WEBVTT - Here Are the Biggest Problems Facing the Fed Right Now

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. My co host Joe Wisenthal is away,

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and if I could just begin the show with a

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>small disclaimer, which is that apparently I have broken my

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>foot in three different places. So if I sound a

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit distracted today, that is why. Um Now, speaking

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of difficult situations, you all know are all Thoughts listeners

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are aware that the debt ceiling drama continues in the States.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Joe and I just recorded an episode on the Mint

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the coin debate, which is one idea of how to

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>bypass the debt limit on a temporary basis at least.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's fair to say that there are

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of challenges out there at the moment, especially

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Federal Reserve the Central Bank. So not only

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are they still trying to navigate an unprecedented economic cycle

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of the global pandemic, but they're also

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>now having to deal with higher inflation to decide whether

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>or not it is indeed transitory. And meanwhile they are

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>also facing the fallout from what's going on in d C.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>So every time there is the sort of debt ceiling brinkmanship,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.559
<v Speaker 1>we generally see some feed through into the treasury market,

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, money market funds stop buying up short term

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>bills around the date, the so called drop dead date

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that the US is actually supposed to run out of money,

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and the FED has to figure out all these different

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>ways to try to keep things going along with the

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>treasury while the politicians do get out. Um, so there

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was a lot going on in the FED. I haven't

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned the insider trading scandal, but that of course

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is an issue as well. Suffice it to say, the

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank faces many, many challenges, and today I am

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>very happy to say we are going to be speaking

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>with the perfect person to discuss some of those issues.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>It's someone who actually used to work at the FED

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>as a trader, and he runs a blog right now

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>called fed Guy, and it's one of my favorite reads.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I highly suggest you check it out if you haven't

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>been reading it already. Joseph Wang, Welcome to the show. Hi, Tracy,

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for in biding me. I'm through it

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to be here. Oh, thank you so much for coming on. Um,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Joe and I have wanted to get you on for

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a long time, so I'm happy you could make it

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe just to begin with, could you describe your background

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>at the FED? What exactly where are you doing there? Sure,

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I worked on the Open Markets desk at the New

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>York FED, and so what the open market that's does.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It's basically the FEDS trading desks, so we conduct operations UM.

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>So all the QUI O, the REPO operations are done

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>by the desk. I focus on money markets, so I

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>run the repo operations, and I studied the banking system.

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of my work has to do with setting

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>how the financial system works, money market funds, just the

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>plumbing of the system basically. So when we have something

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like a debt ceiling crisis, do you start getting flashbacks

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to previous episodes. Well, I think one of the main

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms of the dead ceiling does impact the markets is

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>through the money markets. So yes, that's probably the direct

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>way that the death ceiling impacts UM. And you can

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>see it right now. Actually, if you look at the

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>short term builder, if you can already see bills that

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>mature around the job dead date are selling off quite

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit. So usually you see market impacts first the

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>money market sector when it comes to the debt ceiling.

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So how do you think money markets and I guess

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the wider treasury market should feel about debt ceilings and

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of political brinkmanship. And the reason I asked

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that is because you know, we we do tend to

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>see these bouts of debt ceiling drama every once in

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a while, or at least you know, in recent years,

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen them every once in a while. But on

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, you know, when it gets really bad,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we tend to see treasuries rally because people go into

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>safe haven assets, and treasuries are still considered that even

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>if the cause of market turmoil is because of the

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>US itself, which is kind of ironic, But how do

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>you think treasuries feel about these sorts of issues and

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>has it evolved in recent years? So you're exactly right,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the way that I would think

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>about this is that I think overall, of course, the

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>investment community understands that this is a passing thing. The U. S.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Treasury has a printing press, right, so they can always

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>make their obligations. But on a more nuts on both sides,

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there are classes of investors that are not able or

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>constrained in their holdings of things that are defaulted, most

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 1>notably the four point five true and dollar money market

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>fund complex. So under the regulations, they are highly constrained

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in holding defaulted securities, and they also don't want they

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be able to They want to be

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>able to tell their clients when they clients read about

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the dead selling on the US that you know, we're

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>not exposed to this at all. So even though I

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>think the investment community understands that this is the passing thing,

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>there are mandate constraints that come into play, and that's

