want to talk about it either. I don't want

0:10:46.497 --> 0:10:48.497
<v Speaker 2>people because I know how people will get. Yeah, it

0:10:48.497 --> 0:10:50.818
<v Speaker 2>has nothing to do with deflecting blame from girod Mao.

0:10:51.338 --> 0:10:53.298
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to talk about it because I feel

0:10:53.338 --> 0:10:55.857
<v Speaker 2>like there are things that are bigger than this, that

0:10:55.898 --> 0:10:56.658
<v Speaker 2>are more important.

0:10:56.658 --> 0:10:57.458
<v Speaker 3>You just find it boring.

0:10:57.857 --> 0:11:00.418
<v Speaker 2>I find it painstakingly.

0:10:59.737 --> 0:11:02.377
<v Speaker 3>Boring, even though it matters and it's important and it's

0:11:02.418 --> 0:11:02.978
<v Speaker 3>part of the game.

0:11:03.178 --> 0:11:06.658
<v Speaker 2>So all that being, I find the math boring. There's

0:11:06.778 --> 0:11:09.258
<v Speaker 2>there's a couple of things you know, obviously that I

0:11:09.298 --> 0:11:12.497
<v Speaker 2>think contributed to this loss. That has to be said.

0:11:12.578 --> 0:11:15.418
<v Speaker 2>Is one of them. One of them is the fact

0:11:15.497 --> 0:11:18.298
<v Speaker 2>that once again they come away with no points before halftime.

0:11:18.338 --> 0:11:19.977
<v Speaker 2>Now it's not his fault that they missed a twenty

0:11:19.977 --> 0:11:22.617
<v Speaker 2>five yard field goal, Okay, but they come away with

0:11:22.698 --> 0:11:24.497
<v Speaker 2>no points or less points than they should have if

0:11:24.497 --> 0:11:28.098
<v Speaker 2>you want to handicap the field goal there before the

0:11:28.137 --> 0:11:31.298
<v Speaker 2>half in another way that I thought they mishanded that situation.

0:11:31.857 --> 0:11:35.617
<v Speaker 2>And then at the end of the game, I understand,

0:11:35.698 --> 0:11:38.617
<v Speaker 2>and I had no problem with him invoking Malcolm Butler there,

0:11:38.698 --> 0:11:41.938
<v Speaker 2>I actually thought live I turned to Douce and Paul

0:11:41.977 --> 0:11:45.058
<v Speaker 2>in the press box and said, well, maybe the argument

0:11:45.218 --> 0:11:49.058
<v Speaker 2>is is Malcolm Butler, So I get that point of it.

0:11:49.458 --> 0:11:52.338
<v Speaker 2>But my whole point with the timeout usage at the

0:11:52.418 --> 0:11:55.778
<v Speaker 2>end of the game is that you have a quarterback

0:11:56.257 --> 0:11:59.418
<v Speaker 2>that they have not stopped. Outside of one drive after

0:11:59.458 --> 0:12:01.698
<v Speaker 2>the Gonzales pick, which we'll get to, which was run

0:12:01.778 --> 0:12:04.418
<v Speaker 2>run pass, they have not stopped Drake May all day.

0:12:04.898 --> 0:12:06.538
<v Speaker 2>All he needs is a field goal. So you don't

0:12:06.538 --> 0:12:08.298
<v Speaker 2>even have to worry about can you execute in the

0:12:08.298 --> 0:12:10.177
<v Speaker 2>red zone because you don't even need to. You don't

0:12:10.218 --> 0:12:12.377
<v Speaker 2>need a touchdown, right, you only need a field goal.

0:12:12.737 --> 0:12:16.378
<v Speaker 2>If you gave Drake May fifty seconds instead of twelve seconds,

0:12:16.698 --> 0:12:18.938
<v Speaker 2>then I really believe that the Patriots would have drove

0:12:18.977 --> 0:12:20.898
<v Speaker 2>down the field and won that game. Now, maybe he

0:12:20.938 --> 0:12:23.138
<v Speaker 2>throws a pick like he did in you know, against

0:12:23.137 --> 0:12:26.458
<v Speaker 2>the Rams, or he did against Tennessee or whatever it's possible.

0:12:26.497 --> 0:12:29.338
<v Speaker 2>I'll allow for it. But that to me was a

0:12:29.338 --> 0:12:32.178
<v Speaker 2>big part of this game, which it irks and grinds

0:12:32.257 --> 0:12:34.578
<v Speaker 2>my gears. But I know that's your side of the street,

0:12:34.617 --> 0:12:35.338
<v Speaker 2>so I'll let you go.

0:12:35.737 --> 0:12:38.338
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the key sequence is the end of the game,

0:12:38.538 --> 0:12:40.297
<v Speaker 3>and the play calling is part of this so that's

0:12:40.298 --> 0:12:42.857
<v Speaker 3>where we kind of bridge the gap there because they

0:12:42.898 --> 0:12:45.738
<v Speaker 3>go run, run, pass. Like when they get down inside

0:12:45.737 --> 0:12:47.897
<v Speaker 3>the eleven, Drake was doing a great job. They converted

0:12:48.578 --> 0:12:50.737
<v Speaker 3>a set was his second and nineteen and a second

0:12:50.778 --> 0:12:53.898
<v Speaker 3>and fifteen or second and fourteen on that two minute drive.

0:12:54.058 --> 0:12:54.898
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, get down there.

0:12:54.938 --> 0:12:56.338
<v Speaker 3>They get to the eleven, they call time out with

0:12:56.418 --> 0:12:58.098
<v Speaker 3>forty one seconds to go, and it's like all right,

0:12:58.377 --> 0:13:01.098
<v Speaker 3>like everything to that point, yeah, you got it. And

0:13:01.298 --> 0:13:04.938
<v Speaker 3>forty one seconds two timeouts in the eleven yard line.

0:13:05.058 --> 0:13:09.737
<v Speaker 3>You have almost everything at your disposal, almost everything. The

0:13:09.857 --> 0:13:13.458
<v Speaker 3>one thing that you want to avoid is going run

0:13:13.538 --> 0:13:16.858
<v Speaker 3>run without a score because now on third down you

0:13:17.017 --> 0:13:19.777
<v Speaker 3>have to throw. You become one dimensional. You tip your hand. Yeah,

0:13:19.818 --> 0:13:21.578
<v Speaker 3>and they come out and they go run run, So

0:13:21.617 --> 0:13:24.538
<v Speaker 3>that was my bigger issue there. Yeah, with the field goal,

0:13:24.538 --> 0:13:26.258
<v Speaker 3>I think that was an operational issue. I mean, you

0:13:26.257 --> 0:13:27.858
<v Speaker 3>got to hit a twenty five yard field. I'm not

0:13:27.938 --> 0:13:32.058
<v Speaker 3>excusing anybody, but that's on the that's an execution thing.

0:13:32.977 --> 0:13:34.738
<v Speaker 3>The drive after Gonzale the same thing that was their

0:13:34.778 --> 0:13:37.098
<v Speaker 3>only three and out of the game, which you want

0:13:37.098 --> 0:13:39.017
<v Speaker 3>to look at it and be able to say they

0:13:39.017 --> 0:13:41.458
<v Speaker 3>had I think it was nine drives they had nine drives,

0:13:41.497 --> 0:13:44.098
<v Speaker 3>they only had one three and out. That's great progress

0:13:44.098 --> 0:13:46.458
<v Speaker 3>for this offense. Yeah, it happened to come at one

0:13:46.497 --> 0:13:48.418
<v Speaker 3>of the most crucial points in the game. You get

0:13:48.418 --> 0:13:50.417
<v Speaker 3>the turnover. They actually had another. It wasn't a three

0:13:50.418 --> 0:13:53.698
<v Speaker 3>and out off their other turnover three place field goal

0:13:53.737 --> 0:13:55.857
<v Speaker 3>because they had the field positions. So I guess technically

0:13:55.898 --> 0:13:58.098
<v Speaker 3>they had two, but they both came off turnovers, which

0:13:58.178 --> 0:14:01.698
<v Speaker 3>is bad complimentary football. And then, yeah, the timeout usage

0:14:02.617 --> 0:14:05.058
<v Speaker 3>didn't bug me as much as it bugged some people.

0:14:05.098 --> 0:14:07.698
<v Speaker 3>It was more the idea that if you're gonna play

0:14:07.698 --> 0:14:10.658
<v Speaker 3>for a field goal, don't play for and I don't

0:14:10.658 --> 0:14:12.618
<v Speaker 3>hate playing for a field goal. Can you make that

0:14:12.658 --> 0:14:14.818
<v Speaker 3>a sixty four to sixty five yard field goal instead

0:14:14.818 --> 0:14:17.897
<v Speaker 3>of sixty eight? In at what depth are you running

0:14:17.898 --> 0:14:19.538
<v Speaker 3>those routes going up the field? And I know they

0:14:19.618 --> 0:14:21.537
<v Speaker 3>kicked it with a second ago, could they've run the

0:14:21.618 --> 0:14:23.938
<v Speaker 3>routes any deeper? Well, if you can mix in something

0:14:23.938 --> 0:14:25.378
<v Speaker 3>on the side of nine, or you don't botch the

0:14:25.378 --> 0:14:28.618
<v Speaker 3>first one or something like that, Like we saw sly

0:14:28.818 --> 0:14:31.258
<v Speaker 3>hit was at sixty two sixty three in San Francisco,

0:14:31.738 --> 0:14:34.338
<v Speaker 3>so we can do that, But sixty eight that's two

0:14:34.418 --> 0:14:36.338
<v Speaker 3>yards longer than the longest field goal in the NFL

0:14:36.418 --> 0:14:39.738
<v Speaker 3>history period. It's four yards longer than the longest outdoor

0:14:39.738 --> 0:14:42.578
<v Speaker 3>field goal in NFL history. It's five yards longer than

0:14:42.618 --> 0:14:45.978
<v Speaker 3>the longest field goal in NFL history outdoor field goal

0:14:46.018 --> 0:14:50.338
<v Speaker 3>in NFL history outside of Denver altitude. Right, So, if

0:14:50.418 --> 0:14:52.858
<v Speaker 3>you run those routes a yard or two deeper and

0:14:52.938 --> 0:14:55.898
<v Speaker 3>this is a lot harder than it sounds, but not impossible,

0:14:56.698 --> 0:14:59.098
<v Speaker 3>if you draw that up a yard or too deeper

0:14:59.098 --> 0:15:02.057
<v Speaker 3>than where it actually happened, do you maybe win the

0:15:02.098 --> 0:15:03.898
<v Speaker 3>game with the sixty three, sixty four to sixty five

0:15:03.978 --> 0:15:05.698
<v Speaker 3>yard field goal instead of sixty eight because.

0:15:05.538 --> 0:15:06.098
<v Speaker 2>He was close.

0:15:06.498 --> 0:15:11.418
<v Speaker 3>Credit to Joey Slide, he was close, but that I'm

0:15:11.418 --> 0:15:13.498
<v Speaker 3>not saying the timeout usage wasn't an issue. Again, I

0:15:13.498 --> 0:15:16.858
<v Speaker 3>see the defense of it. It's did they draw it

0:15:16.938 --> 0:15:19.778
<v Speaker 3>up for sixty eight or did they draw it up

0:15:19.818 --> 0:15:20.538
<v Speaker 3>for sixty five?

0:15:20.578 --> 0:15:21.458
<v Speaker 2>Get to sixty eight and.

0:15:21.458 --> 0:15:22.978
<v Speaker 3>Say, well, we have no choice now, we got to

0:15:23.018 --> 0:15:26.178
<v Speaker 3>kick it cause it's sixty eight. I might almost go

0:15:26.218 --> 0:15:27.658
<v Speaker 3>for the hill Mary there, but I don't hate the

0:15:27.658 --> 0:15:29.778
<v Speaker 3>idea of kicking the long field goal with the kicker

0:15:29.818 --> 0:15:31.898
<v Speaker 3>like Joey slye. But they need to execute a little

0:15:31.898 --> 0:15:33.298
<v Speaker 3>further down the field to make that work.

0:15:33.418 --> 0:15:36.778
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I just feel like if you maximize time there

0:15:37.338 --> 0:15:40.417
<v Speaker 2>on defense by taking your timeouts on defense, yeah, then

0:15:40.458 --> 0:15:43.138
<v Speaker 2>they made they might have one more play so on

0:15:43.258 --> 0:15:45.938
<v Speaker 2>offense to get into Joey's slide field.

0:15:46.138 --> 0:15:52.738
<v Speaker 3>General consensus or the cliche is timeouts are more valuable

0:15:52.778 --> 0:15:56.138
<v Speaker 3>on offense than defense. Yeah, because you don't have to

0:15:56.138 --> 0:15:58.258
<v Speaker 3>go hurry up. You know, you're not minute right, you're

0:15:58.258 --> 0:16:01.698
<v Speaker 3>not limited to the sideline. So if you're falling back

0:16:01.738 --> 0:16:08.178
<v Speaker 3>on that belief, okay, yeah, like I now they're maybe

0:16:08.178 --> 0:16:09.578
<v Speaker 3>you look at it and say, well, if that's what

0:16:09.618 --> 0:16:11.938
<v Speaker 3>you're doing, do you let them score?

0:16:12.298 --> 0:16:12.538
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:16:12.818 --> 0:16:16.098
<v Speaker 3>And that's I never, I very rarely should you let

0:16:16.138 --> 0:16:18.098
<v Speaker 3>the opponents score like rare situations.

0:16:18.258 --> 0:16:20.417
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wouldn't.

0:16:20.418 --> 0:16:22.218
<v Speaker 3>There you could have an argument, but like to me,

0:16:22.338 --> 0:16:25.098
<v Speaker 3>it's a case of timeouts and more available, more valuable

0:16:25.098 --> 0:16:27.098
<v Speaker 3>on offense the defense. And I wonder if they thought they'd.

0:16:26.898 --> 0:16:27.418
<v Speaker 2>Have more time.

0:16:27.658 --> 0:16:30.417
<v Speaker 3>I also wonder if they were surprised by the Colts

0:16:30.498 --> 0:16:32.818
<v Speaker 3>one for two and if they kind of figured, well

0:16:33.338 --> 0:16:36.098
<v Speaker 3>they shouldn't have been your okay, fair enough, but to

0:16:36.178 --> 0:16:38.138
<v Speaker 3>your like I didn't think the Colts were gonna do

0:16:38.178 --> 0:16:40.578
<v Speaker 3>it because they were kind of struggling at times and

0:16:40.618 --> 0:16:42.458
<v Speaker 3>it was this long drive. I kind of thought the

0:16:42.498 --> 0:16:44.218
<v Speaker 3>Colts are gonna kick it, and I had the thought

0:16:44.778 --> 0:16:47.058
<v Speaker 3>where you were where it was like they've been able

0:16:47.058 --> 0:16:49.338
<v Speaker 3>to stop drinking may all day. All Right, this goes

0:16:49.338 --> 0:16:49.978
<v Speaker 3>to overtime.

0:16:50.538 --> 0:16:52.218
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, just win coin to us.

0:16:52.658 --> 0:16:56.537
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I wonder if if the belief was basically

0:16:57.298 --> 0:17:00.178
<v Speaker 3>the timeouts are better served on offense.

0:17:00.418 --> 0:17:04.018
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the end of the game, it didn't. I didn't

0:17:04.058 --> 0:17:07.258
<v Speaker 2>love it, and I hear that cliche and I can

0:17:07.298 --> 0:17:11.018
<v Speaker 2>hear that argument as well. And then I before halftime,

0:17:11.098 --> 0:17:13.218
<v Speaker 2>like this has just happened way too many times this year,

0:17:13.338 --> 0:17:14.298
<v Speaker 2>like they've really.

0:17:14.298 --> 0:17:18.217
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, halftime one is it's it's time and time and

0:17:18.298 --> 0:17:18.818
<v Speaker 3>time again.

0:17:19.058 --> 0:17:23.018
<v Speaker 2>They've literally executed before halftime. I'm taking the Texans bomb

0:17:23.058 --> 0:17:25.338
<v Speaker 2>to Kishon booty out because that's just a bomb. That's

0:17:25.378 --> 0:17:27.738
<v Speaker 2>just a great play and a great throw and catch

0:17:27.818 --> 0:17:31.178
<v Speaker 2>by two guys. Like that's not executing a sitch a right,

0:17:31.298 --> 0:17:33.938
<v Speaker 2>that's just making a great pot. I'll even give them that.

0:17:34.178 --> 0:17:39.458
<v Speaker 3>And there's they've still hit on like two out of eight. Yeah,

0:17:39.578 --> 0:17:41.258
<v Speaker 3>if you're being generous whatever you want to call that.

0:17:41.338 --> 0:17:43.458
<v Speaker 3>Jets one where at least they didn't punt the ball back,

0:17:43.498 --> 0:17:45.978
<v Speaker 3>they killed the block. They still hit on two out.

0:17:45.898 --> 0:17:48.098
<v Speaker 2>Of eight to give them that. It's still not good enough.

0:17:48.138 --> 0:17:51.098
<v Speaker 2>The only great situational football you've seen all year from

0:17:51.178 --> 0:17:53.698
<v Speaker 2>this team is in Chicago. Like that was that was

0:17:53.738 --> 0:17:57.058
<v Speaker 2>a well executed Uh looked great, Like that was a

0:17:57.058 --> 0:17:59.858
<v Speaker 2>great moment for this team in that in this vein.

0:18:00.498 --> 0:18:02.898
<v Speaker 2>But the biggest thing that I look at before halftime

0:18:03.578 --> 0:18:07.338
<v Speaker 2>is the decision of course to go run run pass

0:18:07.858 --> 0:18:11.458
<v Speaker 2>uh there in that spot, and then coinciding with that

0:18:11.498 --> 0:18:15.938
<v Speaker 2>decision to take time outs in between the run plays.

0:18:16.578 --> 0:18:20.418
<v Speaker 2>If you're gonna go, in my mind, going run run

0:18:20.538 --> 0:18:23.258
<v Speaker 2>on first and second down in those situations, is to

0:18:23.298 --> 0:18:25.778
<v Speaker 2>make sure that that is the last possession of the half. Right,

0:18:25.818 --> 0:18:28.418
<v Speaker 2>it's to milt clock. So if you're gonna if that's

0:18:28.458 --> 0:18:30.618
<v Speaker 2>the idea is to make that the last possession of

0:18:30.658 --> 0:18:33.058
<v Speaker 2>the half, then make it. They'll like, make sure it's

0:18:33.098 --> 0:18:35.058
<v Speaker 2>the last possession of the half. Don't keep stopping the

0:18:35.058 --> 0:18:38.378
<v Speaker 2>clock for him, right, like, don't keep calling timeouts for him.

0:18:38.658 --> 0:18:41.058
<v Speaker 2>I just thought that that was a little bit weird

0:18:41.098 --> 0:18:43.898
<v Speaker 2>that it feels like you're trying to milk clock, but

0:18:43.938 --> 0:18:47.298
<v Speaker 2>then you're also stopping the clock simultaneously, like that sort

0:18:47.298 --> 0:18:50.138
<v Speaker 2>of not here nor there. And then to your point

0:18:50.458 --> 0:18:54.138
<v Speaker 2>about third down being an obvious passing down, now they

0:18:54.178 --> 0:18:58.538
<v Speaker 2>got bailed out that there was a penalty. So my

0:18:58.618 --> 0:19:03.258
<v Speaker 2>biggest thing after the second down play was third down

0:19:03.298 --> 0:19:06.978
<v Speaker 2>cannot be a sack. You absolutely cannot take a sack

0:19:07.018 --> 0:19:09.178
<v Speaker 2>on third down, and he took a sack. It was

0:19:09.218 --> 0:19:11.018
<v Speaker 2>probably worst play the game. Yeah, it was one of

0:19:11.018 --> 0:19:12.858
<v Speaker 2>his worst plays of the game. And he gets bailed

0:19:12.898 --> 0:19:15.178
<v Speaker 2>out for the fact that they get called for a

0:19:15.218 --> 0:19:18.738
<v Speaker 2>penalty on the play which stops the clock. So they

0:19:18.818 --> 0:19:21.338
<v Speaker 2>really should have came away with not even a field

0:19:21.378 --> 0:19:24.018
<v Speaker 2>goal attempt with the way that they handled the situation,

0:19:24.138 --> 0:19:27.378
<v Speaker 2>let alone a missed field goal. So that was that

0:19:27.458 --> 0:19:29.618
<v Speaker 2>was a bad sequence in this game because you score

0:19:29.618 --> 0:19:32.138
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown there. I'm not saying it's a game over,

0:19:32.298 --> 0:19:36.658
<v Speaker 2>but with Anthony Richardson, like in his like limited limitations

0:19:36.698 --> 0:19:40.418
<v Speaker 2>throwing the football, it's it's you're in a really good spot.

0:19:40.538 --> 0:19:42.618
<v Speaker 2>You're in a really good spot up two scores going in.

0:19:42.778 --> 0:19:45.498
<v Speaker 3>I thought the management at the end of the first

0:19:45.538 --> 0:19:47.338
<v Speaker 3>half is more costly than the management at the end

0:19:47.378 --> 0:19:49.378
<v Speaker 3>of the second half. Obviously, in the second half game

0:19:49.418 --> 0:19:52.218
<v Speaker 3>online like you have to be better and that wasn't good,

0:19:52.298 --> 0:19:55.058
<v Speaker 3>but pound for pound, the end of the first half

0:19:55.138 --> 0:19:56.417
<v Speaker 3>was a bigger missed opportunity.

0:19:56.938 --> 0:20:00.258
<v Speaker 2>The other element of this that I feel like come

0:20:00.498 --> 0:20:03.098
<v Speaker 2>follows a little bit on the coaching side of things, too,

0:20:03.418 --> 0:20:05.938
<v Speaker 2>is the regression of the defense, which we've been talking

0:20:05.938 --> 0:20:09.818
<v Speaker 2>about on this show for the entire season, but now

0:20:09.858 --> 0:20:13.138
<v Speaker 2>it's it really seems like it's coming to ahead because

0:20:13.298 --> 0:20:15.338
<v Speaker 2>we're getting to the end of the year and there's

0:20:15.378 --> 0:20:17.778
<v Speaker 2>got to be decisions made about, you know what, what's

0:20:17.818 --> 0:20:20.618
<v Speaker 2>gonna be what this coaching staff is gonna look like

0:20:20.658 --> 0:20:23.058
<v Speaker 2>in year two for Girodmeo. Is it gonna look exactly

0:20:23.098 --> 0:20:25.018
<v Speaker 2>the same? Is it not gonna look exactly the same.

0:20:25.578 --> 0:20:27.578
<v Speaker 2>I know that there's been a lot of conversations about

0:20:27.618 --> 0:20:31.538
<v Speaker 2>DeMarcus Covington. I understand all of those things. I mean, look,

0:20:31.618 --> 0:20:35.098
<v Speaker 2>right now, since Drake may took over as the starter,

0:20:35.698 --> 0:20:38.378
<v Speaker 2>they have the worst defense in football by DVOA. They're

0:20:38.418 --> 0:20:41.938
<v Speaker 2>the thirty second ranked defense in the league. They should

0:20:41.938 --> 0:20:43.938
<v Speaker 2>not be the thirty second ranked defense in the league.

0:20:43.978 --> 0:20:45.898
<v Speaker 2>They have enough talent on that side of the ball

0:20:46.138 --> 0:20:49.218
<v Speaker 2>to at least be middling on defense. They are things

0:20:49.218 --> 0:20:52.018
<v Speaker 2>that I am seeing defensively with them, though are I

0:20:52.298 --> 0:20:54.178
<v Speaker 2>don't want to call him self inflicted because I don't

0:20:54.178 --> 0:20:56.818
<v Speaker 2>want to give zero credit to the opponent, But in

0:20:56.898 --> 0:21:00.818
<v Speaker 2>a lot of ways, they just are not tied together

0:21:01.098 --> 0:21:03.618
<v Speaker 2>as a defense. It doesn't feel like it's eleven guys

0:21:04.018 --> 0:21:07.178
<v Speaker 2>on a string. It feels like it's individuals out there

0:21:07.738 --> 0:21:11.338
<v Speaker 2>on islands, like trying to make individual plays to keep

0:21:11.378 --> 0:21:14.218
<v Speaker 2>this defense afloat. You know, whether it's run fits, whether

0:21:14.258 --> 0:21:16.938
<v Speaker 2>it's assignment's in the red zone, you know, they whether

0:21:17.018 --> 0:21:20.058
<v Speaker 2>it's you know that fourth and three play after the

0:21:20.098 --> 0:21:23.698
<v Speaker 2>catch that everybody wanted Girodmeo to challenge. That fourth and

0:21:23.738 --> 0:21:26.938
<v Speaker 2>three play, the receiver is just wide open, like it's

0:21:26.978 --> 0:21:29.658
<v Speaker 2>another coverage bust, Like it's just a wide open coverage

0:21:29.658 --> 0:21:34.898
<v Speaker 2>bust on a critical game deciding type of play. They

0:21:34.938 --> 0:21:37.778
<v Speaker 2>can't get off the field there because they don't have

0:21:37.858 --> 0:21:40.298
<v Speaker 2>good zone distribution and there's nobody to cover the tight

0:21:40.418 --> 0:21:44.458
<v Speaker 2>end there when Anthony Richardson kind of breaks contain and

0:21:44.498 --> 0:21:46.498
<v Speaker 2>then there's just nobody there and not to you know,

0:21:46.538 --> 0:21:50.418
<v Speaker 2>look get Sjabrill Peppers's first game back. But the whole

0:21:50.498 --> 0:21:52.978
<v Speaker 2>break container element of it too just speaks to the

0:21:53.538 --> 0:21:57.778
<v Speaker 2>undisciplined nature of this defense right now, the run fits again,

0:21:57.858 --> 0:22:00.938
<v Speaker 2>and the run defense again was a problem. So I

0:22:01.018 --> 0:22:05.018
<v Speaker 2>do think defensively, we're getting to the point now where

0:22:05.298 --> 0:22:07.378
<v Speaker 2>there need to be some changes on that side of

0:22:07.418 --> 0:22:10.578
<v Speaker 2>the football in the offseason, not just personnel wise, but

0:22:10.618 --> 0:22:14.538
<v Speaker 2>maybe coaching staff wise as well, because of just really

0:22:14.538 --> 0:22:19.618
<v Speaker 2>what's going on fundamentally with the defense run defense assignments.

0:22:19.658 --> 0:22:21.418
<v Speaker 2>You know, how many times are we going to watch

0:22:21.898 --> 0:22:25.098
<v Speaker 2>them blow coverages in the red zone before something has

0:22:25.178 --> 0:22:27.938
<v Speaker 2>to give there? So and just in general, I think

0:22:27.938 --> 0:22:31.778
<v Speaker 2>that that is a big, big question mark and problem

0:22:31.818 --> 0:22:33.378
<v Speaker 2>that they need to answer. And it's a tough one

0:22:33.818 --> 0:22:37.898
<v Speaker 2>because everybody really is very high on DeMarcus Covington, myself

0:22:37.898 --> 0:22:40.618
<v Speaker 2>included in terms of the future for him as a

0:22:40.658 --> 0:22:43.898
<v Speaker 2>coach in this league. But right now it feels to

0:22:43.938 --> 0:22:46.858
<v Speaker 2>me a little bit like they've regressed too hard on

0:22:46.898 --> 0:22:47.658
<v Speaker 2>that side of the ball.

0:22:47.938 --> 0:22:50.018
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how many times did we talk about in

0:22:50.018 --> 0:22:51.418
<v Speaker 3>the spring of the summer that the point of the

0:22:51.458 --> 0:22:52.898
<v Speaker 3>season was are you better at the end than you

0:22:52.938 --> 0:22:54.738
<v Speaker 3>are at the beginning? And you use the word regression.

0:22:54.738 --> 0:22:55.298
<v Speaker 2>That's what it is.

0:22:55.738 --> 0:22:57.898
<v Speaker 3>You're looking for growth and it's just not there defensively

0:22:57.978 --> 0:22:58.338
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:22:59.138 --> 0:23:02.218
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, the last one red zone obviously go two

0:23:02.218 --> 0:23:03.338
<v Speaker 2>for six in the red zone for.

0:23:03.338 --> 0:23:06.018
<v Speaker 3>Six defensively three for four. The opponent goes three for four.

0:23:06.818 --> 0:23:08.578
<v Speaker 3>Three weeks in a row, they've done three for four

0:23:08.658 --> 0:23:11.417
<v Speaker 3>defensively in the red zone. So you have to be

0:23:11.418 --> 0:23:13.498
<v Speaker 3>better in that area. Yeah, and Drake May should be

0:23:13.538 --> 0:23:16.538
<v Speaker 3>a weapon. And this goes to you look how the

0:23:16.578 --> 0:23:19.698
<v Speaker 3>Colts used Anthony Richardson down there, and Alex Van Pelt

0:23:19.938 --> 0:23:22.178
<v Speaker 3>changed his tone going into that game. He had said

0:23:22.218 --> 0:23:24.538
<v Speaker 3>that they weren't going to do design quarterback runs for

0:23:24.658 --> 0:23:27.657
<v Speaker 3>Drake May, and I mean they still haven't, but that

0:23:27.738 --> 0:23:29.937
<v Speaker 3>week he said, you know, we might mix them in.

0:23:30.538 --> 0:23:32.138
<v Speaker 3>You might have had a shot to mix one in there.

0:23:32.258 --> 0:23:35.098
<v Speaker 3>So you saw what a difference maker Richardson could be

0:23:35.138 --> 0:23:37.818
<v Speaker 3>in that scenario when you lose that space and you

0:23:37.818 --> 0:23:40.378
<v Speaker 3>have more defenders down in the box and now you

0:23:40.418 --> 0:23:41.698
<v Speaker 3>have more guys you have to block. When you have

0:23:41.698 --> 0:23:44.738
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback as an extra number in that count, the

0:23:44.818 --> 0:23:47.938
<v Speaker 3>running backs now blocking that can give you an advantage.

0:23:47.978 --> 0:23:51.178
<v Speaker 3>So I offensively, I wonder if that's key. Defensively, they're

0:23:51.258 --> 0:23:53.258
<v Speaker 3>just they're getting beat every which way.

0:23:53.138 --> 0:23:53.698
<v Speaker 2>In the red zone.

0:23:53.698 --> 0:23:55.658
<v Speaker 3>So there's not one thing I think you look at

0:23:55.658 --> 0:23:57.858
<v Speaker 3>and you say, if you adjust this or if you

0:23:57.938 --> 0:24:01.298
<v Speaker 3>try that. It's a lot more more complex than that.

0:24:01.338 --> 0:24:03.698
<v Speaker 3>But offensively, I wonder if i'd get they don't want

0:24:03.698 --> 0:24:05.778
<v Speaker 3>to run Drake may A ton and I agree with that.

0:24:06.378 --> 0:24:09.938
<v Speaker 2>I would rather underrun him than overrun him. Yeah, but I.

0:24:09.858 --> 0:24:12.418
<v Speaker 3>Don't think the answer is zero either, And if there

0:24:12.498 --> 0:24:13.818
<v Speaker 3>is a time to do it, I think the red

0:24:13.898 --> 0:24:14.298
<v Speaker 3>zone's it.

0:24:15.218 --> 0:24:18.658
<v Speaker 2>What's happening for offensively in the red zone other than

0:24:18.978 --> 0:24:22.018
<v Speaker 2>one drive that completely got killed by penalties. They get

0:24:22.018 --> 0:24:24.898
<v Speaker 2>called for holds on back to back plays and first

0:24:24.898 --> 0:24:26.978
<v Speaker 2>and goal from the two becomes first and twenty two

0:24:27.378 --> 0:24:29.978
<v Speaker 2>from outside the red zone. They there, they go from

0:24:30.018 --> 0:24:32.978
<v Speaker 2>the two line to outside the red zone because of penalties.

0:24:33.218 --> 0:24:35.458
<v Speaker 2>So that was one of the drives that got killed.

0:24:35.818 --> 0:24:37.858
<v Speaker 2>The other drive that got killed was obviously the pick

0:24:38.018 --> 0:24:40.178
<v Speaker 2>right like that happens in the pick, And then the

0:24:40.178 --> 0:24:43.378
<v Speaker 2>other two drives were situations where they got into third

0:24:43.418 --> 0:24:48.138
<v Speaker 2>bat third down dropback situations. When you are in third

0:24:48.298 --> 0:24:51.898
<v Speaker 2>and obvious pass down in the red zone, that's a

0:24:51.938 --> 0:24:55.418
<v Speaker 2>difficult play to execute, like it's a difficult way to

0:24:55.418 --> 0:24:59.698
<v Speaker 2>score it really is. The main reason why it is

0:24:59.778 --> 0:25:02.618
<v Speaker 2>obviously because the space is condensed, so there's no vertical

0:25:02.618 --> 0:25:05.338
<v Speaker 2>element to the field, so you really only are working

0:25:05.378 --> 0:25:08.258
<v Speaker 2>with the horizontal stretch of the field, which is why

0:25:08.298 --> 0:25:10.418
<v Speaker 2>on the first one they called mesh because that's a

0:25:10.458 --> 0:25:14.218
<v Speaker 2>horizontally stretching of the field type of play. But the

0:25:14.298 --> 0:25:16.458
<v Speaker 2>problem is that if you're spacing is off like it

0:25:16.578 --> 0:25:18.978
<v Speaker 2>was on that play, there's just not a whole lot

0:25:19.018 --> 0:25:22.218
<v Speaker 2>of answers for the quarterback at that point on mesh

0:25:22.218 --> 0:25:25.778
<v Speaker 2>against zone. So I didn't love that call from a

0:25:25.858 --> 0:25:28.458
<v Speaker 2>play call in perspective, because there's really when you get

0:25:28.538 --> 0:25:31.458
<v Speaker 2>zone coverage against mesh, which is the crossing routes in

0:25:31.498 --> 0:25:33.818
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the field with a little sit or

0:25:33.858 --> 0:25:36.138
<v Speaker 2>an over the ball route by the tight end behind it,

0:25:36.378 --> 0:25:38.818
<v Speaker 2>and then usually you have like a flare or rail

0:25:39.018 --> 0:25:41.937
<v Speaker 2>out in the flats. It's a really good answer against

0:25:41.938 --> 0:25:44.538
<v Speaker 2>man to man coverage in the red zone. Most teams

0:25:44.578 --> 0:25:46.938
<v Speaker 2>call that mesh traffic where they're just trying to get

0:25:47.218 --> 0:25:49.298
<v Speaker 2>some picks or some traffic in the middle of the

0:25:49.298 --> 0:25:51.618
<v Speaker 2>field and leak the running back out and a lot

0:25:51.658 --> 0:25:54.218
<v Speaker 2>of the time if you can get that player in

0:25:54.258 --> 0:25:55.818
<v Speaker 2>the box to have to go through a bunch of

0:25:55.818 --> 0:25:57.458
<v Speaker 2>trash on his way out to the flat to the

0:25:57.538 --> 0:25:59.818
<v Speaker 2>running back, the running backs just wide open in the

0:25:59.818 --> 0:26:01.618
<v Speaker 2>flat right and he can just run the foot race

0:26:01.658 --> 0:26:03.858
<v Speaker 2>and it's a touchdown. But the problem is is that

0:26:04.058 --> 0:26:07.338
<v Speaker 2>with Mesha in terms of getting zone coverage, which is

0:26:07.338 --> 0:26:10.138
<v Speaker 2>what they got on the play, really the only answer

0:26:10.178 --> 0:26:13.258
<v Speaker 2>to mesh against zone is the over the ball route right,

0:26:13.298 --> 0:26:16.938
<v Speaker 2>and so you have to stretch out the underneath zones

0:26:17.178 --> 0:26:20.417
<v Speaker 2>and create that passing lane to Hunter Henry Hunter, Henry

0:26:20.458 --> 0:26:22.898
<v Speaker 2>I thought probably could have cut off his route a

0:26:22.938 --> 0:26:24.898
<v Speaker 2>little bit sooner and been a little bit more to

0:26:24.938 --> 0:26:27.538
<v Speaker 2>the hash instead of the middle of the field. And

0:26:27.698 --> 0:26:30.138
<v Speaker 2>Kendrick Bourne owned it after the game that he ran

0:26:30.258 --> 0:26:33.378
<v Speaker 2>the wrong route around his route poorly. It didn't keep

0:26:33.618 --> 0:26:36.138
<v Speaker 2>you know, running and continuing across the field. So you

0:26:36.178 --> 0:26:40.018
<v Speaker 2>get into an obvious pass situation. Not only is it's

0:26:40.098 --> 0:26:42.938
<v Speaker 2>in the tight quarters to throw the football. Not only

0:26:42.978 --> 0:26:44.698
<v Speaker 2>do you have to have the right play call against

0:26:44.698 --> 0:26:47.298
<v Speaker 2>the coverage that you get and line it up that way,

0:26:47.578 --> 0:26:51.018
<v Speaker 2>you're also asking a young quarterback to now read progressions

0:26:51.098 --> 0:26:53.978
<v Speaker 2>in the red zone where things happen a lot faster.

0:26:54.378 --> 0:26:56.138
<v Speaker 2>So the one thing that I would put on Drake

0:26:56.178 --> 0:26:58.898
<v Speaker 2>a little bit in the red zone is when they

0:26:58.898 --> 0:27:01.778
<v Speaker 2>get into those situations, he's got to be quicker. He's

0:27:01.818 --> 0:27:04.218
<v Speaker 2>got to be faster through the reads. Like on one

0:27:04.218 --> 0:27:06.458
<v Speaker 2>of the plays, it was a second down play, he

0:27:06.578 --> 0:27:09.178
<v Speaker 2>had Gibson on the angle on the Texas route coming

0:27:09.218 --> 0:27:11.858
<v Speaker 2>out of the backfield. Gibson slipped a little bit, and

0:27:11.898 --> 0:27:14.258
<v Speaker 2>I think that's why Drake came off of it. But

0:27:14.338 --> 0:27:16.618
<v Speaker 2>that's one where you just put it on your running

0:27:16.658 --> 0:27:19.538
<v Speaker 2>back James White style and he burrows his way into

0:27:19.578 --> 0:27:21.738
<v Speaker 2>the end zone and you don't have to get into

0:27:21.978 --> 0:27:23.778
<v Speaker 2>a third down. You know. Those are the types of

0:27:23.818 --> 0:27:27.178
<v Speaker 2>things I thought he had Remandre. They kind of had

0:27:27.218 --> 0:27:29.978
<v Speaker 2>Remandre wheel or seam frond of seam out of the

0:27:30.018 --> 0:27:32.978
<v Speaker 2>backfield and make it three strong on that side, and

0:27:32.978 --> 0:27:35.218
<v Speaker 2>he kind of runs the seam. I thought he had

0:27:35.258 --> 0:27:37.618
<v Speaker 2>Remandre on the seam. He would have had to rip

0:27:37.658 --> 0:27:38.938
<v Speaker 2>it like it would have had to have been a

0:27:38.978 --> 0:27:41.818
<v Speaker 2>tight window. But that's what happens in the red zone

0:27:41.858 --> 0:27:44.698
<v Speaker 2>in the league. The windows shrink, the timing is faster,

0:27:45.338 --> 0:27:50.498
<v Speaker 2>So those things are tough for young quarterbacks. And the

0:27:50.538 --> 0:27:52.738
<v Speaker 2>one way, you know, like as you were talking about,

0:27:53.058 --> 0:27:56.698
<v Speaker 2>to combat the fact that asking quarterbacks to go through

0:27:56.698 --> 0:27:59.378
<v Speaker 2>progressions in the red zone can be dicey that when

0:27:59.378 --> 0:28:01.818
<v Speaker 2>they're in their rookie seasons and their young quarterbacks in

0:28:01.818 --> 0:28:06.858
<v Speaker 2>this league is to run option plays, read options, you know,

0:28:06.978 --> 0:28:11.258
<v Speaker 2>play actions like things like that where it's really simplifying

0:28:11.298 --> 0:28:13.498
<v Speaker 2>the game for the quarterback. Right, so you're not getting

0:28:13.578 --> 0:28:17.938
<v Speaker 2>back into the gun, dropping back and going one, two, three, four, five, right,

0:28:17.978 --> 0:28:21.178
<v Speaker 2>You're just it's an RPO. You're either handing it off

0:28:21.298 --> 0:28:24.338
<v Speaker 2>or you're running it yourself, you're throwing a slant, whatever

0:28:24.378 --> 0:28:26.338
<v Speaker 2>the case may be. I think that those are the

0:28:26.378 --> 0:28:28.658
<v Speaker 2>things that they have to get to a little bit

0:28:28.658 --> 0:28:31.898
<v Speaker 2>more moving forward in the red zone from an offensive perspective.

0:28:32.378 --> 0:28:36.378
<v Speaker 2>Last thing on the offense in the red zone or

0:28:36.898 --> 0:28:39.098
<v Speaker 2>in the offense in general, the Gonzo drive, you know,

0:28:39.218 --> 0:28:42.018
<v Speaker 2>the Gonzo picks it off. Yeah, really probably should have

0:28:42.018 --> 0:28:45.898
<v Speaker 2>sealed the game right there, the first down run. I'm

0:28:45.898 --> 0:28:48.818
<v Speaker 2>fine with running the ball on first and ten there,

0:28:49.258 --> 0:28:52.578
<v Speaker 2>that's okay. I there is a chance that he might

0:28:52.618 --> 0:28:55.658
<v Speaker 2>have checked into the second run. I'm not one hundred

0:28:55.658 --> 0:28:57.818
<v Speaker 2>percent sure, but it looked like he did have some

0:28:57.818 --> 0:29:01.098
<v Speaker 2>communication pre snaps, so maybe that was a can or

0:29:01.338 --> 0:29:04.938
<v Speaker 2>you know, a check into a run on second down.

0:29:05.058 --> 0:29:07.538
<v Speaker 2>But then again, you get yourself into obvious pass on

0:29:07.618 --> 0:29:10.658
<v Speaker 2>third down, and these are the situations you run yourself into.

0:29:10.738 --> 0:29:13.098
<v Speaker 2>I thought he had a chance on third down to

0:29:13.138 --> 0:29:15.698
<v Speaker 2>make a throw to Kendrick Bourne on that play, But

0:29:15.738 --> 0:29:18.938
<v Speaker 2>what it looked like to me was he was told

0:29:19.378 --> 0:29:22.938
<v Speaker 2>if you don't love anything, you can't turn it over here,

0:29:23.138 --> 0:29:25.698
<v Speaker 2>like we can't have a turnover. So he kind of

0:29:25.698 --> 0:29:27.698
<v Speaker 2>turtles in the pocket. And I'm not saying that he's

0:29:27.738 --> 0:29:29.658
<v Speaker 2>like afraid to get hit, don't take it the wrong way,

0:29:30.098 --> 0:29:32.578
<v Speaker 2>but it looks to me like he felt some pressure

0:29:32.618 --> 0:29:35.498
<v Speaker 2>from behind him and didn't want to get strip sacked again,

0:29:35.618 --> 0:29:36.978
<v Speaker 2>and so he just went down.

0:29:36.778 --> 0:29:39.138
<v Speaker 3>Which like good, like that that's growth.

0:29:39.178 --> 0:29:40.458
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't know.

0:29:40.458 --> 0:29:41.698
<v Speaker 3>I kind of would have liked them to take a

0:29:41.698 --> 0:29:43.778
<v Speaker 3>shot there. Yeah, on the first or second down, and

0:29:43.818 --> 0:29:45.898
<v Speaker 3>maybe that's what he checked out of, but I thought

0:29:45.898 --> 0:29:46.938
<v Speaker 3>that was a good time to take a shot.

0:29:47.138 --> 0:29:49.858
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I can't disagree with you there, but just in general,

0:29:49.978 --> 0:29:53.458
<v Speaker 2>I think that those are the the ways that you

0:29:53.578 --> 0:29:57.978
<v Speaker 2>get a really good performance from your rookie quarterback who

0:29:58.018 --> 0:30:01.818
<v Speaker 2>continues to stack games. Obviously the Miami game wasn't was

0:30:01.898 --> 0:30:06.098
<v Speaker 2>bad for everybody, but rams game, this game, stacking good

0:30:06.178 --> 0:30:10.858
<v Speaker 2>games against these teams, and you just can't win. You can't,

0:30:11.138 --> 0:30:12.978
<v Speaker 2>they can't, they can't come away with wins. And I

0:30:13.458 --> 0:30:17.938
<v Speaker 2>feel like game management, defensive regression, red zone offense for

0:30:18.058 --> 0:30:20.858
<v Speaker 2>the three reasons you could check all three of those boxes.

0:30:20.898 --> 0:30:22.578
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's do three up, three down, and then

0:30:22.618 --> 0:30:26.378
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna get into the draft. So do you want

0:30:26.378 --> 0:30:28.418
<v Speaker 2>to start? It was gonna brut up and everyone up

0:30:28.458 --> 0:30:29.298
<v Speaker 2>with Strake May. Yeah.

0:30:29.378 --> 0:30:33.458
<v Speaker 3>I thought, maybe not the flashiest game he's played as

0:30:33.458 --> 0:30:35.938
<v Speaker 3>a pro outside of the forty one yard run. Doesn't

0:30:35.938 --> 0:30:37.498
<v Speaker 3>have and I mean to minimize that, but like didn't

0:30:37.538 --> 0:30:41.138
<v Speaker 3>have those like real highlight deep ball kind of throws.

0:30:41.178 --> 0:30:46.378
<v Speaker 3>But what a complete game he played. I just thought

0:30:46.658 --> 0:30:49.898
<v Speaker 3>his he did a good job reading the defense. The

0:30:50.058 --> 0:30:54.378
<v Speaker 3>intermediate accuracy was excellent. I thought his decisions went to

0:30:54.458 --> 0:30:57.618
<v Speaker 3>run when to not run made sense. He protected himself

0:30:57.618 --> 0:31:00.178
<v Speaker 3>and running the football didn't put the ball on harm's way.

0:31:00.858 --> 0:31:03.778
<v Speaker 3>That's what you're looking for. That's the game we're we're

0:31:03.818 --> 0:31:08.458
<v Speaker 3>looking for. And when we've talked about where there's room

0:31:08.458 --> 0:31:11.258
<v Speaker 3>for growth with Drake May kind of balancing that, Okay,

0:31:11.298 --> 0:31:13.738
<v Speaker 3>where does he need to be better and where will

0:31:13.778 --> 0:31:16.538
<v Speaker 3>it just naturally improve when the talent around him is better.

0:31:16.898 --> 0:31:18.858
<v Speaker 3>And this was the first game where I feel like

0:31:18.938 --> 0:31:22.218
<v Speaker 3>definitively you looked at it and you said, I'm not

0:31:22.258 --> 0:31:24.378
<v Speaker 3>sure how much more he could have done. There was

0:31:24.418 --> 0:31:28.258
<v Speaker 3>some but like he plays at that level with an

0:31:28.258 --> 0:31:32.018
<v Speaker 3>improved roster to your for Cock to QBR stat like,

0:31:32.018 --> 0:31:33.938
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna wait probably more than fifty eight percent of

0:31:33.938 --> 0:31:35.778
<v Speaker 3>the games with him playing that way.

0:31:35.938 --> 0:31:38.458
<v Speaker 2>Cock, that's the best way to measure quarterbacks.

0:31:38.458 --> 0:31:41.218
<v Speaker 3>But when when well, he was more than fifty percent,

0:31:41.258 --> 0:31:43.418
<v Speaker 3>when he plays the way he played on Sunday, they're

0:31:43.418 --> 0:31:43.858
<v Speaker 3>gonna be more.

0:31:44.218 --> 0:31:46.818
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, yeah, his QBR on Sunday was like seventy five.

0:31:46.898 --> 0:31:49.458
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that I would say is probably more like it.

0:31:49.538 --> 0:31:52.498
<v Speaker 3>So now he needs to stack him When we talk

0:31:52.538 --> 0:31:54.658
<v Speaker 3>about the growth down the stretch, right, it can't just

0:31:54.738 --> 0:31:56.498
<v Speaker 3>be being intermittent.

0:31:56.778 --> 0:31:58.938
<v Speaker 2>But if you get all you can give him one.

0:31:59.178 --> 0:32:01.218
<v Speaker 3>If you get like three more of those games in

0:32:01.258 --> 0:32:04.498
<v Speaker 3>the last four from Drake May, I'd feel I'm gonna

0:32:04.498 --> 0:32:07.658
<v Speaker 3>feel really good heading into year two, Like that's the

0:32:07.738 --> 0:32:09.978
<v Speaker 3>kind of game I've been waiting for him to play.

0:32:10.138 --> 0:32:12.378
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, he was really good in this game. And

0:32:12.418 --> 0:32:14.658
<v Speaker 2>I think, what you know, just I had him with

0:32:14.698 --> 0:32:16.978
<v Speaker 2>a twelve plus plays five and a half minus plays

0:32:16.978 --> 0:32:19.978
<v Speaker 2>in this game, so it really was half really good ratio.

0:32:20.298 --> 0:32:21.658
<v Speaker 2>I would have to go look at my notes and

0:32:21.658 --> 0:32:24.538
<v Speaker 2>see you half plays I do have for sometimes I

0:32:24.578 --> 0:32:28.058
<v Speaker 2>do have for like ball placement issues where it's still

0:32:28.058 --> 0:32:32.738
<v Speaker 2>a completion, but like the ball placement wasn't great. Interception No, yes,

0:32:32.858 --> 0:32:36.018
<v Speaker 2>the interception was a full downgrade to me. But there

0:32:36.138 --> 0:32:39.058
<v Speaker 2>was a ball to Hooper along the sideline where he

0:32:39.098 --> 0:32:42.018
<v Speaker 2>wrong shouldered Hooper and Hooper had to fight through some

0:32:42.058 --> 0:32:44.058
<v Speaker 2>contact to make the catch, made a really nice catch

0:32:44.098 --> 0:32:46.378
<v Speaker 2>on the ball, and I put that as a half

0:32:46.458 --> 0:32:49.738
<v Speaker 2>match down. No, okay, no, that was great. The wrong No,

0:32:50.138 --> 0:32:52.498
<v Speaker 2>it was a different It was a different one anyways.

0:32:53.218 --> 0:32:56.578
<v Speaker 2>But number one up was Drake May. I think what

0:32:56.698 --> 0:32:59.978
<v Speaker 2>continues to impress me so much is how well he's

0:33:00.018 --> 0:33:02.338
<v Speaker 2>doing at the first two levels of the defense and

0:33:02.378 --> 0:33:05.338
<v Speaker 2>the short in the intermediate passing game. I don't think

0:33:05.338 --> 0:33:08.098
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of people that were anti Drake

0:33:08.138 --> 0:33:10.578
<v Speaker 2>May in the draft that anticipated that he would be

0:33:10.658 --> 0:33:14.698
<v Speaker 2>this good instructure. This early on, we a lot of

0:33:14.698 --> 0:33:17.138
<v Speaker 2>people kind of knew that he had the deep ball,

0:33:17.258 --> 0:33:20.418
<v Speaker 2>had the mobility, had the off script stuff. But the

0:33:20.458 --> 0:33:22.938
<v Speaker 2>ability to just kind of dice up zone coverage like

0:33:22.938 --> 0:33:25.658
<v Speaker 2>he did on Sunday was something that I was told

0:33:25.658 --> 0:33:28.538
<v Speaker 2>a million times he couldn't do right, Like all draft season,

0:33:28.538 --> 0:33:30.858
<v Speaker 2>I was told that was not in his game, that

0:33:30.858 --> 0:33:33.378
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't who he is, like all those kinds of stuff.

0:33:33.658 --> 0:33:36.978
<v Speaker 2>It's hard when you play Augus Bradley's style defense, a

0:33:37.058 --> 0:33:41.178
<v Speaker 2>Seattle three style defense, to just take profits underneath the

0:33:41.258 --> 0:33:44.858
<v Speaker 2>defense and be patient and take the chunks and take

0:33:44.858 --> 0:33:48.098
<v Speaker 2>the easy layups. When you're a quarterback that wants to

0:33:48.098 --> 0:33:50.618
<v Speaker 2>be back there and wants to make plays, it's hard.

0:33:50.698 --> 0:33:53.138
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to not take the bait and throw deep.

0:33:53.258 --> 0:33:56.218
<v Speaker 2>You know, a couple of times, and a lot of

0:33:56.258 --> 0:33:59.218
<v Speaker 2>young quarterbacks, you know, my boy, Josh Allen, you know

0:33:59.258 --> 0:34:02.338
<v Speaker 2>a lot of young quarterbacks make mistakes doing that. Right.

0:34:02.338 --> 0:34:05.098
<v Speaker 2>They'll they'll take the cheese and they'll throw deep and

0:34:04.898 --> 0:34:07.618
<v Speaker 2>all and then it's a pick right like they do.

0:34:08.378 --> 0:34:11.698
<v Speaker 2>It was really impressive to watch how patient he was

0:34:11.817 --> 0:34:14.138
<v Speaker 2>marching the ball down the field in this game. And

0:34:14.338 --> 0:34:16.618
<v Speaker 2>I continue to be really impressed too with some of

0:34:17.138 --> 0:34:20.258
<v Speaker 2>his anticipatory throws. I thought those were his best throws

0:34:20.297 --> 0:34:22.938
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday. You know, Hunter Henry on a out on

0:34:23.058 --> 0:34:25.857
<v Speaker 2>third down, just a great ball, you know, just right

0:34:25.898 --> 0:34:28.498
<v Speaker 2>out of the break. It's right on Hunter Henry. He

0:34:28.817 --> 0:34:31.178
<v Speaker 2>had to throw a couple over the middle to Kendrick

0:34:31.218 --> 0:34:33.658
<v Speaker 2>Bourne on those incuts on the bow concept. That's just

0:34:33.738 --> 0:34:37.777
<v Speaker 2>like tight window layering the ball in there against zone

0:34:38.018 --> 0:34:39.738
<v Speaker 2>like Bourne is like on the other side of the

0:34:39.738 --> 0:34:42.258
<v Speaker 2>linebacker and he's throwing them open on the you know,

0:34:42.338 --> 0:34:44.938
<v Speaker 2>one side to the other side of the linebackers. Like,

0:34:44.978 --> 0:34:49.538
<v Speaker 2>those anticipatory throws are really impressive, next level type of throws.

0:34:50.218 --> 0:34:53.138
<v Speaker 2>And then again, you play man coverage against this guy,

0:34:53.178 --> 0:34:55.978
<v Speaker 2>you better account for the quarterback because otherwise he's gonna

0:34:56.018 --> 0:34:58.498
<v Speaker 2>run for forty one yards. So when you put it

0:34:58.538 --> 0:35:01.018
<v Speaker 2>all together, you know, I think he only had what

0:35:01.218 --> 0:35:04.098
<v Speaker 2>like two hundred and something passing yards in this game.

0:35:04.698 --> 0:35:06.937
<v Speaker 2>It was I have it right here, it was two

0:35:06.978 --> 0:35:09.297
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight. But then you add the forty one yard

0:35:09.378 --> 0:35:12.297
<v Speaker 2>run in there too, and you know, really fifty what

0:35:12.498 --> 0:35:14.618
<v Speaker 2>nine yards on the ground I think he had in

0:35:14.698 --> 0:35:16.738
<v Speaker 2>this game. You're up over three hundred yards of total

0:35:16.778 --> 0:35:20.218
<v Speaker 2>offense from your quarterback almost so he was very very

0:35:20.218 --> 0:35:20.978
<v Speaker 2>good in this game.

0:35:21.298 --> 0:35:26.018
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, number two Christian Zalez. Yeah, just another excellent game

0:35:26.018 --> 0:35:28.538
<v Speaker 3>from him. That interception should have sealed. It had a

0:35:28.538 --> 0:35:32.458
<v Speaker 3>couple other pass breakups. I think I said this last week, right,

0:35:32.898 --> 0:35:35.178
<v Speaker 3>at what point do we just retire Christian Zalz isn't

0:35:35.218 --> 0:35:37.258
<v Speaker 3>up and just acknowledge it's every week domit.

0:35:37.418 --> 0:35:40.338
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll say this about Christian Goanzalz to all you

0:35:40.458 --> 0:35:42.898
<v Speaker 2>Patriots fans out there. I'm gonna look into the camera

0:35:43.098 --> 0:35:45.418
<v Speaker 2>on the ISO shot right now and say to all

0:35:45.458 --> 0:35:49.018
<v Speaker 2>those Patriots fans out there, go vote for Christian Goanzales

0:35:49.018 --> 0:35:51.778
<v Speaker 2>in the Pro Bowl. Yeah, go smash the vote button

0:35:51.818 --> 0:35:53.658
<v Speaker 2>and go vote for this guy in the Pro Bowl.

0:35:53.698 --> 0:35:56.138
<v Speaker 2>I know the team right now, I know. I know

0:35:56.258 --> 0:35:58.378
<v Speaker 2>the team is struggling. I know that they don't have

0:35:58.458 --> 0:36:00.898
<v Speaker 2>a great record. I know all of that. But he

0:36:01.058 --> 0:36:04.218
<v Speaker 2>is playing at a Pro Bowl level. He deserves to

0:36:04.218 --> 0:36:06.858
<v Speaker 2>be in the Pro Bowl. He deserves your support. So

0:36:06.898 --> 0:36:09.138
<v Speaker 2>go out there and vote for Christian Gonzales for the

0:36:09.138 --> 0:36:12.297
<v Speaker 2>Pro Bowl because he's playing lights out football right now.

0:36:12.978 --> 0:36:17.018
<v Speaker 2>He sometimes has games like this where it just looks

0:36:17.058 --> 0:36:20.458
<v Speaker 2>so effortless and so easy for him. And I don't

0:36:20.498 --> 0:36:23.538
<v Speaker 2>mean to disrespect Alec Pierce or Michael Pittman, who are

0:36:23.538 --> 0:36:27.058
<v Speaker 2>both NFL receivers and are capable guys. It was it

0:36:27.098 --> 0:36:29.378
<v Speaker 2>was light work for Christian Zalez in this game to

0:36:29.418 --> 0:36:32.098
<v Speaker 2>cover those two guys. It was it was a stroll

0:36:32.138 --> 0:36:36.337
<v Speaker 2>in the park and the interception was just a fantastic

0:36:36.738 --> 0:36:39.458
<v Speaker 2>play of route recognition and just driving on the football

0:36:39.538 --> 0:36:42.058
<v Speaker 2>and jumping the pass over the middle of the field.

0:36:42.458 --> 0:36:46.338
<v Speaker 2>He's just been outrageous. He's been great almost every single week.

0:36:46.538 --> 0:36:49.377
<v Speaker 2>He's still only giving up one deep past the entire year,

0:36:49.418 --> 0:36:51.978
<v Speaker 2>that won in London to Brian Thomas Jr. Is the

0:36:52.018 --> 0:36:55.578
<v Speaker 2>only deep ball he's allowed all season long. Into his coverage,

0:36:56.018 --> 0:36:58.538
<v Speaker 2>he's been excellent, and he does it every single week,

0:36:58.778 --> 0:37:01.698
<v Speaker 2>playing almost fifty percent of his downs in man coverage

0:37:01.858 --> 0:37:06.018
<v Speaker 2>and shadowing the other team's best outside receiver every single week.

0:37:06.058 --> 0:37:09.857
<v Speaker 2>Like he's getting you know, Michael Pittman, he's getting Tyreek Hill,

0:37:10.018 --> 0:37:13.818
<v Speaker 2>he's getting Garrett Wilson, he's getting you know, whoever they play,

0:37:13.978 --> 0:37:17.337
<v Speaker 2>he's getting the number one guy, and he's going toe

0:37:17.378 --> 0:37:19.538
<v Speaker 2>to toe with that guy every single week. So you

0:37:19.578 --> 0:37:21.858
<v Speaker 2>can go and take like your zone corners, right, like,

0:37:21.938 --> 0:37:23.818
<v Speaker 2>go let those guys in the Pro Bowl too. I

0:37:23.818 --> 0:37:27.418
<v Speaker 2>guess the guy that shadows him slowers all the way across.

0:37:27.458 --> 0:37:29.857
<v Speaker 2>That's the guy that I'm taking. Well, and I've seen

0:37:29.898 --> 0:37:30.297
<v Speaker 2>this take.

0:37:30.578 --> 0:37:32.897
<v Speaker 3>People have been like, yeah, but he's being targeted a lot,

0:37:32.978 --> 0:37:35.138
<v Speaker 3>and he's six in the league in targets with seventy two,

0:37:36.058 --> 0:37:38.777
<v Speaker 3>he's fifteenth and catches a lad with forty one. Like

0:37:38.858 --> 0:37:43.458
<v Speaker 3>the opposing opposing completion percentage is I think it's it's

0:37:43.498 --> 0:37:44.018
<v Speaker 3>fifty six.

0:37:44.058 --> 0:37:46.498
<v Speaker 2>It's very low. So I don't know, like.

0:37:46.458 --> 0:37:48.338
<v Speaker 3>Why do teams Why are teams throwing in him as

0:37:48.418 --> 0:37:49.898
<v Speaker 3>much as they are, couldn't tell you.

0:37:50.338 --> 0:37:51.058
<v Speaker 2>I don't really care.

0:37:51.338 --> 0:37:53.178
<v Speaker 3>It's awesome as long as he keeps making the plays

0:37:53.218 --> 0:37:56.738
<v Speaker 3>which he's making, like go ahead, waste those back whatever.

0:37:56.858 --> 0:37:58.858
<v Speaker 2>They're throwing a lot at him because he's covering the

0:37:58.938 --> 0:38:00.178
<v Speaker 2>number one receiver, so like.

0:38:00.458 --> 0:38:02.698
<v Speaker 3>These well, but I think people used to like, you know,

0:38:03.058 --> 0:38:06.858
<v Speaker 3>to go back to Gilmour even revis where like teams

0:38:06.858 --> 0:38:09.378
<v Speaker 3>didn't even throw to that receiver, they just left the

0:38:09.418 --> 0:38:12.138
<v Speaker 3>corner alone. Yeah, and I think people are expecting that

0:38:13.418 --> 0:38:17.458
<v Speaker 3>the target number to me is not totally irrelevant. But

0:38:17.498 --> 0:38:22.297
<v Speaker 3>like again, if the passes aren't being completed, then let

0:38:22.298 --> 0:38:23.138
<v Speaker 3>them waste the down.

0:38:23.218 --> 0:38:26.018
<v Speaker 2>I don't really care. I just feel like the target

0:38:26.138 --> 0:38:28.937
<v Speaker 2>number to me is indicative of you're gonna go into

0:38:28.938 --> 0:38:31.578
<v Speaker 2>these games and teams are gonna trying to feed their guys.

0:38:31.738 --> 0:38:34.778
<v Speaker 2>Like even if you're you have a really good corner,

0:38:35.058 --> 0:38:37.858
<v Speaker 2>like if you're going up against Tyree Hill and Jalen Waddle,

0:38:37.858 --> 0:38:40.818
<v Speaker 2>if you're going up against uh, you know, Stefan Diggs,

0:38:40.818 --> 0:38:44.777
<v Speaker 2>if you're going up against whoever, like Calvin Ridley, like

0:38:44.858 --> 0:38:47.018
<v Speaker 2>that's the guy on the other team. They're not gonna

0:38:47.138 --> 0:38:50.338
<v Speaker 2>go the entire game without targeting their number one receiver.

0:38:50.698 --> 0:38:52.938
<v Speaker 2>And when you're playing as much man to man coverage

0:38:52.938 --> 0:38:55.698
<v Speaker 2>as the Patriots are playing, Uh, then I feel like

0:38:55.818 --> 0:38:59.138
<v Speaker 2>that's another you know, thing to to point to that

0:38:59.458 --> 0:39:03.098
<v Speaker 2>those guys are on an island a lot. So it's

0:39:03.138 --> 0:39:05.898
<v Speaker 2>not like there's like doubles or safety help. That is

0:39:05.978 --> 0:39:09.698
<v Speaker 2>also deterring quarterbacks. When quarterbacks see their number one receiver

0:39:09.898 --> 0:39:11.738
<v Speaker 2>one on one with the guy, they're gonna throw them

0:39:11.778 --> 0:39:13.938
<v Speaker 2>the ball. You know, that's the way it goes, all right?