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>why you still actually see sell offs in the in

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the short term turchy markets. Addition, I think that we've

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>been through the death seeing a few times over the

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>past decade, and what we can learn from a lot

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of public documents that were either disclosed by the FED

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>or through subpoenas that the official sector actually has a

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of plans just just to avoid and you fall

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>out in the trojan market. So it would be I

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think reasonable to not for the trogury market to not

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>be too much afraid of the dead sailing um. But

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these backup plans do have economic impacts,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not in reasonable for the troges to

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>actually rally in that context. Well, so one of the

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>things I want to ask you is how much the

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>r r P, the reverse repot program might make a

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>difference this time around. So you know, we know that

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Fed has been running this UM. Recently, they they

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>upped the amount that they could take. I can't remember

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>what it was. What the cap is now, do you remember? Yeah,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a hun sixty billion per counterparty. So earlier in

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the year it was thirty billion, and then was up

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to eighty and now it's too un sixty But in practice, though,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I would just think a bit as a full lotment facility,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>So there really is no limit. So one of the

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons they've raised it is in preparation, presumably for money

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>market funds having to move into this thing because they

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have to avoid bills or they're unable to buy bills

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>because Treasury can't issue them. UM. So how much does

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that help in a scenario like this? I think it

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>helps tremendously in terms of rate control. So heading into

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the debt seling, one of the ways that the US

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Treasure prepares is by paying down bills. The way they

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>manage your debt is they have they manage under a

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>regular and predictable issue and schedule, and in practice that

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>means maintaining coupon issuants as much as they can and

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>meeting short term cash flows through bill issuants. If you

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>think back last March when we suddenly had a lot

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of emergency COVID expenditures, what happened is that they met

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>those expenditures issuing two trillion dollars in bills. Now in

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the same way as we're heading into dead selling and

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to maintain space on the dead selling, what

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is the reducing the amount of bill issuance

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the amount of dead outstanding. The main investors

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in the bill markets are the money market funds, and

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>now that money market funds don't have as many bills

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to invest in, there's a buffer there where they can

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>invest in the overnight reverse reple operation that helps us

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that maintain rates even as the amount investments available in

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the money market space decreases. Without the overnight report facility,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I think short term rates would definitely be below zero.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>How much does it matter that the Fed now pays

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>interest on our rps, because I remember that was a

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>big deal in the summer when they started to do that,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it was an extra five basis points UM

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Five base points, whereas previously they had

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>been paying almost nothing. But why the need to do

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that and how much UM? Did that sort of change

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>things for money market funds? So the reverse report facility

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is one of the fed's key tools for short term

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>rate control. One of the Fed's goals or any center

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being skills, is to control rates. In the US, we

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>choose the overnight rate. Before the crisis, it was primarily

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>controlled by adjusting reserve balances within the banking system. After

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, now that we have so many more reserves,

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that's just not a feasible way. So in practice, the

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>FED controls overnight rates by paying interest on the reverse

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>report facility as basically boundary lower bound rate. That means

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that if you're an investor with sir M funds and

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you can always invest in the FED risk free at

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the RP rate, that puts a lower boundary of what's

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you're willing to accept in other investments. So if you

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>can invest in the FED at five basis points, there's

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>never a reason for you to buy to invest in

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>any lower rates. And that's how that's basically a crucial

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>tool to FED now uses to control interest rates. So

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>let's say we get to I mean, I think the

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>consensus right now is that the US um Treasury could

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>run out of money sometime around mid October. I think

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the one day I've seen consistently come up as October eighteen.

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I should just say that we are recording this on

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>October five. So maybe something changes between now and then.

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But if we get to October eighteenth and treasury runs

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>out of money, the debt limit isn't raised, what would

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you expect to actually happen in the treasury market, in

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>money markets, and how would the FED respond? So this

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>scenario has happened quite a few times in the past decade,

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and from public documents have been disclosed, you can kind

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of see that the FED and Treasury have basically been

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>wargaming this for for the past ten years. So the

0:09:54.480 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>path forward is basically prioritization. But before before they actually

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>drop that date, there's this is basically a political political process,

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>right It's in negotiation within Congress, So the FED doesn't

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>really want to step in or say anything, and administration

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>has an incentive to maximize I guess fear to encourage

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a compromise, but when the drop dad it actually happens.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>What was discussed during was that the FED and what

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that was that the treasure would actually prioritize principal interest

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>payments to U S tursury holders as well as Social Security.