0:39:14.258 --> 0:39:18.897
<v Speaker 2>Third up, Ben Brown, nice, I just Ben Brown shout there.

0:39:19.298 --> 0:39:21.578
<v Speaker 3>You got to Forest Buckner, who's been a Patriots killer,

0:39:21.578 --> 0:39:23.338
<v Speaker 3>and Buckner at a good game, but not against Brown.

0:39:23.738 --> 0:39:25.898
<v Speaker 3>He had Laydon Robinson next to him playing a new position.

0:39:26.018 --> 0:39:28.738
<v Speaker 3>Like remember last time they changed the interior the line.

0:39:28.738 --> 0:39:30.738
<v Speaker 3>He had a really bad game. Yep, so you had

0:39:30.818 --> 0:39:33.258
<v Speaker 3>more movement against a good player he would solid.

0:39:33.418 --> 0:39:34.418
<v Speaker 2>He was solid. Again.

0:39:34.458 --> 0:39:35.938
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what you're sending the tape to Canton,

0:39:36.018 --> 0:39:39.857
<v Speaker 3>but like, I didn't have any real issues with him.

0:39:39.898 --> 0:39:41.817
<v Speaker 3>He didn't stand out to me. It's like, what's Ben

0:39:41.858 --> 0:39:42.337
<v Speaker 3>Brown doing?

0:39:42.458 --> 0:39:42.618
<v Speaker 2>Role?

0:39:42.658 --> 0:39:44.618
<v Speaker 3>Ben Brown got beat there, like he held his own

0:39:44.978 --> 0:39:48.417
<v Speaker 3>and he had tough matchups, so good.

0:39:48.538 --> 0:39:50.178
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was solid performance from him. I also

0:39:50.178 --> 0:39:52.658
<v Speaker 2>have a fourth half up. Okay, yeah, no, I thought

0:39:52.698 --> 0:39:54.578
<v Speaker 2>Ben Brown was good in this game, too, wrote I

0:39:54.618 --> 0:39:57.258
<v Speaker 2>wrote about it, and after further review, I thought, you know, look,

0:39:57.978 --> 0:40:00.698
<v Speaker 2>we keep going here with this offensive line and who's

0:40:00.698 --> 0:40:04.218
<v Speaker 2>gonna play and who's not gonna play, and I understand

0:40:04.258 --> 0:40:06.857
<v Speaker 2>that this is not a fairness business. Yeah, and Cole

0:40:06.898 --> 0:40:09.418
<v Speaker 2>Strange is a former first round pick that the coaching

0:40:09.458 --> 0:40:12.698
<v Speaker 2>staff seems kind of high on playing center, and maybe

0:40:12.738 --> 0:40:16.378
<v Speaker 2>Ben Brown ends up being a casualty because of that.

0:40:16.698 --> 0:40:18.458
<v Speaker 2>But I would just say that Ben Brown does not

0:40:18.538 --> 0:40:19.258
<v Speaker 2>deserve to get.

0:40:19.218 --> 0:40:21.458
<v Speaker 3>Ben No, it would be a shame. And look, they

0:40:21.538 --> 0:40:23.618
<v Speaker 3>need a center down the road, and I'm not saying

0:40:24.258 --> 0:40:29.378
<v Speaker 3>Ben Brown is that player. Is he a good backup center? Absolutely? Yeah,

0:40:29.418 --> 0:40:32.658
<v Speaker 3>and maybe deserves a shot to at least compete for

0:40:32.818 --> 0:40:35.698
<v Speaker 3>the future starting job behind David Andrews. Maybe you draft

0:40:35.738 --> 0:40:38.337
<v Speaker 3>somebody on like Day three, but that's a competition. Uh,

0:40:38.378 --> 0:40:40.297
<v Speaker 3>they got to keep this guy in Fuld. He's he's

0:40:40.338 --> 0:40:42.698
<v Speaker 3>an NFL caliber player and they don't necessarily have a

0:40:42.698 --> 0:40:44.298
<v Speaker 3>ton of NFL caliber linemens.

0:40:44.418 --> 0:40:46.498
<v Speaker 2>So all right, So I had my last up. I

0:40:46.538 --> 0:40:49.018
<v Speaker 2>had a few not like honorable mentions. Yeah, I have

0:40:49.138 --> 0:40:51.378
<v Speaker 2>like an honorable mention because I thought it was a

0:40:51.378 --> 0:40:54.138
<v Speaker 2>good game for several guys on the offensive side of

0:40:54.178 --> 0:40:57.458
<v Speaker 2>the ball. So just quickly on the honorable mentions. Yeah,

0:40:57.538 --> 0:41:00.138
<v Speaker 2>even though he was, you know, in on that interception,

0:41:00.218 --> 0:41:02.018
<v Speaker 2>I thought both tight ends were really good in this

0:41:02.098 --> 0:41:04.897
<v Speaker 2>game and the run and pass game. I just want

0:41:04.898 --> 0:41:07.058
<v Speaker 2>to know a little shout out to Austin Hooper. I

0:41:07.058 --> 0:41:08.378
<v Speaker 2>think Austin Hooper has been great.

0:41:08.418 --> 0:41:10.418
<v Speaker 3>He leads the team in touchdown catches. Yeah, and I

0:41:10.458 --> 0:41:15.338
<v Speaker 3>think he's broke the tie with I don't know Jalen Polk. Okay,

0:41:15.578 --> 0:41:17.498
<v Speaker 3>their leaders are Hooper with three, Polk with two, and

0:41:17.498 --> 0:41:18.418
<v Speaker 3>then a bunch of guys have won.

0:41:18.578 --> 0:41:21.738
<v Speaker 2>I thought that he is he's been really, really solid,

0:41:21.778 --> 0:41:24.297
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's been a really reliable veteran guy

0:41:24.698 --> 0:41:27.337
<v Speaker 2>for some of the younger players in that room as well,

0:41:27.418 --> 0:41:30.258
<v Speaker 2>especially Drake May. I think Drake May gets a lot

0:41:30.298 --> 0:41:34.138
<v Speaker 2>of help from both tight ends Hunter Henry and Austin Hooper.

0:41:34.778 --> 0:41:37.178
<v Speaker 2>I thought Hooper was really good. If you watch the

0:41:37.258 --> 0:41:40.857
<v Speaker 2>Ramandre Stevenson's thirty two yard run early in this game

0:41:40.898 --> 0:41:43.218
<v Speaker 2>on the opening drive, Hooper takes out two guys with

0:41:43.338 --> 0:41:45.938
<v Speaker 2>his block. He gets two guys on that play and

0:41:45.938 --> 0:41:48.378
<v Speaker 2>then he obviously had the touchdown. But the up that

0:41:48.458 --> 0:41:50.778
<v Speaker 2>I ended up going with was Antonio Gibson, who I

0:41:51.098 --> 0:41:55.538
<v Speaker 2>just thought was outstanding for rushes over ten yards in

0:41:55.578 --> 0:41:59.777
<v Speaker 2>this game. Continues to be a darling of the analytics,

0:41:59.818 --> 0:42:02.938
<v Speaker 2>you know, yards after contact, that type of stuff. He's

0:42:03.018 --> 0:42:05.258
<v Speaker 2>third in the league right now in yards after contact

0:42:05.738 --> 0:42:09.178
<v Speaker 2>per rush. He should get more touches. He should get

0:42:09.218 --> 0:42:12.938
<v Speaker 2>more touches in this offense. Yeah, he needs to play more,

0:42:12.978 --> 0:42:15.418
<v Speaker 2>he needs to get the ball more. It's it's funny,

0:42:15.818 --> 0:42:18.938
<v Speaker 2>not any no disrespect to Antonio Gibson, but you look

0:42:18.938 --> 0:42:22.978
<v Speaker 2>at the yards per contact leaders and it's like Saquon Barkley,

0:42:23.058 --> 0:42:26.778
<v Speaker 2>Derrick Henry, and Antonio Gibson, and it's just like, why

0:42:26.898 --> 0:42:28.777
<v Speaker 2>is this guy the one that's not touching the ball

0:42:28.778 --> 0:42:31.777
<v Speaker 2>in this offense? Right? You know, he's making a lot

0:42:31.818 --> 0:42:34.658
<v Speaker 2>of yards. And I would also say that he's a

0:42:34.698 --> 0:42:38.538
<v Speaker 2>really good fit for the outside zone scheme, probably better

0:42:38.858 --> 0:42:40.498
<v Speaker 2>than the other guy, which we'll get to here in

0:42:40.818 --> 0:42:42.538
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. So Antonio Gibson.

0:42:42.578 --> 0:42:45.098
<v Speaker 3>So I had one honorable mention of sex from the defense,

0:42:45.178 --> 0:42:47.817
<v Speaker 3>I believe it or not. I was so ready to

0:42:47.858 --> 0:42:49.898
<v Speaker 3>take a massive victory lap and then he had the

0:42:49.898 --> 0:42:52.498
<v Speaker 3>PI late, which is kind of ticky tack. And that's

0:42:52.498 --> 0:42:56.138
<v Speaker 3>Alex Austin. Alex Austin finally got to play defense, and

0:42:56.178 --> 0:42:58.418
<v Speaker 3>he was good. He looked like the guy we saw

0:42:58.458 --> 0:43:00.338
<v Speaker 3>down the stretch last year that you would hope about.

0:43:00.738 --> 0:43:02.937
<v Speaker 3>He belongs, He belongs in this league, and he gives

0:43:02.938 --> 0:43:04.658
<v Speaker 3>you an option on the boundary. He gives you some

0:43:04.698 --> 0:43:07.578
<v Speaker 3>size and physicality on the boundary that you need watching

0:43:07.658 --> 0:43:10.938
<v Speaker 3>him at the catch point. Marcus Jones isn't giving you that.

0:43:11.058 --> 0:43:13.458
<v Speaker 3>Jonathan Jones isn't giving you that, and against some of

0:43:13.498 --> 0:43:16.738
<v Speaker 3>these teams with bigger receivers, you need it. So again

0:43:16.778 --> 0:43:20.618
<v Speaker 3>he had the PI late that was costly, but overall,

0:43:21.258 --> 0:43:23.578
<v Speaker 3>Alex Austin was good and should continue to play a

0:43:23.658 --> 0:43:24.538
<v Speaker 3>role on this defense.

0:43:24.618 --> 0:43:26.817
<v Speaker 2>Agreed. Yeah, I was really impressed with him. He had

0:43:27.058 --> 0:43:29.978
<v Speaker 2>a couple of really great zone drops in this game.

0:43:30.098 --> 0:43:32.938
<v Speaker 2>One he kind of fell off his man because his

0:43:32.978 --> 0:43:35.698
<v Speaker 2>man went under and cover three and he picked up

0:43:35.738 --> 0:43:38.418
<v Speaker 2>the crosser from the backside of the formation, or actually

0:43:38.458 --> 0:43:40.218
<v Speaker 2>might have been in the strength, but regardless, he picked

0:43:40.258 --> 0:43:42.178
<v Speaker 2>up the crosser from the other side of the formation.

0:43:42.698 --> 0:43:45.178
<v Speaker 2>That's hard to do. Like, that's really good discipline. That's

0:43:45.218 --> 0:43:47.378
<v Speaker 2>really good eye discipline and having your eyes in the

0:43:47.458 --> 0:43:50.138
<v Speaker 2>right places, you know, once your guy drops off and

0:43:50.178 --> 0:43:51.858
<v Speaker 2>you and you kind of pass him off to the

0:43:51.898 --> 0:43:54.858
<v Speaker 2>other underneath zones. I thought he was really good in

0:43:54.898 --> 0:43:56.978
<v Speaker 2>this game. And the p I is you know, a ticky,

0:43:57.098 --> 0:44:00.218
<v Speaker 2>tacky jostling for position type PI. I don't hold out

0:44:00.218 --> 0:44:03.218
<v Speaker 2>against him. A great coverage rep on the quarters call

0:44:03.338 --> 0:44:05.658
<v Speaker 2>to knock the post away like that could have been

0:44:05.658 --> 0:44:08.298
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown without safety help in the middle of the field.

0:44:08.818 --> 0:44:11.458
<v Speaker 2>I agree. I thought he was great. Should play more? Yeah, agreed,

0:44:11.458 --> 0:44:13.778
<v Speaker 2>all right, him and Gibson play more. Go to the downs,

0:44:14.058 --> 0:44:16.058
<v Speaker 2>all right, number one down. We already did this just

0:44:16.178 --> 0:44:18.898
<v Speaker 2>game management. Yeah, just as a whole weird We already

0:44:18.978 --> 0:44:20.897
<v Speaker 2>we did twenty minutes on that. Yeah, but yeah, yep,

0:44:21.178 --> 0:44:22.738
<v Speaker 2>I let you do twenty minutes on that.

0:44:22.818 --> 0:44:24.418
<v Speaker 3>You should be thinking it was important. What are you

0:44:24.458 --> 0:44:26.898
<v Speaker 3>talking about the story? Let me do twenty minutes the

0:44:26.938 --> 0:44:30.138
<v Speaker 3>story of the game. That was the story of the game, Evan.

0:44:30.538 --> 0:44:30.777
<v Speaker 5>I know.

0:44:30.818 --> 0:44:33.418
<v Speaker 2>That's why I had to talk about it. You know,

0:44:34.098 --> 0:44:36.498
<v Speaker 2>has to do his job. You know, it really irked

0:44:36.498 --> 0:44:38.498
<v Speaker 2>me to talk about it, you know, the story, but

0:44:39.578 --> 0:44:42.498
<v Speaker 2>act like it was some like detour that we know

0:44:42.658 --> 0:44:44.777
<v Speaker 2>that was the story of the game. That was the

0:44:44.938 --> 0:44:47.698
<v Speaker 2>story of the game. The story of the game was

0:44:48.658 --> 0:44:52.898
<v Speaker 2>my number one down. And not that he is fully

0:44:52.938 --> 0:44:55.378
<v Speaker 2>to blame. I don't mean to put it all on him,

0:44:55.778 --> 0:44:57.818
<v Speaker 2>but the story of the game was not gonna being

0:44:57.858 --> 0:45:00.377
<v Speaker 2>able to stop the Colts on a twenty play drive

0:45:00.858 --> 0:45:03.418
<v Speaker 2>and that ended with a touchdown that was into Kyle

0:45:03.498 --> 0:45:06.337
<v Speaker 2>Dugger's coverage. And I didn't think this game was as

0:45:06.338 --> 0:45:09.938
<v Speaker 2>egregiously bad for Kyle Dugger as the Miami game when

0:45:09.978 --> 0:45:12.698
<v Speaker 2>I watched it live and I watched the film back,

0:45:12.738 --> 0:45:14.978
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, there's still a lot of Kyle

0:45:15.058 --> 0:45:17.778
<v Speaker 2>Dugger issues on this tape. I just I don't know

0:45:17.818 --> 0:45:20.618
<v Speaker 2>where his head's at, you know, I don't know what's

0:45:20.698 --> 0:45:23.778
<v Speaker 2>going on with Kyle Dugger. I don't think this is physical.

0:45:24.018 --> 0:45:26.978
<v Speaker 2>I think this is mental. And he's a much better

0:45:27.018 --> 0:45:29.178
<v Speaker 2>football player than he showed the last couple of weeks

0:45:29.218 --> 0:45:32.258
<v Speaker 2>since he came back from the injury, and they got

0:45:32.298 --> 0:45:34.337
<v Speaker 2>to get him back on the program, like they got

0:45:34.338 --> 0:45:37.578
<v Speaker 2>to get him back mentally locked in. I thought he

0:45:37.658 --> 0:45:40.897
<v Speaker 2>was late on the crossing route on the touchdown, tried

0:45:40.938 --> 0:45:45.538
<v Speaker 2>to recover, couldn't. I thought he had some other minus situations,

0:45:45.538 --> 0:45:50.098
<v Speaker 2>like they ran that crack taw, that crack sweep quarterback

0:45:50.098 --> 0:45:54.458
<v Speaker 2>sweet play and it was a fourth down play, one

0:45:54.458 --> 0:45:56.578
<v Speaker 2>of those fourth and shorts where they went for it

0:45:56.978 --> 0:45:59.337
<v Speaker 2>and the whole stadium knew what play they were gonna run.

0:45:59.698 --> 0:46:02.378
<v Speaker 2>And he gets walloped on the crack block like this

0:46:02.498 --> 0:46:05.218
<v Speaker 2>doesn't even see it coming. That to me, is not

0:46:05.458 --> 0:46:09.218
<v Speaker 2>a player that's like physically impaired. That's a player that's

0:46:09.258 --> 0:46:13.418
<v Speaker 2>not mentally thinking through the game, right, Like this has

0:46:13.458 --> 0:46:15.978
<v Speaker 2>got to be the call right, so I need to

0:46:16.018 --> 0:46:18.858
<v Speaker 2>get over the top of this block, and instead Michael

0:46:18.858 --> 0:46:22.578
<v Speaker 2>Pittman just clocks him and absolutely takes him out. Same

0:46:22.618 --> 0:46:24.458
<v Speaker 2>thing happened to Jaylen Hawkins, to be fair, So I

0:46:24.458 --> 0:46:27.098
<v Speaker 2>could probably put all the safeties on this list, or

0:46:27.098 --> 0:46:29.738
<v Speaker 2>at least those two guys. So I had Dugger as

0:46:29.738 --> 0:46:33.178
<v Speaker 2>the number one down mainly because they just need to

0:46:33.178 --> 0:46:35.458
<v Speaker 2>get him right, Like, whatever it takes, they just need

0:46:35.498 --> 0:46:35.858
<v Speaker 2>to get.

0:46:35.858 --> 0:46:38.698
<v Speaker 3>I had him on my list as well. You say

0:46:38.738 --> 0:46:40.897
<v Speaker 3>it's mental, I wonder if it's if it's a little

0:46:40.898 --> 0:46:43.498
<v Speaker 3>bit of both, or like to me, he feels like

0:46:44.578 --> 0:46:47.658
<v Speaker 3>when he's on, when Kyle Tucker's on, he's so instinctive

0:46:47.658 --> 0:46:51.178
<v Speaker 3>and his ability to recognize something and then the physical

0:46:51.218 --> 0:46:55.338
<v Speaker 3>explosiveness to plant and react to it, and with a

0:46:55.378 --> 0:46:57.698
<v Speaker 3>bad ankle, I wonder if he just doubts his ability

0:46:57.738 --> 0:47:00.698
<v Speaker 3>to do that, and so he's trying to he's overthinking

0:47:00.738 --> 0:47:03.777
<v Speaker 3>things because he's worried about his ability to just go

0:47:03.818 --> 0:47:06.258
<v Speaker 3>and cut off of it. Yeah, but yeah, I had

0:47:06.338 --> 0:47:07.738
<v Speaker 3>him as a down to for a lot of the reasons.

0:47:07.778 --> 0:47:09.777
<v Speaker 3>He said he just he was at the point of

0:47:09.778 --> 0:47:12.978
<v Speaker 3>attack in on too many plays that the Patriots got

0:47:12.978 --> 0:47:15.458
<v Speaker 3>beat on and he's supposed to be that's supposed to

0:47:15.458 --> 0:47:17.297
<v Speaker 3>be a strength to his So he's got to get right.

0:47:17.458 --> 0:47:19.938
<v Speaker 2>Yep. My number two down is another guy that they

0:47:20.018 --> 0:47:21.777
<v Speaker 2>just need to figure out. They need to get this

0:47:21.858 --> 0:47:24.538
<v Speaker 2>guy right. They paid him. He's a guy that's gonna

0:47:24.578 --> 0:47:28.498
<v Speaker 2>be here. He's not going anywhere. Ramondre Stevenson. I had

0:47:28.578 --> 0:47:31.618
<v Speaker 2>him in this game responsible for I've run stuffs on

0:47:31.658 --> 0:47:35.898
<v Speaker 2>his own, just running into piles, you know, tunnel vision,

0:47:36.018 --> 0:47:39.898
<v Speaker 2>not seeing cutback lanes, not seeing you know, really feeling

0:47:40.258 --> 0:47:42.738
<v Speaker 2>these zone runs like you know, the zone run game

0:47:42.818 --> 0:47:46.658
<v Speaker 2>is a rhythmic play. It's not a downhill play. It's

0:47:46.658 --> 0:47:50.618
<v Speaker 2>a rhythmic play where everything's kind of being concert and

0:47:50.618 --> 0:47:52.378
<v Speaker 2>then the running back is supposed to flow with the

0:47:52.378 --> 0:47:56.258
<v Speaker 2>blocking right and black and cut accordingly. I thought there

0:47:56.258 --> 0:47:58.698
<v Speaker 2>were multiple runs in this game where there was more

0:47:59.018 --> 0:48:03.337
<v Speaker 2>yards to be had that Remandre just wasn't seeing the cut,

0:48:03.378 --> 0:48:07.298
<v Speaker 2>the cutback lanes and the right reads, and Antonio Gibson was,

0:48:07.618 --> 0:48:09.498
<v Speaker 2>which is why he had the big game that he

0:48:09.578 --> 0:48:13.218
<v Speaker 2>had in this game. So whether it's a scheme fit issue,

0:48:13.778 --> 0:48:16.418
<v Speaker 2>whether it's a ball security like that's in his head,

0:48:16.498 --> 0:48:19.778
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I can't speak to the second one.

0:48:20.178 --> 0:48:22.858
<v Speaker 2>I still I said it when they made this coaching

0:48:22.938 --> 0:48:25.498
<v Speaker 2>higher and they gave her Mare the contract, that this

0:48:25.538 --> 0:48:28.938
<v Speaker 2>is what I was worried about. I'm still worried about it.

0:48:28.978 --> 0:48:31.418
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he's a great fit for this scheme.

0:48:31.698 --> 0:48:33.778
<v Speaker 3>Let me ask you this, do you think it's possible

0:48:34.138 --> 0:48:36.578
<v Speaker 3>in the way we talk about quarterbacks getting sped up

0:48:36.578 --> 0:48:38.378
<v Speaker 3>when they're facing a lot of pressure. Yeah, do you

0:48:38.418 --> 0:48:40.578
<v Speaker 3>think it's possible for a running back to get sped

0:48:40.658 --> 0:48:44.218
<v Speaker 3>up in the sense that it just hasn't been blocked

0:48:44.258 --> 0:48:46.978
<v Speaker 3>for him all year, so now when there are openings,

0:48:47.058 --> 0:48:48.578
<v Speaker 3>he just doesn't know where to look for him because

0:48:48.618 --> 0:48:51.178
<v Speaker 3>he's so used to just having to evade that defender

0:48:51.218 --> 0:48:52.338
<v Speaker 3>immediately in the backfield.

0:48:52.498 --> 0:48:56.018
<v Speaker 2>It's a really fair point, and I would say that

0:48:56.018 --> 0:48:58.938
<v Speaker 2>that's definitely on the list of reasons why I think

0:48:59.018 --> 0:49:01.258
<v Speaker 2>that maybe he's at this point he's seeing.

0:49:00.978 --> 0:49:03.418
<v Speaker 3>Go like it's impossible that as a running back he's

0:49:03.418 --> 0:49:03.938
<v Speaker 3>seeing ghosts.

0:49:03.938 --> 0:49:06.618
<v Speaker 2>It's just very odd to me, especially with Fermandre, because

0:49:06.618 --> 0:49:10.938
<v Speaker 2>I do feel like he has been a good process

0:49:10.938 --> 0:49:12.618
<v Speaker 2>cerc like he does read well.

0:49:12.618 --> 0:49:14.938
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing that's why I ask you this. It's

0:49:14.978 --> 0:49:17.898
<v Speaker 3>not characteristic of him. Yeah, So I wonder if just

0:49:17.978 --> 0:49:20.018
<v Speaker 3>the we talked about the start of the season how

0:49:20.058 --> 0:49:22.138
<v Speaker 3>egregious the run blocking was, and how he was still

0:49:22.178 --> 0:49:24.418
<v Speaker 3>making so much out of it that he really shouldn't

0:49:24.418 --> 0:49:26.458
<v Speaker 3>have been. Is it possible that that's all just just

0:49:26.498 --> 0:49:27.498
<v Speaker 3>gotten to him at this point.

0:49:27.738 --> 0:49:30.818
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely possible. You know, there's just instances that, you know,

0:49:30.858 --> 0:49:34.258
<v Speaker 2>with this zone run game where it's just really key

0:49:35.178 --> 0:49:38.458
<v Speaker 2>want you know, to make quick decisions, you know, decisive decisions,

0:49:39.178 --> 0:49:42.418
<v Speaker 2>and to really see those cutback lanes forming, Like when

0:49:42.458 --> 0:49:45.618
<v Speaker 2>there's you know, you're reading usually like the defensive end,

0:49:45.738 --> 0:49:48.578
<v Speaker 2>the defensive tackle to the linebacker on the play side

0:49:48.618 --> 0:49:51.298
<v Speaker 2>of the field in that order, and when those guys

0:49:51.338 --> 0:49:53.897
<v Speaker 2>are flowing outside the numbers and they're trying to set

0:49:53.938 --> 0:49:56.297
<v Speaker 2>the edge of the defense, you gotta cut it up,

0:49:56.378 --> 0:49:57.978
<v Speaker 2>like you got to cut it up through the middle

0:49:58.018 --> 0:50:01.258
<v Speaker 2>of the field. And there's just instances where those cutback

0:50:01.298 --> 0:50:03.297
<v Speaker 2>lanes are just right there for him. I'm not saying

0:50:03.338 --> 0:50:05.138
<v Speaker 2>that he's gonna go sixty yards to the house if

0:50:05.138 --> 0:50:08.378
<v Speaker 2>he cuts it back, but instead of going for one yards,

0:50:08.578 --> 0:50:10.578
<v Speaker 2>he might get eight or nine yards if he cuts

0:50:10.618 --> 0:50:13.098
<v Speaker 2>it up the field, Like those are big differences when

0:50:13.298 --> 0:50:15.258
<v Speaker 2>you know you're a team that wants to run the football.

0:50:15.338 --> 0:50:17.938
<v Speaker 2>So I just feel like it's a little bit in

0:50:17.978 --> 0:50:20.178
<v Speaker 2>his head all of it. Probably that a little bit

0:50:20.218 --> 0:50:22.698
<v Speaker 2>in terms of seeing ghosts. I think the fumbling which

0:50:22.698 --> 0:50:24.618
<v Speaker 2>he put the ball on the ground again in this

0:50:24.698 --> 0:50:27.898
<v Speaker 2>game as his sixth fumble of the year, So that

0:50:27.938 --> 0:50:29.938
<v Speaker 2>goes into the grade too, right like that that's a

0:50:29.978 --> 0:50:34.138
<v Speaker 2>downgrade situation as well. So I like Ramandre. I think

0:50:34.138 --> 0:50:36.538
<v Speaker 2>he's a good football player. I think that he's better

0:50:36.578 --> 0:50:38.338
<v Speaker 2>than he's shown as well in the similar boat as

0:50:38.378 --> 0:50:40.378
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Duggar. But it's a guy you paid in the

0:50:40.418 --> 0:50:42.578
<v Speaker 2>off season. So he's gonna be here next year. There's

0:50:42.618 --> 0:50:45.698
<v Speaker 2>really unless they trade him. There's no way out of

0:50:45.698 --> 0:50:48.218
<v Speaker 2>the contract. Right, Like, he's gonna be here, And I'm

0:50:48.218 --> 0:50:50.498
<v Speaker 2>not saying they should cut him either, but like, you know,

0:50:50.938 --> 0:50:53.378
<v Speaker 2>this is your guy, this is your bell cow. You

0:50:53.418 --> 0:50:54.377
<v Speaker 2>got to figure it out.

0:50:54.698 --> 0:50:59.698
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, number three Bearinger, Bryce Bearinger and Joey sly combined. Yeah,

0:50:59.818 --> 0:51:02.138
<v Speaker 3>not even taking the last feel little out of it.

0:51:02.178 --> 0:51:03.498
<v Speaker 3>He's not expected to take that.

0:51:03.698 --> 0:51:04.018
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:51:04.058 --> 0:51:06.578
<v Speaker 3>On the myths, So Joey Slye talked about there being

0:51:06.578 --> 0:51:09.578
<v Speaker 3>a communication error on the twenty five yard miss and

0:51:09.658 --> 0:51:12.538
<v Speaker 3>you see him like immediately after he misses the kick,

0:51:12.578 --> 0:51:16.138
<v Speaker 3>turn around and look at at Bryce. Yeah, and kickers

0:51:16.298 --> 0:51:19.218
<v Speaker 3>use different holds for different kicks depending on the hash

0:51:19.258 --> 0:51:20.538
<v Speaker 3>mark on the distance.

0:51:20.538 --> 0:51:22.058
<v Speaker 2>It can even be like the weather, the wind.

0:51:22.378 --> 0:51:24.058
<v Speaker 3>It might be you know, you're tilting the ball a

0:51:24.058 --> 0:51:25.418
<v Speaker 3>little bit to left, a little bit to the right,

0:51:25.498 --> 0:51:29.417
<v Speaker 3>little background whatever. So clearly something got messed up there

0:51:29.818 --> 0:51:33.858
<v Speaker 3>where the whole wasn't right and that's on both of them. Yeah,

0:51:33.898 --> 0:51:36.738
<v Speaker 3>and to miss it by that much like is bad.

0:51:36.778 --> 0:51:39.578
<v Speaker 3>And you al said Bryce Behinger had a chance to

0:51:39.578 --> 0:51:42.738
<v Speaker 3>really pin the Colts before that going into that nineteen

0:51:42.778 --> 0:51:46.538
<v Speaker 3>play drive instead just hits a thirty eight yard punt

0:51:46.578 --> 0:51:49.538
<v Speaker 3>down to the seventeen that allowed for return as well.

0:51:49.578 --> 0:51:51.698
<v Speaker 3>Didn't even get nine to twenty on that. So I

0:51:51.738 --> 0:51:54.778
<v Speaker 3>thought those two guys there were some issues.

0:51:55.018 --> 0:51:59.138
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bryce Berenger, you're the punter guy, so I'll let

0:51:59.218 --> 0:52:02.258
<v Speaker 2>you answer this. But kind of feels like he's had

0:52:02.298 --> 0:52:07.098
<v Speaker 2>a bad year. Is that. I don't want to go here.

0:52:07.378 --> 0:52:10.058
<v Speaker 2>But it's not quite as bad as Jake Bailey.

0:52:10.138 --> 0:52:14.418
<v Speaker 3>No, but he had the one in Jacksonville where he

0:52:14.778 --> 0:52:16.978
<v Speaker 3>hits the crap out of the ball, Yeah, and overkicked

0:52:16.978 --> 0:52:19.138
<v Speaker 3>out cases covered and the Jacks return it.

0:52:19.258 --> 0:52:19.498
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:52:19.498 --> 0:52:23.698
<v Speaker 3>And it feels like since then he's been like almost

0:52:23.738 --> 0:52:26.337
<v Speaker 3>taking something off to make sure he doesn't out kick

0:52:26.378 --> 0:52:28.777
<v Speaker 3>his coverage. And it's now he's maybe taking a little

0:52:28.778 --> 0:52:30.818
<v Speaker 3>too much off, right, So he might he might need

0:52:30.858 --> 0:52:31.858
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a reset there.

0:52:31.858 --> 0:52:32.098
<v Speaker 2>I mean that.

0:52:32.258 --> 0:52:34.578
<v Speaker 3>Look, I'm not expecting even to pin them inside the

0:52:34.658 --> 0:52:38.538
<v Speaker 3>three with that kick, especially in those conditions, but to

0:52:38.618 --> 0:52:41.138
<v Speaker 3>the seventeen from where they were, he could do a

0:52:41.138 --> 0:52:41.777
<v Speaker 3>little better than that.

0:52:42.018 --> 0:52:46.538
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, last one, Laden Robinson. I didn't think

0:52:46.578 --> 0:52:49.458
<v Speaker 2>he was terrible, but I just didn't think it was.

0:52:49.738 --> 0:52:53.818
<v Speaker 2>It was quite good enough. Still, I would say I

0:52:53.938 --> 0:52:57.058
<v Speaker 2>had him with four pressures allowed in this game. He

0:52:57.098 --> 0:53:00.058
<v Speaker 2>obviously got called for both holds. Two of the pressures

0:53:00.058 --> 0:53:04.897
<v Speaker 2>again come on like line stunts, like postline movement one.

0:53:05.018 --> 0:53:07.938
<v Speaker 2>He he he went to the linebacker coming from the

0:53:07.938 --> 0:53:10.498
<v Speaker 2>second level when he had Remandre and Blitz pick up

0:53:10.578 --> 0:53:14.058
<v Speaker 2>like usually you talk, you think back on backer, right,

0:53:14.098 --> 0:53:16.898
<v Speaker 2>like the running back has has the linebacker and then

0:53:16.938 --> 0:53:19.937
<v Speaker 2>you block the big guys up front. So I thought

0:53:19.938 --> 0:53:23.857
<v Speaker 2>that was on him. And you just keep going through

0:53:23.858 --> 0:53:25.898
<v Speaker 2>some of these pressures like some of the ones against

0:53:25.898 --> 0:53:28.058
<v Speaker 2>you gave up a pressure against Buckner, Like I'm not

0:53:28.058 --> 0:53:30.698
<v Speaker 2>gonna kill him for it against the player like that,

0:53:30.818 --> 0:53:33.777
<v Speaker 2>But some of these line movements and things like that, Uh,

0:53:33.978 --> 0:53:36.098
<v Speaker 2>this is why Michael Jordan got benched just because he

0:53:36.098 --> 0:53:38.458
<v Speaker 2>couldn't pick up stunts. So if the next guy can't

0:53:38.458 --> 0:53:41.258
<v Speaker 2>pick up a stunt either, then I start to think about, II,

0:53:41.338 --> 0:53:43.498
<v Speaker 2>what are we coaching these guys on these things? Right? Like,

0:53:43.538 --> 0:53:46.298
<v Speaker 2>how are we preparing these guys for line movement and

0:53:46.378 --> 0:53:49.698
<v Speaker 2>picks and games and things like that, the defensive lines,

0:53:49.778 --> 0:53:52.218
<v Speaker 2>like the play up front. So I did see some

0:53:52.298 --> 0:53:54.857
<v Speaker 2>of the physicality, like I can see where girod Mayo

0:53:54.978 --> 0:53:56.978
<v Speaker 2>is coming from that that he's a physical guy and

0:53:57.258 --> 0:53:59.538
<v Speaker 2>he moves people on the line of scrimmage. But the

0:53:59.578 --> 0:54:01.618
<v Speaker 2>pass pro has still got a long way to go.

0:54:01.818 --> 0:54:04.898
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I had him as number three on the downs.

0:54:04.938 --> 0:54:07.777
<v Speaker 2>All right. So there's there's the Colts. I hope you

0:54:07.858 --> 0:54:10.138
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed it. Fun game. It was a fun game. It

0:54:10.178 --> 0:54:12.498
<v Speaker 2>was a game. It was a fun I enjoyed that game. Yeah,

0:54:12.578 --> 0:54:16.018
<v Speaker 2>I agree, let's take these calls and then we'll get

0:54:16.098 --> 0:54:18.978
<v Speaker 2>right into the draft, and get right into the draft.

0:54:20.418 --> 0:54:22.498
<v Speaker 2>I know I keep teasing it, but before we take

0:54:22.538 --> 0:54:25.498
<v Speaker 2>the calls, I gotta do do some homework here. Bridgestone,

0:54:25.538 --> 0:54:28.297
<v Speaker 2>the official tire of the Newland Patriots, is proud upon

0:54:28.458 --> 0:54:31.818
<v Speaker 2>partner with Sullivan Tyre, New England's head quarters for quality

0:54:31.858 --> 0:54:35.498
<v Speaker 2>Bridgestone tires. Visit slivantire dot com to find a location

0:54:35.658 --> 0:54:39.698
<v Speaker 2>near you and my favorite one. Massachusetts is made for everyone.

0:54:39.778 --> 0:54:44.458
<v Speaker 2>Leaf peepers, corn maze strollers, regatta lovers, pumpkin pickers, and

0:54:44.538 --> 0:54:46.618
<v Speaker 2>anyone else you can think of. Come to where there's

0:54:46.618 --> 0:54:49.978
<v Speaker 2>something for everyone in this fall, Massachusetts, where everything is

0:54:50.018 --> 0:54:54.258
<v Speaker 2>made possible. Plan your trip at VISITMA dot com. All right,

0:54:54.458 --> 0:54:58.058
<v Speaker 2>Patty is an agoam. What's up, Patty?

0:54:59.498 --> 0:55:00.858
<v Speaker 6>What is going on? Gentlemen?

0:55:00.978 --> 0:55:01.777
<v Speaker 2>Hey? What's up?

0:55:04.098 --> 0:55:07.018
<v Speaker 6>Not too much so, of course the bye week. I'm

0:55:07.058 --> 0:55:09.738
<v Speaker 6>glad you guys just talking draft. I wanted to throw

0:55:09.978 --> 0:55:13.458
<v Speaker 6>a quick draft question out there for you guys, more

0:55:13.498 --> 0:55:16.058
<v Speaker 6>specifically to Alex, because I know like you've been paying

0:55:16.058 --> 0:55:18.138
<v Speaker 6>attention a little bit more heaven. I know you're getting

0:55:18.178 --> 0:55:21.018
<v Speaker 6>caught up and stuff. But I brought up this name

0:55:21.058 --> 0:55:24.698
<v Speaker 6>before and I just wanted to get your opinion on this,

0:55:25.258 --> 0:55:30.778
<v Speaker 6>both of you guys. But Josh Simmons, How would you

0:55:30.778 --> 0:55:33.658
<v Speaker 6>guys feel, specifically Alex, that you two haven't How would

0:55:33.658 --> 0:55:35.897
<v Speaker 6>you feel if if we did take take a left

0:55:35.898 --> 0:55:39.578
<v Speaker 6>tackle early, like Will Campbell or Kelvin Banks junior, and

0:55:40.258 --> 0:55:42.498
<v Speaker 6>we took him like if he falls to like the

0:55:42.578 --> 0:55:45.658
<v Speaker 6>fourth round and he's he's just there and he's too

0:55:45.698 --> 0:55:47.538
<v Speaker 6>intriguing to pass up, I mean, would.

0:55:47.298 --> 0:55:47.777
<v Speaker 5>He doubled it?

0:55:47.858 --> 0:55:51.098
<v Speaker 6>Because, like like we've seen this year, we not only

0:55:51.138 --> 0:55:54.738
<v Speaker 6>need talent, we need depth too. And I mean, if

0:55:54.738 --> 0:55:56.498
<v Speaker 6>you take two guys that are got to have good

0:55:56.578 --> 0:55:58.938
<v Speaker 6>high upside, you got to figure that at least one

0:55:58.978 --> 0:56:01.178
<v Speaker 6>of them is going to work out. And I have

0:56:01.898 --> 0:56:07.898
<v Speaker 6>the dream scenario too. Here's a dream scenario. We trade

0:56:07.898 --> 0:56:10.978
<v Speaker 6>with Oakland and now we finished like either top two

0:56:11.098 --> 0:56:15.338
<v Speaker 6>or top three Oakland does or I'm sorry, Vegas, Vegas.

0:56:15.378 --> 0:56:19.538
<v Speaker 6>The Raiders do what the Raiders do, and they trade

0:56:19.618 --> 0:56:25.178
<v Speaker 6>us their twenty twenty sixth first round pick, plus they're

0:56:25.178 --> 0:56:28.018
<v Speaker 6>pick in the second round and their first round pick

0:56:28.978 --> 0:56:32.978
<v Speaker 6>bought first round picks with them. They we take a

0:56:33.058 --> 0:56:35.538
<v Speaker 6>left tackle and Alex, we take one of those second

0:56:35.578 --> 0:56:38.098
<v Speaker 6>round picks. That swap it for day Let's go.

0:56:38.418 --> 0:56:39.458
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that.

0:56:39.458 --> 0:56:42.378
<v Speaker 3>That's that's a perfect scenario and thanks for the call, Patty.

0:56:42.498 --> 0:56:45.337
<v Speaker 3>That is the perfect scenario for me. So Josh simm

0:56:45.378 --> 0:56:46.378
<v Speaker 3>is a really interesting player.

0:56:46.618 --> 0:56:49.138
<v Speaker 2>It's because this this crawls up your backside a little bit,

0:56:49.178 --> 0:56:49.738
<v Speaker 2>which I like.

0:56:50.018 --> 0:56:53.578
<v Speaker 3>So for people who don't know, Simmons is a tackle

0:56:53.618 --> 0:56:56.417
<v Speaker 3>from Ohio State. Uh, he just declared for the draft,

0:56:56.498 --> 0:56:58.538
<v Speaker 3>so he's he's officially coming out left tackle.

0:56:58.578 --> 0:56:58.898
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:56:59.698 --> 0:57:02.698
<v Speaker 3>Good player, and he had a really good start to

0:57:02.738 --> 0:57:04.778
<v Speaker 3>the season. Was viewed as like a top one hundred

0:57:04.818 --> 0:57:10.098
<v Speaker 3>prospect coming in and started moving into that first round range.

0:57:10.578 --> 0:57:14.618
<v Speaker 3>He then tore his ACL. I think was in late September. Yeah, so,

0:57:15.018 --> 0:57:16.738
<v Speaker 3>oh no, it's later in that. It was whenever he

0:57:17.178 --> 0:57:19.618
<v Speaker 3>was October. He didn't play against Penn State, I know that,

0:57:19.698 --> 0:57:22.578
<v Speaker 3>which was so yeah, yeah, okay, So he tore his ACL.

0:57:22.618 --> 0:57:25.658
<v Speaker 3>It was like mid October then, and so there's that

0:57:25.858 --> 0:57:29.138
<v Speaker 3>element of it. So I think a lot of Patriots

0:57:29.218 --> 0:57:31.658
<v Speaker 3>fans see that and see the trajectory he was on

0:57:31.698 --> 0:57:33.858
<v Speaker 3>and see the injury and say, well, okay, we need

0:57:33.858 --> 0:57:36.418
<v Speaker 3>a first round tackle. Here's a first round tackle in

0:57:36.418 --> 0:57:38.378
<v Speaker 3>the second round. So I can still get my shiny

0:57:38.378 --> 0:57:40.258
<v Speaker 3>new toy. I can still get ted McMillan. I can

0:57:40.298 --> 0:57:43.378
<v Speaker 3>still get Travis Hunter, but why is he going in

0:57:43.378 --> 0:57:46.458
<v Speaker 3>the second round? Sure, right, he's coming off of torn

0:57:46.498 --> 0:57:50.018
<v Speaker 3>ACL And could he end up being a good player still, yes,

0:57:50.058 --> 0:57:53.858
<v Speaker 3>of course, but there's significant unknown that comes with that.

0:57:53.898 --> 0:57:55.058
<v Speaker 2>Is it gonna be a good player, He's gonna be

0:57:55.098 --> 0:57:56.578
<v Speaker 2>ready to start the season. Yeah?

0:57:56.618 --> 0:57:58.658
<v Speaker 3>If not, then okay, now you still need to get

0:57:58.658 --> 0:58:00.738
<v Speaker 3>you either run it back to the Darien Lowe or

0:58:00.778 --> 0:58:03.338
<v Speaker 3>you still need to get a starting caliber tackle. And

0:58:03.978 --> 0:58:06.338
<v Speaker 3>you know, we've been down this road with guys like

0:58:06.378 --> 0:58:09.658
<v Speaker 3>Dominique Easley where you're not necessarily gonna get the same

0:58:09.658 --> 0:58:13.058
<v Speaker 3>guy coming off of torn ACL. So for where Simmons

0:58:13.178 --> 0:58:15.738
<v Speaker 3>is projected to go, even after the injury, which is

0:58:15.778 --> 0:58:19.418
<v Speaker 3>top fifty, he's unless you're gonna go tackle tackle, he's

0:58:19.498 --> 0:58:22.218
<v Speaker 3>probably the first tackle you're gonna take. And I just

0:58:23.138 --> 0:58:25.738
<v Speaker 3>it's kicking the can again, Evan. It's another half measure.

0:58:25.778 --> 0:58:29.098
<v Speaker 3>And how many times have we talked about like this

0:58:29.338 --> 0:58:32.138
<v Speaker 3>not they can't keep doing that if they still at

0:58:32.178 --> 0:58:34.218
<v Speaker 3>Trent Brown, Right, if it was like two years ago

0:58:34.218 --> 0:58:35.858
<v Speaker 3>and it's sorry, you got one more year Trent Brown,

0:58:36.338 --> 0:58:39.298
<v Speaker 3>then yeah, it makes perfect sense. But I just think

0:58:39.298 --> 0:58:41.218
<v Speaker 3>for where they are right now. No, now, if he

0:58:41.298 --> 0:58:43.498
<v Speaker 3>falls to the fourth, like Patty said, if you can

0:58:43.538 --> 0:58:46.938
<v Speaker 3>get him down there, absolutely, because he's certainly worth that flyer,

0:58:47.018 --> 0:58:48.338
<v Speaker 3>especially if he's your second tackle.

0:58:48.578 --> 0:58:49.938
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's gonna fall that far.

0:58:50.018 --> 0:58:52.578
<v Speaker 3>And the reality is, if he does, it probably means

0:58:52.618 --> 0:58:54.298
<v Speaker 3>there were some red flags in the medical check, and

0:58:54.338 --> 0:58:57.098
<v Speaker 3>now we're talking about maybe a Malcolm Mitchell type situation.

0:58:57.778 --> 0:59:00.538
<v Speaker 3>But so I don't hate the player. I think he

0:59:00.618 --> 0:59:03.458
<v Speaker 3>makes sense in a certain situation. I just don't think

0:59:03.458 --> 0:59:06.018
<v Speaker 3>he makes sense for the situation Patriots are in because

0:59:06.058 --> 0:59:08.818
<v Speaker 3>they need a guy that can step in and play,

0:59:09.098 --> 0:59:14.218
<v Speaker 3>and Josh Simmons, for what his upside is, isn't guaranteed

0:59:14.258 --> 0:59:15.778
<v Speaker 3>to be a guy who can step in and play

0:59:15.818 --> 0:59:17.098
<v Speaker 3>starting caliber tackle for you.

0:59:17.298 --> 0:59:19.578
<v Speaker 2>So I agree with everything you said. I think the

0:59:19.178 --> 0:59:22.338
<v Speaker 2>one thing that you know you mentioned that is the

0:59:23.458 --> 0:59:28.138
<v Speaker 2>potential play here, just as play Devil's Advocate, if they

0:59:28.298 --> 0:59:31.818
<v Speaker 2>sign a Garrett Bowles, if they sign a Cam rob

0:59:31.818 --> 0:59:34.658
<v Speaker 2>and sure, then you go ahead and you and you

0:59:34.738 --> 0:59:37.658
<v Speaker 2>throw the dart at Josh Simmons, who A lot of

0:59:37.738 --> 0:59:40.858
<v Speaker 2>people that I trust think that he might be the

0:59:40.898 --> 0:59:43.858
<v Speaker 2>best pure left tackle of the draft. Like the player,

0:59:43.898 --> 0:59:46.618
<v Speaker 2>like not not necessarily the best blocker, right, like you

0:59:46.658 --> 0:59:49.138
<v Speaker 2>know they don't. They don't think he's a better prospect

0:59:49.178 --> 0:59:52.098
<v Speaker 2>than Will Campbell. But because of Will Campbell's concerns with

0:59:52.218 --> 0:59:54.618
<v Speaker 2>arm length and if he's gonna play tackle, you know,

0:59:54.738 --> 0:59:57.378
<v Speaker 2>just the guy that is the best, you know, cut

0:59:57.378 --> 1:00:00.218
<v Speaker 2>from the cloth type of guy to play tackle, it

1:00:00.258 --> 1:00:03.618
<v Speaker 2>would be Josh Simmons. So in my mind, I don't

1:00:03.738 --> 1:00:05.858
<v Speaker 2>hate the plan because this kind of gets to what

1:00:05.898 --> 1:00:08.098
<v Speaker 2>I my sort of big picture thought on the on

1:00:08.178 --> 1:00:10.738
<v Speaker 2>this draft, the top of the draft class. I don't

1:00:10.738 --> 1:00:13.378
<v Speaker 2>hate the plan, but the plan has to come with

1:00:13.778 --> 1:00:17.498
<v Speaker 2>a immediate stop gap and not Venerian Low. It has

1:00:17.538 --> 1:00:20.298
<v Speaker 2>to be somebody better, like a Garrett Bowles, like a

1:00:20.338 --> 1:00:21.058
<v Speaker 2>cam rob.

1:00:21.058 --> 1:00:23.818
<v Speaker 3>Now that's a guy you're giving a premium contract at.

1:00:23.898 --> 1:00:26.498
<v Speaker 3>So yes, are you gonna use? Can they afford? So

1:00:26.858 --> 1:00:29.258
<v Speaker 3>you're not signing Garrett Bowles as a bridge guy in

1:00:29.258 --> 1:00:31.138
<v Speaker 3>the sense that, all right, well, Simms is gonna be

1:00:31.178 --> 1:00:32.498
<v Speaker 3>ready in October, so we're gonna.

1:00:32.298 --> 1:00:35.378
<v Speaker 2>Start here starting no. And my guess, in my mind,

1:00:35.458 --> 1:00:38.538
<v Speaker 2>this team afford to use what's going to be a

1:00:38.578 --> 1:00:40.658
<v Speaker 2>top forty pick if you want to take Simmons, I

1:00:40.658 --> 1:00:42.858
<v Speaker 2>think can this team afford to use a top forty

1:00:42.898 --> 1:00:44.698
<v Speaker 2>pick on a guy that's not gonna play as a rookie.

1:00:46.418 --> 1:00:48.498
<v Speaker 2>What what if he plays right tackle?

1:00:49.498 --> 1:00:52.058
<v Speaker 3>I would rather bowls move that like, no, because now

1:00:52.098 --> 1:00:54.298
<v Speaker 3>you're if he's gonna play left tackle, you gotta develop

1:00:54.338 --> 1:00:56.378
<v Speaker 3>him left tackle. You gotta let him learn to play there. Gain,

1:00:56.498 --> 1:00:58.818
<v Speaker 3>we're crossing wires and we're trying to find ways to

1:00:58.818 --> 1:01:02.338
<v Speaker 3>make a convenient No, just invest in the position.

1:01:02.418 --> 1:01:03.178
<v Speaker 2>It's left tackle.

1:01:03.218 --> 1:01:05.098
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the most important positions on the we're

1:01:05.098 --> 1:01:06.298
<v Speaker 3>going to do you do you disagree?

1:01:06.298 --> 1:01:06.458
<v Speaker 2>Though?

1:01:06.858 --> 1:01:09.258
<v Speaker 3>I don't like can I don't we stop with the

1:01:09.298 --> 1:01:10.978
<v Speaker 3>half measures and getting cute at left tackle?

1:01:11.058 --> 1:01:11.178
<v Speaker 6>Well?

1:01:11.618 --> 1:01:14.538
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but but I'm not getting cute. I'm signing Garrett Bulls,

1:01:14.538 --> 1:01:15.578
<v Speaker 2>who's a franchise.

1:01:15.418 --> 1:01:19.218
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but then if you're drafting Josh Simmons, let him

1:01:19.218 --> 1:01:20.018
<v Speaker 3>work at left tackle.

1:01:20.138 --> 1:01:22.178
<v Speaker 2>I agree, I would let him work at left tackle.

1:01:22.218 --> 1:01:24.498
<v Speaker 2>My only thing is is, like, if he's healthy and

1:01:24.578 --> 1:01:26.618
<v Speaker 2>gets healthy his rookie season and you want to put

1:01:26.698 --> 1:01:29.138
<v Speaker 2>him on the field, then you can always get his

1:01:29.138 --> 1:01:31.018
<v Speaker 2>feet wet in the NFL by playing him at in

1:01:31.018 --> 1:01:34.458
<v Speaker 2>the right side. I guess I just I they've done it.

1:01:34.658 --> 1:01:37.498
<v Speaker 2>In the past, like and look what I don't mean,

1:01:37.618 --> 1:01:41.258
<v Speaker 2>like this pass, like the bad pass. Now it was

1:01:41.298 --> 1:01:43.778
<v Speaker 2>a different past. It was Tom Brady was your quarterback

1:01:43.818 --> 1:01:46.658
<v Speaker 2>and Bill Belichick was your head coach. But Nate Solder

1:01:46.658 --> 1:01:49.298
<v Speaker 2>did this right where Matt Light was still here and

1:01:49.378 --> 1:01:51.938
<v Speaker 2>they had Nate Solder waiting in the wings. He played

1:01:51.938 --> 1:01:53.738
<v Speaker 2>a little six to zero line. He played a little

1:01:53.818 --> 1:01:57.218
<v Speaker 2>right tackle right like they just to get him involved as.

1:01:57.138 --> 1:02:00.178
<v Speaker 3>A road So all right, again, can this team afford

1:02:00.218 --> 1:02:01.698
<v Speaker 3>to use the top forty pick on a guy that

1:02:01.858 --> 1:02:04.778
<v Speaker 3>is just involved and not a full time starter? And

1:02:05.178 --> 1:02:07.778
<v Speaker 3>this also is predicated on the idea, So how how

1:02:07.818 --> 1:02:08.978
<v Speaker 3>long you signing gear Boles for?

1:02:09.778 --> 1:02:13.058
<v Speaker 2>Right that you would get Garrett Bowles on like a

1:02:13.058 --> 1:02:13.738
<v Speaker 2>two year deal.

1:02:14.258 --> 1:02:15.978
<v Speaker 3>I think he's probably gonna get three years.

1:02:16.138 --> 1:02:18.658
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, so I just said it to play Devil's out.

1:02:18.818 --> 1:02:21.618
<v Speaker 2>That's fair enough, good player. I just it.

1:02:21.858 --> 1:02:23.818
<v Speaker 3>They can't afford to use that pick on a guy

1:02:23.858 --> 1:02:25.978
<v Speaker 3>that's not gonna play.

1:02:25.858 --> 1:02:28.338
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough, fair enough? All right? Mark is in Connecticut?

1:02:28.418 --> 1:02:29.858
<v Speaker 2>What's up? Mark?

1:02:30.538 --> 1:02:31.418
<v Speaker 5>Steppy? Bye week?

1:02:31.498 --> 1:02:36.298
<v Speaker 2>Guys, stay New Year. If I don't talk to you, Uh.

1:02:36.778 --> 1:02:38.698
<v Speaker 5>Just had a couple of quick things for you, guys.

1:02:38.858 --> 1:02:41.298
<v Speaker 5>I'm just not happy. Here's the first thing. I'm not

1:02:41.338 --> 1:02:45.698
<v Speaker 5>happy with Girod Mayo with his just non aggressiveness with

1:02:45.778 --> 1:02:48.498
<v Speaker 5>a lot of you know, end of game decisions. And

1:02:48.538 --> 1:02:50.778
<v Speaker 5>I know you guys talked about it earlier, but I

1:02:50.778 --> 1:02:52.618
<v Speaker 5>think you guys were kind of alluded to it that

1:02:53.018 --> 1:02:54.898
<v Speaker 5>he just needs to be more aggressive because what does

1:02:54.898 --> 1:02:57.818
<v Speaker 5>he have to lose with this team this year. I'd

1:02:57.938 --> 1:03:02.138
<v Speaker 5>rather be more aggressive on those type of end of

1:03:02.138 --> 1:03:04.898
<v Speaker 5>game decisions, and I'm just not seeing that. The other

1:03:04.938 --> 1:03:10.338
<v Speaker 5>thing is any possibility of Mike Vrabel coming back here

1:03:10.378 --> 1:03:14.538
<v Speaker 5>and maybe having Girod Mayo take a step down and

1:03:14.658 --> 1:03:17.658
<v Speaker 5>be at d C because I think he needs a

1:03:17.698 --> 1:03:23.098
<v Speaker 5>little more grooming in that area as well. And DeMarcus Cummington.

1:03:23.698 --> 1:03:26.378
<v Speaker 5>I like the guy, but I don't think that he's

1:03:26.458 --> 1:03:28.458
<v Speaker 5>a d C right now. So I don't know why

1:03:28.578 --> 1:03:32.058
<v Speaker 5>Gerard isn't getting more of his hand on that defense

1:03:32.578 --> 1:03:35.898
<v Speaker 5>right now. And then the other thing for the draft, Alex,

1:03:36.138 --> 1:03:38.538
<v Speaker 5>tell me what you think. I know everybody likes Trevor,

1:03:39.098 --> 1:03:44.338
<v Speaker 5>Trevor Hunt, Travis Hunter. I love the Mike Evans replica

1:03:44.898 --> 1:03:48.738
<v Speaker 5>t Mac. What do you think about t Mac in that? Uh,

1:03:48.938 --> 1:03:51.138
<v Speaker 5>you know, top five pick that we would have. What's

1:03:51.178 --> 1:03:52.098
<v Speaker 5>your thought on that, Alex?

1:03:52.498 --> 1:03:54.858
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the call. Mark. We're gonna get the team where.

1:03:54.858 --> 1:03:58.498
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to that in a second. Yeah, unvariable. Look,

1:03:58.578 --> 1:04:01.258
<v Speaker 2>Girodmeo is not getting demoted, right, that doesn't happen. Nobody's

1:04:01.258 --> 1:04:03.418
<v Speaker 2>getting I've seen that. Well. Can you demote Alex van

1:04:03.458 --> 1:04:04.778
<v Speaker 2>Pelt to quarterbacks coach? Like it?

1:04:04.898 --> 1:04:06.978
<v Speaker 3>Actually, when I say it never happens, it sort of

1:04:07.018 --> 1:04:09.778
<v Speaker 3>happened with Matt grow but that was incredibly rare.

1:04:09.978 --> 1:04:12.938
<v Speaker 2>No, and now his front office. You don't take a

1:04:13.018 --> 1:04:15.458
<v Speaker 2>head coach and demote him to defensive coordinator.

1:04:15.578 --> 1:04:15.698
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:04:15.818 --> 1:04:18.578
<v Speaker 2>You might take play calling duties from a coordinator, which

1:04:18.618 --> 1:04:20.738
<v Speaker 2>I guess is sort of a demotion, but you don't

1:04:20.778 --> 1:04:21.258
<v Speaker 2>do that at the.

1:04:21.298 --> 1:04:24.898
<v Speaker 3>Head No, you don't. It's even super Who is it

1:04:24.978 --> 1:04:26.218
<v Speaker 3>as back where he is it?

1:04:26.498 --> 1:04:27.658
<v Speaker 2>Raheem Morris? Yeah?

1:04:27.898 --> 1:04:30.658
<v Speaker 3>Is back where he coached as the DC now the

1:04:30.698 --> 1:04:31.138
<v Speaker 3>head coach?

1:04:31.218 --> 1:04:33.458
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Uh no, he's the head coach there? Who am

1:04:33.458 --> 1:04:36.698
<v Speaker 2>I thinking of? Were he Morris is in Atlanta? Yeah?

1:04:36.738 --> 1:04:37.898
<v Speaker 2>But isn't a head coach? Yeah?

1:04:38.298 --> 1:04:41.618
<v Speaker 3>No, there's somebody in the league. Is the DC somewhere

1:04:41.618 --> 1:04:43.458
<v Speaker 3>where they had been ahead coach and gotten fired?

1:04:44.778 --> 1:04:47.898
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I, oh, yeah, who are you talking about? This

1:04:47.978 --> 1:04:48.618
<v Speaker 2>is gonna bug me.

1:04:49.018 --> 1:04:50.378
<v Speaker 3>I saw it the other day and I was like, oh,

1:04:50.458 --> 1:04:56.658
<v Speaker 3>that's interesting. Yeah, yeah, uh it is oh Vance, Joseph Vance,

1:04:56.738 --> 1:04:59.458
<v Speaker 3>Joseph in denvery. Yeah, because he was he was there

1:04:59.498 --> 1:05:01.178
<v Speaker 3>having the time of his life, and then he wasn't.

1:05:01.178 --> 1:05:03.018
<v Speaker 2>And now he's back and having the time of his life.

1:05:03.058 --> 1:05:05.898
<v Speaker 2>Giving up five hundred yards to Jamis Winston is having

1:05:05.938 --> 1:05:10.498
<v Speaker 2>a respect Jameis Winston. Yes, he did have waited.

1:05:10.978 --> 1:05:12.738
<v Speaker 3>The Lord is going to deliver him from pick six

1:05:12.778 --> 1:05:13.538
<v Speaker 3>to either he said.

1:05:13.618 --> 1:05:16.098
<v Speaker 2>James hasn't been throwing pick six as his old NFL career.

1:05:16.138 --> 1:05:17.378
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Lord's helping him.

1:05:17.338 --> 1:05:21.618
<v Speaker 3>Thirty thirty man, thirty thirty club to the the Rabel point.

1:05:21.698 --> 1:05:24.538
<v Speaker 3>And this is something we talked about a lot last offseason. Yes,

1:05:24.978 --> 1:05:28.138
<v Speaker 3>it wouldn't be moving Mayo down. It would be would

1:05:28.138 --> 1:05:30.858
<v Speaker 3>Mike Vrabel take a kind of head of football opera rations?

1:05:30.938 --> 1:05:31.058
<v Speaker 4>Right?

1:05:31.138 --> 1:05:35.378
<v Speaker 2>I just think that he's so do I we love

1:05:35.498 --> 1:05:38.978
<v Speaker 2>this idea. I love this. It's so dicey now because

1:05:38.978 --> 1:05:41.858
<v Speaker 2>of all the fire that's on girod Mayo. If Rabel's

1:05:41.898 --> 1:05:45.578
<v Speaker 2>here like held, you know, hanging over him all like

1:05:45.858 --> 1:05:47.738
<v Speaker 2>all the fans are just gonna want able to be

1:05:47.818 --> 1:05:49.538
<v Speaker 2>the head coach. You gotta do it best for the team.

1:05:49.578 --> 1:05:51.218
<v Speaker 3>Of having somebody in that roles, what's best for the team,

1:05:51.258 --> 1:05:51.978
<v Speaker 3>you gotta be willing to take.

1:05:52.218 --> 1:05:55.258
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's tough to uh to to put

1:05:55.818 --> 1:05:58.618
<v Speaker 2>Girod in that situation. What if it's not Rabel, Like,

1:05:58.658 --> 1:06:00.538
<v Speaker 2>I still think hiring somebody in that role. I remember

1:06:00.538 --> 1:06:03.458
<v Speaker 2>it's for for Wolf and grow too. Yeah, Like, I

1:06:03.938 --> 1:06:06.338
<v Speaker 2>still think there'd be value in adding that role. Yeah,

1:06:06.338 --> 1:06:07.938
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna lie. You know, when I was watching

1:06:07.978 --> 1:06:11.738
<v Speaker 2>Monday night football, it was a good game. It was

1:06:11.738 --> 1:06:15.738
<v Speaker 2>Monday Night, right, yeahs Browns and uh, they panned to

1:06:15.818 --> 1:06:18.498
<v Speaker 2>the to the brown sideline and Rabel was just standing

1:06:18.578 --> 1:06:21.178
<v Speaker 2>there on the sideline and I did do a double

1:06:21.218 --> 1:06:24.978
<v Speaker 2>take of like, in an alternate universe like this, this

1:06:25.098 --> 1:06:28.458
<v Speaker 2>could have been different. Uh, but I you know, look

1:06:28.498 --> 1:06:32.018
<v Speaker 2>at it isn't. So that's where we're at. But no,

1:06:32.218 --> 1:06:34.818
<v Speaker 2>I I don't think they I don't like the idea

1:06:36.018 --> 1:06:38.298
<v Speaker 2>of bringing Rabel in now because of how year one

1:06:38.378 --> 1:06:40.418
<v Speaker 2>has gone for Girad MAO. I think that would be

1:06:40.978 --> 1:06:43.018
<v Speaker 2>that would be tough. You know, I was talking to

1:06:43.098 --> 1:06:45.818
<v Speaker 2>somebody off the air yesterday about this, uh, you know,

1:06:45.978 --> 1:06:49.578
<v Speaker 2>just about defensive coordinator and names and things, and you know,

1:06:49.658 --> 1:06:52.858
<v Speaker 2>obviously like Brian Flores, right, Like, I don't know if

1:06:52.898 --> 1:06:54.978
<v Speaker 2>you'd make a lateral move, but I'm just saying, you know,

1:06:55.898 --> 1:06:59.298
<v Speaker 2>Brian Flores is an example. That's another one where can

1:06:59.378 --> 1:07:01.778
<v Speaker 2>you really bring Brian Flores in here? Because then if

1:07:01.818 --> 1:07:03.978
<v Speaker 2>it's still not going well, everybody's just gonna want him

1:07:03.978 --> 1:07:05.818
<v Speaker 2>to be the head coach of the team, right, Josh

1:07:05.898 --> 1:07:08.778
<v Speaker 2>McDaniels on offense, same thing. It's just gonna be you know,

1:07:08.858 --> 1:07:09.338
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

1:07:09.138 --> 1:07:10.858
<v Speaker 3>Know if people a gonna be claaring for Josh McDaniel's

1:07:10.898 --> 1:07:11.298
<v Speaker 3>head coach.