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, when the trishy runs out of space

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>under the debt limit, it still has a lot of

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>cash receipts. If you look at data from the past

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>five years, the US Treasure usually has cash receipts so

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>about let's say eight hundred to nine hundred billion during

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, so that's pretty steady. So they have

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money coming in, but they don't have

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>enough money to pay everything that that's that's due. But

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 1>if they only focus on paying principle and interest, that's

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>about two in over a quarter four If they only

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>paid social Security, that's probably three billion. So they have

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>enough money to pay some bills but not everything. And

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was discussed in the past was just prioritization, So the

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>trophy market will actually be fine. There will not be

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a default. And what would happen, I think is that

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>once they hit the dead scene, sitting the absolute drop

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>dead date in order to calm the markets. They will

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>announce their plan to prioritize surgery payments and others, more

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian payments, social security, veterans benefits, food stamps, and so forth,

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and that should actually immediately calm the trgury market down

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because they know that to fault us off the table

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>heading into it. You can already see the disruptions. Some

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>short term bills are selling off. But I think once

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we red reach the drop dead date oddly enough, I

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>think that prioritization announcement will solve everything. Of course, there

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>would be some economic impact from this, because trojury does

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things. They also have pay it's to

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>let's say, doctors, hospitals, farm studo comple companies, defense companies,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and those companies will have some liquidity problems. But the

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>trugy market I think will be fine, and maybe they

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>rally as you mentioned before, understanding that when there's a

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>liquidity crisis in the non financial sector, maybe if they're

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>liquidity to get squeezed a bit, that affects the economy.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Even if Turgury doesn't prioritize or they decide not to.

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately it's a political decision by by the Treasury and

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the one that makes a lot of sense. The

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>FED also has a plan just to step in in

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>case anything bad happens, just just as I mentioned a

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier. So a lot of investors have mandate restrictions

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>where they can't hold treasures that defaulted. The biggest investor

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that has these meant these mended restrictions, these are legal,

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>are the money market fund industry. So if by any

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>chance there was like a technical default, a lot of

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the money market fund industries will not be able to

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>hold treasuries. And that's a huge problem because they don't

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just church of those, but they are also enormous investors

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in the report market. The report market is a multi

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market for basically overnight secured loans, and a

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of those loans are in treasuries with tregary crap Claro.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a money market fund based on sec data,

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>probably investing a trillion dollars in turgy backed repot every

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>day to the private sector, excluding FED, and because of

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>your mandates, you're not able to accept or unwilling to

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>accept without a waiver from your board of directors, default

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to Claro. So a lot of people who are getting

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>funding in the report market using treasuries may lose access

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to that funding. And you know, that's classic bank one

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>lefe scenario because if you're buying turguries on leverage using

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>overnight money and suddenly you lose access to that financing,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and that could be very disruptive um effectively, I think

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in practice of default and technical default would probably buy

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>furycate the turgy mark between those that are at risk

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of not receiving principle and interest in the coming months

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and those that are safe let's say they're interest due

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>dates are next year. If you do the math, the

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of treasuries outstanding that have principal and interest payments

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>during the this quarter about a bit over a trillion.

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's potential for enormous disruption when let's say investors

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>have to shuffle out of at risk treasuries into treasuries

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that are not at risk because this has never happened before.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh in addition to that, once there's a technical to thought,

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I imagine the ratings agencies would have to follow up

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and to downgrade the US. And in addition to the

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>money market events, there are also many classes of investors

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that have trouble holding securities that are not let's say

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>rated triple A by two or more end agencies that

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe they have trouble holding U S reasuries. There's some

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>discretion there depending on how their mandates are written. Um,

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so it could be a very destructive event. And that

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is something that has never happened before, and no one

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>really knows how it will happen, but which is kind

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of why no one will allow it to happen. You

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>have the Treasury prioritizing and if for whatever political reason,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't prioritize P and I payments, The FED has

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>discussed in October of what their game palent plan would be,

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's uh, they have the tools and the motivation

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to fix everything. So but they would

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>do is they would still accept the defaulted Collardo in