1:07:11.618 --> 1:07:13.338
<v Speaker 2>I think if it goes bad again, I think they're

1:07:13.338 --> 1:07:17.338
<v Speaker 2>gonna be clearing for anybody else. All Right, Reggie is

1:07:17.418 --> 1:07:18.178
<v Speaker 2>in Peabody.

1:07:18.778 --> 1:07:22.978
<v Speaker 6>What's up, Reggie, Hey, guys, big fan of the show.

1:07:23.658 --> 1:07:26.898
<v Speaker 6>Got a quick one for you, guys, is speaking of

1:07:26.938 --> 1:07:30.738
<v Speaker 6>an alternate universe seven If Jamar Chase and Pense Pool

1:07:30.818 --> 1:07:32.698
<v Speaker 6>we're both in this draft, So are you guys taken?

1:07:33.298 --> 1:07:36.058
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question. That's a good question, Reggie. It's

1:07:36.058 --> 1:07:38.178
<v Speaker 2>a good way to segue us as I keep trying

1:07:38.178 --> 1:07:41.018
<v Speaker 2>to get us to the draft. I would take Penne

1:07:41.138 --> 1:07:43.898
<v Speaker 2>Sewel as well. But this is the meme, right and

1:07:43.978 --> 1:07:47.338
<v Speaker 2>this is like part partially the conversation we're gonna have

1:07:47.858 --> 1:07:50.818
<v Speaker 2>this offseason, is the wide receiver or the tackle like

1:07:50.938 --> 1:07:54.138
<v Speaker 2>it's it's kind of similar. I wouldn't put any of

1:07:54.258 --> 1:07:58.058
<v Speaker 2>these players in the Penne Sewel Jamar Chase level. I

1:07:58.138 --> 1:08:01.298
<v Speaker 2>think that one worked out. I mean, the Bengals sort

1:08:01.338 --> 1:08:02.898
<v Speaker 2>of worked out on to a Super Bowl. I suppose

1:08:02.938 --> 1:08:03.378
<v Speaker 2>it worked out.

1:08:03.658 --> 1:08:04.938
<v Speaker 3>Joe Burrow still getting hurt every here.

1:08:05.458 --> 1:08:07.778
<v Speaker 2>That one sort of worked out for both sides because

1:08:07.818 --> 1:08:10.858
<v Speaker 2>they were both elite players, right, Like, you really didn't

1:08:10.898 --> 1:08:14.538
<v Speaker 2>have a wrong answer between those two guys. My biggest

1:08:14.578 --> 1:08:17.817
<v Speaker 2>takeaway as we get into it here with my initial

1:08:17.898 --> 1:08:23.418
<v Speaker 2>draft thoughts, big Day, my big picture thought after watching

1:08:23.458 --> 1:08:27.737
<v Speaker 2>the top of this draft class, and that is Travis

1:08:27.858 --> 1:08:35.058
<v Speaker 2>Hunter both ways, Campbell, Kelvin Banks, Ted McMillan, Abdull Carter

1:08:35.858 --> 1:08:37.657
<v Speaker 2>Uh and I threw in a couple games of those

1:08:37.738 --> 1:08:39.777
<v Speaker 2>Georgia guys too and watched them both at the same time.

1:08:39.858 --> 1:08:43.577
<v Speaker 2>Michael Williams, Will Johnson, and I've already seen Will Johnson

1:08:43.617 --> 1:08:47.817
<v Speaker 2>and Mason Graham a little bit from Michigan's. I've already

1:08:47.857 --> 1:08:49.977
<v Speaker 2>got a pretty decent feel for those two guys what

1:08:50.098 --> 1:08:52.177
<v Speaker 2>they bring to the table. So I've got a pretty

1:08:52.378 --> 1:08:54.098
<v Speaker 2>to the Georgia guys. I'm impressed. Yeah, I got to

1:08:54.138 --> 1:08:55.897
<v Speaker 2>the Georgia guys just a couple of games. I didn't

1:08:55.897 --> 1:08:57.697
<v Speaker 2>do it. I didn't do all my notes on those

1:08:57.737 --> 1:08:59.657
<v Speaker 2>guys yet, but I just wanted to see him move

1:08:59.777 --> 1:09:03.977
<v Speaker 2>and see how they play. Uh. My biggest takeaway from

1:09:04.138 --> 1:09:08.817
<v Speaker 2>watching all these guys was I feel really strongly about

1:09:09.458 --> 1:09:12.817
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots cannot draft based off of need in this

1:09:13.018 --> 1:09:18.378
<v Speaker 2>class because I don't feel like I am pounding the

1:09:18.458 --> 1:09:21.218
<v Speaker 2>table for guys at positions that I know the whole

1:09:21.258 --> 1:09:25.338
<v Speaker 2>world wants them to draft, mainly wide receiver. But all

1:09:25.458 --> 1:09:28.617
<v Speaker 2>these guys, as we go through this process, all of

1:09:28.737 --> 1:09:31.777
<v Speaker 2>them have some wartz. I don't love the top of

1:09:31.817 --> 1:09:34.537
<v Speaker 2>this draft class. On offense. I don't think that there's

1:09:34.617 --> 1:09:37.777
<v Speaker 2>a great class on that side of the football. You

1:09:37.937 --> 1:09:42.057
<v Speaker 2>have guys that are tackles that might be guards, both

1:09:42.098 --> 1:09:46.817
<v Speaker 2>of them frankly for different reasons, but both of them.

1:09:47.537 --> 1:09:51.537
<v Speaker 2>And you have a player in Ted McMillan who I

1:09:51.857 --> 1:09:55.697
<v Speaker 2>just don't see as being on the same level as

1:09:55.857 --> 1:10:00.617
<v Speaker 2>like a surefire top ten pick, like a Marvin Harrison junior,

1:10:00.817 --> 1:10:04.218
<v Speaker 2>a Molak neighbors. Maybe he's a little bit more in

1:10:04.258 --> 1:10:07.177
<v Speaker 2>the same category for me, as like a Roma Dunze

1:10:07.378 --> 1:10:10.258
<v Speaker 2>or a Brian Thomas junior was last year. But I

1:10:10.298 --> 1:10:14.497
<v Speaker 2>would probably have Ted McMillan as wide receiver four at

1:10:14.617 --> 1:10:18.378
<v Speaker 2>best in the class last year. And to me, that matters.

1:10:18.458 --> 1:10:22.737
<v Speaker 2>When you're picking this high. You cannot draft a player

1:10:23.298 --> 1:10:26.977
<v Speaker 2>fourth overall where they stand right now, that is really

1:10:27.058 --> 1:10:29.777
<v Speaker 2>the fifteenth best player in the draft. You just can't

1:10:29.857 --> 1:10:32.857
<v Speaker 2>do it. That's how bad teams stay bad is they

1:10:32.978 --> 1:10:36.577
<v Speaker 2>reach on positions of need. They reach on positions that

1:10:36.657 --> 1:10:39.378
<v Speaker 2>are sexier than other positions just to sell fans and

1:10:39.458 --> 1:10:43.138
<v Speaker 2>to sell their regime on people. That is how bad

1:10:43.218 --> 1:10:47.298
<v Speaker 2>teams stay bad. And I'll give you one example. It's

1:10:47.338 --> 1:10:49.657
<v Speaker 2>not a perfect example because there was another receiver that

1:10:49.737 --> 1:10:52.617
<v Speaker 2>went a couple of picks after that wouldn't would have

1:10:52.697 --> 1:10:55.697
<v Speaker 2>made all this go away. When I watched Ted McMillan,

1:10:56.857 --> 1:10:58.777
<v Speaker 2>the player that I see with him is Drake London

1:10:58.937 --> 1:11:02.537
<v Speaker 2>in Atlanta. Drake London got drafted eighth overall by the

1:11:02.577 --> 1:11:06.018
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta Falcons three years ago in twenty twenty two. I

1:11:06.138 --> 1:11:09.577
<v Speaker 2>want to say it was that was not a good pick.

1:11:11.058 --> 1:11:14.217
<v Speaker 2>I understand that Drake London's an NFL player. I understand

1:11:14.218 --> 1:11:16.777
<v Speaker 2>that Drake Lonnon is a solid NFL player. He was

1:11:16.897 --> 1:11:19.458
<v Speaker 2>not worthy of the eighth overall pick in the draft.

1:11:19.497 --> 1:11:21.418
<v Speaker 2>He's yet to have in a thousand yard season in

1:11:21.458 --> 1:11:25.737
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. I worry that in this draft, if you

1:11:25.897 --> 1:11:29.378
<v Speaker 2>reach based off of need, that you're gonna get an okay,

1:11:29.577 --> 1:11:32.138
<v Speaker 2>but not great. And the Patriots right now need to

1:11:32.258 --> 1:11:34.857
<v Speaker 2>use their top pick on a great player. They can't

1:11:34.857 --> 1:11:38.857
<v Speaker 2>afford okay with the fourth overall pick. It's got to

1:11:38.857 --> 1:11:41.857
<v Speaker 2>be a stud. And whether that stud plays offense, if

1:11:41.897 --> 1:11:45.137
<v Speaker 2>plays defense, he's a corner, he's an edge rusher, wherever

1:11:45.258 --> 1:11:48.777
<v Speaker 2>he might play on the field. I'm in the school

1:11:48.817 --> 1:11:50.697
<v Speaker 2>of thought that they just need talent, man, Like, I

1:11:50.737 --> 1:11:53.217
<v Speaker 2>don't think it matters. I really don't think it matters.

1:11:53.298 --> 1:11:56.857
<v Speaker 2>You have the thirty second ranked defense, you have the

1:11:56.937 --> 1:12:00.298
<v Speaker 2>thirty first ranked offense in DVOA Like. You need help

1:12:00.378 --> 1:12:02.537
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the football. So if it's an

1:12:02.657 --> 1:12:06.058
<v Speaker 2>edge rusher this year, even though wide receiver might be

1:12:06.497 --> 1:12:08.857
<v Speaker 2>a bigger need to some people, I think this is

1:12:08.897 --> 1:12:10.817
<v Speaker 2>the year that you have to go where the talent is.

1:12:11.458 --> 1:12:13.697
<v Speaker 2>So I don't necessarily disagree with that.

1:12:13.817 --> 1:12:16.617
<v Speaker 3>I just hate the idea of like not supporting Drake

1:12:16.737 --> 1:12:18.017
<v Speaker 3>May with this premium ass set.

1:12:18.817 --> 1:12:21.137
<v Speaker 2>And I'm leaning more toward because.

1:12:21.018 --> 1:12:22.577
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, they need help on offense, they need

1:12:22.617 --> 1:12:26.458
<v Speaker 3>help on defense, they need help everywhere. Yeah, I'm opening

1:12:26.777 --> 1:12:28.777
<v Speaker 3>up more and more to the idea, and the quarterbacks

1:12:28.777 --> 1:12:30.977
<v Speaker 3>aren't helping them. But I'm opening up more and more

1:12:30.978 --> 1:12:34.577
<v Speaker 3>to the idea of like trade down, like wherever they

1:12:34.657 --> 1:12:38.697
<v Speaker 3>are that picks probably not going to be worth the

1:12:38.978 --> 1:12:40.737
<v Speaker 3>player you're getting with that pick is not going to

1:12:40.777 --> 1:12:42.817
<v Speaker 3>be worth the haull you can get in return. And

1:12:43.458 --> 1:12:47.017
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these guys we've talked about, the guys

1:12:47.098 --> 1:12:49.617
<v Speaker 3>that you know you might take there just off of

1:12:50.178 --> 1:12:53.657
<v Speaker 3>best player available. There's other really good players at those

1:12:53.697 --> 1:12:58.657
<v Speaker 3>positions not that far behind. This draft is very There

1:12:58.657 --> 1:13:00.977
<v Speaker 3>aren't a lot of good positions. The positions that are

1:13:01.018 --> 1:13:03.098
<v Speaker 3>good are very good, but there's not a lot of

1:13:03.138 --> 1:13:07.017
<v Speaker 3>good positions. So like, for instance, the one I've been

1:13:07.058 --> 1:13:09.537
<v Speaker 3>big on with this is Mason Graham. Mason Graham's a

1:13:09.617 --> 1:13:13.338
<v Speaker 3>really good player. This is a pretty good defensive tackle class.

1:13:14.098 --> 1:13:16.497
<v Speaker 3>And if you're telling me I can have Mason Graham,

1:13:17.258 --> 1:13:19.218
<v Speaker 3>or I can have two first round picks next year

1:13:19.218 --> 1:13:21.617
<v Speaker 3>in a much better class, and maybe another top fifty

1:13:21.657 --> 1:13:25.057
<v Speaker 3>pick this year and a guy like Dean Walker from Kentucky.

1:13:25.737 --> 1:13:27.817
<v Speaker 3>That's a no brainer to me. I'm taking the Hall,

1:13:28.418 --> 1:13:32.298
<v Speaker 3>So I think that that it becomes I haven't been

1:13:32.378 --> 1:13:33.857
<v Speaker 3>We'll see where Will Campbell's arms are at.

1:13:33.897 --> 1:13:35.017
<v Speaker 2>If he's over thirty three.

1:13:34.897 --> 1:13:37.857
<v Speaker 3>Inches, stretch those freaking If he's over thirty three inches,

1:13:37.857 --> 1:13:39.418
<v Speaker 3>I'm pounding the table for Wial Campbell. I think to

1:13:39.497 --> 1:13:41.897
<v Speaker 3>take Will Campbell, and because at that point, everybody knows

1:13:41.937 --> 1:13:43.537
<v Speaker 3>his arms that long, and he's gonna be that high

1:13:43.577 --> 1:13:45.258
<v Speaker 3>of a pick, right, And I don't think there's many

1:13:45.298 --> 1:13:47.458
<v Speaker 3>other issues with him beyond the armline. The penalty is

1:13:47.577 --> 1:13:50.458
<v Speaker 3>the one thing that make me nervous. But like Ted McMillan,

1:13:51.657 --> 1:13:53.817
<v Speaker 3>I'm almost better off with the Hall. So I'm at

1:13:53.857 --> 1:13:55.577
<v Speaker 3>the point where, yeah, there's some very good players top

1:13:55.617 --> 1:13:57.218
<v Speaker 3>of the board, and you're not moving down that far.

1:13:57.298 --> 1:13:59.098
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying move down there at four as we

1:13:59.178 --> 1:14:01.617
<v Speaker 3>sit here today, I think right four or five. I'm

1:14:01.657 --> 1:14:03.657
<v Speaker 3>not saying move down from four to twenty, right, But

1:14:03.737 --> 1:14:05.937
<v Speaker 3>if you move down to like four or eight to

1:14:06.058 --> 1:14:09.737
<v Speaker 3>eight or nine, and you add a future first Abdull

1:14:09.817 --> 1:14:12.537
<v Speaker 3>Carter still might be in play at that point, so

1:14:12.697 --> 1:14:15.258
<v Speaker 3>the burden James Pearce might still be in play. Mason

1:14:15.298 --> 1:14:17.177
<v Speaker 3>Graham might still be in play at that point because

1:14:17.178 --> 1:14:18.378
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't play premium position.

1:14:18.577 --> 1:14:20.857
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is this is a trade down draft.

1:14:21.058 --> 1:14:21.258
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:14:21.298 --> 1:14:24.058
<v Speaker 2>So the issue though, is that everybody knows it's a

1:14:24.098 --> 1:14:27.537
<v Speaker 2>trade down draft. So you're really gonna have to get

1:14:27.577 --> 1:14:30.058
<v Speaker 2>a team that falls in love with one of these quarterbacks.

1:14:30.098 --> 1:14:32.097
<v Speaker 2>And I do think there's a chance that Shador, Sanders

1:14:32.178 --> 1:14:34.418
<v Speaker 2>and cam Ward are one of those guys. I do

1:14:35.018 --> 1:14:37.338
<v Speaker 2>you know, I was watching Travis Hunter yesterday. I tweeted

1:14:37.378 --> 1:14:39.058
<v Speaker 2>it out like I was really impressed with what I

1:14:39.098 --> 1:14:42.017
<v Speaker 2>saw from Shador and the tape that I was watching

1:14:42.058 --> 1:14:46.697
<v Speaker 2>of Colorado's offense, Like he's got the traits that teams

1:14:46.737 --> 1:14:48.857
<v Speaker 2>look for now that we talked a lot about with Drake,

1:14:49.018 --> 1:14:54.537
<v Speaker 2>like arm talent, pocket poison, mobility, off script ability, just

1:14:54.737 --> 1:14:58.737
<v Speaker 2>general playmaking style that teams covet right now in the league.

1:14:58.817 --> 1:15:02.218
<v Speaker 2>And his processing is a little bit raw. He I

1:15:02.258 --> 1:15:04.617
<v Speaker 2>think the arm talent is probably B plus and not

1:15:04.817 --> 1:15:07.897
<v Speaker 2>a but like all the things are there for him

1:15:07.937 --> 1:15:09.017
<v Speaker 2>to be a really pro.

1:15:09.338 --> 1:15:10.937
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna give you this is where I said earlier,

1:15:10.937 --> 1:15:12.817
<v Speaker 3>I had a college football playoff take I wanted to give.

1:15:12.857 --> 1:15:14.937
<v Speaker 3>This is where this comes into play, and I'll have

1:15:15.058 --> 1:15:17.458
<v Speaker 3>something up. Oh no, I wrote this today on ninety

1:15:17.458 --> 1:15:20.617
<v Speaker 3>eight five Sports of dot Com. So those are the

1:15:20.617 --> 1:15:22.817
<v Speaker 3>two quarterbacks right now. Should Sanders cam Ward. I don't

1:15:22.817 --> 1:15:24.937
<v Speaker 3>know how much Camward you've watched. You're gonna need to

1:15:24.937 --> 1:15:27.258
<v Speaker 3>watch them because you're gonna need to watch Xavier Restreppo. Yeah,

1:15:27.258 --> 1:15:29.937
<v Speaker 3>he's absolutely gonna be Patriots target. Big fan of is

1:15:30.458 --> 1:15:32.258
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver from Miami. But those are the two guys

1:15:32.378 --> 1:15:36.017
<v Speaker 3>right now. I'm not saying these other quarterbacks have had

1:15:36.058 --> 1:15:38.497
<v Speaker 3>great years because frankly, they haven't. Jalen Milroe has not

1:15:38.577 --> 1:15:40.697
<v Speaker 3>had a good year. Quinn Ewers has been fined, but

1:15:40.737 --> 1:15:44.418
<v Speaker 3>he's been hurt. Carson Beck, I mean, geez, talk about

1:15:44.418 --> 1:15:47.458
<v Speaker 3>a falloff. But there is this new element to the

1:15:47.577 --> 1:15:50.817
<v Speaker 3>draft this year that is the college football Playoff Because

1:15:51.298 --> 1:15:54.937
<v Speaker 3>there are now chances and this applies beyond quarterback, but

1:15:55.058 --> 1:15:58.018
<v Speaker 3>just using it at quarterback, there are now chances for

1:15:58.138 --> 1:16:02.537
<v Speaker 3>players to impact their stocks significantly because when we do this,

1:16:02.697 --> 1:16:04.657
<v Speaker 3>we talk about the games that you have to watch.

1:16:04.897 --> 1:16:07.577
<v Speaker 3>Travis Hunter vers Tech McMillan, we talked about that as

1:16:07.617 --> 1:16:10.617
<v Speaker 3>a matchup, and you're gonna watch that game differently than

1:16:10.657 --> 1:16:13.178
<v Speaker 3>you watch Tech McMillan versus New Mexico, even though we

1:16:13.218 --> 1:16:16.178
<v Speaker 3>put up three hundred four yards three hundred four yards

1:16:16.218 --> 1:16:17.977
<v Speaker 3>four touchdowns. Yeah, but you're gonna watch right, So you're

1:16:17.978 --> 1:16:19.937
<v Speaker 3>gonna watch that game differently. Now, all of a sudden,

1:16:20.018 --> 1:16:23.017
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna have elite players against elite players, two three,

1:16:23.218 --> 1:16:26.258
<v Speaker 3>four more games than we'd usually have. And I go

1:16:26.338 --> 1:16:29.338
<v Speaker 3>back to Michael Pennox last year. Where do you think

1:16:29.378 --> 1:16:31.258
<v Speaker 3>Michael Pennix gets draft? And I know he had the

1:16:31.258 --> 1:16:34.017
<v Speaker 3>fall off against Michigan. Where does Michael Pennix get drafted?

1:16:34.058 --> 1:16:35.577
<v Speaker 3>If you take out the game against Texas.

1:16:36.058 --> 1:16:38.098
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we talked about this a little bit yesterday. You

1:16:38.138 --> 1:16:41.017
<v Speaker 2>know that's I think a big thing with college football

1:16:41.018 --> 1:16:41.737
<v Speaker 2>playoff in general.

1:16:41.937 --> 1:16:46.017
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, so you have Jalen Milroe, quinn Ewers.

1:16:46.817 --> 1:16:47.218
<v Speaker 2>I'm on it.

1:16:47.298 --> 1:16:49.937
<v Speaker 3>Can I write off Carson Beck as I make this take.

1:16:50.458 --> 1:16:53.537
<v Speaker 2>Car I kind of write off quinn Ewers too. I

1:16:53.577 --> 1:16:55.298
<v Speaker 2>think Quins fine.

1:16:55.497 --> 1:16:59.178
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Milroe absolutely if he goes out and lights up

1:16:59.218 --> 1:17:01.777
<v Speaker 3>because Alabama, for whatever reason, is going to make the playoff. Yeah,

1:17:01.777 --> 1:17:04.017
<v Speaker 3>if he goes out and lights up Oregon, I know why.

1:17:04.098 --> 1:17:05.937
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, if he goes out, he lights it up

1:17:05.978 --> 1:17:08.737
<v Speaker 2>out there, right, Dylan Gabriel, does he have a little

1:17:08.817 --> 1:17:10.217
<v Speaker 2>bow nick'sish sort.

1:17:10.018 --> 1:17:13.218
<v Speaker 3>Of rise during the playoff? And Will Howard all right off?

1:17:13.258 --> 1:17:15.937
<v Speaker 3>The one other name I'll give you, and this nobody

1:17:16.018 --> 1:17:18.298
<v Speaker 3>has talked about him at all. I heard last year

1:17:18.657 --> 1:17:21.817
<v Speaker 3>when people wanted the Patriots, Oh you can pass on Drake,

1:17:21.897 --> 1:17:23.977
<v Speaker 3>May you pass on the quarterback? You gotta get you all.

1:17:23.978 --> 1:17:26.338
<v Speaker 3>You gotta get Marvin Harrison. There were two names that

1:17:26.537 --> 1:17:31.737
<v Speaker 3>came up a ton besides Shedder during that time. One

1:17:32.218 --> 1:17:35.497
<v Speaker 3>Jackson Dart No, oh my god, no Jackson. One was

1:17:35.537 --> 1:17:38.617
<v Speaker 3>Carson Beck He's obviously fallen off. The other one was

1:17:38.697 --> 1:17:41.977
<v Speaker 3>Curtis Rourke from Indiana. Everybody was all hot and bothered

1:17:42.018 --> 1:17:44.178
<v Speaker 3>about Curtis work last year, and I never really got

1:17:44.218 --> 1:17:47.058
<v Speaker 3>a straight answer as to why Curtis Rourke had a

1:17:47.697 --> 1:17:50.977
<v Speaker 3>very under the radar solid season in Indiana. Obviously they're

1:17:51.018 --> 1:17:54.657
<v Speaker 3>going to the playoff, But but now nobody's everybody want

1:17:54.657 --> 1:17:56.617
<v Speaker 3>to talk about him. Last year, nobody's talking about him.

1:17:56.937 --> 1:17:59.897
<v Speaker 3>If Curtis Rourke goes out and leads Indiana to a

1:17:59.937 --> 1:18:03.177
<v Speaker 3>playoff winner, two, he's gonna start getting first round buzz.

1:18:03.617 --> 1:18:05.897
<v Speaker 2>So the college football playoff.

1:18:05.937 --> 1:18:07.338
<v Speaker 3>Remember I said this at the beginning of the year,

1:18:07.857 --> 1:18:09.897
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots aren't taking a quarterback, but we're not done

1:18:09.937 --> 1:18:10.698
<v Speaker 3>doing quarterbacks.

1:18:11.777 --> 1:18:14.458
<v Speaker 2>Gonna be done, No, we're not because time to watch

1:18:14.497 --> 1:18:16.818
<v Speaker 2>all these guys. You just have to watch him the playoff.

1:18:16.897 --> 1:18:21.897
<v Speaker 3>Just because to Jalen Milroe or Dylan Gabriel or Curtis Rourke.

1:18:22.018 --> 1:18:25.737
<v Speaker 3>You want to throw in Will Howard, Carson Beck, Quinn Eewers.

1:18:25.937 --> 1:18:27.977
<v Speaker 3>Does one of these guys have a rise where maybe

1:18:28.058 --> 1:18:31.097
<v Speaker 3>a team goes yeah, take him the top five a quarterback.

1:18:31.098 --> 1:18:32.057
<v Speaker 3>I take him in the top five.

1:18:32.218 --> 1:18:35.418
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I just really feel I'd be pretty surprised if

1:18:35.497 --> 1:18:39.258
<v Speaker 2>Shador isn't already there as a as a top ten guy, and.

1:18:39.298 --> 1:18:41.098
<v Speaker 3>Cam Ward, I think, are there. It's do one of

1:18:41.138 --> 1:18:43.098
<v Speaker 3>these other guys in college football players join them?

1:18:43.138 --> 1:18:44.897
<v Speaker 2>So you could have that You could have that trade

1:18:44.937 --> 1:18:47.937
<v Speaker 2>down scenario come into play with with those two guys

1:18:47.978 --> 1:18:50.098
<v Speaker 2>I think already. I mean Dan Bruger put out his

1:18:50.378 --> 1:18:52.218
<v Speaker 2>first mock draft and had both those guys in the

1:18:52.258 --> 1:18:54.897
<v Speaker 2>top five. So I definitely feel like I could see

1:18:54.937 --> 1:18:57.857
<v Speaker 2>that happening. But the problem is, you know, like Dane mentioned,

1:18:57.857 --> 1:19:01.258
<v Speaker 2>I believe in the piece, the Jaguars took Travis Hunter

1:19:01.378 --> 1:19:04.138
<v Speaker 2>number one overall, and then he had two quarterbacks at

1:19:04.138 --> 1:19:06.378
<v Speaker 2>two and three, and he just said, look, it's not

1:19:06.617 --> 1:19:08.737
<v Speaker 2>a trade up for a quarterback. That these guys are

1:19:08.817 --> 1:19:11.098
<v Speaker 2>so good that we're giving up hauls to trade up.

1:19:11.178 --> 1:19:14.817
<v Speaker 2>So the Jaguars still got stuck picking a non quarterback

1:19:14.897 --> 1:19:15.258
<v Speaker 2>number one.

1:19:15.298 --> 1:19:18.218
<v Speaker 3>The quarterbacks are are going to be dictated by like,

1:19:18.338 --> 1:19:20.218
<v Speaker 3>that's dictated by where the teams are, and Dane didn't

1:19:20.258 --> 1:19:21.817
<v Speaker 3>do trades, right, But who do you have two and

1:19:21.857 --> 1:19:22.817
<v Speaker 3>three Raiders and Giants?

1:19:22.978 --> 1:19:23.258
<v Speaker 4>I think so?

1:19:23.378 --> 1:19:26.097
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the order is now so well, those are those.

1:19:25.978 --> 1:19:29.298
<v Speaker 3>Are quarterback teams. What happens if the Panthers end up there?

1:19:29.338 --> 1:19:32.737
<v Speaker 3>What happens if the Patriots there? Like that changes Shouldar

1:19:32.978 --> 1:19:35.897
<v Speaker 3>Sanders and cam Ward are gonna go high. But you know,

1:19:36.298 --> 1:19:38.018
<v Speaker 3>it's not a trade up scenario of teams two and

1:19:38.058 --> 1:19:40.218
<v Speaker 3>three are quarterback teams. If suddenly one of those teams

1:19:40.298 --> 1:19:42.617
<v Speaker 3>isn't a quarterback team, that changes everything, all right.

1:19:42.737 --> 1:19:44.777
<v Speaker 2>So here's what I did down that we've got the

1:19:44.817 --> 1:19:46.378
<v Speaker 2>big picture out of the way, which I want to

1:19:46.418 --> 1:19:50.177
<v Speaker 2>reiterate my stance on this. Do not pick a player

1:19:50.978 --> 1:19:52.657
<v Speaker 2>in the top five who's not worthy of a top

1:19:52.697 --> 1:19:54.378
<v Speaker 2>five pick. That's the worst thing that you can do,

1:19:54.617 --> 1:19:57.777
<v Speaker 2>right like that, that's just you are open to trading down, Yeah, exactly,

1:19:57.857 --> 1:19:59.777
<v Speaker 2>like if you want to trade down. And that's exactly

1:19:59.817 --> 1:20:01.937
<v Speaker 2>how I set this up, right, is I have two

1:20:02.018 --> 1:20:04.057
<v Speaker 2>guys that I watch that I feel like are worth

1:20:04.098 --> 1:20:06.657
<v Speaker 2>the top five pick in this draft is going to be.

1:20:06.737 --> 1:20:08.058
<v Speaker 2>And then I have a bunch of you know, a

1:20:08.098 --> 1:20:10.017
<v Speaker 2>handful of guys that if they were to trade down,

1:20:10.058 --> 1:20:12.657
<v Speaker 2>I'd be cool with taking nine. Yeah, exactly, taking in

1:20:12.737 --> 1:20:13.418
<v Speaker 2>that next wave.

1:20:13.617 --> 1:20:15.378
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't trade out of top ten because somebody, oh,

1:20:15.418 --> 1:20:16.937
<v Speaker 3>you want to trade down, you don't want me at town.

1:20:17.018 --> 1:20:19.018
<v Speaker 2>No. I wouldn't trade past top ten. No, neither would I.

1:20:19.577 --> 1:20:22.298
<v Speaker 2>So my two guys that are I haven't let's call

1:20:22.338 --> 1:20:25.418
<v Speaker 2>it s t here right at that top of this draft. Uh,

1:20:25.857 --> 1:20:28.617
<v Speaker 2>the best player in the draft, bar none. I think

1:20:28.657 --> 1:20:31.138
<v Speaker 2>it's not particularly close that Travis Hunter is the best

1:20:31.138 --> 1:20:35.178
<v Speaker 2>player in the draft. He is I thought was outstanding

1:20:35.218 --> 1:20:38.258
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the football. I really did as

1:20:38.298 --> 1:20:41.977
<v Speaker 2>a receiver, the twitch and the athleticism just jumps off

1:20:42.018 --> 1:20:44.458
<v Speaker 2>the film at you what I was most impressed with

1:20:44.537 --> 1:20:46.897
<v Speaker 2>him as a receiver, where his ball skills and his

1:20:46.978 --> 1:20:47.378
<v Speaker 2>feel for.

1:20:47.458 --> 1:20:49.337
<v Speaker 3>Zone coverage almost like he plays corner.

1:20:49.298 --> 1:20:52.058
<v Speaker 2>Really advanced for what I thought I was getting in.

1:20:52.458 --> 1:20:54.657
<v Speaker 2>I thought I was getting into a situation where they're

1:20:54.697 --> 1:20:57.098
<v Speaker 2>just like, he's the best athlete on the field, so

1:20:57.178 --> 1:20:59.977
<v Speaker 2>we're just gonna have him dabble at wide receiver. He

1:21:00.497 --> 1:21:03.098
<v Speaker 2>is starting to kind of learn wide receiver right, Like

1:21:03.178 --> 1:21:05.697
<v Speaker 2>you can see he has a great feel going over

1:21:05.777 --> 1:21:07.577
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the field and he's not afraid to

1:21:07.657 --> 1:21:09.817
<v Speaker 2>go over the middle of the field. He's got great

1:21:09.897 --> 1:21:12.178
<v Speaker 2>hands and ball skills at the catch point. He's made

1:21:12.218 --> 1:21:15.178
<v Speaker 2>some really tough catches at the catch point. And he's

1:21:15.218 --> 1:21:17.338
<v Speaker 2>got a real inate ability. I know he's played with

1:21:17.458 --> 1:21:19.897
<v Speaker 2>him forever, Yeah, but he's got a real inateability of

1:21:19.978 --> 1:21:22.057
<v Speaker 2>working off script with Shador And like, if you get

1:21:22.138 --> 1:21:24.737
<v Speaker 2>that with Drake May then that's really good, right, Like

1:21:24.817 --> 1:21:27.537
<v Speaker 2>that you can have that sort of connection there. The

1:21:27.657 --> 1:21:29.737
<v Speaker 2>one thing that I had against him at wide receiver

1:21:29.897 --> 1:21:32.737
<v Speaker 2>that I just didn't feel that he was like a

1:21:32.897 --> 1:21:37.577
<v Speaker 2>prototypical boundary x receiver, right, Yeah, Like I don't see

1:21:37.657 --> 1:21:40.418
<v Speaker 2>him that way a wide receiver, just because of the

1:21:40.537 --> 1:21:43.617
<v Speaker 2>size and like some of the rawness with his releases

1:21:43.697 --> 1:21:46.338
<v Speaker 2>and things like that. I don't necessarily look at him

1:21:46.418 --> 1:21:49.818
<v Speaker 2>as like a true X, but I think he's outstanding.

1:21:49.937 --> 1:21:53.138
<v Speaker 2>Where's he better? Well, I'll get to my corner. But

1:21:53.817 --> 1:21:56.138
<v Speaker 2>I told you, I tell you when we were recording her,

1:21:56.178 --> 1:21:58.017
<v Speaker 2>before we started. I think it is before we started.

1:21:58.338 --> 1:22:00.057
<v Speaker 2>I told you how I did this. I did pros

1:22:00.058 --> 1:22:02.617
<v Speaker 2>and I did cons and I did a bottom line. Yeah,

1:22:02.777 --> 1:22:06.577
<v Speaker 2>so let me give you corner first. Okay. At corner,

1:22:07.018 --> 1:22:08.897
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he has the opposite problem is what

1:22:08.978 --> 1:22:12.017
<v Speaker 2>he has at receiver. At corner, he is an elite

1:22:12.338 --> 1:22:15.697
<v Speaker 2>boundary corner, not a great slot corner, right, So you're

1:22:15.697 --> 1:22:17.737
<v Speaker 2>gonna play him on the boundary. I think he can

1:22:17.857 --> 1:22:19.577
<v Speaker 2>mirror and match with the best of them in Manta

1:22:19.617 --> 1:22:23.378
<v Speaker 2>man coverage. His feet are exceptionally quick. He's very twitchy

1:22:23.418 --> 1:22:26.017
<v Speaker 2>and smooth through his transitions. He can go out there

1:22:26.298 --> 1:22:29.617
<v Speaker 2>and you can cover top receivers with that cornerback tape

1:22:29.657 --> 1:22:32.218
<v Speaker 2>that he put in coloro. And he's a very good

1:22:32.338 --> 1:22:35.458
<v Speaker 2>flat or like cloud cover two corner, and he'll read

1:22:35.497 --> 1:22:39.018
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback size and he'll jump plays awesome ball hawk like,

1:22:39.178 --> 1:22:42.298
<v Speaker 2>great ball instincts and the ability to you know, click

1:22:42.338 --> 1:22:45.258
<v Speaker 2>and close and really close on the football in a hurry.

1:22:45.897 --> 1:22:48.258
<v Speaker 2>That is it pops off the film, like when he

1:22:48.817 --> 1:22:51.218
<v Speaker 2>has a ball come in his direction and he's got

1:22:51.258 --> 1:22:53.458
<v Speaker 2>to close on something to make a play on the football.

1:22:53.657 --> 1:22:58.097
<v Speaker 2>He is shot out of a canon, unbelievable trade for him.

1:22:58.577 --> 1:23:01.138
<v Speaker 2>He to me, looks like a top five pick in

1:23:01.178 --> 1:23:05.098
<v Speaker 2>an NFL draft should look like both positions. Really is

1:23:05.138 --> 1:23:07.977
<v Speaker 2>how I felt. But at corner I thought he got

1:23:08.018 --> 1:23:10.338
<v Speaker 2>a little bit loose in the slot and then was

1:23:10.418 --> 1:23:12.977
<v Speaker 2>really good on the boundary and receiver. I thought he

1:23:13.098 --> 1:23:15.298
<v Speaker 2>has some issues on the boundary, but is really good

1:23:15.338 --> 1:23:17.937
<v Speaker 2>playing off the liner in the slot. So you gotta

1:23:18.058 --> 1:23:20.817
<v Speaker 2>figure him out, and I know that's your big thing. Yeah,

1:23:20.978 --> 1:23:23.298
<v Speaker 2>my bottom line with him, I have no notes. The

1:23:23.338 --> 1:23:26.617
<v Speaker 2>guy's a stud. The question with him you got to

1:23:26.657 --> 1:23:29.378
<v Speaker 2>figure him out, right, like where is he playing in

1:23:29.537 --> 1:23:30.298
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of thing.

1:23:30.458 --> 1:23:32.418
<v Speaker 3>This is my big take on Travis Hunter. I've heard

1:23:32.418 --> 1:23:34.937
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people say, well, you just draft him

1:23:34.978 --> 1:23:36.937
<v Speaker 3>and then you figure it out, which is really easy

1:23:36.978 --> 1:23:39.937
<v Speaker 3>to say on the outside. You can't that can't be

1:23:40.058 --> 1:23:43.657
<v Speaker 3>the answer. And what is my big draft take among

1:23:43.737 --> 1:23:46.577
<v Speaker 3>all else, the one draft take I always go back on.

1:23:47.218 --> 1:23:50.017
<v Speaker 3>It's nature verse nurture. Drafting the right players only half

1:23:50.098 --> 1:23:52.537
<v Speaker 3>the battle. You have to properly develop him. There's been

1:23:52.537 --> 1:23:54.817
<v Speaker 3>a lot of very talented players that have gone to

1:23:54.937 --> 1:23:58.617
<v Speaker 3>bad situations with bad development plans and bottomed out. And

1:23:58.978 --> 1:24:03.298
<v Speaker 3>Travis Hunter is the ultimate example of this. If he's there,

1:24:03.378 --> 1:24:05.617
<v Speaker 3>you take him because he's that talented. Let me be clear,

1:24:05.697 --> 1:24:07.777
<v Speaker 3>this is not me saying don't draft draft Travis Hunter.

1:24:08.058 --> 1:24:09.977
<v Speaker 2>As much as you want that to be my fast

1:24:10.098 --> 1:24:11.817
<v Speaker 2>You're going on the fence like I'm not going on

1:24:11.897 --> 1:24:12.218
<v Speaker 2>the fence.

1:24:12.857 --> 1:24:15.817
<v Speaker 3>You can't draft him and then say all right, we'll

1:24:15.817 --> 1:24:17.378
<v Speaker 3>take him, then we'll feed You gotta have a plan.

1:24:17.657 --> 1:24:17.857
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:24:18.018 --> 1:24:19.777
<v Speaker 3>Are you gonna try playing them both ways one hundred

1:24:19.777 --> 1:24:22.097
<v Speaker 3>percent time? I don't think that's realistic. Are you gonna

1:24:22.098 --> 1:24:23.418
<v Speaker 3>try playing them one hundred percent of the ways of

1:24:23.418 --> 1:24:24.617
<v Speaker 3>all time? If not, where's he playing?

1:24:24.817 --> 1:24:27.138
<v Speaker 2>Who makes that decision? Is it him? Is it you? Right?

1:24:27.338 --> 1:24:29.058
<v Speaker 3>How is he gonna split up his practice time? What

1:24:29.098 --> 1:24:30.777
<v Speaker 3>are you gonna do about himhysically? Because he does need

1:24:30.817 --> 1:24:33.018
<v Speaker 3>to be bigger, that's that's the one knock that like,

1:24:34.018 --> 1:24:36.298
<v Speaker 3>he has had a little bit of trouble with durability.

1:24:36.338 --> 1:24:38.258
<v Speaker 3>Now he plays their injuries. He's a tough guy, but

1:24:38.378 --> 1:24:41.937
<v Speaker 3>he gets hurt. And at the NFL, the players only

1:24:41.978 --> 1:24:44.378
<v Speaker 3>getting bigger, the hits are only getting more physical, So

1:24:45.378 --> 1:24:47.537
<v Speaker 3>he's not gonna hold up playing both ways. He's just not.

1:24:47.817 --> 1:24:50.378
<v Speaker 3>So do you PLAYM at corner where I think he's

1:24:50.378 --> 1:24:52.577
<v Speaker 3>a better corner. I think he's a very good receiver. Yeah,

1:24:52.777 --> 1:24:54.617
<v Speaker 3>he's a better corner. Do you play M at corner

1:24:54.657 --> 1:24:56.937
<v Speaker 3>where I think he's gonna be a dominant player for ten, twelve,

1:24:57.018 --> 1:24:59.697
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years. Do you playhim at receiver where maybe he

1:24:59.777 --> 1:25:01.737
<v Speaker 3>has more of an impact but now the injury thing,

1:25:01.857 --> 1:25:04.577
<v Speaker 3>the durability comes more to play, and I just I

1:25:04.657 --> 1:25:08.497
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's quite the like ninety nine overall corner

1:25:09.458 --> 1:25:11.418
<v Speaker 3>ninety overall receivers kind of where I'm at with him.

1:25:11.937 --> 1:25:13.057
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's fair.

1:25:13.418 --> 1:25:15.497
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to how much do you trust the

1:25:15.577 --> 1:25:18.017
<v Speaker 3>coaching staff to have the right plan. I think there

1:25:18.098 --> 1:25:19.577
<v Speaker 3>might be more than one plan. If you want to

1:25:19.577 --> 1:25:21.058
<v Speaker 3>tell me we're gonna draft him and play him at

1:25:21.098 --> 1:25:25.057
<v Speaker 3>corner and then kind of Marcus Jones him on offense. Yeah, Okay,

1:25:25.178 --> 1:25:26.817
<v Speaker 3>that's a good plan if you're gonna draft him and say,

1:25:27.018 --> 1:25:28.697
<v Speaker 3>we know he's a better corner, but we want to

1:25:28.737 --> 1:25:30.378
<v Speaker 3>do something for Drake May. We're gonna play him at

1:25:30.378 --> 1:25:33.737
<v Speaker 3>res receiver and maybe against certain receivers and certain matchups

1:25:33.737 --> 1:25:35.897
<v Speaker 3>will put him on defense, right, Like, oh, we have

1:25:36.018 --> 1:25:38.537
<v Speaker 3>to you know we're facing this great receiver this week.

1:25:38.617 --> 1:25:40.857
<v Speaker 3>We want to get him give him a chance. Okay, fine,

1:25:40.937 --> 1:25:43.098
<v Speaker 3>Like that's a good plan too. If the planet's just

1:25:43.338 --> 1:25:44.657
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna get to camp and throw him out on

1:25:44.657 --> 1:25:45.697
<v Speaker 3>the field and see what it looks like.

1:25:45.937 --> 1:25:48.817
<v Speaker 2>No, No, I am out on that. So no, my

1:25:48.937 --> 1:25:52.577
<v Speaker 2>biggest thing with him. Uh And again, if they draft,

1:25:53.058 --> 1:25:54.977
<v Speaker 2>if we get to April and it's and Travis Hunter

1:25:55.098 --> 1:25:57.338
<v Speaker 2>is the pick, I'm ecstatic. I think I think is

1:25:57.378 --> 1:26:00.857
<v Speaker 2>an absolutely terrific football player. So I'm on board. I

1:26:01.018 --> 1:26:02.298
<v Speaker 2>think I agree with you.

1:26:02.577 --> 1:26:04.777
<v Speaker 3>I also think he is going to be one of

1:26:04.777 --> 1:26:07.857
<v Speaker 3>the hardest development projects we've seen in the NFL, especially

1:26:07.897 --> 1:26:09.057
<v Speaker 3>outside the quarterback position.

1:26:09.258 --> 1:26:12.817
<v Speaker 2>But I know in the reward is so but but

1:26:12.857 --> 1:26:15.298
<v Speaker 2>there's not much work. There's not much football development that

1:26:15.378 --> 1:26:18.657
<v Speaker 2>needs to be done. It's all about managing it, right,

1:26:18.777 --> 1:26:21.138
<v Speaker 2>like where is he gonna put it goes along the

1:26:21.178 --> 1:26:23.017
<v Speaker 2>same thing, Like I know, but there's not like he's

1:26:23.058 --> 1:26:25.178
<v Speaker 2>not raw as a pro, but even just the day

1:26:25.218 --> 1:26:27.657
<v Speaker 2>to day of it, like to be to be elite

1:26:27.737 --> 1:26:29.497
<v Speaker 2>in college and to be elite and a pros are

1:26:29.537 --> 1:26:31.737
<v Speaker 2>two different things. Yeah, you can go out and just

1:26:31.857 --> 1:26:33.777
<v Speaker 2>line it up, and I mean there's some work that

1:26:33.857 --> 1:26:36.217
<v Speaker 2>goes into it, obviously, but think about all the hours

1:26:36.298 --> 1:26:38.258
<v Speaker 2>and hours and hours of film a guy like Steph

1:26:38.298 --> 1:26:39.338
<v Speaker 2>Gilmour watched.

1:26:39.138 --> 1:26:43.697
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right to every nuance of his opponent's game every week. Yeah,

1:26:43.857 --> 1:26:46.657
<v Speaker 3>Can you do that and also spend enough time in

1:26:46.657 --> 1:26:48.418
<v Speaker 3>the offensive meeting room where you're still on the same

1:26:48.458 --> 1:26:51.178
<v Speaker 3>page as your quarterback? Can you what happens when you

1:26:51.258 --> 1:26:53.378
<v Speaker 3>do ones versus ones on one first ones in practice?

1:26:53.378 --> 1:26:54.497
<v Speaker 2>So, like you need to.

1:26:54.497 --> 1:26:58.617
<v Speaker 3>Figure that out because that is where you go. You

1:26:58.737 --> 1:27:00.937
<v Speaker 3>go back and forth between getting a good player and

1:27:01.018 --> 1:27:03.338
<v Speaker 3>getting a great player. That is gonna be the difference

1:27:03.378 --> 1:27:05.857
<v Speaker 3>with Travis Hunter. It's gonna be how the coaching staff

1:27:05.978 --> 1:27:08.418
<v Speaker 3>utilizes him and what they ask him to do. That's

1:27:08.458 --> 1:27:10.138
<v Speaker 3>what the pick comes down to. I still take him.

1:27:10.458 --> 1:27:13.258
<v Speaker 2>I still take a good plan. Here's what I would do, Yeah,

1:27:13.458 --> 1:27:16.217
<v Speaker 2>so assuming that he doesn't do any of the college

1:27:16.218 --> 1:27:17.977
<v Speaker 2>All Star games, and I think is a safe assumption.

1:27:18.098 --> 1:27:20.418
<v Speaker 2>Now I'll go I think he's going to the shrine,

1:27:20.458 --> 1:27:22.937
<v Speaker 2>but to like do interviews. I know shador Is, I didn't.

1:27:22.937 --> 1:27:24.338
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Travis oh I might be thinking

1:27:24.338 --> 1:27:29.897
<v Speaker 2>of Yeah. Uh so let's just say first point of

1:27:29.937 --> 1:27:33.218
<v Speaker 2>contact the combine. Yeah, all right, that's the biggest question

1:27:33.258 --> 1:27:35.258
<v Speaker 2>in the room is what position do you want to play?

1:27:35.817 --> 1:27:39.657
<v Speaker 2>And if the answer is both, then you have to

1:27:39.697 --> 1:27:42.378
<v Speaker 2>be real with them, like you're what you just said, right,

1:27:42.577 --> 1:27:45.497
<v Speaker 2>you can't. We don't feel as an organization. And I'm

1:27:45.697 --> 1:27:49.737
<v Speaker 2>I'm speaking on behalf of the organization, right, I'm just

1:27:49.937 --> 1:27:52.617
<v Speaker 2>is just my scenario. If I'm in the room, I'm

1:27:52.657 --> 1:27:56.378
<v Speaker 2>gonna say to him, we don't really feel like it's

1:27:56.897 --> 1:27:59.137
<v Speaker 2>feasible for you to play both ways. Well, I don't

1:27:59.138 --> 1:28:00.338
<v Speaker 2>want to put words in your mouth. Do you feel

1:28:00.378 --> 1:28:03.097
<v Speaker 2>that way? I don't feel that way. No, you think

1:28:03.098 --> 1:28:04.737
<v Speaker 2>he can play both ways one hundred percent, not one

1:28:04.817 --> 1:28:07.378
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent, but I think that yours. There's a path

1:28:07.458 --> 1:28:09.338
<v Speaker 2>for him to play both ways in some capacity. But

1:28:09.418 --> 1:28:12.097
<v Speaker 2>I say the difference to me between him and Marcus

1:28:12.218 --> 1:28:15.897
<v Speaker 2>Jones is Marcus Jones is a great ball carrier. Travis

1:28:16.018 --> 1:28:19.058
<v Speaker 2>Hunter is good after the catch, but he's not this

1:28:19.298 --> 1:28:23.497
<v Speaker 2>like gadget player goes putting him on offense to play

1:28:23.537 --> 1:28:24.418
<v Speaker 2>actual wide, but it.

1:28:24.458 --> 1:28:27.418
<v Speaker 3>Goes back to putting in the time to have chemistry

1:28:27.497 --> 1:28:28.338
<v Speaker 3>with the quarterback.

1:28:28.577 --> 1:28:31.258
<v Speaker 2>Yeah A, that that's right. That that's my point too,

1:28:31.897 --> 1:28:33.617
<v Speaker 2>is that like this isn't like we're gonna just throw

1:28:33.657 --> 1:28:35.418
<v Speaker 2>him out there to throw a screen to him, right,

1:28:35.497 --> 1:28:37.537
<v Speaker 2>Like this is like he's gonna run routes.

1:28:37.617 --> 1:28:39.378
<v Speaker 3>But that's all the more reason that he needs to

1:28:39.458 --> 1:28:40.697
<v Speaker 3>spend significant.

1:28:40.258 --> 1:28:41.817
<v Speaker 2>Time with you. Yeah, yeah, I'm agreeing with so.

1:28:41.937 --> 1:28:44.058
<v Speaker 3>But he can't do that and spend significant time with the.

1:28:44.258 --> 1:28:46.497
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with you. So I look at it

1:28:46.577 --> 1:28:50.298
<v Speaker 2>and I say to Travis Hunter, first of all, you

1:28:50.497 --> 1:28:52.937
<v Speaker 2>need to as an organization, you need to pick a

1:28:53.018 --> 1:28:55.178
<v Speaker 2>side with him, Like what side do you think he's

1:28:55.218 --> 1:28:56.338
<v Speaker 2>the best player at?

1:28:56.378 --> 1:28:58.977
<v Speaker 3>Where would you if you're having him focus on one

1:28:58.978 --> 1:28:59.697
<v Speaker 3>where you're putting him.

1:29:00.937 --> 1:29:03.057
<v Speaker 2>I think I agree with you that he's a better corner.

1:29:03.657 --> 1:29:05.577
<v Speaker 2>I think it's more valuable for him to be a

1:29:05.617 --> 1:29:08.737
<v Speaker 2>better receiver. So that's what makes it tough. I'd probably

1:29:08.817 --> 1:29:11.017
<v Speaker 2>draft him as a receiver. Yeah, because if you draft

1:29:11.058 --> 1:29:13.737
<v Speaker 2>him as a receiver and it hits the way I

1:29:13.817 --> 1:29:17.057
<v Speaker 2>think it will, then you have a you have Jamar Chase,

1:29:17.218 --> 1:29:19.298
<v Speaker 2>Like you have an elite wide but he's not that

1:29:19.697 --> 1:29:22.697
<v Speaker 2>X outside. No, But I just mean like it, you

1:29:22.777 --> 1:29:26.057
<v Speaker 2>have a top ten receiver. You have the coverage dictating receiver.

1:29:26.218 --> 1:29:27.058
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you have your Tuesday, And.

1:29:27.657 --> 1:29:30.378
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's more valuable than having another shutdown

1:29:30.537 --> 1:29:34.218
<v Speaker 2>corner opposite. I'm with you. So I look at it

1:29:34.338 --> 1:29:37.897
<v Speaker 2>and say I'd play him at receiver. The I was really,

1:29:39.138 --> 1:29:41.937
<v Speaker 2>like I said, I was really surprised, and uh in

1:29:42.018 --> 1:29:46.697
<v Speaker 2>a good way. How instinctual he is already at wide receiver.

1:29:47.338 --> 1:29:49.977
<v Speaker 2>Uh that I was. Again, I just made a big

1:29:50.098 --> 1:29:51.497
<v Speaker 2>leap from last year to this year. I thought he

1:29:51.577 --> 1:29:53.098
<v Speaker 2>was just gonna be mossing guys because he was a

1:29:53.098 --> 1:29:55.218
<v Speaker 2>great athlete. I didn't realize that he was going to

1:29:55.458 --> 1:29:58.537
<v Speaker 2>be going out there and like understanding where to settle

1:29:58.577 --> 1:30:01.777
<v Speaker 2>in zone, yeah, and all that kind of stuff. So

1:30:01.937 --> 1:30:04.657
<v Speaker 2>I developed him at wide receiver. I'd send him down

1:30:04.737 --> 1:30:06.657
<v Speaker 2>at these at these meet and greets, and I'd say,

1:30:06.697 --> 1:30:08.857
<v Speaker 2>we see you as a wide receiver. If you come

1:30:08.937 --> 1:30:11.737
<v Speaker 2>to us, you're playing wide receiver right point blank.

1:30:11.577 --> 1:30:13.298
<v Speaker 3>And then you know what, I think there's room four,

1:30:13.817 --> 1:30:16.338
<v Speaker 3>especially when you get later in the year. Hey, we

1:30:16.577 --> 1:30:19.178
<v Speaker 3>have you know, all right, we're facing the Dolphins this week, right,

1:30:19.258 --> 1:30:22.458
<v Speaker 3>they have Tua and or they have Hill and Waddle. Yeah,

1:30:23.338 --> 1:30:25.138
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna put you out there like fifty percent of

1:30:25.178 --> 1:30:26.378
<v Speaker 3>the time on defense this week.

1:30:26.657 --> 1:30:27.218
<v Speaker 2>And then he has.

1:30:28.857 --> 1:30:31.657
<v Speaker 3>Third down, right or third down and maybe maybe you

1:30:31.857 --> 1:30:34.218
<v Speaker 3>you decrease this role offensively that week a little bit.

1:30:34.338 --> 1:30:34.458
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:30:34.537 --> 1:30:35.937
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I would do it as a week

1:30:35.978 --> 1:30:37.977
<v Speaker 3>to week thing, but I would have him like in camp,

1:30:38.657 --> 1:30:39.378
<v Speaker 3>you're playing receiver.

1:30:39.577 --> 1:30:41.697
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So the last thing I want to say on

1:30:41.737 --> 1:30:44.857
<v Speaker 2>Travishun and then we should move. Uh. The other thing

1:30:44.897 --> 1:30:47.257
<v Speaker 2>that I would assume, and this is just an assumption,

1:30:47.777 --> 1:30:49.458
<v Speaker 2>is that he's going to want to play wide receiver.

1:30:49.617 --> 1:30:51.378
<v Speaker 2>I think so because the money is that wide receiver.

1:30:51.817 --> 1:30:54.497
<v Speaker 2>So he's gonna know I can be a thirty million

1:30:54.577 --> 1:30:57.097
<v Speaker 2>dollar wide receiver or I can be a fifteen million

1:30:57.138 --> 1:31:00.377
<v Speaker 2>dollar corner. And knowing his background and knowing the dion's

1:31:00.418 --> 1:31:02.178
<v Speaker 2>in his ear and all that kind of stuff. So

1:31:02.298 --> 1:31:03.857
<v Speaker 2>I think this is gonna work itself out.

1:31:03.978 --> 1:31:05.857
<v Speaker 3>Is I guess we're out going that'd be like, if

1:31:05.897 --> 1:31:08.298
<v Speaker 3>I'm advising him for whatever this is worth, I would say,

1:31:08.537 --> 1:31:10.418
<v Speaker 3>you could be a thirty million dollar wide receiver on

1:31:10.497 --> 1:31:13.217
<v Speaker 3>one big contract, or you can play corner for fifteen

1:31:13.298 --> 1:31:15.857
<v Speaker 3>years and get like four to twenty million dollar contract.

1:31:15.937 --> 1:31:16.057
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:31:16.298 --> 1:31:21.418
<v Speaker 3>But my one other thing is it's not gonna matter

1:31:21.418 --> 1:31:23.097
<v Speaker 3>because he's going first overall, and I don't think they're

1:31:23.098 --> 1:31:23.977
<v Speaker 3>getting over I.

1:31:23.937 --> 1:31:25.817
<v Speaker 2>Don't know if it's not gonna matter. They could lose that.

1:31:25.897 --> 1:31:27.817
<v Speaker 3>They still have I know, but they have what three

1:31:27.897 --> 1:31:28.777
<v Speaker 3>four teams ahead of them.

1:31:28.897 --> 1:31:30.737
<v Speaker 2>They have three teams ahead of them. They're all one

1:31:30.857 --> 1:31:32.617
<v Speaker 2>loss ahead of them, and that and those teams have

1:31:32.737 --> 1:31:36.777
<v Speaker 2>some head to heads against each other. So it's a

1:31:36.857 --> 1:31:40.777
<v Speaker 2>Giants still, it's possible. Anyways, the Giants still play. They

1:31:40.857 --> 1:31:43.257
<v Speaker 2>play the Ravens, the Falcons, the Colts, and the Eagles.

1:31:43.298 --> 1:31:46.218
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty tough, yep. And then again that's a quarterback team.

1:31:46.298 --> 1:31:49.697
<v Speaker 2>So so uh long, long way to it, you know,

1:31:49.737 --> 1:31:52.218
<v Speaker 2>long way to Grahama's house here on Travis Hunter uh

1:31:52.497 --> 1:31:58.777
<v Speaker 2>Studd No notes yep, great football player, no notes, nope, none,

1:31:59.098 --> 1:32:02.378
<v Speaker 2>film notes no none, none on either side. Like he's

1:32:02.418 --> 1:32:04.577
<v Speaker 2>gonna be good. Like there's things that I can nitpick

1:32:04.897 --> 1:32:06.937
<v Speaker 2>about both things, Like I don't think he's great on

1:32:07.058 --> 1:32:09.777
<v Speaker 2>the outside receiver. I don't think that he's great on

1:32:09.857 --> 1:32:12.218
<v Speaker 2>the inside of a corner. I don't really care. I

1:32:12.298 --> 1:32:15.737
<v Speaker 2>think he's awesome. That's it all right, Next guy, this

1:32:15.897 --> 1:32:19.657
<v Speaker 2>one comes with his asterisk, but just off talent alone

1:32:19.697 --> 1:32:21.897
<v Speaker 2>and watching it on the film. Will Campbell is a

1:32:21.937 --> 1:32:25.017
<v Speaker 2>top five pick in an NFL draft. Okay, he just is. Okay,

1:32:25.378 --> 1:32:28.097
<v Speaker 2>he What I think is the best part about Will

1:32:28.178 --> 1:32:33.817
<v Speaker 2>Campbell to me is he's got that package of foot speed,

1:32:34.537 --> 1:32:37.697
<v Speaker 2>body control power at the point of attack right, like

1:32:37.777 --> 1:32:41.178
<v Speaker 2>he's got it, Like you just watch him move and

1:32:41.298 --> 1:32:44.137
<v Speaker 2>he's explosive out of his stance. He can mirror pass

1:32:44.218 --> 1:32:46.178
<v Speaker 2>rushers on the edge, like some of the clips that

1:32:46.218 --> 1:32:49.178
<v Speaker 2>I posted, what game was that against South Carolina where

1:32:49.178 --> 1:32:51.817
<v Speaker 2>he's just mirroring those guys is just absurd, Like it's

1:32:51.978 --> 1:32:55.418
<v Speaker 2>just crazy how well he can mirror guys on an

1:32:55.458 --> 1:32:58.338
<v Speaker 2>island in pass protection. And he also has a really

1:32:58.458 --> 1:33:00.817
<v Speaker 2>great anchor and like you really don't go through him

1:33:00.857 --> 1:33:04.057
<v Speaker 2>too often either, Like he's he really is very stout

1:33:04.178 --> 1:33:05.897
<v Speaker 2>and like you can just see it right like from

1:33:06.058 --> 1:33:10.618
<v Speaker 2>in his lower half, how stout he is just technically sound, athletic,

1:33:11.138 --> 1:33:11.537
<v Speaker 2>all of it.

1:33:11.697 --> 1:33:12.138
<v Speaker 5>Like he is.

1:33:12.777 --> 1:33:16.617
<v Speaker 2>He's a blue chip offensive line prospect. Of course, the

1:33:16.697 --> 1:33:21.258
<v Speaker 2>astra is the arm light. But I find this whole

1:33:21.258 --> 1:33:25.257
<v Speaker 2>thing to be insufferable frankly about this conversation with Will Campbell,

1:33:25.657 --> 1:33:28.218
<v Speaker 2>because it's almost like knocking the player right for the

1:33:28.298 --> 1:33:31.897
<v Speaker 2>fact that he was not born with longer arms. And

1:33:32.058 --> 1:33:34.338
<v Speaker 2>also I just find it insufferable because I think it's

1:33:34.458 --> 1:33:38.298
<v Speaker 2>way overthinking it with him. And that's why I was

1:33:38.378 --> 1:33:40.218
<v Speaker 2>glad to see that Brugler just gave him to the

1:33:40.258 --> 1:33:43.857
<v Speaker 2>Patriots at fourth overall and didn't overthink that's that freaking pick.

1:33:44.737 --> 1:33:49.057
<v Speaker 2>He to me, Will Campbell is a stud I told

1:33:49.098 --> 1:33:50.897
<v Speaker 2>you earlier that I would have it was a little

1:33:50.897 --> 1:33:54.097
<v Speaker 2>recency biased. I kind of digested a little bit more.

1:33:54.458 --> 1:33:56.338
<v Speaker 2>I probably would still have Joe Alds ahead of him,

1:33:56.418 --> 1:33:58.777
<v Speaker 2>just because of the measurables, Like joeald was cut from

1:33:59.378 --> 1:34:03.138
<v Speaker 2>freaking chiseled yeah, to play tackle right, like six eight

1:34:03.218 --> 1:34:06.298
<v Speaker 2>three thirty thirty four inch arms like just check check, check,

1:34:06.378 --> 1:34:09.298
<v Speaker 2>check check. Will Campbell doesn't do that. But I think

1:34:09.497 --> 1:34:11.617
<v Speaker 2>he would be right there for me. He does besides

1:34:11.657 --> 1:34:14.258
<v Speaker 2>the arms six six three thirty Yeah, he'd be right

1:34:14.378 --> 1:34:17.697
<v Speaker 2>there for me in terms of you know, Alt Campbell

1:34:18.258 --> 1:34:19.697
<v Speaker 2>for Shanu, I think for sure.

1:34:19.737 --> 1:34:21.577
<v Speaker 3>So let's say they end up with a second pick. Yeah,

1:34:21.697 --> 1:34:24.537
<v Speaker 3>Travis Hunter's gone. Yeah, thirty three inch arms he taken

1:34:24.577 --> 1:34:25.017
<v Speaker 3>Will Campbell.