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>their repo market operations, so they would be able to

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>provide liquidity against that, even if the money market funds

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot or do not want to. They would be able

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to accept defaulted Collardo and their securities lending operations. So

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>if you had let's say ann at risk treasury, you

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>could stop it out with the FED. Or, of course,

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>if that's not enough, they could just do outright purchase

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>QWI style to purchase at risk Collardo. So you have

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>these two tiers of plants from the triedurgy and from

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the FED to make sure basically the trigy market will

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>be protected. And so going forward to Dassling, I don't

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>really worry about anything because there's just this is something

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that happens so many times. And if you're in the market,

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that something that people wanticipate, risk that people

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>anticipate usually don't materialize because they prepare for them. And

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of those cases. So I

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>mean I get the point that the FED is sort

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of prepared to step in as lender of last resort um,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it really has to. And I get

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that it also attempts to be politically neutral, um, you

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>know when these types of situations come up. But I'm wondering, like,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what do people at the Central Bank actually think when

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>politicians are arguing with each other And we sort of

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>get to this point like you know, again, you were

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>on the open markets desk, you were a trade or

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>does everyone they're kind of like roll their eyes and

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>go like, oh no, now we have to work on

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on a and plan B and how is this going

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to affect the market and do we have to factor

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>this into our economic predictions and things like that, Like

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I guess, how do people actually think about it? So

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the Central Bank is a very conservative and organization. It's

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I think even more as a utility, so it wants

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to make sure the basic plumbing of the system works,

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>and that includes the trojan market. Trades are basically a

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>full of money or financial system. If you look at

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>class de classified documents, this scenario of payment prioritization. There

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>were simulations of this run in eleven and again, and

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm absolutely sure that it's being run right now.

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>So people there, I think don't think they worry about

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the market impact, but it does create an enormous amount

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of work for them and so they don't like that.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that they understand that this is part

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of the political process. Though another declassified memo that features

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say someone speaking with chir Paul basically inside the

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that they understand that part of this is the

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>political process, and it's also partly trying to put pressure

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on Congress to do something. So even though this probably

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>won't happen, having this in the news. Talking about very

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>bad scenarios is something that serves a purpose. So let's

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>let's shift gears um slightly and talk about some other

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>challenges that the Central Bank faces at the moment. And

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there isn't a shortage of new things, new

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>developments to actually wrap their heads around and address. But

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>one of the interesting things that you brought up in

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a recent post on your blog was this notion of

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>um wealth effects and maybe wealth effects that haven't necessarily

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>been understood or taken into account by the Fed. Could

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you walk us through your thesis there. And you know,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people tend to complain, well, some people

0:18:55.400 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>complain about the fed's emergency liquidity feeding into risk assets

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like or financial assets like stocks and bonds, and making

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are already wealthy even richer. But you point

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>out that not only is that happening, but there's also

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a sort of unaccounted for wealth effect through cryptocurrency. So

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>could you maybe describe that? Sure? So, so, I think

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is a very confusing market to analyze

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, because you have lots of indications of tight

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>labor market with you have help wanted signs everywhere. We're

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just going higher, and at the same time, the unemployment

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>rate is still pretty elevated. So I think one of

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the reasons just thinking about this has to do with

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the wealth effect, and there are actually academic papers finding

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>something similar and common sense, and I think you should

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>understand that the more money you have, the less you

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>need to work, the less you're motivated to search that

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you won't you're less willing to set uluer wages. And

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that has happened over these two

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>years is that the wealth effect, basically the wealth people

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>hold it has been supercharged. If you just look at

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>residential real estate, it's up over the past two years,

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit over six of the Americans own

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a home, and that's your largest asset, so a lot

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of people have a lot more equity in their in

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>their homes. If you own stocks, um, you know that's

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>uh SMP is up over the past two years. When

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at FED data and you break it down,

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the things you notice is that you know

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what everyone says, it's true, it's really the rich people

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>getting much much richer. However, because the wealth effect, the

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>growth and asset value is so extreme this time around,

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if you were actually just top halfen wealth. You saw

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>significant gains in your in your paper wealth, So that

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>has to have an effect on whether or not you're

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>willing to work and what wages you're willing to accept.

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's just what's what you see in official data.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>There is also an enormous wealth boom that you don't see,

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's in the cryptocurrency. Is you alluded to the

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency that they are, they exist on decentralized letters, so

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>they don't show up anywhere in official data. But we

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>see just from public data sources of where cryptocurrencies are

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>treating and no. Cryptocurrencies have gone from basically nothing that

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago to two trillion dollars in

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>total assets size. And we know Bitcoin and Ethereum are

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the most well known ones, but just behind them there

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are hundreds of these all coins that have also grown

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to billion dollar market caps, and none of this shows

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>up an official data, but it's it's being held by

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>by the general public, likely younger people. Enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is palpable. If you look at coin based user data,

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just surging, and so that has to have an

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>impact on the motivation of young people to work as well.

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>If you can just stay at home and trade cryptocurrencies,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>or if you held a little bit of crypto um,

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>then you you are a bit bothier than you were before.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you're not as desperate for a job. Just anecdotally,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I remember that I took a cab from l a

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>airport from lax in my uper driver at the time.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>He was driving a ten year old camera and he

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was telling me that he put thirty dollars into bitcoin

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>because bitcoin only goes off, and you know, he did

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>not seem to look like a wealthy person, so actually

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>encouraged him to diversify a bit. And he also told

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>me he bought them dodge coin. So this is this phenomenon.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>So the phenomena I think is real and it's something

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that that it's not captured in official data. This wealth effect,

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think fundamentally changes the dynamics of labor market. And

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>if that's true, though, then you know, maybe maybe the

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>FED is actually a bit behind in raising rates and

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>so far as raising rates close it down inflation. Yeah,

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>there's I mean, there's a ton of irony um in

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking that cryptocurrency might be the reason that the FED

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ends up overheating um the economy me but or letting

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy run too hot. But do you think the Fed?

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of an unfair question because I don't

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>think anyone really understands crypto. But do you think the

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>FED understands crypto? Or is it making a good faith

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>effort to understand the market? I don't think the FED

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>understands crypto. I think one of the things that I

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>would take away from my time and the FED is,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess how surprising how few things said management understands.

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it's kind of apparent from even

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look back, let's say twenty years ago during

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, the FED was not really aware of

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what was happening in shadow banking either. Now I only

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>speak from my experience at the New York FED, but

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>if you really think about it, New York FED is

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>basically a government agency with unlimited money and no government oversight.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think a lot of strange things happening there.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And in my own experience, let's say, the person who

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>ran the money markets as at the New York FED

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any experience or expertise in money market at all,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and that was very common throughout the open market desk,

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you don't really have any external pressure

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to to know or do anything. So I don't think

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the FED is very much in tune with what's happening

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in cryptocurrencies. So speaking of the FED, UH not necessarily

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>being in tune with the economy right now. UM. I

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you also about inflation. So this is

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest question currently facing central banks and investors

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Uh, To what degree are these inflationary

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>pressures that we've been seeing some of the gridlock in

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>supply chains and supply shortages and things like that, To

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what degree are they transitory? And to what degree should

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>central banks actually be worried about them? Should central banks

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>be responding to them? Is an interest rate hike the

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>appropriate way to fix? Um? You know the problem of

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>not enough shipping births in Los Angeles and things like that. Um. So,

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess my question is, like, number one, how do

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you think the FED is thinking of inflation at the moment?

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>A number two, to what extent is the flexible average

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation target still in play? I think the FED is

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>really worried about inflation. After telling everyone was transitory, you

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer share that word anymore. And I think that's

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a really hard it's a really hard question for

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the FED right now because you know, a lot of

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>this inflation, it's it appears to be driven by supply

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>side effects that you have. You know, we read about

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the energy crunch, we have, you know, congestion at ports

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>says this hasn't been discussed at this on the podcast. Um,

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>there is also a big demand first as well. You know,

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we kind of printed and spent a lot of money

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and that increases demand. A lot of the supply constraints

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>will be changed by interest rate hikes, but interest rate

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>hikes do damp in demand. So if you high rates,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you can really hurt demand. And so you know, reducing

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>demand that you know, lowers inflation. However, it costs your

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>other mandate, which is unemployment. So it's a very very

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>difficult time for the Fit to choose right now. And

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I would also that though that just mechanically speaking, looking

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>at the financial system, it's really hard for the FED

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>high rates without having a tremendous financial impact. And the

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is when you have a very high

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>level of debt in the system, your interest rate hikes

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are magnified in their effect. So there's interest rate risks

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not in let's say fixed income debt, and when you

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>hike rates, you kind of basically destroy some of that value.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And when you're thinking about tresuries, you're basically kind of

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pulling away money out of the system. If you think

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about tresuries as a form of money, then what we've

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>been doing in the past, let's say decade, when we

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>reduced rates, all those hyderation assets, they become their market

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>price arises, they become enriched. People have more money through

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that which they can repo or sell and then they can,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, buy the stuff. Or if you're let's say,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>let's say a sixty proo, the manager of your bonds

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you have to buy more equities to balance, then

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that makes equity markets go higher. But when you're hiking rates,

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the reverse. And because the level of debt

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is so much higher, then I think there's some very long,

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>nonlinear impact, so that Collado channel from thro wish money

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy is transmitted that I think it really sets

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a constraint as on the fattest whether or not they

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>could just high rates like they did in the seventies

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>because you could have very, very large impacts on the

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>financial markets, so I don't think they're in a position

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to do much. If there is a solution to inflation,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it probably has to come from the fiscal side,

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe through taxation by let's say, more progressive income taxes

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for example. So when you have when it seems like

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we're moving towards the world where the fiscal authorities play

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>much greater role in demand right there spending trillions of dollars,

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and when you have a large market constraining the central bank,

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the ways that you could solve

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation is just through taxation, basically draining away money selectively

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the financial system, instead of something blunt like

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>an interest rate increased wholesale lopping of market value of

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>fixed income debt. That's really interesting because I always thought

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal as you know, one way to boost demand. Obviously,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the government announces some big infrastructure spending program

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully Congress passes it instead of arguing about it

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and voila, you know, the economy

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>gets a demand boost. But I hadn't actually considered that

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the reverse could also be true. That fiscal could act

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of demand constraint if it has to. Yes,

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>we can, and I think but the problem of course

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the fiscal, the Congress, who you know, the

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sets of fax laws is, can't act as quickly as

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the feed and the fat can. You know, Luck last March,

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>instantly you rolled out liqudity facilities and cut rates. It's

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for for the legislature to to be able

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to act as quickly. So what is decision making actually

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like at the FED? Because I mean, on the one hand,

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we have seen the Central Bank praised in recent years

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for putting together a very very quick response to the

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>market crash that we saw in and you know, the

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>turmoil in the treasury market specifically. But on the other hand,

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it does get a lot of criticism for basically being outside,

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>um the sort of democratic process. You know, it's it

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>operates without political oversight, I guess, and you know, there's

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a perception that it's just a bunch of economists doing

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>their own things. So I'm curious what internal decision making

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>actually looks like at the FED. Is it really just

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, one or two senior people making decisions or

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is there some sort of um committee like process in

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>doing these things. So the FED is very very consensus driven,

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>so everything is done by community committee. Uh, it's just

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that what happens in practice is the most senior person

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>says something and everyone just nods. So it's it is

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it is by consensus. And you can kind of see

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this in at the highest levels, at the level in

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the sea, for example, you have a FED chair who

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>basically you know, says something and everyone agrees, and what's

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>happening is behind the scenes, just lots of evolving so

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that when we actually make it to the decision, everyone

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is on the same page. Um. But I think well

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>when in practice also, I mean, the power is heavily

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>tilted towards let's say the FED chair and the two

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wise chairs, so in practice those people have a disproportionate

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>amounts of power. But I think you're concerned about FED

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>governments and lack of oversight is valid, especially since the

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>FED seems to be becoming more powerful that has over time,

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can see this I think in their reaches

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to or it's expanding their mandate to say the climate

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>change impacts on the financial system, because when you can

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>make it that argument because climate change affects the financial system,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>therefore we must have oversight of it. Then there's no

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 1>limiting principle there. Then, right, everything affects the financial system,

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't that mean that the FED could have its influence

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>on anything. It reminds me to let's say, the early

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>days of our country, when the federal government was very limited,

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>but then through the Commerce Clause, they vastly expanded their

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>power because basically everything is affected interest comments. Even if

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you were growing wheat in your own backyard for your

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>own consumption, that meant that you weren't buying wheat in

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the interesting markets, so that affected interstate commers. So this

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>expansion of part that the FED is doing through through

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>basically being able to touch everything that affects the financial system,

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>has no limiting principle. And if that's the way that

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they are going to go, then I think they do

0:31:55.760 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>need more oversight. Just going back to the inflation discussion,

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there was one more thing that I want to ask you,

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>which is another big mystery that is sort of bedeviling

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>markets at the moment, is the fact that we still

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>have relatively low bond yields and specifically nominal yields, but

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we also have higher levels of inflation, even though it

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like inflation expectations haven't moved that much recently. I'm

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at tips, they've been pretty flat. I think, how

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think about this, this puzzle of low yields.

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a puzzle if you assume that bond

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>yields are basically a reflection of economic conditions and inflation expectations,

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and there are definitely people who buy bonds with that framework,

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but there are also many people who buy bonds without

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that framework. And um for example, a view are a

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>commercial bank to receiving io R and new reserves fifteen

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>basis points. Under the regulations, surgeries and reserves are considered equivalent.

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So what do you do, well, I I just sapp

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>out my reserves and buy a whole bunch of sruguries.

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And you see commercial banks doing that to the tunes

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of hundreds of billions at a time. So it's not

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>because of any fundamental view and growth and inflation. It's

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just that under their constraints, you know, treuguries are better

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>than reserves that will by struguries and will hedge the

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rate risk. Um. You also have a lot of

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>actors let's say the FED buying eighty billion a month.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>If that does not care about growth of inflation. They're

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>buying it because it's their mandate to do so. And

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you have also many other I would say foreign central banks.

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>You're very conservative Investment managers who were buying trujuries because

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they need to save the assets are maybe they're regulatorily

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bound by their regulations to do that. So I think

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that tugs are just the financial asset. They go higher

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>because there are a lot of people buying it, and

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a mistake to infer economic conditions from them.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>The analogy I would use this I let's say you're

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at Tesla stock. Let's say you can forecast earnings

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can put that into a dividend discount model.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You can come up with a fundamental value of Tesla. Right,

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that's your framework. You forecast earnings, you value based on

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental way. But you can't really take the price

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla into as an input in your model and

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>back out supposedly market expectations for revenue growth because people

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>are buying tests up for momentum, or maybe you're an

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>options dealer, you got to buy Testla to head your

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>options right, and in the same way, you really can't

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>take price as an input for let's say treasuries and

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>try to back out what the treasury market is saying

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about economic conditions because not everyone approaches treasuries as an

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>investment on that basis. So this is one of the

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>areas where I kind of see overlap between some of

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the research you do and some of the research one

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of our other, uh, you know, recurrent money market guests,

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Saltan Posar, actually does where you know, he's well known

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>for calling up banks and you know, speaking to people

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in the money markets and trying to gather color on

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what exactly they are doing. And I see a lot

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of that in the post that you do on your

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>blog as well, like actually digging into the numbers to

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>see what treasuries at large banks have been buying, and

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>then you know, charting the fact that they've been buying

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more bonds over the past year or so.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>How much does that sort of inform your thinking? Do

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you still keep in contact with a lot of people

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in the market and try to get as much information

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>as you can from them. You're right that a lot

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the work that I did at the FED was

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>basically the same as what Salton did, And I have

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>great respect result and I read everything he writes. It's

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>great and I'm glad you have them on your show.

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I think a lot of my information I actually

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I get through Twitter these days, and what I've realized

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is set fin Twitter. It's just test amazing resource. You

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>can access the thoughts of some of the I think

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>best managers, expert subject matter experts in the world, and

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all an available on Twitter. And you don't get

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:13.840
<v Speaker 1>certain things that you could get, let's say, if you

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>had relationships with your Treasury desk. But I think once

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you understand how the system actually works, there's just enough

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>from public data and from let's say, anecdotal reports through

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>outlets like Bloomberg or fin twit that you can actually

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have a very good picture as to what's happening. There's

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 1>one more question that I want to ask you, which

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is maybe it's a sensitive one. I don't know, but

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>let me know if it is. But why did you

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decide to leave the fund? I think it goes

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 1>back to what I was mentioning about the open market sex.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The FED is a phenomenal place to work on the

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>open Market's desk. You have access to tremendous amounts of

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>confidential data. You can call up big banks or dealers

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>or just hitch funds or money market funds and they'll

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>speak to you and you get to understand. But it's

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a really good place to learn, but it's not a

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>really good place to work. It's not a good place

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to work because well, just looking in the money market, says,

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>no one on the management, almost no one on the

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>management has any expertise or experience in money markets. It's

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of basically purely based on your seniority, so it's

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 1>impossible to grow. It's kind of just like a I guess,

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the big piggy bank for the people who got there first.

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a good place to grow, but it's

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>not a good place to learn. And we have tremendous turnover.

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you from just this past year on

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the money market. Says turnover was like some of them

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>go to other divisions and the fed, some of them

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>go to the street. So I felt that I had

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>learned all there is to learn, and there is really

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>no point of being there anymore. Mh um. One more

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>question for you, and then we're going to have to

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>wrap up. But what do you think the biggest challenge

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is that the FED is facing at the moment. I

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>think the FED is seen a moment where they have

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>to choose between their two mandates, employment or inflation, and

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a very difficult choice, and it's going to be

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a political choice depending on the composition of who's on

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the m C. You have inflation that you can control

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and a few raised rates or try to tamp down

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and demand, you're going to have higher unemployment. That's a

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>very very difficult choice and there's just no good way

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it. So they're going to have to Basically,

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a political thing, and it's going

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to be based on their values. What are they value

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>more employment or inflation? And we'll have to see the

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>composition of the FMC. Looks like it's changing with all

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 1>these revelations and resignations, So we're going to see how

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the composition of the flom SE is next year to

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>see how they might rule. Yeah, certainly a lot going

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>on in interesting times. UM for the FED. Well, Um,

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Joseph wag uh The the writer at the Fed Guy blog,

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on and just for

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>our listeners, if you haven't checked out that guy yet,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend that you do. It's fed got dot com. Joseph,

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much, Thank you so much to happen you, Tracy.

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So here's the part where I talked to myself because

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Joe isn't here. But um, I'm trying to think how

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to sort of synthesize that conversation. I mean, part of

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>me is just relieved that I don't actually work at

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a central bank and have to be on the hook

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.479
<v Speaker 1>for solving a lot of these problems at the moment.

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I obviously don't think the FED is

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a perfect institution, um, and certainly we're seeing that recently

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with the news about the insider training scandal. But it

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is clear that they are facing a number of new

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>situations that they've been thrust into after COVID and after

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the big market crash, and I don't necessarily envy them

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>having to figure out how the world works in current conditions,

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to figure out whether or not hiking

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:14.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates would actually do anything to damp down supply

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>pressures um that are caused by transportation gridlock and supply

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>chain issues that just seems really difficult to me. And

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>also Joseph some idea of bitcoin and a sort of

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>unaccounted for wealth effect maybe changing the composition of the

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>labor market. That again is something brand new, and I

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>doubt that the vast majority of central bankers, you know,

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>many of whom are quite old at the moment and

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>probably haven't been following bitcoin for that long or that much.

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I doubt that they've really wrapped their heads around that phenomenon.

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I guess the message is, uh, don't envy

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the people at the FED, and there's a lot going

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on and a lot of new challenges that they are facing,

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and that I am going to leave it there. One

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>thing I would say is, if you are enjoying odd Thoughts,

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>if you do appreciate the work that Joe and I

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>put into the show, and here I will just go

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead and mention that I am recording this with a

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>triple fracture in my left foot. If you appreciate all thoughts,

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.720
<v Speaker 1>please go over to Apple Podcasts and give us a review,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you know, a five star one. It would be

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>much appreciated, and Joe and I enjoy seeing that kind

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of feedback, So thank you so much and I will

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. So this has been another episode of

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>add Thoughts. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Tracy Alloway. You can follow my co host

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Wisenthal at The Stalwart, and you can follow Joseph

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Wang at fed Guy twelve. Can also check out his

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.959
<v Speaker 1>blog at fed guy dot com. And you should follow

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>our producer Laura Carlson. She is at Laura M. Carlson.

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And you can follow Bloomberg Podcasts at podcast Thanks for listening.