1:34:25.737 --> 1:34:29.138
<v Speaker 2>I can't trade out you. Well, that's an option, but

1:34:29.298 --> 1:34:29.577
<v Speaker 2>you can.

1:34:29.777 --> 1:34:31.338
<v Speaker 3>If you trade out, your probably not getting Will campb

1:34:31.338 --> 1:34:35.178
<v Speaker 3>If he his thirty three inch arms, I'm probably taking him,

1:34:36.018 --> 1:34:37.497
<v Speaker 3>all right, thirty two and seven eighths?

1:34:40.577 --> 1:34:43.418
<v Speaker 2>Is he good? Set the meter? I'm taking him. If

1:34:43.458 --> 1:34:45.258
<v Speaker 2>it's thirty two and seven eights, we're talking about an

1:34:45.298 --> 1:34:46.977
<v Speaker 2>eighth of an inch, And if that's what you're caught

1:34:47.058 --> 1:34:49.617
<v Speaker 2>up on, then your looney tunes. Okay, So I'm taking

1:34:49.697 --> 1:34:51.178
<v Speaker 2>him at an eighth of an inch. But I I

1:34:51.978 --> 1:34:54.937
<v Speaker 2>sigh and I pause because I know that it's gonna

1:34:54.937 --> 1:34:57.697
<v Speaker 2>be insufferable, Like it's gonna be a pain in the ass,

1:34:58.058 --> 1:35:00.777
<v Speaker 2>Right it was. I told you the other day. I

1:35:00.857 --> 1:35:01.617
<v Speaker 2>wasn't explaining this.

1:35:01.697 --> 1:35:04.617
<v Speaker 3>I was giving a take the cutoff. The benchmark was

1:35:04.657 --> 1:35:07.497
<v Speaker 3>thirty four inches until Rashaun Slater showed up and was

1:35:07.537 --> 1:35:11.097
<v Speaker 3>a very good tackle with thirty three inch arms. Will Campbell,

1:35:11.178 --> 1:35:12.657
<v Speaker 3>to me, is the kind of guy that could maybe

1:35:12.737 --> 1:35:15.338
<v Speaker 3>reset the benchmark again. I think he's that talented. Doesn't

1:35:15.378 --> 1:35:17.458
<v Speaker 3>mean every guy with thirty two and seven eighth inch

1:35:17.617 --> 1:35:20.617
<v Speaker 3>arms can play tackle. I think Will Campbell probably could

1:35:20.777 --> 1:35:22.617
<v Speaker 3>if it's like thirty two and a half right now,

1:35:22.657 --> 1:35:27.577
<v Speaker 3>we're talking Peter Skronski territory. Okay, But I have some

1:35:27.697 --> 1:35:28.857
<v Speaker 3>flexibility with Will Campbell.

1:35:28.857 --> 1:35:29.458
<v Speaker 2>I think he's that good.

1:35:29.497 --> 1:35:29.657
<v Speaker 5>Really.

1:35:29.657 --> 1:35:31.537
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that worries me with him because he's

1:35:31.577 --> 1:35:33.737
<v Speaker 3>got the leadership quotient he plays.

1:35:34.418 --> 1:35:35.378
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even mention that.

1:35:35.937 --> 1:35:36.537
<v Speaker 3>I did.

1:35:36.577 --> 1:35:39.258
<v Speaker 2>You got all excited about the seven. So this this thing,

1:35:39.418 --> 1:35:42.258
<v Speaker 2>this is super cool. You usually hate this. No, I'm

1:35:42.497 --> 1:35:45.097
<v Speaker 2>so surprised you're into not because not when it comes

1:35:45.098 --> 1:35:49.218
<v Speaker 2>to offensive lineman, because offense. Playing offensive line is a mentality,

1:35:49.338 --> 1:35:51.617
<v Speaker 2>like you have to have a mindset to play that position.

1:35:52.258 --> 1:35:54.737
<v Speaker 2>And the one of the reasons why I'm swimming over

1:35:54.777 --> 1:35:58.098
<v Speaker 2>Will Campbell is because he he has that like he

1:35:58.338 --> 1:35:59.977
<v Speaker 2>has that intangible quality.

1:36:00.098 --> 1:36:01.777
<v Speaker 3>Well he might be he's probably a nice, kidding person.

1:36:01.857 --> 1:36:02.937
<v Speaker 3>He's a mean, nasty guy.

1:36:03.138 --> 1:36:05.977
<v Speaker 2>He's nasty. He wants to kill you. He wants to

1:36:06.058 --> 1:36:08.617
<v Speaker 2>kill your family. He wants to take your your kids

1:36:08.657 --> 1:36:11.298
<v Speaker 2>out behind the woodshed along with you, Like this guy

1:36:11.497 --> 1:36:14.537
<v Speaker 2>is nasty as tough as nails. And the seventh thing

1:36:14.657 --> 1:36:17.977
<v Speaker 2>is so cool to me because LSU explain the seven.

1:36:18.138 --> 1:36:21.817
<v Speaker 2>So at LSU, the seven is the best playmaker on the.

1:36:21.857 --> 1:36:24.218
<v Speaker 3>Rocket is awarded by the coaching staff. You cannot choose

1:36:24.298 --> 1:36:26.617
<v Speaker 3>number seven, the coaches say at the beginning of every year. Yeah,

1:36:27.018 --> 1:36:28.777
<v Speaker 3>the best playmaker on the offense gets seven.

1:36:28.817 --> 1:36:31.418
<v Speaker 2>Khan had that. I think it's best playmaker on the

1:36:32.218 --> 1:36:34.977
<v Speaker 2>eighteen on defense. I thought Patrick Peterson wore seven.

1:36:35.617 --> 1:36:36.657
<v Speaker 3>Oh there's an eighteen too.

1:36:36.697 --> 1:36:38.657
<v Speaker 2>I forget what that is. Maybe it's best on the team.

1:36:38.657 --> 1:36:40.338
<v Speaker 2>Hang on all Yeah, fine, so I thought it because

1:36:40.338 --> 1:36:42.857
<v Speaker 2>I know Patrick Peterson wore it and Leonard Fournette wore it,

1:36:42.937 --> 1:36:47.418
<v Speaker 2>I think. And to have a program like LSU that

1:36:47.577 --> 1:36:51.097
<v Speaker 2>is just a factory of skill player. You're right, eighteen

1:36:51.218 --> 1:36:53.777
<v Speaker 2>is best leader. Seven is best playmaker either side.

1:36:53.857 --> 1:36:54.017
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:36:54.098 --> 1:36:56.058
<v Speaker 2>So to have a program like LSU, that's just a

1:36:56.178 --> 1:36:58.617
<v Speaker 2>factory of great NFL players.

1:36:58.657 --> 1:37:01.697
<v Speaker 3>As you explained, I give you some sevens Pat Peterson,

1:37:01.737 --> 1:37:05.057
<v Speaker 3>Tyron Matthew, Leonard Fournette, DJ Shark, Jonathan Giles, Grant Delpin.

1:37:05.218 --> 1:37:06.897
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So not all of them have panned out to

1:37:07.018 --> 1:37:12.057
<v Speaker 2>be fair, but to have LSU give a offensive lineman

1:37:12.777 --> 1:37:15.577
<v Speaker 2>the seven, first time it's ever happened. Best playmaker gets

1:37:15.657 --> 1:37:18.458
<v Speaker 2>the seven from the offensive line, and then he's not

1:37:18.697 --> 1:37:21.298
<v Speaker 2>eligible to wear seven in the game because he's an

1:37:21.338 --> 1:37:24.058
<v Speaker 2>offensive lineman, so he wears it as a patch on

1:37:24.178 --> 1:37:24.697
<v Speaker 2>his jersey.

1:37:24.817 --> 1:37:27.418
<v Speaker 3>That is freaking awesome. That is That is the kind

1:37:27.458 --> 1:37:28.897
<v Speaker 3>of thing you usually roll your eyes in.

1:37:29.897 --> 1:37:32.098
<v Speaker 2>Because not because that's what that's what you want to

1:37:32.138 --> 1:37:35.657
<v Speaker 2>hear when you're drafting an offensive lineman and he's a playmaker. Yeah,

1:37:35.657 --> 1:37:38.298
<v Speaker 2>he's a playmaker that changes your line.

1:37:38.378 --> 1:37:41.298
<v Speaker 3>That's a Pennay soul kind of thing, right, So yeah,

1:37:41.378 --> 1:37:43.777
<v Speaker 3>outside of the arm length, like and I'm willing to

1:37:43.817 --> 1:37:46.097
<v Speaker 3>be flexible there, like I to me, he's the guy.

1:37:46.218 --> 1:37:48.697
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that gave me any semblance of pause

1:37:48.737 --> 1:37:50.058
<v Speaker 3>this year's penalties.

1:37:49.737 --> 1:37:52.017
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that was it. He gets opened up a little

1:37:52.058 --> 1:37:54.537
<v Speaker 2>bit in his past sets, but it's fixable in my mind,

1:37:54.577 --> 1:37:56.298
<v Speaker 2>Like it's it's just a technique thing. I don't think

1:37:56.338 --> 1:37:57.378
<v Speaker 2>it's anything too serious.

1:37:57.537 --> 1:38:00.098
<v Speaker 3>He played three years in the SEC, started as a

1:38:00.138 --> 1:38:03.017
<v Speaker 3>true freshman, started three full seasons. He allowed a sack

1:38:03.098 --> 1:38:05.138
<v Speaker 3>in his first game, He allowed a sack in his

1:38:05.258 --> 1:38:08.258
<v Speaker 3>last game. He allowed one sack the entire time in between.

1:38:08.378 --> 1:38:10.697
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, two years without a sack base, basically two.

1:38:10.657 --> 1:38:13.697
<v Speaker 3>Years in that sack in the SEC. The guy's freaking

1:38:13.777 --> 1:38:14.338
<v Speaker 3>special man.

1:38:14.418 --> 1:38:18.418
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I was thirty two and seven ages.

1:38:21.258 --> 1:38:22.817
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, if you're gonna take a guy in

1:38:22.857 --> 1:38:24.857
<v Speaker 3>the top five, he needs to have top five talent.

1:38:25.138 --> 1:38:26.577
<v Speaker 3>Will Campbell his top five talent.

1:38:26.697 --> 1:38:29.017
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So last thing on Will Campbell, then we'll move again.

1:38:29.777 --> 1:38:32.497
<v Speaker 2>I just look at it to a little bit, and

1:38:32.617 --> 1:38:36.497
<v Speaker 2>I look at Drake and even Christian Gonzales. I am

1:38:36.657 --> 1:38:40.777
<v Speaker 2>all aboard the early declare train. At this point in

1:38:40.817 --> 1:38:44.018
<v Speaker 2>the draft, true junior is coming out. That means that

1:38:44.058 --> 1:38:44.537
<v Speaker 2>you're a stud.

1:38:44.657 --> 1:38:46.937
<v Speaker 3>Well, this class is all true juniors. It's like an

1:38:46.978 --> 1:38:47.977
<v Speaker 3>insane number of.

1:38:48.058 --> 1:38:51.258
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that means you're the real deal. It didn't take

1:38:51.298 --> 1:38:53.497
<v Speaker 2>you six years in college to get to this point.

1:38:53.777 --> 1:38:56.017
<v Speaker 2>You did it in three and you're already a top

1:38:56.098 --> 1:38:57.178
<v Speaker 2>ten prospect in the NFL.

1:38:57.178 --> 1:38:59.138
<v Speaker 3>There's so many true juniors in this class. It's an

1:38:59.178 --> 1:38:59.657
<v Speaker 3>insane night.

1:38:59.697 --> 1:39:01.298
<v Speaker 2>And I know you love this. It's a little bit

1:39:01.418 --> 1:39:05.298
<v Speaker 2>like Drake too, where like his his sophomore season was

1:39:05.378 --> 1:39:08.378
<v Speaker 2>maybe even better than his junior season. You know, I

1:39:08.458 --> 1:39:11.097
<v Speaker 2>thought Will Campbell last year was like, Okay, this guy's

1:39:11.098 --> 1:39:12.657
<v Speaker 2>going to be a top five pick in the draft

1:39:13.058 --> 1:39:15.218
<v Speaker 2>last year if he was able to come out and

1:39:15.258 --> 1:39:17.977
<v Speaker 2>he was eligible. Now this year, he just did what

1:39:18.058 --> 1:39:18.617
<v Speaker 2>he needed to do.

1:39:19.258 --> 1:39:23.617
<v Speaker 3>I say, Garrett nuss Meyer's a much harder quarterback.

1:39:23.178 --> 1:39:24.657
<v Speaker 2>To block franchise Terris.

1:39:25.617 --> 1:39:28.537
<v Speaker 3>Garrett nuss Meyer has no concept of the pocket.

1:39:28.697 --> 1:39:33.537
<v Speaker 2>It's atrocious. Yeah. Okay, So that's Will Campbell. Yeah, bottom line,

1:39:34.657 --> 1:39:38.458
<v Speaker 2>high level blocker, elite foot speed, body control, but just

1:39:38.577 --> 1:39:41.897
<v Speaker 2>might not be long enough for tackle. That's that's it, right,

1:39:41.978 --> 1:39:43.777
<v Speaker 2>It's just that butt. It's just that butt.

1:39:43.857 --> 1:39:47.057
<v Speaker 3>So the combine technically begins on the twenty seventh. Yeah,

1:39:47.138 --> 1:39:50.017
<v Speaker 3>so that would put offensive line measurements I think March

1:39:50.978 --> 1:39:51.737
<v Speaker 3>March second.

1:39:51.577 --> 1:39:55.058
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, big day circle it. Okay, So here is my

1:39:55.218 --> 1:39:59.418
<v Speaker 2>next wave here, and this is like if the Patriots

1:39:59.458 --> 1:40:02.697
<v Speaker 2>were to trade down, I feel comfortable with drafting one

1:40:02.737 --> 1:40:04.777
<v Speaker 2>of these three players, and I put him in order

1:40:04.777 --> 1:40:05.418
<v Speaker 2>because you know I like this.

1:40:05.617 --> 1:40:07.338
<v Speaker 3>So wait, I know you said you didn't watch him,

1:40:07.418 --> 1:40:08.977
<v Speaker 3>but from what you're familiar with, where do you put

1:40:09.018 --> 1:40:09.617
<v Speaker 3>Will Johnson?

1:40:10.697 --> 1:40:10.857
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

1:40:11.817 --> 1:40:14.537
<v Speaker 2>Probably in this list? Okay. I think the big thing

1:40:14.617 --> 1:40:16.737
<v Speaker 2>that I see with Will Johnson is long speed I

1:40:16.978 --> 1:40:19.458
<v Speaker 2>know that's been something that's come up with people. If

1:40:19.497 --> 1:40:21.218
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna play on the boundary in the NFL, you

1:40:21.338 --> 1:40:22.737
<v Speaker 2>have to be able to run, like you have to

1:40:22.777 --> 1:40:24.298
<v Speaker 2>be Christian Gonzales, like, you have to be able to

1:40:24.298 --> 1:40:27.138
<v Speaker 2>carry everything. Travis Hunter can carry everything. I don't know

1:40:27.178 --> 1:40:30.497
<v Speaker 2>if Will Johnson's like it's not terrible, Like, yeah, but

1:40:30.497 --> 1:40:32.418
<v Speaker 2>it's not. I mean, he was projected as the top

1:40:32.458 --> 1:40:34.857
<v Speaker 2>pick in this draft. Yeah, that's why I ask. Okay,

1:40:34.978 --> 1:40:38.298
<v Speaker 2>so I put I put these guys in order, Uh,

1:40:38.737 --> 1:40:41.458
<v Speaker 2>my next guy on my wish list here, and this

1:40:41.617 --> 1:40:44.057
<v Speaker 2>is the trade down category. Right, So we're going from

1:40:44.138 --> 1:40:46.897
<v Speaker 2>FORDA to eight or nine or ten, and we're drafting

1:40:46.978 --> 1:40:49.737
<v Speaker 2>this guy. I'm not drafting this guy at four. Abdul

1:40:49.777 --> 1:40:53.937
<v Speaker 2>Carter from Penn State. I h I was really impressed.

1:40:54.978 --> 1:40:59.657
<v Speaker 2>My one caveat with it for him is really more

1:40:59.657 --> 1:41:03.378
<v Speaker 2>about them, right Like, are you gonna draft as the Patriots?

1:41:03.458 --> 1:41:03.497
<v Speaker 5>Like?

1:41:03.697 --> 1:41:06.617
<v Speaker 2>Are the Patriots now into up the field rushers? Right? Like?

1:41:06.737 --> 1:41:10.137
<v Speaker 2>Is that now a thing that they're subscribing to? Because

1:41:10.577 --> 1:41:14.897
<v Speaker 2>when I watch when I watched Abdul Carter, his style

1:41:14.978 --> 1:41:18.097
<v Speaker 2>of play is not is not a Belichick style of play.

1:41:18.418 --> 1:41:22.777
<v Speaker 2>He is a up the field, downhill, hair on fire,

1:41:23.218 --> 1:41:26.378
<v Speaker 2>coming around the edge. That's how he plays. If you

1:41:26.458 --> 1:41:28.657
<v Speaker 2>need want a guy to like post up on the

1:41:28.817 --> 1:41:30.817
<v Speaker 2>edge and set the edge of the defense ends and

1:41:30.897 --> 1:41:33.057
<v Speaker 2>hold the point of it like an Anthony Jennings. Right,

1:41:33.497 --> 1:41:36.937
<v Speaker 2>he's not that, But this guy is Matthew jud replaced.

1:41:37.178 --> 1:41:39.097
<v Speaker 2>This guy has twitched up as hell, Like this guy

1:41:39.218 --> 1:41:42.937
<v Speaker 2>is shot out of a cannon. Excellent bend around the

1:41:43.018 --> 1:41:45.897
<v Speaker 2>corner as well, closing bursts to the quarterback. Like he's

1:41:45.937 --> 1:41:48.458
<v Speaker 2>got that ability to corner and just close on the

1:41:48.497 --> 1:41:50.537
<v Speaker 2>quarterback and get him on the ground. Like some of

1:41:50.697 --> 1:41:53.298
<v Speaker 2>the tape that you watch against him, you know, against

1:41:53.657 --> 1:41:56.697
<v Speaker 2>your boy Ursery just kind of ate his lunch. Ohio

1:41:56.817 --> 1:42:03.497
<v Speaker 2>States tackles ate their lunch third Maryland last week was absurd, right, like,

1:42:03.657 --> 1:42:06.257
<v Speaker 2>you know, just every single week, this guy's putting up numbers.

1:42:06.897 --> 1:42:11.977
<v Speaker 2>But like I said, awesome, awesome pass rusher, screamer twitched

1:42:12.058 --> 1:42:15.697
<v Speaker 2>up off the edge, But he's not He's not an eddsetter.

1:42:15.978 --> 1:42:18.897
<v Speaker 2>He's a pass rusher. He's an up the field player.

1:42:19.458 --> 1:42:21.537
<v Speaker 2>Are the Patriots into that sort of thing? And now

1:42:21.857 --> 1:42:24.138
<v Speaker 2>is that a is that a new turning a new lead?

1:42:24.258 --> 1:42:26.897
<v Speaker 2>Well it kind of worked with judea On, so you'd

1:42:26.937 --> 1:42:29.217
<v Speaker 2>have to. But like jud On was a veteran, proven

1:42:29.258 --> 1:42:30.657
<v Speaker 2>player in this league, are you going to have a

1:42:30.777 --> 1:42:31.857
<v Speaker 2>rookie that kind of freedom?

1:42:31.897 --> 1:42:33.897
<v Speaker 3>That's a fair question. The other thing with me, and

1:42:34.018 --> 1:42:35.138
<v Speaker 3>by the way, this is a theme for a lot

1:42:35.178 --> 1:42:37.737
<v Speaker 3>of guys in this draft. Yeah, it's consistency. Like he

1:42:37.777 --> 1:42:40.138
<v Speaker 3>had a pretty pedestrian start to the season and then

1:42:40.178 --> 1:42:43.098
<v Speaker 3>the last month and a half just went on an

1:42:43.258 --> 1:42:46.657
<v Speaker 3>absolute heater even though Maryland sucks in Ohio again, was

1:42:46.737 --> 1:42:49.497
<v Speaker 3>like using their third string right guard as a left tackle.

1:42:49.617 --> 1:42:52.418
<v Speaker 3>But no, he can he can play, he can get

1:42:52.418 --> 1:42:55.697
<v Speaker 3>after the quarterback. He's a modern rusher, something that teams

1:42:55.697 --> 1:42:57.218
<v Speaker 3>are gonna have to decide when they look at the

1:42:57.298 --> 1:43:00.098
<v Speaker 3>edge guys. We talked about this with James Pierce, who

1:43:00.178 --> 1:43:02.857
<v Speaker 3>was the top pass rusher coming into this class and

1:43:02.978 --> 1:43:05.977
<v Speaker 3>had a rough year. It's more extreme with James Piers.

1:43:06.178 --> 1:43:09.418
<v Speaker 3>James Pierce is a pass rush specialist. James Pearce is

1:43:09.458 --> 1:43:11.817
<v Speaker 3>not a three down player. Now, he's damn good to

1:43:11.857 --> 1:43:14.258
<v Speaker 3>getting to the quarterback. But are you going to use

1:43:14.537 --> 1:43:18.657
<v Speaker 3>a top fifteen pick on a guy that is a

1:43:18.777 --> 1:43:19.657
<v Speaker 3>situational player?

1:43:19.897 --> 1:43:22.418
<v Speaker 2>Now? Carter projects more as a run defender. Yeah, he's

1:43:22.458 --> 1:43:24.378
<v Speaker 2>not gonna give you much that he wins, but he

1:43:24.497 --> 1:43:27.017
<v Speaker 2>wins in the run game with quickness. Right, he's gonna

1:43:27.018 --> 1:43:29.378
<v Speaker 2>slip blocks and he's gonna jump gaps and things like that.

1:43:29.458 --> 1:43:31.857
<v Speaker 3>He is the opportunity to become a three down player,

1:43:31.897 --> 1:43:33.137
<v Speaker 3>but he's probably not right away.

1:43:33.378 --> 1:43:34.098
<v Speaker 2>So that's the other thing.

1:43:34.138 --> 1:43:35.697
<v Speaker 3>And it goes to your point about play style, like

1:43:35.777 --> 1:43:38.058
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna come with an adjustment. You just have to

1:43:38.098 --> 1:43:40.338
<v Speaker 3>ask yourself how he projects as a three down player,

1:43:40.378 --> 1:43:43.137
<v Speaker 3>and your your say, whatever team drafts him, whatever team's

1:43:43.138 --> 1:43:46.057
<v Speaker 3>evaluating him, you have to project either how he fits

1:43:46.138 --> 1:43:48.058
<v Speaker 3>the three down player in your defense or do you

1:43:48.138 --> 1:43:51.177
<v Speaker 3>go to the James Pierce extreme and just say, maybe

1:43:51.218 --> 1:43:54.258
<v Speaker 3>he's just a situational rusher, but he's so good, we'll

1:43:54.338 --> 1:43:55.097
<v Speaker 3>use the pick where.

1:43:54.978 --> 1:43:57.937
<v Speaker 2>We use the pick. Had some just unreal moments of

1:43:58.018 --> 1:44:00.458
<v Speaker 2>speed and bend around the edge where like Cackles can't

1:44:00.458 --> 1:44:04.018
<v Speaker 2>even get there, no tier athlete, like just eliting. And

1:44:04.138 --> 1:44:05.897
<v Speaker 2>you can see it too, like you know, not to

1:44:05.978 --> 1:44:08.098
<v Speaker 2>go all weird, but like you can see it with

1:44:08.218 --> 1:44:10.338
<v Speaker 2>the body type, like the lower half, like you can

1:44:10.418 --> 1:44:12.657
<v Speaker 2>just see the explosiveness that he has in his legs

1:44:13.497 --> 1:44:16.857
<v Speaker 2>off the ball. Just a really fun player to watch it.

1:44:16.937 --> 1:44:18.977
<v Speaker 2>And another guy we talked about this, you know, another

1:44:19.058 --> 1:44:21.218
<v Speaker 2>college football playoff guy, right, like you know you can

1:44:21.258 --> 1:44:24.618
<v Speaker 2>see him have have even more good games against good competition.

1:44:24.897 --> 1:44:26.937
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be the college football playoff, right, pen State

1:44:27.018 --> 1:44:30.537
<v Speaker 2>Penn State? Yeah yeah there so he'll I've and I

1:44:30.577 --> 1:44:32.657
<v Speaker 2>mean there's a chance we get Penn State Texas. Yeah.

1:44:32.737 --> 1:44:35.058
<v Speaker 2>So Kelvin Banks Abdual Carter Right, that's again like that

1:44:35.418 --> 1:44:38.057
<v Speaker 2>game is going to mean so much for both players

1:44:38.058 --> 1:44:42.257
<v Speaker 2>stocks yep, all right. Next on the list, Yeah, TEP McMillan.

1:44:42.777 --> 1:44:46.257
<v Speaker 2>So I like Tech macmillan, I don't love TEP McMillan.

1:44:47.098 --> 1:44:49.138
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel the same way about TEP McMillan as

1:44:49.178 --> 1:44:51.577
<v Speaker 2>I did. Marvin Harrison Junior and Melik Neighbors last year

1:44:52.697 --> 1:44:55.977
<v Speaker 2>not the same caliber. Like you know, look, Marvin Harrison

1:44:56.058 --> 1:44:59.817
<v Speaker 2>Junior wasn't like a burner either, but like when better

1:44:59.857 --> 1:45:02.378
<v Speaker 2>comparison to me, you know you look at in terms

1:45:02.418 --> 1:45:05.338
<v Speaker 2>of body type than Melik Neighbors obviously, but like when

1:45:05.378 --> 1:45:09.058
<v Speaker 2>you would watch you know, Neighbors at LSU, like that

1:45:09.178 --> 1:45:11.577
<v Speaker 2>guy just moves different, right, you can just see it.

1:45:11.697 --> 1:45:13.338
<v Speaker 2>That's what I want to see when I watch a

1:45:13.418 --> 1:45:16.777
<v Speaker 2>first round pick in the top ten at a wide receiver.

1:45:16.897 --> 1:45:18.857
<v Speaker 2>I want to see a guy that is just a

1:45:19.497 --> 1:45:22.338
<v Speaker 2>tier athlete and moves different than everybody else on the field.

1:45:22.697 --> 1:45:25.777
<v Speaker 2>And I just didn't necessarily see that with Ted. And

1:45:25.978 --> 1:45:28.378
<v Speaker 2>I think the biggest thing to me is that you

1:45:28.458 --> 1:45:31.057
<v Speaker 2>have to understand what you're drafting when you draft Ted

1:45:31.178 --> 1:45:33.897
<v Speaker 2>mc millan. And my concern with it is is that

1:45:34.018 --> 1:45:37.338
<v Speaker 2>you're adding another guy to this offense who's not fast,

1:45:37.737 --> 1:45:40.458
<v Speaker 2>like and they already have guys that are are not fast,

1:45:40.537 --> 1:45:44.178
<v Speaker 2>that are just like good possession, like body receivers right

1:45:44.338 --> 1:45:47.817
<v Speaker 2>like contested catch guys and back shoulders and I'm gonna

1:45:48.098 --> 1:45:50.577
<v Speaker 2>run across the middle of the field into zones and

1:45:50.777 --> 1:45:52.857
<v Speaker 2>like catch balls over the middle of the field. And

1:45:53.258 --> 1:45:55.098
<v Speaker 2>like I do like the fact that he can, you know,

1:45:55.218 --> 1:45:57.338
<v Speaker 2>go inside a little bit, Like you can use him

1:45:58.258 --> 1:46:00.777
<v Speaker 2>in the slots some to stretch the seam and to

1:46:00.897 --> 1:46:03.378
<v Speaker 2>run routes from the slot, which I guess can be useful.

1:46:03.497 --> 1:46:06.217
<v Speaker 2>And like the catch radius in the body control is excellent,

1:46:06.338 --> 1:46:09.737
<v Speaker 2>Like he's got that ability back shoulder, high point fade

1:46:09.897 --> 1:46:13.258
<v Speaker 2>work the sidelines, got great feet and you know awareness

1:46:13.338 --> 1:46:16.897
<v Speaker 2>of the sideline canto, those types of things. So I

1:46:17.298 --> 1:46:19.897
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of Drake London. I see a little

1:46:19.897 --> 1:46:21.737
<v Speaker 2>bit of T Higgins in his game. As a way,

1:46:22.378 --> 1:46:24.697
<v Speaker 2>I think Mike Evans is on a different stratosphere. I

1:46:24.777 --> 1:46:27.378
<v Speaker 2>don't think that's a fair comp to anybody. Frankly, it's

1:46:27.418 --> 1:46:29.657
<v Speaker 2>the it's the apex of that sort of player. But

1:46:29.817 --> 1:46:32.258
<v Speaker 2>that's him like truly maxing out. So the question that

1:46:32.338 --> 1:46:35.057
<v Speaker 2>I would just have, and we all know those players

1:46:35.098 --> 1:46:38.577
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, would you draft T Higgins fourth overall

1:46:38.617 --> 1:46:39.137
<v Speaker 2>in the draft?

1:46:40.617 --> 1:46:44.537
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean the Patriots, given their history at wide receiver,

1:46:44.617 --> 1:46:45.258
<v Speaker 3>you can get that guy.

1:46:45.258 --> 1:46:47.258
<v Speaker 2>I think you would. Now do you do that when

1:46:47.298 --> 1:46:50.577
<v Speaker 2>you can just sign to Higgins? Right? Becomes another conversation.

1:46:50.937 --> 1:46:51.777
<v Speaker 2>Definitely not both.

1:46:51.817 --> 1:46:53.338
<v Speaker 3>I know some people want to see them so too

1:46:53.418 --> 1:46:55.817
<v Speaker 3>a receiver. If you're gonna do that and T Higgins

1:46:55.978 --> 1:46:58.497
<v Speaker 3>is the guy, well, now we're talking about Travis Hunter

1:46:58.617 --> 1:46:59.857
<v Speaker 3>or even maybe Luther Burden.

1:47:01.258 --> 1:47:03.617
<v Speaker 2>I think you're under selling McMillan's speed a little bit.

1:47:04.978 --> 1:47:07.137
<v Speaker 3>He's not a burner. He's not gonna run the four twos.

1:47:07.737 --> 1:47:09.497
<v Speaker 3>He could be a low four to four guy because

1:47:10.178 --> 1:47:14.617
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't he doesn't look that fast because his legs

1:47:14.657 --> 1:47:17.537
<v Speaker 3>are so long. He's got that stride that it looks

1:47:17.577 --> 1:47:21.338
<v Speaker 3>effortless and the most underrated part about his game to me,

1:47:21.378 --> 1:47:24.298
<v Speaker 3>And maybe this doesn't go to straight line speed. He's quick,

1:47:24.617 --> 1:47:26.657
<v Speaker 3>he can get away from defenders with the ball in

1:47:26.737 --> 1:47:29.458
<v Speaker 3>his hands. He's a plus player after the catch. Usually

1:47:29.458 --> 1:47:31.097
<v Speaker 3>don't see that from guys that are six to five.

1:47:31.138 --> 1:47:34.378
<v Speaker 2>And he brings that. I agree, Like he's not slow.

1:47:35.218 --> 1:47:36.057
<v Speaker 2>He's not slow.

1:47:36.098 --> 1:47:38.258
<v Speaker 3>And to the point about they need to add speed, Yes,

1:47:38.258 --> 1:47:40.178
<v Speaker 3>I would like to see them add speed, But I

1:47:40.258 --> 1:47:42.338
<v Speaker 3>don't look at McMillan and say, all right, there's another

1:47:42.378 --> 1:47:44.418
<v Speaker 3>guy that's just gonna trudge around the field. Now he

1:47:44.497 --> 1:47:47.258
<v Speaker 3>has quickness, he can create after the catch. It's not

1:47:47.657 --> 1:47:49.937
<v Speaker 3>This isn't a case of you know a guy like

1:47:50.058 --> 1:47:52.298
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Polk, who you worry about his ability to separate

1:47:52.338 --> 1:47:54.577
<v Speaker 3>and he has to win those fifty to fifty balls.

1:47:54.617 --> 1:47:57.418
<v Speaker 3>Ted McMillan can create separation, but he's not gonna be

1:47:57.458 --> 1:48:00.097
<v Speaker 3>somebody again that you're just gonna have running goal balls

1:48:00.138 --> 1:48:01.777
<v Speaker 3>and expect him to beat the defender every time.

1:48:01.897 --> 1:48:03.338
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a fair point. Like I know

1:48:03.577 --> 1:48:05.817
<v Speaker 2>you're right, Like I'm not trying to say he's a

1:48:05.937 --> 1:48:08.218
<v Speaker 2>snail out there. But I just think that when I

1:48:08.338 --> 1:48:11.258
<v Speaker 2>watch him, I don't see a whole lot of three level,

1:48:11.458 --> 1:48:13.378
<v Speaker 2>you know, third level separating what do you see?

1:48:13.657 --> 1:48:15.857
<v Speaker 3>But but and I know people roll their eyes at

1:48:15.857 --> 1:48:17.178
<v Speaker 3>this because here we go again. He's not the kind

1:48:17.178 --> 1:48:18.497
<v Speaker 3>of guy that needs to do that because he can

1:48:18.537 --> 1:48:20.458
<v Speaker 3>win at the catch point. Yeah, but they have a

1:48:20.537 --> 1:48:22.617
<v Speaker 3>quarterback now that can do more to take advantage of

1:48:22.617 --> 1:48:23.098
<v Speaker 3>a guy like that.

1:48:23.497 --> 1:48:24.218
<v Speaker 2>What do you see?

1:48:24.338 --> 1:48:26.418
<v Speaker 3>Where do you see his forty time ranging? Like, when

1:48:26.458 --> 1:48:29.697
<v Speaker 3>you watch him, what do you four or five see?

1:48:29.777 --> 1:48:31.617
<v Speaker 3>I think he can get to the mid four force.

1:48:31.737 --> 1:48:33.817
<v Speaker 2>If he does that, then I like I'd be impressed.

1:48:33.978 --> 1:48:36.737
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a four or five guy. I think

1:48:36.777 --> 1:48:39.497
<v Speaker 2>the best part about Ted McMillan to me is that

1:48:39.577 --> 1:48:42.378
<v Speaker 2>he's a really really smooth athlete for six foot five.

1:48:42.897 --> 1:48:45.497
<v Speaker 2>And when I watch you know guys in the past

1:48:45.537 --> 1:48:48.497
<v Speaker 2>that I haven't like loved at the position, Yeah, Quinton

1:48:48.577 --> 1:48:52.178
<v Speaker 2>Johnston for example, Keon Coleman. So so let me ask this.

1:48:52.258 --> 1:48:54.057
<v Speaker 3>Some people have brought up Quentin Johnston, and you were

1:48:54.218 --> 1:48:56.178
<v Speaker 3>very quick two years ago to say this guy is

1:48:56.218 --> 1:48:58.857
<v Speaker 3>not he thinks he is. How do you see McMillan

1:48:58.897 --> 1:49:00.018
<v Speaker 3>compared to Johnston.

1:48:59.817 --> 1:49:02.458
<v Speaker 2>Much better compared to them, And the reason being is

1:49:02.577 --> 1:49:06.177
<v Speaker 2>that one he doesn't have frying pan hands, which helps

1:49:06.338 --> 1:49:09.698
<v Speaker 2>actually very good. Yeah, and number two is just his smoothness.

1:49:09.817 --> 1:49:12.258
<v Speaker 2>Like the big thing that I was worried about when

1:49:12.338 --> 1:49:16.017
<v Speaker 2>I studied Quinton Johnston and when I studied Keon Coleman

1:49:16.138 --> 1:49:19.057
<v Speaker 2>last year is that they're very robotic in their movements.

1:49:19.058 --> 1:49:21.737
<v Speaker 2>They're stiff, right, And one of the things that I

1:49:21.857 --> 1:49:24.378
<v Speaker 2>learned from Nikhil Harry is when you see guys that

1:49:24.497 --> 1:49:27.657
<v Speaker 2>are like stiff like that and are like they don't

1:49:27.657 --> 1:49:30.897
<v Speaker 2>have a difficult time like sinking and cutting and things

1:49:30.978 --> 1:49:34.017
<v Speaker 2>like that, then you can't add branches to the route tree.

1:49:34.178 --> 1:49:36.977
<v Speaker 2>All it is is jump balls, right, There is no

1:49:37.058 --> 1:49:40.138
<v Speaker 2>other branches. So with Quentin Johnson, like we're seeing that

1:49:40.458 --> 1:49:44.817
<v Speaker 2>in Los Angeles right now, Ted McMillan is not not

1:49:45.218 --> 1:49:48.218
<v Speaker 2>anywhere like that. Like he's a very smooth athlete. He's

1:49:48.338 --> 1:49:50.537
<v Speaker 2>very smooth in and out of his brakes. He has

1:49:50.617 --> 1:49:53.497
<v Speaker 2>some flashes of route release and you know, ability to

1:49:53.537 --> 1:49:56.178
<v Speaker 2>get off the line of scrimmage. He's just not a

1:49:56.338 --> 1:49:59.497
<v Speaker 2>top end, like he's not a game breaker like in

1:49:59.617 --> 1:50:03.458
<v Speaker 2>terms of like that torpetability type of ability with speed.

1:50:04.338 --> 1:50:06.737
<v Speaker 2>But you mentioned the yards after catch. I do agree

1:50:06.737 --> 1:50:08.817
<v Speaker 2>with you there. I think he's faster with the ball

1:50:08.857 --> 1:50:11.737
<v Speaker 2>in his hands, which is interesting, which I do like.

1:50:11.857 --> 1:50:18.458
<v Speaker 2>But to me, he's gonna win. It's gonna be you know, slants, digs, comebacks,

1:50:18.857 --> 1:50:22.777
<v Speaker 2>back shoulders, high points, like that's gonna be his route tree. Well,

1:50:22.817 --> 1:50:24.977
<v Speaker 2>they have a quarterback that's pretty good with that route tree. Yeah,

1:50:24.978 --> 1:50:26.777
<v Speaker 2>but it's not gonna be. I'm gonna just run through

1:50:26.777 --> 1:50:28.617
<v Speaker 2>the defense, right, I will say this.

1:50:28.777 --> 1:50:30.817
<v Speaker 3>So here's how you know it's really drafts. And again

1:50:30.857 --> 1:50:32.817
<v Speaker 3>we're doing the rumored high school forty times. Remember we

1:50:32.897 --> 1:50:34.897
<v Speaker 3>did this to Johnny Wilson last year. I was like, oh,

1:50:34.937 --> 1:50:37.177
<v Speaker 3>he ran a four or three in high school and whatever.

1:50:37.577 --> 1:50:41.857
<v Speaker 3>So Tech McMillan's rumored high school forty time, yeah, is

1:50:41.937 --> 1:50:45.018
<v Speaker 3>four or five flat. Yeah, So okay, But if you

1:50:45.058 --> 1:50:47.458
<v Speaker 3>figured that's high school is also rumored that's high school.

1:50:47.458 --> 1:50:49.218
<v Speaker 3>If he's built on that, can he shave half a

1:50:49.298 --> 1:50:51.257
<v Speaker 3>second off that three.

1:50:51.178 --> 1:50:53.298
<v Speaker 2>Years into college? Yeah? The other weird thing.

1:50:53.537 --> 1:50:55.857
<v Speaker 3>The other weird thing with Tech McMillan. And I'm curious

1:50:55.937 --> 1:50:57.497
<v Speaker 3>to see how people react to this. You kind of

1:50:57.497 --> 1:50:59.577
<v Speaker 3>talked about it with Travis Hunter, but Travis Hunter just

1:50:59.657 --> 1:51:03.978
<v Speaker 3>a different kind of player. So Tech McMillan's quarterback at Arizona,

1:51:04.338 --> 1:51:06.817
<v Speaker 3>And I'm curious, now that you've watched, how you win this.

1:51:07.258 --> 1:51:09.697
<v Speaker 3>Tech McMillan's quarterback in arizona' a guy named Noah Fafida.

1:51:09.897 --> 1:51:13.458
<v Speaker 3>Noah Flafita is a solid college quarterback. This is another

1:51:13.537 --> 1:51:16.577
<v Speaker 3>thing real quick. The rest of that Arizona team terrible. Yeah,

1:51:16.737 --> 1:51:20.458
<v Speaker 3>just Notita's fine. And so consistency is the thing with

1:51:20.577 --> 1:51:23.058
<v Speaker 3>McMillan you're gonna look at with him, but some of

1:51:23.138 --> 1:51:24.937
<v Speaker 3>it is teams would just like triple cover him.

1:51:25.657 --> 1:51:28.018
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, in the quarterback kind of stinks like he

1:51:28.138 --> 1:51:30.617
<v Speaker 2>had one route. I remember that I cut where he

1:51:30.937 --> 1:51:33.418
<v Speaker 2>separates on the comeback and the quarterback throws at ten

1:51:33.497 --> 1:51:33.937
<v Speaker 2>yards over it.

1:51:34.098 --> 1:51:36.338
<v Speaker 3>So but here, So one thing you gotta look at

1:51:36.418 --> 1:51:39.018
<v Speaker 3>Ted mcmillinerson. He was getting all the attention defensively and

1:51:39.098 --> 1:51:41.258
<v Speaker 3>that's why you had these fifty percent of his receiving

1:51:41.338 --> 1:51:42.298
<v Speaker 3>yards came in three games.

1:51:42.418 --> 1:51:42.617
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:51:42.857 --> 1:51:44.378
<v Speaker 3>But the other thing is so Fafita has been his

1:51:44.497 --> 1:51:47.817
<v Speaker 3>quarterback since high school. Yeah, so there's an advanced chemistry there.

1:51:47.857 --> 1:51:49.378
<v Speaker 3>And I'm wondering if some people are gonna look at

1:51:49.418 --> 1:51:51.617
<v Speaker 3>that and say, well, yeah, he looks like such a

1:51:51.697 --> 1:51:54.178
<v Speaker 3>great body control fifty to fifty ball receiver because him

1:51:54.178 --> 1:51:56.258
<v Speaker 3>and Fefida are on the same page. Is he gonna

1:51:56.258 --> 1:51:57.097
<v Speaker 3>have that with the next guy?

1:51:57.218 --> 1:51:59.737
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they'll definitely see that too, working over the middle

1:51:59.737 --> 1:52:02.737
<v Speaker 2>of the field, like the anticipatory throws that the quarterback

1:52:02.817 --> 1:52:04.657
<v Speaker 2>just knows he's gonna be there and he just can

1:52:04.737 --> 1:52:07.817
<v Speaker 2>fit it into windows like that. Look, I don't hate

1:52:07.817 --> 1:52:09.378
<v Speaker 2>the player, I know it kind of sounds like I'm

1:52:09.418 --> 1:52:12.617
<v Speaker 2>down on him. I just I'm not in love where

1:52:12.657 --> 1:52:14.817
<v Speaker 2>I would be pounding the table at fourth overall to

1:52:14.978 --> 1:52:17.018
<v Speaker 2>draft him, I definitely.

1:52:16.777 --> 1:52:18.338
<v Speaker 3>But if it's him at eight in a future first

1:52:18.418 --> 1:52:20.098
<v Speaker 3>round pick, sure, Okay.

1:52:19.978 --> 1:52:22.378
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wouldn't kill him for it. I wouldn't kill

1:52:22.458 --> 1:52:24.378
<v Speaker 2>him a right. We gotta hurry, We got we gotta

1:52:24.418 --> 1:52:27.697
<v Speaker 2>wrap here on drafts. Yeah, so I got two more

1:52:27.737 --> 1:52:32.017
<v Speaker 2>guys or Kelvin Banks, Mason Graham. Yeah, one more guy,

1:52:32.098 --> 1:52:35.537
<v Speaker 2>one more guy, Kelvin Banks. Ok. Yeah, So look I

1:52:35.737 --> 1:52:38.378
<v Speaker 2>like Kelvin Banks. I think you can really move the

1:52:38.458 --> 1:52:40.218
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage. I think it's a strong dude. You

1:52:40.258 --> 1:52:43.017
<v Speaker 2>can see that I do think he's got good footwork

1:52:43.098 --> 1:52:45.937
<v Speaker 2>for a guy that size, pretty good in terms of

1:52:46.058 --> 1:52:49.537
<v Speaker 2>technically sound footwork as well. I think the two issues

1:52:49.577 --> 1:52:51.018
<v Speaker 2>that I saw with him on film is that he

1:52:51.058 --> 1:52:55.418
<v Speaker 2>falls off blocks sometimes he has a trouble sustaining blocks,

1:52:55.458 --> 1:52:59.178
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that speaks to some body control issues and

1:52:59.258 --> 1:53:01.777
<v Speaker 2>some hand placement issues, which I guess you could probably

1:53:01.857 --> 1:53:05.097
<v Speaker 2>work through. And then also just watching him against high

1:53:05.178 --> 1:53:08.577
<v Speaker 2>level pass rushers, and this is probably the biggest one.

1:53:09.418 --> 1:53:12.338
<v Speaker 2>He's right on the line of giving up the edge

1:53:12.418 --> 1:53:14.897
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the time, right Like it's getting all

1:53:15.058 --> 1:53:17.617
<v Speaker 2>out to that landmark to get the guy past the

1:53:17.697 --> 1:53:20.777
<v Speaker 2>quarterback at ten yards. It can be a struggle for him.

1:53:20.857 --> 1:53:24.017
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes he's flirting with it, right Like sometimes you see

1:53:24.058 --> 1:53:28.177
<v Speaker 2>throughout the course of the game, it'll be like ten ten, nine, eight,

1:53:28.537 --> 1:53:30.418
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half, you know what I mean, we're

1:53:30.577 --> 1:53:33.458
<v Speaker 2>trying to go down. Uh. And that is why I

1:53:33.537 --> 1:53:35.937
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of people have projected him to move inside,

1:53:36.138 --> 1:53:40.217
<v Speaker 2>because he's kind of this like blocky build, really good power,

1:53:41.098 --> 1:53:43.617
<v Speaker 2>good initial footwork that he's gonna be able to handle

1:53:43.697 --> 1:53:46.697
<v Speaker 2>interior guys. I don't know if he's like a dancing

1:53:46.777 --> 1:53:48.857
<v Speaker 2>bear to play on an Island, Like, I don't know

1:53:48.897 --> 1:53:51.258
<v Speaker 2>if I'm kicking him outside in the NFL. I kind

1:53:51.258 --> 1:53:53.537
<v Speaker 2>of have more concerns about him at tackle honestly than

1:53:53.537 --> 1:53:54.418
<v Speaker 2>I do with Will Campbell.

1:53:54.497 --> 1:53:58.617
<v Speaker 3>So he's the guy to me that if like you're

1:53:58.937 --> 1:54:03.338
<v Speaker 3>playing for Josh Simmons, which is, yeah, we draft him,

1:54:03.338 --> 1:54:05.857
<v Speaker 3>and because I think he's a right tackle in the NFL, yeah, certainly.

1:54:06.098 --> 1:54:07.338
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would move to the right.

1:54:07.338 --> 1:54:10.817
<v Speaker 3>Tackle before I move to guard. And he's one where

1:54:10.978 --> 1:54:13.537
<v Speaker 3>like I draft him, play him at left. Maybe you

1:54:13.537 --> 1:54:15.697
<v Speaker 3>don't sign Garrett Bowles, but you sign like a capable

1:54:15.737 --> 1:54:18.218
<v Speaker 3>bridge guy. Worst case scenario, you kick him over the

1:54:18.298 --> 1:54:19.537
<v Speaker 3>right side where I think he would be good, and

1:54:19.537 --> 1:54:21.258
<v Speaker 3>then you go back in and do left tackle next year. Now,

1:54:21.298 --> 1:54:24.258
<v Speaker 3>I know I said no half measures, so I'm not

1:54:24.378 --> 1:54:27.338
<v Speaker 3>saying I'm like endorsing that plan. But yeah, like he

1:54:27.497 --> 1:54:30.058
<v Speaker 3>he might be a good right tackle. I'll say that

1:54:30.817 --> 1:54:34.578
<v Speaker 3>the big game for him, We'll see what happens. But

1:54:35.138 --> 1:54:38.138
<v Speaker 3>so well, Texas is gonna play Georgia in the SC

1:54:38.298 --> 1:54:41.018
<v Speaker 3>Championship this week. So Michael Williams, who you said you

1:54:41.098 --> 1:54:42.778
<v Speaker 3>watched a little bit, Yeah, you want to get ten

1:54:42.818 --> 1:54:44.738
<v Speaker 3>seconds on Michael Wims, I wasn't crazy about it.

1:54:44.818 --> 1:54:47.097
<v Speaker 2>But also at the same time, like that Georgia's scheme

1:54:47.178 --> 1:54:49.978
<v Speaker 2>is really weird for defensive ends. It's it's very bellichicking.

1:54:50.178 --> 1:54:52.177
<v Speaker 3>Nobody gets a lot of sacks because everybody gets.

1:54:51.978 --> 1:54:54.017
<v Speaker 2>A yeah, and they don't really let guys get up

1:54:54.058 --> 1:54:56.337
<v Speaker 2>the field, and they play a lot of five techniques,

1:54:56.378 --> 1:54:58.778
<v Speaker 2>so he's straight up over the tackle instead of outside

1:54:58.818 --> 1:55:02.178
<v Speaker 2>the tackle, which is a disadvantageous rush angle and all like.

1:55:02.258 --> 1:55:05.017
<v Speaker 2>There's also we did this with Trayvon Locker a couple

1:55:05.058 --> 1:55:07.298
<v Speaker 2>of years ago. It's all the same stuff. So I

1:55:07.378 --> 1:55:10.778
<v Speaker 2>didn't really see it with mikel Williams that I watched

1:55:10.818 --> 1:55:11.897
<v Speaker 2>two games and really, did.

1:55:11.897 --> 1:55:15.897
<v Speaker 3>You watch the Texas game? Uh? No, Okay, so that

1:55:16.258 --> 1:55:19.137
<v Speaker 3>was the game that kind of sunk everybody on Calvin Banks.

1:55:19.178 --> 1:55:21.218
<v Speaker 3>That was Michael Williams's best game of the year. Yeah,

1:55:21.338 --> 1:55:25.977
<v Speaker 3>So rematch Saturday Texas Georgia. Big game for both guys.

1:55:26.298 --> 1:55:29.538
<v Speaker 3>And then as we get further in this thing pass

1:55:29.618 --> 1:55:33.057
<v Speaker 3>rushers up and down. Penn State has Abdul Carter, Georgia

1:55:33.098 --> 1:55:37.338
<v Speaker 3>has Michael Williams Tennessee as James Pearce. I am blanking

1:55:37.458 --> 1:55:39.578
<v Speaker 3>on the name of the guy from Indiana, but like

1:55:40.098 --> 1:55:42.297
<v Speaker 3>he's not at the top of the draft because he's undersize.

1:55:42.298 --> 1:55:45.418
<v Speaker 3>He's like six foot two sixty, But he led the

1:55:45.458 --> 1:55:47.858
<v Speaker 3>Big ten and pressures this year and I wish I

1:55:47.897 --> 1:55:50.538
<v Speaker 3>could remember his name. Obviously, Alabama has guys if they

1:55:50.618 --> 1:55:54.137
<v Speaker 3>get there. Yeah, Kelvin Banks may be in the best

1:55:54.178 --> 1:55:56.858
<v Speaker 3>position of any of the guys we've talked about because

1:55:56.937 --> 1:55:59.458
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna have so many chances to prove what he

1:55:59.538 --> 1:56:02.897
<v Speaker 3>can do against high level NFL caliber players. However long

1:56:02.978 --> 1:56:05.578
<v Speaker 3>the Texas run lasts, I think it's gonna last. I

1:56:05.618 --> 1:56:07.298
<v Speaker 3>don't know they're gonna win the national championship.

1:56:07.338 --> 1:56:08.057
<v Speaker 2>I like Oregon.

1:56:08.258 --> 1:56:10.418
<v Speaker 3>I still think Ohio State in spite of Ryan Day,

1:56:10.418 --> 1:56:12.778
<v Speaker 3>as a chance because the Ohio State's another one. Jack

1:56:12.818 --> 1:56:15.298
<v Speaker 3>Sawyer my guy, another team with two great edge guys.

1:56:15.338 --> 1:56:18.017
<v Speaker 3>But Kelvin Bank's in a great position because he's gonna

1:56:18.058 --> 1:56:19.778
<v Speaker 3>have so many chances here over the next month and

1:56:19.818 --> 1:56:23.258
<v Speaker 3>a half to show up against other guys that are

1:56:23.298 --> 1:56:25.017
<v Speaker 3>gonna go in the top ten to fifteen to twenty

1:56:25.058 --> 1:56:25.738
<v Speaker 3>picks in this draft.

1:56:25.818 --> 1:56:27.818
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're right tackle shots a good one. Like I

1:56:28.138 --> 1:56:29.818
<v Speaker 2>look at him and I just worry a little bit

1:56:29.978 --> 1:56:32.698
<v Speaker 2>about him protecting his edge, like against real twitched up

1:56:32.818 --> 1:56:35.177
<v Speaker 2>edge rushers that are he's gonna see in the NFL

1:56:35.298 --> 1:56:38.097
<v Speaker 2>every single week, you know, like looking just in division,

1:56:38.178 --> 1:56:40.738
<v Speaker 2>like if he has to face Chop Robinson right like

1:56:40.818 --> 1:56:43.897
<v Speaker 2>with Miami, you know, Chop Robinson, his first step is

1:56:43.937 --> 1:56:46.058
<v Speaker 2>gonna eat him up a little bit. I think I

1:56:46.818 --> 1:56:47.178
<v Speaker 2>guess what.

1:56:47.218 --> 1:56:48.538
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying to you, though, on my point is like,

1:56:48.578 --> 1:56:51.097
<v Speaker 3>don't don't be done evaluating Kelvin Banks.

1:56:51.298 --> 1:56:55.498
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not. We got some breaking news here. This

1:56:55.658 --> 1:56:59.218
<v Speaker 2>is interesting Patriots breaking news. Yesh okay Uh.

1:56:59.458 --> 1:57:02.937
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina is interviewing Bill Belichick for its head coaching opening.

1:57:02.978 --> 1:57:06.057
<v Speaker 2>According to On three Sports, Oh so, uh, your boy

1:57:06.138 --> 1:57:09.778
<v Speaker 2>Tony maz had had that scoop yesterday. Yeah, I think

1:57:09.818 --> 1:57:10.338
<v Speaker 2>Maz had that.

1:57:11.937 --> 1:57:14.618
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see Bill going to college, not thean l

1:57:14.738 --> 1:57:15.458
<v Speaker 3>R didn't see it.

1:57:15.698 --> 1:57:17.977
<v Speaker 2>That's sad. It's sad. I find it sad.

1:57:18.338 --> 1:57:20.698
<v Speaker 3>This has to be some sort of leverage play by somebody.

1:57:20.978 --> 1:57:25.658
<v Speaker 2>I find it. I find it legitimately sad that Bill Belichick,

1:57:25.698 --> 1:57:28.258
<v Speaker 2>the greatest head coach of all time, is gonna not

1:57:28.418 --> 1:57:32.698
<v Speaker 2>only sink himself from going to college, but to you

1:57:32.858 --> 1:57:36.098
<v Speaker 2>n C like, no disrespect. Drake May but like you,

1:57:36.258 --> 1:57:38.738
<v Speaker 2>and he's gonna say, like, after all you talked to

1:57:38.897 --> 1:57:42.778
<v Speaker 2>Drake May, maybe Drake Drake May is the is literally

1:57:42.897 --> 1:57:47.138
<v Speaker 2>the only good thing that's Taylor. It's like, Lauren, there

1:57:47.178 --> 1:57:50.658
<v Speaker 2>he goes Drake Baylor. That's why I bet he's doing

1:57:50.738 --> 1:57:54.298
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence Taylor and Lawrence Taylor are solid. We just solid there.

1:57:54.498 --> 1:57:58.338
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, jeez, jeez, How the Mighty have fallen? Huh?

1:57:58.738 --> 1:58:01.458
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, speaking of how the Mighty have fallen,

1:58:01.698 --> 1:58:03.578
<v Speaker 2>it's December fifth, and we just did an hour on

1:58:03.658 --> 1:58:05.977
<v Speaker 2>the draft already, so that's how the mighty have fallen?

1:58:06.058 --> 1:58:09.338
<v Speaker 2>Here and now Bill Belichick's interviewing for a college coaching job,

1:58:09.418 --> 1:58:12.017
<v Speaker 2>so we're what world are we living in right now?

1:58:12.098 --> 1:58:14.778
<v Speaker 2>It's like this is an upside down world. But that's

1:58:14.858 --> 1:58:17.298
<v Speaker 2>a That's my my initial take on the draft. I

1:58:17.698 --> 1:58:20.818
<v Speaker 2>hope you enjoyed it. I did. It was good stuff again.

1:58:20.937 --> 1:58:24.098
<v Speaker 2>I I'm gonna keep pounding the table for the next

1:58:24.138 --> 1:58:26.618
<v Speaker 2>six months, so I'm gonna be a broken record. Don't

1:58:27.338 --> 1:58:29.658
<v Speaker 2>waste this pick on a player that's not worth the pick.

1:58:29.818 --> 1:58:32.378
<v Speaker 2>If you're picking fourth overall, you gotta pick a guy

1:58:32.458 --> 1:58:35.818
<v Speaker 2>that's worth the fourth overall pick every year, not just

1:58:35.897 --> 1:58:37.458
<v Speaker 2>this year. You don't want to be that team that

1:58:37.538 --> 1:58:40.698
<v Speaker 2>gets stuck, you know. I always bring up Jacksonville and

1:58:40.778 --> 1:58:42.778
<v Speaker 2>they might be in the same position again this year.

1:58:43.458 --> 1:58:46.658
<v Speaker 2>Trayvon Walker like solid player for the Jaguars. He was

1:58:46.738 --> 1:58:48.977
<v Speaker 2>not a number one overall pick in a draft, right

1:58:49.058 --> 1:58:51.618
<v Speaker 2>like that, that was the position they were in in

1:58:51.698 --> 1:58:53.858
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. I don't want the Patriots to be in

1:58:53.937 --> 1:58:56.218
<v Speaker 2>that position again in twenty four. I guess we'll see

1:58:56.258 --> 1:58:57.858
<v Speaker 2>what happens in the last four weeks of the season

1:58:58.538 --> 1:59:00.298
<v Speaker 2>and if they can, you know where they finished in

1:59:00.418 --> 1:59:03.458
<v Speaker 2>terms of the draft order. But that's it real quick.

1:59:03.698 --> 1:59:07.578
<v Speaker 2>The Georgia like linebacker, hybrid guy, Like, what do you

1:59:07.658 --> 1:59:08.418
<v Speaker 2>think about him?

1:59:09.418 --> 1:59:12.618
<v Speaker 3>I'm not familiar enough with him. It's Jalen Walker.

1:59:12.738 --> 1:59:14.738
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, weird player I really like.

1:59:15.138 --> 1:59:17.218
<v Speaker 3>So the next two guys project, Like, there's so many

1:59:17.258 --> 1:59:20.137
<v Speaker 3>linebackers in this draft now, like Giod Campbell, Harold Perkins,

1:59:20.218 --> 1:59:22.738
<v Speaker 3>Danny Stutsman, Barrett Carter. I can't get a read on

1:59:22.818 --> 1:59:24.858
<v Speaker 3>Walker yet. But he's another guy where it's like I'll

1:59:24.897 --> 1:59:25.897
<v Speaker 3>be watching him very closely.

1:59:26.258 --> 1:59:28.017
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I watched him a little bit too, as

1:59:28.058 --> 1:59:30.897
<v Speaker 2>well as MIKEL Williams, and I have to admit, you

1:59:30.937 --> 1:59:32.698
<v Speaker 2>know who the guy that I kind of saw in

1:59:32.778 --> 1:59:36.778
<v Speaker 2>his game was who trod Mayo for Michael Williams. No

1:59:37.018 --> 1:59:41.338
<v Speaker 2>oh for okay, off the line, on the line, off

1:59:41.378 --> 1:59:45.738
<v Speaker 2>the line, insideline. Yeah, a little bit of that, A

1:59:45.818 --> 1:59:48.897
<v Speaker 2>little bit, so that would be an interesting one, all right.

1:59:49.418 --> 1:59:51.778
<v Speaker 2>Before we wrap it up here, attention Patriots fans, is

1:59:51.858 --> 1:59:55.218
<v Speaker 2>the most nail biting action film of the season. Carry On,

1:59:55.498 --> 2:00:00.458
<v Speaker 2>starring tarn Edgerton, Sophia Carson, and Jason Bateman, touches down

2:00:00.818 --> 2:00:04.458
<v Speaker 2>on Netflix on December thirteenth, just in time for the holidays.

2:00:04.578 --> 2:00:08.698
<v Speaker 2>Only liquids allowed, Blood sweat and tears. Catch carry On

2:00:08.858 --> 2:00:11.698
<v Speaker 2>December thirteenth on Netflix. I thought they were gonna go

2:00:11.818 --> 2:00:14.098
<v Speaker 2>with a clear eyes, full heart, can't lose there for

2:00:14.178 --> 2:00:16.418
<v Speaker 2>a second, but blood sweat and tears is what we got.

2:00:16.897 --> 2:00:19.578
<v Speaker 2>And one last time, easy to drink, easy to enjoy

2:00:19.658 --> 2:00:22.738
<v Speaker 2>bud Light, the official beer sponsor of the New England Patriots.

2:00:22.778 --> 2:00:25.738
<v Speaker 2>I apologize to the people waiting on hold call us

2:00:25.818 --> 2:00:27.698
<v Speaker 2>back next week, but we already went long, so we

2:00:27.778 --> 2:00:30.298
<v Speaker 2>got to wrap this thing up. Get like lead it

2:00:30.578 --> 2:00:32.498
<v Speaker 2>leave it to us to go long on the bye

2:00:32.538 --> 2:00:34.858
<v Speaker 2>week like we can't even Hey, we can't even do

2:00:34.978 --> 2:00:37.097
<v Speaker 2>a short show on the bye week. We'll be back

2:00:37.138 --> 2:00:40.378
<v Speaker 2>next Thursday, same time, same place, and you guys can

2:00:40.458 --> 2:00:42.977
<v Speaker 2>follow up on all this good draft stuff and we'll

2:00:43.138 --> 2:00:45.298
<v Speaker 2>talk about the Arizona Cardinals and the trip out to

2:00:45.338 --> 2:00:47.338
<v Speaker 2>the desert. So we'll see you guys then. Thanks for watching,

2:00:48.258 --> 2:00:49.937
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for downloading this podcast.

2:00:50.218 --> 2:00:53.498
<v Speaker 4>Subscribe on Apple, google Play, and everywhere else you listen.

2:00:53.897 --> 2:00:57.057
<v Speaker 4>Like the show, please rate and review us. Listener comments

2:00:57.098 --> 2:00:59.778
<v Speaker 4>and ratings help keep us high in the podcast rankings

2:00:59.897 --> 2:01:02.498
<v Speaker 4>so new listeners can find us. Be sure to check

2:01:02.578 --> 2:01:06.178
<v Speaker 4>Patriots dot com for more news and more podcasts.

2:01:10.818 --> 2:01:12.377
<v Speaker 2>Patriots Postgame Show.

2:01:13.818 --> 2:01:16.858
<v Speaker 1>Join Batsmith along with Patriots dot Com Paul Parrillo and

2:01:16.937 --> 2:01:19.858
<v Speaker 1>Mike Desso as they offer instant analysis.

2:01:19.418 --> 2:01:20.778
<v Speaker 2>After every Patriots game.

2:01:21.098 --> 2:01:23.578
<v Speaker 3>We bring you the good, the bad, and the injured

2:01:23.618 --> 2:01:24.218
<v Speaker 3>from each game.

2:01:24.538 --> 2:01:28.178
<v Speaker 1>Plus you'll hear press conferences, exclusive player interviews, and more

2:01:28.218 --> 2:01:31.818
<v Speaker 1>on the Patriots Postgame Show. Search for Patriots Postgame anywhere

2:01:31.858 --> 2:01:32.858
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts.